It's (generally) bloodless and unarmed, but the basics are all there.
2. Corporations are not armies.
Would it really be such a bad thing to view them as such?
3. Corporate imitations of military training are almost invariably done by and for spoiled brat MBA types who love to think of themselves as macho warriors, but wouldn't last five minutes humping a pack and a rifle.
So then have them go through the training as well. The top military had to go through it to get where they are, so why not the top corporate?
Nothing is preventing anyone from packaging all the GNU tools into a.apk and installer short of not giving a rat's ass. Won't you please give a rat's ass?
"Science" has a precise meaning; it's not something you can just bandy around whenever the hell you feel like it. Mixing two chemicals together isn't "science", it's "mixing two chemicals together". And if the results happen to break the law, then you just might get what's coming to you.
People who need food might not be able to afford genetically engineered crops once they're all that exists. And as always, the problem isn't producing food, it's getting it to the people that need it.
2. Corporations are not armies.
Would it really be such a bad thing to view them as such?
Yes, it would be such a bad thing. If you make living together in society a zero-sum conflict game, you get hell, not society.
You say that as though modern life isn't already a zero-sum game, both on the individual and on the societal level.
1. Business is not war.
It's (generally) bloodless and unarmed, but the basics are all there.
2. Corporations are not armies.
Would it really be such a bad thing to view them as such?
3. Corporate imitations of military training are almost invariably done by and for spoiled brat MBA types who love to think of themselves as macho warriors, but wouldn't last five minutes humping a pack and a rifle.
So then have them go through the training as well. The top military had to go through it to get where they are, so why not the top corporate?
So then they shouldn't have called Gnome 3 "Gnome". Just like Microsoft shouldn't have called Windows 8 "Windows".
Learning when and how to ask for help is part of getting along in society.
How long do you suppose Microsoft can hold out until Windows 9?
I guess cramming it down people's throats really *is* an effective way to gain marketshare...
Those are not skills for this summer, those are skills for several summers ago.
And this is Microsoft, where saying "it works" is often preferred to actually making it work.
Just because you support the latest technologies doesn't mean you support them *well*.
You know what's awesome? I don't care. That's awesome.
"Have", not "of".
DVD would be a step backwards. That's done with PXE these days.
Yes, as he threw a real power supply at it instead of using the crappiest USB adapter he could find.
Sure, but if you're going to throw the book at them, make sure you've highlighted all the relevant sections first.
Nothing is preventing anyone from packaging all the GNU tools into a .apk and installer short of not giving a rat's ass. Won't you please give a rat's ass?
The fact that you in turn save encrypted copies of their data.
A bomb is a bomb, regardless of what your gender, age, or skin color is.
"Science" has a precise meaning; it's not something you can just bandy around whenever the hell you feel like it. Mixing two chemicals together isn't "science", it's "mixing two chemicals together". And if the results happen to break the law, then you just might get what's coming to you.
It is selfish and full of shit! If you create a product or service that people use - then you do have a right to get money from it.
Unless there is a legal contract, written or otherwise, there is no such thing as a "right to compensation".
WTF? Of COURSE the creation of art (or anything) is dependent upon remuneration - or payment of some kind.
If you can't make a living doing it, you can't do it.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you probably didn't/won't get any remuneration for that post.
People who need food might not be able to afford genetically engineered crops once they're all that exists. And as always, the problem isn't producing food, it's getting it to the people that need it.
No one *needs* genetically-engineered crops, they simply result in a higher profit (and possibly various unknown health risks).
Non-LTS. But it's still shorter than other distributions.
No one offers GNOME 2 because it's effectively dead. MATE is the replacement.
And a little further down, MATE 1.6. Fixed.