Slashdot Mirror


Gold Sold From Vending Machines In Germany

There are fewer hassles for an adventurer or business traveler bigger than lugging around bags of silver and copper pieces. Luckily TG-Gold-Super-Markt has installed gold vending machines in 500 locations including train stations and airports all across Germany. The machines charge about 30% more than the current trading price for gold, and are updated every few minutes. All are closely monitored by cameras, and like 3rd and 4th edition, electrum pieces are not accepted.

472 comments

  1. 30 Percent! by arizwebfoot · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If gold is selling for $1K per ounce, a 30 percent increase is $300!!

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:30 Percent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Captain Obvious, is that you? :)

    2. Re:30 Percent! by Shaddow0001 · · Score: 1
      Probably for exclusive use in the sex trade industry for 'anonymity'.....

      "Honey, I hold on while I pick up some gold for use while here in Germany on our trip"

      'WHAM'..... wakes up in hosipital..... wondering what happened.....

    3. Re:30 Percent! by TinFoilMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If gold is selling for $1K per ounce, a 30 percent increase is $300!!

      We be in the wrong business!

      Maybe Gold foil hats would be better.

      --
      In my other life, I eat cats.
    4. Re:30 Percent! by infolation · · Score: 1

      Electronic money is the index that relates you to your data shadow. That 30% is your privacy tax.

  2. Im sorry by anglico · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but I can't see the point to this. Granted I don't have the problem of needing to have gold bars available but I still can't see why somebody would do this.

    1. Re:Im sorry by zwei2stein · · Score: 5, Informative

      When Inflation hits hard and money turns to useless paper, gold or anything similar is how you preserve your assets.

      Germany after WW1 actually saw this (bread costing million one day and 10 million the other day, but exactly same amount of barter currency. It made helluva lot sense to spend 1000 on gold because withing year those 1000 were only good as tinder and would buy one something like one grain of wheat while gold kept value much, much better.)

      Remember that money nowadays that is unbacked is just piece of paper without government enforcing it as legal tender as it is.

      Gold at 30% extra is swell deal if you are faced with possibility that your cash would be worth 50% less tomorrow.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    2. Re:Im sorry by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      The vending machines are actually a public safety measure. Whenever somebody "goes Galt" they will immediately head for the nearest gold vending machine, in order to exchange their fiat money slave-currency for good solid gold. They can then be registered by the cameras and collected before they have a chance to cause any public disorder.
      :Conspiracy theory ends:

    3. Re:Im sorry by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Trouble there is, nobody would be selling gold at +30% in exchange for a paper currency that will be worth half as much tomorrow.

      If you want to buy gold at any reasonable rate, you pretty much have to do it well before you actually need it(or you have to be buying in some other apocalypse currency, like dog food or ammunition).

    4. Re:Im sorry by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a panic sparked by a fear of a coming currency collapse - quite a reasonable fear given the current rate of US government spending, but still a very low probability event. However, while hedging against the chance of the dollar collapsing (and taking the Euro with it) makes sense, it only makes sense to pay a very small premium to hedge against this unlikely event.

      Some see this hedging going on by central banks and other who buy and sell gold by the ton, and overreact. Physical gold coins are a total ripoff right now (and entire industry has emerged to exploit the panic), and, seriously, if society collapses to the point that legitimate "intangible" gold (such as GLD shares) become worthless, you don't want gold coins, you want *guns*.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even if you buy plenty of gold before the apocalypse, remember that you also need the ability to keep others from just taking it away from you.

    6. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold at 30% extra is never a swell deal, because, by definition, one can by it cheaper at market. Therefore, I can buy at market to protect myself against inflation.

      And, if you have the kind of day to day inflation you're suggesting above, you won't find gold for sale. I.e. What would be the motivation on the part of the seller? Cash?

      The fact that this is out there is a sign of how much of a problem this ISN'T right now.

    7. Re:Im sorry by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Let me know when I can buy platinum, 5 or 6 pounds, for use in a duodynetic field core.

      Better yet, let me know when I buy plutonium at any corner drug store.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:Im sorry by Abreu · · Score: 3, Funny

      apocalypse currency

      Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    9. Re:Im sorry by panthroman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gold at 30% extra is swell deal if you are faced with possibility that your cash would be worth 50% less tomorrow.

      No it isn't, because one of your other options is gold without the 30% premium. If you don't like fiat currency, fine, invest in whatever you like. But why you'd pay a premium over the market value is beyond me.

      Vending machines work for candy bars. I'm willing to pay a markup because I want my snack in my hand right now. What could possibly be the urgency with gold?

      (Yeah, yeah, hyperinflation in post-WWI Germany or late '80s Argentina or current Zimbabwe. You think what Zimbabwe needs are vending machines for gold?)

    10. Re:Im sorry by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Gold at 30% extra is swell deal if you are faced with possibility that your cash would be worth 50% less tomorrow.

      So is real estate, or oil futures, or mortgage backed securities.

      Problem is, you don't know if it's going to be worth 50% more, or 50% less tomorrow.

    11. Re:Im sorry by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The term "market value" for gold is idiotic to begin with. Market value for what? Gold smelted into 1000oz bars? Gold minted into pretty 1g wafers with a fancy design on the face and fluted edges to prevent dishonest vendors shaving some off? Gold in the form of a promissory note from a bank that holds the equivalent in metal in their vaults? Gold in the form of a promissory note from an institution that holds only a fraction of your gold but claims they are "good for the rest?"

      Each of the above will command a different premium over the spot price you see quoted in your newspaper ... and some of those premiums might even be 30% or more depending where you buy.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    12. Re:Im sorry by vertinox · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want to buy gold at any reasonable rate, you pretty much have to do it well before you actually need it(or you have to be buying in some other apocalypse currency, like dog food or ammunition).

      See. I don't understand the gold bugs. Most of their hyper-inflation apocalypse scenarios they state that gold will be the new currency, but time and time again nations that have went through hyper-inflation have reverted to bartering instead.

      When people are in times to need, they look to commodities with utility rather than value.

      So in the wastelands in the future people will value gas, water, canned food, guns and ammo and not a pretty metal.

      Secondly, if anarchy does set in, you can always use your gun to take someone else's gold if you wanna bother lugging that around.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    13. Re:Im sorry by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meanwhile, back in reality, paper money is gaining in value as prices fall.

      http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aE9AA32hx8ek

      So go ahead and buy your vending-machine gold (instantly losing 30%) and keep talking about hyperinflation as the recession eventually ends and gold crashes back to pre-recession prices.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    14. Re:Im sorry by Nutria · · Score: 2, Funny

      you want *guns*.

      And ammo. Lots of ammo.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    15. Re:Im sorry by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      How is it a reasonable fear if it is a low probability?

    16. Re:Im sorry by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      30 years in the future.

    17. Re:Im sorry by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you'll notice though that much like the gold mentioned in the article, people are stocking like CRAZY on ammunition right now. Prices have doubled (or more) in the last 6 months. You have about a snowball's chance in hell of finding any common pistol ammunition on the shelves right now (9mm, .45acp, .40s&w, etc) - people are literally waiting at stores as the boxes are unloaded and buying it all up immediately. All the local stores have had to put a per item limit on customers just to try and keep the speculators from buying it all.

      Even if you reload your own it's tough times. To load a round of ammo you pretty much need a case, a primer, powder, and a bullet. Cases are reuseable. For slower rounds bullets can be cast at home out of scrap lead (I've got about 400 lbs melted into lead bars if needed). Powder and primers usually must be purchased (you can make black powder at home, but it's usually poor quality and most loaded rounds use smokeless powder rather than black powder anyways). Like the loaded rounds though, the primers have become rarer than hens teeth. When they become available people are buying them 10,000 or more at a time.

      I think overall, be it gold or ammo or canned goods, a lot of people are dumping a lot of money into supplies that they feel will see them through some tough times.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    18. Re:Im sorry by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      Risk vs. reward. It's like waiting for the walk light at a street corner. If it's noon, and heavy traffic, you've a high risk of being hit, and the reward is only crossing the street sooner.

      If it's midnight, and there's no/almost no traffic, crossing the street without the light has low risk, and you're saving some time.

      People hedging against a currency crash in a *Sane* fashion are crossing the street against the light at midnight. People who do it recklessly are crossing at noon. Thus, you can have a reasonable fear of something with a low probability by weighing the risks of ignoring the situation (if/until) it becomes critical vs. the situation never happening.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    19. Re:Im sorry by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it isn't, because one of your other options is gold without the 30% premium

      Only if you're buying in large quantity.

      For example, spot price of gold is currently $936/ounce. More readily purchasable gold bullion coin (using the 1oz Canadian gold maple leaf as an example) is currently priced at $1078/ounce, which is a 15% markup. and now consider these are selling in 1/30th that quantity and the markup is higher. Compare a 1 kilo (32.15oz) bar of gold, which currently costs $31,396, or $976/oz, which is only a 4% markup.

      As usual, buying in bulk is cheaper, provided you have the money to do that.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    20. Re:Im sorry by realnrh · · Score: 0, Troll

      Something had to take the place of the real estate bubble. At least an ammo bubble mostly only hits people who're convinced that they're going to be living in a hellhole soon anyhow one way or another, so when the bubble pops and they're out several grand on overpriced ammunition, they'll be better off than they thought. So, a benefit to pessimism?

      --
      Long? What do you mean the signature at the bottom of every comment I post on Slashdot is too lo
    21. Re:Im sorry by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity: Is the manufacturing process for ammunition particularly trick, or are there other reasons that supply hasn't expanded to meet demand(or at least lag demand a bit less)?

    22. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arg. "trick" should be "tricky".

    23. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to buy gold at any reasonable rate, you pretty much have to do it well before you actually need it(or you have to be buying in some other apocalypse currency, like dog food or ammunition).

      See. I don't understand the gold bugs. Most of their hyper-inflation apocalypse scenarios they state that gold will be the new currency, but time and time again nations that have went through hyper-inflation have reverted to bartering instead.

      When people are in times to need, they look to commodities with utility rather than value.

      So in the wastelands in the future people will value gas, water, canned food, guns and ammo and not a pretty metal.

      Secondly, if anarchy does set in, you can always use your gun to take someone else's gold if you wanna bother lugging that around.

      Another alternative would be to educate oneself in practical knowledge and obtain useful skills which are currently rare in the 1st world but would be in great demand if the modern economy based on mass-production and consumerism ever did collapse. Examples of these skills would be blacksmithing, weaving, and ceramic production (note: this would include the ability to make the basic equipment necessary for these activities as well). There is also an advantage of bartering skills rather than goods, there is no incentive for others to kill you for your primary "wealth".

    24. Re:Im sorry by Thinboy00 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think you'll notice though that much like the gold mentioned in the article, people are stocking like CRAZY on ammunition right now. Prices have doubled (or more) in the last 6 months. You have about a snowball's chance in hell of finding any common pistol ammunition on the shelves right now (9mm, .45acp, .40s&w, etc) - people are literally waiting at stores as the boxes are unloaded and buying it all up immediately. All the local stores have had to put a per item limit on customers just to try and keep the speculators from buying it all.

      [citation needed]

      --
      $ make available
    25. Re:Im sorry by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      That's what you said 30 years from now.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    26. Re:Im sorry by broggyr · · Score: 1

      How about I sell you a shiny bomb casing filled with used pinball machine parts?

      --
      Irony? Yea, it's like goldy and bronzy, only it's made of iron!
    27. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Nuka-Cola caps.

    28. Re:Im sorry by corprew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Out of curiosity: Is the manufacturing process for ammunition particularly trick, or are there other reasons that supply hasn't expanded to meet demand(or at least lag demand a bit less)?

      You mean like the US fighting two foreign wars at once taking up most of the supply capacity of the ammo factories?

    29. Re:Im sorry by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Getting enslaved would, however, have a high probability of harshing your mellow.

    30. Re:Im sorry by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the price of lead has gone up, along with the price of brass leading to higher ammo prices. For example, I shoot sporting clays and the price of a box of shotgun shells have gone up from ~$5 a box to ~$6.50 in only two years. The prices of other forms of ammunition have also gone up. I don't think this is as much of a "bubble" as simply the rising costs of raw materials.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    31. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's amusing. I was just at the sporting goods store yesterday. Ammunition for your pistol is plentiful. Buy as much as you want. You're not even a good gun-nut troll: they all know that if the apocalypse were to actually come, your pistol is only a backup piece.

    32. Re:Im sorry by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's totally reasonable to take precautions against being stuck by lightning: lighting strikes are a real cause of death, but very low probability. It's not reasonable to spend 30% of the value of your house to protect it from lightning strikes. So the fear of lighting is reasonable, if you're not obsessive about it.

      Sadly, the chance of a currency collapse is a bit higher than the chance of being struck by lightning, since we've promised to spend more money in the next few decades than we can possibly tax or borrow. I think we'll probably change our reckless spending ways before that, and not actually spend all the trillions we've promised to spend, but I'm still hedging against the possibility that I'm wrong.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re:Im sorry by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      The Libyans are our friends now.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    34. Re:Im sorry by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

      The problem with ammo is that it's a non-scarce commodity being inflated by unfounded fear mongering. So while I think buying gold is also a silly idea, it's a far less silly idea.

    35. Re:Im sorry by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "When Inflation hits hard and money turns to useless paper, gold or anything similar is how you preserve your assets."

      No, it won't.
      Gold is not really any good when society collapses. It's only value is perceived value.
      And it's value will adjust. Are you hungry? well I'll sell you some bread for 5 Oz. of gold. Don't want it? well I'll take it from you after you starve to death.
      Being able to build, repair, and designing things will be far more valuable.

      You need a government to make gold valuable.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:Im sorry by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mostly in the south, out of fear of the black president.
      Irrational knee jerk reaction.

      Plenty of Ammo here on the west coast.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    37. Re:Im sorry by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I saw this in the 80's, and the economy was worse. remember 18% interest for a new home? Tbills at 15%.
      Crazy by today's standards.

      SO these people come out, and say gold is inflation proof completly ignoring any realities of the situation. Like if everything collapse who dictates the value? How do you carve up 1 1Oz. coin to a small enough piece to buy a loaf of bread? Or the flip side when they loaf of beread you nede to eat goes for 'whatever you have on you"

      It's like they imagine there life will keep going on with all the infrastructer in place and they can just start spending gold.

      A good example would be having a policy of telephoning someone in case the telephone system collapse.

      hmm, ok, think 1980 for that example, when no one had cell phones.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    38. Re:Im sorry by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Well, if the economy collapse, I know what I'll be stealing. It's not like the camera will be monitored, or even functioning.

      OK, in truth, I'll be grabbing pharmaceuticals. They will ahve a high barter value. Condom will be very value once small communities start forming.

      Or I'll become a priest. They get free food and housing and are never questioned.
       

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    39. Re:Im sorry by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, you need to find someone willing to part at collector value.
      I did that in the 80s, and sold just before gold dropped like a rock. Something that will happen in about 2 months. We ahve bottomed, and leading economic indicators have started going up.

      SO Sell now, buy again around Christmas

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    40. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Who is Galt?

    41. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think ammo prices have probably gone up because Obama was voted in. People are stocking up just in case new gun laws are introduced.

    42. Re:Im sorry by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      It's a shame you don't take the time to spell, and use random punctuation, as your post would've been kind of interesting had you proofread it.

    43. Re:Im sorry by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      There is the election of a certain moron into a high ranking position who has a long history of trying to outlaw anything related to firearms. Along with the promises/threats from idiots like McCarthy to push for more bans, demand has soared through the roof in the past few months. Production has been increased, but demand has risen much much faster.

    44. Re:Im sorry by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      I know of a few people who made a crapload of money during the depression using the barter system. During times of economic hardships, people start to trade things, either services or goods, for other things. I know one guy who ran a bakery and took goods in trade and put them into a warehouse. When the economy turned around, he opened it up and made far more than the cost of the bakery and became a very wealthy man. Gold isn't very valuable when you are hungry and need to sell it to eat. And it's pretty difficult to make change.

      My point?? It is the calm, innovative people who make money during economic downturns.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    45. Re:Im sorry by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Paper currency (or equivalent numbers in a bank account, which is even riskier) is definitely a riskier way to store wealth than gold. However, gold is overrated. Gold is simply a metal that won't rust and it's good for jewelry, and maybe some electrical contacts and lab equipment, but it's really not such a precious metal, at least these days, compared to technological metals, such as nickel, cobalt, tantalum, tungsten, molybdenum, chromium. Those metals even in a rusted form represent value, that carbon steel, in a rusted form never will, simply because iron and carbon are so abundant, and cheap. But if anything, will robot armies of the future be made of gold, or of alloys mentioned above? Future development of titanium technology is the big if here, because titanium is both noble and relatively abundant in the Earth's crust, and future robots might be made from it. But presently most high temperature turbines and military armors use cobalt/nickel etc. type alloys. So someone with a lot of gold might look at the gold market this way, and offload some of their gold reserves unto the public, or whoever will buy it, without dropping the market price too much. Vending machines with a fixed markup are a good way to do this. Gold currency is still universal, anonymous and needs no laundering, and its value does not go up in a flash like paper currency, simply because of limited reserves available. A totalitarian government might not look at the widespread use of gold currency with a good eye, simply because it enables the public to trade and deal without government oversight (including tax oversight), and the public cannot be stripped of their wealth in a flash of inflation.

    46. Re:Im sorry by twostix · · Score: 1

      Bloomberg was singing the virtues of Sub Prime mortgages and the new derivatives packages until about a month before the crash. Who in their right mind would listen to anything they have to say anymore?

      And the USD is on a consistent trend buying less gold per dollar than the GBP, CAD and AUD. http://www.alchemymetals.com.au/index.php?site_id=6&product_types_id=2 See the disparity between the CAD, AUD and USD disappearing? That's not a good sign that the USD is "gaining". The price of gold is increasing for anyone buying with USD but is pretty flat for anyone buying in the aforementioned currencies.

      That's not the dollar "gaining", that's inflation of the USD and the buying power of the dollar dropping when compared to other currencies.

      People need to stop thinking that *price drops* of consumer products which is inevitable in a recession is the same thing as an a upward trend of the strength of their currency. The only rational comparison is how much stuff you can buy vs how much stuff other similar currencies can buy, and at the moment the USD is buying less and less.

    47. Re:Im sorry by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      I think with all the dead people dog food would be REALLY CHEAP

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    48. Re:Im sorry by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Taking precautions is one thing... being in fear of a lighting strike is another.

    49. Re:Im sorry by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      no... I said it in 1955!

    50. Re:Im sorry by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      Who is Galt?

      exactly

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    51. Re:Im sorry by mattack2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your political diatribe didn't actually answer the question asked. (Plus [citation needed].) One other answer, currently score 0 troll, did say without citation that 2 wars were using up a lot of the bullet supply, which might be true.. maybe the supply is truly more fixed than us non-gun owners know.

    52. Re:Im sorry by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is interesting. A neighbor of mine is the local gun store dealer (only one in town, here in Friendly Alaska). Plenty of all sorts of ammo although prices are high (as are prices for damned near everything else). But he was mentioning on a recent trip to Arizona, they stopped into a local gun store to pick up some ammo and found it nearly cleaned out of .22 / .45 /.308 and a couple of other typical calibers. Same thing in several other Arizona towns.

      He can get anything he wants from his wholesalers, so there is no global shortage. Just odd local ones.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    53. Re:Im sorry by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, he did answer the question, if you're sharp enough to catch it.

      The current administration--along with the Congressional leadership--has shown itself to be hostile to the idea of us mere citizens owning firearms. Demand is through the roof as some of us--the ones who believe that the government is answerable to its people--are stocking up in case of future interruptions in supply. Modern marketing methods include the "just-in-time" supply chain; with the incredible spike in demand, not only are the ammo manufacturers unable to keep up, but their suppliers are unable to keep up with their demand. Metals suppliers--lead, copper, zinc--chemical suppliers--powder and priming compounds--etc. The entire supply chain is thin right now.

      Now, the ammo manufacturers are doing the best they can. By raising prices, they're able to pay higher prices to their suppliers, increasing the quantity of raw materials supplied. By doing so, they have been able to increase production somewhat, but that has limits. The factories are running at full capacity. The only way to increase production past that point, assuming the availability of input materials, is to expand the production line. That would require the manufacturers to take out loans. Unfortunately, due to the aforementioned "leaders" running the show, it's by no means certain that the manufacturers would be able to sell enough ammunition to pay back those loans; said "leaders" are working on any number of laws to restrict ammunition sales (see, for example, microstamping, limitations on purchase quantities, and so forth). Considering the political risk, banks are (quite wisely) reticent to loan large sums of money to engage in such ventures. Throw in the fact that everybody knows it's a bubble, and will inevitably burst, and even if the manufacturers could get the money, they know that the increased demand probably wouldn't last through the payback period on the expansion. In fact, this is already starting to happen, proving the wisdom of riding the storm out without expanding facilities.

      Does that answer your question more clearly?

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    54. Re:Im sorry by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Most of their hyper-inflation apocalypse scenarios they state that gold
      > will be the new currency, but time and time again nations that have went
      > through hyper-inflation have reverted to bartering instead.

      Sure, during the crisis people barter.

      But gold also generally retains value. If you can manage to hold onto the gold through the crisis, it consistently comes out the other side with most of its value intact. Paper currency often loses its value when governments collapse; gold doesn't.

      Gold is, of course, not the only thing that behaves this way. There are other precious metals (platinum, iridium, silver, ...), not to mention gemstones, and foreign currencies will often fit the bill assuming the crisis is geographically contained (which is *usually* the case). When it became obvious that Germany was going to be losing WWII in the immediate future, the Deutch Mark lost its value, but Germans who were holding Pounds Sterling or Swiss Francs still had money.

      Capital goods (that is, durable equipment needed to produce other goods; e.g., a refinery is a capital good) generally also retain most of their value if you can hold on to ownership of them, although historically you can't always rely on the new government to recognize your ownership, and capital goods tend to be difficult to transport on short notice if, say, you need to get across a border.

      From a security perspective, the principle of defense in depth would suggest that investing in a variety of different value-holding prospects is more likely to leave you with something worth having after the crisis. If you have bank accounts in the US, Japan, Switzerland, and Norway, plus a bag of diamonds, an oil refinery, and a cruise ship, you probably won't end up with nothing unless there's either an extremely severe worldwide crisis, or something along the lines of a gunshot to your head.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    55. Re:Im sorry by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      The current wars going on aren't using a great deal more ammo than is normally spent during training purposes anyway. It's not the wars that is causing the demand to rise.

    56. Re:Im sorry by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Go tell my friend that.

      He has lost enough computer equipment from lightning that now he unplugs everything when he hears thunder when there's a storm approaching (which is frequent here).

      --
    57. Re:Im sorry by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Demand is through the roof as some of us--the ones who believe that the government is answerable to its people--are stocking up in case of future interruptions in supply.

      I'm sorry... Maybe it's cause I'm from Europe, but what does guns have to do with government being answerable to the people?

      If they don't answer, you'll shoot them? Hell, in Norway we got 1.5 million weapons with a population of 4.7 million. Yet we don't go around having wet dreams of a future where the government becomes totalitarian so we can shoot people we don't like in an excuse of a revolution.

      We got the 11th lowest murder rate in the world. I think you guys just need to stop being so angry at the world.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    58. Re:Im sorry by countach · · Score: 1

      There's only so much gas, bread, water and canned food you can practically store in your basement while you wait out the apocolypse. But gold you can store easily, and redeem when things go back to normal.

    59. Re:Im sorry by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The component materials have gone up in price as well. Brass for cases, lead and copper for cores and jackets have all become less available and more expensive.

      Some people believe it has a lot to do with the wars. Basically, most of the capacity that was used to make ammunition for the civilian market has been making ammunition for the military. This war isn't likely to go on long enough to make it worth while to expand capacity. If they did, when the war is over they'd be stuck with idle factory space. This wasn't a problem for years because we had a Republican administration. Firearms collectors and shooters believe that the current administration will take steps to make gun ownership more difficult or expensive (in the 1990s a Democrat in congress proposed a 10000% tax on ammunition), so those people who distrust the Obama administrations motives are buying guns and ammo as fast as they can afford to. I have bought several firarms and over 1000 rounds of ammunition since the election.

      So to put it all together, we have a war using up supply and we have an anticipated lack of supply in the near future. These are the reasons why the supply hasn't expanded.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    60. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demand may be up, but additional reasons for ammo price increases are from the cost of raw materials increasing - lead has doubled in price over the past two years, rising global demand for metal (lead, brass) driven by economic booms in China and India; the cost of fuel to transport ammo, and um, the fact that the US is actively fighting two wars right now. Yup, that about covers it.

    61. Re:Im sorry by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's cause I'm from Europe, but what does guns have to do with government being answerable to the people?

      Yes, apparently it IS because you're in Europe. Citizen ownership of firearms is a "last case scenario" kind of reminder to government officials that we're their boss, not the other way around. It's a particularly American way of approaching civics.

      A good example of this would be the "Battle of Athens" a google search will bring up a description of events that I don't particularly feel like rehashing now. It shows how Americans deal with corruption.

      Yet we don't go around having wet dreams of a future where the government becomes totalitarian so we can shoot people we don't like in an excuse of a revolution.

      Perhaps not, but then again Norweigans aren't known for their warlike nature. Not even to defend their homeland from outside aggressors. Quisling bent over and grabbed his ankles. Maybe that's the Norweigan way of approaching civics...

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    62. Re:Im sorry by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Plenty of Ammo here on the west coast.

      California?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    63. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you provide some hard data on this? I'd like to research more on the topic of stockpiling munitions.

    64. Re:Im sorry by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      "Maybe it's cause I'm from Europe, but what does guns have to do with government being answerable to the people?"

      I take it you are not a student of history. Whenever a group of people wishes to control another group, the first thing they do is prohibit that group from having weapons. Most Americans do not like the sound of it when our leaders say "we will prohibit you from having these for your own protection".

      First of all, it's totally disrespectful and hypocritical to imply that someone else is unable to handle weapons responsibly, while claiming you are able to do so.

      Secondly, no good will come of it. The threat of force can be used to coerce others through fear. If people have weapons, there is only so far you can push then before they fight back. This is a natural and healthy balance of power. On the other hand, if people lack weapons they will only fight back once they've literally decided it is not worthwhile to live.

      There is simply no good reason for a "benevolent" government to ban weapons. That means that any government that wishes to do so must be malevolent, hence the general fear of weapons restrictions.

    65. Re:Im sorry by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      Gold is also unbacked fiat money, for the most part. Its primary value derives from the perception that it's useful as a value story and currency, i.e. recursive. Its actual utility value, as jewelry, industrial metal, and similar, is substantially lower than its current price. In a major collapse of civilization, it'd be lower still, since jewelry wouldn't exactly be a priority.

      Say I had a bunch of actually usable goods, in some post-apocalyptic scenario. Why would I let you have them in exchange for some relatively useless piece of metal? The only conceivable reason is an expectation that that metal would be accepted by others as currency also; i.e. exactly the same thing that backs U.S. dollars.

    66. Re:Im sorry by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      There's only so much gas, bread, water and canned food you can practically store in your basement while you wait out the apocolypse. But gold you can store easily, and redeem when things go back to normal.

      Yeah, if you haven't starved, frozen to death, or just been killed by someone who stocked up on guns and ammo.

    67. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. When Inflation hits hard and money turns to useless paper, the government confiscates all gold. Even if you would hide your gold, its difficult to use it a payment media when mere possession of it is criminal for private citizens.

      But please, buy gold to hedge the paper money, its good for the country.

    68. Re:Im sorry by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's because the war of independence -- where the citizens of North America took up arms against the then government and won their independence -- is a significant part of the identity of many North American citizens. Also don't forget that the founding fathers made it very clear that all citizens must have the right to possess arms, for the explicit reason of being able to overthrow a future corrupt government. While one hopes that would never come to pass, it's still an important part of the very identity of US citizens.

      Or to put the question back to you: if your government ignores the apparent will of the majority of the people, how will you react? If they start imposing martial law to keep the peace and outlaw protests against their clearly unpopular policies, what can the ordinary citizen do?

      Armed revolution is most definitely a last resort, but if you don't have an unpalatable last resort then what's stopping those in power from abusing that power in the extreme?

    69. Re:Im sorry by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean "Who is John Gault?"

      Best laugh I've had all day.

    70. Re:Im sorry by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Those vending machines a partly a publicity stunt for a internet gold trading company.

      http://boerse.ard.de/content.jsp?key=dokument_358326 (german. apply babelfish as necessary)

      And at Eur 31 it's rather an idea for a present than for investment.

      --
      bickerdyke
    71. Re:Im sorry by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I think you guys just need to stop being so angry at the world."

      I don't think it's anger, I think it's fear. Here in Oz we have bolt action rifles and shotguns for sportsmen, "self defence" is not a valid reason for obtaining a shooters license. Even before our strict gun laws very few people owned hand guns, I can't imagine living in a country where fear of your fellow countrymen is the norm.

      As for our government, they are too disorganised to run a totalitarian state, if they tried most of the victims would die laughing.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    72. Re:Im sorry by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      That is, in the US.

      Europeans would rather keep on being friendly with their neighbors and inviting them over for dinner.
      That might prevent them from thinking it would be a good idea to stop by and use their precious ammos as soon as they don't get any macaroni and cheese at home.

    73. Re:Im sorry by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

      I think the ammunition rush is like the 9/11 gas panic. That afternoon I was called in to fix our credit card system (Conoco crashed nationwide) and I had a good half-inch of checks to deposit. A couple days later, the price of gas plummeted to 99 cents per gallon, and I imagine everyone didn't feel too bright at that point.

      I'm betting we'll have more ammo than we know what to do with, and the prices will go to normal again. Isn't hysteria fun? The manufacturers (and gun store owners) are probably trying to find the right balance so they're not stuck with tons of extra inventory.

      As for gold vending machines--whoever is running those is a genius and deserves all the euros they make. If I want to buy gold (more often silver eagles because I'm not rolling in dollars here,) I go to one of the three bullion dealers in my city. It's just a side investment that helps me hang onto a few more dollars in the long run.

      --
      "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
    74. Re:Im sorry by qc_dk · · Score: 1

      That's a bit of atlas shrugged I've never understood. Why gold?
      It has very little intrinsic value. It's industrial uses are very limited.
      An odd choice when the Galtians profess to value production and progress
      above all else.

      Gold only has value as an abstract of value. It has value because we all agree it does.
      It's main purpose is to facilitate trade. It's the oil on the wheel of commerce to paraphrase
      Adam Smith.

    75. Re:Im sorry by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      you can always use your gun to take someone else's gold if you wanna bother lugging that around.

      I believe you've struck on the alchemists' secret: transmuting lead into gold.

    76. Re:Im sorry by alecwood · · Score: 1

      Now might be the time to switch to lead free, more environmentally friendly ammunition then.

      At the time of its inception I wondered, but never dug far enough to find out, if the EU RoHS directive would make lead-free ammunition a reality

      --
      Real happiness lies in the completion of work using your own brains and skills.
    77. Re:Im sorry by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why I invest in gold _and_ lead.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    78. Re:Im sorry by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      That's why Notgeld came about. It was a somewhat-official barter currency used to evade hyperinflation, for one thing.

      Note [hah, that was a pun, son!] that many Notgeld notes are very pretty indeed, and are in fact aggressively collected, bought, and sold.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    79. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the local stores have had to put a per item limit on customers just to try and keep the speculators from buying it all.

      I don't get this part. Why don't they just rise the price to match demand?

    80. Re:Im sorry by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine living in a country where fear of your fellow countrymen is the norm.

      Living in the US and being an avid firearm enthusiast, I can assure you that we do not live in fear of our fellow citizens.

      Aside from target shooting and hunting, firearms are an insurance policy against the unthinkable. Do you have fire and flood insurance? Same thing. I bet you don't spend every day in fear of fire or flood, but you have insurance just in case.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    81. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the American Spirit. We value freedom from Tyranny, which is why we left Europe.

      Arms are the only true badges of liberty. The possession of arms is the distinction of a free man from a slave. - Andrew Fletcher 1698

      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now. - Ed Howdershelt

      "The true [American] revolution was not to defy one earthly power, but to declare principles that stand above every earthly power-the equality of each person before God, and the responsibility of government to secure the rights of all." - GWB

      "Societies exist under three forms, sufficiently distinguishable: (1) without government, as among our Indians; (2) under governments, wherein the will of everyone has a just influence, as is the case in England, in a slight degree, and in our states, in a great one; (3) under governments of force, as is the case in all other monarchies, and in most of the other republics. To have an idea of the curse of existence under these last, they must be seen. It is a government of wolves over sheep." - Thomas Jefferson

      (In the same letter to James Madison as the quote above) "I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. Unsuccessful rebellions, indeed, generally establish the encroachments on the rights of the people which have produced them. An observation of this truth should render honest republican governors so mild in their punishment of rebellions as not to discourage them too much. It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government." - Thomas Jefferson

    82. Re:Im sorry by bogwoppit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whenever a group of people wishes to control another group, the first thing they do is prohibit that group from having weapons.

      You are sounding rather limited in your own grasp of world history - many enlightened countries of the modern world prohibit weapons, and none of of them have totalitarian governments. There is simply no need for anyone to possess powerful weapons if nobody else does either. And why does your government want to "control" you (hint: that's a big part of what they're for)?

      First of all, it's totally disrespectful and hypocritical to imply that someone else is unable to handle weapons responsibly, while claiming you are able to do so.

      Who says anyone has to have them? Here in the UK, gun ownership is illegal, and the police do not carry guns either. Nobody feels they need a gun, criminals rarely use them, and nobody is upset by the army having them. Over here, the hysteria is about pen knives instead.

      If people have weapons, there is only so far you can push then before they fight back ... if people lack weapons they will only fight back once they've literally decided it is not worthwhile to live.

      Or in other words, "black is not white, therefore it must be red". Are you mental? Why would people not express their opinion just because they don't have a gun?? Shooting people isn't the only (or even a likely, or indeed effective) way to fight back, surely you can't think it is? In your vision of the future, are rednecks going hand to hand with robotic agents of the government in the streets, heroically winning through their wise stockpiling of assault weaponry? And then the government says "OK, we give up" and everything is hunky dory again? Methinks you've missed about a million steps in between (probably involving an election). I hear this time and time again, and it's always from people who secretly fantasise about an apocalypse in which they get to shoot a looter/robot/zombie/graboid in the face.

      There is simply no good reason for a benevolent government to ban weapons. That means that any government that wishes to do so must be malevolent

      Err, reasons to ban weapons:
        1. weapons are dangerous
        2. people with weapons are dangerous
        3. without weapons, weapons are unnecessary
        4. the government is there to make life good for people (which includes keeping them alive)

      What reason exactly are you suggesting for your malevolent government's wish to "control" you? I could just as easily turn your statement around and suggest that a benevolent government has no reason to allow ordinary citizens to take up arms.

    83. Re:Im sorry by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Actually, most people in the US are buying ammo so they'd have deer or rabbit for dinner, rather than starving after the mac n cheese is gone.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    84. Re:Im sorry by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      So what is gold backed by? Or right, nothing. It's usefulness is very limited, and give a choice between gold or wheat, I'd rather have wheat.

    85. Re:Im sorry by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Um, I think people are stocking up on ammo because they think Obama will try to revoke the 2nd Amendment, not because they fear the end is nigh.

    86. Re:Im sorry by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Cute, but I was only speaking to the availability of pistol ammunition, not what firearms I own. If you want to question the pistol being a backup piece, that's fine. I own 7 of them, 5 shotguns, and 21 rifles. What's backup or not isn't even an issue. It's just that the AMMO for pistols is much harder to find than ammo for rifles or shotguns right now. That's an actual observed situation that's common across the country right now. Go read any firearms discussion board for more information. Or better yet, go to any major online outfit (MidwayUSA.com for example) and try to order common pistol ammo or primers. They're all out of stock.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    87. Re:Im sorry by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      They have raised prices, but certain stores like Walmart don't always react as fast to market pressures on certain items (go price video cards, hard drives, or other computer equipment there and notice how out of whack the prices are - sometimes too high. when clearance they're dirt low). A lot of the guys buying it there are buying it to resell at gun shows and the like where it most certainly will be priced to match demand. As an example, IF you can find it 100 rounds of .45 ACP costs $33 at walmart (closer to $20 before the shortage hit). At most gun shows though 100 rounds runs more around $50-60, and they're still selling it at that price too.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    88. Re:Im sorry by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if the collapse only lasts a few years (see the USSR) then you can do very well by selling loaves of bread for gold during the fall and then selling the gold afterwards (or after you've moved somewhere else).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    89. Re:Im sorry by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think supply hasn't expanded? Ammo factories are now running 24/7 trying to keep up, I think some companies are trying to build more factories. Do some research.

    90. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flawless European logic:

      I'm European -> Americans like guns -> Americans are angry at the world.

      But to answer your question, yes, we'll shoot them. At one point our political leaders understood this quite well and actually had respect for the people they were beholden to. I suggest you read the Declaration of Independence if you're truly so ignorant of why Americans think it's primary that the people hold the power to effect change in their government.

      Why are you so bitter that American's like guns, anyways?

    91. Re:Im sorry by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      You are sounding rather limited in your own grasp of world history - many enlightened countries of the modern world prohibit weapons, and none of of them have totalitarian governments.

      That's both a paetitio principi and a non sequitur. It begs the question because it assumes that weapons bans are enlightened (and hence not totalitarian; it doesn't follow because by banning weapons those countries are by definition totalitarian.

    92. Re:Im sorry by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I'm a goldbug because for practical reasons (my extreme reluctance to shoot people for one thing) I'm hoping and planning for something LESS than a total destruction of civilization. I do not expect to be able to survive that, nor to be able to help my family to do so by any means short of getting them out of the U.S. However, in the event of a less extreme eventuality, such as hyperinflation, gold will help us to survive and to weather that storm until it passes - which may well take 10-20 years, or more if people do not learn enough from history to avoid repeating it.

    93. Re:Im sorry by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Usually it's closer to 7% and it can be much less. Markups are higher than normal right now due to heavy demand, and Canadian Maple Leaves carry a larger than average premium over other gold coins. I'm not sure why . . .probably relates to Canada's better than average economic stability. But Krugerrands are available for a much smaller markup . . I've paid as little as spot plus 2-3% for 1oz. KR in the past, though not recently. I use kitco.com and bulliondirect.com. You can get unmarked gold bars for even less, but they may be less easily recognized and thus less liquid under the circumstances in which one would be most likely to sell them.

      I'm surprised no one has mentioned yet that for smallish transactions silver may be a more practical money than gold. Doesn't hold its value quite as well, and is subject to far more volatility, but sometimes an $8 coin - even if it is $10 on some days and $6 on others - is more practical than a $950 one. Certainly less dangerous to carry around.

    94. Re:Im sorry by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Hyperinflation is not inevitable. What makes it seem very likely is that no one knows any other way for the U.S. government and population to deal with their enormous debts and unfunded future liabilities. I don't know of a situation where another country in a similar position did not either hyperinflate, or simply repudiate the debt (which would have civilization-threatening consequences of its own).

    95. Re:Im sorry by smithmc · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry... Maybe it's cause I'm from Europe, but what does guns have to do with government being answerable to the people? If they don't answer, you'll shoot them? Hell, in Norway we got 1.5 million weapons with a population of 4.7 million. Yet we don't go around having wet dreams of a future where the government becomes totalitarian so we can shoot people we don't like in an excuse of a revolution

      It's not a wet dream (well, except maybe for a crazy few), it's a nightmare. But isn't it still better to be ready for it? Especially since we know it's happened in the past (didn't the Nazis own your country for a while a few dozen years ago?) and will happen again?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    96. Re:Im sorry by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude, you should not even dignify him with a response, he so just wanted to take a shot at how US is so crap, and his nation is so great because they don't use their weapons, they also sit on the side lines, when dictators are busy using the new genocide weapons they bought on their own population.

      He forgets his nation went through a transition with the similar problem back in the dark ages, seeing as his nation is 1000s of years old, and ours hundreds.... I would say we did pretty good for ourselves so far, considering we have 60 times the population they do....and 60 times the possibility for crime, chaos, and gov. related disasters.

      When a gov of 20 people find out they were tricked by one amongst them who is leader...not much happens other then ...guess we wont be doing that again...when a gov. of 1200 people
      find out they were tricked, they will surely act more like a lynch mob then the 20 people..why...because of the numbers.

      Many studies prove the bigger the number, the bigger the differences in a government. You can not apply to a government like the US, policies that would work in Okinawa!

      Anyways...lame comment on his part if you ask me..... raise that US flag bud!

    97. Re:Im sorry by whiledo · · Score: 1

      Stereotyping a whole country based on one guy? Stay classy, Lord Kano.

      Also, to avoid shattering your cozy world view, please never look up either Benedict Arnold or Vikings.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    98. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One only has to watch Mad Max to know just how valuable gas might become :)

    99. Re:Im sorry by whiledo · · Score: 1

      Aside from target shooting and hunting, firearms are an insurance policy against the unthinkable. Do you have fire and flood insurance? Same thing. I bet you don't spend every day in fear of fire or flood, but you have insurance just in case.

      Fires and floods many times every year. How often do world superpowers fall into anarchy? Also, I don't have flood insurance for my house, and I live two streets away from the Mississippi River. I don't have it because the estimated chances of my location flooding are <0.2% annually. What do you think the chances are that you'll need to fight an armed rebellion against the U.S. government?

      I get your point, but it's apples and oranges.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    100. Re:Im sorry by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Canadian Maple Leaves carry a larger than average premium over other gold coins. I'm not sure why

      That's easy. The maple leaf is made from 24kt (99.99% pure) gold. Most other bullion coins like the American gold eagle and krugerrand are 22kt (91.67%).

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    101. Re:Im sorry by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      My understanding, which may be wrong, is that the amount of gold in every 1oz. coin is gold coin is 1oz., irrespective of the amount of alloying material mixed in which varies considerably. Can anyone confirm or deny? (Even if my understanding is correct, the difference in purity might still be sufficient to explain the difference. On the other hand if the differences in the amount of gold were as extreme as 91% vs. 99.99%, that would tend to support a larger price differential than what actually exists.)

    102. Re:Im sorry by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was insurance against the gov't, although I guess that was the context of the ongoing discussion. It cetainly could be used for that, if it became necessary. I was (and am) more concerned about the results of a natural disaster when the looting starts, or someone breaking into my home.

      It seems that everyone thinks the police are there to "protect and serve" - they're not. They have no responsibility for your safety at all; ask any domestic abuse victim that's been told "we can't do anything until he beats you." You're the only one who can protect yourself and your loved ones from violence.

      I'm not anti-police, but defense/protection is simply not something that they can provide to everyone, everywhere, all the time.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    103. Re:Im sorry by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not fears of your own government, but certain neighboring governments have been...problematic to your and your neighbor nations within the past 100 years.

      To each nation their own.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    104. Re:Im sorry by compro01 · · Score: 1

      They all contains the 1oz, but the purer gold is more fungible. It's easier to alloy than it is to refine.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    105. Re:Im sorry by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Sure, bartering works. But gold solves some of the same problems that money solves.

      A problem with bartering is you need to find someone who has what you need AND lacks what you have. If you've got meat, but need petrol, you need someone which is in precisely the oposite situation. Trade is a lot easier when there's a universal method of payment.

      Second, many barter-items have practical problems. You want to be able to *store* a bit of value. You want to be able to *transport* it easily. You don't want it to go down in value from being subjected to the hardships of both. You want it to be small, easily concealable and still equally valuable even if you decide to dig it down at some unmarked spot for a year.

      Sure for immediate emergency of the how-to-survive-the-next-48-hours variety some reasonably unperishable food, drinkable water, simple first-aid supplies, or a gun with ammunition will be more useful than a few grams of gold.

      But the advantaeg of the gold is on somewhat longer timescales. Odds are you can hide the gold, and a year from now, it'll still be valuable, and if you dig it back up, you can still use it for buying all those other things.

    106. Re:Im sorry by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Better dust off my trusty old arbalest!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    107. Re:Im sorry by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There is simply no good reason for a "benevolent" government to ban weapons.

      I'd say stopping people going round shooting each other is a fairly good reason, but maybe that's because I'm European too. All that muskets and redcoats stuff was a long time ago.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    108. Re:Im sorry by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      That is absolutely ridiculous. Crime ALWAYS increases in areas with strict gun laws.

      Try reading www.GunFacts.info, you will be surprised at what gun ownership actually does.

    109. Re:Im sorry by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      Good point. In fact, there are court cases that say they are not required to protect you. Only to identify and apprehend those responsible. Cops aren't the public's bodyguards.

      Good thread about it @ http://www.defensivecarry.com/vbulletin/law-enforcement-military-homeland-security-discussion/74826-police-not-required-protect-you.html

      I dont want to try and copy all the links and information there. Nobody will probably read it anyway.

    110. Re:Im sorry by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      According to Switzerland, the best thing you can do to reduce crime, gun related and not, is give your citizens guns.

    111. Re:Im sorry by quax · · Score: 1

      To answer your question:

      If you don't have an unpalatable last resort then what's stopping those in power from abusing that power in the extreme?

      A police force and army free of sociopaths that wouldn't follow an order to shoot at their own citizens if the latter were to mass protest non violently.

    112. Re:Im sorry by quax · · Score: 1

      Please hurry over to Wikipedia to edit the article on totalitarian rule. It doesn't yet quite reflect your definition and uses so many unnecessary words in comparison to your brief definition that - dare I say it - exudes an intoxicatingly elegant simplicity.

    113. Re:Im sorry by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      Right... but how do you ensure you have that? Pretty much everyone is susceptible to corruption, and any worthwhile police force or army is going to have to consist of a lot of people. Decent people can easily become indecent, as has been shown time and again in history. Saying "but we'd only have good, uncorruptible, virtuous people in positions of power" is a cop-out that has zero chance of success. You may as well say we're going to solve world hunger and end all wars just be having everyone decide to be nice to each other. Sure it makes sense, but it's obviously not what actually happens.

      Regardless, even if you get your wish, what are non-violent protests going to achieve? Why would the government pay any attention? All you're doing is standing around chanting catchy slogans. They're free to continue doing whatever they want. Unless you somehow get the vast majority of citizens to join the protest and down tools, but are you really naive enough to think that'll happen? Even without using any force against protestors, the government can just make offers to people who continue to work and ignore the protestors - tax cuts, or access to useful services like health care and public transport, and so on. Not to mention the fact that if the people in power think what they're doing is a good idea, it's highly likely a significant number of ordinary folk will too and won't even want to resist.

    114. Re:Im sorry by quax · · Score: 1

      Why would the government pay any attention?

      If the government needs to apply lethal force to stay in power but the army won't play it is game over. That what toppled all the Eastern communist countries after Gorbachev made it clear the Russian military will not intervene.

      '68 this would have already worked in Czechoslovakia but back then the Soviets intervened.

      And yes in all cases as you put it you somehow get the vast majority of citizens to join the protest. News bulletin: If just a minority is disenfranchised and protests violently this is usually referred to as terrorism and the majority of people will gladly have police force and army take care of them.

      So it is not like there isn't plenty of cases where non violent protest got the job done (starting with Ghandi). In recent history the suppression of such protest has been the exception rather than the rule (Tienanmen, Burma). It will be interesting how Iran shakes out. At any rate I fail to see how the fire power in civilian hands will ever be a match to the resources that a cohesive army can command.

    115. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fear of our fellow countrymen is not the norm here; there are very few people who are actually afraid, and those tend to be the ones who are scared of anything and everything.

    116. Re:Im sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but gold has intrinsic value.

  3. Ouch by Xsydon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I prefer a candy bar. Gold hurts when I chew.

    1. Re:Ouch by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      You could probably chew 24ct gold without it hurting

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    2. Re:Ouch by vintagepc · · Score: 1

      What if you have fillings?

      The upside to the machine is that stealing the whole thing would be near impossible.. they wouldn't need to anchor it at all, just make sure it's secure and well-stocked at all times.

      --
      Evolution - Est. 4500000000 B.C. Don't piss in the gene pool.
    3. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow Up. stop being a kid

    4. Re:Ouch by squish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mmmmmmm, carrots.

    5. Re:Ouch by lag10 · · Score: 1

      Considering that gold is one of the softer metals, I'd say that it's not too bad.

      Just be glad they're not stocking titanium or steel in the machines. Those would really hurt your teeth.

    6. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is a soft metal!! .......Ok I'll leave now....

    7. Re:Ouch by CubicleView · · Score: 1

      And imagine the effort to insert all those coins!

  4. Sell signal by Cereal+Box · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this isn't a "sell" signal, I don't know what is.

    1. Re:Sell signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, think the gold price has reached what looks like a permanently high plateau.

    2. Re:Sell signal by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      Sort of like the plateau housing prices reached in 2005? Or the one gold prices reached in the late 70's?

    3. Re:Sell signal by vertinox · · Score: 2, Informative

      If this isn't a "sell" signal, I don't know what is.

      If you happen to be a investor on the stock market, you can buy ProShares UltraShort Gold (ETF) on ticker GLL which is a leveraged short fund on gold. I've been thinking on putting something in it but Gold has been dropping due to the unexpected dollar strength so its a bit high right now.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    4. Re:Sell signal by cynical+kane · · Score: 1

      GP is quoting Irving Fisher, who declared that stocks had reached a permanently high plateau. He said this in 1929. A few days later, the stock market crashed and the Great Depression started. Bad timing.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Fisher

    5. Re:Sell signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afraid that ze germans invade you for your gold assetz ?

    6. Re:Sell signal by frieza79 · · Score: 1

      If you happen to be a investor on the stock market, you can buy ProShares UltraShort Gold (ETF) on ticker GLL which is a leveraged short fund on gold.

      I don't think thats what he means by "sell signal". I think "sell Signal" is more of sell the market, buy gold
      He'd probably be more interest in buying gold, not shorting it. ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL).

    7. Re:Sell signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are SO right. Sell your gold NOW, and buy STOCK w/ that money!

    8. Re:Sell signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, he meant the opposite of what you think: sell gold! When the market is *that* saturated, it's a sign gold is near its peak price.

    9. Re:Sell signal by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Amen. There was a very similar silver rush in the late 1970s when the Hunt Brothers tried to corner the market. My dad told me he started shorting silver the day he heard about women hosting parties at their houses to mail off their silverware for cash. Vending machine + cash2gold = commodity bubble. And behold there was a silver crash.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    10. Re:Sell signal by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're crazy. I suggest shorting ProShares UltraShort Gold (ETF)

      I should start a fund to make it simpler.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    11. Re:Sell signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... shorting gold might be a good idea before NASA starts mining asteroids and dropping hundreds of tonnes of AU through the atmosphere.

    12. Re:Sell signal by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

      Leveraged funds (like ProShares Ultra and UltraShort funds) are only designed to work over a single day. Holding a leveraged fund for a long period may have very bad consequences. For example, SLL (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) was down 43% in 2008, when it should have been up 100%.

  5. Poor kids by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    From TFA: "Because of the crisis there is a lot of awareness of gold," he said. "It is also a great gift for children for them getting gold is like a fairytale."

    Imagine... you hand them a gold bar for those 250 bucks and they try to unwrap it for a few minutes before they realize, nope, it ain't chocolate.

    Truely the gift of a wealthy sadist.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Poor kids by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Imagine... you hand them a gold bar for those 250 bucks and they try to unwrap it for a few minutes before they realize, nope, it ain't chocolate.

      [inspecting the repossessed Key to the City]
      "These look like teeth marks."
      "I thought there was chocolate inside. ... Well, why was it wrapped in foil?"
      "It was never wrapped in foil!"

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Poor kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so how much more sadistic, then, are coinset proofs and generally anything else made by the franklin mint?

    3. Re:Poor kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is heavier than lead. In order to mistake it for chocolate, you'd have to be...dense.

    4. Re:Poor kids by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      For 250 bucks you will not get a bar. Rather a small coin.

      Yeah. That's how worthless that credit-based "money" is.
      And in two years, you will get 350 bucks for the same coin it.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  6. Different by gubers33 · · Score: 1

    This is extremely different. But someone must see a business opportunity in this niche market. Personally, I'm not the kind of guy who has the sudden urge to buy gold at the train station or airport especially at 30% over the going rate maybe some people are I guess. I'm also not the kind of guy who spends in the thousands for a burger or ice creams with gold foil shavings on it, but there are restaurants out there who do this and they are in business because some people just love gold. I wish them luck, but I'm not sure how far they can go with this idea.

    --
    Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
  7. why? by ringdangdu · · Score: 1

    For when you quickly need gold?

    1. Re:why? by legirons · · Score: 1

      For when you quickly need gold?

      I'd guess people are reading the news while on their journeys (wifi, newspapers, radio, etc.) so if any bad economic news is announced, then wanting to buy gold sooner rather than later isn't necessarily so weird?

    2. Re:why? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Because teh people iz scared. The gold can haz value but not the Euro!
      The problem is exactly the reverse, of course. If a business has gone through the trouble to make an automated gold-selling machine that gives out gold in exchange for Euros, then that means the businessmen want Euros. Whenever I hear an ad on radio or TV for the same thing, I'm always perplexed (they just spent $$$ to advertise they're selling gold? Must mean gold is losing value).

    3. Re:why? by ringdangdu · · Score: 1

      gold never really looses value. And it does grow in value but at the same rate as inflation. But giving up 30% you would need to wait that much longer to see any growth in your investment.

    4. Re:why? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Good and plausible logic, but not necessarily the case here. With a 30% mark-up, they can use the money from selling the gold to buy more gold. If they wished, then the more gold they sold, the more they'd end up with (subject to not hitting the finite limits of the world's gold reserves). And more than this, the value of their gold might have gone up because it's in demand (subject to them increasing the selling price of their own gold over time to maintain parity).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:why? by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      gold never really loses value*

      Sure it does. Lock yourself in a bank vault filled with gold for a year. How much gold would you trade for water on day 2? How much gold would you trade for water on day 10? How much for food? How much would you trade for indoor plumbing on day X?

      Okay, that's kind of a ridiculous scenario. But I'll tell you how gold loses value: if no one wants it. The only reason gold had "value" in ancient times was because people realized that it could be used as a medium of exchange. It had no value of its own other than being pretty. You couldn't eat it, you couldn't use it for armor or weapons. Mostly worthless except for being a fake mechanism of trade due to its rarity (harder for people to "pretend" they did a service or sold a good than by using a leaf or seashell in trade).
      Gold's real value skyrocketed when we found out we could use it for stuff (electronics, medicine, etc), but its market value remained the same (everyone wanted it because everyone else wanted it). Now that credit and/or paper cash seems ingrained in our cultures, gold will lose value once people stop wanting it for anything but jewelry, electronics, and other actual uses. The gold bubble is going to burst soon, and people with a lot of it are trying hard to sell it off a little bit at a time, trying to con people saying "Only Gold is this stable", hoping to get real currency, or even better, durable goods and livestock. When you think about it, what's been more stable than *stuff*?


      *Spelling corrected

    6. Re:why? by realnrh · · Score: 1

      You've lost a crown and aren't willing to wait for the dentist, so you're making it a DIY project, clearly.

      --
      Long? What do you mean the signature at the bottom of every comment I post on Slashdot is too lo
    7. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >When you think about it, what's been more stable than *stuff*?

      >*Spelling corrected

      I can't believe you spelled stuff wrong... twice...

  8. Gold is the currency of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For all black market dealings anyway. Once they phase out cash in favour of a more monitored and traceable cashless alternative the value of this stuff is going through the roof.

    Gold holds its value like nothing else and if you're brought up to court by the RIAA it's going to be a lot harder to take your gold than it is for them to change the sign on your bank balance.

    1. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Cereal+Box · · Score: 0

      Gold holds its value like nothing else

      Tell that to the people who bought in the late 70's/early 80's.

    2. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by whiledo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cash is going away because it's terribly inconvenient compared to electronic methods. So now you're this theoretical criminal who deals in gold. How you going to use that gold for anything other than paying another criminal, since nobody else is going to want to take your inconvenient gold, except maybe if they charge you a ridiculous surcharge. Sure, they'll be some places that pop up and advertise heavily that you can pay with gold, no problem, no extra charge. But guess where the first place is that the cops will put under surveillance so they can tell who uses a lot of gold?

      All this is pretty silly anyway, though. As cash dies, what will replace it are anonymous cash cards. They already have them in plenty of other countries. If/when cash is phased out here, they'll have to exist and not specifically for criminals. You think most people are going to want to run their credit card down at the porn store?

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    3. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Insightful??? At that time frame gold when from round $400/oz. to around $800/oz.

    4. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or those who had it forcibly confiscated by the US Government in 1933, under the liberal's hero, FDR.

    5. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to tell the people buying now, 10 years down the road.

    6. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Anonymous cash cards aren't going to happen. Governments are getting rid of high-value bills precisely because they're mostly useful for criminals, and they will never accept the existence of an "instant money laundering card" unless they are extremely corrupt.

      Really, people should get used to the idea that economic transactions will never be 100% anonymous. It's not like speech. Money is more like actions. Try to image what the world would look like if anyone could anonymously and securely buy any service they wanted, and tell me you want to live in that world.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    7. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Cereal+Box · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and guess what? If you bought in the late 70's, you STILL haven't recouped your investment. ~$750/oz in 1980 equates to ~$2100/oz adjusted for inflation. Gold reached its all time high a year or two ago at... ~$1000/oz. Oops.

      So yeah, in the short term it's possible to make money with gold. But again, talk to the people who bought and held 30 years ago how their investment is doing.

    8. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by selven · · Score: 1

      The only reason I can come up with to even look at economic transactions is taxation.

    9. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by cdfh · · Score: 1

      With digital cash*, one obtains a token from the bank, which they can then spend anonymously at stores. Obtaining the token is not anonymous, so criminals cannot make huge payoffs without the bank noticing that they're withdrawing £1,000,000 as a single token (or lots of little tokens at the same time). The tokens themselves are useless unless payed into the bank, and so if a gangsta receives £1,000,000 worth of tokens, it shall still be noticed by the bank. What will not be noticed by the bank is how they received the £1,000,000.

      (The above is an argument against anonymous digital cash being worse than high-value bills; I'm not arguing against your other points)

      * There are presumably many protocols for digital cash; I think I'm referring to the one introduced by David Chaum, but it was a while ago when I read about it.

    10. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      A third party can be used as an anonymizing agent, no question about that. What the crypto-cash protocols overlook (as academics are allowed to) is that a third party (bank) that started providing such services would be struck down by government at once, as any other money laundering service foolish enough to advertise.

      There still is no crypto protocol that can do without a third party. I feel confident that there never will be - it seems to run into too many absurdities. How can there be trust in a truly anonymous transaction? And what kind of transactions could you reasonably do, if you knew the other party was by definition completely unaccountable to you?

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    11. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Porn stores usually end up on your bill with an obscure or inconspicuous name like 101ACMESTUF or Bob's Hardware Shop ..so I've heard.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    12. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by whiledo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, really honey, I was just buying some pens and fishing tackle!

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    13. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by whiledo · · Score: 1

      Then I'd say David Chaum's "digital cash" is not what will wind up being used.

      If cash goes away, there will be easy ways to get cash cards anonymously. And no, the tokens won't be useless unless payed into a bank. You take the cash card, go to the store and buy something with it. Or, if you're accepting them like you would cash, you simply stockpile them just like you would cash.

      And yes, it'd be hard to get a $50,000 cash card while remaining anonymous. But do you think you can somehow easily get $50,000 cash anonymously today?

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    14. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Remember all the Great Crash of 1987? Remember how it was going to be the end of civilization? Remember how gold was skyrocketing? ...remember how gold crashed and took twenty years to come back?

      The hard cold reality is that gold is not money, it's just another commodity. The bubble in gold came about because of inflation, which both funded the gold investments with easy credit, but also the overhype due to worries about eroding value. Add the hysteria about a collapsing monetary system, and gold became absurdly overvalued. We're seeing it again today.

      If you want an inflation hedge, and are squeamish about land, then buy platinum. Same qualities as gold but without the hype. Or buy collectible coins. They'll keep their value better but less likely to be confiscated by the next FDR.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    15. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by whiledo · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I already have an anonymous cash card with $300 on it. It's an American Express gift card that was given to me. They have the name of the purchaser on it, but not my name. It is traceable in that AMEX knows when it is used and where, but they do not know by whom (sign with an X). They're not the only one who sells cards like this. Rather than actually pay with them, I could pass the actual card off to someone else as payment. Yes, there are some practical issues such as some of these cards having features like being able to call in and report it stolen (if you actually registered it in your name), but not all cards have this feature. And it would be difficult to check a balance, true. But all these are pretty small points, and I think it's far enough along to say we DO have anonymous cash cards.

      Yes, it would be hard to get a $50,000 gift card without being traced, but do you think you can actually get that much cash without being traced? And really, when you say $50,000 cash, you mean something along the lines of 500 $100 bills. Not so much different to have 500 $100 gift cards.

      So maybe if you're thinking I meant we'll have a cash card that can hold hundreds of thousands of dollars and you can seamlessly transfer it back and forth and use it everywhere you'd use a credit card or check, no. But you already can't do that with cash today (at least non anonymously). So basically, I see cash cards replacing cash in the $1000 per card amounts which you can then refill later. Their use would be anonymous and you'd be boned if you lost the card (just like cash).

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    16. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by cdfh · · Score: 1

      Then I'd say David Chaum's "digital cash" is not what will wind up being used.

      Very possibly

      And no, the tokens won't be useless unless payed into a bank. ... you simply stockpile them just like you would cash

      With Chaum's protocol, the tokens are worthless unless they are repaid by the bank. Stockpiling them is worthless. That may or may not be good, but it's how the protocol works. Like you say, another protocol may be used.

    17. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point for some is not to make cash, but to preserve what they have.

      If the dollar tanks and I have several ounces (or pounds) of gold stocked away, I'm set!

    18. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "How you going to use that gold for anything other than paying another criminal, since nobody else is going to want to take your inconvenient gold, except maybe if they charge you a ridiculous surcharge."

      the same way criminal deal with laundering large sums of cash.

      "what will replace it are anonymous cash cards."
      Nope. As someone who has work and made smart cards, one of the first things the bank wanted was tracking. The second thing was only to allow the banks to put money on them
      We kind of created a micro economy that left the banks out. Oops.

      If a card is truly Anon, then it is trivial to forge. There needs to be a verification factor, and for that there needs to be a way to follow the cards history.

      "You think most people are going to want to run their credit card down at the porn store?"
      Considering how main stream it's becoming, I don't think that will be a problem.
      I mean, seriosuly the generation that has had porn emailed to them everyday of there lives is not going to be too embarrassed by purchasing porn.

      Man, I just think about how easy kids had it. When I wanted porn I had to sneak my dads playboys. Fortunatly I only needed it for a minute~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      does anyone else think that this sounds like a complete pain in the ass way to conduct financial transactions?

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    20. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Cost. Money costs a lot to print and circulate. Also, if you remove cash you need fewer people in your business. Not much use for a cashier.

      If banks didn't have to deal in cash, they would save a lot of money.

      Also, you wouldn't need to mail checks to people. So all government checks would be electronic, saving the tax payers 100's of million every year.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by geekoid · · Score: 1

      except the token will ahve an identifier associated with the bank and you.
      I know I've seen varies plans for implementations and design.

      Plus where this has been implemented, people want a period where they can claim the money back. Either with returns, or if it is lost. We had a 3 day policy. Loose the card and contact the bank and it will freeze that card. Then look at all the transaction and then refund your money.

      plus, Anon cash cards mean counterfeiting.
      In your scenario, I would use the tokens to make purchase, not to return to the bank, so they wouldn't know who had it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by snookums · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If gold became a serious black-market currency, it would be tagged with trace impurities. I wouldn't be surprised if much of it already is. It's already possible to tell which mine gold came from. (see gold fingerprinting)

      World governments already have buy-in from printer manufacturers to tag all printouts for the purpose of tracing paper-money fraud. It would be even easier to coerce gold refiners to do the same, given that governments are such large consumers of gold.

      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    23. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Cash is going away because it's terribly inconvenient compared to electronic methods.

      Yes ... until you're faced with let's say a massive power outage or the entire system to handle said electronic methods fails (has happened several times in Denmark).

      Hell, something as simple as a crashed register will make it impossible to use electronic methods, but won't stop you from using cash.

    24. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't buy into gold as an investment. They buy it as a solid currency that the entire world sets standards on. If your countries dollar turns to crap tomorrow you can still sell the gold off to another country and its still worth the relative amount you paid for. Of course now in your own country you could have just made a nice little profit.

      Its like a granny having her life savings under her bed so she doesn't have to deal with banks going bankrupt. Paranoia sure but meh.

    25. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by selven · · Score: 1

      By "look", I meant "make it hard for people to do it privately and have the government watch carefully". Otherwise I agree with all those points.

    26. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What bullshit Libertarian gold standard propaganda. Gold absolutely does not in any way "hold its value like nothing else." Gold is much more variable, up and down, than many possible investments.

    27. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by whiledo · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if the bank can track the transactions, as long as it can't tie them to you. As I explained in another thread, I already have a cash card that's not tied to my name. It's made by American Express and has $300 on it.

      I'm not necessarily saying I think there will be cards that actually have the cash "in the card" (in that the value is tracked by the card alone and not by a bank). I think that's a possibility, for low value denominations like $10 or $20. But the debate over whether anonymous cash cards will ever happen is rather silly since I've got one in my wallet.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    28. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I hadn't thought about these "gift" credit cards. You're right, they are kind of anonymous. I wonder if criminals use them much already.

      But then again, cash exists too, even quite large bills. My guess is that these gift cards will go more or less at the same time large bills do, and maybe faster if it turns out they are popular with criminals.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    29. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by whiledo · · Score: 1

      The gift cards meet a legitimate need. As such, they're not going to go away. Sometimes people overestimate the amount our government control us versus how much we control our government.

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    30. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Platinum is highly valuable and will likely remain so . . but it is neither as liquid, as easily divisible, as easily recognized, or as easily verified as gold. A little bit as a hedge against gold confiscation is not a bad idea, but good luck trying to buy bread, bullets, or booze with it.

    31. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      But you can refine gold in your basement. It is a very, very old technology that predates written history. Plus, under normal and even considerably less than normal circumstances (including but not limited to all of the wars, hyperinflations, and decaying/collapsing empires of which we have written record), gold is an easily fungible and interchangeable commodity. Even governments that don't hyperinflate hate it for exactly that reason: it makes "money-laundering" almost impossible to trace, and thus enables people (including, but not limited, to criminals) to escape some of the monitoring and tracking that most governments routinely do today.

    32. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Buying platinum is for its value storage properties. It's not about a collapse. If civilization collapses, you might as well screw your gold goodbye. I mean, who the hell is going to accept gold coins in the aftermath? It's a ludicrous goldbug fantasy. Gold's non-monetary utility is jewelry, and pretty baubles are going to be the last thing anyone thinks about after the collapse. But even if they did care about shiny metal disks, gold's worth far too much to use for daily purchases, so silver would be far better. Hell, silver was used a LOT more than gold simply because you didn't have to deal with futzy microscopic milligram coins with which to make change.

      If you want a valid medium of exchange for the post-apocalyptic order, you should be considering bullets. They're easily transportable, have relatively uniform sizes and weights, and have a utility value independent of their role as currency.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    33. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      I for one never needed one. In fact, I thought they were a really stupid idea, and wondered who would actually use them.

      To the degree that they fill a need, it can probably easily be met in a way that doesn't imply untraceable purchases.

      (I don't disagree that we have have some real influence over our governments, btw).

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    34. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      Try to image what the world would look like if anyone could anonymously and securely buy any service they wanted, and tell me you want to live in that world.

      Since we already live in that world, it's pretty easy to imagine.

      We do have cash NOW, you know.

      Your idea that we should "get used" to the government increasingly monitoring it's citizens is part of the problem, not a route to a solution.

    35. Re:Gold is the currency of the future by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      No, we do not have that world. Criminals' need for money laundering proves that.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  9. Know your target audience by whiledo · · Score: 1

    The machines charge about 30% more than the current trading price for gold

    Yeah, that seem about right, considering the level of logic in most of the "we must return to the gold standard" posts I've seen. They may actually manage to make this a viable enterprise.

    I now present several guest posters who will now provide examples of just the posts I mean.

    --
    Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    1. Re:Know your target audience by Bigby · · Score: 1

      We must go to a monetary policy that is disassociated from politics. This makes a gold standard better than our current policy. The problem with the gold standard is that it is linked to a single irrelevant commodity which will cause confusing and disrupting fluctuations in prices/salaries that we don't need to put up with.

      The monetary policy needs to be driven by math (a computer) that tries to fix against a good CPI chart. When the economy is expanding, the money will inflate; when the economy is contracting, the money will deflate. The government can be the creditor/debtor.

      Just get the "free" money out of the hands of the $&^% politicians.

    2. Re:Know your target audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wondered about the "gold standard" crowd. Why gold? Gold doesn't have any innate qualities that make it a better currency then other metals similarly rare metals... the only "answer" is because that's what we used to use in this culture. I'm sure someone who cared could find a metal worth as much as gold that was a little more, um... hard.

    3. Re:Know your target audience by cromar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why not nukes?

    4. Re:Know your target audience by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Having a government controlled monetary policy gives us a knob to turn to prevent market failures. Yes, governments can abuse that knob and screw up the economy.

      Here's a car analogy, just because it's possible to drive off a cliff, doesn't mean we should take away the steering wheels - after all, everything will by just fine if you stay in a straight line...

      And let's not pretend that putting us on the gold standard will prevent untoward government tampering, after all there were plenty of bubbles and recessions before the widespread adoption of fiat currency.

    5. Re:Know your target audience by realnrh · · Score: 1

      Slashdot moderation-based monetary policy. You get modded up, you get money. Modded down, you lose money. The monetary policy is then based off of the number of good (or at least popular) ideas and comments you make.

      --
      Long? What do you mean the signature at the bottom of every comment I post on Slashdot is too lo
    6. Re:Know your target audience by whiledo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, slashdot is a big proponent of moderation deficit spending:

      Concentrate more on promoting than on demoting.

      We need a balanced moderation amendment. No comment shall be moderated up without another comment being moderated down!

      --
      Moderators: Before moderating a comment Insightful/Informative, check to see if a child post has already refuted it.
    7. Re:Know your target audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The economy is too complex to be controlled by knobs.

      Here's a better analogy: you have a headache, you know it'll go away in a few hours if you just leave it alone but you don't want to wait that long because you have to convince yourself that you're doing something about it. So you open up your skull and start chopping bits of your brain off and reconnecting bits of it to see if you can make it better.

    8. Re:Know your target audience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, before anyone brings up an argument about how we take drugs to manipulate our brains when we have a headache, that fits into the analogy as well.

      An economy-ache could be fixed by an infusion of new materials from another country or by finding a new cache of raw materials somewhere, but it cant be fixed just by manipulating the connections. Just like the headache can be fixed by taking some drugs to help out, but can't be fixed by going into the brain with a scalpel.

    9. Re:Know your target audience by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      either that, or you suspect you have a brain disease, so you seek out an expert, who might recommend surgery - or nothing at all.

  10. The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price? by VinylRecords · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Am I missing something? Is there really such a demand for gold on the street that the convenience of being able to purchase it from a vending machine warrants a 30% markup? What possibly could justify an individual purchasing gold at a 30% markup in small quantities?

    I'm not an economist (not that they have really have a good track record lately) but this seems like a ridiculous scam.

    "Because of the crisis there is a lot of awareness of gold," he said. "It is also a great gift for children - for them getting gold is like a fairytale."

    Somehow I think little Jimmy or Susy would have prefer a Playstation or a bike or something.

  11. Extension of a "scam"? by Daravon · · Score: 1

    Is this the next level of the Cash For Gold commercials that seem to be everywhere? Buy gold off of people at a ridiculously low price,s melt it down, resell it at a stupidly high price, and the keep repeating the cycle.

    --
    I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
    1. Re:Extension of a "scam"? by Xsydon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Anyone taking bets on when we see GoldStar machines? Melts your gold down on the spot and gives you cash. ;)

    2. Re:Extension of a "scam"? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1, Troll

      Is this the next level of the Cash For Gold commercials that seem to be everywhere? Buy gold off of people at a ridiculously low price,s melt it down, resell it at a stupidly high price, and the keep repeating the cycle.

      I think we finally uncovered Ron Paul's endgame.

    3. Re:Extension of a "scam"? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Heh, just on BBC Breakfast this morning there was a feature about the new craze of 'Gold Parties'. Along the same lines of Tupperware and Vibrator parties, bored housewives are now having get-togethers to sell their spare gold jewellery. A company valuer weighs the gold and gives the party attendee 70% of the current price, with the party host receiving a nifty ten percent of total money taken. So if the same companies that are setting up gold parties are then selling off the gold in bars from vending machines, they're making a nice little margin and both ends of the transaction.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    4. Re:Extension of a "scam"? by herring0 · · Score: 1

      I saw this while eating lunch and misread what was written. Then I had the immediate image of bored housewives trying to resell 'spare toys' with a company valuer from the original 'parties' designating value.

      Next thought was the economy must be in worse shape than I realized. Maybe I should open a Girls, Girls, Girls Goodwill.

    5. Re:Extension of a "scam"? by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Well, that sure beats the UK Prime Minister's approach, which is to tell the world several months in advance that he's going to sell of a fair portion of the UK gold reserves.. Then when he's successfully crashed the market price, sells at a ridiculously low price.. Now everybody wants it, so adding to the UK reserves will cost a hefty sum!

    6. Re:Extension of a "scam"? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      Awesome, I've been meaning to get those lead weights out of my car.

    7. Re:Extension of a "scam"? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      Get rid of your old, unwanted or discarded girls for cash!

    8. Re:Extension of a "scam"? by calix0815 · · Score: 1

      In a german newsprogram the company said that it obviousely isn't really intended as an investment but rather as a cool gift. And most importantly as an advertisement for their real business of selling you larger bars via their website. In the interview they clearly stated that 250g is the minimum for a somewhat cost efficient investment.

      And as someone else already stated here, a 30% markup is not unusual for tiny bars. The spot price is for the bulk metal, in the european market that would be 400oz bars, in the US 100oz. You pay for having the small bars made. And if you sell gold that isn't stored in an accredited vault you'll have to have it assayed again before you can sell it for spot price (probably molten down completely to make sure there's no fake core).

  12. Interesting but inherently flawed! by jchawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is certainly an interesting concept but I have a handful of concerns -

    1. Why as an investor would I pay a 30% premium to purchase physical gold?
    2. Assuming I would I then have to worry about keeping the gold physically secure once I take possession of it.
    3. I run into issues when trying to sell the gold after I've taken possession because how can anyone be sure that I haven't tampered with the gold? How do they know that 1oz is still 1oz? What if I drilled and filled it?

    There are many other ways to purchase gold as an investment that eliminate the above issues. Gold ETF's are one. They are easy to trade and move in and out of. There are services that will let me purchase gold and store it at their locations, and will certify the amounts as to avoid purity issues as well as security issues.

    If you truly believe that the world economies are going to collapse why bother to buy gold at all? You should be buying guns. Believe me, you'll need them to protect more important things like your family and your home.

    Interesting idea but only suckers will buy from them. :-)

    1. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The purity issues are easy to deal with. They are standardised coins such as Kruggerands (South Africa), Maples (Canada), Eagles (US), Sovreigns (UK) etc. People can weigh the coins and get the volume very easily. If the density is correct, it is made of gold.

      A lot of gold ETFs, particularly the ones that don't charge you for storage, don't actually hold any physical gold to back up your investment. Instead they match your investment with people who are short selling gold. It is very similar to the way spread betting works, except it is taxed as an investment rather than a gambling transaction. These funds can and do go bust, and investors have lost money as a result.

    2. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      3. I run into issues when trying to sell the gold after I've taken possession because how can anyone be sure that I haven't tampered with the gold? How do they know that 1oz is still 1oz? What if I drilled and filled it?

      What are you planning on filling it with? And isn't detecting this sort of thing simply a matter of knowing the purity (and thus density) of what the gold is supposed to be, then measuring the actual density? It's not like you're the first to think up the idea of tampering with gold (remember the story of Archimedes?)

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    3. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you'll find a candy bar or a soda in a vending machine is typically 30% to 60% higher than supermarket prices. People pay for convenience.

    4. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many other ways to purchase gold as an investment that eliminate the above issues. Gold ETF's are one. They are easy to trade and move in and out of. There are services that will let me purchase gold and store it at their locations, and will certify the amounts as to avoid purity issues as well as security issues.

      Like they actually have anywhere near the amount of gold they deal with in bits?

    5. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by e1618978 · · Score: 2, Informative
    6. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Minwee · · Score: 1

      But how often do you feel like eating a bar of gold while walking to the train station?

    7. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, wouldn't it be more convenient for them to simply throw the 30% mark-up into the trash on their way through the station. Accomplishes about the same.

    8. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Alari · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with pretend gold or pieces of paper that say you have some gold, somewhere, but no you can't have it, is that you don't actually have the gold.

      Gold isn't as special as people think it is, but it is more special than might be apparent just from intellectual consideration. In other words, a smart person will realize gold is only really useful in industrial uses and electronic components due to it's properties. A smarter person will realize that, even if civilization collapses, certain people will still trade food, water, and sex for shiny objects.

      Same thing with diamonds, they're nearly worthless rocks, useful to industry and science. But, oh wow, they're sooo shiny... :P :D And you know what they say. "Diamonds. She'll pretty much have to."

      --
      I use Windows... like a two dollar wh.. why don't I just go ahead and not finish that sentence.
    9. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by lgw · · Score: 1

      And they *do* charge you for storage, but like any ETF management fee, it's quite a small percentage.

      Avoid the "eGold" scams like the plague, as they're no more secure than some company, but GLD shares and commodity futures contracts are as secure an investment as anything else (other than guns).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Why is trusting GLD better than trusting government? No, for all the crank theories about the innate value of gold to make the slightest bit of sense, you need to have physical control of it as well.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    11. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by lgw · · Score: 1

      There are many other ways to purchase gold as an investment that eliminate the above issues. Gold ETF's are one. They are easy to trade and move in and out of. There are services that will let me purchase gold and store it at their locations, and will certify the amounts as to avoid purity issues as well as security issues

      Like they actually have anywhere near the amount of gold they deal with in bits?

      Yes. Yes they do. Both gold ETFs and futures contracts. Central banks participate in these markets, guys who deal with scammers by using thousands of men with guns. Anything you buy online from some e-Gold website - probably not.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by nasor · · Score: 1

      Although they talk about it being an investment in the article, I get the strong impression it's intended more as a travel souvenir. I mean come on, the vending machines are in airports.

    13. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by HiThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whiskey is another good investment if you have such expectations. Good whiskey is difficult to make, in high demand, keeps well, and takes a very long time to make if you have only primitive equipment. (Consider the problem of seals in the still, and making pipes that don't leak lead.)

      You'd probably want to make sure that it was securely packaged, and that the caps of the bottles were upright and not exposed to moisture. Doing such in the current environment is easy. After a collapse, much more difficult. And you can buy an extra liter of whiskey a week without anyone raising an eyebrow. (Try doing that with guns and ammo. And ammo doesn't store as well.)

      Another good investment would be a medical degree. That one's more time consuming, but after a collapse doctors, those who know more than what drugs to prescribe anyway, will be extremely valuable. Nurses too.

      Or you could apprentice yourself to a blacksmith. That would be a really valuable skill. But you'd better learn how to handle and recognize scrap metal.

      Horse handling probably won't be worth bothering with in most areas for a few generations. Most of the horses will be eaten. Archery would be worthwhile, but learn to fletch your arrows at the same time. I doubt that you could learn to handle a longbow well, but it would be a good idea to learn how to teach the use of it. (Supposedly one needs to grow up with a longbow to learn it's proper use.) Having a few compound bows would be a good substitute, but you won't be able to replace them. So also get a few regular bows, and learn how to make them from wood. And which wood. (Yew is likely not to be available, so learn what's available in your area.)

      Guns are a strictly short term answer. (So is whiskey.) Both only buy you time to establish yourself in a community...and you'll NEED a community. Self defense by an individual is a recipe for dying out within one generation.
       

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    14. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe me, you'll need them to protect more important things like your family and your home.

      You forgot to add your gold.
       
      As in "My guns will protect my friends, my family, and your gold"

    15. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Physical gold may allow you to avoid taxes (depending on where you buy it and who you sell to).

      No inheritance tax.

      Can't be taken away in bankruptcies or other such situations (well, nobody needs to know you have it). Not so easy with ETFs.

      Easily sell-able anywhere in the world (just walk into any small jewelry business; might not get "full" market value---but in emergency you never get full value on anything).

      ETFs charge fees (that's why they're in this business---not to make your life easier).

      And the "uh, oh, market is collapsing"; when an emergency happens, you might find there's a large stack of worthless paper contracts with bankrupt intermediaries behind that ETF, and real gold is nowhere in sight. In other words, the point of gold is that it's "physical gold", not some paper contract saying "there is gold behind it".

      Not saying everyone should convert to the gold standard, just saying there are good rationalities for it (there are also fairly bad reasons for it too).

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    16. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by parabyte · · Score: 1

      I read an interview with these guys some times ago.

      - They basically sell very small bars, like 1 gram pieces, which are sold which high markup everywhere

      - they don't target investors with these machines, but people who want to bring a gift home

      - they want to raise interest for buying gold this way

      p.

      --
      Without order, nothing can exist. Without chaos, nothing can be created.
    17. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Garridan · · Score: 1

      Daily.

    18. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by selven · · Score: 1

      You're operating the assumption that people are going to buy this for a reason other than the excitement of having REAL GOLD, that super expensive stuff that criminals steal and knights and princesses go after in movies, IN YOUR OWN POCKET.

    19. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing the point, this isn't designed to sell gold to people that would have bought it anyways, this is to snag people that would not have bought gold had they not walked past the machine.

      Think about it, if you ask some random person where do you buy raw gold at? How many would be able to answer anything beyond a jewelry store? Hell I don't know myself.

      So you have this segment of the population that might like to own some gold, but either don't know, or don't have the drive to research it to find out, where to buy gold. Is this segment large enough to make a decent profit setting up and maintaining these vending machines? Well I guess we'll find out when either they stick around or the company folds.

    20. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      3. I run into issues when trying to sell the gold after I've taken possession because how can anyone be sure that I haven't tampered with the gold? How do they know that 1oz is still 1oz? What if I drilled and filled it?

      Shit, you're right. Someone could have tampered with the gold - alloyed it with some cheap metal perhaps, taken the rest of the gold for themselves. How can we tell whether the gold is in fact truly gold?

      I'm going to have to go and think about this. It's time for my bath anyway...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    21. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Good whisky is indeed difficult to make, but decent moonshine, which will satisfy most people looking to get drunk, is dead simple given a good still and the ability to follow a "recipe"

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    22. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I just thought I'd point out that ammo does store pretty well- at least as well as glass bottles of volatile fluid. I regularly fire pre-ww2 surplus ammunition without issues.

      Ammunition, especially .22lr, .30-06, .223, and other common hunting calibers will always be a good investment. If I could send a letter to myself but 10 years earlier, one of the first sentences would be "Buy ammo!" (along with apple and google stock, of course). I could have more than doubled my money buying and selling ammo if I had know prices would skyrocket when they did.

      When worst comes to worst, you can make your own gunpowder, cast your own bullets, and make your own guns. In a military conflict, however, the people with brass-cased ammunition will beat the muskets.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    23. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

      1. Why as an investor would I pay a 30% premium to purchase physical gold?

      Because in this instance you are buying small lots of gold. If you were to buy gold in larger quantities then you could pay the spot price.

      2. Assuming I would I then have to worry about keeping the gold physically secure once I take possession of it.

      When was the last time your house was broken into? Would you tell ANYONE that you kept gold in your house? If not, you probably have little to worry about.

      Also, you probably have one or more guns in your home loaded and ready. As the old sign says: Forget about the dog. Beware of owner!

      3. I run into issues when trying to sell the gold after I've taken possession because how can anyone be sure that I haven't tampered with the gold? How do they know that 1oz is still 1oz? What if I drilled and filled it?

      EUREKA!

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    24. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by vertinox · · Score: 1

      According to that link posted in a few posts above...

      Tungsten

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    25. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      But how often do you feel like eating a bar of gold while walking to the train station?

      All the time!
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    26. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a total breakdown I prefer to not have any goods that too many people want desperatly. Like those 20 people at your front door could just decide to slaughter you and take your ammunition for free. Maybe you can shoot a few of them but that doesn't make up for yourself being dead.

      A useful skill or trade is definetly better. Easier to hide, easier to move, easier to keep.

    27. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Why as an investor would I pay a 30% premium to purchase physical gold?

      This isn't marketed to investors, but is aimed at suckers.

    28. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Facegarden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whiskey is another good investment if you have such expectations. Good whiskey is difficult to make, in high demand, keeps well, and takes a very long time to make if you have only primitive equipment. (Consider the problem of seals in the still, and making pipes that don't leak lead.)

      You'd probably want to make sure that it was securely packaged, and that the caps of the bottles were upright and not exposed to moisture. Doing such in the current environment is easy. After a collapse, much more difficult. And you can buy an extra liter of whiskey a week without anyone raising an eyebrow. (Try doing that with guns and ammo. And ammo doesn't store as well.)

      Another good investment would be a medical degree. That one's more time consuming, but after a collapse doctors, those who know more than what drugs to prescribe anyway, will be extremely valuable. Nurses too.

      Or you could apprentice yourself to a blacksmith. That would be a really valuable skill. But you'd better learn how to handle and recognize scrap metal.

      Horse handling probably won't be worth bothering with in most areas for a few generations. Most of the horses will be eaten. Archery would be worthwhile, but learn to fletch your arrows at the same time. I doubt that you could learn to handle a longbow well, but it would be a good idea to learn how to teach the use of it. (Supposedly one needs to grow up with a longbow to learn it's proper use.) Having a few compound bows would be a good substitute, but you won't be able to replace them. So also get a few regular bows, and learn how to make them from wood. And which wood. (Yew is likely not to be available, so learn what's available in your area.)

      Guns are a strictly short term answer. (So is whiskey.) Both only buy you time to establish yourself in a community...and you'll NEED a community. Self defense by an individual is a recipe for dying out within one generation.

      I would think carpentry and farming are two of the most universally needed fields. People need to eat and have shelter, so those are really useful.

      But all this talk of collapse is bullshit anyway.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    29. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could call it the gold standard of gold standards.

    30. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ya just gotta go find some deposits of saltpeter or whatever.. lol

      crackpots itt

    31. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Mead is also dead simple to make and probably far tastier than most moonshine, though it is not going to be quite as potent.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    32. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, ammo stores quite nicely. Keep it dry, preferably in an airtight container, and it should last longer than you. People around here routinely shoot ammo produced around WWII with no problems at all. Current ammo shortage notwithstanding, I could buy a few hundred rounds every day without anyone raising an eyebrow - where is this that weekly ammo purchases are somehow out of the ordinary?

      And, definitely add dentistry next to medicine as a good educational investment. I'd go without a lot of things to get that kind of pain to stop.... or is that where the whiskey comes in?

    33. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by AxemRed · · Score: 1

      1. Why as an investor would I pay a 30% premium to purchase physical gold?
      I have no idea. I could understand if they were charging a transaction fee that's 30% higher than the norm. But if they are really charging 30% more for the gold, that makes little sense.

      3. I run into issues when trying to sell the gold after I've taken possession because how can anyone be sure that I haven't tampered with the gold? How do they know that 1oz is still 1oz? What if I drilled and filled it?
      Um... weigh it?

    34. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by bar-agent · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good whiskey is difficult to make, in high demand, keeps well, and takes a very long time to make if you have only primitive equipment. (Consider the problem of seals in the still, and making pipes that don't leak lead.)

      I don't know about the lead, but leave some fish out and that should lure away the seals.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    35. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that. I'm going to learn to make at least black powder, since I produce a key ingredient.

      I'll see your crappy bow and raise you a Sharps rifle.

    36. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mead requires honey. Honey requires bees. Bees are currently in trouble. Also, beekeeping in a time when there aren't suppliers for the equipment is going to be much more difficult.

      OTOH, if you DO successfully keep bees, they not only allow you to make mead, they provide the highly salable honey. (I don't know that much about beekeeping in low tech environments...just that it was a late development in northern Europe.)

      Beer's good though. It's one of the earliest ways of providing safe water used in Europe. And safe water is going to be a desperate need. (That's one of whiskey's strong uses in a primitive environment. It's also a good disinfectant and a reasonable pain killer.)

      N.B.: Whiskey will be a necessity for any primitive surgeon. As both a disinfectant and as a painkiller. (Well, ok. Brandy would work as well. Or Vodka. Anything 60 proof or over.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    37. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Saltpeter's easy. Sulfur's the hard part. And getting the mix right. (You need more than just the right proportions. Grain size needs to be right. Meal powder means that all the components need to be ground VERY finely, and then you only have meal powder. To turn that into gun powder you need to moisten it, work it into cakes dry it and grind it back to powder of even grain sizes...without setting it off.)

      (You don't need all that if all you want is firecrackers. And cannon are slightly more forgiving. But muskets foul even with very good black powder...but bad black powder causes them to foul much more quickly.)

      P.S.: Perhaps modern gunpowder stores well, but I've heard tell of powder forming crystals that caused it to either hang fire or to burn quite irregularly. It's true this was from around the time of WWII, and the stories may have been old then. I've never wanted to experiment in this direction.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    38. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but look at the run-up in prices on ammunition and guns. Both are completely non-scarce commodities, made scarce by silly fear-mongering. So yes. Suckers will buy them. Guns, ammunition and gold from vending machines - the beanie babies of the Obama administration.

    39. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by vikstar · · Score: 1

      2. Assuming I would I then have to worry about keeping the gold physically secure once I take possession of it.

      That's easy, just keep it in the gold-smith's vault, and let him give you a receipt for it. If enough people do this, then they won't even need to go back to the vault to retrieve their gold to pay for goods and services, and they can just trade with the receipts.

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    40. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Basic carpentry is pretty easy. And that's all that one needs when there's no new lumber.

      Farming is good...but what's your water source? The area that I live in is a natural desert, which is watered with water from the mountains. The pre-tech people who lived around here subsisted largely on hunting and acorns (ugh!). You need to check out the area you live in to see whether or not it will support farms. (There are very good reasons why the Nile and Euphrates valleys were places where cities got their start.)

      Generally, if the disaster is catastrophic, people who live in the cities aren't going to have a chance of surviving. There's too many, and they're too far above the carrying capacity of the area. If that's where you live, guns are probably your only hope, but you'd better not advertize that you have them. (And you only hope is a pretty poor one.) Most people in rural areas will also die. Most of our rural population is in areas that can't survive without things like externally supplied water. And in areas where waters available (say rivers and lakes) people are going to be jammed in too close for the carrying capacity of the land. After, say, five years the survivors will start to have a reasonable chance of continuing to survive. During those five years every animal that can't escape will have been eaten, so hunting will be extremely poor. At this point farming will start to emerge as a necessary choice. But the farmers will need protection, either self supplied, or supplied by others. One way leads to village based democracy, the other to feudal totalitarianism. I suspect that what will usually happen is a "strong man" based democracy. This means that the village chief has nominally absolute authority, but when he angers too many people, he's cast out. Possibly alive. And then the next chief is chosen by consensus.

      You'll notice that here I didn't talk much about possessions. There won't be any transport, so what you have is basically what you can carry for 50 miles/day. Without a decent pack. And with no pack animal. If you invest your weight allowance in guns and ammo, you'd better hope you run across someone you can steal safe water from. (Note that guns and ammo also means all the other equipment you need, like gun oil. Which will be irreplaceable.) There are reasons that when I was talking about projectile weapons I mentioned bows. Being skilled with a spear-thrower might be nearly as good. (Different ratio of strengths and weaknesses, but not much inferior overall.)

      To my mind, anything which catastrophically destroys civilization on one continent will make recovery on that continent a VERY long term affair, if it's possible at all without outside help.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    41. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      How are you going to make the barrel? The primer? Flintlock or matchlock I could see.

      There's two stages:
      1) Immediately after you use consumables while you try to establish some stable situation.
      2) Later you'ld better be making or trading for everything you need.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    42. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A smarter person will realize that, even if civilization collapses, certain people will still trade food, water, and sex for shiny objects.

      No, a smarter person will think about what "collapse" means and realize that gold won't be worth anything for a long while. Starving people won't accept gold in trade for anything.

    43. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      But gold? if you have that kind of money, just pick up your phone and call a broker.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you're right- the chemistry part of things could cause problems for a lot of people. But on the other hand so could soap-making. Me, I'm not a doctor or a chemist, but I can treat wounds and make helpful things like gunpowder and soap. You don't need a PhD to do those things- our ancestors did them thousands of years ago. What I like to see are people getting out of their element and learning a skill or two that they don't need but might prove useful. CPR class is an obvious example, but other really good experiences can come from craft fairs, boy scouts, summer camp, etc. Sometimes even just reading a book on a whim can give great insight when trouble arises (am I the only one who read a book on knots on a whim?)

      It's sad to think about, but I'm pretty sure that in the event of a great disaster, our population centers would display markedly greater mortality per capita than other areas. From a survival standpoint, the center of New York City is about as bad as things get.

      So anyways what I mean is, your original post was correct in that skill and knowledge may become the most valuable currency of all.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    45. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...why bother to buy gold at all? You should be buying guns. ...

      That's a good point. Where can i find the gun vending machine? Does it take gold, by chance? :)

    46. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by CodeBuster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why as an investor would I pay a 30% premium to purchase physical gold?

      Agreed. Investor premium for gold should be 7-13% above spot depending upon the product. Anything more than that is a gold dealer taking advantage of an inexperienced buyer.

      Assuming I would I then have to worry about keeping the gold physically secure once I take possession of it.

      Among the convenient properties of gold is that a large amount of exchange value can be stored in a commodity which is quite compact. At the current price of ~$970.4 per troy ounce a 1 kilogram bar with a spot price value of $31,198.36 only takes up 4 1/2' X 2" X 3/8" or 117mm X 53mm X 8.7mm. There are not many other valuable exchange commodities about which that can be said; even an equivalent stack of $100 bills would probably take up more space than that.

      I run into issues when trying to sell the gold after I've taken possession because how can anyone be sure that I haven't tampered with the gold? How do they know that 1oz is still 1oz? What if I drilled and filled it?

      There again gold provides an easy answer. There are not many commodities and none worth less than the gold itself that could be used for the "filler" because of the high density of gold among other unique physical properties. There is a reason why gold has classically been chosen, where available in sufficient quantity, to be the exchange commodity. It is difficult or impossible to fake the actual gold content without the fake being almost immediately obvious to anyone who handles gold on a regular basis and doubly so when the gold object in question is standardized into a solid ingot or coin. You shouldn't have any trouble selling your gold back into the marketplace at any gold dealer in any major city. There are dealers in the gold and jewelry districts of major cities like New York and Los Angeles who will readily buy back your gold at spot prices. If you want to dispose of larger quantities of gold at one time then you might have to call around and make arrangements in advance, but generally the gold markets are almost as liquid as cash.

      There are many other ways to purchase gold as an investment that eliminate the above issues. Gold ETF's are one.

      Some people want physical possession of their gold or they don't want to pay the storage fees; to each his own after all. If one is dealing in larger quantities of gold then ETF's can be quite practical, but for smaller holders the advantages are somewhat lessened over simply keeping personal gold in a hidden safe or safe deposit box at a bank. For the truly paranoid, nothing less than physical possession will do.

      There are services that will let me purchase gold and store it at their locations, and will certify the amounts as to avoid purity issues as well as security issues.

      Yes, those are the main advantages of gold ETFs. However, don't some ETFs have rather high minimum amounts (i.e. at least 1 kilo) and increments?

      If you truly believe that the world economies are going to collapse why bother to buy gold at all? You should be buying guns. Believe me, you'll need them to protect more important things like your family and your home.

      Guns would be useful, no doubt about that, but gold would be useful too. Think about the purpose that gold serves. In the absence of a "money" commodity every transaction is done by barter and suffers from what economists call the "coincidence of needs and wants". Suppose that the two of us meet in the typical post apocalyptic setting and rather than shooting each other on site we exchange greetings and attempt to barter. Suppose that you need ammunition and that I have some to trade, but that I want compressed natural gas for my camping stove. If you don't have gas cylinders or anything else to trade that I want then you will first have to find someone else who has gas cylinders and will trad

    47. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by mgblst · · Score: 1

      You realise that in most civilized countries around the world, you can't actually buy guns freely??? You know, apart from the one that you fucking occupy??

      How fucking stupid are you people!!!

    48. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trading price of gold is for gold which has been certified and has never left the vaults of the banks. Gold outside of the vaults would have to be certified (an expensive process). So the premium of 30% over the traded gold is more like 40-50% since this is "dirtied" Gold. Check out bullionVault dot com for more info buying physical gold stored in vaults in London, New York and Switzerland.

    49. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I recommend buying "the encyclopedia of country living". Look it up on Amazon.com for a good description of its contents.

      Probably the best book out there and it covers topics you might not have considered.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    50. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by ToreTS · · Score: 1

      And then, since the goldsmith knows that all of his customers won't come and reclaim their gold all at the same time, he can lend out some of the gold in his vault to people who want to buy houses, and earn interest. Profit!

    51. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      So also get a few regular bows, and learn how to make them from wood. And which wood. (Yew is likely not to be available, so learn what's available in your area.)

      Longbows are relatively easy to make, as are crossbows if you have a few more tools. If you live in Britain, it helps to be aware that most church yards contains a yew tree for this exact purpose; yew is poisonous to sheep, and the church yard is the one place where you are not allowed to graze your sheep. Since they haven't been cut for a long time, a typical church yard has enough branches to make few dozen bows without damaging the tree much.

      By the way, shot is also easy to make, and so is gunpowder if you live near a peat bog. It is possible to build a serviceable barrel out of wood wrapped in twine, but I'd give it to someone else to fire - you don't want to be near it when it fails...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    52. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Judging by firearms that I own from the turn of the century (1907), a good firearm purchased right now will last longer than my life will, and there is plenty of WWII and Cold War surplus ammunition still being sold right now. Well maintained and used as much as any single person would need to, a good firearm will still be there to protect your children when they venture into the wild.

    53. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      It's not really that difficult to fake it. Adulterate the gold with powdered tungsten, then electroplate pure gold over it. The difference it weight is close to negligible, but the tungsten costs a whole lot less...

      Of course, it would be easy to separate it out by just melting the gold...

    54. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      The difference it weight is close to negligible

      Yet well within the detection range of a finely tuned balance scale; a technology that has been available for thousands of years. Wooden measuring devices with pre-cut size depressions could easily be used for common ingot and coin sizes and anything unusual could be subjected to either melting down or, even more simply, the buoyancy density test.

      The story goes something like this:

      At some point during his rein, King Hiero II of Syracuse ordered his goldsmith to fashion for him a new crown. A known quantity of gold was weighed and given to the goldsmith so that he could commence the work. When the work was finished the goldsmith presented the king with his new crown, which weighed the same as the original amount of gold. However, the king became suspicious that the crown was not pure gold so he asked his kinsman, Archimedes, to devise a method of putting the crown to a test without damaging or destroying it in the process. Archimedes pondered for a time how this could be done before the revelation came to him suddenly when he lowered himself into the bath and observed the tub overflowing. This incident provided the necessary inspiration for a solution to the crown problem and Archimedes is said to have lept from the tub, shouting "eureka, eureka", and made his way to the palace; departing in such great haste that he neglected even to put on his clothes.

      Thus was discovered the Principle of Archimedes or an immersed body is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the displaced fluid. In order to test the crown, Archimedes weighed it in the air (where it was the same weight as the original gold) and then again when suspended under water where the loss in weight in water is called the buoyant force and is equivalent to the weight of the displaced water. The density of water is 1 gram per cubic centimeter so cubic centimeters can be substituted for grams to yield the volume of the crown and because density = mass/volume the density of the crown can be calculated and compared with the known density of pure gold.

      When this was done it was found that the crown was in fact, as the king had suspected, NOT pure gold but rather had been blended with metals of lesser density, perhaps copper or silver. The goldsmith had clearly kept some of the gold for himself. The story generally omits the fate of the dishonest goldsmith, but whatever it was it probably wasn't pleasant.

      The episode of the golden crown took place sometime before 212 BC, so we can see that even with a relatively low level of technology the ancients were by no means fools and were quite capable of telling the difference between gold and other metals.

    55. Re:Interesting but inherently flawed! by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      The difference in density is less than half a percent. Much more difficult to detect than, say, the substitution of some quantity of silver. Depending on the method used, it could easily slip beneath the margin of error of a test. For a ten grams of material (a popular size for ingots), that's a difference in volume of 0.0013 milliliters. To put that in perspective, a drop of water is twenty times larger than that.

  13. WoW? by Guppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did anyone else read just the headline, and figure that some enterprising RMT had come up with a vending machine selling World of Warcraft currency?

    Man, I need to interface with the real world more often.

    1. Re:WoW? by Xsydon · · Score: 1

      They stand near mailboxes (naked of course) yelling about how they have the cheapest gold.

    2. Re:WoW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually hadn't occurred to me that there might NOT be a naked midget accompanying each machine. That takes this deal from "I don't think so" to "no way".

    3. Re:WoW? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at first I was like "cool, I might actually get to see some other people that play too!" and then I was like "oh wait, it's in Germany, nevermind". But now you're telling me it's like the crap they use to make necklaces and rings and shit? Fuck that, who needs that?

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    4. Re:WoW? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That makes at least as much sense as what they're actually doing.

    5. Re:WoW? by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

      It's probably a more stable currency than the Fed-backed USD, though.

      At least the guys running WoW have a vested interest in WoW having a sane economy.

      With the USD, the Fed realizes that the government will bail them out if they screw up the economy enough.

    6. Re:WoW? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, had you kept some gold from before the crisis, then you could buy six times the money you bought it with with it. When the economy falls, the price of gold always rises. Keeping you safe from any bad times.

      What do you thing the big fatcats did? Invest in things that keep their worth, like houses, gold, real material things. Not that fake stuff called money.
      And thereby they made themselves even richer, relative to you.

      That's what gold is there for.

      But go on. Get another credit to pay your last credit, until you're realizing you've long become a slave.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  14. German Leprechauns rejoice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can always get me gold!

  15. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by wizardforce · · Score: 1

    gold doesn't rot so i'm sure you could find a few people who thought this would be a deal worth having at some point.. it would be different if it were some perishable item that is time critical, with something like this it's just a matter of waiting for the right peopel to come along.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  16. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We are at the beginning/middle/end of a gold bubble, just like we had a .com stock bubble in 1999/2000 and a real estate bubble from 2001-2007.

  17. Re:30%? by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, if you try to buy physical gold in small pieces (such as the 1 gram wafer mentioned in TFA) you'll find the markup is easily 20% or more over "spot price."

    The spot price you see quoted in the daily business reports is really only relevant if you're buying "paper gold" such as certificates in a common pool ... or if you're an institutional investor buying hundreds of ounces at a time.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  18. Re:1st post by Devout_IPUite · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Silver on first post, sorry.

  19. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by Xugumad · · Score: 1

    From my understanding of these things, 30% isn't out of the ordinary for "limited edition" gold coins (y'know, the ones they make 5,000 of because they don't think there's 6,000 people stupid enough to buy them), or other sources of non-investment gold.

    That means your average fool on the street will probably see it as about what they'd expect to pay...

  20. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by wizardforce · · Score: 1

    indeed, taking a look at the price of gold lately and it is quite clear that it is way over-valued compared to its history...

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  21. Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by sstair · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I could see someone realizing that they have too much cash to get through customs buying gold.

    1. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I could see someone realizing that they have too much cash to get through customs buying gold"

      Too True. Back in the 60s my Dad was employed by a british merchant bank that specialised in loans to foreign customers (often behind the iron curtain). They had one customer who nearly failed to repay a debt - my father was sent out to collect. He returned carrying the payment back as gold coins, avoiding customs on the way _out_ of the other country, but declaring it to british customs. He did this by carrying the gold coins in his pocket mixed in with other "normal" coins. I am not quite sure what would have happened if the country had worked out that he was flying out with a large quantity of currency, but I imagine the results would not have been pleasant.

    2. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      I'd rather use PS3s. You lose a lot less money buying PS3s and selling them than buying gold from these outlets.

    3. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 30% above market? Fuck that. If I'm carrying that much cash, I'm going to slap it in gold through a broker (if gold is what I want) and hop on the plane carrying jack shit.

    4. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see someone realizing that they have too much cash to get through customs buying gold.

      Yes, it's clearly much easier to conceal heavy gold coins that show up on X-rays instead of lightweight paper notes that don't.

    5. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      Many countries don't consider gold to be a monetary instrument, and you would not have to declare it as currency. The US is one of these countries.

    6. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Canada?

    7. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see someone realizing that they have too much cash to get through customs buying gold.

      You could probably just give away 20% in bribes and save 10%.

    8. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Or you can carry 10 $50 coins in your pocket and not have to worry about the X-ray machines. I can't speak to the declaration requirements in other countries, but in the USA it's the face value of any legal tender and not the trade value. While the trade value of those 10 gold coins would be near the declaration limit, the face value is only $500.

      I'd much prefer to carry 10 coins that won't set off an airport metal detector than 100 $100 paper bills. A coin tube is smaller and more easily concealable than 100 $100 bills. When you start talking about currency amounts greater than $10,000, the difference is even more extreme.

    9. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Late+Adopter · · Score: 1

      You would have to declare it as an imported good, though, and pay import duties. In the US you pay no duties on currency, you only have to declare it for amounts above $10,000 (then the IRS looks at you more closely).

      Sounds like a foolish proposition.

    10. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

      100 $100 bills is a pretty small package. Like, smaller than a paperback novel. Wads of $10000 can easily fit in a pocket or be taped to your person. These bundles of cash can bend, and are impervious to x-rays and magnetic fields. Also unless it's drug money you're unlikely to be detected by sniffer dogs*

      And remember that the $100 bill is far from being the largest commonly-available denomination. Why not smuggle the same amount in 500euro notes? Or 10000 Brunei dollars? (although trying to exchange the latter might take a while)

      Sure, if you have loads of time you could melt down some gold and cast it into something that looks innocent. But if you need to cross a border NOW (or within the next few days) cash is king.

      *Do they even have drug sniffer dogs in airports anymore? Or are they too busy sniffing for fresh produce, pirate DVDs, and explosives (AKA nitrate heart medication?) Do those fancy mass-spectrometer explosive detectors also detect cocaine? Can a thermal swine-flu camera detect the heat of a condom full of heroin?

    11. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And then do what? walk through customs with a lot of gold and then get questioned?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Don't countries have limits on how much gold you can import into them, too? I remember seeing something on a US customs form about "Do you have more than $10,000 in cash, jewelry, gold, or other 'currency instruments'..."

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    13. Re:Gold is a lot easier to smuggle through customs by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      > I could see someone realizing that they have too much cash to get through customs buying gold.

      I could imagine some countries where it may be needed to get *through* customs :-)

  22. We must return to the gold standard... by brian0918 · · Score: 0

    ...because it's the right thing to do.

    1. Re:We must return to the gold standard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we need is money that doesn't force debt on the country, and that cannot be manipulated. The gold standard doesn't address these issues, especially the second one.

    2. Re:We must return to the gold standard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why? is gold itself useful? NO, its only value is that it can be traded in exchange for what you need, sounds a lot like a dollar TBFH.
      Is gold immune from market crashes? erm NOPE
      is giving the government control of creating currency bad? Not really, only if they fuck it up, but surely its better to have the US government control US currency values than some random international cartel of gold mine owners.

    3. Re:We must return to the gold standard... by Starayo · · Score: 1

      why? is gold itself useful?

      Yes, dental prosthetists use it all the time due to its ideal properties.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:We must return to the gold standard... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      ...because it's the right thing to do.

      Gold seems too arbitrary and no man can produce it except miners no matter how hard they work.

      Not only that but we don't really need it in day to day activities other than gold fillings and wires.

      Why not create an energy based currency?

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:We must return to the gold standard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is gold itself useful?

      Yes. It's a wonderful EM reflector, highly conductive, ludicrously malleable, quite ductile, and very resistant to corrosion and oxidation. It's a highly important material for modern electronics.

  23. Why ... by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    .. would anyone pay 30% more than the current price of gold is beyond me. What is beyond me also, is how this idea made it past the marketing department.

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
    1. Re:Why ... by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you met any marketing departments?

    2. Re:Why ... by realnrh · · Score: 1

      It's the same marketing department that decided to sell used panties from vending machines in Japan. Which, when you think about it, may be an insight into a couple of national psyches...

      --
      Long? What do you mean the signature at the bottom of every comment I post on Slashdot is too lo
  24. Obvious use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money laundering seems like a pretty obvious application, and likely a very profitable one.

    Gold can't be traced, is universally accepted, and is easily verified for purity (at least gold wire, gold bars are more easily forged). So the obvious users of gold in quantity are for the criminal element. Further, you need to then locate the vending machines in areas with a minimal chance of theft, and enough traffic to encourage a feeling of safety. There's a reason drug deals are done in shopping malls and government buildings, it's a much harder place for something to go wrong!

    I predict profit!

  25. Been done before by ellbee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I lived in Switzerland '86-'88 you could get small gold ingots from a UBS ATM on the Bahnhofstrasse in downtown Zurich. Just the sort of thing a conservative Swiss banker would do on the way home from work.

    --

    You can't fight in here - this is the war room!

    1. Re:Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Mormon!

    2. Re:Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here in singapore the banks have "gold desks" (down in the basement, at least in my bank) where you can buy gold at a moderate markup over spot. it's available as most of the standard coins (maple leafs, koalas, the local "lion", etc.), in ounce and smaller, or in a variety of bar sizes from gram to kilogram. here's their live price feed (note that prices are in SGD).

  26. Stuck Machine by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldn't it suck if the little corkscrew thing started to push the gold out and right when it's going to fall it stops and the gold just sits there. Man, that'd be so much worse than not getting a candy bar!

    1. Re:Stuck Machine by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      I once saw a guy who punched the wrong number and selected an empty row.

      He basically paid to see the little corkscrew rotate. Once.

      It'd probably be a whole new level of suck if he was buying gold, though.

    2. Re:Stuck Machine by CodeBuster · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's no problem, just rock and tilt the machine until your bar drops down into the dispensing area; those stickers on the side that tell you not to do that were put there by greedy vending machine owners who want to cheat you out your candy er...gold bar. DISCLAIMER: This is sarcasm in case any of the eraser heads out there are actually inspired to go out and try it.

    3. Re:Stuck Machine by DrJimbo · · Score: 1

      ... talk about getting screwed ...

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
    4. Re:Stuck Machine by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Yea, but when I come upon the machine next, I'll get 2. And I didn't even want gold, makes me put on too much weight.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  27. Low markup for a vending machine by eison · · Score: 1

    Where I'm at, Coca-cola sells for more than a 100% markup between a store and a vending machine.
    30% sounds pretty low. Why not just sell cokes?

    --
    is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    1. Re:Low markup for a vending machine by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking, but in the interests of pedantry the answer is that the cost per transaction is higher for gold. One person buying $1000 worth of gold could be the equivalent of several weeks worth of soda sales.

      Also there are fairly large costs involved in transporting and stocking sugary-water. Gold has much lower overhead, based on it's high worth per pound. $1000 worth of gold weighs an ounce. $1000 worth of soda weighs several hundred pounds.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:Low markup for a vending machine by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      Volume!

    3. Re:Low markup for a vending machine by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Coca Cola is an immediately consumable product. Gold in bullion form is an investment. That's why a 30% markup at a vending machine is so stupid.

      p.s. I recall gold kiosks back in the 80's during the last gold bubble. I have no idea what their markups were though.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  28. Insurance Scam by Jellybob · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're planning to get them all stolen at some point, claim for the gold on insurance, and then sell it anyway.

    It's the only way I can see them making any money on this.

  29. Re:LUNIX! by Missing_dc · · Score: 0

    Sounds like your mother fooled around with a member of the Glup clan shortly before you were born and you are just venting some long repressed feelings. It'd take a bit more than a charm spell to bring you to our side. Linux is generally the tool of elites, so take your IT to the next level and spend some points on those stats.

    and regardless of what mommie says, dead lizards do not help coughs.

    --
    How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
  30. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by SomeJoel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We are at the beginning/middle/end of a gold bubble, just like we had a .com stock bubble in 1999/2000 and a real estate bubble from 2001-2007.

    Well, which is it?

    --
    <Complete your profile by adding a signature!>
  31. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by Bigby · · Score: 1

    Or the dollar is over-valued. Considering that we recently drove ourselves trillions more in to debt, I would put my money on the dollar being over-valued.

    The economic collapse scared everyone into the dollar (Treasuries). Wait until we are in a full-fledged "recovery". They'll leave the dollar to invest and watch the dollar plummet.

  32. What if it eats your money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if it eats your money? PITA to have to get your 250 euros back out of the machine,

  33. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by HiThere · · Score: 1

    But remember that the amount of gold is finite, and the number of people who desire it has increased. And the number of people who both desire it and can afford it has increased even more. Also, lots of it is "used up" in things like plating chip connections to prevent oxidation. (Not much per each, but there's LOTS of chip connections.)

    So one should EXPECT the price of gold to be high by historical standards. Don't know if it's overvalued. (I expect that it is.) Just that this isn't a good argument.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  34. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    It isn't possible to say until it crashes, and it isn't possible to know in advance when this is going to happen.

    I do know that it is way over its fair value at the moment. The main real market for gold is Indian jewellery, and Indians are mostly not buying now as it is too expensive. It may well inflate to even more than its fair value before it pops, but I don't know by how much it will be.

  35. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by lgw · · Score: 1

    Inflation-adjusted, the price of gold isn't all that high. People are buying it as a hedge against hyper-inflation. Doing so efficiently, by buying GLD shares or gold futures, isn't necessarily a bad idea. Buying physical gold coins right now is just a ripoff. If I had any I'd be selling, even though I think gold will go higher, as the markup you can get for physical gold is unreal (30%! vending machines!).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  36. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by schmiddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I missing something? Is there really such a demand for bottled water on the street that the convenience of being able to purchase it from a vending machine warrants a 10000000% markup?

    In all seriousness, this will be a boon for privacy nuts, the very rich, money launderers, and anyone else too lazy to buy direct for cheaper. Keep in mind that tax evasion is something of a national pastime in Germany.

    --
    http://cltracker.net -- powerful craigslist multi-city search
  37. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by Abreu · · Score: 1

    From my understanding of these things, 30% isn't out of the ordinary for "limited edition" gold coins (y'know, the ones they make 5,000 of because they don't think there's 6,000 people stupid enough to buy them), or other sources of non-investment gold.

    Or jewellery...

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  38. Pffft by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Pffft. We all know the real money is in mythril. Heck, with gold you barely get armour to protect yourself against a level 2 orc.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  39. This is targeted at doomsdayer types by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This isn't a rational thing. It is to get the people who are doing the "OMG the economy is going to collapse!" thing and don't know what to do. They see this and go "Ahh I can buy gold, gold is always safe!" It isn't targeted at rational investors, or even rational survivalists for that matter. It is targeted at alarmist doomsdayers.

  40. I always wondered about this one. by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    the size and density thing..

    is it impossible to find a combination of multiple materials that combined will match the volume/density of gold?

    lead and sand for example?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:I always wondered about this one. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      lead and sand are both less dense than gold. Things that are more dense than gold are generally more expensive.

    2. Re:I always wondered about this one. by mrjb · · Score: 1

      Wrong- lead is both cheaper and more dense than gold: Gold (Au) has an atomic weight of 196.966569(4) g/mol whereas Lead (Pb) has an atomic weight of 207.2(1) âg/mol.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    3. Re:I always wondered about this one. by mindstormpt · · Score: 1

      While your numbers are right, your conclusion is wrong. Gold has a density of 19.3g/cm^3 while lead has a density of 11.34g/cm^3.

    4. Re:I always wondered about this one. by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      That's atomic weight. Density has much more to do with how the atoms get laid out.

      RE: Graphite @ ~2.1 g/cm^3 vs. Diamond @ ~3.5 g/cm^3

      Exact same atomic weight, but 2/3 more density.

  41. Gold .. and internet in Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How funny! I wondered where Germany got all of that gold from!
    They must have downloaded it over the internet from Africa!

    1. Re:Gold .. and internet in Africa by terbo · · Score: 1

      I heard they sold all of their gold for two *bits* (per second).

      --
      If you're interested in facts I'll tell you what they are and I'll give you sources - Chomsky on The Big Idea
  42. Copper is King! by jameskojiro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Copper currency is good because the copper has an intrinsic value.

    So I am hoarding Pennies, pre 1982 pennies, made a machine to sort them out of the regular pennies and go to bank to buy all of the pennies that they have then sort out the pre 1982 pennies and cash back in to new pennies for older unsorted pennies. i figure a couple thousand dollars of copper in pennies (which I won't melt, but will hoard) are less of a rip off than buying gold. Copper is always useful.

    I am also hoarding quarters, nickels and dimes as well just not in as high quantities as pennies. My goal is to get a few barrels of pure copper pennies. Them be really good barter tokens in an apocalyptic world.

    Gold, pfaw, gold is for the elite asswipes who will rule the post apocalyptic fiefdoms, I am into copper cause I am going to become a mid class merchant who bakes bread, gets fed and maybe sells goods to the elite. The elite are goign to be involved in wars and stuff and probably be dangerous, I am going to be a merchant.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:Copper is King! by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      I am simultaneously scared, impressed and jealous. I bet you have a killer zombie plan.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:Copper is King! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      He actually got me thinking about building the coin sorter though....

      Wondering which would be better to pick out the "right" pennies from a continuous rolling stream:
      1) Eddy current
      2) weight

      I'm thinking eddy current deflection. All the pennies run in a track rolling down at enough of a clip to pass a breif channel where there is no side rail. instead an electromagnet causes a deflection binning the penny into the collection pile. All zinc pennies go straight through to the return-to-bank pile, and as I type this I realized that steel pennies would jam the machine :-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:Copper is King! by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      Would a strong neodymium magnet work in the mechanism instead of an electromagnet? You know with electricity being a rare and scarce resource in the bleak future. I would love to build something like that out of LEGO or wood or clay.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    4. Re:Copper is King! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      not really.
      It would possibly work, but what you really want is a rapidly changing magnetic field that will slow the coins roll till it can't stay in it's unsupported track, then it should fall, while the zinc pennies would continue on and the steel pennies continue to make your life a pain...
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Copper is King! by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      How do you sort them? I've been eyeballing these things since, what, 1982?

    6. Re:Copper is King! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      that said, if you find a few steel pennies, you stand to make a decent sum from the coin collecting crowd, so it'd be worth it.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    7. Re:Copper is King! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this post works on so many levels

    8. Re:Copper is King! by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Weight would probably be your best bet, or, believe it or not, sound.

      All pennies are copper on the outside, so unless the eddy currents run deep, there'd be no difference.

      A penny weighs 3.1 - 3.2 g (pre 1982) and 2.5 g (post 1982). That should be detectable.

      The best way might be to strike or drop each penny and 'listen' to the sound it makes. If you drop a pre-82 penny and a post-82 penny on a hard surface, you can clearly hear the difference. The pre-82 penny rings quite a bit more than the 'thud' of the post-82.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  43. Gold =! not only for total world societal collapse by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    If you truly believe that the world economies are going to collapse why bother to buy gold at all? You should be buying guns. Believe me, you'll need them to protect more important things like your family and your home.

    World economy might not collapse but the local German one might. According to TFA, German investors like gold because they have lost everything 2 times in the past (WW1 and 2).
     
    Taking post WW2 period for example, your idea of buying guns wouldn't have been useful because the occupying Allied troops prevented societal anarchy. But whatever investments Germans made in Hitler-era corporations, Reich war bonds and whatnot were probably wiped out.
     
    But the people who hoarded and hid away gold during the war would've come out.... golden.

  44. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    indeed, taking a look at the price of gold lately and it is quite clear that it is way over-valued compared to its history...

    So what changed? Answer: Gold actually has uses beyond being pretty, ductile, and imperishable now.
    We use it in electronics, medicine, science, etc.

  45. Re:LUNIX! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be new here (TM)

  46. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by tmosley · · Score: 1

    It is my understanding that the lowest denomination of gold, the single gram of gold, will cost 30% more than the value of the gold inside. This is about the same amount that you will pay anywhere. The extra cost comes from the assay (it is sealed in an assay card), the minting costs (which are higher for small pieces like that), and the cost of the rather nice looking box it comes in (not sure WHY they simply MUST put it in a nice box). Basically, the extra cost is like an ATM fee, only a bit higher (about $10-20), which is probably quite worth it, honestly.

  47. Not quite so crazy by Spacepup · · Score: 1

    Actually, this can make a lot of sense for Americans working overseas. Defense contractors (my brother in law works for one in Germany) get paid in dollars instead of euros. Depending on how the dollar is faring, some months they take a big hit in pay and are only able to afford the basic necessities after conversion. Other months they fare better. Instead of having their savings in either US dollars or Euros, if they buy gold during the good months, they could then cash it in when the dollar is weak and be able to maintain their quality of life. As opposed to savings being in dollars and having to exchange when the dollar is weak. Or having their savings in euros and when they come back to the states having to convert back in a weak euro market.

    It wouldn't work out for everybody, but Germany has a very large foriegn military presence. So in some ways, it makes sense for people who get paid in one currancy, but need to exchange for something more useful. So if they can exchange for something that holds its value, they wont loose even more when they need to make a withdrawl from their savings.

    As it turns out, exchanging currancy this way is a big market. A trader might only make fractions of a us cent on each dollar exchanged to what ever currency has less value than the dollar, but they trade tens of millions of dollars, wait until the currancy they traded into improves in value, then trade back and make a few million. pretty straight forward, but you need big bucks to make any real money in it.

    1. Re:Not quite so crazy by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Depending on how the dollar is faring, some months they take a big hit in pay and are only able to afford the basic necessities after conversion. Other months they fare better. Instead of having their savings in either US dollars or Euros, if they buy gold during the good months, they could then cash it in when the dollar is weak and be able to maintain their quality of life.

      You take a 30% hit when you buy the gold, you carry the risk of storing the stuff in the meantime, and then the cash-for-gold dealers rip you off again when you change it back.

      I'm not seeing the benefit of this plan over, you know... just buying euros.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  48. Re:30%? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    If this were true, I could buy "hundreds of ounces" then divide them up and sell them at 20% markup. That sounds like easy money. Why am I sitting here in this cubicle?

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  49. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by selven · · Score: 1

    For something to be a scam there has to be deception. There is no deception here - you know exactly what you're getting and exactly how much you're paying.

  50. Re:30%? by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Informative

    From kitco.com:

    Gold Bar 400 oz $378,440.00 = $946/oz
    Gold Maple 1 oz $1,015.85 = $1015/oz
    Gold Maple 1/2 oz $514.98 = $1030/oz
    Gold Maple 1/4 oz $266.90 = $1068/oz
    Gold Maple 1/10 oz $126.50 = $1265/oz
    Gold Maple 1/20 oz $75.25 = $1505/oz

    Now all you need is a smelter, minting facility, and a distribution model and you're ready to start making some easy money.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  51. Money laundering made easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holding some hot cash? Just robbed a bank? No problem, for a fee of only 30%, you will have converted the cash to untraceable gold bars that are easy to store and hide, will probably hold their real value at least as well as a bank account and are easily convertible to any world currency without attracting the Interpol's or FBI's attention.

    1. Re:Money laundering made easy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you will have converted the cash to untraceable gold bars

            Those "untraceable" gold bars usually have serial numbers that can probably be associated to the person making the transaction - via the cameras around the machine or their debit/credit card info. Of course you can probably melt down the gold and re-cast the bars, but considering the very high melting point of gold, you'll be looking at a lot more than 30% by the time you're done. Then you have to explain where you got the gold from, unless you sell it as earrings or other jewelry.

            Still, there are lots of easier ways to move large amounts of cash around, for less cost. I personally know of several "evangelical churches" that are fronts for drug cartels. And I know of a few bus companies owned by drug cartels. What better way to "store" your assets than under the blessing of "God". And what better way to move your money across borders - albeit a couple thousand dollars at a time to avoid raising suspicion - than on a dozen or so buses that cross the border two or three times daily. Funny that the bus is almost empty, yet the driver has $5k in his pockets / cash bag. Hmm.

            Posted anonymously for obvious reasons.

           

    2. Re:Money laundering made easy? by ninjapiratemonkey · · Score: 1

      "considering the very high melting point of gold"
      Gold has one of the lowest melting points of all metals. Just over 1000 degrees Celsius. Clearly this is still very hot, but something as easy to find as a charcoal or natural gas can reach this temperature. A blowtorch is even hotter.
      Now, I'm not sure how tight the security is around these things, but if you wear a ski mask, that could possibly be enough, and as long as you're not doing anything suspicious to the machine, very few people will pay you mind.

      --
      01110000 01010111 01101110 00110011 01100100
  52. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by kryptKnight · · Score: 1

    Am I missing something? Is there really such a demand for gold on the street that the convenience of being able to purchase it from a vending machine warrants a 30% markup?

    The type of person who would make a spontaneous commodities investment at a vending machine probably isn't the type of person who's concerned with those kinds of details.

    --
    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -Aldous Huxley
  53. Interesting idea but by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    It's a fucking ripoff.

    The gold price is already inflated by the crisis. It may rise further, but to buy it at 30% above market value requires a lot of faith. It's not as if gold is getting any rarer.

    However, it is a very clever business idea. Gold glitters very nicely, and you can entice poor people with the shine of a small, overpriced gold bar while letting them justify it as "an investment in the future". I'm sure they'll make lots and lots of money off something marginally less deceptive than a slots machine.

    1. Re:Interesting idea but by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Just like the diamond business.

    2. Re:Interesting idea but by geekoid · · Score: 1

      All vending machine are a rip off.
      Cokes have a 400% plus mark up.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. Re:30%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If this were true, I could buy "hundreds of ounces" then divide them up and sell them at 20% markup. That sounds like easy money. Why am I sitting here in this cubicle?

    Most likely, because you lack the initial capitial to buy the "hundreds of ounces" (and honestly you'll probably need an order of magnitude or more to really make this business plan work) to begin with. Sorry dude, but the way out of techo-serfdom isn't that easy.

  55. Funny? by Hanyin · · Score: 1

    Out of curiosity, why was the parent modded funny? If such an economic colapse was to happen then this is genuinly good advice but I suppose that most people don't even want to consider the possibility of it coming to be, much less being prepared for it...

    Or maybe it was a joke and I just missed it?

  56. Re:LUNIX! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is generally the tool of elites

    Bzzzt sorry. Real "elites" use something like Solaris or a BSD. Only anti-Microsoft script kiddies use Lunix.

  57. Wait... by JRIsidore · · Score: 1

    I'll wait till they have vending machines with gold pressed latinum.

    --
    :w!q
    1. Re:Wait... by earlymon · · Score: 1

      I'll settle for Kongbucks.

      --
      Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
    2. Re:Wait... by mjwx · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll wait till they have vending machines with gold pressed latinum.

      who thought of putting latinum inside bricks of worthless gold.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  58. Great! by lumpenprole · · Score: 1

    Now if I could just find an XP vending machine, I 'd be all set.

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
  59. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by Fjandr · · Score: 1

    That sort of markup remains the province of extraordinarily small transactions. Anyone purchasing gold as a hedge or for other investment purposes isn't going to pay anywhere close to 30% markup. Only those who don't know any better are going to pay such an outrageous amount above spot, and I have no sympathy for those who don't bother to educate themselves.

    The point of gold investment is that it holds a unique position by moving with inflation (at least since the unlinking of the dollar value with the value of gold). According to Ray Jastram's "The Golden Constant," the purchasing power of gold has remained relatively stable over the last 300 or so years. You can't say the same for any paper currency.

    Unless you're paying ridiculous premiums for the gold you purchase, even if the value of it falls the purchasing power of it remains mostly unchanged.

  60. Re:30%? by david_thornley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's so special about gold? There's a whole lot of things you can buy bulk and sell at a considerable markup.

    Some of my favorite places to visit do this with books: they buy large quantities, and sell individual copies to me at a markup.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  61. Re:Gold =! not only for total world societal colla by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    But the people who hoarded and hid away gold during the war would've come out.... golden.

    If I remember my history, quite a lot of people did hoard and hide gold during the war. It benefited them very little. A stash of gold may protect you for a while, but sooner or later someone comes along that you can't bribe to look the other way, and then you're dead.

    Much of the gold belonging to those cautious investors ended up looted, and traded to the Swiss for foreign exchange to finance the Reich's war effort. The rest probably ended up lining assorted SS pockets.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  62. Re:30%? by felipekk · · Score: 1

    All are closely monitored by cameras, and like 3rd and 4th edition, electrum pieces are not accepted.

    WTF does this mean?

  63. Re:30%? by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You should see how well this business model works with drugs!

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  64. Re:30%? by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 1

    And when you try to sell the gold (coins or bullion) you've once bought at 20% markup there'll always be an excuse why you won't get the full price. Diamonds are even worse.

    For "old gold" in jewellery, even if proven 24kt, you'd be happy to fetch 60% of the spot price. A prime 1kt diamond with certificate you bought yesterday will sell for 50% today.

    That said, I need to fight an atavistic preference for a few stones of gold buried in my backyard over some random digits stored in a computer, were it not for the ongoing daily expenditures that are easier to pay by bank transfer.

    --
    I'm not a coward by any name.
  65. Re:30%? by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

    No clue wtf "like 3rd and 4th edition" means, but electrum can be explained.

    --
    $ make available
  66. You should try... by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    ...this. You can buy them in Switzerland all over the place. If will hurt your teeth less than gold although, being Swiss, the price is about the same.

    1. Re:You should try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If will hurt your teeth less than gold

      I don't know, if you ate enough it looks like your teeth would fall out either way.

  67. Nah... this is Germany we are talking about... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    They are just getting rid of all that excess dental gold from about 70 years ago.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  68. Re:30%? by realnrh · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's a Dungeons and Dragons reference. Before 3rd and 4th editions, electrum pieces were a form of in-game currency, worth five silver pieces or half a gold piece if I recall correctly.

    --
    Long? What do you mean the signature at the bottom of every comment I post on Slashdot is too lo
  69. Re:30%? by mrjb · · Score: 1

    Can I interest you in an individual copy of my book then? At a markup, of course.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  70. See? There lies your problem! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    You are still bogged down in 20th century way of thinking.
    You need to think of the future. Namely - time travel.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  71. Re:30%? by Niris · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...Get off my /., this is news for nerds. Every nerd should understand a basic D&D reference :\

  72. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    If you stole someones credit card I would think it would come in handy. It is better then a sack full of canybars.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  73. Re:30%? by ZombieBite · · Score: 1

    It's a Dungeons & Dragons reference.

  74. 30% markup not that outrageous ... by triclipse · · Score: 1
    A 30% markup is a little high, but not at all outrageous for taking physical possession of gold bullion. For example, the spot price of gold on the NY futures market as I post this is US$939/ounce. However, an American Buffalo one ounce gold coin will sell today on Ebay for $1200 - a 27% markup.

    There has been a substantial rise in the premium for taking physical possession of gold bullion rather than holding it in a pool or via ETF. Draw your own conclusions as to why ...

    --
    No Inflation Taxation without Representation
  75. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Insightful
    According to Ray Jastram's "The Golden Constant," the purchasing power of gold has remained relatively stable over the last 300 or so years.

    Relative to what? Suppose I was in London with ten sov'reigns bright in my pocket in the year 1709. What could I buy with them? Suppose now I am in London with ten sovereigns in 2009. What can I buy?

    One thing hasn't changed: London was and is a colossal trading centre, so if it exists and I have the money I can buy it. But everything else is completely different. What if I want a passage to Boston, in the colonies - and back again? Well, in 1709, my sovereigns might buy my passage, several weeks on a sailing ship in dubious conditions. Just. The cost of such a trip was many months' pay for a labourer - people would indenture themselves for years in exchange for their passage. What if I want the same in 2009? Why, I can get from London to Boston and back again the next day if I wish it, and I'll have ample change left over for shopping while I'm there.

    The same goes for almost everything I might seek to buy. What if I desire personal transport? How many horsepower can I get for ten sovereigns in 2009? A hundred or so? How many horsepower can I get in 1709? One or two? Or contrariwise: what if I would hire myself a servant? Ten sovereigns will get me a labourer for six months or so in 1709. In 2009, ten sovereigns for even two months' work would be a low wage.

    Economy and society and technology have changed so much: how do you compare the value of those sovereigns across the centuries?

    Oh, of course: some things don't change so much. Always there is demand for beer, and beer changes little enough. When I go into an alehouse, and order whiskeys and wines of the best, what can I have? Well, a pint of London porter was 3d a quart, or a penny and a half for a pint, or 160 pints for a sovereign (this being back when a sovereign really was worth a pound, not just having that nominal face value). Nowadays, a sovereign sells from the Royal Mint for £200, and a pint of porter - Dublin porter more likely nowadays - is something like £3. That's 67 pints for a sovereign.

    So to my mind, where it really counts, on a London street buying beer, the value of that sovereign has fallen substantially in the three centuries gone by.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  76. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by fermion · · Score: 1
    It is for the unsophisticated investor. It is like $50 for a gold coin. It is cool, it is something one can keep at home, and it is a hedge against all the fear that has been instilled by the various changes going on around the world. From a purely rational view, it might seem irrational. OTOH, I see people spending $5 or $10 every week on lottery tickets. Ultimately I think that gold might be the better investment, even if the purchase price is high. And it is not such a markup. If one were to buy gold jewelry, the only other way that the average person has easy access to gold, it would cost at least twice that much.

    It is also helpful to remember the current fear factor it great, and we are living in times when people will pay anything just to feel a little safer. For instance guns and ammunition sales are skyrocketing, even though there is only so much one can use. A friend of mine sold a gun for twice of what it would fetched a year ago, to a guy who already had many guns. There is no logic to the inflation, just scared people who have more money than sense.

    Which I mean literally, because if things come to pass as the fear mongers predict, gold and guns are not going to help that much. The food will not be sale, and will be surrounds by land mines and other high explosives, not pea shooters.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  77. Moneychangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A ten for 13 ones?

    When you exchange money there usually isn't a premium involved.

    1. Re:Moneychangers by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      This gold isn't being sold so much as a money piece as a curiosity. CoinStar machines, BTW, do charge a portion of your coinage to issue it back to you in paper bills. You could go to a bank and have it done for free, but when you're using a vending machine for convenience, expect to pay a premium.

  78. What's so special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For thousands of years gold has been recognized as money. It is only because our paper money has lasted a surprisingly long time that people don't readily recognize it as money. No paper money system has lasted longer than 100 years, and ours is about 80.

    1 ounce of Gold has always bought about 400 loaves of bread. You would think with all the advances in modern machinery this would make gold dirt cheap. It hasn't because it is so scarce (thinks tens of grams per tonne of dirt), and the process to extract it is very environmentally dangerous because it requires sodium cyanide.

    Because of its rarity, gold is one of the most efficiently stored and universally recognized forms of wealth you can have.

    1. Re:What's so special? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      the process to extract it is very environmentally dangerous because it requires sodium cyanide.
      Or(no pun intended) you could use mercury.
      Because of its rarity, gold is one of the most efficiently stored and universally recognized forms of wealth you can have.
      Less rarity, more chemical stability and difficulty in counterfeiting.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    2. Re:What's so special? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      You're on crack. In just the last 100 years the value of gold has fluctuated ~700%

    3. Re:What's so special? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      1 ounce of Gold has always bought about 400 loaves of bread

      Which means that it's worth a lot less now than it used to be. A poster above worked out that, over the last 300 years, gold has gone from buying 160 to 67 pints of beer in London. The cost of producing bread has been going down a lot since the agricultural revolution. Combine harvesters, wind, then steam and electric mills, and various other improvements have decreased the price of flour. If gold has lost its value at the same rate as fresh bread then it's a very poor investment.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:What's so special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it fluctuates compared to a paper currency. I don't think that was the point the OP was trying to make. Learn about fiat currency and get back to us when you have something intelligible to say.

    5. Re:What's so special? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      look at that link again. It fluctuates vs. the CPI (consumer price index). That's a measure of purchasing power. In other words, it's directly proportional to the gold to bread ratio.

  79. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by merreborn · · Score: 1

    ...this will be a boon for... money launderers

    Shit. If I were a petty thief with a freshly-lifted wallet, one of these things would be my first stop. Instantly convert someone's credit/debit cards into gold, which can be melted down to remove any identifying marks, at a 70%+ rate of return?

    It's a money launderer's wet dream.

  80. Re:30%? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Right - because someone who reads a site on tech news because they're interested in tech has to also play Dungeons and Dragons? Are the two groups synonymous? If I see a group of people rolling dice can I go over and ask them to design the schema for my database?

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  81. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by WebHikerOriginal · · Score: 1

    Umm, am I the only one to see the obvious money-laundering possibilities here? Big brother tracks money, no-one tracks gold...30% is a steal

  82. Some guidance on ETFs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just for clarification: ETFs are "exchange-traded funds", which is effectively a bucket filled with X, where X is absolutely whatever, and each share is a proportionate ownership of the bucket. The shares are traded.*

    Now, for commodity ETFs, some actually have filled the bucket with physical gold, while others just have filled the bucket with a note saying "JP Morgan promises that this note has the value of lots of gold". Nothing can happen if the stock exchange or the administrator or the accounting or the custodian goes bust - however, in the latter case, if JP Morgan goes bust you own essentially zilch, while in the former case, you own a bucket full of gold.

    Needless to say, checking whether your ETF holds physical stock or a derivative based on the stock might be an idea. There should be little if any difference in fees.

    * The theory, which admittedly is crazily clever, is that the shares should always be valued according to what's in the bucket every second of the day, because you are able to get a bunch of shares and _trade them in_ for a proportionate amount of the bucket-content.

  83. Is Slashdot a celebration of ignorance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe this post got tagged as "insightful". Is Slashdot a celebration of ignorance?

    I could understand it as a good joke!

    The reason why precious metal has been used as a backing for money is that it's hard to get! To mine out only some grams of gold you need to dig out several tons of rock. This is a garantee that gold will always be an expensice and valualbe metal. If the price of gold skyrocket more gold would be mined but at a higher price since less profitalbe mines would be used. In Norway, my country of origin, we had very little gold since we had few/none colonies. Then we used silver to back our currency. But this was less succesfull hence silver is more common.

  84. Re:30%? by Ifni · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only if they are over 30.

    --

    Oh, was that my outside voice?

  85. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ATM fee? i only see them at festivals and other places normal ATMs are not available, does America really still have such things? LOL!

  86. Holy shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    this is funny. Keep it going...

  87. problem of selling by tengwar · · Score: 1

    I looked at getting some gold a couple of years ago as a precaution when the banks started having problems. Two issues: firstly, it's difficult to sell unless it has never left the vault of a registered gold dealer. Because it's easily adulterated, it has to be re-assayed unless there is a chain of trust. Coins are a bit easier to sell, but sell at a heavy discount. Secondly, the price is wildly unstable, so that it's only suitable for speculation, not as a precautionary investment. IMHO the best precautionary investment is some dollars, yen, euros and pounds held as banknotes. Obviously you will lose some value to inflation, but that's low at the moment and if you view that as your "insurance" charge, it's not that expensive.

    1. Re:problem of selling by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Because it's easily adulterated,"
      Only if the person buying it is a complete idiot. Gold has some very specific proerties:
      A) It weighs twice that of lead. SO weight is a key issues.
      Ahh, but you could use tungstan!
      B) gold can be dented with a finger nail.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:problem of selling by tengwar · · Score: 1

      And checking the density is part of what they do to assay it. Look, check it for yourself: if you want to sell a gold bar, it either has to have been in controlled storage (i.e. you can't have kept it yourself) or it needs to be re-assayed, which will cost you money. This isn't an argument about physics, I'm just telling you the way the trade works.

  88. But why? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    As one who has a wide streak of goldbug in me, I must ask the question: why? At 30% over market price who the hell would buy gold out of a vending machine? If you're the type who thinks inflation is going to stomping Europe so hard that 30% is an acceptable markup for gold, then you're not the type who's going to be buying gold out of a vending machine.

    Are gold dealers not allowed in Germany or something? Is it illegal to sell out of store fronts? Why the hell pay such a ridiculous markup for a commodity metal? It must be a European thing...

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  89. /. gold sentiment flashes buy signal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bearish sentiment in a lot of the comments on this article give me great confidence that gold (and hard assets in general) still have a long way to run. I'll be selling at huge profits by the time the average /.er figures it out, which is probably a little ahead of the general population.

  90. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by lgw · · Score: 1

    Plenty of people are paying absurd markups (10%+ above spot) to get physical gold, which they'll end up selling back at an equally bad price (10%+ below spot) because they don't trust bits. Not a totally stupid position, but overpriced IMO.

    But gold isn't safe - it could easily fall by half (relative to inflation), and while in the long run it may return, as the man said "in the long run, you're dead".

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  91. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by FourthAge · · Score: 3, Informative

    One gram of this gold is actually worth less than the market price for one gram. When you take your gold bars out of a professional gold vault, they cease to be "Good Delivery", which means they lose value to other traders since their purity is not guaranteed to the same standard.

    Real gold traders always keep their gold in a vault, or move it between vaults. This is extremely expensive - but gold bars are expensive - $400k each! So it's not just a 30% markup - it's even worse than that. Confidence trick.

    --
    The tao of democracy: the government you can vote for is not the real government.
  92. Re:30%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right - because someone who reads a site on tech news because they're interested in tech has to also play Dungeons and Dragons? Are the two groups synonymous? If I see a group of people rolling dice can I go over and ask them to design the schema for my database?

    This is a "News for Nerds", not an actual tech site.

  93. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by tmosley · · Score: 1

    That's what happens when you only have one bank (the Federal Reserve), even if it has thousands of different names...

  94. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by geekoid · · Score: 1

    and the gold bubble in the 80's

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  95. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by geekoid · · Score: 1

    end.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  96. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by geekoid · · Score: 1

    sure it is.
    Clearly it's not at the beginning becasue ti has risen sharply.
    Economic indicators are showing an improvement, and the dollar is gaining value, but secondary indicators are still weak.
    So we are just coming over the hump.
    We are at the beginning of the end.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  97. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by geekoid · · Score: 1

    lets ee:
    Privacy nuts: transactions are recorded, so they are out
    The very rich: way too financial savy for buy gold at 30%
    Money laundered: the transactions are recorded and this just means they will have to launder gold.

    I don't' know German tax law, but isn't the money they are using to buy gold alread taxed? Wouldn't converting ti back create another point of taxation?

    My impressions of German are that they are reasonable smart, ahve hot women, and over value their beer.

    You heard me.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  98. Where do you even sell gold? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

    Seriously?

    I know of no stores that will accept gold as payment (unless it's in official currency, and then it's just cash anyway). I haven't asked around, but I also suspect that my local bank would be very recluctant to cash it for me. I certainly wouldn't expect any random bank to do it for me.

    We don't have such around here, but would pawnbrokers even give you close to a decent deal on gold? I.e. if you're paying a 30% markup on buying and then paying a 30% markup on sellng, you'd end up with 49% of the original cash value, so why even bother?

  99. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

    Gold is not consumed, and provides no use to most people other than as an investment.

    Water is something that is consumed, quite regularly.

    Additionally, the price of water bottle is $1-$3 (depending on your location). The amount of gold that could be purchased for the same quantity of money is minuscule.

    Therefore, I declare your analogy inept. Try comparing against cars next time.

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  100. Re:30%? by True+Vox · · Score: 1

    I don't know where I got it into my head, but I remember electrum being worth between a gold piece and a platinum piece. You're likely right (it's been a while for me), but I do wonder why that relationship sticks in my head.

    --
    "Gratuitous complexity is akin to chaos" - True Vox
  101. Re:30%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll stick to selling grass to a small circle of people.

    8 oz = $162.50/oz
    1 oz = $200/oz
    0.5oz = $225/oz
    0.25oz = $240/oz
    0.125oz = $320/oz
    1 gram = $420/oz

    Markup is much better and the initial cost is much more reasonable.
    Plus, repeat customers and no need to go "make sales". I'm not some punk on the street asking you if you want any weed.
    It may not be NYC pricing (goddamn you guys get raped down there), but up here in Toronto but it's plenty for me. Almost Zero risk and I get to smoke for free.

    The best part? Even if I get caught with a half pound while I'm driving it home - the chances of me actually seeing the inside of a jail cell are slim-to-none. Now, if I had that half pound weighed up in 1/4oz bags, then that's pretty much guaranteed trafficking. (guess what? chances are still good that I probably won't see any jailtime at all)

    "We stand on guard for thee", indeed. How can I not love it up here?

  102. Actually, this is targeted at illegal immigrants by gregorio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nuff said.

  103. Re:30%? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey Steve, I was gonna call you later. Can you hook me up for the weekend?

  104. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by wasabu · · Score: 1

    You're surprised that retailers have a profit margin over the manufacturers price? I think you're just bewildered that people might even want to own gold. You have a lot to learn my son ;] In actuality, the paper money you trust is 'marked-up' constantly and behind your back. The value of the US dollar has lost more than 90% of it's value in the last 100 years. How?... It's called monetary inflation, the greatest secret tax ever conceived. Government deliberately prints more money than the GDP justifies and waters down that paper in your pocket and in the bank. You think 5% depositor's interest is making you money? Think again. See the *real* inflation at http://www.shadowstats.com/ and see that you are earning *negative* interest. ie. You are being robbed. Gold maintains it's purchasing power for a number of reasons, paper money does not. Learn about gold, and how invariably ALL paper money becomes an elite tool to steal from the middle class, over a long period of time. We are very close to the inevitable collapse now. If you don't think it's inevitable, read history. All paper money collapses, it's just a matter of time. You think it's different this time? How? Has greed and corruption been bred out of the human race?

  105. Eats your money by langelgjm · · Score: 4, Funny

    I also can't decide if it'd be worse to have the machine eat your $100,000, or return it to you in quarters.

    --
    "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  106. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by wasabu · · Score: 1

    The key concept to understand is 'value'. The question has to be asked, "value in terms of doing what?". The most obvious answer is "to buy stuff". Gold historically maintains it's purchasing power in relation to paper currencies. What you see is when the Dollar drops, gold goes up. What's really happening is not that gold is worth more, it's in fact just maintaining it's purchasing power, whereas the dollar is losing it's purchasing power.

  107. Monitored by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    All are closely monitored by cameras

    So they'll get a good picture of the thief as he makes off with their gold. Yeah, that will stop them.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  108. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by nsheppar · · Score: 1

    gold doesn't rot

    Neither does most junk food.

    --
    Correctness matters. Mercy matters more.
  109. Ceiling at $980 by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One current problem with gold is the lid at $980/oz. Every time the market touches that trigger someone big is coming in and sell sell selling until they drive it back to near $880. Don't know who, but they must have a pretty good pile of the stuff at the moment to have kept this up this long.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Ceiling at $980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's a lot of conspiracy theories out there about that being driven and/or backed by central banks. one commentator i read refers to the "NGM" (nice government men) whenever gold makes another obvious bounce off a resistance level.

      there's also some questions as to whether certain players are going naked-short gold to keep the price down, and getting covered by central banks when necessary.

    2. Re:Ceiling at $980 by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      No conspiracy; just good old-fashioned self-interest. If gold prices rise precipitously, this signals everyone that the dollar is about to plummet, and a likely result is a very immediate and disorderly (rather than calm and planned) flight away from the dollar and all dollar-denominated assets. This potentially leaves the major holders of such assets - the BRIC countries and oil exporters in particular - in a very, very deep hole. So to the extent possible their central banks do try to stabilize the gold price. Ours does as well, for obvious reasons. This is well-known in gold markets, and it is a temporary phenomenon. Gold is, always has been and probably always will be, for reasons explained by other posters, the money of last resort. When the dollar fails, which it will, gold will be the only safe haven, and it will have to rise in dollar terms for two reasons: the fall of the dollar itself (main reason), plus greatly increasing demand (secondary reason). But while the price ceiling lasts, it represents an amazing buying opportunity that almost certainly won't be repeated during the next few lifetimes.

      Disclaimer: like all people who understand economic history and our current place in it, I'm a goldbug.

    3. Re:Ceiling at $980 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's the alchemists guild. They sell via various fronts, for obvious reasons.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  110. germany? go figure... by The_Rook · · Score: 1
    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  111. Overlooking the allomantic value? by Oponox · · Score: 1

    After all, electrum is poor man's atium.

  112. Re: Copper is king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So...When Ryan Crowder and the trader come to town will you be trading for firearms or books?

  113. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you're dollar isn't worth that much gold anymore it's more in the range of $1-$7

  114. Re:30%? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Now all you need is a smelter, minting facility, and a distribution model and you're ready to start making some easy money.

    Wasn't that what Goldmember tried to do?

    --
    bickerdyke
  115. Nice ... by garry_g · · Score: 1

    ... but I only use my Gold to store and trade the Latinum inside ... so much easier to handle than the eye-dropper ...

  116. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by mykdavies · · Score: 1

    Damn, I wish I had mod points today; this is so nicely written.

    --
    The world has changed and we all have become metal men.
  117. There's no "probability" to it. by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    "but still a very low probability event"

    Why do people say things like this. There isn't a probability associated with it at all, it is completely predictable, as were the last two bubbles. If global political leadership keeps doing what they've been doing, and people keep listening to them, a global economic collapse is a certainty. You simply can't expend resources continually without regard for where they are coming from and what you are using them for. Sooner or later, the economy will become so bogged down and inefficient that production will fall below demand. Since life relies on continued growth (or at least sustainability) to continue functioning, it will then collapse in on itself and shrink to the point where it is sustainable.

    It's just like when people say that the current "economic climate" was unlikely. People pouring money into a housing bubble is pretty damed certain to cause a market correction. I don't know why people say it was unexpected. The same with the .com crash. Is it really so hard to understand that money has to come from somewhere, and if it doesn't produce anything, it will eventually run out. It's common sense.

  118. Diamonds? Are you serious? by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 1


    Diamonds ?
    You do know diamonds are absolutely worthless don't you?
    http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/198202/diamond

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  119. Faaaake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is a fake, there's no such thing here ....

  120. Gold is a STORE OF VALUE by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    If you don't have any value to store then you don't need gold.

    If however, you do, then well, what're you going to do with e.g. 100,000 dollars worth of dog food (~300,000 cans)? You can't carry it, you can't move it, what're you going to trade it for? 100,000 dollars worth of ammo?

    You'd pretty much have to hang around it and hope that someone isn't hungry enough to take it away from you.

    100,000 dollars worth of dog food: ~300,000 cans
    100,000 dollars worth of ammo: 200,000 shotgun cartridges
    100,000 dollars worth of gas: 30,000 gallons (110,000 litres)
    100,000 dollars worth of bottled water (evian or bon aqua?): no clue, but hundreds of thousands of litres.

    On the other hand, $100,000 in gold is only 100 coins.

    So... With gold, I can have all the dogfood I can carry. All the ammo I can carry. All the gas I can carry. All the water I can carry and still store a shit load of value in a small easily concealed package which can be traded bit by bit for something else later.

    Get it?
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Gold is a STORE OF VALUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... With gold, I can have all the dogfood I can carry.

      Nope. You can have all the dogfood that is a) available and b) people are willing to trade.

      If either variable is zero you've got nothing but some pretty shiny stuff.

  121. Much better deal at money exchange by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not sure about Germany or other parts of the world, but in Poland, many (most?) standard money exchange points buy and sell "gold junk", with about +/- 15% markup on the market price (the difference between their buy/sell price is around 30%, market price somewhere in the middle).

    The interesting part is that this "gold junk" is usually in form of perfectly good jewelry - various gold chains, rings etc - and with a much higher actual jewelry value. So you can ask them to show what golden items they got, find something that is pretty, undamaged and you like it, and ask to have it weighted for you - you buy a quality jewelry item for price of junk. If you're lucky and knowledgeable, you may find a very valuable antique even, worth many times its weight in gold.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  122. US Gold coins by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    How do US gold coins stand in the gold market? If you buy it directly from the gov, you get the coin and a box and certificate. If you keep that intact does that protect the investment into the coin?

    I am wondering about this because have gold securities is nice until the communication systems go down, so a little on-hand product would be nice.

    Same question about silver coins.

    Yeah, I'm a little paranoid.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  123. One point you all should know: by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    If you had bought gold, and then ran on a local gold-based economy only, before the "crisis", you would now be able to buy six times more with it, than before. Or in other words: The "crisis" would not even have touched you.

    The rule to avoid them fucking you up is simple: Don't use their money. At all.

    I am in the process of developing an MMO. And the in-game currency will be gold-based. Meaning you can legally exchange it to other "real-world" currencies. And get gold for it.
    They will not be called "credits", because a credit-based currency/economy is a major crime.
    Maybe this will help get people started in becoming independent from that system.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  124. A clarification from someone who is kinda involved by RichiH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Disclaimer: I work at the ISP which is handling this from the IT pov.

    TFA is wrong. While the gold is obviously more expensive than what TG buys it at, it is still cheaper than what you, as an end-user, pay for actual physical gold.
    Bypassing large resellers and banks, both the online shop at http://gold-super-markt.de/ and the vending machines are cheaper than your local bank or jeweler. I am not saying that everyone should rush to buy gold, but if you plan to do so anyway, there is now a discount outlet.

  125. USian fears by oboeaaron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think it's anger, I think it's fear. [snip] Even before our strict gun laws very few people owned hand guns, I can't imagine living in a country where fear of your fellow countrymen is the norm.

    Speaking as a USian, I think it is overstating the case to assert that "fear of [our] countrymen is the norm" (if that is indeed your implication). Although I can certainly see where you would get that idea from all of the wingnut apocalyptic talk around here. I think that the primary motivation for preserving and exercising the right to keep and bear arms is to keep those in power just a little off-balance. At least, that was the original idea. Whether that is a realistic expectation given the federal government's access to modern military weaponry is another question.

    Anyway, it is definitely not the case that most people walk down most streets in the US worried about getting their caps peeled by Their Fellow Americans. Some people, and some streets, yes, but not the vast majority.

    Yeah, I know, Off Topic, No True Scotsman, Citation Needed, blah blah blah . . .

    --
    Journey onward.
  126. Re:30%? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

    If you start with high purity gold, you could easily divide it with a balance, crucible, and propane torch.

    The distribution model is a little tougher, but isn't that what the internet is for?

  127. Re:30%? by infolation · · Score: 1

    ebay could be your distribution model

    Gold Bar 32.15oz $33,999.00 = $1057.51/oz

  128. Re:Im sorry - norway never had a wild west! by MrSaxonite · · Score: 1

    lol, all those western gun slinger movies came from carson city, nevada... where many things are still done the same way as before...

  129. Yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like with you, we have ATMs both with and without. It usually depends upon the individual bank. For mine (as an example), I don't pay the fee when I use an ATM with my bank's logo. Some banks have agreements between each other to avoid the ATM fee (for customers of Bank A at Bank B's machines and vice versa). If I use another bank's ATM, I'll usually pay $3-5 as a convenience fee for the 2nd bank to make the transfer of funds from my bank account to their system and into cash.

    Although I think you don't really care and were simply looking for a reason to bash America (based upon your 'LOL' remark).

  130. Re:30%? by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

    Well the 20% would be less if more people wanted 1g wafers. The means for providing them would become more efficient. In fact anything over ~10% markup seems to be premium being charged for the novelty, and convenience. People who go to these vending machines probably wouldn't have gone through the hassle of seeking out the same thing though other channels. And the product likely has the company name, purity and weight of the gold stampped onto it. It's a (privately minted) coin. It makes sense to accept this coin as being what it purports to be because it's kind of hard to fake. It looks like gold, it's heavy like gold, and it has been manufactured to appear to be gold of a certain purity and weight. Someone could go through the trouble to fake this, but it wouldn't be trivial. And they would have to be willing to commit a crime (fraud) to do so. So if someone tried to pay me with 50 bucks worth of gold minted into a coin, then I'd likely accept it as readily as I would a $50.00 bill, especially if I'd seen such a coin before, and were familiar with the vending machines. I would certainly do so if it were possible to put coins back into the vending machines and get credits for currency deposited on my debit card. Vending machines already verify that money is real, why couldn't they verify the goldness of coins snapping a picture of you and recording your name ( on your debit card ) to prevent money laundering. The question is whether the premium attached to holding gold should also be credited to the gold depositor valued in currency, or remain with the operators of the vending machines. 1 gram of gold coins should be worth more than 1 gram of gold. The machines could/should offer the service of verification for free. You insert a coin, and the machine tells you if it's genuine and it's true weight. The operators of the machines might choose to keep the premium as a way to make money. This would discourage people from depositing gold at all, and keep it in circulation, increasing it's appeal as it became more ordinary for people to use. Because they charge a high premium they concentrate not on having convenient machines all around, but on selling the gold coins. Maybe national governments could get in on the game, as they have recognizable stamps to put on coins already. What if the US for instance minted 1 dollar gold coins containing say 1/9 oz of gold charging the spot price of ~ $100.00 for each coin plus whatever minting premium the market would bear. The coins should have the denomination ( really used here as more of a trademark ) and also the more important purity and weight of the gold, as well as LEGAL TENDER. They would be legal tender valued at $1.00 but only an idiot would give one up for a dollars worth of goods.

    --
    ...
  131. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    If the grandparent knew which bit of the bubble we were in, he would be buying or selling gold to take advantage of the massive returns you can get from going in the opposite direction to the rest of the market during a bubble, not telling everyone else. It relatively easy to tell that you are after the start of a bubble, or after the end, but anywhere from the beginning to just before the end looks quite similar.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  132. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    OTOH, I see people spending $5 or $10 every week on lottery tickets

    Good analogy. Lotteries typically pay out something like 30% of their takings, so an investment in lottery tickets is likely to have a return of -70%. Buying gold at a 30% markup has an immediate return -23%. If the value of gold goes up a little, then it may become a profit or, at least, a smaller loss. If we are in a gold bubble then it seems more likely that it will go down, so the total loss is likely to be around 30-50%. Still a better investment than lottery tickets...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  133. What the... by JustJenFelice · · Score: 1

    So who, pray tell, wants to be toting around freakin' bricks of gold?! People get killed for their freakin' shoes, yet somebody thinks it's a good idea to carry around bricks of gold?

    And they're going to charge 30% more than current market value?!?

    I'm sorry, but this sounds like the most asinine idea ever.

    --
    [Insert pithy line of moxie here.]
  134. Forget Gold, invest in Bacon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My German teacher related a tale where the family sold a bureau worth a couple of grand (today's $USD) in the morning, and bought a pound of bacon with the cash that afternoon.

    Mmmmm! Bacon!

  135. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    What possibly could justify an individual purchasing gold at a 30% markup in small quantities?

    It's a "stupid tax," like the lottery. The people who pay it are taxed for being stupid.

  136. Re:The machines charge 30% MORE than trading price by CTachyon · · Score: 1

    One thing hasn't changed: London was and is a colossal trading centre, so if it exists and I have the money I can buy it. But everything else is completely different. What if I want a passage to Boston, in the colonies - and back again? Well, in 1709, my sovereigns might buy my passage, several weeks on a sailing ship in dubious conditions. Just. The cost of such a trip was many months' pay for a labourer - people would indenture themselves for years in exchange for their passage. What if I want the same in 2009? Why, I can get from London to Boston and back again the next day if I wish it, and I'll have ample change left over for shopping while I'm there.

    (Warning: obligatory Austrian-school-informed left-libertarian ramble ahead.)

    You've actually hit one of the key insights as to why the Chicago-school idea of using liquidity to maintain flat prices is a bad thing.

    In some industries, constant improvements in technology or specialization of labor lead to prices that fall rapidly year-over-year (because the increased efficiency allows the same goods/services to be produced/performed at less cost). In other industries, prices are stable because technology is mature or has temporarily plateaued. In yet other industries, prices rise because of unforeseen disruptions (example causes: droughts, shifts in climate, changing sociopolitical landscapes, and so on). Computers are a perfect example of a rapidly maturing technology: viz. Moore's Law. Beer is a good example of a mature technology, albeit one somewhat disrupted by increasing costs of doing business (example causes: shifts in global agricultural production toward corn, greater regulation of breweries and alcohol distributors, and so on). Overall, the general trend is dominated by technology and increased efficiency, allowing the same monetary value to purchase more value — or, on a broader scale, for the same resources to support a larger population.

    Put Friedman's followers in charge, though, and they'll try to "add liquidity" (print money) to counteract this general trend, and scream "deflation!" if they don't get their way. When one tries to use an artificial index like PPI or CPI, information is lost: any index is going to be an artificial subset of what people are actually buying, so it will be dominated by the bias of whatever industries were hand-picked for the index. The result is basically an information-free number: if it conveys any information at all, the information it conveys (to the extent that the index is representative of the entire economy) is a measure of how much more efficient the economy has become over time, with falling CPI/PPI numbers ("deflation") being better. But measure the same index in the context of an inflating currency, and use such an index as a bellweather for "managing inflation" (choosing whether or not to print money), and the whole system becomes a chaotic self-referential mess, with the last bits of biased-but-useful information squeezed out entirely. (And when I say "chaotic", I mean it in the same sense as the Three Body Problem of Newtonian gravity: a differential equation that references its own derivative, which is thus subject to highly unpredictable behavior — the occasional tidy-looking attractor hiding the fact that it's subject to rapid and volatile changes without prior warning.)

    --
    Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  137. 30% markup? is that all? by qralston · · Score: 1

    Here's a little exercise for you: calculate the markup on the soft drinks, candy bars, and chips in the vending machines in your place of work, versus what you'd pay for those same items if you bought a pack/case of them at the grocery store.

    I bet you'll find the markup far exceeds 30%.

    Why? Because the the business model of vending machines is to entice the consumer to pay a massive premium in order to have the product right now. It's all about enticing and encouraging the impulse buy. Thus, there's nothing unreasonable about what TG-Gold-Super-Markt is doing. Hell, for a vending machine, their markup is astoundingly low.

    Moreover, these gold vending machines have another advantage working for them, in that most people don't know where or how to buy precious metals. If I don't want to pay a 30% markup on that soft drink, I can go to the grocery store and buy a case for a far less odious premium per bottle/can. But if I want to purchase gold or silver in small quantities (because let's face it: most people aren't wealthy enough to be able to purchase them in large quantities), where would I go? How would I do it? In that light, a 30% markup for the convenience of having to research the answers to those questions myself might not seem like such a bad deal.

    If you anticipate widespread unrest and civil breakdown, you should be stockpiling lead, water, food, silver, and gold, in that order.

    If you don't necessarily think that society is about to come unglued, but you'd like to protect the government from surreptitiously stealing your wealth (by inflating the currency and thus devaluing the currency you're holding), buy silver and gold, in that order.

    (The Moneychanger has lots of useful information about buying gold and silver, and also offers a monthly allocation plan. The Northwest Territorial Mint sells gold and silver, and their bulk prices for silver rounds and bars are actually quite good (~8% over spot), because they mint them themselves. Finally, you can often find good deals on eBay, as long as your stick to common bullion coins with a low premium over spot, and purchase only from high-volume sellers with lots and lots of positive feedback.)

    --
    Your bank is insolvent.
    Taking Money Back