Kids with dumb and irresponsible parents will generally have genes making them dumb and irresponsible. Giving these genetic lines "more opportunities" to proliferate is counter-productive.
Nonsense, a woman who makes an allegation will almost always get everything she wants. Most women stay silent because "sexual harassment" is about as big of a problem as someone microwaving popcorn
Killing active combatants isn't controversial, it seems what brings up ethical issues is that the USA is conducting the conflict through an assassination program, which is not how you fight a real defensive war.
The strikes really only take place at the local government's request, though it's kind of hard to tell if such governments are sanctioned by the people when dissenters are killed.
Major donors will still shape policy on an issue as long as it doesn't antagonize the general membership too much. The "corporate gun lobby" itself is influenced by government connections more than the big government supporters can admit, since after all government is every big gun manufacturer's best customer.
My school banned rice cookers too, no arguing they are simply confiscated and you are fined. Nearest food store was also a 20 minute drive. Couldn't have guessed when I was applying to college that it might have food supply logistics similar to a derelict bus in Alaskan bush country.
You're the one who seems out of touch, the most popular drone is the semi-autonomous assassination bomber. There have been some advancements in computer processing since the 80s...
It's very strange that people are less disturbed by a serial killer who has lost count of how many he has killed, and who got away with it for so long over such a wide area that the police can't determine how many people are unaccounted for either.
Rare event in a small country, you have to wait 100 years to prove it. China will have invaded and easily occupied the disarmed country before that milestone is reached, however.
Are China and Russia taking action, is Saudi Arabia switching to wind? It's tiny resource-poor countries that embrace environmentalist righteousness since they have always had to live frugally anyway
Men can't bear children, work is the only thing that gives their lives meaning. They also have to pay for dates. Women should get a stipend to cover gas, lunch, and tampons, but it's only fair for 95% of the payroll to be reserved for the pathetic males.
Most religions encouraged scholarly and scientific research, at least amongst the clerical class. The only thing the common man has learned from the internet is how many penises can fit inside a woman's anus.
Apology would not have kept him his job, would have just been used as part of a Maoist style public humiliation. See Paula Deen, or even Limbaugh's apology for criticizing that freeloading slut.
They have to pay taxes for gay entitlements, though, just like they have to pay for "family planning" for depraved heterosexuals. Granted you can probably find some tax money making its way to religion, but there are probably more grants to nonprofits with a satanic mission
Didn't they call for a boycott of Barilla pasta because the CEO said his ads would only feature traditional families? The gay agenda does involve encouraging homosexual behavior and the destruction of the family, the people who support this cause are less concerned with helping the poor gays than covering up their own inability or unwillingness to contribute to civilization.
The way people think is probably more genetic than you'd like to believe. Certainly people who think that a legal structure to regulate sexual reproduction can possibly apply to a pair of the same sex must have a neural fault somewhere. OK, it's possible that technology could someday allow two people of the same sex to produce a child, but that's not the reality we live in currently. Of course not stopping such genetic manipulation would be a grave error, just like not stopping the promotion of homosexuality will be prove to be.
And you support nothing that might negatively impact others' lives? Not surprising that someone focused on what's between their legs can't consider that possibility
Kids with dumb and irresponsible parents will generally have genes making them dumb and irresponsible. Giving these genetic lines "more opportunities" to proliferate is counter-productive.
Nonsense, a woman who makes an allegation will almost always get everything she wants. Most women stay silent because "sexual harassment" is about as big of a problem as someone microwaving popcorn
Killing active combatants isn't controversial, it seems what brings up ethical issues is that the USA is conducting the conflict through an assassination program, which is not how you fight a real defensive war.
The strikes really only take place at the local government's request, though it's kind of hard to tell if such governments are sanctioned by the people when dissenters are killed.
If I spent $10,000 on a 3D printer. I couldn't just open the box and push the "Give me a 3D Prosthetic Hand" button
No shit, you need to print the button first.
Major donors will still shape policy on an issue as long as it doesn't antagonize the general membership too much. The "corporate gun lobby" itself is influenced by government connections more than the big government supporters can admit, since after all government is every big gun manufacturer's best customer.
My school banned rice cookers too, no arguing they are simply confiscated and you are fined. Nearest food store was also a 20 minute drive. Couldn't have guessed when I was applying to college that it might have food supply logistics similar to a derelict bus in Alaskan bush country.
Don't think most schools' plans are that flexible. Many have for-profit contractors running food service, so I'm sure they're not.
You're the one who seems out of touch, the most popular drone is the semi-autonomous assassination bomber. There have been some advancements in computer processing since the 80s...
Tendency is for the laws to be standardized, Stevens knows that only a federal ban on private ownership would be practical after such an Amendment
It's very strange that people are less disturbed by a serial killer who has lost count of how many he has killed, and who got away with it for so long over such a wide area that the police can't determine how many people are unaccounted for either.
Rare event in a small country, you have to wait 100 years to prove it. China will have invaded and easily occupied the disarmed country before that milestone is reached, however.
You left out the part where the girls laughed at your beatdown and told the principal you started it
Are China and Russia taking action, is Saudi Arabia switching to wind? It's tiny resource-poor countries that embrace environmentalist righteousness since they have always had to live frugally anyway
The cost for the treatment you received in the 90s probably doubled or tripled by now, so it's questionable how long Medicaid would be sustainable
Men can't bear children, work is the only thing that gives their lives meaning. They also have to pay for dates. Women should get a stipend to cover gas, lunch, and tampons, but it's only fair for 95% of the payroll to be reserved for the pathetic males.
Women are 99% of the prostitutes
How is an additional job opportunity supposed to indicate adversity?
Most religions encouraged scholarly and scientific research, at least amongst the clerical class. The only thing the common man has learned from the internet is how many penises can fit inside a woman's anus.
Apology would not have kept him his job, would have just been used as part of a Maoist style public humiliation. See Paula Deen, or even Limbaugh's apology for criticizing that freeloading slut.
probably were looking for "vehemently"
They have to pay taxes for gay entitlements, though, just like they have to pay for "family planning" for depraved heterosexuals. Granted you can probably find some tax money making its way to religion, but there are probably more grants to nonprofits with a satanic mission
Didn't they call for a boycott of Barilla pasta because the CEO said his ads would only feature traditional families? The gay agenda does involve encouraging homosexual behavior and the destruction of the family, the people who support this cause are less concerned with helping the poor gays than covering up their own inability or unwillingness to contribute to civilization.
The way people think is probably more genetic than you'd like to believe. Certainly people who think that a legal structure to regulate sexual reproduction can possibly apply to a pair of the same sex must have a neural fault somewhere. OK, it's possible that technology could someday allow two people of the same sex to produce a child, but that's not the reality we live in currently. Of course not stopping such genetic manipulation would be a grave error, just like not stopping the promotion of homosexuality will be prove to be.
And you support nothing that might negatively impact others' lives? Not surprising that someone focused on what's between their legs can't consider that possibility
I see your point, but if it reached a certain scale that website probably would face legal action.