You should see the lineup for ottawa bluesfest this year... its fucking sick
Iron Maiden, Rush, Metric, Matthew Good, Drake, Weezer, Arcade Fire, Crowded House, Hole, Joan Jett, Great Big Sea, Santana, b-52, Keith Urban, Steve Winwood, Flaming Lips, Moody Blues, Amos the Transparent, Tokyo Police Club
And thats just the start... I have no idea how this was arranged, but I know I'll be at LeBreton flats for the next two weeks.
OMG Italy missing out on the knock out round was so SWEEETTTT!...
I totally drove through little italy of my city honking my horn and flying a big non-italian flag screaming out "how do you mother fuckers like it now huh? Like it when people drive through your neighbourhoods acting like assholes and honking their carhorns... fuck you alll!!!!"
Ok, I didn't really, I had to work... but I daydreamed it.
You misunderstand the term 'meta.' Video games do not "abstract" from other forms of art. Video games are not "derivatives." Well except for parody video games, as parody implicitly means derivative.
Video games are "amalgamations" of other art forms. Video games are simply art. If you must attach a qualifier to the term use "multi" as in Video games are multi-art.
basically who's Ebert to say that a game isn't art?
Ebert isn't qualified to say whether or not anything is art, unless he has at least a Masters Degree (or better yet, a PhD) in art & design.
Wow, that has to be the biggest load of shit ever to clog a toilet. I bet evacuating it from your bowels must have been an ecstatic event uneclipsed in your life.
Lets just for a moment pretend like a PHd in "art and design" is AT ALL meaningful, the very idea that a PHd or a Masters degree is the only qualifier for criticism of a field of study is plainly incorrect.
Case in point: What was the limit of Michelangelo's schooling?
I think your definition of art is incredibly insightful. Even though you might not have thought of it while you were writing it... your post IS art. It has the first level -trying to define what is and isn't art- and also has a second level -making people think about what their own definition is-.
As with all good art, I am totally going to steal your ideas and use them as my own. Pretending that I never read the above post at all.
He cant do that because he hasn't played any games.
For that matter there are some spectacularly emotionally involved games which would put them on par with some of the best movies being made (they dont yet compare to the Renaissance classics of course... but games are still a young art-form).
The only argument that Ebert has a chance of winning is that games aren't an art-form at all.
RF designer: "Do not try to adjust the reception — that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth" Steve Jobs: "what truth" RF designer: "there is no reception... " Steve Jobs: "there is no reception?" RF designer" Then you'll see, that it is not the reception that adjusts, it is only the bars on the user interface."
"Thought is language, language is thought" is what your trying to say. It's why a large vocabulary is an important measure of intelligence; because if you lack the words to think with, you lack the very thought.
Re:intelligence doesn't matter, communication does
on
Empathy Is For the Birds
·
· Score: 2, Funny
I agree on the ability to communicate, I disagree that vocalization is key. I think we may have come up with some sort of sign-language or language based on snaps/claps & rhythm if we lacked vocal chords.
If we lacked ear drums we would have been a dead species a very long time ago. "did you hear that, it sounded like a tiger coming to eat us" "no frank, i dont hear a god damn thing because I dont have ears, neither do you AAAAHHHHGGG Im being eaten!!!"
Slashdot Mirror
You should see the lineup for ottawa bluesfest this year... its fucking sick
Iron Maiden, Rush, Metric, Matthew Good, Drake, Weezer, Arcade Fire, Crowded House, Hole, Joan Jett, Great Big Sea, Santana, b-52, Keith Urban, Steve Winwood, Flaming Lips, Moody Blues, Amos the Transparent, Tokyo Police Club
And thats just the start... I have no idea how this was arranged, but I know I'll be at LeBreton flats for the next two weeks.
1020. 0x3FF is the highest you can count on your fingers using binary. 1024 has the same "fingular" representation as 0.
Some of us can only count to 255 however... my ring fingers are incredibly difficult to use when counting binary.
OMG Italy missing out on the knock out round was so SWEEETTTT!...
I totally drove through little italy of my city honking my horn and flying a big non-italian flag screaming out "how do you mother fuckers like it now huh? Like it when people drive through your neighbourhoods acting like assholes and honking their carhorns... fuck you alll!!!!"
Ok, I didn't really, I had to work... but I daydreamed it.
Actually, the Dutch are a better team this year. They simply had a bad first half, but showed they were obviously better in the second half.
If you watched the group stage, Brazil wasn't that impressive.
But yeah, we get your point.
Hence giving you a reason for selling your shoes for $1,000,000.
Ebert is just holding the video game wrong.
Excuse me! The term used back then was "Griefer" !
The act of pissing on modern art is a modern art itself.
You misunderstand the term 'meta.' Video games do not "abstract" from other forms of art. Video games are not "derivatives." Well except for parody video games, as parody implicitly means derivative.
Video games are "amalgamations" of other art forms. Video games are simply art. If you must attach a qualifier to the term use "multi" as in Video games are multi-art.
basically who's Ebert to say that a game isn't art?
Ebert isn't qualified to say whether or not anything is art, unless he has at least a Masters Degree (or better yet, a PhD) in art & design.
Wow, that has to be the biggest load of shit ever to clog a toilet. I bet evacuating it from your bowels must have been an ecstatic event uneclipsed in your life.
Lets just for a moment pretend like a PHd in "art and design" is AT ALL meaningful, the very idea that a PHd or a Masters degree is the only qualifier for criticism of a field of study is plainly incorrect.
Case in point: What was the limit of Michelangelo's schooling?
I think your definition of art is incredibly insightful. Even though you might not have thought of it while you were writing it... your post IS art. It has the first level -trying to define what is and isn't art- and also has a second level -making people think about what their own definition is-.
As with all good art, I am totally going to steal your ideas and use them as my own. Pretending that I never read the above post at all.
This statement's just six words long.
No its YOU that does not want to start this fight... cause Reps have guns and they'll shoot all those smart mouth Demos!
I'd give it +7 biotch! I WIN!
All entertainment is art, period. Art is entertainment. Though art can sometimes be non-entertaining.
He cant do that because he hasn't played any games.
For that matter there are some spectacularly emotionally involved games which would put them on par with some of the best movies being made (they dont yet compare to the Renaissance classics of course... but games are still a young art-form).
The only argument that Ebert has a chance of winning is that games aren't an art-form at all.
If you dont like how the RIAA controls your government perhaps YOU should donate $100mil to their campaign fund too!
Obama: Where "Yes we can" means "No you cannot!"
epic!
RF designer: "Do not try to adjust the reception — that's impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth" ... "
Steve Jobs: "what truth"
RF designer: "there is no reception
Steve Jobs: "there is no reception?"
RF designer" Then you'll see, that it is not the reception that adjusts, it is only the bars on the user interface."
a hahaha, nice.
both are thought to be functions of the brain. humans are thought to have the most refinement of both functions.
empathy is one of the ways in which humans learn and expand their intelligence.
"Thought is language, language is thought" is what your trying to say. It's why a large vocabulary is an important measure of intelligence; because if you lack the words to think with, you lack the very thought.
I agree on the ability to communicate, I disagree that vocalization is key. I think we may have come up with some sort of sign-language or language based on snaps/claps & rhythm if we lacked vocal chords.
If we lacked ear drums we would have been a dead species a very long time ago. "did you hear that, it sounded like a tiger coming to eat us" "no frank, i dont hear a god damn thing because I dont have ears, neither do you AAAAHHHHGGG Im being eaten!!!"
after careful analysis of your statement over a period of 3 hours, I understand that you are telling me next weeks lottery numbers.