Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Hungry Students, How Common?

Gud (78635) points to this story in the Washington Post about students having trouble with paying for both food and school. "I recall a number of these experiences from my time as grad student. I remember choosing between eating, living in bad neighborhoods, putting gas in the car, etc. Me and my fellow students still refer to ourselves as the 'starving grad students.' Today we laugh about these experiences because we all got good jobs that lifted us out of poverty, but not everyone is that fortunate. I wonder how many students are having hard time concentrating on their studies due to worrying where the next meal comes from. In the article I found the attitude of collage admins to the idea of meal plan point sharing, telling as how little they care about anything else but soak students & parents for fees and pester them later on with requests for donations. Last year I did the college tour for my first child, after reading the article, some of the comments I heard on that tour started making more sense. Like 'During exams you go to the dining hall in the morning, eat and study all day for one swipe' or 'One student is doing study on what happens when you live only on Ramen noodles!'

How common is 'food insecurity in college or high school'? What tricks can you share with current students?"

390 comments

  1. first post :P by sgt+scrub · · Score: 2, Funny

    Feed me!

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:first post :P by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      Feed me!

      College Diet:

      1.Ramen noodles

      2.Natty Light

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:first post :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all seriousness, macaroni is usually cheaper per calorie.

    3. Re:first post :P by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      2. Natty Light

      You mean sex in a canoe?

    4. Re:first post :P by knightghost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Potatoes are 10 cents a pound here.

      "Learning to live poor" is the most education that people get in college. They have money... they just don't know how to manage it properly. I've been there. Many years, the $1 burger king friday special burger was my treat for the entire week.

      Looking back, I could have done far better. Why? Because I've learned. Why did I learn? Because things got tight so I got motivated. People are capable of far more than they'd like to be.

    5. Re:first post :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are 89 cents each here.

    6. Re:first post :P by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      I recall the biggest food challenge for me at the university was that food was so expensive at the university and around it. I had cheap food at home but didn't often have time to pack a lunch. And with the 30 minute shuttlebus to get to main campus from the cheap parking lot, anything I ate would have to be walking distance or carried with me the entire day. I pined for NYC bodegas where you can get a roll for $0.50 or something cheap just to tide you over until you get home. I went hungry many long days, but thanks to both subsidized and unsubsidized loans and a little bit of income, I wasn't starving.

    7. Re:first post :P by knightghost · · Score: 1

      Scrub potato. Nuke it. Stick it in a ziplock bag with catchup. Lunch for 25 cents.

    8. Re:first post :P by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      Common staples, many of us have done it. Ramen. Fried liver. Linguine aglio e olio. I've never quite forgotten my lean years. I could live off staples in my pantry for three months.

    9. Re:first post :P by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Youre right , money management IS a problem for young college attendees.
      Mom and Dad spent high school buying everything for Jr. that his job at McDonalds didnt cover. So Jr.s first splash in the adult pool doesnt leave room to buy food because the cable bill is two months due, he already put in an order for an oz. of mexican pot and its his turn to buy beer this weekend, he had to buy more data minutes for his phone and gas for the graduation Stang costs waaaay too much.
      The answer is; get a girlfriend, shower more and get a girlfriend. Get one with some meat on her bones, she likes to eat and will feed you. Big gals always try harder in the sack too. Win/win!

      It really IS important to teach the young how the world works and how to get from point A to point B, before turning them loose on the wild , wild world.
      OOOH baybeee baby, its a wild world, its hard to get by without a fat girl.
      The difference is; dont pick up girls @ bars, pick up girls @ Dairy Queen!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    10. Re:first post :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RAMEN ramen ramen. Thats how I get by.

  2. You don't hear about the failures by MindPrison · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...because no one wants to tell you about those, of course not - who wants to admit they didn't make it after all of those hardships?

    I took an education in Animation, very VERY expensive, cost me a HUGE fortune (which I took up a loan for, and worked in a computer store to pay off), did I end up working for Disney? No. Despite winning TWO FILM AWARDS - I still didn't get a job with Pixar or the likes, why? Did I suck? No - I just didn't have the right connections, and I didn't even understand how important it is to have the right connections, and NOT to piss off the wrong people.

    I spent the next 10 years paying of my study debts, I'm finally free. But I don't regret anything, if I didn't do it - I'd spend the rest of my life wondering how things would have turned out if I did it, if I really just took the plunge and went for it. Well - I did...and it didn't turn out as I expect it.

    But you know what? Everything you learn in life - you'll eventually get some use out of, I use my former education to work in advertising, using my animation skills in a technical sense, earning my living that way. Nothing is ever 100% black & white.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious what you are doing now then? If I had the skills, I'd try to use Blender (or whatever) and start my own studio if I couldn't get hired by the big boys/girls. Connections would still be a problem though for distribution, but now you know that and could alleviate it.

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    2. Re:You don't hear about the failures by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      I currently use Blender, I'm also a 3Dstudio max user. Right now, I am a 3D graphics artist in a small town. Between jobs, I work as a teacher, it's a small town, I have my own house here...that's why I don't work in the big cities. It's my own choice.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    3. Re:You don't hear about the failures by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      I took an education in Animation

      Good for you.

      Where were we?

      No, if I wanted fries I'd have asked for them.

      Yeah, I know...I tend to give people fries even though they don't ask for them.
      I guess that's why I don't work for McDonalds.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    4. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but big cities started as small towns too. I.e., you could still start a studio if you find some good people and you might be surprised what skilled people (like you) live in your neighborhood, and if you were very good in the local endeavors, you would probably attract more to the locale.

      LOL, I just realized, my comment was directly influenced by the fact I've been reading the Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin this week -- good book btw, a bit rambling as he was mostly an old fogey as he says up-front, but I should have read it when I was much younger I think, because he has really good advice for getting shit done (both personally and in the community). :)

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    5. Re:You don't hear about the failures by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You couldn't find a job at any of the studios? What did you do to piss people off? I know plenty of people without any connections who are doing just fine finding animation gigs. I hate to be "that guy" but the only person who I've ever heard about making the right connections was someone who showed up in town, didn't get anything within a couple months of showing up and complained that the whole system was rigged and left. If you are blacklisted you must have been a world class asshole to a lot of people.

    6. Re:You don't hear about the failures by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      Nice, I'm a big fan of Benjamin Franklin. His picture hangs framed in gold, on my wall amongst the others, Einstein, Tesla, Faraday, Edison, Newton, Mandelbrot, Curie, Turing, Farnsworth, Planck, Disney (yes! Walt!), Roentgen, Morse and so many more, but they are the well known ones, the most interesting ones - are those people we never hear about...

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    7. Re:You don't hear about the failures by bielcosmo · · Score: 2

      Here is the problem. 30 years ago, you just needed a degree. English degree? You were still able to find a well paying degree. In fact, it mattered more what one did after graduating than the major. Then majors became important after the dot.com crash. Want a computer job, where is the CS degree? Now, a degree in the field is relevant only because without it, your resume doesn't pass the first round of filters. There used to be an unspoken deal. A student paid the insane fees and dealt with pleasing the professors for the degree, and because of that, they would get hired. Now, that deal was welched on, and not by the students who played by the rules.

    8. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah... what said the philosophy major with a job to the one without? "Want fries with that?"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

      I guess I just don't get why you wouldn't try bettering your community with starting a new local industry (the US needs more job-makers after all!)-- that said, being a teacher is certainly admirable as I would like to be one, and that betters the community in nonlinear ways like creating a business. But there are are a surplus of students in the US and not enough JOBS, so the ability to be able to deliver an _actual_product_, produced locally, is a big deal IMO, and a big deal for your locale (and would be for your local government FYI)...

      From your brief comments, you could shepherd that, and even Pixar and Disney(!) started small.... Just saying... There's probably more going in your life than you let on I would hazard a guess, like family or something, and I understand if that's the case, because they can distract from the IDEAL career-choices... And I suppose the IDEAL career-choice, was not a recent option for you, because you (like many) have had practical considerations to think of... Cheers though, for sharing your story!

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
    10. Re:You don't hear about the failures by websitebroke · · Score: 2

      An animator is one skill, an entrepreneur is another. Quite frequently, people only have one of them.

    11. Re:You don't hear about the failures by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Everything you learn that you are interested in that is. That is one of the main reason to advise people to learn something they have a passion for. The ones doing things for the money will not get a lot of mileage out of their "learning" as it will not become part of who they are and hence they will never be good at it will not stay long with them. That is also a reason why everybody that finds they cannot find passion for a subject to change the subject.

      Sure, at the end of the day you have to find some way to make enough money from what you learned to live off it. But you can either live in hell, doing a job you hate and no amount of money will ever compensate for that (although many people think it does). Or you can do something that you at lest love parts of and that you are good at. That usually does not make you rich, but unless you are really unlucky, it should be enough to live decently off it. Just remember that working is what takes most of your awake-time. Making that time more agreeable is very much worthwhile.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    12. Re:You don't hear about the failures by gweihir · · Score: 1

      A society where somebody looking to get an education can be reduced to that sucks on a very fundamental level. Doing education right takes everything a person has. Adding economic survival to that is just plain wrong and also plain stupid economically. Maybe one of the reasons the US imports so many H1B workers: The domestic talent seems to find it far to difficult to get a good education. A country the size of the US should not have any shortage of highly talented, skilled and educated people. Yet it has.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At no point in all of human history has this retarded excuse for a joke EVER been made by anyone who himself possessed any sort of marketable skill. It is literally physically impossible.

    14. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      H-1B workers are about cheapness not talents or skill. They fake not having skilled workers by demanding grab bags of overly specific skills, for IT positions often in specific software packages that didn't even exist for the years of experience they're demanding. Read most any job listing. HR's both incompetent and deceitful.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    15. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      I'd image there's a lot of unlucky people then. Certainly, no one wants to pay me for anything I'd ever realistically care to do.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    16. Re:You don't hear about the failures by gweihir · · Score: 1

      There certainly are a lot of people that are incompetent at their jobs. That would support your hypothesis.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    17. Re:You don't hear about the failures by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That explanation is far too simplistic.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    18. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Nephandus · · Score: 1

      Why? It works. It's profitable.

      --
      "A soft answer turneth away wrath. Once wrath is looking the other way, shoot it in the head."
    19. Re:You don't hear about the failures by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      A country the size of the US should not have any shortage of highly talented, skilled and educated people. Yet it has.

      No it hasn't. Employers just aren't willing to pay market rates for talent and not work them into the ground, so they found a loophole in the system that allows them to hire foreign workers for less than market rate and work them into the ground.

      Let's eliminate the various loopholes in overtime laws and H1-B laws and put some teeth into enforcement and see how many jobs open up overnight.

    20. Re:You don't hear about the failures by Monkey-Man2000 · · Score: 1

      True, and many people are not born with entrepreneurial skills either (but some learn early and we'll say they were born for it) -- most people need to learn these types of things through work or education. Those averse to learning them, or encouraged(/discouraged) by comments like yours, will surely fail as they think they can't learn to be an entrepreneur to begin with. Did Walt Disney think of himself primarily as an entrepreneur, or just an animator that wanted to get shit done? The end effect was the same, he was an animator AND an entrepreneur but he needed no special training, or novel built-in talent, to distinguish the two. That's my point. The GP post pointed out he knew some of his faults were in his industry connections; IMO, that's the first lessons to be learned toward an entrepreneurial future and GP learned some hard but good lessons IMO. Why not start an industry? We need more of those things states-side I think...

      --
      This post was generated by a Cadre of Uber Monkeys for Monkey-Man2000 (603495).
  3. Work for the money before going to school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody is forcing you to attend an expensive university or college. There's community college and also trade schools which don't cost as much. Many of us don't fall victim to the social brainwashing either. Myself I'm a lead architect developer, been doing this for years, without any educational background. Do I have enough money to get a degree now? Sure. Would I? Maybe for business, other than that, no. Point being, work yourself up, then attend college. Nobody is forcing you to keep working at dead end jobs, I've seen plenty of positions where companies want those who push themselves to the next level and want to learn.

    1. Re:Work for the money before going to school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen plenty of positions

      What 3? 30?

      3 million? Well...

    2. Re:Work for the money before going to school by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That is a road not many can take without sucking badly (and most that take this road do indeed suck badly, many of them do not know it). High-quality education is what allows you to stand on the shoulders of giants. No amount of talent can replace that. In fact, talent is orthogonal to it. You need both to be good.

      I do know a number of people in the CS field that had abbreviated educations (BS only) or educations with the wrong focus point (economics, then they were doing IT security work) and that invested in more (MA, PhD in one case). All say that it was very much worth their while. All also say that they could not even see or only very fuzzily see what they were missing before.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  4. Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by runeghost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sure, the 'best' schools are there, but who cares if you're walking the edge of malnutrition in order to pay for class, gas, and books? Emigrate to an actual civilized country instead of a pretend one.

    1. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Informative

      As if food isn't going to be a problem in Europe, where the food and books and gas are far more expensive...

      I was dirt poor as a student in college, but I still managed to eat just fine and have a car I could get away with when I needed a break. No way I could have afforded having and using a car in Europe.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      confirming the only civilized outside the USA that exist are in Europe...

    3. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food isn't much more expensive. Gas is almost entirely a non-issue because public transportation is infinitely better than almost every single US city.

    4. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a car in Europe, they have decent public transport.

    5. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by dkf · · Score: 1

      As if food isn't going to be a problem in Europe, where the food and books and gas are far more expensive...

      Academic books aren't such a problem; the US has more of a racket going there.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    6. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Noughmad · · Score: 2

      Yes, things are expensive in Europe, but a large majority of students here can afford to own a car. You know, not having to pay for college does wonders.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    7. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're in college and suffering from malnutrition it's probably your own damn fault. Granted working a 40 hour a week job on top of going to classes is probably overkill, but you can always get a loan to cover the cost of school and life expenses while you're in school.

      Sure the loans are often unsubsidized and can't be discharged by bankruptcy court, but you can always get loans.

      Also, the first 4 years are the ones that are hard to finance, the grad schools usually find money to cover your costs in some fashion, assuming that you've got potential.

    8. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I didn't NEED a car in school either, I lived on campus or could also take the bus. But a car gives you a lot more latitude - even in Europe it gets you places not easy to visit by public transport (I've travelled a lot in Europe both by car and train/bus/tram so I know what's what there).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    9. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You know, not having to pay for college does wonders.

      For everything except your education. And your job prospects...

      Although costs for school in U.S. now are so out of hand I would warrant you are better off in Europe since you can easily supplement education for very little, whereas the geas a huge student loan places upon you is nearly unrecoverable even after decades.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    10. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      As if food isn't going to be a problem in Europe, where the food and books and gas are far more expensive...

      Right. Because that's the only factor.

      It is of course impossible that other countries actually give financial assistance to students and that's what GP was referring to.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't need a car in Europe, they have decent public transport.

      Ha! HAaahaaahahahaahaaHAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAaaaaaa! You are joking, right?

      Yours sincerely,

      a British student.

    12. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most universities in Germany include an unlimited public transport pass in the low semester fee (ca. $300 per semester, the biggest part of that actually is the public transport pass. There is no tuition.) Public transport includes railways, not just buses. You don't need a car. Cycling is common in Germany. Get a bike. It is often the fastest way to get around.

      Students typically choose from several canteens offering a variety of subsidized meals (a full meal for $3.50, for example). You don't need to learn how to cook (but cooking is a great opportunity for socializing, so do it anyway).

      Most required reading is available at the libraries or you can buy hand-me-downs cheaply. Course based learning materials are also made available online.

      By far the biggest cost of studying in Europe is a place to stay. There's at-cost rooming (with high speed internet and other amenities), but due to the high demand there's usually a waiting list for that.

    13. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by MtHuurne · · Score: 2

      Food is not that expensive in Europe, if you buy in-season vegetables and cook them yourself. Driving a car is expensive, but in many countries you can get by without a car. Typically people get their first car when they get their first full-time job. If you're studying in Europe, drive a car and don't have enough money to eat properly, I'd say you made the wrong budget choices.

      When I was a student (in the Netherlands in the late 90's), housing was the largest expense. Second was the tuition costs. Food was third, but a lot below housing and tuition. Books were expensive a piece, but fortunately our university didn't require a lot of books to be bought: they tried to use books efficiently (only require a book if a lot of chapters were used; use the same book for multiple courses if possible) and offered a lot of their own material at duplication price (about 1/5th to 1/10th the price of an academic book). Looking at my bookshelf I count 14 books from my studies and I think I sold one, so 15 books for a master's degree.

    14. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if food isn't going to be a problem in Europe, where the food and books and gas are far more expensive...

      I was dirt poor as a student in college, but I still managed to eat just fine and have a car I could get away with when I needed a break. No way I could have afforded having and using a car in Europe.

      Well, ok, but then again, in Europe, you don't need a car. Not even to "get away". So food is really the only major expense, and there are cheap ways to eat.

    15. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Then why are there so many cars in Europe?

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    16. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On second thought, maybe we should just let the Russians overrun you.

    17. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I wrote in other postings here, there is no such thing as "free" education. You (later on) and your parents pay through the nose in taxes and deductions for that.

      We have tax/social security contribution rates of 40% or more in Germany. The middle class is actually destroyed by the socialism. See the average fertility rate as the core argument of mine. Germany is consuming its future, very much like the Soviet Union did.

      Sure as hell mainstream politiocs and media will not say that. They want to eat the cake and have it.

      I know, German born to German parents, still living here.

    18. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we can afford them?

      NEED and WANT are two different things. Look at how many people actually drive daily into E.g. London or Paris.

    19. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Conspicuous consumption? Also, some people happen to have cars only for occasional usage (weekly raids of supermarkets, e.g.).

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    20. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      For everything except your education. And your job prospects...

      Yeah, no one ever hires people from shitty European schools like Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial College London, the Sorbonne, Gottingen, ETH Zurich, ...

    21. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      The expense of food in the Netherlands is what prompted me to post...

      I was living in Amsterdam for a few months a few years ago and I thought food was damn expensive (raw or otherwise) compared to the U.S. Perhaps in the 90's that was true but I think taxes have gone up substantially since then, also the fuel costs used to transport the food.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    22. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Well, ok, but then again, in Europe, you don't need a car. Not even to "get away".

      I've lived there. Yes, you do. You can get around any U.S. city just as well by public transport, but you can do a LOT more with a car in the U.S. or the EU...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    23. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

    24. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      And statistically speaking no one gets into those schools either

    25. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh, food sure is a problem around here, too, but tuition fees are not. I don't know what's the current going rate, but back when I went to university, they wanted somewhere around 400 bucks a semester from me.

      That's manageable with a part time job, trust me. Just work through the 3 months of breaks you get per year and you should be golden.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    26. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then no one gets into the good American schools either and it's all a wash.

    27. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, your job prospects are quite great. Most universities here have a quite shining international rep.

      Just because YOU don't pay for it doesn't mean nobody does. I do. My taxes do. By far not enough if you ask me, and they keep cutting back on money for education to bail out a few banks, but my taxes pay for education here.

      Just because public schools are completely fucked up in the US doesn't mean that it can't be done right. All it takes is people in control who actually WANT public schools to succeed rather than enjoying watching them fail because they themselves come from expensive private schools and don't like the idea that someone could get for free what they had to pay through the nose for.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind having a room in a multi-room apartment and sharing the apartment (not the room, of course) with a few other students, you can actually live fairly cheaply... ok, not in Paris or London, but almost everywhere else.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Stop bailing out banks, stop "saving" Greece so they keep buying your submarines and there's suddenly a whole lot of money for education without bleeding the middle class dry.

      As long as you keep voting in that helmet hairdo she-male, you should not expect any pity from me!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Russians would ask you for permission.

      Wait, you really think you could stop them if you wanted? Now that's cute.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Most universities in Germany include an unlimited public transport pass in the low semester fee (ca. $300 per semester, the biggest part of that actually is the public transport pass. There is no tuition.) Public transport includes railways, not just buses. You don't need a car. Cycling is common in Germany. Get a bike. It is often the fastest way to get around.

      Many US universities also offer free public transportation passes as well. But this typically only works well for urban campuses and in areas with good public transportation, which does not describe most of the united states. The oil companies made sure of that several decades ago.

      Most required reading is available at the libraries or you can buy hand-me-downs cheaply. Course based learning materials are also made available online.

      Publishers have American students basically by the balls. The cost of textbooks has doubled and even quadrupled in the 20 years since I was an undergraduate. They'll charge you through the nose for a required textbook, then make a few minor changes to the questions at the back of the chapter, pump out a new edition, and use that next semester, so the buyback/used value drops to practically nothing. And if they don't get you that way, it's the extra fee for "online access" and "online homework". I also see more and more students opting for the "international version", which is basically the exact same textbook but not in hardcover -- it's a paperback. Basically, they know that the USA is the wealthiest nation on earth, and companies intended on milking us for every dime they can get.

      BTW; Professors don't buy the textbooks. Publishers give professors free complimentary copies of the "instructor's copy". They also like to wine and dine them to make sure their textbook gets selected,. . .

    32. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

      The main VAT rate went up from 17.5% to 21% iirc, but food falls under a special VAT rate of 6% that has stayed at the same level afaik. There is a new "packaging tax" which was supposedly introduced to discourage unnecessary packaging material, but I don't think it actually changed anything except the price.

      We had something like 5% inflation for several years in a row around 2000. Many people blame this price increase on the switch to the Euro in 2002, but there were significant price increases in the years before that as well. I don't know the reasons behind those increases. In the years after, we had a "supermarket war" where the supermarkets lowered their prices one after another to attract more customers, which has reduced their profit margins significantly. So that's probably not where the high cost is either.

      Even so, there are plenty of tasty dishes you can make from cheap ingredients like carrots, onions and cabbage. Meat is the most expensive ingredient, but you need hardly any meat at all from a nutricional point of view (provided you get sufficient proteins from other sources), so if we're talking about starving students then meat is optional.

    33. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And if you chose the right one, you also get solid command of a second language out of that, an invaluable asset if you want to do anything international.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    34. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      In most of Europe, you do not need a car, because they have something called "public transportation" that, unlike in almost all of the US, does not suck. Example: Here the longest distance to the next stop (city area, 350'000 inhabitants) is 200m, and during the day its one Bus/Tram every 7 minutes. A car is completely redundant. Instead use the Bus or Tram ride to read, something you do all the time as a student anyways.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    35. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by gweihir · · Score: 3, Informative

      The British are not really part of Europe...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    36. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      British living in the US and I cant drive. Sure our rail and public transport system sucks compared with the rest of Europe. It is still way, way, way, way, way better than the crap that passes for public transport in the US, even in the big cities.

    37. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Tuidjy · · Score: 2

      When I lived in France, I would get in my car for two reasons: go to the Cora (big supermarket) once a week, and go on weekend trips around Alsace. During the week, it was public transportation all the way. I didn't know many people who commuted in their cars... the two that did commute did it on gas-sipping motorcycles.

      Today I live in California, and drive 34 miles per day to get to work, my wife drives a bit less, in a different direction. Our commutes are shorter than most of the people we know. Comparing California to Alsace, the driving cultures are completely different. My daily commuter is a 24 year old 270hp Toyota Supra, the car I take to see customers a 460hp Volvo (I'm in IT, but I work for an aftermarket auto-manufacturer)

      With cars like this, I would be regarded like a wasteful pig by most people I knew in Europe. Amongst the people I know in the US, my cars get good MPG.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    38. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      complain to your professor and university then, it's not the publisher's fault the person actually making the decision is screwing you. Everyone likes to get angry at the faceless company, rather than the person putting you in that position. It's like when people get angry at their insurance company even though it is the hospital charging you 200 dollars per saline drip. It just doesn't feel right to tell your doctor and hospital they are profiteering.

      At my college, professors regularly assigned either their own questions for homework or questions that didn't change over the last couple editions of the book (math and physics classes) and it saved us a lot of money. This meant you only got a new edition if you wanted it, or if for some reason the class was using a first edition.

    39. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      meats are expensive in Europe (at least in the UK when I was living there last year) but not necessarily everywhere else. I get 400 grams of lean, minced chicken breast meat for about 1.4 pounds equivalent. That is more than enough meat, and it isn't crap cuts.

      I'm not sure why it is so expensive in Europe for meat. I'd say it's an US/Europe thing but I'm comparing it to prices in Japan, which are usually a bit higher than the states.

    40. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I went to university in Europe, England to be precise.

      As if food isn't going to be a problem in Europe, where the food and books and gas are far more expensive...

      Food? Not too expensive. More so than the cheapest places in the US, but the canteen was subsidised and decent enough. You could cook cheaper for yourself if you tried however.

      Books? What books? The whole have-to-buy-the-lecturer's-book thing is a uniquely US invention. Actually, I was always planning on being an engineer for life, so I bought quite a few of the books and still use them. Many of my fellow students survived just fine on the lecture notes and libraries (and still got first class degrees).

      And gas? What are you some posh rich kid or something? And how did you wangle a parking space at uni anyway? Sleep with the senior administrative staff? Bicycles remain extremely popular in universities. This is doubly so in many of the older universities since their town centres predate automobiles and can't cope with volumes of motorised traffic.

      If you need a break and want to get away, we have these things called "trains". They go all over the place. If you're a argain hunter you can even get cheap beds on the sleeper ones.

      You seem to be deeply convinced that America is the best country in the world and that all others are like America but worse. I happen to be a big fan of the place (well certain parts) and would probably emigrate there if I could, but man, you need to pull your head out of your arse.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    41. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a British student.

      Get a bike, you lazy git.

      Oh and if you think the public transport is bad in the UK, please bear in mind that the GP is American. On that scale, we have excellent public transport.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    42. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I've lived there. Yes, you do.

      I live there now, and no you don't. I live in London, and own no car. There's no point because I commute to work by train and on foot and have enough storage space that I can get free deliveries on groceries by ordering enough of them. I sort of keep meaning to sign up to one of those car rental schemes, but never get around to it. Trains go lots of places.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    43. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      Here in Tulsa, OK we dream of having a semi-efficient public transport system. All we have are a bunch of buses that require at least 2-3 hours to get anywhere, that's including waiting at the various "bus stops", most of which have nothing more than a bench (no overhead shelter)...which really sucks since in the summer it gets 110F and in the winter we often have negative wind chill. I suppose you could always call a cab and wait for 3-4 hours too...and the nearest "store" is a convenience gas-station, the nearest actual grocery store is two miles if you could cut through the neighborhood (but you can't because they are almost all fenced 4x4 around entire blocks), so it's really a six-mile total walk...and we have a serious lack of sidewalks - most of that walking would be through tall-ish grass full of ticks.

    44. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by berberine · · Score: 1

      Well, ok, but then again, in Europe, you don't need a car. Not even to "get away".

      I've lived there. Yes, you do. You can get around any U.S. city just as well by public transport, but you can do a LOT more with a car in the U.S. or the EU...

      This is not true. I'm an American. My hometown, which is a city, (East Coast) has no public transportation. When I lived in North Carolina, the city I lived in had no public transportation and still doesn't. The state I live in now has public transportation, but only if you live in the eastern part of the state and only in the two major cities. If I want to travel anywhere, I have to take my car. There are numerous other cities, large and small, in the US that have no public transportation.

    45. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was dirt poor as a student in college, but I still managed to eat just fine and have a car I could get away with when I needed a break. No way I could have afforded having and using a car in Europe.

      You're making a false comparison. In America you needed to be able to afford a car to even be able to get around. In Europe you don't need a car, neither to just get around nor to "take a break", because you can go as far as you want without one (and you can get shitfaced on the way too;).

      That is as unrealistic a comparison as a European saying "No way I could have afforded having and using healthcare in the US". It's just a difference in basic assumptions and in how we go about things; in America unless it's life-threatening or you're rich you generally just go without and hope for the best.

      (PS. I tried and tried to come up with a reverse example that would have made the US look better, but sadly I found it nearly impossible...replies welcome!)

    46. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I was dirt poor as a student in college, but I still managed to eat just fine and have a car I could get away with when I needed a break.

      So you were dirt poor, except you had both property and income and could afford to waste them taking leisure drives? Good for you, but how is this relevant in a discussion about people who have trouble getting food?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    47. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK student here, confirming that this post is absolute bollocks.

      Sure in some countries in Europe, University is free to students that were born there.... but let me give you a breakdown of how things work here.

      My rent, for a one bedroom housing association place on the outskirts of London is £480 pcm. I get 2200, three times a year from my loan. That's 6600.

      480*12=5760.

      That leaves me with just over £600 for food, transport, books, equipment, gas, electric, internet etc. per year. Obviously the solution is to get a job for one of your remaining two days a week, but even with that job, you will find yourself destitute should any bills come your way unexpectedly, especially for those who do not have a bank of mom and dad.

      We have 1 million right now that are surviving due to food banks. I would bet at least a quarter are students that don't have family assistance.

    48. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've travelled through Ireland (both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland); stayed in London, England; and have visited or lived in several cities across Mexico, the US, and Canada, and the public transportation in London was by far the best, with Ireland being a pretty close second.

    49. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Then why are there so many cars in Europe?

      I live in Europe but own no car. However, I travel around ten thousand kilometres a year here by hitchhiking, so in talking with my drivers I have long thought about the demographics of car ownership on the continent. Basically, it comes down to:

      • Businessmen who can afford the luxury
      • Families with children; the convenience of being able to cart your tykes around on weekends and holidays makes up for the expense
      • People who live in remote areas where there are only one or two buses a day

      However, it is much less common for young, single and lower-middle class people here to own a car. In my student years, not a single one of my acquaintances at university owned a car, while friends from high school back in the US often couldn't live without one if they were studying outside of a city centre.

    50. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      complain to your professor and university then

      The professor might realize that this situation is unfair and decide that he will do things differently in the next academic year (but you will have moved on by then). However, American universities often have a strong financial interest in making their students buy expensive textbooks year after year, because they run campus bookstores.

    51. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      That is just one of the reasons I got the fuck out of OK. My funny story about Tulsa's transit system. When in high school, I lived in a small town near Tulsa and decided to go to the local sci-fi convention. I was able to get a ride to the airport, figuring that I could get a bus to as near to the convention as possible and then walk the rest. I was already assuming I'd be walking a few miles. I went up to the booth that said "bus schedules" at the airport. It was out of bus schedules. I asked the old lady that worked the counter if there were any others and explained what I was trying to do. She searched the booth, made calls, tried to find out the bus schedules for me. Eventually, she just told the person in the next booth she was taking a break and drove me to the con in her own car because she couldn't even figure out what buses I might be able to take and she ran the Tulsa information booth that was supposed to have the bus schedules. Luckily, at the con I discovered there was a shuttle back to the airport for the return journey.

    52. Re:Here's a trick: Don't live in the U.S. by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      In many European countries, food & housing is subsidized. 0.80 euros a meal (buffet style) at the University cafeteria and about 350 euros a month to live in student housing (1 bedroom apartment).

      And this was in the mid-2000s, in Finland - one of the more expensive countries to live in - which meant that the Internet connection (which was included as part of the rent along with other utilities) was better even then, than I could get now in 2014 in the US (if I were a regular Internet subscriber, that is).

      And car? WTF would you need a car for in most European cities? Students in most European cities would not consider a car to be a necessary item (nor would many adults) and since public transport costed about 40 or 50 euros a month for a pass that got me on any form of Helsinki public transport (bus, local train, tram) which ran several times an hour, a car simply wouldn't have been worth it.

      And having also lived elsewhere in Europe, I seem to recall that situation being pretty similar in many other parts of the continent too.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  5. Well considering that.. by blahplusplus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... 80% of you in the US are competing over 5% of the money in the economy, you guys have no idea how unequal your society has become and you keep voting for more of getting screwed.

    http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesa...

    http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesa...

    http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesa...

    1. Re:Well considering that.. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Because it's one jot different anywhere else in the Industrialised World.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      49% or so of us know and the other 51% are too arrogant to admit that they aren't going to improve things much without the help of the government.

    3. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey! It's more like 70% competing for 10% of the wealth over here.

      That's because we're all cormernusts, with socialized medicine death panels and compulsory gay marriage.

    4. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "49% or so of us know and the other 51% are too arrogant to admit that they aren't going to improve things much without the help of the government."

      Well you guys need to come out of your illusions first.

      http://www.amazon.com/Empire-I...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      http://www.democracynow.org/bl...

      NC on: Free markets

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    5. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... he says without bothering to check.
      You know the US isn't the whole world right? and that American Exceptionalism is a lie that leaves you in the gutter, thinking that so long as everyone else is below you then you're okay?
      And only North Korea and Venezuela are actually below you in the real world.

    6. Re:Well considering that.. by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a difference between income and wealth. The IRS tax stats are freely available for anyone to view. The bottom 80% of Americans (that's a roughly $80k/year income cut-off) account for about 40% of the income, closer to 45% after taxes.

      Wealth is the integral of income (minus expenses). It's just how much of that income you're able to save or spend on durable or appreciating assets. A large percentage of lower- and middle-class income is spent on consumable necessities (food, clothing, gas, etc). But a lot (if not most) of it is also spent on things with no long-term value and depreciating assets with negative ROI (movie/concert tickets, iPhones, HDTVs, eating out, interest on credit card debt, the latest and greatest [anything], etc).

      Given that income distribution is still pretty healthy, you can still amass a large amount of wealth if you simply live within your means and spend/invest your money wisely. I've met a little old lady who worked in a library all her life who has a half million dollar fortune, a carpenter who works out of a pickup truck who owns three houses. In my younger days I made about $40k/yr, yet over 5.5 years managed to save up over $100k for a down payment on a house. I had to live like a hermit, but it's doable. It's all about how you spend your money. If you're blowing it on things which will be worthless in a few years (or tomorrow) while blaming the 20% of people who own 95% of the wealth for all your woes, you've already lost. Yes the system can be improved, but "the man" holding you down is usually yourself.

    7. Re:Well considering that.. by khallow · · Score: 2

      80% of you in the US are competing over 5% of the money in the economy

      Looking at the chart, they say 11%.

      The problem with this statement is twofold. First, it still ignores significant parts of the economy, such as future income. For example, if you have an income (not net income) of 17,300 (like the mean of the bottom 40%), then you probably have a few tens of thousands of potential net income over your lifetime. That isn't reflected in the net worth figure.

      Second, it ignores that most US residents don't compete for wealth. For example, more than a third don't save at all for retirement (36%). So of the 44% who aren't in the 20% wealthiest and happen to save even a little and thus, compete in even the slightest way for wealth, they have 11% of the wealth of the US. That doesn't sound bad to me at all.

    8. Re:Well considering that.. by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      ...because 80% competing for 15% of the money is soooo much more civilized.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    9. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but "the man" holding you down is usually yourself."

      I cant' hear you through all that bailout money...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Or the protectionism for the business community and elites:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      And the plutonomy memo...

      http://politicalgates.blogspot...

    10. Re:Well considering that.. by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      None of you seem to know what wealth is.

      Wealth is not a dollar amount in a bank account, nor is it a deed to a property, nor the size of your paycheck.

      Wealth is the goods and services that you can enjoy. Money is a means to that end, but when comparing percentages of money between different pools (such as between different countries) you cannot possibly be comparing wealth in any way at all, because money percentages are even more removed from wealth than money itself is.

      Americans are doing quite fine in the wealth department. The vast majority of Americans enjoy levels of goods and services that are the envy of most of the world. 5% this, 11% that, 20% whatever, 44% blah blah... meaningless crap that does not relate to wealth at all.

      With the looming trillion dollar student loan bubble, it is quite clear that Americans are not going without access to the higher education services, that quite the contrary there is evidence that too many are partaking in the service to the detriment of us all.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    11. Re:Well considering that.. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Erh... yes, it is. There are still a few countries where "poor" just means "only has a place to live and food, but no luxury stuff". Of course, rich also only means that you have more than you can spend, not more than some small nations can spend.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Well considering that.. by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

      We're far from that. Let's take a look at the Income equality by country.

      Let's just take the richest/poorest 10% comparison. The US has a factor of 15.9. Meaning that the richest 10% make about 16 times what the poorest 10% make. With this, they're in the great company of splendid equality paradises like Uganda, Georgia (the country, not the state...) and Iran.

      There is not a SINGLE European country with a worse ratio than the US. Granted, the aforementioned Georgia along with Portugal and the UK are coming close to it, but none of them is actually WORSE. Most central European (and let's also lump in the Scandinavian) countries revolve around a disparity factor of about 5-8.

      That means that we're looking at about three times more equality in Europe than the US.

      Btw, the 20% rich/poor ratio doesn't get much better for the US. It goes down to a "mere" 8.9 times more money in the 20% rich than the 20% poor, but it's still more than twice the ratio of Finland and Sweden.

      A look at the Gini map also tells a lot (ok, if you know what the Gini coefficient is), with Europe lighting up in green and the US being in a group with such equal rights beacons like China, Argentina or Iran.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Well considering that.. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >... 80% of you in the US are competing over 5% of the money in the economy, you guys have no idea how unequal your society has become and you keep voting for more of getting screwed.

      Anyone who talks about income inequality as if it is a problem in and of itself is automatically labelled an idiot in my mind. Especially when they post (two out of three) references that don't work, and the one that does is just more of the same idiocy that you always hear when it comes to income inequality.

      What matters is median wealth to the health of a society, not income inequality. You could have a perfectly equal society where everyone made 10 bucks a year. Or you could have a society where the median income was 100,000, but you had a handful of plutocrats running around. Which one would you prefer to live in? The second of course. Having a rich person floating around cause harm to you, in and of itself.

    14. Re:Well considering that.. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Typical US ignorance. It is.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    15. Re:Well considering that.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about amassing wealth, it's about quality of life. Reaching 70 with a half million dollar fortune just means you missed out on those enjoyable things in life that depreciate or have negative ROI, like movies and concerts or eating out or holidays. Exchanging enjoyment and variety in life for a pile of money when you are probably too old to really enjoy it anyway doesn't seem like a good way to live.

      Anyway, what happened to the concept of being rewarded for working hard? I thought that was the American Dream, not "do the same low paid job for 40 years and forego all of life's little pleasures". Also, why would a carpenter with three houses work out of a pick-up truck when he can clearly afford some kind of basic workshop that would allow him to grow his business?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Well considering that.. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is that the bottom 35-40% of America is so poor they can't save anything, and the best you can say to them is "you may not be able to put food on the table today, but over your lifetime you might earn a few hundred k!"

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Well considering that.. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Wealth is the goods and services that you can enjoy.

      Nonsense. I can enjoy great, highly valued ski trips to Vail, Colorado but they don't add to my wealth. Instead, if I invest that money, I not only can use a portion of it in the future to buy such ski trips or anything else of similar value that I happen to desire. Wealth is whatever enables me to buy present or future goods and services of value.

    18. Re:Well considering that.. by khallow · · Score: 1

      and the best you can say to them is "you may not be able to put food on the table today, but over your lifetime you might earn a few hundred k!"

      Which, if you think about it, is not that bad an outcome especially given that the vast majority of the bottom 35-40% can put food on the table.

    19. Re:Well considering that.. by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 2

      It's not about amassing wealth, it's about quality of life. Reaching 70 with a half million dollar fortune

      A half million dollars is hardly a "fortune" these days for retirement. Having about 20 times your annual living expenses in the bank to retire at age 60-65 is a pretty reasonable goal. $500,000 / 20 = $25,000. While many people tend to spend less in retirement, $25,000/year is not exactly extravagant living. Many people don't manage to save that much, but anyone who is middle-class or above should probably be targeting something like that or more... unless you're one of the rare people these days with a guaranteed pension or something.

      just means you missed out on those enjoyable things in life that depreciate or have negative ROI, like movies and concerts or eating out or holidays. Exchanging enjoyment and variety in life for a pile of money when you are probably too old to really enjoy it anyway doesn't seem like a good way to live.

      You're presenting a false dichotomy. It's not like you have to choose between living on rice and beans every day to maximize the pile of coins in your "moneybin" OR you get to go out to movies and eat out every night and enjoy life. There's a lot between those extremes.

      The prudent thing is always to be prepared for emergencies. So, personally, I'd put a pretty big priority on making sure I have adequate insurance (including disability, etc.) and an emergency fund with about a year's living expenses that I can draw on if I lose a job or something. I'm not saying you need forego all eating out or movies or whatever, but many people would be surprised how fast you can save money if you just stop buying lattes every day or every other day, or if you only ate out for lunch once per week instead of most days.

      If you're not prepared for emergency situations, you're just not living rationally. Most people will have some sort of crisis happen at some point in their lives, and having at least a small "cushion" in the bank is just a necessary thing... like having a few cans of soup in your pantry in the winter in case a snowstorm comes and you need to stay home for a day.

      As for saving for retirement and so forth, I think you're also missing out on one important element: the more you save, the quicker you become financially independent. That means you have more choices and can decide to do enjoyable things when you want, rather than just when you get your tax refund or are lucky enough to get a bonus.

      Some extreme people save enough of their income and live so frugally that they can retire by age 40 or 45, so they get to spend the rest of their lives -- including most of middle age -- doing what they want.

      An intermediate course is to put some money away, but continue to enjoy some of the things you mention. That way you trade a little flexibility now for a lot more flexibility later on.

      Anyway, what happened to the concept of being rewarded for working hard?

      Both of my sets of grandparents came from lower class backgrounds (three of their families had been immigrants). They lived life well, had most of the nice things that "middle-class" people have, and for one set of them actually had significantly more nice things than most middle-class people, even on blue-collar salaries. They had fewer things, but the things they had were top quality.

      But they also saved -- to my knowledge they always bought cars in cash, they might have taken a mortgage for a while, but otherwise never had a loan in their lives (definitely never any credit card debt). They had plenty of money in the bank to retire, and when they died, they passed on a decent sum to the kids and grandkids.

      So, it is possible to be "rewarded for working hard" and also save money, assuming you have a decent middle-class job. People are just stupid and think you have to live within your "income group." If you make $200k per year, but live li

    20. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wealth is the integral of income (minus expenses). It's just how much of that income you're able to save or spend on durable or appreciating assets. A large percentage of lower- and middle-class income is spent on consumable necessities (food, clothing, gas, etc). But a lot (if not most) of it is also spent on things with no long-term value and depreciating assets with negative ROI (movie/concert tickets, iPhones, HDTVs, eating out, interest on credit card debt, the latest and greatest [anything], etc).

      Good lord, the reality distortion field is strong here. Right now the going rate for a low-skilled office job - the kind of thing you can get right out of high school, no CPA, no CS degree, etc - is ~$30,000. Taxes (state and feds) take about 8,500, leaving 21,500 in the checks. Housing eats 12k/yr to rent anything safe, e.g. not in the ghetto. That leaves you with around 9500 a year. At this point you have no food, no clothes, no transit, no phone, and no meaningful access to health care.
      $5/day for healthy food is pretty much the minimum, so there's 1,825 gone, bringing us down to 7,675.
      If we figure you need 2-3 outfits to replace damaged/destroyed clothing, that's ~$250, down to 7,425.
      Public transit here is another $840/year, down to 6,585.
      A fairly limited phone plan is $360/year, down to 6,225.

      At this point, you have no computer, no internet, no TV, walk everywhere, and are never allowed to get sick. Obamacare forces you to get insurance, haven't checked the rates, but even the subsidized rates aren't free.

      So... how again is this person going to accumulate $100,000 for a house in 5.5 years?

    21. Re:Well considering that.. by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      There is not a SINGLE European country with a worse ratio than the US. Granted, the aforementioned Georgia along with Portugal and the UK are coming close to it, but none of them is actually WORSE. Most central European (and let's also lump in the Scandinavian) countries revolve around a disparity factor of about 5-8.

      That means that we're looking at about three times more equality in Europe than the US.

      I'm not saying you don't have a point. Maybe you do. Maybe you don't. But if you're going to compare inequality in Europe to inequality in the USA, you can't compare the USA with individual European countries.

      Smaller inequality in all individual European countries doesn't imply smaller inequality in Europe as a whole.

      Inequality inside Albania, for example, might be small, but there's a great deal of inequality between Albania and the Netherlands.

    22. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a neighbor who has sworn me to secrecy. She lives with her husband and two children in the same apartment building I do, and his mother, aunt, younger siblings also rent apartments in the same building. "Linda" has saved more than $40,000 for a down payment on a house. She's an LVN, hubby is a security guard, and they always save enough money to spend two weekends a year at Disneyland, celebrating each child's birthday. She's terrified of her husband's family finding out about the $40k - his mother and aunt are both living on Section-8 housing, meaning the gov't pays most of their rent. In their lifetimes, they'll never have the opportunity to save that kind of money, but she's convinced they would demand a loan if they knew about her secret stash. Linda and hubby live incredibly modestly and for years had one car. So I've seen it happen. An LVN is a job that required only a year of technical college, no college degree. Her ex-gangster husband has taken the only job he can find, working as a security guard. He's a scary-looking MOFO. Now he has an employer who adores him, and will give him as many hours a week as he wants to work. He's now working as head of a security detail protecting rappers and B-list movie stars. You rise up where you're planted.

    23. Re:Well considering that.. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The world wide inequality R/P 10% rate is 12. World wide Gini index is 39 (USA 45, Europe 25-30).

      An "international" R/P rate is quite moot since I can't earn my money in country A where income is high while living in country B where cost of living is cheap. One could now start to put something like the Big mac index against it to see what purchasing power actually means and how "poor" poor actually is.

      It doesn't really improve the US position vs. European countries if you ask me.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    24. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like an entitled jackass. If movies, concerts, and eating out are so important in your life, then go for it. But dont go fucking whining about how you cant afford a house, or a college education, or healthcare, or built up adequate retirement savings, etc...

    25. Re:Well considering that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question: Can you name a single Corporate Entity where 80% of the employee's make 45% of the net, post-tax, post-benefit payroll?

      No, you can't.

      That's because without various scams and scheme's, it'd be impossible to take it out of your rear in just one way.

      People can't find houses and the rent on apartments is skyrocketing from the overflow of ex-homeowners because Banks and Wall-Street Played highly illegal, highly immoral rip-off games with Real-Estate (LIBOR, Wells Fargo is undergoing a RICO Lawsuit, RoboSigning). Our Wonderful Federal and State Governments have no intention of ever performing their due diligence in arresting the rotten bastards who perpetrated these scheme's.

      People can't invest in the stock market without getting screwed; fairly soon this will start hitting teacher and police pensions who will spin right around with their hand out to the tax payer instead of doing their f-ing jobs. (Petters, Madoff, LIBOR, HFT, The Chicago Mercantile Exchange was just sued over helping HFT).

      People used to be able to skip out on health insurance and save a couple bucks a year, now it's $3k minimum thanks to ObamaCare, which comes out of your paycheck one way or another. Either it gets taken out before you even get hired for the job with lower pay rates, or it gets taken out of you in your co-worker getting "downsized" and you getting "more workload".

      By the way, we've gone from "downsized" to "higher workload" to "burn-out" to "People quit or completely fuck their employer over hard or walk from burn-out" (I'm a sysadmin, the company I work for was accident or act of god away from being toast just on backups alone) to "companies are starting to hire again for jabberwaukie employee's that do not exist because no you can't find a secretary who will do accounts payable and auditing for $10 an hour" to finally, now companies are realizing they have to hire, and that cost is coming out of bonus checks and investment expectations. That hiring is at as-low-as-you-can-get-it wages, in some industries employers are even willing to play games that will get them put in jail.

      And now, we've got students, up to the hilt in debt, who can't afford a decent meal while at college.

      45K a year, right now, here today, is an 85th percentile income; 85% of Americans make less than that.

      I'll agree with you; if you're not an idiot, And you avoid Financialization like the plague, and you negotiate in cash, and you're a complete bastard, yes you can get some decent things.

      But even you have to admit, We live in a Dystopia, Deal with it.

      It sure as hell won't last forever, and things have yet to get much worse.

  6. not poor by BradMajors · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If someone still owns a car and has a place to live they are not poor. I have know students so poor that they are homeless.

    1. Re:not poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you are paying for college but not able to afford food or shelter, you are an idiot. Priorities, folks!

    2. Re:not poor by Smallpond · · Score: 2

      I could not afford a car until I had been working for a year after grad school. While in school I had a 3rd floor walk-up and a 10-speed bike. My Hungarian landlady taught me how to make Chicken Paprikash. Buying whole chickens, fresh vegetables, rice and flour in bulk is cheaper than prepared foods (except I still bought macaroni and cheese, of course). I worked as a dishwasher, graded exams, repaired equipment in the EE lab, ran statisical analysis for researchers, whatever I could get. It's not hard to get by if you can live simply and are willing to work. The city where I went to school, Pittsburgh, has great parks and museums and the best football team in the world.

    3. Re:not poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If someone still owns a car and has a place to live they are not poor."

      If you are less than 1-3 months paychecks away from homelessness, you are poor! What a stupid measure of poverty. Most jobs require some kind of transportation to get to, and you need food, clothing, the basics to even get one.

    4. Re:not poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buying whole chickens, fresh vegetables, rice and flour in bulk is cheaper than prepared foods

      How long ago was that? Last time I ran the numbers, just the added cost of electricity destroys most of the cost savings and leaves you with a big chunk of time that could have been spent working or studying. Could it be that apartments that once included energy costs are no longer? I don't know. I am still young and have never lived in a place where anything is included except garbage pickup.

    5. Re:not poor by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Even assuming an electric stove (I've always used gas) the electricity cost is less than $100/year so I don't know where this comment is coming from.

      http://michaelbluejay.com/elec...

    6. Re:not poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are in school (hence, a 'student'), you are not poor. I know people who never had a chance, broken homes, sexual abuse, and they are now in prison. If you are a student, you are not poor.

      Get off your "I've seen it worse than that" high horse. There's always someone who has it worse. Jews in Nazi Germany come to mind.

      It's all relative. Get over yourself, and help us all to raise the bar of what is and is not acceptable for a human being to endure. It's called "civilization." You're holding it back with your attitude.

    7. Re:not poor by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Cost of electricity? Seriously? Around here, electricity is about 12 cents/kwh. Granted, electric stovetops and ovens are power hogs, but you're looking at something like 10-25 cents/hour to operate them. It's not going to be a big cost compared to the food itself.

    8. Re:not poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're trying to decide whether you have enough money for gas to get to your job to pay for your apartment, food, utilities, clothing, and sundries, you're probably poor. There are degrees of poverty, certainly, but to say someone is not poor because they have a car and somewhere to stay is a myopic viewpoint.

    9. Re:not poor by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      If you are paying for college but not able to afford food or shelter, you are an idiot. Priorities, folks!

      If it's like my alma matter, a semester of school is essentially free. Once you get accepted and sign up for classes, you weren't required to pay till you wanted to register for the next semester, graduate, or get your transcript. There were plenty of people who were in school and going to classes because they didn't have to pay the money up front, but were having a hard time making ends meet during the semester.

  7. Definitely didn't starve during gradschool by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

    I recently graduated from gradschool in computer engineering. I had a $30k per year stipend on top of my tuition remission (18 credits per year totaling $25k ). Lived in a 1200 sq. ft. 2 bed/2 bath apartment for 5 years. If you're starving during grad school you're probably in the humanities or doing it wrong.

    1. Re:Definitely didn't starve during gradschool by Hemi+Roid · · Score: 1

      IMHO you are NOT a "typical" college student.... hell I work 45-50 hours a week and wish I could have the 1200 sq ft. 2 bed/bath apartment you "slummed" in ... due to unfortunate ....oops baby on the way I had to put my career on hold... damn if it wasn't hard knowing you are under paid for what you do but having to put food and shelter on the table for a new life seems in itself a handicap but I look at it as a reward. Had I been selfish and tried to better myself I would be labeled as a "bad parent" I decided that sacrificing my future for the betterment of my child was the correct way to go. If that meant digging ditches (thanks dad.. I am not a ditch digger) so be it I did it... did I get paid 25K? HELL NO! I got paid less than 20K and I had to work my ass off for every dollar all the while worrying whether I had enough cash to grab more diapers, have enough for unexpected emergencies... (which in all the Doctor Phil episodes where I am a dead-beat parent because I didn't have enough money to handle such) I did the best I could... could I have made more money by sacrificing my family life... yes without a doubt.... but was that the "politically-correct" thing to do ... I still have reservations... I am nearing my seventh decade of life on this planet and wish I would have pressed the EASY button. Am I complaining Yes... but complaining that I didn't have the breaks someone else had... is sorry for bringing up Aesop but is just Sour grapes... I made my bed and I slept in it... and for all the other delusional people out there... my daughter will graduate HS next month the rewards I have received more than make up for the sacrifices I made. Now more to on topic... Rescind laws preventing the discharging of student loans let a person decide not the law!

    2. Re:Definitely didn't starve during gradschool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >oops baby on the way I had to put my career on hold

      We're supposed to be sympathetic to your poor life choices and bad planning because ... why, exactly?

    3. Re:Definitely didn't starve during gradschool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > .oops baby on the way I had to put my career on hold...

      > I made my bed and I slept in it...

      The obvious comments are all too easy. But giving up on straight sex is a *no brainer* if you're broke. Learn mouth and hands, people, they have nerve ending s and a lot less risk of screwing up your career.

  8. Yeah I went through that. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    It's part of the Tao of graduate school.

    I cheated by marrying while I was a grad student. While my wife didn't have that great of a job we had food. After I finished my PhD I supported her graduate studies, an MLIS.

  9. Handout in Orientation Class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my College orientation class they had a handy handout on inexpensive, nutritious meals. It was very useful. This should be SOP in all colleges.

  10. The admins are complicit by CaptBubba · · Score: 1

    The article talks about "Stigmas about seeking help" but only focuses on undergrad and the students' internalized stigmas with the school being super helpful. That has not been my personal experience with graduate TAs and RAs. A close grad student friend worked out that his stipend was so low that he (and all other similarly paid grad students int he department) qualified for food stamps. He jokingly told one of the other grad students when he was within earshot of a professor, and got called into a meeting with the department head threatening retribution if he "made the department look bad" by applying for food stamps.

    I don't know if there were any real teeth in that threat but grad students can't exactly rock the boat too much if they hope to get the all-important recommendation for post-doc work.

    1. Re:The admins are complicit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He shouldn't mock it - one of my department members in my last job was actually on food stamps because he had a family during grad school - one daughter and one son by the final year.

  11. Grad school is voluntary... by Assmasher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if you don't have the means and/or resources necessary to live comfortably during that period AND you're not willing to make the sacrifices necessary otherwise - then don't go.

    Seriously, wtf is up with people thinking that they should get everything they want all the time?

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by NettiWelho · · Score: 0

      Seriously, wtf is up with people thinking that they should get everything they want all the time?

      I agree with you, only the rich people should be allowed not to choose between starving and freezing to death. Shelter AND food? Do they think we can just print more money!?

    2. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      There's a fair point that grad students are probably on average a bit underpaid for the work they perform (research+ marking etc.) even if the hourly rate is good, the limited official hours etc. are not all that great.

      But ya, if you can't live on what you're going to get paid as a grad student and don't have other means, don't go. Pick a degree where you can get money for grad school and can get a job on the side or go back to school when you have the financial means to support it.

    3. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      Yes, because flipping hamburgers is a great and fulfilling experience even if you're gifted for boring down-to-earth stuff like math or physics.

    4. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are gifted in math or science, many (most?) graduate school programs will support you with stipends and teaching jobs.

    5. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's the internet now for studying those things if you don't need the degree. And even before the internet, there were used book stores where you could learn most of the stuff on your own. And even if you needed to have current books, the cost of a new book is generally a lot less than the class, even at community colleges.

      It's a complete waste of resources to produce PhDs that wind up serving coffee or flipping burgers.

    6. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      It's your choice, which would you prefer, the "hardships" of graduate school (LOL) or flipping burgers?

      Hell, if you're worried about eating, be a bartender. I tended bar on weekends in school and the kitchen staff hooked me up all the time.

      --
      Loading...
    7. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Seriously, wtf is up with people thinking that they should get everything they want all the time?

      That's what we call 'entitlement'. It's the confusion of cause and effect when applied to societal systems.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But that's the freedom of choice! Nobody forces you to choose either or. Some like it warm, others like to eat. You can make that choice individually! That's free market, in a socialist world they'd probably make you eat and turn on the heating. Without even caring whether you want that!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It is not only what you want. If you have the required talent, you have a strong moral obligation to become good at using it. Otherwise a technological society collapses.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      because most college grads are forced to choose between enough money to eat and enough money for heating?

    11. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      Seriously, wtf is up with people thinking that they should get everything they want all the time?

      Well, I want a pony. AND I want the flying car I was promised. All together, like NOW.

      OH MY GOD does that mean I'm a BRONIE ?


      Instant gratification vs delayed gratification vs trusting sources perhaps you shouldn't. I think people like to think that hard work and sacrifice always pay off. If you're lucky it does, if not you're like the farmer with their crops eaten by bugs / destroyed by hail / pick a disaster. You survive and try to plan so that it doesn't happen again.

      Just because you want it and wave your hands doesn't always make it so, Mr. Picard.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    12. Re:Grad school is voluntary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be a bartender ...and stay a bartender. People going to graduate school are trying to get an education and a research-oriented CV so that they don't *have* to spend their entire life in a hellhole minimum wage service-sector job. Quitting graduate school and becoming a bartender would ensure that things improved by a little bit in the short-term, and then stayed that way for the rest of your life. An undergraduate degree isn't worth what is used to be -- 80% of the people in the US are fighting for 5% of its total wealth, and plenty of college graduates are living in poverty off of unemployment benefits because they can't find a job (thousands of competing applications for any given posting, and "overqualified" for McDonalds because you don't see it as a "career").

  12. Bulk food is your friend, you have to be creative. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 60s I found I could get just expiring beef and freeze it. I also found restaurant supply place that would sell me bulk sizes of frozen vegges and I would freeze portions. The local Safeway would sometimes give me bread that was going to be trashed. I guess I was lucky that my unfurnished apartment did come with a freezer. Then I was able to furnish my apartment with gifts from the University and tenants moving out that did not want stuff. When my money ran out I found professors that would step in for a helping hand. Rich undergrads would sometimes pay me for help with math, I would wander the undergrad library and ask students that looked frustrated. Ah, the good old days...

  13. I'm not sure how common it is... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But it sounds like an absurd example of a false economy: Even at relatively cheap schools, the cost of running a student through is nontrivial. It seems like complete insanity to waste expensive instructional time on somebody who can't concentrate properly for want of a few dollars worth of calories. Nobody's interests are well served by that.

    1. Re:I'm not sure how common it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the Soviet Union they had budgeted for that. Unfortunately this took away the money they needed to fund that microchip cutter and those coal exhaust cleaners. So they had plenty of excellent graduates and an economy limping along.

      They realized their sucking economy could not build the weapons to defend against the well-equipped cowboys with their NSA, long-range fighter radars, loads of PCs, walkmans, video recorders, patient monitors and advanced pharmaceuticals.

      So, if you cannot afford food+studies, maybe you should drop studies and get a job.

    2. Re:I'm not sure how common it is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the difference between universities in the US and around here in Europe. There, you have to be rich to get through. Over here, you have to be smart, because universities can afford dropout rates around 90-95%.

      Tuition is cheap (and if you're halfway intelligent, free) around here. So, as one may assume, the auditorium is packed in the first semesters. I mean literally. Get there early or you won't even get to stand on the stairs (to get a seat, you should be in at least an hour before it gets going). If you want to get into a seminar, camping in front of the place where you get to register might be a good idea. It's not exaggerating too much when I say, the best friend of a new student is his sleeping bag.

      That in turn means that tests are brutal for the first few semesters. I do not exaggerate, at least 9 out of 10 students will not even get past the first semesters.

      But that also means that everyone, literally EVERYONE who holds a degree from my university is one of the top 5% of the people in the field. Else, he would not have that sheet of paper.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:I'm not sure how common it is... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >But it sounds like an absurd example of a false economy: Even at relatively cheap schools, the cost of running a student through is nontrivial. It seems like complete insanity to waste expensive instructional time on somebody who can't concentrate properly for want of a few dollars worth of calories. Nobody's interests are well served by that.

      The cost is to the student, not to the institution. It doesn't cost the institution more to educate a hungry student, even if they can't think as well.

      I see it as part of the challenge of going to college. I made $18k a year in grad school working as a TA, while living in San Diego. From that, I had to pay for books, car/gas/insurance/registration fees, rent, food, and everything else. Which wasn't easy. But I did it, and graduated from college with only about four thousand dollars in student loans, and that I had to take out because my car's engine and transmission went out within three weeks of each other and I had to put them on my credit card.

      It was like a game to me. I had a budget of $10 or less per day for food. Two $1 bacon cheeseburgers and a $1 frosty for lunch, a $4 bowl of rice and orange chicken for dinner, and I still had enough left over for a snack at night or in the afternoon. The next day I'd get a $5 footlong for lunch, and four tacos for $2 for dinner, and so forth.

      People who are just eating Top Ramen are just doing it wrong, in my opinion.

  14. Ultra-frugal cooking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever money you have, it stretches a whole lot further if you opt for cooking your own meals rather than relying on convenience food. I realize Britain isn't USA but one pound per day goes a long way to keeping you fed if you know how to cook - and I'm not talking pasta 7 days a week either.

    If you join up with other students and buy in bulk, you can probably do better than I did.

    1. Re:Ultra-frugal cooking by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What did work out incredibly well for me was moving in with other students. Not only do you get to have some kind of company without "wasting time" on it (and no matter what you might think, you need people to talk to or you go nuts), it also means that you can much more easily stretch the food money. Cooking for 3 is more efficient than cooking for 1. And more fun too (unless you have a weirdo like one of my former roomies who has a ... let's say rather special taste. I still say he only did it 'cause he wanted to avoid cooking duty). It also takes less time if you split the housework.

      We still come together every other week, one of us cooks and we chat. It's a nice little reminder of our university years, despite us splitting up and moving apart (still within driving distance, fortunately), one of us having a family now, the others engaged or divorced... it's nice to see people you know develop and it's interesting to see how things turn out.

      Seriously, unless you absolutely cannot stand people near you, share an apartment with two or three others. Life gets a LOT cheaper that way and you actually get to stay in touch with humanity despite studying.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  15. It's common in USA and North Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are unfortunate to live of commie states like USA or North Korea, don't be surprise you will be starving.
    USA spends enormous amounts of money on military and security forces. Everyone arriving in USA will be stunned by STASI style of living. Police and security present is strong. Public demonstrations are prohibited in Washington D.C. political dissidents put in jail or landfill.
    USA has the worst records against journalism. Forget press freedom. Official propaganda tubes like Fox News or CNN rules the airways.
    Expect another school district to be closed to divert fund to another F-16 or more bombs. Regime don't care about 60 millions of starving Americans guns are more important.

  16. Cars are a luxury by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember choosing between eating, living in bad neighborhoods, putting gas in the car, etc.

    A starving student with a car?! I think we've isolated the problem.

    1. Re:Cars are a luxury by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      I remember choosing between eating, living in bad neighborhoods, putting gas in the car, etc.

      A starving student with a car?! I think we've isolated the problem.

      I thought the same thing. I could never have afforded a car as a student.

    2. Re:Cars are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely agree - I was never hungry, was able to fly back across the country for the holidays, but took public transit. Could have never afforded a car and insurance.

    3. Re:Cars are a luxury by jonwil · · Score: 1

      If you live in an area where the only way to get from where you live to where you study is private transport (be that a car you own or something else like a taxi) you may not think a car is a luxury.

      But if you are doing that, you are also stupid for not living somewhere close to campus (or to public transport links to campus)

    4. Re:Cars are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you live close enough to walk, the rents are more expensive. if you live far enough away that the rent is cheap, you need a car to get to class. you pay either way.

    5. Re:Cars are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness that my state says that ALL public schools must provide some sort of free transport option to all students that live within a certain me radius of the school.

    6. Re:Cars are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I commuted 45 minutes each way because it was cheaper than paying for the dorm. When I was in college, I snacked out of vending machines and didn't stay long on campus because I got hungry

    7. Re:Cars are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In many parts of the midwest, college campuses and affordable residential areas can be separated by as many as 20 miles. The dorms are barely enough for the freshman and all the alumni push up land values in the college town. The only alternative for all but the most well-off is to live in the next town over. Of course there is no off campus public transit and the snow makes biking or walking a reenactment of polar exploration. That arrangement is so common it is laughable that a site as large as slashdot does not have anyone aware of it.

    8. Re:Cars are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A car is often cheaper than living within walk/bike range of the campus.

    9. Re:Cars are a luxury by buss_error · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Much depends on where you live. If you are on the west or east coast, with great public transport, then I agree.
      If however, you live in Texas, where public transportation is treated as a poor joke, and one in bad taste at that, and vast metroplexes, then maybe not so much.
      It's funny, because the buss routes through the "poor" side of town are 40% less than on the "rich" side of town. On the poor side, you are expected to walk as much as 6 miles to a "transportation hub", while on the "rich" side, there are no routes longer than a mile away from any business or residental section.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    10. Re:Cars are a luxury by Mantrid42 · · Score: 1

      I see you've never been to California.

    11. Re:Cars are a luxury by Altrag · · Score: 1

      You can buy a used car pretty cheap. A few hundred bucks. And most of the "starving students" that have a car probably didn't buy it after they started going to college.

      Keeping the car insured, fueled and maintained is another story all together though. I imagine there's a lot of student cars that spend the majority of their time parked.

    12. Re:Cars are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was me in school. I lived at home, because I couldn't afford to live in a dorm or apartment ,and needed to drive to an off-campus job.

    13. Re:Cars are a luxury by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I guess I am spoilt by living in Australia where pretty much all the major universities I know of are well served by good public transport and are surrounded by piles of privately-owned student housing.

    14. Re:Cars are a luxury by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I guess I am spoilt by living in Australia where pretty much all the major universities I know of are well served by good public transport and are surrounded by piles of privately-owned student housing.

      I don't know about spoilt, but in the US, pretty much everything including cities are built with the expectation that you will have a car. A few larger coastal cities have some form of public transit that make it possible to live without one, but Still not anything like what I've seen in Europe. In the Great Plains states (Texas and everything north of it), things are spread out with miles between your house, work, stores, etc. A 20-30 miles commute to work is not unusual. In the college towns I lived in, there were lots of housing near the schools, but the nearest grocery stores were over two miles away. The only jobs nearby were the few retail jobs which were usually in short supply with so many willing to work them. There are no paths or lanes for bicycles.

    15. Re:Cars are a luxury by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I remember choosing between eating, living in bad neighborhoods, putting gas in the car, etc.

      A starving student with a car?! I think we've isolated the problem.

      And how many of those cars are bombs that aren't even worth US$500?

      I work at a university and most students drive 15-20 yr old cars with a value of between A$1000 and 4000. A 15 yr old Toyota Corolla costs a few 1000 to buy and runs off the smell of an oily rag (seriously, a 15yr old corolla has the efficiency of a modern diesel hatch, I averaged 6L/100 KM in an EK Civic). Owning a car is not a symbol of opulence.

      However I also live in a city where you can get by on public transport, but you're paying A$110 for a shoebox sized room in a sharehouse (A$150 for anything that can accommodate a single bed and a desk). Rents will be by far, the most expensive cost for a student unless they're living at home, the cost of running an old bomb will pale in comparison to rent and food.

      Cars are not as expensive to run as people think, I drive an extremely thirsty 2L Honda Integra, it gets 9-10L/100KM doing mostly highway K's. A weeks worth of RON 100 (the most expensive fuel you can get) is between A$50-70 (@A$1.60 a litre) depending on how much suburban driving I do. Groceries easily cost $80 p/w. However I'm a full time worker so I can easily afford my car, if running costs were an issue, I'd have kept my EK Civic as that costs A$30 a week to keep running (petrol and maint). The problem a lot of students face is that the car isn't really optional due to the distances between a home, work and uni and living in places where public transport is practically non-existent.

      An old 4 banger whitegoods car like a Corolla or Civic is not a luxury, for many it's a necessity due to a lack of public transport options.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  17. Never forget where you came from by jmcbain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I finished my CS PhD about 10 years ago at a top-20 US university. My first year I was not paid, but after I hooked onto an advisor later, I received an RA or TA position for $23k/year, and in my last few years, I received a fellowship for about $40k/year.

    That first year was horrible. I recall eating spaghetti and ketchup, and I distinctly remember having to ask one of my rich friends for a $500 loan just to pay my rent one month. That was one of the most humiliating experiences of my life, and it really shaped my financial planning. Now, 10 years later, although I'm making well over $150k/year, I keep my expenses very low like I'm still a grad student, and I always have at least 6 months' expenses in short-term accounts.

    1. Re:Never forget where you came from by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah spaghetti and ketchup. Nice combo.

      Some of my favorites from my college days were:

      - A boiled potato with a slice of American cheese
      - A cup of white rice with a handful of peanuts

      I was hungry much of the time the last couple of years in college, but mostly that was from stupidity (losing money for dumb reasons) and hubris (refusing to accept any assistance from my parents).

      In Pittsburgh (I went to CMU) there used to be a grocery store that would sell expired food ("Groceries Plus More II" was its name). That was a godsend. You'd never know what you'd get each time you went since their stock was determined by whatever expired goods they could procure that week, but whatever you ended up with was usually for pennies on the dollar. Who cares if a can of spaghetti sauce expired two weeks ago, if it is only a quarter, I'll take it.

      Nobody actually starves in college or grad school, and going hungry and living on the cheap is one of the charms of that time of life. So enjoy it.

    2. Re:Never forget where you came from by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      My university food memories mostly involve dipping fried meats in peanut butter. So delicious, but I do not think my metabolism could handle that any longer.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Never forget where you came from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that subject line, I was expecting to read that having gone through that experience you had empathy for those even less fortunate than you and that you now made an effort to help them out - donating to food banks, volunteering in homeless shelters, putting in some time with habitat for humanity, doing a big-brother/big-sister program. That sort of thing.

    4. Re:Never forget where you came from by jmcbain · · Score: 1

      I actually do have almost 200 hours in community service, but almost all between high school and grad school. I volunteered at hospitals, homeless shelters, and habitat for humanity. Since becoming a professional, though, I have little time for that now. What's most disturbing is that I've now become more libertarian, i.e. disgusted that I have to pay so much tax for socialist services after having spent the entirety of my 20s in CS degree programs.

    5. Re:Never forget where you came from by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Potatoes and cottage cheese actually make wonderful dinners. And rice and beans go splendid together, if you find some kind of grease to glue them you're golden.

      And if you're contrary to expectations still hungry after that Lucullan crapulency, you can always dissolve some stale bread in a cup of water. You can actually kinda bake that if you like, gives it a nice toast-y touch.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Never forget where you came from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising at all.

      There is a saying, "If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain."

      Of course, that saying is much more of an indictment of the people who say it than it is some sort of great truth.

    7. Re:Never forget where you came from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar here.

      I got to make a large pot of rice for the week and mix it with what ever else I got from the market. Lettuce and chicken or the sort. I paid for University parking (which was ridiculously expensive) when I had money, although it wasn't necessary and of course I shared the place with 2 more people so rent was not a problem.

      If you're really having issues when going to grad school, perhaps you need to cut costs somewhere.

    8. Re:Never forget where you came from by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      Ah spaghetti and ketchup. Nice combo.

      Some of my favorites from my college days were:

      - A boiled potato with a slice of American cheese
      - A cup of white rice with a handful of peanuts

      For nutrition's sake, I'd highly recommend adding some things with a little more protein, as well as fruits/veggies. Better to mix in some beans or lentils with the rice or potato. Dry beans and lentils are incredibly cheap in bulk, and last forever -- lentils cook faster than beans, so they'll be ready about as fast as your rice would be, if that's a concern. (Canned beans cost a little more, but get the giant cans if needed, and eat them over a week.)

      As for veggies, there's often a big bag of frozen mixed vegetables on sale, or some other giant bag of something. It's not a good idea to live for years on potatoes, white rice, and American cheese. Add in a giant can of cheap olive oil for loads of relatively cheap calories. Buying in bulk is your friend. (Some would go for the cheaper bottle of vegetable oil, but if you can afford it, go for what's tastier, most versatile, and nutritious.)

      If you're willing to spend just a little time in the kitchen, you'd be amazed what you can do by adding in a (cheap) large sack of flour -- fresh bread, pizza, etc. can be easily done these days with little work (no kneading necessary, with even a small fridge, you can make it easy to bake on whatever schedule you have, etc.). Add in a few of those giant cheap bags of spices from the Indian or Chinese grocery, and pretty soon you'll be grilling up fresh naan with your lentil curry and rice or something.

      Seriously -- when I was in graduate school, a friend and I thought of trying to write a cookbook for people like starving students. It is possible to balance nutrition and frugality, along with very ease or low maintenance recipes for busy students (or minimum-wage workers).

    9. Re:Never forget where you came from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah spaghetti and ketchup. Nice combo.

      (refusing to accept any assistance from my parents).

      enjoy it.

      It's probably easier to enjoy it when you're only poser poor instead of actually poor.

    10. Re:Never forget where you came from by ThEATrE · · Score: 1

      Now, 10 years later, although I'm making well over $150k/year, I keep my expenses very low like I'm still a grad student, and I always have at least 6 months' expenses in short-term accounts.

      With that kind of salary proper frugality, by now you should have accumulated enough money to never have to work again.

    11. Re:Never forget where you came from by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      In any college town, there are myriad ways to live on the cheap. So "actually poor" college students have as many avenues available to them as I did, which is basically the point. No college student actually starves, and college is a fun time to live cheaply when you are surrounded by other young people living as you are and enjoying a time of life when you can have lots of different kinds of fun that cost basically nothing. And you typically have no dependents to worry about.

      Anyway, you're an anonymous coward and you suck.

    12. Re:Never forget where you came from by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      I could have used that cookbook. I bought some dried beans and onions and carrots and stuff once and tried to make soup. Of course because I had no idea how to cook I did not realize that you need some kind of stock to start with. I just put all my ingredients in a pot and boiled them together and ended up with a pot of boiled tasteless vegetables in water. It was disgusting.

  18. Even "student athletes" go to bed hungry by aheath · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Even "student athletes" go to bed hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How soon do they start abusing that for their families like the google employees were doing?

    2. Re:Even "student athletes" go to bed hungry by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      NCAA Approves Unlimited Athlete Meals After Hungry

      Which is complete crap, by the way. Scholarship students get meal plans, and cafeterias let you eat as much a you want and don't really pay attention to students sneaking out food (especially if they are star athletes). Hell, when I played football in college and had 2 a days during camp the team would even feed us after the evening practices. And yeah, sometimes when we got out of practice during the season the cafeteria would be closed. But we had a grill and a little convenience-store type plce that sold frozen or boxed/packaged food that you could buy with your meal plan. And this was at a tiny university. Larger colleges will have multiple cafeterias, multiple on-campus restaurants/grills (which take meal plans), and usually have deals with just off campus places that take meal plans as well. I played with rich kids and poor kids, scholarship and non-scholarship kids, and I can guarantee you that none of them ever went to bed hungry.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Even "student athletes" go to bed hungry by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Don't think most schools' plans are that flexible. Many have for-profit contractors running food service, so I'm sure they're not.

    4. Re:Even "student athletes" go to bed hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they have for-profit contractors, but the school/contractor takes a nice little 10-20% cut of the bill when they allow off campus places to accept meal plan funds. The part where they crack down is when you are able to use meal funds on alcohol, then the athletes' funds get locked down a bit.

    5. Re:Even "student athletes" go to bed hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The same company that services prison meals also services my university's cafeterias. There are some food courts with private companies (Burger King, McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts, et cetera) that accept the meal plan cards, but it's hardly like the GP dreams about. You'd be lucky to get an extra ketchup packet for free...

  19. And it's also unnecessary by MikeRT · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't know about other states, but in Virginia you can go to community college and then get a guaranteed transfer to a 4 year state university if you have at least a 3.0 upon graduation. If you live near Virginia and your state schools are subpar, then all you have to do is move to the town where you want to start, declare residency and apply after one year to the community college to get in state tuition. Want to go out of state and find it a burden to pay $25k/year instead of deferred gratification of one year for less than $5k-$7k/year? Only got yourself to blame. It's not fair, but I doubt most of the world's poor would cry a single tear for you due to your inability to wait one year to save $15-$20k/year.

    1. Re:And it's also unnecessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I live in Virginia and know at least 4 people who were "guaranteed" this transfer and subsequently denied by the college they were attempting to transfer to. The programs in place here sound good, but don't always deliver the way they sound like they will.

    2. Re:And it's also unnecessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Colorado and California getting in-state tuition is much more difficult than moving and waiting one year. If you're less than 22 they go by where your parents live, unless you can prove you received nothing from them for n years or something. They want to know where your car's registered and where you vote, so of course you can handle all that stuff, but making your parents appear to be residents of Colorado or California is more difficult. They have kangaroo tribunals set up to judge people. California even has separate categories of "in-state for admission purposes" and "in-state for tuition purposes".

      All this stuff needs to die with prejudice. In Europe you can go to any country and pay the local fee, while here you cannot even go to a different state.

  20. Learn how to be cheap ... by MacTO · · Score: 1

    That means things like learning how to manage your money: learning what is a necessary and unnecessary expense, learning how to shop for bargains, learning how to do things for yourself in order to save money (e.g. cooking), learning tricks to reduces bills (e.g. heating), learning how to share resources, and so forth.

    I've seen many students complain about how poor they are. Yet they were spending money like their parents were spending money, which was fine for the parents because they had a lifetime to establish themselves financially (e.g. good paying job, accrued assets). Worse yet, some were spending money like they were still living with their parents (i.e. they didn't cut back on the discretionary expenses since leaving home).

    Yeah, losing the luxuries suck. On the other hand, most students would be able to provide themselves with the necessities and lead a happy life without those luxuries.

  21. Undergrad, yes; grad school not so much by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I was squeaking by in undergrad, working various part time jobs to pay the bills. I took longer than most to finish my BS but made it through without having to take out any student loans.

    For grad school I was a married man, which helped. I was also given a tuition waiver and a $20k stipend which also helped. I knew plenty of people who did OK on the stipend living alone as well; not great but a tolerable existence. After all, the stipend is intentionally kept on the meager side to encourage you to get out of grad school.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  22. Get creative by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I subsisted on Ramen and chicken pot pies because they were cheap (4/1$ for Ramen, 2/1$ for chicken pot pies). Even the cheapest dollar meal at the local fast food didn't have as many calories. But, no, I didn't worry about food all that much.

    First thing is to learn to cook. It's generally cheaper to buy family portions and make your own than to buy individual meals. For example, a bag of rice is $10, but can act as bulk in many meals such as fried rice, chicken & rice, steamed rice with butter & onions.. Yeah, doesn't sound too appetizing, but it can be. Fried rice, for example, is easy to make. For about 20$ worth of ingredients, you can have 10 meals. Just need rice, an egg or two, onions, salami/pepperoni, etc.. You can buy a pack of miso for around $4. Add firm tofu ($3) or chicken chunks ($4) and dried seaweed ($3) and you can make soup for 10 people. Buying a bulk pack of 50 tacos will set you back around $10; add a couple pounds of beef (10$), lettuce (2$), cheese ($5), etc., and you can feed 10 people for $50 or so.

    Next, use coupons and shop of two-for-one days. You can easily save 50% of your bill just by using coupons and shopping on the right days. Avoid individual meal items such as can soda and even White Castle burgers.

    You can also show up at friends/relatives around dinner time but use that only as a last resort unless you're really tight with them. Make friends with someone who works at a pizza shop. I knew a guy in college who would take leftovers from the restaurant. At a Denny's, for example, he'd order a coffee. When people were about to leave he'd run up and ask if he could have their leftovers. Bizarre, but he saved a few bucks. He's also gotten pretty wealthy since those days so I guess it paid off. I figure that one day he'll find a way to end up in jail just so he could get a free meal and bunk. :/

    Oh, and forget about corned beef. Back in my day it was cheap, around $1.50 a can. Now it's close to $6 a can. I remember many days eating corned beef and cabbage, corned beef and scrambled eggs, steamed corned beef, corned beef sandwiches. No more.

    1. Re:Get creative by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whoah you're a monster.....

      Corned beef AND cabbage? I take it your gas costs during the winter were low at least but your whole dorm would've smelt like a warcrime. Bravo on the flawless fart recipe for college students.

    2. Re:Get creative by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      I will add this:

      Beans and frozen vegetables are your friends. Get a crock pot. Make a crock of beans, divide them into servings and freeze them to use as needed. Beans are good nutrition. Meat and bean dishes go much further than just meat. A crock pot is also great for turning less expensive cuts of meat into a feast.

      I find that frozen vegetables are much handier than canned, they keep nicely, and don't have all the added salt or other ingredients. Having them in the freezer makes adding vegetables to a dish, or making a side dish, very easy. You can easily have several different types or mixes to use as desired. Spinach in the omelet, mixed veggies in the stew, and so on. Getting those vegetables into your diet is better than just going for a burger and fries all the time.

      Eggs are a great source of cheap protein, and sometimes they even go on sale. You can hard boil them to keep them longer.

      Keep an eye out for sales on various fruits and vegetables, such as apples, sweet potatoes, or potatoes, and buy a bunch.

      Frozen bread dough can be quite a bit cheaper than already baked loaves. Having some in the freezer during bad weather means you can have bread in case there is a run on the store (as sometimes happens) and the shelves are bare.

      Raman can be tasty, filing, and tempting, but you might want to leave it as an occasional treat with all the fat and salt in the standard cheap stuff. Nutritionally you're probably better off with a potato.

      You'll know you're developing the right mindset if you look at the price of a standard fast food "meal deal" and think to yourself: "I could buy a pound/half kilo of hamburger, a loaf of bread, and add a few pennies of potatoes and eat for 3-4 days for that! If I made a meat and bean stew it would be all week!"

      Plan ahead. If you are going out, bring a container of water and a snack, such as an apple. That way you can avoid the temptation of soda and a candy bar. It's cheaper and better for you.

      If you do it right, eating fairly cheaply can be healthy too.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    3. Re:Get creative by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      And grains, don't forget whole grains. Oats, barley, wheat, etc. Filling and nutritious.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Get creative by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      Corned beef AND cabbage?...

      Beano works for me. However, for it to really work well, I've found you need 2-3 pills per serving of food, typically 6-9 pills per meal, which (even for the generic version) can cost more than the meal itself!

    5. Re:Get creative by houghi · · Score: 1

      Instead of chicken filet, chicken legs or chicken wings, I buy a whole chicken and cut it up myself. The 2 filets I use to wok together with som vegetables and rice. Enough for 3-4 days.
      1 day is some potatoes, chicken legs and potates.
      The chicken legs and the carcass I cook and the meat I use for sandwiches. The water as stocking for soup. That is already 5 days of meat from a 4 EUR chicken.

      I know that one supermarket does 50% of meat on mondays, because that will be the last day before the expire day. I can keep it in the freezer for another few days easily (including the chicken).

      Look uo things about "living frugal. Don't follow everything, but instead see what you can easily do.

      What I also did was buy a book with many wok recepeis in a second hand book store. The advantage you have with using a wok is that it is fast. Chinese cooking is the world first fast food.

      Also always use a shoppinglist and don't go shopping hungry. A last is to NEVER buy bottled water. NOT EVER. And have a budget. Write everything down on what you sped it on. Or use any of the free programs or apps for whatever you use.

      If you like pizza, learn how to make your own. Making your own dough will spare you a lot and they taste better. Spagetti is the number one food for students where I live (Belgium) because it is cheap if you make your own sauce and it can feed many when you invite people over.

      As an extra bonus, when you have learned to cook, you can invite somebody over, which is cheaper then taking them out to dinner,and with a bit of luck they will have sex with you.

      So yes, learning how to cook will save you a LOT of money. It will also help you in the long run. You will be able to sit down with your kids and have a meal without having to make cooking a drag. And there is no price you can put on that, no matter how rich you are.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Get creative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (4/1$ for Ramen, 2/1$ for chicken pot pies)

      You know, $4 for ramen and $2 for pot pies sounds like kind of a rip-off. Maybe you were shopping at the wrong places....

  23. Beans & Rice, Rice & Beans by BKX · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's like Dave Ramsey says: if you're broke, then eat "beans and rice, rice and beans." It's easy and cheap, even in a dorm.

    1. Rice cookers are like $10-20. Get one with a steamer tray. It doesn't have a burner and can't start a fire, so tell your RA to fuck off.
    2. Buy rice at the Asian store. It'll cost $1/lb for good Jasmine rice (brown rice only, you'll need the nutrients). (You don't have an Asian store? My ass. Or try the Mexican store. You don't have a Mexican store, either? Shut the fuck up and stop lying. Open your eyebulbs; they're everywhere.)
    3. Buy bullion cubes and/or soup base (it comes in a jar) for flavor. You can get that stuff cheap at the Asian store.
    4. Buy beans in a can from Save-a-Lot/Aldi/cheapo-store. I like navy beans and fava beans. There're a few dozen other kinds. Get what's cheap. One can a day, minimum.
    5. Put the rice, soup base/bullion/soup mix and water in the rice cooker and press the button. Add the beans when it's done. Enjoy.
    6. If you're feeling rich, chicken or sausage or burger patties go in the steamer tray.
    7. The Asian store will also have cheap noodles that the rice cooker will cook just fine. Cheaper than ramen. (You still need the beans, or you'll eventually get something nasty like beri-beri.)
    8. Oatmeal and raisins make a good, fast breakfast. (Add sugar packets and creamers from wherever other people get coffee.)
    9. You'll also need to add some vitamin C every once in while to prevent scurvy. Any fruit or fruit juice will do. Tea made from fresh pine needles (actual pine trees only) will do in a pinch. I like raisins, apples, bananas, and oranges, which are all usually cheap enough.

    You can actually live on that stuff for months at a time without dying. The soup base/bullion and occasional noodles and meat will keep you from committing suicide.

    1. Re:Beans & Rice, Rice & Beans by misexistentialist · · Score: 2

      My school banned rice cookers too, no arguing they are simply confiscated and you are fined. Nearest food store was also a 20 minute drive. Couldn't have guessed when I was applying to college that it might have food supply logistics similar to a derelict bus in Alaskan bush country.

    2. Re:Beans & Rice, Rice & Beans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Couldn't have guessed when I was applying to college that it might have food supply logistics similar to a derelict bus in Alaskan bush country.

      I feel your pain. I had to take a Byzantine system of buses to get to a supermarket, wasting an entire day, when I was in college.

      Conversely, I mostly ate out of the campus store, which sold frozen crap. Probably took a few years off my life, I'm sure.

      It's far, far too late for me, and too late for you, but let us join forces:

      High school kids: Pull up your campus on Google Maps and look at what you're getting yourself into. ;)

    3. Re:Beans & Rice, Rice & Beans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's like Dave Ramsey says: if you're broke, then eat "beans and rice, rice and beans." I

      Add corn - eating beans, rice and corn will supply all the needed amino acids needed to prevent protein malnutrition.

    4. Re:Beans & Rice, Rice & Beans by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Why did your school ban rice cookers?

  24. Wrong Problem by oldhack · · Score: 1

    Gas vs. food? You have a car?

    Your real problem is the prospect once you get your (graduate/doctoral) degrees. There are too many of yous, not enough posts to absorb you, even for you in STEM fields, never mind humanities.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  25. "Me and my fellow students..."??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From which college did they graduate where such poor grammar is taught?

  26. Re:Dorms are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are far less dorms and cheap nearby apartments than there are students. And tuition itself, before even touching the costs of living, can cover the wages of a full time burger-flipper.

  27. Re:How's your Russian? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    That U.S. crotch you're cheerfully kicking might not be able to bail out your "actual civilized" buttocks from the next war.

    I'm pretty sure Europeans are more worried about the US starting the next war.

    The thing Europeans like best about the US military is all the coin we drop having bases there. Unless you count Serbia, where the US military is about as welcome as a bladder infection.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  28. Editors schmeditors already by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    collage admins

    If you can't make ends meet, I suppose you'll have to cut something, or you'll get stuck in debt.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  29. Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Germany we have many features of the Soviet Union: Excellent, free Education, social safety net, universal healthcare,...

    But you know what ? Our economy sometimes sucks DONKEY BALLS and people with that great education don't get ANY job for years. "Generation Praktikum" (Generation Intern) is a very real thing here. People worked in corpos from 2002 to 2005, did not get a cent for that, as it was "intern". Or they were completely unemployed with a PHD in chemistry.

    I work as a software engineer with a CS degree and I know my shit. I can just so afford a wife and two kids and a very small car. As in "barely". My reserves are at something like 1000 Euros.

    And that is in the supposed "heartland" of German auto manufacturing. You know, where they INVENTED that car thing.

    So, be careful what kind of socialism you yearn for.

    1. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To clarify this: I did not pay for my studies, I actually got paid by a company for that. But now, I and my employer pay about 40% tax/social security/health insurance on every euro spent by my employer.

      Germans cannot afford kids on average and the population quickly grows "old heavy". They take away the money you need to raise kids and spend it on all sorts of socialism here. And that makes the "old heavy" problem ever bigger.

      My analysis is: Too much socialism and your nation goes into a tailspin. Also ask the Japanese about this.

    2. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the opposite side of the problem: no one in their right mind would employ an educated American over a German with the 'same' nominal level of education.
      Americans are proud of the long hours they work, but get almost nothing done. Germans get work done, then go home instead of staying at work doing nothing to inflate their overtime hours.

    3. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I can guarantee you that Germans that come to the US wind up working the same sort of hours that Americans do. The amount of work demanded is based upon time rather than actual out put. If you work harder, that typically just means more of it.

    4. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "smart" Germans grow up here, get the best education for free and then they move to Switzerland and the US. Or Singapore or Australia.

      I am still here because, well, I don't really know. Probably I am a bit slow to realize things. I recently applied for jobs in Switzerland.

    5. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      It's got nothing to do with "socialism". Quite far from it. What it has to do with is completely fucked up tax and tax money politics in Germany. There is a very easy fix for it: Stop bailing out banks, stop pumping money into bailout funds for high risk investment banks (actually, tax the fuckers 'til it's no longer profitable to leech the industry to death), stop destroying the middle class and instead tax capital gains more and you're set.

      Of course, nobody really wants that. Especially not "Mutti". And as long as you keep voting that ... thing in, no pity from this side of the border.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Switzerland is great, Austria is better. Same language but FAR better social services and more foreigner friendly. Payment is lower, though, but so is cost of living.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by steg0 · · Score: 1

      It's got nothing to do with "socialism". Quite far from it. What it has to do with is completely fucked up tax and tax money politics in Germany. There is a very easy fix for it: Stop bailing out banks, stop pumping money into bailout funds for high risk investment banks

      Whatever there may be to like or dislike about the educational system in Germany and its cost, I doubt it has changed much since any "bailing out" began (well, some local governments have removed tuition fees in recent years) , so I doubt rewinding that would have any middle-class-saving qualities. An unmarried engineer starts off with 50% tax/social contribution ratio after college; it's been like that for at least a decade.

      (actually, tax the fuckers 'til it's no longer profitable to leech the industry to death), stop destroying the middle class and instead tax capital gains more and you're set.

      As it stands now, taxing capital gains means taxing the middle class, as they are usually invested in capital market backed retail products.

    8. Re:Slowly, Mr Uljanov by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      All I want is less tax on wages and higher tax on capital gains. I know it's an outlandish idea, but I think that WORKING should actually be rewarded, not having others work for you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Not college material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We live in a time of unprecedented abundance. Never before in the history of mankind has food been so plentiful and so cheap. Past generations worried about famine. We worry about the "obesity epidemic".

    The whole point of education is to learn how to solve problems. If you cannot figure out how to feed yourself in a time of such great abundance, then maybe you are not college material.

  31. Ahh by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    So if I just show up in a European country, they'll let me go to university for free? Hint: No they won't.

    My sister went to Europe for her PhD. She didn't end up paying... because she got a generous scholarship. That also was what allowed her to get the visa to go. She didn't just show up and walk in to a university for free.

    Same way it would have worked in the US or Canada, actually. If she had been accepted to a program with a generous scholarship, well it would have been free.

    1. Re:Ahh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're confirming his point that starting out in a civilised country rather than a joke country is far more affordable?
      Can you even read?

    2. Re:Ahh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So if I just show up in a European country, they'll let me go to university for free?

      Depends on the country, but in some you can actually do that. You need the same required qualification as everybody else, obviously, and your cost of living is on you, but in some countries there is no tuition, not even for foreign students.

    3. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You can't choose where you were born. You can choose where you live. If you are born in the US, you *can't* go to uni in Europe for free (without some unusual scholarships). There's no way to move to europe as a 12 year old on your own, and if you move there on a student visa, you are going to pay.

      So the point was, the advice was correct, but 100% useless. What can a person, already born, do about it?

    4. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Name one. I did a quick look, and I didn't see any where foreign students on a student visa were tuition-free.

    5. Re:Ahh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So if I just show up in a European country, they'll let me go to university for free? Hint: No they won't.

      In my country, they will. Counter-hint: learn Czech, tuition is only paid for lectures in English.

    6. Re:Ahh by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      So you're confirming his point that starting out in a civilized country

      You mean the ones with statues in every square commemorating one of the many wars you guys have constantly had?

      Perhaps one of the ones that is constantly rioting because basic services can no longer be provided by the government...

      OK then.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Ahh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Ahh by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually yes, your chances that you will get an education for free are pretty high.

      What? Oh. No, of course not if you only speak English and not the local language. Silly me, I thought you wanted to learn, not just get a sheet of paper for free.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Ahh by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      A quick search didn't turn up any universities that are free either. But there are quite a few where 1000 bucks a semester or less buy you the ticket to ride.

      And let's be honest here, if 1500-2000 bucks a year break your back (with a minimum wage that revolves around 8-10 bucks an hour, depending on country), I guess you have worse problems to deal with.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The trouble to learn an unusual language to be able to get free tuition is not worth it, and most of the rest of the ones with the same rules for foreigners have higher fees for foreigners. And none of the languages are common first or second languages, so it would likely take extreme effort to be able to get anything from that "free" education.

    11. Re:Ahh by gweihir · · Score: 1

      While I did my PhD at one of the best technical universities in Europe (and on the planet), I was paid about 60% of an industrial salary. Doing a PhD and not getting paid enough to live off it decently is pure insanity. Of course you have some teaching duties (40% in my case), but you learn a lot there too, like presenting stuff and speaking in front of a group. Invaluable in basically any technical job on advanced level.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    12. Re:Ahh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it just me, or are you bitching that an American going to Norway won't get free education in English, when a Norwegian going to US is not only going to have to pay exorbitant money for university tuition but also can completely forget receiving lectures in Norwegian at any US university, even despite the exorbitant cost? I mean, what did you think about European universities, that they have all been built for Anglophone people? "Isn't worth it"...typical. Well, I guess all those tales of the "monolingual pride" of Americans were true!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    13. Re:Ahh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, there are European universities which not only won't charge tuition but will also offer most courses in English, or at least provide course materials and tutoring in English. You see, Europe has no true common language, so English is the modern lingua franca. Courses in English aren't (just) a courtesy to foreign students. They're also meant to prepare domestic students (who are the biggest part of the audience) for working in the real world, where English serves as the common language. It'd be a shame if you didn't learn the local language, but it's not actually strictly necessary.

      And no, I won't tell which universities are like that. If AK Marc can't be arsed to do a little research, even if it means avoiding six figure debt, then debt it is.

    14. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Someone else indicated it was easy to get a "free" degree in europe. That doesn't seem the case. That's all I said.

      How many people in France know Finnish? Almost none? Then your irrational hate is misaimed.

    15. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Spain looks pretty good, but no, I'm not interested for myself. Maybe my kids some day, but I already have a master's degree. I don't need anymore. Though I need to see which countries in Europe allow dual citizens. France does, but has stricter requirements. Spain is easier to become citizen, but doesn't allow duality. Nor does Germany. UK does. So more important than cheap tuition, is someplace to get a third citizenship from. Gotta have options when the US finally self-destructs, and tries to take the rest of the world with it.

    16. Re:Ahh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      "Irrational hate"? I'm just pointing out obvious things.

      You were specifically asking for tuition-free education for foreign students on a visa. I pointed it out to you. Now you're moving the goalposts and making extra requests. I'm just waiting when you start asking for a free plane ticket to Europe or counseling with cultural acclimatization. Everything has its costs, direct or indirect, monetary or otherwise, including studying in a foreign country - that much is obvious, but I answered exactly the part you were asking for, no more, no less.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    17. Re:Ahh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the point was, the advice was correct, but 100% useless. What can a person, already born, do about it?

      What makes you assume <statement about how things work someplace> is automatically <advice for American citizens about taking advantage of said things>?

      Seriously, what? There was not a hint in there saying "you should go to XY and get YZ", it was just a statement like when an American states you can get gas cheaper in the States than you could in Europe. Why a European would misconstrue that as "advice for getting gas cheaply into your car which is in Europe", I have no idea.

      Besides, you can *still* leave the USA without a state permit, can't you? So while that remains the case, nothing stops you from going somewhere else on the planet where, say, higher education costs as much for you as a foreigner as it would have cost you as a citizen in the USA. That way, for the same investment you get the education you wanted but you also get the opportunity to provide that choice to your children, who, like you said, will have no way to move elsewhere at a young enough age to do the same.

    18. Re:Ahh by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What can a person, already born, do about it?

      Pick whichever candidate promises higher taxes to fund more services? Stop believing corporate spin that tries to paint socialism bad? Stop voting right-wing, either the Obama or Bush variant?

      I dunno, how do you effect change in a democracy?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    19. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I dunno, how do you effect change in a democracy?

      When it's a corrupt one that isn't a "democracy" any more outside name, you don't.

    20. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I never moved the goalposts. And the statement I was addressing was "So if I just show up in a European country, they'll let me go to university for free? Hint: No they won't." where one would presume the OP was in the US, so yes, it was about an American. And, as you point out, the number of Americans speaking Finnish is minuscule. It's you who is moving the goal posts. Not me.

    21. Re:Ahh by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      And as I pointed out, there are European countries that will allow him to do exactly that - or, as you put it, "where foreign students on a student visa [are] tuition-free", which naturally includes Americans. Or are you really counting in the airline ticket? I also never said anything about number of Americans speaking Finnish, I have no idea where you got that.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    22. Re:Ahh by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      At least in Slovenia, a PhD program isn't free, it costs about 3000eur per year. Fortunately, we have this great "Young researcher" program where the state research agency basically pays both your tuition and your salary. And yes, it's available for foreigners too.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    23. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There are what, two that have free tuition, but only in unpopular local languages? And one or two others? That doesn't seem common. The initial comments seemed to imply that it was common in the EU for foreign tuition to be the same as local. That's most assuredly false. So yes, you are answering one subset of the question, and pretending it's the only one that matters (especially since you've shown your hateful anti-American attitude, and need to show the answer proves Americans wrong).

    24. Re:Ahh by ultranova · · Score: 1

      When it's a corrupt one that isn't a "democracy" any more outside name, you don't.

      In what way is US democracy corrupt? Do votes get miscounted? Are third-party candidates prevented from running? Do thugs block voting stations or watch behind your back when you vote?

      By all appearances the US government accurately reflects the collective preferences of its citizens. If you have evidence to the contrary, let's hear it.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    25. Re:Ahh by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Informative

      How many people in France know Finnish? Almost none?

      Hi there, I'm an American who studied in Finland for free, and the process of going there to study was pretty effortless. Even if I spoke no Finnish (or Russian, my field's lingua franca), my department was happy to let me concentrate on language learning for the first year or two before moving on to my real coursework. University of Helsinki is full of foreigners, some of which never really learn Finnish, so your claim that the language is a real barrier doesn't wash.

      As for having the money to study here, beyond there being no tuition fees, nearly all non-EU foreigners who come to study in Finland get funding (800€ a month, not luxury but sufficient) and housing for their first year as a matter of course. With a year's head start, one then has plenty of time to find some part-time employment or scholarship for the following years.

    26. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Do votes get miscounted?

      Yes. Every presidential election in the last 15 years had "anomolies" greater than the vote spread. There are precincts that recorded more "valid" votes than people registered to vote, in an area with low voter turnout. Ballot boxes from areas that strongly lean one way or the other were "lost".

      By all appearances the US government accurately reflects the collective preferences of its citizens. If you have evidence to the contrary, let's hear it.

      I don't get "proof". Those with "proof" are discredited through expensive smear campaigns, or never heard from. As I don't wish to be disappeared, I prefer to watch from the side-lines. Watergate wasn't a one-off, it was business as usual (and one of the least direct tampering in recent history). Campaigns are to get the vote close enough to cheat the victory, and if you are leading enough, you don't need to cheat, except to make sure the other guy doesn't cheat you.

    27. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That's not what the links from the other guy indicate, but if it actually works, that's great. For those that "never really learn Finnish" what language do they take classes in? Do they take the classes in Finnish, but never get to a conversational level?

      And your comment of "even if I spoke no ..." makes it sound like you did, not that you didn't and it wasn't a problem. So you spoke Russian (something more common in foreign students than Finnish), but that's not on the "allowed" languages for free tuition, so it seems the issue is the bad cite I was given, not my interpretation of it. But good to hear from an independent source that the cite was worthless.

    28. Re:Ahh by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      For those that "never really learn Finnish" what language do they take classes in? Do they take the classes in Finnish, but never get to a conversational level?

      Teaching full degree programmes in English is a very common phenomenon in Europe now, it's a general part of European integration (universities in a given country want to be open to students from other EU nations) but lots of Americans, Chinese, wealthy Arabs, etc. take advantage of this too.

      For those degree programmes where there is not teaching in English, you have to understand that except for the hard sciences (which requires visiting a lab), attendance at lectures is not obligatory in Finland and various other European countries. You are free to simply do the reading on your own and just come in twice a year to take exams. Since so much assigned reading is in English, and many departments will allow you to write the exam in English, there isn't much need for Finnish skills to make it through university. Of course, to fulfill degree requirements, one must at some point take a three-semester course of Finnish as a foreign language, but many people pass the exam for that without ever really reaching conversational ability in the language.

      So you spoke Russian (something more common in foreign students than Finnish), but that's not on the "allowed" languages for free tuition.

      Actually, I didn't speak Russian when I arrived there either. My first year or two was thus spent learning Finnish and Russian, and only then I moved on to taking courses related to my "major". But there is no list of "'allowed languages for free tuition", there were no language demands on me when I went to study there. When it came to the application process and proving my qualifications, I did all that in English.

    29. Re:Ahh by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'll have to send the kids to Finland for uni. I wonder what the fees are like in China. They have some good universities there. And are an economic powerhouse,

  32. er, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How presumptuous. Do you really believe that we're so woefully unaware that this is likely the first time we've heard of it?

  33. But Fox News says the USA is the best! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And we're the only country with peace an freedom an stuff! And that in t'other countries folks work 20 hours a day to support soshalism! How can it possibly be otherwise? FOX NEWS AND SARAH PALIN AND SEAN HANNITY WOULD NEVER EVER LIE TO ME!

  34. Re:Dorms are a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/less/fewer/

  35. Re:How's your Russian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US crotch's spawn, in the form of their military, would be annihilated by the receptionist at the first European armed forces base that they wandered into, thinking they would be welcomed as a 'bail out'.
    The main attraction of the US Marines as a force to defeat, is the tremendous amount of nutrition to be gained from their corpses once cannibalism becomes an option.

  36. Grad school can be done on the cheap; I did it. by SylvesterTheCat · · Score: 1

    I went to graduate school at a state university from '98-'00 and I did it with minimal student loans.

    I was (am) in the National Guard (no education benefits, just the paycheck) and I always had another part-time job. The first year as a Graduate Assistant was teaching a introductory computer class and after that as a part-time employee for a state department on campus. My car was 10 years old, had well over 100,00 miles, was mechanically sound and had been paid off for several years. I lived in my friend's basement for cheap rent and it was far from the lap of luxury. Somehow I still managed to have a pretty hot girlfriend. Yeah, I know... bring on the jokes about basement and girlfriend.

    My first job after graduating paid less than $40k and I was debt free within 5 years.

    The point is that it is possible to live on little if you have prepared for it and manage what you do have right.

  37. My trick: take a university close by by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    During university I lived at my parents. All I had to pay was about 700 Euros twice a year and that money included the ticket to ride the train and streetcar to campus.
    When I got my degree and moved out to work in another city, I immediately lost 20kg :).

  38. I'm not worried about poor students by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    right now. But wages have been in decline for 30 years. A little mis management is one thing (Mitt Rhomney was famously so broke at one point he had to sell the stocks his dad gave him to make ends meet :P ), but we're getting to the point where it's impossible to "work your way through college".

    For one thing, when we say "Wages Adjusted for Inflation" we mean inflation as a whole, but the cost of food and shelter (what college kids spend most of their money on, jokes about Ramen & Natty Lite aside) have gone up much faster than inflation. The sort of job you can hold while in College is gonna pay $8-$15 an hour depending on where you live. I know ppl at that income level working part time because the economy sucks and they made mistakes. They're not making it, and somehow I doubt the added expense/stress of school would help them, especially after they graduate with $150k in loans... If you're one of those super humans that doesn't need sleep and can go to class and the work 8 hours then spend 8 hours doing homework you might make it. Everyone else will just drop out. The consoles tell you this when you apply, and a lot of the big majors (Math, CS, MIS, Medical) won't take you if you're working full time.

    What sucks is we're so much more productive, you'd think we'd be working less. But why the hell would we give anything to anyone if they didn't "work" for it?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Getting to the point? We're there. We passed that threshold a while ago. We're already on our way of getting to the point where you cannot recover your college fees during the rest of your working years.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by gwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a teacher at a public university in Mexico. I know many of my students work (and, of course, many don't) to get enough income to live (maybe because their parents cannot support them, maybe even because they support their family).

      What I completely fail to understand is how on Earth can a 22-year-old graduate –as you say– with US$150K in loans. That is just insane. And sick.

      In my country, as in most of Latin America, and (as far as I understand) in Europe, all of the best universities are State-run, and tuition is either free or really low — Of course, there are private universities, with first-world scolarships. They have some selling points, but with very few exceptions, they are basically little but diploma mills, and next to no research at all is done in them (just teaching).

      Anyway, I cannot understand how the USA cannot have a decent public university system. I know there are *some*, as part of my family have graduated from them. But just the idea of being in such a deep debt as a freshly graduated student... Makes me sick.

    3. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wages are in decline relative to GDP, but relative to the middle class family 10 years ago, or 20 or 30 or 40 years ago, today's middle class family has LOTS more money. Your 2005 middle class family (mid point of middle 20% quintile) earned $58500. In 1979, in 2005 dollars, they earned $51,000.

    4. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by uncqual · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What I completely fail to understand is how on Earth can a 22-year-old graduate –as you say– with US$150K in loans. That is just insane. And sick.

      If one borrows as much as they can and doesn't focus on their studies, that's not insane or sick, likely just a sign of questionable judgement.

      For example, in California the estimated annual costs for a student living off campus attending a UC school is $29,200 including tuition, fees, books, supplies, room, board, transportation, and personal expenses (some of these of course will vary depending on which campus the student is attending). About half of this ($14,700) is for educational related expenses while the rest is for ordinary living expenses that one would incur even if not attending school.

      For a fulltime, four year course of study, this amounts to about $120,000 - assuming no grants or scholarships. So, graduating with $150K of debt in California suggests the student is attending an excessively expensive school, fails to work part time to at least cover summer expenses, spends excessively, and/or didn't complete in four years.

      The UC system is well respected, and some campuses are very well regarded (Berkeley for example). However, the Cal State system also offers "real" degrees and costs even less.

      As well, in some cases, a clever student will likely be able to figure out how to fulfill some general ed requirements at their local Community College reducing costs yet further.

      Of course, $150K would be nothing for advanced degrees/training such as Med School (but, only a fool would build up such debt if the career wouldn't allow them to pay the debt off from earnings fairly quickly and, from a life long viewpoint, result in net earnings greater than not pursuing an advanced degree unless it is their desire to donate their education/life to a particular interest or education is a hobby for them).

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    5. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by puto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am a natural born US citizen of Colombian heritage. My first degree was a double major of Information Systems/General Business and a minor in Philosophy. I got it in the US, at Nicholls State University in Thibodaux, Louisiana in 1992. My tuition, meal ticket, apartment, insurance, and spending money was 4,000 us a semester. 1500 hundred was covered by grants, and the rest was me waiting tables and bartending. My second degree was in economics in Colombia at a private university. 2000 was the year and my tuition was about 1200 USD a semester. Just for tuition. I worked for the university in the computer science department and was a sub ESL teacher, and so my tuition was waived. I also had a wild hair and studied law for a bit a public university but al fin no me llamo la atencion. I have worked in Colombia, Argentina, Peru, Ecuador, and Mexico. The company I worked for specialized in letting computer science majors do their internships and then hired the best of the best. In the US students tend to work while in school. In Latin America some do, but the majority do not. It is almost a insult to suggest to a Latin American student that they have an after school job. Not too mention the 18-20 year old grown men not being able to cook, wash clothes, and basically take care of themselves without being under their mothers skirts. Sure some of the best unis in Latin America, are state run. In Colombia only the best of the best get into them. In the US many people can go to a community college, then to a public uni etc. But people like to get grants, loans, stay in school forever, live beyond their means, and accumulate debt. It is not the school systems fault but the individual students. You can go to an inexpensive school, work full or part time, or you can ride the government teat and run up huge loans. No one signs the papers but you.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    6. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      The University's are in the process of being privatized here. A few Venture Capitalists noticed our Federal Gov't would give guaranteed loans out to any school with accreditation. So they bought up a bunch of old Secretary Schools that has accreditation from the 40s and 50s and used those to get loans for students to go to their diploma mills.

      Meanwhile we've got a political movement to lower taxes while keeping spending constant so that our country goes massively in debt. The debt isn't really a problem (we owe it to ourselves) but it frightens people. After 30 years we have people exploiting that fear to get cuts in education in the name of saving money. The whole scheme is called "Starve the Beast" and was thought up by our Republican and Libertarian parties. The result is most of our subsidies for state education have been cut.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    7. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only for the truly clueless. Yes, you can pay 5x the price of your resident state public university to go to a private college or university, but I think most people are finally realizing that's only worth it for Ivy League and other brand-name opportunities. If one of my kids wants to blow a quarter million to get a degree from Boston University rather than Iowa State, we're going to have to revisit the issue of what $250,000.00 really is.

    8. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

      I am a natural born US citizen

      So you're not a vampire?

    9. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      if you are taking out 150k in loans you are doing it wrong. Plain and simple. Most folks, while not capable of paying for all of college, can take care of a large portion of the cost. And if you live reasonably close to a college (this is a lot of folks) stay local and it gets even cheaper. At least in florida, it is still doable for undergrad at 80k on the top end and as little as 40k if you are careful.

    10. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by ottothecow · · Score: 2
      But you ignore financial aid (most people who have to borrow every cent will qualify for some at at least one school they apply to), term time employment, and summer jobs/internships.

      If you absolutely can't get any financial aid (i.e. wealthy parents who won't pay for you but whose income prevents you from aid eligibility), then you are simply an idiot for not getting a job shelving books in the library and pursuing paying positions in the summers.

      Term time employment is not hard to find (and in my experience, campus jobs tend to pay on the high side), and you can find something that is only 10-20 hours a week and won't interfere much with your studies. Also, half of the student jobs out there are the kind where you can study in your down time (the kids who check out books at the library or ring you up at the student coffee shop can spend half of their time doing their course reading). At $12 an hour (pretty common for student jobs, even without work-study), this can net you 6-7k each year. And of course you could always work more if you really needed to (and reduce living expenses below the "average" which includes the kids living off mom and dad).

      Then, you should absolutely be working during the off periods. Not too hard to nab a retail job during winter break leading up to christmas (although not a ton of earnings from that either). But you should be working full time all summer, every summer. Even if you don't need the money, you should do this since it always seems like the kids who don't are the ones who have the hardest time finding jobs after graduation (no experience). Even if you can't beat the $12 an hour you had before, this should get you another 6k for the year. And after the first year of school, you get access to better programs, and internships from higher paying employers. Lots of places pay interns the same as 1st year employees...even in the middle of the crisis in the summer of 2008, lots of kids were getting an easy 15-18 an hour plus overtime. With a bit of work, its not that hard to clear 10k in a summer. Yeah--you don't get to go take that unpaid internship that the rich kids can afford, but it's ok--they are just being exploited anyways. You'll come out with experience, money, and maybe even a post-graduation job offer.

      That pretty much covers all of your living expenses (and then some...considering you should probably be living a little sparser than the average student). Honestly, you could even still drop a grand in extra loan money on a cool spring break every year and it wouldn't really matter. You are still going to clock in at only mid 5-figure debt.

      The people complaining in the media about 150k debt for 4 years of school are either lying, actually had post-graduate education, or made extremely poor and lazy decisions (and I count going to a $$$ private university as a poor decision if you have zero financial aid). Its not even easy to get 150k in loans. You can't get that much from federal loans...and private lenders aren't so favorable to slacker kids who can't even bother to earn a single dollar all 4 years.

      --
      Bottles.
    11. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by gwolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The people complaining in the media about 150k debt for 4 years of school are either lying, actually had post-graduate education, or made extremely poor and lazy decisions (and I count going to a $$$ private university as a poor decision if you have zero financial aid). Its not even easy to get 150k in loans. You can't get that much from federal loans...and private lenders aren't so favorable to slacker kids who can't even bother to earn a single dollar all 4 years.

      That's also a very striking fact. Practically all of the people I know that work on postgraduate studies in the best universities in the country not only do it without paying tuition, but getting a scolarship (around US$1000-1500 a month, roughly the salary they would get as professionals). The logic is, postgraduate studies do require you to focus full-time on them, and not giving them that attention will lead to failure. The whole society will benefit from masters and doctors, so the whole society pays for them. Of course, academic requisites for permanence are high.

      If the society and government do not value having skilled professionals, sick schemes where graduate students have to spend their evenings serving at restaurants, and can devote much less to their studies. That's a losing recipe. And of course, that leads to longer terms because of failed subjects, which means increased debt.

    12. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two points:

      1. Few students graduate at 22 with that much debt. 22 year olds get an undergradate degree, and those numbers are mostly far lower. When you see numbers that high, you should think 'professional degree', ie lawyers and doctors. And I suppose a number of people who, having matriculated with a degree in Literary Arts, double down on failure and go back for an M.A.

      2. Students are allowed to borrow for room and board. And they often do. When looking at 'net price trends' for 4 year public instiutions, the average price in 2013 dollars is roughly 13,000 a year. Room and board makes up 9,500 of that. So tuition is a pretty small fraction of the overall indebtedness.

      As for why the US's most famous universities are private, I figure a lot of it comes down history: most of the earliest universities were founded for religious purposes, and the many Provinces were usually in favor of religious tolerance. Even Massachusetts, the State closest to a state religion, favored State neutrality by 1780. And the US constitution intentionally tied its hands on matters of theology. So universities have never really been seen as tools of the state during periods of socialist fervor. The land grants, established for more secular purposes, were nearly 100 years after the Revolution. They're younger and so it's not surprising they're less prestigous.

    13. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting to the point? We're there. We passed that threshold a while ago.

      Correct. However, what many fail to realize is that in the 70's we didn't need to pay the educational extortion racket for permission to get work. The computing explosion was exploited to force the majority of the populace to seek degrees, but elementary school kids now have mastery of required technologies. The tools are more high-tech but the interface is even simpler than ever, certainly things that could be learned in on-the-job training.

      The folks bitching about not being able to afford degrees are fools just now feeling the effects of an education bubble about to burst. The tech that created the education bubble has brought ">advances that made degrees obsolete. You can always tell a bubble by the final pump and dump of ramped up attempts to cash in on overly optimistic valuation. You are now aware that degree mills exist...

      The requirement for college accreditation has always been a method for discrimination against the poor who would otherwise self-educate. More stringent degree requirements are a means by which corporations can drive down wages and get more government approved H1B visas and outsourcing. In reality, requiring employees to have a final exams is foolish since it doesn't actually prove they know anything at all -- That's why your boss is likely a moron. Entrance exams would instead suffice to prove applicants had the required knowledge and skills, without requiring they be saddled with debts by the educational gatekeepers of employment -- It doesn't matter how you learned what you know. Promoting to management from within makes cost cutting improvements in ability to predict and not make unrealistic expectations upon the workers, it also gives upward mobility to aging experienced workers instead of considering them dead at 40 (family raising age).

      We're already on our way of getting to the point where you cannot recover your college fees during the rest of your working years.

      Negative, debt levels have long since passed that point, and owing a debt to the careers you enter has always been unacceptable in the first place. College as anything more than elective learning college is just shifting around the Company Store by leveraging "intellectual property." We need college degrees less now that in the 70's. ::POP::

    14. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by thsths · · Score: 1

      > Mitt Rhomney was famously so broke at one point he had to sell the stocks his dad gave him to make ends meet.

      Oh, wow, I am really feeling for him. Time for a donation campaign then?

      Honestly, studying is an excellent budgeting experience. The expenses are pretty well known, and if they surprise you, that is a problem.

      I would argue that fees are too high, but there is a lot of good international competition. So if you want to pay the premium of going to a top US university, well, that is your choice.

    15. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about people making bad choices. Spend the first two years in community college in the state you reside in, then transfer to a public four-year school. Then get your masters at an expensive private school, if necessary. Why would you go to a private school all four years and take out loans to do it? Completely foolish but I know plenty of people who have done it.

      Community College (per year): $3K with books
      State School (per year): $12k with books
      Total: $30K

      You could cover that with a part-time job. $7500 per year is not difficult to accumulate. I worked as an aide at a local elementary school 25 hours/week and made enough to rent a room AND pay for school. I graduated with no debt and I paid for it all myself. I was also able to pay for my own car, gas and insurance. Did I have a new M3? Of course not, I drove a 17-year old POS that I could afford. Which is why I have the new M3 now while they are still struggling to pay for their school debt and credit card debt. It's not like nobody told them - I told them when they were doing it that they were digging their own graves and even made spreadsheets for them to illustrate how things would turn out. They choose not to listen.

      The problem is obvious - lots of kids use their money to go out drinking, go to Starbucks, buy a new phone every year, designer clothes... the list goes on. They are trying to live the life that they expect to live on their salary jobs after college and aren't willing to sacrifice while in school. My friends did it, and they are still paying for school eight years later. Many of them even had parents who paid for school while they took out loans anyway so they could live lavishly. I have no sympathy for any of them. They got there by their own stupidity and lack of foresight.

      I think the bottom line is that people need to stop bitching, tighten up their belts and get to work. I've never seen anyone get ahead by bitching.

    16. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Anyway, I cannot understand how the USA cannot have a decent PUBLIC university system. I know there are *some*, as part of my family have graduated from them. But just the idea of being in such a deep debt as a freshly graduated student... Makes me sick.

      I've highlighted the reason in bold capitals. That's considered worse than most four-letter words in the vocabulary of many Americans (or at least, most of the one with enough power and/or money to actually put such a thing into practice.)

    17. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Altrag · · Score: 2

      Two problems with this:
      1) By the time you learn to budget that well, you've probably already got the debt. People in their early 20s are notoriously bad for not having a decade's worth of working class life experience to give them the perspective needed to properly plan their debt load.

      2) I doubt "staying local" is really an option for most people (at least in their minds.) Between the stereotype of "get away from your parents and have fun" and the Hollywood-induced idea that Ivy League schools are the only ones worth attending, its pretty easy to see how young people with little world experience and only a vague sense of where they want to be in the future would jump at any opportunity to attend "the best schools" regardless of cost.

    18. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      College degrees have been too expensive to the point where not getting one meant that you earned more money during your lifetime without one than with one for a while now. What I mean is that we're getting towards the point where you will die in debt from your college education.

      But the scam is being perpetuated. By the same people that suffer from it. Because if I needed a college education that broke my back to get this job here, why should I hire you if you don't have one? You should suffer just as much as I did, for I would envy you your "free pass" if you didn't.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Immerman · · Score: 1

      1) That's a clear failure on their parents part. Not much society can do to make up for bad parenting, though I suppose we could at least make Home Economics a required course in high school.

      2) A damn shame. But I'd again tend to put the blame on parents. The world has always been full of silver-tongued hucksters, why the hell are you letting your kids set out on their own without having instilled even basic commercial cynicism? Have you truly been on such an authoritarian power trip that after 18 years your kids are completely unwilling to listen to your advice on real, practical matters? That's just shameful.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    20. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by uncqual · · Score: 1

      I was intentionally ignoring financial aid. My point was even without aid or doing some of the things you wisely suggest (and certainly many do and have for decades), it's still hard to imagine how a qualified and motivated student exercising even a modicum of good judgement would end up with $150K of student debt from obtaining a BA or BSc.

      I was trying to politely point out, by leaving it to the /. reader to reach the obvious conclusion, much of what you pointed out more directly - somehow I got down modded for that :)

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    21. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1000-1500 isn't really what they would make as a professional programmer or something like it, though? The number one reason why I chose not to go to MIT or Stanford but stayed in Europe was the grossly inadequate "salary" as a grad student.

    22. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much fail in the parent post.

      Term time employment is not hard to find (and in my experience, campus jobs tend to pay on the high side), and you can find something that is only 10-20 hours a week and won't interfere much with your studies.

      If 20 hours a week isn't interfering much with your studies, you went to a school or had a major that wasn't very challenging, period.

      Also, half of the student jobs out there are the kind where you can study in your down time (the kids who check out books at the library or ring you up at the student coffee shop can spend half of their time doing their course reading).

      Also, half of all statistics are completely fucking made up on the spot, including this one.

      Not too hard to nab a retail job during winter break leading up to christmas (although not a ton of earnings from that either).

      At many top schools, winter break is one or two weeks. Who gets hired for one week?

      There's lots of factually incorrect info in the rest of the parent post, but this takes the absolute cake:

      even in the middle of the crisis in the summer of 2008, lots of kids were getting an easy 15-18 an hour plus overtime

      Yes folks, during the worst economic recession of the last seventy years, when the labor force participation rate was going to some of the lowest levels since WWII, $18 an hour was easy to get... plus overtime if you wanted it! Those 8.8 million people that lost their jobs were just lazy!
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_employment_1995-2012.png
      In fact, it was exactly those 15-18 an hour jobs that became the epicenter of the collapse; see http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/08/31/low-wage-jobs-are-dominating-the-u-s-recovery/
      "The NELP report finds that mid-wage jobs, paying between $13.83 and $21.13 per hour, made up about 60 percent of the jobs lost during the recession. But those mid-wage jobs have made up just 27 percent of the jobs gained during the recovery to date. "
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Recession#Risk_of_relapse_into_recession

    23. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by rosseloh · · Score: 1

      No one signs the papers but you.

      Right, but at least in my experience, nobody educates you as to the downsides before you sign those papers. I was raised thinking "I have to go to college or I'll never get anywhere in life", by both parents and teachers, and for a straight-up middle class family, that means either scholarships/grants or loans. (My parents made too much for me to be eligible for most grants/scholarships, but I never saw a dime from them when I was living in the dorms.) And obviously the schools and the banks don't want to "discourage" you from taking their money/paying their tuition fees.

      If I could go back to 7 years ago knowing what I know now, I'd skip college entirely, or maybe just go to the tech school that I ended up at anyway. I'd be out in 2 less years, with maybe a whole $5000 of debt, and probably working the same job I am now (with higher pay because I'd have 2 more years of being employed here).

    24. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by rosseloh · · Score: 1

      "I have to go to college or I'll never get anywhere in life"

      And I should have clarified this, it wasn't "I have to go to college...", it was "I have to go to a 4-year college for a full bachelor's degree to get anywhere".

      Guess what I don't have now...?

    25. Re:I'm not worried about poor students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More stringent degree requirements are a means by which corporations can drive down wages and get more government approved H1B visas and outsourcing.

      You conveniently leave out the three most guilded professions each with dick to do with running corporations although many will work for one.

      The first example is doctors. They started this game two hundred years ago which is long beyond your goldfish memory, knee-jerk complaint of H1B visas. There are valid complaints of H1Bs, you simply failed to identify one. Doctors are so good at this game, they escape the scrutiny of lesser nerds. Clean your glasses and take a step back.

      The second example is lawyers. Their trick is neat in that they have obtained near exclusive access to all three branches of governement. Although it helps that there are plenty of them, that doesn't really do much when a paralegal could do your work in her sleep, but you need to go through a lawyer to get that work done.

      The third group is educators themselves. Although degrees have lessor and sometimes no influence in the private market, tax supporters like yourself ensure that market is mostly available for the rich.

      You think this is about H1B? You have no fucking clue.

  39. I would run out of food between paychecks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from my work-study job. I'd buy a loaf of bread, peanut butter,
    jelly and milk and gorge myself when the money came around.
    This was in the 1970s though.

  40. And often not that useful/needed by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Grad school was historically and is supposed to be the sort of thing not everyone does. It is for people who are really interested in a field, who want to start doing some original research (under the umbrella of a professor's overall research) and so on. The sort of thing only for those that are truly interested in pursuing the subject more deeply and pushing the boundaries.

    Also most fields don't require graduate degrees. There are some that do (like lawyers), though usually they require a PhD or other advanced degree after it (like professors, medical doctors, etc). However for most an undergraduate degree is all they are after.

    However where I work, I see a ton of students that go in to grad school that are hoop jumpers. They see it as the next thing, that will get them a better job. They aren't that interested in the work, and don't have a particularly good understanding of it. They take comprehensive exams instead of doing a thesis, and so on. They try and use more time in school to make up for a lack of talent.

    So, if you are thinking of grad school, and it'll be any kind of financial hardship ask yourself: Why am I going? If it is because your field requires it, then ok no problem. Gotta do what you gotta do. If it is because you really love the field and you want to go to a higher level, that's good too, but just understand it'll be a pain financially. If it is "because I'll get a better job," then no, stop right there. That's not a reason to go to grad school, particularly if it is going to be a problem financially. It probably will NOT get you a better job, and will just give you more debt.

    1. Re:And often not that useful/needed by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY

      --
      Loading...
    2. Re:And often not that useful/needed by cryptizard · · Score: 1

      It's not a pain financially if your degree is in a STEM field. Not only do you not have to pay tuition, but you get paid to pursue a PhD, because graduate students actually do most of the grunt work for the research which makes the big bucks. It's not a ton of money, but it is more than enough to live comfortably.

    3. Re:And often not that useful/needed by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      I agree with you when thinking from the perspective of an individual - one can be said to be feeling entitled indeed for all these expectations.

      But from the society's perspective - SHOULD it be so hard to get an education ? I see this question in this regard - and I cannot agree education should be so hard especially these days. An immense amount of knowledge has been amassed by man, and productivity can be improved immensely by at least some specialization , and acquiring knowledge should help.

      Now knowledge CAN be acquired without college (or formal education), and can be applied well. But formal education makes it easy to acquire knowledge and improve one's usefulness to society using it. Readymade food can be acquired without formal restaurants by knocking on many doors and negotiating with door openers for food, but formal restaurants make this business much easier.

      Don't you think that this idea of acquirability of knowledge without formal education has taken root in US precisely because of formal education being difficult? Taking an example from fiction - Sherlock Holmes was the summit of amateur excellence but he acquired a lot of his early knowledge in university (or maybe college) setting - in chemistry, poisons, maybe more. A huge storehouse of easily accessible practical knowledge can only help, right?

      Given that everyone will benefit, even people whose kids do not make it to the most prestigious colleges, by improving students' future usefulness to society, why is there such a revulsion for highly subsidizing education?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  41. THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Germany we already have a flood of engineers and CS students. But nobody seems to like to do the physical jobs like painting wooden window frames and plumbing.

    But you know what ? Plumbers make as much money per hour here as freelance C++ developers.

    So the middle class got the "get academic and be rich" message, We actually get poorer from an oversupply of academics and an undersupply of craftsmen.

    1. Re:THIS by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but without a good supply of plumbers, the Internet is doomed in about a decade or so.

  42. Bulk up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gain a few 100 before you start and you'll burn it off in no time while you're starving to death. Well I was already overweight but I burned it off fast to live in a so so area closer to everything.

    In high school it should be a nonexistent problem whether they can afford it or not it should be provided. College that's different you're grown and shit is not easy all the time. It's sad that it has to be like that but it just is and mass greed will keep it like that :( I doubt we'll see a change in our lifetime or even our children's children.

  43. Those poor souls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How unfortunate that these people are forced at gun point to go to grad school and live like this. Where can I donate money to these deprived individuals? I mean, the people who put grad school on hold for a few years so they could get a decent job to cover the expenses of grad school have everything handed to them. I can't imagine how bad they have it.

  44. Re:How's your Russian? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    The thing Europeans like best about the US military is all the coin we drop having bases there.

    Part of the Post-WWII ecosystem, yes.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  45. ... learn how to be a student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep, I too knew many students who would claim to be really poor, but very very few were actually too poor to eat - just too poor at budgeting and prioritising to be able to do so. Funnily enough, that was exactly what my mother told me student life would be like before I went - and exactly what I'll be telling my kids.

          "choosing between eating, living in bad neighbourhoods, putting gas in car"

    QED.

    You're a student, live in a student neighbourhood. Of course it will be bad - it's full of f***ing students! So it's full of teenagers freshly free from parental control having all-night parties, trashing the accommodation and treating any yard/garden/street outside as a rubbish dump/emergency latrine/alfresco sex area (these uses not temporally or spatially exclusive), etc. etc. If you can't sleep at night then go into the lab/faculty/library (i.e. go to "work") at night, and sleep in the day, when the loud party crowd do. That's student life, you're a student, live with it. Lather, rinse, repeat until sick of academia, then leave get a proper job, car, house in the suburbs, and talk about how students make an area such a s***hole... (whilst thinking about the wife + 2.4 kids + mortgage + bills + bills + bills and secretly wishing you were back there).

    You have a car ? You're a rich student - at least in my day (car pretty much meant fat daddy wallet or trust fund or both). If you can afford to buy, maintain and insure (as a student age driver!) a car, then you can afford to eat. Period. You have simply chosen to prioritise other things over eating.

    Prioritising and budgeting for independent living ought to be a key life skill that a student learns when they go away to college - sadly, it often wasn't in my day and seems it still isn't now. Plus ca change.

  46. Personal Experience by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Well, it's anecdotal, but when I was in college my parents paid for one of those meal cards... so I could go to any of the college dining halls I wanted to and I couldn't blow the money on beer (I definitely would have!) This worked great when I was in the dorms. I was always skinny and actually started to gain some weight. But after I started having to pay the dorm fees, they were REALLY expensive compared to basically anything off campus that was easily quadruple the size of a dorm room. So I moved to an apartment. Now the dining halls were 3 miles away. So I basically always didn't get breakfast, but I'd get lunch... and I'd get dinner maybe, depending on my schedule. During the summer I had no reason to go on campus other than to eat. So I'd hide what I could in my coat and smuggle it out to re-heat later.

    I was never going to "starve" as, if I really needed it I'd walk the 3miles, but it was still a major distraction.

  47. C. H. Douglas -- Social Credit by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "What sucks is we're so much more productive, you'd think we'd be working less. But why the hell would we give anything to anyone if they didn't 'work' for it?"

    If inheriting property is a legitimate idea, what about all of humanity inheriting our collective know how and so being entitled to some of the fruits of our global productivity?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
    "Douglas disagreed with classical economists who recognised only three factors of production: land, labour and capital. While Douglas did not deny the role of these factors in production, he saw the "cultural inheritance of society" as the primary factor. He defined cultural inheritance as the knowledge, technique and processes that have been handed down to us incrementally from the origins of civilization. ..."

    One way to implement that:
    http://www.basicincome.org/bie...

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    1. Re:C. H. Douglas -- Social Credit by Altrag · · Score: 1

      Yeah we apparently prefer the opposite approach of doing our best to deny people that inheritance -- unless they pay dearly for it of course!

      Copyright and patent laws exist to specifically prohibit "all of humanity" from inheriting anything, preferring to try and force scarcity (and thus solitary ownership) on the one thing that has no inherent scarcity -- ideas.

    2. Re:C. H. Douglas -- Social Credit by Immerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      >Copyright and patent laws exist to specifically prohibit "all of humanity" from inheriting anything

      Quite the opposite actually, at least originally. Patents encouraged people to share their innovations with the world rather than keeping them secret (which was a major problem), in exchange for a decade or so of exclusive rights to profiting from them. Copyrights did similar - artists were encouraged to be more prolific by being granted control over the distribution of their creations for the first decade, giving them a better chance of being able to monetize their creations. And that addressed a very real concern - the for example it was quite common for the "media moguls" of Shakespeare's time to build their fortunes by producing performances of popular plays without paying the original playwright a dime - and thus many promising playwrights abandoned the profession in favor of something that would put food in their bellies. Or at least relegated their writing to an after-hours hobby.

      The problem came when folks started gaming the system and then purchasing more lucrative extensions to the law. 10 years gives the creator time to make some money off the initial wave of popularity (assuming they can generate such). 100 years ensures that their grand-children can still prevent the work from entering the social inheritance, quite possibly contributing to the creation being lost forever.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    3. Re:C. H. Douglas -- Social Credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An interesting idea, but not a brand-new one

      For Us, The Living: A Comedy of Customs is a science fiction novel by Robert A. Heinlein, written in 1938 but published for the first time in 2003. Heinlein admirer and science fiction author Spider Robinson titled his introductory essay "RAH DNA", as he believes this first, unpublished novel formed the DNA of Heinlein's later works.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/For_Us,_The_Living:_A_Comedy_of_Customs

      Note that, despite his popularity with the 60's/ 70's 'counterculture' , Heinlein seems more libertarian than socialist...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farnham's_Freehold

  48. Re:How's your Russian? by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure Europeans are more worried about the US starting the next war.

    I'm pretty sure that Russia has fixed that problem for the Europeans able to make a reasoned judgment that might have actually believed that. The ones that still believe that tend more towards viewing the world with a constant filter applied and it will take an actual occupation or perhaps bombing to adjust it.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  49. Cut expenses by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    No beer.
    No cigs
    No pot
    No cell phone
    No tv.

    Should be able to eat now.

    1. Re:Cut expenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No TV and no beer make students something, something.

      But yeah, cut the stupid non-absolute expenses. Get the low-end version of high-speed internet, replace TV with Netflix, get a free smartphone from a friend who's rich enough to update every godamn year, use FaceTime/Skype/magicJack on the available free wi-fi networks all around you.

  50. To many people are going to college that should no by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    To many people are going to college that should not be there when they can be in a trades / tech school / apprenticeship setting that can be quicker / tech real job skills. Also we to cut out the underwater basket weaving classes.

  51. Re:How's your Russian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of Western Europe views the military essentially as a jobs program with minimal standards, not as a necessary part of protecting the nation. They assume the US will bail them out if a problem happens. So far they have been right, but that might be changing.

  52. Vegetarianism and dinner at Uncle Harry's by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    When I was a student, I discovered that if you restricted your diet to grains, vegetables, eggs and cheap cheese, you could get through a week very cheaply. Crock pots were your friends.

    When I was in school, the Hare Krishnas were still a thing. Free vegetarian dinner every Sunday (We called it "Sunday dinner at Uncle Harry's"). Hilarious mockery thrown in as an extra added bonus. They may be loonies, but the food was awesome.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  53. Liberty Without Agency: Food Insecurity In College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://therightstuff.biz/2014/04/14/liberty-without-agency-food-insecurity-in-college/

    In an ongoing crusade to distract us from our total lack of self or cultural identity, the West now comes to face the latest crisis-that-isn’t: food insecurity.

    For someone who struggles to make $50 a week for provisions, Paul’s attire is pretty trendy. I wager that jacket could secure him a few weeks of “nutritional food,” alone.

    As an American I grew up watching commercials where fat white women begged for donations to feed some African warlord starving African children. Images of emaciated children convey “insecurity” a lot better than a picture of a well-groomed, feminine white boy with Beatles haircut and cat lady glasses.

    Inventing “food insecurity” and presenting me instances of people whining about their right to food porn while earning a BA in Advanced Adolescence does nothing to make me feel less apathetic to a westerner unable to prioritize.

    In fact, I feel downright hostile at the underlying suggestion that I must provide something so basic to someone who is supposedly accomplished enough to earn a degree in higher education. Why are you there if you can’t feed yourself? What value can you offer the economy when you apparently fail to accomplish the most basic survival strategies? What can we expect these people to add to society when they spend the first two to three decades of their life begging for entitlements and avoiding hardship? Can we seriously expect a piece of paper to deprogram a lifetime of parasitism and narcissism?

    Joe Bradley and the whiny children WaPo present us a Liberal society facing Diminishing Returns. A world of ever-lowering standards to accommodate impossible and unchallenged ideals, we are fast becoming incapable of dealing with reality. Joe and numerous others can no longer separate rights from responsibilities, cause from effect. This is how simple hardship that accompanies poor choices and life in general can become an issue of social justice. This is also how a society destroys itself.

  54. I was sometimes hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give up the car., beer, and cigarettes, not necessarily in that order. Cheap pizza is surprisingly high calorie and fatty so the glucose lift is quite long, so scrounged party pizza can keep you going a *long* time.

    I left home at 16 and became an emancipated minor. College was not cheap, and I had to take a 2 year break in the middle due to poverty. But I scrimped, saved, ate ramen, lived on party food, and did work that covered meals while working. I was working full time until the last term of my senior year, when I had to focus on thesis. And yes, I was often *hungry*. Working at that rate, I was packing away 2500 calories a day and still hungry.

    And oh, yes, I'm an insulin dependent diabetic. Juggling *that* against erratic meals and sleep and overwork was a nightmare.

  55. Not expecting nor will get any sympathy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bet the only ones posting in here are going to champion how they made it, and how they, in fact, didn't starve, and how great they are.

    College was the worst years of my life. All the stress and starvation just made me a very angry person. I still see that I am right, that there is literally no remorse or accommodation for someone trying to focus on studying and learning instead of "get a job you worthless piece of garbage".

    These are the two options for those coming from very poor parents in a small town (and being white, ugly, male, and peasant clothing):
    1) work menial service job and waste away.
    2) work menial service job and go to college (and starve).

    I am not trying to troll. I can just see the writing on the wall with no sympathy:
    1) Why have __ when you should be eating food? You need to prioritize better. No sorry, need car to get to menial service job, remember?
    2) Some bullcrap story from the 1990's or earlier that somehow supposed to be equivalent to the last 16 years of economic hell.
    3) I made it by doing _ . You should follow this winning formula. Absent differences in city, luck, personality and circumstances.
    4) All that starvation was good for you.
    5) That you didn't make it was all your own fault.
    6) Spoiled children... blah blah blah.
    7) Some euro-centric view of the world that is only intended to bash the United States.

    That the smart people on here won't come up with actual solutions (technological or otherwise) is not going to be surprising. Yes I made it, yes I graduated, but then it was a year without a job in the field. And all the stress and bad eating wrecked my digestive system. Also took a thin person and made him fat, with an affinity for gobbling up any extra calories and anything free.

    1. Re:Not expecting nor will get any sympathy. by Kojiro+Ganryu+Sasaki · · Score: 1

      You reminded me of the survivor fallacy.

      A Polish engineer/mathematician was hired by the US air force during WW2. His mission was to make US airplanes stay in the air longer. He was shown a bunch of planes which had returned safely from missions. Some of them had many bullet holes. His commander told him that he thought the best plan was to reinforce the bullet pierced areas with thicker plating.

      The engineer objected and suggested instead: The bullet holes indicate that the pierced areas need no additional plating. After all, the planes with bullet holes here returned safely. Look instead into reinforcing areas without bulletholes, as if a plane was downed surely it must've been struck somewhere where these planes were not.

  56. This warms a Republican's heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They love to hear stories like this. That is what their kind loves to hear. They don't like the poor or people interested in learning so this is a double-bonus for them.

  57. My thoughts exactly by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Hungry students. How common.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  58. Great advice; see also seasonal vegetables by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2

    http://frugalliving.about.com/...
    http://www.drfuhrman.com/libra...

    Leafy greens especially are really important to preventing many diseases. Cabbage is a fairly cheap one. You can steam the cabbage while cooking the rice. Dandelions are a terrific source of healthy greens (if they have not been sprayed with weedkiller etc.). It's crazy that people have been taught to hate healthy Dandelions.

    Our stainless steel "Miracle" rice cooker with a steamer attachment was one of our best kitchen investments ($70) as it does not have Teflon as most rice cookers do, but we worked up to it from cheaper Teflon ones.

    Without good food, the mind and body can go into a downward spiral of low energy and depression -- thus a cycle of poverty. Hunter/gathers are more than 100 different types of food over the course of a year. Getting calories in not enough -- you need micronutrients too, and that means a diversity of foods -- but they don't have to be expensive foods.

    Of course, so many sick care schemes (Medicaid, Medicare, "health" insurance) will pay for expensive drugs and surgeries but won;t pay for good food to avoid drugs and surgeries. It doesn't help that stressed-out people tend to bulk up on calories as an ages old survival mechanism, not knowing where the next meal may be coming from. This is all made worse by US farm policy:
    http://economix.blogs.nytimes....
    "Thanks to lobbying, Congress chooses to subsidize foods that weâ(TM)re supposed to eat less of."

    Watch out for additives in bullion that might cause headaches and such. Lots of bad headaches could make it hard to keep a job or graduate from college.

    Beans are also cheaper to buy dried than canned -- except you need to know how to prepare them and have a place to cook them and the electricity or gas too cook them, which together may not be possible for many students.

    People need a healthy source of fat, too -- something lacking in what you outline. The brain is mostly fat, so it is no wonder on low fat (or poor fat) diets that people can get messed up mentally. Nuts can be one, but they tend to be expensive and they may be lacking in Omegas 3s. Eggs might be a good cheap choice of fat including some Omega-3s for many people; some other sources:
    http://www.self.com/blogs/flas...

    Eating vegetarian in general is healthier and cheaper. So is buying the right things in bulk, maybe splitting big purchases with others.

    We also got a lot of value from a $100 blender to do smoothies from frozen fruit -- but that is beyond very cheap (although still cheaper and much healthier than a carton of ice cream).

    Still, something like a "basic income" may be a needed as a general solution to poverty. The problem with a lot of frugal advice is that it forces people to take on various risks (like health risks of lack of vegetables, or safety risk of a cheap car, or assault risk in a bad neighborhood, and so on). Or it entails doing a lot of time consuming things that prevent more productive activities. Your advice though is very time-saving and practical, which is why I like it (except for quibbles on some of the above points as far as long-term living).

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
  59. Re:Liberty Without Agency: Food Insecurity In Coll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am the guy who used the Soviet Union as a point of reference. These people really tried to create a "more just" society and so do many socialists around the world. We have lots and lots of those in Germany and other Nations in the area.

    I tried to explain the downsides of socialism:

    The leaden atmosphere of "you cannot get a job, and of course never one useful to your chemistry PHD" is badly depressing. I assume you simply cannot imagine what is going on in some of the super-socialist nations east of the Ural mountains. In Spain, an entire generation of youngsters can't get a job because they have socialist laws which prohibit the firing of any employee. The effect is: nobody will be hired if possible at any cost.
    Here in Germany it is not as bad as Spain, but we are not far from that. We have tons of socialist policies and the middle class is destroyed (by means of 40 or 50% taxes on payroll) in the process of paying for it.

    Now, I don't want to praise New York capitalism here - I believe many of them are socialists too, who want to (somehow) make everybody earn the 500K dollar Goldmann Sachs wage. Many of them are just a bunch of thieves.

    BUT, that does not mean the "fix" is in socialism. The Soviet Union and now also Germany prove that too much socialism depresses everybody. What use is your degree if you cannot find a job because the taxman has killed the economy ???

      Finally, couldn't you become a non-academic respected worker, craftsman or the like ? Are those jobs only "menial" ?

    I am not sure you understand my message, but it was certainly not meant to unduly influence a U.S. discussion. Rather, I think my observations are universal and apply to Russia as much as they apply to China and Germany.

  60. Clinical trials + plasma donations = $CHACHING$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got me all the way through grad school. ;)

  61. Why does college cost so much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the point in talking about carting 20 pound bags of flour and rice from harbor freight foods when contrasted /w college costs food expenditures represent a rounding error?

    I understand colleges *think* they need massive sums of money to pay professors who generally have no clue how to "teach", feed pet research projects, keep the lights and grounds up..etc.. Yet at it's core education is you sitting down and memorizing and or figuring out material yourself.

    Interactive computer programs provide better outcomes at virtually no cost v feeding an industry where costs have reached laughably disgusting heights.

    I fail to understand why people en-masse continue to tolerate what amounts to antiquated institutionalized extortion.

  62. Food insecurity at University? Marginal by idunham · · Score: 1

    First, suggestions (aka what I ate):
    Oatmeal, peanut butter sandwiches (especially with bananas or home-made jam), and the cheapest organ meat you can find. Ground beef heart can make a decent meatloaf, in a pinch.
    (I got that from the "Meats Laboratory" at Chico, which is a slaughterhouse run by the university to train students.)

    Now, observations:
    Yes, it can be a problem.
    I ended up spending around $10/week, for about the cheapest food I could get.
    Most of the money I used to pay for a university education was from work I did in the meanwhile for $8.15/hr, so it's not impossible to work your way through.
    The biggest thing is to find a place to stay that's close enough and cheap enough. I was working at the university farm and staying there as well, for ~$150/month. If I'd had to pay the $500+ that would be more typical, I don't think it would have worked.

  63. How about making college affordable first? by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1

    Before we worry about the problem of whether or not students can afford to eat we need to deal with the problem of poor children not being able to go to college.

  64. Companies Help Pay For My Needs by dont_jack_the_mac · · Score: 1

    Info sessions and hack-a-tons for food. Career fairs or campus organizations for free t-shirts. Every campus has something. It's time to join some clubs and meet people.

  65. Re:How's your Russian? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    You don't really spend a lot of time working with EU military, do you?

    I had my share of work with various armies of this planet. Including Russian, various European countries and of course US. Without wanting to start a flame war, but if the average US soldier is about as motivated, trained and bright as the people I had to deal with, waiting for the US to bail the EU out is NOT really something that I'd consider a sound strategy...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  66. Re:Liberty Without Agency: Food Insecurity In Coll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    west of ural of course.

  67. At a community college in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I teach at several community colleges here in Texas. My students are mostly lower-income, mostly first-generation-to-college, and mostly unemployed.

    The biggest problem is that they have transportation problems. A blown transmission, or a wreck can cause them to miss several weeks of school. This can lead to them dropping my class.

    Single moms get so much government help, that they are not at a greater disadvantage than single people without kids.

  68. Food by binaryhat · · Score: 1

    I went to a small state college for two years that only had a dining hall. The food was horrible. I only had one other option which was delivery from a pizza/fast food joint. I could have gone out but the weather was either freezing cold or snow/ice was everywhere. Lukily I transfered to a bigger school out west where weather wasn't an issue and good food was accessible on/off campus.

  69. Student Loans by Pricetx · · Score: 2

    Just to clarify, how do student loans work in the US?

    In the UK, they're provided by the government, and they don't work like conventional loans. They come directly out of your salary, and only once you start earning a certain amount. Even then, the amount scales depending on how much you earn, to the point where you may never even finish paying it (if you hit age 50 it just gets dropped completely).

    Whilst admittedly I still live at home, I can afford a car with literally thousands to spare, and have never met anyone personally who has financial issues relating to being a student.

    Based on all of the comments I'm reading here, my assumption is that in the US, student loans work more like conventional bank loans, where repayments are a fixed amount regardless of earnings?

    1. Re:Student Loans by Altrag · · Score: 1

      I believe it goes something like this:
      1) Charge ridiculous fees for college with (or perhaps due to) little or no government subsidy.
      2) Convince everyone that they'll be eternally relegated to crap jobs and low wages if they don't have a college education.
      3) Wait until they graduate.
      4) Bend them over.
      5) Profit.
      There isn't even a ??? step in there.

      Keep in mind that in the US, colleges are businesses and their primary goal is profit, NOT educating students.

      We're on basically the same track up here in Canada. We've still got a fair bit of subsidy (I think around 60%? Been a while..) but students still commonly come out with $20-40k debt loads depending on their school, program and how smart they were with their money.

    2. Re:Student Loans by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      US student loans have various humiliating processes you can use to get some deferments, but if you never actually start making money with or without your degree you still have to pay them back eventually and they never go away and if you have outstanding student loans you can't close escrow on a home, or do some other important things.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re: Student Loans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only do they never get dropped due to age, they're the only loans that can't be dropped if you go bankrupt. They're provided by private companies (though some are government subsidized, only very poor students are eligible for the subsidized ones and the subsidy only applies to interest, not the capital of the loan) and whether or not you can get an income-based plan depends on the bank you got the loan from.

      They're also not available to everyone. You have to apply, and many people are rejected due to bad credit or bad grades.

  70. No, you might want to take a closer look by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    In a lot of the EU, students from other EU countries don't have to pay tuition fees. Foreign students? Not so lucky, and language doesn't matter. If you aren't from the EU you pay increased fees. For example in Sweden you pay about 15,000 EUR/year for a science degree. In terms of language, you have to already demonstrate a proficiency in English and Swedish just to be able to get in.

    Also all of this assumes you can get a visa and get admitted. People from other EU nations, no problem, you can live and work anywhere in the EU, that is a big part of what the treaty means. Non-EU individuals have to get a student visa, the requirements of which vary.

    And of course none of that deals with the cost of food, housing, transport, etc. You are on your own for that, barring a scholarship.

    This is a subject I have more than a passing familiarity with, as my sister is currently working on her PhD in Europe (at two universities, one in the EU one outside of it). She got a generous grant that pays all her tuition, living expenses, and even some extra but that isn't what all students get. It wasn't as though she just walked in and said "I'd like to go to school here," and they said "Certainly, please come for free!"

    Also she even had an easier in than many: She and I hold Canadian citizenships. Canada is a commonwealth country and England is in the EU so that makes a lot of the visa shit way easier than it would be for an American, not that it wasn't still a big production.

    It is exceedingly narrow-minded to suggest that an American should just "Emigrate to an actual civilized country instead of a pretend one," for school, as though such a thing were trivial to do and people only did not out of ignorance (not to mention the misplaced cultural supremacy of the statement). No, it turns out that you can't just graduate from an American highschool and say "Well screw the US, I'm off to Europe!" and walk in and go to school for free.

    1. Re:No, you might want to take a closer look by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Tell her to transfer to Austria if money is that big an issue.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:No, you might want to take a closer look by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Reading and comprehending posts isn't your thing is it? You just like to skim and then jump to conclusions to try and support your narrow world view.

      I noted that my sister has no trouble, she has a generous grant (a scholarship if you like, but it works a little different) and her expenses are handled. However I have a full understanding of what those expenses are, and that they not paid for all students.

      So maybe more reading, less jumping to conclusions.

  71. Stupid people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if they can't afford to go to school, and eat, perhaps they need to go to a cheaper school, or not take so many hours, something. THEY are solely responsible for THEIR decisions

  72. Re:How's your Russian? by deadweight · · Score: 1

    Well they got us into TWO world wars, so we can do WW III and WW IV and just be EVEN.

  73. "What tricks can you share with current students?" by s.t.a.l.k.e.r._loner · · Score: 1

    Discarded pizza boxes are a good source of cheese.

  74. Re:How's your Russian? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Are you certain that you know what's happening in Ukraine and why?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  75. Re:How's your Russian? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    ecosystem

    You use words the way hillbillies use corn cobs.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  76. simple trick by stenvar · · Score: 1

    Choose a cheaper college in a cheaper town.

  77. As I Recall by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Around the time I was going through college, there was an article about scurvy making a comeback because a lot of college students ate Ramen noodles and nothing else. Turns out there's no vitamin C in Ramen.

    I used to joke that you had to supplement your Ramen with pop tarts but I checked the nutrition information on those recently and they also have 0% of your RDA of vitamin C. So, I guess you're down to foraging for rose hips or something. And if you're lucky maybe you can kill a squirrel with one of your textbooks...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:As I Recall by Nimey · · Score: 1

      That's crazy, because multivitamins are dead cheap: something like $15 for most of a year's supply.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  78. Aren't these the same people... by bferrell · · Score: 1

    Who will come to sneer about how others have made choice's that make them poor?

    I'm just askin'

  79. Parents? by kaka.mala.vachva · · Score: 1

    Don't parents help? If college costs $150000 for 4 years, don't American parents help? I am genuinely curious about this. Also, why not halve the costs by staying at home and finding a college close by for 4 years, and then leaving home? This question isn't on topic, but I'd really like to hear some Americans comment on why parents don't help with costs.

    1. Re: Parents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of American students are first-generation college attendants. Their parents can't afford to help them. Mine would have loved to, but they had several kids and were terrible with money, at our home the electricity often got cut off because they failed to pay the bill. Even when I was in college, I was sending money home to keep that from happening in the winter.

      Staying home wasn't an option because they live in a rural area, so heading out on my own was the only way I'd ever make a better life for myself. In college I met quite a few other students with the same story, mostly with immigrant parents but also a lot of long-time American families that just never prioritized education.

  80. No smartphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If hunger is a problem, first thing that should be done is get rid of the smartphones. Then make cheap food, like roman soup. The biggest problem is many students have very bad money skills.

    Smart phone? Drop it.
    What car you driving? If you have a loan your paying on a car, buy a cheap used car instead.
    Don't eat out.

    Dose not just apply to students, but people in this country feel entitled to what they have, and that results in hunger and debt.

  81. Well Done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me and my fellow students..."
    A grad student? You must be proud of your first degree; your mastery of English is perfect.

  82. Re:To many people are going to college that should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did you fare in college? You might look into the proper use of To/Too/Two.

    I''m just saying...

  83. Re:How's your Russian? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    The Russian armies continuing to mass on Ukraine's borders?
    Russian special forces and intelligence agents infiltrating Ukraine and instigating insurrection and incidents?
    The Russians violating the Open Skies treaty to deny Western and US compliance inspection over-flights of Russia to hide their activity?
    The UN finding that the Crimean election wasn't quite as free as claimed?
    Putin admitting that the "little green men" in Crimea were, "surprise! surprise!," Russian soldiers after all?
    Jews being told they must "register" in an area of Ukraine controlled by Russian separatists? which echoes the problems Russia has with National Socialists?
    Russia taking up the "anti-fascist" fight after "defeating fascism" in Poland in 1939 (splitting it with the Germans), "defeating fascism" in Finland in 1940 (annexing Finnish territory), "defeating fascism" in Georgia in 2008 (taking territory from it), and now volunteering to "defeat fascism" in Ukraine despite the fact that Russia seems to be unable to defeat fascism at home?
    That momentum is building in Ukraine's legislature for rearming with nuclear weapons which will ironically be accepting Putin's advice offered on Syria?

    Ironically, the notion of reacquiring nuclear weapons as a security guarantee is a position publicly advocated by Putin himself: "If you cannot count on international law, then you must find other ways to ensure your security. ... This is logical: If you have the bomb, no one will touch you." -- Is Ukraine about to go nuclear again?

    Most Ukrainians are neither loyal Russians nor fascists

    Putin has promoted the notion that ethnic Russians were in danger. There has never been evidence for this unless you count as brutal repression a failed attempt to revive an old law making Ukrainian the sole language for court hearings and government forms. Putin calls for greater autonomy for the south and east of Ukraine, and more rights for Russian-speakers, while doing all he can to obstruct elections that would bring them back into the political process.

    No doubt there is more. Do you have an inside scoop? Is it, as I fear, that the US is at fault?

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  84. I'm in Grad School by stuporglue · · Score: 2

    I'm in grad school right now.

    1) I know grad students who are struggling financially

    There are at least two people in my program (of about 100 total) who I know personally who are struggling to make ends meet. Their families aren't well off and our program doesn't have funding. They're getting along OK, but they have to live very very tightly, skipping any extra curricular activities, not buying text books, and budgeting both money and food.

    I assume that others may be struggling and I don't know it.

    2) More of us miss out on things so we don't have to starve

    A good number of us work full time or more to pay for things. I've had to not participate in school events both social and scholastic, including guest speakers and class outings. It is very difficult to see a teacher during office hours since I'm supposed to be at work.

    I'm not missing out on food, but if food were available I might be able to work less and be more involved.

    --
    https://www.facebook.com/digitizeicm -- Show your support for the digitization of the Iron County Miner newspaper archiv
  85. Bag of dried beans, rice and chili powder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goes a very long way. The Texas A&M abandoned abattoir in the basement of the Range Science dept. had large non-functioning meat lockers that graduate students lived in. (The Range Science graduate stipends for TAs would not have covered half of a one-bedroom apartment rent at the time, not matter how bad the neighborhood)

  86. re: degrees by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Informative

    The funny thing is, I'm hearing the exact opposite complaint coming from some of the people with many years of actual work experience in their fields. They're saying that recently, the college grads with a B.S. or Masters in the field are getting hired over those with real experience.

    I don't know? Personally, I suspect the REAL issue is just a high unemployment rate overall. We're all stuck in a "buyer's market" when it comes to those doing the hiring, so expectations and requirements are very high, and opportunity to get hired is low. No matter where you're at on the education and/or skills ladder, it's difficult to get hired right now. So people begin tossing out accusations, trying to explain why they can't get jobs.

    I've worked in I.T. for over 25 years myself, and yet I don't have a degree. (I'm one of those people with "some college", meaning a few classes shy of an Associates' degree.) I've *definitely* encountered my share of jobs I was passed over for because someone really considered the degree of prime importance. Yet I don't think my track record for employment is really any worse than my counterparts who did have the 4 year degrees. Yeah, some of them earned $20K - $50K/yr. more than I did, especially during the dot-com boom era.... but in the long-haul? A lot of them lost those high-paying jobs when budget cuts or corporate mergers came around and they had to accept less to get back into the ranks of the employed. Others just got burnt out on I.T. completely and changed careers.

    Meanwhile, I don't have all the college debt they had to pay off, and since my salary has been relatively steady for the last decade or more, I didn't get so caught up in the thing of moving to a more expensive area, buying a large house, etc. -- only to have to give it all up when times got rough.

    There's a key difference though between the "old guys" like myself and people trying to get a start in I.T. today. I think most of us who lived and breathed computers in the 80's really got into it when it was still a hobbyist's world. Corporate America wasn't even really looking at home computers as more than a passing fad, or something to just "keep an eye on, in case it eventually became useful". When you bought a computer ,you got a 200-300 page manual you had to read, cover to cover, to learn how to make it work. You might have shared knowledge with a few friends you made who owned the same machine, or joined some computer club in town. But all in all, you had to be really motivated to learn it, hands-on. Otherwise, why even waste time with it? My college courses in anything resembling I.T. were largely a joke. Either I knew way more than the professors did, or the courses went in depth on something I didn't know much about because truthfully, it DIDN'T MATTER in the grand scheme of I.T.

    These days, I think colleges have figured out much more about what people actually need to know to be successful in I.T. -- and you actually *can* take classes and learn really useful material. At the same time, I see a lot of younger people who seem to be just as "into computers" as I was growing up, but they focus on much different things; social media, web sites, mobile device apps, and MMORPGs that can really suck up a LOT of one's time. It's all pretty cool and entertaining stuff -- but won't translate that well to a career doing network or systems administration, working as a PC support specialist, or systems analyst.

  87. Home economics by rwa2 · · Score: 2

    Potatoes are 10 cents a pound here.

    "Learning to live poor" is the most education that people get in college. They have money... they just don't know how to manage it properly.

    Yep, pretty much this. Students should learn to get by the same way adults do. Make a damn budget and stick to it (granted, this is getting rare among adults too). But do that math and get creative stretching your bucks.

    Found a handful of dependable roommates and rented rickety 100-year old houses with them, which were a lot cheaper than apartments and university housing. We took turns cooking for everyone. We ate well. We'd do a grocery run once a week and shop carefully... fresh or frozen meat that was under $3/lb., lots of pasta, rice, veggies, etc.. Drank tap water, mixed with that frozen juice from concentrate when we wanted something fancier. I pretty much stuck to ~$40 a week for groceries (in 2000 money), and maybe augmented that once or twice a week with trips to one of those heaping Chinese "any two or three" stir fry takeout places for $3-$5 per meal. Plus, I would volunteer to staff the ASME coffee shop in the morning while doing homework, which was good for a bagel or two per sitting. And of course stake out the extracurricular activities that had free pizza.

  88. attitude of collage admins to the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spelling these days is so overrated

  89. Univeral Basic Income by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 0

    This might be reason #232 for implementing Universal Basic Income. How may people are not able to show what they are capable of at critical times in their lives effectively wasting the person as an asset to society?

    How many great students not only don't have enough food but then leave school in pursuit of sufficient nutrition?

  90. Been on my own since HS by RJarett · · Score: 1

    I couldn't afford more than a semester of college. I couldn't get loans. I couldn't get grants. I worked my ass on from HS on. I have been homeless, I have worried about when the next time I would find food is. I still found time to volunteer, and help others, and give up my first fruits.
    I have no sympathy for you all. I rarely hire people with degrees, they tend to be the biggest whiners and excuse makers.

  91. Strange question... by GNious · · Score: 1

    If people worry about being able to have food on the table while studying, they are likely living in some backwater, 3rd world country, and probably do not have internet access to read your question or post a reply.

    Meanwhile, in the modern, 1st-world, western countries, social policies and government-supported education (put in place to ensure the well-being and future of those countries) ensure that people are able to follow higher education, while having a place to live and food to eat.

    (snarky?)

  92. Re:How's your Russian? by sumdumass · · Score: 0

    The problem is that those in charge in the EU will sit on their collective hands and do absolutely nothing until any problem has become so massive that they are dependent on US military assistance in order to hope to survive.

    This was true with WWI and WWII, they sat and watched while Russia invaded Georgia, and now after promising to protect Ukraine if it gave up it's nuclear arsenal, they are sitting and watching Russia toy with it too. Well, siting and watching is cutting it a little thin, they had "words" for them and I think the current commander in chief used his inside voice while not allow some people from Russia to go outside for recess.

    You are right, it is not a sound strategy. But it will be reality as history has shown us. It will be a reality as Europe doesn't invest much in their military compared to potential threats. Russia likely has more rusted out equipment that can be put into use than all of Europe combined has available if you leave the US out of the equation. I think right now the EU has about 1.5 million active troops with about 400,000 being capable of immediate deployment where Russia is sitting on about 2 million reserve troops and 1.1 million active duty troops. Of that, roughly 700,000 are ready for immediate deployment.

    Of course the US is winding down it's military- or so some of our leaders claim. So this sitting around naval gazing while Russia rapes the fields and pillages the women of European countries might be even worse of a strategy of any of them expects the US to bail them out again.

  93. I've actually had worse going into work by dbIII · · Score: 1

    At University you usually know that things are going to be tight so can plan to an extent, and have time to find the cheapest vegetables of the week.

    Starting a new job you have extra expenses and if that first pay gets delayed it can really suck. I had to live off fried cabbage with chilli flakes for a couple of weeks due to such a delay, and had another near crisis when a combination of a nine week delay in pay and an expectation that I would buy IT equipment to be reimbursed later cleaned out my savings. It's difficult to be civil with accounts people when you have purchased a fucking photocopier for them out of your own savings and they do not see any reason to pay it outside of when they normally do that each month, despite their original lie that it would be paid back the next day. Threatening to quit when you are owed money and have no resources to take legal action to recover it does not look like a good move when there is some hope that waiting will produce results. Both those are traps for new players. It's hard to tell people to fuck off when it's early enough that you can be dismissed with little consequence.

    Being a contractor can suck more than being a student until you've got a bit of work behind you. Being a postgrad relying on being paid for teaching work and having that payment delayed a long time also sucks - been there too, more than three months delay with one batch of work and most of it tied up in tax for a year due to accountancy errors.

  94. How can you miss something so simple? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    If more people train in a profession than there are job positions what do you think happens?
    Surely you can work that one out.

    For an added bonus consider looking for work as a recent graduate at the same time when the job market is flooded with a lot of experienced people due to layoffs, and those experienced people are willing to take the same wages as a recent graduate.

    If you consider it numerically you may be able to work it out despite an apparent sheltered life and lack of empathy.

    1. Re:How can you miss something so simple? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      The market is brutal. If he had said "I tried to get a job at Pixar, SPI, Dreamworks etc but I couldn't make the cut" I would give the guy some slack. But if you're going to claim that you're hot shit an award winning animator and the only unemployable because you didn't suck up to the right people then I'm going to call you on it. Plenty of people aren't employed due to lack of talent/practice/training in this industry. But don't say it's because you didn't go to the right parties or you didn't hold the door open for a recruiter.

    2. Re:How can you miss something so simple? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      But don't say it's because you didn't go to the right parties or you didn't hold the door open for a recruiter.

      Hollywood is infamous for nepotism and corruption. People there also seem to put a vast amount of effort into name dropping and social connections, so that's why his story sounds very likely to me given that "culture". I've certainly seen situations in another industry where well connected but unqualified people have gotten a job that had hundreds of qualified applicants. Working with such people is depressing but gives some practice in training people if they are merely unskilled and actually do want to be able to do a decent job.

      Even if he embellished it DailyWTF style it's still interesting and I do not think it deserved a personal attack.

  95. Re: degrees by dbIII · · Score: 1

    They're saying that recently, the college grads with a B.S. or Masters in the field are getting hired over those with real experience.

    Lazy HR by keyword sorting is the culprit. Also remember that many HR folk have no way of recognising the difference between experience and bullshit so they will take a bit of paper with the right words on it from a degree mill over experience or anything with slightly different words.

  96. Learning how to eat makes a big difference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just about lived on lentils and rice to get through engineering school, which wasn't all that bad because lentils are fairly nutritionally complete and could be thrown into the slowcooker when I got up in the morning... fulltime school and work didn't leave much time for cooking. My last year as an undergraduate I finally applied for food stamps so that I could afford meat, which felt great because I tend to get anemic without it. It felt pretty good to pay my taxes my first year out, because even the state income tax on a six-figure salary wiped out what I felt I owed back to the state that gave me food stamps in school.

    Lots of people here have commented about ways to eat cheaply, and it can be done nutritionally as well, but you have to learn how to do it and many students fail to strategize. It seems like they expect that if they do as they're told in class then everything else should just fall together.

    Even if they get a big paycheck when they leave college, they end up adding on consumer debt to their student debt because they never sit down to have an honest look at their resources and make a plan. ("Look at all this income, I can get a house/new car/eat out all the time etc." instead of "Look at all the interest these loans are accruing.") Then if they get laid off, life falls apart, like the friend that ended up living on my couch last summer being depressed because unemployment benefits didn't let her keep up her newly inflated lifestyle and even a halfway decent degree only gets your foot in the door. The earlier someone learns to strategize, the less vulnerable they'll be the rest of their life.

  97. Rice Cooker -- JUST SAY NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My college charged so much for housing, it was significantly cheaper to live 12 months in an off-campus rental a 20 minute walk away than to live on-campus and get kicked out every holiday and summer. I mean thousands of dollars less, and you get a full 12-month rental to boot.

    Off-campus means you have a stove. Get yourself a $3 pot with a lid. Put in 2 cups of rice, 4 cups of water, 2-3 tablespoons of olive oil, and 1 teaspoon of salt. Cover and bring to a boil (approximately 6-15 minutes depending on stove) and then simmer for 15 minutes or so. (Rotate the pot every few minutes to keep it from burning.) Let the rice cool down for an hour or two, and you can put it into a gallon-size zip-lock bag and keep it in the fridge. Makes enough rice for 4-10 meals, depending on how hungry you are. The oil makes you feel full afterwards. Keeps for about a week. Clean the pot with a little vinegar if the rice-stains bother you. Overall cost is next to nothing, in terms of money and time. Rice forms the base for a wide range of healthy inexpensive meals. Frozen veggies are dirt cheap, and you can just toss a handful of them in.

    A microwave will help for reheating. If you check out your local colleges around May or June, you'll find a number of bargains for microwaves, fridges, tvs, furniture, computers, etc from folks who don't want to haul it home for the summer, or take it with them when they graduate.

    Another approach is bread. I have a friend who does that. Forget the bread machines. A handful of ingredients mixed together in pot/bowl, let rise, and baked in the oven will feed you quite nicely. Things like flour and sugar are dirt cheap at your local megamart. A single 5lb bag will feed you for a month.

    Or canned meats. They're a little more expensive. But a $2 can of chicken, mixed with the rice, or spread on the bread, perhaps mixed with a little sloppy joe sauce if you're feeling rich, will feed you quite nicely. It's expensive, but cheap compared to a $7 meal at McDonalds.

    Study how folks live in third world countries. It will help you to survive here.

  98. Re:How's your Russian? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Your familiarity with hillbillies may exceed mine.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  99. Meetings, company presentations... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    Check bulletin boards for group meetings, companies doing recruiting presentations and see if they have food. I sat through a lot of boring meetings and presentations as a grad student in payment for free eats. A little searching can find a number with food, and offering to help cleanup afterward often scores leftovers. Some organizations routinely provide food as well, the student paper, for example, always had pizza when putting an edition to bed. Join them, not only do you get to eat but have fun and learn something as well. Volunteering to help at events with food is another way to eat free.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  100. "Beer as food"--think twice about it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a money problem, and I sure as hell wasn't going to give up drinking beer. So instead, I rolled the food budget into the beer budget. For years, I lived on a twelve-pack and a bag of potato chips every day--right around five bucks a day back in the late '80s.

    Eventually I turned into an alcoholic, amounted to nothing, spent about a decade trying to undo the mistakes I made, and now I worry about food money without any beer money at all. So great, I made it nearly half a century living on beer for 20 of those years, but I've also lived in poverty for most of that time. Soon, no diet and no amount of money will save my short, Hobbesian life.

  101. Re:How's your Russian? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    I see one of my fans got mod points again. How special and democratic of you.

  102. Begs for Change by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    As we already have too many folks begging for change how about we get smart and really beg for change. That is to say let's get real and admit that we nee to do a basic change in the way the economy works. The old ideas and methods do not fit into modern realities at all. A redistribution of wealth is in order as well as the simple fact that we will have less and less jobs available every year. That spells disaster as we clearly will have more and more people available every year. Here is a demonstration of why the economic model does not work now. Picture seven hundred coal miners per shift going down into the mine and producing coal. Now picture modern mining equipment being delivered and instead of seven hundred workers only twelve are now on each shift to produce even more coal than the seven hundred men used to do. But here is the snag. The price of coal keeps going up and up. Coal is less affordable despite getting rid of almost all of the workers. Then we start to understand just how severe the effects of burning coal really are and we start to restrict the use of coal sharply. Meanwhile we flood the labor markets with ever more immigrants seeking work. But other effects kick in. In the bad old days a man could go catch a fish if he was short on food. But almost no fish in W. Virginia or Kentucky are at all safe to eat because coal has left heavy metals in almost 100% of the rivers, streams and ponds in those states. Meanwhile we really don't want the public to be aware that crops also pick up those nasty pollutants and if the water is not fit to drink chances are the tomato or corn or spinach grown on that land is also unfit for food. Then we turn around and feed that stuff to beef, to chickens or make pellets to feed fish on fish farms. After all who will really blow the whistle on pollutants in the food supply?

    1. Re:Begs for Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you Americans first and foremost need to fix the madhouse of NY finance. These folks will happily destroy completely healthy industries and they have spread their cyncial view of how people should cheat each other in order to get weatlhy.

      In other words, you need a guy like Vlad Putin to run the show in Washington. And I mean this totally serious - Putin cleaned out the Augias Stable that had developed under Jelzin. Russians almost starved while some insanely rich bastards (as in Bill-Gates class rich) stole the natural riches of the largest country on the globe.

      I am not from the FSB, neither do I have business relationships with Russia. I am just fucked over by NY like most other people in Pax Americana countries. And I can see through the mainstream lies.

      Free enterprise can work nicely, if the state clamps down on irresponsible and cyncial finance actors.

      AT Slashdot Censor: come on, let me post this message

  103. Re: degrees by ultranova · · Score: 2

    Lazy HR by keyword sorting is the culprit.

    It's not necessarily laziness but another symptom of the oversupply of labour. When there's a 100+ applications for every position, it's impossible to evaluate them without resorting to data mining techniques. And at that point, if your application is not Search Engine Optimized, for example if you lack a diploma, sucks to be you.

    The underlaying problem is that our current economic model, and our model of employment as its subset, is based on the needs of the Industrial Era, which is ending. Capitalism is breaking down just like Feudalism before it, and whatever will replace it hasn't emerged into the mainstream yet. The question is: how long and painful will the transition be this time around?

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  104. Re:How's your Russian? by ultranova · · Score: 1

    The problem is that those in charge in the EU will sit on their collective hands and do absolutely nothing until any problem has become so massive that they are dependent on US military assistance in order to hope to survive.

    The problem is that many EU countries are dependent on Russian oil and gas. US military can't solve that problem.

    Of course, Russia is also dependent on EU buying said resources. A disruption of trade would, at the very least, topple Putin. He's counting on EU being unwilling to take the pain, but it's becoming increasingly clear he's trying to rebuild Soviet Empire. Sooner or later he'll miscalculate, and at that point it's a question whether he can gets removed from power before starting another (world?) war as a desperation move.

    But no, Russia cannot win a war with the EU. EU has 3.5 times as much population and almost 8 times as large economy. Even with all the inefficiency inherent in coordinating multiple independent militaries, it could only end in Russian defeat or nuclear escalation.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  105. Price of admission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in college I considered my "food insecurity" part of the price of admission to higher paying world of being a college graduate, and I don't think there is anything wrong with that. A little sacrifice on the way to achievement develops character. Also, most college students are straight out of high school and if left to their own devices will eat out or consume fast food constantly rather than learning to cook (which costs a fraction of prepared food). Lack of funds is a forcing function that teaches them how to make their own food. Now that I have kids in college I continue the tradition. I provide enough that they are in no risk of starvation, but they don't have enough to buy Starbucks. Ramen noodles go a long way. Eventually they get sick of ramen and start branching out to other food.

  106. Weekly Income for Students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I lived fairly poor through my undergraduate days. The single most helpful thing I did was take a job working at the campus cinema. It paid just above minimum wage, and was maybe 8 hours per week / two nights total. But you know what it did - it gave me a weekly income to afford food. I was not forced to live on a noodles/bean/rice diet. I ate healthy for less than $2/day (that exact number has gone up since I was an undergrad, but you get the idea). Rent/utilities/etc. came out of student loans.

    Two shifts a week is doable of a typical 60-70 hour grad student life. If you are one of these extreme cases where you are consistently doing 80+ hours, switch advisors.

  107. Re: degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That really applies for management, and has also been going on since the dot-com boom.

    Literally during that period, big tech industries like Microsoft would hire Degree students straight out of college that had never worked in the industry. I chalk a lot of the US industries failures and many more of Microsoft's failings down to these young bucks mismanaging things into the ground.

  108. Work in the food industry by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I had this problem when I first started college. You can work at best part time while going to school full time, and have to crowd into an apartment to be able to afford it, and often we'd be counting out change to make rent, which left very little for food. You haven't lived until you've dined on boiled rice and ketchup packets because that's all you had in the kitchen.

    I don't know how it is now, but I tried for food stamps at the time, and ran into a catch-22: You couldn't qualify if you shared a cooking area with roommates, but if you were well off enough to live by yourself, you were too well off to qualify.

    A partial solution for me, since I had to work anyway, was to get a job in the food industry. I worked in a restaurant, which included one meal during my shift, so at worst I was guaranteed one meal a day three or four days a week. Later I got a job at a supermarket which gave discounts and other food related benefits to employees. For instance, they sometimes overbought on whole hams for the holidays, and employees were allowed to buy them at a reduced price, with free slicing and packaging. I loaded up my freezer and had ham... for a long... time... Moreover, working at the store puts you first in line for loss leaders, freight-damaged, and discontinued items. (And I know that's a misuse of "loss leader", but the store allowed it.)

    Other issues to be cognizant of besides mere starvation are nutrition and food poisoning. The first because of the tendency to eat the same thing over and over, and the second because you may be too distracted to remember to put food back in the fridge, and too hungry not to eat it anyway.

    Part of the problem, I think, is that college kids are young and often fresh out of home, and don't often have the life experiences to foresee what their needs are going to be and arrange to be in a place where those needs can be met. There's a tendency to live in the moment, not think ahead, and that causes "the moment" to often include boiled rice and ketchup packets.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  109. We make a huge assumption here: by hessian · · Score: 1

    That means that we're looking at about three times more equality in Europe than the US.

    That assumption is: "equality is good."

    Universal good is a difficult concept by itself. Equality is a concept of mathematics, not the more complex nature of reality.

    I'd rather have us pick good people and hand them lots of money so they can do even better things with their new power.

    "Absolute power corrupts absolutely," you might say. To which I respond: only if you assume people are identical. Many can handle power, but not all.

    1. Re:We make a huge assumption here: by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Absolute equality is not only useless, it's counterproductive because there is no incentive to better yourself.

      Too little equality though is a breeding ground for revolutions. The middle ground is where there is peace and prosperity.

      Being "good" has nothing to do with the ability to gain money. In my experience, being "bad" makes it far more likely that you will end up on top of the crowd. Only if you're willing to climb over dead bodies you will be able to compete with others who don't mind doing so.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  110. It's part of your education. by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Learning to make do and do well enough on damned little is part of what you're supposed to learn in life. If you didn't learn it before, you'll learn it in college. Being thrifty all around, reusing and repurposing, cooking your own meals because it costs a fraction of what it does to eat out. These are valuable life lessons that will serve you in good stead when things don't go entirely swimmingly later on.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  111. "Me" as the subject! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me and my fellow students still refer to ourselves as the 'starving grad students.' "

    A grad student who never learned the difference between I and me. Another education wasted.

  112. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soylent for all students! Problem solved.

  113. How is this even remotely "news"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean this was common long before I went to college, which was over 10 years ago now. (High school, not so much, unless your family is poor).

  114. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, if may be impossible to "work your way through college" if you go to an expensive school. But if you pick a decent major, you can pay for an expensive school with a half-way decent job you'll get once you graduate.

    I'm a pretty good example because I made a lot of mistakes. I took longer than I should have to graduate, I took out a private (high interest) loan to cover part of my balance, which I delayed paying off (costing me more interest!), I went to an expensive graduate school too, which further delayed me making payments.

    But...
    1. Everyone in the US can get government loans at relatively low interest rates
    2. There are cheap schools (community colleges, state schools) that most people can get into and possibly work their way through without loans.
    3. If you take a decent major, you will usually get a decent job.

    the people in the biggest trouble are those who mess up and drop-out half way through with thousands in loans they have to pay back and no degree to show for it.

    Still, I think it it's better not to work full time, and just take the loans so that you can actually concentrate on class. Also, of course, make a point of studying and getting good grades in high-school instead of goofing off all the time so that you'll be able to get a scholarship somewhere.

    And.. who graduates with $150k in loans? nobody I know has that much for just regular college. Even counting graduate school I don't have that much (granted I paid most of that in cash from my salary). I know one girl who owed $80K and I considered that quite a lot.

    I'm not even close to rich, probably median pay or below for my profession, but I have no problem paying off my loans. (I wish I could pay them off faster because I don't like making banks rich, but...)

    Eating ramen for a few years was worth it...

  115. Re: degrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    complaint coming from some of the people with many years of actual work experience in their fields. They're saying that recently, the college grads with a B.S. or Masters in the field are getting hired over those with real experience.

    Today's college grads are better trained at accepting a much lower wage than professionals with years of experience.

  116. Re:How's your Russian? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    they sat and watched while Russia invaded Georgia

    Why would you have expected the EU to go to the aid of Georgia? For one, Georgia already was ineligible to join NATO because it lacked full control over the territory it claimed (Abkhazia having been de facto independent since the 1990s), so it had no guarantees as a part of a defensive alliance. Two, the Russians were seizing a single province that had already expressed discontent with being part of Georgia, and it was not threatening the survival of Georgia in general as an independent state. Three, as countries where the army is mainly seen as defensive, projecting force into the faraway Caucasus is probably not something they've ceaselessly drilled on. Fourth, the broad population here does not care much about Georgia, it is just too far away and while Georgia is in fact culturally remarkably "European", most people in the EU don't know that.

    now after promising to protect Ukraine if it gave up it's nuclear arsenal, they are sitting and watching Russia toy with it too.

    The same point about lack of broad public support holds for Ukraine too. I live in a EU country bordering on Ukraine and there is zero passion about protecting Ukrainians from aggression. They are seen as belonging to a very different cultural sphere from the EU nations of Central Europe. Furthermore, many EU residents simply feel that they lack an understanding of the "complicated" ethnic relations in the area and so can't judge the rightness or wrongness of the situation.

    Europeans would probably be happy if Ukraine turned westward, but many years would have to go by before Ukraine was considered "one of us" enough to go to war to protect.

  117. Dropped out of grad school due to hunger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long-term malnutrition was basically the biggest factor leading to me dropping out of grad school. I survived my undergrad on achievement scholarships, summer research positions and grading mostly, and by my last year I was about $1000 short, from which 500$ came out of my food budget and the other $500 from tuition. By the end of the year I didn't know if I would even graduate or not because I couldn't pay tuition, but ultimately the university waived the remainder of the fee. I had received a nice grant for my master's too, $17,500 a year where I had been surviving on about $15,000, but that summer was fairly brutal. I had no access to a proper kitchen, and about $35 a week for food, which meant two meals a day, one of which was instant noodles and the other a salad bar from the school cafeteria. I would have been financially set for grad school, but I was in such poor shape that everything fell apart after just a few months. It took me about four years to recover physically and financially from the continued state of poverty which ensued.

  118. Sold weed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was making $15/hour at my part time internship during school, which was barely enough to cover my expenses. So I sold a little weed on the side, which more than doubled my income with little time commitment. Then I got too big and careless and got raided after several years, but that was by time I had a salaried job which could pay my legal fees. Can't say it's for everyone, but it kept me from living the life of the "Staving college student" and certainly kept things interesting.

  119. Chicken, chicken, chicken by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    unless you have a weirdo like one of my former roomies who has a ... let's say rather special taste.

    I lived with one of those once. Funny thing is, there was a really high turnover of people there. Some left without saying anything or even packing their things.

    He always blamed it on my BO.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  120. Good points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with your sentiment. I did actually do what you said working my way through college and taking a full time job at night, sleeping roughly 20 minutes a day on weekdays and about 10 hours on the weekends. I don't recommend it though, my skin changed color and you live in a perpetual state of constantly being unsharp. Fight Club had it right about feeling like a copy of a copy. Never been called super human before, but I have enjoyed being a legend in my own mind.

  121. Been there ... by cybrarian_ca · · Score: 1

    I had access to neither loans nor parental support in college. For a while I was in a co-op program, which was good & allowed me to support myself during school terms, but I had to leave it. After that, I worked multiple part-time jobs on & off campus while going to school full-time, & was always worried about paying the rent, eating, etc. I worked pretty much full-time, went to school full-time, no other life, which was fine, as I was living with my boyfriend. Things I learned: 1) Combine time & effort as much as possible. I worked in the main campus library, & did most of the research for papers (mostly for electives) right after work, before heading home. I also lived in a very inexpensive co-op housing complex, where tenants had to do 1 hour/week of labor, and in return rents were about half the cost of other apartments, and I worked one Saturday afternoon a month for a food co-op in exchange for a staff discount on food purchased there, which wasn't a lot, but helped with bulk goods. 2) Take jobs that offer more than just the pay. I waited tables in a beer-and-pizza/pasta joint, right next to the Engineering school, which at the time had about 800 students - about 3 of them female. Drinking age was 19 (Canada). I'm a decent-looking female, & I did well on tips. I was also permitted to eat 1 meal at work after a shift, and to take home leftovers from the pizza & pasta lunch buffet or any delivery orders with mistakes. My boyfriend & I ate a lot of cold/leftover pizza, leftover pasta, etc. A lot of students took jobs in restaurants because of meals & tips. Between that & the co-op apartment, living near campus (which cut down transportation costs), & picking up things like serving as a subject in psychology experiments with lots of quizzes for $25 a pop, I managed most of the time. The rent was late with some regularity, life was stressful, & meals were not always the most nutritious - but I survived.