So you’re saying if team A really harms a player of team B, not only he’s injured, but the guys is also punished by being removed from the set for X minutes...
Not an easy call, as, sometimes, the down player is not acting, and it’s hard to assess the difference between real and acting.
In peace time you brag about your superiority. In war time you use it as a surprise.
Hmm, in this case we're talking about amazingly innovative and ultra scientifically challenging weaponry. A "we did it" show off gives the other parties a huge clue: it's possible then, feasible using today's technos, let's do it!
How much would that be on an iPad? I mean, is that price reasonable? The desktop version is still awful expensive ; ok the soft delivers, but seriously there are amazing pieces of software from Apple which price went down crazy a few years ago ( or even free ).
If China or Russia identifies all US ICBM launch sites, and submarines, aircraft carriers... they then perform an simultaneous attack on all of that - ok a few might escape, and China might lose a few million people, but they would win. No?
Why would China brag about this new advanced technology, telling the world that a "quantum radar" is indeed possible? To mislead westerners? If they really achieved such amazing military weaponry success, wouldn't they better keep silent? Or maybe China is simply aware of their superiority in quantum fields, which is more worrying..
If Apple is keen on implementing that level of censorship [ which has been made public ] who knows what else stagnates in the code ready to break privacy?
currently the referree has to ASK for VAR
The referee has an earpiece (and a mic), and gets suggestions from the VAR team.
Video === nerds
To be fair, the new FIFA seems to behave better.
In football it’s so easy to waste time while winning, the referee has to be given the right to lenghen the game à discretion.
So you’re saying if team A really harms a player of team B, not only he’s injured, but the guys is also punished by being removed from the set for X minutes...
Not an easy call, as, sometimes, the down player is not acting, and it’s hard to assess the difference between real and acting.
In peace time you brag about your superiority. In war time you use it as a surprise.
Hmm, in this case we're talking about amazingly innovative and ultra scientifically challenging weaponry. A "we did it" show off gives the other parties a huge clue: it's possible then, feasible using today's technos, let's do it!
How much would that be on an iPad? I mean, is that price reasonable? The desktop version is still awful expensive ; ok the soft delivers, but seriously there are amazing pieces of software from Apple which price went down crazy a few years ago ( or even free ).
And yes, indeed, GIMP is a viable alternative.
On desktop / laptops wine might work.
If China or Russia identifies all US ICBM launch sites, and submarines, aircraft carriers... they then perform an simultaneous attack on all of that - ok a few might escape, and China might lose a few million people, but they would win. No?
Why would China brag about this new advanced technology, telling the world that a "quantum radar" is indeed possible? To mislead westerners? If they really achieved such amazing military weaponry success, wouldn't they better keep silent? Or maybe China is simply aware of their superiority in quantum fields, which is more worrying..
why Tim Cook is so crazy about dongles.
Cook is convinced Jobs' design genius is limited to having as few ports as possible.
This is planned. For 2038.
and a few GB of RAM
Does anyone at Microsoft
...cares? No.
And even 'ed' (try a regex in notepad..)
Chrome takes what it can to make the browsing experience faster and more optimized. Give it only 4GB and it works sensibly the same.
And you need 32GB on a laptop?
The headline sounds like it was written by a 12-year-old
Really? I was more under the impression it was written by someone who doesn't care at all.
This story was generated automatically, obviously. AI’s not perfect yet. Give it some time.
Use Google translate: English to English.
They’re removing the few remaining ports...
Ah ah very funny. You're kidding, right?
"No, unfortunately" would have been funnier, grasshopper.
That's amazing how a man could design systems in a way that even after he died 7 years ago they're now still sold almost as they were 7 years ago.
If Apple is keen on implementing that level of censorship [ which has been made public ] who knows what else stagnates in the code ready to break privacy?