They are the same subject. I cannot be responsible for another person's perceptions of actions. I cannot offend you; if you are offended you choose to be offended. You have the responsibility bass ackwards.
The fact that you think it was a statement I made shows that you don't understand English well at all. A 6th grader would have known what the quotes indicate.
Nobody said that, and if you know anything about complexity you know that can't be done. It isn't even a software (only) problem. Take for example prisons. Despite all the effort making them secure, including outrageous spending on full time guards and other personnel people escape. Security isn't a product it is a product it is a process; humans will always be the weakest link.
You can't prove it correct due to Godel Incompleteness; You can only increase assurance. That's why it is called Software Quality Assurance, not Ensurance.
Nope. If I go to my site via HTTPS it says everything is great but if I go to the HTTP link which mod_redirects to the secure link it says my site is insecure.
Bullshit. The competent among us know how to produce GREAT software. The real problem is that very few people have what it takes to do it but a pervasive meme that anyone can do it has resulted in a situation where 90% of the people getting paid to develop software shouldn't be in the field at all.
"Nobody said that. Congratulations, you said something idiotic. I didn't get the point."
For the record, this is why you aren't qualified to pass an elementary school English test. When you don't understand the lesson you think it is because the teacher is an idiot.
I certainly hope English isn't yours, as "the" and "a" are not equivalent. "Is there a wake? Yes there is the wake." Oh, that would be idiotic wouldn't it. One would say yes there is *a* wake. Again, the way it was said doesn't introduce the idea that there is *a* wake. It assumes *the* wake. Good luck learning English!
Slashdot Mirror
Oh look, an AC pretending he is too stupid to know Linux isn't a company on Slashdot. I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
They are the same subject. I cannot be responsible for another person's perceptions of actions. I cannot offend you; if you are offended you choose to be offended. You have the responsibility bass ackwards.
You ended a sentence with a preposition. Dumbfuck.
The fact that you think it was a statement I made shows that you don't understand English well at all. A 6th grader would have known what the quotes indicate.
It's a process*
Nobody said that, and if you know anything about complexity you know that can't be done. It isn't even a software (only) problem. Take for example prisons. Despite all the effort making them secure, including outrageous spending on full time guards and other personnel people escape. Security isn't a product it is a product it is a process; humans will always be the weakest link.
Who do you suppose will create this magical OS that doesn't allow bugs and isn't written by programmers?
You can't prove it correct due to Godel Incompleteness; You can only increase assurance. That's why it is called Software Quality Assurance, not Ensurance.
Nope. If I go to my site via HTTPS it says everything is great but if I go to the HTTP link which mod_redirects to the secure link it says my site is insecure.
Bullshit. The competent among us know how to produce GREAT software. The real problem is that very few people have what it takes to do it but a pervasive meme that anyone can do it has resulted in a situation where 90% of the people getting paid to develop software shouldn't be in the field at all.
So when you look at a codebase written almost entirely in C and C++ most of the bugs are in C and C++? Say it isn't so!
Yes, because startups are a new invention. There were no startups until incompetent idiots with beliefs like yours came along.
For the record, this is why you aren't qualified to pass an elementary school English test. When you don't understand the lesson you think it is because the teacher is an idiot.
No, but my phone needs to do so, that's for sure :^)
They literally don't know what a fact is, so you can't really expect them to keep them straight.
He is ordering Americans not to let him into their homes? Didn't anyone tell him there was no special need for that one?
You need take a remedial English course.
I certainly hope English isn't yours, as "the" and "a" are not equivalent. "Is there a wake? Yes there is the wake." Oh, that would be idiotic wouldn't it. One would say yes there is *a* wake. Again, the way it was said doesn't introduce the idea that there is *a* wake. It assumes *the* wake. Good luck learning English!
If that was the case the correct English would be *a* wake, not *the* wake. Of course you are putting words in its mouth.
You must be delusional. Absence of evidence indeed
Not everyone goes to both, and maybe I'm wrong but I don't believe there is anywhere where the wake is held *after* the funeral.
I can't even parse what you wrote.
So you are saying the definition of a "conservative" is a hatemonger? Interesting.
It couldn't be any more easy. You are simply incompetent.
It's Punk, not Pop.