Slashdot Mirror


Apple Refreshes MacBook Pro Lineup (arstechnica.com)

Apple said on Thursday it is refreshing the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Pro models. Neither machines are getting major redesigns, but the innards are getting a spec update. For starters, both the models are powered by the 8th-generation Intel processors and house more cores than before -- a maximum of six cores on the 15-inch model (compared to four in last year's models) and four in the 13-inch model (compared to two). That means faster performance for many use cases. Maximum SSD capacity is also doubled, and the MacBook Pro line offers DDR4 RAM for the first time. ArsTechnica: The laptops also borrow some features from the iMac Pro and the iPad Pro -- the T2 chip and True Tone, respectively -- and feature a revised butterfly keyboard, the third generation of the design Apple introduced in 2016 (the revision is a little more significant this time around). Apart from those tweaks to the keyboard, the basic design of the MacBook Pro is unchanged. The top configuration of the 15-inch model includes an 8th-generation, six-core Intel Core i9 CPU clocked at 2.9GHz. Six-core Intel Core i7 processors are also options. The 2017 iteration of the MacBook Pro featured DDR3 memory with a maximum configuration of 16GB. This time, it's DDR4, and the maximum is 32. The faster memory uses more energy, so a bigger battery is now included -- but Apple's battery life estimate remains the same as last year's. The GPU in the top standard configuration is listed as an AMD Radeon Pro 555X.

The 13-inch model has different specs, of course. It still only offers integrated Intel graphics, for one thing -- Intel Iris Plus 655, this time with 128MB of eDRAM. But the maximum number of cores are again doubled -- in this case to four -- in 8th-generation Intel Core i5 or Core i7 CPUs, which run at up to 2.7GHz. Maximum SSD capacity is also doubled; it's now 2TB. The maximum memory is still 16GB. Apple claims the 13-inch model is up to twice as fast as its predecessor, though it will of course depend on the application.
ArsTechnica says the keyboard on the new MacBook Pro models, though look similar to the one in the predecessor lineup, feel a little different to type on. The price of 13-inch starts at $1,799 while the 15-inch starts at $2,399.

217 comments

  1. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sad when incremental hardware updates is big news. I guess it shows how infrequent Apple upgrades hardware on Mac's. PC makers upgrade model much faster without much fanfare.

    1. Re:Why is this news? by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must be new on Slashdot.
      I remember back in the Early 2000's every minor Linux kernel release got a front page story. It was darn annoying.

      That being said, Apple is the only major player, offering a Non-Windows Laptops. While Apple hasn't been offering a major Redesign in appearance, the Hardware upgrade is actually the more important part then the appearance.

      Especially as the Macbook pro line is still arguably the industry standard on the "Premium" Laptop which the likes of Asus, Dell, Lenovo are all trying to copy off of.

      In all fairness The current Macbook pro isn't that much different then for the Titanium Powebook back in 2002. Thinner, more powerful, but still a Gray Metal Laptop With a clamshell design, with a keyboard and a track pad.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      completely wrong.

      performance updates are the ones that deserve to be news-worthy.

      gimmicks like touch bar aren't.

    3. Re:Why is this news? by blindseer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In all fairness The current Macbook pro isn't that much different then for the Titanium Powebook back in 2002. Thinner, more powerful, but still a Gray Metal Laptop With a clamshell design, with a keyboard and a track pad.

      I worked on a solar car competition in college and in the early years the cars came in all kinds of shapes. The size was constrained by the rules on height, width, and length, so size didn't vary all that much but inside that box the cars filled that in the best way they thought at the time.

      The next couple competitions the more outrageous shapes disappeared and the more successful shapes were copied and varied upon by others. Another couple competitions and all the cars looked basically the same, a wide and flat wedge with a bubble on top for the driver.

      Why mention solar cars in a thread about laptops? Because when it comes down to the evolution of the shapes of the things we deal with everyday there are shapes that just evolve naturally. This has been true for all laptops since the demise of the trackball in the 1990s. Of course the current Macbook Pro looks like the PowerBook from 2002, because that is a shape and size that has a nice compromise of cost and convenience. I'm guessing if people had their way they might like some variations on the shape and color but a brushed aluminum, titanium, or stainless steel shell is durable that looks nice enough that people will buy it. A thin flat clamshell design is well suited to a keyboard and screen, and being folding shut to fit in a purse, briefcase, or backpack. For pointing devices it's a trackpad, because nobody wants a trackball or pencil eraser sized joystick any more.

      In all fairness The current Macbook pro isn't that much different then for the Titanium Powebook back in 2002. Thinner, more powerful, but still a Gray Metal Laptop With a clamshell design, with a keyboard and a track pad.

      Just like those solar cars where the shape and size settled into really just variation on a single theme the real competition comes with what's under the hood. This includes the ports offered. I'll hear people complain about the lack of ports on Apple laptops and yet we find other high end laptops copying it. Sure, we might still see a single USB-A port alongside the USB-C ports but for the most part the choice of ports on high end laptops is thinning. If there is an Ethernet port then it's a flimsy pop-out thing or a proprietary micro-port which may or may not have the adapter included. Video ports will be HDMI, mini-DisplayPort, or just video out of one of the USB-C ports. Maybe there is a slot for SD cards but those seem to be disappearing. Charger ports are switching over to USB-C. I miss the magnetic charger ports but I'll take the standard USB-C until we figure out a standardized magnetic charge port that doesn't require buying only those expensive chargers from the manufacturer.

      That being said, Apple is the only major player, offering a Non-Windows Laptops. While Apple hasn't been offering a major Redesign in appearance, the Hardware upgrade is actually the more important part then the appearance.

      Yep. We'll be getting plain metal grey laptops with only 2 or 3 ports, maybe 5 ports on the high priced ones, for a long time. Gone are the days with laptops with 12 ports on them. Remember those days? I have an old laptop here with headphone, microphone, PCMCIA, power, serial, VGA, parallel, Ethernet, modem, S-video, and 2x USB-A. Dealing with only USB-C and a combo headphone/mic port is annoying sometimes but I'll take that over the heavy, colorful, and many ported, laptops of the past.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    4. Re:Why is this news? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Pretty sad when incremental hardware updates is big news. I guess it shows how infrequent Apple upgrades hardware on Mac's. PC makers upgrade model much faster without much fanfare.

      How infrequent Macs Are upgraded? Are you high, or just stupid?

      We'll just concentrate on the past few upgrades of the MacBook Pro.

      November 2016: Significant upgrade of the MBP over the 2015 lineup.

      June 2017: Processor upgrade. Keyboard upgrade.

      July 2018: Processor Upgrade.

      I would like to see all those "PC" mfgs. Who have upgraded significantly faster.

    5. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the mac mini hasn't had a true upgrade since 2012 - 6 years.

    6. Re:Why is this news? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      Many of the differences between 2002 and now haven't been improvements. Loss of ports, loss of Magsafe, no more matte screens, no more user-replaceable RAM and disk, idiotic design decisions like a keyboard that's bonded to the top shell so it costs $900 to replace.
      I hope my 2012 MBP stays viable for a few more years, and then it's time for a Hackintosh.

    7. Re:Why is this news? by rjstanford · · Score: 2

      Well said.

      As for the ports, the nice thing about USB-C standardization is that we no longer need to guess which port anyone will need, only the general largest number of simultaneous accesses they'll want. Very few people have ever plugged more than 2-3 things into their laptop at the same time, especially in the WiFi era; many have never attached anything but power.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    8. Re:Why is this news? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing if people had their way they might like some variations on the shape and color but a brushed aluminum, titanium, or stainless steel shell is durable that looks nice enough that people will buy it.

      In all seriousness, I could go for a modern MacBook Pro that looked like the old colorful iBook G3 "Clamshell" laptops.

      All the cookie-cutter laptops offered by most vendors, which all look more or less like Apple's MacBook Pro, are sleek... but boring.

      As an aside - I just bought a refurb 2015 MacBook Pro, and for me this announcement reinforces that I made the right decision. Right now Apple is doubling down on form over substance - the current-sen keyboards are an abomination.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:Why is this news? by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      Thank you.

      As for the ports, the nice thing about USB-C standardization is that we no longer need to guess which port anyone will need, only the general largest number of simultaneous accesses they'll want.

      I'll agree with one caveat, video.

      USB-C supports at least three different video alternate modes natively, MHL, HDMI, and DisplayPort. Then there are adapters and docks that think it's a great idea to dispose of the native video protocol that might be on the USB-C port and provide a USB video adapter chip instead. So someone can have a laptop with a perfectly functional and quite elaborate video chip to drive a display but unless they take great attention on their purchases they might get crappy video because the chip in the adapter sucks, or find no video because the drivers suck.

      The people in the USB group should have, for their benefit and ours, stuck with one video standard or none at all. With one USB-C video standard we'd have less of this confusion, either the port supports video natively or it doesn't. With no USB-C video standard we'd know that a USB-C to video cable or dock had a chip in it and we'd need supported drivers and that the video would be limited to the chip in the adapter.

      Very few people have ever plugged more than 2-3 things into their laptop at the same time, especially in the WiFi era; many have never attached anything but power.

      I find myself using the two USB-C ports on my laptop mostly for power and a mouse. Once in a while I'll have to swap one of those out for a while to plug in a flash drive or something. Sometimes I find a USB hub so I can plug in multiple things at a time, like when my wireless scanner acts up and I'd rather just plug it in than try to find out what's up with it. I thought about investing in a dock of some kind but I've got by without so far. I've been using various dongles for so long I don't even think of it anymore. I just leave the dongles on the cables and shove them in my bag when I pack up the computer, the dongles are just part of the cable to me. I've worn out or broken some USB-A cables and adapters and I'll just replace them with their USB-C equivalents so I don't need the dongles any more.

      I hate USB-A and I'd like to be done with it. I have a greater hate for micro-B ports. Both of them are difficult to tell which way is up and if I hadn't invested so much money in devices and cables with those connections then I'd just toss them in the trash to get USB-C replacements.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    10. Re:Why is this news? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Lenovo P series. Three models. Introduced around the end of 2014. About 3.5 years ago. Three major revisions (meaning entirely new designs) for each model, and multiple hardware upgrades in-between - probably close to 6-7 changes over the last 3.5 years (they seem to upgrade every 6 months). Oh, and you can install more than 32 GB of RAM, and get a real 17" screen, too...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    11. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Windows-land, you can buy an Acer E5-576-392H for $380 which has 7 ports: 4x USB (mix of types), 1x VGA, 1x HDMI, and an RJ-45. And the obligatory audio jack, so I guess 8 total. It even includes a DVD drive.

      You can still buy motherboards with serial ports or PS/2 jacks. The Windows side of the market actually has variety of products and meets consumer demand. It's not a problem.

      Except for Apple. Apple has a problem where they want to make their products a work of art rather than tools. That's fine for consumer hardware to a point, but it really falls apart with the trash can Mac Pro.

    12. Re:Why is this news? by blindseer · · Score: 2

      In Windows-land, you can buy an Acer E5-576-392H for $380 which has 7 ports: 4x USB (mix of types), 1x VGA, 1x HDMI, and an RJ-45. And the obligatory audio jack, so I guess 8 total. It even includes a DVD drive.

      Let's see, 1/3 the processors, 1/3 the RAM, 1/3 the screen resolution, for 1/3 the price. Oh, and twice the weight. TAKE MY MONEY!!

      You can still buy motherboards with serial ports or PS/2 jacks.

      Why? So I can plug in my CueCat?

      The Windows side of the market actually has variety of products and meets consumer demand. It's not a problem.

      I'm boggled on why Acer isn't getting more mention on Slashdot then. No... wait... I changed my mind. I'm not boggled at all.

      Except for Apple. Apple has a problem where they want to make their products a work of art rather than tools. That's fine for consumer hardware to a point, but it really falls apart with the trash can Mac Pro.

      Absolutely, because I wasn't getting anything done until my CueCat was plugged in.

      Are you for real?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    13. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it also means that we *know* that they will most likely need dongles or docks. Admittedly I haven't looked very hard, but apart from the power supply, I have never seen anyone use a device with a native USB-C connector attached to a Macbook. Always via some kind of adapter.

      I have a photo of one of our C*O:s carrying his MBP on a presentation, with dongles sticking out on both sides of the state-of-the-art laptop, making it look not so cool. In my view, the silhouette of the MPB is not a rectangle, but rather like the head of a teletubbie.

    14. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the part about the Nov 2016 significant upgrade having an old CPU and little RAM, turning some of the later upgrades into more of catch-ups.

    15. Re:Why is this news? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The MacBook Air hasn't been upgraded since march 2015*.

      * the small CPU speed bump on the low-end model in june 2017 does NOT count as an upgrade. The internal name is still "MacBookAir7,2".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    16. Re:Why is this news? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Lenovo P series. Three models. Introduced around the end of 2014. About 3.5 years ago. Three major revisions (meaning entirely new designs) for each model, and multiple hardware upgrades in-between - probably close to 6-7 changes over the last 3.5 years (they seem to upgrade every 6 months). Oh, and you can install more than 32 GB of RAM, and get a real 17" screen, too...

      If those were more than simple CPU/GPU-type Upgrades every 6 months, then, after the first couple of revs., that points more to an unstable design, not "innovation".

    17. Re:Why is this news? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The MacBook Air hasn't been upgraded since march 2015*.

      * the small CPU speed bump on the low-end model in june 2017 does NOT count as an upgrade. The internal name is still "MacBookAir7,2".

      Did I mention the Air, the Mac Pro or the Mac mini?

      No I did not.

    18. Re:Why is this news? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      And the parent did not specify MacBook Pro, only Macs. You used one of the two only Macs regularly upgraded to defend Apple, I simply told you the truth. The MacBook Air (2015), Mac mini (2014, a downgrade of the 2012 model too) and Mac Pro (2013) are not upgraded regularly at all.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    19. Re:Why is this news? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Wait. So if a company updates more frequently than Apple, they are unstable. And if they update slower than Apple, they are slow?

      Dude. you are the ULTIMATE Apple shill...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re:Why is this news? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Let's see, 1/3 the processors, 1/3 the RAM, 1/3 the screen resolution, for 1/3 the price. Oh, and twice the weight. TAKE MY MONEY!!

      1/3 the processors - a little more but ok
      1/3 the RAM - OK, I'm sure there's a 18GB ram option
      1/3 the screen resolution - 6Kx3K? hmm,
      for 1/3 the price - bitch, please. If they sell that thing for 1100 let me know because I will stand in line for a week for that.

  2. Nobody cares. Same old, same old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's gonna be exactly the same to everyone of their target group. At best(/worst) somewhat more restrictive and patronizing.

    And this time, Jobs can't be re-hired to save the company from the tied management drones.

  3. holy price jump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Base price on the 13 went up $500? ouch!

    1. Re: holy price jump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Base price for 13â has doubled in the UK in 4 years

    2. Re: holy price jump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you will now get 1.2% more CPU power and hardware build quality has been halved. Be a good iDiot and go to Mac store and get this year model.

    3. Re: holy price jump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We (the UK) is one of the few nations who ARE paying their way with NATO. It is laggards like Germany that aren't.
      Plenty of the report from trusted/decent news sources show this clearly. Obviously the likes of Fox just go with the headline and imply that all NATO members apart from the USA are skinflints.

    4. Re: holy price jump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear, another clueless Muritard showing stupidity and ignorance again

    5. Re: holy price jump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly, i was at the gym yesterday and Fox news was on. They ran a chart showing the six European NATO countries, the UK being first, that were paying their share. It was the "others" that remained unnamed. I was surprised that Greece made the list.

    6. Re: holy price jump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Greece has a neighbor (Turkey) with which they have never been in real peace for, oh, about 30 centuries now (when they were not part of the Ottoman empire). Then they have a very complex geography, with lots and lots of islands, some of them _very_ close to Turkey (like you can swim from a Greek island to the Turkish shore). Other countries are far from that situation, Netherlands, Denmark, Luxembourg (the richest ones and the ones that pay the least, by far, why do we other poorer Europeans have to pay for the defense of Luxembourg, which is also a legal tax heaven in the middle of Europe).

  4. A little step in the right direction. by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Insightful

    6 Core on the 15" and 4 Core on the 13", which makes the 13" a viable alternative for many people who could not previously consider it. More importantly, there is finally a 32GB option (welcome to the 2010s Apple), but as you'd expect from Apple only for the 15" and only at the time of purchase as it is soldered-on. Yeah, those 32GB RAM modules are too large to fit in just a 13" laptop.
    Sadly, you only get USB-C connectors, which is the main reason I have asked my company to refrain from upgrading my 2015 MBP (my existing peripherals won't work, plus there will be an extra little box to carry around with me), although there was also the fact that so far there was no real hardware upgrade - esp. regarding memory (compare to a Mac Pro I have at home, with 48GB and 6 cores - sure not a laptop, but it almost a decade old, a 2010 model).

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      although there was also the fact that so far there was no real hardware upgrade

      You didn't bother to read the article then. Typical.

    2. Re:A little step in the right direction. by ThosLives · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eh, the biggest loss in my mind is still MagSafe... that was a truly useful connector.

      --
      "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
    3. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't read the GP post. There was no real hardware upgrade, meaning since the 2015 model, but before this new update there was no real hardware upgrade and you didn't have any reason to switch to the new laptop. Now you have the extra core/RAM reason if you need it.

    4. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Wrong tense there, it should say "the main reason I had asked", because previously there was no reason to upgrade. Now I am thinking about it since I can get extra RAM/cores. I mean, it is right there on my first paragraph about the hardware upgrade...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    5. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Agreed. That was the most important of my "existing peripherals" ;)
      I had one for home, office, vacation home etc, all would go to waste so I was trying to avoid it when I had no reason. Now with 2 extra cores and twice the RAM, I might have to bite the bullet.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    6. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are doing the right thing. PC's for everyone will eliminate all those terrible problems that plague Mac users. Looks like you dodged a real show stopping bullet there.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      Wrong tense there, it should say "the main reason I had asked", because previously there was no reason to upgrade. Now I am thinking about it since I can get extra RAM/cores. I mean, it is right there on my first paragraph about the hardware upgrade...

      Look, there is no reason that anyone needs to use a Mac. Windows 10 computer are faster, more reliable, and Windows 10 is the best, most error free Operating system ever creates. Get a new Surface, and your problems will vanish.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Eh, the biggest loss in my mind is still MagSafe... that was a truly useful connector.

      I wonder why on earth they discontinued it? Perhaps with all the magnets in new aluminum laptops it became a safety issue? It was an awesome connector.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, there is no reason that anyone needs to use a Mac.

      tell me how to compile my OSX binaries on windows, please.

    10. Re:A little step in the right direction. by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Get a new Surface, and your problems will vanish.

      Sure right up until Microsoft decides I have to install updates right before meeting. Sorry Windows 10 is a toy. Its simply not appropriate for real work.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    11. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't tell if he is being serious or just trolling. Which, in itself, tells me it is probably successful trolling.

    12. Re:A little step in the right direction. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      TFA doesn't even mention USB. How many ports do they have? How many are USB 3.1 and how many are Thunderbolt?

      Some nice new stuff, like them finally enabling secure boot. But major problems remain, like the crappy keyboard that is riveted in to the top of the shell so you have to replace the whole thing. Also the usual glued in battery and soldered on storage etc.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:A little step in the right direction. by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      I wonder if it has to do with them constantly pushing for both thinner and lighter. The MagSafe connector wasn't massive, but they killed off the headphone jack in their phones so that they could go thinner and the MagSafe connector may have been the largest remaining constraint preventing that. Also, at some point they get the weight down far enough where the MagSafe connector's attraction isn't broken by gentle tugs/pulls and you can actually drag the notebook off a table with the cord because the magnetic attraction is too strong. If you make the magnetic attraction less strong, eventually you wind up defeating the point of it to begin with and it comes loose too easily.

      I've never personally owned a Mac notebook (I have friends/relatives that have had various models over the years) so I don't know how true that is in reality, but I can't think of anything else (outside of some patent situation) that makes any sense. I suppose you could argue cost or some hippy crap like them not being able to get the components from a conflict free source or something like that that.

    14. Re:A little step in the right direction. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Same reason they removed the headphone socket and dropped down to a single combined USB/charging port.

      I guess that way they can sell more dongles.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:A little step in the right direction. by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      I still think my mid-2014 MBP is one of the best platforms Apple ever made. It has a MagSafe charging connector, a keyboard that still works after four years of nearly daily use, and enough non-USB-C ports that I don't have to carry around a handful of dongles.

      Post-Jobs Apple doesn't seem to understand how pros work. That seems to happen most often when a COO takes over as CEO. To appeal to me again, the MBP should at least have an option for MagSafe charging, and bring back at least a couple of USB-A ports and the headphone jack.

      Oh, and fix the keyboard; that's still the primary interface between man and machine!

    16. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, there is no reason that anyone needs to use a Mac. Windows 10 computer are faster, more reliable, and Windows 10 is the best, most error free Operating system ever creates. Get a new Surface, and your problems will vanish.

      Windows 10 is the *exact* reason I need to use a Mac. If I had to use Windows 10 I'd go insane. macOS may not be perfect, but it's so much nicer to use than the schizophrenic Windows 10.

    17. Re:A little step in the right direction. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      By far, that is what is keeping me away from "upgrading". My Air is a little sluggish, but between the dongle madness (already bad enough on the Air) and a less functional power supply, it simply isn't for me.

      Fixing fat finger mod...

    18. Re:A little step in the right direction. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      While I mourn the loss of the magsafe connector, being able to plug in the charging cable on either side of the MBP via USB-C is pretty convenient. I do wish I could use USBC on my iphone as well and then it would be one less cable/brick to carry around.

      Magsafe was really ingenious though.

    19. Re:A little step in the right direction. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      but they killed off the headphone jack in their phones so that they could go thinner

      I keep hearing this, yet the current iPad models, which have headphone jacks, are thinner than the current iPhone models, which do not.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    20. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Khyber · · Score: 0

      "tell me how to compile my OSX binaries on windows, please."

      Use a cross-platform language like a real coder?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Post-Jobs Apple doesn't seem to understand how pros work.

      Just because they chose to de-emphasize what pros want doesn't mean they don't understand it.

      As I see it, they can:

      • Make a non-pro laptop that compromises things that pros want
      • Make a pro laptop that compromises things that non-pros want
      • Make a hybrid laptop that compromises things from both sides
      • Build both laptops at the same time, spreading engineering effort out over more products in the lineup

      Is there enough of a market for professional laptops versus regular folks that it makes sense to do (2) or even (3)? This is basically just a question of projected sales numbers, right?

      I really don't see how you can jump from a choice of market focus to a lack of understanding of the market. Are you asserting that there are millions of untapped sales here?

    22. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, there is no reason that anyone needs to use a Mac. Windows 10 computer are faster, more reliable, and Windows 10 is the best, most error free Operating system ever creates. Get a new Surface, and your problems will vanish.

      Windows 10 is the *exact* reason I need to use a Mac. If I had to use Windows 10 I'd go insane. macOS may not be perfect, but it's so much nicer to use than the schizophrenic Windows 10.

      I'm sorry that exposing features without hotkey voodoo and allowing systems customization is too much for your tiny mind.

    23. Re:A little step in the right direction. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      They already build two laptops — three if you count the Air. They already have a pro and non-pro laptop line. The problem is that they have no clue what pro users want. If that were not the case, they would have acknowledged the feedback from 90% of users that the touchbar is a false-triggering nightmare of epidemic proportions, and they would offer an optional normal keyboard.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    24. Re:A little step in the right direction. by swillden · · Score: 2

      Sadly, you only get USB-C connectors, which is the main reason I have asked my company to refrain from upgrading my 2015 MBP (my existing peripherals won't work, plus there will be an extra little box to carry around with me)

      Your existing USB-A peripherals will work fine. You may need to buy a couple of these. Not sure what extra little box you're talking about, but maybe you mean one of these? I have one (not that model, but similar) and I think it's great because it combines all of the less-needed ports into a single compact unit -- HDMI, Ethernet, SD card, etc.

      One non-obvious upside of USB-C on Macbooks is that you can use any of the ports for charging, which means you can plug your charging cable in from whichever side is convenient. This seems like an irrelevant advantage until you've actually lived with it for a while. Another thing I really like, since my phone and bluetooth headphones use USB-C as well, is that I now travel with only a single charger, my laptop charger. I used to carry extra charging cables so I could charge the phone and headphones from the laptop, but now I don't bother. One charger and one cable, is all I need. It even works if I need to connect phone to laptop because the cable between the computer and charger is a normal male-to-male USB-C cable. So I can just disconnect it from the charger and use it to connect laptop to phone. The fact that it's a standard cable also means that when I got annoyed that Apple's provided cable was too short, I just bought a longer one and swapped it out.

      So, IMO, the USB-C ports are great.

      However, there is a good reason to stick with your 2015 MBP: the new keyboard sucks, and while the touchstrip isn't awful it's not great either.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    25. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MagSafe is worthless, or at least it is since they "upgraded" to MagSafe 2 and made it so thin that just about any vertical motion is enough to rip it out, while wide enough that it's not hard to drag a MagSafe 2-connected MacBook to the floor provided you yank it back/front. (It also helps that Apple makes the absolute slickest laptop bottoms I've ever used.)

      Basically, Apple already killed MagSafe when they decided to go for "thin." The previous incarnation is useless, as it's both too easy to unplug it while using and too easy to not unplug it when you'd drag it to the floor, so they just removed it entirely.

    26. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Mattcelt · · Score: 2

      Windows 10 is a privacy invasion hiding behind a desktop.

      I will never use it.

      So my choices are OSX and Linux. While I love using Linux at work, it's worse than useless for work.

      For better or for worse, the majority of the time OSX just works. And sadly, Linux will never overtake Apple in that space until their overarching ethos becomes focused principally on UX (at the kernel level, not simply at the UI level).

    27. Re:A little step in the right direction. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      No real hardware upgrade apart from RAM, processor GPU, keyboard, display.

      I've had a new form factor MBP since 2015 and I now have quite an impressive collection of USB-C to various other kinds of adapters, most of which I never use. I have a Thunderbolt dock for when I am at work. The cable between it and the MBP provides both connectivity and power. All of my adapters together don't take up a huge amount of space in my bag, certainly much less than the horrible tangle of USB-A/B B mini, B micro and other exotic cables I used to carry.

      I wouldn't go back to the old arrangement of multiple different types of connector now.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    28. Re:A little step in the right direction. by swillden · · Score: 2

      Eh, the biggest loss in my mind is still MagSafe... that was a truly useful connector.

      I disagree. I love the idea of the MagSafe connector, it seems like a brilliantly simply design for an obvious problem... but it doesn't work as well as I would like, and the problem that it solves isn't a problem. Not for me, at least.

      Taking the second point first, I got my first laptop in 1993 and I've had one ever since; a quarter century of experience. In all that time, I've never once had a laptop damaged by someone kicking a cord, and I'm anything but conscientious. I've had many cords kicked, and I've had many laptop cords break from wear, but no laptops or cords ever damaged in the way that MagSafe would protect. I'm not saying that my experience is universal, of course. If your pre-MagSafe life was littered with the remains of shattered laptops caused by kicked cords, then you might want to stick with MagSafe as long as possible. But for me, it doesn't seem to matter.

      Indeed, I've had more problems with MagSafe cords breaking than I have with any other sort of laptop cord. They come apart right where the thin cable goes into the MagSafe connector.

      The other problem with the MagSafe connectors is that they're too easy to disconnect when you don't want them to. Sitting on my bed, under the covers, with the laptop sitting on top of the blankets, for example, puffy blankets often exert just enough upward force on the connector and cord to angle the connector so that it didn't make contact. On countless occasions I've realized that my ostensibly plugged-in laptop is almost dead because it wasn't actually quite plugged in. Apple fixed this problem when they went to the right-angled connector... but then with MagSafe 2 they went right back to the straight-out version.

      USB-C is a better solution, I think. Because you can use any of the USB-C ports to charge, you can plug in from either side. Because the connector inserts into the laptop, a little pressure on the cable doesn't disconnect it. Because it doesn't insert very far into the laptop, it pops out easily when someone kicks the cable. So far I haven't had any problems with cables breaking the way my old MagSafe Apple charger cables did, but if one does break, it's not a big deal. I can simply buy any old male-to-male USB-C cable of reasonable quality and replace the broken part. For that matter, I have already swapped the Apple-provided cable out for a much longer (and sturdier) one, extending the distance I can sit from an outlet.

      Then there's also the fact that my phone and headphones are USB-C, so I can use my laptop charger to charge those devices as well. This means I now travel with only a single charger, and don't even carry any extra USB cables.

      I thought I would miss the MagSafe connector, but I don't. At all. I do miss the better keyboard and real function keys, though.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    29. Re:A little step in the right direction. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      On the 15 inch, they are all USB-3.1 and all Thunderbolt.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    30. Re:A little step in the right direction. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      The headphone jack hasn't gone.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    31. Re:A little step in the right direction. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is the best, most error free Operating system ever creates

      I can hear the pitchforks being sharpened and torches crackling into life already.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:A little step in the right direction. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "they're all USB-C".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    33. Re:A little step in the right direction. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Interesting. How many do you get total? Are they all USB C or are some A?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:A little step in the right direction. by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Where are the customization options for the telemetry, start menu/lock screen ads, and manual updates in the Windows 10 GUI? I'd really be happy to switch back.

    35. Re:A little step in the right direction. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I guess he wanted to be cynical.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    36. Re:A little step in the right direction. by blindseer · · Score: 2

      Same reason they removed the headphone socket and dropped down to a single combined USB/charging port.

      I guess that way they can sell more dongles.

      Right, because only Apple does that. Except most every maker of high end cell phones, they have only a USB-C port now. Oh, and Lenovo that has that silly proprietary micro-Ethernet port, and the adapter is not included with the laptop.

      Yep, only Apple is looking to sell more dongles. Except all the other manufacturers doing away with everything but the USB-C port on their laptops, cell phones, and tablets.

      Give the Apple bashing a break for once. Everyone making everything electronic is trying to cut down on the variety of ports they offer. I quite enjoy not having to track a dozen different kinds of chargers and power supplies at work now. I quite enjoy that Lenovo standardized on their one port for powering their displays, laptops, and other stuff. If they can't stick with USB-C then I'm happy that they stuck with something standard across their many products. I miss the magnetic power ports on Apple and other laptops but there are products out there that can bring something real close as an adapter or cable.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    37. Re:A little step in the right direction. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Swift and GCC both can compile on windows for Mac OS X/macOS.

      https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/...

      But why would you want to do that? Most likely it makes more sense to run the windows stuff you *need* in a VM on a Mac ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    38. Re:A little step in the right direction. by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I'm torn on the Lightning port vs. USB-C. Since Lightning predates USB-C, and especially things like HDMI/MHL/DisplayPort/video over USB-C, I see why Apple went with it and stuck with it.

      Here's my guess, Apple will stick with Lightning until whatever that replaces USB-C comes along.

      I was also torn on the MagSafe vs. USB-C for charging port. I resolved that with a magnetic breakaway USB-C charging cable. There's small ones for 5V/15W phones and bigger ones for 20V/60W tablets and laptops. I don't miss MagSafe all that much any more.

      I guess that Apple and others will stick with USB-C until some kind of standard comes along for a safe breakaway connector.

      Maybe Apple will release MagSafe into a licensed standard and others will grab onto it. It might need an update for things like more power and/or have some kind of data pass through. It was nice but got to be expensive if a replacement or spare charger was needed.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    39. Re:A little step in the right direction. by twdorris · · Score: 1

      One non-obvious upside of USB-C

      Another, although more obvious but still underrated, upside is the fact that USB-C ports are not keyed. You no longer have to fiddle around with orientation trying to shove a cable into a port the wrong way or spend precious seconds examining the cable end and port first before inserting it. Like you said, this is one of those "eh" things until you've actually lived with it for a while and then are forced to work again with those damn micro-USB cables for some reason...then you remember what a tiny little annoyance that was that added up over time to a bigger one.

    40. Re:A little step in the right direction. by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I fixed the problem with a magnetic breakaway USB-C charge cable. The one I have is from Griffin Technology but there are others.

      I haven't had a laptop destroyed or damaged from a cord being tripped over, but I had a few close calls. I had problems with MagSafe not making contact, and also seen laptops at work made worthless because the charge port was worn or damaged.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    41. Re:A little step in the right direction. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      but they killed off the headphone jack in their phones so that they could go thinner

      I keep hearing this, yet the current iPad models, which have headphone jacks, are thinner than the current iPhone models, which do not.

      IPads don't have to be waterproof.

    42. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Look, there is no reason that anyone needs to use a Mac.

      tell me how to compile my OSX binaries on windows, please.

      Must.... create.... a.... sarcasm..... tag.....

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    43. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Get a new Surface, and your problems will vanish.

      Sure right up until Microsoft decides I have to install updates right before meeting. Sorry Windows 10 is a toy. Its simply not appropriate for real work.

      Sigh, some days I'm a real Poe. I was just being sarcastic. Having used both Mac and PC since about forever, I personally wouldn't ever buy a surface.

      And you're right about the unstoppable backups. I've seen W10 machines download and install updates over metered connections when they were only on metered connections.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    44. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Can't tell if he is being serious or just trolling. Which, in itself, tells me it is probably successful trolling.

      Trolling, I confess.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    45. Re:A little step in the right direction. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And waterproofing doesn't have to preclude a headphone jack. My last 5 phones have had IP68 or better ratings and a headphone jack.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    46. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever had a USB port die on you? imagine if your laptop didn't have any spare ports, and the only port there is also doubles as a charge port. what happens when that fancy schmansy usb-c port goes bugger? you have a laptop you cannot charge.

      apple, at least give the hipsters a 2nd port. at a time where manufacturers are adding features and hardware, apple brainwashes people into thinking less is really more.

    47. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Same reason they removed the headphone socket and dropped down to a single combined USB/charging port.

      I guess that way they can sell more dongles.

      Funny, my iPhone came with a Dongle. Anyhow, taking umbrage at a tiny little adapter, means that the person should be very thankful that they have reached the zenith of first world problems.

      As before, buy that android phone, and be pleased with it. I've used them - they work.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    48. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Same reason they removed the headphone socket and dropped down to a single combined USB/charging port.

      I guess that way they can sell more dongles.

      Right, because only Apple does that.

      Don't harsh their righteous anger, dude!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    49. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The better (more cost-effective) solution to the problem is a simple 90-degree right-angle connector for the power cord plugging into the laptop. The straight plugs turned into a lever whenever you yanked the cord sideways, which would twist the internal socket and eventually break it. If you used the laptop at the edge of a table with the power cord draping down, then the weight of the cord on this lever was constantly twisting the socket down. By using a right-angle connector, you limit the maximum length of this lever and thus the maximum torque it can place on the socket. The forces instead get transferred into the plastic/metal housing at the edge of the socket, which is easy to build strong enough to withstand the loads.

      The MagSafe connectors do help prevent you from sending the laptop flying if you trip over the power cable. But with most laptops coming with SSDs nowadays, that's not a problem. There are virtually no moving parts inside a modern laptop, so they can withstand very high accelerations without sustaining damage. Most solid state electronics can be shot out of a canon without sustaining damage.

    50. Re: A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, with the other brands you are free to buy dongles from may different vendors... With apple they are locking it down more and more...
      I have both a 2017 Macbook pro running OSX and they broke the compatibility with displaylink..
      https://www.computerworld.com/article/3267865/mac-os-x/latest-macos-update-cripples-enterprise-docks-blanks-external-screens.amp.html

      This is not even comparable to the other vendors going the usb-c route..

    51. Re:A little step in the right direction. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Keyboard aside - if they'd kept a couple "legacy" ports in addition to adding the new USB-C / Thunderbolt 3 ports, it wouldn't have been quite so maddening. It's not like they don't have room... several other manufacturers have managed to do it on equally-thin machines.

      I realize Ethernet is a goner just due to size considerations (and my 2015 MBP doesn't have one anyway) - but they certainly could've included at least one USB-A port, an SD card port, perhaps a Thunderbolt 2 port...

      That said, I'm perfectly happy with my "new" (refurb) 2015 MBP.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    52. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      They already build two laptops — three if you count the Air. They already have a pro and non-pro laptop line. The problem is that they have no clue what pro users want. If that were not the case, they would have acknowledged the feedback from 90% of users that the touchbar is a false-triggering nightmare of epidemic proportions, and they would offer an optional normal keyboard.

      The have a clue, all right.

      THEY... JUST... DON'T... CARE

    53. Re:A little step in the right direction. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Four core yes, but still 16 GB of RAM...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    54. Re: A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over the last three months I've been working day-to-day in Linux, then Windows 10, in an attempt to reevaluate my choice of OS X. Linux display management and scaling is a shock-and-awe shit show, and power management is abysmal; the CPU never goes below C3 state where the same laptop rebooted to Windows will go to C7 or C8 and thus gets better than 40% more battery life.

      Windows 10 acts better with multiple displays, but is completely aggravating with managing those windows. Any time I drag a window, it's trying to put this annoying fucking thing right under the mouse cursor to make it take up the whole fucking display, or what seems to be half of a randomly chosen display. And God forbid I step away to a meeting and it goes to sleep - when it wakes up it shoves every window back to the laptop screen regardless of previous position even though nothing was actually disconnected. Oh, and then there's the fucking constant updates, the driver shit show, all the stupid sounds and shit it makes by default, the notification spam for every little thing (why give me three notification messages and a sound when I plug in a keyboard? Just let me start typing and I'll know it works), the spying, and generally badly behaved apps that just want to jump in front of what I'm doing like an attention-seeking 3 year old (I'm looking at you, Microsoft store)

      Yeah, staying with Mac. Theme may be some dumb shit that Apple does, but it's stuff that can be lived with. They just fixed the thing I couldn't - a max of 16 GB of RAM.

    55. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's the good old DC 19V round plug otherwise. Having proprietary PSU plug on Apple or other made some sense if they didn't want to support low quality or downright rogue PSU but now with USB-C they're throwing that out anyway?
      It's all marketing and advertisement in that they want you to feel insecure about getting your dick sucked if you don't have the fashionable late 2010s plug to "charge" your computer. Frustration and fear of frustration about a goddamn computer connector. And then they tell you about the exciting moon base 30 years away and you long for that. Or Musk's brain in a robot shooting lasers.

    56. Re: A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why use a shitty USB video adapter in your shitty dock when each and every port on it supports either DisplayPort or HDMI with an adapter that is cheaper, and works better?

      Can your DisplayLink do 4k at 60Hz? Anything with Thunderbolt 3 can, not even limited to Apple. Because it's just better.

    57. Re:A little step in the right direction. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Lenovo offers several lines, including real workstation class machines - so pros and general consumers can find anything they want. Of course, they also have over twice the market share as Apple, so maybe they can afford to have more engineers working on multiple lines, and upgrading things every 5-6 months...

      I see a ton of P series Lenovos where I work (and I have a P71), but I tend to work with hard-core hardware engineers - mechanical and electrical types, so they need workstation class performance. Nice to be able to get a 17" 4K screen, 64 GB of RAM and lots of type A ports for connecting all kinds of dev kits and acquisition hardware. Not to mention HDMI so I can plug into just about any TV/monitor around the office or in any conference room without using a forgotten dongle (as seems to happen often with those who don't have the luxury of an HDMI port).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    58. Re:A little step in the right direction. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Except all those dongles are are still keyed. So we've moved from keyed ports on the laptop to unkeyed ports on the laptop that pretty much need a keyed dongle to use with 95% of all the rest of the world. Same problem (keyed connection) but we've made sure and added an extra piece that you can lose or forget!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    59. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It reminds me I made a mess recently with a laptop's "wall wart" power supply (where the AC plug is built into the PSU, instead of having an "eight" cable). This kind of plug is very convenient with their modern shape.
      I tripped on the cord since it's too short and what came out was the wall from the plug (European or virtually the same as what's European).

      What I needed was one more foot of cable.
      I didn't think to check the laptop and it's fine.

      ------------
      I had another silly point :

      Here's my guess, Apple will stick with Lightning until whatever that replaces USB-C comes along.

      I would rather have them make phones with both USB-C and Lightning. Brings back wired audio and gives more power options.
      It would be just a bit "confusing" but if they killed jack connector because it was to deep then do it faggots.

      One generic laughable thing is what to think of a little "lightning bolt" logo : Is it quick charging? Or fast charging? Thunderbolt? Any charging or power at all? And then the Apple proprietary sauce is called "Lightning".

      -------------------
      Not sure why USB-C would get replaced, it's entrenched already yet a bit in trouble because it's too high end (so it's no so much entrenched AT ALL : zero mouse or keyboard or gamepad at my supermarket ; maybe two dual modes drives vs twenty USB-A drives. Zero wifi adapter, zero RJ45 adapter)
      After Nintendo released their tablet gaming computer on USB-C, Microsoft takes the plunge and is releasing their first tablet shit on USB-C. So its biggest use will be charging. For niche uses there's 10 gbps and 20 gbps USB (the latter is so niche only I remember it from the slashdot story) and the TB3 crap made to make rich people spend $10K on a SAN to store their vacation pictures.
      So, I wish you good luck for USB-C to be replaced soon.

    60. Re:A little step in the right direction. by cowdung · · Score: 1

      yeah.. the 13" is still disabled with only 16 GB of RAM. My ancient MacBook Pro already can do that. I need something better to upgrade. The extra 2 cores is nice.. but with only 16 GB it feels limited.

      And no.. I don't want 15".

    61. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason for them to only have one of the ports though is there? I mean, another one would mean charging and dongle use could occur at the same time then.

    62. Re:A little step in the right direction. by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Keyboard aside - if they'd kept a couple "legacy" ports in addition to adding the new USB-C / Thunderbolt 3 ports, it wouldn't have been quite so maddening. It's not like they don't have room... several other manufacturers have managed to do it on equally-thin machines.

      Interesting. I'm listening...

      I realize Ethernet is a goner just due to size considerations (and my 2015 MBP doesn't have one anyway)

      Not only size but also WiFi is quite common, USB to Ethernet adapters are cheap, and other attempts to shrink Ethernet to smaller jacks never caught on, probably because of the earlier two point menttioned.

      - but they certainly could've included at least one USB-A port,

      With quality USB-A to USB-C adapters going for $6 on Amazon I'm not going to throw a fit over this. Cheap USB 2 only adapters sell for a buck or two when bought in packs. If the size of the $6 adapter is too big there's very small USB 3.1 adapters for $10.

      an SD card port,

      I could see that but I have a SD slot on my older MacBook and I think I used it once. I'll admit I may be an outlier so I'll give you this one.

      perhaps a Thunderbolt 2 port...

      Mini-DisplayPort needs to die in a fire.

      I wouldn't be so harsh on mini-DP if they hadn't made the Thunderbolt and mini-DP cables different and incompatible. It took me forever to figure out what the deal was. I finally figured out that mini-DP cables were straight-through and TB1/TB2 cables were crossover. This was confusing and needlessly so. To the few people that really need TB1/TB2 they can buy the $50 adapter. Because DP and TB compatibility was broken from the start someone that wants an adapter for USB3 to mini-DP will need a different $50 adapter. I cannot recall ever seeing a display with a mini-DisplayPort input that didn't have an Apple logo on it so I doubt there's a lot of demand out there. A more likely solution for people is instead of the $50 adapter is getting a $15 USB-C to DisplayPort cable.

      Keeping the mini-DP/TB2 port will just extend the confusion for another generation. Let it die.

      USB-C fixed this DisplayPort/ThunderBolt cable madness from the mini-DP port. USB-C introduced it's own kind of cable madness but at least we can walk away from the mistakes in mini-DP.

      That said, I'm perfectly happy with my "new" (refurb) 2015 MBP.

      That was a nice design. I'd likely still be happy with mine if I hadn't broken it.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    63. Re:A little step in the right direction. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Eh, but do we still have to custom order for those bigger sizes like for SSDs, RAM, etc.? Or will they be the defaults to buy in stores?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    64. Re:A little step in the right direction. by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      There are solutions for a USB-C version of the MagSafe connector. In my opinion, it shouldn't stop you from upgrading. I've done so, and actually don't miss the MagSafe connector. It's only necessary when I use it at home, but I arrive home with a fully charged laptop.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    65. Re:A little step in the right direction. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      And waterproofing doesn't have to preclude a headphone jack. My last 5 phones have had IP68 or better ratings and a headphone jack.

      They may have had IP68 RATINGS; but they probably didn't have IP68 PERFORMANCE. IP68 isn't that hard to attain; but it isn't all that useful, either.

      Apple doesn't actually publish the IP rating, they just exceed everyone else that does.

      Here is a test with the iPhone 7 vs. the Galaxy Note 7 in 35 feet of water.

      https://bgr.com/2016/09/19/iph...

    66. Re:A little step in the right direction. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And I've lost 0 of them to water. Including a Palm Pixi Plus that went for an unplanned swim and had no water resistance rating. Even working outdoors in the Ohio rain (I haven't always been a developer), long before phones had water resistance ratings, I've never had one water damaged. I'm not thoroughly convinced it's all that necessary.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    67. Re: A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The samsung is not rated for 35 feet. Test is pointless. Depth and time have different effects that impact water resistance. Something that handles higher depths may handle immersion at lower depths for less time than a product that can't handle the same peak depth.

    68. Re:A little step in the right direction. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      And I've lost 0 of them to water. Including a Palm Pixi Plus that went for an unplanned swim and had no water resistance rating. Even working outdoors in the Ohio rain (I haven't always been a developer), long before phones had water resistance ratings, I've never had one water damaged. I'm not thoroughly convinced it's all that necessary.

      I thought I had lost my first iPhone (a 4s), when a ridiculously-well-aimed raindrop (just the one, mind you!) zeroed in on my then top-mounted headphone jack. The iPhone absolutely flipped-out for about 20 minutes; until I could get enough water out of the jack to stop it from short-circuiting what I believe was the "switch" detection for headsets.

      Water never got INTO the phone; but it still made it essentially non-functional until I got things dried-out.

    69. Re:A little step in the right direction. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Well, here's the thing: a large portion of the population uses their phone's headphone jack often and its waterproofing rarely, if ever. If a simple market study were done, it would likely reveal that people prefer the headphone jack, if they really have to choose.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    70. Re:A little step in the right direction. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Well, here's the thing: a large portion of the population uses their phone's headphone jack often and its waterproofing rarely, if ever. If a simple market study were done, it would likely reveal that people prefer the headphone jack, if they really have to choose.

      I'm frankly personally on the fence regarding the 3.5mm jack removal. I can see both sides of the argument.

      On the one hand, the 3.5mm jack has been around for decades relatively unchanged. OTOH, it is often an aggravating, intermittent POS. For example, my car's "Entertainment Center" doesn't have BT; but it does have a 3.5mm jack, like my iPhone 6 Plus. But the jack on the car-side is SO intermittent, it might as well not exist; and I have nearly had an accident running off the road trying to twist the damn plug in the socket to "clean" the jack while driving! (yeah, yeah, I know...). So now, I simply don't even try to use it.

      I do NOT, however, believe it is some evil Apple conspiracy to force people to buy AirPods, though. I really do think they are trying to improve water resistance. Plus, I think that sometimes Apple personnel seemingly live in a happy-happy, joy-joy world, and once they have decided on a "better way", then they just go for it whole-hog, like with USB-C.

      Arrogant? Yeah, maybe a little. But disruptive changes often come off that way.

      And I'd rather have to reconsider and rethink old memes and longstanding habits once in awhile, than be that "Get off my lawn!" luddite...

    71. Re:A little step in the right direction. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      And I'd rather have to reconsider and rethink old memes and longstanding habits once in awhile, than be that "Get off my lawn!" luddite...

      And I'd rather have headphones with full-range hi-fi audio and no drop-outs. When I can get that from bluetooth, I'll agree with Apple that it's a better way. For the record, I happily use Apt-X in my truck, so, not quite a "Get off my lawn!" luddite.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    72. Re:A little step in the right direction. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Oh, I forgot to ass zero-latency to the requirements. In recording (and FPS gaming), that matters. A lot.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    73. Re:A little step in the right direction. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Oh, I forgot to ass zero-latency to the requirements. In recording (and FPS gaming), that matters. A lot.

      From what I have read, and FWIW, people give high marks to Apple's BT stack using AAC and the W1 chip; on all counts: Fidelity, range/lack-of-dropouts, and Latency.

    74. Re:A little step in the right direction. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      W1's AAC is still lossy compression and non-zero latency, therefore not suitable for audio production and less than ideal for FPS gaming. Add to that the fact that it's not available in any form of studio monitor headphone and, well... yeah. And it never will be, because it's not suitable for the application in the first place.

      And yes, there is a fair bit of pro recording gear centered around the iPhone, so this is an actual market segment I am talking about, here.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    75. Re:A little step in the right direction. by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      W1's AAC is still lossy compression and non-zero latency, therefore not suitable for audio production and less than ideal for FPS gaming. Add to that the fact that it's not available in any form of studio monitor headphone and, well... yeah. And it never will be, because it's not suitable for the application in the first place.

      And yes, there is a fair bit of pro recording gear centered around the iPhone, so this is an actual market segment I am talking about, here.

      AptX is lossy, too, and I have read the chipset datasheets, and the minimum delay is 50 ms. That's quite audible! For example, A Rockabilly slap back echo is only around 64ms.

      I wouldn't call ANY wireless audio protocol low-enough latency for audio production/recording.

      While I know there is some recording sw and hw centered around iOS devices, I'm not sure I would call any of it "Pro", sorry.

      I have gotten some fantastic impromptu recordings with the DAW iOS app; but I wouldn't record on it if I had something else at hand.

    76. Re:A little step in the right direction. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      AptX is lossy, too, and I have read the chipset datasheets, and the minimum delay is 50 ms. That's quite audible! For example, A Rockabilly slap back echo is only around 64ms.

      Note that I also state that I use AptX in my truck. That is, as with all other bluetooth audio protocols, it is not fit for studio use.

      I wouldn't call ANY wireless audio protocol low-enough latency for audio production/recording.

      Bingo. That's been my point this whole time.

      While I know there is some recording sw and hw centered around iOS devices, I'm not sure I would call any of it "Pro", sorry.

      There are a few mic inputs that hit 192/24 with low latency and no noise. Not sure if they have headphone jacks, as I don't do audio work on an iPhone or iPad, but these are aimed at the pro market as replacements for standalone recorders.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    77. Re: A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you can disable that windows snapping easily, its in the settings for multi-tasking. For me I utterly despise trying to use OSX for work. We use them for dev work because its a middle ground between having a linux setup and having something manageable by IT, but compared to any windows laptop Ive used they are so utterly unreliable in both hardware and software.

      As you pointed out first the multiple displays. OSX is complete and utter shit when it comes to multiple displays. Sometimes it decides to work, sometimes it doesnt, sometimes when you wake up after swapping display setups it will have everything on the laptop screen, other times it wont, sometimes you just get a black screen and have to forcibly reboot to get it working again, etc etc etc. Its just completely crap. This is with using 2 'apple approved' official dongles, I had attempted to use a generic usb-c->hdmi/usb/usbc adapter that worked fine on my personal laptop and 2n1 but of course it caused nothing but issues with the macbook pro because ................ reasons.

      For the hardware the power delivery is very inconsistent. Ive had it shut off displays just on choice of which usb ports Im using for dongles because of power draw (or some unknown reason). Ive had it just shutoff display because of the stupid single body aluminum enclosure likes to conduct static and by me walking out of my office and back I end up zapping the whole body.

      Ive just never had more problems with a laptop product than I have had when working with a macbook pro

    78. Re:A little step in the right direction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one big drawback to the magsafe connector is that it can pick up magnetic dirt (bits of iron commonly found it regular dirt, or from metal filings from a workshop) It's difficult to clean the magnetic dirt out, and can interfere with the proper mating of the cable.

      It's not a huge drawback, but can be annoying at times, especially if you bring your mac or your bag that you also use to carry the mac, to dusty locations, or in a workshop.

  5. Updated price breakdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's now $400 for the hardware, and $800 for the Apple logo on the back.

  6. Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by tomknight · · Score: 1

    That RAM limitation really has been an issue for some people. That we can now go to 32GB on DDR4 will makean enormous difference.

    --
    Oh arse
    1. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 0

      And you need 32GB on a laptop?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by tomknight · · Score: 1

      I don't yet, although when playing with VMs it might be helpful. it helps I'm using Linux only and I'm not bad at reducing memory footprint.
      It's certainly a problem for some academics/developers playing with large chunks of data.

      Combine the two, such as when you need to run a Windows only application in a VM (ArcGIS springs to mind) and *that* is used to look at a large dataset... 16GB can feel awfully restrictive.

      Niche to Apple perhaps, but there are an awful lot of h/w manufacturers very happy to go way above 16GB RAM.

      --
      Oh arse
    3. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Photo / video editing?

    4. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      And you need 32GB on a laptop?

      Some people use their laptop for more than just standard office apps. CAD, Video editing, etc. can take a lot of RAM. Granted, these work better on a desktop but you can't take a desktop to a client, etc.

      Plus, since the RAM can't be upgraded after purchase it makes sense to get more than you need, just in case.

    5. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the desktop line is built with laptop hardware and not very impressive at all (and systems like the trashcan Mac Pro a downright waste of time and money) you might as well use a laptop as your primary system, which means, yes, 32GB for any serious professional.

    6. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you work with virtual machines or media creation tools, 16GB ain't a whole lot, let alone people who need to do real engineering or scientific computing. These are supposed to be "Professional"-grade machines. Realistically, a Pro-grade notebook in 2018 should probably top out at 64GB, not just 32, especially since the RAM in Apple notebooks is not upgradeable.

    7. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      And you need 32GB on a laptop?

      A marketing point for most people. Having more RAM simply has to mean it is better, amirite?

      But in most cases, if you need that much RAM, you probably need a desktop with it. If you simply want that much in a laptop, there are fine offerings running Windows 10 that should keep a person happy.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      And you need 32GB on a laptop?

      Some people use their laptop for more than just standard office apps. CAD, Video editing, etc. can take a lot of RAM. Granted, these work better on a desktop but you can't take a desktop to a client, etc.

      Plus, since the RAM can't be upgraded after purchase it makes sense to get more than you need, just in case.

      A Laptop works pretty good for Video editing if you get an external screen, external hard drive, external keyboard..... Oh hell, forgive me, I was wandering off into sarcasm land.

      But doing a lot of video editing, I really need as much real estate and multiple screens as I can get. A laptop is a real non starter, I've only used them for review purposes.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Photo work.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      try working with some larger than 1MB datasets in R or python

    11. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      You can do the external devices. And then when you need to, pick it up and take it to the client meeting to show off your work. Including a quick live edit if necessary. The idea is you don't need a desktop any more, everything is on the laptop. And when you're at home/work you plug it into more convenient displays via a dock.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    12. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most taxing app on my iMac Pro is chrome. Just a couple of tabs open in that monster takes 8 gb or more.

    13. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Our CAD/BIM laptops have dual external monitors with docks. Still easier to transport than a tower, especially if you can dock into a station with everything already set up at your destination.

    14. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Chrome takes what it can to make the browsing experience faster and more optimized. Give it only 4GB and it works sensibly the same.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    15. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I've needed it a few times, actually.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    16. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      This is an awesome setup (I'm rocking it right now), but it's always been a lot more expensive than a desktop + laptop setup for a lot less performance.

    17. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      But in most cases, if you need that much RAM, you probably need a desktop with it.

      Unless you also need portability. Think being able to not only demo your work to a client (which you can do with pre-rendered files on basically any machine) but also implement requested changes right there during the demo.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    18. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes.

    19. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try using a real programming language instead of toys made for dumb people. Then you’ll find that 16GB is 16000x more memory than you need to work with a 1 megabyte data set.

    20. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Khyber · · Score: 1

      If you have MB-range datasets taking up gigs of RAM, your database and dataset are utter garbage.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the memory leaks in the OS X kernel, yes, I do.

    22. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Funny

      But in most cases, if you need that much RAM, you probably need a desktop with it.

      Apple doesn't believe people who want to do real work want a desktop which is why they've been relegated to the trash can.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    23. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do photo editing and time lapse compilation on a 2012 mbp with 8 gigs of ram with no problems. I keep a memory monitor going and my machine has never maxed it out. Not saying that there aren't others who may not find this a limitation but most of the people on the street are waaaay too fast to start screaming for more RAM anytime things don't move as fast as they'd like.

      The RAM thing was big a decade ago, yes. Today? Not so much. Sadly this concept continues to perpetuate among the masses. This is very much in the same vein as the automatic versus manual transmissions debate. Is manual more fuel efficient? Sure but in the majority of cases it's a thin margin at best. Years ago it was a no brainer. YMMV (pun intended)

    24. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      RAM is extremely useful to cache the files you are working on ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      But in most cases, if you need that much RAM, you probably need a desktop with it. Apple doesn't believe people who want to do real work want a desktop which is why they've been relegated to the trash can.

      Yeah, those iMac Pros are the power equivalent of the ASUS bottm level Chroomebooks. Seriously though, if you are pleased with Windows offerings, buy them. I have some Windows machines, and aside from update hell, they work. But then again, the Ford versus Chevy in you is strong, so you must represent.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      But in most cases, if you need that much RAM, you probably need a desktop with it.

      Unless you also need portability. Think being able to not only demo your work to a client (which you can do with pre-rendered files on basically any machine) but also implement requested changes right there during the demo.

      I don't know about you, but when I did reviews, I took notes. This is because different people might want different changes and yes - some would want changes to something that another person suggested to change. And of course, the in-office changed video would not match the master on the machine it was made on.

      So since ten people might see the rough cut at different times, I did notes and discussed.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    27. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by blindseer · · Score: 1

      I bought a laptop with 16 GB before because at the time I was taking training for VM certifications and it was nice to take the laptop to class to play with and have the same setup still there when I went home. I still use multiple VMs on my laptop for testing websites on different operating systems, gaining access to software that's unique to Windows or Linux, and just separating work spaces.

      Having access to 32GB isn't necessary but it would be nice in my next laptop for the same reasons I had bought what was then the most RAM I could get in a laptop last time I was shopping.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    28. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      How does that apply to CAD? Generally, if a part is off by a few mm, it's gonna be off be a few mm no matter who you're showing it to and can be adjusted on-site.

      It's easy to forget that fields other than your own exist, but they do.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    29. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You can do the external devices. And then when you need to, pick it up and take it to the client meeting to show off your work. Including a quick live edit if necessary. The idea is you don't need a desktop any more, everything is on the laptop. And when you're at home/work you plug it into more convenient displays via a dock.

      Live edits? What level of videos are you making? If you don't need a desktop, then that's wonderful. I do.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      How does that apply to CAD? Generally, if a part is off by a few mm, it's gonna be off be a few mm no matter who you're showing it to and can be adjusted on-site. It's easy to forget that fields other than your own exist, but they do.

      Sorry - didn't think that anything off by a few mm would be considered something to show a client.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    31. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Could be a spec change on their end that you weren't informed of. Shit happens in the real world.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    32. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Could be a spec change on their end that you weren't informed of. Shit happens in the real world.

      Sure shit happens. Next person you talk to might change the part the first guy had you change - Just sayin - you want a laptop to do the actual work, I want notes taken on mine.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    33. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Turnaround is a bit quicker when you can deliver the change on the spot. Sure, you wouldn't design the whole part on a laptop, but why not have the capability to answer "what would it look like if we..." questions in real-time and on-site if it's available?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    34. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Turnaround is a bit quicker when you can deliver the change on the spot. Sure, you wouldn't design the whole part on a laptop, but why not have the capability to answer "what would it look like if we..." questions in real-time and on-site if it's available?

      It probably depends on the workflow. If you have a good way to update master files - maybe. I've had a few nightmare occasions where different people have modified aspects without updating a master file.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    35. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't believe people who want to do real work want a desktop which is why they've been relegated to the trash can.

      Oh Snap!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    36. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      And you need 32GB on a laptop?

      On a *computer*. Laptops are everything now, desktops are extremely rare so the question is "who needs 32GB on any computer". There's no reason not to have 32GB options, and need to, especially when you've got developers and video producers kicking around your platform.

    37. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      If you have MB-range datasets taking up gigs of RAM, your database and dataset are utter garbage.

      a) you know nothing about his particular dataset
      b) so what if it is? We've had acres of memory available in computers for years now, it's absurd that it's taken Apple this long to get around to offering it.

    38. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Chrome takes what it can to make the browsing experience faster and more optimized. Give it only 4GB and it works sensibly the same.

      I see... so you the person who is doing backflips to tell everyone they don't need 32GB of RAM, also will admit that more memory improves performance.

    39. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      That's why you want a laptop with a ton of RAM- so you *don't* need a desktop.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    40. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I need 64 GB - and I have a laptop that supports that. Of course, I also work with multi-GB 3D CAD models, so...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    41. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I have a 17" laptop, and the screen is plenty good for 3D CAD work. I do like to have a secondary screen at my desk, but that's so I can keep Outlook and a few other things (typically a browser) up. CAD is done on just one screen...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    42. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like average impoverished people do for mundane purposes? (of watching crap, browsing web, doing taxes or welfare). While USians are busy wanking off with their Rokus, Raspberrys, subscriptions, Google Cast, Apples, tablets that cast their display, NAS with Plex, on $100 per month Internet and labelling themselves as "cord cutters" who stick it to the Man, there are people who simply have a laptop and their laptop is showing on the 32" 1080p TV (sometimes an old projector on VGA).

      Some people use USB 2.0 hard drives. Some people do both. External input too but that may be a game controller to play a few stolen games from the 80s and 90s ; for others it's the logitech style mouse+keyboard with the tiny non-bluetooth wireless dongle.

    43. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iMac Pro is another lemon, drop it an inch and it's totaled and Apple asks $5000 again for it.
      Apple also crippled it by putting it half the memory slots vs its competitors (desktop Core i9, Threadripper) and perhaps crippling it further!

      https://everymac.com/systems/apple/imac-pro/imac-pro-faq/imac-pro-how-to-upgrade-replace-ram-memory.html

      RAM Type & Actual Maximum RAM Capacity

      In marketing copy, Apple simply states that the iMac Pro is equipped by default with 32 GB of "2666 MHz DDR4 ECC memory" and it can be configured with 64 GB or 128 GB at the time of initial system purchase at additional cost.

      In support information, Apple specifies a formal maximum capacity of 128 GB, but does not specify the number of slots. However, in a full teardown of the iMac Pro, site sponsor OWC discovered that it has four memory slots with the default 32 GB of memory installed as four 288-pin 8 GB modules (4 x 8 GB).

      Unfortunately, OWC also determined that it is possible to install 64 GB memory modules in four slots (256 GB of RAM total), but Apple has limited the system to 128 GB in software. Perhaps Apple will remove this restriction in the future.

      captcha : skimped

    44. Re:Finally able to support more than 16GB RAM! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You mean like average impoverished people do for mundane purposes? (of watching crap, browsing web, doing taxes or welfare). While USians are busy wanking off with their Rokus, Raspberrys, subscriptions, Google Cast, Apples, tablets that cast their display, NAS with Plex, on $100 per month Internet and labelling themselves as "cord cutters" who stick it to the Man, there are people who simply have a laptop and their laptop is showing on the 32" 1080p TV (sometimes an old projector on VGA).

      Some people use USB 2.0 hard drives. Some people do both. External input too but that may be a game controller to play a few stolen games from the 80s and 90s ; for others it's the logitech style mouse+keyboard with the tiny non-bluetooth wireless dongle.

      Wow, amazing how people can turn anything into an anti-US rant. Pssst - that usually means you are the one with the problem.

      But to address your rant - there's room at the table for all manner of computers. I have my desktop Mac for video work, I have a nice HP Envy for location work and one program that isn't available yet on MacOS. And right now, I'm posting using a cheap tablet/laptop combo that I don't care if it gets broken or lost. Its all good homie!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  7. Does new design overheat when placed on a pillow? by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

    I have a lingering doubt about the current case design. The previous Retina models had ventilation intake and exhaust opening to the top of the case (between the base and the screen). So when placed on a soft bed with all bottom-facing openings thoroughly blocked, they would not overheat. And this is how I work a lot, laying on a bed. That includes gaming that runs at maximum power and spins up the fans to the full speed.

    The current design has the ventilation openings at the bottom only, that will be blocked when placed on a blanket or pillow.

    Does this result in overheating and slowdown or thermal shutdown when running a computationally intensive task, like a game? Any informal reports on this aspect of thermal performance?

    Another complication is that I am using Windows (i.e., no MacOS) that does not use energy saving features, so it will run hotter even when idling.

    The touchbar is of course useless under Windows, but I guess I will have to put up with this blinking annoyance. There is still no word of 15" models without the touchbar. Apple keeps pushing this feature on the users. Just as they are pushing USB-C while lots of peripherals in continuing use need normal USB.

    4 TB drive is fantastic. Just what is needed for scientists and creative pros who keep a lot of data. This is now four to five years ahead of the nearest competitor (Microsoft Surface).

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  8. And there was much rejoicing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't cared this much in a long time

  9. Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just bought my first Windows PC ever: a cheap netbook. Maybe I'll get in on the next generation -- or on the MacBook version of a netbook.

    1. Re:Too Late by Megane · · Score: 1

      I'll be holding out for a Dell Precision, some of them seem to work well for Hackintosh, or I would get a Linux version. Meanwhile, my 17" still marches on. I just ordered replacement screws for the bottom plate, and last night a random CD cleaner disc restored its ability to play DVDs (and probably burn them as well).

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  10. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ever place a laptop on a blanket or pillow. That's never been a recommended practice for any laptop. Find a hard-cover book and place it on that while in bed.

  11. Mac users will never be happy. by xack · · Score: 1

    The 32GB ram option is here now, but there is still so little options for a real pro portable mac. Make a "fat macbook" with USB-A, 17 inch screen and optical drive and long battery life and it will sell like hot cakes.

    1. Re:Mac users will never be happy. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      No, we won't. We have been programmed that way by Apple.

      As for 32GB, we needed that two years ago, in another two we will need 64-128GB. Soldered-on RAM makes for a short life.

    2. Re:Mac users will never be happy. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      The 32GB ram option is here now, but there is still so little options for a real pro portable mac. Make a "fat macbook" with USB-A, 17 inch screen and optical drive and long battery life and it will sell like hot cakes.

      I still use my 17" 2011 MBP as my main computer. Sure it only has 8 GB RAM & 1 GB Video RAM, but has magsafe, Gigbit Ethernet, FireWire, Thunderbolt & USB-A x 3, as well as a headphone jack, an optical drive, a physical ESC key and a flash memory card reader. Obviously not using some of those things any more (Ethernet, DVD Drive & memory card reader almost never get used), but the rest are features I use often. Firewire is good for transferring data between computers & also target disk mode. If not for magsafe, my computer probably would have been dead years ago. I'd really like to see Apple make a 17" with updated specs.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    3. Re:Mac users will never be happy. by Jonathan+C.+Patschke · · Score: 1

      Make a "fat macbook" with USB-A, 17 inch screen and optical drive and long battery life and it will sell like hot cakes.

      Yep, that's the Mac I wanted--and the Mac I upgraded to every two-to-three years starting with the first 17" PowerBook G4.

      I'm told we're a niche market. We're too picky and too expensive to cater-to relative to the masses of people who just want a shiny Facebook/YouTube machine. I was told that a 15-inch screen is big enough, that I really would never want to upgrade memory or storage, and then I was told to be patient while iOS got all the attention from Apple's OS engineers.

      So I waited. My most recent Mac is 8 years old. The new OS X won't run on it, and I can't even get a 15 "Pro" MacBook with an "escape" key. I didn't really want to run Vim, anyway, I guess.

      I've stopped waiting, and now I carry a ThinkPad. It's big, it's ugly, it's fast, the battery lasts all day, and I can swap out parts as I need. Shame about losing my investment in software for OS X, but Apple have firmly and repeatedly told our type that we're not welcome at their party anymore.

      --
      Pining for the days when The Glorious MEEPT!!! graced SlapDash with his wisdom.
    4. Re:Mac users will never be happy. by Megane · · Score: 1

      If only Apple had kept it for a year longer, we would have had a 17" with USB 3.0. I'm still using mine right now, and I have one stashed away, along with an older 17" model. I think that my biggest long-term problem is going to be power supplies, thanks to wear problems at the wire ends and embrittlement of the crappy insulation on the power cords.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    5. Re:Mac users will never be happy. by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      I still use my 17" 2011 MBP as my main computer. Sure it only has 8 GB RAM

      Just a heads-up: despite Apple's claims, it will happily take (and use) 16GB. I have a a 17" 2011 MBP with a dead GPU that won't boot into Windows or OSX (not even the installers) but runs Linux just fine with integrated graphics; with that upgrade it's not a bad machine, even today.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    6. Re:Mac users will never be happy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add me as another who wanted that, too - a fat, 17" fully port-loaded Macbook but with a removable battery.

      I think there's more of us than you think. But it seems we have all been waiting for nothing.

      Time to do some deep researching about Hackintoshing.

    7. Re:Mac users will never be happy. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I love my P71. Full 17" 4K screen, 64 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, and runs a solid 10 hours on battery doing normal stuff (7 hours doing CAD or more advanced stuff). Yeah, it's 8 pounds - but if 8 pounds is too heavy for a person to carry from office to office or on the occasional (weekly, in my case) flight, then they may have other health problems to consider. Plus, the true numeric keypad is a bonus!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    8. Re:Mac users will never be happy. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I'd really like to see Apple make a 17" with updated specs.
      Same, but I guess I just buy two used ones with maxed out RAM, and 2 big SSDs.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  12. Mac Mini by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Later?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Unusable by ebcdic · · Score: 1

    I have bought several Macbook Pros over the last 15 years, and I'd buy one of these if they didn't have the touchbar. I've tried the previous generation and I constantly touch it by mistake. And the virtual escape key is no good if you have to use it frequently, because it feels completely different from the real keys.
    So I'll be sticking with my existing pre-touchbar model for another year at least.

    1. Re:Unusable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pros
      - - -
      newer/faster CPUs
      more/faster RAM
      more storage

      Cons
      - - -
      Butterfly keyboard
      Emoji bar
      No physical ESC key
      No user-replaceable RAM
      No user-replaceable SSD user
      No user-replaceable battery
      No USB A ports
      No SD card slot
      No Magsafe
      No matte display option
      Over-used of glue (presumably)
      Still stupidly expensive

      Sorry, Apple, but the flaws and drawbacks still way outweigh any benefits. I'm sticking with my 2010 MBP (with day-one upgraded RAM, SSDs swapped in for the original HDD & DVD and a recently-self-replaced battery, thank you very much). If it fails before you come out with a good new option, I'll probably try to get my hands on a second-hand 2012 model or look at moving to a non-MacOS machine.

  14. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 2

    Go find that in a hotel room, in vacation home, etc. That's a huge dongle to carry around! There are a few laptops that do not have ventilation openings at the bottom, MS Surface and the previous (2013) MacBook Pro are some of them. All the rest have shitty thermal design that requires air flow under the bottom.

    In short, a notebook should not require any add-ons in normal use. Bed is my normal use.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  15. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a hard-cover book and place it on that while in bed.

    What? Now I have to go buy a new peripheral?

  16. Too little, too late for me by JoeWalsh · · Score: 1

    I've already switched back to Linux. I'm done paying twice the price for mediocre hardware.

    Sure, the Mac experience can be nice, but it's not *that* nice.

    1. Re:Too little, too late for me by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Same here. Got a Dell Precision about a year and a half ago, and I've never looked back. Less irritating bugs and quirks than the Mac, and half the price. Sure the case isn't as slick and the desktop isn't as flashy, but I'm really not too upset by that. It's actually lighter by quite a bit than my last MBP. And since I've never been locked into the Apple ecosystem, I'm not missing anything since I switched.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Too little, too late for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also got a 15" Dell Precision at the beginning of the year and couldn't be happier. 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, and a 4k display (because it was actually cheaper than the 1920x080), which is fantastic fro some CAD work. The touchscreen is not really useful, but is only a problem if you touch the screen. The only point in which the new Apple is clearly superior is the processor, but it also costs 60% more here in Europe.

  17. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what defect has been built into this one?

    1. Re:I wonder by Stephen+Piazze · · Score: 0

      It's gotten like that, hasn't it?

  18. Fuck the T2 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do people not realize what kind of DRM this implements?

    These x86_64 systems are now locked down harder than a fucking iPhone, all in the name of "user security".

    Here's a hint for you- Apple isn't securing these devices for your benefit. They are securing these devices AGAINST YOU.

    You can no longer run whatever software you want on a T2 enabled Mac (as far as macOS is concerned). The T2 implements numerous restrictions and security certificate checks that prevent you from running older software on the machine if newer software is available. You can only get authenticated copies of macOS (for your system only) through the App Store, and Apple removes the last version of macOS the moment a new version is available. Even if the installer still shows up in your purchase history and you can download it, it will not authenticate and run when it inevitably tries to grab the required data to allow the system to boot. If you ever have to do an internet recovery, you're getting the latest version of macOS whether you want it or not.

    Furthermore, your SSD contents are now encrypted by default and TIED TO THE LOGIC BOARD.

    This means that if ANYTHING happens to that system, you better fucking have backups, because your SSD contents are as good as gone. This is even worse than Filevault- at least with FV, if something happened there was a chance you might be able to recover your data because it was encrypted through software. With this system, if the T2 decides to blow away the encryption keys for your disk drive, you're totally fucking hooped.

    It doesn't stop there either. Even the diagnostics for these computers are now INTERNET ENABLED and require authentication with a remote Apple server before they'll run. You can no longer download a copy of ASD and self service your OWN FUCKING HARDWARE. From what I've heard, even if you somehow obtain a copy of the diagnostics, they won't actually run unless the machine's S/N has been entered into Apple's service system and there's a valid repair order number associated with it.

    Oh, yeah, and if you ever do anything that freaks out the T2 enough to send it into a panic mode- you need a second system (with another T2 security chip inside it) to resurrect the first one using a utility that needs to talk to a remote Apple server. If you piss off Apple enough, they can simply block your system from ever being resurrected again. At that point your hardware is as good as dead- you might as well throw it out and buy a new system.

    Make no mistake, you do NOT own one of these computers. Apple does. At best, you are renting this hardware from them in perpetuity, and they can shut you down the moment they want to. You cannot modify it however you wish. You cannot repair it whenever you want. YOU DO NOT OWN THESE COMPUTERS.

    Don't fucking fall for this ruse. These systems do not offer "user security". They are secured from YOU, the user, to protect Apple's bottom line (just like their iOS devices). I never thought I'd see the day when the freedoms associated with owning a PC were trampled on so heavily, but here we are. If you buy one of these computers, it is going to bite you in the ass eventually- regardless of what "premium" you may have paid for it.

  19. In other news... by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hamilton Beach has a new drip coffee maker, whose parts cost $0.17 less than the previous model but make coffee 2% faster!! (Why isn't this on Slashdot's front page yet?)

    Oh, you use a French press? A French press, really. Looks like some snob is already getting ready for this weekend's celebrations, I see. Well, good for you! But some of us prefer drip coffee makers even though the coffee isn't nearly as good. And my favorite manufacturer is Hamilton Beach, which is why my coffee maker case-cover has a hole, to show off the Hamilton Beach logo.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new coffee maker they are making will not allow you to open any of the compartments. It will be fed water and ground coffee by HB Premium connectors which only interface with HB Premium bottled water and HB Premium ground coffee packs. It will be twice as expensive but it's so simple and now the logo has a backlight which you _definitely_ want to show off.

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, just get an AeroPress - a piece of rubber and plastic that'll make coffee better than any powdery, grounds-leaking cafetiere piece of shit you've got, and is far, far more consistent than a drip-maker.

      For filtered coffee it's second to none. Heck, it's better than most consumer espresso machines, a twentieth of the cost, and easier to clean.

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A French press is another "French" thing that's not actually French.

    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A French press is another "French" thing that's not actually French.

      French Stewart is actually from New Mexico!

  20. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by Megane · · Score: 1

    A hotel room is likely to have random cards for room service, and you can probably find a newspaper. You can also use a suitcase; even the softest of suitcases aren't likely to block the ports. This is a problem that I learned how to work around at least ten years ago, back in the era of the Aluminum case design, of which I had three. It was very nice looking, but crappy in so many ways, the cooling being just one of them. Unibody was an amazing improvement.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  21. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have stayed in, hotels from Japan, to hostels in Sweden, dorm rooms in France, and ski cabins in Canada. I have never seen a hotel, hostel, dormitory, or AirB&B that doesn’t have a desk.

  22. An inc is better than a mile in the wrong diretion by Mats+Svensson · · Score: 1

    The butterfly keyboards has been phased out, and replace with a new design called "mote".
    New mote keyboards will be 0.0001 inch thinner, only sacrificing minimal travel length, comes in 2 new colors.

  23. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

    Guys, sigh, don't tell me how to work. I'm too old to reconsider my habits :).

    Here is the use case (not actual me): https://www.shutterstock.com/v...

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  24. Mac users should be upset by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    The SMART (impossible) thing for Apple to do is simply attach the battery to the bottom of the case and make it part of the battery. They get all the size savings and users could remove and replace the battery with a little effort. This would also open the market to creating 3rd party bottom plates that are thicker with larger batteries (Apple could sell their own as well.)

    The quality has gone down, especially as the phones take greater priority; Jobs being gone and those who retired around that time...

    Apple needs to spin off the Mac division like they did with Claris (now Filemaker) and still owning them can share plenty between the two but separating and making the mac division survive on it's own may produce better results. The Mac side is not weak it's just being undermined and going downhill despite doing as well sales wise.

  25. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15 years ago, I used to use a 12 inch Thinkpad and it had a matching hard-backed portfolio case that wrapped around it and zipped shut like a book cover. I kept using it as a rigid pad to put under newer notebooks when using them on my lap on a couch. It works well as a platform for 14 inch laptops even if they won't fit inside the case for travel. Because it has a nylon fabric covering, it's not too uncomfortable even if I am wearing shorts on the weekend and it sits across bare skin.

    However, I don't always remember to pack it for travel. In remote places, I've improvised with locally found magazines and books as described in previous posts. I also found that a FedEx or DHL flat-pack envelope or rigid document mailing box works OK in a pinch. I've seen other people carry around a white or other colored plastic board for this purpose. They look exactly like cutting boards, so I imagine they probably are. It makes sense to me, as those are commodity priced and have a pebbled texture that will act as non-slip.

    I imagine even the super-thin, plastic cutting-board liners would work. I.e. the ones meant to allow you to gently lift and fold the sheet to funnel chopped ingredients into a small pan etc. They are very light weight, but still rigid enough that they would keep fluffy bedding away from the vents. However, a rigid board would be better to maintain that 1-2mm air gap under laptop designs where tiny feet lift the entire device off the desk surface.

  26. what? Killing magsafe?? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    What, they're killing the magsafe power connector????

    Darn-- I love that connector.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:what? Killing magsafe?? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      The last magsafe-equipped MacBook Pro is the 2015, now on clearance from Apple. Get one while you still can.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:what? Killing magsafe?? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      The last magsafe-equipped MacBook Pro is the 2015, now on clearance from Apple. Get one while you still can.

      If you're quick (it helps to use something like Refurb Tracker), you can also still occasionally grab a 13" MacBook Pro off the Apple refurb store.

      I prefer buying refurbished direct from Apple because you can get AppleCare+ - but there are also other options available, such as Gazelle.

      If you're buying new, you can sometimes get a better deal from B&H Photo than you get directly from Apple.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  27. Still not "Pro" by sremick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Still glued-in battery (consumer hostile)
    Still no removable/expandable SSD (consumer hostile)
    Still no removable/expandable RAM (consumer hostile)
    Still no easily-replaceable keyboard (consumer hostile)
    Still a horrible keyboard design that people will continue to hate
    Still no necessary ports
    Still no Magsafe, so users are back to busting their computer motherboard
    Still overpriced, especially for repair parts like the display ($500 or more for some models)
    Still not recyclable

    There's nothing "Pro" about this. This is the "MacBook Contempt"... as in, Apple's overt contempt for their customers.

    1. Re:Still not "Pro" by chrism238 · · Score: 1

      Who replaces a keyboard on a laptop?

    2. Re:Still not "Pro" by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      And what's a "necessary" port?

      Half of this litany show a desire to lug around a 10 lb device vs a light/thin *laptop*.

      The removal of Magsafe still puzzles me, though.

    3. Re:Still not "Pro" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have many times. There is no reason to replace an entire laptop because the keyboard is somehow malfunctioning or broken. I've done this process on both Dell and Lenovo laptops, generally not a hard thing to do.

      Maybe some of us don't feel the need to throw things in the trash due to something silly like a busted T key.

    4. Re:Still not "Pro" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the same people who have a shitty bit of dust under their 'butteryfly' keys ruining their $6,600 non-gaming-level laptop with 2.5 year old, sub-par GPU technology?

  28. Lab Tests on NeXTstep OS kernel... by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    in the 90's proved more cores is not faster.

    NeXTstep OS...which is the same kernel OS in MacOS X revealed that its architecture did not gain increases in throughput above 4 cores. This testing was done when 4+ cores emerged with " more cores the better" marketing hype.

    Darwin kernel (ex BSD) with proprietary enhancements for MacOS X by Apple is not a modular kernel but hybrid monolithic/modular architecture that takes advantage of modularity by design.

    Additional core improvement to throughput must be a function of off-loading CPU intensives by algorithmic and hardware optimizations.

    1. Re:Lab Tests on NeXTstep OS kernel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      in the 90's proved more cores is not faster.

      the darwin kernel and its I/O pipelines have changed massively in the interim, so your information is useless

  29. You misspelled "offense and breeding terrorists" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beig pro organized mass-murder spending is something only Americans or Nazi Germany could be.

    You motherfuckers deliberately and willfully recruited, trained, armed and financed the very exact terrorists you now want us to waste money on, because this time a fuckin' third of the US budget was not enough ... now you wanted OUR MONEY too! And for that you deliberately sent masses of refugees our way, to destabilize us!

    Fuck off, Nazi nation of mass-murderers and consumer livestock! It's our money! *You* deal with the shit you bred, or we will deal with you and your joke of a Trump government! Nobody cars if you go bankrupt in the process! (Maybe a few of your citizens will finally experience what it means for your mind to be free and to have an actual life instead of propaganda and slave work.)

  30. Sucky Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you need to tell people how much RAM they need? Why? For that matter why does Apple?

    See, this is the thing. Different people have different needs, and when we can accommodate those needs (and easily too), we ought to do so. Why is this hard for some people?

  31. DisplayLink can go fuck themselves. by blindseer · · Score: 1

    DisplayLink is a USB based video adapter, that's just fucked up to begin with. Do the math on a 1080p/60 display...
    1920 (horizontal) x 1080 (vertical) x 24 (bits of color) x 60 (frames per second) = 3 Gbps

    3 Gbps the raw data rate for a 1080p/60 display on a bus that has a max speed of 5 Gbps data, 4K/60 needs 4 times that bandwidth. DisplayLink is trying to squeeze 4K and 5K video on a 5 Gbps, or maybe 10 Gbps if they use USB 3.1, and to do that they compress the frames and expand them on a chip they made. If they can't figure out how to make that work on MacOS then maybe they should get better code writers or use the built-in DisplayPort chip in every Apple computer with a USB-C port.

    Other vendors can figure this out by using Thunderbolt and/or DisplayPort which can achieve 20 or 40 Gbps on the same USB-C port. With 20 Gbps that gets 5K/60 or 2x4K/30 without compression, with compression (which again is built-in to the DisplayPort chip in every Apple with USB-C and DisplayPort 1.4 displays) and/or 40 Gbps cables/adapters it gets up to 5K/120 or 4K/240.

    A quick Google search tells me that DisplayLink and Linux have their own problems. Don't blame Apple on this. Blame the maker of your dongle for using DisplayLink chips for passing video or blame yourself for choosing crap dongles.

    I had to take support calls on DisplayLink shit and so I have all kinds of hate for them. This isn't an Apple thing, or Linux thing, because even in Windows DisplayLink support sucks balls. DisplayLink can go fuck themselves.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    1. Re:DisplayLink can go fuck themselves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DisplayLink is used on Android allegedly. Do you know something about, er, that.
      I got some unknown kid on the Internet to buy one (he asked for it) for his advanced all-in-one Windows PC with no display out. I said beware, these things were originally to display spreadsheets and powerpoints, get a USB 3.0 one. Not this one, according to reviews it won't do but that other one will actually do the job within its limitation.
      End result he could do what he wanted, watch videos on the TV. Some compression artifacting but do you fucking remember the days of composite and S-Video on PC? When composite was crap and S-Video was in black and white because vendors concerned didn't give a crap about PAL S-Video to work.

      Quick prediction anyway Displayport on USB-C and Thunderbolt on USB-C will fail on the market except for high end stuff. Most low end laptops and desktops will have one USB-C and the rest USB-A ; and a HDMI unless it's some laptoptablet 2-in-1 shit where they cheaped out.

  32. Netboot and Imaging Killed By Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T2 chip puts an end to this useful workflow.

    Fuck Apple.

    Don't buy these units either.

    Ignore.

    Wait another few years, maybe the poor sales will finally sink the message home.

  33. Re: You misspelled "offense and breeding terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you trying to be willfully ignorant?

    NATO is the reason you aren't speaking Russian, with a hammer and scythe flag waving above your house. Asshat.

  34. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    My Lenovo P71 has its cooling fans on the sides and rear. Works great on a soft surface, no overheating at all.

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  35. Only $540 more than comparable XPS15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Configured on the Apple and Dell websites with an i9 processor, 32GB, and 1TB SSD drive:

    Macbook Pro - $3589

    Dell XPS 15 - $3049

    captcha - nonsense

  36. Where's muh Face ID? by fortfive · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you can take away my ports if you give me Face ID on my Mac.

  37. They don't learn from their mistakes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I miss Jobs. He'd quietly can bad products. Like the Cube. And the round mouse.

    But Cook just doubles down on silly ideas like this touch bar thing.

    At ESC could have been a physical key.
    I'm going to have to build a hackintosh.

  38. Re:Does new design overheat when placed on a pillo by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 1

    Interesting. I wouldn't say that from the pictures. Half the bottom panel is ventilation grille.

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  39. Tell People What They Need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, right here, is part of what is wrong with Apple. This endless desire to tell people what they need. No, you don't understand your own needs, only we do! And your needs magically fit perfectly within our product offerings...

    "But in most cases, if you need that much RAM, you probably need a desktop with it..."
    "A marketing point for most people. Having more RAM simply has to mean it is better, amirite?"

    It's also this business of de-legitimizing and down-rating requests from customers. You might as well say, "if you are using that much RAM then you are Computing Wrong!"

    I can imagine many scenarios, all valid, where a high RAM capacity would be beneficial or even essential. The fact that you cannot is your problem, not mine.

  40. Are they upgradable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the 2018 MacBook pros upgradable with regards to RAM and SSD? I am thinking about switching from a PC to a Mac, but someone mentioned that the last couple of years they have not been upgradable. If that is the case I would prefer to stick with a PC.