Slashdot Mirror


User: grappler

grappler's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
814
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 814

  1. Look bad in front of whom? (wow. he said 'whom') on Open Source Summit Report · · Score: 1

    The business world? We are not trying to impress the business world or make ourselves look more credible in their eyes. Even if that was the goal, we reached it long ago - businesses are tripping over each other to become 'Open source' friendly.
    Each other then? I would guess most /. people are not english or business majors, and don't put much stock in grammar as a way to judge another person, even if they do notice it (I do) and can write well themselves (I like to think that I can).
    One thing I haven't seen very often on /. compared to other forums is flawed logic as a result of a grammar error. Nerds tend to be careful about getting the intended meaning across. Notice the ranting recently about what double negatives mean (on the SMP thread) - they were debating whether negatives applied to a word are added to make a stronger negative or multiplied to cancel each other out. And programming syntax often finds it's way into subject headings. Meaning - the important part of any communication - is given top priority, and I like it that way.

    Just another difference between hackers and suits.

  2. Is 'obvious' obvious? on Salon Magazine on Hi-Tech Patents · · Score: 1

    Couldn't resist that title. Seriously, though, any patent that seems even halfway obvious shouldn't go through, and if it does, is should last only for a coulple years. It is SO frustrating to have to abandon work on something because the idea is patented, especially when it is not exactly a unique, brilliant flash of genius to begin with.

  3. Linus==group && RMS==individual on Wired on RMS · · Score: 1

    I don't think I need to explain my reasoning here. The two are about as extreme as they can get in this respect.

  4. You are not even a good liar on Microsoft claims Linux provides weak value · · Score: 1

    >You remind me of all those ms haters at work who use amipro...
    [SNIP]
    >I work for microsoft and Bill is expected

    Don't make me puke

  5. This isn't good for their case, that's for sure on Microsoft claims Linux provides weak value · · Score: 1

    It sure looks to me like he is saying, "NT is better than Linux because it has more market share."
    To put it another way, Microsoft is the smarter choice because it is a monopoly. No operating system could possibly be a better choice because Microsoft is a monopoly.
    Are they just giving up on the case and chasing Linux now, or what?

  6. Sousa on LinuxWorld Show Favorites · · Score: 1

    He was a marching band director. The pronounciation, I think, is almost exactly the same, not a rhyme.

  7. They brought back indulgences recently on The Internet Death Cult of Fun · · Score: 1

    There's a whole system that goes with it. A system with points and weightings for different offences and such. You can figure out whether you're going to heaven with a few calculations. It's really quite silly.

  8. Didn't know we were competing with them on European OSS Advantage? · · Score: 1

    Since when was it "Europeam" OSS vs. "American" OSS? Don't most of these projects tend to cross national borders?

  9. One less room in the house we need to visit on Another Wireless Book · · Score: 1

    As it stands right now, the rooms in the house we must use are the kitchen, the bathroom, and whatever room has the computer in it. We passed the point of being able to stay inside permanently long ago. With this new innovation we need only visit the kitchen and the bathroom. Let's hope it stays that way, because the next one to go would be the kitchen. Ugh.

  10. Pentium::Microchip -> Windows::Operating System on PIII - dead end technology? · · Score: 1

    For those of you familiar with the SAT notation for analogies. Big, bloated, inefficient, and loaded down with dubious 'features'.

  11. Phil Zimmerman drew the opposite conclusion on Privacy: Good Riddance? · · Score: 1

    from the same premise of the village. While you did know everyone in a village, he contended that to have a private conversation with someone you needed only to step out behind the barn and talk.

    So back then, there was more privacy, if you wanted it, and less if you didn't care. I personally don't give a crap who knows what salad dressing i bought, or, for that matter, the amount of all my monthly bills. This was all stuff that people in the friendly village could find out if they wanted to. But, like in the old days, its nice to know you can have a private conversation if you want. Otherwise its 1984.

    BTW, good choice of article Hemos. Inspires lots of good debate.

  12. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you... on Rumours · · Score: 1

    then they fight you, then you win.

    -Ghandi

    Only one step left, fellows.

  13. Oops. Shouldn'tuh bought MS on Quickielanch · · Score: 1

    what were they thinking

  14. So you /. the poor thing on World's Smallest Web Server · · Score: 1

    Are we trying to push the micro server to it's limit?