If you would like to continue down the path of dissent of the u.s. government and the powers that rule it (special interests [record companies...?]) is it not possible to see your voice as a risk to national security?
If I had $150,000 laying around that I could throw away I would use it to clone the morons that cloned their dog and then I would take my new clones and the originals and throw them off a cliff.
Use your money for something noble instead of rubbing it in the faces of have nots your rich pricks.
For all of you defending the rights of the sites that promote terrorism as a voice should go and offer your heads and necks to their swords. They should be shut down and silenced.
Give me a break. Linux integrates into a windows network much easier than a mac does considering Samba is incomplete on the mac. I just dont see it. Take a look at the length of time macs have been around, the length of time that windows have been around and then the length of time linux has been around. Which one proliferated faster? My guess is linux. My friggin grandfather called me up the other day to ask me a linux question, which tells me something.
PMs are over priced middle man monkeys. Personally wouldnt have any desire to be one. That aside rest assured than when your Project managers loose their job, and they will, that they will be unemployed for many months because the rest of the world does require project managers to not have their head in their collective asses during the interviews.
Last I looked in the newspaper for jobs I didnt run across any for Computer historian. I would say go to college and in your first year go as undecided because most likely you will realize that not everyonegets to do what they want and that it is more pheasible to pay off your student loans when you have a job. I wanted to be an artist so I became a programmer so that I would have money to buy food and paints.Got the point? The world doesnt give a shit what it is that you want to do.
The $ole i$$ue involve$ the ea$e of approachabiltiy by a $pecial intere$t group to a voter. It would be ea$ier for me if I were a lobbyi$t to go door to door and a$k people to vote for a particular candidate and offer monetary gain$ or gift$ in exchange, than it would be for me to do $o at the voting booth. Becau$e of thi$, corruption i$ more likely. The pro$pect of having true participation right$ in our government i$ overwhelming and one can only be hopeful; however, it is a pipe dream a$ thi$ government ha$nt been for the people $ince the day the green back wa$ i$$ued.
Who gives a flying Nuclear fuck? Do we really need more information other than it will level cities? We already know that the damn things work why waste more money on additional information?Just another fine example of stupid governments doing stupid things with tax payers money. Definitely a sad commentary on the future of a population that has already put humanity to shame with its insipid obsession of the WWF and Nascar.
No shit! How much information do we actually need on the devestation that a nuclear bomb can produce. Do we really need a supercomputer to study the effects? What difference does it really make? How about using the superstupidwasteoftimecomputer to solve a more relevant problem, of which I have no example, anyway get the point.Do we really need to have so much information of how a weapon works.
Not only will it limit the voting field it will allow for corruption. Digital signatures are not fool proof against a purchased vote. The democratic process has long been corrupted by special interest groups and their lobbyist. It is hard to get our congressmen to vote for what is right over what is profitable. With online voting and digital petitions the opportunity for corruption is easier. It would be absolutely fabulous if there was a way to vote on every issue thereby eliminating the need for congressmen and their infantile greedy needs; however, I dont see it happening.
I guess there is a fine line between what deserves privacy and what deserves attention. I am all for privacy; however, after seeing a rather disturbing mpeg at Stile of a young woman strapped to her chair and murdered at gun point, it is difficult for me to observe the right to anonymity. Maybe this mpeg was a captured police video or maybe it was something an individual digitized and sent in. Should the submitter of the video remain anonymous? I know he/she should but then again.....hmmm
Slashdot Mirror
If you would like to continue down the path of dissent of the u.s. government and the powers that rule it (special interests [record companies...?]) is it not possible to see your voice as a risk to national security?
If I had $150,000 laying around that I could throw away I would use it to clone the morons that cloned their dog and then I would take my new clones and the originals and throw them off a cliff.
Use your money for something noble instead of rubbing it in the faces of have nots your rich pricks.
For all of you defending the rights of the sites that promote terrorism as a voice should go and offer your heads and necks to their swords. They should be shut down and silenced.
Give me a break. Linux integrates into a windows network much easier than a mac does considering Samba is incomplete on the mac. I just dont see it. Take a look at the length of time macs have been around, the length of time that windows have been around and then the length of time linux has been around. Which one proliferated faster? My guess is linux. My friggin grandfather called me up the other day to ask me a linux question, which tells me something.
I bet it all has to do with the following phrase:
"How hard would it be to make this small change"
These movies have sucked the jedi pole. Lucas needed the money and knew he could draw on the success of the first set of movies.
they are the bomb.
NOTE TO FBI:
the phrase "they are the bomb" is slang for "they is the shiznit"
NOTE TO FBI:
"the shiznit" is not anthrax.
PMs are over priced middle man monkeys. Personally wouldnt have any desire to be one. That aside rest assured than when your Project managers loose their job, and they will, that they will be unemployed for many months because the rest of the world does require project managers to not have their head in their collective asses during the interviews.
Last I looked in the newspaper for jobs I didnt run across any for Computer historian. I would say go to college and in your first year go as undecided because most likely you will realize that not everyonegets to do what they want and that it is more pheasible to pay off your student loans when you have a job. I wanted to be an artist so I became a programmer so that I would have money to buy food and paints.Got the point? The world doesnt give a shit what it is that you want to do.
The $ole i$$ue involve$ the ea$e of approachabiltiy by a $pecial intere$t group to a voter. It would be ea$ier for me if I were a lobbyi$t to go door to door and a$k people to vote for a particular candidate and offer monetary gain$ or gift$ in exchange, than it would be for me to do $o at the voting booth. Becau$e of thi$, corruption i$ more likely. The pro$pect of having true participation right$ in our government i$ overwhelming and one can only be hopeful; however, it is a pipe dream a$ thi$ government ha$nt been for the people $ince the day the green back wa$ i$$ued.
Possible Explanation:
Fascination with WWF
Fascination with NASCAR
TV Babies doped on Ritalin
Possible Explanation on Why we even need a bomb in the first place:
Obsessive Nationalism
Might vs Right
Ethno-Egotism
Who gives a flying Nuclear fuck? Do we really need more information other than it will level cities? We already know that the damn things work why waste more money on additional information?Just another fine example of stupid governments doing stupid things with tax payers money. Definitely a sad commentary on the future of a population that has already put humanity to shame with its insipid obsession of the WWF and Nascar.
No shit! How much information do we actually need on the devestation that a nuclear bomb can produce. Do we really need a supercomputer to study the effects? What difference does it really make? How about using the superstupidwasteoftimecomputer to solve a more relevant problem, of which I have no example, anyway get the point.Do we really need to have so much information of how a weapon works.
Not only will it limit the voting field it will allow for corruption. Digital signatures are not fool proof against a purchased vote. The democratic process has long been corrupted by special interest groups and their lobbyist. It is hard to get our congressmen to vote for what is right over what is profitable. With online voting and digital petitions the opportunity for corruption is easier. It would be absolutely fabulous if there was a way to vote on every issue thereby eliminating the need for congressmen and their infantile greedy needs; however, I dont see it happening.
I guess there is a fine line between what deserves privacy and what deserves attention. I am all for privacy; however, after seeing a rather disturbing mpeg at Stile of a young woman strapped to her chair and murdered at gun point, it is difficult for me to observe the right to anonymity. Maybe this mpeg was a captured police video or maybe it was something an individual digitized and sent in. Should the submitter of the video remain anonymous? I know he/she should but then again.....hmmm