Slashdot Mirror


Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

serutan writes "Tuesday night I attended a sneak preview of Kerry Conran's groundbreaking film, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow , courtesy of the Science Fiction Museum in Seattle. I was completely blown away. Below is my brief review of the movie and the event. No spoilers, if you have seen any of the clips available on the web." Read on for the rest.

Set in a mythic version of the late 1930s, this movie is a stunning tribute to classic sci-fi serials, comics and pulp magazines of that era. Starting with a reporter investigating the disappearances of top scientists, the story quickly becomes a nearly constant barrage of giant robots, aeroships, submarine planes, ray guns and retro technology on a grand scale. The plot, which hurtles across maps of the world Indiana Jones style, definitely take a back seat to the effects. The character interactions are all predictable. But all of that is consistent with the genre, and for me it didn't get in the way of enjoying the hell out of this movie.

What sets this film apart from others is that every scene was shot against a blue screen. Except for some hand props and the actors themselves, the whole thing was computer generated. We've certainly seen plenty of CG, going all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" in the 80s, but I've never seen anything done so stylishly or so well. Perhaps the hazy, murky look is perfectly suited to both the 1930s atmosphere and the current state of the art of CG. It works.

The packed screening was followed by a Q&A with director Conran, who turned out to be an impressively low-key, likable guy. He started working on the film about 10 years ago with a blue screen in his living room, wondering whether he could create an entire movie in his Mac. The first 6 minutes took him 2 years. Initially he made an animated version, which actors later used as a guide as they mimed their way through the live version. When Paramount got involved they insisted on big-name actors, so the theatrical release is actually version 3. Hopefully all three will make it onto the eventual DVD. Conran mentioned that for his next project he wants to tackle Edgar Rice Burroughs' epic John Carter series.

The presenter, a filmmaking friend of Conran's, closed the screening with a joke about Pete Townshend meeting Eric Clapton in a London bar and commiserating about some new kid named Hendrix, "who's gonna kick our asses." He imagined that Spielberg and Lucas might soon be having a similar conversation somewhere in California. I have to agree that it seems like a distinct possibility.

Thanks to serutan for this review!

571 comments

  1. Woo hoo! by coyote4til7 · · Score: 1

    Yeah for the little guy. Great to see he's made good with this.

    --

    the clock on the wall says 4 til 7
    1. Re:Woo hoo! by xplenumx · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah for the little guy.

      Don't they all start off as little guys?

    2. Re:Woo hoo! by sgant · · Score: 2, Funny

      The presenter, a filmmaking friend of Conran's, closed the screening with a joke about Pete Townshend meeting Eric Clapton in a London bar and commiserating about some new kid named Hendrix, "who's gonna kick our asses." He imagined that Spielberg and Lucas might soon be having a similar conversation somewhere in California.

      So in a couple of years Conran's going to die in a hotel room after a night of drinking?

      Well, the candle that burns twice as bright, burns out twice as fast...it's better to burn out, than to fade away...

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    3. Re:Woo hoo! by coyote4til7 · · Score: 1, Funny

      No.

      --

      the clock on the wall says 4 til 7
    4. Re:Woo hoo! by Reducer2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like a candle in the wind?

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    5. Re:Woo hoo! by JaxGator75 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'd be willing to bet about 1,000,000 geeks on the net can tell the same story, right up to the part where it worked and he'll be rich & famous...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    6. Re:Woo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was at the screening too. EVERYTHING HE SAYS IS TRUE! The movie is Awesome.

      Curiously, Conlan stated that there have been no licensing deals. Paramount has no idea what they have here.

    7. Re:Woo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never knowing, never caring, when the rain sets in?

    8. Re:Woo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I would have liked to have known you
      But I was just a kid

    9. Re:Woo hoo! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Happy Halloween, ladies!

      YAAAAH...YAAAAH...YAAAAHH...(tongue out)

      Nuns! No sense of humor!

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  2. Huh by MichaelDelving · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Anyone else have trouble viewing this article?

    1. Re:Huh by lothar97 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, I just made sure my eyes were looking at the computer monitor.

      --

    2. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA...you just made me get funny looks at work from laughing out loud.

    3. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Witty, but no, I meant for a period of about 30 seconds after I noticed it, the link (from the main page) resulted in an error. I'm posting anonymously because I don't have THAT much Karma to spare.

    4. Re:Huh by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

      For the record, is there a place to talk about such issues (a live /. forum or something), without having to post to random articles when these things happen? Then we could also see posts from /.'s admin team saying "Yeah, we know, this's waht's up, we're working on it." and so on.

      --
      Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  3. I can think of another... by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 4, Funny
    What sets this film apart from others is that every scene was shot against a blue screen.

    Pretty sure that Attack of the Clones was also shot entirely in front of a blue screen.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    1. Re:I can think of another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bzzzzzzzt! Incorrect. Wrong. There were location shots by a lake in Italy.

    2. Re:I can think of another... by Retric · · Score: 1

      No, think back to when they picked up the record none of that was CG / blue sreen work.

    3. Re:I can think of another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm pretty sure some of them were green.

    4. Re:I can think of another... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Attack of the Clones was also shot entirely in front of a blue screen."

      Funny.. the first thought that came to my mind was the word "blew."

    5. Re:I can think of another... by rwiedower · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That comment, however, was extremely funny!

    6. Re:I can think of another... by revscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, in the BSOD context, that was really funny. Too bad that's not what you intended. :)

    7. Re:I can think of another... by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 5, Funny

      Funny, I always thought they shot the background and poorly animated the actors.

      --
      I do security
    8. Re:I can think of another... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Nicely turned =)

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    9. Re:I can think of another... by BlewScreen · · Score: 4, Funny

      mine too :)

      -bs

      --
      That that is is not that that is not. That that is not is not that that is.
    10. Re:I can think of another... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too bad they didn't film it _behind_ a blue screen. At least the parts with Annakin.

    11. Re:I can think of another... by Cereal+Box · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What sets this film apart from others is that every scene was shot against a blue screen.

      And you can tell. Up until now, I didn't know it was entirely shot in front of a blue screen, but every time I saw the commercial the thing that struck me was just how obvious the blue screen effect is. I just can't get over how awful (visually) this film looks, based on the trailer.

    12. Re:I can think of another... by billimad · · Score: 1

      The first thought i had was - Cool, Windows for Movies.

    13. Re:I can think of another... by ePhil_One · · Score: 4, Funny
      And you can tell. Up until now, I didn't know it was entirely shot in front of a blue screen, but every time I saw the commercial the thing that struck me was just how obvious the blue screen effect is.

      Just think of it as an animated film and it will all go down better. Even the parts with live actors. :)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    14. Re:I can think of another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On all of these it's too bad they didn't shoot Jar Jar Binks BEHIND a blue screen. And in all senses of the word 'shoot'.

    15. Re:I can think of another... by gmuslera · · Score: 0

      Now most movies with CG effects are rendered with Linux, so the ones that have a lot of blue screens on the back are becoming rare.

    16. Re:I can think of another... by davidsyes · · Score: 0

      And, if anakin BLEW the clones in front of a blue screen in "Attack of the Clones" would they hear a "clack of the tones" as those bots drizzled and sizzled?

      What would be "shot" entirely in front of the blue screen? Cordon Bleu?

      The POWER of Blue...
      The blouer off poo...

      Not exactly the Spoonerism any credit card advertiser wants to hear...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    17. Re:I can think of another... by dresgarcia · · Score: 1

      He didn't say it was the first movie shot on the bluescreen, that still sets a movie apart from the norm.
      Most movies that incorporate digital effects these days use blue / green screens, the difference is that few are entirely shot against such a background, and for a lot of actors thats not easy to do.

    18. Re:I can think of another... by xmpcray · · Score: 1

      Attack of the Clones gave a whole new meaning to the phrase Blue Screen of Death

      --

      --
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer.
    19. Re:I can think of another... by goodhell · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too bad they didn't shoot some of the poor actors and animate the background.

    20. Re:I can think of another... by FudgePackinJesus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well then...

      The set designer for Tron must have been a genius.

    21. Re:I can think of another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always best to pay TWICE for a crap movie, huh? You get the DVD too?

    22. Re:I can think of another... by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Amazing what you can do with a dark room and some glow sticks.

    23. Re:I can think of another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it wasn't. Sorry.

    24. Re:I can think of another... by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah and what doesn't seem to set this apart from every movie that was shot entirely in front of blue screen is that it looks like it was done that way too... ugh.

    25. Re:I can think of another... by mindriot · · Score: 1

      Maybe in Soviet Russia.

      Please, forgive me...

    26. Re:I can think of another... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bzzzzzzzt! Incorrect. Wrong. There were location shots by a lake in Italy.

      But the reason that Anakin and Padme interacted so poorly must surely have been because the actors were filmed independently and then composited together!

    27. Re:I can think of another... by scottking · · Score: 1

      i am more or less sure that attack of the clones was shot with shit smeared all over the lens.

      --
      scott king
    28. Re:I can think of another... by jasmusic · · Score: 1

      Suit yourself. I watched it again and again for the sheer fun and pace of the story, not because of any positive relationship to my over-protected view of what Star Wars would be if I ruled the world and controlled George Lucas's mind.

    29. Re:I can think of another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent +1, Insane.

    30. Re:I can think of another... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "I just can't get over how awful (visually) this film looks, based on the trailer."

      That's subjective - because i think it looks fantastic - it has enticed me solely based on that look.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    31. Re:I can think of another... by Samhaine · · Score: 1

      Missing the point, methinks. It's supposed to look overly stylized.

    32. Re:I can think of another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, The Cheat! I didn't install that lightswitch so you could hold *FRICKIN RAVE PARTIES!*

  4. Can't wait to see this! by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just saw the trailer for this yesterday. I must have been hiding under some rock (or not reading /.) for the past several months, because I hadn't heard of the movie until my roommate told me about it yesterday. Looks very cool.

    1. Re:Can't wait to see this! by Country_hacker · · Score: 1

      The first time I saw the trailer was way back last September (?) before we saw RotK for the umpteenth time. My little brother and I have been waiting for it ever since, although we were dissapointed the June release date got bumped to September. Counting the days now, I'm even going to try to take the afternoon off from work to catch the first screening.

      --
      Never give any object more potential energy than you want it to have.
    2. Re:Can't wait to see this! by bpland · · Score: 5, Informative
      The clip has been up on apple.com for almost 3 months. Have a look if you want

      http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/skycaptain andtheworldoftomorrow/


    3. Re:Can't wait to see this! by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      How to download the movie instead of playing it in the browser:
      1. view source
      2. search for the _480.mov link. Let's call it $url
      3. $url =~ s/_480/_m480/
      4. wget $url
    4. Re:Can't wait to see this! by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Well, I was excited about the movie until I saw the trailer.

      That dialogue. Horrid. The acting - I've seen better from used car ads.

      I literally shuddered.

      Yes, it's pretty, but I'm afraid that I just can't afford the lobotomy I would need to enjoy the film.

  5. My Impressions from the Commercials by Enigma_Man · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the commercials about this movie, it looks incredibly cheesy, like an unwitting hollywood insult to the retro-future styling (not to mention their choice of an actress, bleh). It's good to hear otherwise.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It does look cheesy, the commercials suck.

      From what I've read, I want to see this film, but it hasn't sparked even the remotest interest for, say, my kids - who are the ones they want, to turn this into the Star Wars of their generation.

      Angelina Jolie is IMO overrated and sucktastic. The commercials feature her fat lips so prominently it looks like another wretched Tomb Raider promo.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by PhaxMohdem · · Score: 1

      Choice of actresses.. Bleh?! This is the same person that starred in Hackers! You remember that hollywood blockbuster nominated for all acting related oscars. Now that was quality. I guess you don't know a good actress when you see one. ;)

      --

      The Property of One's : "The Oneitude is directly proportional to the Colditude of the one." - S.B.

    3. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      You must be referring to Paltrow, as this specimen of perfection is NEVER the wrong choice.

    4. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What's wrong with Ewan McGregor? OK, so she needs a shave, but otherwise... ;)

    5. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by scowling · · Score: 5, Funny

      Angelina Jolie. Sucktastic. Fat lips.

      I'll be in my bunk.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    6. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by xTown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what I thought too, except for the "unwitting" part. I'd like to see a non-campy movie that really DOES pay homage to pulps. The pulps themselves were not campy, nudge-nudge wink-wink affairs, so there's no reason that movies like "Doc Savage" and "The Phantom" et al. need to be. Of course, I'm just going by the trailers and commercials for "Sky Captain," like you are.

      I also don't like that waxy white "CGI" sheen that everything has. The latest Harry Potter movie had that, too. Ick.

    7. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reminds me quite a bit of Fallout. Game looked incredibly silly, but was one of the best RPG's ever (and it was also a '1940s post appocalyptic world' genre).

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    8. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad she had to go and inject about 2 kilos of butt-cheese into her upper lip since that picture was taken.

    9. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by tgd · · Score: 1

      Aparently her part is very minor in it... just above a cameo.

    10. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by colenski · · Score: 1

      +1 funny for the Firefly reference. Just saw that episode last week on DVD.

    11. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's got to be a better picture of her. Those lips look like tree bark.

    12. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, best Friday post :D I was thinking the same thing. The only thing she's good for is eye-candy.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    13. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      After that preview my wife hit me with the ultimate in trick questions. She said, "I'd like to look more like her, would you mind implants if I got my breasts to look like hers?" I thought it was best just to pretend I didn't hear her.

    14. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      Hooray! The commercials make it out like she is infact "Sky Captain" and/or the main character, which would've been the poo..

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    15. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Notice how that was worded. "Would you mind." That's such a baited question. "No, I wouldn't mind" and "Yes, I would mind" can *both* be changed into "Your breasts are small and saggy, saddlebags." (I'm not saying anything about your wife's breasts, just how someone could interpret the question.)

      You made the right call.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    16. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, it looks horrible in the commercials. One shot of Jolie has the standard local weatherman in front of his weathermap quality. The rest of it looks like it was done on a video toaster in 1993. I'd never go see that movie.

    17. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless she will actually be sucking I get tired of her playing the same character over and over again.

      Let me know if she is going to be naked most of the time, then it'll make seeing her character worthwile.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    18. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by NoData · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They really missed the boat on the commercials. They employed that same overused, overwrought, narrator that menacingly voices every action movie commercial in his baritone growl (you know the one). It just really takes away from the mythic period-piece nature of the movie. It's kind of confusing for the average viewer...you hae the standard sci-fi or action voice, but an entirely different look and feel. There's an expectation violation. They should have either had no voice-over (like the downloadable trailer), or made the narration more period appropriate--like a "Newsreel" type voice over.

    19. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here question is a field of landmines. Your only hope of a right answer is, "Honey you are the most gorgeous woman on the planet, I wouldn't change a thing". Any other answer and you are pretty much doomed. Of course by ignoring her you made her think you were fantasizing about Jolie.

    20. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by JaxGator75 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Listen and learn, boys...

      "I wouldn't change a thing..."

      /seriously turned off by fakes, lips or otherwise

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    21. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      Agreed. She's all skanked out now. She used to be hot back in Gia and Hackers, but she's really worn herself out since then...

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    22. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by cheezit · · Score: 1

      Prepare yourself for a world of adventure! From the filmmakers bedroom to the rental rack, with a thrilling nose-dive ride through the world of the multiplex! They said it couldn't be done---he couldn't remake the same movie three times---and they were right!

      --
      Premature optimization is the root of all evil
    23. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      but she's really worn herself out since then...

      actually, I think it was Billy Bob Thronton that wore her out.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    24. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try this one.:

      "Honey, *I* think you're perfect. But it's YOUR body, and if YOU think you'd want to change something, I'll still support you and think that you're perfect--just like I do when you cut your hair."

      (An optional "but, yeah, that'd be hot!" is only allowed for those of us with loving wives who have grown used to sarcastic comments.)

    25. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just say, "Yeah honey, I've always thought your tits were too small and saggy. I say you get a second job and fix them up nice. Get me a beer."

      See, it's like a lottery. The coolness of the remote possibility of success is worth the probability of losing, and having to sleep on the couch for a week.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    26. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by mbrod · · Score: 1

      I agree. I don't know if I can sit through any more of Angelina Jolie with a phony British accent. She is bad enough in her native tounge without that making it even worse.

    27. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Na.
      I'd go with "Why stop there? Lets make them freakin HUGE!"

    28. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course by ignoring her you made her think you were fantasizing about Jolie.
      And that would probably make her horny. Not good?

    29. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by LordPixie · · Score: 1

      I just say, "Yeah honey, I've always thought your tits were too small and saggy. I say you get a second job and fix them up nice. Get me a beer." See, it's like a lottery. The coolness of the remote possibility of success is worth the probability of losing, and having to sleep on the couch for a week.

      If your punishment for a comment like that is just a week on the couch, your wife is waaay too good for you.


      --LordPixie

    30. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by kimota · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you haven't seen "The Rocketeer," it may be as close to the pulps as you can hope for (well, there's always "Raiders of the Lost Ark"). Relatively non-campy in a way that "The Shadow" "Doc Savage," and "The Phantom" weren't (although the Phantom was played fairly straight, too, IIRC). If you *have* seen it, see it again--I can guarantee that it's been too long since you've gazed upon the beauteous Jennifer Connelly!

      --Kimota, who is almost as excited about seeing "Sky Captain" as he was at 13, when seeing trailers for Raiders....

      --
      Who moderates the meta-moderators?
    31. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Even better:

      "Here's the credit card hon...go to the Dr. Goodset and knock yourself out!"

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    32. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It all depends on her mood when you say it.

      Men are all confused by the "mysteries of women", when they're actually very easy to understand. From watching my wife, I've learned that she is basically a binary state machine: either she's pissed off at me, or she's not pissed off at me. If she's pissed off, well, then I can say whatever I want and she's still pissed off. No big deal.

      If she's not pissed off, then I know that if I say just about anything at all, I'll piss her off. So I just don't talk much when she's not pissed off. Of course, that pretty much pisses her off again, and, well, there you go.

      Posting anonymously to avoid the couch...

    33. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by bonkedproducer · · Score: 1

      Each time I see the trailer I think - Gee.. when was the last time I played "Crimson Skies" and why isn't Microsoft suing the shit out them?

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    34. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by feloneous+cat · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much up with the one my wife posed in our early years of marriage (men, you can NOT answer this one correctly... no, trust me on this!) "Do I look fat in this?"

      --
      IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
    35. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      (men, you can NOT answer this one correctly... no, trust me on this!) "Do I look fat in this?"

      I can answer it correctly. My wife is slim. If yours isn't, you blew it long before any married-life questions were asked.

      (Go ahead, mod me -1: Smug, I don't care!)

    36. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      She's got DSL and it ain't got nothing to do with high speed networking

    37. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I don't think I'd fuck that with your dick... :-/

      I personally don't understand women who are absolutely infatuated with Jolie... it just doesn't register in my male hetero brain....

      Anywho, back to your regularly scheduled wank-fest.

    38. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by macrom · · Score: 1

      The analogy that I read was : think Matt Damon in "Saving Private Ryan" where you sit around for 2 hours wondering where the hell Matt Damon is and why he was given first billing.

    39. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Ha! I accept all challenges!

      "Do I look fat in this?"

      the correct answer: "that dress is too small. Try [insert suggestion here]"

      If you cannot answer your wife's questions properly, one of you isn't doing their part in the marriage.

    40. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by thumper666 · · Score: 1

      I got asked something similar by my girl recently:

      "I'm thinking about getting a boob job. How big do you want 'em?"

      "C. I think that would suit your height well."

      "Cool. Not sure when I'd do it, just thought I'd ask."

      Then she decided that having bigger sweater puppies would interfere with her ability to ski Super-G. But I digress. :)

    41. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by nizo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Do I look fat in this?

      Some possible safe answers are:

      Take off your clothes so I can compare.

      What fat?

      Damn I think I left the oven on (run from the room and out the front door and don't ever come back).

    42. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by scowling · · Score: 1

      Booyah!

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    43. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Can you have your wife give my future wife a call? She seems like a good influence...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    44. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      (not to mention their choice of an actress, bleh)
      I know! What kind of idiot thought it would be a good idea to put two Oscar-winning actresses into a movie? Crazy, just crazy.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    45. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      I picked option 3 a few years ago and have been posting to /. from webcafes ever since.

      I recommend it to everyone.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    46. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by True+Grit · · Score: 1
      Angelina Jolie is IMO overrated and sucktastic


      Now I've seen everything, a geek with a standard of beauty set very high for the opposite sex.

      You do realize you are talking to guys who would accept anything feminine, with workable hardware roughly in the right places, even long after the warranty has expired? You are suggesting that profoundly sex-starved males should turn down a physically gorgeous woman because her lips are too large?!? Her lips?!? :)

      I don't know about the rest of these guys, but my minimum standard of beauty is so low, you can't even trip over it, and if AJ ended up a consolation prize in a game show, I'd still consider myself the luckiest geek alive.
    47. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you don't reply using words. you just go over, nuzzle your face between her breasts, and purr loudly. ;-)

    48. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "She said, "I'd like to look more like her, would you mind implants if I got my breasts to look like hers?""

      Three words: Duck and cover!

    49. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      So what you're saying is that women who aren't skinny don't deserve relationships.

      Is that what you're saying? You shallow fuck.

    50. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should have said. I don't like her breast, but your lips, those could definitly improve.
      Do you want to get implants for those?

    51. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Tom Hanks was given first billing in Saving Private Ryan.

    52. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Trackster · · Score: 1

      Yep, but that's where skillfulness is needed in wording the reply. If you do mind, just say "You look fine just as you are" followed by a list of problems that come with implants. If you'd don't mind or would like her to do it you could say "I think you look fine just as you are but if you really want to do it then its your decision."

    53. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Snaller · · Score: 1

      If you can't tell her the truth, its time for a divorce.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    54. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women who aren't skinny need to get off their lazy arses and exercise. I exercise, most other skinny people exercise too. Of course there are exceptions but if you look at the proportions of skinny people to fat people actually AT the gym, it's something like 10 to 1. Hmm, me no good at logic ...

    55. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Fallout. Game looked incredibly silly, but was one of the best RPG's ever (and it was also a '1940s post appocalyptic world' genre

      50's

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    56. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by xTown · · Score: 1

      Yeah, "The Rocketeer" was really good. Actually, the original comic was even better, because IIRC it implied, if not stated outright, that Doc Savage invented the Rocketeer's gear. I always liked that.

      And it's certainly been too long since we've seen Jennifer Connelly's real nose. :)

      Man...I totally forgot about that "Shadow" movie. That's another one I'd like to see played straight.

    57. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You're assuming there that body fat is necessarily unattractive. Some people are comfortable being fatter than others. It's only recently in even our culture's history that extreme thinness has been an ideal.

      Stop superimposing your personal preferences on the rest of the world.

    58. Re:My Impressions from the Commercials by Tassach · · Score: 1
      [I]f you look at the proportions of skinny people to fat people actually AT the gym, it's something like 10 to 1.
      Maybe that's because elitist stuck-up fuckwits like you make them feel unwelcome when they do try to go to the gym.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  6. looks good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    looks like a very interesting movie. Cant wait to check it out for myself..

  7. First intirely blue screen movie was.. by MrPrefect · · Score: 5, Informative

    called The Immortal you can find it on the net, pretty wierd but shot intirely infront of a blue screen

    1. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      It's actually still a question mark on which movie was first. Sky Captain, The Immortel (it's French... apparently the French don't have the letter "A"), and Sin City were all done this way. I was really surprised to hear Sin City was taking this same approach.

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    2. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Immortal ???

      Got a link?

    3. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by ENOENT · · Score: 5, Funny

      My first entirely blue screen experience was Windows 3.1.

      So there.

      --
      That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    4. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by crovira · · Score: 1

      Google finds me "Results 1 - 10 of about 145,000 for "The Immortal" movie." and all of these are wrong.

      The Immortal isn't enough to go on. Got a better search strategy?

      --
      MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    5. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "Blue's Big Musical." Of course, they might be thinking first wide-spread theatrical release. :)

      --
      --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
    7. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Decent movie, something of a mindfuck, although it leaves a lot of questions unanswered. I assume it'd make more sense if I had the background of the comic it is based on.

      It was going around the bittorrent sites a month or two ago, should still be around and is worth it for the effects alone.

    8. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by MrPrefect · · Score: 1

      alright for those of you who don't know where it is.. dont' know how to post links in here really since this is only the second message I've contributed.. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0314063/

    9. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      My first entirely blue screen was the moment I loaded Norton Utilities in DOS just before the dialog came up.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    10. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by ittaib · · Score: 0
      --
      Ittai
    11. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by ittaib · · Score: 0

      Sorry, that linked directly to the high bandwidth trailer. Main site (French) is http://immortel-lefilm.com/

      --
      Ittai
    12. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by monkeymonster · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...it's French... apparently the French don't have the letter "A"...


      That's because they live in "Frence", somewhere between "Spein" and "Germeny" (and they go skiing in the Elps)
    13. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by slipnslidemaster · · Score: 0

      There can be only one...

      --


      "What the hell is an aluminum falcon?"
    14. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by WreathOfBarbs · · Score: 1

      Whoah. I know that story. It was a serial in Heavy Metal Magazine back in the early 90's I think. Very cool, with awesome art.

    15. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      Not to be the boring pedantic geek here, but Windows 3.1 didn't have a blue screen, when it crashed you got a dos prompt or a screen that didn't do anything.

      Or the lovely "GPF".

    16. Re:First intirely blue screen movie was.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to remember the entire installer for DOS 6 was a blue screen..

  8. Kinda Reminded Me by The+Dobber · · Score: 5, Interesting


    of the PC / Xbox game "Crimson Skies" when I first saw the previews.

    1. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by tr33limbz · · Score: 1

      that is exactly what i thought. kinda funny that both were reworked several times, and had their release dates pushed back.

      --
      -end of post.
    2. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by qBeaks · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT. I've been trying to figure out if they are connected in someway.

    3. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      I love that game. It's one of the few flying games that gets it that fun is more important than realism. Sounds like this movie gets it too.

      TW

    4. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      And to a lesser extent, the Disney cartoon show "Tail Spin" which takes place in a similar setting, but is occupied by animals instead of humans. Tail Spin was always my favorite of all the afternoon Disney cartoons because of its creative setting.

    5. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Crimson Skies was originally a paper hex-map-with-figures kind of game.
      (And it was a lot of fun in that format too - the tactics of the game were that you had limited moves to pick from, your opponent had limited moves to pick from, and you both had to write your move down in secret before the two of you moved. So getting behind the other guy to shoot was largely a matter of second-guessing what your opponent is going to do, while simultaneously surprising him with what you do.)

      Great game - lots of fun. When the company sold the rights to the name to Microsoft so they could make a video game from it, the resulting video game was pretty cool too, and did an excellent job of mapping the theme into a video game and preserving the feel of the gameworld.

      But if you want to reference the theme of the interesting imaginary setting in which the game took place (which is what it sounds like you're doing), then the video game wasn't where that game from. The credit for the theme and the gameworld goes to the original game.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    6. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by Java+Pimp · · Score: 1

      When I first saw the previews it reminded me of Last Exile that was ran on TechTV a while back.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    7. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by Da+Twink+Daddy · · Score: 1

      ...which is based on the RPG of the same name produced by FASA before they went out of business.

      Part of the company (FASA Interactive) had long time associations with MS. When FASA went under this became FASA Studio. I believe a Crimson Skies game is also in the works.

    8. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Kinda reminded me of the TV series 'Stargate: SG-1' when I first saw the previews on apple.com/trailers/ .... Because they used the same theme music!

      I don't know if it's still the same, but I know it had the SG-1 music in the background (confirmed this with my roommate).

      Couldn't figure it out. Not only that, it was poorly cut SG-1 theme music (jumped all over the place, but not in time with the clips in the trailer).

      --Dan

    9. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was thinking "Crimson Skies" meets "Independance Day" and "Pearl Harbour". I love the Radebaugh style, and a genuinely stylish movie would be superb, but art deco jingoism's probably not going to do it for me.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    10. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to do you a favor and recommend you check out Castle in the Sky by Hayao Miyazaki - Last Exile borrowed a lot of elements from Miyazaki's classic film (though it was good in its own right). Castle in the Sky is one of the best animated films of all time, and I doubt Sky Captain can measure up to it.

      It's been released by Disney, and you can find it at most rental places. The english language track had a bad music job though, I suggest you watch it subbed...

    11. Re:Kinda Reminded Me by mink · · Score: 1

      For more games with high flying fun check out:
      Skygunner on the PS2 (we need a version on a more powerful console so we loose the slowdowns in some spots).
      Propeller Arena for the Dreamcast (never released, leaked to the underground). Great fun fast and good looking as well.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  9. Hey Great by jetkust · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see. 1. It's a Sci-Fi Movie. 2. It's not a sequal or a remake. And 3. It's not Star Trek!
    Wow, they should make more of these!

    1. Re:Hey Great by superultra · · Score: 5, Funny

      Right. Because original science fiction movies that aren't sequels, remakes, or Star Trek always do well at the theater.

    2. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right?

    3. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just ruined not only Sky Captain for me, but also every other movie Angelina Jolie ever made. Thanks a lot.

    4. Re:Hey Great by stratjakt · · Score: 0

      You just ruined not only Sky Captain for me, but also every other movie Angelina Jolie ever made. Thanks a lot

      Come now, surely Angelina had no small part in ruining them.

      With "her" thick swollen cock.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nahhh... I just spin it to mean that she's got MY dick.... in her mouth.....

      *aaahhhhh*

      Much better. ;)

    6. Re:Hey Great by kc0re · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I seem to remember a movie entitled "The Matrix" that was pretty good for it's time.

    7. Re:Hey Great by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're right! I'm going to run out and see Battlefield Earth as soon as I can!

    8. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based on #2, you don't like sequels. So why do you want them to make more of these?

    9. Re:Hey Great by currivan · · Score: 1

      4. It's not based on a video game. Of course, Event Horizon meets all these criteria too.

    10. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was glad to see this movie featured on the cover of the latest issue of Amazing Stories .

      And hey, look -- Amazing Stories is back from the dead once again! Geez, it's been a foundation of science fiction since 1924. Heck, the Hugo award is named for the guy who started Amazing. The current incarnation seems to be covering lots more stuff than just short stories -- comics, movies, video games and everything scifi. Coolness.

    11. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...Perhaps I've just come in touch with a part of my sexuality that I've never encountered before, but Angelina Jolie with a dick sounds both exciting and intriging.....

      I'm gonna be thinking about that possibility all day...

      After all, if she looked like Angelina Jolie, would you really care?

    12. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about doing well in theaters?

    13. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see. 1. It's a Sci-Fi Movie. 2. It's not a sequal or a remake. And 3. It's not Star Trek!
      Wow, they should make more of these!


      Yeah, let's hope they make a sequel!

      Oh wait...

    14. Re:Hey Great by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Better yet, it's not an action movie or a horror wrapped in a thin veneer of science fiction. That's even rarer.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    15. Re:Hey Great by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      But not my criterion. It was a cheesy horror movie posing as a science fiction movie.

      The premise was cool, which is why I saw it in the first place, but the execution was awful. After a while, I was just thinking "Would you all die already!?"

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    16. Re:Hey Great by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's not fair... a lot of them do very good. The ones that do, however, usually turn into the original that other movies are sequels of.

      But look at movies like, The Day the Earth Stood Still, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Planet of the Apes, Alien, Blade Runner, Minority Report, A.I.

      They're out there. Don't be a pessimist.

    17. Re:Hey Great by j1bb3rj4bb3r · · Score: 0

      Battlefield Earth is *not* Sci Fi. It's scientology propaganda thinly veiled as Sci Fi.

      Bah!

      "That's the problem with Santa Clara, too many vampires".
      "That's the problem with Los Angeles, too many scientologists"

      Oh wait... same thing.

      --
      *yawn*
    18. Re:Hey Great by djocyko · · Score: 1

      It ain't sci-fi if it documents truth, can it?

    19. Re:Hey Great by bmalnad · · Score: 1

      Me too. Then I'm going to go to church with Tom Cruise and John Travolta. Maybe they can loan me the extra money I need to get into heaven.

      --
      Free Scotland!
    20. Re:Hey Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who considers "2001: A Space Odyssey" to be worth watching is a fool, and should be ignored with extreme prejudice.

    21. Re:Hey Great by danieleran · · Score: 1

      Anyone who considers "AI" to be worth watching is a fool, and should be ignored with extreme prejudice.

  10. Groundbreaking? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Tuesday night I attended a sneak preview of Kerry Conran's groundbreaking film

    The plot, which hurtles across maps of the world Indiana Jones style, definitely take a back seat to the effects. The character interactions are all predictable. But all of that is consistent with the genre

    Is this a little contradictory? Special effects are not ground-breaking. Give me a movie with effects like these and a plot that doesn't insult me. Then, we can call it "groundbreaking."

    1. Re:Groundbreaking? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      It has a "league of extrordinary gentlemen" feel to it, and that was the vilest shitstain to hit celluloid in the history of film.

      I kept waiting for Dorian Grey to sodomize some young boys but he never did. (Who the hell writes him into their story as some sort of superhero?)

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Groundbreaking? by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Funny
      I kept waiting for Dorian Grey [sic] to sodomize some young boys but he never did.


      I must have the abridged version of "The Picture of Dorian Gray."

      -Peter
    3. Re:Groundbreaking? by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      "Groundbreaking" is such a horrible descriptor for works like this. Music, movies, etc are very rarely so new that they should even be considered "groundbreaking." Someone once said that good artists borrow, great artists steal. With that in mind, consider everything you like and enjoy in music, film, and the arts in general simply an improvement upon the thing before it. Tool isn't groundbreaking. They didn't invent anything new, but they did introduce millions to music with a time signature other than 4/4. There's a lot of instances where something that looks new and amazing is just something that was done before, but done differently, or with an improvement.

      "Groundbreaking" should only apply to construction jobs. Using it in the entertainment industry just creates too much of a potential to over-sell and over-hype what might probably be a really good thing.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    4. Re:Groundbreaking? by lpp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe the grandparent post was referring to the author of said work, Oscar Wilde, homosexual and I believe accused of sodomizing young boys (vary vague and flimsy recollection of that bit of information).

    5. Re:Groundbreaking? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I almost posted something about the author being no stranger to sodomy. I don't know anything about Wilde molesting boys.

      If he did it would shed and interesting light on the story at issue . . .

      -Peter

    6. Re:Groundbreaking? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. We covet "innovation" so much, yet we rarely see it, so we attribute the title to things that do not warrant it. Ground-altering, maybe, but groundbreaking is a word thrown around way too much.

    7. Re:Groundbreaking? by XO · · Score: 1

      League had so many different famous literary characters in it, that I have watched it like 6 times now, just trying to get my mind around who everyone actually is. Of course, I'm doing this while I'm at work, so I'm frequently interrupted. I usually need to play a movie 10-15 times before I've seen all of it.

      I haven't even grasped the plot of the movie so far, so I know i'm not too far along in it.

      But, I do rather enjoy that movie. Of course, I think that movie is OK (not great), and I think Minority Report sucks. I guess that means the wrath of Slashdot will come down upon me :(

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    8. Re:Groundbreaking? by XO · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's that Tool plays in a lot of non-4/4 time signatures.. it's that they outright change time signatures regularly. Also, Tool has a rather unique sound - can you tell virtually any Tool song within the first three or four notes, even if you've never heard it? Most people can, after listening to just a few Tool songs. Very unique sound.

      Not groundbreaking, but very unique.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    9. Re:Groundbreaking? by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I had to read The Picture of Dorian Gray in college, and I feel like I've been molested.

    10. Re:Groundbreaking? by sharkey · · Score: 1
      It has a "league of extrordinary gentlemen" feel to it, and that was the vilest shitstain to hit celluloid in the history of film.

      You should widen your sample group.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    11. Re:Groundbreaking? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you were "reading" it with the wrong end.

      -Peter

    12. Re:Groundbreaking? by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      I think he "wrote" it with the wrong end.

    13. Re:Groundbreaking? by Temsi · · Score: 1

      Groundbreaking is a perfectly apt description for this film, in every sense of the word, and yes, it can be used about something other than construction jobs.

      Think of what the word means, and implies.

      Groundbreaking, as in breaking ground... the first to successfully do something new which will be mimicked and built upon by future generations and will inspire an entire generation of those who want to do something similar.

      Breaking ground in the world of cinema, is the first successful attempt at something that has not been done before but will lead to others doing the same.
      As far as visual effects goes films such as 2001, Star Wars, The Abyss, Terminator 2, Jurassic Park, Toy Story, Shrek or any of the Ray Harryhousen projects, were all groundbreaking in their own right and in their own way.

      Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow is groundbreaking. It's the first successful attempt at entirely eliminating practical sets and locations.
      Star Wars Episode 1 and a few others have successfully used CGI sets for a number of shots, but they still used practical sets.
      The technology itself was groundbreaking back then, and to many still is. However, the full scale application of it here in a big budget film (which is an enormous risk), is what's groundbreaking.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    14. Re:Groundbreaking? by bonkedproducer · · Score: 1

      AMEN - Minority Report was the biggest product placing snooze fest I've ever allowed myself to sit through. Fuck the hive mind - you are dead on on that call!

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    15. Re:Groundbreaking? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Come on, if it's got Ben Afleck in it, and it doesn't have either Robin Williams or Kevin Smith in it, it's gonna suck.

    16. Re:Groundbreaking? by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      In the book Wilde never states directly that Gray sodomized anyone, but there are allusions to scandlas involving other men that would lead the reader to believe that something like that had occured

    17. Re:Groundbreaking? by drew · · Score: 1

      apparently you didn't actually finish the movie. as far as i could tell, he was not any sort of hero, super or otherwise...

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    18. Re:Groundbreaking? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Is this a little contradictory? Special effects are not ground-breaking. Give me a movie with effects like these and a plot that doesn't insult me. Then, we can call it "groundbreaking."

      Right, and these special effects arn't even close to ground breaking, they do look like they were done on a PC or Mac with 3dsMax or something, all shiny, etc.

      And the live-action stuff just looks bad like all oversaturated, etc.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    19. Re:Groundbreaking? by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Give me the sfx in Independence Day over these any day. People are running around with boners over these cause they look "retro" or some shit...

    20. Re:Groundbreaking? by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      he also fucked the marquis of queensburys son (who was 18 or older at the time, not that it made any difference back then of course....)

      you know, the guy who codified the rules of boxing.

      would love to have been able to say to him "yes, but i've had your son......"

  11. check this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... if you like the look of this movie also look at Sin City, directed by RR (Desperado, Spy Kids fame). It is also filmed all against a green screen like Sky Captain. Initial screenings have people drooling. Sky Captain looks good, but I think Sin City will own all when it comes to the style... go RR!

    1. Re:check this out by John_Allen_Mohammed · · Score: 1

      Just checking out the Sin City link you provided... someone named "Jessica Alba" starring in it. The name sounds familiar, has she done any nude scenes ? (google images doesn't turn up much except a handfull of obvious fakes..) Here's a bunch of good shots of her I thought I'd share...

      On the left.. whew, she's smoking.. damn, oh ya, and another.., and another :), nice... who's that chick beside her ? I'd do em both., come to daddy.. oh ya.. ...

      Here's the directory listing I linked those pictures from.. be gentle.

      anyways, for the good of the community, someone paste an authentic nude shot of this chick. Thanks.

      --

      Skype Me! username: john_allen_mohammed
    2. Re:check this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      she was in the James Cameron TV show Dark Angel. She's pretty hot but I doubt she's ever done anything nude, which is why there are so many fakes of her.

      The cast for the movie is incredible. There aren't many people NOT in this movie...

      and she's not really "staring" in it in the conventional way. Sin City is a collection of stories based off of Frank Miller's comic books. She stars in one of the segments, if I understand correctly.

    3. Re:check this out by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      Yup Jessica Alba is there. I used to watch Dark Angel, not because the show was great (they had starting material to make something good, but it got cheezy pretty soon) but she always rocked. You can definitely sign me up for this one, and I don't even care if the movie stinks.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    4. Re:check this out by curtlewis · · Score: 1

      The linked picture title who's that next to her...

      That picture is of Jessica Alba on the left and Jennifer Garner (of Alias and Daredevil) on the right.

    5. Re:check this out by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Yah, what happened to that show? First season of Dark Angel was very cool. Second season pretty much sucked. Not even sure when it was canceled.

    6. Re:check this out by theguyfromsaturn · · Score: 1

      After second season. That season was very bad with the obvious mutants on the loose and all. The last episode finished on a cliffhanger that should have lead to the third season. But I guess by then the ratings were low enough that it didn't happen. But however bad the show was, I still diligently watched just because of her.

      --
      I like my dinosaurs feathery, and my pterosaurs hairy (or is it pycnofibery?)
    7. Re:check this out by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1
      Looks like the chick beside her is Jennifer Garner.

      She's been in the TV show Alias, and the movies Daredevil and 13 Going On 30. But the role that most people remember was in Dude, Where's My Car?.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
  12. Groundbreaking??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash Gordon plot re-hashes from the 1940's Groundbreaking??? Bullshit!!!

    1. Re:Groundbreaking??? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      I think he means the fact that the only real things in the movie are the actors.

    2. Re:Groundbreaking??? by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      Cause you KNOW I hate when the only real things in the movie are the props. 8P

      Yo Grark

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    3. Re:Groundbreaking??? by InternationalCow · · Score: 1

      Since when are Hollywood actors "real"? I personally have never seen someone who even remotely resembles Angelina Jolie (or has any of her -uhm- physical attributes) - I keep thinking that she must be the result of some heavy duty CGI herself :)

      --
      ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
  13. Movie theatre trailer by lothar97 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen the trailer a few times in the movie theatre, and it looks pretty impressive visually- soft lighting, retro color scheme, etc. I guess it doesn't translate as well onto the small screen.

    --

  14. Crimson Skies by kisrael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw my first preview for this movie this past Holiday season, when I was also playing through "Crimson Skies", the Xbox port. Both have a similar vibe, a retrofuture that never quite was, lots of planes, exploding dirigibles, etc. I'm really looking forward to this flick...

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    1. Re:Crimson Skies by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, I was thinking the same thing -- it looks a lot like Crimson Skies, made into a movie.

      Not that I've seen this movie yet, but the previews look so similar that I wonder if they wanted to make a Crimson Skies movie, but couldn't get the movie rights.

      Either way, it looks like it's right up my alley. Alas, with kids, going to the movies is hard. :)

    2. Re:Crimson Skies by kisrael · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt it's an aborted Crimson Skies license, knowing what we do about the movie's background.

      I think it's just a captivating idea...WW2 plans always seems to be one of the "coolest" eras, not quite as primitive and "knights of the air" as WWI, but not so electronic and jet powered as Korea and beyond. Making a retrofuture of it might just be a natural fit.

      Crimson Skies actually played a lot like Wing Commander and Wing Commander 2...a LOT of gameplay parallels. And WC was indeed modeled on WW2 type stuff as well, so it all fits together.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    3. Re:Crimson Skies by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but thirties steampunk/derrigable/we-can't-actually-imagine-jet s-so-everything-is-prop-driven pulp science fiction is and old and venerable tradition which Crimson Skies has picked up on, rather than vice versa.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:Crimson Skies by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Couple things here...

      1) It's not an XBox port, it's actually the sequel to the first game that happened to be made on the XBox. If you play both, you'll notice the story is entirely different and that the XBox game definately sequels the PC one.

      2) I always thought Crimson Skies was a ripoff (at least in theme) of that old Disney Cartoon "Tail Spin." It also had groovy prop planes, huge dirigibles, film-noir leanings and an Art Deco style.

    5. Re:Crimson Skies by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      I always thought Crimson Skies was a ripoff (at least in theme) of that old Disney Cartoon "Tail Spin." It also had groovy prop planes, huge dirigibles, film-noir leanings and an Art Deco style.

      Retrotech or "steampunk" seems to always be bubbling under mainstream consciousness. Tim Burton's take on Batman, the Steampunk comic books, TailSpin and Treasure Planet, the old Space: 1899 RPG, etc...

      I personally love this genre, but everytime it makes a stab at becoming mainstream, it usually fades quickly. (Even the recent Batman movies got morphed into camp, leaving the "Noir Deco" esthetic to the first season of the Animated Series.) You would think with the Sci-Fi concept being pioneered by Jules Verne and others that this kind of retrotech fiction would be evergreen in our popular culture, but it just doesn't appeal to the masses (or even most geeks!) like medieval fantasy or futuristic conjecture...

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    6. Re:Crimson Skies by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wasn't sure if it was a proper sequel or a remake.

      And Crimson Skies has fewer talking rodents in it, mercifully.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    7. Re:Crimson Skies by MalachiConstant · · Score: 1
      I haven't seen anyone spell this out yet so here goes:

      The visual style of this movie is based on sci-fi visuals of the late 20's and 30's. Probably largely based on illustrations from the pulp magazine "Amazing Stories" which was started by none other than Hugo Gernsback (as in the "Hugo" award for science fiction). Check out these covers by Frank R. Paul for an idea of the style.

      They were called "pulp" magazines because they were printed on cheap paper. It carried reprinted stories by H. G. Wells, Edgar Allen Poe, Jules Verne, etc. as well as new sci-fi.

  15. Angelini Jolie wearing an eyepatch? by ellisDtrails · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow my pirate / brunette bombshell fetish is finally realized!

    1. Re:Angelini Jolie wearing an eyepatch? by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Guybrush? Is that you?

      -Peter

    2. Re:Angelini Jolie wearing an eyepatch? by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 1

      Uh... hello!

    3. Re:Angelini Jolie wearing an eyepatch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, in the movie she's supposed to be Jude Law's mommy.

    4. Re:Angelini Jolie wearing an eyepatch? by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      mmmmmm.... imagine getting an eyejob from Angelini Jolie!


      You're entirely welcome for the mental image I just gave you!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    5. Re:Angelini Jolie wearing an eyepatch? by ellisDtrails · · Score: 1

      Eye job, I love it. I wonder whats behind the patch! (Is this thing on? Don't forget to tip your bartender.)

    6. Re:Angelini Jolie wearing an eyepatch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Havent you seen kill bill?
      Sexy evil women with eyepatches give me a woody

  16. How do you figure? by clean_stoner · · Score: 0, Troll
    Starting with a reporter investigating the disappearances of top scientists, the story quickly becomes a nearly constant barrage of giant robots, aeroships, submarine planes, ray guns and retro technology on a grand scale. The plot, which hurtles across maps of the world Indiana Jones style, definitely take a back seat to the effects.

    Alright, so how do you figure this is good again? It sounds like another crappy big-budget *cough*Matrix Reloaded*cough* sci-fi *cough Episodes I & II*cough* that won't be even slightly entertaining beyond the initial awe of the special effects.

    --

    Sigs are for the weak.

    1. Re:How do you figure? by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the difference is that many big budget sci-fi "epics" aspire to something more cerebral than their material will allow. Take all of that stuff and reprise the old Buck Rogers serial experience in a CGI package and you have something called fun. It's a foreign concept among "serious" directors and actors (and perhaps pretentious movie goers).

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    2. Re:How do you figure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cause it's got Angelina Jolie... nuff said.

    3. Re:How do you figure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cough*...*cough*...*cough*...*cough*

      Are you okay? You seem to be coughing alot. Maybe you should go for a walk and take a break from slashdot.

    4. Re:How do you figure? by AltaMannen · · Score: 1

      the segment "..investigating the disappearances of top scientists.."

      made me think of the movie as more like Wild Wild West than any Matrix or Episode movie. I still have high hopes for this movie in spite of most other sci-fi I've suffered recently. As long as it is not related to Star Trek or Star Wars there is still hope!

    5. Re:How do you figure? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      It sounds much more like a 1930s pulp fiction serial, which appear to be the inspiration for the film. They were the special effects films of their day, even if they look cheesy to modern eyes. Unfortunately, most young people have never seen these films.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:How do you figure? by painandgreed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Alright, so how do you figure this is good again? It sounds like another crappy big-budget *cough*Matrix Reloaded*cough* sci-fi *cough Episodes I & II*cough* that won't be even slightly entertaining beyond the initial awe of the special effects.

      That's just it. It isn't a big budget move, under 50 million which is half the cost of the average Hollywood movie. Most of what they did have was spent on actors. It was mostly done using new techniques developed by the director. According to a friend who also saw a sneak preview earlier this week, it rocks and is what sci-fi geeks have been waiting for.

    7. Re:How do you figure? by Zed2K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thats exactly right. Going to the movies is supposed to be a fun event. There is plenty of fun to be had in cheesy movies. When I go to see a movie I want to be entertained. Way too many people look at movies and take it way too seriously.

      Even movies that are flat out bad can be watched in such a state of mind that one can find fun in them (without chemical influences of course).

    8. Re:How do you figure? by British · · Score: 1

      So in a lot of 1930s serials do top scientists get kidnapped as often as journalists in modern day Iraq?

    9. Re:How do you figure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You remember the Max Fleischman Superman cartoons from around WWII? Remember how they worked? How it was tommy guns and prop planes and giant dirigibles and robots with fricking lasers in their eyes?

      It's like that. But live-action and feature-length.

      It's *cool*.

    10. Re:How do you figure? by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      (without chemical influences of course)
      Explain.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    11. Re:How do you figure? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      More often. Evil villains can't seem to hire their own scientists, so they are reduced to kidnapping them.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    12. Re:How do you figure? by iiioxx · · Score: 1

      Even movies that are flat out bad can be watched in such a state of mind that one can find fun in them (without chemical influences of course).

      Not at $6.50 a ticket they can't (and that's for a matinee!). There's only one state my mind gets to after I shell out good money to watch a crappy movie, and that state could best be described as psychotic rage.

  17. Aha! by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's what Jar Jar Binks, "Face Dances", and "AI" have in common!

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  18. I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Couldn't you have put in a paragraph or two drawing parallels between this movie and Columbine? Or how it relates to globalism? Your plain vanilla movie review kinda feels naked without you attempting to link it in with current events or society.

    GMD

    1. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Great, I'd finally been able to forget about comparing every new movie that comes out with golbalism, or the state of society today, or some other type of social commentary. I've actually started enjoying (some) movies again and you have to bring those thoughts back.
      Thank you oh so much

    2. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, are you the GMD, the guitar playing GMD?

    3. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by Enry · · Score: 1

      Or letting 13-yr olds you don't know into an R-rated movie (sheesh).

    4. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by daniil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, it's easy to read some social commentary into it. For example: "Set in a mythic version of the late 1930s, this movie is a stunning tribute to classic sci-fi serials, comics and pulp magazines of that era." To elaborate on this, you could, for instance, draw parallels between tributes to classic sci-fi and the increasingly popular retro-looking cars. And talk about how, unlike in the 50's, all these cars are computer generated, etc. Oh, and i won't even mention parallels between the world "then" and "now..."

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    5. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if we had giant flying submarines, there would not have been a Columbine.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    6. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Movie: Stuff goes kaboom.

      Current Events: Stuff goes kaboom.

      Does that work?

    7. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      I don't.

      The guy was an idiot ;-)

    8. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by serutan · · Score: 1

      Word has it that the Columbine students' whole motivation was to get mentioned by Jon Katz.

    9. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      Katz is gone? Ive been ignoring him ever I found that little checkbox in options...

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    10. Re:I Miss ol' Jon Katz's reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obvious parralells between planes and thier effect at fending off invaders is interesting. Obviously it reflects the pain of post 9/11 America coupled with the Isolationist feelings many people have. The odd thing here is the technology delta which will almost certainly be read as support for rag-tag groups (read Iraqi insurgents) to fight near magical technology (read American Troops). All this summed up with a shamefully patronizing credit sequence.

  19. Burroghs Mars books Filmed??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been waiting for that since I was in Junior High School!! I still own ALL the Mars books (my Grandson is reading them now), I can't wait to see 10,000 Green Martian warriors on great Thoats charging across the dead seas of Mars!!

    1. Re:Burroghs Mars books Filmed??? by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting just as long for a John Carter of Mars big screen adaptation, but while there have been many rumors, none have come to fruition. The last time I heard any solid information on it (probably from an earlier /. post), the word was that director Stephen Sommers (Van Helsing, The Mummy/Mummy Returns/Scorpion King series) had obtained the rights from the Burroughs Estate and was preparing the project as a showcase for Duane Johnson (the Rock) to star as John Carter.

    2. Re:Burroghs Mars books Filmed??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pellucidar...or something. Ah..new window..google an voila http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6696/p ellucidar.html (watch out for that space in the URL) At the Earth's Core. Great fun. Telepathic saurians & other weirdness. &... Really folks. It's all about thee pulp. Kill the bad guys, save the world, ride off into the sunset. You want artsy, watch Bergman. Sheesh!

    3. Re:Burroghs Mars books Filmed??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's Dejah Thoris?

    4. Re:Burroghs Mars books Filmed??? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Princess of Helium and most beautiful (egg-laying) woman on Barsoom.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Burroghs Mars books Filmed??? by Darby · · Score: 1

      preparing the project as a showcase for Duane Johnson (the Rock) to star as John Carter.

      Oh crap. Please tell me your kidding. Even if you have to lie to do it.

    6. Re:Burroghs Mars books Filmed??? by Bourbonium · · Score: 1

      Well, since I'm not a politician, I don't make a habit of lying, but as the top of the thread indicates, this may have all changed now that Kerry Conran is involved in the project. But think about it... The Rock as John Carter. Yeah, it might just work. And Burroughs frequently described with great eloquence John Carter opening up a can o' whoop-ass on Barsoom.

      Alternatively, now that Stephen Sommers had such great success with Hugh Jackman as his new action hero in Van Helsing, can you picture our favorite Wolverine as John Carter?

  20. Previously on Slashdot... by TeaQuaffer · · Score: 1
    This was mentioned back in March.

    Can't wait to see it.

    --
    Sola Deo Gloria!
  21. the Sci-Fi museum by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just visited that museum on vacation a few weeks ago. It's not very big, being shoe-horned into the Experience Music Project, but what it lacks in quantity it makes up for with quality. The exhibits and presentation was amazing. (for example, while a short loop about the Matrix displayed on a big projection screen, smaller projectors turned the walls into cascading 'Matrix-code')

    --
    May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    1. Re:the Sci-Fi museum by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 3, Informative

      Strange, I just visted last weekend and was a little disappointed. The spherical video displays were cool, and some of the original cg work was passable (though, it seemed somewhat inappropriate since it looked lower-quality than the movies being represented). However clever some of the looping videos (including a big screen display of numerious famous ficitonal starships all passing within close proximity to each other)these aren't really good reasons to go to a museum-- all those things could have just as well been presented online.

      The real reason to visit a museum for the artifacts, and on this level they sometimes impressed and sometimes were lacking. A number of items were not authentic props- there were replica lightsabers, a replica R2-D2, a reproduced Terminator - and these sometimes made the displays seem a little incomplete. On the other hand, they have lots of Star Trek originals: Patrick Stewart's Borg accessories, a couple dozen phazors, tricorders, Captain Kirk's chair. They had a lot of scripts and original manuscripts, as well as model spaceships... Actually, my disappointment might just be bitterness at the gift shop lingering - I just wanted something with a logo on it, and everything was wildly overpriced, I think the cheapest pen was $10... oh yeah, that and the wording on the back of the ticket rubbed me the wrong way, I believe it starts "This ticket is a revokable license..." - I shit you not.

      Meh, I'd still go again, but if you're planning a trip, keep your expectations in check. I'm sure that as the years go on it will only improve.

      As a more on-topic aside, the Sky Captain movie reminds me of my friend's comic that he's been working on for the past year or so. It's more of a traditional pulp thing, but what I've seen [that he hasn't posted yet] seems pretty cool (he just finally put up the first installment recently - I believe he'll be updating weekly): Captain Spectre and the Lightning Legion.

    2. Re:the Sci-Fi museum by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      oh yeah, that and the wording on the back of the ticket rubbed me the wrong way, I believe it starts "This ticket is a revokable license..." - I shit you not.

      That's no different from the language on any concert ticket. Basically it gives them license to throw you out should you start acting like an asshat.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    3. Re:the Sci-Fi museum by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, except I visited 3 other public museums Labor Day weekend, and none of their tickets had wording like that at all. It was also the only one of the 4 that didn't allow photography. (I can understand not allowing flash-photography, but not allowing any sort of recording device is somewhat unusual.)

      Overall I enjoyed my visit, but their institutional attitude seems a little strange.

  22. personally by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm looking forward to seeing this movie, but I'll admit I'm starting to have CGI-fatigue.

    CGI should be a tool to enhance a good, original story.

    I rarely see original plots anymore being made into movies.

    One notable exception though, is the recently made Oldboy, a Korean movie.

    If you intend to see this work of genius, avoid spoilers at all costs.

    1. Re:personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many plots are original these days? Seriously... everything was done like 1000 years ago...

      just new names & faces...

    2. Re:personally by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think RA Heinlen got the last one of the basic dramtic plots with "Boy meets girl, boy gets girl pregnant, boy runs off, girl has baby, learns that she is a hermaphrodite, has sex-reassignment surgery, gets job in the time patrol, runs into her former self and impregnates her, recruits former self into time patrol".

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:personally by OoSync · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think RA Heinlen got the last one of the basic dramtic plots with "Boy meets girl, boy gets girl pregnant, boy runs off, girl has baby, learns that she is a hermaphrodite, has sex-reassignment surgery, gets job in the time patrol, runs into her former self and impregnates her, recruits former self into time patrol".

      His short story All You Zombies-- from 1939. Its my personal favorite short fiction because it was so damned weird the first time I read it. Its also very well written, especially considering it was one of his first fiction.

      Its currently available in the recent anthology The Fantasies of Robert A. Heinlein.

      --

      I always get the shakes before a drop.
  23. Obligatory Futurama Quote by loonicks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every time I hear this advertised I picture the cryogenic technician in the first Futurama episode, saying "Welcome to the WOOORRLD of Tomorrow!"

    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama Quote by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

      "And by 'metaphorically' I mean 'Get your coat.'"

  24. How about a plot too? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The plot, which hurtles across maps of the world Indiana Jones style, definitely take a back seat to the effects."

    Why can't Hollywood make movies that have great special effects AND good plots? The Matrix and Spiderman were the the only two decent movies in recent times that have had good CG and a decent plot. I guess you could toss some of the Pixar flicks as well, but that's still a small minority when compared to all the crap that has come out.

    Hollywood, pay attention: we need something that interests us, not just something that looks pretty.

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:How about a plot too? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hollywood, pay attention: we need something that interests us, not just something that looks pretty.

      Ahhh! But the problem, you see, is that Hollywood does not take into account the opinions of the minority. The majority of the sheeple in the market far outweigh the number of people who want more than just effects in their movies.

      Hollywood has no motivation to improve both plot and effects, as most consumers will pay for any drivle that comes out.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    2. Re:How about a plot too? by Jameth · · Score: 1

      "Why can't Hollywood make movies that have great special effects AND good plots? The Matrix and Spiderman were the the only two decent movies in recent times that have had good CG and a decent plot. I guess you could toss some of the Pixar flicks as well, but that's still a small minority when compared to all the crap that has come out."

      Wow, to make your point you look at Spiderman and The Matrix. First off, X-Men outdid spiderman for plot and effects, especially if you look at the second Spiderman movie. Beyond just X-Men, which had fine plot, what about Equilibrium, which had excellent plot and effects.

      So, including X-Men I and II, Spiderman (I'll only count #1), The Matrix (once again, only the first), and Equilibrium, you have five movies in recent times with great plot and effects, and that's off the top of my head when I'm not at home to skim through movie collections. Is that really such a large rate of failure?

    3. Re:How about a plot too? by DesertFalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While I definitely agree with you, I feel the need to point something out here.

      Whenever I catch myself thinking about the "good old days" when everything that was put out was good quality and worthwhile, I have to remind myself that things only seem that way in retrospect because I've forgotten about all of the drivel that was produced back then, and have remembered all of the high quality stuff. Take music, for example - the only reason "classical" music has a reputation as being high quality is because nobody plays the crap that was written in the 1800's. Only the very best of what was written then is still around.

      The lifespan of craptacular movies is shorter than that of bad quality arts in other genres, I think, so it doesn't need to take several hundred years for the quality to be separated from the crap.

      Anyway, just my two cents on the issue of "Why is there so much crap coming out these days?"

      --
      --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
    4. Re:How about a plot too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Matrix and Spiderman were the the only two decent movies in recent times that have had good CG and a decent plot.

      The CG in Spiderman was terrible. The only reason the shots of Spiderman jumping and swinging looked semi-decent was that they were so brief and fast you couldn't get a good look.

    5. Re:How about a plot too? by mod_parent_down · · Score: 2, Funny
      Pixar's effects aren't that good. Look at Finding Nemo -- I guess some of the shark footage was pretty good, but ftmp they're just swimming around chatting with each other.

      They definitely had no memorable explosions, that's for sure.

    6. Re:How about a plot too? by tr33limbz · · Score: 1

      Its all a matter of opinion. Personally, i was pissed when i saw both The Matrix and Spiderman. I honestly felt pissed and cheated by all the hype. The Matrix, for all its cool violence and CGI effects, had zilch for original story value. While my family and friends were raving about how cool and thought-inspiring it was, I was thinking to myself how they were a bunch of morons who had never read really good science fiction (Gibson, Dick, Asimov, etc). And Spiderman... well, after growing up reading comics and working in a comic shop....I thought the special effects were sucky and they ruined the story. Heres hoping Sky Captain won't be another ripoff!

      --
      -end of post.
    7. Re:How about a plot too? by khrtt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. The Matrix did not have a good plot. Maybe a decent plot idea, but -- using humans for batteries????? Isn't it obvious, flies are a much better source of power for machines.

      2. Spiderman was only a sequel/remake to a 100 feature movies and paper cartoons, originating from a cartoon. The plot was barely good enough for a cartoon, designed barely well enough to be barely enterntaining to retarded children. I don't see how an adult slashdot reader can find the plot of Spiderman satisfactory.

      3. By CG you mean CGI - "computer generated imagery", no?

      Movies with shitty plots and pretty SFX make good box office. This is the lesson of StarWars. Before StarWars was a hit, it was generally thought that good plot would produce a good box office. Then Lucas made StarWars and hit the jackpot with it. Every hollywood movie ever since has been designed around the SFX. Basically, they design the SFX first, according to currently available technical means and the available budget. Then they tailor the plot to fit aroung the SFX - no wonder the resulting product is barely watchable while heavily stoned. This kinda tells you that most moviegoers are retarded and/or stoned, but it doesn't leave any hope that Hollywood will ever make a good movie again. If you want a nice plot, go see an independent movie.

      There was a Cronenberg flick, eXistanZ, out at about the same time as The Matrix. Similar "trapped in virtual reality" type plot. Much less box office intake. Much less SFX, better plot, and better screenplay. Most people had a strong preference to either one or the other movie, as you can deduce from reading the comments on IMDB. You can also see, from the same comments that most people who liked the Matrix over the eXistanZ couldn't spell. nuff said.

    8. Re:How about a plot too? by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Somehow, we're not surprised that you grew up in a comic shop. Nice ego, man.

    9. Re:How about a plot too? by dinsdale3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Matrix and Spiderman were the the only two decent movies in recent times that have had good CG and a decent plot.

      Lord of the Rings?

    10. Re:How about a plot too? by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      I cannot believe you just said equilibrium had a good plot. While I didn't dislike the movie, that is one of the most overdone plot devices in all of scifi. Pretty much not one bit of originality in there. Well put together, especially for the small budget, good acting, etc. But plot?

    11. Re:How about a plot too? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      The notion of using humans for batteries was dumb, but it's wrong to call it part of the plot. The plot is something at a more vague high-level and than that. The plot way of looking at it is "humans are kept alive by the machines because they are useful for something". The fact that the specific something doesn't make sense is too low-level of a concern to call it a flaw in the plot. It's a flaw in the details.

      Spiderman was popular amongst adults mostly for nostalga. It was cheesy, but it was cheesy in a way that precisely fits the original source material, and thus evokes nostalga. That's not a bad thing. Heck, this Sky captain movie, much like the Indiana Jones movies, is going for nostalgic capture of an old theme - the pulp adventure.

      To most slashdotters, CGI means Common Gateway Interface, so CG is used for Computer Graphics to avoid confusion.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    12. Re:How about a plot too? by jerzee_devil · · Score: 1
      The lifespan of craptacular movies is shorter than that of bad quality arts in other genres

      Unless they were lucky enough to be on MST3K.... then they live on forever!

    13. Re:How about a plot too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The Matrix and Spiderman were the the only two decent movies in recent times that have had good CG and a decent plot"
      A "decent plot" in The Matrix? You must've seen a different cut of the movie. In the one I saw, giant evil robots were using humans as a power source, and Neo needed "lots and lots of guns" for fighting his way through a computer program. Silly violent fantasy fare served up as science fiction. More "blech" than "whoa."

      A good story wouldn't harm Sky Captain, either, but at least the movie doesn't seem to take itself so seriously.

      Spider Man was exceptional for a couple reasons: winking at the audience (I mean, hey, it's a comic book, it really can't get too high-minded) while delivering a story that largely focused on well developed characters. Incredibly, the things that made the first installment successful were not lost in the sequel. That's very, very rare, and I'm almost wish they'd end the franchise there, on a high note. I'm fairly confident in Hollywood's ability to screw it up, though I'm sure Raimi will fight the good fight.

      But The Matrix was nothing more than a geek fad, and the fad was basically over by the time even worse sequels were inflicted on us.
    14. Re:How about a plot too? by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I can't consider adaptations to be counted under this criteria, because the stories were already written, they just had to adapt them. It's not a hollywood plot, it's a literature one.

      That being said...

      The Lord of the Rings series suffered badly (moreso in the last than the first) from being incredibly drawn out with boring crap. In a book, I want a lot of character development, but when I go to see a movie, I don't want to suffer through watching someone talk. Movies are a visual medium, and they should make use of that. There's no point in having a good plot if you have to watch the characters talk about it for 30-minute stretches before something actually HAPPENS.

      The problem though is that all this exposition is vital to the storyline of the LOTR series, and cutting it out wouldn't make a movie with a lick of sense to it. In that respect, the movie was pretty much damned in this respect from the get-go. Great effects, great acting, great storyline, but as soon as the last battle scene in Return of the King was over, I stopped my DVD player and took out the disc (and have since lost it, but I don't think I could stand to watch it again).

      Now, if hollywood could learn to do something on that scale, with that level of detail, that was meant from the start to be a movie, and still pull it off, I'd be sold. Oh well.

      --Dan

    15. Re:How about a plot too? by SpootFinallyRegister · · Score: 1
      The Matrix and Spiderman were the the only two decent movies in recent times that have had ... a decent plot

      if those are decent plots, i weep.

    16. Re:How about a plot too? by Rysc · · Score: 1

      I can't consider adaptations to be counted under this criteria, because the stories were already written, they just had to adapt them. It's not a hollywood plot, it's a literature one.

      Spiderman wasn't an adaptation?

      Remember: Comic books are the cultural literature of the USA.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    17. Re:How about a plot too? by lrucker · · Score: 1
      Whenever I catch myself thinking about the "good old days" when everything that was put out was good quality and worthwhile, I have to remind myself that things only seem that way in retrospect because I've forgotten about all of the drivel that was produced back then

      It's one of the corollaries to Sturgeon's Law: "The past only looks good because we've forgotten the 90% that's crap"

    18. Re:How about a plot too? by drew · · Score: 1

      wait....
      spiderman had a plot? oh yeah that's right.
      1. high school kid gets super powers.
      2. bad guy decides he doesn't like super powered high school kid
      3. super powered high school kid fights bad guy, and (gasp) wins.

      hope i didnt ruin it for any one who hasn't seen it yet.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    19. Re:How about a plot too? by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      ...the only reason "classical" music has a reputation as being high quality is because nobody plays the crap...

      I taking a musicology class once (hey, my girlfriend was taking it!). At one point, the instructor demonstrated this point quite effectively -- by playing a sample of a piece written by Mozart's grandson (or some such relation).

      <...shudder...>

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    20. Re:How about a plot too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's all you were able to get from the plot, you need to go back to high school and take a literature course.

    21. Re:How about a plot too? by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      That's a good example, but I thought the movies became progressively worse, in part because of their increasing reliance on special CGI. The first movie had relatively few CGI shots, such as the spectacular scene with the Balrog. The third movie, however, had the terrible Eagle animations, and even worse, the army of the dead destroy the CGI army of Mordor.

      The movies also became less and less true to the books, which didn't help. But I think the CGI hurt too.

    22. Re:How about a plot too? by khrtt · · Score: 1

      The notion of using humans for batteries was dumb... It's a flaw in the details
      The devil is in the details. The way I see it, these dummies couldn't even come up with a half decent excuse for the machines to keep the humans alive.

      "humans are kept alive by the machines because they are useful for something"
      This is a plot idea. Details are what makes it into a plot. There was nothing in Matrix beyond this one-line plot idea that was not stupid, don't you think? The "take the red pill or the blue pill" line really made me laugh, though. This big black Morpheus guy with his nice black suit and his box of colored pills would make a nice addition to my local dance club.

      Spiderman was popular amongst adults mostly for nostalga(sic)
      Exactly. Hollywood has to resort to playing on nostalgia for stupid comic books to make money. Way to go:-)

      To most slashdotters, CGI means Common Gateway Interface...
      Speak for yourself -- not every computer geek is in IT. Computer Graphics is a topic in computer science. It includes many things, one of which is the hardware and algorithms that are used for making CGI. Referring to Computer Generated Imagery as CG is the same as referring to a calculator as a computer. Then, again, CGI does stand for both Common Gateway Interface and Computer Generated Imagery, and has to be disambiguated by context.

      -1 offtopic for the abbreviation nazy spiel.

    23. Re:How about a plot too? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Lord of the Rings?

      In places dodgy CG - and a lame plot.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  25. Great by Arthur+Yossarian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He imagined that Spielberg and Lucas might soon be having a similar conversation somewhere in California. I have to agree that it seems like a distinct possibility. Wonderful. We'll have another director who relies solely on CG to sell his films, without any real focus on plot, dialogue, or acting, just like Lucas does these days. I don't think that this is a good trend; it makes for bad movies and deligitimizes CG technology, so that directors who actually use it well (like Peter Jackson in LOTR) don't get the recognition they deserve.

    --
    "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." - Ford Prefect
    1. Re:Great by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      so that directors who actually use it well (like Peter Jackson in LOTR) don't get the recognition they deserve.

      Umm, excuse me? Exactly HOW MANY Oscars did LotR win?!

    2. Re:Great by Bearpaw · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't think that this is a good trend; it makes for bad movies and deligitimizes CG technology, so that directors who actually use it well (like Peter Jackson in LOTR) don't get the recognition they deserve.

      Yeah, all Jackson got for his effort was shitloads of money, shitloads of great reviews, and shitloads of awards, including an Academy Award for Best Director. Okay, sure, he didn't win an Unobtanium Zrigny Award from the Unaligned Worlds Council for the Electromagnetic-Spectrum-Based Arts, but there was a lot of tough competition last cycle. Anyway, he wouldn't have been able to keep the award anyway -- possession of unobtainium by private individuals isn't allowed on backward worlds like Terra.

    3. Re:Great by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      How many oscars did Peter Jackson get for LOTR vs Lucas for either SW triligy. Seems like we're getting the recognition correct at this point.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  26. FireFox by SQLz · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess the world of tomorrow doesn't support Mozilla/FireFox. I can't view the page.

    1. Re:FireFox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works fine for me.
      Maybe I use the Un DMCA'ed version !!!!.

    2. Re:FireFox by zerOnIne · · Score: 1

      Works fine in FireFox here.

      --
      09
    3. Re:FireFox by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Do you have flash installed? I didn't have any problems myself. Most of their site looks flash based.

    4. Re:FireFox by Flower · · Score: 1

      It's a Flash site. Works fine in FireFox if you have the plug-in.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    5. Re:FireFox by Cheap+Imitation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, this particular world of tomorrow uses 1930's technology. Try Internet Explorer!

    6. Re:FireFox by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. I guess the world of tomorrow doesn't support Mozilla/FireFox. I can't view the page.

      Worked fine for me. (Running Firefox preview release 1.0 NF under Linux)

      Ran the videos, watched the flash, changed the 'themes'...no issues with the site.

      I even installed the Windows version of the game under the current release of Wine and it installed and ran fine...till it asked for the login information. Checking back with the site, they say that DirectX is required (not surprised) so I'm not going to bother getting an ID.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    7. Re:FireFox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The movie was filmed entirely in front of a Blue Screen of Death.

  27. Groundbreaking! by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Conran's groundbreaking film
    The plot, which hurtles across maps of the world Indiana Jones style, definitely take a back seat to the effects. The character interactions are all predictable. But all of that is consistent with the genre

    Special effects are not ground-breaking.

    Why not? There's no SFX ground to break? Or does this not constitute a ground-breaking level of SFX achievement according to you?

    Give me a movie with effects like these and a plot that doesn't insult me.

    The plot insults you? WTF?

    Its a pulp! I love these! Indiana Jones, Tom Strong, and now Sky Captain. I'm happy.
    If you don't like pulps, that's your loss, but to say that it insults you...that's something else.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Groundbreaking! by StevenHenderson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, FX can be groundbreaking. However, the inclusion of said effects does not make for a groundbreaking MOVIE.

      As for the plot, why does a movie with special effects have to be a pulp? Why not run with the great effects and make a movie like Minority Report? Yes, I understand that not all movies have to be serious, but just because a movie has a thin, cheesy veil of a plot, does not mean I am going to defend it. Kill Bill went for that type of pulp plot and succeeded. Sky Captain does not try for it, but rather stumbles onto it - not the same thing at all.

    2. Re:Groundbreaking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was nothing, NOTHING, original about the plot of Minority Report.

      Just a few cool ideas - and many sucky ones - and some effects.

      I thought more highly of Minority Report before hearing Spielberg say that it was "the darkest thing he could come up with." WTF? This is not only ridiculous on its face, but it demeans a work of his which was actually dark. Hint: it's historical and based on facts.

    3. Re:Groundbreaking! by XO · · Score: 1

      Because Minority Report was a relative bomb at the box office, and was an all around crappy movie, that's only real bright spot was the main actor. And I don't even LIKE most of Tom Cruise's stuff.

      The movie sucked. So, then I read the story it was based on. And that was just as bad.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    4. Re:Groundbreaking! by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for the plot, why does a movie with special effects have to be a pulp?

      You are approching this completly backwards.
      Its not a movie with SFX that has to be a pulp; Its a pulp movie that has to have SFX.

      Why not run with the great effects and make a movie like Minority Report?

      Because that movie was already made?
      Why do you object to people making the storie they want to make? He started this with a mac in his house. You don't like it? Buy a mac, make your own instead of attacking his movie, without even having seen it no less!
      If you have a movie in your head you want to see on a screen, make it instead of demanding that others refrain from making theirs in order to make what you want to see.

      God I can't stand that attitude! He's not taking anything away from you!
      He's making something new, he's contributing years of effort to our cultural heritage, and you sit there complaining that he spent these years making something he likes instead of something you like.
      Sheesh.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Groundbreaking! by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1

      You are getting me all wrong. I am not posting to declare a hatred for this movie, but rather a lament for the fact that it could have been so much more. So many times I have gone to the movies this year to be viscerally amazed, but mentally repulsed.

    6. Re:Groundbreaking! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You are getting me all wrong.

      I hope so, hope that you're not really this dense is what kept me from listing you as a foe...maybe you're having a bad day or something.

      I am not posting to declare a hatred for this movie, but rather a lament for the fact that it could have been so much more.

      Lamenting what it is while expressing a wish that it were something entirely different, especially since you have apparently not seen it, is hatred (prejudiced hostility).
      Have you seen it yet? If not, then do not claim that it could have been anyting. It will be something, and you are not in a position to judge what that is yet.

      So many times I have gone to the movies this year to be viscerally amazed, but mentally repulsed.

      Keep your bile for what caused it. Don't spread it over the innocent.
      If you were foolish enough to spend money on I Robot or Alien VS Predator, I can understand that you would have some pent up anger, but keep it focused on those who irked you, don't lash out at others.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:Groundbreaking! by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      but it demeans a work of his which was actually dark. Hint: it's historical and based on facts.


      Hint: he didn't come up with those facts.

    8. Re:Groundbreaking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how many people take that "Slashdot Foe List" thing so seriously.. "I'll put you on my foe list!!1!"

      OMG no, anything but that. Oh dear. Whatever shall we do.

      What? The fuck ever.

    9. Re:Groundbreaking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AvP was a good movie. What is with movie snobs who assume a movie must have a plot to be good. Sometimes all we need is a lot of killing to make things fun to watch. Some days I watch movies to be mentally stimulated. Most days I watch movies to turn off my brain and enjoy the purty pictures. Good movies do not need great plots, they just need to entertain for at least an hour. If they can entertain through SFX then so be it, if the entertain through slap-stick comedy it's great and finally if they entertain through a story that is fine.

    10. Re:Groundbreaking! by NidStyles · · Score: 1

      Well damnit make your own friggin' movie then, and make it the way you think it should be. You obviously have a computer. Get to work.

      --
      Yes, I said it.
    11. Re:Groundbreaking! by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1
      Lamenting what it is while expressing a wish that it were something entirely different, especially since you have apparently not seen it, is hatred (prejudiced hostility).

      Look, I understand where you are coming from, and you make good arguments. However, last time I checked, Slashdot was an Open Forum (TM) for discussion, and if I think SCatWoT will suck, then let me say so! You obviously saw it and I didn't, so you can say for sure. I base my opinion off of pure conjecture, but it is my opinion nevertheless. Therefore, if you do not agree with what I have to say, make your argument against mine, and move along. It is not personal. Unless you directed the damn movie, settle down. If you had put me on this "foe" list (which I don't even know what it is), would it be for good reason? Because I disagree with you and actually take the time to refute things you say?

      I'm sure most posters roll over and let you flame all you want, but honestly, stop for a second, and re-evaluate what you are arguing about. Is it for the movie or against me? My view on the movie is indeed prejudiced, I will give you that. But hatred? Bit of a stretch aint it? Well, anyways, thanks for listening...I'm going to go burn Sky Captain movie posters and picket outside the theaters.

    12. Re:Groundbreaking! by Snaller · · Score: 1

      "The plot insults you? WTF?

      Its a pulp! "

      In the definitions for Pulp i've seen, it doesn't specify that it must be an incompetently written script with plotholes and stupid plot.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    13. Re:Groundbreaking! by danila · · Score: 1

      Lest everyone forgets about the battle we are fighting let me remind that he is not "contributing years of effort to our cultural heritage", but to the profits of rapacious corporations, thanks to all the copyright extensions and the comatose public domain.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    14. Re:Groundbreaking! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Lest everyone forgets about the battle we are fighting let me remind that he is not "contributing years of effort to our cultural heritage", but to the profits of rapacious corporations, thanks to all the copyright extensions and the comatose public domain.

      Well, if and when this battle is won, then the work will still be there, taken from the hands of its opressor and given back to the public to whom it shall one day rightfully belong.

      In the meantime I agree with the basic premise of author's rights that it should be controlled by the creator or someone whom the creator chooses for a few dozen years. Lest parasites profit from the creative efforts of others.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  28. I'm impressed with something different by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SUre, the all-in-front-of-the-blue-screen point is important and impressive, but i'm equally intrigued by:

    1. Laurence Olivier starring in the movie, from old celluloid.

    2. That film noir look achieved through filming the scenes in black and white... and then colorizing them! (Smacks forehead) What a great, simple, and clever idea.

    Those 2 slick gimmicks have to lend an air of retro feel to the movie with aplomb, nevermind the other design elements, like the look and feel of the robots.

    Gotta see this one.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:I'm impressed with something different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh.. how can you shoot in B&W in front of a bluescreen. Tought to use chroma keying with no chroma signal :)

    2. Re:I'm impressed with something different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been seeing trailers for Sky Captain for over a year, and they were all in black and white except for a touch of colour in the explosions. But I just saw a TV ad that was fully colour. Did the studio decide to colourize it, or did the director/writer plan the colour from the start?

  29. Looked pretty cheesy by augustz · · Score: 1

    Saw the trailer a few times, the whole plot / effects looked cheesy, even though I normally love CGI. Hard to beleive the movie is that much better then the trailer.

    Is the plane some kind of super plane? In the trailer it doesn't make sense that he is able to avoid getting hit while flying it for example.

  30. Groundbreaking, my arse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    OK, let's translate this...

    What you said:
    ...groundbreaking film...
    ...I was completely blown away.

    What you meant:
    OK, OK, I know this film is just a cheesy knockoff of a pulp '30s-era sci-fi rag, but Angelina Jolie pops her tiddies out! TWICE!!!

    1. Re:Groundbreaking, my arse by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

      Angelina Jolie pops her tiddies out! TWICE!!!

      Hey! I thought we agreed -- no spoilers!

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    2. Re:Groundbreaking, my arse by ShroomSolo · · Score: 1

      "Angelina Jolie pops her tiddies out"

      -Does she really? I'd go see that... not that the world hasn't already seen them... Um.. maybe I'll rent it =)

  31. Wow!!! by Nosf3ratu · · Score: 0, Troll

    The plot, which hurtles across maps of the world Indiana Jones style, definitely take a back seat to the effects. The character interactions are all predictable.

    Awesome! First "I, Robot" and now this! What ground-breaking, revolutionary film-making! Where do I sign up!?
    Tell me, does Nerd Captain and World of Nerdnerd have random product placement too?

    --
    The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori
    1. Re:Wow!!! by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      Tell me, does Nerd Captain and World of Nerdnerd have random product placement too?

      Only if you're in the market for a P-40.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  32. The coolest part of this movie is... by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the fact that it was one man's vision, and started in his garage using off-the-shelf software and a whole lot of time before any studios ever got involved.

    Wired had an article about it a while ago, and i've been excited to see it ever since.

    Horray for garage studios!!

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
    1. Re:The coolest part of this movie is... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Informative
      Thank you for pointing it out, I was about to until I read your post.

      Although I had originally been under the impression that he took pictures of the actors, and added them to the movie that way. Oh well, still just as cool.

      If you ever want to see a cool CG anime done ENTIRELY by one man and voiced by himself and his wife, check out Hoshi No Koe (Voice of the Stars), and he recently did another one but I forget the name.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:The coolest part of this movie is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of Makoto Shinkai.

      "She and Her Cat" was his first award-winning short film. Just featured his animations, he and his wife's voices.

      "Voices of a Distant Star" was his second. Same deal on the voices. Some cleanup was done on the animations, but that doesn't change the fact one guy put the film together.

      Great films, both. Here's a fan site: http://daike.hp.infoseek.co.jp/

      I feel I should also plug Animation:Master (http://www.hash.com/) because those guys are doing everything they can to put a full studio on your computer. I used it all through art school.

  33. Wild ride to the past that should have been by miketo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cheesy? Of *course* it's cheesy! It's for every kid who sat in a theatre with a big bucket of popcorn, grinning like a madman at every swoop and explosion that graced the screen.

    I wasn't part of the pulp era, but I enjoyed reading pulp and Golden Age sf works. There's just something free-wheeling, childlike, and wondrous about the visions of tomorrow that those stories embodied. I still like space opera, with vast galactic fleets spinning out of a nebular cluster to go into battle with the dreaded Zorkanoids -- or whatever the evil space being of the moment was.

    The trailers for this reminded me of another "guilty pleasure" film, "The Rocketeer." I suspect "Sky Captain" will join "Rocketeer" in my movie collection as something that is aimless, harmless exciting fun.

    1. Re:Wild ride to the past that should have been by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      All I can say is, "Commando Cody and the Lost Planet Airmen." I spent I don't know how many nights staying up late watching the Commando Cody movies with my grandpa. Channel 41. 1:00 in the morning. Popcorn, pipe smoke and an excuse to stay up until they played the star spangled banner and the test pattern came on. Good times, man...

    2. Re:Wild ride to the past that should have been by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      here here! i agree completely
      The Rocketeer was one of the most underrated movies of my time, I'm really looking forward to next weekend.

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    3. Re:Wild ride to the past that should have been by serutan · · Score: 1

      Like me, you are the exact target audience for this film. I don't think you're going to be disappointed.

  34. No one will go to see this movie by Jakhel · · Score: 2, Funny

    for the action, special effects, or storyline. We all know that geeks since the early 90's have attended movies for 2 reasons and 2 reasons only:

    1) Angelina Jolie (and her lips..god those lips)
    2) Natalie Portman

    Hence the reason the movie "Hackers" is a favorite among geeks, as well as the continued success of the new Star Wars Trilogy (and in some cases "The Professional")

    1. Re:No one will go to see this movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a movie starring Angelina Jolie and Natalie Portman starting off in a wet t-shirt contest whereupon the judges are unable to determine a winner so the ladies are forced into a mud wrestling match to finish things. After this free for all, a riot breaks out, the two barely escape and run to a nearby hotel, barefoot and covered in mud. They still manage to rent a room and end up cleaning each other off in a shower scene.

      How would that one do?

  35. John Carter of Mars! by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, this would be kind of interesting. I've read the original series (my father named one of my sisters after Dejah Therece, the Princess of Mars) and loved the sheer retro campty style of the "smiling Virginian" sword fighting his way across the Red Planet.

    If done "so seriously it's fun" like Sky Captain appears, it could be one hell of a ride. If nothing else, I love a good swashbuckling movie.

    1. Re:John Carter of Mars! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      my father named one of my sisters after Dejah Therece

      I hoped he spelled it 'Dejah Thoris.'

      Your father wouldn't happen to be a mathematician specializing in n-dimensional geometry, would he?

    2. Re:John Carter of Mars! by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Angelina Jolie can swash my buckle any day.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:John Carter of Mars! by toddhisattva · · Score: 2, Funny

      They are waiting for the cameras and projectors that can handle the fourth primary color.

    4. Re:John Carter of Mars! by William+R.+Dickson · · Score: 1

      I've been looking forward to this, too. My uncle gave me the whole hardcover set when I was a teenager, and I reread them every 6-10 years; they're just a blast. Well, up until the last couple, anyway; then they're just kinda tired (and, in one case, unfinished).

      I was terribly worried when I heard the project was alive yet again that it'd be horribly massacred, but having seen the previews for Sky Captain, I think this guy may have just the right sensibilities to do it right.

    5. Re:John Carter of Mars! by RickP+in+AZ · · Score: 1

      Darting around the universes in a tri-mode, sport model, Ford...

    6. Re:John Carter of Mars! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      ...with a very illegal laser canon, of course. :)

    7. Re:John Carter of Mars! by crashfrog · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, I love a good swashbuckling movie.

      Especially one where everybody's naked! Or, maybe not.

      Nobody else is maybe just a little apprehensive of the idea of a fantasy swashbuckling movie dominated by John Carter's dangly bits? Nobody? Did we forget that little detail from the books - all the characters are naked?

      --
      I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
      If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
    8. Re:John Carter of Mars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your father wouldn't happen to be a mathematician specializing in n-dimensional geometry, would he?

      That was by far the worst Heinlein book I've read. I should have quit after the first twenty pages but since I liked many of his other books, I had this sick sense of wonder at the thing and wouldn't put it down. Ugh!

    9. Re:John Carter of Mars! by mink · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good companion to Flesh Gordon.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  36. John Carter !! by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

    I suppose that CG has finally come so far as to make the books possible. I hope who ever does it, does it well because the books are fantastic. Many are the days I enjoyed them, and the old SPI game as well. Casting John Carter wouldn't be too tough I don't think - Hugh Jackman comes to mind. But Dejah Thoris? That is a tough one, a young Catherine Zeta-Jones maybe? Wow, this has set my weekend - time to dust off an old campaign I had tried to get together once long ago.

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    1. Re:John Carter !! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Careful about wishing for book-to-movie conversions. Especially if you enjoyed the book.

      Movies can (and usually do in my experience) suck big time compared to the books. As in The Postman. Excellent Book. Abysmally disappointing movie.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    2. Re:John Carter !! by nytes · · Score: 1

      Whoever they cast as Dejah Thoris had better look good. I believe that she went topless, or nude, in the books (it's been quite a while since I read them).

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    3. Re:John Carter !! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      There was a Barsoomian role-playing game. On the Social Interaction with a Princess table, a bad result was "You accidently spill your dessert down the front of her dress.*" (* With a footnote that Martian princesses wore topless dresses.)

      Also, Barsoonian warriors challenged each other by grabbing their metals* and slapping the other in the face with them. (* metal shorts and harness that were all males wore.)

      I can see why John Norman did a cheap S&M knockoff of it. Too bad he went completely off the rails after the third Gor book or so.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:John Carter !! by nytes · · Score: 1

      Barsoonian warriors challenged each other by grabbing their metals* and slapping the other in the face with them.

      Are you certain that "metals" wasn't a euphemism for something else?

      And with that image implanted firmly in your mind, I leave you :)

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    5. Re:John Carter !! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Could be. I don't remember if you were supposed to grab your own or the other guy's metals to do the slapping with. (Since Martian women laid eggs, who knows. I dunno you know?)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  37. I'm sorry, Microsoft has patented the blue screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...though I hadn't realized they had ported it over to the Macintosh yet.

  38. View the trailers by nemski · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you haven't seen the commercials or trailers, take a look here . . . http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/skycaptain andtheworldoftomorrow/

    --
    Some people have a way with words, others not have way.
  39. Doc Savage, Man of Bronze!! by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm a tremendous fan of pulp era Science Fiction, back when a stout young Virginian could wish himself to Mars. Probably my favorite stories that would translate well to modern visual media are the Doc Savage stories.

    The real thing were written before physics was a respected scientific profession, and chemists and electricians were the cutting edge of technology. The World's Fair and the technological marvel of the Golden Gate Bridge are the settings for the Man of Bronze, a paragon of physical perfection raised by five scientists and flanked by his four comrades in arms, plus their pet monkey, pig and occasionally aided by Doc's sister.

    They are slices of a different age, a different outlook. The world was as full of sinister forces as the headlines of today, but the steadfast belief that honorable and well trained (and euro-caucasian) men could triumph over evil was held as a truism. Airplanes were new, the world had just become global, but war had yet to span the whole planet.

    Great books.

    I have a strong feeling that this movie is based more on the modern steampunk and Sons of Ether (a la White Wolf's Mage) genre. A modern retake on an era, just like RenFaires have little to do with the actual Middle Ages.

    --
    Evan "Not for the Politically Correct sensitive"

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    1. Re:Doc Savage, Man of Bronze!! by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1
      A modern retake on an era, just like RenFaires have little to do with the actual Middle Ages.

      that's a lie! everyone in the middle ages was a wealthy Pagan Celtic magician who carried a sword and all the women wore low-cut tops and flirted with anything in pants!

      hehehe, sorry, i know too many ren-faire people who can't seperate fantasy from reality

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    2. Re:Doc Savage, Man of Bronze!! by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      What about E. E. Doc Smith? All the good guys are built like Arnold Swartzenegger, and the bad guys are more like Don Knotts. All the women are beautiful, and in desperate need of rescue. All machines are huge, complicated, and make lots of noise. What more can you want?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    3. Re:Doc Savage, Man of Bronze!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, if you want to download the entire 181-book Doc Savage collection (for free even), go here:

      http://www.blackmask.com/cgi-bin/newlinks/page.cgi ?g=Pulp_Fiction%2FDoc_Savage%2Findex.html&d=1

      Posting anonymously because my boss occasionally reads Slashdot and has this crazy notion that I should be working instead of surfing.

    4. Re:Doc Savage, Man of Bronze!! by DCMonkey · · Score: 1

      There was a Doc Savage movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072886/ but it doesn't sound like it was very good.

      I think I actually saw it in the theater when I was around 5.

      --
      DCMonkey
    5. Re:Doc Savage, Man of Bronze!! by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      I saw part of it. The names and "factual" information about the characters are there, but that's it. It was modernized and I think was supposed to be a farce. It wound up simply bad.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    6. Re:Doc Savage, Man of Bronze!! by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Yep... I almost mentioned him and Robert E. Howard and Edgar Rice Burroughs (well, the latter I did reference). Good authors all.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  40. Yeah, great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they took the Stargate theme music and used it in the UK trailers. Fucking weak.

    1. Re:Yeah, great by objekt · · Score: 1

      So did about 16 other films. Grow up!
      from the FAQ on imdb http://imdb.com/title/tt0346156/board/nest/1150995 3?d=11510088#11510088
      1) Why is the STARGATE theme in the teaser trailer? Why did they steal the music from Stargate? Will this movie have an original soundtrack?

      Because the trailer editor thought it envoked the right mood, and the Paramount marketing people didn't say, no and it wasn't too expensive to license. Its been used in other trailers, and there are Star Gate Freaks all over the internet freaking out on this for some reason.

      The score is one of the last parts of a film to be developed. A teaser trailer usually has to be released well before the composer has been able to do much work, if any.

      Music from Stargate has been used in the following trailers:

      Dragonheart (1995) - Theatrical Trailer
      Independence Day (1996) - Theatrical Trailer
      Jumanji (1995) - Theatrical Trailer
      Lost in Space (1998) - Theatrical Trailer
      The Man in the Iron Mask (1998) - Theatrical Trailer
      Mighty Joe Young (1998) - Theatrical Trailer
      The Mummy (1999) - Theatrical Trailer
      Volcano (1997) - Theatrical Trailer
      Warriors of Virtue (1997) - Theatrical Trailer
      Waterworld (1995) - Theatrical Trailer
      Mission to Mars (2000) - TV Trailer
      Titan A.E. (2000) - TV Trailer
      Dungeons & Dragons (2000) - Theatrical Trailer
      Deep Rising (1998) - TV Trailer
      The Time Machine (2002) - Theatrical Trailer
      Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron (2002) - TV Trailer
      Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (2004) - Teaser Trailer

      The music is from the original Stargate movie, and was adapted for Stargate SG-1.
      It also features music from "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within". (It's the music from Aki's dream sequence)

      They did not "steal" this music. It's called "licensing"
      The second trailer doesn't use the Stargate music.

      Yes, the movie will use original music composed by Ed Shearmur.
      It's getting rave reviews, and will be released Sept 7, 2004.
      You can listen to it here
      RealPlayer format: http://demand1.stream.aol.com/ramgen/aol/us/aolmus ic/artists/sony/various/skycaptainsoundtrack/vario us_skycaptainsoundtrack_lp.rm
      or
      http://mp.aol.c om/audio.main.adp?mxid=1153566

      ----

      It may interest you to know that the Stargate movie "stole" the music for its own trailer :)

      from http://www.soundtrack.net/trailers/?cid=S&id=5 91

      Stargate (1994)
      "Rhythm of the Heat" - Peter Gabriel
      Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) - Wojciech Kilar

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
  41. Wired Magazine Article by Standmic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wired ran an article about Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow several months ago.

  42. SciFi set in the past? by fred3666 · · Score: 0

    It is set in the 30s and yet we know this didn't happen. There isn't too many examples of SciFi movies that are set in the past. There's not too many people alive today that remember the 1930s all that well. I'd wager that a big percentage of them don't like SciFi as a genre. I'd also worry that there isn't too many theatres in 'walker' distance of an old-folks home. I just can't imagine that this would be commercially viable. But who knows, I would never have guessed that people would buy half the things on eBay either...

    1. Re:SciFi set in the past? by servognome · · Score: 1

      Weren't Indiana Jones, Who Framed Roger Rabit, and Rocketeer set in the same time period?
      Just because they chose that era for a setting doesn't mean it is a nostalgia film. I wouldn't worry about the "walker" folks, I worry whether the new generation will like the film style.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:SciFi set in the past? by theAtomicFireball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, there's a whole genre... it's called SteamPunk. Not too much of it has made it to the big screen (especially live action) and what has hasn't been great (it's a tough concept to pull off) but it is far from a novel concept.

      If knowing something didn't actually happen makes a story worthless, we might as well just start throwing out the old SF from Vernes up to the early Clark, Asimov and Heinlein as well as all the historical fiction "littering" up our libraries and book stores.

    3. Re:SciFi set in the past? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      yeah man, I saw 2001 and it was a load of crap! I was alive in 2001 and none of that happened!!1!

      jesus... get a clue. Sci-fi is FICTION, it doesn't have to be historically accurate, it doesn't have to be futuristic, it doesn't have to be anything. I for one LIKE seeing scifi with a clever setting that isn't the usual extrapolation of what our world might be in X years.

  43. LAST EXILE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello! This is just a Holywood rehash and spin from Last Exile. Or at least that is what I see from the trailers and review. Hollywood cannot get orginial ideas they are pretty much dead!

  44. The world of tomorrow by servognome · · Score: 1

    In this world of tomorrow do we get flying cars?
    I don't care about robots, submarine planes, or ray guns. I WANT MY FLYING CAR

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  45. Looks boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but I think this is going to be a complete box-office disaster. Everything about this just reeks of "boring".

    Anyone remember "The Phantom"? Same shit, different pile.

    1. Re:Looks boring by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      I agree. The only difference is that there's a bunch of good actors willing to sink with the movie.
      When Hollywood need that much talent on something that looks this fishy, you gotta wonder.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  46. Parrots the ads by brian6string · · Score: 1

    I saw some ads for this movie last night that also called the film "ground breaking."

    Filmed in front of a blue screen is groundbreaking? Spy Kids 3D was also filmed this way. My kids liked it, but I'd never mention it on /. Um, oops, I think I just did.

  47. Its Live action Anime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Im serious.

    Watch it, then watch Last Exile :)

  48. Review? by rockhome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't a review, it is a few paragraphs about having seen the film.

    Is not a review a critical assessment of the films intentions and its success in achieving its aims?

    Why do articles like these get approved?

    Sometimes I think /. is trying to waste my time with worthless sci-fi sychophants and their crap about bad sci-fi(All of Star Trek).

    1. Re:Review? by theghost · · Score: 1
      Maybe it wasn't a great review, but i got the following out of it:
      • Plot took a back seat to effects
      • Enjoyed the hell out of it

      Looks like a review to me! Don't be such a curmudgeon!
      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    2. Re:Review? by marsvin · · Score: 1

      I think you just coined the term "psychophant"... I'm going to use that. Thanks.

    3. Re:Review? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My goodness! Were your cornflakes a bit more yellow than usual this morning?

    4. Re:Review? by Kredal · · Score: 1

      I hear you can filter out any story listed as "scifi" on slashdot, so you won't have to read about any more bad sci fi movies.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  49. Which language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    CGI should be a tool to enhance a good, original story.


    But which language, perl or php?

  50. I'd almost completely forgotten! by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Jeez! I'm a little amazed. I've been reading Slashdot regularly every day and somehow, without really realizing when it happened, I'd almost completely forgotten about Jon Katz. How can this be? I still remember how he used to make my blood boil with his pompous, sophomoric rants. And yet at some point I sort of started to chalk that up to the nature of the beast -- listening to children in grown-up bodies blabbering on like they wielded the authority of a BBC field correspondent was all part of the fun of Slashdot. Then he disappeared and ... could it be ... my Slashdot experience seems to be none the worse for wear! How can this have happened? How can I have so quickly forgotten all about Jon Katz's seminal contribution to Slashdot history, when it had given me so much bitter, perverse joy?

    Oh yeah... now I remember. That was about the time I started browsing at -1.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  51. the simple answer... by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is because it's hard.

    hollywood is kind of like the gymnasts in the olympics. you always want them to do a spectacular routine, they always wants to do a spectacular routine, they practice forever to do it right, but they can still screw up badly, even at the highest levels of competition. it's just plain HARD. and you can still fail on the easy stuff you know how to do in your sleep.

    there is just so many variables involved, and so many nuances of execution to keep track of, that hollywood will always be churning out bad movies.

    but look at it this way: there are no peaks without valleys. you can't have something seem great if you compare it against a bunch of other movies equally as great. you're a tough judge. we all are. if every movie was matrix-quality, then it stop impressing you as much as it did. so bad movies will be made, in a greater number than good movies, forever. it's statistical inevitability and human psychology conspiring together.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the simple answer... by Pragmatix · · Score: 1
      It is even simpler, Hollywood is mostly interested in just making money. As long as the crap they put out makes money, they are not going to shed too many tears about not making good movies.

      Hollywood is also very risk averse, and it is difficult to make a good movie that also has a broad appeal to the American public.

    2. Re:the simple answer... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      if every movie was matrix-quality

      I would settle for every Matrix movie to be Matrix-quality.
      Alas its only one out of three : (

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  52. Quick Question by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

    It has a "league of extrordinary gentlemen" feel to it, and that was the vilest shitstain to hit celluloid in the history of film.

    Did you even see the second Matrix movie?

    On another note. Was Captain Nemo Persian or whatever in any other source before the league of extrordinary gentlemen came out?

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    1. Re:Quick Question by questor · · Score: 1

      From Verne's Mysterious Island: "Captain Nemo was an Indian, the Prince Dakkar, son of a rajah of the then independent territory of Bundelkund." (Thanks to Jess Nevin's annotations of the "League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" comics on which the movie was (loosely) based for a pointer in this direction, and Project Gutenberg for making the text of the novel available.)

      --
      Mashed potatoes can be your friends!
    2. Re:Quick Question by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Thanks for relieving a bit of ignorance. I guess it was just my Euro/Amercano-centric brain at work again, eh?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    3. Re:Quick Question by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes, that's how Jules Verne wrote him.

      At one point in Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, Nemo declares himself to be a native of India, who has lost his family and his homeland.

      He shows up again in The Mysterious Island, and although there are inconsistancies between the two books, we get a lot more information about him:

      Captain Nemo was an Indian, the Prince Dakkar, son of a rajah of the then independent territory of Bundelkund. His father sent him, when ten years of age, to Europe, in order that he might receive an education in all respects complete, and in the hopes that by his talents and knowledge he might one day take a leading part in raising his long degraded and heathen country to a level with the nations of Europe.

      From the age of ten years to that of thirty Prince Dakkar, endowed by Nature with her richest gifts of intellect, accumulated knowledge of every kind, and in science, literature, and art his researches were extensive and profound.

      He traveled over the whole of Europe. His rank and fortune caused him to be everywhere sought after; but the pleasures of the world had for him no attractions. Though young and possessed of every personal advantage, he was ever grave--somber even--devoured by an unquenchable thirst for knowledge, and cherishing in the recesses of his heart the hope that he might become a great and powerful ruler of a free and enlightened people.

      Still, for long the love of science triumphed over all other feelings. He became an artist deeply impressed by the marvels of art, a philosopher to whom no one of the higher sciences was unknown, a statesman versed in the policy of European courts. To the eyes of those who observed him superficially he might have passed for one of those cosmopolitans, curious of knowledge, but disdaining action; one of those opulent travelers, haughty and cynical, who move incessantly from place to place, and are of no country.

      The history of Captain Nemo has, in fact, been published under the title of "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea." Here, therefore, will apply the observation already made as to the adventures of Ayrton with regard to the discrepancy of dates. Readers should therefore refer to the note already published on this point.

      This artist, this philosopher, this man was, however, still cherishing the hope instilled into him from his earliest days.

      Prince Dakkar returned to Bundelkund in the year 1849. He married a noble Indian lady, who was imbued with an ambition not less ardent than that by which he was inspired. Two children were born to them, whom they tenderly loved. But domestic happiness did not prevent him from seeking to carry out the object at which he aimed. He waited an opportunity. At length, as he vainly fancied, it presented itself.

      Instigated by princes equally ambitious and less sagacious and more unscrupulous than he was, the people of India were persuaded that they might successfully rise against their English rulers, who had brought them out of a state of anarchy and constant warfare and misery, and had established peace and prosperity in their country. Their ignorance and gross superstition made them the facile tools of their designing chiefs.

      In 1857 the great sepoy revolt broke out. Prince Dakkar, under the belief that he should thereby have the opportunity of attaining the object of his long-cherished ambition, was easily drawn into it. He forthwith devoted his talents and wealth to the service of this cause. He aided it in person; he fought in the front ranks; he risked his life equally with the humblest of the wretched and misguided fanatics; he was ten times wounded in twenty engagements, seeking death but finding it not, but at length the sanguinary rebels were utterly defeated, and the atrocious mutiny was brought to an end.

      Never before had the British power in India been exposed to such danger, and if, as they had hoped, the sepoys had received assistance from without, the influence and su

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    4. Re:Quick Question by coaxial · · Score: 1

      On another note. Was Captain Nemo Persian or whatever in any other source before the league of extrordinary gentlemen came out?

      Get thee some culture. Or at least a junior high education.

    5. Re:Quick Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI - Verne's originally intended Nemo to be Polish, and Russia the country he had a grudge against. See note 139.

    6. Re:Quick Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting, and I suppose that explains the screen door on the Nautilus ;)

    7. Re:Quick Question by Standmic · · Score: 1

      In 20,000 Leagues, Captain Nemo never says a single word about being from India or anywhere else for that matter. The most you can gleam from the story is that he lost his wife and child(ren, I don't remember). Maybe you got that information from Mysterious Island (which I haven't read), but I literally just finished 20,000 Leagues, and none of that information was contained in it. Use Amazon's Search Within the Book if youd on't believe me.

    8. Re:Quick Question by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      I skimmed through Gutenberg's 20,000 Leagues in writing the post, actually. The big excerpt is all Mysterious Island. But the statement about being Indian IS from 20,000 Leagues, and comes shortly after the scene where Nemo rescues an Indian pearl diver and gives him a bag of pearls, IIRC.

      Quite a bit later, he briefly mentions how he's upset about losing his family, et al.

      Certainly he never gets into details at all, much less as much as we get in Mysterious Island, but we do get a few little glimpses.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  53. Blue Screen Filming by Kenshin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What sets this film apart from others is that every scene was shot against a blue screen.

    The trouble is: It looks very much like that.

    Good use of blue screening results in the characters looking like they're "there". From the commercials I've seen of this movie, it reminds me of one of those old CD-ROM games where they mixed live actors and CG backgrounds.

    This one just doesn't work for me. It feels so artificial.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    1. Re:Blue Screen Filming by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      I think the standard reply would be that that was the look they were going for. You don't have to enjoy it, but lots of other people will. It's a popcorn movie.

    2. Re:Blue Screen Filming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh! You got all that from just looking at a short trailer? Wow. I'm impressed. You must be one of those movie studio execs we keep hearing about.

    3. Re:Blue Screen Filming by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      All I said was that I didn't like the visual style.

      That, itself, might be enough to distract me from enjoying the film.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  54. Alert! Yellow Dog Review by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
    Hollywood has *NEVER* had problems creating great computer graphics. It *HAS* had problems creating compelling stories and characters with depth and emotion.

    I'll be waiting to hear the plot is terrible, like Catwoman -- another movie that "looked" great but was utter trash.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Alert! Yellow Dog Review by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      Looked great??? From the very first moment I saw a preview for Catwoman, I was convinced it would be an absolutely terrible movie. It just looked so bad! You would have had to pay me to see such garbage.

      Since then I've been hearing it is as bad as I originally suspected.

      This Captain Sky movie looks like it could be decent or really, really bad. There didn't appear to be much in the way of plot from the previews, but I believe it has potential.

      Unfortunately, films that tend to focus on special effects also have the tendency to be weak on plot. I'd rather have a well-written script than special effects any day.

  55. Yeah... by raehl · · Score: 4, Funny

    we need something that interests us, not just something that looks pretty.

    And you probably like women for their personality too. Wierdo.

    1. Re:Yeah... by Xaroth · · Score: 1

      And you probably like women for their personality too. Wierdo.

      Singular. All hail Queen Borg!

      But, I kid. I kid. ;)

    2. Re:Yeah... by gosand · · Score: 1
      And you probably like women for their personality too. Wierdo.

      Pictures have a personality?

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    3. Re:Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, at least as much personality as a slashdot nerd. Other questions?

  56. They finished it? Finally! by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    This was supposed to ship last June. Originally, Conran was trying to do the whole job with his own people in Canoga Park. The project was in deep trouble by last winter, and they were frantically outsourcing work to the usual effects houses (ILM, Pixel Liberation Front (hi!), Ring of Fire, etc.) ILM makes about half of their money bailing out productions in trouble.

    (Incidentally, this is why working with Hollywood is such a pain. Either you're in development hell, and there's no money, or you're in production, and and there's no time.)

    "Sky Captain" does look a bit too much like Crimson Skies. Microsoft has a line of Crimson Skies pulp fiction novels. that seem designed to be movies. Dreamworks optioned movie rights for Crimson Skies back in 2001, but didn't use the option.

    1. Re:They finished it? Finally! by objekt · · Score: 1

      Sky Captain was moved from June to September because Spiderman got pushed too close. Money that would have gone to overtime for the animators instead went to getting the job done better.

      Crimson Skies was in production when the makers took a tour of the World Of Tomorrow studio and decided to cancel the film.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
  57. Clarification by SoCoKapSig · · Score: 0

    It's the first movie filmed entirely in front of a blue screen AND with all backgrounds being computer generated

  58. Post Modern? by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this movie just seem like a chance for a filmmaker to do something well in a technical sense. Sure the SF/adventure genre has been done to death, but for the story and genre how well did he do it? Like the example of great artists and painters who cut their teeth on replicating the works of the masters. Or gymnasts who go through the technical routine before peforming their own styles.

    This might also be his opportunity to say "Hey, Film Industry! I can make a decent Hollywood A film. Hire Me!" Y'know something to put on the resume. For the kids.

    Of course as other fans of the genre said, it might be nice to see the world again where the future is optimistic, and there are genuine heroes.

    1. Re:Post Modern? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Of course as other fans of the genre said, it might be nice to see the world again where the future is optimistic, and there are genuine heroes.

      Exactly, I love gritty postmodern tales of a dark future where science and technology have screwed us all, but I need the occasional retro modern optimistic sense of wonder and exitement of the prospects of the future.
      : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  59. This looks like... by wiggly-wiggly · · Score: 1

    Command and Conquer with some Captain Proton thrown in for good measure.

  60. John Carter definitely R-rated by shaper · · Score: 1

    As I recall, in all the John Carter books everyone ran around mostly naked. At least, that's how Dejah Thoris was described the first time John Carter saw her. Naked with some jewelry was described as normal attire.

    So, I can see Hollywood doing naked women running around everywhere, but they would probably balk at male full-frontal nudity. I wonder how he would address this? Probably just put clothes on everybody.

    1. Re:John Carter definitely R-rated by Lovedumplingx · · Score: 1

      All I know is the Mars series was fantastic...up until liek book 6 and then it started to turn. But I've often thought that it would be wicked cool to see John Carter on the big screen. Nudity be damned. I want to see the Green Martian men and watch Carter beat the shit out of people.

    2. Re:John Carter definitely R-rated by William+R.+Dickson · · Score: 1

      With his earthly thews propelling him across the Barsoomian landscape in great leaps and bounds.

      One thing I could never figure out in that series -- why did anybody trust themselves to those one-man fliers? As I recall, they invariably had their buoyancy tanks punctured by a lucky shot from a green martian while passing over some dead city, and then the eight ray leaked out all over the place and they had to set down in the middle of nowhere. I'm not sure anybody ever actually successfully went from point A to point B in one of those things.

    3. Re:John Carter definitely R-rated by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Brutal encounter tables. Also the green martians only aimed at the flyers that were radiating the aura of Player Characterness.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  61. That fat guy from AICN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Conran mentioned that for his next project he wants to tackle Edgar Rice Burroughs' epic John Carter series."

    Um, isn't Harry Knowles already working on the John Carter series?

    1. Re:That fat guy from AICN by objekt · · Score: 1

      Harry Knowles is not the director, Conran is. Knowles is the financial backer/producer. http://imdb.com/title/tt0401729/fullcredits

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
  62. Saw 8 minutes at Wondercon in SF by r0d3nt · · Score: 1

    While my wife and I were at Wondercon in SF back in April, they had a special presentation of Skycaptain and The World of Tomorrow. The director and producer were there to answer questions after the 8 minutes of footage that were shown. Good stuff, especially since most all of the work was done using PowerMac G5s.

    --
    You are not root, go away.
    1. Re:Saw 8 minutes at Wondercon in SF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good stuff, especially since most all of the work was done using PowerMac G5s.

      In what way does the use of a specific tool make it good/bad? This sounds like you are being an apologist for some other part of the movie.

    2. Re:Saw 8 minutes at Wondercon in SF by r0d3nt · · Score: 1

      With the LoTR trilogy being mostly done with a Linux render farm, and I was estatic to hear that Skycaptain was done with G5s. This movie DOES look awesome.

      Guess I should have prefaced this with: While my wife and I [both Apple fans]...

      --
      You are not root, go away.
  63. Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny
    This isn't a story you want to tell. It tears down everything our libertarian, DIY, hacker culture stands for!

    "Little guy with big ideas, can't bring them to fruition, needs to sell out to big media corps (TEH DEVIL!) to bring his dream to frution and expose it to the masses."


    Now, if he had self-published, set up a website and sold his own DVDs, now that would be worth trumpeting.

    This guy should be publicly flogged as a traitor, a collaborator with the evil corps! First against the wall when the revolution comes!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  64. OT - Re: your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I have one name for you - Dirichlet

  65. as long as nerds review films by dragongrrl · · Score: 1

    we'll have films released that are boring wastes of computer time.

    since i haven't seen "Sky Captain", i won't pre-judge it. but comments like
    The plot, which hurtles across maps of the world Indiana Jones style, definitely take a back seat to the effects. The character interactions are all predictable.
    will keep me away from the theater every time. i'm tired of being burned.

    anyone else remember how badly "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within" sucked? oh yeah, any visually pleasing film will get a "thumbs-up" from Ebert, regadless of how thin the plotline might be. he's a closet nerd.

    1. Re:as long as nerds review films by mink · · Score: 1

      Upset because something with "Final Fantasy" in the title had a thin plotline?
      I like the FF movie and games but they are not exactly deep or even thought provoking most of the time.

      I'm not saying don't be wary of this movie, but you might want to get a few more reviews and see how it does on rotton tomatos befire staying away.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  66. shelved? by SpootFinallyRegister · · Score: 1

    didnt this get shelved last summer after a brutal panning by critics? i thought i remembered this movie being a laughingstock.

    i have a friend who likes possibly the worst movies ever made. he was thrilled when too fast too furious got on HBO or starz or whatever it was on... and even he thinks this movie looks like cheesy garbage.

    1. Re:shelved? by objekt · · Score: 1

      No, it didn't even have it's first showing of the completed version until July of this year.

      Last year was when all the major studios were in a bidding war to get the distribution rights.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
  67. Tom Strong, modern and postmodern. by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm a tremendous fan of pulp era Science Fiction

    Then you should rather enjoy the adventures ofTom Strong, from America's Best Comics. Very good pulp.

    I have a strong feeling that this movie is based more on the modern steampunk and Sons of Ether (a la White Wolf's Mage) genre. A modern retake on an era

    There is a vocabulary used to discuss and analyse art, and by extension science fiction, that uses the words "modern" and "postmodern" that you might or might not be aware of.
    I don't want to go into a lenghty explanation of the differences, but basically, postmodern sci-fi is darker and recycles elements of past stories.

    Yes, "modern" means "contemporary", but art gave it another meaning:
    modern artistic or literary philosophy and practice; especially : a self-conscious break with the past and a search for new forms of expression

    And by opposition:
    Main Entry: postmodern
    Pronunciation: "pOs(t)-'mä-d&rn, ÷-'mä-d(&-)r&n
    Function: adjective
    : of, relating to, or being any of several movements (as in art, architecture, or literature) that are reactions against the philosophy and practices of modern movements and are typically marked by revival of traditional elements and techniques

    The fun with sky captain is that it looks like its got the retro modern feel to it: A sense of adventure and wonder, as opposed to the post modern weariness (post as in after that era of "modernism" ... using the word "modern" to refer to the past can be confusing, I know).

    So Sky Captain and Tom Strong are both postmodern, but they seek to reanimate the feel of their inspiration's modern attitude (the "gee whiz" feeling of the newness of things that are now retro to us).
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Tom Strong, modern and postmodern. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woo-hoo, the artistes have their own little geeky in-language. Aren't we up to post-post-post-post-modernism now? Avant-Garde is 150 years behind us, and Art-Nouveau is 120 years old.

    2. Re:Tom Strong, modern and postmodern. by xethair · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is an artifact of fools who were so fixated with the now and contained by fashion that they failed to come up with any remotely descriptive label. I see no reason why we should continue to humor them, and it is certainly wrong to interject this kind of drivel just because someone used the word "modern" in a correct, natural, and perfectly clear way.

      using the word "modern" to refer to the past can be confusing, I know

      No, it's stupid. There's a difference. Confusing would be if it were hard to understand. It's not. Stupid would be like using the word modern to refer to the past.

  68. see for yourself by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2004/09/02/arts/2 0040905_TOPC_SLIDESHOW_1.html

    1. SKETCHING IT OUT
    As in traditional filmmaking, hand-drawn storyboards are used to guide the composition of a shot. This one was created in April 2002 as production began at a warehouse studio in Van Nuys, Calif. Look out, Polly, there's one behind you!

    2. FLESHING IT OUT
    The next step was this computer-animated version of the storyboard, called an animatic. Animatics serve as a rough draft for the animators, but they're also useful to the actors. With no set or robotic invaders to orient her, Gwyneth Paltrow could get a sense of the scene from the animatic.

    3. GET ME PALTROW
    Ms. Paltrow, costumed in Polly's slouchy hat and girl-reporter coat, acted the scene in front of a blue screen. The colored points of light behind her are "trackers," used to position her within the frame. She and the other actors were shot on high-definition digital film.

    4. GET ME BUILDINGS
    The animators combined photographs of actual New York City structures with computer-generated elements to create the streetscape, leaving space for the robot legs. The marquee features a little in-joke: "Wuthering Heights," another Olivier film -- one he made while alive.

    5. GET ME ROBOT
    The giant robots, inspired by both the Bauhaus aesthetic and early D.C. Comics, typify the movie's retro look. First the drawings were embellished with color, shadowing and other detail. Then a finishing process known as rendering gave them their photographic realism.

    6. NEARLY THERE
    The animators combined Ms. Paltrow and the computer elements in a composited black-and-white frame. Although the film is in color, it was initially conceived for black-and-white, and this step allowed the animators to approach the frame as a composition of light and shadow.

    7. PUTTING IT TOGETHER
    Drawing from the color in the live-action and animated components, the animators tinted the sequence, using a process similar to the one used to colorize old movies. Each scene in the film was given a distinct palette. For this, the filmmakers chose a muted, almost monochromatic scheme, to evoke the dark urban mood.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  69. all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by theghost · · Score: 5, Funny

    all the way back to "The Last Starfighter"

    all the way back to 1984?

    Never heard of Tron? 1982? CG all over the place?

    You whippersnappers with your fancy Angelina Jolie-la-di-da and Jude Law-la-di-doo! Back in my day, all we had was Jeff Bridges and Bruce Boxleitner in neon jumpsuits. And we liked it!

    --
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    1. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by tool462 · · Score: 2, Funny
      all the way back to 1984?

      1984? I think I remember that book. Was it really like that back then? I'll have to ask my mom. She's almost done packing my lunch for school today.

    2. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by osrevad · · Score: 0

      TRON. DID NOT. USE CG.

    3. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by solios · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but Tron's actual CG footage was farmed out to every fledgling computer graphics house in the area.

      TLS was rendered completely on a single Cray, and while some shots have a definite "atari" quality about them, some shots still hold their own, even today.

      Yeah, Tron might have been first to market, but TLS was, imo, a whole hell of a lot cooler. TLS is why I went to Art School and why I have a degree in Computer Animation.

      Of course, I spend my workdays subtitling video and being a linux bitch, but hey. That's the economy. A man can dream.

    4. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I concur. Also, Tron seemed to throw in CGI scenes just because it could. For instance, while they are on a solar sail over some valley in the computer world, one of the characters points to the ground and says, "look, gridbugs!" Cut to a scene of little CGI bug critters puttering around a grid for a few seconds. Then they're gone. The gridbugs disappear. They had NOTHING to do with the story of the movie.

      The Last Starfighter had a lot more compelling features:

      1) Everything that looked like CGI in it was actually CGI. Tron had many, many sets that were made of wood and paint, and just painted to look like CGI.

      2) The CGI was used to simulate real-world objects. For instance, when the recruiter lands in his 'space car' the car is a prop constructed for use in the movie. Later on, this car flies into space and becomes a CGI effect seamlessly. (Of course, the careful observer can tell when it happens, but the CGI does look good.)

      3) General polish. Tron feels a lot like a tech demo. The Last Starfighter feels a lot like a movie, albeit a really cheesy one.

      Of course, neither of the movies were very good...

    5. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tron was cool because it created its own world. Those smooth, untextured surfcaes were unlike anything I had ever seen before. The director says in the DVD/Laserdisc commentary that, for Tron, he wanted to let computer animation be its own thing and develop its own look. He said he thought computer animation became less interesting the more effort people put into making it uber-realistic.

    6. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES. IT DID. JUST NOT. EXCLUSIVELY. MUCH LIKE. TLS.

      (wow, that's fun, except for that damned lameness filter.)

    7. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      What were the lightcycles, then? Hand-drawn cartoons? What was the big sailship? What were the walking blocks?

      To render your statement into a true one, insert the word "exclusively": Tron did not EXCLUSIVELY use CG.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    8. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by hambonewilkins · · Score: 1

      Actually, IIRC, the gridbugs were hand-drawn but made to look like CGI. Many things in TRON are traditional animation made to look like CGI. So, you didn't use the best example, but I get your point.

      --

      God Bless America. Why? Did it sneeze?
    9. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha! Your mom makes your lunch. What bedtime story will she read to you tonite?

    10. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by syukton · · Score: 1

      There's about 15 minutes of CG in Tron. The rest is just good photography on special film.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    11. Re:all the way back to "The Last Starfighter" by danila · · Score: 1

      All the way back to Westworld (1973) then. :)

      Timeline of CGI in movies

      Back in MY day we only had some wireframes on screen like in Star Wars or Alien and we liked it. :)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  70. Re:I'm sorry, Microsoft has patented the blue scre by dcphoenix · · Score: 1

    that makes sense, both Microsoft's blue screen and the Star War's I and II movies shot in front of one both cause the same sickly reaction.

  71. Barsoom! by peacefinder · · Score: 1

    Okay, now that would be cool.

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  72. check it out by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
    http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2004/09/02/arts/2 0040905_TOPC_SLIDESHOW_6.html

    6. NEARLY THERE
    The animators combined Ms. Paltrow and the computer elements in a composited black-and-white frame. Although the film is in color, it was initially conceived for black-and-white, and this step allowed the animators to approach the frame as a composition of light and shadow.

    7. PUTTING IT TOGETHER
    Drawing from the color in the live-action and animated components, the animators tinted the sequence, using a process similar to the one used to colorize old movies. Each scene in the film was given a distinct palette. For this, the filmmakers chose a muted, almost monochromatic scheme, to evoke the dark urban mood.
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  73. Where's Katz? by Augusto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He had the most inane and illogical opinions, but I really enjoyed his articles because they just generated levels of flaming and hilarity that are classic on slashdot.

    What happened to Katz? Why did he stop contributing to slashdot? Is he still talking about Columbine and geekdoom? Did he lear to use a computer?

    I wish slashdot would post an interview with him, I predict record page hits!

    Jon Katz we miss you, you sucked, but you are missed!

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Where's Katz? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Katz posts a new rant every week or so. However, there is a bug in Slashcode which has hardcoded everyones settings to Ignore him, no matter how you have you configuration set, so nobody can see any of his postings. Poor guy, he's been wondering why nobody slams on his rants anymore...

    2. Re:Where's Katz? by Quay42 · · Score: 1

      Oh, did he stop posting? I long ago marked Jon Katz articles to not show up for me (the only articles I ignore).

      --
      "Has anything you've done made your life better?" - American History X
    3. Re:Where's Katz? by kgp · · Score: 2, Informative
      Looks like he's writing about dogs now (wasn't he always? rimshot). He's obviously on a roll he's onto his second book:You can read an interview with John.

      Perhaps dealing with real dogs is easier than dealing with the Dogs of Slashdot.
    4. Re:Where's Katz? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so did I. I thought "I'm sure everything will be fine if I turn off Jon Katz. It's not like EVERYONE on slashdot will do that, right?" Horrifically, I now see how wrong I was!

    5. Re:Where's Katz? by Cadrys · · Score: 1

      A clear case of "it's not a bug, it's a *feature*" if I've ever heard one.

      --

      ----
      It is often easer to gain forgiveness than permission
    6. Re:Where's Katz? by bigwang · · Score: 1

      ditto. And I am considering ignoring the politics section now. How many of those articles just today? 10?

  74. Shoutout to Junis! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First STFU, Katz! post!

    woot!

  75. Living Proof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that even you with stupid niche idea can get a movie with a lame title, weak plot, and flat characters made by a major film studio.

    For the cherry on top, you can even get geeks to eat the shit up with a spoon just because it's classified as sci-fi.

  76. Angelina by serutan · · Score: 3, Informative

    The commercials overemphasize her role. She is actually only in it for about 15 minutes. Don't let it drive you away.

    1. Re:Angelina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same person who put the trailers for this together must have done the "Once Upon A Time In Mexico" promotion.

      Salma Hayek gets top-billing, appears prominently in the trailers, turns up on Letterman to promote "her" film, and appears all of 5 minutes total in the movie :)

  77. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I would love to see a "Where are they now?" interview with Katz! He was such a staple of slashdot for so many years! Parent is right: Katz's articles would always generate tons of discussion and that's what we all come here for, right? Please, Slashdot Overlords, please try to do an interview with Katz!

  78. i guess the answer was .... by cilqster · · Score: 1

    no.

    He started working on the film about 10 years ago with a blue screen in his living room, wondering whether he could create an entire movie in his Mac. The first 6 minutes took him 2 years.

    i'm supposing if he turned it into a feature length blockbuster backed by a major studio, he used more than his g4 powerbook.

    where's the obligatory massive beowulf linux clusters reference?

  79. Princess of Mars, A (2006) by kulakovich · · Score: 3, Informative


    Princess of Mars, A (2006)

    Announced, and in production as of March 2004, my friends!

    And to start the rumors flying like a Sky Captain, I heard they are looking at Rena Sofer.

    kulakovich

    1. Re:Princess of Mars, A (2006) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great! When I met Ray Harryhausen in 1980ish he was promoing Clash of the Titans. I asked him why no one had made a movie about Barsoom and he said that it would be difficult to generate enough interest for it. At that time he was one of the few people who could have made that movie. Thanks for the link!

    2. Re:Princess of Mars, A (2006) by blamanj · · Score: 1

      Civil War vet John Carter is transplanted to Mars, where he discovers a lush, wildly diverse planet whose main inhabitants are 12-foot tall green barbarians. Finding himself a prisoner of these creatures, he escapes, only to encounter Dejah Thoris, Princess of Helium, who is in desperate need of a savior.

      Princess of Helium, eh? We'll need someone with a high, squeaky voice. Casting, get me Ms. Boop.

  80. Guilty pleasures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The trailers for this reminded me of another "guilty pleasure" film, "The Rocketeer." I suspect "Sky Captain" will join "Rocketeer" in my movie collection as something that is aimless, harmless exciting fun.

    Hmmm....

    Sky Captain, Angelina Jolie
    The Rocketeer, Jennifer Connolly

    Yeah, I guess I can see how both those movies would qualify as aimless & exciting fun but harmless? Just as long as you don't "enjoy" those films too often (you know if you do that too much you'll go blind)

  81. Re:Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by eggegg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now, if he had self-published, set up a website and sold his own DVDs, now that would be worth trumpeting.

    Sadly, if he did that, few would have the opportunity to share in even a "corporatized" version of his vision simply because all the trumpeting in the world isn't enough to reach the masses.

    It's all about distribution.

  82. You evil sonofabitch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Posting something I actually want to see from the web-antagonistic NYT site!!!

    IF I EVER MEET YOU, I WILL KICK YOUR ASS!!!

  83. Re:Yer Sig by aristus · · Score: 1

    1. give blood
    2. eat cookie, sip juice, wait for dizziness to pass
    3. step out into the sunshine, suddenly clutch your chest as you find out just how good a collapsed lung feels. (hint: like an icepick.)

    ??? Yeah. It's rare but it happens. Your lung pressure gets greater than your blood pressure, and little bubbles of air can leak out into the space between the lung and the muscle, separating them and collapsing the lung. painfully. for weeks.

    --
    Sometimes seventeen/Syllables aren't enough to/Express a complete
  84. Eye strain by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

    Won't the oversaturated visuals, and light flares all over the place make viewer's eyes explode? It looks like an art student photoshopped every frame of this film...

    --
    word.
  85. CGI - it's not just for SFX anymore by poptones · · Score: 1
    I disagree with that part of what you said. Actually, with the cheap horsepower available nowdays I think CGI could be the tool that allows "little guys" to ultimately attract headliner talent into projects that otherwise might not get made - even if the script is for a very old story. There's way more to a film than just a script (although it, admittedly, starts there). But with CGI an entire film could be composited together without any onscreen talent (no Jolie jokes here) and shopped around in nearly complete fashion - no money needed up front for expensive cameras, location shoots, film labs...

    I don't know how great or bad this movie is, but I hope it succeeds just because it could help set a good tone for the (near) future. Think how things could change if a few talented art-geek types could put together the proverbial garage project that draws in some mainline talent and promotional money. Here's another I had big hopes for, although it seems to be taking forever...

  86. Unless you can justify Jolie not to mention by smurfnsanta · · Score: 1

    the idiotic eyepatch, I'll have to assume this is definitely one movie not to waste time on. Odd that Paltrow agreed to be in the same movie, oh well.

  87. Angelina Jolie Naked (was Re: My Impressions...) by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you want to see Angelina Jolie naked, there's some skin in Gia . Judging from it, Angelina has benefitted from "foundation garments" and body doubling in later roles.

    I also have to think that anyone who has dated a batshit crazy woman (ah, the good old days... when I could look beyond a woman's crumbling psyche and see the great rack inside), sees the downside in Angelina. Basically, I might want to do someone who looks like Angelina, but even just a night with that psycho might be more work than it's worth.

    - Greg

  88. another movie like this by ColonBlow · · Score: 1

    for another beautifully constructed, all-green-screen movie, try Casshern, the live action anime mentioned here a while back. The trailer alone is worth burning to DVD.

    --
    free online diet tracking.
  89. Doc Savage, Man of Bronze!!-Cynical city. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They are slices of a different age, a different outlook. The world was as full of sinister forces as the headlines of today, but the steadfast belief that honorable and well trained (and euro-caucasian) men could triumph over evil was held as a truism. Airplanes were new, the world had just become global, but war had yet to span the whole planet."

    People were less cynical.

  90. Crimson Skies producers saw this in progress by objekt · · Score: 1

    and they decided to cancel their movie which they were already working on.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  91. all the way back to "The Last Starfighter"-Shh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Back in my day, all we had was Jeff Bridges and Bruce Boxleitner in neon jumpsuits. And we liked it!"

    Don't ask, don't tell.

  92. Re:Angelina Jolie Naked (was Re: My Impressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's also in the buff in 'Original Sin' playing opposite of Antonio Banderas

  93. Groundbreaking!-Bullies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you don't like pulps, that's your loss, but to say that it insults you...that's something else."

    I heard that it beat him up, and took his lunch money too.

  94. No we didn't .... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
    You whippersnappers with your fancy Angelina Jolie-la-di-da and Jude Law-la-di-doo! Back in my day, all we had was Jeff Bridges and Bruce Boxleitner in neon jumpsuits. And we liked it!


    OK. Maybe we did like tron at the time. We also liked Pong. That doesn't make me nostalgic for it.

    But I'd way rather see Angelina Jolie in a jump suit than Jeff Bridges.

    Period. =)

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:No we didn't .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tron was about a billion times better than The Last Starfighter. You will now be de-rezzed for your insolance.

    2. Re:No we didn't .... by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Dude, Tron is the shiznitch!

      End of line.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
    3. Re:No we didn't .... by theghost · · Score: 1

      Carai al caldazar! Al caldazar!

      Damn that Robert Jordan! He needs to finish that fucking series! And make the last few better than the most recent ones!

      And...oh yeah...i was not knocking Tron. Tron is the MAN...er...PROGRAM and Flynn can back me up any day!

      --
      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    4. Re:No we didn't .... by don.g · · Score: 1

      Some of the dialogue is downright painful, though.

      "Come on, you scuzzy data, be in there!"

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    5. Re:No we didn't .... by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Man you're telling me. It's like an addiction. The books are awesome in the beginning, but after a while it isn't so good anymore, but I can't stop reading them, I need to buy the new ones when they come out, I have to know what happens...help me. :)

      But yea, Tron kicks ass.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  95. It always looked like a Crimson Skies ripoff by IronChef · · Score: 1

    Before reading about the film's history I figured it was a Crimson Skies ripoff, like Underworld seemingly ripped off White Wolf's World o'Darkness.

    Then again, maybe I am overestimating the impact that freakin' board games and RPGs have on Hollywood executives!

  96. *ahem* I've read the novelization by objekt · · Score: 1

    all 260-some pages of it. It certainly has a plot, and a good one at that. I haven't seen the film yet, so it is indeed possible that the plot takes a back seat to the effects. Don't be a knee-jerk and assume it has no plot. Amazon page for book

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  97. She was way fricken nude in.... by Sevn · · Score: 1

    The Sleeping Dictionary

    She plays a language teaching tart that has sex with her student a lot. Her ass would look equally excellent in polished marble, or riding my considerable johnson.

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    1. Re:She was way fricken nude in.... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that was a stand in for the nude scenes. :(

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0242888/board/nest/655 416

    2. Re:She was way fricken nude in.... by Sevn · · Score: 1

      NOOOOOOOOOOO!!1111one!!!eleven!!!111

      I killed all those kittens over stunt butt.

      There is no God.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
  98. How can you ruin an Angelina Jolie movie.... by big-giant-head · · Score: 1

    It's not like we watch them for the plot or 'character development'........ Actually the comment Fat Lipps and sucktastic probably nail the reason we do watch her movies. Except my definition of sucktastic is probably different.....

    I need some kleenex....

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
  99. I wonder... by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    ... if I'm the only one who really doesn't care if a girl has fake boobs.

    --

    +++ATH0
  100. I got your information right here! by objekt · · Score: 1
    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  101. [nt] prolly got her some trunk butt by now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  102. Re:Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by RexDart · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If your post was sarcastic, feel free to ignore this comment. That being said...

    It's easy to decry someone who 'sells out'. But why lambast someone who used the system to bring a dream to life?

    Gainsaying mainstream distribution by mplying traitorship to some imagined cause is silly. What's the cause in this case? Simply an artist's desire to bring his vision to life.

    To reach the masses, he cannot do this on his own. He either uses 'establishment' media channels or uses the internet, which despite the apparent chaos and freedom, still runs on a commercial backbone. He cannot show the world his vision without some medium (or media) to carry the message, who cares what path he takes? The important thing is that a man had a vision, and that vision was powerful (or at least compelling) enough to make the powers-that-be in the media industry sit up and take notice. Why should we not celebrate his success for what it is?

    If visionaries can make their visions seen, by hook (the internet) or by crook (big media) what more revolution do we need?

    --
    "Yes, Jayne, she's a witch. She's had congress with the beast..."
    "She's in Congress?" - Firefly, "Objects in Space
  103. Re: Event Horizon by rpresser · · Score: 1

    The sad thing about EH is that the set design and even the premise could have been used to make a really great sf/horror movie. But they weren't.

    The only logical explanation for the ship doing what it did (and for Sam Neil going along with it) is that he built the EH using his wife as a human sacrifice. Explains why his wife died, why he still obsesses about her, and why he calls the ship "she" with such ... affection. (Disclaimer: not my idea, read it on usenet somewhere). But did they go there and give us all a decent thrill? Nope.

  104. Recommended anime by OoSync · · Score: 1

    I've seen the trailers for this and hearing the director's path to get this made reminds me of two recent anime.

    The first, Voices of a Distant Star, is similarly, a labor of love by a single director. Its 25 minutes long, so you might want to check it out at Blockbuster (as I did) instead of purchasing it. It has an interesting catch for the plot, mixes 3-D and 2-D animation (both probably done on computers), and keeps up a nice pace. Definitely worth a watch if not a purchase.

    The second, Last Exile, is currently being released on DVD, so there's some time left if you want to wait for the entire series (26 eps) to finish being released. Its also shown on G4TechTV, but I don't know the schedule. I like Last Exile because it also has the retro feel to it, with "vancraft" that are reminicent of WWI-era aircraft.

    From the Sky Captain promos I've seen, Last Exile is similar in style in and art direction. You'll see plenty of flying retro-style craft battling futuristic enemies. However, Last Exile has a plot worth following.

    Check 'em out!

    --

    I always get the shakes before a drop.
    1. Re:Recommended anime by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      ... reminds me of two recent anime.

      There's another one: Castle in the Sky (that's the english re-release name, anyways) by Miyazaki. Check out the walking robots in the trailers -- they look very similar to the guard/caretaker bots in the Miyazaki film. Also the blimp-warships, and the overall look/feel.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
  105. The correct answer is by objekt · · Score: 1

    "Sorry, honey, I didn't notice her breasts."

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:The correct answer is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then she KNOWS you're lying. Best to stick with "I like you for the way you are and wouldn't change a beauty of God." Note: "a beauty of God" may be replaced with "such a beauty" or whatever...

  106. Re:Quick Question....? OXYMORON? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...great and powerful ruler of a free and enlightened people..."

    Free people may (possibly) have, by their own revokable consent, "leaders", but rulers?!?!
    I think not!

  107. Hazy murky look by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    It's no style job... they were just too poor to afford color back then.

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  108. Re:Quick Question....? OXYMORON? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    Please direct your comments to Jules Verne.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  109. THEFT! by Monkeyfobia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come on the main theme is stolen from stargate, how can a film be good if they steal music from other things!

    1. Re:THEFT! by objekt · · Score: 1

      Would be it it was true, troll.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
    2. Re:THEFT! by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is true, and the parent isn't a troll.

      However, it's not ENTIRELY true.

      It's true in that many of the previews of the movie use(d) the StarGate SG-1 opening theme as the background music. It's not true that this is now the main theme.

      However, the parent post is PARTIALLY correct, while you are ENTIRELY incorrect. So perhaps before calling somebody a troll, you should get your facts straight.

      In fact, I was about to post a similar comment, deriding the film for stealing/licencing the StarGate theme for their previews.

    3. Re:THEFT! by objekt · · Score: 1

      "It's not true that this is now the main theme."

      Which means we are in agreement.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
    4. Re:THEFT! by objekt · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not true that this is now the main theme.
      From the FAQ on imdb http://imdb.com/title/tt0346156/board/nest/1150995 3?d=11510088#11510088
      1) Why is the STARGATE theme in the teaser trailer? Why did they steal the music from Stargate? Will this movie have an original soundtrack?

      Because the trailer editor thought it envoked the right mood, and the Paramount marketing people didn't say, no and it wasn't too expensive to license. Its been used in other trailers, and there are Star Gate Freaks all over the internet freaking out on this for some reason.

      The score is one of the last parts of a film to be developed. A teaser trailer usually has to be released well before the composer has been able to do much work, if any.

      Music from Stargate has been used in the following trailers:

      Dragonheart (1995) - Theatrical Trailer
      Independence Day (1996) - Theatrical Trailer
      Jumanji (1995) - Theatrical Trailer
      Lost in Space (1998) - Theatrical Trailer
      The Man in the Iron Mask (1998) - Theatrical Trailer
      Mighty Joe Young (1998) - Theatrical Trailer
      The Mummy (1999) - Theatrical Trailer
      Volcano (1997) - Theatrical Trailer
      Warriors of Virtue (1997) - Theatrical Trailer
      Waterworld (1995) - Theatrical Trailer
      Mission to Mars (2000) - TV Trailer
      Titan A.E. (2000) - TV Trailer
      Dungeons & Dragons (2000) - Theatrical Trailer
      Deep Rising (1998) - TV Trailer
      The Time Machine (2002) - Theatrical Trailer
      Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron (2002) - TV Trailer
      Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (2004) - Teaser Trailer

      The music is from the original Stargate movie, and was adapted for Stargate SG-1.
      It also features music from "Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within". (It's the music from Aki's dream sequence)

      They did not "steal" this music. It's called "licensing"
      The second trailer doesn't use the Stargate music.

      Yes, the movie will use original music composed by Ed Shearmur.
      It's getting rave reviews, and will be released Sept 7, 2004.
      You can listen to it here
      RealPlayer format: http://demand1.stream.aol.com/ramgen/aol/us/aolmus ic/artists/sony/various/skycaptainsoundtrack/vario us_skycaptainsoundtrack_lp.rm
      or
      http://mp.aol.c om/audio.main.adp?mxid=1153566

      ----

      It may interest you to know that the Stargate movie "stole" the music for its own trailer :)

      from http://www.soundtrack.net/trailers/?cid=S&id=5 91

      Stargate (1994)
      "Rhythm of the Heat" - Peter Gabriel
      Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992) - Wojciech Kilar

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
    5. Re:THEFT! by tiltowait · · Score: 1

      Man, why you bringing up old stuff?

    6. Re:THEFT! by objekt · · Score: 1

      Other people are bringing it up. I'm setting the record straight.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
  110. Give me a break! by objekt · · Score: 2, Informative

    The source material in Sky Captain is mostly old movie serials from over 50 years ago, NOT SOME STUPID VIDEO GAME OR DISNEY CARTOON FROM THE LAST TEN YEARS!

    Now if you were talking about the Fleischer Brothers' Superman Cartoon, MECHANICAL MONSTERS, from the '40s, then you'd be onto something.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:Give me a break! by The+Dobber · · Score: 1


      Easy there Spike, I believe we said "reminds me".

      Shheeeeesssssshhhhhhhhh...........

    2. Re:Give me a break! by objekt · · Score: 1

      Sorry 'bout that, I didn't take my meds today.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
  111. Re:Angelina Jolie Naked (was Re: My Impressions... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Funny

    I also have to think that anyone who has dated a batshit crazy woman (ah, the good old days... when I could look beyond a woman's crumbling psyche and see the great rack inside)

    Brought back some memories here as well :) Now, I got me a logical woman *gasp, can it be true?*.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  112. Reality Captain and the World of Box Office Bomb! by Luscious868 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This thing is going to flop big time and probably become a cult classic when it's released on DVD.

  113. are you saying.. by Bhull · · Score: 1

    mary lou retton should make films?

  114. Re:Angelina Jolie Naked (was Re: My Impressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CYBORG 2, where she plays a robot and has sex with Casey Jones.

  115. Re:Yer Sig by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    Ummm... I call bullshit, or at least Urban Legend. Name me one time this has happened. I hate to tell you, but that's physically impossible.

    Air pressure @ sea level: 749 mmHG.

    Average blood pressure 120/80 mmHG.

    If your story was true, your lungs would never work.

  116. Re:Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by Oligonicella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What a butt-load.

    Just because you haven't had an idea worth making into something significant, don't carp that this guy did.

    Dying alone and silent in idealism is nothing to hawk to the masses. Or even individuals.

  117. Re:Reality Captain and the World of Box Office Bom by objekt · · Score: 1

    I predict you won't be back here in a week to eat crow.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  118. Re:Yer Sig by aristus · · Score: 1

    It happened to me, first and only time I gave blood. I was on my back for 3 weeks. The *classic* way to collapse your lung is to lift a large object over your head, like a sheet of plywood, while holding your breath. You don't feel it immediately but a short time later you are hating life. It's just a leeetle hole that leaks air. Some people are more susceptible especially if you have low blood pressure. I'd already had it once so I knew what it was. But even the techs there had only heard of it happening after giving plasma. Fun stuff.

    --
    Sometimes seventeen/Syllables aren't enough to/Express a complete
  119. Re:Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by LGagnon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Libertarian? A lot of us hackers (including myself) are liberals. Hacking is non-partisan.

  120. Re:Angelina Jolie Naked (was Re: My Impressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Tin Men, with Billy-Bob Thornton and John Cusak -- Angelina appears topless there. Good stuff.

  121. Re:Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by glwtta · · Score: 1
    First against the wall when the revolution comes!

    You mean against the blue-screen, right?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  122. CG can be too much at time.. but I still like it. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it was the first movie filmed entirely on blue screen, but some others are right up there like the new star wars movies.

    The thing is, CG is awesome and it really looks fantastic now, but it often has a detrimental effect on how the movie is played out - the way the characters interact with the sets, the way the camera work is done, etc.

    Don't get me wrong - it's just as hard or harder to direct a CG scene or movie. The animation takes real skill and talent and the directors still have to direct the animated characters.

    I guess I'm split down the middle. I like CG a lot but I also like good old sets and camera work. I think CG is better suited to compliment the movie, not become the movie.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  123. Hendrix who? by roskakori · · Score: 1

    The presenter, a filmmaking friend of Conran's, closed the screening with a joke about Pete Townshend meeting Eric Clapton in a London bar and commiserating about some new kid named Hendrix, "who's gonna kick our asses."

    As far as I know, Hendrix died long ago, while both Townsend and Clapton are alive and kicking.

    Now who kicked some ass?

    1. Re:Hendrix who? by MacDaffy · · Score: 1

      Hendrix. Townsend and Clapton didn't play guitar the same way they did after hearing Hendrix. No one has.

  124. Other Modern 30's Style Films by airship · · Score: 1

    "30's Style Noir Art Deco Movie Serial" seems to be becoming a whole subgenre, and it's definitely one of my favorite classes of film. Few of the following have the pervasive Sci-Fi themes that Sky Captain has. Still, here are some of my personal favorites in this subgenre. Note that some are more "Noir", some more "Art Deco". but most are just good, clean, movie-serial style fun. Needless to say, I love anything with an airship in it. :)

    Doc Savage, Man of Bronze
    The Shadow
    The Phantom
    The Rocketeer
    The Indiana Jones films (of course)
    Flash Gordon (Queen soundtrack!)
    Big Trouble in Little China
    Brazil (noir)
    Bladerunner (noir)

    Though it really doesn't fit, I'd also add J-Men Forever.

    Others?

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
    1. Re:Other Modern 30's Style Films by alw53 · · Score: 1

      The Voyager TV series had some Flash Gordon-style stuff set in the holodeck that I thought was pretty well done.

  125. Angelina's small part, preview showing by adpowers · · Score: 2, Informative

    Exactly. From the few trailers for the movie I have seen, and the prominent placing they gave her name in the opening credits, I figured she would have a much larger part. The director mentioned she was only on the set filming for three days... hardly a major role.

    BTW, I went to the same preview showing you did (which was fun (and no previews!)). I had read about this movie a while ago (can no longer find the article online) and I thought it was an awesome premise and it was neat how the guy started it on his computer in his apartment before being picked up by the big boys. This is one of the few movies I actually looked forward to seeing and kept an eye on.

    One more thing to note, in one comment, someone mentioned that the studio demanded they bet bigger actors for the movie. I think the director said it was the other way around. They showed it to Jude Law, who got Paltrow involved, and then the studios took note. At least, that is what I thought he said.

    Andrew

    PS: Damn the Cinerama for no longer offering free refills on popcorn!

  126. First all blue screen... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    First all blue screen presentation I ever saw was at a "dog and pony" show given by Microsoft. Bill had to talk in front of the blue screen (BSOD).

    Maybe the demo would have been better received in the 1930's?

  127. Not ALL Blue Screen by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    "Entirely" is a misleading term here.

    Recently, I noticed Best Buy was giving away Sky Captian promotional DVDs, which contain the two trailers, a making-of documentary, and a PC game (which I haven't bothered to try). In the documentary, they clearly show that the libarary scene (In which Sky Captian is shot across a small library or study by a mysterious woman in a leather suit) was shot on a soundstage set, and the bulk of the room was real. Bluescreen was only visible through the windows. I wouldn't be surprised if there were other such scenes that they weren't counting.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
  128. Re:Angelina Jolie Naked (was Re: My Impressions... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    She's nude in taking lives too (at least the director's cut..that's the one I rented).

  129. ask and you shall receive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you complain about being modded +5 funny, now you're +3 funny. hope you're happy!

  130. Re:Angelina Jolie Naked (was Re: My Impressions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  131. Wow by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Give you've seen Leauge 6 times and you still don't understand the insipid plot, you're probably an idiot. Come on, "Special Agent Tom Sawyer"?!, wtf ever.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  132. ooh, look! by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Look, boys and girls! It's geek cool to 'dis' popular music and listen to shitty garage bands, all the while claiming that in some mysterious fashion this raises your intellect to godlike proportions over the masses of sheep you egotistically look down on.

    And now we have something new! It's now cool to do the same thing to Angelina Jolie! Those same geeks who watched "Hackers" 67 times and jacked off wildly to every scene with Angelina in it now turn around and try to score points with their uber-arrogant crowd by claiming that Angelina Jolie, like "suxx0rs, d00d".

    You know, if it were legal to sterilize you little twits I'd be out there with a pair of nail clippers in a heartbeat, doing my part to clean up the gene pool.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  133. It's about the money . . . by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    Hollywood makes movies that are designed to make money. Not movies that are good. Don't forget, capitalism rules over art unless good art makes money.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  134. Now that CG is so advanced by strannik · · Score: 1

    Now that CG is so advanced as to remove all but props and actors, I want to see a new movie version of "Our Town" by Thornton Wilder!

  135. Better than Flash Gordon? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    this movie is a stunning tribute to classic sci-fi serials, comics and pulp magazines of that era.

    I hope it's a better tribute than Flash Gordon of a few years ago -- although the Queen sountrack was GREAT!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  136. in other words .... by Surt · · Score: 1

    Worst Movie Ever!

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  137. Re:Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by Semi-Psychic+Nathan · · Score: 1

    Um, I think he said libertarian, not Libertarian.

    --
    I have nothing to allude to, and I am alluding to it.
  138. Bring back plots!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They really don't cost too much and they make movies more enjoyable.

    1. Re:Bring back plots!!! by objekt · · Score: 1

      It has a plot! If you've seen it, you'd know. I read the 260 page novelization, so I know.

      --
      -- Boycott Shell
  139. Yes. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Many of us have trouble viewing articles.

    That being said, if that fellow would have just used a software solution to begin with, then he would have been more successful.

  140. And yet they will never reach me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just clicked on the link to their web site. It was obviously set up to show a Flash animation or some such thing, but since I run my browser with no plugins enabled, nothing showed. And since they provided no alternative link, there was nothing to see. Their loss. Whatever they may be selling, I won't be buying.

  141. Forgetting the title... Lol by geoswan · · Score: 1
    Don't forget Tin Men...

    I haven't forgotten it, but I think you might have forgotten some aspects of it, like the title .

    The film were Billy-Bob met Ms Jolie is actually entitled Pushing Tin.

    Tin men, also a good film, is about cynical, dishonest, aluminum siding salesman in 1950s Baltimore.

    As for the comments suggesting Ms Jolie is some kind of psycho... two points. First, it may be worth bearing in mind that this image of her as a psycho sells papers. She may be a lot more benignly eccentric than psycho. Second, Billy-Bob is probably just as "psycho" as as Ms Jolie.

    1. Re:Forgetting the title... Lol by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The film were Billy-Bob met Ms Jolie is actually entitled Pushing Tin [imdb.com].

      And in that film, Cate Blanchett's the one to look at, not Jolie.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  142. Reminds me of Crimson Skies by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    The pulp retro 1930s future with airships, aircraft, and advanced industrial age technologies (pre-computers) is a popular genre and has been featured in several other films and computer games such as "The Roketeer" and "Crimson Skies". I was probably going to see this film anyway and not expect very much out of it, but the good reviews here have sealed the deal. I am going to see it for sure now. Of course the dialog in these sorts of films is often dumbed down for the masses which detracts somewhat from what are otherwise interesting concepts (ala Hellboy or Van Helsing). We shall see...

  143. sounds like... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    sounds like this is the re-envisionment of George Lucas' Star Wars. It has all the same elements (sci-fi/fantasy, clear good/bad division, heroes and heroines, 50's pulp fiction feel, destroys the 3rd wall effectively, good music...), but drastically outperforms Episode I. :)

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  144. Offtopic, sorry. by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but I have to ask again. Is there a GPL'd free Quicktime plugin for Mozilla/Firefox yet? I am only finding a suggestion to buy Crossover plugin and run the Windows version which I don't want to do. Is there any other way?

    Thanks in advance.

    1. Re:Offtopic, sorry. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      See my instructions for downloading below. Use Xine with the windoze DLL's to view.

  145. Castle in the Sky / Laputa by dcmeserve · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've only seen the TV trailers, but I get the distinct impression that the Miyazaki film "Castle in the Sky" served as the inspiration for the visuals. Not only in the blimp-battleships, but also those walking robots -- with the rope-like arms and the uneven eyes.

    I definitely need to see this movie, if nothing else than to check for more similarities. :)

    --
    "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    1. Re:Castle in the Sky / Laputa by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I've only seen the TV trailers, but I get the distinct impression that the Miyazaki film "Castle in the Sky" served as the inspiration for the visuals. Not only in the blimp-battleships, but also those walking robots

      Or they both could have been inspired by 1930's and 40's blimp battleships and robots.

      The Superman Cartoons from the 40's also have giant robots who's arm are wings. Who show up, take what they came for and leave without a trace.

      Tentacle arms on giant walking machines are described as far back as The War Of The Worlds, a book from the 19th century!

      Not sayin' he ain't a Miyazaki fan and he did not take any inspiration from it (I don't know that), just pointing out that his inspirations definatly go farther back than the 80's.... and that you need to broaden your pop culture background : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  146. I hate TV.. by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

    Friggin TV ruining the movie for me before I even see it. I hate to not be surprised by movies, and the ads on TV and before other movies in the theater always show too much! I hate that.

  147. I hate TV too by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

    ...so I don't watch it.

    Not only are my movies not ruined by it, but the house is a much more pleasant place with that damned thing turned off. Also, reducing the number of commercials I expose myself to has had a very nice effect on my general outlook.

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
  148. Speaking of asshats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did you follow his link to his friend's comic?

    Captain Whoever's Lightning Rod

    That particular episode crawls with classic 1960's era ambiguosly gay super-tough chic.

  149. Steamboy by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    Another new Steampunk movie is this Anime title; Steamboy.

  150. Re: Me, too. by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

    Yes, I'm finding random things not showing up with many comments I've clicked on in the past while. Strange.

    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  151. that might be the point by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

    I just can't get over how awful (visually) this film looks, based on the trailer.

    Apparently, that's the point. The style itself is supposed to be some throwback to the early 20th century (I guess people were hazy-looking then, changing from black-and-white eyes will do that ... )

    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
  152. I give it two thumbs up... my ass. by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    No, I haven't seen this movie.

    I am a Sci-Fi / action adventure / bombs / boobs / guns / explosions fan. That's pretty much the only movies I watch.

    This movie looks like the crappiest movie to come out in ages. While nothing can rival the craptacular nature of AI, this movie looks like it's going to take it's shot of dethroning AI in raw stupidity. However, whereas AI was and tried to be something intellectual, this movie doesn't even aspire to that. It appears to aspire to the campy, god awful dialog, visual effects and "science" present in the 1930's era comics and sci-fi rags.

    All that stuff is great, and should be left to history. Not dredged up again, given a spit polish of SFX and called new. There's nothing nostalgic about a NEW movie done in the "old" style. It just looks like crap. Then we have the story... giant "evil" robots invade or something equally as vapid.

    Yay... err *yawn*. Hi! I and my fellow white male American humans grew up several decades ago, and we no longer want to read/listen to/watch shallow, vapid, unrealisitic stories that require MASSIVE suspension of disbelief. We want something that's possible, if not plausible. We want Sci-Fi that we can potentially see happening in 10, 20, 50, 100 years. Not something that's just so ludicrous and unrealistic that it makes us gag.

    In short, there's nothing about this movie that I find even remotely entertaining. The fact that they used the music from Stargate SG-1 for the first 4 months of the previews didn't help matters much, either. It was a blantant attention grab by the studio to try to garner interest by loosely associating it with a respected, well established bit of Sci-Fi... and that pisses me off. If the movie can't stand on it's own even in the previews, and needs to ride the coattails of real SF, why should I bother to go see it?

    Bleh... is about all I can say. The story sounds stupid. The monsters/robots look stupid. Jude Law is weak. Angelina Jolee is hot, but not with an eyepatch for Christs sake. Basically, the actors suck.

    So, in short, this movie has absolutely NOTHING going for it. Thanks, but no thanks. Please drive through.

    1. Re:I give it two thumbs up... my ass. by mink · · Score: 1

      Sadly I posted so I cant mod your insanity down (and there is no mod that would be appropriate).

      If we never revisit the past no one will ever learn from it. The past has some pretty keen stuff to it that the world would be a poorer place if people like you controled what was made.Sure this particular retro timeline never came to pass, but besides a blade runner style future-soon where else can we have a fun bit of escape? If every film is like Equalibrium then what is the point of any other film in those constraints? In this version he gets a kitten not a puppy.

      The stargate music thing has been addressed, and you must be new to the whole world of movies, but film teasers and even trailers have been using music from other films and such for as long as they have been made. I suppose you are going to stupidly claim that all movies using Carmina Burana in it's trailer is trying to ride on the coat tails of opera? Or all the movies that use Green Onions in the trailer are trying to ride on the coat tails of Booker T. and the MGs.

      Another reason I think you should be modded down is your insane presumption to speak for all the rest of the people reading slashdot. I'm sure you speak for the people who think like you, and thats fine, but not all of us only want what you describe.

      I hope that your theater experiances live up to your expectations and you get everything you want in films.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  153. Thanks for all - still OT by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    Thanks, just what I was looking for. I also downloaded the "xine-mozilla-plugin-0.2-040910.rpm" package and dropped a copy of "xineplugin.so" into my Firefox plugins directory. Except for my bandwidth limitations, everything works exactly as it should for playing Quicktime streams.

    How much of what I had to do is considered illegal by the MPAA? I noticed when I was googling for one of the Xine RPMs that all the hits were outside the US borders.

  154. Re:Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naw, you are first against the wall when the revolution comes, moron, to live in the REAL world you need to understand how things work and then use them to make what you want happen, not sit in the corner in your little idealistic, impossible to realize world and do nothing.

    I saw this guy is great, he had a dream, he made it happen, no one got hurt!

  155. Re:How about a plot too? -- Next year! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Why can't Hollywood make movies that have great special effects AND good plots?

    They can next year: In Joss Whedons Serenity

    (Note, it's not his fault there is flash on that there site ;)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  156. No actually by Snaller · · Score: 1

    is because it's hard.

    No actually that's not it. Its because they don't give a shit. Why spend money on a writer with talent, when you can still make a bundle from something scribbled down in haste by you, your friend and the janitor.

    They have standards for the quality of photography, not none for good story telling.

    Its not hard if you have talent. But it does become hard because most of the people with the money don't have talent and don't have time for those who do.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  157. Re:Yay for the little guy?!!!! BZZZZZT! by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

    Libertarian? Like "Liberal" or "Conservative" it's fast becoming little more than a flag to wave, I'd be surprised if more than 10 percent of the folks who go calling themselves "Libertarian" have any real concept of political-social dynamics.

  158. Jolie's Body Double by meehawl · · Score: 0, Troll

    The commercials feature her fat lips so prominently it looks like another wretched Tomb Raider promo.

    Of course, you know the supreme irony is that Jolie herself no longer has or never had quite as perfect a body as required for the Tomb Raider 2 marketing collateral or body shots. Yes, even the best surgery and personal trainers have limits. So for the adverts and the pseudo-nudie shots, what you see is her head pasted (expertly and imperceptibly) onto a body double's torso. This is true - I have it on good authrity from my wife's sister's roomate's friend, who worked on the digital compositing.

    --

    Da Blog
  159. I love obligatory blue screen bashing... by weedenbc · · Score: 1

    Why is it that some people always bring up the "looks so fake" argument over every CGI heavy movie. No matter how well done the effects are there are plenty of people who seem to pride themselves on pointing out that they look fake. Hmm, really? 100ft tall robots look fake? Gee, is it because they did a crappy job with the CGI or is it because your brain has never seen a realy one? Gimme a break - just enjoy the damn movie.

    --

    "Trying is only the first step towards failure." - Homer
    1. Re:I love obligatory blue screen bashing... by danila · · Score: 1

      The truth is that in a double blind test most people would probably not be able to distinguish between many CGI + live actors and live footage + a lot of post-production shots. And if you throw in some live footage + some CGI objects, this will only further confuse most of them.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  160. Check out "Original Sin"... by weedenbc · · Score: 1

    She gets pretty damn naked with Antonio Banderas. Not XXX but what do you expect from a "respected actress".

    --

    "Trying is only the first step towards failure." - Homer
  161. Re:Reality Captain and the World of Box Office Bom by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    I predict you won't be back here to tell me how right I was.

  162. Logical woman...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, I got me a logical woman *gasp, can it be true?*

    Your computer is female? Or did you mean your porno collection?

  163. Re:Yer Sig by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    I've heard of it in relation to diving accidents, but never giving blood...

  164. Re:Reality Captain and the World of Box Office Bom by objekt · · Score: 1

    In a week, one of us will be proved wrong

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  165. Not this time by objekt · · Score: 1

    I've read the book and know that the trailers and TV ads aren't showing too much.

    A few of the online clips go a bit too far, but there's still much more.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  166. Re:Reality Captain and the World of Box Office Bom by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

    It failed. It did open at #1, but it only made 16.2 million this weekend. That's a failure. It'll drop off by about 50% next week. The studio will be lucky if they get to 40 million.

  167. Re:Reality Captain and the World of Box Office Bom by objekt · · Score: 1

    #1 and made as much as the other two new releases put together? I'd say it's a wash at best. The budget was far less than $70 milion, Paramount picked up distribution rights for probably half that, and the foreign territories have already been sold. Just by opening, it has made a profit.

    When I think of flop, I think of 3 million Gigli type numbers, not #1 at the freaking box office! OK, I was here and you were here.

    You didn't eat crow, and I didn't tell you that you were right.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell