But it already works that way. Self-appointed elitist assholes flood information channels with what they think should be consumed, and the masses in turn consume it. We simply need elitist assholes that have a different goal.
You're confusing "popular" with "good" or even "worth considering". Don't feel bad though; it's a very common mistake, right after "I didn't see that sign" and "I thought pulling out would be good enough".
Are you claiming that it's acceptable to impersonate a serial puppy murderer, but not someone that volunteers their time and money to save starving children in Elbonia?
However, there is little that CentOS or Oracle really bring to the table by rolling out their own distros.
CentOS helps keep RHEL "honest" to a certain degree. Could SL have filled that role had CentOS not existed? Possibly, but the customizations made could be seen as an impediment to that.
If you want to guarantee a system keeps operating and maintains data integrity when a single computer fails, you need at least another three computers that are still running with no failures. There is a mathematical proof for this.
I would like to see this proof. I am not doubting you, I am simply curious about the mathematics involved.
mechanism for communication between client and servers
I hope you meant remote clients and servers. Otherwise it's just X all over again, but slightly different. One thing Windows and OS X get right is that their GUI is based around local API calls.
Unfortunately if you give them the most advanced tools possible then they never actually *leave* the novice state since they're too used to their tools doing all the work for them.
Slashdot Mirror
But it already works that way. Self-appointed elitist assholes flood information channels with what they think should be consumed, and the masses in turn consume it. We simply need elitist assholes that have a different goal.
You're confusing "popular" with "good" or even "worth considering". Don't feel bad though; it's a very common mistake, right after "I didn't see that sign" and "I thought pulling out would be good enough".
Are you claiming that it's acceptable to impersonate a serial puppy murderer, but not someone that volunteers their time and money to save starving children in Elbonia?
Remove "rhgb" and "quiet" from the kernel boot line. Fixed.
Wow, it's almost like you didn't read TFA at all...
Xerox created a machine. Their involvement in creating the world ended pretty much there.
Personally, all this whining about the loss of a start menu is because you kids grew up in a point and click world.
Microsoft practically created that world. And now they've destroyed it.
And if that's not enough, there's the AOS kickstart.
Or use a software group, at least for the ones with yum.
A pair of filters with polarization aligned at right angles to each other will block over 99% of the laser light when placed in front of each other.
However, there is little that CentOS or Oracle really bring to the table by rolling out their own distros.
CentOS helps keep RHEL "honest" to a certain degree. Could SL have filled that role had CentOS not existed? Possibly, but the customizations made could be seen as an impediment to that.
If you want to guarantee a system keeps operating and maintains data integrity when a single computer fails, you need at least another three computers that are still running with no failures. There is a mathematical proof for this.
I would like to see this proof. I am not doubting you, I am simply curious about the mathematics involved.
So then what *could* impress you, given that almost everything is based on someone else's work?
In this case "hw is just off the shelf" means that the components are easily sourceable, not necessarily that the completed device already exists.
mechanism for communication between client and servers
I hope you meant remote clients and servers. Otherwise it's just X all over again, but slightly different. One thing Windows and OS X get right is that their GUI is based around local API calls.
See Figure 1.
Hurd... who knows.
It'll finally have USB 3.0 support.
Because Apple can do it better</facetious>.
...that even (supposedly) smart people can be stupid.
Fewer people willing to pay for enforced ignorance.
What, pulling your collecting asses out of the fire in the first place isn't "just compensation"?
And no one (sane) hates you for that. Fedora isn't a one-size-fits-all distro, nor do they ever want to be one.
Virtual nobody posts sensationalistic headline to grow mindshare, news at 11.
They charge for linking to them, duh.
Unfortunately if you give them the most advanced tools possible then they never actually *leave* the novice state since they're too used to their tools doing all the work for them.