Slashdot Mirror


User: Snaller

Snaller's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,862
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,862

  1. Re:An analysis on Bush Service Memos Questioned · · Score: 1

    he didn't disobey a direct order because there was no such order. Okay?

    Not that you can prove that.

  2. It was never safe to look at images! on Flaw in Microsoft JPEG Parsing · · Score: 1

    Don't you know you can go blind?!

  3. Re:Finally on 378 Terabytes Of Star Wars on 600 G5s · · Score: 1

    "The man spends his money on making the "film" process better. Look at what ILM has done for films since 1977. How about THX sound? Yeah, thank George Lucas for that. He'll also be one of the reasons why movies will eventually been shown at the theatres in digital form. At such time, it won't matter if you go to the theatre on opening night or two weeks later, the "film" will look the same. No "cigarette burns," vertical strip lines, or any other glaring issues with the projection will you ever deal with again."

    If he hadn't someone else would have. And the reaosn they do it is: TO MAKE MORE MONEY - and to save money (cheaper not having to make celluloid copies for instance)

  4. Ok what the fuck is going on! on Upcoming Firefly Movie Behind-the-Scenes Photos · · Score: 1

    Which idiot moderator keeps modding me flamebait! Idiot - you are abusing your damn position!"

    The message is
    they" where not precisely defined, that I remember. If it was Joss himself
    "It was joss. And as *i* recall, she does mention it on the DVD's"

    That's not fucking flamebait, that's damn fact! Moron!

  5. Re:No, mister moderator, it was insightfull on Pennsylvania Child Porn Act Overturned · · Score: 1

    And if you don't see that you should be allowed to moderate - damn stalker.

  6. Re:Animated childporn - no it was informative on Pennsylvania Child Porn Act Overturned · · Score: 1

    If you are that oversenstiv you oaf, you should be allowed to moderate!

  7. Re:Finally on 378 Terabytes Of Star Wars on 600 G5s · · Score: 1

    "If he hadn't someone else would have. And the reason they do it is: TO MAKE MORE MONEY - and to save money (cheaper not having to make celluloid copies for instance)"

    That's not true.


    Wow - you can tell what would have happened in alternate timelines. Can you tell the future as well? What's the lottery numbers next week?

  8. Re:Finally on 378 Terabytes Of Star Wars on 600 G5s · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "The man spends his money on making the "film" process better. Look at what ILM has done for films since 1977. How about THX sound? Yeah, thank George Lucas for that. He'll also be one of the reasons why movies will eventually been shown at the theatres in digital form. At such time, it won't matter if you go to the theatre on opening night or two weeks later, the "film" will look the same. No "cigarette burns," vertical strip lines, or any other glaring issues with the projection will you ever deal with again."

    If he hadn't someone else would have. And the reaosn they do it is: TO MAKE MORE MONEY - and to save money (cheaper not having to make celluloid copies for instance)

  9. Re:Forget the DVD's... on 378 Terabytes Of Star Wars on 600 G5s · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "English Subtitles (the kind burned into the image for alien speak)"

    How pathetic is that!

  10. Re:Ah on 378 Terabytes Of Star Wars on 600 G5s · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Of course. Release the DVDs now. Special edition DVDs next year. Limited Edition DVDs the year after that. Then redo the whole cycle again on high definition DVDs, making it so that people have to buy the trilogy six times, spending a couple hundred bucks."

    Such are the amoral evils of copyright. Vote against it each chance you get.

  11. So where is the torrrent? on 378 Terabytes Of Star Wars on 600 G5s · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm surprised nobody has asked this yet ;-)

  12. Re:Sci-fi? on Upcoming Firefly Movie Behind-the-Scenes Photos · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Spaceships, terraforming, and psychic powers

    Laser guns

    Flying cars

    Sonic rifles

    Space stations

    Cryogenic transport

    That funky soldering tape thingy

    Real time non-invasive 3D brain scan imaging
    etc.


    Hovering Islands (for the very rich)

    Hovering Chandeliers (for the slightly affluent)

    Digital paper

    Energy forcefields

    Organ smuggling (inside people)

  13. Re:Bah, where is the cute engineer girl??? on Upcoming Firefly Movie Behind-the-Scenes Photos · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    they" where not precisely defined, that I remember. If it was Joss himself

    It was joss. And as *i* recall, she does mention it on the DVD's

  14. She is right here! on Upcoming Firefly Movie Behind-the-Scenes Photos · · Score: 1

    Fans asked if they could interview her, and she said sure, so they whipped out ye olde shakycam:

    Jewel Interview

  15. Re:Hmmm on Upcoming Firefly Movie Behind-the-Scenes Photos · · Score: 1

    Duh - or is it a case of him using his own site to show the photos.

  16. Re:Animated childporn on Pennsylvania Child Porn Act Overturned · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Interesting - the most uptight country in the world that is legal - tsk tsk :)

    It isn't in a lot of european countries.

  17. No, mister moderator, it was insightfull on Pennsylvania Child Porn Act Overturned · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...Cat got your tongue? (something important seems to be missing from your comment ... like the body or the subject!)

  18. Re:The Lucas Problem on Star Wars TV Show, And An Unmade Trilogy · · Score: 1

    I'm certain that is the only reason Jar Jar Binks ever survived being edited out of Episode 1 is that no one would dare say to George, "Uh, George, you may not have realized it, but this character is nothing more than an offensive racial stereotype that will not go down well with anyone."

    I'm sure someone said that, and Lucas replied, quite correctly: Only Racists will see him that way.

  19. Naa, on Star Wars TV Show, And An Unmade Trilogy · · Score: 1

    If they are going to do a StarWars reality series, it should obviously be The Amazing Race.

    "And the roadblock is: Get a tooth from a sarlac"

  20. Re:Groundbreaking! on Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow · · Score: 1

    "The plot insults you? WTF?

    Its a pulp! "

    In the definitions for Pulp i've seen, it doesn't specify that it must be an incompetently written script with plotholes and stupid plot.

  21. Re:How about a plot too? on Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow · · Score: 1

    Lord of the Rings?

    In places dodgy CG - and a lame plot.

  22. No actually on Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow · · Score: 1

    is because it's hard.

    No actually that's not it. Its because they don't give a shit. Why spend money on a writer with talent, when you can still make a bundle from something scribbled down in haste by you, your friend and the janitor.

    They have standards for the quality of photography, not none for good story telling.

    Its not hard if you have talent. But it does become hard because most of the people with the money don't have talent and don't have time for those who do.

  23. Re:How about a plot too? -- Next year! on Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow · · Score: 1

    Why can't Hollywood make movies that have great special effects AND good plots?

    They can next year: In Joss Whedons Serenity

    (Note, it's not his fault there is flash on that there site ;)

  24. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials on Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow · · Score: 1

    If you can't tell her the truth, its time for a divorce.

  25. Re:I can think of another... on Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow · · Score: 1

    "I just can't get over how awful (visually) this film looks, based on the trailer."

    That's subjective - because i think it looks fantastic - it has enticed me solely based on that look.