Slashdot Mirror


The Ignominious Fall of Dell

snydeq writes "InfoWorld's Bill Snyder discusses the ignominious decline of Dell, one akin to that of Computer Associates, leaving the company forever tainted by scandal and a 'shocking breach of faith with customers.' Dell's pioneering business model and supply chain helped make desktop computing ubiquitous, affordable, and secure. But years of awful quality control and customer service have finally caught up to the company in a very public way that will do irreparable damage to the company for years to come. 'What we've learned about Dell recently doesn't qualify as an understandable mistake. Only a rotten company sells defective computers and lies about it.'"

604 comments

  1. cough by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Only a rotten company sells defective computers and lies about it."

    Maybe the users are holding them wrong?

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not an apple fanboy, but this isn't the same class of issue.

      Now -- if Apple had been selling the iPhone 4G for four years and ignoring the fact that a statistically large number of them were suddenly dying of a known bad issue, then intentionally shipping out 'repaired' iPhones with -more- bad parts in them, then I'd agree.

      There's a lot of evidence to suggest that Dell not only knew about the cap issues beforehand, but that they intentionally misled a lot of customers about the problem and when they did fix them, they did so with more bad boards.

    2. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ' Dell's pioneering business model and supply chain helped make desktop computing...secure....a rotten company sells defective computers and lies about it.'

      Dell sold secure computers? I guess Windows was a LOT better than I thought!

    3. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not funny. How dare you attack Apple? They are all that right and good in the world of computing, and if you can't be bothered to hold it properly, maybe you shouldn't buy a fucking phone. Ever thought of that?

      STEVE JOBS IS LORD

    4. Re:cough by sound+vision · · Score: 0

      Pish-posh. Only the truly rotten Apples would say anything like that.

    5. Re:cough by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now you're assuming Apple cares about any product more than 2 years old. After all, they just cut support for first generation iPhones and iTouches, and those are just a hair over 2 years... I guess that's a better business model, though - planned obsolescence in 24 months.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I bought mine with Ubuntu on it from Dell a couple of years ago. So far it's the least hassle purchase I've ever made (knock on wood).

    7. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      First gen iPhones are just about 3 years old. I picked up my iPhone 3G in August 2008.

    8. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's nothing.

      Microsoft killed Kin in a month.

    9. Re:cough by frosty_tsm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now you're assuming Apple cares about any product more than 2 years old. After all, they just cut support for first generation iPhones and iTouches, and those are just a hair over 2 years... I guess that's a better business model, though - planned obsolescence in 24 months.

      A hair over 2 years? The first iPhone model itself is 3 years old. Combine that with the expected life-span of a mobile phone to be 2 years (subsidized phone every 2 years), they aren't doing anything outside of the norm.

    10. Re:cough by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      Heck, even the iPhone 4 is a few months old.

    11. Re:cough by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, Apple has been (at times) pretty straight-forward about support lasting three years. I think Jobs even said something during the announcement of iOS4 that these products have an expected lifetime of 3 years.

      It's not all that strange within the computing industry. Warranties on new computers are usually 3 years or less. IT departments usually plan for upgrade cycles every 3-5 years. Many computer components are designed to have a lifetime of at least 3-5 years.

    12. Re:cough by KarmaKhameleon · · Score: 5, Funny

      "dude you're getting a dell"

      is that a threat?

    13. Re:cough by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Now that's what I'm talking about.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    14. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I thought Apple was doing everything outside the norm. Guess the norm catches up to every/thing/one at some point.

    15. Re:cough by sortius_nod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the big problem is that people are focusing on just Dell. I've stated in a previous post that Lenovo had the same problems, they were aware of them but did nothing to recall or even stop selling the defective machines.

      The biggest problem is that consumers don't read tech sites before purchasing, which means they are beholden to the whims of the tech company they are buying from. If they choose to deceive customers it will only become apparent when it's reported by large media organisations.

      Look at what happened with the Xbox 360. The first generation were RROD devices and it took a class action law suit with major media reporting it before Microsoft changed their tactics. I have no doubt they were well aware of the problems well before the class action suit, yet still shipped defective products. It took 2 generations of Xbox 360 boards before the problem started to be resolved. Yes, they did do a lot to mitigate brand damage, but by that stage it was too little too late. Yes, I do own a 360, and I have had a RROD.

      The biggest problem is that these companies suffer no government backlash, the whole idea that "the market will sort itself out" is total bullshit. So long as companies are not heavily scrutinised after they are caught deceiving the public means they can just claim ignorance and move on. Even with harsh consumer protection laws (like here in Australia), the idea that you can lobby your way out of it sickens me.

    16. Re:cough by mattack2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first generation iPhones & iPod touches (there is no such thing as an "iTouch") do as much as they did the first day you bought them, and continue to do the same things. You can still buy apps that run on them, use your songs (whether your ripped CDs or other) on them, etc.

      How is that "cut[ting] support"? If they literally stopped working (e.g. the playsforsure stuff, and I am NOT a general MS hater btw), that would be cutting support. The fact is that _new_ software revisions aren't coming out for them. Just like you can (and I still have, along with newer ones) use a 10 year old Tivo Series 1 even though it hasn't gotten a software update for a very long time (I pay no monthly fees either since I paid lifetime).

    17. Re:cough by brian_tanner · · Score: 1

      Cut support for older products, or stopped providing free upgrades that give new functionality on a regular basis?

      I had a Razr before my iphone. I remember getting 0 upgrades ever from the original crap interface.

    18. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when things had Lifetime Guarantees? What about Ten Year Guarantees? Five Year?

      We are talking about a phone here.

      Vote with your dollars for companies that produce solid lasting worthwhile products and be prepared to pay accordingly. Start encouraging others to do the same.

      Its like that phrase I keep hearing kids say about "buying local" like it is some big revelation.
      Some of us have always purchased as much as we can at Farmer's Markets and Mom & Pop Shops instead of other chain name places.

      Now get off my lawn.

    19. Re:cough by whitedsepdivine · · Score: 1

      Damit, I was going to say that! I think that one line made this company. I hate dell, as I type it into a Corp dell.

    20. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The biggest problem is that consumers don't read tech sites before purchasing, which means they are beholden to the whims of the tech company they are buying from. If they choose to deceive customers it will only become apparent when it's reported by large media organisations.

      I think a bigger problem than that is information overload.

      I work for a small business. I used to build custom computers in the 90s but haven't felt it's been worth it in a long time.

      So what do I buy today for desktops? Dell? Lenovo? HP? Acer? something else?

      If I settle on Dell, which models? Inspiron? Dimension? Vostro? Studio? etc. Each of those branches has DOZENS of configurations and differences.

      Annoying.

      Say what you will about Apple, but their products lines are much easier to grok.

    21. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you're assuming Apple cares about any product more than 2 years old. After all, they just cut support for first generation iPhones and iTouches, and those are just a hair over 2 years... I guess that's a better business model, though - planned obsolescence in 24 months.

      A hair over 2 years? The first iPhone model itself is 3 years old. [b] Combine that with the expected life-span of a mobile phone to be 2 years[/b] (subsidized phone every 2 years), they aren't doing anything outside of the norm.

      What?

      Maybe you replace everything after 2 years, but some of us don't. (Unless it's free.)

    22. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, your only example of the market not working is Xbox 360 where the "consumer backlash" was enough to cause Microsoft to fix their shit voluntarily? I would say that's a good example of the market working to correct itself. The class action suit too is a good example of why nothing is broken, because that's still an example of government backlash. The government is righting a particular wrong perpetrated by a particular company after the fact rather than trying to be proactive and limiting everyone's rights in the process.

    23. Re:cough by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmmm, my calendar math is a little rusty, but August 2008 would be nearly 2 years ago, not 3 (2008 to 2009, 2009 to 2010)...;)

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    24. Re:cough by decoy256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OH! 3 years! Well, that makes ALL the difference. Rest easy, guys... Apple gave us an extra year.

    25. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if he picked up the iPhone 3G about two years ago, then the first gen is about three years old.

    26. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      along the same lines, HP/Compaq has had similar issues. A large chunk of the "business class" 500 series had faulty caps which HP didn't admit to for quite some time. That aside I'm still convinced that some of the NC4000 series laptops had serious issues. My companies initial order of 500 or so had an extremely high failure rate (over 50%) which our HP contacts to this day chalk up as "bad luck"

    27. Re:cough by Mr2001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is that "cut[ting] support"? If they literally stopped working (e.g. the playsforsure stuff, and I am NOT a general MS hater btw), that would be cutting support.

      No, "support" includes patching security holes. Supporting a product means they stand behind it and ensure not only that it does what it was designed for, but also that it stays secure and stable.

      For example, when people talk about Microsoft cutting support for Windows XP, they mean MS will stop providing any updates. MS's answer to any newly discovered exploits will be "sorry, we don't support that anymore, upgrade your OS."

      Likewise, if Apple stops patching holes in the older iPhones (which apparently they have), then they're no longer supporting those products. Apple's answer to flaws in the older iPhones is now "sorry, we don't support that anymore, upgrade your phone."

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    28. Re:cough by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, life is easier when The Party tells you what products you can have.

    29. Re:cough by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Name specific security holes that exist in the older ones that they have said "we aren't releasing patches".

      Again, there haven't been new FEATURE upgrades, but it still works as well as it did when you bought it. If the phone service (on an iPhone) were no longer available, I would consider that "no support".

    30. Re:cough by ushering05401 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wait a second. It isn't like these iphone users chose knock off hardware and are now paying the price. The hardware was dictated by Apple and now the customers aren't getting critical security patches because Apple only wants to deal with their most current hardware configs? I would never buy Apple again if they did this to me... No fanboyism necessary.

    31. Re:cough by techmuse · · Score: 1

      The first generation iPhone came out in 2007, not 2008. That's 3 years.

    32. Re:cough by bonch · · Score: 1

      Are Apple-haters going to pollute every story with this?

    33. Re:cough by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      Desktops: Dell Optiplex or Precision (unless someone wants some fancy looking bullshit, then one of the vostro all in one piece of shit machines)

      Laptops: Dell Latitude or Precision

      If you buy the cheaper lines, you get what you pay for. Also, don't buy as a home user, always buy as small business.

      As far as Apple, iMacs seem to have much less longevity than the more expensive Mac Pro, same with MacBook vs MacBook Pro. Regardless with Apple, you are paying a higher premium for the hardware and REALLY get fucked if you buy their upgrades and not using third party memory and hard drive upgrades after purchase.

      That said, I'll take my fantastic MBP battery life running OS X over my Dell Latitude with its 9-cell battery running any variant of Windows. And I reboot into bootcamped Windows if I need more performance for gaming than the Parallels based Windows VM can give me.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    34. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picked up iPhone *3G* in August 2008. The 1st-gen iPhones were released almost exactly three years ago, late-June 2007.

    35. Re:cough by SQLGuru · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think people love to bash Dell. They don't say anything about the capacitor problems, they suck. They are the first to disclose the exploding battery issue, they suck. All of the issues stem from the suppliers parts that are shared by other computer manufacturers. But Dell gets bashed for their response to the situation and other companies don't. Dell's response to the battery isssue was actually the best one for the customer (and was more recent than the 2003 to 2005 for the capacitor issue) but they get no credit for changing their ways, no credit for doing right by the customer, no credit for being the first to admit that there was a problem.

      I've bought Dell computers and not had issues. They are solid computers. Tech support via chat is fine (I don't use the phone support). Of course, I only contact them when it's something that requires a part replacement because I can fix my own computer. Computers are commodity items now, there isn't a significant difference between any of them, buy on price and features and repeat in three years.

      --Sent from my Dell laptop

    36. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I ended up picking a Vostro business computer. I would have preferred one of the other lines, but the vostro had far better specs and came with a Win7 64-bit license. A similarly specced Optiplex that had Win7 64-bit cost several times as much when I last checked (~3-4 months ago)

      We've had pretty good luck with Mac longevity. We JUST had a dual g5 powermac (refurb too) die from a powersupply failure.

      I have a 3 year old MBP that I like...it's had a rough existence. It had the Nvidia chipset bug and so had the logic board replaced. Immediately afterwards it developed a monitor problem (bottom 1/3 of the monitor froze) and so Apple agreed to replace the monitor for free. Not a bad deal. They gave me a new battery while they were at it too...

      Completely agree re: getting fucked by upgrades.

    37. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I didn't say it was necessarily a good thing, I think it's an example of how Apple simplicity blows the competition out of the water.

      When your average person goes to buy a Mac, they have two basic choices. (discounting Mac Mini and iPad)

      1) Get a laptop
      2) Get a desktop

      If they want a laptop, they have two choices:

      1) Get a cheaper laptop (Macbook)
      2) Get a more expensive laptop (Macbook Pro)

      Each of which has ~3 main configuration

      If they want a desktop, they have two choices:

      1) Get a cheaper system (iMac)
      2) Get a more expensive system (Mac Pro)

      Each of which has ~3 main configuration.

      The systems are labelled clearly (ie Macbook vs Macbook Pro). There are clear differences between them, and they scale from a low end computer at ~$900 to a very high end computer at $4000+ bucks. Apple systems are also rough in the upselling category--each upgrade has that one feature that makes it JUST worth having!

      Like I said, compare that to Dell where when looking at business desktops alone there are: Vostro, Optiplex, Inspiron, Studio, XPS, AlienWare and Precision all of which have probably dozens of configurations and models, some VERY different from each other. There are some stupid choices, like you can't (or couldn't) get Windows 7 64-bit on many of the Optiplex line, when you could on the Vostros, even though Vostros are supposedly the inferior quality machine. What gives? It took me hours of reading to figure out which Dell was the best (and then the pricing differential and lack of 64-bit os license made me pick a Vostro).

      Again, say what you will about Apple / "The Party" but their product lines should be required reading for the other PC makers...

    38. Re:cough by perryizgr8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      (there is no such thing as an "iTouch")

      why do all itards get angry over petty naming issues? its not like were writing a fucking press release. now if it was something ambiguous you might have had a point. but can you really get confused if someone says itouch?
      i had another asshole get angry with me after i called his holy leader's operating system 'OS eX'. 'its not 'eX', its TEN!!1'. so what asshole? i dont go on and blindly follow what some fucker tells me to say. i do what i want to do. and you should not have a problem unless you are unable to understand what i'm saying.
      seriously these guys sound like they're some sort of trademark protectors for apple.
      here goes: itouch itouch itouch itouch itouch itouch itouch

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    39. Re:cough by farrellj · · Score: 1

      Actually, the problem is across all computer manufactures....It's the "Race to the Bottom" price wise, with the stupidity of quarterly profits having to always go up that means that too many corners are cut in design, manufacturing & support, and we get crap quality at a low price. If they went back to a tiered model, with cheap, but reasonable quality products all the way up to Cadillac quality with all the bells and whistles...and a certainly OS developer didn't give you the impression that a Dual Xeon quad core systems will run MS Office better than a single core AMD 64, things would be a lot saner in the computer world.

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    40. Re:cough by Meski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be when it was last sold, not when it was released.

    41. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Look at what happened with the Xbox 360. The first generation were RROD devices and it took a class action law suit with major media reporting it before Microsoft changed their tactics

      Right now the most endearing legacy of Microsoft / Bill Gates is going to be the total removal of the expectations of consumers to buy products which work as expected. And there are leagues of companies running in their wake. Dell is just an example of one company which has finally run into a semi permanent brick wall. And despite this, people will give these companies their money then get on the web and complain about the results.

      The companies aren't doing a good job because they don't have to, despite actually being a well educated consumer... you bought a broken 360 anyway. The only guarantee you have is that as long as you buy broken goods, companies will keep producing broken goods.

      The biggest problem is that these companies suffer no government backlash

      Government consumer protectionism has been falling apart for about 80 years. Australia isn't as bad as the US yet but that's just because we live in a slightly backwards nation. This isn't going to suddenly turn around. If the market isn't going to sort itself out then you really need to take the initiative.

      I challenge everyone reading this who purchased an RROD 360 to never buy another Microsoft product. The power really is in your hands, take it.

    42. Re:cough by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

      Your calendar math is great. It's your iPhone version knowledge that's a bit off. If he got the iPhone 3G 2 years ago, that means the 1st gen iPhone *is* 3 years old.

    43. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your math is correct, but the original iPhone came out June 29, 2007. The 3G came out July 11, 2008, and is still supported.

    44. Re:cough by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Nokia, HTC, Motorola and the rest of the gang all have a great history of updating the OS of their handsets, years after they stopped selling them, adding new features that were not promised when the phone was originally sold, for free, with a easy and straightforward method of updating the OS on the handset...

      Hell, most of them are dragging their feet providing Android updates for phones only a few months old. Android fanboys have redefined platform-fragmentation so that if you can write a program that can support multiple versions of Android, then fragmentation doesn't exist.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    45. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmmm the difference here is you get people who aren't in India when you call MS. They are also really helpful about RROD. I have had them 3 times now, and every time they ship me a new console and a few months of XBL. Even when my console was 5 years old they replaced it for free because they felt bad. Dell just sucks and support is terrible.

    46. Re:cough by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It looks to me like thanks to lawsuits and public attention the market is indeed sorting out the problem. Look at the situation unfolding with the new iPhone. And the examples you cite are a perfect example of the market sorting out the problems.

      A situation like we had with Microsoft is one that required government intervention. Certainly government involvement helped things along and likely helped prevent some real potential for problems But even then, over time the market helped sort that out too. Google and Apple's successes, for example, weren't due to the government's rulings on Microsoft but they clearly did bring about real competition.

    47. Re:cough by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      ...and now the customers aren't getting critical security patches because Apple only wants to deal with their most current hardware configs?

      Well if YOU want to develop an exploit that turns iPhone 2G units into a botnet, but doesn't involve multitasking and won't kill the user's battery to an appreciable extent (5% they don't notice, 50% they do), then go right ahead. If that weren't enough, remember that they basically only run on EDGE, so you'll be pumping out packets at a blazing 4-10 KBytes/sec. I'd applaud you even at that point, but you will have my eternal adoration if you can pull off a successful DDoS on AT&T's cellular network.

    48. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody calls the "iPod Touch" the iTouch for short, you pedant. If you've never heard this you must live in a cave.

    49. Re:cough by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Name specific security holes that exist in the older ones that they have said "we aren't releasing patches".

      link

      Apple has released version 4.0 of its iOS mobile operating system, formerly know as the iPhone OS, closing a total of 65 vulnerabilities, some of which could be used by an attacker to take remote control of the device. [...]

      The iOS 4 update is only available for iPhone 3G and 3GS and second and third generation iPod Touch devices. [...] The company has yet to confirm if it will issue a separate security update for first generation iPhone and iPod Touch devices.

      If they do decide to release a separate security update for older devices, then we can say they haven't dropped support for them.

      Again, there haven't been new FEATURE upgrades, but it still works as well as it did when you bought it. If the phone service (on an iPhone) were no longer available, I would consider that "no support".

      You misunderstand what "support" means. Apple doesn't provide phone service for the iPhone -- AT&T does, so the scenario you describe is one in which AT&T stops supporting the iPhone.

      The support Apple provides is in the form of software patches. If they stop providing those patches, they stop supporting the device.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    50. Re:cough by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Apple "cut support" by writing features in the new iOS that were incompatible with first gen iPhones and iTouches. Tomato/tomahto.

    51. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem is that these companies suffer no government backlash, the whole idea that "the market will sort itself out" is total bullshit.

      The market did work itself out when people became aware and Media companies spread the word.

      If people don't know about the issues at hand, how are they expected to react?

    52. Re:cough by Vskye · · Score: 1

      This isn't really new to any company that has been around a long time. As a example, I bought a Everex laptop that I did a ton of research on, only to get burned by the dreaded Nvidia 8600 something chipset, which overheated. Guess what, the damn thing lasted a tad over the 1 year warranty.

      Everex used to be a solid company back in the day, my buddy had a 286 that ran forever.. he just got sick of moving the damn thing around. Looks like they are now out of business, and they deserve it for cutting corners and going from quality to crap. Dell will face the same fate.

      --
      Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
    53. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also a lot of evidence that Apple knew of the yellow tint issue affecting iMac screens and did their best to make customers keep the faulty screens. IMHO it's not so different.

    54. Re:cough by chartreuse · · Score: 1

      "First gen iPhones" and "iPhone 3G" are not the same objects. Odd that your whoosh has been judged more informative than its parent.

      Ten seconds on Wikipedia indicates the 1G iPhone was introduced three years and a few days ago.

    55. Re:cough by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      there is no such thing as an "iTouch"

      But there is such a thing as an "iDouche". You are one.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    56. Re:cough by Facebeast · · Score: 1

      Are apple fanboys going to whine every time they do?

    57. Re:cough by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Dells have a 1 year warranty. Unless you are willing to pay more than what a new computer costs for support.

    58. Re:cough by TheLink · · Score: 1

      For Dell:

      Inspiron: home stuff
      Vostro: cheap business laptops (boring designs and colours)
      Latitude: "big corporation" laptops that will keep the same hardware AND supply the same parts and models for years, so companies can roll out the same disk images/OS/software - no worries that the hardware will change and not be supported, no drivers etc.

      XPS: more eXPenSive higher performance stuff :).
      Alienware: for rich gamers who can't be bothered to build their own rigs.

      Naturally it's simpler for Apple: Apple doesn't have a product for the high performance gamer market, nor do they intend to keep selling the same model for years. Apple doesn't care as much about backward compatibility.

      --
    59. Re:cough by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "As far as Apple, iMacs seem to have much less longevity than the more expensive Mac Pro ... Regardless with Apple, you are paying a higher premium for the hardware...."

      They also have a much, much higher RESALE value as well, which people rarely factor into the equation. I've sold many a Mac a year or two later for 60-70% of the purchase price.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    60. Re:cough by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It's how the company addresses it.

      We had our entire customer facing counter network (70 systems) hit by the bad capacitor problem (with machines from Hewlett-Packard). The HP local agent fixed all of the machines, whether failing or not - no questions asked, no trying to wriggle out of it, no saying "the computer's in a place too hot and confined" or any of that bravo-sierra. They stood behind their product and fixed it.

      Dell on the other hand, according to the article linked in the older Slashdot posting, tried damned hard to blame the customer and wriggle out of it, even supplying newer defective boards as the fix.

    61. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Again, say what you will about Apple / "The Party" but their product lines should be required reading for the other PC makers..."

      In the Apple Party, you are expected to toe the product line.

    62. Re:cough by smallfries · · Score: 1

      What a short memory the AC has.

      Instead of assuming the OP was talking about the iPhone 4G antenna issue think back a little way further. The Santa Barbara generation of MacBook-pros used faulty 8600GTs from nvidia. This was the process shrink that nvidia totally fucked up and shipped millions of faulty GPUs.

      Unlike most pc manufacturers who issued recalls straight away Apple hedged for 12 months before announcing that the thousands of failing machines did have a hardware fault and they would replace any model in the line that showed problems within two years.

      I say this a little bitterly as my my early 2008 laptop is now 2.5 years old and has stopped using as many PCIe lanes as it should on the GPU which is an early sign of failure. Now remind me again how spotless Apple are?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    63. Re:cough by butlerdi · · Score: 1

      Except cluttering the land fills with a bunch of crap.....

      --
      "If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!" -- "Ma" Ferguson, Governor of Texas (circa
    64. Re:cough by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not an apple fanboy, but this isn't the same class of issue.

      You're not an Apple fanboy, you're simply an Anonymous Coward who just happened to be browsing the board and jump into Apple's defense. I've noticed that such happy coincidences happen a lot for corporations with large, well-funded PR departments. Weird, huh?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    65. Re:cough by musicmaster · · Score: 1

      In 1998 A customer of mine had a whole batch of Dells who all had the same problem that the second IDE port didn't work. No problem as long as you kept the machine as you received it, but it became a problem when I wanted to add cdroms. As the whole batch had the problem they should have known about it. But instead they tried to make life difficult for me: "have you tried that? Didn't you make that mistake?". It paid of for them. I got so sick of it that I only asked replacement for those computers where I actually needed 3 IDE devices at that moment. But in fact the whole batch (some 15 computers) was bad.

    66. Re:cough by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      That's nice, but it sucks if you want something unusual.

      For me, there's not nearly enough choice. I recently chose from more than 200 laptops, and ended up going with a Dell one. (I don't have any particular love for Dell, mind. I've had HP, Toshiba and Asus laptops as well). Mac hardware is outright out because it has a TPM. I loathe the idea itself of it, and refuse to buy any hardware that has it.

      Like I said, compare that to Dell where when looking at business desktops alone there are: Vostro, Optiplex, Inspiron, Studio, XPS, AlienWare and Precision all of which have probably dozens of configurations and models, some VERY different from each other. There are some stupid choices, like you can't (or couldn't) get Windows 7 64-bit on many of the Optiplex line, when you could on the Vostros, even though Vostros are supposedly the inferior quality machine. What gives? It took me hours of reading to figure out which Dell was the best (and then the pricing differential and lack of 64-bit os license made me pick a Vostro).

      What that tells me is that there's not enough choice yet. For me, the ideal would be complete configurability: say what components you want, what battery life, size and weight, choose the external appearance and it comes up with a price.

    67. Re:cough by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      How's Froyo on those older Android handsets working out for you guys?

      In the world of mobile phones, I think everyone is guilty of "the next best thing" syndrome. It's the new computer arms race.

    68. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... and for the basic desktop, there is the Mac Mini, which meets the needs of the majority of non-geek desktops (and some of us who are) for a decent price. A very simple choice, works well. Also physically easy to deploy.While I am not exactly a 'fanboi' for Apple, the overall cycle of purchasing/using/maintaining/etc has been smoother than any other computing equipment I have dealt with. When labor is factored in, not so sure it is not actually cheaper.

      The problem with the way man (most?) PC's is, that despite the low entry price, the overall life cycle hassles/costs lower the total value proposition for many people. But, when most of the market is driven by a combination of low price and strong advertising, it is not surprising that both service and 'flash vs build quality' are issues. And there is no question those issues affect Apple as well, just to a lesser degree, due to their approach to marketing.

      And this is not new, a few of us are almost old enough to remember when cars looked like parade floats, and the height of the rear fins could be crucial to sale

    69. Re:cough by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Linux is Unix, right?

      The GPL is the Generally Public Licence.

      Android is the name of the handset, yes?

      Slashdot is hilarious when a large part of the "humour" comes from poking fun at people who don;t know the technical names for things "omg, a woman brought her computer to me and told me the moden was broken, but she was referring to the tower! lolz!" but then can't take it if someone points out that they themselves named something incorrectly.

      Would you not correct me if I called Ubuntu "Ubuntu Unix"? What if you drove an Impala and someone pronounced it "impaler" - would you not correct them? (although, if you are driving one of those, you're probably too concerned with collecting the bits that fall off it in the net you drag behind the car).

      So, from now on I can just say Unix when I mean Linux? All those OSS operating systems are the same, yes?

    70. Re:cough by theolein · · Score: 2, Funny

      OMG Apple fanboi fire brigade to the rescue!!!!! Thank God you got here in time before people could realise that Apple is just as prone to making shoddy products and lying about it as anyone else.

    71. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say what you will about Apple, but their products lines are much easier to grok.

      If I remember my Heinlein correctly, the word grok literally meant drink in martian. So the question to ask about any Apple product is - will it blend?

    72. Re:cough by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      That is available - if you are willing to pay for the unit. One offs (or very low production runs) are very expensive. Unless you have thousands of people who want a computer case/laptop case just like you, it is just not economical to manufacture one completely custom to you.

      You can have some customisation where it doesn't affect the economics - like a bigger drive, more ram, faster cpu etc - something that won;t affect the case manufacture. There's a reason that all product lines look identical in a specific model range.

      Unless the thing is designed completely modularly, it's just not going to work - I know some laptops have a swappable optical drive unit that can be removed and replaced with an extra battery, for example, but then you are getting into compromise territory - you need space, weight and design changes to accommodate the mechanical hardware for swappable units.

      I like Apple a lot, and I admire the way they have streamlined their product lines, but I would like slightly more options than I have, but I'm on the upper end of the spectrum where the line is just starting to blur between "turnkey" and "spec your own down to the paint job" consumer. So, Apple's method, while advantageous, also carries disadvantages - you just can't get a Radeon 4850 in the 21" iMac - you have to go up to the 27", you can't get the quad core i5 in the 21" etc. The prices aren't enormously different (eg, between the top level 21" iMac and the lover 27" iMac is not all that much, but if you want something that only the 27" has, like the 4850 GPU, you have to get the bigger screen, even if you don;t want it).

      Sure I'd like some more flexibility, but I think if Apple's store ended up looking like Dell's with literally thousands of possibilities it would just be chaos.

    73. Re:cough by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Now -- if Apple had been selling the iPhone 4G for four years and ignoring the fact that a statistically large number of them were suddenly dying of a known bad issue, then intentionally shipping out 'repaired' iPhones with -more- bad parts in them, then I'd agree.

      You mean like Microsoft did with the Xbox 360?

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    74. Re:cough by hhw · · Score: 1

      Or you could just read the latest buying guide from Anandtech. http://www.anandtech.com/tag/guides

      --
      http://astutehosting.com/
    75. Re:cough by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Actually, the amount of choice is what I like about Dell. Unfortunately, all of that choice really boils down to several different models as TheLink pointed out. But within those several models, the user has the choice to add better graphics, more memory, bigger HDD, faster CPU, different or no OS, add-in cards, and a slew of accessories.

      I wouldn't be touting the demise of Dell just yet. I still recommend them. Their site is far easier to find drivers and chatting with tech support is simple. Configuring a system is easy. I wouldn't actually call their tech support line, though, but I wouldn't call any of the major computer tech support lines.

      HP / Compaq's driver support is easy to find, but their offerings are insanely limited. And they still load their machines with a bunch of junk software. Dell does too, but it's not nearly as bad. Sony's are way overpriced. IBM's are also expensive (but they do have quality). Lenovo may be good, but I haven't ever played with one. Gateway is a joke of a company. They could've been a contender.

    76. Re:cough by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      That is available - if you are willing to pay for the unit. One offs (or very low production runs) are very expensive. Unless you have thousands of people who want a computer case/laptop case just like you, it is just not economical to manufacture one completely custom to you.

      Sure. I was just talking about how the way I'd like things to be like. Apple is very, very far from it. Dell is much closer.

      Unless the thing is designed completely modularly, it's just not going to work - I know some laptops have a swappable optical drive unit that can be removed and replaced with an extra battery, for example, but then you are getting into compromise territory - you need space, weight and design changes to accommodate the mechanical hardware for swappable units.

      I had one of those, and thought it was really cool. Unfortunately it's hard to find anymore.

      I like Apple a lot, and I admire the way they have streamlined their product lines, but I would like slightly more options than I have, but I'm on the upper end of the spectrum where the line is just starting to blur between "turnkey" and "spec your own down to the paint job" consumer.

      I don't like them at all, precisely for the same reason. I want to buy the right thing, not to spend $500 more than I wanted because the cheaper model has all I need except one thing, which the expensive one has along with 10 other things I don't want.

      Sure I'd like some more flexibility, but I think if Apple's store ended up looking like Dell's with literally thousands of possibilities it would just be chaos.

      Absolutely not. All you need is a good laptop selector. Dell has it right now.

      You go there and select:
      11" - 14"
      Dedicated video card
      5-7 lbs
      Power

      You get a grand total of 2 laptops to choose from. Then there are minor choices for those, like CPU speeds and disk sizes. That's the main reason I bought from Dell. Apple didn't have anything I wanted, HP's site was a mess, everything I liked from Asus was way too big, Acer didn't have anything I liked. The only thing that annoys me somewhat is that they have the option of having the laptop only in black or pink. More selection would be nice.

      If HP and Asus had a laptop selector like Dell I'd have been done in 10 minutes. For Asus I actually ended up mirroring the product catalog and grepping it for specs.

    77. Re:cough by gozar · · Score: 1

      Mac hardware is outright out because it has a TPM. I loathe the idea itself of it, and refuse to buy any hardware that has it.

      Apple hardware hasn't included TPM since 2006. (Trusted Computing for Mac OS X)

      --
      What, me worry?
    78. Re:cough by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      Would you not correct me if I called Ubuntu "Ubuntu Unix"?

      no, i'd ignore it.

      What if you drove an Impala and someone pronounced it "impaler" - would you not correct them?

      if it is obvious that it is the car 'impala' that is being talked about, i'd ignore it. otherwise, if there is another car called 'impaler', then i would correct it.

      So, from now on I can just say Unix when I mean Linux? All those OSS operating systems are the same, yes?

      no. unix and linux are completely different operating systems. and all oss oses are quite different. if you encountered a specific bug in ubuntu, that does not mean you can say the same for every other linux distro. thus they have to be differentiated in such a situation.
      if you are talking about something that is common to both linux and unix THEN you can interchange them whenever you like.
      on the other hand, in the gp's case both him and the person he replied to are clearly talking about the same device. there is no ambiguity. so there is no need to be all picky about it.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    79. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be touting the demise of Dell just yet. I still recommend them. Their site is far easier to find drivers and chatting with tech support is simple. Configuring a system is easy. I wouldn't actually call their tech support line, though, but I wouldn't call any of the major computer tech support lines.

      I've been using OSX for about 7 years, and I think in that entire time I have had to download one third-party driver.

      I've had to deal with HP, Dell, and Apple tech support. Apple blows the other two out of the water.

      After extensively evaluating laptops for work purposes within the last 6 months, I went with Lenovo. I've never particularly liked the Dell laptops I've dealt with, though as you point out, they are nearly infinitely customizable.

    80. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I think you're confused / missing what I said. I wasn't even getting into laptops, I was ONLY talking business desktops (though I think some of your points do stand for ie the latitude line)! You managed to summarize 5 of the product lines that show up under "business desktops" but you missed Optiplex, Studio and Precision.

      When even slashdotters trying to argue with my point are unsure of Dell product lines, what does that tell you about the situation?

    81. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I think Anandtech does crappy reviews of notebooks and systems.

      Decent on components, not so good on systems.

      According to the guide I should get a Toshiba, Alienware, or Acer? I went with a Lenovo.

    82. Re:cough by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      How long did Bob manage ?

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    83. Re:cough by bannable · · Score: 1

      The major difference here - between Microsoft's 360 and Dell's PCs - is that Dell hid the fact that the devices were faulty from it's customers when asked. Lenovo on the other hand, acknowledged (to my knowledge) the existance of the problem once they'd become aware of it.

      --
      "If you see a man on a horse, he is likely an enemy. Kill the man and eat the horse."
    84. Re:cough by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

    85. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, my calendar math is a little rusty, but August 2008 would be nearly 2 years ago, not 3 (2008 to 2009, 2009 to 2010)...;)

      Your math is ok, it's your reading skills that are lacking.

    86. Re:cough by discord5 · · Score: 1

      That's nothing different than Doom 3 having a higher RAM/processor requirement than Doom 2.

      HEY! That engine required a fuckton of horsepower to render several hundreds different shades of black.

      Darkness never looked so dark before.

    87. Re:cough by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      I have a first gen iPod touch that I bought soon after they came out. The product still works great. The battery life has decreased somewhat. I don't expect it to get iOS4 or its new features. I understand your point about the hardware. However, it would be nice to get a maintenance release of the 3.x OS for that device (not sure what number they were at) that fixed the 30 odd security vulnerabilities that were fixed in iOS4. I haven't explicitly checked for an update, but I haven't seen any news about it either.

    88. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how Apple fans equate less choice and "take it or leave it" as a bonus and an advantage. I can solve your confusion issues with Dell. Click on the first model name that sounds good to you and pick one of the three or four offerings in that line that will best fit your needs. No more confusion.
      After all, if you limit your selection at Dell to two random model lines and ignore the others, isn't that the same exact thing as going to the Apple site and choosing between two model lines?
      Would you feel left out or slimy and think you might be getting cheated if you did not at least consider the other Dell models? Why? Apple only had two and you don't feel cheated?

      Take it back a little further. Why even pick a Dell, why not HP, Acer, some house brand? OMG, the choices! Your claim is "I don't want choices, I want to go to one place and pick from two because it is easier.". Again, make it easy on yourself, pick from two, problem solved.

      Next time you are looking for a new car, you should only consider a Scion or a Mini. They only have two or three models to choose from and using your logic, you already know one of those few will be a perfect fit and that is a benefit to you because you will not have to compare.
         

    89. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I know you're an AC and probably won't reply, but you raised some interesting and totally wrong points.

      The point I made was about information overload. Apple differentiates themselves by selling products that are different, and that are simple. The simplicity extends from the OS, to the physical design, to the marketing product lines.

      You're EXACTLY right about the choices available at Dell and when you say "Take it back a little further. Why even pick a Dell, why not HP, Acer, some house brand" you've unwittingly hit the nail on the head though you've failed to realize it! Exactly, WHY pick a Dell? There's no reason. They make junky computers and quality computers that are virtually indistinguishable from Acer, HP, Lenovo, etc etc etc.

      Do you wonder how many people have gone to dell.com only to be overwhelmed and then head to a nearby Apple store? Given the success of the Apple stores and Apple in the last roughly decade, I think it's probably quite a few people!

    90. Re:cough by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      I would add on to this that this is very public knowledge for anybody in IT for almost all manufacturers. No surprises here at all. I do a LOT of server purchasing from Dell and have yet to have problems where they didn't stand behind a machine. That being said, I also know that they're a soul-sucking corporate America company out to make a buck from everyone so buyer beware.

      Just my $.02

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    91. Re:cough by twilightzero · · Score: 1

      Just finished reading the rest of the article and this is still about the CAPACITOR problem? My god that's old news! EVERY technology manufacturer was affected by that, and by and large every one had the same response. To be blabbering on about how this is a breach of the sanctity of customer trust or some other bullshit is...well...bullshit. Get with the times.

      --

      "Christ what a design! I could eat a handful of iron filings and PUKE a better emergency pump than that!"
    92. Re:cough by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      You have to realize what the Optiplex's are meant for though. Optiplex is created for stability, their HAL barely changes and you have a plethora of other image guarantees. The hardware is also a little behind the rest of the lines as they look to more tried and true equipment. With the capacitor issue that was a matter of a manufacturer giving them bad parts unfortunately...7 years ago. I havent seen any issues like that since, I dont know why people are all up in a tiff right now for something admitted 7 years ago.

      If you are in it for sheer cutting edge performance, Optiplexes aren't your best bet, but if you are a corporation that does image management, mass deployment, and wants to set and forget the box. Optiplex is the way to go. If you don't understand any of these reasons, then you are right, Vostro or one of the others is the best bet for you.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    93. Re:cough by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      The Dell laptops are certainly cheap. I've got a few dead ones at my house. I suppose the next time I go to purchase a laptop, I'll have to remember that a $200 premium for quality (if Lenovo's laptops are as good as when they were in IBM's hands) is better than what Dell offers.

    94. Re:cough by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      To be fair, there aren't many apple haters out there, just apple fanboy haters...

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    95. Re:cough by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I was watching kin ads last night on Hulu. They may have killed Kin, but it's not dead yet!

      PS: 48 days is more than a month.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    96. Re:cough by genghisjahn · · Score: 1

      I think we are all forgetting our Fight Club:

      "A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one."

      --
      Sorry about the mess.
    97. Re:cough by tibit · · Score: 1

      Marketing people don't understand that sometimes too much of a good thing is a bad thing: too much choice is bad, too.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    98. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at what happened with the Xbox 360. The first generation were RROD devices and it took a class action law suit with major media reporting it before Microsoft changed their tactics. I have no doubt they were well aware of the problems well before the class action suit, yet still shipped defective products. It took 2 generations of Xbox 360 boards before the problem started to be resolved. Yes, they did do a lot to mitigate brand damage, but by that stage it was too little too late. Yes, I do own a 360, and I have had a RROD.

      The biggest problem is that these companies suffer no government backlash, the whole idea that "the market will sort itself out" is total bullshit. So long as companies are not heavily scrutinised after they are caught deceiving the public means they can just claim ignorance and move on. Even with harsh consumer protection laws (like here in Australia), the idea that you can lobby your way out of it sickens me.

      The market did sort itself out. They sold a crappy product, you still bought it, other people bought it, where's the incentive for them to not screw it up?

    99. Re:cough by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      If that weren't enough, remember that they basically only run on EDGE, so you'll be pumping out packets at a blazing 4-10 KBytes/sec.

      At even 1 KB/sec, if you have 150,000 phones in the botnet, you have the equivalent of an OC-24 for sending spam.

    100. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with this. Your example on desktops is flawed. The choices are

      1. Buy an all in one (iMac)
      2. Buy a desktop (mac mini, not upgradable like a dell)
      3. Buy a Workstation (Mac Pro)

      Apple only makes one desktop model and it's not a "real" desktop. I can't upgrade it without breaking my warranty. It takes laptop parts which makes it useless for storing iTunes content or anything else of reasonable size.

      Most of my friends want apple to make a "Mac", a true desktop computer. Instead we either buy Mac Pro machines which really aren't gamer rigs like they're used for or iMacs. My iMac sucks on upgradability and anything I have to use suction cups on it get into is designed poorly.

      Finally, I'd like to comment on Apple customer service. I've had good and bad experiences with them. The last two issues I've had were not solved.

      1. Hard drive died in iMac. Apple wouldn't replace it and instead someone managed to get 10.5 on it even though it had 10.6 on it previously. Drive would not format and was 0 bytes in snow leopard installer. Ended up doing it myself, but i was out 80 bucks for apple to look at it first. I could have done it myself to begin with but i didn't want to bother with suction cups and working on a monitor/computer combo. (it took me an hour so i should have just done it) To make matters worse, it took them a week to hand it back to me.

      2. Snow leopard stopped supporting my 3 year old printer. It was on some lists but not others for support. Had to throw out printer.

    101. Re:cough by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I didn't know I was supposed to give a full summary. It was just an example of why they have certain lines.

      Dell targets a far wider range of customers than Apple. If you don't like or can't handle choice, you certainly shouldn't go for Dell. Or you should delegate the task to someone else.

      Dell allows lots of customization and they've done that since the early days when Michael Dell started the company. It's part of what Dell is about. HP and IBM don't allow as much online customization. I don't really care so much whether it's "Optiplex" or whatever, it's the specs and stuff they put inside that matters.

      FWIW, I personally build my own desktops for home use (as I mentioned the parts inside are more important than the logo on the outside ;) ), but if I have to buy stuff for work or other people, Dell really isn't so bad - they're not great but they are typically "average" for reliability and quality. I've had more negative experiences with HP - DOA rates were like 1 in 7 at one time (HP servers didn't DOA much, but they tried to be too clever with BIOS and proprietary crap). For servers I actually prefer IBM.

      --
    102. Re:cough by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Google agrees. "iTouch" definitely means "iPod Touch".

    103. Re:cough by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      The bad qualities of other companies don't excuse Apple's short support.

    104. Re:cough by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Complex choices are certainly a big part of the problem, but still only part. Some Slashdotters tend to think the whole problem is dumb users who can't handle too many choices, when it's really as often a case of a dumb marketer who couldn't figure out how to distribute features sensibly among all those choices. Witness Dell, where some higher end product lines don't have higher grade versions of Windows among their options.
            To use one of those lousy car analogies, what would we think of a car maker who offered a V-8 option with its budget subcompact, but not with its sports or luxury sedan models? It's not an end user 'too many choices' problem when the marketing department has already pre-made the dumb choices.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    105. Re:cough by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Grok is the ultimate word to NOT take literally. Taking it literally means you didn't grok it at all. Still, I think you grok Apple just fine. Next question is, Can Steve Jobs sit lotus at the bottom of a swimming pool for longer than Percy Jackson?

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    106. Re:cough by dekemoose · · Score: 1

      Too long.

    107. Re:cough by davester666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except he was complaining that Apple's support for releasing new, free, significant upgrades have stopped after ONLY 3 years, when for the rest of the industry, you are more likely to be struck by lightning than you are to get any sort of update for your handset.

      Apple not only kicked the industry in the balls with industrial, software and UI design with the iPhone [as witnessed by everybody trying to jump on Apple's bandwagon], but they also kicked it in the balls with support.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    108. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I didn't know I was supposed to give a full summary. It was just an example of why they have certain lines.

      AGAIN, exactly the point. A few lines makes perfect sense. Customizing individual computers make perfect sense! 8 different overlapping product lines for business desktops? Really?

      I don't really care so much whether it's "Optiplex" or whatever, it's the specs and stuff they put inside that matters.

      Which I should note, are not always readily apparent. For instance, 3 months ago bought a business Vostro with Win7 64-bit. Pretty nice computer, good specs, lots of ram, fast processor, etc.

      It doesn't have a DVI port. No DVI! The thing came with a 23" monitor!

      FWIW, I personally build my own desktops for home use (as I mentioned the parts inside are more important than the logo on the outside ;) ), but if I have to buy stuff for work or other people, Dell really isn't so bad - they're not great but they are typically "average" for reliability and quality. I've had more negative experiences with HP - DOA rates were like 1 in 7 at one time (HP servers didn't DOA much, but they tried to be too clever with BIOS and proprietary crap). For servers I actually prefer IBM.

      Building your own computer is certainly one way to go. I used to do this, and would probably continue to build for home (I got an amazing deal on a dell+monitor from fatwallet a couple years ago). I personally have had no better long-term survival rates from computers I've built out of quality components than dells etc.

    109. Re:cough by snarfies · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well, the Jerk Store called - they're running out of YOU!

    110. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you wonder how many people have gone to dell.com only to be overwhelmed and then head to a nearby Apple store? Given the success of the Apple stores and Apple in the last roughly decade, I think it's probably quite a few people!

      So, if you do not want to be overwhelmed, make it easy on yourself, pick the first company, pick the first model line, and pick a desktop/laptop. It is not hard man. The fact that you CAN narrow it down and pick and choose every single spec and custom part you desire does not mean you HAVE to do that. With shopping at a site like Dell or HP, you have the choice to be quick and easy OR pick and choose specifics. let me repeat. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GO THE SPECIFIC ROUTE OF CHOOSING SPECIFICS. If you want the easy experience that Apple has between given a selection of two models, you can do that at HP and Dells site. With Apple, you have to choose one of the two. That is not an advantage to every consumer.

      How do you shop for a car? a home stereo, a roof and shingles for your house? appliances? tires for your car? the list is endless. People compare features and options, decide what meets their need and price, and buy it. This is not a new concept man, really, its not. Are you telling me people go to Sears to buy a washer and dryer because they only have 2 models to choose from which makes the decision easy? Hell no, they go because Sears has a lot of models and styles and you can compare. How many people shop at Amazon because they only have 2 choices of the product you are looking for? Are you honestly telling me you do all of your shopping like that and so does everyone else? It does not happen man. People are buying Apple for reasons other than they only have two to choose from that should fit everyones needs and that's all anyone should want or need to compare from.
             

    111. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just use apple and grok in the same sentence. FU buddy

    112. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Still 100% missing the point. It doesn't matter whether you or I or Joe Random Slashdot User are capable and willing to do the research. I HAVE bought Dells and probably will again. Irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

      The point is that Apple's product line is easier to understand and more straightforward than Dell's. From this information, I speculate that this goes a long way towards explaining why Apple has been so popular over the past decade.

      I think a lack of empathy goes a long way towards explaining why some (eg) Slashdot users have such a hard time understanding other people's motivations. I think this is a perfect example of you failing to understand many people's motivations, and instead ranting at me (though I'm struggling to understand what there is to get worked up about in the conversation here?). Apple is brilliant at marketing...I think even the biggest Apple haters would agree with that? Does that tell you anything about their product lines?

      People are buying Apple for reasons other than they only have two to choose from that should fit everyones needs and that's all anyone should want or need to compare from.

      Here's your one nugget of (partial) wisdom in your rant. People ARE buying Apple for other reasons. It's exactly like I said in my previous post in this thread... Apple has product lines that are clearly differentiated from other PC makers and clearly demarcated amongst themselves. The average Dell/Compaq/HP/Acer/etc are identical and practically indistinguishable.

    113. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open an appliance store and only offer 2 washers, 2 dryers, 2 refrigerators, 2 couches, and 2 different microwaves. See how long you stay in business. You claimed because Apple had less choices, it was an advantage and people liked that and that is why they were buying Apple.

      I don't care what the numbers are and I don't base my buying decision on what everyone else does but realistically speaking; Apples computer sales in 2009 were still only are 8% of the computer market in (and 7.9% in 2008) so your glamorous claims of why Apple is doing so great are relative and the masses that you are referring too that are flocking in droves to their superior offering and user friendly choices accounted for a whopping 0.1% sales increase. Pretty much dust in the wind when you look at the ACTUAL figures.

      http://www.tuaw.com/2010/01/14/mac-sales-growth-continues-according-to-idc-numbers/

    114. Re:cough by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      But I thought the iPhone was supposed to be something more than a call-and-text-only generic handset that a person throws away? ... and I've been using the same handset for about 6 years, now. It's doing just fine, thanks - though I have replaced the battery twice now.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    115. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Yes, and what was the situation 10 years ago? It's more so if you look at laptop sales which are more indicative of the home/personal market than desktop computers which seem to be becoming dinosaurs outside of the workplace.

      You claimed because Apple had less choices, it was an advantage and people liked that and that is why they were buying Apple.

      No, I distinctly did NOT say it was just because Apple had less choices. I said it was an example of "Apple simplicity." Part of that simplicity does mean that yes, there are fewer choices to make than if you're speccing a Dell, but most of it comes down to clearly defined product lines that are easy to understand, their names make sense, and they are clearly demarcated between themselves.

      Open an appliance store and only offer 2 washers, 2 dryers, 2 refrigerators, 2 couches, and 2 different microwaves. See how long you stay in business

      Isn't that exactly what Apple has done with the Apple store? After all, they offer ~3 mp3 players, 2 laptops, 3 desktops, 2 cellphones and 1 tablet? And they're all even the same brand!

      And we all know how succesful Apple stores have been over the past 9 years...

    116. Re:cough by smisle · · Score: 1

      funny, all three dell laptops I've bought (from the outlet) with ubuntu have come partitioned for windows, but blanked out without any OS at all. Since they were netbooks, there wasn't even a disk drive to put the two-year-old ubuntu in the thing.

      I got them for an unbeatable price, and it's no trouble for me to install another OS on it, but I have to wonder what a non-tech would have done. Probably returned it.

      --
      I'm not a bird, I'm a super-advanced flying stealth dinosaur!
    117. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH SNAP!

    118. Re:cough by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Clippied before his prime, eh?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    119. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on man, you specifically claimed Apple sales of computer were skyrocketing and implied a wave of change was upon us because of the fact they offer two models and that is what consumers want. I gave you examples of how that does not follow the typical consumer buying and purchasing habits. I showed you sales numbers that showed that the mass exodus to Apples way and "simplicity" was not very effective for computer sales. Now you are talking about sales over 10 years, wait, no just laptops, how about the Apple store and iphone sales, (You can easily find the numbers of smartphones or cell hpones in general and the ratio of them that are from Apple on Google, you would be very surprised at the results.

      The point is that Apple's product line is easier to understand and more straightforward than Dell's
      Dude, think about what you are saying, they only have TWO MODELS, that makes it simple by definition. It is not simplicity for the sake of being simple or Apple did something special to make their offerings seems simple, it is simple because there is ONLY TWO models! It cant be anything but simple. Yes it is simple, no doubt, what does that mean for the consumer? Based on the last two years of sales numbers, not much at all. Those are real numbers man, REAL NUMBERS.

      You are implying Apple computers are out pacing and overwhelming all others by leaps and bounds and gave your bogus reasons for why and people want change blah blah, I showed you numbers that show they are not. You can search for world wide numbers for phones and smartphones as well and get roughly the same results and %'s. Apple has the fashion and the hype but it is not turning into these massive changes you claim are going on and therefore your reasons to explain this non existent exodus just do not make sense.

    120. Re:cough by davester666 · · Score: 1

      And how is Android 2.2 working out for you on your G1? If you are raggin' on Apple for not providing a free update for a 3 year old phone, you must be ready with the torches and pitchforks to storm all the Android who haven't even provided ONE update for their handsets. Or that have declared that phones released last year [ie, six months ago], won't get any updates? And what about the multi-month time lags between when Google releases an update to Android that includes security fixes and when any of the vendor's bothers to release an update for a handset?

      And has anybody seen updates to WinCE 6.0 or 6.1 recently [for handsets that use them]?

      In terms of after-sales updates for handsets, right now, Apple is the Gold Standard. EVERYBODY else has a crappier record, even though they all have WAY more experience than Apple has in doing handset software, dealing with carriers, and everything else in the cell phone industry.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    121. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      you specifically claimed Apple sales of computer were skyrocketing

      No, you're wrong. I EXACTLY said "Do you wonder how many people have gone to dell.com only to be overwhelmed and then head to a nearby Apple store? Given the success of the Apple stores and Apple in the last roughly decade, I think it's probably quite a few people!" and EXACTLY "why Apple has been so popular over the past decade." I stand by both of those statements absolutely. The rest is just your imagination.

      I showed you sales numbers that showed that the mass exodus to Apples way and "simplicity" was not very effective for computer sales.

      I never claimed a mass exodus. Go read my posts (again?). Apple market share HAS increased greatly in the past 10 years, and especially in the home/personal segment. Not so much corporate (though Google is a good example of a switcher company).

      Dude, think about what you are saying, they only have TWO MODELS

      You're a dedicated troll... Read my first post again (or look at apple.com for that matter). You seem to be confused about Apple's product lines.

    122. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is responsible for developing the first phones that are NOT designed to be disposable every one or two years, unlike all (most) previous cell phones on the market before iPhone came along.

      The 1st gen iPhone (which I have) is now 3 years old, and is still working fine. While the latest OS - iOS4, won't run on it, the last 3.x OS does just fine, still works, still makes phone calls, still does all the stuff it did on day 1, still connects to iTunes, still runs apps from the app store, can still get help from the Genius bar if needed, etc. etc. I might not get all the latest bells and whistles like on-phone video editing, but Apple hasn't dropped 'support' for it. The build quality of Apple's phones are such that if you don't abuse it, it will last as long as their computers - which have some of the longest useful life-spans in the industry. I have a PowerBook that's going on 8 years old now and still works fine, and even though it's PowerPC, I can still get some software titles for it, believe it or not.

      The term 'support' is elusive... Don't confuse support with warranty or new features. Any computing device, phone or otherwise, will eventually not support some new feature or run some new program, and product warranties are limited. Apple's standard warranty is 1 year on all their products, but just because a warranty ends doesn't mean the device's life is over, or becomes unsupported.

      Unlike competitors, Apple's phones are not throw-away items. They designed them to be long lasting. Now, while I'm tempted to upgrade to the iPhone 4, I will probably wait 6mo - 1yr until they release a '4s' or a '4g' or something like that. At that point, I'm still not going to landfill my 1st gen iPhone, I'll just discontinue cell service on it and use it as an iPod for one of the kids. I fully expect my 1st gen iPhone to continue to function perfectly fine for 6 years or more.

    123. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

      So you point out that "so many people have left Dell for Apple" and "given the success of the Apple store" and "Apple has been so popular over the past decade"

      I interpret that as you saying Apples sales are skyrocketing. If that's not what you are implying, then what are you saying? How else do you quantify those three statements other than sales numbers? Water cooler talk? Your friends discussing it all of the time? The number if times your Apple in the news?

      So many people have left Dell for Apple
      Okay, Dells numbers should be falling greatly, noticeable AND those numbers are going to Apple. Let's look at overall sales numbers?

      given the success of the Apple store
      Success, measured in what why? Compared to what?

      Apple has been so popular over the past decade
      Popular in what? what is your gauge? What does that even mean?

      So, you are doing a lot of talking but not really saying anything. You have nothing to back up any of your statements and apparently, I don;t even really know what you are even saying other than the same thing over and over.

    124. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Your highly selective reading and responding to my posts matches up quite nicely with your highly selective picking of sales numbers.

      Okay, Dells numbers should be falling greatly, noticeable AND those numbers are going to Apple. Let's look at overall sales numbers?

      Yes let's! I'll respond to this paragraph again at the bottom.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/19/technology/19compute.html

      Apple also picked up market share in the United States, growing to 5 percent, from 4 percent, as its shipments increased 30 percent, according to Gartner. Apple grew faster than any other PC maker in the United States, Gartner said.

      http://www.maclife.com/article/news/apples_market_share_pc_world_continues_surge

      or http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/04/14/apple_sells_estimated_1_4m_macs_in_us_to_capture_8_market_share.html

      Research firm Gartner said that Apple was the fifth-largest PC seller in the U.S. for the three-month quarter to start 2010. An estimated 1.398 million Macs were shipped in the States, and Apple only lagged behind HP, Dell, Acer and Toshiba.

      Looking back 6 years...

      http://www.macworld.com/article/43741/2005/03/marketshare.html

      Apple's desktop market share in the United States for the fourth quarter of 2004 was 2.88 percent (and 2.06% q4 2003)

      So in those 7 years Apple managed to almost quadruple their marketshare (2.06 to 8.0, 6% or 3.8x). Dell lost 9%. HP gained 3%. etc.

      http://www.channelinsider.com/c/a/Dell/10-Things-Dell-Must-Do-to-Catch-Up-to-HP-221568/

      Obviously primarily an opinion piece with many facts, but does this sound like anything I've been saying about Dell / Apple?

      1. Keep It Simple
      Dell tries to do too much. The company has spent the last few years attempting to be the company that satisfies any potential buyer. That's a mistake. HP has shown that simplicity will reign supreme in the computing market. That company has gone out of its way to provide customers with several options that will satisfy them in one way or another. Dell should follow suit. Its buying process is a mess that's overrun with customization options. Even its product offerings are all over the place. Enough is enough. Keep it simple, Dell. That's what customers want.

      Okay, Dells numbers should be falling greatly, noticeable AND those numbers are going to Apple. Let's look at overall sales numbers?

      Dell loses ~8%, Apple gains about 6%. Those are the numbers. You don't think that's significant? Really?

      Dell has closed or is closing almost all of their facilities in the US, including a factory building ~5 years ago near where I live. Should this tell you anything?

      given the success of the Apple store
      Success, measured in what why? Compared to what?

      Success meaning that they are profitable! Success meaning that they have helped quadruple Apple marketshare in the last 6-7 years. Success meaning that while others like Gateway tried--and failed--to open branded computer stores, Apple is opening more every month. Is this really that difficult to see?

      Apple has been so popular over the past decade

      Popular means going from 2% of the computer market to 8% in 6-7 years. It means everybody in the WORLD knowing what an iPod, and a lot of them having one! It means 1.7 million iphones sold in 3 days at prices higher than most Android phones (and none of the 2 for 1 deals). It means virtually every

    125. Re:cough by Kakari · · Score: 1

      You don't need to worry about EDGE to DDoS AT&T, just send lots of SMSs - that should handily take care of their network (or any other providers for that matter).

    126. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, market share, Android sales are up 24% over what they were last year. In the last 3 years, Acer sale increased almost 40% pushing Apple down to 5th.

      We can through out statistics all day long, bottom line, Apples current rate of growth in the last 5 years in the PC market is about close to 1% a year and even SHRUNK last year while Acer growth was 50%. OMG 50%! Of course YOU assume that since Dell went down, those people went to Apple, sorry, statistically, they went to Acer.
      Statistics are like bikinis, what they reveal is suggestive, what they hide is critical.

      http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135603/Analysts_pull_Mac_sales_numbers_out_of_a_hat.
      http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/07/15/idc.prelim.q2.2009/
      http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/15/acer-eclipsed-dell-and-apple/

      We have been hearing for 10 years how awesome Apple is and how much inroads they are making into the home computing market but they only have 8% total after 10 years. 10 years is a LOOOONG time in the computer industry and going from 2-8 in 10 years is not a fast paced sprintto the finish by any stretch of the imagination and as glorified as you seem to think.

    127. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, market share, Android sales are up 24% over what they were last year. In the last 3 years, Acer sale increased almost 40% pushing Apple down to 5th.

      Could not be more irrelevant to the conversation at hand. Does cellphone OS (that most people probably don't know anything about and replace every 2 yars on avaerage) really have any correlation to desktop computer usage? I don't think so.

      We can through out statistics all day long, bottom line, Apples current rate of growth in the last 5 years in the PC market is about close to 1% a year and even SHRUNK last year while Acer growth was 50%. OMG 50%! Of course YOU assume that since Dell went down, those people went to Apple, sorry, statistically, they went to Acer.

      You unwittingly make my point _again_. Go look at the Acer product lines (specifically for business desktops which is what I've been talking about since post #1).

      We have been hearing for 10 years how awesome Apple is and how much inroads they are making into the home computing market but they only have 8% total after 10 years. 10 years is a LOOOONG time in the computer industry and going from 2-8 in 10 years is not a fast paced sprintto the finish by any stretch of the imagination and as glorified as you seem to think.

      So now you're reduced to arguing semantics, which has exactly what relevance to my argument...?

    128. Re:cough by JuliaNZ · · Score: 1

      the first phones that are NOT designed to be disposable every one or two years, unlike all (most) previous cell phones on the market before iPhone came along.

      What utter bollocks. I've just replaced my Treo 650 that I bought second-hand more than four years ago. It's had one replacement battery (you're probably not familiar with that concept) and it went to a friend of mine who's still using the Treo 180 I gave him when I bought the 650. He'll get a few more years out of the 650, I'm betting.

      Blackberries also seem to have a decent lifetime and they've been round a lot longer than the iphone.

    129. Re:cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a knack for twisting things and reporting half truths as if they were actually facts. Acer is the #1 (or #2 depending on who is reporting) of laptop sales. Their major growth is because of the laptop/netbook sales. And yes, they have more than two models which apparently is to confusing for you to comprehend. Check this link (and there are many others like it http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1558689/dell-falls-acer
      Make note of the last two sentances that directly contradict your previous post.
      More than 80 per cent of Dell's customers are companies and they are not buying yet. Acer and HP sell in all regional markets however and have also done better at peddling products to increasingly confident consumers.
      But Acer has been doing extremely well. Its shipments surged 25.6 per cent last quarter, the fastest growth among the top PC makers. Most of the sales have been cheap and cheerful netbooks.

      Yes, Acer is BOOMING right now and it is NOT from corporate purchases and it is NOT desktops and it is NOT because they offer an easy web site with two laptops.

      You can keep saying your are right over and over again but it does not make it right. You claimed Apple is so great and blowing away the competition because they only sell a few models and that is what the consumers want. I proved to you that Apple is NOT blowing away the competition and people are buying from places that have more than two offerings and many of those companies are reporting great sales numbers (more than apple in quantity and percentage) but for some reason, you refuse to beleive it. Yes Dell is in a slump, it happens, CS, faulty computers, crappy web site, and probably many other reasons but Dell is not in a slump because the sales are going to Apple because Apple is easier and better place to buy from. That is how this whole thread started.

    130. Re:cough by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Acer is the #1 (or #2 depending on who is reporting) of laptop sales. Their major growth is because of the laptop/netbook sales.

      Relevant how?

      I already once referred you to the Acer website. Take a look again. Notebooks are a great example. Three lines. As compared to Dell's at least 6 lines.

      And yes, they have more than two models which apparently is to confusing for you to comprehend

      You keep resorting to this tpye of ad hom, and I'm really not understanding what your point is. I've even cited other articles that specifically mentioned how Dells multitudes of lines and options were driving customers away (in comparison to HP even!).

      The point is not that it is confusing for you or for me. I DO Happen to find the Dell product line confusing. Their marketshare has tanked in the last 7-8 years. Their competitors such as Acer, HP, and your favorite bugaboo Apple, take VERY different approaches to marketing and product lines, and have all increased their sales.

      That's the end of the story...If you don't understand that, I don't think I can state it any simpler!

      Yes, Acer is BOOMING right now and it is NOT from corporate purchases and it is NOT desktops and it is NOT because they offer an easy web site with two laptops.

      You're right, they offer 3 *lines* not 2 *lines* -- I think you're getting confused here, so I just wanted to make sure you understood that point about the lines. I would think Acer succeeds by picking up the bottom of the barrel price and netbook market (being the first to the punch there) ... can't say. I've heard decent things about their technical support. Again, relevant to my criticism of Dell only insofar as I've already explained half a dozen times!

      You claimed Apple is so great and blowing away the competition because they only sell a few models and that is what the consumers want

      I hate to say this because it sounds too much like an ad hom, but work on your reading comprehension! I've very specifically NOT said what you just claimed. Apple has done well by differentiating their products from competitors and internally. Just like Apple has 2 lines of notebooks, Acer has 3 lines. Apple has been doing very well by any standard. You can "poo poo" all you want, but quadrupling your marketshare in 6-7 years, opening 300 retail stores, etc is not a failure.

      I never claimed Apple is blowing away the competition... I claimed they've been very successful (do you disagree?) and have been very popular over the last decade. Again, I don't see how anyone with any rationality in this argument could deny that Apple in the last decade HAS been successful and HAS been popular?

      Yes Dell is in a slump, it happens, CS, faulty computers, crappy web site, and probably many other reasons but Dell is not in a slump because the sales are going to Apple because Apple is easier and better place to buy from.

      You do realize that the "crappy website" you cite is tied inextricably to "crappy marketing of product lines" ... ? Ironic much?

      If your SOLE point is that "not every customer who switched from Dell, switched to Apple" I will 100% agree with you!

      That is how this whole thread started.

      Interesting, because your first post more sounds like an adamant defense of Dell and an attack on Apple, not because I suggested that "probably quite a few people" had switched from Dells to Apple (I said this in reply to your post).

  2. Were the accused stand guilty by stickytar · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm all for Dell bashing, but what happened to America where the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty. It seems like every lawsuit implies some guilt on the part of the accused? Really?

    --
    believing the big bang requires a certain amount of supernatural faith
    1. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Airdorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They ARE presumed innocent. They aren't shut down and sitting in jail right now, you know. Court of public opinion is a whole other animal, though.

    2. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by selven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Innocent before proven guilty is not an ideology. It is a pragmatic policy implemented because it is considered a lot worse for an innocent man to go to jail than for a guilty man to go free. There are places where the opposite is true: it's a lot less harmful for an employee to be locked out of the office than for a thief to be able to get in, and it's a lot less harmful to lose out on a relationship with a company that is trustworthy than it is to get screwed over by one that is not. In those places, guilty before proven innocent is the norm.

    3. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by lorenlal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, as someone who had to support these monsters....

      I convicted them a long time ago in my personal court of opinion. Also, let's face it - In cases of CYA, greed, and lying in the business world, there's a pretty high chance of guilt.

      Over the course of a couple years, almost a quarter of my billable time was spent on the partner support line with Dell calling in service tags of machines that had a bad motherboard because of these capacitors. Another quarter was performing the in-field switch. It really hurt my credibility and I felt that it hurt my company's credibility with our customers. I constantly had to call in systems, and it resulted in a lot of time explaining what was happening and why "our recommendation" had so many problems.

      I was glad that I didn't have to call up the customer support number because my few experiences with them were maddening at best. It quickly became obvious (based on the frequency and the models involved) that there was something wrong with the Optiplex 260s, 270s and the early 280s. I asked about what to do with all the other systems we had out there that were clearly waiting to die. I was informed that I must've just been unlucky with the orders. We started selling IBM/Lenovo products at that point. To this day I won't spend a dime on Dell, and I actively discourage people from purchasing Dell products. Had they issued a recall, I'd feel completely different... But they didn't, so screw them.

    4. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by couchslug · · Score: 3, Informative

      The USAF surplused MANY pallets of Dells that died from bad caps, as it wasn't worth getting them fixed and having a questionable machine.
      We had numerous machines fail at our base that I knew of.

      I'm delighted to see Dell take a hit. I particularly despise their proprietary form-factors which amount to vendor lock. Fuck 'em.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...but what happened to America where the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

      Lawsuits are civil matters, not criminal. "Innocent until proven guilty" is the standard in criminal cases but, for civil suits, the standard is "the preponderance of evidence."

      I get what you're saying about people rushing to judgment of Dell without having all the facts that would be presented at trial, but then you'd want to ask, "What happened to America where the accused has a right to a jury trial?" rather than asking about Dell's rights in a criminal matter.

    6. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      >innocent until proven guilty

      LOL I stopped believing in Santa Claus when I was 6. Grow up. Next thing you're going to tell me that if I work hard, I'll get rich. When an adult says something as stupid as that, it's not cute. Really.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    7. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Yaos · · Score: 1

      I've looked in plenty of Dells and they don't use proprietary form factors, try again.

    8. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...it is considered a lot worse for an innocent man to go to jail than for a guilty man to go free.

      I guess you didn't get the memo. Warrants are passe, especially within a few hundred miles of the nation's border; you can be arrested (anywhere in the country) for carrying large amounts of money (and they'll confiscate it, and you won't get it back); and of course, once convicted of anything at all, you're a permanent member of the new underclass. Not to mention that "innocence" is highly correlated with how much the defendant spends on lawyers.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    9. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      They don't have a proprietary form factor. They just don't have ATX anymore. BTX(which is what it is), isn't common outside of Dell, but it's not proprietary either.

    10. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Some current models may be pure BTX (I've not gutted one to see if the internals conform) but that's a recent change.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell_OptiPlex

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      really?
      All that I've seen were.
      proprietary PSU connections
      proprietary ATX back panel
      etc.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    12. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      In the past they have been known to flip a single circuit on the power ATX power plug jsut so you HAVE to buy a Dell replacement.

      --
      Good-bye
    13. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      What happened to America where the accused are presumed innocent until proven guilty

      Sorry, but there's no such rule for the court of public opinion. It exists as part of due process in criminal and civil courts because the courts have the power to deprive you of life, liberty, and property. A few thousand people on Slashdot are under no obligation to follow such restrictive rules.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative

      FWIW, both civil and criminal operate under "innocent until proven guilty". The difference you're thinking of is the difference in what constitutes "proven guilty". The burden of proof in civil is "preponderance of the evidence" and criminal is "beyond a reasonable doubt".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Informative
    16. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by HiThere · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, but I believe that's the way the laws (bureaucratic edicts?) read. He didn't assert anything I haven't seen declared at true in other contexts.

      I notice that he *didn't* mention that any large airport is considered a part of the border, but that one's true also.

      And I really *wish* it were just paranoia.

      Some of these have been declared true by bureaucratic edict rather than by legislative action, but they've been affirmed by court cases. (And no, I won't chase them down for you. If you're interested enough, look them up yourself, just like I'd need to.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    17. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? CTU shares the same fate. They extensively use Dell servers and as a result they are frequently compromised, shutdown or outrightly bombed. That explains the perpetually annoyed behavior of Chloe O'Brien. Good thing there is always Jack Bauer who can continue pursuing the terrorists inspite of having unreliablle I.T. infrastructure. But even a strong willed man has his limits. Because i've heard Jack Bauer won't be reporting to CTU anymore for season 9.

    18. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Is it really fair to link to a power supply from a 7-year old model? While I certainly remember those days, as far as I can tell, their standard towers nowadays are all standard parts, though some do seem to use the not-very-widespread BTX form-factor. Their mini computers are propriety, which I can't really blame them for.

    19. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      it IS paranoia.

      this is the definition of paranoia. the idea that you're going to be frog marched out of your own home for no good reason? That's paranoia to a T.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    20. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Not precisely. More precisely the idea that the courts would find it legal for you "to be frog marched out of your own home for no good reason". (Where I'm interpreting "good reason" as sufficient cause to obtain a warrant from an unbiased judge.)

      Doesn't mean it will happen to most people. I'd be surprised if it did. That doesn't happen even in North Korea. (It does happen in Somalia...but not by the government, usually.) Keep your head down and you'll be safe (with a very high probability).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    21. Re:Were the accused stand guilty by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I just googled "Dell Power Supply". My roommate a dreaded Dell Optiplex GX280 (debut: 2005) that I acquired in a trade. The thing was barely used. But when the time to upgrade a graphics card came, there's no higher power supply than 150W (meaning a more powerful graphics card is a no-go).

      I can say firsthand that as late as five years ago Dell has been using proprietary stuff. I haven't seen any of the newest Dells so I can't say for sure on the last 5 years.

  3. I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by jbeach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it might be a bit early for "Dell is the Devil".

    --
    The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
    1. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by Cylix · · Score: 1

      You're mini10 actually has a terribly high and consistent error rate on the IDE channel.

      In Windows XP this will eventually force the disk access down to PIO Mode 4.

      This is a known issue with the chipset and the only fix is to occasionally reset the disk to UDMA.

      I don't care what the desktop suffers go through. I have their servers and I hate them. They finally patched the oddest behavior on the M610 after swearing it wasn't really a problem. We could consistently reboot the hosts and force an error state on the motherboard.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You are English skills are terrible.

    3. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not mini 10.

    4. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by zxsqkty · · Score: 1

      You are English skills are terrible.

      Sarcasm? Irony? WTF is this?

      Otherwise, I think the GP got his point across just fine...

      --
      Caution: May contain nuts.
    5. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by masmullin · · Score: 1

      a hahaha, nice.

    6. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by Terkanil · · Score: 1

      With the customer service, they try to keep it a good thing, but I would agree some choices aren't made well. When I worked in Dell support, if we didn't know of a major problem, it didn't exist. But many companies do it that way. Innocent until forced into guilty. Now if I call in, its a matter of forcing the rep to do as I say and not be a mindless tree riding drone. Free thought among the reps I've talked to has been declining. However, I bought a short lived Mini 9. Now use Ubuntu 10.04 on it. Still love the little thing. Its a permanent part of my Mobile Office.

      --
      "I do not suffer from insanity; I enjoy every minute of it!"
    7. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a reference to a misplaced contraction. He expanded the homophone "you're" to "you are" to show how it does not indicate possession.

    8. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by Cylix · · Score: 1

      It was a late night with several issues cropping up during a data center migration. I'm sure there are other mistakes in my writing today, but it's a bit too late to correct those errors now.

      I actually thought it was a bit funny when I realized the mistake.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    9. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remembers sales team chants, "Dell Yeah!". Got the Dell out long ago ;-)

    10. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Ya I dont get why people are hating on dell. The company makes fantastic products and are very open with their customers. I have been running a mix for the last 10 years as a sys admin, OSX, Dell, HP, IBM...each have their place but Dell is my favorite for many many reasons besides their ability to understand HOW I like things to work.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    11. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by jbeach · · Score: 1

      Could be - but I actually loaded OS X on mine. So now I have a $300 Mac netbook. :) :)

      http://mydellmini.com/

      It was sublimely easy. I've seen on the above site where someone made a triple boot Mac/XP/Linux; haven't tried that yet.

      No issues yet on the IDE channel. No idea how OS X may or may not affect that.

      --
      The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
    12. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by jbeach · · Score: 1

      For the curious, about making a triple boot mini with OS X and Linux: http://www.mydellmini.com/forum/mac-os-x-guides/20638-dell-mini-10-1011-snow-leopard-triple-boot.html

      --
      The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
    13. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that for small business computers, Dell can still make a good product at a fair price. However, for the love of Dog, don't go with their printers. GARBAGE. Their sales reps are the worst, no exagarration. We have been trying to buy about 11 servers and it has taken months for our local rep to get this done, we are equipped with Dell racks and we like the hardware but man, we are trying to spend like 30K and it's almost impossible to get this guy on the phone and he keeps screwing up what we want... we talk to his boss, things are good for a week, then back to the suck. I have heard similar complaints from other people I know about the Dell sales people and how hard it can be to get a quote.

    14. Re:I got there Mini10v, and quite like it by jbeach · · Score: 1

      Your sure? (intentional mistake this time...)

      --
      The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
  4. -shrug- by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really is there any PC maker that is 100% great and excellent? I'm sure that Dell's faults aren't any worse than HP, Toshiba's, Gateway's, or any other major maker of PCs.

    About the only way you can make sure you get decent PC hardware is to build it yourself or have enough knowledge to sub in and out parts if need be.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:-shrug- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Packard Bell

    2. Re:-shrug- by redsoxh8r · · Score: 1

      Child, please. The only surprise here is that it took this long. Dell has sucked out loud for years. Their products are crap and the media perpetrated the ridiculous myth that they had world class service.

    3. Re:-shrug- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that we as a purchasing public are inclined to accept "well, my guy doesn't stink any worse than the next guy"?

      Accept that best value != lowest cost, and find a vendor / price point that meets your needs and for once exceeds your expectations. Sick and tired of this "woe is me, it has always been this way" crap...

    4. Re:-shrug- by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Packard Hell

      FTFY

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:-shrug- by smash · · Score: 1, Funny

      Apple :D

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    6. Re:-shrug- by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      About the only way you can make sure you get decent PC hardware is to build it yourself or have enough knowledge to sub in and out parts if need be.

      Really? Would you know about the "Deathstar" drives or faulty caps or Intel's math bug or nVidia's process problems or Creative's bus noise or every odd compatibility problem? Reality is that the PC has been changing at breakneck speeds, and it's a reason why they call it breakneck. In almost every other business, staying with the old model is just fine if the new one isn't ready. In the PC industry that's suicide, might as well throw yourself off a cliff and try to fly than wait for certain death.

      We'll see stability when the ten year old computer is no more different than the ten year old car. Unfortunately that'll also be the day Moore's law is dead and computers have hit the ceiling. Personally I prefer the situation as it is now, as long as I have proper backups all else can be replaced. You can get a new, fully functional 1001PX nettop for about $240, at least that's what I paid for one (+VAT). Now I know that's still a lot of money for many, but to many it's not and there's always used laptops for less.

      Yes, it sucks and nobody likes it but a 95% reliable cheap notebook beats a 99% reliable expensive one, and ~100% doesn't exist when you add in real world accidents not even a ToughBook would survive, like say house fire or getting stolen. You know, IBM tried this strategy in the 80s, PCs built to top tolerances and top durability and they ended up grossly overpriced and people bought clones and if they failed people threw them out and bought another clone still for less than the IBM. They are exactly as robust as the market wanted them to be, which is to say not very.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:-shrug- by Shikaku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really is there any PC maker that is 100% great and excellent?

      If you want something done guaranteed done right you have to do it yourself.

    8. Re:-shrug- by Fumbili · · Score: 1

      Really is there any PC maker that is 100% great and excellent?...

      Sure...Alienware. That is of course until Dell bought them.

    9. Re:-shrug- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Dell is one of the better ones, at last in my eyes. And my eyes is in the corporate Norway.
      No problem getting faulty PCs/laptops fixed, just a phone call, and a 'tech' shows up on the door the next day.
      The products is sturdy, and is mechanical good. Looks a bit military, no fancy 'lines', just good workhorses.

      hum, soh, are we seeing different products here???

      Posting as AC because this bloody slash-thing does not like Konqueror! (please fix this!!)

    10. Re:-shrug- by smash · · Score: 0

      Magical and revolutionary, even.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    11. Re:-shrug- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really is there any PC maker that is 100% great and excellent?

      No, but this is not relevant. The fact that no computer company is perfect does not excuse the behaviour of those who knowingly cover up problems.

      I'm sure that Dell's faults aren't any worse than HP, Toshiba's, Gateway's, or any other major maker of PCs.

      How can you be sure? "They're all the same" is about as good an argument as "Nobody's perfect."

    12. Re:-shrug- by hhedeshian · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Really is there any PC maker that is 100% great and excellent? .

      Yes. Packard bell.

    13. Re:-shrug- by dangitman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes, it sucks and nobody likes it but a 95% reliable cheap notebook beats a 99% reliable expensive one,

      That doesn't make any sense. How is 95% reliability better than 99% reliability? Perhaps you should study basic mathematics, like learning to count?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    14. Re:-shrug- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, it sucks and nobody likes it but a 95% reliable cheap notebook beats a 99% reliable expensive one, and ~100% doesn't exist when you add in real world accidents not even a ToughBook would survive, like say house fire or getting stolen. You know, IBM tried this strategy in the 80s, PCs built to top tolerances and top durability and they ended up grossly overpriced and people bought clones and if they failed people threw them out and bought another clone still for less than the IBM. They are exactly as robust as the market wanted them to be, which is to say not very.

      Early IBM PCs were only robust if you wanted to run a tank over the case or bludgeon someone to death with a keyboard. When you bought an IBM, you were mostly paying for the 3 letters on the face plate. ;p

    15. Re:-shrug- by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You apparently missed the other operator in the statement.

      (95% reliable + cheap) > (99% reliable + expensive)

    16. Re:-shrug- by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, and DO NOT under any circumstances buy after Dell bought them. I was into PC gaming for a while and wanted a decent notebook so I decided to get an Alienware, of course I didn't realize that Dell had bought them... the computer was excellent, the fact that the motherboard got fried twice... wasn't. The fact that the power cord would break every 6 months... wasn't. The fact that near the end they sold me a replacement cable which melted in the laptop... was not. Really, I should have saved $200 and went with a cheaper system.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    17. Re:-shrug- by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      Just as long as they do not do some of the crap that Packard Bell did before they went under and became part of HP...

      Like knowingly sell several lines of computers with defective parts.
      Or sell new machines with used parts in them. (And state that the machines were 100% new)
      Or sell nothing but crap machines for years back to back.

    18. Re:-shrug- by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      Serious, Apple is the only one for general use. We sell and deploy our POS product on HP rPOS series products. For Point of Sale, HP has damn good products with one hell of a warranty (5 year next business day replacement on everything in the bundle including bar code scanners and printers). But internally at our company, all the development and business computers are Macs. We have HP POS hardware for testing purposes, but all the software is developed on Macs.

      Which when we pitch HP POS hardware we have to explain, especially to small businesses, that HP's POS group is not the same division that produced the crap laptop or tower they have at home.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    19. Re:-shrug- by initdeep · · Score: 1

      yes because apple wasnt recently selling computers with KNOWN defective lcd screens at all.........

      but they would (sometimes) "gladly" let you keep exchanging them (in-store) until you could get one that wasnt pee yellow.........

      or until you pissed them off and they said "there's nothing wrong with them".

      oh wait.

    20. Re:-shrug- by jbwhite99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They did have World Class service. But it was 3rd World Class service. Sorry to insult those in the 3rd World.

    21. Re:-shrug- by dangitman · · Score: 1

      (95% reliable + cheap) > (99% reliable + expensive)

      But that only makes sense if you value reliability less than the additional cost. For many users, reliability is a much more important issue than a few dollars saved. It's hard to put a price on not having your computer die at an inopportune moment.

      Also, with the higher-end machine, you not only get increased reliability, you also get increased performance. Again, for intensive users who make money with their computers, that's very important.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    22. Re:-shrug- by wintermute000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're still missing the OP's point. He's saying that the market has signalled overall that price is more important than reliability. If enough people valued reliability over value then purchasing decisions would indicate over time that this was the case, leading the companies to adjust their products and pricing points i.e. economics 101

      To be honest if you want reliability and price is not a concern you don't usually think Dell.
      For sure there is a market for these people, and it is serviced by other means/vendors.

    23. Re:-shrug- by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Informative

      FTFA (emphasis mine):

      Capacitors [...] are not meant to pop and leak fluid, but that is exactly what was happening earlier this decade, causing computers made by Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Apple and others to break.

      Of course, Apple fixed the machines without making a big deal out of it...

    24. Re:-shrug- by dangitman · · Score: 1

      You're still missing the OP's point. He's saying that the market has signalled overall that price is more important than reliability.

      But he doesn't actually say that - he just says that 95% reliability beats 99% reliability if it's cheap enough, and doesn't qualify it as a decision of the market.

      If enough people valued reliability over value then purchasing decisions would indicate over time that this was the case, leading the companies to adjust their products and pricing points i.e. economics 101

      That is exactly what the market is indicating, so why don't the manufacturers take the hint? Apple is making greater profits off a smaller number of laptop sales than anyone else. Meanwhile, the vendors selling the cheap crap are treading water. So why aren't they using Economics 101 and switching to selling more profitable products?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    25. Re:-shrug- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree to this..better build one yourself if you feel dissatisfied with any PC brand..

      Do you want to make money and also improve the quality of your products? Just visit this.
      market research paid survey

    26. Re:-shrug- by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I have an m1710 I bought in Canada, got the 3 year warranty, I've been gaming with it for years.
      The 7950GTX still holds up pretty well for most games.

      A couple years ago I moved to South Korea. 2 months before the warranty was about to expire, I noticed some blue screening. Did some tests found out the memory on the video card was gone (7900 GTX at the time)
      contacted Dell Korea, they transferred my warranty, but because it was an old system they don't carry, they didn't have the parts. They ordered it from Taiwan a couple days later a guy was at my place and replaced the video card and motherboard. He came when I wanted, and didn't give me some big time window, but that's more Korean service culture than dell. Still the best experience I've had. Still using the machine a year later..but it's finally going to be replaced soon.

      Hate to see it go, love the 17" 1920x1200 display.

    27. Re:-shrug- by wintermute000 · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm reading a bit more into the OP's reply than was stated, true

      I do think though that you're overstating the size of the market for quality (as opposed to low price), for all their advantages and marketing Apple's market share is still dwarfed by windows PCs. Existing PC makers' attempts at 'boutique' lines have not exactly been selling like hotcakes (adamo, elitebooks, alienware etc.) - it is arguable that their quality still falls far below Apples, but then again how much of that is the software?

      for the record I'm a platform agnostic geek (right tool for the right job) who runs all 3 OSes (win for workstation/gaming, macbook, linux server).

    28. Re:-shrug- by dangitman · · Score: 1

      for all their advantages and marketing Apple's market share is still dwarfed by windows PCs.

      Companies don't (or shouldn't) go into business for marketshare, they are supposed to make money. Greater marketshare can actually be a bad thing if you aren't making a profit on each transaction.

      Existing PC makers' attempts at 'boutique' lines have not exactly been selling like hotcakes (adamo, elitebooks, alienware etc.) - it is arguable that their quality still falls far below Apples, but then again how much of that is the software?

      Right. So shouldn't they be addressing that issue?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    29. Re:-shrug- by wintermute000 · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not implying that "Companies don't (or shouldn't) go into business for marketshare", I'm saying that Apple's marketshare implies that the market for quality vs price is small and that Apple has occupied much of the available space. When I invest I avoid race to the bottom, high quantity low margin industries (mass retail etc.).

      I suppose I am implying that the market 'is always right' in a sense in that if there were greater profits in pursuing quality over price then there would be more players in this space. I guess its all conjecture unless you or I were handed a few hundred million to 'do it right' ;)

    30. Re:-shrug- by Shrike82 · · Score: 1

      Meh, I bought a M15x last year and it's worked flawlessly ever since. I don't exactly treat it well either, it's constantly under high-load situations for gaming and programming.

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    31. Re:-shrug- by hitmark · · Score: 1

      there is the claim that when the economy is on the up, people buy cheap as if it breaks they just buy a new one. But on a down economy they buy expensive in the belief that it will last longer.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    32. Re:-shrug- by chill · · Score: 1

      Early IBM PCs were only robust if you wanted to run a tank over the case or bludgeon someone to death with a keyboard.

      If you ever worked in tech support, you'd realize just how often that situation came up.

      While the movie may be vapid and childish, the early scene in Wanted where the kid unplugs the keyboard and totally decks his jerk coworker with it ranks right up there with the scene from Office Space with the mob-style slaying of the laser printer.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    33. Re:-shrug- by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We'll see stability when the ten year old computer is no more different than the ten year old car.

      If you understood cars better you'd know that's not a desirable thing. Let me tell you a little story about cars: they make them with inferior parts they know will fail and which are more expensive than the parts which would last forever. Literally fucking forever. Oh sure, you can't make the whole car last forever, but you can make the bushings last that long. Polyurethane bushings will outlast a car in pretty much any case in which they are not subjected to abrasion, and they can be composed such that they deliver similar performance characteristics to silicone-filled rubber bushings. The latter is GUARANTEED to wear out even if the car is just sitting still. The former, again, typically outlasts vehicles regardless of how they are driven.

      Mass-produced cars are designed to fail, without exception. If it didn't cost more to refurbish your car, why would you ever buy a new one? Only if you wrecked it? How the hell does one make money on a business plan like that? If you look at what dealers charge for parts, you can rapidly see why they'd want to keep you coming in to buy more of them.

      With that said, I'm working on replacing the suspension of my 1992 F250 one piece at a time. The next bushing to replace is the axle pivot bushings... which are being replaced with polyurethane. The parts were less than half the price of OE replacements, and the OE parts aren't even silicone-filled, it's just a metal sleeve vulcanized into a metal race which gets pressed into the axle. The replacement looks the same but instead of rubber it's got poly. And if you buy the right vehicle (i.e. a Diesel not made by GM in the 1980s) you can keep it going for a lot more than ten years. And if you buy the right computer (something with solid capacitors, say) then you may well be able to use the same computer for ten years, too. However, you won't want to, because the new computers will be so much more efficient. Cars, on the other hand, are not becoming dramatically more efficient. You could get a CRX HF or a Diesel Rabbit that would get about 50 MPG in the 1980s. You can get a Golf TDI (well, maybe not in this country, are they back yet?) which gets about 50 MPG now. So while they have become more comfortable for the same overall efficiency, there are compelling monetary reasons why you might want to keep driving your rabbit diesel... if everything but the engine hadn't disintegrated by now.

      Anyway, in summary: Cars are designed to wear out to produce more sales and service revenues, computers are simply not designed to last (there is a big difference) because there will be more sales anyway and that keeps costs down which keeps people buying your shit instead of someone else's.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:-shrug- by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      (I don't think anyone got the joke).

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    35. Re:-shrug- by dangitman · · Score: 1

      there is the claim that when the economy is on the up, people buy cheap as if it breaks they just buy a new one. But on a down economy they buy expensive in the belief that it will last longer.

      I completely agree, as I have mentioned in previous posts.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    36. Re:-shrug- by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Packard Bell did NOT get purchased by HP.

      They were purchased by Acer Group (which now also owns Gateway and eMachines)

      They are *ALL* unbelievably shitty brands, and should never be considered, nor recommended to anyone you don't absolutely loathe.

    37. Re:-shrug- by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I was mistaken. I knew someone actually PAID for the Packard Bell brand...

      I prefer Toshoba and HP...

      However my Acer Netbook is pretty awesome. But my 17" acer laptop had a hinge break RIGHT AFTER the warranty ended...

  5. Hyperbole much? by JesseL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone here care to name a PC manufacturer with a spotless record of turning out nothing but quality, or who has always been 100% up front about dealing with legitimate manufacturing problems?

    They've all turned out crap and they've all reliably concerned themselves with their own bottom lines first and foremost. It doesn't excuse Dell, but I can't really see why they need to be singled out either.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    1. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apple?

    2. Re:Hyperbole much? by girlintraining · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does anyone here care to name a PC manufacturer with a spotless record of turning out nothing but quality, or who has always been 100% up front about dealing with legitimate manufacturing problems?

      I built a linux firewall out of a cardboard box, spare parts, and duct tape. The power switch was literally duct-taped to a hole I made in the side. It was pushed a grand total of three times during it's illustrious career. After configuring it and setting it to auto-update with Debian, it was left there unattended for about six years before it was finally decommissioned, still working. I wrote on the side of it "Hillbilly Deluxe Firewall".

      If Dell can't make working computers using brand new equipment, an assembly line, trucks, workers, and a working budget bigger than "a can of Dew and some leftover chinese" like I did, I don't really think they have an excuse.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'm sure Dell's customers are just holding the computers wrong.

    4. Re:Hyperbole much? by LostAlaska · · Score: 1

      Can anyone here name a computer manufacturer with a 97% failure rate of a computer line and then try to cover it up and continue to sell them? Sure there's the margins where every company will have some (hopefully small) percentage bad hardware and turn out a few crap products, but Dell has been circling the drain for the better part of the last decade when it comes to most people's opinion of them. Mainly due to the poor build quality and cheap parts that keep causing problems. I worked for a state agency where we had to replace nearly every single motherboard on our GX620's over the course of about 18 months as the originals kept failing like clockwork.

    5. Re:Hyperbole much? by tibit · · Score: 1

      I don't want to excuse what Dell did, but those capacitor issues were easy fixes. All you needed was a soldering iron and maybe $30 in parts per motherboard. Way quicker turnaround too -- shouldn't take more than an hour per machine. If you had many machines, it'd be obvious after a while that it'll be all or nothing, and then your part cost drop dramatically. If you bought replacement capacitors in qty. 1000, you'd be looking at half the price. I have fixed plenty of those boards myself, not only in PCs, also in quite a bit of test equipment (oscilloscopes, etc).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    6. Re:Hyperbole much? by jackal40 · · Score: 0

      OK, I'll play - ummm, Dell?

      --
      The patriot volunteer, fighting for country and his rights, makes the most reliable soldier on earth. (Stonewall Jackson
    7. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manufacturing problems occur all the time. It is very common for a vendor to routinely let products fall out of specification to increase their profit.
      Nichicon's QA had to have known of a problem this widespread & serious.
      Dell's QA either didn't care or was being "encouraged" by the vendor to overlook a "rare issue".

      That said, the REAL issue is that Dell ignored and/or covered up the problems to customers. Why should I trust what Dell says about their product quality from now on?

    8. Re:Hyperbole much? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple?

      Nope. Even Apple has had problems with bad power supply caps--on the G5 towers and possibly others (iMac G4?). All computer manufacturers have had batches of faulty machines from time to time

      And, BTW, lest you think I'm an Apple basher, I'm typing this on a MacBook Pro.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    9. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow companies like Foxconn that make computers for both Dell and Apple, knew which caps were bad and stuck them only in Dells. Don't kid yourself, everybody including Apple got bit by the bad capacitor plague. They were in everything, I had an abit board, router, and a shuttle all fail with bad caps.

    10. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a set of caps for my msi motherboard for $4.57. Some ebay deal.

    11. Re:Hyperbole much? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Apple?

      No reason to be sarcastic.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:Hyperbole much? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Gigabyte is just as guilty of not owning up to having faulty capacitors. Hell they had them in units made in 2004! Sheer excrement.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    13. Re:Hyperbole much? by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      Apple?

      Nope. Even Apple has had problems with bad power supply caps--on the G5 towers and possibly others (iMac G4?). All computer manufacturers have had batches of faulty machines from time to time

      And, BTW, lest you think I'm an Apple basher, I'm typing this on a MacBook Pro.

      I liked back when the iMacs were new that the special ones came with no fans and would over-heat.

      (I'm not on a MacBook Pro, but I'm not an Apple basher either).

    14. Re:Hyperbole much? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      I built a linux firewall out of a cardboard box, spare parts, and duct tape.

      That's nothing. I built a nuclear reactor out of an old refrigerator, bits and pieces purchased at the local Home Depot and Radio Shack, and spare parts from a 1976 Toyota pickup.

      It works fine, but I have a hell of a time getting fissile material. Those nice young Russian guys say they're going to deliver as soon as my check clears. I'm going to put the waste materials in my mother-in-law's basement, which should be safe, since there's a concrete foundation. I cleaned out a corner next to the washing machine and I plan to stack the cardboard boxes there for the next 50,000 years.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:Hyperbole much? by Shakrai · · Score: 0

      That joke would have been funnier if you had replaced "nice young Russian guys" with "Libyans" and "check" with "used pinball machine parts" ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    16. Re:Hyperbole much? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Singling one out is more effective. If Dell tanks, it puts genuine fear in the eyes of the others. Not singling one out makes them all look more like angels.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    17. Re:Hyperbole much? by GaryOlson · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are assuming failure of the capacitors did not cause damage to other components. Faulty caps caused failures randomly in other components for some of the Dell's I repaired: HDD, power supply, video card, etc. Best just to swap out the entire motherboard under the assumption the re-manufactured boards were [marginally] tested; and bad caps could have damaged other motherboard components. Last thing I want to deal with is marginal voltage to the CPU or other devices.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    18. Re:Hyperbole much? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Later to be replayed in the "overheating time capsule" debacle.

    19. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had cardboard?

      Ha! In my days we had to used tree bark and assemble it with vines and dried sap.

      Now get off my lawn chair!

    20. Re:Hyperbole much? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I'm going to put the waste materials in my mother-in-law's basement, which should be safe, since there's a concrete foundation. I cleaned out a corner next to the washing machine and I plan to stack the cardboard boxes there for the next 50,000 years.

      Lets hope the washing machine doesn't leak because water is a great moderator. I am sure neither of us wants your mother-in-laws house to go sky high.

    21. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lenovo?

    22. Re:Hyperbole much? by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      "Can anyone here name a computer manufacturer with a 97% failure rate of a computer line and then try to cover it up and continue to sell them?"

      Shuttle with the K48 series. The power supply is way too small(100W) to support (almost any) hardware decently. It usually ends with the components using 95-97W and when the power supply degrades it is overstressed and burns out. It costed us a lot of money, mostly from shipping costs.

      Our failure rate: 70-80%

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    23. Re:Hyperbole much? by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      Supermicro, and I'll single out anyone who intentionally deceives me, why aren't you? To the rest of you, it really is okay seek out a different vendor if your current one is making it difficult not walk bow-legged.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    24. Re:Hyperbole much? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually IIRC the whole damned thing boiled down to badly done corporate espionage. It went basically like this: Company A has a new 'recipe" that lets them make caps better and cheaper, company B tries to steal the recipe but sends a dufus that misses the last page of the recipe. All the others copied off of company B and BLAM! Shitload of bad caps.

      So in the end I guess we can put the whole thing down to "crime doesn't pay". But as someone who ended up parting out tons of bad Dells given to me by disgusted SMBs that had me build them new boxes, I can say Dell tech support was total shit and went out of their way to screw their customers knowing damned well the caps were bad. Any excuse they could think of, the machines were in "bad environment" or they were "pushed too hard" or anything else they could say to lay the blame on the customer, they did it. Which of course ended up running off a whole lot of customers they'll probably never see return, just like Nvidia and the whole bumpgate fiasco.

      Moral of the story is this: If you have a problem be man enough to admit it, take the hit, and treat your customers right. Doing so would have probably increased sales as companies and individuals like dealing with someone who stands by their product. Instead they tried to burn as many folks as possible and are paying the price. I'm sorry but Dell deserves every bit of scorn and loss of market share they get, just for treating customers like shit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    25. Re:Hyperbole much? by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh heh, that's hilarious... sounds like something I would do!!

      I don't think the major brands have a "problem" with their stuff dying on schedule, because they figure it just adds sales churn since most people won't know what the PC died of anyway, and most don't brand-hop once they've got started with a given brand.

      I say this because my observation is that the namebranders are *designed* to fail at about 3-4 years old, primarily due to chronically running too hot.

      I have a high-end Dell sitting here that, as it came from the factory, routinely overheated due to the lack of proper heatsink, and no CPU fan (just the one at the end of the shroud). I replaced the stock cooler with an ordinary HSF, threw out the shroud, and its operating temperature dropped by 40F degrees -- yes, FORTY degrees. (So much for the claims of highly engineered airflow.)

      And shortly after that, it died from bad capacitors.

      I'd be more annoyed, but the machine was free due to first owner despairing of the cooling issues.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    26. Re:Hyperbole much? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Lets hope the washing machine doesn't leak because water is a great moderator. I am sure neither of us wants your mother-in-laws house to go sky high.

      Well, on the upside, at least she'd know it was leaking when she saw the blue flash.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    27. Re:Hyperbole much? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand how statistics work. People have fallen out of aircraft with no parachute and survived. Personal anecdotes don't mean shit when we're discussing track-records or quality control issues.

    28. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, Yes! Sun Microsystems! Though I guess it is Oracle now, but they have always been amazingly upfront, honest, and extremely helpful.

    29. Re:Hyperbole much? by SakuraDreams · · Score: 1

      Panasonic Toughbook - business and fully ruggerdised notebooks?

    30. Re:Hyperbole much? by bignetbuy · · Score: 1

      How the hell did you get a +5 when you didn't even RTFA?

      Every PC vendor has problems. True. Not every PC vendor knows about those problems, still ships the equipment to their customers, then BLAMES THEIR VERY OWN CUSTOMERS FOR THE PROBLEM.

      Dell should be hung from the rafters for the crap they pulled.

    31. Re:Hyperbole much? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      . I am sure neither of us wants your mother-in-laws house to go sky high.

      Speak for yourself.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    32. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun Microsystems?

    33. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuckin' dyke

    34. Re:Hyperbole much? by Life2Death · · Score: 1

      Micron Electronics? I hear horror stories of them backordering returned parts until they finally ship the guy a better, top of the line part as a "sorry we screwed up" with free shipping. Tech support was based in america and would answer any question in 24~ hours, no matter how random or stupid including WHO MAKES YOUR MOTHERBOARDS? They'd link you to the company.

    35. Re:Hyperbole much? by Real1tyCzech · · Score: 1

      Heh...

      Zeos was probably one of the best PC makers until they got bought by Micron. Worked there for years... wee even had a guy send in pictures of his system still running after he shot it.

      We have a storm and my Zeos 486 sound crapped out. I was board and my new PC was on the way so I sprayed the mainboard with water and littered it with iron filings.....damned thing still ran without a hiccup. (A magnet to the HDD turned it into a nice multi-colored strobe-light, but the mbd lasted another 6 months before I finally got rid of it.)

    36. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DEC tended to turn out reliable, high quality systems that you could swear by. Its just ashame that it led them to have the horrible financial troubles they had. I guess its a choice all computer systems manufacturers have to make, "Do I want to create decent stable machines that will actually hold up and actually make the customer happy, or do I want to make as much money as I can as cheaply as I can?"

    37. Re:Hyperbole much? by Pontiac · · Score: 1

      It's not that they made a few defective products.. the how they handle those defects..

      On the server side they make you jump through hoops testing and swapping parts before sending out a warranty replacement.. THEN about half the time the replacement part is defective! DOA or introduces new issues..

      The problem got so bad we started marking the old boards going back to Dell.. There were several times we would get our own marked boards back a few weeks later as replacements on another server.. Guess what.. they were still bad!!!!

      This was on a Platinum support contract.. I can't imagine what kind of crap the lower level contracts got.

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    38. Re:Hyperbole much? by tehcyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As this is slashdot, I can't be entirely sure you're not telling the truth...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    39. Re:Hyperbole much? by tibit · · Score: 1

      There are pretty much two ways those faulty capacitors could damage other components:

      1. Damage from leaking electrolyte.

      2. Damage from supply voltage transients.

      #1 is the worst, since unless you properly wash the boards, the chemicals will slowly damage the traces and things will fail. Go to pretty much any test equipment related mailing list, where people routinely deal with Nichicon aftermatch.

      #2 can cause degradation of semiconductor junctions and interconnects, so it could potentially lead to problems, but usually it's an on-off thing. Either the transients kill something, or they don't. As Jim Williams said at the end of one application note describing effects of transients on low voltage switching regulators: "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds." -- Vishnu, to the Prince. [in] Bhagavad Gita

      As for "marginal voltage" -- that's a meaningless expression. Marginal how? Too much ripple? Too low/too high average value? Poor transient response of the power supply? All of those things are relatively easy to measure if you have a modicum of electronics experience and some rudimentary tools.

      IOW: I smell some cargo cultism. Computers are electronic devices, not magic.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    40. Re:Hyperbole much? by tibit · · Score: 1

      A properly designed power supply is supposed to run indefinitely at rated load, in environmental conditions it was designed for. Everything should have been derated at the design stage to maintain proper performance at rated load. You should not have to add any extra safety factors as long as you can guarantee that the power consumption will stay where it's supposed to.

      Shuttle's problem was that they were so cheap, they didn't buy power supplies that were properly designed and tested. Getting a 150W power supply from same el-cheapo vendor would have cost same as getting a 100W supply from a better vendor. You can't eat your cake and have it, too...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    41. Re:Hyperbole much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh. Stacking boxes in your mother-in-law's basement, what a waste of space. I flush mine down the toilet along with old batteries and old motor oil. Problem solved. The ocean is the world's favorite dump. Huh BP.

    42. Re:Hyperbole much? by Reziac · · Score: 2, Informative

      Re our club's donated slushpile, I found that in namebrand PCs, there are two components most likely to be dead:

      1) motherboard (even with good caps)

      2) power supply (which is usually a dead-minimum capacity, cheaply-made unit)

      I soon became suspicious that the high percentage of dead mobos (even with good caps) was secondary to the shit PSUs, maybe producing wobbly voltage or not enough juice, at any rate my speculation was that having to barely scrape by on a shit PSU was damaging and eventually killing the mobos, and possibly other components too. Low voltage is hard on motors; what does it do to a HD motor over time? would that partly explain why the optical drives in namebranders fail so much more often than those in clone units??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    43. Re:Hyperbole much? by tibit · · Score: 1

      The above is only mildly informative, and partly misleading. You can't talk of those things like they were magic.

      Power dissipation on modern CMOS logic scales methinks with cube of voltage (energy in a MOS gate cap ~ voltage^3). So lower voltage will actually lower energy dissipation at a given clock rate, but it decreases noise margins. So lower voltage will increase probability of errors.

      Low voltage is "hard" only on some motors. Specifically, it's not hard on typical motors in a PC. All motors in a PC -- that includes fans, floppy drive spindle & head, HD spindle, etc. -- are brushless DC motors. In a brushless motor, torque is proportional to current, and maximum speed is proportional to voltage on the DC bus feeding the speed regulator. Some fans are speed regulated, some aren't, but everything else IS.

      If the voltage is high enough, speed will be in regulation. If the voltage is too low, they drop out of regulation. There isn't much that happens to a brushess DC motor if you run it on a voltage high enough for speed to stay in regulation. The winding isolation will fail if the voltage is too high, but otherwise it genuinely doesn't care. If anything, lower voltage is easier on the PWM switches that commutate the motor's windings.

      As for optical drive failures: I think, everything else being the same, those fail solely due to contamination, and that would be proportional to some power of air flow (eddies have a great way of depositiong dust -- just ask mr. Dyson). Methinks namebrand systems may have higher air flow through the optical drive bay. This should be easy to measure.

      As for marginal power supplies and whatnot: if anything, a failing power supply may have very poor transient response and will overvolt the logic on transients. CMOS logic doesn't get destroyed by low voltage, it gets destroyed by heat and/or high voltage. PCs place rather heavy transients on power supplies. The active regulation in the power supply has only some capacity to respond to transients, most of transient suppression is provided by capacitors.

      Wet electrolytic capacitors lose their capacity quite quickly if they are operated at elevated temperatures. A typical "good" electrolytic capacitor may have useful life (20% drop in capacity) of 5000 hours at 105 degrees C, or somesuch. Some caps are only rated for 1000 hours, and/or for 80 C -- they are obviously cheaper. If you run those cheap capacitors HOT, they simply lose capacitance and eventually make the transient response of the power supply POOR. That's enough to produce spikes that have too high voltage, and they slowly degrade the logic circuitry on the motherboard, until something fails.

      I'd say that since ATX power supplies only provide 3.3V, anything that fails on the motherboard will be run from 3.3V. That means that the CPU and memory will likely be intact, but southbridge would be suspect, as may be anything that plugs into PCI slots.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    44. Re:Hyperbole much? by tibit · · Score: 1

      I meant to say that out of all the logic supply voltages on a modern motherboard, only 3.3V comes directly from the ATX supply. I don't think that anything uses 5V for digital signaling these days -- maybe I'm wrong. But memory, northbridge and CPU will run at voltages lower than 3.3V AFAIK. Maybe external buses (pin drivers) on those run on 3.3V? That I don't know.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    45. Re:Hyperbole much? by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know the technical reasons (tho your explanation makes sense in the hot-running machines); I can only speculate based on what I see. I have read that some cheap PSUs are bad about producing voltage spikes, so that would seem consistent here too.

      I've almost never seen a dead PSU or mobo in a clone, yet these are THE most commonly-dead parts in namebrand PCs (even in the better-vented, cooler-running models). I concluded that there's something going on here that involves the PSU and mobo. And yes, memory and CPU are nearly always alive even if the entire rest of the machine is dead. I've got a whole boxful of perfectly good RAM and CPUs pulled from otherwise-dead Dells.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    46. Re:Hyperbole much? by tibit · · Score: 1

      That sorta points fingers to potentially killer transients on the 3.3V supply -- RAM and CPUs don't see 3.3V methinks. The regulators that feed the CPU/RAM core voltages have very good transient response, with spare capacity.

      I would like to know, though, if there are any tantalum capacitors on the motherboards. Maybe the issue is as simple as a shorted tantalum...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    47. Re:Hyperbole much? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      No idea, don't know how you'd tell. I have noticed that as a general rule, the crappier the mobo, the smaller the physical size of the capacitors. Same with PSUs. My good old Topower has capacitors the size of your thumb.

      CPUs and RAM will put up with a lot of abuse; I've got a CPU in yonder system pulled from a machine that had been so hot the mobo was warped and I needed (I shit you not) vise-grips to get the CPU out of the slot. And I've got RAM in use that was found on the salvage warehouse floor. Makes you wonder. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  6. What Kind of Company Sells by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Defective phones and lies about it?

    1. Re:What Kind of Company Sells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UR HOLDIN IT RONG

      There is a difference between chutzpah and lying.

  7. Did I miss the boat on this one? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've been a corporate customer of Dell for ages and I've never had a problem with any of my systems. Their laptops have been some of the best I've used. Why all the doom and gloom? What's the problem? Has their CEO been indicted for baby-eating or something?

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ok, actually RTFA'd and you know what? This article is shit - its premise is shit. The faulty cap story was news in 2005; people got their systems replaced. It was a blip. And you know what? 5 years later Dell is still with us. Snyder is running a beat-up here and I think it's off base.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are a corporate customer as well using Optiplex and for the most part they are stable as our Apple machines but still fail more. Always loosing Power Supplies, Motherboards. The laptops we usually get Precisions and the last models we had we bought 4 and all of them had the hard drives and cdroms fail.

      But going back to the 2005 era about all the pc companies where having issues with capacitors. Not sure what Dell did differently than the others? All the companies should have stopped production if they knew things were wrong.

    3. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by oldhack · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's despicable. Why would you RTFA?

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    4. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by crafty.munchkin · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering the same. I've had every model of Dell mentioned in the various articles about this - and not encountered this problem. Every time I've called their support for a problem, they've shipped the parts that day and had a tech turn up to install them the next. That's leaps and bounds ahead of HP and Acer.

      --
      ... wait, what?
    5. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1
      Here's ResellerRatings.com entry

      Now compare it with Newegg

      Dell has a lot of problems with their machines and customer service.

      --
      RIP America

      July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    6. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My last company purchased 30 Dell workstations in 2000. They were great and still work.. Then for a client company we purchase 16 Dells in 2003.. Just after the 3 year warrenty period.. all 16 Dell workstations died within a very short time out of warrenty.. >_

    7. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      See, that's what you get for RTFA!

    8. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Er, Newegg doesn't make, sell, and support Desktop and Server machines. They just resell other people's products.

      (that said, the Egg is the shit (in the good way))

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    9. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Karunamon · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, a lot of the caps didn't start to fail until after the warranty/recall period was up. Which kinda SUCKS for me, seing as how my company has got a number of circa 2005 dell machines that are failing left and right. Lawsuits are seriously being considered. No, I am not making this up.

    10. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Skapare · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is that, back then, Dell lied to their customers about the problem. Then when Dell found out the truth about the problem, they just kept on lying. Lots of those computer actually did not get fixed or replaced. At least half didn't, and apparently most didn't. Dell NEVER did a recall. They should have. People lost money, lost data, lost business, all for Dell's bottom line. Some people never have even found out. Dell told them it was some other problem, that was in the "customer caused" category. People bought some other computer (maybe from Dell, maybe elsewhere), and just didn't deal with it anymore, at a loss.

      Once Dell sends every one of those customers a whole new computer that doesn't have any problems for 3 years, then I'll change my tune about Dell.

      Disclosure: my employer bought me a Dell laptop in November 2009. It died in April 2010. I got a new one, now. It's been 3 months and it is still working. I have no idea for how long. I don't trust it.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    11. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

      Agree with your view of this report. I've been buying Dells for about 7 years. They have all been great. Never had to return any of them. I've helped many other people purchase system from Dell with the same experience. I simply look back to the 90's and my time with Gateway to remind myself that Dell is WAY BETTER than most builders. Sure, they must make a buck, but they're no eMachine.

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    12. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      I agree -- the columnist whines a great deal, found a great big soap box to stand on, and got hysterical.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    13. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

      Hours of entertainment to be had on that page about Dell. Newegg is just plain awesome.

      Dell consumer desktops have always been crap. I bought two Dimension 4600s new on eBay for $300 each a few years ago, and they work great... because I replaced the power supplies, disk drives and hard drives and added decent graphics and sound cards. And put Linux on them.

      I suspect that Dell and MS have had a symbiotic relationship for years where people blame Windows for a lot of things that are actually Dell's lousy quality control and vice versa.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    14. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Their laptops have been some of the best I've used.

      Wow, you must have used a lot of terrible laptops and somehow managed to skip the good ones.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    15. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're going to try to sue because machines that were past their manufacturer-specified lifetime started failing? Good luck with that. Buy a stack of replacement motherboards and save yourself more headache than you've already got.

    16. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me second that, since their Latitudes, which are practically mobile Optiplexes, have improved in quality and durability. For instance, lots of people who upgraded to the E-series line from the D-series line have lauded the improved durability and style, and I know for certain it beats the pants off their C-series and CPx-series from way back quality-wise.

      The company's that come closest to perfect build quality in my experience with using laptops has been IBM/Lenovo with their Thinkpad line, and even those have their issues.

    17. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I heard that if RTFA sometimes there's naughty images at the bottom. But since I never RTFA, I wouldn't know.

    18. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by jim_v2000 · · Score: 0

      If anyone lost data, that's their problem, not Dell's. A blown out capacitor on the motherboard doesn't hurt the HD.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    19. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I get from it as well... The issue seems to be not just knowingly selling faulty products, but then also knowingly and intentionally lying and misleading consumers seeking support.

      That's most definitely cause for litigious retribution.

    20. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it odd that the submitter talks about himself in the third person?

    21. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't have any other Dell experience, but my company gave me an almost-new Dimension C630 notebook about 3 years ago, and it is still running fine (even after I installed the SATA drivers for WinXP from Dell "uncertified" by our PC "engineering" group - I was fed up with the pitiful "safe"disk performance). I have seen before that their business-class machines are much better than the consumer ones.

      R

    22. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      No? Random power failures and voltage fluctuations don't have a potential to corrupt data in any one of a dozen different failure modes? Interesting.

    23. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

      They gave a deadline for when they would stop replacing boards. Then they replaced the boards with the same parts that hadn't failed yet. They gave the replacement defective parts a very short warranty period.

      --
      Their they're doing there hair.
    24. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And Dell has had a ignominious fall? I didn't even know it had a fall. It's still a good company, it's still profitable, it's still around, and it still makes good computers. What is this "fall"?

    25. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one Dell Inspiron 9300 from 2005. It still works without problem. I have one Dell Inspiron 9400 (Inspiron e1705 for the 'mericans) from 2006. It still works without problem.
      I have one Dell Optiplex something from 2004 IIRC, it still works without problem.
      I have one Dell ... do I really need to continue?

    26. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by NetServices · · Score: 1

      How do you explain the puffed caps?

    27. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that, back then, Dell lied to their customers about the problem. Then when Dell found out the truth about the problem, they just kept on lying. ...

      Question: How could Dell lie about something (1st sentence) when they didn't know about it (2nd sentence)?

    28. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by tibit · · Score: 1

      Just replace the frakking capacitors already; if they are indeed the problem. It will cost you less than filing any sort of a lawsuit. Hire a decent electronics technician to do the rework. Why do people insist on using lawyers where the fix to the problem is maybe $35 per machine in parts an labor?!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    29. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by tibit · · Score: 1

      What "died" on them? If it was the capacitors, it's an easy and cheap fix. Saying that a computer "died" is like saying a car "died". WTF had really died? Did the wheels come off? Is the battery flat? Out of gas? WHAT????

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    30. Re:Did I miss the boat on this one? by grammaticaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, they did have a recall on certain Optiplexes with faulty caps. I know because I had many, many GX620s repaired out of warranty at Dell's expense.

  8. Whatever by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We got greedy."

    End of the story. No, seriously. Most companies in this industry have sunk not because their product or brand sucked, or the economy went bad, etc.; Most die because of bad management. Anyone remember Northgate computer systems? Very promising company. If it had maintained its profile it would be bigger than Dell today, but corporate mismanagement torpedoed it during the 90s -- during a period of economic growth and a huge upswing in computer sales.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Whatever by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Real shame too Northgate systems were always top notch. I am typing this on a Northgate Omnikey Ultra keyboard right now; best keyboard ever (sorry model M fans).

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, the Northgate Omnikey keyboard. *sheds tear*

    3. Re:Whatever by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      You couldn't be more right. Dell hasn't been the same since I left.

    4. Re:Whatever by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Function keys where God intended them.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re:Whatever by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's part of it. The other is that actual honest dealing companies will be actively driven out of the market by all the scum.

      Lats say a particular machine spec can be made for $1000 if margin is cut to the bone and no support is offered. Honestco does exactly that. Too bad Weaselco sells it for $950 and offers 3 months of phone support. Too bad for the customer that they did it by using known defective parts including relabeled overclocked CPU and the phone support barely speaks English and can't actually fix anything, but they are trained to keep you trying things until the mandatory minimum warranty period is up. With lesson learned 6 months later, you might try Honestco this time, but there's this Slimyco selling for $975...

      A year later you get to Honestco and find that they've gone out of business for some reason.

      Sadly the customer has very little to base a decision on. TFA shows that buying a recognized brand name doesn't help. They can't just buy the most expensive and know they'll get quality because sure enough Greedco is re-badging Weaselco's PCs and selling them for $1500.

  9. its never been about by nimbius · · Score: 4, Informative

    hardware reliability or quality, arguably. I just filled out a Purchase order for ~1mil. in dell hardware. all our megacorp cares about is how good is the corporate support, how fast to return parts arrive, how big is the discount.

    uptime and scalability are all our concerns. for us to care about dell lying would be calling the kettle black.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:its never been about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So very true.

      Lie, cheat and steal all you want. I don't pay the bill. Just get me the parts I need when I say they're broken and we're on good terms.

    2. Re:its never been about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hardware reliability or quality, arguably. I just filled out a Purchase order for ~1mil. in dell hardware. all our megacorp cares about is how good is the corporate support, how fast to return parts arrive, how big is the discount.

      uptime and scalability are all our concerns. for us to care about dell lying would be calling the kettle black.

      So you work for Microsoft?

  10. Commerce IS deceit by sgage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's face it, all corporations are deceitful sacks of s**t. That's the norm for business these days. Presumably it wasn't always like this, but nowadays it's the way it is. Lie, cheat, spin, whatever it takes. If that doesn't work, pretend ignorance and innocence going into the lawsuit. This is modern capitalism.

    1. Re:Commerce IS deceit by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      First off, we don't have true capitalism in the USA. Secondly, everyone has been doing it since the dawn of time. Everyone tries to create a lower-cost product and sell it for a higher price, its been going on since the dawn of time.

      What changes corporations is public knowledge, the more they know the higher the quality of product needs to be created in order for it to sell.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:Commerce IS deceit by sgage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course businesses try to create a lower-cost product, and sell it at a higher price. But then they end up selling stuff that they know full well is defective.

      Yes, everyone does it, and always has. This is not an indication that it's OK. It's an indication that there's something rotten at the core.

    3. Re:Commerce IS deceit by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't mean that something is wrong at the core, it means that there isn't enough knowledge, what needs to be done is to eliminate all barriers to knowledge and remove restrictions to free commerce, by restoring sanity to copyright and eliminating many forms of patents, we can make sure that things work like they are supposed to.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:Commerce IS deceit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Substitute "governments" for "corporations" and you'll be closer to the truth.

    5. Re:Commerce IS deceit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that something is "Human Nature".

      But from my experience, what's wrong isn't just Dell here, it's also this yellow journalism, where problems are all blown out of proportion and exaggerated. Dell isn't perfect, but I have a netbook and a desktop from Dell, both bought with Ubuntu already installed and I've yet to need to call support once for either one, and both are more than a year old. Years ago I did on site repair work for several companies, including Dell, and while there were some large known issues (they had us replace every single CTX motherboard for a keyboard issue) they were usually very prompt about getting us the parts, unlike some of the other companies I did work for (Sears, Compaq namely). Maybe things have changed a lot since those days (it was back in 2003-04), but my personal experience with the two systems I bought just over a year ago and about 2 years ago don't have any problems so far, so I have reason to doubt the issues are anywhere close to what some sensationalist sources are claiming they are.

    6. Re:Commerce IS deceit by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Let's face it, all corporations are deceitful sacks of s**t. That's the norm for business these days.

      I don't see why we should let them off the hook, though. They certainly won't change if we excuse all their actions with "well what do you expect? They're a corporation after all!"

    7. Re:Commerce IS deceit by gsgriffin · · Score: 2

      I'm confused. Are you talking about politicians and our government or computer business?

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    8. Re:Commerce IS deceit by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Look, that just ain't true. Firstly, there is no golden age when companies were more or less honest than today.

      Secondly, you can try to look after your customers and do a good job and make money, or you can screw your customers out of every penny through as many deceptive means possible, and make money. The main difference is that deceptive companies typically make money fast and then their reputation catches up with them, while companies that look after their customers gain a better long-term reputation.

    9. Re:Commerce IS deceit by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not "rotten to the core." It's almost good engineering.

      Those first few tolerances you shave off save scads of money, if you can live with slightly lower yields. There's nothing wrong with this, as long as you don't misrepresent your product. "Just good enough, but cheap as dirt" is a valid business model. And it was always Dell's stated business model.

      Of course, the laws of diminishing returns work in reverse, too, and eventually you have to really shave tolerances to get even meager savings, to the point where you don't have a product any more.

      "rotten to the core" is taking the units out of the dump bin and selling them anyway.* Just reducing resources spent while still satisfying people's needs is the whole point of engineering.

      *or metaphorically doing that if you're using the users themselves as your QA...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    10. Re:Commerce IS deceit by TimothyDavis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is not an indication that it's OK. It's an indication that there's something rotten at the core.

      And do you know what is also rotten at the core? The consumer. Before you mod me flamebait, consider this: The consumer drives the price down by buying the cheapest computer available. This causes a race to the bottom, where businesses cut as much cost as possible. You think that Dell is greedy, but many of the consumers are not contributing to a win-win deal. You pay for what you get, which is why Apple is generally a better brand.

      So for fucks sake, quit putting all of the blame on the corporation. The consumers also play a role in scenario - and have contributed to the situation.

    11. Re:Commerce IS deceit by phision · · Score: 1

      And it is called economics. Which stems from the law of nature - survival of the fittest. If you manage to deceive the others to give you resources you survive, the others do not. If you manage to detect the lie you (and the honest ones) survive, the lier does not. It was always like that, and will be only on a different level as we evolve.

    12. Re:Commerce IS deceit by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      In the race to dominate rapidly growing or new markets, there is no such thing as 'long-term reputation' .. there is 'the big winner' and 'everyone else.'

      If you've taken any serious study of business strategy, you know that in new or rapidly growing markets, the best strategy is to run at a loss in an extreme rapid growth mode. It doesnt matter that you have little to no profits, or end up in extreme debt. What matters is that you are one of the big players when the growth levels off. So along the way, you sacrifice profits for brand, and borrow as much as you can to grow as fast as possible.

      What Dell has been doing is the ultimate business mistake .. they grew rapidly, became a huge player, and even had a strong brand... then the pissed all over their brand... so all those years of running thin to non-existent margins is in jeopardy of being wasted. Instead of going with the lowest bidding supplier, they should have raised prices, ensured quality, and capitalized on their brand. Like Apple (I hate Apple, but one thing Apple knows how to do is capitalize on their brand)

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    13. Re:Commerce IS deceit by Jawnn · · Score: 1

      Of course businesses try to create a lower-cost product, and sell it at a higher price. But then they end up selling stuff that they know full well is defective.

      Yes, everyone does it, and always has. This is not an indication that it's OK. It's an indication that there's something rotten at the core.

      False. Demonstrably false. While it may be uncommon these days for a company to appreciate the value in a quality product, they are out there. That same understanding of the value of quality is even rarer on the consumer side of the equation. Here, http://slashdot.org/articles/06/03/28/2235246.shtml , is as good an example as you will find. Put simply, one should get what one pays for. Pay more - get more. Dell's mistake was in thinking that it could get away with selling the same pile of crap in a more expensive package - a package that used to represent superior value. Not surprisingly, the market discovered the charade and has raised it's middle finger at Dell.

    14. Re:Commerce IS deceit by tibit · · Score: 1

      I'd think that while there may not have been a golden age like that universally, there used to be exceptional corporations with pretty much impeccable image. Think Tektronix up to the end of 70s. Real innovators on the frontline of technology, with a corporate culture of excellence.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    15. Re:Commerce IS deceit by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually no, EVERYONE has NOT been doing this since the dawn of time. There have always been a few slimeballs doing this, but it is only recently that the slimeballs reached such a critical mass that they actually drive the fair dealers out of the market.

      If you allow them the "everyone does it" and "it's just business" defenses, they will use them.

  11. And you're surprised? by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been telling my customers for years about how wonderful the hardware that dell uses is. And by wonderful I mean you buy one, hope you get a year out of it, then buy another. I have a stack of Dell/HP/All other junk machine motherboards all with puffed caps. Kind of Makes my job much easier. Customer calls and says thier pc is crashing or wont start. I ask what brand, they say dell, and I know right away what to look for. 2 seconds to open the machine. 2 more seconds to see the puffed caps. 2 minutes explaining why and what happened. 5 minutes later I have a check to build them a new pc. You know. I guess I love dell.

    1. Re:And you're surprised? by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 1

      I've seen just as many HPs with the same problem... and lets not even get started on the HP/Compaq laptops with the motherboard-no-worky problem.

      customer: "My laptop turns on, the fan spins, the lights come on, but there's nothing on the screen..."
      me: "Is it a Compaq V-series laptop?"
      customer: "Yes! how did you know?"
      me: "Nevermind that. Is it under warranty?"
      customer: "No."
      me: "You're screwed. Buy a new laptop that isn't an HP"


      The worst part is I was convinced it was nVidia's fault until I stared seeing ATI based laptops with the same effing problem. Been seeing a few much more recent CQ-series laptops with the exact same problem as well.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    2. Re:And you're surprised? by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      Some other people here referred to popped caps. and I thought, "Just what neighborhood have you been in???"
      I didn't think anyone from Dell would pop a cap in someone's computer.

      Oh, you guys mean capacitors...

      Life makes more sense now. Maybe I'm hanging out in the wrong places.

      If Dell cut corners by using under-rated components (capacitors/power supplies), I have no sympathy for them.

    3. Re:And you're surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I have a decade-old Dell Precision 340 that's still going strong, although with an upgraded HDD, DVD, and monitor (not because of any failures, though). I've seen exactly one Dell Precision, bought during the time of the bad capacitors, shit the bed. All the rest have been rock solid. Servers and laptops, too. You do have to be careful and research before buying (avoid Craptiplex models like the plague they are), but it's hard to believe you've really had that terrible of an experience with Dells.

      5 minutes later I have a check to build them a new pc.

      Ah, now it becomes clear:

      "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." -- Upton Sinclair

      - T

    4. Re:And you're surprised? by tibit · · Score: 1

      You're part of the problem -- you're no better than Dell. Had you had any integrity left, you'd advise the customer that for ~$50 you can refurbish their motherboard and power supply with new capacitors...

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    5. Re:And you're surprised? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Or at worst, transplant all the other body parts into a real computer with a decent motherboard and a non-proprietary PSU (apparently some Dells have a "unique" mobo power connector layout). But unless an upgrade is in order anyway, yeah, building a whole new monkey is somewhere between overkill and dishonest.

      Tho I'd also warn the customer that the interchangeable parts from the old Dell may not be so great either (given that the OEMs often use seconds), and that the HD probably has some heat damage, so I couldn't predict its remaining lifespan.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  12. Dell did this to themselves by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There cultural values fell by the wayside years ago. The bottom line became the end all and be all of everything. They outsourced everything they could, getting rid of every non-Indian employee they could. Does it come as any surprise that a company that would sell out it's own employees would also sell out their customers?

    They got rid of their greatest asset, their people, and with it also got rid of the ethic that made them what they were. Dell was a very hard working hungry company, full of hard working people. Get rid of the hardworking people and you get rid of the hardworking ethos.

    You can't outsource ethics. When damage control becomes more important that quality control your company has lost it's way.

    1. Re:Dell did this to themselves by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      You can't outsource ethics.

      Amen. Americans work longer hours, for less pay and benefits, than any other country. That's why we have such a high per capita:GDP ratio. Unfortunately, our infrastructure, labor force, and future was broken up and sold off piece by piece to chase the almighty dollar. Now the U.N. is recommending the dollar no longer be considered a stable reserve currency, and we're in an economic free-fall. Dell is just a symptom of the deeper rot.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:Dell did this to themselves by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Does it come as any surprise that a company that would sell out it's own employees would also sell out their customers?

      Maybe. Most companies would sell out their own employees in a heartbeat. Employees are an expense to them, the more they can get rid of (without a correspondingly big decrease in revenue) the better. On the other hand, those same companies usually realize that they have to keep their customers somewhat happy, or they won't make money any more.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    3. Re:Dell did this to themselves by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Americans work longer hours, for less pay and benefits, than any other country.

      I assume you mean for skilled professions, rather than a blanket statement. I guarantee you the people who work in factories (the ones that are left, anyways) here in the USA are the exact opposite of your statement.

      This is part of the reason everything was moved off-shore.

      It would be great if everyone played by the same rules, but they don't. They can work their workers to death for peanuts and get away with it, we can't. Therefore, if all anyone ever looks at is the bottom dollar, they win (because healthy and happy employees don't magically make competitor prices lower, or the costs to produce your product lower).

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:Dell did this to themselves by ap7 · · Score: 1

      Right, because every outsourcing organisation is unethical. Sure.

    5. Re:Dell did this to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like another company. and I work for them!
      (yikes)

  13. Re:-shrug- still got a dell at work... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

    of course there is desktop support (our IT, not dell) to remove and replace burned out bits, and we replace them all every two years.

    In this case, cheaper is better.

    I actually use a couple of older ones at home, they are pretty much peices of garbage that fail to work with common pci boards or third party video cards.

    Can anybody remind my why somebody would pay for a dell to use at home?

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
  14. Dell is fine for me. by hilather · · Score: 1

    In fact, I recommend Dell computer to all my friends. Their next day onsite warranty is fantastic. I'll admit, customer service is hit and miss, and we all have to put up with phone monkeys to get our PCs repaired, but I haven't found a company where this isn't the case. I've NEVER had a problem with a warranty fix with Dell. Which is more then I can say about other companies.

    1. Re:Dell is fine for me. by CAOgdin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen. I've bought 'em all since 1980, one vendor or another, and Dell is STILL my preferred choice. I agree: This story is WA-A-AY old, and the problems of the Dell Latitude D6xx series is another old one that still gets flogged by lazy journalists. Remember, Michael Dell stepped down as CEO (in favor of Rollins) in March, 2004. From that date, Dell deteriorated: Support was outsourced to India, Purchasing bought cheap crap from mainland China, and Development was cut back to the bare bone. A deteriorating Dell reputation was the result, and Michael Dell stepped back into the CEO role in January, 2007, to arrest the slide. It's taken him a long time, but Customer Service still is VASTLY better than HP or Lenovo or Gateway, they offer Next Day On-Site Repair, and they stand by the extended warranties they had to issue after the crap Rollins bought started failing in customer sites. I still rate Dell as better than 94% on a scale of Perfect, with the nearest competitor below 85%. HP, for instance, has taken the same route: They hired Carly Fiorina who trashed the place (e.g., killing the Customer Service Operation, recognized as World Class by the industry), corrupted the brand with Compaq, laid off everybody competent. They then brought in "seat warmer" Mark Hurd, who is barely holding on by his fingernails...and there is STILL no decent Customer Support or Product Quality improvement on the horizon; they're just chasing the Stock Price (mostly with over-priced printer supplies), as that's how Senior Executives get rich. I'll stick with Dell. This story is bad, but it's ancient history, and there's nobody on the horizon who's likely to ever do any better.

    2. Re:Dell is fine for me. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      but Customer Service still is VASTLY better than HP or Lenovo or Gateway I had a quick support call with Lenovo and their support was great. Did you have a bad experience (I'm thinking of getting another Lenovo, so wouldn't mind any warnings) ;)

  15. Worst thing is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst thing is that HP, which is pretty much the only other big option is no better. They all treat consumers like crap, unless you are a really BIG account for them.

  16. What about phones? by Totenglocke · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So, does that mean only a rotten company would sell defective phones and lie about it claiming that the customers are "just holding it wrong"?

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:What about phones? by X0563511 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Goddammit, why do you freaks keep dragging Apple into every unrelated discussion? Leave that crap out.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:What about phones? by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Because the article is about a company knowingly selling defective product and then blaming the customer... which is rather much like what Apple is doing with this "you're holding it wrong" bullshit.

      Sorry fanboys, but Apple is just as greedy and evil as everybody else. A coat of shiny doesn't change much.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    3. Re:What about phones? by Totenglocke · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's perfectly related. They're both issues of a company (Apple and Dell) selling defective hardware and claiming that it's not defective when they got caught.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:What about phones? by X0563511 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm not defending anyone. But this story is about DELL not fucking Apple or anyone else.

      Fuck off yourself.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:What about phones? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Alright, fine. I overeacted. But it's getting old. Go back through the past few stories, and someone is bitching about Apple in every damn one of them.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:What about phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple PR has already denied that Steve sent any of these 'messages' being floated about. I expect a bit more credulity from ./ when it comes to e-mail headers.

      http://www.phonedog.com/2010/07/01/apple-denies-email-exchange-with-disgruntled-fanboy-ever-took-place/

      Do you believe these e-mails are valid because it's so difficult to fake e-mail headers? Has /. become so Anti-Apple that they are now willing to trust any e-mail you get as valid? If so, I have a message from Nigeria I would love to sell you.

  17. didn't outsource ethics... by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    just redefined them. Or, as they say in business school, "it is the ethical duty of a business owner to return maximum profit to the shareholder, as reported in quarterly statements"

    So, there you go... no duty to employees, community, or even customers. Just make certain that we turn a profit this quarter, and everything else if a-ok

    --
    Wherever You Go, There You Are
    1. Re:didn't outsource ethics... by Mackeul · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the business owner BE the shareholder?

      --
      Never bathe in hot oil and Bisquick.
    2. Re:didn't outsource ethics... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      just redefined them. Or, as they say in business school, "it is the ethical duty of a business owner to return maximum profit to the shareholder, as reported in quarterly statements"

      So, there you go... no duty to employees, community, or even customers. Just make certain that we turn a profit this quarter, and everything else if a-ok

      I'd fire ANYONE that thought like that in my business. Your statement, or the one you quoted as being normal business.

      The problem is, that maximizing shareholder value on the NEXT quarter's balance sheet is not only short sighted, but stupid. It is also a product of tax laws, and speculation.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  18. Nobody cares by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful
    HP sold defective PCs, IBM sold defective PCs, all have had their class action cases and they're over, and nobody cares.

    The fact is, the consumer doesn't buy reliability. The consumer buys emotional factors, and brand perception, and a good marketer can make the consumer buy any garbage whatsoever.

    This is not the end of Dell. Nobody will remember this in a few months, any more than they remember HP and "pretexting" when they buy a printer or a PC.

    1. Re:Nobody cares by CAOgdin · · Score: 1

      I disagree. We all make mistakes...even huge companies. But, it's what they do AFTER they make a biggie that marks those the consumer can have confidence in, or not. Gateway had failures, but never tried to improve their practices, so they're still an "also ran." IBM decided it was smarter to get out of the business that didn't fit their management model, post-Gerstner. HP I've written about before in this thread. Dell has won my confidence, and they've not (to my knowledge) ever lied to me. They deserve my caution during the recovery, but they seem to be doing well at it, so I'm likely to say a "Dell-preferred" professional.

    2. Re:Nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google "Dell rebate scam". I still remember that one, and am not surprised that the guys (Michael Dell and Kevin Rollins) responsible for that excellent profitmaking adventure were thick in the motherboard story as well. Those two guys should be in prison.

    3. Re:Nobody cares by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Bruce, maybe your definition of nobody includes a bunch of 'small people' (in the words of BP chairman), but myself and a bunch of people I know do not buy HP products because we remember.

  19. Re:-shrug- still got a dell at work... by v1 · · Score: 1

    Can anybody remind my why somebody would pay for a dell to use at home?

    Potheads in tv advertisements maybe?

    Duuuuude, you're gettin a.... hey, are those CHEETOS?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  20. You lost me by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 2

    at "Secure"

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  21. SMART Disabled by default in Dell BIos by WoodburyMan · · Score: 1

    They've been declining for years, and been selling defective parts for years. I work at a local small privately owned workbench, and for years Dell's computer's motherboards BIOS, by default, has SMART error reporting turned off. If you turn it on, and go to "restore defaults" it will also reset it to off. I turn it on in every case in hope that it will save someone's important data, which I have seen SMART do, so that they can backup their data before the drive completely fails. I discovered this when someone brought us a maybe 4 month old Dell desktop system who's filesystem, and this windows, was ripped to pieces. Running a diagnostic tool, in this case SeaTools for DOS on it, revealed SMART was tripped, and it fail read element tests, so bad sectors. Seeing SMART was tripped, I wondered why the BIOS did not report it, as most modern BIOS have it and it is enabled by default. I looked, and found the above results.

    1. Re:SMART Disabled by default in Dell BIos by longhairedgnome · · Score: 1

      Your post reads like a murder-mystery

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    2. Re:SMART Disabled by default in Dell BIos by WoodburyMan · · Score: 1

      Well.. we are talking about the "death" of a company =P

  22. Not sure about Dell by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

    Not sure about dell but I've always had good dealings with HP and IBM.

    1. Re:Not sure about Dell by WoodburyMan · · Score: 1

      I've had quite the negative experience with HP/Compaq. They've had a ongoing problem with many of their dv2000, dv6000 and dv9000 laptops which are nVidia chipset based, mostly those with AMD processors, where the south bridge chipset fails. This started happening after about one year of use, and more prevlant once laptops got 2+ years old to the point where I see at least two a week now at my local workbench. With such a massive problem, you think they would issue some recall or something? All they did was issue a extended warranty, which adds one year warranty to the affected laptops. Most only had one year warranties.. and if they are two years old, it does NOTHING for them. Also, only those who took the time to search could find the extended warranty information. This is almost worst than the recent Dell problems IMHO, and the press and the like has not picked up on it. http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c01087277&lc=en&cc=us&dlc=en&product=1842189&lang=en

  23. OH come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Dell was born making bad computer for stupid people. They barely have a PC lineup out in the wild that didn't have huge flaws or was just plain shit.

    Dell is doing what Dell does best, finally the reality bubble has burst for them.

  24. Par for the course by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    No manufacturer is any different. As long as you don't have a problem under control, you sweep it under the rug. What's the alternative? A stop ship? You only do that if the costs down the line are expected to be higher than the loss from not shipping anything.

    1. Re:Par for the course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In before Fight Club quote.

  25. [insert company name here] makes crap... by Evil.Bonsai · · Score: 1

    It happens. It eventually gets fixed, everyone moves on with their lives, then 5 years later, it gets spammed all over. As a receiver of a $500 settlement check from a lawsuit against Toshiba (re: Toshiba Satellite 5005-S507 Laptop), I'm getting a kick out of these posts...and currently looking forward to getting a Dell Streak.

  26. This is spot on... by citking · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in higher ed in the state of Wisconsin. We, of course, have a purchasing contract (a mandatory one no less). Because of this, I've been working with Dell (ordering PCs and doing warranty replacements) for a long time now.

    In the past, even just 3 years ago, Dell would bend over backwards for us. We got waived on the fees and got waived through the "exams" for warranty parts replacement certification. We could also could get spare parts on hand for PCs. Lastly, we got huge discounts for the UW System and for personal purchasing. Now, however, our sales rep is forcing us to take these stupid, 2 hour exams for replacing parts. We are, of course, overworked and understaffed and I have no time in my week to sit down and "learn" how to replace RAM or swap a power supply. Yet Dell will not budge. When I questioned our sales rep on this he became irate and downright pissy with me.

    But, that point is moot really when one looks at the atrocity that is the DOSD (Dell Online Self Dispatch) that replaced the Warranty Parts Direct site. Before my certs expired I needed to get a new DVD R/W drive. I had to scroll through lists and lists of parts, many of which were printer parts, server parts, plastic bezel pieces, etc...things that had nothing to do with the service tag of a standard desktop system.

    Dell has hit bottom. Their customer service is shit, their tech support is horrible, and the issues with the bad caps was pretty much the last straw (it's OK to have bad components; the bad part is how they tried to cover it up). I'm done with Dell. I won't recommend them to anyone now.

    --
    "This food is problematic."
    1. Re:This is spot on... by RKenshin1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I work in lower ed in the state of Minnesota. This is a mirror story to what I deal with here in our school system! In addition, I'm having trouble even buying computers from Dell. All of our sales reps won't return calls, even when we flat out say we're trying to give them money.

      What summed Dell up for me was when we bought a lab of machines for CAD use... we naturally upgraded the video cards, but stayed with Optiplex's (our trusty line). When they arrived with the Dell flatscreen monitors we ordered, we noticed we couldn't plug DVI monitor cable into the video card. After several seconds, we realized that the ATI card has a proprietary ATI video connector... looks similar to DVI, but you need their adapter. The adapter is a Y cable which also allows you to use dual monitors.

      I assume anyone reading this is up to speed with the issue at this point... DELL however, could not grasp this concept. After calling them, they sent us 32 DVI -> VGA converter cables which of course, didn't work. Calling our rep again, resulted in a different converter cable. A month passes. We still feel they are unable to grasp the issue at hand here. I take photos, google similar issues, send it off to them. Finally, the correct adapter arrives.

      One would think this was an isolated incident, but I had the exact same issue 3 more times in the past two years. All with the same rep. I explain.... send the documentation.... and I still feel they can't grasp this. I too hang my head in shame when I tell people that we purchase Dell.

  27. I'm happy with them. by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    Sure, their service isn't as good as the old Gateway (who replaced a motherboard, free, more than a year after the warranty expired), and their customer service sucks for software problems (they try to blame _everything_ on a virus. Even if you _just_ reformatted, and haven't even connected the internet yet). But when the motherboard on my Vostro 1000 died a couple months ago, it took less than 20 minutes on the phone to get them to mail me a box to mail it back, all paid for, and I had it back in about a week. Quite possibly the easiest RMA I've ever had to deal with.

    1. Re:I'm happy with them. by int69h · · Score: 1

      I also had a motherboard replaced by Gateway for free around 1994-1995 after the warranty had expired. I've also had pretty good experiences with Dell for others. The only company that's really given me any grief was HP.

  28. How Dell got huge by caywen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I still remember some 15 years ago what the PC marketplace looked like. There were dozens of these little PC shops that filled the pages of the gargantuan Computer Shopper magazine. They all wanted to undercut each other.

    Dell stood out because they formalized a real manufacturing process, setup good quality controls, made it brain dead simple to order, and *still* had prices that were just about the best you could get. They had a refined image with organized, glossy ads, which helped a lot.

    Where they fell was when they started becoming the expensive guys again. HP has been undercutting them for years, and have established an image even more refined in the eyes of consumers. HP recognized that, sadly enough, if you sell for $100 cheaper and slap some shiny plastic on, you can dominate.

    Dell needs to out-HP by figuring out how to be $100 cheaper again, and revamping their image.

    Also, it will be interesting to see how their recent tablet/handheld plays pan out. Streak vs WebOS. Will HP's WebOS fizzle out like Kin, or will Streak get lost in a sea of Android devices? Or both.

    1. Re:How Dell got huge by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Dell stood out because they formalized a real manufacturing process, setup good quality controls, made it brain dead simple to order, and *still* had prices that were just about the best you could get. They had a refined image with organized, glossy ads, which helped a lot.

      Not to mention consistently placed in the top couple spots in customer satisfaction surveys.

      I haven't payed attention in a decade, but I wonder where they are now...

  29. My company builds stuff in China by Trip6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone who outsources manufacturing of any kind has faced this problem. Component suppliers provide defective parts to factories, and when the first parts that contain a defect not seen before arrive, incoming QC hasn't seen the defect yet and so might not test for it. The parts are then used, and if the defect allows the product to pass inspections and burn in, you now have your supply chain infected with product containing the bad part. The consequences of the bad part range from outright consumer danger (e.g. exploding batteries), to shortened product life resulting in expensive warranty repairs and a damaged brand reputation, to very little impact resulting in just a few consumers experiencing annoying problems.

    Once you learn of the bad part and the consequences, you're like the CDC (center for disease control). You have to find out how bad the outbreak is, what the return rate is, how much of the supply chain is infected, what the consequences of the failure are, and then decide what should be done about it.

    If the failure rate is below, say, 10% and the consequences non-life-threatening, you will likely do nothing and deal with it in the repair channels, and make a running change to your incoming QC processes and manufacturing lines. If there is extreme personal risk you might have to do a recall, and you probably have to suspend your entire supply chain until the root cause is found and everything from raw materials to subassemblies to product in transit to store inventories to consumer's products is fixed.

    In this case, Michael Dell was more than likely in the CDC meeting, and data was probably presented that pointed to the fact that a recall wasn't necessary. However, it looks worse than that, and Dell is being painted as a greedy tyrant who shipped bad parts knowing full well he did so.

    I guarantee this is NOT the whole story, and there was some serious gray area involved at Dell as to what to do about this issue. More than likely, this was a calculated risk that the problem would not turn out as big as it is.

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
    1. Re:My company builds stuff in China by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The simple solutions:

      1. Don't outsource at all. This isn't practical
      2. Don't buy from the lowest bidder. This is more practical. Who cares if you spend an extra $0.05 on each motherboard, if it cuts your failure rate by 60%? The problem here, is the factory could still be using lowest bidder parts, but charge more.
      3. See if you can arrange to have the factory avoid buying from the lowest bidder. This is the same as #2, but pushes it further down the line (and if you can do it, improves the chances of it actually helping)

      The real problem? Businesses seem to lack forethought or forward planning. They care about now now now, this quarter now! Nobody with any power seems to realize that dealing with the issue before it becomes an issue is actually better in almost every way.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:My company builds stuff in China by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They care about this-quarter-now and screw-the-future precisely because publicly-held companies are legally beholden to their shareholders first and foremost, and if they don't do their best to provide a return on shareholders' investment, then they're in legal trouble of a different sort.

      This is why I say the stock market is the root of corporate evil -- because if you're a public company, you're obligated to too many shareholders who don't give a damn about your customers or your future, so long as you give them a dividend check TODAY.

      The owner of SAS software said flat out he would not go public because of this. He didn't want to be forced to do the wrong thing for his company or his customers, solely because the shareholders (and the laws that protect them as your primary lienholders) demand it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:My company builds stuff in China by sribe · · Score: 1

      In this case, Michael Dell was more than likely in the CDC meeting, and data was probably presented that pointed to the fact that a recall wasn't necessary. However, it looks worse than that, and Dell is being painted as a greedy tyrant who shipped bad parts knowing full well he did so.

      FYI, I think that at the time the decision would have been made, Michael Dell had stepped aside as CEO and was not involved in day-to-day operations. I know for certain that when Dell was flat-out lying to me (mentioned in another post) repeatedly about a warranty issue, he was not the one in charge, but rather the worthless turd he hired as a CEO.

      I do not know if things will get better now that he's taken control back, but I do know that when things went completely to hell he was not in charge.

    4. Re:My company builds stuff in China by rhizome · · Score: 1

      They care about this-quarter-now and screw-the-future precisely because publicly-held companies are legally beholden to their shareholders first and foremost, and if they don't do their best to provide a return on shareholders' investment, then they're in legal trouble of a different sort.

      The shareholders can certainly generate a new board of directors, but as Dell is so vibrantly illustrating for us in just this story right here, being profit-centered can result in poor corporate health. They might fire a CEO who said that, but I don't think they would incur liability merely for promulgating a different direction. Anybody can make a fine case that ever-increasing profits are not possible without hurting the company.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    5. Re:My company builds stuff in China by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Having voted in countless shareholder BoD elections, I can attest it's not that simple. Generally they're people one knows NOTHING about, except that they're on a bunch of Boards. I can't remember EVER seeing a 'recommended' vote being overturned, and I've held most of my stocks for 30 years.

      "Anybody can make a fine case that ever-increasing profits are not possible without hurting the company."

      I think that's a good point. Short term betterment too often becomes long-term detriment.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:My company builds stuff in China by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Actually a defective series happens to every vendor (I would not call them producers anymore because the brand holders clearly are nothing anymore than the middle men between customer and the producers who sit nowdays mostly in china and taiwan, and to some extent in Korea, speaking of selling your silver ware for a dime, that happened here)

      But the problem is if this happens a lot and the vendor tries to offload it by neglecting it or by simply trying to resolve it without official comments or by sending the marketing departement in than the reputation goes down the gutters.

      I always get the feeling, if a serious damage happens companies first try to go to their marketing departements to resolve the problem instead of speaking openly and in an honest manner with their customers. And of course if the damge is really serious this always fails, because after a certain point people do not want to hear the corporate double speak anymore. (Not that they want to hear it at all in the first place, but in that kind of situation corporate marketing double speak is like a slap in the face, when they expect honest answers and honest solutions)
      I personally guess this comes from the fact that most of them are run by MBA type of people who lack any serious skill than getting their bottom line numbers right by pushing persons around and selling things, worst persons in charge of disaster control, where they need a more technology focused mind with a clear language and straight forward problem solving mentality.

      Also there is another issue:
      Generally you can ruin your reputation entirely with the outsourcing of support to call centers just because it is cheaper, angry customers hitting a poor sod who has to go through his list and not being able to help really and cannot get out of the context due to language barriers, and not having any sort of technical expertiese and not really being able to forward the call to a proper (more expensive) technitian does not help to get the reputation back. To the worse those guys are not paid to solve problems but to cover as many calls as possible.

      Poor support == a few dimes saved for the next year, but also less customers for the upcoming years, it is a simple as that, but does not get into the corporate minds filled by greed.

    7. Re:My company builds stuff in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could take the amazon.com approach and not issue dividends for the first years the company goes public.

    8. Re:My company builds stuff in China by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Or take the Microsoft approach and not issue dividends for... what was it, 30 years??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:My company builds stuff in China by Trip6 · · Score: 1

      I read a lot of posts with the attitude of "screw the customer, quarterly profits are all that matter." It is so much more complicated than that it is clear that these posters are not and never were in any kind of positions of power to analyze and make decisions of this nature.

      Every division of every company is hanging on by a very thin thread. There are competitors around every corner if their products are overly profitable, not to mention the foreign knockoffs. If customers are unhappy they vote with their feet. They are busting their asses to figure out how to stay in the game, and then they get smacked with some sub supplier who decided to ship a load of crappy parts that they didn't test for. Then they decide how to balance the need to stay afloat with the need to "do the right thing." Sometimes they get it right and it turns out to be nothing, sometimes they get it wrong and get smacked around by the press and the public.

      --
      I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
    10. Re:My company builds stuff in China by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Well, What I said comes from an "insider" perspective. I've dealt with the fallout from such manufacturer problems myself, personally. Though, the problems were with a much touchier type of product (payment device with pinpad, so very touch security features * and self-destructing components etc).

      One supplier even managed to fuck up plastic. Yea, simple plastic molding, except that it melted when it got hotter than 100F. WTF.

      * - One such component that was particularly troublesome... have you seen those little rubber connectors that hook high-res LCD screens to a board (rubber with tiny metal leads embedded in it) - imagine that, only it forms a gasket about 3 inches in diameter and is hardly symetric. It had a positional tolerance of 0.25mm - and the failure rate due to this was around 5/100 alone. Then you had flux wash etc getting on the pad and corroding or interfering with the metal-metal mating, etc. Fucking mess.

      I know the shareholder battle. Fuck them. The thing costs end-users over a thousand dollars each. You can spend an extra dollar per unit and not get cheap-ass suppliers and manufacturers. Instead, you save that dollar-a-unit NOW, and pay it back hundred-fold in warranty returns and service.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:My company builds stuff in China by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Oh. That little gasket I was talking about that sounds needlessly complicated - it basically forms a border around the circuitry that handles PIN entry. This, coupled with a few other measures, is designed to make the device "dump" it's debit encryption keys should a tamper be detected. You can't come from above, from below, or from the side without tripping one or more devices.

      If a key is dumped, it's useless. It's also not a field-repair item, because it has to be analyzed for security reasons, reset (with a special super-secret key that doesn't leave the building), and injected with a new key (using said super-secret key).

      So it's not just a simple gasket, but complicated circuitry weaves around in, through, and around it. Changes in resistance, inductance, or capacitance will trigger it. So, you can't really touch it. Even if you get a probe between leads (good luck) any current flowing through that probe will trip it. Yeesh.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:My company builds stuff in China by sjames · · Score: 1

      Most vendors got caught in the bad capacitor problem. SOME of them implemented QC quickly and when necessary told the customer they would have to back order due to the supply problem (they might even point the customer to an article about the problem).

      Dell didn't do that. They decided to make the sale now to take advantage of people who didn't want to wait and who would believe that Dell wouldn't knowingly sell a defective product. Then when the inevitable returns started coming in, they swapped in more bad parts to clear their inventory and hope that some of them would last long enough. When that didn't quite pan out, they actively tried to blame the customer and get them to accept that the failure was their own responsibility.

      If all they did was get a bunch of bad parts from their vendor (just like everyone else), this wouldn't be such a big deal.

    13. Re:My company builds stuff in China by sjames · · Score: 1

      They are not LEGALLY beholden to profit now at the cost of long term stability. The stock market sets that requirement all by itself.

      What I said doesn't change the gist of your argument, but it does challenge their excuses for bad behavior.

      Sadly, Wall street no longer even cares much about the dividend check, they just want you to prop up the stock price long enough for them to find a sucker to sell it to.

    14. Re:My company builds stuff in China by rhizome · · Score: 1

      I think that's a good point. Short term betterment too often becomes long-term detriment.

      I wonder if there could be a case of fiduciary responsibility or duty of care here.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    15. Re:My company builds stuff in China by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There should be, but unfortunately, that only seems to apply to shareholders' interests. Another problem is, how do you enforce it, when a bad policy made the bottom line look better today, but kills the company 5 years down the road? Makes it hard to place blame where it belongs.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  30. Bloatware by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first thing that did it for me was when they started polluting computers with bloatware.
    Being the family computer nerd I would just wipe out any new Dell coming into the family with a fresh copy of the OS.

    The second thing that did it for me was the quality reduction of support. 10 years ago Dell would go that extra mile and they were my standard recommendation for a PC. But then they went Indian with their support and calling in would start with a market survey and eventually end with a big negatory.

    The first two were enough for me but the third was a bizarre drop in quality. Their machines were burning out and other oddities.

    They might try and defend themselves saying that they needed to cut support costs and that without the additional revenue of the Norton AV subscriptions that they couldn't compete. But the reality is that their initial reputation was that buying a Dell was a safe bet. But as a nerd I have a reputation to manage and recommending Dells became a bad idea. Now I recommend a local computer shop that rocks.

    1. Re:Bloatware by Velex · · Score: 1

      But then they went Indian with their support and calling in would start with a market survey and eventually end with a big negatory.

      I work in a (USA) call center. If Indian call centers are anything like my employer, I can guarantee that what you're stating was the result of a USA citizen.

      I don't mean indirectly, either. They probably specified a braindead script, then called in test calls. If the agents deviated from their brain-dead scripts, I'll guarantee that someone got a death threat.

      That's just how call center is. Please your client by inconveniencing the caller, or the business goes elsewhere.

      I guess, I just hope that you're not blaming the call center workers. Some C*O had to turn a profit next quarter, but they didn't give a crap how the calls would be handled, so they gave the call center half-assed information about this business.

      Of course, if you inconvenience the caller to avoid being cussed out by the client, you'll still get cussed out by the client!

      These people have no idea how to use a call center effectively.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    2. Re:Bloatware by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      When I first started here, everyone had Dell laptops. The average cost of the laptops was about $1800, so they weren't the cheap models. These were purchased to replace a generation of HP laptops where 80% of the laptops had their wifi cards and then their entire motherboards fail. Well within 18 months, 1/2 of the Dell's went back due to hardware problems like the motherboard cracking around the power supply.

      We replaced the Dell's with MacBook Pros. Only problem we've had is that the power supplies will bust when falling from the tall tables at the coffee shop and hitting the ceramic tile floor just right. And it only seems to happen to me. People on /, like to complain about Apple's high prices, but we've not had the build problems as with other brands.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    3. Re:Bloatware by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      These are not very strong arguments for discouraging people from getting Dells. Almost all OEM computers come with tons of trialware, probably from legal agreements and some such. Additionally, almost all of the major companies have outsourced their bottom-tier warranty support overseas. Fortunately, though, it's pretty easy to get quicker and higher-tiered support; you just have to pay for it. (I get parts replaced for my Latitude E6500 overnight, and all of the reps I've dealt with were nice, friendly and spoke very clearly.) Finally, quality has "dropped" across the market because of outsourcing...but business-class PCs are usually built with better designs and components depending on how they are customized.

      I like brick and mortar too, but it's really, really tough to buy a PC any cheaper than what Dell offers at the moment unless you --- surprise, surprise --- get low-end stuff from Newegg, eBay or similar, which will STILL cost about the same as a higher-spec'ed Inspiron with a crappier warranty.

    4. Re:Bloatware by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you didn't pay for the laptop with your own money.

      When you do, then you can dismiss people's complaints about high prices.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  31. Even then you don't know by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've had lemons come from high end brands before. They were always promptly replaced, but doesn't change the fact that they were faulty.

    Or, in the case of the whole capacitor deal which is what I imagine what this is about, ASUS and others like that got hit too. You could buy a top of the line motherboard and have the caps blow up. Again, they replaced it under warranty but I seem to recall Dell doing the same.

    Products have problems, deal with it. If you own a line of products that have never had problems the reason is NOT the that products are perfect, but that you've been lucky. Shit happens. So long as the manufacturer replaces the broken part, what more do you want?

    1. Re:Even then you don't know by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The court documents disagree with your last statement regarding Dell. The problem here isn't that there were defective computers, it was the Dell sold them knowing they were defective, then cycling around to blaming the customer when they did break. And this isn't about Mini10's or anything like that.. this is about Optiplexes... which is a staple of small to medium-sized businesses. I am not angry that Dell sold defective computers (that is the capacitor maker's fault really.) I am angry at Dell because they lied about it and blamed users. That is dirty pool in anyone's book. This is about the capacitors failing, but that is just the half of it.

      From the article linked to this one:

      The documents were connected to a lawsuit filed by Web hosting service provider Advanced Internet Technologies (AIT) against Dell in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on Nov. 1, 2007. AIT sought $75,000 and punitive damages from Dell for breach of contract, fraud and deceptive business practices.

      So they WERE found guilty of fraud and deceptive business practices on a small scale with AIT. And so it balloons into a shitstorm even Michael Dell can't sweep under the rug. This is about far more than lemons....

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    2. Re:Even then you don't know by smash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thing with Dell is, they seem to go out of their way to blame your use of the product in cases like this. I dealt with the capacitor issue, and we ended up getting sent a stack of about 20 GX260 motherboards to replace ourselves (we were on a remote mine site and couldn't have a dell tech come out every time one died).

      However, their handling of the E6500 and E6400 overheating and down-clocking problems has been appalling. They were sold as a high performance laptop, and dell's first question was what software I was running. I'm in an air conditioned office, using a "high end" laptop, it shouldn't fucking matter what software I am running. Despite sending through details of the mass problems people experienced on the internet, and listing the service tags of basically the entire first batch of E series machines we purchased, dell were "unable to replicate" the problem. I had to do a bunch of testing and send through snapshots of what i was seeing to get them to acknowledge that the problem even existed despite massive background info available from unhappy customers on the internet who were also ignored by Dell. Turns out there was a motherboard rev, hence they could not replicate on their newer machines.

      Just recently we ordered about 10 more E6500s, all of which have constant network drop outs. The quality control really has gone to shit.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    3. Re:Even then you don't know by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Dell would also replace bad motherboards with... another ticking timebomb of a motherboard....

      There is no way you can twist that into being a reasonable practice.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:Even then you don't know by JDeane · · Score: 5, Informative

      I worked as Dell telephone tech support, I can honestly say they DO know about the issues. Nice big red screen pops up when you call them that says "Do not read this to the customer" it contains a full description of the issue your having 99% of the time. (The E6400's where funny as hell.... and no your not crazy and yes Dell knows about the issue.) Oh did I mention this screen pops up right after we ask "Can I have your service tag number".

    5. Re:Even then you don't know by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      Just recently we ordered about 10 more E6500s, all of which have constant network drop outs. The quality control really has gone to shit.

      I'm not trying to rile you, but what was the thought process to go back and purchase more crap, after that first experience?

      Corporate policy, or what?

      This is a great example of why big corporations get away with doing stuff like this.

      Regards.

    6. Re:Even then you don't know by Orestesx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work at a software company. We had weekly conference calls about a slow response time issue that went on for months. Funny thing was it wasn't even our software per se, but our interface with Microsoft Word. Anyway, after extensive analysis, I concluded that the issue was the performance of the client machines, not the software. Customer didn't believe me. They wanted perfmons to prove it. Perfmons didn't show anything unusual. Memory upgrades didn't help. In unusual fashion, we just gave up and suggest that the customer run Citrix, because the Citrix users were fine.

      Two months later I get a note in the ticket saying something to the effect of "we have been informed that these PC's had bad capacitors. PC's have been replaced and the issue went away."

      Freaking Dell, they owe me days of my life for not informing their customers about this problem sooner.

    7. Re:Even then you don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can tell that you're lying because your post doesn't have an Indian accent!

    8. Re:Even then you don't know by smash · · Score: 1

      Corporate policy - takes about 30-60 days to get a new supplier set up, along with the rest of the logistical BS (tweaking our SOE, etc), and we simply needed new machines ASAP.

      Additionally, we have yet to receive eval machines from a couple of other suppliers - better the "devil you know" until we can find something to shift to.

      We're looking at either Lenovo or HP at the moment, if anyone has any other real suggestions, that would be great.

      Yes, in the next 6 months or so, i think we are going to be purchasing elsewhere.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    9. Re:Even then you don't know by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      In unusual fashion, we just gave up and suggest that the customer run Citrix, because the Citrix users were fine.

      Die in a fire.

      Two months later I get a note in the ticket saying something to the effect of "we have been informed that these PC's had bad capacitors. PC's have been replaced and the issue went away."

      Your customers should die in a fire, too.

      Oh, and, of course, Dell.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    10. Re:Even then you don't know by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      "Just recently we ordered about 10 more E6500s"

      Dude, are you a masochist?

      More likely someone's in a 'comfort zone' in purchasing?

      I specced the kit for a 120-machine roll-out and it was HP or Acer for the servers and Acer Small form factors (about the size of a Wii) for the desktops, but the software vendor 'persuaded' the Directors (despite my best efforts) that they could offer a 'complete solution' using Dell - a brand that I would not touch with a bargepole except for their rackmount server range.

      The machines were mostly for veterinary consulting rooms and the reception desks, where space is at a premium, so the Acer's would have been perfect, but we ended up with Vostros (ugh) that are about 4x the size and come with monitors with no inbuilt speakers - which is just dandy because a lot of veterinary courses include an online multimedia component so we have had to supply external speakers.

      We did kit out the first few small clinics with Acers (about 10 units) because I had already committed to the first batch and we have had one issue with a duff (external) power supply that was quickly swapped out.

      So far, we have had two Dell's needing new hard disks and one has a broken DVD drive tray (it came out, make a loud clicking noise and something snapped) - and the kit is all approx 6 months old.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    11. Re:Even then you don't know by Aliotroph · · Score: 1

      In the case of the Optiplex systems the red screen also said to replace the motherboard immediately without troubleshooting. I started there in 2006 so I don't know when they added that part. It could easily have been after they caved and added three-year warranties for all those boards.

      I did notice an awful tendency for hardware support to be useless unless you had Gold Support. They once hung up on me when I tried to get a customer's computer replaced and we had to do it ourselves as they had failed to fix it three times in a row (I did exclusively software support).

      Different parts of the company had conflicting goals, information and widely variable competency. The outright lies and agents hanging up are just wrong and I don't blame anybody who runs away and doesn't come back. Sadly, the support from HP and Sony seems to be consistently worse (Sony forcing customers to reformat *before* troubleshooting comes to mind).

    12. Re:Even then you don't know by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Thumbs up on those Acers, although they do suffer from pretty loud fan howl if you do something rash, like actually turning them on.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    13. Re:Even then you don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, any company that replaces broken brand-new for "just as good" refurbished parts is bad in my book. I worked phone support for Dell for about a year, and that was enough to make me decide NEVER to buy anything from them.

      Oh, and we weren't allowed to tell customers that we were replacing parts on their computers with refurbs. You were just supposed to say "just as good."

      It takes very little to go from hiding the fact that you're replacing faulty, new parts with supposedly-working, "just as good" old, broken-but-repaired parts, and deciding to just put stuff together from the broken parts and see if you could offload them on somebody. Every time a computer broke down we had to guide them over the phone to look for the foo on the motherboard so they could disconnect and reconnect the bar, so it's really easy to tell them that they broke the foo in the first place and that it's all their fault.

    14. Re:Even then you don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Service tag." Now there's a term I have not heard in a long time. A long time.

    15. Re:Even then you don't know by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      So far so good with them - I bought a couple before hand and we tried them for a while to see how they fared - I was mostly concerned with ventilation in such a small case but they seem to be coping well.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    16. Re:Even then you don't know by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Yup, they're fine, until the cases get clogged with airborne debris, like dust or hair. Say, where are they being used again?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    17. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      As an agency that ran the Optiplexes in question, dell only played dumb for about 2 months, after that they admitted the fault. This is first hand knowledge here, I personally replaced or arranged to replace 20 Mobos in question in the 2 month span. I was irritated at first because I kept having to re-explain the issue, but by number 10 or so the techs were all informed of the capacitor issue, and I wish I could find it but there was an article on dell admitting the problem, I remember because it was a bit "I told you so" and you know us geeks love those :)

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    18. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      What level of support are you running? El cheapo you get tards like that but the Gold support levels, it is a matter of, "where would you like me to ship the new laptop?"

      You will get bad batches with any brand, trust me, as a guy who orders in bulk, it is amazing how many times in the past I have had a set of WD drives or Seagate drives fail, or IBM laptops, or pick your product. It happens. It just happens less with dells.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    19. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Ummm so Dell's system knows the issue I am having before I explain my problem? AMAZING!

      I will take 2 please...

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    20. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Because 1 bad batch isnt worth shifting vendors. Consistently getting bad batches...now that warrants a switch.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    21. Re:Even then you don't know by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      Sure, switching because of a single bad batch might not be worth it or even very smart. I can certainly understand how a batch of parts from one of your suppliers could go tits up. I can even understand how this slipped through QC. But the company's actions from then on should determine your response, beacuse these things do happen.

      If one factors in the quote from the OP and another from (former) Dell tech support:

      Thing with Dell is, they seem to go out of their way to blame your use of the product in cases like this.

      I worked as Dell telephone tech support, I can honestly say they DO know about the issues. Nice big red screen pops up when you call them that says "Do not read this to the customer" it contains a full description of the issue your having 99% of the time.

      It becomes a bit more than just a bad batch, even without deliberately selling defective devices. It becomes a company that is out to screw you.

      And to voluntarily accept that is bad business. Not so much for them, but for you.

      Regards.

    22. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Yes I agree, but I have been working with dell for over 10 years, (along with HP, IBM, and Apple). I am pretty sure the OP is full of it, I have never had any of my friends who are ex-dell employees metion this. There is a disclaimer saying not to read what is on the screen to the end user but no magical "this is the fix". When the fix comes up you are to talk the end user through it, not just read the friggin manual to them. Many times this is a problem of entry level support, call your telco for support and that is what you get, this is Dell trying to increase user friendliness.

      For those of us who actually pay for business class support, it is phenomenal, most of the time I get my problem resolved in one phone call in under an hour. Even better, dell allows you to certify very easily and order YOUR OWN PARTS, no tech support needed. Not to mention if you go for gold support, I get a guarantee of a max of 4 hours to resolution. That is astounding. Many times I have part in hand less than 2 hours after initial contact over the phone...This isn't support for one large corporate entity, this is the way I have been treated at every company I have worked for. HP is the same way.

      We have all heard horror stories about bad batches and you get people pooling their bad experiences and it looks REALLY bad to the point where you vow to never buy WD or seagate or Hitachi again. But when it comes down to it, dell is on the ball, they run a great company that provides awesome service to businesses. I cannot vouch for their home support though...I never use it because no one ever pays for a warranty past the default one.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    23. Re:Even then you don't know by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      2 Months is unacceptable, especially since these machines are not just playing solitaire and looking at photos of grandchildren. Dell should be spanked hard for this. And if their reputation doesn't recover, oh well. They should've thought of that before making their corporate customers angry.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    24. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      That is just asinine. for 1, it was 2 months in which I replaced all 20 Mobos I replaced the first 10 in a week or 2. It takes a while to know you have a manufacture problem. Even as I remember it was only the 3rd mobo before a tech said unofficially there had been a lot of calls. Soon after the announcement was made.

      You evidentialy have not worked in a public facing position, it is practically impossible NOT to make customers angry. A good company is seen in how they react to bad situations. In my opinion as one of the aforementioned angry customers, I think dell responded in an acceptable fashion.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    25. Re:Even then you don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where space is at a premium, so the Acer's would have been perfect,

      Wrong.

      We did kit out the first few small clinics with Acers

      Right.

      So far, we have had two Dell's needing new hard disks

      Wrong.

    26. Re:Even then you don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny you should mention this and all these articles have started to come out. A year ago I left a company I was doing desktop support for had switched from Lenovo to Dell laptops, E series. All hell broke loose. It got so bad the new CIO who made this big change (has friends on the DELL board of directors) almost got fired. After a quarter of us deperatley trying to keep these laptops working a new policy came about in the company, all senior people could purchase the Lenovo models, while the lower than director staff got stuck with DELL. I would always joke with the lower staff "Dude you're getting a DELL, I'm sorry".

      These E series laptops are garbage compared to the equivelent Lenovo models. The keys would fall off after a few weeks (our CEO was the first victim), the wifi was bad, and since it was 100% cheap plastic they would look like trash after a month of use because of all the scratches. Our team of 8 desktop support techs at just our HQ location couldn't stand supporting them. The hardware failed or problems would creep up that we would need to replace memory, then hard drive, then motherboard, we even had to send new machines back after a few weeks for problems we couldn't fix. The quality control is gone at DELL. Not to mention their PITA tech support. Look I've been a PC technician for a decade, if a hard drive is grinding and clicking I know the drive is DEAD, I want to be able to call tech support (or better yet just order a replacement online) not have to explain anything, not have to become "DELL CERTIFIED", nothing, I have lots of PCs to repair and I DON'T need to jump through hoops, DELL made us do this everytime unless we go certified, which none of us had time for. Lenovo I just went on the website, entered the part number and the next day I had either a tech at my office or a part to swap in, nothing could have been easier.

    27. Re:Even then you don't know by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      Have you considered ASUS? They seem to be very reliable across the board (only brand of MoBo that I will use myself). I've heard bad things about their software load, but I would hope that you have your own images (Esp. if you're even considering HP's crapola-drenched systems).

      Failing that, try and find a local OEM- it shouldn't be impossible to find one that uses good parts (esp. Asus boards and Kingston RAM) but CHECK THEIR QA PROCESS- I used to work for a fairly large OEM (~500 units shipped per day) and their QA was a complete joke- 1-2 hour automated load process, and 5 minutes at QA- no real stress test of any sort, even when their were known issues and high failure rates. As an added bonus, they will most likely be using 100% standard parts, also marketed to the general public, so any issues should be easier to track down.

    28. Re:Even then you don't know by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes I do, and with far more computers and systems than you can muster in a year, and lots of those custom solutions and devices you've never heard of before. But with machines that are front facing your company would NOT knowingly (and the court case has SHOWN THAT DELL KNEW THIS) sell defective parts and take even 2 days to fix them. See, the key here (that you still seem to be missing) is that Dell KNEW the mobos were DEFECTIVE. They KNEW BEFORE THEY LEFT DELL'S PLANT and landed on your copmany's doorstep. That is the problem. Not your wonderfully anecdotal "Dell did alright by me" nonsense.

      You can believe I work for Wal Mart or I am a bum on the street with a netbook. I could tell you I worked for NASA and you have no reason to believe me, but I can tell you this... Dell is wrong and should pay for this in spades. I don't care what anecdotal evidence you come up with. It doesn't change the COURT ruling. I am glad you got satisfactory service for your Optiplexes. That doesn't change the fact that Dell is guilty. They could've saved your grandma from a burning house and it still wouldn't matter.

      And even though YOU thought Dell responded in an acceptable fashion (and it sounds like they did), the court system did NOT think so. I am not lambasting your story about Dell and their support, and I can safely say that if we didn't have the mountain of evidence to the contrary, your story would be the exception to the rule and treated very differently. But since Dell's been convicted of knowingly selling defective units already, the facts do speak for themselves. Just read the original article that this piece was linked to and you'll have a different perspective on "Dell did right by me."

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    29. Re:Even then you don't know by smash · · Score: 1

      Will look into it. Not interested in building systems, so Asus would need to have equivalent models available to what we already order, and good global support - we are an international company with offices in 4 continents - the local OEM with PCs built by Bob or whatever will not suffice.

      Will be loading our own SOE, so yeah the default OEM build full of crapola is irrelevant, we have volume licenses...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    30. Re:Even then you don't know by smash · · Score: 1

      Question(s): how long have you been buying Dell hardware for, what other OEMs have you dealt with, and have you bought any hardware from them in the past 18 months?

      Dell hardware used to be half decent - which is why we started using them as our OEM back in 2002. I still have D505 and D510 laptops out there in the field working perfectly, on bios revision A4 or similar.

      The new stuff? E6500s are up to A20 or something, and still have firmware/hardware problems. The dell controlpoint garbage is not SOE friendly, the hardware feels flimsy in your hands, and our failure rate on E series machines has been well above 20% from the 50 or so E6400/E6500 machines we've bought in the past 12 months.

      We have gold level support. I have had a single tech assigned to look into the E6500 down clocking issue. After 3 months, we eventually managed to get the ability to fast-track motherboard replacements. however on the new last batch of E6500s before the new E6510 model (about 8 machines), we have had a 100% failure rate on NICs (losing carrier, and dropping network connection at random). Unfortunately a number of these machines were shipped off to bumfuck africa before the problem was discovered - good luck getting a Dell tech to come out to some 5 person office several hundred km from the nearest city to replace...

      We purchase roughly 100-120 machines per year, and the past 18 months has been a nightmare as far as failure rate on new Dells is concerned. we've had less OLD machines come in for repair than current models....

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    31. Re:Even then you don't know by smash · · Score: 1

      Dude, are you a masochist?

      No, i am pushing for eval gear. we simply needed 10 new machines ready to ship with 2 weeks notice. Getting alternative hardware sourced, tested, approved for purchase and the SOE altered in that time frame was simply not going to happen.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    32. Re:Even then you don't know by smash · · Score: 1

      Good to hear, thanks for your input. I've used a recent thinkpad and was quite impressed. not as sexy looking as the E series, but much sturdier, much more friendly driver packages, and comparable performance. Am pushing hard to get a few eval units with a view to ditching dell ASAP.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    33. Re:Even then you don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also worked for a Dell call center. Policy changes from center to center, ours simply replaced anything that needed it so long as the caller sounded even slightly competent ( many 'IT' people did not ).

    34. Re:Even then you don't know by JDeane · · Score: 1

      Only if your one of the lucky ones, or unlucky depending on how you look at it....

    35. Re:Even then you don't know by JDeane · · Score: 1

      I used to love the transfers from India.... Customers saying "Why should I reformat when its my printer thats not working" A lot the "Techs" in India would start the call with asking the customer to format the drive and restore the Dell partition. (I use the term tech loosely...)

      Invariably I would fix the issue with out reformatting and the customer would thank me.

      The biggest problem I spotted was lack of team effort and management just plain not being available and escalation of issues was like trying to push a car uphill underwater with a life vest on...

      I agree support from companies is horrid. The thing that still amazes me is that during my training with Dell they consistently used Walmart as an example of how to treat customers to bring in more customers. (I agree with this philosophy)

      but once out on the production floor wow what difference....

      One call I had got written up for... A customer called me to complain the system did not come with the CD keys to install the software that came with the system, I can send replacement disks but those do not come with CD keys. So I transfered to the department that handles returns and told the customer to return the system for a different one. The customer was retransfered back to tech support and a different "tech" sent out replacement disks.... They said I should have done the same thing and when I said that the customer had the disks and this wouldn't solve the issue they looked at me like I was growing a second head.... So I am sure that customer was really happy to know that in the end not only would they be stuck with a system and no way to return it (you have 14 days to return a system) but also that it was missing software that they purchased lol Makes for super happy customers!!!

      Remember "Be the reason people choose Dell!!!" lol I tried really really hard to help people there and 99% of the time I was able to do that in spite of working working there, but those 1% are killers...

      Oh BTW I handled the phone call that essentially caused Raytheon to Cancel its Dell contract... That call still makes me sick to this day.

      One of the higher up in Raytheon called for his home system he had purchased a system with one of those upgrade coupons for Vista, well at the time the online ordering system was a wreck and he called in asking for help with it. No problem just send the guy a copy of Vista. (I googled his name while on the phone and checked it against his account and the guy was telling the truth) So I talked to several managers double checked everything talked to this man on the phone for almost 2 hours. After doing everything in my power to try and get the man what he was supposed to get he was very kind and said "I knew you have tried everything and I don't blame you, I can tell your a good employee but if this is how Dell supports its customers I don't think we will be doing business again" He thanked me for trying...

      He even told me at one point that he didn't make the decisions about company purchases for PC's but he did have the ability "to whisper in his ear" I kid you not a few weeks after that it was in the news that Dell had lost a multi million dollar Raytheon contract. Over a $400 copy of Vista Ultimate.... Thats how you lose customers.

    36. Re:Even then you don't know by Aliotroph · · Score: 1

      I think I had an easier time giving people things than you did. Despite not working in hardware support I once had to send a customer a new computer because hardware hung up on me when I did the transfer to get it replaced (mentioning I had the L2s on board). They'd tried to fix it three times and utterly failed.

      The worst transfer from India was a lady looking to buy a spare part. She and her husband had a desktop where the power button broke. They wanted to buy that part that has the button, the LEDs and the little, colourful wires. So they ordered it twice and each time got the front face plate. So they tried again and instead of hardware sending her to spare parts she got me. I offered to check the part # she was given just in case. It was wrong. So I spent 30 min looking for the correct part.

      When I was about to send her to spare parts an L2 walked by and told me to confirm with hardware. So I get some guy in India and ask him if I have the right part number for the part. He puts me on hold and comes back with a different number. I asked what it was and he says, "this is a six-foot power cable, sir." So I got kind of mad at him and reiterated what I was actually looking for. He says, "yes, yes, that is the right part" without even checking. I ended up thanking him for blowing me off, hanging up and sending the lady to parts because I knew I had it right. Maybe his centre didn't have enough "Be The Reason" posters.

    37. Re:Even then you don't know by JDeane · · Score: 1

      I don't get the love affair with Indian tech support companies have, I have heard customer after customer tell me they would rather wait 3 hours on hold and get some one who has no accent and possibly knows how to help them. (I say possibly because some of the people I worked with where pretty bad too.... although the worst of them was probably better then most of the Indians...) I am not saying Indian's are dumb or stupid, I think they just got a crash course in a complicated field in a language that is not native to them. It all adds up to major problems.

      On my first performance review I remember being shocked that one of the complaints they had about me was that I spent too little time on the phone per customer, I think my average was a little under 10 minutes...I understand that they made money per minute of me being on the phone from Dell but still... I tried to tell them that I am just that good and 90% of my phone calls involved something like "OK did you check the power cord?" Customer response "Ohhhh its unplugged... thats why its not working" lol nothing major and I was glad to help (I always tried to make them feel better by telling them that I myself have done the same thing and that it happens to everyone.)

      lol Dell tech support in the states could be run so much cheaper then they do now.... Urge techs to solve problems quicker not spend more time on the phone (The customer is happy once they are up and running they really don't care about anything else) Make the notes less of a pain in the ass... (I hated having to type a bunch of crap in the system for a simple phone transfer... what a waste of everyones time and resources) Simple issue's should not require more then a drop down note in the system saying "Customer informational call" and nothing else needs to be put in the notes. I can only imagine the amount of ACW that would eliminate company wide lol

      Some things do need lots of notes if you come up with a solution to an issue note the hell out of it so the system can put it in the Del solutions thing (been too long for me to remember what it was called, just a database of solutions lol)

      Some of the notes from India gave me a headache trying to read what the techs there had done... I remember when I worked there literally waking up in the middle of the night from having nightmares about the horrors they did... (I am not joking)

    38. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      I think you have just gotten a bad batch. I have deployed 10 E6400s which really is a piddly amount, and they have behaved admirably. I think they feel pretty solid, I really think the inspirons feel flimsy though, haven't purchased one of those for home in years.

      As for other OEMs I have purchased lenovos and HP laptops, so far if I were to move to a different OEM than dell it would be HP or Toshiba probably. IBM just has WAY too many security protocols in their laptops that is completely unnecessary, you often get the wrong drivers listed on their site, and thanks to the security chips, things just don't behave the same when you wipe and re-install.

      HP servers are a little clunky under the hood, Dell has a great design and are largely key less.

      I have had problems with hardware on all the manufacturers, and when it comes down to it, dell is the best I have worked with when it comes to responding to problems.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    39. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Dude calm down.

      as you said for all you know I could work for the IRS as a top level Strategist now. This all happened a long time ago in the tech world.

      The tech world has a history of blowing things out of proportion, EVERY major company has been sued and lost. my only point is, as manufacturers go, dell behaved in a way I found acceptable. This is all that matters, whether or not the vendor behaves in a manner consistent with your business practices. I have different needs than a mom and pop, and NASA has different needs than mine. At our workplace currently we are interested in cosistency and response time. Dell delivers that in a way that suits our needs. Back when this fiasco happened, I worked for the gov't and luckily only had ordered 20 of the PCs in question. We usually ordered in the hundreds and were understandably pissed that dell knowingly sold us the items, but they did a better than normal job of making sure the problem did not effect us too much. Now having worked at several large companies I understand their position a little better. The article does not explain much about the decision that dell made and why. Sometimes you know there are defective parts and you realize that it is better to take the bad press than to recall billions in assets. Dell must have underestimated the damage. I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt as they have behaved very well and within acceptable means. Using this as an example to bastardize the whole company is a bit shortsighted.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    40. Re:Even then you don't know by smash · · Score: 1

      We've had *several* bad batches over the past 18 months. Not ONE bad batch.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    41. Re:Even then you don't know by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Yuck. One thing I am truly enjoying now that I am on a smaller lan is that I haven't had to deal with bad batches. Kind of nice ordering 5 and 10 at a time.

      Are you buying the latest and greatest model? When I was on a larger lan I would purchase one back when possible. Tried to stick with the 260s as long as possible, then I tried sticking with the 280s as long as I could...

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
  32. You knew it was coming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you're getting a dud!

  33. I told you so by noz · · Score: 1

    Never bought one. My brother (non-nerd) did and it had RAM errors manifesting as BSODs within weeks of delivery.

    The laptops were always cheap. They "check all the boxes": i.e. they have all the on-paper credentials to compete with other manufacturers, on paper. But the build quality is crap.

    Also I had one loaned to me for work and the keyboard's enter key stopped working, so I carried an enormous USB keyboard around with it for 3 months. ;-)

    Never. Buy. Dell.

  34. He should just dismantle the company and give the by bsane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He should just dismantle the company and give the proceeds back to the shareholders.

  35. Obligatory by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Shortly after Mr. Jobs returned to Apple in 1997 as part of the company's acquisition of NeXT, Dell's founder and chairman, Michael Dell, was asked at a technology conference what might be done to fix Apple, then deeply troubled financially.

    "What would I do?" Mr. Dell said to an audience of several thousand information technology managers. "I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders."

    1. Re:Obligatory by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      I think that shows how bad Michael Dell is at running businesses. He correctly identified that Apple couldn't go on the way it had been run, but didn't suggest running the company a different way as a potential solution. If Dell is in trouble now, they will stay in trouble unless the market changes to require a company just like Dell.

  36. Summary is wrong by billcopc · · Score: 0, Troll

    InfoWorld's Bill Snyder is feeling lonely, so he wrote a vitriolic puff piece titled "the ignominious decline of Dell"

    FTFY, you self-righteous he-cunt.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  37. Former Senior Support Analyst for Dell... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 4, Informative

    A good example of some of the things going on at Dell go like this.

    I was hired as Basic Server Support tech.

    I was given extra training to take over the graveyard shift from headquarters in round rock.

    It was moved to Oklahoma City.

    After several months we had done well as a team and were offered Gold level support,
    but we would need to apply for that job.

    I did apply and I got the position and the night crew became gold level support.

    After just a few weeks the platinum crew was so swamped they started dumping
    their calls on us and we were required to take them.

    We got a few days training and were thrown to the sharks
    taking calls way over our heads with little to no prior experience
    in the advanced server software arena.

    The customers were guaranteed MCSE trained technicians.

    Needless to say that is not what they were getting.

    Customers were furious and launched into a tirade over the idiocy,
    and I did not blame them a bit.

    To me this was breech of contract and fraud.

    I brought this up in a meeting and was shouted down.

    I decided at that point to leave the company.

    At the end of the one year I had been there, over
    half the ppl working for server support had quit.

    1 year after I left my team of 26 only had 3 original members.

    The upper management at Dell was THAT bad.

    Michael Dell came off his long term vacation and
    tried to correct the course of the company, but
    the damage had been done and he was lied to as well.

    It took him time to work thru all the lies and he fired
    a lot of ppl for various reasons.

    Some of the low to middle management were actually
    good ppl, such as my eventual manager.

    He didn't like what they were doing, but he had left
    his prior job and had to make this work or lose his
    house, his car, and likely his wife.

    Fun times...

    I keep in touch with some of the ppl still working there,
    and after I quit things got better once Mr. Dell could
    cut through some of the lies.

    I do not think the company will fully recover and it
    cannot compete with Asian companies that do not
    have all the government regulations, fees, taxes,
    and red tape to deal with.

    That and they can get workers to work for below minimum wage.

    Like most US businesses it is hard to compete on uneven ground.

    Good Luck to you all !

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Former Senior Support Analyst for Dell... by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm glad you're keeping alive the tradition of epic poetry :D

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:Former Senior Support Analyst for Dell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. That sounds about right. What really killed Dell was a two year span of layoffs where no one knew anything about anything. Where the company was going, or what position to prepare for in the future. Upper management to middle and lower management communication was horrible. They re-organized 6 times in two years in our Division alone. In 1 year I had 8 different reporting structures. No one was secure in their future. It was horrible. It killed souls. People left Dell. Good people left Dell. They should have implemented the cuts much faster, and targeted them at failing parts of the business. They should have cut their losses and made certain acquisitions (vmware, netapp or emc, sun), instead they bought Alienware and a slew of smaller organizations that have done nothing to improve Dell. They wasted money aqcuiring Zing... WTF!!? Dell tried to rebrand itself as a "green" company. What a crock. All that time and money chasing unicorns instead of investing in the core business. It was frustrating to see all the money wasted on these initiatives (plant a tree..), when product development, services, and support were being starved. Dell had little to no r&d. And what r&d it did have was starved of the resources needed to compete. Dell was so anti-R&D I think it was instrumental in Dell not merging with EMC when it should have. The 6th generation server line sucked so hard, that anyone associated with it's product cycle was fired, except for the upper managers. The same for the PowerVault 660. Everyone fired, except for the upper management. The only smart acquisition I have seen is Perot. But even that was a "me too" response to HP. Management refused for far too long to put AMD into the server platform, over the demands of services and sales organization because they loved the Intel money train more than the health of the business.

  38. Oh My... by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A whole new generation gets to learn how business works. A company starts and is nothing, why should people buy from it? So the company focuses on quality, low prices and customer satisfaction. People like the company so much they swarm to it. Over the years the company grows larger and larger. Eventually they have capped out their market share, they can grow no more. This is a problem in our growth driven society. We believe that any company that is not growing is failing. So the owners of the company have to grow in other ways, they have to give less to the market they already have... and try to get the market to pay more despite getting less. First the sacrifice from within... departments are cut, benefits are cut, employees are given quotas that grow daily until they are doing so much work they can barely focus on any one thing at a time. Eventually the company realizes it can't cut anymore from within and still function, so it starts looking for cheaper suppliers. Bonuses are given on a yearly basis so an executive can come it, buy tons of faulty components, get his bonus and be gone before the shit hits the fan. Eventually the company is so distrusted by the public they are relegated to a brand name sticker wall-mart sticks on junk it bought from some 3rd party. But the big wigs at the company walk away with their wallets over flowing, open a new start up... rinse and repeat. It's the same with nearly every American business.

    1. Re:Oh My... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      This is a problem in our growth driven society.

      Excellent post.

    2. Re:Oh My... by yuhong · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yea, we need to end the obsession with stock price growth and move away from stock price based compensation and the quarterly earnings game. It was originally done in the name of "maximizing shareholder value" promoted by corporate raiders back in the 1980s and it must end. I have this latest Slashdot submission that is still pending: http://slashdot.org/submission/1273270/HBRs-article-on-death-of-stock-based-compensation

    3. Re:Oh My... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It's worse than it used to be. Back 60 or 70 years ago, chances are that if a company had a different name it was a different company. Now those two companies may very well be different, but they get their products produced on the same exact line. Perhaps one of them requires an additional QA step to make sure it's better. The problem then lies when a consumer wants to boycott or avoid products of an inferior quality, since much of the products come off only a very small number of lines or are made by only a couple companies, getting quality becomes challenging.

      But when all is said and done this is really just the natural consequences of hiring MBAs to do things which require actual knowledge and experience. Well that and some degree of common sense and patience.

    4. Re:Oh My... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly -- see my small rant above on how being beholden to shareholders above all else is what really ruins companies. Gotta make the bottom line look good, gotta make it look like there's always "growth" (what on earth is wrong with being merely "stable"??!) or the stock market declares you a failure!

      If we really want to end this corporate spiral to hell, we need to change the law so companies are first beholden to customers, then to their own future and employees, and last, to stockholders.

      Of course, a lot of investment money would subsequently dry up since shareholders would no longer be first in line for any payouts, but that might be a good thing, as it would discourage companies from growing so fast that they have to cut corners just to keep up with their own success.

      And I say this as a shareholder in several core companies. But thinking just in terms of dividends and growth is shortsighted and narrowsighted... frex, if Exxon-Mobil didn't have to pay me a dividend first and foremost, maybe the price of gas wouldn't be so high, cost of many other things that rely on fuel would also not be so high, and we'd all benefit.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Oh My... by yuhong · · Score: 1

      We don't need to change the law to do that, but glad you agree, and hopefully you have seen my Slashdot submissions.

    6. Re:Oh My... by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was with you till the last sentence.

      The big-wigs aren't in on the start-up. They're not part of that initial spark of insight, inspiration, and hard work.

      They come in later, when the company is growing into medium-to-large-sized breeches, and needs "people experienced in running a medium-to-large sized company." They get hired into the top positions, and bring in their own people. The kind of people (ahem.. like Carly...) that don't think they need to know about their business, because one business is just like any other..

      And yet, somehow, boards of directors keep falling for this crap and hiring these hacks as if they're the only ones who could possibly run the company.

      Oh wait.. it's not "somehow." These guys buy their way onto the boards' of directors of rising companies and then pick officers from the same club.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Oh My... by yuhong · · Score: 1

      The kind of people (ahem.. like Carly...) that don't think they need to know about their business, because one business is just like any other..

      Yea, dates back to the rise of conglomerates I think (in the 1950s/60s I believe?). Has obvious flaws, of course.

      And yet, somehow, boards of directors keep falling for this crap and hiring these hacks as if they're the only ones who could possibly run the company.

      Agreed that board of directors should no longer default to these types.

    8. Re:Oh My... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Also, never has the corporate world been dominated by psychopaths as much as nowadays.

      Not every executive is as you describe (take Warren Buffet, for example), but most are corporate psychopaths of the worst king - BP exec, past and present, for example.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    9. Re:Oh My... by syncrotic · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason why investors demand constant growth from a company is that so many - Dell included - don't pay dividends. In the absence of those, the only reason to hold shares in a company is the expectation of higher future value.

      Dell has been around for over two decades. At some point it became obvious that they weren't going to take over the world: their growth had peaked. They weren't going to completely crush the consumer / business desktop computing competition, and they weren't going to enter other markets in a meaningful way... so why didn't they start disbursing the profits of their business to the owners of the company?

      This has only tangential relevance to the whole bad-capacitor issue: I'm more taking issue with your assertion that companies have to compromise their core values and strengths in search of endless growth. There's another option.

    10. Re:Oh My... by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read the article you linked to above (haven't noticed your other submissions, but now will keep an eye out :) -- very good points. Of course this would require changing an entrenched system, pretty tough to do.

      I'd add a further incentivizer: let no compensation be given until NN-years later (I'd suggest 10 years) to ensure that decisions are made with longterm company health in mind, and perhaps tie the level of compensation to how stable (not how cancerous, er, growthy) the company is. If the company you helped run goes tits-up due to bad executive decisions, well then, no gold for you, let alone golden parachute!

      One big problem is that we've got this generation of MBAs who've never actually BUILT a company, but are being brought in to RUN a company. They know what they learned in business school, and how to play the bottom line, but nothing else. As the HBR article points out, this does not concern them, because they'll have shown their "improved bottom line", collected, and bailed long before their decisions hit the fan.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:Oh My... by yuhong · · Score: 1

      let no compensation be given until NN-years later (I'd suggest 10 years) to ensure that decisions are made with longterm company health in mind, and perhaps tie the level of compensation to how stable (not how cancerous, er, growthy) the company is.

      I would not go that far.

    12. Re:Oh My... by yuhong · · Score: 1

      BTW, this submission is still pending. You can still vote it up or down.

    13. Re:Oh My... by farditmitts · · Score: 1

      Another way to grow would be to innovate: Hire some good, forward thinking staff, take on some exciting up and coming designers, build a product range to compete with apple.

      Another way would be to produce a shiny pink piece of decal ridden plasticy crap, so rubbish that you would only considering buying one if it came in a pack of 12. If I was going to consider buying dell again (and that would only happen after a good day skiing in hell), I would also demand a support contract that guaranteed I didn't have to telephonetically traverse the globe, on hold, listening to U2 for 45 minutes before someone hung up on me.

      Screw you modern day dell, you suck.... though your still better than HP.

    14. Re:Oh My... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      But it would sure cure the short-term thinking problem :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:Oh My... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I can't read slashdot in glorious-colour mode so I don't even see that stuff -- normal mode hurts my eyes and makes me crazy waiting forever for stuff to load. I use low-bandwidth mode with no CSS or JS. Comments and modpoints work but nothing else does. Sorry!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:Oh My... by klui · · Score: 1

      Hmm, another name for things that grows and grows is cancer.

    17. Re:Oh My... by yuhong · · Score: 1

      But in a way that IMO is way too draconian. I was once thinking of using a share of the company profits as compensation, but yea that is another debate altogether.

  39. The Fall of the Roman Empire by owlnation · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was 1500 years ago, and yet the lesson has never been learned by many.

    Manage by overextending, with long chains of command and a reliance on slave labor, and your empire will collapse.

    Outsource, and you are simply counting the days until your business fails / is taken over.

    1. Re:The Fall of the Roman Empire by Yaos · · Score: 1

      So Dell should make their own motherboards, processors, RAM, hard drives and video cards?

    2. Re:The Fall of the Roman Empire by Yergle143 · · Score: 1

      Is the problem with management, or the whole idea of "building an Empire"?
      And why is it us penny pinching plebes always buy into the notion of Empire anyway?
      Because the barbarians are coming today...
      http://www.uvm.edu/~jgm/barbarians.html

  40. Just my personal experience, but... by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    I've bought hundreds of Dells, really. Maybe a thousand altogether, but probably no more than that. I'd buy them ten or twenty at a time. I'm actually a guy who likes doing it. I love taking a new computer out of the box to smell those wafting polymers in the air. Out of the box failure rate = 0. Three year failure rate = maybe 1 per 100, too low to really need to track. I actually usually pushed the boxes to five years. Customer Service? I don't believe I've ever called them. I simply didn't need it. If I have to call customer service, I figure I'm the one who failed. They were reasonably priced, reasonably well powered, network ready, and easy to work on. I used them for rack mount servers as well. I bought between forty and fifty of those. I had one drive go out.

    Maybe different model and all, but certainly in my own case, I simply don't have any problems at all with Dell.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  41. Lousy service by Andy+Smith · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had a couple of Dells.

    I was going to relate some of my bad tech support experiences, but I'll jump straight to this one:

    The tower was making a lot of noise. I had researched the issue and discovered that badly-fitting card readers on certain Dell models (including mine) were causing vibration noise.

    Called tech support, got through to a guy at an Indian call centre. Told him what the problem was, and that I knew why it was happening.

    He wanted me to disconnect _everything_ from the motherboard, take the memory out, unplug every cable, etc. He said this was policy: They have to try plugging everything back in separately to diagnose what is making the noise.

    Eventually I had to be bluntly honest and very carefully say: "I'm sorry, but throughout this call we haven't been able to understand each other because, with respect, you don't speak good English. I'm not comfortable with the idea of disconnecting everything because I don't believe you could explain to me how to re-conect everything."

    And that was how Dell got out of helping another customer. Without me disconnecting every single component in my computer, they would class the noise fault as "unresolved" and wouldn't replace the card reader.

    Dell's machines are pretty good. Most people who have had a Dell would recommend them to their friends and family. But people who have had to use Dell tech support will tell you the same thing: If you do buy a Dell, do so with the knowledge that you are effectively buying a computer without a warranty because you will never get any fault fixed.

    1. Re:Lousy service by int69h · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've used Dell tech support. I would not tell people the same thing. In your case, if that's the standard script they use for diagnosing noise, it's the standard script. None of these companies hire rocket scientists for tech support. You couldn't afford the machines if they did.

    2. Re:Lousy service by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      None of these companies hire rocket scientists for tech support. You couldn't afford the machines if they did.

      I'd be willing to pay a bit more for access to a clueful support staff of native English speakers that don't insist on following a script, but actually listen to what troubleshooting I've already done and go from there.

      That's why I buy Macs. The last time I had to call Apple support a couple years ago, the tech I spoke to was in Texas. He listened to what I had done to isolate the problem, agreed with my conclusion, and arranged a repair with no BS.

      ~Philly

    3. Re:Lousy service by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That's why I loved Western Digital's late in-house support. I'd call and say "this HD is doing this and this" and the tech would ask if I'd run their diags, and I'd say I already tested it some other way and it did this and that, and he's say sounds like it's sick, here's your RMA number -- about that fast. They knew enough *themselves* to peg whether YOU knew what you were talking about, and if you did, they were willing to cut to the chase.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Lousy service by int69h · · Score: 1

      You voted with your wallet. Good for you. Things won't change until more people do. These companies are giving people what they're asking for, the cheapest possible product.

    5. Re:Lousy service by int69h · · Score: 1

      Dell does sell support contracts that connect you to clueful call center people that are located in the US. You pay for that with the premium price of Apple, and Dell offers it as an option at $338/2 years or $478/3 years on the $600 system I looked at on their site. I haven't checked, but I'm sure that the other major manufacturers offer it as an option as well.

    6. Re:Lousy service by wintermute000 · · Score: 1

      Just lie about it. Say you did everything their braindead script demands.
      works for me

    7. Re:Lousy service by trouser · · Score: 1

      By contrast, my wife had a problem with her Dell Studio 15. I spoke to an Indian guy who organized for an Indian guy to come to my house the following day. He arrived on time, diagnosed and fixed the problem very quickly and handed be an invoice describing the repairs undertaken and indicating no charge as the fault was covered by the warranty.

      --
      Now wash your hands.
    8. Re:Lousy service by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      That's why I buy Macs. The last time I had to call Apple support a couple years ago, the tech I spoke to was in Texas.

      I bought a used eMac from a friend. When it was just shy of 3 years old, it started crashing and having all sorts of video issues. A Google search said that it might have bad caps on the video card and told where to look for them, so I did, and it had them. I called Apple and told the woman what I'd found and she gave me an RMA to replace everything that could have potentially gone bad.

      The second-hand machine had a one-year warranty. Apple fixed the whole thing, free of charge, a week before it turned 3. That is why my next computer will be an Apple.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Lousy service by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      The second-hand machine had a one-year warranty. Apple fixed the whole thing, free of charge, a week before it turned 3.

      The eMacs got hit with the same bad capacitors that the Dells did. Unlike Dell, Apple instituted a repair extension program for the affected machines, so that's probably why they fixed it for free that far out of warranty.

      Apple has been known to go above and beyond, however. Some of the Power Mac G5s that were liquid cooled developed leaks, resulting in corrosive coolant basically destroying the innards. Even though those are from almost 5 years ago and well out of even the optional three-year extended warranty, Apple has been making affected customers whole. Not by repairing their old G5, but by giving them a new Mac Pro.

      ~Philly

    10. Re:Lousy service by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      The eMacs got hit with the same bad capacitors that the Dells did. Unlike Dell, Apple instituted a repair extension program for the affected machines, so that's probably why they fixed it for free that far out of warranty.

      That's exactly why they fixed it. Rather than try to dodge blame or explain why the warranty was expired, they cheerfully ate the expense of working on my machine. Everyone has a bad batch of hardware from time to time. Most telling is how a company reacts to the problem. In my case, Apple quickly took the most customer-friendly route.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  42. possible production run problems? by BulletMagnet · · Score: 1

    We have 2 dozen Optiplex GX240-270 PCs from that time period that were used in extreme conditions (construction jobsite trailers where it would take a FULL can of air to blow the gunk of out them, per machine) and not a single one ever had cap related motherboard problems (One did blow a power supply twice...) We still have them (however not in service) and just fired up 6 or so to give away as donations to employees (for their little kids) and every single one fired up... I have complaints about Dell (posting drivers for the BCOM embedded quad NICs that leak memory - well bleed like an amputation - and crash R710 servers - that was a fun one to figure out) , but I've never had any workmanship quality issues.....

    1. Re:possible production run problems? by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My experience has been the opposite. As the hardware dude for the local user group, I vet all the donated systems. Dells are nearly always sick or dead; the only brand with a worse track record in our slushpile is Micron (which looked to me like it used a lot of parts from the same sources, only further down the 2nds chain). It's to where I just assume a donated Dell is an unrepairable organ donor until proven otherwise.

      HP desktops are much more likely to be alive and not need work, and Gateways/eMachines are usually alive but in need of work. But the Dells have been almost entirely goners.

      And the clones are nearly always alive, healthy, and outlive any namebrand PC by 3 to 1.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  43. What is good then? by BlueFiberOptics · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If Dell is junk, what do people recommend? I already have a Macbook Pro, but in the future I want to purchase a non-Apple computer, what brand is most trusted? Lenovo? HP?

    1. Re:What is good then? by Yaos · · Score: 1

      Dell.

    2. Re:What is good then? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm planning on replacing my current Thinkpad with another one. The thing is that Thinkpads aren't trendy or consumer products. It's a well-established business brand and Lenovo know it.

      While they have to be competitive on price, they don't have to be so competitive that they have to cut corners. They know that their customers are buying more for quality over price and will pay that little extra to have a more reliable machine.

    3. Re:What is good then? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Get a local clone shop to build a system to your specs. Even a low-end clone will outlive a high-end namebrand machine, and will have fewer issues and be quicker to fix even if something does break. See my other posts in this discussion.

      Typing this from a clone whose major innards are now 12 years old :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:What is good then? by edremy · · Score: 1
      Sadly, even that isn't a help these days. I built my current home machine from scratch, paying more for higher quality components. The ASUS motherboard blew in less than 2 years- at least the nice little LED display gave a code that a bit of Google showed to be "dead, no hope of recovery" so I didn't have to waste time troubleshooting. I paid a lot more for that since it was all solid state capacitor- didn't help.

      The Gigabyte video card went nine months later- that one was a pain since it gradually got more and more unstable and I couldn't figure out the issue.

      Everything is crap today

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    5. Re:What is good then? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Just buy it directly from foxconn....

      Seriously, though, we're going through a period where there really aren't any trusted consumer-level PCs out there. Even Apple needs to be watched carefully.

      Fear not, though. Eventually, the cost to produce a quality machine will fall so far below the cost of packaging it you'll be able to find good brands again. You'll buy them in the grocery store, but they'll be there nonetheless.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:What is good then? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I agree it's not as simple as it used to be. Cheap prices beget cheap manufacturing, and the market has noted that now the majority of today's "geeks" are not really knowledgeable as they were in the past, but rather are gamer types all too easily seduced by SHINY, and have the yuppie mentality that thinks a high price is a good indicator of high quality. (Which explains Alienware.) So instead of price being fairly well tied to quality as it used to be, now we have a lot of high-priced utter crap.

      Still, it's generally better than the namebrand system crap, and at least you got to pick your own crap instead of having it foisted upon you. :)

      Personally I've never thought much of Asus, Abit, and a number of other gamer-oriented boards; I've seen too many with odd problems. I'm a Tyan bigot when I can afford it, and I also like my iBase board a lot. But those are server motherboards, and it makes a difference.

      I recently had a server-class power supply finally fail at the ripe old age of 15 years (not its fault, it got fried by a major surge that cooked half the house breakers and two layers of surge protection -- tho the rest of the computer is undamaged), and was thrilled to discover that Topower still makes this model -- you can guess what I'm buying to replace it. Yet at $60 it's no more expensive than the shiny crap!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:What is good then? by Pinback · · Score: 1

      About four months ago, I was issued a new Lenovo Thinkpad and an approximately 20" LCD display. We used laptops as our primary workstation, and having two screens allowed us to keep several applications open at once.

      At one point the team got an extra docking bay, and they passed it to me. I was happy to gain a DVI connector this way, and scrounged up the requisite DVI cable to connect to the external display.

      At this point, everything on my table was Lenovo, but the DVI cable would not plug in to the docking bay. The connectors on the cable and the docking bay were of such low quality and fit that they would not work together.

      I examined it closely for a while, and found that I could make things work by bending the keying tab inside the cable slightly so that it lined up with the slot in the connector. I found it odd that there was no chamfering at all in the connector.

      In my opinion, Lenovo quality is the bare minimum to get the job done. If you're using company money, and you're getting a great discount, then maybe. But if you're spending your own money, I'd look for something with better fit and finish.

    8. Re:What is good then? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      Mind if I ask for the model of that power supply? Sounds like something I'd be interested in if I need to build me a ZFS server.

    9. Re:What is good then? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      What is ZFS? Anyway, here's the list of what they make: http://www.topower.com/product/product.htm

      And here's my PSU that finally got surged to partial death at age 15 years (the mobo connector no longer works, but the rest seems fine): http://www.topower.com/product/at_300ssce.html

      Will be replacing it with a minor upgrade: http://www.topower.com/product/at_400ssce.html

      They also said they'd repair the old one for $30, tho I can also buy a replacement for $40 (or about $60 for the upgrade). The original cost me $50 at a local clone shop; at the time it was very hard to find a 300W PSU (choice of one). Everything about it is heavy-duty, worth every cent. I've replaced the fan 3 or 4 times, but that's no big deal.

      I hadn't realised Topower was still in business... next time I build a halfway modern machine, I'll probably try one of theirs instead of Enermax (which I've liked a lot for ATX systems).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    10. Re:What is good then? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      Wow, it just occurred to me it's an AT (not ATX) power supply that you're pointing at. Either way, it seems the reviews for some of their newer ATX offerings seem good, so I'll keep them in mind for future home-built PCs.

      ZFS. As in Sun's ZFS file system. As I see more and more drives dying at work, I've been considering building a file server a home with redundancy and checksumming.

    11. Re:What is good then? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's an old system (but exceedingly stable) -- Tyan S1830S motherboard, now 12 years old, occupying a case that started life holding a 486. (I have two of those Tyans. I get offers to buy 'em every so often, for more than I paid new. NO!!!) It has an ATX connector too but declines to power on properly when that's used.

      I've found the simple way to evaluate PSUs without knowing what's inside or caring about brand is to weigh them, count wires, and note wire gauge. The heavier, the more wires, and the thicker the wire, the better. The Topower weighs over 4 pounds, has 7 molex plus some others, all long and thick. I've seen cheapies that weigh 12 ounces and have 2 connectors on wires that rival human hair for thinness.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:What is good then? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the weight of the PSU is a pretty reliable indicator too. Although a year ago I found this site: http://jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Review_Cat&recatnum=13

      Having a guy who sounds like he enjoys making power supplies blow up and understands how to use an oscilloscope is definetely a good reviewer. Having the guy equipped with a instrumented load is even better.

    13. Re:What is good then? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thanks for reminding me, I'd forgotten about this guy's reviews! looks like my two preferred brands are doing okay, far as I read :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  44. Satisfaction is an abstraction, not a machine by bartwol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some time in the nineties, it was reported that IBM ran an unusually high problem rate on a line of Thinkpads. The media attacked IBM for refusing to make any detailed remarks about the problem, or to establish a formal action plan. IBM's only comment was something to the effect, "IBM Thinkpad users have a high degree of satisfaction with their Thinkpad products. We remain committed, as always, to assuring that high degree of satisfaction."

    Product failures, particularly computer failures, are a routine part of the landscape. All this hubbub about people losing data because of Dell's unreliable computers is dubious...responsible computer owners assure their own data protection. Only the irresponsible or ignorant rely on the manufacturer to do so, and always at their own peril.

    A good computer company stands behind its products. When you have a problem, you call them and they promptly restore your satisfaction. The methods, economics and logistics of doing so may sometimes turn to the dark arts, but in the end, SATISFACTION best describes what a customer wants most.

    Over the years, I've dealt with a lot of Dells, a lot of Dell problems, and a lot of Dell. And as ugly as this capacitor story now plays, I am still faced with the fact of my continued satisfaction with Dell as a company that has provided me with good value and satisfaction. I'm not lucky. Dell has done a good job of standing behind its products, and in my experience, continues to do so.

    P.S. My only relationship to Dell is as a customer.

    1. Re:Satisfaction is an abstraction, not a machine by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Also, you can't ADMIT to a failure until the lawyers are done vetting it, because doing so sets you up for much greater legal liability... no thanks to today's litigious society.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Satisfaction is an abstraction, not a machine by bartwol · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I think a bold transparent approach to something like this would be just plain stupid...like bathing in blood before visiting sharks.

      I'd sooner leave it to the good people to find me by their own reasons, and then help them when they do.

    3. Re:Satisfaction is an abstraction, not a machine by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's essentially what I said -- admitting to a mistake is crumming the waters at best.

      I don't know at what point "helping the good people" becomes a legal admission of fault; that may be another can of, uh, shark bait. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  45. Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by lalena · · Score: 5, Informative

    People on this site should know that if you buy from Dell, you get it from their Small / Medium Business site.
    US tech support & they come to your house to fix the computer within a day or two.
    The bonus is that I think the computers are cheaper. If you try to get a powerful PC from Dell, their home models usually force an overpriced under powered video card on you. Good video cards are very expensive from Dell. The Business site allows more choices. It lets you get a good PC with no video card. If you don't need one, use on-board video. If you do need one, get it from newegg.
    Note: I do build and overclock PCs, but sometimes if you need something simple it is hard to beat Dell's < $300 computers. I also go with them for the very small form factor PCs and sometimes check out their Refurb Site for Previously Ordered New (returned - not refurb) PCs to see if they have exactly what I am looking for.

    1. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      Dell also makes these PC brands so if you have one, you might want to check for faulty components, or search google to see if anyone's having problems:

      * OptiPlex (office desktop computer systems)
      * Vostro (office/small business desktop and notebook systems)
      * n Series (desktop and notebook computers shipped with Linux or FreeDOS installed)
      * Latitude (business-focused notebooks)
      * Precision (workstation systems and high-performance notebooks),

              * Inspiron (budget desktop and notebook computers)
              * Studio (mainstream desktop and laptop computers)
              * XPS (high-end desktop and notebook computers)
              * Studio XPS (high-end design-focus of XPS systems and extreme multimedia capability)
              * Alienware (high-performance gaming systems)
              * Adamo (high-end luxury laptop)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those are all clearly branded as Dells you retard.

    3. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by dangitman · · Score: 0, Troll

      People on this site should know that if you buy from Dell, you get it from their Small / Medium Business site.

      I would have thought people on this site should know not to buy from Dell in the first place.

      & they come to your house to fix the computer within a day or two.

      That's the problem. You will need them to come and fix it. Possibly within a day or two of purchase.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    4. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by tunapez · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...and sometimes check out their Refurb Site for Previously Ordered New (returned - not refurb) PCs to see if they have exactly what I am looking for.

      FYI: no matter what you choose, Dell will send you a used computer if that is what they need to unload. Been through it on 2 laptops I ordered, one was new and files I recovered from other's drive spanned at least 3 months of previous usage. This despite my unchecking Refurb and Scratch/Dent when deciding. The Dell tech told me they're all potential refurbs from Outlet, refused to issue an RMA and flat-out REFUSED to escalate the call to any superior. Good thing I recorded the convo (1-Party State) and it was before they re-worded the site's legalese to what I linked to above, AmEx was not impressed and issued me immediate, full refund for both. I won't be getting any more Dell's in my lifetime.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    5. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      what did you smoke this morning? seems stronger than anything i've ever known. these are not brands. they are models of computers by dell. like e71, n95, n900, etc are models of phones by nokia.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    6. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Dell
      Who can tell
      Where it's been
      What it's seen
      And what will you
      Do
      If a file
      On hard drive
      Turns out to be
      Illegal pornography
      And FBI
      Comes late at night
      Takes you away
      For a trip one way
      To a place
      Where those
      Who bought Dell
      Brand from Hell
      Always go
      When life runs low
      So sleep tight
      At night
      And listen close
      To every sound
      Cause you bought Dell
      The brand from Hell
      Ghostly chorus, fade to silence:
      Dell... from Hell...
      Dell... from Hell...
      Dell... from Hell...
      Dell... from Hell...
      Dell... from Hell...
      Dell... from Hell...
      ...

      Anyone care to compose a tune for this ?-)

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by Jainith · · Score: 1

      Yeah I just got a great deal from the Dell Outlet.

      I've spent more on games from Steam (on sales) than I did on the computer itself.

    8. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      I've had many Dell computers over the past 10 years and never had any issues, with the exception of a hard drive failing (but that was a Western Digital component, not Dell). I actually like their hardware (laptops, at least); I find their laptops to be a perfect balance between the 'industrial' feeling Thinkpad/Lenovo and the dumbed-down clunky 'consumer grade' HPs, and more often than not the prices are very competitive if not the lowest around.

      Disclaimer: I currently own several Lenovo, HP, Dell, and Apple laptops, so my opinion is based on what I have. I can't argue with the quality and feel of the Apple hardware, but next in line would be the Dells.

    9. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Oh.

      I thought maybe those brands were like my Compaq computer, which is made by HP but has no indication of it. Or Lexus which is made by Toyota but also hides that fact from the owner.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by george14215 · · Score: 1

      I live in a two party state (WA). Does anyone know of an easy way for my phone to play a pre-recorded message saying that the phone coversation might be recorded for "phone quality purposes" and that the caller consents to this? just like when i call any customer support number? I would love to have the ability to record (legally) the outrageous conversations that I've engaged in with various members of the business community.

    11. Re:Buy Dell Small/Medium Business PCs by tunapez · · Score: 1

      FCC Rules
      The 3rd option is OK, but most script readers know what that tone means.

      *If you're in enforcement or intelligence and have a 3-5 letter acronym you are exempt. Record them all!!!

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  46. Wow, this damage-control strategy sounds familiar by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to the Times, when the University of Texas complained that its Dell PCs were failing, the company said the school's math department had pushed them too hard, making them solve difficult calculations

    From: michael@dell.com
    To: xxxx@utexas.edu
    Re: Hardware failures running Matlab

    You're exceeding the floating-point unit's recommended duty cycle. Turn it off for awhile.

    Sent from my iPhone

  47. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The very worst part about Dell is the are not a channel friendly company. Say you are a reseller of their product and you uncover a great opportunity for a hundred or so machines. You register the deal with Dell, get your reseller price, put your markup and make the customer, YOUR customer, an offer. Out of curiosity, the customer calls Dell direct, speaks to an inside sales person who conveniently DOES NOT look to see that it's be registered by an authorized reseller, and offers the customer a better price than you can offer them, and they scoop the business out from under you.

    They are notorious for doing this, and I see plenty of resellers complaining about it. Personally, I'd recommend Lenovo or HP, or any other channel friendly partner. When you're out there competing against your suppliers, it's only a matter of time before you're squeezed out of the market altogether.

  48. Re:-shrug- still got a dell at work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had a dell xps 420 system for a good 3-5 years now (yea, I know its time for a new one). Not a single issue with it. It even has vista and I never had an issue with that either.

    Now my mac book pro, 2 years old, the last generation before they got gay. Thats been in and out of the shop constantly to have its logic board replaced, battery frying, various other issues. Had to reinstall mac os x about 3 times now.

    Can anybody remind me why I should listen to the ap?

  49. Appropriate quality for the price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell went through a rough patch where you'd be insane to buy from them. Now they're an appropriate quality for their price point. There are higher quality options out there for a bit higher cost, but they're price-appropriate now. If you demand stringent quality standards, then, as usual, you have to open your wallet a bit wider.

  50. Not in the Business school I attend by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have one semester, out of four, left on my MBA. I have never heard anyone say, "it is the ethical duty of a business owner to return maximum profit to the shareholder, as reported in quarterly statements."

    If it were said, and it were not being said as an example to be torn apart, I would expect any of the instructors, or fellow students, to tear such a position to shreds. It may fit your notion of what is taught in Business School; but, it is not what is actually taught in Business School.

    1. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may not be what is taught in business school. But that is what is being said in board rooms. And to pretend it isn't, is just sticking your head where the sun don't shine.

    2. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by PhxBlue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just like any other career field, there's how it works in an academic setting, i.e., how it should work; and then there's how it actually works.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    3. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, it is taught in law school.

      Say what you will about lawyers, ethics & equity underpin the bulk of corporate law. Byzantine regulations are too often the result of yet another scam.

      It is not your money you waste with poor business practices. That money belongs to the shareholders and bondholders.

      Even more so, something that is not taught in business school: when a company gets to the "zone of insolvency," duties should shift to bondholders rather than shareholders (i.e. management should be concerned with the long-run rather than short-term spikes or gains, and the higher risks associated with immediate returns).

      This is why business school is by and large bulsh. Just sayin...

    4. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you want us to think.

    5. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't confuse theory, as taught by academia, with reality. "Profit to the shareholder" (i.e. "greed is good for us") is THE MANTRA. Most unfortunate, but true.

    6. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Because I'm getting my MBA, about to start my third semester, and I'm pretty sure they mentioned this in one of my first classes as one of the goals of a firm (maximize the market value of the existing owner's equity). Granted, it isn't verbatim and a lot of people tend to misinterpret the actual concept (there is no ethics in business let alone any ethical duty), but it is easy to see where people are getting this from.

    7. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because that is the school talking. Wait until you get into the real world.

    8. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it isnt taught in school, obviously it is learned real quick in the real world. Funny how most school is BS til you get a job.

    9. Re:Not in the Business school I attend by sjames · · Score: 1

      Given the prevalence of such behavior in business, it's understandable that people might conclude that it's actually being taught as the correct behavior.

  51. AIT files fraudulent lawsuit by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

    If you read the full text of the issue, notice the complainant was misusing the equipment: desktops as servers. For those who need a car analogy: AIT was using passenger cars to haul cargo instead of purchasing trucks. Also, AIT stopped paying for product shipped to them even though AIT admits Dell fulfilled their warranty agreement. Looks like AIT needs a good bitch slapping; and, sent back to the boardroom without any catering.

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  52. Let 'em fail by Ngarrang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The computers, that is. They are cheap and easy to fix.

    I have my company running on refurbished GX260, GX270 and GX280 models. I have the occasional fan failure, but no motherboard failures with PCs that are on 24x5, and some 24x7 out on the factory floor. If it fails, I put the HD into another one. We paid $200 each, or less. I got 'em stacked up in the corner like cord wood. Easy to fix, easy to swap parts. I can put a HD into any of the 3 models since they share a common chipset and XP runs just fine.

    P4-2.4GHz or faster, 2GB RAM...pretty much all a normal business user needs.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
    1. Re:Let 'em fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2GB ought to be enough for anyone.

    2. Re:Let 'em fail by owlstead · · Score: 1

      "P4-2.4GHz or faster, 2GB RAM...pretty much all a normal business user needs."

      Except for a highly airco...

    3. Re:Let 'em fail by owlstead · · Score: 1

      A high efficiency airo...sorry about that, it's over 30 degrees here and I'm not that heat resistant.

  53. Made in China by wooden+pickle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not that this is some kind of deep insight only apparent to me, but it's no coincidence that Dell's reputation as a supplier of a quality product has faded as they've moved more and more of their R&D work overseas (and I use the term R&D loosely here). Back in the 90s when Dell was a quality machine, they had quality people designing them. It was a good job, and everyone I went to school with was excited about the prospect of working there. So, they could pick the best and the brightest. Today, they just pick the cheapest. They know their engineers overseas aren't as good. They just don't care. Dell doesn't even do a lot of their own R&D. They contract a lot of it out to Foxconn. A friend of mine was "sold" to Foxconn when he was due for a promotion. He sits in the exact same cube, but doesn't have access to the Dell gym. He went without software for several weeks because Foxconn didn't get him licenses right away. Turns out the last Dell laptop I bought (Inspiron 1720) wasn't designed by Dell. Someone else did the R&D work (I assume Foxconn), and Dell slapped their name on it. And yes, that model has a quality issue with the GPU detaching from the motherboard. Contrast that with Apple... Yeah, they manufacture stuff overseas. But, as far as I can tell, they still do their R&D work in the US. Most engineers I know would love to work for them. They make a good product. They charge more for it, but people pay it. Maybe Dell should think about that. Bring your R&D back here and start caring about quality from the beginning. If that makes your stuff more expensive, I'd like to think people will be receptive when they know you make a good product. Heck, I even wonder if it would be economical to put manufacturing in a less affluent part of the US (West Texas, deep South, etc). You'd get to market your stuff as made/assembled in the US, you'd save on freight, and you wouldn't have to pay the workers that much (in US terms) to give them a decent standard of living. I'm no bean counter, but I've got to think the tradeoffs there aren't all that crazy.

    1. Re:Made in China by Bangalorean · · Score: 1

      Talk is cheap - vote with your wallets (if you can). Don't buy Dell, stick to Apple and other companies that 'keep the R&D in the US'. Let's see.

  54. DELL still digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "AIT was using the OptiPlex systems as servers, a use for which they weren't designed." - Dell spokeshole.

    Time for Dell to stop digging and take their own advice to Apple; fold and give the money back to the investors.

  55. Well, there's a reason for most Dell quality probs by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    I've purchased two Dell laptops, and both of them have had issues.

    However, they have both been relatively low-end models, and the issues have been minor. I suspect they take a lot of shortcuts to get the price down, so I'm not really outraged about it ... the lesson is just not to buy cheap crap :)

    My tower at work is a Dell Optiplex running Vista - *VISTA* - and it hasn't had any issues at all.

  56. Dell computers were always crap by gig · · Score: 1

    I have no idea why anyone is surprised that Dell makes bad computers. They are the ultimate commoditizer. Adding Linux to a Dell made it *more* expensive. Botnet-free? Costs extra.

  57. you get what you pay for by archangel9 · · Score: 1

    In probably 2002 I had a late-night call on a SCSI controller for our DB server. The support alone was probably $3K. I called Platinum Support and immediately got Randy (yes, I still remember the name) who was a down home Texas boy. He was really knowledgeable, funny, and did the entire call with a dip in his mouth (so I naturally joined him). I had to call back a few more times for other stuff on the same support contract over the next few months and got Randy 4/5 times. I miss those days.

  58. Too bad . . . by CG_Man · · Score: 0

    I bought a "PC's Limited" machine (80286 / 8MHz) from Mr. Dell back in mid 80's. That machine served me well for quite a while - I learned a great deal from it. I wonder if Dell wishes he were back in the good ol' days putting his machines together personally and without all of the problems that come from going corporate. Sad to see it come to this.

  59. Wait, what? by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't be a fucking moron and write shit that isn't true.

    [looks at slashdot user ID] Yeah, you're new here.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Wait, what? by mortonda · · Score: 4, Funny

      [looks at slashdot user ID] Yeah, you're new here.

      you all look the same to me...

    2. Re:Wait, what? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That'll be your eyesight going, grandpa.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Wait, what? by chrish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hush, noob.

      --
      - chrish
    4. Re:Wait, what? by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      God dammit, everybody pipe down. I'm trying to take a nap.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  60. Ok, name another... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Now you're assuming Apple cares about any product more than 2 years old.

    What other cell platforms are getting significant updates after two years?

    The original iPhone got all the way up to 3.1.3, which is pretty good still and will run most applications for a while.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Ok, name another... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now you're assuming Apple cares about any product more than 2 years old.

      What other cell platforms are getting significant updates after two years?

      The difference is that Apple just posted 65 critical patches to iOS, half of which allow arbitrary code execution. So you're not getting those now-published and officially acknowledged holes.

      And Apple holds your actions illegal if you attempt to fix them yourself.

      So it's not just the open publishing of security patches that won't be fixed for old phones, but legally prohibiting the owner from fixing those patches on their own.

      Yeah, they won't support it, and legally restrict you from supporting yourself!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:Ok, name another... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      The difference is that Apple just posted 65 critical patches to iOS, half of which allow arbitrary code execution.

      So what? What would this arbitrary code execution do? Every app is in a sandbox. You break out of an app to run arbitrary code, and there's not much you can do.

      Or you can just jailbreak and fix the system that way, if for some reason it really mattered.

      And Apple holds your actions illegal if you attempt to fix them yourself.

      That old canard? After millions of people have jailbroken devices and never a single person affected by this "law" you just made up, you think people like you would no better than to make such fools of yourselves with THAT argument.

      Apple can say what they like but when it comes down to it existing law side squarely on consumers being able to modify devices they own.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Ok, name another... by FrkyD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that until the iPhone came out no phones were supporting easily applied updates for the users. My HTC TyTn was delivered with buggy software that would let the phone radio crash without any kind of notice for the user, and a bluetooth stack that couldn't deliver what was promised.

      If it weren't for a group of dedicated hackers at xda-developers and jumping through a lot of hoops I would have been stuck with that system until my provider decided to push through an upgrade. Something that never happened.

      Sony Ericson phones used to require a special cable to change the firmware, and none of the other phones I have had allowed any kind of user software upgrade. The high expectations you have for support only exist because apple changed the way things were done.

    4. Re:Ok, name another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm not mistaken, they are charging all owners of iPo touches for those critical security updates.

    5. Re:Ok, name another... by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Yeah double plus on this comment. It's interesting also that Microsoft at first threatened to shut down XDA's work in this area on the grounds that it was copyright violation, and they realized that this crew was basically an outside engineering force developing solutions and supporting customers for them.

      I wonder if any of the radio and OS work that's happened in XDA has ever made it back into MS core?

  61. They're all rotten, then by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then I guess they're all rotten.

    Dell: Numerous examples. I have one of them, the otherwise excellent XPS M1330 that has a defective nVidia 8400M GPU.

    Apple: Numerous examples (including right now - iphone). The various iBook motherboard defects also come to mind.

    nVidia: The afore-mentioned 8400M remained in production long after nVidia discovered the defect. They kept the defect secret for as long as possible, then when forced to admit it continued selling the faulty part without any warning for users and refused to talk about any arrangements they might've made with individual OEMs for RMA/warranty.

    Acer: Frequently sells shoddy hardware and yells "la la la la" loudly when told about it. I have one of those, too, an Acer laptop with a fairly powerful GPU and a cooling subsystem for a basic one, so if you actually use it the GPU overheats and the machine crashes.

    Hell, the list is basically endless. Everyone does it, because the consequences are small compared to the profits. Unless that changes, it'll keep on happening, too.

  62. What about HP? by Yaos · · Score: 0

    None of their products work correctly. Have you ever tried to use an HP printer?

  63. Dell is responsive to customer issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are getting this all wrong, according to Dell,

    "The AIT lawsuit does not involve any current Dell products. Dell is responsive to customer issues and we continue to remain focused on our customers, their needs, and our growing record of superior customer service," Frink wrote.

    Ref.: http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-industry-standard/dell-knowingly-sold-faulty-pcs-711 The bold emphasis is mine, of course.

    In fact, just a few months ago (in December) I ordered (online) a computer from Dell that was supposed to come with a free promotional external hard drive. After I ordered it I noticed that the invoice appeared to have a charge on it for a HDD, so I phoned customer service who told me that I shouldn't worry because my HDD was already shipped. After calling again I was told that Dell is not giving away HDD's (though their Web site said otherwise). I called Dell customer service a few more times, most of the time the customer service representative said she would phone me back with more information, but they never did. I finally asked one customer representative that I wanted to talk to her manager, but I was told that I was not allowed to talk to a manager or a supervisor, so then I sent various emails stating that I would sue the company and tell the Better Business Bureau about them (the BBB already had lots of complaints about Dell when I checked their Web site, after the problems occurred). At least one time a Dell representative hung up on me (I was not be rude or aggressive, but just asked a question that they refused to answer, which was "When would I get my refund back?". [I had already canceled my order by this time [the day after I ordered it], but they said they would still ship the product anyways]). The credit card company also stated that they wouldn't give me a charge back because they could be sued by Dell. The CC company claimed that because they don't have any proof of wrong-doing on Dell's part (it was just my word versus Dell's word), they would side with Dell.

    So after a few days and lots of (legal) threats, Dell finally canceled my order with no processing fees. This goes to show you that you can deal with Dell, and get what you want. Like that say, "Dell is responsive to customer issues...". Which is true, Dell did respond to me as a customer, for which I thank them.

  64. What should be done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If I was the CEO of Dell I would sell it off and give the money back to the shareholders.

    Sincerely

    Steve Jobs

  65. Time for a change by helix2301 · · Score: 0

    After years of working with PC's all company's have there flaws but Apple seemed pretty stable my next computer I was thinking Imac but after hearing about the Iphone I am worried about Apples quality control now.

  66. Delusion IS deceit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's face it, all corporations are deceitful sacks of s**t.

    /me looks into future and see's that sgage.inc has made millions with it's new slogan, "I'm better than they are".

  67. Wait. Stop, Hold up a minute. by DoninIN · · Score: 1

    Don't almost all these PCs come with MS windows installed on them? Come on.. /. I can't believe you're not all over that thing! (Posted from my trusty Dell, running windows XP instead of Linux, 'cause I didn't reboot after playing some game that still won't work on Linux, given the amount of time I'm willing to spend on making it work.

  68. My company just left from Dell for quality by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1
    The GX270 was such a problem for us that a year ago we switched to Hewlett Packard -- which I'm not convinced is particularly better. However, since we buy 3000 desktops/laptops a year, maybe they'll notice and do something about their quality.

    In other news, I'm now the proud owner of two free ex-corporate GX270's. Turns out lots of people sell refurb kits for about $20USD that include all the bad caps. They're very obvious: they're the ones that are all puffed up and bleeding brown snot out of the tops. There are two that are hard to replace because of soldering iron clearance issues with a heatsink that's basically riveted to the board, but a 60W soldering iron will solve that problem if you're careful.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  69. Dell really are worse than most by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    While other manufacturers hardly have a spotless record (I'm looking at you, Sony, Acer and Gateway) Dell has been well below average for years now. For those of you that got a Dell and never had any problems with it, congratulations. But just like how it being cold where you are today doesn't mean global warming isn't real, just because your one PC didn't have any problems doesn't mean Dell's quality control has been shit for coming on 10 years.

    But somehow, when it comes to management, Dell is Teflon coated. I wish this was the death knell for Dell, but it just isn't going to be.

    1. Re:Dell really are worse than most by Auntie+Virus · · Score: 1

      Wow. All I can say is WTF? I don't want to come off as a Dell fanboi, but I've been at my company for 7 years, and we've been Dell for the whole time. Servers, switches, notebooks and a few desktops, and VERY few problems. When we do have problems, service and support have been very good. Compared to Compaq/HP at other companies I deal with which are a horror show. I'm typing this on a Latitude D810 that was 3 years on the job at the company, and a few more here at home. We DID have 3 desktops that had bad capacitors, and Dell replaced the motherboards AFTER the warranty expired. Now maybe Dell Canada has better service than the U.S. but we've always been happy.

      --
      Why yes, I *AM* new here. Why?
  70. Capacitor Plague by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague

  71. This sounds a lot like the xbox 360 mess and cover by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like the xbox 360 mess and coverup at first.

  72. I experiences the rot about 3 years ago by sribe · · Score: 1

    Only a rotten company sells defective computers and lies about it.

    And, likewise, only a rotten company sells RAM upgrades with a lifetime warranty, then lies about the warranty, then lies about the replacement inventory, then lies about the refund. True story--and I don't need to post anonymously because I have the recordings to prove it all ;-)

  73. best cover letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i agree..Dell wouldn't be as big as it is now if they sell defective products..they should also consider on how the customer handled their products after they bought it..

    Want to get that interview for your dream job with good benefits and nice salary. This will get it for you.
    amazing cover letters | best cover letter

  74. Re:-shrug- still got a dell at work... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Now my mac book pro, 2 years old, the last generation before they got gay.

    Uh... hate to break it to you, slick, but just like soccer... macs have always been gay.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  75. saw it coming by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

    I hate to say I told you so, but for the better part of a decade I've been saying how people should stay as far away from Dell as humanly possible.

  76. "Michael should just liquidate Dell... by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

    ...and return the money to the stockholders."

    Said Steve Jobs today, barely able to keep a straight face at the plight of Michael Dell and Dell, Inc.

    --
    Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
  77. HP did the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP did the same thing with tons of laptops with defective motherboard melting graphics cards built in. Yeah it was Nvidia's fault originally but every laptop manufacturer offered an extended warranty for the thing except HP. Dell even replaced those affected for free. HP tried to pass off a firmware upgrade that increased the fan speed as a fix, when all this did was keep the laptop running long enough to go out of warranty. They replaced some but mostly, if you're not in the US, you're SOL. I'm typing this from a TX2000 that has its wifi burned out and is probably going to be destroyed completely by this fault eventually. HP won't replace it. They knew this was an issue and continued to sell it too.

    1. Re:HP did the same thing by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      I have a HP 6735s notebook that is just for general use and I got as a staff discount because my missus works there.

      The moment I got it I erased Windows and stuck 64-bit Gentoo Linux on it but it occasionally has a problem where the BIOS simply does not detect the wireless card on boot so Linux boots without it being active. I went onto HP's forums, it's a known problem but they have done nothing about it in about 18 months.

      There is a workaround that usually works - either remove the power and battery completely for a few seconds, or there's something you can "echo" into /proc in Linux that also fixes it sometimes.

      But it's disgusting that they won't fix it.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  78. ODM Fault? by nukem996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for a very large American computer company and while everyone thinks we build machines we don't. We don't even really design it. We goto the ODM(Original design manufacturer) with an idea, spec out the parts, help design the case and they put the thing together. Their the ones that really control the quality of the board and most of the parts. Even when we do come to them with certain parts we want(CPU, GPU, etc) they end up making the decision on everything else(SATA controller, audio card, etc). There are a number of ODMs(Foxcon, Miatec, and a bunch more I forgot the names of) their all competing for the lowest price so the company(Dell, HP, Apple) can sell it to you at the best price. The part that always amuses me is that the ODMs are the ones building the machines for everyone. So a Dell, HP, Apple, all can be built by the came company with the same parts the only difference is the case. That being said the company can control the quality of the parts but that means price goes but which makes customers goto cheaper competitors.

    1. Re:ODM Fault? by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work for a very large American computer company and while everyone thinks we build machines we don't. We don't even really design it.

      Start looking for another job. Soon, your company will be replaced by a brand from India or China. Take a look at these laptops from Hanbo. US$100 to $288, delivered to the US. Order 500, and they'll put your logo on them. You too can be a "computer manufacturer". Who needs a US false front?

    2. Re:ODM Fault? by NetServices · · Score: 1

      And every ODM is over seas.

  79. The Fall of Dell? Really?? Speak for yourselves! by Bangalorean · · Score: 1

    Might have 'fallen' in the US - in India, Dell is still the most popular and largest selling brand, although HP is catching up. Dell hardware is moderately priced, of good quality and has excellent on-site warranty.

  80. Evil capitalists! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people claiming that companies didn't used to operate this way, that we're witnessing the decline of corporate American and capitalism in general. When hasn't business been conducted this way? There have been guys selling radioactive tonics as panaceas. Automakers have covered up the fact that their cars exploded in an accident. I'm sure at some point in history some unscrupulous individual has tried passing off sickly cattle as healthy. This is not a failing of capitalism. This is a failing of humanity. There have always been and probably will always be people trying to take advantage of other people. I'm not making excuses, simply pointing out reality.

  81. hmm i wonder by orthicviper · · Score: 1

    Dell must have saw this coming, so it's not really a mistake on their part. They're just serving the investors who want short-term profit, and giving the shaft to any investor that hoped to make long-term gains with Dell.

  82. Re:-shrug- still got a dell at work... by 21mhz · · Score: 1

    Um, soccer is perceived as gay in the US?

    Yeah, to think of it, compared to a game full of guys in kinky garb emphasizing their muscular prowess and tight shorts, making intense physical contact with each other...

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  83. what fall? - we're quite satisfied with Dell by darkeye · · Score: 1

    what 'fall' is this article talking about? seriously?

    we're using Dells at our SME, and we don't really have problems with them. in 4.5 years, there was only one PC that had an minor issue, and that was fixed in our office by the Dell support technician, within a few days. all the machines still run, despite some of them being 4+ years old.

    this article just doesn't make sense..

  84. Re:-shrug- still got a dell at work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, 95% of the world (6 billion - 300 million americans) is gay (talking about soccer).

  85. You want to see how shocking DELL are? by RobWalker · · Score: 1

    Read the following threads and petition about their stance on upgrading early SSD customers to TRIM:
    http://en.community.dell.com/forums/t/19310219.aspx
    (one of the most active threads on their forums - and totally ignored by DELL)

    http://www.petitiononline.com/dellssd/
    (170 signers to date - that's a lot of unhappy users)

    http://en.community.dell.com/support-forums/desktop/f/3514/t/19332633.aspx
    (a truly jaw dropping example of DELL's arrogance and ignorance where they try and justify not providing TRIM support to SSD users)

    It's hard to fathom that a supposed IT company can blindly ignore the importance of a major feature like SSD Trim to people who ordered early. By definition, SSD buyers are the top end of their customers, so it's not smart to ignore their needs.
    I know of several companies (ours included) who took DELL off the supplier list because of this. If you check the petition you'll see Boeing on there too. I doubt any company can afford to lose them as a customer. I'll personally never buy or recommend DELL again after this either. -- Rob

  86. If they put their name on the products... by opus_magnum · · Score: 1

    ...it's also their responsability.

  87. Re:-shrug- still got a dell at work... by ooji · · Score: 0

    Is 'gay' a synonym for 'good' now then? I'd prefer that. It sits better with me than all this juvenile homophobia.

  88. Re:He should just dismantle the company and give t by blake182 · · Score: 1

    He should just dismantle the company and give the proceeds back to the shareholders.

    It's interesting that more people moderated this insightful than moderated it funny.

  89. Oh, now, please. by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thank you for all the helpful citations and examples. Oh, wait, you don't give a single one, you stereotypical, paranoid fruit loop.

    Are you familiar with the website "Google"? It's really kind of neat. For instance, watch this:

    Google: "Money confiscated"

    Very first result:

    Headline: Federal Appeals Court: Driving With Money is a Crime
    Lede: Eighth Circuit Appeals Court ruling says police may seize cash from motorists even in the absence of any evidence that a crime has been committed.
    Link: http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/12/1296.asp

    Isn't that awesome the way that works? You just type in the thing you want a reference for, and there it is. Tech is cool, eh? Also, I assure you that the other matters I referred to... references are just as easily located.

    So... if you really wanted those answers, they're right there to be found. Or, you could have asked politely (or even tersely, such as "Cite?") Instead, you wasted time calling me names. Interesting approach. Not likely to get you want you ask for in the general case, just so you know. I just did it to show what an idiot you are, considering that you took the time to call me unjustified names.

    Next time think first, type second. Like "Why would he write that..." google... "oh." Or just ask politely. Then you won't have your butt handed to you so neatly packaged.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  90. Re:He should just dismantle the company and give t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insightful? More like funny.

    "What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders". Michael Dell, 1997, on what he'd do to maximise Apple shareholder value.

    http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/08/flashback-10-years-ago-michael-dells-throwdown/

  91. And Dell said ..... by darkonc · · Score: 1
    The Infoworld article quotes from a Dell rep. (David Frink) who apparently called in to get a response on record. The response in question is standard PR pablum. Factual, but meaningless. Let's take Frink's apart a sentence at a time:

    The implication that this situation affects Dell currently is incorrect.

    Effectively true. It's not the 5-year old optiplex problem that currently affects Dell, its the (apparent) fact that the mindset that caused the problem persists that currently affects Dell.

    The AIT lawsuit is three years old, and the Nichicon capacitors were used by Dell suppliers at certain times from 2003 to 2005.

    True. Unfortunately, Dell has now gone 3 years without resolving the issue with their (former) customer.

    We actively investigated the failures, audited the Nichicon plants and worked directly with customers to fix OptiPlex computers on a case-by-case basis.

    True, true and ... well, true. On the last of those three points, some OptiPlex customers got good results and others got the runaround. As he said, "On a case-by-case basis.".

    And Dell extended the warranties on all OptiPlex motherboards to January 2008 in order to address the Nichicon capacitor problem.

    OK. I'll believe that -- but Dell didn't announce the fact, they probably just hoped that customers would junk their dead machines and buy new ones (hopefully Dells).

    The AIT lawsuit does not involve any current Dell products.

    Again, true.

    Frink added, "AIT was using the OptiPlex systems as servers, a use for which they weren't designed." (Dell's website has a fuller statement.)

    Plausible... Probably true... Note that this is actually the first new information in the entire statement. Everything else that he said is information available from the original Infoworld article. Even the inference that the Capicitor problem is long past.

    But, in any event this is (once again) useless information. Server boxes are (usually) designed to be more robust because it tends to be much more traumatic when they fail in their designed lifetime -- but the truth of the matter is that its not uncommon to see situations where the Desktops have a more robust service (especially in terms of CPU usage) than servers do. If you don't mind the occasional failute, then there's really no big problem using a 'desktop' for 'server' applications. There are two big differences between servers and desktops:

    • Nobody cares if the server fans are noisy, so designers can err on the side of air vs. silence. This makes heat death that much less likely
    • When a desktop dies, the user waits for it to be replaced (in many cases, using a spare machine to do their work while they're waiting). When a server dies, the whole company or division can grind to a halt until the problem is fixed.

    (OK: Maybe just one).

    Thing is, even though the OptiPlex isn't designed as a server, stats say that they were almost certain to die no matter what AIT did with it. I don't care what use a machine is designed for, a 97% death rate is still unacceptable.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  92. Not really true by theolein · · Score: 1

    Back in 2003, the company I was working for bought 20 Dell Optiplexes. Of those 3 were DoA. It took Unisys, the company that Dell outsources support to here in Switzerland, 3 months to finally get the last one working. If Switzerland had laws like in the states where law suits can be the number 2 in 1)Buy Dell, 2)???, 3)Profit, we would have made a killing. The quality of the machines was truly terrible and even the German speaking support (Dell had/has a German speaking support center in Ireland) were just the usual read-the-support-script kind of people. Never again.

  93. Service issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience, Dell is trying to minimize their service costs in very peculiar way. (I am talking about enterprise level support)

    When service call is made to HP, some brief questions are asked and service person arrives soon to investigate the situation further. Usually he has the most likely spare parts with him already, and the server is back up and running with only small downtime. If further components are needed, the service person orders them and makes another visit when the parts have arrived.

    Dell, on other hand, uses the customer to make part of the diagnosis. They haven't ever checked if I am aware about ESD protection or if I can tell CPU apart from PSU - they are risking more damage here. Service persons apparently have to order parts one by one, and all "advanced" diagnosis is done on "high level specialists" somewhere up in the support organization. So far this has meant long downtimes, large number of support visits and many unneeded spare part deliveries. When the effect of long downtime is counted as lost work hours, slightly cheaper Dell hardware seems suddenly very expensive in comparison to other suppliers.

    How do other big manufacturers deal with their service calls? (IBM, Sun^H^H^HOracle, etc?)

  94. Give a whole new meaning to: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude! You're getting a Dell!

    "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

  95. The "E" In Dell by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Is this why the "E" in a Dell logo is at a 45 degree angle, like the "E" in the Enron logo?

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  96. My recent dealings w/ Dell by mprindle · · Score: 1

    I'm a part of a world wide organization that uses Dell machines exclusively. On the whole most of there machines we have very few problems with but there are series of machines that have major issues. Take the Precision 380 and 390 desktop machines. They have corrosion issues due to the motherboards not being coated like in past revs. This has been corrected in the T series machines, but that doesn't stop the fact we have had a ton of these machines die on a regular basis due to this known issue. Also, we have also seen a trend in the PowerEdge 28xx machines that have sticks of memory being reported as bad. I can count 7 servers at one location alone we service that has had at least one stick of memory replaced and several have had two or more replaced. The old PE 26xx and the newer 29xx series haven't had the same issues.

    The next think that really pisses me off is Dell's Warranty Parts Direct now called Dell Online Self Dispatch. We pay dell for each tech that works on machines. This last month when we renewed they had upped the price of the program by $20 per tech and they have removed all phone numbers for us to call them. This includes administrative work like renewals and account issues. Now you can chat with a person, which takes forever, or you can put a request for them to call you back. This also stinks, because as soon as I get up from my desk to leave for a customer site they are going to call.

    So while I don't totally agree with the quality issues, while they are there, it really irks me that I can no longer call and talk to a person on the phone. There are times when chat just doesn't cut it. If Dell doesn't start taking there customers, home and business, they are going to go the way of so many other companies that thought they could treat there customers like crap and they would take it.

  97. Wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If I'm not mistaken, they are charging all owners of iPo touches for those critical security updates.

    You are mistaken, since Apple dropped the accounting rules that required them to charge for updates. 4.0 for free for Touch users.

    Classic Apple Hater syndrome, more than a year behind reality.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  98. not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell is not going away, and no, sorry, this isn't going to 'ruin' them. They are just as rotten as any other capitalist and what's going to happen is Dell will reinforce their warranty strategy and it will be biz as usual. nobody in business really cares if you're a crook or not as long as they are getting their money.

  99. There are a lot of rotten companies then by Benfea · · Score: 1

    A while back I excitedly jumped on the LGA1366 bandwagon. I bought a motherboard from MSI that was close to $300 because I had good experiences with MSI boards in the past. This particular board turned out to have a manufacturing flaw that resulted in one of the motherboard chips overheating due to a bad choice in either what thermal grease was used or in how it was applied. MSI's response to the resulting outcry? "It's fine because the temps are still below 100 degrees C." Then they mysteriously pulled the product from the shelves.

  100. What about all the Dell laptop video card defects! by doesthisdefineme · · Score: 1

    We have had NUMEROUS Inspiron 9300 and E1705's that have had the video card fail due to overheating. I have called Dell on all of them and they have REFUSED to admit there is any known problem with them, I told each rep I spoke with to google 'Dell laptop video card defect problem', and even after that they still refused to admit any problem. We had another 9300 go out this week, and now Dell admits that they recognize a problem with the nVidia video cards. We have an ATI card in this system (and other systems have had ATI's as well) and ALL experience the problem. On top of this, they stated without a warranty, even with a known defect, they will not replace the part. They completely LIE about a defect they full-well know about, and every level of support and even customer care refuses to do anything about it. When I explained that the phone call is recorded and will be promptly posted on Youtube to become the next Dell Viral Video, they magically changed their mind and overnighted a box to us to send the laptop back to them for a 'one time courtesy out-of-warranty repair'. UNBELIEVABLE!!! I can't even imagine how many people out there have suffered this problem and were ignored by Dell, causing thousands of dollars in loss to each customer who purchased these laptops. Widespread defects like these should be exempt from the system needing to be under warranty. Selling defective equipment and then refusing to fix it (regardless of warranty) is outright FRAUD and they should be held accountable for each one of them. They should be fixing each laptop and reimbursing every customer that was pushed away when they called about these problems. Who's ready to jump on board with a class action suit and force Dell to take responsibility for their actions??? I am 100% serious; let's do this!

  101. Ignominious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ignominous #corrections

  102. It doesn't look like a fall to me. by Lythrdskynrd · · Score: 1
    http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=DELL+Interactive#chart2:symbol=dell;range=19880817,20100628;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on

    Sure it's a bit down - but considering the economy, it's not so much a "FALL" as a need to spend a few bucks on marketing.

    Remember, the *vast majority* don't read computer news. Mom and Pop will still buy Dells for their sons and daughters when they go off to uni. CTOs of fortune 500's will still buy DELL because of their price for volume... a few broken bits here and there won't matter because, as opposed to you and me, fortune 500's actually get pretty good service.

    Don't kid yourself. Dell will be fine.

  103. dell partner program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my beef with dell is that they are not channel friendly, having signed up as a re-seller of their product i seem to be in a battle with their inside sales team. dell inside sales often quote prices to end user as deeply discounted as they offer me and that leaves me no room for a margin and still remain competitive.

    that along with the fact that they turned down my deal registration by stating that a deal of that size / volume is meant for inside sales and not a re-seller to handle.

    since then i have decided to boycott the company and their products.

  104. It's very simple. by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

    Dell had a culture that only cared about short-term stock price. Only. No decisions were ever made in the long term, and they rocketed to the bottom in a blaze of corruption. Every company meeting was like an ad for the lottery. If we can just make this number, you'll be rich like the cleaning lady who's actually a millionaire! It's no surprise that they often did things that were ridiculously short-sighted. They were only ever hoping to beat out a quarter. The quarter after that was never a concern. Replace defective motherboards with defective motherboards? That's a great solution as long as they won't blow up again until next quarter.

    I worked there in 1996, and I'm just shocked it took as long as it did.

  105. More fuel by NotASaint · · Score: 1

    I used to be a steadfast Windows platform supporter. What better gaming platform is there? :p Before Dell acquired AlienWare I purchased one of their systems that worked extremely well for a good long time. After Dell acquired them I purchased another system. It had issues from day one and the quality of AlienWare's support managed to match the quality of the system. When you purchase a desktop replacement system to specifically run games you expect it will actually run games... Not the case this time I'm afraid. Feel free to read here for my trials and tribulations regarding Dell/AlienWare: http://notasaintinca.blogspot.com/2007/06/review-alienware-aurora-m9700.html As far as Apple comparisons go, I have to say that I am a big time fan of the engineering that goes into their systems. The MacBook Pro that I purchased after dealing with the AlienWare issues has been amazing at running both my MacOS as well as Windows XP under my Bootcamp partition. My games run smoother and faster than ever and Windows has been more stable than on any other machine I've ever owned...and that's been a LOT. So, am I an Apple Fanboy? You betcha!! "F" Dell/AlienWare!!

  106. DELL are just the delivery people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DELL: a one product company, while the desktop computer is rapidly going out of fashion, while the rest of the world move to other devices. After all, they're just Microsoft's delivery people.

    "take the wsj for example. you ship via delivery people, they are your oems. you have dominant share of the daily news market. what if the delivery people could substitute someone's else's front page for your own and further more what if it was not even clear that it wasn't the wsj?"

  107. Not a hater, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I worked for 2 different companies, they had nothing but dells. One of these companies was in the 2003-2005 era, the other was still using P4 systems in 2008 era.

    Did they fail? Yes. Sometimes. However much of it can be attributed to the crapware/spyware the business loaded onto it (oh god when Norton Antivirus started running, these things slowed to a god damned crawl.)

    Now on the other hand, a company that I provide service for, owns half a dozen identical Dell's in a data center, P3 era. These machines were pre-owned too, so that puts them around 1998-1999 when purchased, but they only started seriously failing in 2009-2010. The hard drives started suffering mechanical failure. 18GB SCSI drives. 10+ years is a long time. However the onboard IDE controllers on these are are useless (ATA33) and getting replacement SCSI drives are hopeless (hundreds of dollars for replacement 18GB's fuck no.)

    Despite that we ordered 2 pre-owned dells again (from 2008+ era) to twin a set of machines that were from a local mom+pop. They're working just fine.

    The moral of the story is that you can buy good equipment that lasts a long time, or you can buy cheap equipment you have to replace more frequently. When you put those numbers on paper you'll discover that the cheapest strategy isn't always the best one (more downtime, more repairs, more customer service.)

    The bad caps issue is one of those non-issues now, but a big deal then because ALL the companies were using the cheapest caps they can find. Sony, Apple, Dell, Asus, MSI, Biostar, Gigabyte, Foxconn, etc, all of them. It affected everyone. It seems that Dell's serious failure was trying to hide the fact that these systems were defective. Asus and Gigabyte just revised all their boards and now advertise "solid state caps" on the boxes. What the hell did Dell do? It seems like they kept using the boards once known as defective.

    The bad caps were because of counterfeit caps being made from IP theft and corporate espionage on a part of the company who made the caps electrolyte.

  108. "I'd shut it down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and give the money back to the shareholders"

    - Michael Dell

  109. We had this happen in my lab by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

    When I was in grad school, we purchased a big lot of those Optiplexes at one point. Several years later, we had mysterious lockups and reboots. Opening the cases revealed pretty much all of the capacitors leaking. They were out of warranty (fair) and Dell informed us there was no way to get replacement motherboards (proprietary, yay). Of course, this also happened to me on an otherwise-nice ASUS motherboard. I'm glad solid-state capacitors were used on my current motherboard.

    --
    Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    1. Re:We had this happen in my lab by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Sounds VERY similar to my Dell experience.
      I got DELLED.

  110. Having worked inside Dell's system, I can tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having worked inside Dell's system, I can tell you why their quality tanked...

    First off let me say that I was the Global Quality Assurance Manager for 12 years for a major supplier to Dell.

    I rode the quality rollercoaster up and then down.

    In the late 90's Dell worked pretty hard on quality then once they made their name, they cared more about squeezing pennies out.

    The Problem stems from the fact that when a issue comes up, it was/is(?) Dell's policy to blame the supplier outright, start hammering the supplier and lie about the issue regarding other suppliers and then continue to push for price cuts. MANY times we would have an issue and Dell's QA people would beat us up in meetings screaming that the issue was our fault and we were the only supplier affected and we had better fix it now, only to later find out that it was a motherboard issue and it affected ALL suppliers of this component. The QA people wouldn't raise a finger to help solve the problem, just blame us and put pressure on us to fix it without giving us enough information. Heck, the main QA guy I dealt with for years was a technical dunce but had been put there by favoritism.

    Then when ol Mikey decided to shave some more pennies off by sending EVERYTHING to China (e.g. the design) quality took another nose-dive. Here's a fact: THE CHINESE DON'T CARE!!!!! They will run a company, produce crap then shut it down only to reopen later with a new name and the same crap. THEY DON'T CARE!!!!

    I could go on but let me say this, Dell is getting what it deserves.

  111. Damn Yanks! by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tomato/tomahto.

    Surely you mean Tomayto/tomato. :-P

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  112. Re:-shrug- still got a dell at work... by smisle · · Score: 1

    ha! ... if only I had mod points

    --
    I'm not a bird, I'm a super-advanced flying stealth dinosaur!
  113. Talk about paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about paranoid! Just walk around any college campus and stop to talk with 1 out of 10 people using a laptop (that WILL BE an apple). They are all fanatical. How else could you rationalize buying an apple? Any one of those 1/10 people I mentioned would go out of their way to irrationally defend apple products.

  114. A little story, folks... by Stone2065 · · Score: 1

    Several years ago (around 2006 or 2007 seems like) I was working in a Dell warehouse in the western USA. (Yes, I'm being vague. I was security there, and don't really want the lawsuit if this can be traced back to me. Bear with me.) Now, all we dealt with were laptops, and "portable electronics", and printers and monitors. Never made sense to me that the same place an order would come in for a laptop would have a monitor too, but who am I to say anything? ANYHOW, the laptops would come in on large sheets. Now a normal semi trailer would have up to 5 of these sheets in them, loaded to the ceiling, and wrapped in layers of blue and clear plastic. ALL of the Dell laptops at the time came from Malaysia, period. No where else. So, we get a load in one day, and the workers start peeling these layers of plastic like usual. The laptops were packed in the Styrofoam shells, but no other packaging, all that was done there at the warehouse. When the last layer came off, it was discovered that all of these Styrofoam shells (which yes, were just packaging, and in no way were waterproof) were SOAKED. Seems like there was a rainstorm, or monsoon or some such over there while they were loading these on the boat, and they were wrapped during the storm. I SAW a laptop Styrofoam shell picked up off the stack, and tipped over and watched water POUR out of it. Know what Dell did? First thing was to call the bigwigs. It was decided to drain one, and let it dry for a few hours. After it appeared to be dry, they would turn it on. If it booted, they were to ship the lot. Early that afternoon, they turned on the "test" laptop, it fired up, and they shut it down, packed it up, and processed that flat of laptops like they had a conscious. By Dell? HELL NO, at least not the laptops...

    --
    Stone
  115. Re:The Fall of Dell? Really?? Speak for yourselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    excellent on-site warranty.

    Let me guess, phone support is probably local too. Must be nice to be able to understand what the hell they are saying.

  116. Re:The Fall of Dell? Really?? Speak for yourselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Must be nice to be able to understand what the hell they are saying"

    Yeah, we have no problems with understanding what they say. So we have the best of both worlds. Time you got used to it too - you'll need it.

  117. Re:The Fall of Dell? Really?? Speak for yourselves by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

    Good point. I'll go down to the Kwik-e-mart and practice.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  118. Oldie but a goodie.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I found that over the years the product quality was poorer as time went on with Dell comps, my last dell was an inspiron in 2000 for my studies, and it was a great machine, and yet still outperforms today's pcs. I doubt that a real laptop for today could be beaten by one from 10 years ago, but put a new dell laptop beside mine...and mine is just as fast (P3 with 512 mb ram and 60gb 7200 rpm drive)
    go figure, ...I am just glad that with that laptop, I realized I never would buy brand names again, they are too easy to build yourself, pc or laptop....you waste too much money for being able to call someone to have them run you through diagnostics you can do yourself when something breaks....