>There is no anti-trust problems here. Apple has full rights to a monopoly on Apple branded hardware. No, they don't. Vertical monopolies are just as illegal as horizontal ones. DOJ's plans for MS were a vertical split, not horizontal, after all.
>I think the lobbying and urging by FSF to a corporate like Google seems somewhat undignified, at least to me.
Why? If corporations get to lobby government, which is supposed to be of and by the *people*, and non-profits can do so as well, why can't a non-profit lobby a corporation? Compare a (call to) boycott.
The book was published in 1788... Is that old enough for you?
Irk? I already referred to this form with the second link. Note though that "temporary" rigging lacks the negative connotation of "bubblegum & bailing wire" or "mickey-moused" that jerry-rigged implies.
Now, granted, it doesn't say that people will be prevented from leaving, but I suggest you think about it for a moment. What is the purpose of identifying people who leave, other than to control who leaves?
To have some better idea of who might be (re-)entering the country in the future. Clearly if JoeBlow644 left for vacation in Egypt and comes back two weeks later, he cannot return yet again the week after.
Also don't forget the books. Henry Reed, The Great Brain, and Mad Scientists Club are all excellent series of tales about adventure, independence and using your noodle.
This is well established as the worst-use case for CFLs. CFLs, like any fluorescent, are more limited by starts than total burn time, unlike incandescents. Therefore short-cycle duty will drastically limit their lifespans.
Climate change was a reframing by the right as it's a more innocuous term. It was eventually adopted by much of the scientific community as being "more accurate" and easier to understand by lay people i.e; it more clearly encompasses the broader suite of ensuing changes... rather than global warming which accurately describes the increase in mean global temperature due to the retention of energy in the atmospheric system. Joe Sixpack doesn't grok that weather is not climate, and that a single "freakishly cold" winter in Duluth doesn't mean anything to someone sizzling in Sydney or Sao Paolo year after year.
It wasn't creative writing, it was about what you wanted to do with your life, and how MIT might help. And no, the numbers are not all that matter. The Institute is trying to turn out better rounded alums than that, hence the numerous humanities and writing requirements.
Umm, when people first started recognizing the problem the issue *was* just a degree or two. On a global scale, one degree mean temperature increase is a shit load of energy being dumped into the weather system. Now we're looking at several degrees due to inaction: http://globalchange.mit.edu/resources/gamble/
a) Urban heat-island effect. b) In the mid-latitudes you could theoretically benefit from a higher albedo in the winter,
but likely suffer from snow-covered roofs (or should, if you have proper insulation).
Yes, the -M missing colon is a copy and paste/revision typo, I will fix it this evening.
No, there is no missing r. The operator used is qr, not q; the delimiter is % ;-)
Indeed, this is even addressed in the article text
As for the GP, I link to all the relevant calendars that I know of on delicious,
accessible via "Links" in the footer of the splash page.
Yes there are a lot of them, but this is the continuation of the original, which was
created by Mark Fowler in 2000.
Just because we haven't really enforced them since Ma Bell was busted up doesn't mean they don't exist:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_antitrust_law
>There is no anti-trust problems here. Apple has full rights to a monopoly on Apple branded hardware.
No, they don't. Vertical monopolies are just as illegal as horizontal ones.
DOJ's plans for MS were a vertical split, not horizontal, after all.
>I think the lobbying and urging by FSF to a corporate like Google seems somewhat undignified, at least to me.
Why? If corporations get to lobby government, which is supposed to be of and by the *people*, and
non-profits can do so as well, why can't a non-profit lobby a corporation? Compare a (call to) boycott.
Stardock WindowBlinds anyone? :-P
Surely of the hundreds of themes available, there must be one with the controls on the left
It's called context bitch, learn to read the status bar.
But that 3 KW is in a 24 MPH wind. How often does the wind blow that fast?
More often than you think because that's at the height of the turbine, which in this case
looks to be about 100 feet.
Note though that "temporary" rigging lacks the negative connotation of
"bubblegum & bailing wire" or "mickey-moused" that jerry-rigged implies.
So actually, yeah, the original use of jury-rigged was appropriate here.
The book was published in 1788... Is that old enough for you?
Irk? I already referred to this form with the second link. Note though that
"temporary" rigging lacks the negative connotation of "bubblegum & bailing wire"
or "mickey-moused" that jerry-rigged implies.
It should be spelled jerry-rigged is a slight on World War I Germans.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=jerry-rigged
Jury-rigged is apparently an acceptable term derived from French.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=jury
Personally, I spell it jerry but pronounce it jury.
Now, granted, it doesn't say that people will be prevented from leaving, but I suggest you think about it for a moment. What is the purpose of identifying people who leave, other than to control who leaves?
To have some better idea of who might be (re-)entering the country in the future. Clearly if JoeBlow644 left for vacation in Egypt and comes back two weeks later, he cannot return yet again the week after.
James Burke's Connections series are excellent.
Also don't forget the books. Henry Reed, The Great Brain, and Mad Scientists Club
are all excellent series of tales about adventure, independence and using your noodle.
This is well established as the worst-use case for CFLs. CFLs, like any fluorescent, are more limited by starts than total burn time, unlike incandescents. Therefore short-cycle duty will drastically limit their lifespans.
Climate change was a reframing by the right as it's a more innocuous term. It was eventually adopted by much of the scientific community as being "more accurate" and easier to understand by lay people i.e; it more clearly encompasses the broader suite of ensuing changes... rather than global warming which accurately describes the increase in mean global temperature due to the retention of energy in the atmospheric system. Joe Sixpack doesn't grok that weather is not climate, and that a single "freakishly cold" winter in Duluth doesn't mean anything to someone sizzling in Sydney or Sao Paolo year after year.
FYI Perl's a bad example. It is actually compiled (at invocation), and dual-licensed.
Sorry, that should have been parent, not grand-parent. Now it's grand-parent.
It wasn't creative writing, it was about what you wanted to do with your life, and how MIT might help.
And no, the numbers are not all that matter. The Institute is trying to turn out better rounded alums
than that, hence the numerous humanities and writing requirements.
Is this still the gmail that you don't pay for btw?
No, it's the education edition of Google Apps. They've been offering
for a while now to colleges and universities.
And how did you manage to get wordpress to not insist on redirecting everything to a single host?
Also http://engineer.openguides.org/
No, because a ration right-handed person would use their *left-hand*
so that they could multi-task without an awkward crook in their neck.
Tragedy of the commons
Umm, when people first started recognizing the problem the issue *was* just a degree or two.
On a global scale, one degree mean temperature increase is a shit load of energy being dumped
into the weather system. Now we're looking at several degrees due to inaction:
http://globalchange.mit.edu/resources/gamble/
a) Urban heat-island effect.
b) In the mid-latitudes you could theoretically benefit from a higher albedo in the winter,
but likely suffer from snow-covered roofs (or should, if you have proper insulation).
No, sorry. Check your high school chemistry book or Wikipedia please.
Oxidation is (roughly) the loss of electrons. It is the opposite of reduction.