Slashdot Mirror


Student Records Kids Who Bully Him, Then Gets Threatened With Wiretapping Charge

An anonymous reader tips news of an incident in a Pennsylvania high school in which a student, Christian Stanfield, was being bullied on a regular basis. He used a tablet to make an audio recording of the bullies for the purpose of showing his mother how bad it was. She was shocked, and she called school officials to tell them what was going on. The officials brought in a police lieutenant — but not to deal with the bullies. Instead, the officer interrogated Stanfield and made him delete the recording. The officer then threatened to charge him with felony wiretapping. The charges were later reduced to disorderly conduct, and Stanfield was forced to testify before a magistrate, who found him guilty. Stanfield's mother said, "Christian's willingness to advocate in a non-violent manner should be championed as a turning point. If Mr. Milburn and the South Fayette school district really want to do the right thing, they would recognized that their zero-tolerance policies and overemphasis on academics and athletics have practically eliminated social and emotional functioning from school culture."

Update: 04/17 04:36 GMT by T : The attention this case has gotten may have something to do with the later-announced decision by the Allegheny County District Attorney's office to withdraw the charges against Stanfield.

798 comments

  1. Rewarding the bullies... by killfixx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why people don't like going to the authorities...

    Not only was his problem not taken care of, but he was actually punished for trying to protect himself non-violently!

    Fucking ignorant fucks!

    I usually don't feel this way, but as a person who was endlessly bullied, I hope they eat a bag of diseased dicks.

    Another person who will be afraid of authority.

    And, what if this kid commits a Columbine-esque revenge scenario? They'll blame it on some other bullshit, not their own lack of souls...

    FUCK!

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    1. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When you take a look at school shootings, I can't help but ... is it me or is it blatantly obvious to everyone what's going on? I mean, look at things.

      1. Kids shoot up schools. Why schools? Why not shopping malls before Christmas or movie theaters during blockbuster premiers? If it's body count and fame you're after, that's where you'd have to do your killing spree. Schools are rather meh for either. Not very cramped, lots of exits, before you can rack up a sensible body count most of the people already hit the exit. Now try a movie theater with 2 exits for 200+ people. Shot 10 or so and a body count of at least 50 is certain due to the stampede! So why schools?

      2. A killing spree is not targeted. That's not the case with school shootings. When you go on a killing spree, you want people dead. You don't care who gets to bite the dust, but when you look at the school shootings that is simply not the case. The shooters don't simply open the first door on their way in and clean the classroom out, then move on to the next. They usually are very selective where they go and who they shoot.

      It's not a killing spree. It's revenge. Plain and simple. That's of course nothing you can say as a politician. Because the ones guilty of the shooting are usually the ones being shot. It's kinda hard to blame teenagers who just got their head blown away and get reelected. So we need to shift the blame on movies, computer games, music, you name it. As long as kids like it and parents don't get it, it's a convenient scapegoat. And it works as such, no doubt. It won't change anything, though.

      We should make our mind up what we want. If we just want to feel good that we "done something", then we can continue as we did so far, ban various games, movies and songs and accept that we'll have a few revenge rampages a year.

      Or we finally start get our heads out of our asses and accept that we have to do something against it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And, what if this kid commits a Columbine-esque revenge scenario?

      Appropriately, the page with TFA has an ad encouraging me to "Win an AR-15 from Sebastian Ammo". Google is getting scary...

      As for the action taken by the school, one really has to wonder as to what kind of cretins make up the school administration. And what they could possibly have hoped to achieve by filing charges, other than a nasty (and well deserved) publicity backlash? Although for a society run by lawyers, that's perhaps what one would expect. Squeaky wheel gets a beating, and a teenager gets hauled in front of a judge on charges of "disorderly conduct" in a school. Seriously... Can any of the officials involved in this case look in the mirror and tell themselves that they are doing the Right Thing?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He'll either:
        - Go Columbine.
        - Learn to cope.
        - Pay an illegal immigrant $100 to stab the bully in the kidney.

      The third option is the safest one as long as he's smart enough to find a way to not leave a trace about the contract.

      I'm not sure which option produces a better society as a result.

    4. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem wasn't taken care of because the first priority of schools officials isn't to protect the students, it's to protect the school (and their jobs). They wanted the recording deleted before it could get out and embarrass them. The police just helped them.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    5. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      Or we finally start get our heads out of our asses and accept that we have to do something against it.

      ...before the kids learn that bombs or poison are safer than guns.

      What truly scares me is the progression. Soon we'll have a Columbine-like event but with chlorine, or an infected water supply, or a home made explosive device, or some other horror.

    6. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by killfixx · · Score: 1

      I have the exact same ad! :)

      Wow, feels like foreshadowing...

      --
      "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    7. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The one where the bully dies.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      That's two out of three, you'll have to be more specific.

    9. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Talderas · · Score: 2

      Columbine did include explosive devices. They just failed to explode....

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    10. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by korbulon · · Score: 5, Funny

      As for the action taken by the school, one really has to wonder as to what kind of cretins make up the school administration.

      Those who can, do; those who can't, teach; those who're cunts, administrate.

    11. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      One can only hope. I am sad every time I hear about the death of those that only want to get revenge once in their life.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Preferably the one where the victim survives, but a Columbine is acceptable as well, it's not really my position to make that choice for him.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...before the kids learn that bombs or poison are safer than guns.

      It is a lot harder to build bombs or to use a proper dosage of poison. Most likely the target will just be hospitalized but survive.
      Guns are a lot more available and efficient.

    14. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, that is the thing that drives me crazy about all the talk about bullying in schools. Schools (and police) pretty much never acknowledge the role they play in strengthening the bullies' hands or even actively participating.

      The worst bullying cases I have known involved teachers joining in, reenforcing the idea that the victim deserves it or is simply being shown their proper social place. And sadly the whole myth that bullies are some broken losers really makes things more difficult since most of them simply have a higher social standing in the school and are acting as their peers feel is appropriate.

    15. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Pay an illegal immigrant $100 to stab the bully in the kidney.

      There's another, more profitable option hiding right there: sell it into black market. Make the immigrant doctor now working as a doughnut seller extract the organ in a murky motel room.

    16. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next thing they'll do is call him a Terrorist and a Traitor to his country... good girls and boys don't wiretap!

    17. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by jythie · · Score: 1

      We can only hope. While explosives can sometimes be effective, things like chlorine gas and tainted water supplies are very hard to pull off in any significant way. They tend to have a significant psychological place in our fears, but as actual implements of harm they have a very poor cost/benefit ratio in the general case.

    18. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by swillden · · Score: 4, Informative

      Appropriately, the page with TFA has an ad encouraging me to "Win an AR-15 from Sebastian Ammo". Google is getting scary...

      Must not have been a Google ad, Google doesn't allow gun ads. Personally, I think that's stupid, but in the interest of accuracy, your ad couldn't have been from Google.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Here's the thing: Everyone has been bullied at some point in their life. Not all children are prone to it, but there is always a bigger kid prone to intimidation tactics when growing up.

      Kids live by the law of the playground jungle when adult supervision and rules are absent from the equation. It is ingrained into us as some form of social stepping stone, the animal in each of us at work, attempting dominance and security for an insecure bully.

      There is a time honored civil process in which we attempt to retrain our young into civilized little pricks. Picking on the weak is wrong, and you don't get to take advantage of a fellow human because you're physically or mentally able to do so.

      Everyone is small and helpless early, and many are old and helpless late in life. These rules benefit us all, and what happened here sends precisely the wrong message.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    20. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      So, the classic win-win-win-lose a kidney situation.

      *: the third win is either for the happy recipient of a healthy kidney or the considerably less happy customer who tastes the new "meat doughnut".

    21. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by hattig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most likely the bullies are members of the school's football team, hence the protection afforded to them.

      So option three, but targeting the Achilles heel tendon or other sport-critical tendon/muscle, is a great option, in my opinion.

      Clearly the school has a bullying problem, and a control problem. It's a sick, diseased school run by weak people, and teachers too afraid to do their job to protect students from bullies who are on the school football team. This is something that requires state intervention, I presume the state has school inspection bodies, and the ability to enact punishments? I would suggest a ban in intra-school sporting competition for a couple of years until the school's curriculum has moved back towards education.

      Indeed, I think that US school sports is really weirdly venerated. I'd split the two up, schools can have basic sport, but clubs, etc, should be run outside of the school, maybe with loose affiliation, but having no influence on the school's central reason for existence - education.

    22. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A girl got raped here a few years ago and later committed suicide. It would of been the end of it, if not for the divine intervention of Anonymous.
      So then people wanted to form a torch welding mob when the facts surrounding it came out, not everyone though, there was a smaller group supporting the rapists.
      So while that angry mob never did form, the pro-rapist group managed to carry out some assaults on people speaking out in favor of punishing the rapists.
      Of course, our fearless POlice step in and say they will spare no expensive or lethal force to protect these people, the rapists that is... the victim and her supporters can go to hell. "She deserved what happened to her."

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
    23. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. Even a few hospitalizations and the panic of having to run from a poisonous gas might be sufficient if accompanied with an anonymous message of "if bullying doesn't stop, the next attack will kill every single one of you."

    24. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Appropriately, the page with TFA has an ad encouraging me to "Win an AR-15 from Sebastian Ammo". Google is getting scary...

      That's not Google. That contest is hosted on the same site as the story -- I actually hovered over the link to see where it went.

      It's their own content.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    25. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have it right. If you want an interesting read on how school administrations become toxic, check out Hammer of Chalk. It's likely out of print so try the usual used book vendors.

      http://www.nea.org/home/41892.htm

      HoC is much more interesting than one might think. Mr Masone was an outstanding science teacher (I was one of his students) and exceptional at inspiring troubled youth.

    26. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by shellster_dude · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why schools? Because no one can shoot back. There are giant signs advertising that no one is armed.

    27. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Agreed. It is the convenience that makes guns so popular for when someone decides to go postal. They are readily available, and some might even say seductive. Something about a firearm also appeals to us, suggests all sorts of power at our fingertips.

      Bombs have the appeal of the big destructive bang, but as you point out there is less certainty, and often more work involved than simply taking your dad's keys to his rifle locker. Poison seems to also be ruled out by the fact that it is too sneaky, doesn't make enough of a violent statement.

    28. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We only tell ourselves that to feel better. It's not true.

      Schools employ a caste system, and the unmentionables get bullied without any hope for intervention from an authority figure, largely because the authority figures identify more with the upper castes which do the bullying. Additionally, the handful of school shootings that have occurred serve as convenient examples of why the lower caste kids are potential threats and need to be oppressed even more.

    29. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As children most cops and most judges were the bullies. For that matter, so were a lot of school administrators. They don't understand the problem, or that there even is a problem. I was suspended for finally hitting back in junior high school, and almost expelled when I did it a second time.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    30. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They do? You happen to know who is innocent and who is not?

      I can't really tell guilty from innocent just by looking at a face. I don't know who is the bully. I have to trust the judgement of those that go after them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by cusco · · Score: 4

      When Columbine happened the first thing that came to my mind was, "If it had gone a little further when I was in school . . ." A friend who was also bullied in school said that she had the exact same thought.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    32. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by jythie · · Score: 1

      While that would indeed have a psychological impact, the actual body count would likely be zero. It is not to say such things can not be dangerous, but for them to be deadly you generally need a LOT of the material and a poorly ventilated/enclosed space. In a school, opening up the window would be enough to nullify any attack a student could manage.

    33. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by LifesABeach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I believe you are describing the current post authoritarian decade that finds its declining numbers of leaders faced with the issue of self survival. The easiest way for them to do this is to point a finger at the weakest person they can quickly identify; then say that person is the problem to be solved.

    34. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the threat that there might be someone with a gun would sure work as a deterrent for someone who plans to off himself in the end anyway...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    35. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...Picking on the weak is wrong, and you don't get to take advantage of a fellow human because you're physically or mentally able to do so."

      You are kidding right? Survival of the fittest is the only rule in life. Just look around. People who were smart enough to "make" the most money or physically brutal enough to steal the most are your owners.

      When someone has that kind of power by whatever means, and uses it to make your life miserable, you have to take them out when it is clear your "society" is not going to help you.

      Even kids know this, and some of them actually attempt it.

      The truth is that we are still apes with a haircut and shinier, smarter ways to kill each other.....same as it was when all had was a rock.

    36. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by davek · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing: Everyone has been bullied at some point in their life. Not all children are prone to it, but there is always a bigger kid prone to intimidation tactics when growing up.

      Kids live by the law of the playground jungle when adult supervision and rules are absent from the equation. It is ingrained into us as some form of social stepping stone, the animal in each of us at work, attempting dominance and security for an insecure bully.

      There is a time honored civil process in which we attempt to retrain our young into civilized little pricks. Picking on the weak is wrong, and you don't get to take advantage of a fellow human because you're physically or mentally able to do so.

      Everyone is small and helpless early, and many are old and helpless late in life. These rules benefit us all, and what happened here sends precisely the wrong message.

      To quote the movie Paranorman :

      Neil: Nah. You can't stop bullying, it's part of human nature. If you were bigger and more stupid, you'd probably be a bully too. It's called, survival of the thickest.

      Profound.

      --
      6th Street Radio @ddombrowsky
    37. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sick fuck principal and the sick fuck vice-principal at my middle school just loved to paddle kids until their asses were purple. They are both dead now, thank God. May they rot in Hell forever.

    38. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Number42 · · Score: 0

      That's the government's job.

    39. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by cusco · · Score: 2

      Nah, 1970s when you could still carry a pocket knife without being automatically expelled. Which I did, but then so did they, and bullies always travel in packs.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    40. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have the exact same ad! :)

      Wow, feels like foreshadowing...

      Why? Are you planning on killing a bunch of people with an AR-15?

      I think the word you're looking for, rather than foreshadowing, is "coincidence."

      Or maybe "irony," depending on your sense of humor.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    41. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It is the convenience that makes guns so popular for when someone decides to go postal. They are readily available, and some might even say seductive. Something about a firearm also appeals to us, suggests all sorts of power at our fingertips.

      And it's much "more up close and personal" than a bomb.

    42. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Streisand effect.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    43. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have gone to Riyadh High.

    44. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst bullying cases I have known involved teachers joining in, reenforcing the idea that the victim deserves it or is simply being shown their proper social place.

      I can still remember being bullied (heavily) back in school for being a nerd, and finally going to a teacher about it. The first thing she said was "Well, maybe you should ask yourself what you're doing to make them treat you that way." And that was the only help she offered. So I kept getting the shit kicked out of me and learned the valuable lesson that teachers were fucking worthless excuses for human beings.

      I only hope that bitch has since died a slow, slow, and very painful death from cancer.

    45. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you ruin a perfectly resalable kidney like that?

      Going "Columbine" has the least chance of success, no matter how emotionally satisfying it will be for the twenty minutes or so before the shooter kills himself.

      Learning to cope just perpetuates the cycle.

      So... option D: pay an illegal immigrant $100 to carve that kidney out whole, then sell it on the black market and keep the $900 profit. And then grow up and realize you've got the talent to be a CEO of a major world bank, and laugh as you cope all the way to the bank after you "Go Columbine" on the entire fucking world. So I guess this is the "all the above" option, isn't it?

    46. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Funny

      I blame that on bad science courses.

    47. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appropriately, the page with TFA has an ad encouraging me to "Win an AR-15 from Sebastian Ammo". Google is getting scary...

      It's not an "ad" in the "served by ad provider service" sense. That's a banner being run by the site itself; if you inspect the HTML, the image is coming from the local server, it's part of the site's template.

    48. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by NotDrWho · · Score: 2

      They would rather have a news story about the arrest than the recording itself going viral. As a poster above noted, this poor kid and his parents were naive for not making a copy (and for trusting school officials to act in anyone's interest but their own).

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    49. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between someone giving you an insult once in awhile or demanding that you move out of their way compared to fearing going to lunch everyday because there's no where you can sit alone (personal experience). Tossing around insults isn't 'real' bullying.

      True, everyone gets bullied at some point but only a few people get bullied by everyone. Those people have no way to cope and get worse year after year because they can't develop their social skills. When they're adults, other adults think they're stupid because they don't have natural people skills. People forget social behavior is learned because they've been doing it for so long. Instead of trying to help those with poorer social skills they ignore them even more.

      When everyone bullies you at school, you end up being bullied for rest of your life. Lots of people don't realize this.

    50. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's time we allow single-party consent of recording in Pennsylvania. I'm not sure this issue will be the one that finally results in movement, but I hope it will.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    51. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is a lot harder to build bombs ... Guns are a lot more ... efficient.

      It may be harder to build bombs than to grab some guns, but the guns are not more efficient. The largest school killing in US history was done with explosives.

    52. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also the possibility that the cop saw an easy win for wire-tapping and wanted another point/conviction on his record.

    53. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The police aren't there to protect the innocent. They are there to defend the criminals. I have witnessed this firsthand.

      Another example of the social insight of the Simpsons. Chief Wiggum wasn't wrong when he said the police are powerless to help you, not punish you. The police arrest criminals, whomever they perceive that to be. This may result in help to someone, but it isn't the primary goal. Dealing with the alleged criminal is their primary goal.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    54. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Chessucat · · Score: 1

      They want the boy to go off and get a gun and kill the bullies. It makes for a better news story and play right along to the politicians' agenda.

      But, seriously, if are you're getting bullied then just post it all over the Internet, like what happened to that girl that got raped by those "popular", affluent boys. The cops and school administrators can't sweep that under the rug.

      --
      "I'm a dirty white tomcat, enter my world..."
    55. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by operagost · · Score: 1

      So what you're telling us is that Anonymous is useless? No surprise there.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    56. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ultranova · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And what they could possibly have hoped to achieve by filing charges, other than a nasty (and well deserved) publicity backlash?

      Most likely they were defending the concept of domination. In their view, society is made of hierarchical power relations, and the only way to advance is to challenge someone above you. Bullying is a natural part of such system, used to establish pecking order, and it's "cheating" to expose it to outside judgement.

      Basically, the school administration approves of bullying because it helps perpetuate a system where they're top dogs, and consequently view any effective attempt to stamp out bullying as a direct threat to their own status. It's ultimately the same reason why some people like to shit on the poor (sometimes despite being poor themselves), or get bent out of shape at the thought of everyone getting a prize: if there's no way to divide people into winners and losers - or pure and impure, or whatever terms you prefer - the hierarchical system will collapse, and take with whatever part of your identity you have invested in status in it.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    57. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is why people don't like going to the authorities...

      Something is terribly broken at that school... From TFA:

      "According to Love, as the teacher is heard attempting to help her son with a math problem, a student says, “You should pull his pants down!” Another student replies, “No, man. Imagine how bad that (c**t) smells! No one wants to smell that (t**t).” As the recording continues, the teacher instructs the classroom that they may only talk if it pertains to math. Shortly thereafter, a loud noise is heard on the recording, which her son explained was a book being slammed down next to him after a student pretended to hit him in the head with it. When the teacher yells, the student exclaims, “What? I was just trying to scare him!” A group of boys are heard laughing."

      The incident happened in direct contact with one of the boy's teachers. The teacher failed to control the classroom, failed to discipline the antagonists, and apparently failed to report the incident to the administration (wonder why). The boy's only hope is to get the hell out of there, his teacher (and probably most of the administration) is disturbingly incompetent.

    58. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two people who work in the justice system:

      A. People who want to fight crime ("superheroes")
      B. People who want to have a position of authority over others ("bullies")

      The cop in question was a type B.

    59. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. Kids shoot up schools. Why schools?

      Because your targets are guaranteed to be unable to shoot back?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    60. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the night is dark and full of terrors....

    61. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity there's no ironically funny moderation :(

    62. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Teachers aren't allowed to discipline kids -- they get sued if they even lay a finger on them or talk to them in a harsh tone of voice.

    63. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think you hit the nail on the head. This bully was clearly protected. I want to see every school official who went along with this fiasco fired with extreme prejudice, and the judge should be reprimanded or even disbarred. Anyone have the name of this Pennsylvania school?

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    64. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by nblender · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I also was endlessly bullied durings gr 6-9 in an era where you were told "Just ignore them and they'll leave you alone" (they didn't)... When it started happening to my son, we immediately reacted and went to the principal... Her reaction? "Well, your son is rather meek and introverted. My kids were like that until I put them in Hockey and that changed their lives.. You should put your son in Hockey.". When we insisted she do something about the bullying, we were told she wasn't able to do anything unless the bully's parents agreed there was a problem (they didn't)... The most she could do was keep the kids separated. The end result was that the bully raced out during recess and started playing with my son's friends... Due to the mandatory separation rule, my son was effectively ostracized. He would try to play with other kids but the bully would just wander on over when the teachers weren't watching... So in essence, my son was punished for going to authorities.

      Eventually we shifted him out of that neighborhood school and into a charter school; where he's much happier and has boatloads of friends.

      There's a lot of lip-service being paid to 'zero tolerance'... I haven't seen any actions.

    65. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by canadian_right · · Score: 2

      What boggles my mind is that this despicable behavior was done in front of a teacher! Any school I, or my kids went to, that bullying tirade would have been stopped, and the student marched down to the principals office by the teacher. A "cut it out" is for talking to your friend when you should be paying attention.

      I'm from Canada, but I'm going to guess the bully was an athlete. Untouchable.

      And I agree with others that have pointed out that the school admin seems more concerned with protecting the schools reputation and athletics program than with learning and justice.

      And in what way is tirade shouted out in a classroom not public? What is wrong with that magistrate, and that cop?

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    66. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by interkin3tic · · Score: 2
      High profile murderers who make no attempt to conceal their crime usually do it more for attention. They might tell themselves it's for higher reasons, like they hate that politician or that race, but really it's that their egos aren't satisfied. Same with school shootings. They shoot up their schools because they want attention from their classmates. With columbine and other school shootings, we like to tell ourselves they're going rambo because they were bullied, and the shooters did too. We tell ourselves the lie because it's easier to think kids only do this when put under extreme pressure by bullying, we don't like to think that some kids are just psychopaths who are evil. They told themselves it was because of bullying because that sounds better than "We're bored and want attention."

      Although early media reports attributed the shootings to a desire for revenge on the part of Harris and Klebold for bullying that they received, subsequent psychological analysis indicated Harris and Klebold harbored serious psychological problems. According to Dave Cullen, Harris, who conceived the attacks, was a "cold-blooded, predatory psychopath" and an intelligent, charming liar with "a preposterously grand superiority complex, a revulsion for authority and an excruciating need for control". In Cullen's assessment, Harris lacked remorse or empathy for others, and sought to punish them for their perceived inferiority.

      wiki

    67. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      "...Picking on the weak is wrong, and you don't get to take advantage of a fellow human because you're physically or mentally able to do so."

      You are kidding right? Survival of the fittest is the only rule in life. Just look around. People who were smart enough to "make" the most money or physically brutal enough to steal the most are your owners.

      When someone has that kind of power by whatever means, and uses it to make your life miserable, you have to take them out when it is clear your "society" is not going to help you.

      Even kids know this, and some of them actually attempt it.

      The truth is that we are still apes with a haircut and shinier, smarter ways to kill each other.....same as it was when all had was a rock.

      Survival of the fittest describes the ability to reproduce, not dominate those around you. Indeed, if it referred to the ability of an organism to dominate all around it, it would eventually run out of resources and die. Not very fit.

      You are correct that might makes right. But we are different from the apes in that we have a choice. We can choose the kind of world we want to live in and work towards realizing it. Just because the powerful keep making the same selfish choices doesn't mean it has to be that way. We make it that way.

      There is still a lot of pain, fear and ignorance to be worked through in the world. We are improving in that many of us recognize that the patterns of domination are not good for us. We at least recognize that it's not what we want. But we still go with selfish impulses, so clearly we have a way to go yet.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    68. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was suspended once for simply running away from a bully chasing me to assault me. As if running away, was somehow considered "participating" in a fight. I'm not sure what is more infuriating, the bullies who bullied me, or the morons in charge of our schools. On the bright side, my parents made me volunteer at a soup kitchen during my suspension, which gave me an appreciation for poverty relief and non-profits.

      These administrators and the police officer involved should be the ones here, who are suspended. Ridiculous.

    69. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the threat that there might be someone with a gun would sure work as a deterrent for someone who plans to off himself in the end anyway...

      Gee, I do wonder why you would use "in the end"...

      If their goal were really only to simply "off himself in the end" they wouldn't shoot up schools or movie theaters. He'd just "off himself".

      Because even you know it - it's not about "off[ing] himself". You used the term "off himself in the end". The end if WHAT?

      Oh yeah, the shooting spree where they're invincibly massacring innocents.

      Others being armed prevents that "invincibly massacring innocents" that's the entire point of the "off himself in the end".

      Don't think so?

      Too bad for you:

      The study, “An examination of the effects of concealed weapons laws and assault weapons bans on state-level murder rates,” conducted by Quinnipiac University economist Mark Gius, examined nearly 30 years of statistics and concluded that stricter gun laws do not result in a reduction in gun violence. In fact, Gius found the opposite – that a proliferation of concealed carry permits can actually reduce incidents of gun crime.

      And it's not an isolated study, either::

      Using cross-sectional time-series data for U.S. counties from 1977 to 1992, we find that allowing citizens to carry concealed weapons deters violent crimes and it appears to produce no increase in accidental deaths. ...

      Go back to Fantasyland.

    70. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was reading my mother's Stephen King collection when I was a kid. She had probably forgotten that Rage was in The Bachman Books. It was written years before I was born and even then my high-school years were before the Columbine / regular school shooting era.

      Even King says he is "glad it is out of print", something I just learned today. Odd, as I did not see the anti-hero as particularly inspiring. If I had been slightly more unstable, perhaps I would have thought so. It is amusing that today a kid that reads that book might be considered a deviant and locked up.

      Kids that are bullied always think of this scenario, reading about it might actually help rather than hurt. Now, writers will not touch this topic with a ten foot pole, leaving teenagers with less support. Talking is not going to help; try getting teens to talk about any important matters, let alone suicidal ones. Yeah, I am not surprised that it comes to a breaking point of school shootings.

      After all these years people will not admit that these thoughts happen and that kids help. Instead we have "blame the victim of bullying", "toughen up", and "kids will be kids." If Stephen Fucking King is afraid to talk about this subject, it is truly hopeless.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    71. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Guns are much more reliable when you are looking to kill someone. And "safer"? Most people involved with a mass murder are not looking to escape it alive. They just decided they are going to take someone with them.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    72. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      Additionally, a homemade bomb have a pretty good chance of blowing up its builder. The guns most people have access to (not home made), not so much.

    73. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sick fuck principal and the sick fuck vice-principal at my middle school just loved to paddle kids until their asses were purple. They are both dead now, thank God. May they rot in Hell forever.

      Dumbass. It's a show you moron. You have to learn how to play your part.

      Always wear your gym shorts under pants when you did something likely to get yourself paddled. Then when you get called to the office, put about ten sheets of folded paper in your back pockets so you can make the principal think he was so smart when he sees them before paddling you and makes you take them out.

      With the gym shorts stuffed under your pants, the "WHACK!" of the paddles becomes a muffled "whump" that doesn't hurt a bit. But you gotta act like it hurts like hell.

      Fucking amateurs.

    74. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      That's a serious WTF - the bullies even know that they can do their shit right in front of a teacher, and get away with it. Plus probably much worse things when not in front of a teacher.

      To be honest, the one which should be charged here is the teacher.

    75. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Quirkz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Survival of the fittest is the only rule in life.

      Don't be silly. Survival of the fittest applies to the wild. The entire *point* of culture/civilization is to blunt that harshest of rules. It doesn't always work so well, and it can easily be exploited, but the GP is entirely correct when he says that bullying should be treated as wrong and discouraged.

    76. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yup I used to see bullies first hand at my school, but I was bigger then pretty much anyone. The teachers ignored bullying, they just didn't care.
      I decided to become an "anti-bully".
      I made it known that if any kid was getting bullied they could come to me and I would protect them, unlike the teachers, so I became friends with a lot of kids and we would all hang out with each other at school, protecting each other en mass. I never went out of my way beat up anyone but I stood up for myself and for the kids I was protecting, sure I got into a few altercations at the start but not much.
      Within a year bullying pretty much seemed like an all time low within the school, and some of the original bullies actually became our friends. The thing is bullies usually have deeper issues and I found they generally fell into one of three groups - 1)Anti-socials who could never make friendssince they don't fit into any of the social groups, it eats away at them so they eventually belittle other people. I generally found these the easiest to "convert" since they finally have something they always wanted: a friend 2)Parental issues, usually their parents are drunks, or pay zero attention to them. This group is harder to get into because the issues are generally so deep-rooted. But often just lending an ear and letting them vent was the biggest success. 3) Alpha males who think they have something to prove, since they were alpha males, I generally didn't bother trying to make friends out of these guys, they always turned me off anyways

    77. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 0

      > So we need to shift the blame on movies, computer games, music, you name it.

      This has been going for on for at least the past 100 years. Americans historically love to play the blame game. Some made up bullshit excuse instead of finding & treating the root problem. One small set (or sect/group/cult) of society tries to blame an inanimate object for all of society's woes and spreads their propaganda to anyone who will listen.

      Every "next technology" is always scapegoated.

      1900 Film
      1910 ???
      1920 Prohibition (Alcohol), Phonographs
      1930 Jazz, Movies
      1940 Radio
      1950 Dancing
      1960 Psychedelic Drugs, Sex
      1970 Rock n Roll, Movies (again)
      1980 MTV, DnD, Heavy Metal
      1990 Computer Games
      2000 ???
      2010 Guns

      As they say in Japan/China:

          "The nail that sticks up gets pounded down"

      Shoot the messenger instead of listening to the message! Sarcasm: Yeah let's ignore the problem hoping it will go away!

      What a sad, dysfunctional, and completely fucked up society we live in.

      --
      First Contact is coming 2024

    78. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep, this teaches kids. "Don't trust authorities, take matters into your own hands."

      I think we know where that can escalate to.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    79. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Coping by paying the immigrant to go Columbine ticks all three boxes.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    80. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      You're wrong on #2. Klebold and Harris specifically let people who didn't bully them live.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    81. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      There was a pretty good "The Outer Limits" episode about this back in the 90s. It posited a near-future where an angry college kid designs and builds his own fusion bombs, setting off one very small one as a demonstration then holding a classroom hostage with a much larger one. The episode ended with the note that if this kid could do this, it won't be long before lots of kids are able to do it.

    82. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The bullied kids might not want to kill everyone, just the bullies, their friends and sycophants, and the administration and perhaps some of the teachers.

    83. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by shess · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's the thing: Everyone has been bullied at some point in their life. Not all children are prone to it, but there is always a bigger kid prone to intimidation tactics when growing up.

      Getting bullied that once, for a few minutes, is kind of different from being frightened of school itself because you keep getting slammed into lockers, etc. In one case, a thing happened to you and you move on. In the other case it becomes a formative epoch in your life which you spend decades dealing with, if you ever manage it.

    84. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      If an Educator, or Administrator caught you with a knife, you were gone. As for the Bullies, I selected game trails they weren't currently hunting at. The "Out of sight, out of mind" solution had more success for me; and I learned a couple of things in the process that is High School.

    85. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I would be more concerned with ads giving away free knives, those lead to more murders than rifles do. Now handguns are a whole other matter. http://www2.fbi.gov/ucr/cius20...

    86. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      What I do not understand is how this ruling happened? You have zero expectation of privacy in school. Students lockers and backpacks may be searched at anytime.
      So a student recording this should be okay and the bullies should be punished as should the teacher.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    87. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ketomax · · Score: 0

      not home made

      I beg to differ.

    88. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to know is: how does this phenomenon (both bullying, and the support of bullying by administrators) differ by country and culture? Is it like this in Japan or Europe? I know it isn't uniquely American; there was a movie a while ago from Belgium called "Ben-X" which was about a kid with Asperger's who was severely bullied and... whoops, almost spoiled it... anyway, it was interesting and definitely not American, so I wonder if things are generally better, worse, or the same elsewhere.

    89. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I also received corporal punishment for finally fighting back against a bully in 9th grade. My best friend got suspended for finally fighting back.
      There is no doubt in my mind that school administrators actively protect the bully system and punish any of those who fight back against it.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    90. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Johann+Lau · · Score: 2

      Who asked for sympathy? They just said they're glad these sadists are dead, and didn't even mention getting paddled themselves. So wtf to both of you.

      They were culpable victims of their own stupidity, on multiple levels.

      Oh, and the people getting off on beating kids are just some kind of force or nature, or what? Stockholm Syndrome much?

    91. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      You. I like you.

    92. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, and experienced myself growing up, it seems that if your kid is the type who might be bullied, sending him to private (or maybe religious) school is an absolute must. Private schools don't seem to tolerate it, or have as much of a problem with it. They have no trouble expelling problem kids, and they don't accept just anyone.

    93. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was Amazing how quick the school authorities took action against me when I threatened to blow out the running backs knee if he ever touched me again.

    94. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem wasn't taken care of because the first priority of schools officials isn't to protect the students, it's to protect the school (and their jobs). They wanted the recording deleted before it could get out and embarrass them. The police just helped them.

      No the problem is that we have a legal system which considered recording things said to you a crime.

      Chances are the bully didn't cross the line of making actual threats (would qualify as assault), so under the law the kid who gathered evidence to expose an injustice in his life is the only one who broke any actual laws.

    95. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, hopefully he has learned his lesson. It's better to learn it sooner rather than later: Stand up for yourself. Fight back early, physically if necessary. Bullies are weak. They know they are in some way inadequate and make up for it with a display of strength. If that doesn't work on you, they will stop pursuing you.

      That said, the police officer needs a slap on the wrist, and if the kid's mom can recover the recording or find witnesses on her side who are willing to testify, she should bring charges against the school and each of the bullies individually. No way was that recording illegal under the given circumstances, even in a two-party consent state.

    96. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by schlachter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      can the police officer force the boy to destroy evidence?
      what would have happened if the child refused?
      is that a PA law? In some states you can record.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    97. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Some teachers roll over and let it happen and don't care. Others don't tolerate it in their class and solve it, it is a mixed bag.

      I recall in 7th grade this guy used to verbally pick on me all the time. We had a class designated for reading, I was the only one reading in the class so it made me a big target. One class the kid decided to flick a rubberband into my back, the first few times I ignored the drive by snapping on my back, but one time he just kept doing it over and over again.

      I finally just lost control, stood up, and kicked him right in the hip. I really don't even remember having control at that point. The kid visibly staggered but immediately called to the teacher that I had kicked him. Now before this I had some contempt for the teacher because she let 'everything' happen in that class, but as soon as he called out she said "Good, you deserved it!" Kudos to her for this at least. I could easily have been punished for losing control first.

      That was the last time that particular guy harassed me.

      Sometimes the old ways are the good ways.

    98. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Back in 81-82 I carried brass knuckles, a pocketknife and a taped-up roll of pennies in my pocket to counter bullying. And I went to a fairly wealthy, upper class high school where most of the parents were engineers, doctors, etc. I can't imagine what it would have been like in a really rough school.

    99. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) Alpha males who think they have something to prove, since they were alpha males, I generally didn't bother trying to make friends out of these guys, they always turned me off anyways

      Now say that you are actually a girl, and see Slashdot fall at your feet :)

    100. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Enigma2175 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for the action taken by the school, one really has to wonder as to what kind of cretins make up the school administration. And what they could possibly have hoped to achieve by filing charges, other than a nasty (and well deserved) publicity backlash? Although for a society run by lawyers, that's perhaps what one would expect. Squeaky wheel gets a beating, and a teenager gets hauled in front of a judge on charges of "disorderly conduct" in a school. Seriously... Can any of the officials involved in this case look in the mirror and tell themselves that they are doing the Right Thing?

      Article is bullshit. It says:

      "School administrators threatened to charge him with felony wiretapping before eventually agreeing to reduce the charge to disorderly conduct."

      School administrators do not charge anyone with anything. They are not the law and do not file charges or determine what charges should be filed. It sounds to me it is a lot more likely that the police determined that a crime had been committed BECAUSE IT HAD. Pennsylvania is one of the few all-party consent states and it is illegal to record somebody without notifying them that you are recording. The kid DID break the law. If you don't like that law (I certainly don't) then get it changed but to whine about school administrators and police enforcing the law that is on the books doesn't get it changed.

      --

      Enigma

    101. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know why this happens? You know *why* the teacher didn't do anything? Go back and look at the comments about the school administrators and talk with a few teachers.

      You'll find out very quickly that teachers are ham-stringed when it comes to disciplinary measures in the classroom. If you assign too many detentions or other "punishments"... you get reprimanded. If you get students going over your head because the problems continue... you get reprimanded. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

      Teachers are neutered in their jobs; they are no longer given the authority and judicious decision-making abilities that would allow them to control their classrooms in favor of shifting that responsibility off to an even smaller few that are much further removed from the *actual* behavior of the problem students, which *always* get downplayed and understated by the disciplinary authorities of the school.

      Thank your local liberals / statists for that.

    102. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think 'everyone' has been bullied, then you were never bullied. Which renders everything else you have to say as useless.

    103. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I wasn't the smallest guy in my class but I was skinny and shorter than most so through out elementary school I got picked on and bullied. It started changing in junior high when I joined the track team and started working on a farm each summer. My freshman year I came back from my second summer on the farm, I was taller, more muscular, and very tan. The guys that had picked on and bullied me quickly lost interest in me and my friends that they had also tortured in elementary school.

      My two younger brothers had similar experiences being the little guy right up until they started high school except they had the advantage of being much closer in age and watched each others backs.

    104. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Person147 · · Score: 1

      The third option is the safest one as long as he's smart enough to find a way to not leave a trace about the contract.

      The problem with the thrid option is that the bully is highly unlikely to know that it was from you. Part of revenge is you want the person you are getting revenge on to know you have got your revenge. Looking down the barrel of your gun just before you pull the trigger fulfils that. Especially if you just blew off the head of the person next to him. Adds a lot of gravitas to the whole situation.

    105. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by mrbester · · Score: 1

      I remember the last line (and have it as well as Rage on my bookshelf) from another short story Stephen King wrote about going postal (Cain Rose Up, in Skeleton Crew): '"Good God, let's eat", he said, and started squeezing the trigger again.'

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    106. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats exactly the problem here, this kid did everything right only to go on and demonstrate how totally broken the educational system is why cops have no role in this kind of situation. They immediately went looking for a charge rather than dealing with the issue that was actually there. One more reason not to engage with the self-percieved authorities.

    107. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, the police came in with their default mindset and made a crap situation crappier illustrated their non need to be involved in school discipline.

    108. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rules around bullying where girls are concerned are a bit different. Just watch Mean Girls.

    109. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      can the police officer force the boy to destroy evidence?

      Not legally. Read the article. The officer can ask, cajole, beg, and plead, but not force the destruction.

      Imagine this in court, "I'm sorry your honor, we had evidence but the police officer destroyed it." Every officer knows and is repeatedly trained that they cannot destroy evidence. That doesn't mean they can't encourage others to do it before it becomes 'evidence' in a case.

      The details in the story are important. The officer didn't destroy the evidence. Because that would be, you know, bad. Instead he told the kid to delete it and made threats about what might happen if the boy got in trouble and the evidence were used against him.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    110. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appropriately, the page with TFA has an ad encouraging me to "Win an AR-15 from Sebastian Ammo". Google is getting scary...
       
      What scares me more is the number of lunkheads out there who live in fear of a firearm but have no desire to look at the cause of violence, only the tool. It's like a dog chasing its tail, you remove on weapon and another rises to the top. But if you take on the challenges of the kind of mind that turn to violence you don't have to go through endless episodes of kids being creative in their kills.
       
      It's not unlike the question of health care. While I do appreciate the number of people who get lung cancer at the age of 25 for no apparent environmental reason, it just floors me the number of people who think that modern medicine is a better solution than not smoking. Banning firearms is the lazy non-solution to a deep question just like creating a cure for cancer is the lazy non-solution to the quest for better general health.

    111. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      And, what if this kid commits a Columbine-esque revenge scenario?

      Appropriately, the page with TFA has an ad encouraging me to "Win an AR-15 from Sebastian Ammo". Google is getting scary...

      I have the same ad, and it's not from Google. The link is to another page on the same site. Now that page does have a Google ad, about slimming fat wallets.

      As for the action taken by the school, one really has to wonder as to what kind of cretins make up the school administration. And what they could possibly have hoped to achieve by filing charges, other than a nasty (and well deserved) publicity backlash? Although for a society run by lawyers, that's perhaps what one would expect. Squeaky wheel gets a beating, and a teenager gets hauled in front of a judge on charges of "disorderly conduct" in a school. Seriously... Can any of the officials involved in this case look in the mirror and tell themselves that they are doing the Right Thing?

      Agreed.

      Falcon Wolf

    112. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      He is correct in the use of the term foreshadowing and feels. Perhaps you should look up the definition?

      I'm hoping you were trying to be funny, it's sad you got modded insightful.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    113. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by stdarg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the reason is probably that common bullying doesn't look that bad when it's not happening to you. Verbal bullying is often quite funny to onlookers. Minor physical bullying looks like no big deal.. almost on the level of a prank.

      Probably another factor with administrators is that, as adults, the kids all look like kids to them. The difference between a bully and a victim to an adult is much less than to the bully and the victim themselves.

      That said, it's incomprehensible to me how a kid gets in trouble for standing up for himself to a bully. I just don't understand what's going through the administrators' minds. They are probably horrible people.

    114. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      So... you taught him how to run and not how to stand?

      Perhaps if you take some responsability you might be able to teach your child something useful.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    115. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      He is correct in the use of the term foreshadowing and feels.

      Not sure what you mean by that, unless you, too, wonder if he's planning on using an AR-15 for nefarious purposes.

      Perhaps you should look up the definition?

      Sure, here you go:

      Foreshadowing - a literary device by which an author explains certain plot developments that may come later in the story.

      Weird that you would agree with me in such a seemingly disagreeable manner...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    116. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As children most cops and most judges were the bullies. For that matter, so were a lot of school administrators. They don't understand the problem, or that there even is a problem. I was suspended for finally hitting back in junior high school, and almost expelled when I did it a second time.

      Do you have data to prove that? If so share it.

      Falcon Wolf

    117. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the cops take the kid's side on this? Cops were the bullies in school who grew up to be adult bullies.

    118. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      not home made

      I beg to differ.

      You seem to have a problem with selective quoting. Here, let me quote the part you chopped off.

      The guns most people have access to

      Emphasis mine.

    119. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's because schools are where kids have their souls beaten down by assholes.

    120. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by L4m3rthanyou · · Score: 2

      And, what if this kid commits a Columbine-esque revenge scenario? They'll blame it on some other bullshit, not their own lack of souls...

      They'd blame it on mental illness, and they'd be right. A mass shooting is not a rational response to bullying, even if it's severe.

      What happened in this case is deplorable, but no one deserves to be killed over it. The amount of apparent sympathy for perpetrators of "Columbine scenarios" in this thread is a bit frightening. I get that this is Slashdot and most of us were probably tormented to some degree while we were growing up. Many probably even fantasized about doing something similar, but there's a huge gap between fantasizing and actually going through with it.

      Bullies are pricks, but that doesn't make them responsible for the actions of victims who happen to be mentally unstable. It's the same thing as the notion of "making someone kill themself". As evil and disgusting as that degree of bullying may be, at the end of the day each individual is responsible for their own actions, not the actions of others.

      Also, while the prevention of school shootings is an obvious reason that bullying needs to be dealt with, I find it rather insensitive to refer to this in the context of a specific case. "What if this kid goes Columbine?" sort of insinuates that he's not right in the head, which isn't very nice.

      --
      One of these days, I'm going to cut you into little pieces.
    121. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      But we are different from the apes in that we have a choice.

      No, you are an ape. If you believe you have a choice, so does the ape.

      But recent research shows that most "choices" are not made by the conscious mind, they are made by the unconscious mind, with the conscious mind at most doing a post-hoc justification for the choice. You have as little real choice over what you do as the other species of ape.

    122. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by nomanisanisland · · Score: 2

      School administrators do not charge anyone with anything. They are not the law and do not file charges or determine what charges should be filed. It sounds to me it is a lot more likely that the police determined that a crime had been committed BECAUSE IT HAD. Pennsylvania is one of the few all-party consent states and it is illegal to record somebody without notifying them that you are recording. The kid DID break the law.

      So, recording in a public place (it was a public school classroom, in front of others) is illegal in PA? Then the school administrators should be charged with tampering with evidence. And the judge should have thrown it out for lack of evidence. And the police officer should be reprimanded for failing to Mirandize the kid, and the kid was actually a minor (15 years old) so not bringing in the parent before interrogating him is another reprimand. So in summary: EPIC FAIL.

    123. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God I wish charter school was an option when I was that age. Good for you for doing good for your kid.

    124. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by cusco · · Score: 2

      My mother was a legal secretary for 13 years, I've worked with cops in several jobs over the years, several of my in-laws are/were teachers. IOW, no hard data but plenty of personal experience.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    125. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something similar happened at my school. A friend of mine commented about how the only times he wasn't bullied were the two weeks following Columbine, and the week following the anniversary of Columbine.

    126. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      It is NOT survival of the "fittest", but survival of the "fit". The distinction is a key misunderstanding that a lot of people have about evolution.

      If you are not fit to survive long enough to procreate, or if your genes cause you to have a below average number of surviving progeny your genes die. If you are fit enough to that you and a reasonable number of your progeny survive to keep procreating, your genes live on. Nothing about evolution says that "better" or "more fit" is a required natural result. It just says that if you are un-fit you die, and such a basic insight explains so much, while "survival of the fittest" fails to explain the patrons I see inside Walmart.

    127. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yup. I got in trouble for "picking a fight" with someone twice my size who abused me daily. I could not believe the vice principal was reprimanding me. I was bawling my eyes out in front of him, explaining how I was punched and kicked every day by this oversized kid. And there's this authority figure telling me not to pick fights and that I need to improve my attitude. 30 years ago and it still fucking pisses me off.

    128. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by deadweight · · Score: 1

      No - because the kids he hates are there because he GOES THERE. The *one* nutcase that attacked the elementary school was an outlier.

    129. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was bullied as a child, everyday at school the other kids would pick on me until I would lash out to defend myself. In the end what this only would get me suspend and bullied more when I came back to school. To clarify, the bullying that happened to me was both verbal and physical, there was a day where I wouldn't come home from school without some sort of mark from being punch or having my glasses broken. The sad truth this can to conclusion when I ended up cracking one of the kids bullying me head off the side of brick wall and putting the kid into the hospital for nearly a month during one of these daily gang up and beat me up sessions. To this day, I caused the kid some brain damaged and I still feel horrible that it had to come to that. Since that happen I wasn't bullied again, but the funny thing is that with all these zero tolerance policies have done is amplify the problem rather then address it. Had my complaints regarding being bullied been addressed properly, maybe I wouldn't have had to go the lengths I had to just to be left alone.

      With that all being said, I would have to agree, the impact of what happened to me during days in public school have had a pretty big affect on me. Mostly when it comes to self esteem, I have a very low opinion of self worth. Generally if asked to rate myself I always rate myself lower then anyone of my colleagues but others rate me much higher, and I still don't believe them. Has this stopped me from enjoy life, I think it has as I always question the intentions of everyone around me.

      Anyway not that I written this I don't know why i felt the need to share it, and will AC this post. Just know, this is a big problem that needs to be looked at from a different stand point and anyone that isn't willing to actually do something is part of the problem.

      Ya I think I need to stop typing and go back to my work.

    130. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't about deterring the other person, it is about limiting their ability to do damage. I would much rather be in a situation where we both have firearms than a situation where only the other person has a firearm.

      "Well what about the situation where neither of you has a firearm?" you might ask. To which I would reply that such a situation can only exist in fairy tales, because no amount of laws which only harms the law-abiding citizen will prevent the determined individual from acquiring a firearm.

    131. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      I was just as mad when I read the article but I wonder one thing: Did the parents attempt to reach out to other parents of bullied kids to try and make the school and authorities take different action? Is there something we don't know about this case? I know many officials and I doubt they would agree to let this go buy silently.

      On a side note, if your kid is being bullied or your kid is bullying another kid, here is what I recommend. Arrange a meeting with the parents. Have the kids talk to each other in front of the parents. When I was 11 my parent had me meet with the parents of the kid bullying me. The bully was also in the meeting. After that meeting, this kid never bullied another kid and I even became friends with him. Same happened to me as a parent where my kid was accused of bullying another kid. After calling for a similar meeting, we found out the kid was actually rating out my kid because he was scared of what would happen if he rated on the actual bully.

    132. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Because the ones guilty of the shooting are usually the ones being shot. It's kinda hard to blame teenagers who just got their head blown away and get reelected

      No. Personal responsibility exists. Even in kids. They choose to do what they do. And while they may be scarred for life in some way, they're not dead. So it's certainly not justified.

    133. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Sigh, you're an idiot.

      What broken piece of machinery in your head is forcing you to wrongly ASSume that the foreshadowing has to apply to him?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    134. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Note that the number of kids who shoot up schools is so tiny that they are also "outliers".

      Note also that the "kids he hates" also go to malls and movie theatres....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    135. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      The third option is the safest one as long as he's smart enough to find a way to not leave a trace about the contract.

      The problem with the thrid option is that the bully is highly unlikely to know that it was from you. Part of revenge is you want the person you are getting revenge on to know you have got your revenge. Looking down the barrel of your gun just before you pull the trigger fulfils that. Especially if you just blew off the head of the person next to him. Adds a lot of gravitas to the whole situation.

      No problem, just teach the illegal immigrant the following sentence, to be repeated at each shooting: "The Kingslayer sends his regards."

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    136. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ai4px · · Score: 2

      HOw will they charge the boy with wiretapping if they made him delete the evidence?

    137. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by deadweight · · Score: 1

      In my experience a significant number of bullies think being a school administrator is a *perfect* way to extend their bullying lifestyle for decades.

    138. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by volvox_voxel · · Score: 1

      "As Children most cops and most judges were the bullies"..That's a pretty broad sweeping statement that may or may not be true that I've heard anecdotally all my life . I would love to see references to back this up. It's believable, but I have a hard time with such statements.. Perhaps a larger fraction of bullies, but it's hard to believe that most of them are this way. You could equally argue that cops spend most of their day helping people, and are mostly decent folks. The highway patrol spends most of their time helping stranded motorists, etc..

    139. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ai4px · · Score: 2

      SOunds like a great case for jury nullification.... what a shame minors aren't subject to jury trials.

    140. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ultimately the same reason why some people [...] get bent out of shape at the thought of everyone getting a prize

      No, it isn't. Well, maybe for some people, but for others (which I like to think constitute the majority of people who dislike the idea of participation trophies), it's about how it teaches people that they do not need to try at anything. As long as you show up, you reap the same rewards as the people who actually put in effort. And in the real world, that is not the case. I can't just show up at work, do nothing, and expect a pay check. I have to actually do work.

    141. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      This is because, just like the student in this story, schools have been punished for doing the right thing in the past. Teachers and administrators that go out on a limb to protect students at the cost of the district get removed by the board of education because some parent will complain regardless of what is done.

      The issue is that they need to fix the goddamn wiretapping laws, and police and prosecutors need to learn some goddamn discretion.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    142. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take him to some self defense classes.

    143. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Not all at once. You have heard of workplace violence and "going postal", right? These workers also go to malls and bowling alleys. The shooters want to take their revenge at the site of their humiliation, not at some random place.

    144. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would it matter if they could shoot back? Plenty of these end in suicide. If you're going to commit suicide rather than be caught, do you honestly think you care if your targets are armed?

      Don't be a moron (like the people who modded you insightful).

    145. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by afaiktoit · · Score: 1

      might say the same for military bases, its just a school for bigger kids

    146. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      And this doesn't embarrass them further?

    147. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by houghi · · Score: 1

      One person tried to intimidate me once. He told me to see him outside school and wait for him. I told him I won't do that. If he wants to fight he must wait for me.
      The only reason I would say that, HE thought, was that I was sure to beat his ass. He appologized the next day.
      My reasoning was different: I was not willing to wait to get a beating.

      The final result was that everybody had repect for me. It was scary. Think The Wave. I seriously hope that I never abused that power. It was very hard for me to see the difference between respect, fear and blind adoration. The last one is the most horid one. Having people following you without asking any questions and without thinking is extremely frightening.
      Having nobody to talk to concerning at a young age was terrible. How do you explain that you are afraid because people respect and like you?

      Sorry for ranting. It is the first time I put this fear into words after 30+ years.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    148. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by anagama · · Score: 1

      That law is stupid. In my state, if one person is threatening another person, it takes only one-party consent, e.g., the person who is being threatened can give consent. Silently of course.

      This situation should spark the PA Legislature to amend the law.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    149. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write a letter to:
      1. School Principal
      2. County oversight board
      3. Mayor
      4. Governor
      5. Chief of police

      Ask, in particular what should your child have done?
      And why wouldn't you give him a Tire Iron, with firm instructions to "Apply VERY Firmly to bully"? (Or, of prohibited, a set of Keys and a roll of nickels)

      Sure, your kid would get in trouble - How different than the non-violent method he tried? (other, of course, than the bully leaving him alone, at VERY least until he healed up.... Then when hearing that your child is parading outside the school with a "Pick on ME again, will ya?" sign, even a bad bully might think twice)
      I sure as heck wouldn't punish my child for beating the * out of a bully, as long as he tried non-violent way(s) first. But if they are ignoring it, then "Civil Disobedience" sure seems to apply

    150. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter now, the evidence was deleted. The article doesn't make it clear who else heard the recording other than the child's mother. If the officials were SMART, they'd have deleted it without listening it to avoid the possibility of perjury.

      Now it's a PR game, which they can still lose, but there will be no youtube playback by millions of outraged people.
         

    151. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by jcr · · Score: 2

      The sick fuck principal and the sick fuck vice-principal at my middle school just loved to paddle kids until their asses were purple.

      Never encountered that in school, but by 9th grade I already knew what kind of damage you could do to someone if you knew their name, address and SSN.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    152. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by jcr · · Score: 2

      The worst asshole in my high school became a cop.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    153. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to provide a source for that? I'd suspect that something that big would have produced at least a couple of news articles.

      Otherwise, I'm just going to assume that you're telling only half of the story, if that. Pretty much anybody that claims that someone in a position of authority said "that girl got what she deserved" is a flat out liar, in my experience.

    154. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by sirlark · · Score: 1

      Guns are also more targeted. If revenge really is the motivation, that counts for a lot.

    155. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, and experienced myself growing up, it seems that if your kid is the type who might be bullied, sending him to private (or maybe religious) school is an absolute must. Private schools don't seem to tolerate it, or have as much of a problem with it. They have no trouble expelling problem kids, and they don't accept just anyone.

      As long as the princeples kid and his best freind are not the one doing the bullying yeah that was a fun year. Not all privet schools stop bullying.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    156. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of them failed to explode, in particular the ones on the propane tanks in the kitchen. Plenty of them did explode, including a rather massive explosion in the trunk of one of the perp's cars in the parking lot about 12 hours later (apparently set for PM instead of AM, or something).

    157. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ask the average rape victim how happy he/she is to be alive. And whether they think that their rapist dying a horrible, slow, painful and preferably gruesome death is something they could enjoy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    158. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, your mileage may vary. I had a very good experience in a Catholic school for a while, but that school had a female principle who didn't (AFAIK) have any kids. (No, she wasn't a nun, nor were any other teachers, this was in the 80s, after those days.)

    159. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by HappyPsycho · · Score: 1

      Who walks around a shopping mall with a gun?

      Who goes to the movies with a gun?

      Even the security guards at these places lack firearms.

      The other locations pointed out by the GP are just as good a target as schools if you are not after a particular target.

    160. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The difference is that it's heaps easier to get out of a base. Not only can you easily avoid getting in, it's also fairly easy to get out again.

      It's not as easy with schools. Especially if you're a kid and your parents force you to go.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    161. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      This is ludicrous. I wonder if he could constantly record all his life activities as an art project or some kind of freedom of speech project.

      Wonder if the bullies parents were politically connected.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    162. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      in the late 90s in my high school we would have our principal come out to the student parking lot and talk about hunting with the rednecks in their trucks with their rifles in the back window. I remember one time by principal asked by buddy if he could see the rifle, and my friend took it off the mount, handed it to the principal and he checked it out for a good 5 minutes, handed it back and it got locked back in the visible mount in the truck. There were never any problems in my schools This didnt even stop with columbine, although I hear it has stopped as of now

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    163. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The point is that this is not part of the whole scenario the revenge seeking bully target plays out in his head. He's not going "Hmm... I'll do it in the school, 'cause they might be armed in the movie theater". Not only 'cause it's even less likely that someone might be armed in a movie theater.

      He's doing it at his school, because that's where he was hurt, that's where he was bullied, that's where he was wronged, that's where he was humiliated. He wants to settle the score, nothing else.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    164. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Sigh, you're an idiot.

      Says the guy who's only 'argument' boils down to a personal attack with zero substance. Congratulations on destroying any credibility you might have had before you decided to attack me personally, rather than argue a salient point.

      What broken piece of machinery in your head is forcing you to wrongly ASSume that the foreshadowing has to apply to him?

      I wouldn't consider the knowledge that a single ad on a single website does not foretell of events that are going to happen anyway as a "broken piece of machinery," as you imply. But feel free to keep it up with the ad hominems in place of valid arguments. Because, you know, calling someone an idiot as opposed to actually pointing out what part of their statements are idiotic is totally working for you!

      Now, if you'll excuse me, there are grown-ups here that want to have a real discussion and not trade playground barbs, and I'd much rather give my time to them, than someone with the mental acuity of a petulant 14-year-old.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    165. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every day the bullying happens you visit the school. You make the visit right at the end of the school day so that everyone has to stay there when they would rather go home. You don't leave for at least a half hour. You do this every time bullying happens. Every single time.

      Not sure why the bullying problem with your child wasn't fixed. No one bugs my daughter anymore.

    166. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I had to have a 'talk' with counselors after I said I thought they had a decent plan. Then offered improvements on their design and how much easier it would be at my school (because of how they lock the doors) just to prevent this same thing from happening.

    167. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My son is a mixed martial arts aficionado.

      The local school bully and his little gang were notorious for picking on other kids.
      Nothing was done. The parents didn't see it as an issues etc. Slap on the wrist etc.

      Anyway one day him and mates picked on my lad and he battered shit out of all three of them.
      The bully's parents only apparently took an interest when he got home with a thousand bucks worth of dental damage.
      He's on medication now. Quiet as a little church mouse apparently.

      My kid, incidentally wants to be a cop.

    168. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      It is a lot harder to build bombs ... Guns are a lot more ... efficient.

      It may be harder to build bombs than to grab some guns, but the guns are not more efficient. The largest school killing in US history was done with explosives.

      See the GP -- with school killings, you're not dealing with a rampage; you're dealing with someone who is fed up that people aren't seeing things their way making sure that people finally listen to them. Teenagers are intelligent enough to know that indiscriminately blowing up a chunk of property with a bunch of people on it, some of which are the ones they're fed up with, won't really get their point across. However, they figure that everyone, including their target, seeing them walk in with a gun, take aim, and fire, will be able to connect the dots and see this as avenging justice. This is the mindset, and guns are a very efficient way of pulling this off. Of course, those who consider this avenging justice are wrong, but that doesn't change the reasoning.

    169. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      is that a PA law? In some states you can record.

      Under federal law, it is illegal to record unless at least one party is aware that they are being recorded. So this would be legal under federal law, since the bullied kid was a party to the conversation. Some state laws go further. In California (where I live) all parties must be informed that they are being recorded. Pennsylvania also requires all parties to be informed. It seems that a reasonable change to the law would be to allow surreptitious recording when there is probable cause to believe that a crime is going to be committed.

    170. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cops are way too fucking stupid to think that far ahead. He was just following orders from his betters.

    171. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then he will be suspended for fighting.

    172. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      ah, so it stems from stick-up-the-butt-itis which makes you anal about the literality of stuff.

      Some people don't sweat the small stuff, generally enjoy life and can even see the pleasure in the little things and possibilities!

      oh, and btw, you're an idiot. If you're going to be waving around fallacies try and understand them all. It's bad form to enact a fallacy while decrying one.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    173. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      Not nearly as much as it would have if this kid had posted the actual audio of it on YouTube and it had played on every evening news broadcast in the U.S.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    174. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. You can't blame anyone else for your own actions. If you follow that kind of logic nothing will ever be your own fault. Which really makes you as bad as those you're seeking revenge against.

    175. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Your groups sound about right for the guys... I saw a lot of girls bullying in school when I was a kid, and it was usually more vicious and more subtle than what the boys were doing. Other than 3) the categories were usually the same though. As one of those misfits who was friends with people in most of the social groups but refused to be associated with any of them, I had a unique opportunity to hear both sides of many of the social incidents at (and outside) school.

      And you're right -- the only thing that worked with alpha males was showing them that picking on you had really bad physical consequences. Not getting hurt, but portraying them as physically powerless in a situation was usually enough.

    176. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by tc3driver · · Score: 1

      I have been saying this for years... literally Oldest I can find, unfortunately my comment history only goes back to 2007 (though I have been a member for much longer), but I digress.

      I still say, allow fighting in schools again, allow kids to ball up their fists and duke it out.

      I am tired of all the folks who say "Violence isn't the answer, violence solves nothing, booo hooo hooo hooo, whaaa whaaa, etc..." Humans by nature are a violent, conquering, species. We very much have a pack mentality, with that pack mentality comes the need to sort out who the leaders are. Historically, this happens around the age of jr. high school (ages 11-14 or so), this is one of the reasons that most school systems are broken into elementary, Jr High, and High schools. It separates out kids at the times they are most violent (and sexually curious, but that is for a different post), it protects the 10 and under crowd from those who are just starting to determine their pecking order, and protects the 11-14 crowd from the pubescent adults.

      Kids need to fight, fighting makes us stronger, both mentally and physically.

      --
      42 69 6C 6C 20 47 61 74 65 73 20 69 73 20 61 20 77 68 6F 72 65 21
    177. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by NotPeteMcCabe · · Score: 1
      "try getting teens to talk about any important matters, let alone suicidal ones."

      As a parent of teenagers and a middle-school teacher I can tell you that this is a great idea. Try. Try getting teens to talk. Try getting them to talk about important matters. Try getting them to talk about suicidal thoughts.

      It's not easy but it does work and it does help. Teenagers who feel this way are usually desperate for the chance to talk to about it. The first thing they learn is that they are not the only ones who feel this way. This is half the battle, sometimes. Often just the fact that the teacher/parent/adult is trying means the world.

      And keep trying. Don't stop trying just because the standard line is that it's impossible to get kids to talk about important matters. That attitude is half the problem.

    178. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And it would have been worth taking that punishment if they weren't the only one getting punished.

    179. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      People don't choose being a victim. Saying that him "deciding" to be docile and not resorting to violence is essentially the same argument as blaming the rape victim for the rape 'cause she decided to dress "too sexily".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    180. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by armanox · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't promise that at the high school I attended.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    181. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      School admins have basically hamstrung themselves. They have zero policy rules which remove the need for any thinking, and indeed even forbid any independent decision making. These changes have been brought about through fear of lawsuits, fear of what would happen if there was a school shooting and there was some rule they failed to implement that may have prevented it, and fear of angry parents (and I put a lot of blame on parents too for being too protective of their precious snowflakes and intimidating schools into making the changes).

    182. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Teachers are essentially forbidden from controlling the classroom anymore. Parents disapprove of this. Their children are special angels who can do no wrong. A teacher who uses disclipline, even non-physical discipline such as detention, can get into a lot of trouble with the school and the school can get into a lot of trouble with the parents.

    183. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't believe that's true. Most of the bullies I knew in school would never have been able to become cops and most certainly never judges. The people I knew from school who did become cops were not bullies.

    184. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by xvent · · Score: 0

      I don't understand that parents who were former victims of bullying themselves don't just whoop these bullies asses. What did you just let it go? Society has taught me that the bullying mentality works. So if some fat little fourth grader starts giving my son shit, I'll just visit the bully after school and pin him down while I hock loogies on him. If the "grown ups" take issue with what I did I'll just turn their twisted logic against them.

    185. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Does your mommy know you're using her computer to talk to strangers?

      oh, and btw, continuing the practice of attacking me, personally? Only serves to prove my contention that you have the mental maturity of a pre-adolescent child who didn't get his way.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    186. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Guns are more *personal*.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    187. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Doesn't really matter - it was a public conversation and should not be subject to that anyway.

    188. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 2

      And what's the teacher going to do if the administration leaves them powerless to do anything meaningful in the situation?

    189. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      zero tolerance is just a way to keep the victims silent, thereby improving the statistics reported on the things that happen to them.

    190. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's exactly my point. Deciding to retaliate violently is your own choice and you can't blame the victim of that round of violence either. It doesn't matter if they "deserved it."

    191. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I can actually blame the "victims" of that round of violence. Without their prior actions, this violence would not occur.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    192. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying this is the "right" or "best" solution, but...

      I taught my son to punch hard and aim for the nose: "if you miss, you'll get his mouth or cheek or eye and it'll still hurt". I also explained that if the bully hit, slapped, tripped, or otherwise battered him, that my son was to lay him out. "What if I get in trouble?", he asked. "You let me handle that part", I replied. We had to play-act it a few times because my boy kept wanting to say something first, like "if you touch me again I'll hit you in the nose!" No. You've already warned him before and he kept it up. Don't talk: act.

      Cut to a week later when the teacher was waiting for me when I went to get my son from school. "He hit another kid today." "Was it so-and-so?" "Yes." "Good. I told him to." The teacher looked around, leaned in and confessed: "someone needed to belt that little asshole."

      The bullying ended that day. My boy stopped coming home with torn clothes, scratches, and bruises. My son got an enormous confidence boost and hasn't had a problem with other little thugs since then.

      Violence is not the solution to all problems, but damned if it can't fix some.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    193. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You mean like dressing too sexily? You're a sick individual and you need mental help.

    194. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by smugfunt · · Score: 1

      2)Parental issues, usually their parents are drunks, or pay zero attention to them.

      Yup, or the wrong kind of attention. In primary school I once walked home with a kid with nascent bullying tendencies (I was much bigger than him). As he walked in his back door I heard his mother launch into a rabid sweary tirade at him for no reason I could see. So he was being bullied at home and just doing the same thing at school.

    195. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Cause if someone takes you out before you can even start, it puts a damper on the whole thing, doesn't it?

      Take your own advice.

    196. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't valuable as evidence of bullying because it was unlawfully collected. It was evidence that he had committed felony wiretapping (a federal crime). In the grand scheme of ridiculous justice, the boy was lucky that the officer broke the law in having evidence of a crime destroyed. In no state can you record audio without alerting those whom you are recording.

    197. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is disturbingly common. At my wife's old high school the teachers would even participate. I thought she was full of it until the siblings of a friend of mine moved into the area of that school and started reporting similar craziness.

    198. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was this awful "dead-arm!" thing when I was in school. It was an excuse to punch kids like me, and my goal was to not react to it in any way. If I saw that happening to /my/ kid now?

    199. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes, the "Just ignore them and they'll leave you alone" trick. After a number of years of telling my that, my parents finally got fed up and told me to do what I had to do and they would back me up. This was only a couple years before getting into a fist fight would have you immediately expelled and criminal charges pressed, so I lucked out. I don't know what I would tell my kids today. Society has effectively blocked off every possible escape (moving to a different school usually doesn't help either).

    200. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Violence breeds violence. If you attack me, expect me to retaliate.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    201. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      1. Kids shoot up schools. Why schools?

      Because your targets are guaranteed to be unable to shoot back?

      They obviously went to different schools than my friends in college. The ones from Philadelphia were explaining all the work they would go through to sneak their guns past the police guarding the school, and the one from NYC just laughed and asked why they didn't pay off the cop like they did. This all would have been in the 80's.

    202. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      3) Alpha males who think they have something to prove, since they were alpha males, I generally didn't bother trying to make friends out of these guys, they always turned me off anyways

      I never had much trouble with the alpha males. The ones I knew had better things to do than push around geeks half their size. Most of my problems were with the wanna-bes. They weren't big enough or strong enough to compete with the alphas, but they were bigger than I was.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    203. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a funny feeling that 50% of slashdot's readers could recover the deleted file.

    204. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      So you're not really looking for an end to anything. You actually want to perpetuate this...

    205. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you went to school, but I accidentally (forgot it was there) carried a pocket knife into back in the 60s, and was booted.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    206. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want sympathy because you used to beat up kids and now everyone that has ever known you is waiting to piss on your tomb when you finally die?

    207. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Solandri · · Score: 1

      1. Kids shoot up schools. Why schools? Why not shopping malls before Christmas or movie theaters during blockbuster premiers?

      1) Kids are in school 30%-40% of their waking lives. It's normal that a disproportionate amount of everything that happens to them happens at school.

      2) They don't really shoot up schools. Statistically a kid is much more likely to be shot outside of school than in school. It's just that "school shootings" have become a thing for the media, so the threshold at which one will become a national news story is much lower than, say, a bunch of gang members shooting each other in a drive-by shooting, or a bunch of teens being killed in a car accident. Despite the impression you get from the media, if you want your kids to be safe from shootings, you're better off sending them to school. Normalize for the time they spend in school (#1 above) and statistically they're even safer.

      3) When a shooting happens at a school, the vast majority of victims are other kids simply because of the demographics of the people in the area. So it gets classified as kids shooting kids. When a shooting happens outside of a school, the majority of victims are adults. So it gets classified as a "regular" shooting incident even if a significant number of kids were victims

    208. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The court system and the police are retarded. And they're the ones with guns. Holy god it's some scary business.

    209. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      The bully did wrong but that is not main problem. Everybody makes mistakes in life. Some of us never learn the art of being a sociable human and become criminals, fully blown psychopaths or as far as gradations go - members of state administration in US. I think what is wrong here is that the whole system seems to missed out on the bullying aspect. I suppose that is because they cannot do anything to protect our privacy online anyway (NSA and other asshats) so they decided to do the fun thing instead of right thing. I guess this school and parts of law system have given a lesson of what goes as civic behaviour in US of A.

    210. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by nblender · · Score: 1

      I'd thought of that... It's just not within my son's nature so I didn't feel he'd be able to pull it off... In retrospect it was a good thing. The bully is a 'hockey kid'... The son of a 'hockey kid'. He's been taught how to fight and enjoys it. So had my son reached up and slugged him, the bully would have enjoyed it and come right back...

      We saw the dad in the local grocery store last year walking around with his little monster... Dad had a big black eye... It was hockey season so he probably got it playing... Nice role model.

      I take solace in the fact that one day that kid will be pumping gas into my son's car.

    211. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by mathmathrevolution · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of lip-service being paid to 'zero tolerance'... I haven't seen any actions.

      "Zero tolerance" policies only serve to extend bullying. Practically speaking, there is intrinsically a huge amount of leeway granted to teachers and administrators to who is subjected to 'zero tolerance' policies under which circumstances. A black kid is suspended for waving to the camera in a photo. A girl is strip searched and suspended for allegedly sharing over-the-counter medication. A girl takes a razor from another student threatening self-harm and throws it directly in the trash and she gets suspended (and recommended for expulsion) for having a weapon when she reports the incident to the teachers. I guaran-fucking-tee you that if that girl had been rich and white and popular the school would have never tried to punish her. People are punished because they are disliked, punished because they are weak, and then ultimately punished for being punished.

      I could list these stories all day long. Zero tolerance is just an excuse for administrators to come up with ridiculous bullshit charges against vulnerable students and then claim that their "hands are tied" to deflect public backlash. The reason the teachers and principle lost their shit during recording incident is because it exposed their complicity with bullying.

      I hope this kid learned his lesson. Next time, don't go the teachers, don't go to your parents, go to YouTube. Make that shit go viral. And when they inevitably try to punish you just lie. You don't know who recorded the incident, you don't know where the video came from, you don't know who uploaded it, it probably the kids who have been relentlessly bullying you uploaded it so they could mock you online but you don't know. Stick to your guns no matter what.

      I'm sorry kid. I wish I could recommend a course of action that didn't require you to lie. I wish I knew a morally pristine way to protect yourself, but the fact is that there isn't one. That's just the nature of the world you live in.

    212. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Erh... that's basically what I said? That they don't simply go and mow down what's in their patch but actually choose their targets.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    213. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Man, this is too funny. You do know that anybody with half a brain can see how you've totally fixated on one interpretation of what somebody said in a non-serious manner and constructed an elaborate reality around it.

      When I call you an idiot, why it is not a personal attack on you, it is a statement. There is a difference. Idiots can't seem to understand logical arguments because they're lost in inconsequencial, frequently fabricated, details which they'll defend to the death because of their sloth-like inability to change their viewpoint.

      Face it, the guy made a not-so-funny funny, you misinterpreted and were called out on it, you made a whole bunch of new assumptions and misinterpreted again. That's when I called you an idiot.

    214. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by dead_cthulhu · · Score: 1

      Victim blaming in rape cases happens *all* the time in the US as well. Look at that case in Ohio, where the rapists were given a slap on the wrist sentence only *after* Anon got involved, and the media kept going on about how "these poor boys' lives are ruined". Nothing for the victim. No federal charges for filming kiddie pr0n on the rapists who filmed it. But they were "promising football players".

    215. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ClioCJS · · Score: 0

      I'd say "A killing spree is not targeted. That's not the case with school shootings. When you go on a killing spree, you want people dead. You don't care who gets to bite the dust" is the very opposite of choosing your target. You specifically said they don't care. Then when I said they did care, you said, "That's what I said". I'm not seeing it in the sentence I just quoted, and am frankly disinterested in continuing this hair-splitting.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    216. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      oh fuck

      i finally saw the "not". Yup. that really does change everything you said. Now I get it. Sorry for the disturbance.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    217. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by NoKaOi · · Score: 1

      As adults most cops and most judges are the bullies.

      FTFY.

    218. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Swedish book/movie "Let the Right One In" has a bullying subplot. As do several Japanese anime (sublots in the darker ones, like Shigofumi or Narutaru). And Mexican telenovelas (any set in High School). The Canadian show Degrassi. According to blogs the Guam school system is paradise for bullying types, with "officials" simply advising parents on teaching their bullied kids to fight back.

      Bullying seems independent of culture.

    219. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have loved to hear instead how you say listen. If you don't mind bully's then I will see what I can get away with. Lets see if the news organizations and other parents agree with your sentimentality. Maybe there might be other kids who feel threatened. I hear that restraining orders work sometimes. Maybe I'll see how much of your time I can take up until this is properly resolved. I wonder if you really know just how far I'm willing to go to make sure my child wasn't bullied like me and my brother were. Just make shit up. My brother Timmy was beaten weekly until his bully was fell down a flight of stairs. Amazing how a accidents tend to happen to bad people.

    220. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      You're **slightly** mistaken. In many states you an record audio if you are one of the parties being recorded.

    221. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to quote bender: "Have you ever tried simply turning off the TV, sitting down with your children, and hitting them?"

    222. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I guess the fact that bullying happens everywhere shouldn't be too much of a surprise to me, since we're all human after all. But how about official reaction and policies? Do other places (esp. developed nations) handle it as poorly as the US does, where victims are either ignored or worse punished by the school administrators?

    223. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. I still remember my sophomore high school year, when I spoke to the coach about bullying in gym class. He proceeded to say I "could handle them", then set me up so they all thought I ratted them out for cutting a big loop of the 3 mile runs. "All of you have to re-run yester's run but this guy, right here". He apparently wondered why it was taking me so much longer to do the runs, and finally chedked the midpoint and saw no one pass but me.

      One bully tried throwing hangers at me, and I took him down the next day with pepper spray, then had to walk him into the shower myself to help him recover. I didn't want to *hurt* him, I just wanted him to know I wasn't playing. When his friend tried throwing a bench at me, I blocked it with a locker door and got a hard scrotum lock on him. Never, never, *never* close with a wrestler who fights dirty!

      I was suspended, but the way the coach had set me up to take them down was quite clear and caused its own little political furor. I was fortunate to be so fast and strong, and I had *no intention* to play the "let's go outside to fight". They had friends, I didn't: I needed it completely clear that "if you bully, especially this guy, you will be *surprised*".

    224. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by brit74 · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't it be foreshadowing if, at some point in the future, the bullied kid in the story got a gun and shot his bullies?

    225. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Maybe the point of the whole discussion went by you, so allow me to direct you to the problem at hand. The question is not whether your kid is safer at school or outside. The question is why teenagers choose their schools for seemingly "random" shooting sprees. Why do they go for their school? If their goal, as the media claim it to be, was to run amok, cause damage and kill aimlessly, a school is by no means a "good" target.

      These kids are not on a random killing spree. They are taking revenge for what has been done to them.

      That's the point. Not whether your kids are safer inside school or outside.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    226. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Turning the other cheek doesn't work. I can vouch for that. I tried. Trust me, it never works.

      What works is ensuring that the other side cannot continue the fight. That does work.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    227. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but wouldn't it be kinda hard to find someone who kills himself in the end for money?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    228. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by rk · · Score: 1

      You have zero expectation of privacy from the authorities. If however, you embarrass the authorities you are suddenly breaching important privacy protections. Funny how that works, eh?

    229. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      One person tried to intimidate me once. He told me to see him outside school and wait for him. I told him I won't do that. If he wants to fight he must wait for me. The only reason I would say that, HE thought, was that I was sure to beat his ass. He appologized the next day. My reasoning was different: I was not willing to wait to get a beating.

      I had a similar experience in school. In hindsight, it was the stressful equivalent of my mother saying, Wait until your father gets home! Waiting all day for an after school fight is a textbook case of "the dreading is worse than the doing".

      The final result was that everybody had repect for me. It was scary. Think The Wave. I seriously hope that I never abused that power. It was very hard for me to see the difference between respect, fear and blind adoration. The last one is the most horid one. Having people following you without asking any questions and without thinking is extremely frightening. Having nobody to talk to concerning at a young age was terrible. How do you explain that you are afraid because people respect and like you?

      It bothered you because you are a good and decent person, worried about the consequences of your influence on others. There is no shame in that. The unfortunate reality is that many in your position would've happily abused this power over others. History is filled with them.

      Sorry for ranting. It is the first time I put this fear into words after 30+ years.

      No worries... ranting is what we do here on the Green Line Site.

      There is an American film called Alpha Dog based on a true story that you might find interesting.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    230. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      can the police officer force the boy to destroy evidence?

      It all depends on how much pain the child is willing to experience.

      what would have happened if the child refused?

      He would have been arrested and hauled off to juvenile hall, his ipad confiscated, and there would have been an "accident" while it was in police custody resulting in it's destruction.

      is that a PA law? In some states you can record.

      I believe PA is a two party state, so both sides of the conversation must be informed it is being taped. HOWEVER elsewhere in the comments is mentioned that Necessity would be a legal defense against the wiretapping charge as it was recording evidence of a criminal conspiracy in progress.

    231. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so expel or suspend them.

    232. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      1. Kids shoot up schools. Why schools? Why not shopping malls before Christmas or movie theaters during blockbuster premiers? If it's body count and fame you're after, that's where you'd have to do your killing spree. Schools are rather meh for either. Not very cramped, lots of exits, before you can rack up a sensible body count most of the people already hit the exit. Now try a movie theater with 2 exits for 200+ people. Shot 10 or so and a body count of at least 50 is certain due to the stampede! So why schools?

      This.

      Terrorists in Israel target theatres, buses and other places where they can kill a lot of people without having many escape. Blowing up a school doesn't make sense because campuses are large and open (ergo requires a lot of explosives).

      It's not a killing spree. It's revenge. Plain and simple.

      This, and why are kids feeling the need to get revenge?

      Like you said, politicians, parents, news media are all very quick to blame video games, comic books, movies, rock and/or roll music but never look at the real cause. The society that created them.

      The kids who go off the edge are reacting. You have to remember that the Columbine killers had lists of people to kill and they even let some people go because they were nice to them. Until the US abandons the Lord of the Flies culture in schools, until the US stops encouraging popularity contests by elevating mediocrity and finally admits that allowing those elevated by this system to ostracise people they don't like the US will continue to suffer from extreme violence in schools.

      But this means the parents, politicans and news media need to admit the society they created is horribly wrong... and that's harder than blaming the people who got shot.

      School shootings are not prevalent in other countries that have a higher rate of violence (violent crime, specifically shootings) because the same culture does not exist.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    233. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      1. Kids shoot up schools. Why schools?

      Because your targets are guaranteed to be unable to shoot back?

      Same with theatres, shopping centres, cafe's and MickyD's.

      I know many Americans have this fantasy about everyone being John Wayne packing a six shooter and picking off a gunman at 1000 yards but the reality is, very few people carry and most of them wont be able to shoot straight at the best of times, let alone in the heat of an attack and they have no idea which person is the shooter.

      You need to go back and re-read the GP's post, people who shoot up schools pick schools for very specific reasons.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    234. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not legally. Read the article. The officer can ask, cajole, beg, and plead, but not force the destruction.

      In other words all he can do is bully.

    235. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      In what way exactly is recording audio in a public place 'wiretapping'?
      Are you claiming that any recording of audio in a public place requires the explicit permission of anyone who is audible on the recording?
      I suspect the main problem here is the parents did not lawyer up well enough (either through assuming this would be trivially solved as it should have been, or through cost).

      The 'solution' unfortunately, will be to get better lawyers. Dont you love the land of the free?

    236. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steubenville_High_School_rape_case

      Enough? Took me a good solid 5 seconds on google.

    237. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by gonnagetya · · Score: 1

      Violence is supposed to be the *last* resort when other methods of dealing with a problem have failed. You have to tread carefully with how to explain this to a child, otherwise they'll see violence as an effective solution to dealing with troubling people and will use it at the first opportunity rather than the last. Imagine what kind of asshole he'll grow up to be with this mindset.

    238. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main mistake of the parents was failing to copy the recordings. I suspect that further investigation of this kid and the school administrators will show that they are in some way connected with the bully in a personal way and protecting him. Were I the parents of the victim I would bringing a lawsuit against the school right off the bat. I would also force the police department to take a complaint report against the bully and request a restraining order as well. The officer made them delete the recording but his testimony is not considered hearsay and so he would be compelled to relate the generalities of the deleted recordings in the quest to get some sort of protection for the victim. If the fucked up school district and the local cops are this turned around then these are the only things that cause them to reassess their cock fucked priorities.

      I suffered my share of bullying growing up in high school from the jocks. Cocaine and steroids were big when I was in high school and there were a fair number of assholes in my school that made it their past time to make others suffer. I kept a watch on them and what they did not only to myself but to others as well. When enough was enough I also payed them a visit in the night and destroyed their parents and siblings cars as well as inflicting serious damage to their parents home, I never touched my tormenters car. I made sure that the parents and siblings knew why they were targeted by burning into the lawn "this is all because of your son" with a diesel fuel/soap mix in a garden sprayer. I would also follow up periodically over the school year with more insidious plots and revenge. Sometimes I used thermite piles over the block on the new car, or... Well you get the idea. I was very creative about how I punished them for their lack of compassion to their fellow students. I never even considered using a firearm to inflict causalities or hurt others. To be sure I had access to many and was EXTREMELY proficient with them both in close and at many hundreds of yards. I spent my week days reloading for weekend desert shooting trips we went on, sometimes leaving right from school. I just stayed laser focused on my tormenter and inflicting the most massive suffering on him, just as he had done to me and many others over the course of the year. Funny thing, that shit usually stopped after the second visit to their house. My thing was always that people can heal in short order, baring murder or mayhem. But continuing to have to pay for repairs can last for years and hurt far more as well as continue to frustrate and infuriate month after month. Over a couple of decades distant now from those very unhappy school days and I reflect on the damage I caused to their family and I do feel bad about the collateral damages to this day. Then I also remember hearing one tormenter literally crying in class about how screwed he was and how his parents took his car, made him drop sports, and go to counseling over the summer break. I suspect that they knew their son to be a flaming asshole and I was the straw that broke the camels back as it were. It essentially broke the guy, he became a far different person. All I really cared is that he stopped fucking with me and others and showed a basic level of respect to all, not just the other jocks.

    239. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 34 and I still think about shooting up my highscool. It wouldn't matter to me that nobody who taught or attended with me would be there any more.

    240. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by gitfiddler · · Score: 1

      No... the problem is these assholes WANT things like this to happen so they can be "FIRST RESPONDERS" / "HEROS" / etc... the blues brothers movie was making fun of this decades ago... ___________ STOP RESISTING !!! ( hits scrawny teenage kid while 4 other cops hold him down ) STOP RESISTING !!! fucking assholes

      --
      .sig
    241. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      ensuring that the other side cannot continue the fight. That does work.

      Sure it does. It's called bullying.

    242. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, how many government watch lists do you think you're on now?

    243. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      It seems that a reasonable change to the law would be to allow surreptitious recording when there is probable cause to believe that a crime is going to be committed.

      While the surveillance state will love this (No need for a warrant, we just need probable cause to BELIEVE), it is a terrible idea. These laws exist for a reason. Weakening the criteria is not the solution. Something along the lines of making it a civil offense might work, but the cut-off should not be changed.

    244. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Necessity would not work. A necessity defense pretty much always requires prevention of immediate harm. Documenting a conspiracy to commit harm does not pass muster.

    245. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Draugo · · Score: 1

      Hey, I remember that episode even though I didn't watch "The Outer Limits" that regularly (not that big a thing in Finland). Mutch better than the feminist world episode from around the same time (if you disregard the shower scenes).

    246. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under federal law, it is illegal to record unless at least one party is aware that they are being recorded.

      So the NSA is acting illegally even under U.S. law?

    247. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Ok, I bite. What's your suggestion?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    248. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      The main mistake the parents made was assuming the school had any interest in the bully being stopped. Far from it. The school has an interest in the bully having an easy target. It means that a potential troublemaker (i.e. the bully) has an outlet for his aggression and won't take it out on school property, faculty or outside the school where they don't have such an easy way to contain it. Bullies seem to understand that "unspoken contract" between the school and them and play along those rules: You get to beat up your victims as long as you don't cause any trouble to the school itself.

      Once the victim of bullying starts to report it or (worse even) fight back, the school has a problem. As perverted as it may sound, from the school's point of view the victim is the troublemaker when he doesn't want to be a victim anymore. Because as long as he's "willingly" the victim there's no problem the school would have to take care of.

      So yes, the school sides with the bully. And as long as there is no responsibility for the school not to, this will continue.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    249. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Imrik · · Score: 1

      Pennsylvania actually goes even farther, not only does it require all parties be informed, all parties must consent.

    250. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't it be foreshadowing if, at some point in the future, the bullied kid in the story got a gun and shot his bullies?

      You mean, aside from the fact that 'foreshadowing' refers to a literary device that doesn't apply to real situations?

      Because nobody knows the future, which is kind of a requirement of foreshadowing.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    251. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I've never heard of this event before.

    252. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I don't understand that parents who were former victims of bullying themselves don't just whoop these bullies asses.

      And if you end up in jail over said actions?

      I'll just visit the bully after school and pin him down while I hock loogies on him.

      That's what the keyboard hero says he'll do.

    253. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      What would you define as meaningfull actions in this situation?

    254. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Yea most of the bullies in my school live about 3 miles away from where they grew up and quite frankly have very boring lives and have done nothing of note. Perhaps a bit of drunk and disorderly. A few killed in a car accident (drunk driver). But mostly just minimum wage workers with not a lot going for them. I don't know if they are happy or not.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    255. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Any form of sanction that separates the students or gives some threat of consequence.

    256. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Even Hollywood portrays good cops as bullies.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    257. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by delt0r · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem with Bullies is that hitting someone in school is somehow ok. But if your in a pub or something.......

      In Austria 14 year olds can have criminal records. The cops come to the schools and explain that if you hit someone that is an issue not for the school, but the police. There was very little physical bulling at school there. In fact violent crime in Austria is very low.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    258. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      How do you know what an ape thinks? I understand that a lot of my choices are not made consciously. That's why I used the word choice instead of free-will. However, I have the ability to bring some of those unconscious choices into consciousness. I have made the choice in the past to alter my perception of something in order to adjust my reaction to it. I have the ability to observe the outcomes of certain actions or attitudes and adjust my behavior to achieve a different outcome.

      We have recognized that simply letting the strong have their way does not lead to a peaceful stable society. So we create laws against assault, fraud and theft. We hold ideals of equality for people in society and before the law. This was not always the case. We have made choices and changed how society works. Are we there yet? Have we created the precise society we want? Of course not. Many people still choose to use their power to dominate others. It's a process whose outcome is uncertain. But we have achieved much more than the apes. And that is due to our ability to create according to our choices.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    259. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by aurizon · · Score: 1

      This sort of oppression happens all the time, and is the underlying reason why bullied kids occasionally take matters into their own hans, sometimes with fatal results when gun are involved.
      Had proper attention been paid to bullied kids how many lives would have been save over the years?
      I was bullied in high school, so I whacked the bully with a broom handle on the head = problem solved as he started crying.

    260. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      That must be manly-speak for "I need a hug".

    261. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      I never seen a school where the teacher isn't allowed to talk to the kids, including talking quite sternly. Quite often it's more than enough to just say no, as long as the intervention is timely and consequent. If it's a bit more serious, take them out of class & discuss it there for 5 minutes - that often "cools down" a situation, but is of course often hard to do if you're teaching alone...

      A big part in gaining the respect of the kids is to respect them, i.e. have clear rules of what is OK and what isn't, and then apply those rules consequently (but not blindly). Don't waste kids time with crap or talking down to them, the energy and concentration they put into a class is usually proportional to what the teacher puts into it.

      Next up would be moving them around, i.e. putting the bully in front of the class and keeping an extra eye on him/her (doubly so if it's a girl, they tend to be just as bad when it comes to picking on others, but better at avoiding getting caught...), and braking up subgroups in the class with bad interactions.

      Then comes restricting movement during breaks, i.e. demanding that the bully stay in only one part of the area normally available to the kids during breaks, or stay together with the teacher who is supervising the break. That has the effect of allowing the bullied to walk free, while the bully is kept away from his "friends". A bonus effect from this is that the bullying kid may talk to that teacher once he/she figures out that he/she isn't going anywhere fun anyway that break (or any break for the next two days) - sometimes they reveal a root cause, such as problems at home / general insecurity / bad friends etc.. Use that information wisely, and discuss it with them - be someone they can thrust.

      Then of course is to talk to the parents, calling a special meeting if neccessary. That scares most kids quite well - it often leads to consequences such as denied access to gaming systems, no internet at home, no friends over etc..

      Escalate to management if neccessary, they should bring in the school councelor, and in really bad cases, have a talk with child services and bring them in on the case if it turns out it is needed - they can do more than just putting the kid in foster care which is really the very last option.

      Where did you go to school / teach where none of these options where available? FYI, I've taught kids from ~10 - 16 years old, and TA'ed students at BSc, Master and PhD level, and also taught high school teachers 2-3x my age. However, most of the time I got by using the advice in paragraph #2 :)

    262. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Copid · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, I'd bet good money that most people who apply to be cops are bullies. The "drive fast, carry a gun, and tell people what to do" job description must draw bullies and nuts like flies to shit, especially when it pays better than most jobs within reach of unskilled assholes. I pity the people who have to weed those guys out and find the decent folks to do the job well.

      I will say anecodtally that while I've had good dealings with my local police, I've noticed that the guys in high school who I stereotpycally thought would end up being cops ended up being cops with a surprisingly high probability.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    263. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      Except in this case, there where plenty of sanctions - they even sent the police.

    264. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yes. Months after it had gone on completely unchecked. And all of it was based around the victim's lawbreaking.

    265. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You're right, I guess there are a few too many "nots" in the construct to be clear.

      I should not write my messages the way I write my code for the IOCCC. :)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    266. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      I actually think you're gracious, because I do not think I was right, at all. I was an ass :D

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    267. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mother made the mistake of going to the pricipal with her son instead of teh school board with a lawyer!

    268. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      YES !! Hit the nail on the head.

    269. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by 400_guru · · Score: 1

      At my high school this was also the norm in the late 70s. You could have armed a decent size militia from our student parking lot. Then add various other items like axes, chain-saws, knives etc to the mix as well. Likely 75% of all students had a pocket knife with them at all times and it was normally very sharp. There were exactly zero stabbings, shootings, or other injuries from weapons in my three years there. There was never a concern spoken about any of this because parents taught their children to respect others and any student who got in trouble at school was in BIGGER trouble at home. Today it's nearly automatic for the parent to take the student's side even when the student IS in the wrong.

      --
      There are two rules to success in life: 1) Don't tell everyone all that you know.
    270. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by tapi0 · · Score: 1

      I think that's exactly what parent was saying, school shootings are selective and not indiscriminate. So, correct on #2

    271. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my state, Texas, from my understanding and I have been told by more than one lawyer you can record a conversation as long as one person in the party is aware it is being recorded. This includes yourself.

      This does vary from state to state.

      Some states, including Pennsylvania where this happened are "All-party_consent_states" meaning everyone has to know they are being recorded.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#All-party_consent_states

      its bullshit in this case yes.. Just throwing up the facts on this...

    272. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 3rd one of course, less assholes = better society. Better for the bully to die painfully a few months later.

      Why didn't I think of that before?

    273. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      How do you know what an ape thinks?

      Again, we are apes, so we know how one species of ape thinks from self awareness. And then the chimp and the bonobo are our closest relatives, and genetically they are closer to us than they are to the other apes, let alone monkeys.

      The chimp and bonobo brains work in basically the same way as ours. We obviously have a bit more ability on the language area, and there are other areas where chimps and bonobos brains outdo us. But fundamentally they work in the same way, They are very close.

      Interestingly adult chimps are a great mirror for our aggressive and competitive side and bonobos for our community and peaceable side.

    274. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how is that different from "shopping malls before Christmas or movie theaters during blockbuster premiers" as he asks in the *very* *next* *fucking* *question*? Why not retirement homes? Why not churches (the peaceful kind .... not like southern baptist or some shit where everyone's packing heat)? Why not a fucking Justin Bieber concert?

    275. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by gnujohn · · Score: 1

      I never taught my sons non-violence, and nor did I preach gathering evidence for authorities. I taught them both that the proper response to bullying was to choose the biggest aggressor and then hit him as hard as possible in the nose and balls, to cause as much bleeding and pain as possible. When my oldest son was attacked by a larger boy, and came to me crying, complaining about being hit in the stomach, I told him where to hit the other guy, and after a short hug, made him go and do it. He has been grateful to me for the rest of his life, because that guy was so shocked and scared he never hit my son again. I taught my sons, "If you're hit and fight back fiercely, you will only get in one fight a year--at most. Otherwise, you'll have to take shit all your days at school." Non-violence is utter bullshit, as a tactic, and the "authorities" are not there to deal with petty issues.

    276. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

      If you believe "the FBI and its team of psychiatrists and psychologists," Columbine was not a reaction to bullying.
      http://www.slate.com/articles/...

      --
      That that is is that that that that is not is not.
    277. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by AaronW · · Score: 1

      It all depends on the school. My mother is a substitute teacher at a high school which doesn't take discipline very seriously. At one point she caught a kid with a paintball gun in the classroom and called it in to the office, conveniently leaving out the "paintball" part. Nothing happened for around 10 minutes until the office called back to get more information. Most kids get just a slap on the wrist if anything, so behavior at the school tends to be poor and the administration frowns on teachers who do use discipline because it inconveniences them. Back in the 1970s and 1980s it was a yearly tradition to stab a teacher every year at this school. Sadly this type of thing is coming back. Some of the lower grade schools in the city are just as bad and there are now a lot of problems with gangs.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    278. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you AC, for saving me the trouble. Stupid ignorant MF Cop, that kid is a little hero, and fuck those little bullies, the lieutenant is BULLY TOO!!!!

    279. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by rezme · · Score: 1

      I would venture to say that human nature is human nature wherever you go in the world. The thing that reigns human nature in is human compassion. Some are born with more than others, some are born with none at all (sociopaths), and some have it stamped out of them by indifferent or abusive parents. The latter two cases can result in bullies, who either act out their aggression to vent their rage at all that's unfair in their lives or just act cruelly because it's amusing to them. Bullies have existed as long as society has. Probably as long as humans have. What society has to decide is how much we want to have in common with cro magnon man. We have had the ability to curtail this sort of behavior for ages, but it's far cheaper in effort and finance to pay the issue lip service, and then actually do nothing at all.

    280. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by rezme · · Score: 1

      I was mercilessly bullied when I was in high school. When I finally had enough and lashed out, I was labeled as "emotionally handicapped" and stuck in one of these classrooms. Let me tell you, it's pure pandemonium in them. There is little to no control, the teacher is usually a "counselor" of some sort, but is woefully undertrained to handle a class of 15 or 20 where the majority of them act literally like animals. We had kids set fire to things in class, fights break out, whatever, and the teacher would ineffectually wave her hands around asking them to stop. Meanwhile, normal old me, who just got sick of hearing disgusting rumors about himself, getting tripped in the hall and then stepped on (repeatedly), beat up after school by groups of "Lord of the Flies" wannabes, etc., just wanted to escape this hell and graduate. Thank FSM I didn't go to school during the internet era, when the whole "cyberbullying" thing started up. I'm 40 now, and it still hurts to think back on how a relatively small group of jackasses managed to get a graduating class of 200 something to unequivocally loathe me.

    281. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by gregorthebigmac · · Score: 1

      I keep seeing people talking about revenge-style columbine-like school shootings. Has no one here heard that wasn't the case with columbine? The shooters were not bullied into revenge. It was not a mission to take out a specific few people who bullied them too much. They were psychopaths, plain and simple. The truth came out years after the shooting, and a quick Google search will reveal this.

      http://usatoday30.usatoday.com...

      According to this and several other articles and books later written about the subject, the main kid was well liked by everyone, a common trait of sociopaths. The whole bullying narrative was assumed by the media, who had only the smallest snippets of data from which to draw conclusions, and of course, they did. Wait around and report the facts? Nope. Let's give everyone a narrative that makes sense, and get it out there first! Once they'd reported this motivation, they couldn't go back and correct themselves, they'd lose face. So everyone stuck with the story, and since then, we've always attributed what happened to bullying.

    282. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Gotta love those torch welding mobs...

      --
      That that is is that that that that is not is not.
    283. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem was resolved exactly how the administration wanted it resolved. A child recording authorities is more important than a child being bullied. Welcome to the America we have created.

    284. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick check on the internet shows PA is one of the few "two party consent" states, which means you must tell the other party you are recording them. "one party states" allow you to use a hidden camera or audio.

    285. Re:Rewarding the bullies... by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      That said, it's incomprehensible to me how a kid gets in trouble for standing up for himself to a bully.

      I picture something like this:

      1. Bully is tossing wads of paper at a kid during a class. Spitwads, quiet stuff like that, and this goes on for a month.
      2. Victim snaps and screams at the bully, maybe pushing him.

      All the teacher saw was 2.

  2. Felony vs terrorism deterence by OffTheLip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ordinary citizens face felony convictions for this while the feds do something similar and are combatting terromism to keep us safe.

    1. Re:Felony vs terrorism deterence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's because citizens can't afford cops whereas the oligarchy has an interest in protecting their herd.

    2. Re:Felony vs terrorism deterence by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the kid that is charged was being terrorized.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Felony vs terrorism deterence by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I have not looked at it from this angle but you are right - this is a new and innovative way. Before we were bullied and bullying indihviduals went to join military and police force. Now we have an option for the bullied person instead of going columbine - join NSA and there you can do some nasty tricks for the bullies from ol' school - I mean there is surely way to show the world that they are some monsters - there are few types to chose from. It is progress but I wonder if that is the right type of progress. Probably not but still better than shooting lost of innocents and then die yourself.

  3. WTF?? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, kid gathers evidence of bullying by other kids, gets charged?

    That is insane.

    So, if I take a video of someone stealing my car, would I get arrested? Under what circumstances could I do that and not be charged? WTF doesn't gathering evidence of bullying get an exemption from wiretap laws?

    Whatever law enforcement and officers of the court were involved in this are total morons. This makes no sense at all.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, the kid got charged because he violated Pennsylvania's wiretapping and recording laws. Pennsylvania is a two-party consent state so both parties to the conversation must consent before a recording can be made.

      No, you would not be arrested and charged for video taping someone stealing your car because you aren't recording a conversation.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    2. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you don't record the audio, your car theft video is probably legal. The wiretap laws deal with "non-consent *audio* recordings of third parties"

      In reality, I suspect that the kid could have beaten the wiretap rap in court (at great expense and pain), because it was recorded in a public place, with no expectation of privacy (unless it was in the bathroom or something).

      And, I'm quite sure there's more to it than is obvious from the published story. Not that the school/police weren't being inappropriate here, but in these sorts of cases, they are constrained from telling "their side of the story".

    3. Re:WTF?? by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how this is "wiretapping" - no *wires* were being tapped, this was a recording of a face to face conversation.

    4. Re:WTF?? by sunderland56 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, kid gathers evidence of bullying by other kids, gets charged?

      When bullies grow up, they become policemen. The police protect their own.

    5. Re:WTF?? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reason enough to end the life of bullies early on. Killing a policeman can really get you into trouble.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:WTF?? by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      So, if I take a video of someone stealing my car, would I get arrested? Under what circumstances could I do that and not be charged? WTF doesn't gathering evidence of bullying get an exemption from wiretap laws?

      Depends on what your state recording laws are. Do you live in a one-party consent state or all-party consent state? Are you recording just video, just audio, or audio and video? Does the other party have an expectation of privacy (e.g. recording bullying in a restroom). Was the recording done covertly or in plain view?

      If someone stole your car that was parked in your driveway and you had a video only security camera in plain view, you most likely would be fine. If there was audio and you lived in a all-party consent state, then you're probably in trouble.

    7. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, the kid got charged because he violated Pennsylvania's wiretapping and recording laws. Pennsylvania is a two-party consent state so both parties to the conversation must consent before a recording can be made.

      A good lawyer would get it thrown out for Necessity.

      "In U.S. criminal law, necessity may be either a possible justification or an exculpation for breaking the law. Defendants seeking to rely on this defense argue that they should not be held liable for their actions as a crime because their conduct was necessary to prevent some greater harm and when that conduct is not excused under some other more specific provision of law such as self defense." - wikipedia

      Recording the bullies was NECESSARY in order to prove the bullying existed, so it could be dealt with.

    8. Re:WTF?? by killfixx · · Score: 1

      Vote this up!

      --
      "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    9. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So if the criminal stealing your car notices you, he can approach you and start to chit chat about the weather and suddenly the recording is not legal? WTF, seriously.

    10. Re:WTF?? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      He got charged for disorderly conduct. But we don't know the details of why or what he was actually alleged to have done.

      As for wiretapping, he shouldn't have been threatened with it, but he was never charged.

    11. Re:WTF?? by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, the kid got charged because he violated Pennsylvania's wiretapping and recording laws. Pennsylvania is a two-party consent state so both parties to the conversation must consent before a recording can be made.

      Yeah, and supposedly this school has a zero tolerance policy towards bullying.

      And according to TFA, the bullying was happening in the class room, with a teacher present. Which means the school had more or less abandoned their role in policing this, and the kid was left with no other recourse.

      Shortly thereafter, a loud noise is heard on the recording, which her son explained was a book being slammed down next to him after a student pretended to hit him in the head with it. When the teacher yells, the student exclaims, "What? I was just trying to scare him!" A group of boys are heard laughing.

      What teacher can't be watching this in their own classroom and NOT understand that bullying was happening?

      If the teacher who was physically in the room wasn't doing anything, WTF good is telling the school about it? Because the school is either indifferent, clueless, or incompetent to address the issue.

      And the officer involved?? I would also say was incompetent or indifferent:

      He later answered as to why he thought the disorderly conduct charge applied to this case by saying, "Because his (the student's) actions - he engaged in actions which served no legitimate purpose." He then read the statute as, "Creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by acts which serve no legitimate purpose."

      I would say the legitimate purpose was to demonstrate that the bullying was, in fact happening, was happening while there was a teacher present, and that nothing at all was being done about it. He certainly didn't create a "hazardous or physically offensive condition". Sorry, but I think the cop was a fucking idiot.

      I'm inclined to agree with the lawyer on this one. The police misapplied the statute here, forced the kid to destroy the evidence, and then didn't do a single thing about the problem.

      And people wonder why kids go into school with guns? I can't even believe the story has a link to a contest to win an AR-15.

      I read this whole story as a complete failure of the police and school to understand and deal with the actual issue here.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:WTF?? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 0

      I blame Rodney King

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    13. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF Wiretapping laws for a civil matter that happened in meat space? What next? Being charged for computer hacking for recording said bully getting beat up by some tall 6'8 guy?

    14. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is too fucked up for Slashdot.

      You realize you're wishing death on 15-year olds? Don't do that, even in jest, not even if they're mean and selfish. Let's hope they get the guidance they need to grow out of it.

    15. Re:WTF?? by jythie · · Score: 1

      It was recorded in the classroom. Which actually does not help since schools are such strange constitutional ground and thus public expectations may or may not apply based on the whim of the judge.

    16. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been facing the same thing as well. My enclosed office is described as restricted area in the company policy book, but it has never prevented people from going in and taking things for themselves. I setup a camera to catch the thieves and advised my direct supervisor of it (he's OK with it). On the other hand, I kept wrestling with the legality of it, because I have always been under the assumption that Canadian laws require disclosure of surveillance equipment on the premises. I ended up printing a "You are being monitored" sign and sticking it next to the light switch (which can only be accessed after the door is opened). It serves as a joke to me, with a hint of warning to the potential thieves.

    17. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are two things about this. Pennsylvania's "two-party consent" only applies in situations where those being recorded without their consent have a "reasonable expectation of privacy." I have a problem with the judge finding that people (teachers and students) have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the classroom. The other thing is that the Pennsylvania law also has an exception that states that you do not need to permission of someone who is committing a crime in the recording. That would not have applied in this case since not all of those being recorded were committing a crime. (I am not sure if any of the actions recorded crossed over into criminal territory, or not. Although if I was a judge, or on a jury, they are at a minimum close enough that I would be unwilling to convict the person recording them.)

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    18. Re:WTF?? by sribe · · Score: 1

      Yes, the kid got charged because he violated Pennsylvania's wiretapping and recording laws.

      As far as I know, all two-party states have an exemption for recording illegal activity. Now, technically, you could argue over whether the bullying reached the level of illegal activity. But that's a question for lawyers and judges, and that stupid fucking prick of a cop should have preserved the evidence, not forced its destruction.

    19. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. My goody-two-shoes catholic grade school took in three bullies that the public schools kicked out. Reform? Grow out of it? Hah. One is now dead from a crack overdose a couple years back -- and left a pregnant girlfriend behind. The others, if dead, news hasn't traveled this far yet.

    20. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, bullying is not against the law, its against POLICY. Necessity is for breaking THE LAW. No law was broken so you can't take this route.

    21. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I read this whole story as a complete failure of the police and school to understand and deal with the actual issue here.

      Oh, no, they understood and dealt with the actual issue here. They just dealt with it in a manner which is evil. These are the same type of people who covered up for Jerry Sandusky.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    22. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm going to play devil's advocate here because I read the article to see what event had transpired.

      Necessity typically requires three tests to be a valid defense, the defendent needs to be breaking the law to avoid a significant risk of harm, there were no adequate lawful means to address the situation, and the harm avoided was greater than the harm caused by breaking the law. The problem in this situation is the second one. The problem is that neither of the articles suggested that any other steps were taken to stop the bullying prior to committing the recording. That's the problem. There's no suggestion that the boy told his mother about the bullying, there's no suggestion that the mother contacted the school about the bullying before the recording was made. All that exists is a vague statement that the boy felt powerless so he made the recording. No suggestion as to why he felt powerless, be it lack of response when bringing the issue up or due to his own disabilities. This situation, unlike many of the clear cases of necessity, had a long period of time over which to address the problem rather than requiring near immediate action such as to prevent someone from being injured or killed.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    23. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Actually, almost all all-party consent states have an exception for recording someone who is committing a crime. Of course that would not apply in this case since not all of those recorded were committing a crime (even if the bullying actions recorded crossed over the line into criminal behavior).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    24. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      Yes, we do. He was charged with disorderly conduct for recording what was going on in the classroom.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    25. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      That's exactly opposite of what was claimed. The students in the school have a reasonable expectation of privacy against being recorded. In fact that's in the article. Whether that is accurate is up for argument.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    26. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what "legitimate purpose" the idiot teacher, school administration, and officer concluded was being served by the actions of the bullies?

    27. Re:WTF?? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Do you have some information about theevidence that was presented to the magistrate, what witnesses actually said, or what the magistrate said?

      If you were a magistrate, based on this information alone, would you have found him guilty? If not, then do you think it's possible that there is some other information that the magistrate was aware of, and we are not?

    28. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he did, not saying he did, but if he DID take it to authorities, it changed nothing. Never does. He could've talked to twenty different adults and not one of them will so much as remember "such horrible things" ever having been mentioned. Especially if they're questioned after the kid finally snapped and did a little columbine.

      A constant aspect of school bullying is that doing anything other than bending over and taking it like a little bi*** is unacceptable to any and all authorities. You'll be hard-pressed to see a bully get a lesser punishment than the evil, psychopathic sociopathic probably-drug-addled delinquent that dares to try to fight back even if in vain. Talking back is defying your betters. Fighting back is mutiny.

      Once things hit the media attitudes change a little, but as long as it's nice and all wrapped up, if they could get away with stoning the victim for the blasphemous act of speaking out, they would. Better to nip those little revolutionaries before they bud.

    29. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the school wasn't part of this school board.

    30. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be honest, this story comes across as a bit sensational. Two minutes of research shows an *out* from the wire taping statute.

      Necessity is a defense, although quite tough to use in practice; it's a bit like successfully using an insanity defense -- possible, but highly unlikely. Also, the necessity description you provide is a general statement of the principle, not the language Pennsylvania has adopted. As a common law defense, the state courts adoption is what controls. Moreover, necessity isn't always a defense (even if you prove the elements) -- it depends upon how the statue is written.

      Turning to the OUT I mentioned above, there is an exception built right into the statue. Full text can be found here:
      http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/LI/consCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&ttl=18&div=0&chpt=57

      In relevant part, the wiretapping statute provides:
      ---------
        5703 Provides "**Except** as otherwise provided in this chapter, a person is guilty of a felony of the third degree if he: (1) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, electronic or oral communication;"

        5704 Contains a long list of exceptions. For the most part they apply to police, telecom, or telemarketers (go figure). Subsection 17 is relevant here ...

        5704 (17) Any victim ... to intercept the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, if that person is under a reasonable suspicion that the intercepted party is committing, about to commit or has committed a crime of violence and there is reason to believe that evidence of the crime of violence may be obtained from the interception.

      If the bullying was as bad as the article describes, the student could surely have reasonable suspicion that the party was about to commit a crime of violence.

      You can read more about this here:
      http://www.phila-criminal-lawyer.com/Publications/New-Wire-Tap-Act.shtml

    31. Re:WTF?? by cusco · · Score: 2

      Why not? I certainly wished death and dismemberment on them then, when I was the victim. Its fuckheads like them that join the Marines and commit atrocities, then get out and become abusive cops and abusive spouses/parents.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    32. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      One of the stories I read contained a summary of the evidence presented at the hearing. The organization which published that story had their own court stenographer present to take down a transcript of the hearing.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    33. Re:WTF?? by njnnja · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but based on accounts that I have read elsewhere, PA only requires two-party consent if there is an expectation of privacy. Since this was recorded in the middle of a classroom with dozens of kids in it, there should not be an expectation of privacy; therefore this crappy ruling should be overturned on appeal.

    34. Re:WTF?? by crakbone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From what I remember from another article (several days ago) the teen recorded the incident to convince his mom that he was being bullied ( he had told her several times but she did not believe him). He had evidently requested help from teachers as well. When his mom saw the evidence she told him to show the principal the recording. The principal then called the police without informing the mother or talking with her about the incident. She was later called in. Mind you this recording was made IN FRONT of a teacher. In a full classroom. I would think there would be no expectation of privacy in a room filled with students and a teacher. In a building with security cameras, in a state that has had schools actively monitoring the students even at home (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_School_District).

    35. Re:WTF?? by fodder69 · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "I’ve emailed her (the special education teacher) several times on this incident with other kids.”

      His mom was aware and had contacted the teacher about it.

    36. Re:WTF?? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      You can't secretly record someone using a tablet. A smartphone, yes.

    37. Re:WTF?? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Cool! What was the evidence, and what defence was offered? The only articles I can find was a statement that the transcript was obtained. The failure of any of the reporters to go into detail about what was said makes me suspicious of bias here.

    38. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a fool. Killing your schoolmate would also get you into serious trouble, at the time when your time is precious. Movies, comic books and novels conveniently end in moment of triumph, but in real life there is always an aftermath.

    39. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is that neither of the articles suggested that any other steps were taken to stop the bullying prior to committing the recording.

      Geez, you didn't read the article very well. The authorities were aware of it- It was going on right in front of the teacher, as shown in the recording: "as the teacher is heard attempting to help her son with a math problem, a student says, “You should pull his pants down!” Another student replies, “No, man. Imagine how bad that (c**t) smells! No one wants to smell that (t**t).” As the recording continues, the teacher instructs the classroom that they may only talk if it pertains to math."
      and
      "Love testified, “ I didn’t believe it (the bullying) was as bad as what it was. And when I heard the recording, I flipped out. He did not want me to say anything to anybody, but I wanted to be able to say something because what I heard was not right. It was not okay.”

      There's no suggestion that the boy told his mother about the bullying

      FTFA: "In his defense, the student testified as to why he made the recording. “I wanted her (Love) to understand what I went through. Like, it wasn’t like I was overexaggerating it. I wasn’t lying. It was really happening. I was really having things like books slammed upside my head. I wanted it to stop. I just felt like nothing was being done.” Love testified that she was aware of the bullying but, “I did not tell him to record. I did hear the recording. I’ve emailed her (the special education teacher) several times on this incident with other kids.”"

      there's no suggestion that the mother contacted the school about the bullying

      "I’ve emailed her (the special education teacher) several times on this incident with other kids"

      This situation, unlike many of the clear cases of necessity, had a long period of time over which to address the problem rather than requiring near immediate action such as to prevent someone from being injured or killed.

      Yes, the school DID have a long time to address the bullying problem. Another article (http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/5945781-74/fayette-south-district#axzz2z3ZQiAcV) says "Love, 40, an Air Force veteran, sent Christian's teacher several emails about his complaints between October and February, according to testimony from the hearing." October, November, December, January, February. 5 MONTHS the school had to rein in the bullies, and they failed to do so. And now it was getting physical: " “I really was having things like books slammed upside of my head.”" Sounds like it was escalating, and could very easily have resulted in him "being injured or killed" before long.

    40. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Necessity isn't even require here.... according to the article, this was recorded in his *class*, which is a Public School and therefore a "public" place.

      In-person conversations: It is unlawful to record an “oral communication,” which is defined as “any oral communication uttered by a person possessing an expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation” without first obtaining the consent of all parties engaged in the conversation. 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. 5702. Thus, a journalist does not need consent to record conversations in public where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy.

      ( http://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide/state-state-guide/pennsylvania )

    41. Re:WTF?? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 2

      15-year olds sociopaths. Bullies needs do be jailed for life, because they are simply unable to live in society. and if that is not enough, then they should be killed. And if that does not happen now, it will happen sooner or later when they become adults. Therefore it is better to kill then before they cause innocent victims.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    42. Re:WTF?? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      I would suspect that much bullying would legally qualify as assault. From Wikipedia:

      An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. [...] Assault in many US jurisdictions[which?] and Scotland is defined more broadly still as any intentional physical contact with another person without their consent.

      It's not completely clear from that article whether physical contact is instead of, or in addition to, a threat of violence. But either way a great deal of bullying would easily qualify.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    43. Re:WTF?? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      I'm going to play devil's advocate here because I read the article to see what event had transpired.

      Necessity typically requires three tests to be a valid defense, the defendent needs to be breaking the law to avoid a significant risk of harm, there were no adequate lawful means to address the situation, and the harm avoided was greater than the harm caused by breaking the law. The problem in this situation is the second one. The problem is that neither of the articles suggested that any other steps were taken to stop the bullying prior to committing the recording. That's the problem. There's no suggestion that the boy told his mother about the bullying, there's no suggestion that the mother contacted the school about the bullying before the recording was made.

      You really think telling his mother would have addressed the situation, in a way that would not increase the likelihood of the boy coming to harm? You've apparently never tangled with a bully; I can hear the aftermath already:

      "Aww, did the little pussy have to go cryin' to his mommy? Here, little pussy, I'll give you something to cry about!"

      Been there, done that, got the tshirt (which a bully subsequently destroyed).

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    44. Re:WTF?? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The problem is you've got to pay for the lawyer.

    45. Re:WTF?? by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Whether it's illegal depends on what the bullies specifically did.

    46. Re:WTF?? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      The other thing is that the Pennsylvania law also has an exception that states that you do not need to permission of someone who is committing a crime in the recording. That would not have applied in this case since not all of those being recorded were committing a crime

      Assault, conspiracy to commit assault, and accessory to assault very much are crimes.

      Just so you know, "assault" is legally defined as the threat of harm, not the actual commission of it; that would be "battery."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    47. Re:WTF?? by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's no suggestion that the boy told his mother about the bullying, there's no suggestion that the mother contacted the school about the bullying before the recording was made.

      The teacher is present on the recording as well. The authorities had 'been contacted', since they were directly witnessing the events. There's no additional onus to rub their noses in it. The idea that a teacher feels the words 'cunt' and 'twat' being used in her presence are acceptable is absurd.

    48. Re:WTF?? by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

      I've seen comments like this a couple of times now and I have an easy way to demonstrate that bullying was (and is) illegal. I believe Aus and US law are not too far apart on this - either the bully hits the bullied, or does not. If he does, he can be found guilty of battery. If not, he can be found guilty of assault, (if the bullied person feels his safety is at risk that's technically enough).

    49. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No truer statement has ever been made in the English language. All police are bullies. They need to bully so badly they work for crap wages just to get the opportunity. They can't help themselves. They're addicted to it.

    50. Re:WTF?? by Sabriel · · Score: 4, Informative

      WTF? Bullying _is_ against the law. You repeatedly intimidate and threaten me, causing me to fear for my safety? That's "assault". You trip me, making me drop my lunchbox? That's "battery". And so on. Just because you're a child and in a sane system you would be required to undergo counselling rather than also be facing fines/prison as adults might, or because in the farcical bizarro world of many schools that you get away with it, doesn't make what you're doing even remotely lawful.

      That officer who, instead of conducting a proper investigation into a potential serial harassment/assault/battery case, told the victim to delete the recording or be charged with felony wiretapping? That officer should be hauled up to explain why he shouldn't be charged with "destruction of evidence and obstruction of justice under colour of authority", which are federal crimes. And if it was done under orders from above? Add "conspiracy under colour of authority".

      But, of course, that's in a sane and rational justice system that actually contains justice, rather than the authoritarian sociopathic farce that is far too common.

      (note: exact wording of charges may/will differ depending on your jurisdiction / country of residence)

    51. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure it would fall under things like harassment and possibly others.

    52. Re:WTF?? by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 2

      Your interpretation of the actions of the police as incompetent are probably mistaken because of a failure to appreciate the true goals and motives of the police here.

      This story makes me pause and consider cui bono.

      It appears the mother went directly to the principal rather than the teacher. The recording and transcription also seems to cast the teacher in a poor light. So it would seem the initial complaint was as much against the ineffectiveness of the teacher as it was against the bullying itself. It seems the mother had discussed this issue with the teacher previously... repeatedly.

      Next, why in the world would the school administration involve the police at all? Do they truly have no ability to manage things at this school without this? No, it seems blatantly clear the goals and motives of the school administration immediately shifted to DAMAGE CONTROL. They never had any concern over the bullying issue itself. The teacher had a reputation to defend. The school was in an adversarial role from the beginning - fighting the complaint, not addressing it.

      So... why would the police allow themselves to be used in such a fashion? Because using antiquated wiretapping laws to prevent citizens from recording the actions of police is a rather favorite interest of the police these days. The police had no intention whatsoever from the very beginning to "address the problem" if by that you meant the bullying. They eagerly jumped on board here because they were handed, on a silver platter, a wonderful opportunity to make a loud example of someone to remind everyone they shouldn't DARE record the police. Failing back to disorderly conduct wasn't inept. It was entirely in line with their goals.

      Soo... what SHOULD they have done? I am sympathetic with the idea of tossing the video immediately into the Net. But other than the PR or novelty impact, how would this have changed anything vis-a-vis the Wiretapping charge or the actions of the school? I wonder what would have happened if instead, the mother asked for a meeting with the teacher and principal and sat down to discuss these issues, alluding to the transcript only if necessary. At the very least she might have gotten the principal to consider addressing the bullying issue by properly managing the teacher rather than running straight to the school's attorney.

    53. Re:WTF?? by naasking · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, bullying is not against the law, its against POLICY. Necessity is for breaking THE LAW. No law was broken so you can't take this route.

      Depends. Quite a bit of bullying is physical assault, and it's definitely harassment.

    54. Re:WTF?? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      No, you would not be arrested and charged for video taping someone stealing your car because you aren't recording a conversation.

      Hmmm, if the car thief said something to his accomplice, would that make the recording illegal, hence inadmissable in court?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    55. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can secretly record audio using a goddamn van if you have baggy enough pants.

    56. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Not everyone in the classroom took part in the activity which could be defined as assault, conspiracy to commit assault, or even accessory to assault. So, not everyone being recorded without their permission was committing a crime during the recording.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    57. Re:WTF?? by sribe · · Score: 1

      It's not completely clear from that article whether physical contact is instead of, or in addition to, a threat of violence. But either way a great deal of bullying would easily qualify.

      That was my thought, but lacking real details of the recorded encounter, I didn't quite go there. FYI, physical contact is separate from the threat of violence. In general physical contact elevates it to battery, thus the cliched "assault and battery" that's on every perp's rap sheet in every crime drama ;-)

    58. Re:WTF?? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound like something you'd need a good lawyer for, that sounds like something a law school student that had only been to half their classes should be able to bring up ...

    59. Re:WTF?? by sribe · · Score: 1

      I've seen comments like this a couple of times now and I have an easy way to demonstrate that bullying was (and is) illegal. I believe Aus and US law are not too far apart on this - either the bully hits the bullied, or does not. If he does, he can be found guilty of battery. If not, he can be found guilty of assault, (if the bullied person feels his safety is at risk that's technically enough).

      But that's a bit circular because it depends on your (perfectly reasonable) definition of "bullying" as involving a threat to safety. There are many forms of childhood cruelty which do not involve any threat of violence, yet are still referred to by many as bullying.

    60. Re:WTF?? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      So criminals can now just use some sign language in front of any video camera - a conversation will have been recorded and the police will instead of charging the criminals order a destruction of the evidence and charge the camera owner with a felony.

    61. Re:WTF?? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Bullying is frequently battery, virtually almost always assault, and practically by definition criminal harassment.

    62. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The principal told the boy to delete the recording, not the officer.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    63. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The school board and should all be dissmissed as the incompitant cretins they clearly are, the police officer should be dissmissed without pension etc AND charged with perverting the course of justice.
      As for the bullies they need a touch of what i have heard the police call street justice.

    64. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Unless the events of the recording showed an ongoing crime or admission of a past crime, that wouldn't affect the legitimacy of the recording itself. The recording legitimacy is based on what events had failed to occur that would justify it being done in the first place.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    65. Re:WTF?? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      That's what you get for using technology. Next time, use your fists.

    66. Re:WTF?? by LaughingVulcan · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how this is "wiretapping" - no *wires* were being tapped, this was a recording of a face to face conversation.

      Good. That means you can never dial me up, as I doubt your phone has a dial.

      You cannot mail me, because the post on the side of the road isn't there.

      And you must be jobless since you'll never be able to punch the clock.

    67. Re:WTF?? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, bullying is not against the law, its against POLICY. Necessity is for breaking THE LAW. No law was broken so you can't take this route.

      How about an imminent threat or personal danger? "Bullying" may not be against the law, but threats and assault are.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    68. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably being facetious here, but I have to chime in: It's referred to as a wiretapping law because it was written in response to wiretapping. Much like Megan's law or whatever doesn't only apply to people named Megan.

    69. Re:WTF?? by BobMcD · · Score: 2

      Don't move the goalposts. We're discussing the second test, per your setup:

      there were no adequate lawful means to address the situation

      The means were clearly inadequate, because there was a teacher in the room and yet the 'zero tolerance behavior' continued.

      The problem in this situation is the second one.

      Second test is now met. "Legitimacy" isn't even in the criteria you listed.

    70. Re:WTF?? by Yebyen · · Score: 1

      So, all I have to do to avoid being recorded while I beat the crap out of you, is to put some uninvolved innocents in the room with us and make sure they have a loud, unrelated conversation that you can't avoid recording at the same time I do it?

      Just what do you think is the definition of Accessory? If those people are paid not to consent to the recording, would you consider them accessories or conspirators, then? Are you saying the kid should have gone around the room and obtained consent forms from everyone who wasn't actively helping the bully commit his assaults, then done his recording?

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    71. Re:WTF?? by j-beda · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be honest, this story comes across as a bit sensational. Two minutes of research shows an *out* from the wire taping statute.

      Necessity is a defense, although quite tough to use in practice; it's a bit like successfully using an insanity defense -- possible, but highly unlikely. Also, the necessity description you provide is a general statement of the principle, not the language Pennsylvania has adopted. As a common law defense, the state courts adoption is what controls. Moreover, necessity isn't always a defense (even if you prove the elements) -- it depends upon how the statue is written.

      Turning to the OUT I mentioned above, there is an exception built right into the statue. Full text can be found here:
      http://www.legis.state.pa.us/c...

      In relevant part, the wiretapping statute provides:
      ---------

        5703 Provides "**Except** as otherwise provided in this chapter, a person is guilty of a felony of the third degree if he: (1) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, electronic or oral communication;"

        5704 Contains a long list of exceptions. For the most part they apply to police, telecom, or telemarketers (go figure). Subsection 17 is relevant here ...

        5704 (17) Any victim ... to intercept the contents of any wire, electronic or oral communication, if that person is under a reasonable suspicion that the intercepted party is committing, about to commit or has committed a crime of violence and there is reason to believe that evidence of the crime of violence may be obtained from the interception.

      If the bullying was as bad as the article describes, the student could surely have reasonable suspicion that the party was about to commit a crime of violence.

      You can read more about this here:
      http://www.phila-criminal-lawy...

      Good point!

    72. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Recording the bullies was NECESSARY in order to prove the bullying existed, so it could be dealt with.

      It wasn't dealt with, so how can you argue that it was necessary to record so that it can be dealt with? The school doesn't give a shit about bullying.

    73. Re:WTF?? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      what proof of wiretapping remained? ..and in case there was that, why not charge the bullies with assault, since it was then already on court records what he wiretapped?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    74. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      The police didn't force the destruction of evidence. It was the principal that told the student to delete the recording.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    75. Re:WTF?? by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      That happens. But what also happens is if they are appropriately punished they will think twice before doing anything to you again. Of course once oversight relaxes he/she will want to take revenge. I am afraid the only good solution is hitting them where it hurts so it diminishes their social standing amongst their sycophants.

    76. Re:WTF?? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      That's dark. I like it. 7 [i]billion [/i]people on the planet, a number of whom are just shit (as is evident in this story), we don't need them; they're part of the problem, not the solution. Some may change for the better eventually, but some never will.
      I'm just surprised that here on "capital punishment is wrong" slashdot, you're modded up to the max for suggesting 86'ing someone.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    77. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      The exception for recording illegal activities are narrow though. Typically it requires a reasonable assumption that a crime of violance was being committed, was about to be committed, or had been committed and it is reasonable that the recording in question would gain evidence of that crime of violence.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    78. Re:WTF?? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Not everyone in the classroom took part in the activity which could be defined as assault, conspiracy to commit assault, or even accessory to assault. So, not everyone being recorded without their permission was committing a crime during the recording.

      Failure to report a crime is a crime in itself.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    79. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      See, that is where you are misunderstanding my initial post(assuming that you actually bothered to follow the thread of conversation). The presence of those other, uninvolved persons changes the situation so that, according to previous court rulings, you no longer have any expectation of privacy. In which case, as the courts have ruled, I am allowed to record you to my heart's content, even if you are NOT committing any crimes. In any situation where those being recorded have no expectation of privacy, such as when they are in a room full of random individuals (say, a school classroom).
      Now, in the situation you described, there are all kinds of reasons why the recording would be legal. First, since you postulated that third-parties would be paid to not give consent, you are postulating that those present knew in advance that there would be a recording. Courts have repeatedly ruled that if you carry on a conversation which you know is being recorded, you are implicitly giving your consent to being recorded. Second, you are postulating that these people are being paid to cover-up your crime (being paid to not consent to being recorded is an attempt to prevent the acquisition of evidence to prove a crime is being committed), which is a crime.
      So, to re-iterate: the exception to the all-party consent law of recording criminal activity does not apply because not all of those present were committing a crime. However, the boy was not guilty of violating the wire-tap law because he was recording the conversation in a place where people do not, and should not, have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    80. Re:WTF?? by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

      No man. That is definitively not the victims fault. The administrator could have asked for a meeting with the teacher on his own initiative. The fact he did not bother is telling enough.

    81. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the parents could afford a good lawyer that is....

    82. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pennsylvania is a two-party consent state so both parties to the conversation must consent before a recording can be made.

      Since when is a bullying, which is effectivily a monologue, considered to be a conversation ?

      Somehow I do not understand the Law, and I get the feeling I never will ...

    83. Re:WTF?? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      This wasn't a conversation either. A conversation would imply two-way communication. This was not. This is just a recording of a disturbance in progress.

    84. Re:WTF?? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Does that count when one of the parties is committing a crime?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    85. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you dig a bit you will find it did get reduced to 'disturbing the peace'. Which can mean anything. The cop was following the time honored tradition of many small police departments. If I am here I am writing a ticket. His supervisor probably would 'yell at him' if he came back and no tickets were issued.

    86. Re:WTF?? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and supposedly this school has a zero tolerance policy towards bullying.

      Simple, they redefine bullying as meaning "anything that embarrasses the administration". Everything else is "kids will be kids".

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    87. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullying is protected speech unless it crosses the line to assault (have to actually hit them or make a specific threat of violence), and therefore the kid did not attempt to prevent a "crime".

    88. Re:WTF?? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and supposedly this school has a zero tolerance policy towards bullying.

      All that means is that their policy is to ignore bullying and pretend it doesn't exist, to do otherwise would admit a problem exists which tarnishes the public image of the school.
      It should read, "zero tolerance policy towards recognizing bullying".

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    89. Re:WTF?? by nctritech · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how ANYTHING should constitute wiretapping when there is no wire to tap.

    90. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to another article on this subject The student said "Like, I'd always go home or tell my mom that this is happening, but I don't actually have anything to show for it. So it was kind of like, basically my voice wasn't being heard and I wanted some help. So it wasn't, like, I — this wasn't just a one-time thing. This always happens every day in that class."

      The Student did try to report it, but felt ignored and helpless.

    91. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get for using technology. Next time, use your fists.

      It's not a matter of the tools and technology, it's how you use them. The bully has fists too, and is probably bigger and stronger than you. Probably has friends too.

      The goal should be asymmetrical warfare. What tools you use and how should keep that in mind.

    92. Re:WTF?? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      To the weak, others are strong.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    93. Re:WTF?? by litehacksaur111 · · Score: 2

      The kid would be bullied even more if his mom got involved. The teacher should have taken action and she did not. This IS a COMPLETE FAILURE BY THE SCHOOL

    94. Re:WTF?? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      um, they are a product of YOUR society.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    95. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      But they were not committing that crime during the recording. You seem to be overlooking the fact that there is another exception to the "all-party consent" law. That exception is that it ok to record a conversation which occurs where none of the parties to the conversation have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Such would be the case here.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    96. Re:WTF?? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, and No.

      Actually we really do live in a savage society where criminals rule, unfortunately... Horever, It never was and will never be an excuse for anyone to be a criminal.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    97. Re:WTF?? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      But they were not committing that crime during the recording.

      Sure they were - they were witnessing a crime in progress, and did nothing to stop or report it. Granted, this is in a fairly abstract sense, but we're discussing a case where the victim was forced to destroy evidence, then was prosecuted and convicted based on this now non-existent evidence. "Fairly abstract" seems to be the name of the game in PA's legal system.

      You seem to be overlooking the fact that there is another exception to the "all-party consent" law. That exception is that it ok to record a conversation which occurs where none of the parties to the conversation have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Such would be the case here.

      They're both accurate methods of verifying the legality of the recording, although I think your case would be the more reasonable of the two.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    98. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine Christian Stanfield has lost his self-esteem after being bullied in high school and his credibility would have been questioned if he didn't record the event. I think he did the right thing to record it. If going back in time, I had cool affordable mini-recording devices at my disposal, I would have done the same thing in order find some kind of justice in this situation.

      One should not push someone that has nothing to lose. I imagine violence in retaliation is not far-fetched as the next rational step for Christian. Violence is not the answer and should only be used as a last resort when put in a corner you can run out of. Nobody ever wins when there is violence because there are always consequences from that.

      I don't have all the solutions, but here is a suggestion for those ready to listen. Self-discipline in all aspects of life:
      -self-control of one's emotions/mental health. read the books: "Emotional Intelligence" and "Emotional Intelligence at work". Its shows you how to be assertive. It doesn't solve the bullying, but it certainly helps to know how to clearly express your unhappiness in a situation.
      -self-control of one's physical health: I'm no expert, but walking/biking/cycling/canoeing/running/pushups/situps every second day helps. Do anything that makes you sweat and helps you to redirect your emotional energies in a positive goal-achieving steps. Being physically fit certainly acts as a deterrent to those who might want to bully you. It's especially important to get the exercise part because otherwise all this bullying will poison your ability to concentrate on your schoolwork which is exactly what these bullies want to achieve. These bullies want to bully you so much that they hope you will abandon your school and studies. By simply staying in school and getting higher marks than they do, you win. By staying healthy and fit, you win because it will make your ability to concentrate on studying easier. When you accomplish your study goals, all your other goals start to fill in the pieces for the puzzle of life.
      -lastly, never forget to pray for a better future. It will come in handy in the hardest of situations throughout life.

    99. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that - does this mean if you hook up a camera to catch someone vandalizing your car then *you* are breaking the law?

      I was bullied at school and my only regret was that I didn't push that dickwad down the tower block stairs and impale them on a lead railing. It's okay, I don't have an anger problem.

    100. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This wasn't a conversation either. This was a kid yelling shit in random directions.

      A conversation is some form of exchange of verbal stuff. You know. I say stuff, you say stuff back that relates to said stuff - that's a conversation. If we're not clear on this then it's effectively illegal to record any audio at all because YOU'RE BOUND TO RECORD AT LEAST ONE OTHER PERSON IN THE ROOM THAT DOESN'T KNOW. Police now are just going for fines and in this case the bullied party was indeed easy prey for a fine. It's despicable, cowardly and extremely offensive. Now there's a court record the police aren't going to backtrack either...not even in the face of a public backlash. There's too much ego on the line now.

      Witness selective enforcement at its best. Your tax dollars at work folks!! Enjoy!

    101. Re:WTF?? by volvox_voxel · · Score: 1

      ..I think if you videotape your car getting stolen without the sound, it's completely admissible..

    102. Re:WTF?? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      OK, fancy-pants article-reader, 'splain me this:

      Why "wiretapping"? I'm not a legal expert (obviously); has the term "wiretap" come to also refer to live conversations?

    103. Re:WTF?? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      OK, down-thread somebody cited the actual law, and sure enough, it DOES include live conversation. Weird.

    104. Re:WTF?? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for that. I find it kind of odd that "wiretapping" has come to refer to live conversations. Though for that matter, I find it kind of odd that it extends even to the two parties a phone call; yes, there's a wire, but both are speaking voluntarily, and the term "wiretapping" was coined to refer to a third party listening in.

      I know that people have an idea that there's some kind of privacy even in public: you want to be able to do stuff with other people around but not be remembered. I find that expectation kind of odd; cameras and recording devices are older than anybody alive and we've all grown up with it. So people are apparently trying to legislate a forgetfulness, but I suspect that expectation is gradually going to change.

    105. Re:WTF?? by esten · · Score: 2

      Pennsylvania's wiretapping laws does not cover oral communications when the speakers do not have an "expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation."

      So this is just an abusive school district and local police department along with a Magistrate.

    106. Re:WTF?? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      The police didn't force the destruction of evidence. It was the principal that told the student to delete the recording.

      You know, to a highschool student, I'm not sure there's a whole lot of difference.

      Because when the principal, the administrators, the teachers, and the cops are all standing around telling you that you must delete it or face consequences ... which entity is it which is forcing you to delete it?

      And since the police then subsequently charged him with something, pretending like they didn't play a role in this farce is pretty naive.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    107. Re:WTF?? by Yebyen · · Score: 1

      I think you spent too long arguing against your own point, then. That was not what I took away from your first two posts, at all.

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    108. Re:WTF?? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      there was no 'judge'. an uninformed administrator and some cops who didn't remember the nuances of the law made the student destroy the recording.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    109. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      You may want to read the article again. The police officer contacted the DA thinking that the charge should be felony illegal wiretapping, but decided to only charge the boy with disorderly conduct. This went before a judge who found the boy guilty of misdemeanor disorderly conduct.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    110. Re:WTF?? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps you should have read my very first sentence. The one where I listed the reason the charges should have been dismissed and then in my second sentence where I stated I had a problem with the judge ruling that the students and teacher DID have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    111. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I'm not moving any goalposts. Sequence of events matter. Necessity is there to justify knowingly breaking the law which means necessity needs to be present at the moment you break the law. The law was broken the moment the recording was started. You could possibly use the contents of an illegal recording, in combination with other evidence, to show necessity but the contents of the illegal recording itself should not be sufficient to prove necessity because the only events you have that could support necessity were provided after the law was broken which means you dive into circular logic to support breaking the law. So records showing that either the boy or mother had contacted the school about the problem (email alone may not be sufficient without correspondance) would be a step to show that lawful means had been exhausted prior to a recording being made. However if you get into a match of he said she said and there's no evidence one way or another the boy and mother would probably be up shit creek if trying to claim necessity. This isn't a desirable option anyway since necessity is a defense like self-defense. You have to go to trial and prove it.

      It would probably be far easier to get the recording labeled as legal under one of the exemptions to the recording law. You just would need to show that the contents demonstrate a threat of physical force and that it was reasonable that the recording would capture evidence of that threat. Of course, that could be tricky too because if that recording was the first time it had been occurring inside a classroom it may not have been reasonable to assume that the threats would have occurred there.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    112. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      To answer your question. The transcript written by the mother. The conversation between the mother and principal. The admission by the boy.

      I was mostly correcting that it was the principal and not the police officer that told the boy to delete it so I'm not sure what your question has to do with my comment. I'm no fan of corrupt policy but the person I responded to was making highly inaccurate accusations.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    113. Re:WTF?? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      As I read it battery involves physical violence, whereas "unwanted physical contact" could be interpreted to also involve anything from an ass-slap to grabbing your bag.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    114. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Semi-good point. There's two conditions that need to be satisfied. The first condition is that there is reasonable suspicion that the bullies are committing, are about to commit, or have committed a violent crime. This one is undoubtedly met. The second condition is that there is reason to believe that the recording will show evidence of the crime from the first condition. This second condition is the one that causes trouble because recording a crime is not by itself sufficient to make the recording exempt. So you would need to show evidence that there was reason to believe that a crime would be captured by the recording. If, for example, the boy was bullied by members of his class but it was only done in hallways or after school with no history of it being done in the classroom then it would be difficult, I would think, to say that recording in the classroom was reasonable.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    115. Re:WTF?? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Because using antiquated wiretapping laws to prevent citizens from recording the actions of police is a rather favorite interest of the police these days

      Motive to be corrupt, sure. But wiretapping laws aren't really antiquated, just shouldn't be applicable. The recording took place in a public school where there is no expectation of privacy. Even in a private run-in with police, they are public servants and working in their official capacity, and almost everything they do ends up in the public record. A recording of police at work should be no different.

    116. Re:WTF?? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      In their opinion, it wasn't destruction of evidence - since it wasn't valid evidence (fruit of the poisoned tree). But they aren't judges, and they really can't make that call. Too bad the judges made the wrong call too - a recording at a public school is public, not private.

    117. Re:WTF?? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      does not apply because not all of those present were committing a crime

      I don't know... Being complicit in the face of something like this and doing nothing about it - especially the teacher, should be considered accessory to assault. Maybe not legally, but logically.

    118. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? Is being bullied a conversation? I don't think it qualifies. If you're being taunted, name-called, harassed, threatened, etc., is that a conversation? Or is it verbal assault?

    119. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Yes, most two-party consent (and even one-party consent) states will have an exemption regarding criminal behavior but most of them don't suddenly make the recording legal if it happens to have evidence of a crime on it. If you look at Pennsylvania's they require that you had a reasonable suspicion that the person being recorded has committed, is committing, or will commit a violent crime and that it is reasonable to believe that the recording will capture evidence of the crime in question.

      So if you're walking around recording and it incidentally shows evidence of a crime, it would fail the first part. If you have reasonable suspicion but it's not reasonable to assume the recording would show evidence then it would fail the second part.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    120. Re:WTF?? by Talderas · · Score: 1

      The principal telling the boy to delete it occurred before the officer showed up.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    121. Re:WTF?? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      So, kid gathers evidence of bullying by other kids, gets charged?

      Yup

      So, if I take a video of someone stealing my car, would I get arrested?

      Yup

      Under what circumstances could I do that and not be charged?

      None

      WTF doesn't gathering evidence of bullying get an exemption from wiretap laws?

      Nope

      Whatever law enforcement and officers of the court were involved in this are total morons. This makes no sense at all.

      Consider yourself under arrest for obstruction of justice for asking so many questions and showing lack of respect for Law Enforcement.

    122. Re:WTF?? by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Thankyou for the correction (sigh, I should know by now not to expect slashdot summaries to get such "minor" details correct).

      _However_ (now that I've read the article and followup articles including court quotes) that means it would be the principal and the other school officials involved who would be risking destruction and obstruction charges, and the officer still isn't blameless either. I mean, if I'm reading the articles correctly, this appears to be how it went down:

      police: "oh hi I've been informed there was a potential felony wiretapping"
      school: "I ordered the kid to delete it"
      police: "you ordered destruction of evidence of a felony?"
      school: "uh... but hey the kid was upsetting us by recording the bullying we were ignoring"
      police: "oh that's alright then, I'll charge him with disorderly conduct"
      prosecution: "sounds legit"
      judge: "sounds legit"

      Seriously, again, WTF?

      Don't know about Pennsylvania, but in my state the school, police, prosecution and judge would all be guilty of the felony of "attempting to pervert justice".

    123. Re:WTF?? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The lawful means to address the issue is to tell a teacher. The recording itself showed that the teacher already knew and was entirely ineffective in dealing with the problem (even to the point you could argue that the teacher was being bullied a bit).

      I sincerely doubt that could be the very first time a teacher or administrator saw the problem.

    124. Re:WTF?? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Then the principal should be charged with evidence tampering and perp walked out to the waiting squad car between classes to maximize visibility.

    125. Re:WTF?? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Which is deeply ironic considering the kid that showed the teacher up and slammed a book down was NOT charged with disorderly conduct.

    126. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like the kid was also bullied by the police officer when he made the kid delete the recording. He had a right to have that recording according to the law but the officer imposed his will without a court of justice to determine the facts.

    127. Re:WTF?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reason enough to end the life of bullies early on. Killing a policeman can really get you into trouble.

      They deserve to DIE. They think they are above everyone.

      NO THEY ARE NOT. Damned bullies. Go to hell.

  4. Must have made some football players look bad by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Judging by how past actions of Pennsylvania HS football players were judged, this is not surprising. Compared to letting them get away with rape, this is downright reasonable.

    1. Re:Must have made some football players look bad by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you meant the Steubenville High School football players. Steubenville is actually in Ohio.

    2. Re:Must have made some football players look bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but Penn State is in Pennsylvania. Looks like school administrators really like protecting scumbags there.

    3. Re:Must have made some football players look bad by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      Leave out "HS", and it apparently applies in both PA and Ohio.

    4. Re:Must have made some football players look bad by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      True, but Stubenville is effectively a suburb of Pittsburgh. (I think the rape thing stopped those idiotic "burb of the burgh" commercials they used to run all of the time on local tv.)

      Either way, the entire region (w PA, WV, e OH) puts high school sports, especially football, on some sort of altar that the local government and police assholes worship.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  5. Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What did his mother expect from the school as a reaction? Siding with the victim of bullying? Seriously? Allow me to give you a brief rundown of how school deal with bullying.

    What a school wants is "peace". They want pupils to shut up and not cause a problem. Especially not a disciplinary one. So how do they deal with bullying? Well, easy: Not at all. Because it is not a school's problem. The bully has his victim, is satisfied and will not cause any other problem towards the school, its property or its faculty. The victim is being pushed and punched.

    Now when does the school run into a problem in this scenario? Right. When the victim does not want to play his role anymore. That is when the school runs into a problem. Because now they have to do something. Until that moment, there was no reason for a reaction. A pacified bully is no problem, and a victim that lets the bully kick him is none either. The very LAST thing the school wants is to be forced to take action against the bully. Because then not only does it draw attention to the bullying problem, it puts a very unhappy bully at their hands, someone who knows how to cause trouble if he wants to, who may or may not be even supported in his actions by his parents.

    The school's reaction is a logical one: The victim upset the apple cart. He created a problem for the school. What the school wants is him to shut the fuck up again and swallow the punches.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Quite logical reaction by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      and now they may have a civil rights issue on there hands. I think that when that cop was talking to him they some how passover his right to an attorney

    2. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was training for when he gets out of school. When you have a co-worker who is dumping his work on you don't go to management! They actually told us that if a co-worker is goofing off cover up for them so management looks good!

    3. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my memory of the early 90's that sounds astoundingly familiar. In that case it was plain old apathy rather than fear of drawing attention to the bullying problem or fear of upsetting the bully though.

    4. Re:Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      The difference is that if you notice that, you can quit your job and get the hell out of there. No such luck as a student. You can't simply quit school without severe problems. Depending on the town you're in you might have no choice but either go to THAT school or drop out.

      And even in the worst areas it's not like you HAVE to work for that single crappy employer or live on the street.

      That's the stress being put on our youth today. Anyone still wondering why from time to time one of them grabs a gun and redecorates his school?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Of course they play along. It's just so win-win, it's convenient AND makes the school look good to not do anything about the bullying problem. Because until you deal with it, the only one who has a problem with it is the one bullied.

      That's also why YOU will get into trouble if you dared to fight back against the bully. Because 'til you did, everything was in order. The bully was happy and docile since he had his punching bag, you were quiet and nobody had to do anything. If you fight back, the bully might go to his parents and they might cause a stink.

      Ever noticed how bullies are also the first to squeal?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best response is to hire a giant beefed up security guard to be with the kid all the time.

    7. Re:Quite logical reaction by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      This is dead on, I had the same experience.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    8. Re:Quite logical reaction by jythie · · Score: 2

      When a school is involved, minor's rights are generally suspended.

    9. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately, opportunist, i think you are w-a-y more right than wrong in your analysis...
      that is more or less the expectation of society as a whole, so hardly surprising that it is writ small in our schools...
      its all about getting us ALL compliant and obedient; 'learning' is besides the point (if not 'dangerous')...
      the nail that sticks up for itself must be hammered down ! ! !

    10. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -SNIP-

      And now by ignoring said problem, the school has created a bigger legal program with the possibility of a police visit, never good for the school's reputation.

    11. Re:Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Really? How so? Because it's a foot note in a blog?

      Pffft. In a week, nobody talks about it anymore.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      A school is like a mushroom farm. You're being kept in the dark and you're fed shit, and as soon as some bright little head shows itself, it gets chopped off.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Quite logical reaction by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Reminds me of a story how I read on how one girl "solved" her bullying problem, they'd raised the issue several times with the school to no effect. Dad finally has enough, teaches her to fight. She grabs the head of the lead bully and slams it on her knee, broken nose, blood everywhere. School threatens to expel her, her dad threatens to sue the shit out of them for everything she's been through. Like the good cowards they are, the school backs down and manages to convinces the bully's parents not to press charges either. She's now forever known as that crazy kid, but nobody's messing with her anymore. It's sad but school is mostly a lawless territory where violence is often the last and only means to defend yourself.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Quite logical reaction by fermion · · Score: 2

      The interactions between children are not the same as the interaction between adults. Even in high school there is judgement call. If we are honest, we admit that there are these kids running around being aggressively annoying and the solution is not only to punish the bully, but to teach the person who is being bullied how to act in civilized society. This is probably not what happened here, but the point is we don't have all the facts. It could be that it is a simple case of group aggression against a individual perceived as not having the power to stop it. The fact that the school felt they needed to protect the bullies speaks to the possibility that this was some sort of group with status and they were showing that status by bullying. That said, bullying, especially at the high school level, is not going to be solved by inspirational PR campaigns. It is going to be solved by identify bullying as a precursor to future criminal behavior and treating it as such. Right now aggressive behavior, especially in boys, is seen as something to be cultivated. The physically strong who are willing to use their strength for evil are considered superior to those who are actually creating things and making the world a better place. As long as those who go to class and learn to be productive and informed citizens are seen as inferior to those who are merely willing to do anything to show strength, nothing will be solved.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    15. Re:Quite logical reaction by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 0

      It's the same thing I would do. If my child was being abused, I would go to school. I then would break the spine of the bully, and his father complained, I also send him to the hospital. It is the only language bullies understand.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    16. Re:Quite logical reaction by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      What did his mother expect from the school as a reaction? Siding with the victim of bullying? Seriously? Allow me to give you a brief rundown of how school deal with bullying.

      What a school wants is "peace". They want pupils to shut up and not cause a problem. Especially not a disciplinary one. So how do they deal with bullying? Well, easy: Not at all. Because it is not a school's problem. The bully has his victim, is satisfied and will not cause any other problem towards the school, its property or its faculty. The victim is being pushed and punched.

      Now when does the school run into a problem in this scenario? Right. When the victim does not want to play his role anymore. That is when the school runs into a problem. Because now they have to do something. Until that moment, there was no reason for a reaction. A pacified bully is no problem, and a victim that lets the bully kick him is none either. The very LAST thing the school wants is to be forced to take action against the bully. Because then not only does it draw attention to the bullying problem, it puts a very unhappy bully at their hands, someone who knows how to cause trouble if he wants to, who may or may not be even supported in his actions by his parents.

      The school's reaction is a logical one: The victim upset the apple cart. He created a problem for the school. What the school wants is him to shut the fuck up again and swallow the punches.

      Why does this explanation make me think of US foreign policy?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    17. Re:Quite logical reaction by Nimey · · Score: 0

      Internet Tough Guy detected. You wouldn't do any of those things, cupcake, you're just a talker.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    18. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty much it.

      Your options are for the most part to tolerate the bullying or become the karate kid. The school's policy is going to be a blanket "suspend/expell them all and let god sort it out" when faced with any sort of bullying/fighting as they can'r be bothered to determine who the aggressor was.

    19. Re:Quite logical reaction by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      And before social media and enhanced coverage of school issues... this was the standard operating procedure. School administrators will only do the right thing when shamed into it. Until then, cover up and deny everything.

      I am wondering why more kids do not go into "break the nose of everyone that looks at me" mode. The old "stand up to the bullies, they will cower away" simply does not work when they know they have the back of the administration.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    20. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do what you have to, and in the face of the cowards, indeed. Sue, advertise the problem, make a HUGE amount of noise over it.

    21. Re:Quite logical reaction by j-beda · · Score: 1

      Best response is to hire a giant beefed up security guard to be with the kid all the time.

      They made a film about that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    22. Re:Quite logical reaction by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      In fact I really do not need to do anything like that, asshole... Because I made the decision long ago of not to have children in this shithole that you call world. But if I ever change my mind, you can be sure that I will defend them at any cost.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    23. Re:Quite logical reaction by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      yeah. the supreme court said you can even strip search a 13 year old girl for Advil. So I guess it's anything goes. It's a wonder there aren't *more* psychopath principals.

    24. Re:Quite logical reaction by Cederic · · Score: 1

      For the record, only cunts use the term 'cupcake' when talking to people over the internet.

    25. Re:Quite logical reaction by Nimey · · Score: 0

      Sure you would, tough guy.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    26. Re:Quite logical reaction by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      What is your problem with that, uh? Maybe you do not liked because you are just one of these bullies who deserve do die in very gruesome ways? I will defend my relatives by any means necessary, and if you do not like, suck it

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    27. Re:Quite logical reaction by Nimey · · Score: 0

      Oh my. You really have no idea how hilarious your posturing is, do you?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    28. Re:Quite logical reaction by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      A former landlady told me something similar. Her daughter was being harassed at school, and the administration would do nothing. So she tells her daughter to fight back. Pushes the assailant down some stairs (!) and after a brief hue and cry, everyone lives happily ever after.

    29. Re:Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Because the US is the bully of the international schoolyard. But that's besides the scope of this thread.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    30. Re:Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually it's a wonder there's not more kids deciding the only way out is to eliminate those that bully them, both teachers and other students.

      Because there is precious little recourse a kid has in this scenario:

      1. He cannot escape. He can't simply avoid going to school because he is being forced to do so.
      2. He cannot avoid them. He cannot not cross their path. He can't put space between his tormentors and himself because he has to go to his classes.
      3. He has no way to get aid. Anyone who could come to his aid has an interest in not aiding him.

      The only logical choices are to endure it or to put an end to the situation. And the way for that is to end the life of those bullying him. It's actually very reasonable, considering the lack of other options...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    31. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that in 6th grade, but I just decked the kid with a round house for kicking me 3 times in the shins (nothing broken but his ego and a black eye). Teacher standing there did nothing, even when I asked her to make him stop kicking me. So I decked him. When I told my Dad, he had a short conversation with the Principal, and suggested that if they revoked my suspension he would not file charges against the teacher, principal, and school for knowingly creating an unsafe environment. He said the Principal did not exactly know what to say when my Dad asked him if his employment agreement covered legal costs extending from failure to perform his job. Problem solved! I got two days vacation and my record was expunged. Good thing Dad was mean son of a bitch who knew how to play the game.

    32. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long ago was this? Pretty sure this gets you immediately arrested and tossed into a tiny cell in our current police state.

    33. Re:Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Pot, meet kettle...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    34. Re:Quite logical reaction by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, "becoming the karate kid" can be just as bad if not worse. Because then HE is the bad guy. Everything was fine while the bully beat him up, the bully was happy and he was the punching bag, now suddenly there is a bully that was beaten up with parents that cause a shitstorm. And all because that punching bag had to fight back.

      That simply isn't done, ya know? You disturbed the peace of your school!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    35. Re:Quite logical reaction by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Says the Internet Tough Guy who'd apparently like to shoot up a school to prove something, yeah. Fuck off.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    36. Re:Quite logical reaction by gonnagetya · · Score: 1

      Shithole? You mean the United States? The rest of the world has bullying issues in schools of course, but no-where near as horrific as in the US with their zero-tolerance approach making bulling virtually impossible to deal with. I promise you it's nowhere near as bad elsewhere.

      Plus, it's your world as much as it is anyone elses. Keep in mind that the news always reports bad news in dominance, so perhaps you should stay away from most news sites/TV/radio for a while so that you can realign your views of the world in a more balanced way. The world has plenty of great, positive things about it. Being addicted to the news would definitely ruin you without balance though.

    37. Re:Quite logical reaction by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, that's nasty. My experience is vastly different.

      On my high school equivalent we had a bully in our class. When the teacher realized he didn't get a grip on the situation on his own we got a surprise visit from the principal who chewed out the bully in front of the class, gave him a somewhat humiliating (but not actually insulting) punishment next recess and promised he'd be back if the bully didn't straighten up. The bully did.

      In this case the school was more concerned about its stellar reputation being sullied by bullies running around unchecked. Then again the school has a thousand-year history and used to be a high-class school for much of it so it might not be very representative...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    38. Re:Quite logical reaction by sjames · · Score: 1

      But in the real world, you put a huge overdose of ex-lax in his coffee.

      When he gets back to work, hint that next time it will be d-con. ;-)

    39. Re:Quite logical reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go away troll, you absolutely have nothing useful to bring to the table.

    40. Re:Quite logical reaction by replicacobra · · Score: 1

      Schools are required to act in good faith in loco parentis, but IMHO and possibly legally they're required to bring the parents in when police and charges become involved.

  6. sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a very strong reason why we won't be sending our child to public schools.

    They are not places of learning. They are prison systems for children in which the biggest bully rules.

    I would not be surprised if there were a strong correlation between the freedom of bullies and test scores. Why should anyone care about school when it's absolute torture going? How can they learn when it's all about emotional and sometimes physical torture?

    1. Re:sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And therefore never learn about finding a place in a hostile hierarchy. Because life is filled with environments where you don't have to fight for social acceptance. Not.

    2. Re:sickening by TheP4st · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And a very strong reason why we won't be sending our child to public schools.

      Do you really think that just because a school is private bullying automagically will cease to happen? Allow me to burst that bubble for you.

      A private school for children of Sweden's wealthy elite has been shut down following accusations that boys were burned with hot irons by older pupils.
      The latest allegations about severe bullying at Lundsberg boarding school emerged at the weekend after one of the boys was taken to hospital and the police were informed. Nine boys were involved in the assault, police said.
      Following a visit to the school in rural Värmland, in south-west Sweden, inspectors announced its immediate closure until measures are taken to prevent abuse.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    3. Re:sickening by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      If you want your kid to learn to stand up for himself, would you pay a couple of other kids to beat him up until he finds the nerve to punch back, or would you send him to a self defence class? The first is likely to end in physical or psychological trauma, the second more likely to instil confidence as well as help keep potential bullies off his back.

      What schools like these are doing is teaching him that his place in the hierarchy is being the classroom punching bag, and that he will be punished if he fights back or complains. Yes, life can be like that too, but only if you let it. School should be teaching him how to deal with such issues, not forcing him to suck it up.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:sickening by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      Unreal. I would be watching a few people permanently disappear if that were my child.

    5. Re:sickening by lonOtter · · Score: 1

      Yes, because locking someone up in an artificial environment with others their own age is the best way to teach people about the real world. Schools do not educate; they indoctrinate.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    6. Re:sickening by crakbone · · Score: 1

      No but a parent will have more control of how their child is treated. In a private school if a parent shows a recording of their child being bullied the principal will work to correct the issue or the child will move to another private school and he will lose income. If not this child the next one the bully goes after will leave. In a public school the principal does not have to worry about income as it is given to the school every year from taxes. He just has to worry about not spending it all or his budget will get cut back. The parent has no control.

    7. Re:sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With no alternative proposed, all you are doing is bitching. I went to a private school and I can tell you that they are no better.

    8. Re:sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the second will get your child classified as a dangerous offender, any attempt at using said self defense suddenly being "excessive force" (any force beyond taking it up the rear or to the face is excessive when defending yourself from a bullying) that will land him in hot water as surely as if he had strangled an old lady at Wal-Mart.

      Do not teach a bullying victim to defend himself in any official, recognized capacity. Teach him some dirty fighting, how to get a pen or pencil into vital organs, and the words "I was afraid, I was just trying to push him away before he put his penis in me again". Then maybe yours won't have a record for assault.

    9. Re:sickening by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2

      And a very strong reason why we won't be sending our child to public schools.

      They are not places of learning. They are prison systems for children in which the biggest bully rules.

      I would not be surprised if there were a strong correlation between the freedom of bullies and test scores. Why should anyone care about school when it's absolute torture going? How can they learn when it's all about emotional and sometimes physical torture?

      Meh, I went to a white-bread private school and I still got bullied. In white-bread private school, your bully's father is a multi-millionaire who gives a lot of money to the school, above and beyond tuition. Ever deal with entitled, spoiled rich kid bullies? They're a lot of fun. And you can't get the school to do anything about it because they want daddy's money. Don't kid yourself. Bullies come in all shapes and sizes and socio-economic classes. Wealth and privilege only make it worse.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    10. Re:sickening by lonOtter · · Score: 1

      Why must I propose an alternative? Identifying a problem or eliminating a proposed solution are important all on their own. In this case, I merely attempted to debunk the claim that they'll never learn about finding a place in a "hostile hierarchy" without a school.

      And when did I say that private schools are any better? I didn't.

      Self-education or homeschooling are what I suggest, if at all possible.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    11. Re:sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a very strong reason why we won't be sending our child to public schools.

      Do you really think that just because a school is private bullying automagically will cease to happen?

      Do you really think that private school is the only alternative to public school?

    12. Re:sickening by koreanbabykilla · · Score: 1

      He did say they wouldn't go to public schools. He did NOT say they would be going to a private school. I am 100% sure my son would be bullied due to being a really smart geek at the public high school. He does not go to a private school. He attends a charter school that is full of nerds. I am positive he has not been bullied there. Perhaps the OP has another option such as this in mind?

    13. Re:sickening by toonces33 · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. Some kids aren't athletic, might not be all that coordinated, and might not have much of an interest in sports. And for that matter, some of them might not be inclined towards violence unless they are repeatedly provoked. In some (many?) cases the bullies are the athletes so they already have the physical advantage over the victims.

      But to force the kid to learn self defense or to try and toughen them up by forcing them to play some sport they might not like doesn't sound like a good plan.

    14. Re:sickening by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      Please tell us what is done at that school to successfully stop/prevent the bullying that seem to occur everywhere else where there's more than a handful of kids or teens spending most of their time together outside of their from home.
      Just because you are positive that your kid isn't bullied doesn't mean he isn't, hopefully you are right, but if so how can you be certain that with him being a smart kid with plenty of equally smart and nerdy friends he isn't bullying one of the less bright ones?

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    15. Re:sickening by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that private school is the only alternative to public school?

      No. But I know that whenever you have more than 1 child spending significant part of their time together bullying will occur. A lot can be done to limit the extent and severity of it but beyond keeping kids completely separated from other kids until they reach adulthood (as complete social disasters) nothing can be done to completely eliminate bullying. Even then there is no guarantee as there are cases of adult bullying kids, something I experienced between the ages of 9-12 when my teacher had me singled out as outlet for his personal failures.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    16. Re:sickening by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have my kids use "excessive force" than endure bullying. I can help them with the former. It's way harder with the latter.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:sickening by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The alternative proposal would be that schools be held responsible for bullying. Simple as that. Only if looking away gets more costly and inconvenient than interfering a school will do it.

      Right now, the best thing a school can do, from the school's point of view, is letting the bullies rule the school yard. It only has advantages for the school. Bullies are usually potential troublemakers. They are the kind of people who would get into trouble if the chance presents itself. Allowing bullies to beat up weaker kids gives the bullies and outlet for their aggression so they won't take it out on, say, school property or other property around school that might reflect badly on the school, and bullies honor that "silent agreement". After all, they get what they want, they get to beat up someone with impunity, so they don't have too much of a problem to play along the "rules".

      That is a very favorable situation for the school because they don't have to deal with the bully problem. It does create a lot of really messed up kids, some of whom will spend a lot of time and money during their adult years in therapy to get over the trauma. Or it might end in a sad report about yet another kid who couldn't take it anymore taking a gun and revenge instead.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:sickening by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Notice however that the authorities took immediate preventive action. Not CYA see no evil type bullshit.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    19. Re:sickening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a very strong reason why we won't be sending our child to public schools.

      How naive are you that you think bullying only occurs in public schools? How about you turn off Faux News and actually take part in the society in which you live, and work to make your local school better for your children's and everyone else's children's sake, rather than only being concerned with your own "precious little angel" who you can afford to send off to a private, for-profit school thanks to having more money than those around you. Selfish fucks like you are the reason why society is so fucked these days.

  7. So while all of this was happening by Renozuken · · Score: 2

    A police officer makes him delete his recording, he then gets in trouble for the recording, then he was forced to testify and then was found guilty, and through all of that no one thought to ask the what the fuck they were doing. The problem with this is if he went to the principal and said they were bullying him he would have passed it off like nothing ever happened. You are told in school to tell an adult when something happens and when you do they don't ever do anything about it, but when the kid gets proof that he is being bullied he gets in trouble and they don't get punished at all(and they probably beat him up for telling on them). And everyone involved just says they were only doing their job.

    1. Re:So while all of this was happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a small town, never go to the police unless you know why they're on your side. A shiv would have worked better. Remember, disarming people is to keep the strong in power.

    2. Re:So while all of this was happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with this is if he went to the principal and said they were bullying him he would have passed it off like nothing ever happened.

      Two things:

      1. Boys will be boys.
      2. The abused should learn how to defend himself. Send him to a karate class.

      I am being facetious, of course. But those two things were the attitude of the authorities back in my day. And of course, it doesn't matter if the victim was abused, because the bully/bullies can always just lie and say that the victim "hit him first." And then it's a "he said/he said" situation, which cancels out. See how that works?

      I am so glad I punched my neighborhood bully in the face. He never messed with me after that, and he got beat up by other kids for it because I was smaller than him and he was considered a coward. Which he was.

    3. Re:So while all of this was happening by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      2. The abused should learn how to defend himself. Send him to a karate class.

      Bullies either have advantage in numbers, or they're very, very good at playing victim once they encounter any kind of "defense".

      Basically, the victim has three options:

      1. Suck it up. Leads to all kinds of physical and mental scars.

      2. Report it to the proper authorities. Victim gets punished. Bullying does not stop.

      3. Defend themselves. Victim gets punished by authorities. Bullies resume bullying.

    4. Re:So while all of this was happening by jythie · · Score: 1

      Let us not forget the 3rd common thing authorities bring up, "well, you are acting XYZ so it is your own fault".

    5. Re:So while all of this was happening by redcaboodle · · Score: 1

      You got 2 & 3 wrong: Bullies will see that authority punishes victim, learn that their behaviour must be right and the victim is actually the guilty party, whatever they do. Bullying will actually spread as other people join in on this clearly positive activity.

      And yes - even if the victim is physically injured in fron of authority with the injuring party loudly declaring they did it on purpose - the victim will be laughed at and then punished by authority for being injured.

      Humans are social pack animals and creating a pariah and treating him/her properly is part of pack behaviour. Suck it up.

      What I have always found odd is that while it is perfectly acceptable and even praiseworthy to make someone wish they were not existent, it is very reprehensible and egoistic for that person to actually terminate their existence. I've asked for explanation but the only one I got is that it makes the bullies feel bad.

      --
      -- Put crudely, the world is an extremely large problem instance. (Russel/Norvig Artificial Intelligence)
    6. Re:So while all of this was happening by fnj · · Score: 2

      Remember, disarming people is to keep the strong in power.

      Of course. That's because you CAN'T disarm "people". Only a moron thinks you can. All you can do is disarm the MEEK people. The PREDATORS will find a way to arm themselves. You fools out there, try to think. I know it's hard, but try. The police are not there to protect people. They are there to protect the State. The "protect and serve" is just fascist window dressing.

    7. Re:So while all of this was happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also
      4. Finally explode and take out a few dozen other students in the process. Bullying resumes elsewhere, as well as in jail for the victim that finally lashed out.

    8. Re:So while all of this was happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good pariahs are hard to find. When they run away, you have to find/make a whole new one.
      That new one might have been someone you or a friend/kin actually liked.
      That suicidal bastard's trying to ruin your relationships.

    9. Re:So while all of this was happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it doesn't make the bullies feel bad. It makes them feel better. Now they know for certain they were bullying a crazy, worthless person because that person also decided the world was better off without them. A victim committing suicide validates the bullying.

    10. Re:So while all of this was happening by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Let us not forget the 3rd common thing authorities bring up, "well, you are acting XYZ so it is your own fault".

      I think the new way of saying that is, "well, you're just so pick-on-able."

      A phrase which sets off every "that guy's a sociopath" alarm in my brain.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    11. Re:So while all of this was happening by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between an asshole and a sociopath.

      Bullies are assholes. They are selfish pricks who enjoy ruining things around them.

      "Sociopaths" (to use the term loosely) are people who are not as inhibited by emotions. A lack of empathy is not the same thing as a preference for injuring others. Not to mention, being able to control your emotions and behave purely rationally can be a very good(tm) thing, if the person accepts helping others as rational.

      I believe there are more assholes in the world than sociopaths. However, it is the presence of sociopaths that puts a limit on assholes. Bully a regular person and you will probably get away with it; bully a sociopath and it might be the last thing you do.

    12. Re:So while all of this was happening by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      A person that rationalizes the abuse of another by blaming the victim pretty much is the definition of a sociopath, by your own reasoning - lack of emotional inhibition.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    13. Re:So while all of this was happening by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      4. Figure out why you're a target and change it.

      This option works the best, but you have to have some intelligence and the ability to listen to the truth about yourself.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    14. Re:So while all of this was happening by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Ah, that's only because you're weak and broken.

      It's interesting that when you get fixed, you feel the same way. Broken people are so cute and funny when they catastrophically over-react to the weight of a fly landing on them. It's very hard not to push their buttons. Like putting a newborn kitten on something slippery, it's just too cute to see the undeveloped struggle with trivialities.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    15. Re:So while all of this was happening by Ihlosi · · Score: 2
      4. Figure out why you're a target and change it.

      ... because you have a physical, mental or behavioral disability.
      ... because you have better grades than the bullies.
      ... because you don't like what everyone else likes.
      ... because your parents are richer or poorer than the bullies'

      Have fun changinge any of those, even with all the intelligence in the world (well, you might change #2 by playing dumb). Your blaming the victim borders on the absurd.

    16. Re:So while all of this was happening by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      Changed all but the last one!

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    17. Re:So while all of this was happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A police officer makes him delete his recording

      The correct (or, at least, smart-ass) answer is: "I'm sorry officer, but if what you say is true and I committed a crime, then deleting my recording would itself be destruction of evidence under color of law."

    18. Re:So while all of this was happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Victim doesn't get punished if the defense is too embarrassing for the bully to compain about.

      I was bullied in elementary school (grade 4 ish). Defense tactics included stuff like screaming like a girl directly in the bully's ear. Doesn't leave any marks, and what's the "tough guy" going to say, "he screamed at me"? Fight dirty and they'll leave you alone.

    19. Re:So while all of this was happening by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      The victim has some other options:

      4. Find some common interests with the bully outside of school, and attempt to form some sort of positive relationship with them based on this. Bullying will continue, but will slowly decline, to be replaced by you "belonging" to them (other bullies better stay away).
      5. Socially navigate the bully into a situation where bullying you makes them look like an idiot. Bullying stops for the most part, as long as it was just for social status. Careful with this one, because if they just wanted a punching bag for other frustrations, they'll feel further humiliated and take it out on you when nobody else is around.
      6. Join the debate club. Assertiveness training without physical intimidation. Good chance of getting into student leadership, and not likely to be bullied in the same way anymore (now you have to deal with political bullying, which is a completely different beast).
      7. Find a bigger bully, and pander to their ego. Suddenly they're the only ones allowed to bully you.
      8. Find one of the rare "protector of the weak" types and ask for help. Bullying stops, but everyone sees you as the lower than low weak kid, so you become a social pariah.
      9. Do some research on your bully, find some dirt on them, and threaten to disclose it if the bullying continues

      There are probably others, but these all have their place. The main thing is to first figure out WHY the bully is bullying you, and take corrective action from there.

    20. Re:So while all of this was happening by Chas · · Score: 2

      4. Figure out why you're a target and change it.

      I know why for me. Because I didn't want to get in trouble for beating the crap out of someone.
      Because I didn't want to fight.
      Because it was never a one-to-one fight.
      Because whenever I fought back, I was immediately outnumbered and had the shit kicked out of me. Sorry, but IRL, martial arts training does NOT prepare you for fighting 15 people.
      Because every time I complained, the stupid, piece of shit principal would reprimand ME.
      Because every time I fought back, the stupid, piece of shit principal would reprimand ME.
      Because the one time I fought back against someone who was attacking me IN A CLASSROOM WITH A TEACHER PRESENT, I had the teacher try to jump on ME and restrain ME.

      Fuck that noise.

      By the time I hit High School, the only thing that kept me from going Columbine was lack of access to a gun, and the fact that other large weapon would have been caught by my parents when they drove me to school.

      People like this are the reason I DON'T allow myself to own a gun. The urge to shoot people like this is just overwhelming.
      All school REALLY taught me was that you can't trust people in authority. Ever. And, as much as your parents want to help you, they can't do anything for you. Not that my parents didn't bust their humps trying. My grade school principal HATED my family, because my parents gave him and his lazy ass, do-nothing self absolute hell. But I still got the crap kicked out of me on a weekly basis from Grade 3-4 to Grade 8 and still had to deal with assholes throughout high school.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    21. Re:So while all of this was happening by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

      "Rationalize" does not mean rational; it is actually quite the opposite.

    22. Re:So while all of this was happening by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Defending oneself can lead to getting in trouble. It can also stop the bullying. No bully likes getting hurt; that's for the victims.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    23. Re:So while all of this was happening by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      "Rationalize" does not mean rational; it is actually quite the opposite.

      True statement.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    24. Re:So while all of this was happening by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Ah, so you haven't learned how to not leave your buttons outside for any body to push.

      You should get started on that right away. One should never allow another to control ones internal state.

      p.s. I'm suprised at the amount of people talking about martial arts, mainly just for the physical aspect, and that fighting back is the only solution people seem to fixate on.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  8. A solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no problem with this. Just get rid of the law where I as a parent can not shit beat a 14 year old that is bullying my kid because he is under 18.

    1. Re:A solution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked I could beat the shit out of a 14 year old just fine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:A solution by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      A brick through the kids' family windows with the appropriate promises could also be persuasive.

    3. Re:A solution by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      So your solution to bullying is to remove a law that would prevent you from bullying a child?

      yes, that sounds completely logical and well thought out.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    4. Re:A solution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Threats have to be followed through. One of the reasons why I don't use threats. Mostly because a threat always also includes the option to avoid it if the other party changes its behaviour.

      By the time I ponder what to do to someone, he already did enough to have forfeited the chance for a choice.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. All-party state by king+neckbeard · · Score: 5, Informative

    The probably is Pennsylvania is an all-party state, where most states only require the consent of one party to record.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:All-party state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Recording something that happens out in the public is not wiretapping. This is as stupid as the police officers that claim that recording them out in public is wiretapping.

    2. Re:All-party state by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 2

      Correct. Maryland is one as well, and MD police used the anti-wire tap law as an excuse for years to prevent people from videotaping their actions before the Supreme Court finally called them on that perverse interpretation. Even now, MD police hate to be recorded.

    3. Re:All-party state by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      I agree, and again, the issue with recording cops is a far bigger one outside of one-party states. The ACLU and such will give you things to say if police try to stop you from recording them. If you are in a single-party state, it's basically just reciting that this is a single party state, so you don't need their consent. If you are an all-party state, you have to state that it's a public place, first amendment, etc.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:All-party state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recording something that happens out in the public is not wiretapping.

      According to you or according to the law? They are not the same.

    5. Re:All-party state by sasparillascott · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's a nice map showing which states are and aren't (by a company that sells phone recording products). Odd mix of states that are two party.

      http://www.vegress.com/index.p...

    6. Re:All-party state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5703. Interception, disclosure or use of wire, electronic or oral communications.
      Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a person is guilty of a felony of the third degree if he:
      (1) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, electronic or oral communication;

      He intercepted an oral communication.

      It's a bad law, which is what legislators are for, failing that there is always jury nullification.

    7. Re:All-party state by fnj · · Score: 1

      Recording something that happens out in the public is not wiretapping.

      According to you or according to the law? They are not the sam,

      Christ. According to COMMON SENSE and English grammar, you twit. According to REALITY.

    8. Re:All-party state by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

      In every all-party consent state, courts have repeatedly ruled that it is legal to record police officers while they are carrying out their job because they have no reasonable expectation of privacy while they are carrying out their job.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:All-party state by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      According to the law in every all-party consent state that I am aware of. One of the exceptions to those all-party consent laws is when the action is in a place were the people involved have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    10. Re:All-party state by crakbone · · Score: 1

      It was in a public place. There is no expectation for privacy. The bully was not whispering. He and the other teens were talking loudly for the whole class. "According to Love, as the teacher is heard attempting to help her son with a math problem, a student says, “You should pull his pants down!” Another student replies, “No, man. Imagine how bad that (c**t) smells! No one wants to smell that (t**t).” As the recording continues, the teacher instructs the classroom that they may only talk if it pertains to math. Shortly thereafter, a loud noise is heard on the recording, which her son explained was a book being slammed down next to him after a student pretended to hit him in the head with it. When the teacher yells, the student exclaims, “What? I was just trying to scare him!” A group of boys are heard laughing." What privacy is expected when you are trying to make a spectacle to an entire classroom? As well this was done in a public building. During public hours. As well I'm pretty sure that building was riddled with security cameras.

    11. Re:All-party state by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying the law isn't on the side of those recording the police, just that it's a great deal more work in those states, and thus, a little bit easier for police to harass you about it.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    12. Re:All-party state by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      That was true until about 1 or 2 years ago, when a judge ruled against the police in cases in several states saying that there had been sufficient rulings against such an interpretation that the police could no longer claim that they thought they were following the law...either they were lying, or their training was criminally inadequate.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    13. Re:All-party state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now, we're talking about the law. Common sense and reality have no place in the law.

    14. Re:All-party state by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      All police hate being recorded. It forces them to do their job properly.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  10. Time for another plan: by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 2

    Assuming this kid doesn't get his tablet smashed as the very next level of bullying...

    He needs to record the bullying again, but this time, the recording needs to go directly to all local media outlets, and perhaps directly to social media as well. This may not make much difference to the bullies on the bus, but it's a lot harder for the bullies in the school administration or police department to bury.

    It is still possible to shame entrenched bullies out of positions of authority. It doesn't often happen, but it's worth a try. It's certainly a Noble Cause.

    1. Re:Time for another plan: by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      but if it's on a school ipad and then they can hit him with one of the Computer Hacking / Unauthorized Access Laws also if an school ipad tablet smashed then the $800-$1000+ (cost of ipad (full cost price) + software + IT time adds up) damage may also be an felony as well.

  11. Legal Analysis by What'sInAName · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's an interesting article that looks at the legal aspects of this case:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

    tl;dr version: The charges are bullshit.

    1. Re:Legal Analysis by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Here's an interesting article that looks at the legal aspects of this case:

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

      tl;dr version: The charges are bullshit.

      One important but often overlooked point in the WS article is how special education classes are setup. As the WP points out, in addition to kids who really need help they become dumping grounds for behavioral problems; as a result teachers have to teach and deal with troublemakers and the administration simply expects them to deal with it. So, instead of addressing the problems schools simply ignore them; especially since actually taking action and expelling the kid or moving them to a school designed to deal with troublemakers is a long and difficult process. If the teacher is lucky they can document the problems and get the kid kicked out of school or if they are an out of district kid, give them so much work to do that they decide to go back to their original school. No wonder many special ed teachers tell young kids who want to do that to do anything but teach special ed; and the kids who really need help suffer because teachers spend far too much time dealing with troublemakers.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:Legal Analysis by Talderas · · Score: 1

      According to your article, the charges are bullshit because the students didn't have an expectation of privacy which is contrary to the actual statement made by the judge on the disorderly conduct trial.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:Legal Analysis by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      One important but often overlooked point in the WS article is how special education classes are setup. As the WP points out, in addition to kids who really need help they become dumping grounds for behavioral problems; as a result teachers have to teach and deal with troublemakers and the administration simply expects them to deal with it.

      A lot of the times the kids with behavioral problems also have learning problems. Most or all of the bullies I encountered in school were on the low end of the intelligence bell curve and did not do well in class. Should a child not get an education just because they have behavioral problems? Sure, the kid might be an asshole but usually it is because his parents are assholes, not because of some asshole gene. Strict discipline is important for these students as they likely are not getting that at home but if they need remedial help they should receive it.

      --

      Enigma

    4. Re:Legal Analysis by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      One important but often overlooked point in the WS article is how special education classes are setup. As the WP points out, in addition to kids who really need help they become dumping grounds for behavioral problems; as a result teachers have to teach and deal with troublemakers and the administration simply expects them to deal with it.

      A lot of the times the kids with behavioral problems also have learning problems. Most or all of the bullies I encountered in school were on the low end of the intelligence bell curve and did not do well in class. Should a child not get an education just because they have behavioral problems? Sure, the kid might be an asshole but usually it is because his parents are assholes, not because of some asshole gene. Strict discipline is important for these students as they likely are not getting that at home but if they need remedial help they should receive it.

      Certainly, but in an appropriate environment; not just thrown into special ed because it is a convent dumping ground. In addition, if their behavior disrupts and threatens others then they should be removed and learn there are consequences for their behavior and it will not be tolerated. Unfortunately, many of them can get away with it and thus do not modify their behavior.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  12. Charge the officer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tampering with evidence, intimidating a witness, and dereliction of duty. Under no circumstances should he have ordered the child to delete the recording. If there was a felony charge to be made, it was his duty to make it. Ordering and then overseeing the destruction of evidence to that effect is actionable.

    1. Re:Charge the officer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tampering with evidence, intimidating a witness, and dereliction of duty. Under no circumstances should he have ordered the child to delete the recording.

      B- b- b- but, I thought we are supposed to obey whatever the cops tell us to do, and argue it out in court later. I guess that doesn't work out so well when what the cops are telling you to do is destroy evidence, does it?

      captcha: avenger

    2. Re:Charge the officer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahaha.

      When was the last time an officer got conviced of tampering with evidence or intimidating a witness?

      At most, he'll get a paid vacation while this is investigated as a "punishment". Cops are rarely charged, and never convicted of destroying evidence.

    3. Re:Charge the officer by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      The fly in your ointment is that most small town cops are former bullies and still fully-formed sociopaths (as evidenced by his actions against the victim).

    4. Re:Charge the officer by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      It's not really surprising this case went the way it did. So often school bullies get nowhere academically, they don't end up working in laboratories for big pharma X or or in an engineering position at metal fabricator Y. No, the bully personality typically ends up in police enforcement or administrative positions in schools, where they can hold onto a small shred of power over people.

      I'm really not surprised that these bullies defended the aggressors here and turned the victim into the criminal.

      The officer and school administrators should be treated with zero tolerance for what happened here.

  13. How factual is the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The author works for a questionable blog and this is her credentials:

    "Priscilla Jones is a business writer and communications strategist based in the nation's capitals—Austin and D.C. Shedding light on incidences of abuse by overreaching government entities is her passion."

    1. Re:How factual is the article? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      It's legit. let's not shoot the messenger.

      http://triblive.com/news/alleg...

      Every single adult involved in this case, from the teacher to the judge, needs to be fired. The cop needs to be arrested for destruction of evidence.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:How factual is the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How legit? All we have is hearsay from all sources...

    3. Re:How factual is the article? by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      You fail.

      You cannot get people to think by encouraging them to commit a logical fallacy.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    4. Re:How factual is the article? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      While the post linked in the story is some right-wing nutjob blog (AR15 contest on the page of a report of school bullying, there's a solution for you)... the story is real. GP's link to the Tribune Review is an actual newspaper with actual reporters.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  14. if there's a 'reasonable expectation' of privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the school, why the fuck are they giving students (or allowing them to have) electronic gizmos with recording capabilities in the school? which presumably may also include bathrooms and locker rooms?

    oh, wait. this is pennsylvania.. where schools spy on students via webcams http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com...

  15. All joking aside by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

    I'm sure I speak for a few slashdotters when I say, I copped it at school too.

    The few times teachers got involved, I was apparently doing the wrong thing, not the person picking on me. As far as I'm concerned, if there's one thing I could change about my childhood - it would be the balls to stand up for myself and at least settle on a point in the pecking order. The few times I did stand up for myself, while incredibly scary for me - worked out in the end. The people involved generally left me alone after that.

    This is instinctual bullshit, bullies themselves are often more messed up than the people they intimidate, normally stuff from parents, older brothers or god knows what, bad homes, drugs, alcohol, abuse - etc. None the less playground bullying and intimidation is simply alpha dominance rubbish but it's also part of life and nature. The last person who is going to help properly with this is a teacher unfortunately.

    1. Re:All joking aside by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Exactly, but we are progressing some as a society on this issue.

      Current movements to limit it are in place, seemingly prompted by several high profile suicides-by-bullying via social networking.

      Growing up in the 70's and 80's, there were fewer publicized concerns regarding intimidation by the older, bigger, or meaner.

      We learned young that getting pushed around sucked, but getting pushed around and labeled a rat or tattletale was worse.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:All joking aside by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      ... is simply alpha dominance rubbish but it's also part of life and nature.

      Is it just rubbish? What if bullies help to point out all the children whose bodies are failing as tensegrities?

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  16. Same old, same old. by SlurpingGreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was assaulted once by a kid twice my size in middle school. He was harassing a group of 5 girls, taking their bags and throwing them on the ground. I asked him, "Why are you being such an asshole? Why don't you just leave them alone?" He punched me in the back of the head when I turned to walk away, then took about 12 swings at my face while sitting on top of me. I never hit him at all, just deflected most of his attacks.

    The next day, the school administrator gave both of us detention for a week. He said I shouldn't have used foul language.

    I think there's a kind of deep inability on the part of adults to distinguish between rough play that got a little out of hand and a bully who's completely out of control. I can't see any school policy fixing that.

    1. Re:Same old, same old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I never had kids. Can't risk subjecting a kid of mine to that kind of treatment.

    2. Re:Same old, same old. by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

      Having been on the receiving end of a lot of that myself, I can tell you that back then teachers always considered both kids at fault. To this day I'll never understand why teachers were so blind to the fact that the bigger stronger "athletic" kids constantly harassed the weaker kids.

    3. Re:Same old, same old. by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      To this day I'll never understand why teachers were so blind to the fact that the bigger stronger "athletic" kids constantly harassed the weaker kids.

      You're lucky, since in your case the bullies were actually considered to be part of the party at fault.

      And the teachers actions are easy to understand when you realize that they're not interested in justice - they want peace in the classroom.

    4. Re:Same old, same old. by scotts13 · · Score: 2

      Heh. I went to an all-boys Catholic high school in the early 70's. Response to a fight between two students (which included bullying, whether the victim defended himself or not) was essentially for the school disciplinarian to punch both kids in the face. Don't like it? Hire a lawyer, like my family had to.

    5. Re:Same old, same old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "punish all parties" rules are the reason why I will teach my kid to fight back and go for blood. If everyone involved in a fight is going to be punished the same, might as well make sure the other kid thinks twice before attacking again. Detention will not deter a future fight.

    6. Re:Same old, same old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You learned three valuable lessons that day: First, don't turn your eyes of person you just confronted, before that person's fighting will is thoroughly broken, or that person is remote enough that it can't launch melee or projectile attack upon you. Second, authorities don't like vigilantes, and you will be punished if you try to do their job. Third, if you are going to do the time anyway, you may feel a little bit better if you actually did the crime (fought back). If it wasn't for that last thing, you wouldn't even remember that childhood incident today. However, that scar that still hurts your soul actually makes you a better person, at least IMHO.

    7. Re:Same old, same old. by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      You can have kids. But you will have to have a policy of "if you harm my son, I kill you" on this sick society.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    8. Re:Same old, same old. by Alioth · · Score: 2

      The bullies are often the popular kids, and are often popular with some of the staff too who want to be 'cool with the kids'.

      The bullied are usually the unpopular kids. It happened to me too, having no recourse to constant bullying and when I finally snapped it was me who got the suspension, and the bullies who get let off.

    9. Re:Same old, same old. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It is one of those stupid myths. "It takes two to make a fight." I would love to run into one of those experts in conflict resolution and just start slapping them. No sometimes people are just rotten and will take it out on you. It can be a bully or a neopagan KKK member at a Jewish Center with a gun.

       

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:Same old, same old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had that happen me at catholic school , my return punch knocked him out cold . Only think that stopped my expulsion was the law suit my parents started.

    11. Re:Same old, same old. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      You left out the part where the girls laughed at your beatdown and told the principal you started it

    12. Re:Same old, same old. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      To this day I'll never understand the 'smart' people who can't understand a dynamic or that it takes two to tango.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    13. Re:Same old, same old. by rainmaestro · · Score: 1

      When I was nine, a classmate who had been bullying me for a couple years came up behind me during recess one day and started choking me. I'd had enough at that point, turned around, kneed him twice in the stomach and he dropped to the ground. I was given a detention, threatened with expulsion if it happened again and sent home. My parents were livid and had a very heated argument with the principal.

      The school's policy was simple: all parties in a fight are punished equally, regardless of circumstances. That evening, my parents explained just how fucked up that rule was, and gave me a very simply lesson: if someone hits you, don't give them a chance to hit you again.

    14. Re:Same old, same old. by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that you haven't been the skinny weaker non-fit kid being bullied and harassed by a bigger strapping star football team member. Sometimes all it's about is a bigger stronger kid harassing and beating on a smaller kid for no other reason than that he can and your remark about "it takes two to tango" is asinine.

    15. Re:Same old, same old. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      I was the shorter, skinnier, weaker, broken, 4-eyed, scoliotic, poor, immigrant minority, genius with speech and behavioural problems. I was the bottom of the totem pole picked on by all parties.

      It only took fixing the broken parts to get people, and animals, to stop bullying me.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    16. Re:Same old, same old. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Sure, two people need to be involved in a fight.
      Only one needs to be active for an assault.

      Fuck you and your bullshit.

    17. Re:Same old, same old. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      For some one who goes off the rails at people for making assumptions, and frequently about motive. and not thinking...

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    18. Re:Same old, same old. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      To this day I'll never understand the 'smart' people who can't understand a dynamic or that it takes two to tango.

      So if I am going to start punching you in the face for no good reason, and if you fight back you deserve to get punished just as much as I do?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    19. Re:Same old, same old. by mjwx · · Score: 1

      To this day I'll never understand why teachers were so blind to the fact that the bigger stronger "athletic" kids constantly harassed the weaker kids.

      You're lucky, since in your case the bullies were actually considered to be part of the party at fault.

      And the teachers actions are easy to understand when you realize that they're not interested in justice - they want peace in the classroom.

      In modern times, the teachers hands are tied. If a teacher stands up to a bully, that bully's father is in the administrators office threatening lawyers.

      I got bullied a bit in High School, one of the teachers was good with it. He'd let the bully get away with a little bit, but after he thought enough was enough he'd start using inventive forms of punishment (I.E. he'd put a dot on the blackboard and the student had to stand with their nose touching it).

      Ultimately I defeated the bullies by becoming part of the clique. I developed a sense of humour, started cracking jokes and that ended up making friends. Once that happened the bullies (who are really, inherently cowards) realised that if they continued to pick on me, they'd be the ones outside the clique.

      I really do feel for teachers these days, it's not that they want to tolerate the bullying, quite the contrary they'd love to toss the bully's out by the scruff of their necks with a swift boot to the pants for good measure but the shitstorm that would create would make WWII look like a school yard scuffle. Its getting to the point where helicopter parents and tiger mums are so aggressive with the layers that they cant even give them a negative report. The worst thing a teacher can write is "Little Johnny needs to pay more attention in class" which has become teacher code for "Little Johnny is a right little shit".

      I used to share a house with two teachers, top blokes, always had good pot but their work was shit. If any parent made trouble with the principal, they'd get it dumped down on them two fold.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    20. Re:Same old, same old. by delt0r · · Score: 1

      Some policy that may help. Is have a system in place where people who want to teach, can and make it a half decent carrier. Right now in a lot of places its just a poorly paid job with a lot of political overhead often from an incompetent principal or a clueless education board.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    21. Re:Same old, same old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seems fairs, kids sometimes lies, you cannot know for sure who is to blame so by punching both of them you are sure that the guilty party have received a punishment with the added benefit that the innocent learn to fears disciplinarian Catholic...

    22. Re:Same old, same old. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      Hypotheticals exist outside of time, reality has a past, a sequence of causes.

      That aside, why can't anybody come up with a solution besides fighting back? That type of mentality is what keeps bullying alive.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    23. Re:Same old, same old. by sploxx · · Score: 1

      I think there's a kind of deep inability on the part of adults to distinguish between rough play that got a little out of hand and a bully who's completely out of control. I can't see any school policy fixing that.

      I would say some adults, but not all. I had my share of bullying in school, but there were teachers who actually were quite aware of who was the asshole. However, many teachers seem to be unfortunately emotionally blind to these kinds of situations. Or they just don't want to deal with it. I don't understand it.

  17. Nothing new here, move along... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, (United States of) America, land of the dumb... laws.

  18. Bullies by Rich_Lather · · Score: 1

    I thought a phone had to be involved in order for it to be considered wiretapping. What is missed here is, bullies eventually grow up and become....police lieutenants.

  19. Misaaplication of the law by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple of points about this. My first thought when I heard this was that Pennsylvania law on recording someone requires their consent except in certain circumstances; one of those circumstances is when a crime is being committed. I thought that was the case here, except the boy recorded others as well as those committing a crime (terroristic threats, at the least). However, there is another exception to Pennsylvania law, when one does not have an expectation of privacy. The judge ruled that the boy recorded people when they had an expectation of privacy. Since everything I have read indicates that all of the recordings occurred in the classroom, I have a serious problem with the idea that anyone in the recordings had an expectation of privacy.
    Further, the judge claimed that she was confident that if the bullying had been reported to the school, it would have been taken care of appropriately, the the school did not tolerate bullying. How the judge could reach that conclusion is a mystery to me, considering that the incident which was recorded occurred in the presence of a teacher.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:Misaaplication of the law by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      The judge lauded the school's behavior and expressed her complete confidence in the school first, then she allowed the defendant (victim) to present his defense. But still, she's a judge so I'm sure she knows what she's doing and she can't possibly be biased in any way. After all, if in her unbiased opinion, the school has never done wrong before, I can't see why she would even need to ever hear evidence to the contrary.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    2. Re:Misaaplication of the law by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I recently came across a story where it was stated that the Vice-Principal actually testified at the hearing that the mother had previously reported students bullying her son, which makes the judges confidence in the school doing the right thing even worse.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:Misaaplication of the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The judge was bias because she was an alumni of the high school, and most likely was among the bullies when she attended. I don't think that this can be a fair and unbiased case as long as it is held in this town..

  20. Who Does The Law Serve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The notion that voice recordings can not be secretly made exists mainly because politicians and officials fear being recorded. Many business people also fear being recorded. If covert recording was allowed we would live in a much more honest society.
                  A looming prospect is a device that can work as a very accurate, real time, thought reader. Watch how quickly the courts disallow the device to be used on witnesses on the stand in court. And watch how quickly the police are forbidden from using the device as well. Imagine being able to read the thoughts of a suspect while he is being interviewed.

    1. Re:Who Does The Law Serve? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Even better if we had even so much as a reliable lie detector: imagine if all politicians were required to be openly monitored whenever addressing the public.

      Of course the reality would probably just be that they keep themselves even more ignorant and only listen to the carefully vetted narrative provided them by their handlers.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  21. Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now we want people running around making secret recordings of each other? I can't keep up.

  22. Charged when the evidence got deleted?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the summery it is stated he was forced to delete the recording..... So if there is no evidence of a recording, how can he theb be charged for "felony wiretapping"?

    It makes no sense

    1. Re:Charged when the evidence got deleted?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this happened in Australia, it would be a wintery.

    2. Re:Charged when the evidence got deleted?? by crakbone · · Score: 1

      They couldn't so they changed the charge to disorderly conduct. Evidently he had no legitimate use for making the recording.

  23. you want school shootings? by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    because this is how you get school shootings. Or in Pennsylvanias recent case, school stabbings. When you strip a person of their safety, and offer them no recourse, they become hard. They become determined with nothing to lose. They adopt these horriffic scorched earth tactics because nothing you say or do is consistent or fair, so the outcome and result of their actions is no longer relevant. And the saddest part is in the aftermath.

    people will wonder how they could have helped, what caused it, and why this happened. Gun nuts will bark about bullet proof blackboards and guns for teachers. Parents will entirely miss the point and call for tougher gun laws. No one will stop to consider students or kids for that matter as real people.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:you want school shootings? by xianzombie · · Score: 2

      No mod points here, so the best I can give is an "Amen!"

      Personally, I was the youngest kid in the class. Kinda short, kinda fat, a kinda a dork. I was a prime target. Nothing like watching the gym teacher laugh as you get a hockey stick under your rips lifting you up off the ground (think bear hug from behind -- kinda creepy in retrospect). The senior(s) and teachers didn't laugh as hard once I whacked one upside the head. Not too hard, but enough to get his attention.

      Thankfully, a couple years later I met some like-minded folks. Combine the goth kids, the metal heads, the geeks, and the 'thankfully this was before columbine' kids in trench coats and combat boots who just didn't really give a fuck. Which amounted to about, oh...8 close people and a network of associated outcasts.

      Not a lot, but when there's only a couple lone bullies, 8 people standing together is enough.

    2. Re:you want school shootings? by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Exact.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    3. Re:you want school shootings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because they aren't.
      Life stops at birth and begins again after you vote republican.

    4. Re:you want school shootings? by litehacksaur111 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. All the stupid gun regulations in the world will not help because schools are unable to discipline the people causing problems and are unable to offer any recourse for victims

    5. Re:you want school shootings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now they would say you formed a gang and kick you all out of school.

      Missing the point of why people form groups, and deciding that removing the group of bullied kids is easier then addressing the problem with the bully.

    6. Re:you want school shootings? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I believe that 'zero tolerance' teaches.... zero tolerance! If administrators are an example then students should use black and white thinking as well, with the expected extreme results.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    7. Re:you want school shootings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That what I did, I started to hang out with the punks for protection as the punks back then did not gave a shit about who you were or how you dress as long as you were not in a sport teams or a drug snitch... As a thank, I help them organized theirs drugs purchase in batch, effectively becoming the administrator of a dope cooperative for the rest of my highschool years...

  24. Hey kid by sootman · · Score: 1

    Work out, get some allies, and beat the ever-loving shit out of the bully. You'll get off easier.

    That's obviously the school's lesson here.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  25. There's a school that emphasis academics? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    I didn't think those existed anymore. While the bullying is wrong, and the prosecution of gathering evidence is wrong, having a school that's about academics is not.

  26. So many things wrong with this.... by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

    There are so many things wrong with this situation it's unreal. Not living in Pennsylvania I don't know what the laws there are i.e. what kind of anti-bullying laws they have and what kind of conversation recording laws they have but the school was wrong, the police were wrong, the judge was wrong and the parents of the kid were stupid for not saying "this conversation stops NOW until our lawyer gets here" when they saw where it was going. And the bully gets off Scott free and the kid who was probably already a nervous wreak now had psychological problems.

  27. Thats the Alayna Macaluso incident in Steubenville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That is, what happened in Ohio versus the PSU incident in Happy Valley.

  28. Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bullyin by Formorian · · Score: 2

    (assistant principal Aaron ) Skrbin testified that the district had records of Love complaining about students bullying her son, including an incident in October in which a student hit her son with “spitwads,” even after her son told him to stop.
    “To be blunt, I would not classifying that as bullying,” Skrbin said.

    WTF?!?!?!?

    I was bullyed in high school. Swirlies/harrassment/vocal/physical. Worst 4 years of my life. I never had the courage back then to stand up, and/or tell my parents. I've since grown and now I'll stand up to random people on street harrassing a complete stranger. It's just gaining confidence, but in HS it's hard to gain that while being bullied.

    But spitwads are a form of bullying, esp if requested to stop and it doesn't and it escalates. It's a way of hummiliating someone. I can't stand teachers/adults in position like this and they nothing against the bullies. no let's punish the victims. I always hoped that with the bullying issue brought more to light a few years ago, this would end, but nope teachers still blaiming the victims. It's sickening.

  29. PA law is the problem and it's not just at schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PA law is defective. Many States allow one party to a conversation to record it.

  30. Contact info for the relevant human garbage by korbulon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are the details of the relevant parties:

    The "judge": Maureen McGraw-Desmet

    295 Millers Run Road Bridgeville, PA 15017 phone: 412-221-3353 fax: 412-221-0908

    The "officer": http://www.linkedin.com/pub/ro...

    and then there's this piece of shit: http://www.southfayette.org/si... (smilburn@southfayette.org)

    If ever there was a job for Anonymous...

    1. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Mod the parent up. I sent an email to the principal telling him of my disgust and that he should resign. I suggest everyone else do the same (just avoid foul language and threats).

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by kaizendojo · · Score: 4, Informative

      And If you're looking for the Superintendant of the District: Bille Rondinelli, Superintendent brondinelli@southfayette.org

    3. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In addition to the principal's e-mail, his phone number is: 412-221-4542 extension 225.

      His bio from the website:

      Mr. Scott Milburn joined the South Fayette team in February of 2010. Prior to South Fayette, Mr. Milburn served as assistant high school principal at Bethel Park High School for three years, assistant principal, career development specialist, and teacher in the Pittsburgh Public Schools. Mr. Milburn holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Education from Indiana University of Pennsylvania and a Master's Degree in Public Management from Carnegie Mellon University.

    4. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to this web page ( http://www.stopbullying.gov/laws/pennsylvania.html ) "Schools that receive federal funding are required by federal law to address discrimination on a number of different personal characteristics."

      I would like to know how to get this federal funding to not go to this school in Pennsylvania.

    5. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by Cowclops · · Score: 1

      Did the same myself. I even said that I know they can't and won't reply for legal reasons but that I hope the words reach his eyes. Shame shame shame.

    6. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      I know Slashdotters are a bunch of nerds who got bullied hard and now want their revenge. But what did the judge do wrong? Recording private conversations is illegal and frankly I am glad that I can have a private conversation and not have it used against me in a court of law.

      So if the evidence against the bullies was illegally gathered, it simply shouldn't be usable. It's like, if the cops beat up a suspect and he confesses to a murder, I agree that also shouldn't be used against the subject. Because it's important not to have cops beat people up to get confessions, just as it's important that we don't live in some surveillance state where everything we say is recorded and then used against us.

      I'm sure the school is anti-bullying and would have offered some help if the boy had directly asked for it. However they don't go along with setting up wiretaps, and good for them.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    7. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The principal (last link) has a funny full-res photo that on my display is sized by the browser without interpolation, and the effect shows a real goofy set of white spots in his eyes.

      Second observation, his photo makes him look like a total fucking pedo. What. The. Fuck. I know that's incredibly unfair of me, but after the Jimmy Saville case where a guy that looked like a giant pedo turned out to be a giant pedo, you've got to wonder wtf is going on in the world...

    8. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by korbulon · · Score: 2

      She was well within her power (and right) to let common sense prevail and dismiss the case outright. Instead she took the spineless route and upheld this farce, summarily judging this child to be guilty of disorderly conduct.

      "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." In this case she did more than nothing, she actually perpetuated this travesty - a chain of awful, mewling officials "just obeying the law" - and gave it a legal seal of approval in an official act of cowardice. That is what she did.

      If someone runs across the street to save a child about to run in front of a car, would you then deem it necessary for hat person to be fined for jaywalking? Because I know just the judge. And people wonder why the U.S. has the highest incarceration rate in the world. Because the legal system is plagued with officious fucks like this.

    9. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A new press release just went out. The school says that the media is lying but that they can't elaborate. There's no need to call in anonymous over this.

      http://www.southfayette.org/cms/lib03/PA01001917/Centricity/Domain/4/PressRelease.png

    10. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Looks like the cover their asses machine is in full operation.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    11. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My local newspaper has a mugshots gallery on their website. I like to try and guess the crime just by looking at them.
      For most offenders I get it right maybe 3 or 4 times out of ten. For fraudsters and paedophiles It's closer to 19 out of 20, and 'paedo' was my first thought when I saw his photo too. :)

    12. Re:Contact info for the relevant human garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a template message :
      Mr Milburn,
      You failed as a school administrator.
      You failed as a community leader.
      Your toxic culture is not accepted in the civilized World.
      Your behavior put a blight upon each graduate from South Fayette.

      You should be ashamed and use what little left of dignity you have and resign.

      Have a bad day

  31. Where is the teacher? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    From the article, the incident took place while he was receiving math help from the teacher. From the sound of it, this crap goes on all during class. What a sad system that puts someone who needs a different approach to teaching into a class where kids mouth off and can't (or won't) be controlled.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Where is the teacher? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a former SE student, allow me to shed some light: SE classes are not intended to provide a "different approach to teaching;" they are designed to segregate the delinquents and the undesirables from the general population. The classes in which I was enrolled ran the gambit from drooling retards to the (no exaggeration) criminally insane.

      My qualifiers for the classes, for the record, were that I had poor handwriting skills and took daily medication. We had one chick who was in a class because she had a peanut allergy. It's absurd.

  32. mixes special ed by colfer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The special ed kids with learning disabilities are mixed with the ones with behavioral/emotional disabilities in this school. In other words, people that get made fun of, and people that are a danger to them. Sheep and wolves. Must make the regular classrooms nice to remove both the slow learners and troublemakers.

    The same thing happens in homeless shelters, where it's hard to protect the defenselessly mentally ill from the bad guys. And prisons, where a lot of mentally ill people live due to the policies of our country.

    Another problem in this case is that the police and the judge are an extension of the school administration, and see themselves that way. Also, it is a small Western Pennsylvania school district surely dominated by athletics. Also, we don't know the full story. This could be the best school in the world, but I somehow doubt it.

    1. Re:mixes special ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My son is a new teacher in such a classroom....NO support from the administration on these types of issues.

  33. Hasn't changed since the 70s by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    If the same behavior occurred between two adults, the perps would be going to jail. It might be time to start adding that little life lesson to high schools.

    When I went to high school. The spineless swine who get to be school administrators *always* punish the victims of bullying, not the perpetrators (usually, the popular kids or athletes). The victim is just one kid, usually powerless, who will be out of their life in a few years. The families of the perps are many, and they're often as dangerously aggressive as their spawn.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    1. Re:Hasn't changed since the 70s by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      If the same behavior occurred between two adults, the perps would be going to jail. It might be time to start adding that little life lesson to high schools.

      When I went to high school. The spineless swine who get to be school administrators *always* punish the victims of bullying, not the perpetrators (usually, the popular kids or athletes). The victim is just one kid, usually powerless, who will be out of their life in a few years. The families of the perps are many, and they're often as dangerously aggressive as their spawn.

      Also:

      "We can't put Jimmy Quarterback in detention, he wouldn't be able to play in next week's Big Game®! Which is way, way, more important than academics, since we rely on the Booster money his athletics bring in!"

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Hasn't changed since the 70s by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      You have correctly identified the thought process behind every highschool administrator in western Pennsylvania.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Hasn't changed since the 70s by ai4px · · Score: 1

      In my case back in high school, I went to the principal several times. The last day it happened, I punched the bully. We ended up in teh office and the principal outright lied and said he hadn't spoken to me yesterday about this very issue. Further, they suspended me for throwing the first punch... because I couldn't prove the guy had pushed me from behind. Taught me a lesson. Screw the authorities. If you're damned if you do and damned if you don't, you may as well do.

  34. This is tragedy waiting to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If reasoning with neither the aggressor nor the authorities will solve the problem, then the only solution left is to eliminate the problem by other means. When reason does not work, then use of force is justified, to remove the aggressor from your life.

    The school and police would be wise to realize that before a disaster occurs.

  35. Stick up for themselves? by Carnivore24 · · Score: 1

    Did parents stop teaching their kids to stick up for themselves? Are they waiting for the school system, video games, law enforcement, movies, or reality TV to do it?

  36. Not wiretapping: There was no wire! by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Stop posting about wiretapping laws when this wasn't a phone conversation! This is such an obvious flaw in the entire story I'm not sure if I believe it at all.

    1. Re:Not wiretapping: There was no wire! by MobyDisk · · Score: 2

      Actually, I'm reading this article with a critical eye now, and I realize that the police never said anything about wiretapping. Only the principal did:

      The defendant testified before Judge McGraw-Desmet that he was forced to play the audio for the group and then delete it.

      The "group" is the principal and a police officer. So who forced him to delete it?

      Mr. Milburn told me to delete it, and I just felt, like, really pressured to do it.

      So the school principal made him delete it. Probably because it embarrassed the school.

      The officer said, “He believed he had a wiretapping incident."

      So the officer says that the principal is the one who thought he had a wiretapping incident.

      Principal Milburn advised her that her son was “facing felony wiretapping charges” because he made a recording in a place with an expectation of privacy, and that Officer Kurta agreed.

      The only mention about the officer is the statement that the officer agreed, and it isn't a quote from anyone.

      This further indicates that it was the school trying to hide their shame:

      ...the administrators gave the student a Saturday detention

      Probably to pressure him into thinking it was all his fault.

      So what legal trouble did he actually get it?

      the magistrate pronounced him guilty of disorderly conduct.

      No mention as to why that was. But the "magistrate" said nothing about wiretapping.

      Now, the doozy:

      The officer then admitted he did not hear the audio file in question or do an investigation into the recording, presumably because the student was ordered to erase it prior to his arrival at the school.

      So the officer claims he wasn't even there for the recording!

      Now it sounds like the principal pressured a student into a cover-up of his own teacher's discipline failures, and destroyed evidence in an investigation! Wow, I would *love* to see the ACLU get involved in this one!

    2. Re:Not wiretapping: There was no wire! by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? The relevant PA law is referred to in the code as "WIRETAPPING AND ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE," and it explicitly covers this scenario. There doesn't need to be a wire involved.

      "Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, a person is guilty of a felony of the third degree if he: (1) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept any wire, electronic or oral communication;"

      http://weblinks.westlaw.com/re...

    3. Re:Not wiretapping: There was no wire! by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      I tried to visit the link but it didn't work for me. Since the Supreme Court ruled on this last year, and since the article shows that the police didn't actually make any claims of wiretapping (only the principal did), and since the DOJ has repeatedly asserted that this kind of recording is okay, I don't think that statute could really apply. By "electronic or oral" they probably mean "bits of data or sound" but they still meant something that was transmitted.

    4. Re:Not wiretapping: There was no wire! by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Sadly wiretapping laws have a long history of being used against recording of oral conversations. Most prominently when the police use them to shut down recordings of their abuses, though there has finally been some motion in the courts to reject that ridiculous line of reasoning.

      The moral is: when you hear something ridiculously unbelievable about the application of a law, don't assume it's the story that's unbelievable.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:Not wiretapping: There was no wire! by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Check out my follow-up post. Reading the article further, the only person who said anything about wiretapping was the principal.

    6. Re:Not wiretapping: There was no wire! by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Fair points. But if the recording had been made in a place where the participants had a reasonable expectation of privacy, as in not making a spectacle of themselves in a public area, then the "wiretapping" laws would likely have been applicable. As a rule "wiretapping" laws tend to be a bit of a misnomer, with actual wiretapping being only one of the specific situations where they come into play.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  37. Blame the victim by KDN · · Score: 1

    Yup, its just like rape victims years ago. YOU THE VICTIM must have provoked it. YOU THE VICTIM ARE THE CAUSE. I'm glad that rape victims are usually not blamed any more. I just hope in the future that bully victims are afforded the same. Unfortunately, in the 40 years since I was that victim, I see not much has changed.

  38. And to that I say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why wasn't a copy made before showing the authorities? ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS MAKE A COPY!!!!

    Not only should a copy have been made, it should have been uploaded to "the internet" as soon as possible where it could never go away.

  39. how this will obviously end by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Well, someone's getting stabbed and I think it's the bully. That'd be a fitting end. Every staff member, the policeman, and anyone else involved will be fired and sued into bankruptcy.

    1. Re:how this will obviously end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are all weird people.

      This is how I dealt with bullying in school.

      I got good friends. Strong friends.

      We demolished the bullies. After school, by the railroad tracks, behind buildings, wherever the occassion presented itself.

      We hurt them. Bad.

      They never bullied us again.

      Of course, I grew up in ghettos, on indian reservations, etc. Trying to rely on authorities is a joke, really.

    2. Re:how this will obviously end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be the fault of videogames, dungeons and/or dragons, rock and/or roll, and drugs. He always got along so well with the other children in class who never did a thing to harm him, and then this insane person, posthumously a fan of a current group or minority we dislike, decided to end all their lives in a stroke of pure and undeserved evil.

      Even more of the education budget will be added to security theater, and what's left of the educators better trained to spot the victims that might one day get sick of being shat on by an entire system every day.

    3. Re:how this will obviously end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you formed a gang. Good for you for having enough friends that you could stalk and assault those you perceived as bullying you.

  40. Close to home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am embarrassed to say that this happened in the next community over from me.

    Only in America. And we wonder why these kids go on shooting rampages. It's because they can't comprehend all the bassackwards rules and regulations we "adults" tell them they have to live by and obey.

    If you are outraged by this, call the Judge and the police chief and let them know how you feel.

    District Judge Maureen McGraw-Desmet: (412) 221-3353
    South Fayette Township Police Department: (412) 279-6911
    South Fayette School District: 412-221-4542, Ext. 411

  41. Sue them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sue them out of existence! Liquidate all their assets. Wipe them off the face of the earth.

  42. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is complete insanity. I hope they go on the Today Show or something and really embarrass the crap out of that school district. This is one of most ridiculous things I've ever seen.

  43. Wish We Had More Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To bad we don't know the school name so we could inform the administrator of our distaste for his failure to handle the situation effectively.

  44. So let me see if I understand this..... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    In Pennsylvania, if you secretly record somebody who is committing a crime, then instead of being considered helpful to the police by providing it as evidence, you would be be considered guilty of another crime yourself (which would then suggest to me that the video could not be used as evidence.... which would strike me me as pretty amazing if the crime that was recorded were heinous enough).

    1. Re:So let me see if I understand this..... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Generally, evidence can be collected with an illegal act, provided the police and other legal authorities don't do it or encourage it. It doesn't make the act legal. (Note: IANAL. Reliance on random pseudonymous people on the net for legal advice may not be wise, even if it is common.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  45. So everyone learnsomething here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, Back to killing your bully.

  46. Concealed weapons, ok, concealed microphone, not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have some trouble with the idea that a person is not allowed to record their own conversations in secret. Especially in light of the fact that in many places it is legal to carry a concealed weapon into many places and thus many conversations.

    It seems like society is actively encouraging resolving any conflict with guns rather than with information, evidence and dialogue.

  47. Option Three is just wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "- Pay an illegal immigrant $100 to stab the bully in the kidney."

    Slashdot is no place to advocate outsourcing good American jobs to illegals and you are a bad person.

    1. Re:Option Three is just wrong. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm usually against outsourcing jobs to illegals, however if the job itself is highly illegal, this actually makes some sense. Besides, kids who are bullied usually don't have thousands of dollars to pay American hit-men, but $100 for an illegal should be quite affordable.

    2. Re:Option Three is just wrong. by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

      But maybe he can get an H-2B visa issued if he proves that the italian mafia can do a better job?

  48. Justice grows from a computer's Ethernet port by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    If I had been that kid, my response to the police bullying that backed up the school bullying would have been to proudly put that video out there on YouTube, with a full and factual description of the police reaction, naming names and quoting the threats. Become such an Internet hot potato that no authority is going to punish you.

    I have noted the same problem in the private sector: you have a consumer problem with some large company, which has found that just ignoring your complaint generally makes it go away. After putting up with months of the runaround, you create a "United Breaks Guitars" video and send it viral. THAT gets attention, and the fix you've been looking for.

    1. Re:Justice grows from a computer's Ethernet port by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Um...
      the police bullying was that they deleted the audio recording. There was no video recording.

    2. Re:Justice grows from a computer's Ethernet port by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Audio only would explain how this recording could have been done unobtrusively with a tablet. Audio might not have had the polished production value of "United Breaks Guitars" but it could still have been a powerful addition to a video of the victim explaining the situation, the school and cop responses, etc.

  49. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by SecurityGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My child was harassing another kid in school. It went on for months. The other kid didn't want to go to school anymore. It was a Big Deal. Finally, the parent called me because she wasn't successful in getting the school to stop it. I called the principal and asked basically "where the hell is your anti bullying policy" and got the same response. He didn't consider it bullying. As you said, "WTF?!?!?!?!". The first I'd ever heard of this was when the other parent called me. More parents need to get involved in schools. Show up at school board meetings. Read them the riot act when they need it. Campaign against the bad ones at election time and for the good ones.

    Oh, and you can bet my kid stopped that crap that day.

  50. Bullies only understand pain, nothing else. by SSonnentag · · Score: 1

    This is why I always took down the bullies who were dumb enough to pick on me. Once they were laid out on the ground, and recovered, they never bothered me again.

  51. So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recording real-life sounds is now "wire" tapping? What wire was tapped?

  52. I'm from Pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm from the area, and judges/DA's and Pigs thru out the state play fast and loose with their positions. In Westmoreland County the shit stain DA Peck, handling the recent school stabbings, since he has been in office there are numerous lawsuits for civil rights violations, I sat at a parole office to find out exactly what was going on, by talking to those that were on parole and found that non of the charges should have ever stuck, or the charges were, more or less, false/overreaching charges that lack any evidence.

    The cops will sit their and act like they did the right thing, and even say well we didn't think it would get this far in the courts. But their the ones that decided to tack on charges with no evidence, and then the DA sits there and tries to make them stick, then the Preliminary Judge makes the charges stick in order to intimidate the defendant to cut a quick deal, racking up points for all parties involved.

    I can see an appeal, and lawsuit against the courts, the pig, and the School district. Unless the kid and his mother have an a hot shot quick thinking attorney I am afraid the appeal court will rule in favor of the pig, and the judges decision. I fail to see how no one from top to bottom used any common sense in determining this was done to protect someone not to blackmail someone, or even used to press charges against anyone. Amazing the NSA and US spying agencies can do this and use a defense claim to warrant such behavior but if a citizen does it, it becomes the most horrific thing in the courts eyes.

    1. Re:I'm from Pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      judges always side with the pigs unless you have serious evidence.

  53. No Expectation of Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PA State Supreme Court has ruled time and time again that students have no expectation of privacy in a school setting. These rulings have supported the violation of students' 4th Amendment rights for decades.

    Wiretapping laws only apply where there is an expectation of privacy.

    That aside, what a bunch of bullshit. Prosecuting the victims seems to be a favorite pastime of the PA "justice" system.

  54. of course, this is legal (from Bruce Schneier) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Washington Post is reporting on an NSA program called MYSTIC, which collects all -- that's 100% -- of a country's telephone calls. Those calls are stored in a database codenamed NUCLEON, and can be retrieved at a later date using a tool codenamed RETRO. This is voice, not metadata.

    What's interesting here is not the particular country whose data is being collected; that information was withheld from the article. It's not even that the voice data is stored for a month, and then deleted. All of that can change, either at the whim of the NSA or as storage capabilities get larger. What's interesting is that the capability exists to collect 100% of a country's telephone calls, and the analysis tools are in place to search them.

  55. Silly citizen, only government can evidence by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

    This is the same mentality of those people who are scared of Google Glass and go all Internet tough guy about what they'd do to people wearing one.

    People who believe in pecking orders, ie. bullies, identify with authority, even if they rebel against it, and those in authority believe in pecking orders, and so see bullying as enforcing the natural order.

    The unifying attribute of all people like this is that they are ashamed of themselves. Not in any way that might modify their beliefs or actions, but in a way that they blame others for their faults and react belligerently to anyone who might capture evidence of them. So of course they're going to punish the kid for recording.

  56. How icky. by thesandtiger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is anyone else creeped out by how hopeful some of the posters here seem to be about the possibility of the kid "going Columbine"?

    I get it that many slashdotters feel they were abused by bullies when they were kids, but the fact is pretty much every kid ever has been picked on (and has bullied another kid) at some time in their childhood. Yeah, it sucks, and yeah, the authorities here should absolutely be taken out of positions where they can commit future injustices like this, but in no way, shape or form should revenge fantasies like "going Columbine" be casually thrown about as if yeah, that's something reasonable.

    Yeah, it sucks that some of you were horribly treated when you were young, but get the fuck over it already. If you still get overwraught to the point where you fantasize about killing people at shit that happened 10 years ago on a playground, you have problems and you need to address them.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    1. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you were never brutalized for 12 yrs., while adults turned the other way. People think they know what it feels like because they were "picked on" once or twice, in school. Believe you, you have NO idea what it is like.

    2. Re:How icky. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'd dare say not so much "hopeful", but perhaps "morbidly curious" would be the more accurate term.

      Obviously such an overreaction would be wrong on every level, but when a person has actually attempted non-violent means to deal with a problem and only faced grief over it, doesn't that indicate that there's something already wrong with the system?

    3. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In response to incidents like these and others, not only is a school shooting expected, but it is justified.

    4. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is anyone else creeped out by how hopeful some of the posters here seem to be about the possibility of the kid "going Columbine"?

      We must be reading different posts. I haven't seen anyone being hopeful...just acknowledgements that this is the type of thing (letting bullying go unchecked, and in this case, piling on, making the administration part of the bullying) that often causes those incidents to happen

    5. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very.

    6. Re:How icky. by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it sucks that some of you were horribly treated when you were young, but get the fuck over it already.

      You obviously have no idea what you're talking about. Victims of constant bullying exhibit the same symptoms as those who have been repeatedly physically/mentally tortured over long periods of time. It stays with you for the rest of your life, even with good counseling. Those behavioral and emotional patterns get etched into your fucking brain like a steel-cutting laser. You don't just "get the fuck over it".

      If you still get overwraught to the point where you fantasize about killing people at shit that happened 10 years ago on a playground, you have problems and you need to address them.

      No doubt. But that isn't the issue here. The issue here is that despite all the "zero-tolerance" bullshit the environment from when they were kids and the environment today hasn't changed, which will lead to more fucked up people living in an already fucked up society increasing the chance that they will do something fucked up.

      So in light of that, I have established a set of rules with my son to deal with bullying (which were the same set I used when growing up):

      1. Tell the kid to stop.
      2. If the kid doesn't stop, talk to the teacher.
      3. If the teacher doesn't do anything or it continues, talk to the principal.
      4. If the principal does nothing and the bullying continues, use deterrent force.

      It's amazing how little deterrent force it takes to stop bullying.

      --
      ~X~
    7. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no.

      I haven't read anybody here that's hopeful about the kid "going Columbine". I have read many who can understand if he does. There is a difference.

    8. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you still get overwraught to the point where you fantasize about killing people at shit that happened 10 years ago on a playground, you have problems and you need to address them.

      I wonder, could there be something that happened to them in their past that caused these "problems"

    9. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said problem being you were bullied to the point of long-term mental issues.

      Everyone has been bullied at some point. Some people were bullied so frequently and for so long that they were left with deep mental scars. OP obviously wasn't and wants to judge those who were.

      Get over yourself, asshole.

    10. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is anyone else creeped out by how hopeful some of the posters here seem to be about the possibility of the kid "going Columbine"?"

      America was founded by "going columbine"

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    11. Re:How icky. by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I must be reading a different slashdot than you. The posts I've seen said things along the lines of "and then they're surpised when kids go columbine" and "this could make him go columbine" NOT "Hey! He should go columbine on their asses! That'd teach 'em!"

      Now that we've got that addressed, let's move on to the second part. There's bullying, where pretty much every kid has been picked on at some point, and then there's chronic bullying, where it has become socially OK in the school setting to intentionally bully an individual. They are not the same thing. The first one is an annoyance and in some cases can become emotionally or behaviorally scarring, but if dealt with properly isn't that big a deal. The second one can reshape the victim, and is one of the nastiest things that humanity is capable of. For the victim, there's no escape from it. Ever. Even after they leave the school, that baggage sticks with them for the rest of their life. It's not something you "get over" -- it's something you learn to live with, over and over again.

      Thankfully, I was always part of the first group -- but I had friends that were part of the second. Many of them are dead now (suicide, drug overdoses, car crashes, etc.). They all ended up with problems that needed to be addressed, but they'd been churned through a system that taught them that attempting to go to the authorities with their problems caused them more hurt and embarrassment without solving anything.

      So why not address the root problem, and change attitudes towards chronic bullying? It's not something you just "get over".

    12. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but no. Until there's been enough dead bullies for someone to DO SOMETHING about this thing happening EVERY DAY, a lot of people here, whether they're still in school or just permanently fucked up by the experience, are going to cheer for him to do it.

      These fuckwits have now been shown that the best place to continue their bullying after school is in administration or enforcement. Death is too kind.

    13. Re:How icky. by strikethree · · Score: 1

      but in no way, shape or form should revenge fantasies like "going Columbine" be casually thrown about as if yeah, that's something reasonable.

      It is not that it is reasonable. It is that such unreasonable actions could occur when all reasonable courses of protecting oneself are removed. We have seen it before and while I hope we never see it again, I am betting that we will see it again... for exactly what we see going on here.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    14. Re:How icky. by Mr_Nitro · · Score: 1

      totally agree....

    15. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you sound like a total piece of garbage. You have no business talking about something you've never experienced personally. Go on a rape survivor message board and post the language "get the fuck over it already" and "you need to move along and get past it". It's the same thing.

      You're trolling under this dumb argument that "slashdot = nerds who've been bullied = pro-shooting schools". What?! Are we reading the same site? You don't actually quote these "hopeful" messages you are supposedly seeing, and since I haven't seen them, I'm going to assume you're just making shit up so you can troll.

    16. Re:How icky. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words you have no clue what many people went through in school, bullied others yourself, and shrug it off as no big deal? Yeah we get it, you have no clue. Sit down, shut up, you have no idea WTF you're talking about because apparently you were special and didn't go through it. The fact that you were so arrogant and stupid as to say that everyone bullies someone else makes it quite plain just how out of touch and psychopathic you are yourself. To be clear for your small mind: NO NOT EVERYONE BULLIED SOMEONE ELSE! Some of us had a little compassion and empathy for others, something you apparently lack since you cannot connect and understand what this kid is going through while so many others here understand EXACTLY how he feels. That you cannot understand what a powder keg these idiots are creating is simply amazing.

      Dumbass.....

  57. Never ever trust the police or the law. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are not there to protect you, never have been never will be.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Never ever trust the police or the law. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      I would sooner seek out a tony soprano than the local cop, if I needed some justice done.

      yes, we have gone 100 yrs backward. yes. we should all realize that. our law enforcement is an enslaving and 'bullying' force and not a justice force.

      interesting that the paid bullies (cops) actually wanted to bully the kid who was bullied!

      the real life 'fat tony' guys are mostly a myth, these days, but it sure makes one feel like they should return again, in force, to bring us justice when the cops refuse to.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Never ever trust the police or the law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. If someone's breaking into your house you'll get a faster response from the fire department.

      Hey, you can always say "but I thought he was an arsonist."

  58. Recording laws by wolfguru · · Score: 1

    Recording a conversation without the consent of the other party even for the purpose of providing evidence requires a warrant, under the first amendment and the laws governing free speech. While I understand the intentions and agree that attempting to resolve it by providing clear evidence is reasonable, the simple truth is that under US law recording conversations is prohibited without the oversight of a judge who can determine whether or not it is an appropriate exception to the right of free speech. The worst part is that even though the officer probably has a very clear understanding of the circumstances that led to the desire to record the evidence, he cannot act on it if the evidence is gathered in an illegal manner. Without that safeguard, we have no right to control the content and audience of our self-expression, and no protection for our right to speak.

    1. Re:Recording laws by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Recording a conversation without the consent of the other party even for the purpose of providing evidence requires a warrant, under the first amendment and the laws governing free speech. While I understand the intentions and agree that attempting to resolve it by providing clear evidence is reasonable, the simple truth is that under US law recording conversations is prohibited without the oversight of a judge who can determine whether or not it is an appropriate exception to the right of free speech.

      You're making it sound like all-party consent laws exist throughout the entire US. Only twelve states require all-party consent: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Washington. In the other 38 it's perfectly legal to record the conversation as long as you are a party to it. This isn't anywhere close to a first amendment or free speech issue. Your right to speak freely does not imply a right to make others forget what you said or prevent them from testifying about it—and the only relevant difference between a recording made in person and one's own memory is that the recording is a more reliable form of evidence, which is all to the good.

      It's the all-party consent states, like this one, which are being unreasonable here. So long as the person speaking is aware that you can hear them, they have no reasonable expectation of privacy from you and you ought to be perfectly free to record what they say.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    2. Re:recording laws by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Surely not. If the recording was illegal then it was evidence of a crime and deleting it was illegal.

      If the recording was not illegal then there was no crime and no need to delete it.

      At no point was deleting it the correct action. The police broke the law. They should be prosecuted for it.

  59. fuck all of it by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    Fuck that school, fuck that police department, and fuck that state.

  60. Top notch police work there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news the same police lieutenant came across a man molesting a child in a car later that week, and asked him politely to please move along as he was in a no parking zone.

  61. recording laws by wolfguru · · Score: 1

    If you take a video it is admissible, but the voice portion of it cannot be used. Unfortunately, while we all agree the kid was trying to do the right thing, the law the protects our right to speak includes rules in how our speech can be used by others. While it is hard to understand in context, the police were correct in their reaction to the recording under the law.

  62. Misconduct in public office? by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    Don't you have any laws against Misconduct in public office that could be brought again that head teacher and police officer for the egregious breach of rights.

    1. Re:Misconduct in public office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a lot of illegal laws in the USA. Federal, state, and local governments all have them.

      The US Bill of Rights is open ended, with the 9th Amendment providing for unspecified rights "retained by the people", but there are huge numbers of laws, precedents, and court orders that violate even the most fundamental, basic, and obvious rights that could reasonably be asserted as arising under the 9th Amendment.

      So long as police officers, judges, district attorneys, and other people can get away with enforcing illegal laws (or acting according to illegal precedents, executive orders, and court orders), a lot of bad things will happen to people.

      Aaron Swartz found this out.

      Now somebody else has.

      Lots of people experience this directly.

      Even more experience it indirectly, in lots of ways during their day to day lives, often without realizing what is actually going on.

      Every hiker, for example, experiences the consequences of illegal laws when they find fences blocking access to large empty lots of private land that they should be able to cross as an exercise of the 9th Amendment Right to Roam. This is land and that is not part of any persons' home, and thus not protected by the right to privacy. In Britain, people would be able to cross this land!

      Land-owners are afraid of being sued (resulting from abuse of tort law by an unethical legal profession, backed by the guns of the government), so they put up fences. In some cases, they are required to do so as a condition for receiving insurance! Police officers arrest those that exercise their rights by crossing this land, and judges uphold those illegal arrests!

      From an ethics perspective, the US legal profession is completely out of control. This has turned the US legal system into a morass of contradictory, ambiguous, and inconsistent laws and precedents, which provides great job security for legal professionals, and the illusion of legitimacy for illegal actions by government, at a huge cost to everyone else.

      It should be possible to work within the system, using the 9th Amendment, and the fact that police officers, district attorneys, and all legal professionals swear oaths to uphold the Bill of Rights, to fight this. So far, that hasn't worked.

      Corruption and unethical practices are deeply entrenched in the system. It's not an accident that it took almost a century to end the "separate but not actually equal" system. The same willingness to enforce illegal laws that allowed that blatantly illegal system to exist for so many decades can be found in the current US legal profession, and in many police officers.

      Things are only going to get worse.

  63. Brutal by Casca · · Score: 1

    This story hits so close to home it is just brutal. I'm over 40, have a good career, family, friends, and so on, and yet this somehow transports me back to high school. It drops me right at the very moment in time when some douchecanoe jock decided it would be hilarious to dump a bag full of crumbled potato chips on my head in the middle of the lunch room in front of 300 classmates. As I sit here at my desk, I'm 16 years old again, my face is flushed, my heart is pounding in my ears, I want disappear.

    I cannot have enough sympathy for this kid. The adults in this situation were criminal in their conduct. Unforgivable.

    --
    Casca
  64. School math teacher/school was at risk by AbrasiveCat · · Score: 1

    The way I read the article was the bullying took place in front of a school math teacher. This likely was a form of harassment. Since the math teacher failed to act on this harassment, and the teacher was management's representative here, the school and therefore the school district (and city) was at risk of a harassment charge. They needed to eliminate the evidence. They had the police do this, who I presume were also city employees. I wonder if this rises to racketeering? Let's hope the state does a investigate of this. Looks like they might have avoided a lesser crime charge by making it a larger crime. (Not always a good idea!) (IANAL)

  65. To the crazy people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let this be a lesson to all you crazy people out there that go after other people. First, don't go after people that had nothing to do with it, stick to the offenders. Second, before you go on some knife or bomb rampage, at least make a note or something telling everybody you tried non-violent methods, and what the results were.

    That said, I think the spirit of the law must apply in this case, and as long as the recording is only going to be used in a court of law, it may well still be okay (at least to a JURY, hint hint.)

    In Ohio, it's perfectly legal to record a conversation in secret as long as you are one of the parties for which the communication is intended, or you have permission of one of those parties. This can be reviewed under Ohio Revised Code section 2933.52 (b) (4)

    1. Re:To the crazy people by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Pennsylvania is a two-party consent state, so by my understanding of wiretapping laws there, what this kid did was illegal.

      Now, this isn't something I would want to see, but I am morbidly curious about what would happen if somebody tried a mechanism like this after being a victim of being bullied, got charged with wiretapping... and then when it happened again, the victim decides to simply kill the bullies in retaliation.

      Now clearly, homicide would probably be considered "excessive force" as a means of dealing with bullying, but I think that this hypothetical scenario also shows that two-party or all-party consent requirements for recording might be broken. If a person tries non-violent means to get the matter dealt with, and only gets punished for it... then what difference should it make, in that sense, whether they resort to violent extremes anyways?

    2. Re:To the crazy people by nomanisanisland · · Score: 1

      Pennsylvania is a two-party consent state, so by my understanding of wiretapping laws there, what this kid did was illegal.

      Then the school administrators should be charged with tampering with evidence. And the judge should have thrown it out for lack of evidence. And the police officer should be reprimanded for failing to Mirandize the kid, and the kid was actually a minor (15 years old) so not bringing in the parent before interrogating him is another reprimand.

  66. Its not wiretapping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US VS White, 1971 determined so long as one person in the party, (ie the student), It is not a violation of wire tapping. This is also how undercover agents wear a wire. If it were illeagle it would not be admissible in court

    1. Re:Its not wiretapping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US v. White shows that wearing a wire does not violate 4th amendment rights. It does not provide that wiretapping laws across the states must be 1-party.

  67. Police want RESULTS by Bruce66423 · · Score: 2

    Given that the public wants measurable results for their tax dollars, getting an easy conviction is their optimum strategy. Upsetting the parents of the bullies, who are probably high status bullies themselves, by revealing that their brats are nasty pieces of work, is not going to do the police any favours. The publicity this case has generated will do some good to this particular situation, but in general, we're stuck with this problem...

  68. South Lafeyette Board Members by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    Let's do some bullying....

    lfornella@southfayette.org
    tburroughs@southfayette.org
    wnewcomer@southfayette.org
    avezzi@southfayette.org
    fmorelli@southfayette.org
    aczaplicki@southfayette.org
    tpetrillo@southfayette.org
    pbrinsky@southfayette.org
    jiriti@southfayette.org
    cgeisler@southfayette.org

    Seriously, I think we should get a group together. Stalk and beat the crap out of the principal. When the principal tries to press charges, we'll simply have a ton of alibis. If he records, we'll press charges against him for wiretapping and demand at gun point that he delete the files.

    So fuming pissed.

  69. Freedom of NON-assocation would fix all of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because who would voluntarily associate with people who are making their lives a misery?

    If we had freedom of NON association, all the decent people would (obviously) live with each other, and all those who can't behave properly would have to fend for themselves, and put up with each other. There would be no crime, at least not in the areas where non-criminals lived, etc.etc.

  70. I thought IN PERSON recordings where allowed... by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

    I thought IN PERSON recordings where legal in PA?

    http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guid...

  71. Once I was the bully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I once bullied someone in elementary school a few times on the bus, because he was weaker, slower, and less capable...

    He was someone with older brothers and family who loved him, they were not weaker, nor slower. And one day, they saw me out riding my bike to a friends house. They chased me down, pulled ahead of me in their car, got out, stopped me, quickly explained who they were and what was about to happen, and commenced in professionally kicking my ass...

    I admit it was a hard lesson to receive, but it was a lesson that I completely understood when the class was over. I realized that I had been an asshole and that I had done wrong to someone that did not deserve it. I realized that I would be held accountable for my actions. I realized that I put everyone at risk without reason, including my own safety. I never repeated these types of actions again...

    We are simple animals, sometimes we need simple lessons...

  72. Easy Target ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This all falls back to the same thing ... an easy target. A bully is looking for an easy target. And the school, rather than addressing the real issue, instead goes after the same easy target while leaving the real issue alone. Hmmm ... sounds like something most governments and politicians do too ...

    Sadly, in the United States today, the only way to get anything is to be loud and obnoxious, otherwise you go through life ignored and getting none of the benefits heaped on those who fuss and fight until they get it their way. What the parent SHOULD have done, is made multiple copies of the recording and sent them to the media. It would have been on the news before anyone could say anything about an "illegal recording" and at that point it wouldn't matter anymore.

  73. Wire tapping? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The kid needs a new attorney. From Pennsylvania's own site:
    The law does not cover oral communications when the speakers do not have an "expectation that such communication is not subject to interception under circumstances justifying such expectation." See 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. 5702 (link is to the entire code, choose Title 18, Part II, Article F, Chapter 57, Subchapter A, and then the specific provision). Therefore, you may be able to record in-person conversations occurring in a public place without consent. However, you should always get the consent of all parties before recording any conversation that common sense tells you is private.

    The recordings he made were all in the public venue. Also, while recording conversations in PA requires the consent of both parties, that is only for the purposes of meetings, phone conversations, etc. Otherwise, recording the school play or little league team would be a violation under the law in PA and it isn't. No, either the story is short on a critical fact, or a grave injustice has occurred.

  74. Don't hit back, walk away by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Then wait for your chance when the bully is not expecting it and then let him have it so hard that he and his whole gang will forever keep clear of you. For example, when you are on the upside of a steep incline, or he is standing on the edge of steps or something that you can hit him off of. Use the advantage of the terrain.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  75. Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who was bullied myself, I just hope that misfortune befalls the magistrate and officer.

    Just because of their epoch shattering retardation.

  76. Hit the school where it hurts. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Suspend it from foot ball league. As long as we value football trophies more than the mental health of the students, this will continue to happen.

    Even though the recordings have been deleted, the officials can be called in and to testify what they saw. The teacher who was allegedly present in these bullying sessions can be called in to testify. Collect evidence of bullying and have the school suspended for three years. That will teach them.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Hit the school where it hurts. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Why would the WIPIAL (the organization responsible for HS football in Western Pennsylvania) give a shit about some kind that is not a football player being bullied? The school administrators stick together and will cooperate on the coverup.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  77. South Fayette Mission Statement by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    From their website"

    Mission Statement
    The mission of the South Fayette School District, in partnership with the community, is to cultivate academic, artistic, and athletic excellence by instilling a spirit of collaboration and communication to develop confident, ethical and responsible leaders.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  78. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  79. Administrator mentality - see, hear, & do noth by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    I could have been this kid back in Jr High school. I might even have done exactly what this kid did back then, if recording devices didn't weigh a ton. Yea, I'm dating my generation here.

    .
    Bullying was out of control, even back then. Its nothing new except for the media is finally covering it. I was no the receiving end of that bulling up until the day I took Aikido. My instructor was an elderly woman weighing in all but about 86 lbs soaking wet. That class change my life. I had started taking Judo 9 month earlier but it had not yet come in handy for anything. After sitting in on just one Aikido class at the ripe old age of 13, only watching, I threw and pinned my adult Judo instructor using an Aikido move in a sparing match when I was just supposed to be the practice dummy for class demonstration purposes.

    Since graduating from high school, I have also taken Taekwondo, Shaolin Kung Fu, and Kenjutsu, but I always come back to Aikido in a time of need and/or a delicate situation. Its just more useful in everyday life. You merely use the opponents own energy against themself, by understanding the physiology of the human body and how it can and can not move. The philosophy of not hurting the opponent is the best part of it, and therefore useful for almost any kind of bad situation.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    My last encounter with such a school yard bully was as a bystander in a high school metal shop class, only I just couldn't stand there and watch it happen. The Class Clown (aka dumb F*@ck ) took a hand full of metal shavings off the lathe and went to shove it down this one kids shirt, and my own hand wound up going in right behind. I clinched his fist so he could not let go of the metal shavings, pulled his hand out slowly, squeezing his hand with around 90+ lbs of pressure, and then gently rolled him across the shop bench table with one hand. All 200 lbs of him, while I was about 150lbs at the time. Its proof that with enough thrust even pigs can fly....

    The administration, as you might guess did nothing, so the mighty sward of 'do-nothing-ever' cuts both ways at times.

    A little bit of self confidence can allow you to talk your way out of bad situations a lot more easily. Simple fact, its no fun to pick on someone who is just not afraid of you. The bullies are after the feeling of control they get when someone submits to their will, and they won't get any kind of satisfaction like that here.

  80. RE #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westroads_Mall_shooting
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Aurora_movie_theater_shooting

  81. Columbine was revenge against rapists by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    Let's keep Columbine out of this...there was waaaaay more going on that what we saw on news reports.

    Those boys were tormented by more than schoolyard bullying, more than fellow students.

    The police admitted, in their book-length report, that they *removed the blanket* from the teacher who had been shot...remember the "1 bleeding to death" sign in the classroom window? Yeah...that guy...the police admitted they removed the blanket as he lay there dying

    Second, Harris and Klebold were arrested and put on probation **a year before Columbine**...that info again didn't get released until years later...the details of their first arrest are still being withheld, only one page (that looks very incriminating to a group of police) has been seen publicly

    those boys were sexually abused by cops

    Schools are insane now...the way the school administrator and cops handled this was insane...but Columbine was an order of magnitude worse

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:Columbine was revenge against rapists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you elaborate on "removed the blanket"? No idea what the significance of that is.

    2. Re:Columbine was revenge against rapists by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      right,

      when I said "removed the blanket" it is a reference to the report released by the cops

      this is all in the report (sorry don't have time to to google it for you) and 60 Minutes did a 2 part story on it, which you can see online, that's where I got this info

      the "1 bleeding to death" sign that we all saw in the classroom window was in reference to a teacher who was shot. He lay there bleeding out for 3+ hours then died

      the report released much later by the cops finally explained some of what happened...the police had secured the school at least an hour before they attended to him, and when they did, as he lay there, one of the police removed a blanket that had been put to keep him warm while he waited

      that's all that's in the 60 Minutes story...IIRC the police paid out a huge settlement to that family which of course bars them from publicly commenting

      i suggest checking out the 60 Minutes story if you want to know more

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    3. Re:Columbine was revenge against rapists by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      You are the worst expository write I have ever seen, and I teach writing to high school kids with 3rd grade reading levels.

      How about instead of making meaningless references to 60 minutes stories none of us have watched, you just tell us what the hell you are talking about.

      What is in the report? What "1 bleeding to death sign"? What did the report released by the cops explain? You've answered nothing in your post.

    4. Re:Columbine was revenge against rapists by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      holy crap man...google it yourself...

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    5. Re:Columbine was revenge against rapists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the worst expository write I have ever seen, and I teach writing to high school kids with 3rd grade reading levels.

      Seriously? Did you read what you wrote? What's your fucking excuse, you lazy trolling bastard? I read that shit three times while I tried to determine if it was English or not. Jesus Christ!

  82. Re:Concealed weapons, ok, concealed microphone, no by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    It seems like US society is actively encouraging resolving any conflict with guns rather than with information, evidence and dialogue.

    FTFY

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  83. ...Then Gets Threatened With Wiretapping Charge... by m.alessandrini · · Score: 1

    ... then asks for asylum in Canada.

  84. Student Records Kids Who Bully Him, Then Gets Thre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly the kid should have brought a handgun to school and shot those students who had been bullying him or her. The prosecutors masterbate every time there is a school shooting and ejaculate whenever a kid stands up for themselves in a peaceful way.

    CAPTCHA: flowed

  85. Let this be a lesson to you Christian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being labeled Christian makes you a target for bullies, no matter what age they are. It's not an easy road, despite the general acceptance in America.

    1. Re:Let this be a lesson to you Christian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull fucking shit. The ones doing the bullying are "christians".

      Fuck you, your god, and your persecution complex.

  86. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    Oh, and you can bet my kid stopped that crap that day.

    How'd you get him to do that? Did you bully him?

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  87. I want to say something FOR the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a child, I was bullied. Six, occasionally more, older and bigger kids in the neighborhood. This went on for years. It graduated to vandalism, theft, verbal harassment of my family. Enabled by the family of a couple of the kids. Who would encourage the bullies to congregate at their house which was quite close to mine.

    One night, they were having a loud party. These things were encouraged by the parents. They assaulted my father. Finally, my parents called the cops. Explained the situation.

    The cops were in my parents' living room. Big men with uniforms and guns. They must have become enraged with the bullies because they turned on them and pursued them like hounds. Shut it all down. I don't know why. But the cops hated the bullies. Pursued them relentlessly. The cops told us if there ever any threat detected, to call them. Which we did. Eventually the bullies proactively ignored us. Even tried to be friendly. Today, one of the bullies is dead. Another is a convicted felon. The rest were dispersed.

    So. There are clearly incidents of cops being douchebags. We hear about it all the time. I've personally been hassled by cops - told to move along, tickets, that sort of thing. But - when it really counted, they were there for us. Obviously, YMMV. But, I wanted to add another angle here.

  88. And people wonder why armed violence at school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make the news headlines.

  89. Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for connecting the dots how we cause our own problems and tragedies.

  90. Simpler technology: rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, I was bullied too. So I started carrying a rock around, and when someone tried to bully me I'd try to seriously hurt them. I'd throw the rock at their heads, bite, claw, scream, snarl, and basically acted like an angry chimpanzee (or a crazy guy in prison). I didn't care if I sent any of them to the hospital, but fortunately none of them ended up having to go. Naturally I was always the one who got in trouble (since the bullies picked the timing) but eventually they decided it wasn't worth it.

    My advice to parents with bullied kids - teach them to be a f-cking animal. It doesn't matter if they lose the fight, they just need to make it a Pyrrhic victory for the bullies. We can't expect kids to be civilized when their aggressors are being protected by the teachers.

  91. There's that "Disorderly Conduct" again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in high school (back BEFORE Columbine, 1995 or so) I had been in a car accident and I was walking around school with a walking stick that I had made in art class. The campus cop saw it and took it, calling it a "weapon". When he presented me no opportunity to get back my very important assignment and necessary tool for walking, I called him an asshole. He immediately frog marched my half-crippled ass down to his little port-a-pottie of an office and wrote me a ticket for disorderly conduct. Must be nice to be able to just toss around such a vague charge any time someone does anything you don't like. I had to go to court three different times because I knew nothing of that process and the cop didn't show up the two previous times. Well, the third time I actually got a public defender to talk to me and it took all of 30 seconds to get the stupid thing tossed out.

    How in the world was this kid convicted of anything? What evidence was presented?

  92. Let them know what you think by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

    School main line - 412-221-4542 Principal Mr. Scott Milburn phone ext. 265 email: smilburn@southfayette.org

  93. I was bullied, went to the principal to resolve ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teacher said I should have come to her first.

  94. Anyone else notice the ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ironic there is an ad for an assault rifle right next to the article.

  95. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really is sad. It's stories like this that provoke major violence I think.

    Every single kid who gets routinely picked on now thinks they can't goto authorities to get help because they will get in serious trouble. Bullied kids eventually snap and when they snap then shit gets real. Maybe he just does something as innocent as punching his bully in the face but maybe someone else decides to split his bully's skull open with a crowbar or kill the bully and his family.

    People wonder why the US is so fucked up, this story is exactly why it is. I hope the bullied kid gets everything dropped and can live a normal life after being abused so much.

  96. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its better to just arrest the bullied and release the bullies into the general populus. Then the whole problem goes away.

  97. Well it makes sense by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    For one, Slashdot has a bunch of anti-social jerks that like to post, who have an inability to empathize with anyone else. So no surprise they think something like that is a good idea, because they they aren't very reasonable people.

    However others have pointed out, accurately I think, that something like this can well be a cause for it. The thing is that if you push someone in to a corner and give them what seems to be no way out, no way to fight back, they may go nuts. Happens with other animals, not just humans. So if you have a kid that is continually picked on, who tries to stand up for themselves, but is then picked on even worse, this time by law enforcement, well then they may well take drastic measures because they feel like there's no option, no hope.

    I think there is some real merit to this. Not merit as in saying it is good that kids do it, but that it is correct that actions like this can lead to kids doing it. If they feel they have nothing to lose and nowhere to turn, then a completely crazy overreaction may be the only option they feel they have.

    I mean here you have a case of a kid who did everything right, and got increasingly screwed: He never fought back or defended himself, which schools do not allow (you can argue if they should, but they don't, it is against the rules). He got no help or support from the school, I mean it was allowed to happen IN CLASS in front of a teacher. He told his parents, they were skeptical, he produced evidence. He was then threatened by the police, ordered to delete it (illegally), drug to court, etc, etc. So what has he got now? He's been effectively told the bullies are allowed to do as they wish and if you attempt to stop them the police and courts will punish you.

    So what's he to do? You can see how a drastic, illogical, action might be what he thinks is his only option. Remember that he doesn't have the perspective of age, he can't look on high school and say "Ya that's a real short time in your life and it gets WAY better once you are out and an adult." To him, this is his whole world. And for that matter, the adult world has stepped in and told him he;s wrong to try and make things better for himself.

    As such you can see why people are saying it can lead to something like a school shooting. It is something that administrators need to consider: Dealing with bullying isn't something to do just because it is the right thing (which would be a good enough reason) but it is a safety issue as well.

    1. Re:Well it makes sense by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I completely understand your points, but let me offer a few things:

      Shit like this happens to people every single day. Often vastly worse; I volunteered with an organization that sought clemency for people who were wrongly convicted and imprisoned (and in the US that means being subjected to some truly horrific shit). Yet, by and large, despite being completely fucked over by the system and having had years - sometimes decades - of their lives taken away, despite being tortured by beatings, rapes, solitary confinement, these people didn't lose their shit and go on a killing spree. They kept their shit together. My point here is that people get fucked over and there are ways of dealing with it, and sometimes things get handled and sometimes they don't, and you need to move along and get past it.

      But, as you say, that takes perspective. Which gets me to my next point: The kid himself may not have perspective, but his parents sure as hell should. Or some other adult. Someone should have sat him down and explained that he was right, the people in power were assholes, and that while he probably is plenty pissed about how it all went down, in the grand scheme of things it's just a run in with assholes, and he's better than that. It is the job of parents not just to teach kids how to not be assholes, but how to deal with the fact that assholes exist and they will try to fuck up your life.

      I definitely agree that dealing with bullying needs to be handled better not just because it's the right thing, but because it's an immediate safety issue and letting it keep going perpetuates a culture that accepts it. The problem is that school administrators are short sighted in this country (actually, pretty much everyone involved in public education in this country is extremely short sighted), and they want to maintain control with a minimum amount of hassle.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  98. You always have a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can delete the evidence or get shot by the officer. Your choice!

  99. Authority confused about victim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 4th grade another student threw some dirt at me. I grabbed a handful of dirt and threw it back. A tiny stone caused a cut above the other student's eye. I was the first person ever sent home from this brand new school. The student who initiated this, and who did the same act, did not get sent home. Incidents like this lead us to distrust authority.

  100. The truth is here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  101. Pennsylvania is a Stand Your Ground State... by sugarmatic · · Score: 2

    The detective clearly would have preferred it if the kid had pulled out a Colt .45 and blown the offending child bully's brains out all over the wall.

    The simple truth is simply too threatening to too many people. They demand laws that provide drama instead.

    1. Re:Pennsylvania is a Stand Your Ground State... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the detective, but I'd have approved.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  102. The thing is... by ramper · · Score: 1

    I don't mean to be "that guy" but at their age neither bully nor victim are at fault. Neither popular kid, nor unpopular kid are at fault. It's not as though these kids make a conscious decision when they're 6 years old to seek popularity or dickhead status. Its most probably bred into them by their surroundings and/or parents/upbringings.

    You know, the whole adult vs child thing. Children cannot be accountable for ALL their actions because some of them are through no-fault-of-their-own.

    This case sounds like one of more privileged vs not as privileged. Ie. bully family has better town status and/or lawyer.

    I didn't read the articles, so my points might be complete nonsense.

    1. Re:The thing is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, please send the poor little bully into counceling, the poor little misguided soul should be shown just how much pain he caused his victim so he learns just how much better it would be not to hurt someone. But we shouldn't make him apologize, it would probably humiliate him too much and shatter his precious little soul.

      Like that?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:The thing is... by ramper · · Score: 1

      No. Not at all. I am not claiming to have any answers. I just wanted to make a point that I hadn't seen anyone else raise. Is my point out of line?

    3. Re:The thing is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If you suggest that kids are little angels, pure and unable to be sinister little bastards, then yes, you are. They are quite capable of being little scheming assholes worthy of being kicked hard enough to fly half a week past Wednesday.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:The thing is... by ramper · · Score: 1

      Human beings under the age of 18 are capable of performing acts of their own will, yes. Sometimes children are tried in court as adults for their perceived willful actions. I don't disagree with you on anything you're saying but you are assuming I have some bully-promoting motive. This bully could plainly be a sinister little shit but generally a child is (for good reason) not held fully accountable for ALL of their actions and that is something that should be considered in this debate - and in each bully debate worldwide. I am not suggesting the bully should or should not be held accountable but am pointing out the potential complex societal structure in place which may or may NOT have contributed to the situation being discussed. I strongly believe these situations are not as simple as they often seem. Somehow I get the feeling that you will still consider me to be taking the side of the bully.

    5. Re:The thing is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There is exactly zero reason for someone to be a bully, and exactly zero excuse to be one. The earlier kids learn that actions have consequences, the better.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:The thing is... by ramper · · Score: 1

      There's obviously something fundamental about what I am suggesting that you don't agree with. I wasn't intending to sway the masses with my original post, I just think it has a decent likelihood of being valid.

      There is exactly zero reason for someone to be homeless but it happens. I believe it's likely there could be legitimate excuses for being a bully. I'm not suggesting that something shouldn't be done about that, though. I respect your posts and appreciate the conversation.

    7. Re:The thing is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the homeless person did not CHOOSE to be homeless. He didn't get up one day and ponder that it would be so much nicer for him to abandon his home and live on the street.

      The bully has always the choice NOT to bully someone. Instead he deliberately took the choice to be a bully.

      Unless someone forces a bully to be a bully, I cannot follow your argument.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  103. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you. You are an excellent parent.

  104. Jeesh, make a federal case of it why don't you... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    Seriously, federal civil rights lawsuit.

    Start with subpoena of the entire school districts disciplinary records for the last 50 years. The photocopy costs alone will have them begging to settle.

  105. Make it stop by sglines · · Score: 1

    If there is such a thing as justifiable homicide I would think this falls into the category of justifiable wiretapping.

    Cops and other people in authority wonder why they aren't liked.

    Geesh!

  106. How my father handled bullying by jstrauser · · Score: 1

    Dad to Principal: "My son can't defend himself when he gets hit?" Principal: "Your son should come to us so we can stop it." Dad: "That's fine, so how about this? Every time my son tells us he got hit, I hit you!" Teachers and playground monitors paid better attention after that.

  107. Works as Designed by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

    Precisely!

    Were you not listening, reading or watching for the past decade?

    What did you not understand?
    This. Is. Corporatism! (Not Sparta! 8-))

    An under-educated class, born to be in debt, endlessly conditioned to obey, bred under pain of punishment, to Serve.

    In this model, Authority is there to Rule, not to Adjudicate, so any attempt, no matter how trivial, to resist, to dissent, or,
    as in this case, to provide any alternative to the Authority defined and controlled processes, will *always* be harshly punished.
    As subversive.

    Appeals for protection justify further exploitation, since the weak deserve to be hurt, and the system serves only the strong.
    Might is Right, and don't bleed on the floor.

    The only element missing is religion: "If Jaysus loved you, you wouldn't be picked on".

    This school has a board.
    This municipality has elected officials.
    The Majority of the people in this area voted for this.
    Your neighbours, colleagues and fellow-parents?
    They want this.

    This is what modern Western society has become.

    --
    (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    1. Re:Works as Designed by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Religion is involved all right... the religion of high school football. The parents elect the board and the board hires administrators that protect the holy football. Football jocks bully some geek, reactions range from slap-on-the-wrist to nobody-gives-a-shit. Administrator punishes football players, team misses the playoffs, and the board fires him.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    2. Re:Works as Designed by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      Ah! But the Jocks uphold the system!

      Those who support, always get special treatment, the only sin being to challenge established "Truths".

      So, if the Jocks beat on the weak, the marginal, the dissenters, then they will be either ignored
      or discretely applauded and supported.

      And by Jocks, I mean Police, LEO, Spooks, and the various pillars of society.

      I really wish that I was wrong.
      I wish that things were not, what they have become.

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
  108. Who's the wiretapping victim? by MorbidBBQ · · Score: 1

    Who is the victim of this heinous wiretapping crime?
    If the bully's lawyer wants to attempt to use wiretapping as a defense, then ok.
    But why should the cops bring it up?

    The power of the District Attorney's office is shown here too.
    Instead of going to court, they "took the deal".

    More than 90 percent of criminal cases are never tried before a jury, in part because the Supreme Court ruled in 1978 that threatening someone with life imprisonment for a minor crime in an effort to induce him to forfeit a jury trial did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to trial.

  109. Lesson Learned... by bunklung · · Score: 1

    So the kid/parents learned a valuable lesson! If you intend to procure a recording, make certain YOU don't do the recording. Perhaps an anonymous tipster could procure the recording and post it publicly next time. No charges, nothing to redact...

  110. 4. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay some one to put the bully on a wheelchair: let his inbreed parents pay for it.

  111. The only solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enact a law requiring every human beaing to wear an audio-visual recording device while in school property with recordings wirelessly uploaded to a secure system and not stored on the device. Then establish an alert system everytime a device is disabled security must respond in five minutes or less and investigate to determine the cause. If the device was disabled deliberately the person is permanantly expelled from the premesis and if criminal activity, like bullying, was performed then prosecution initiated.

    For privacy sake the devices would have a lockout for the Lavatory and in person security would be enacted. Any place like locker rooms/showers where this would be infeasible would be banned. Any activity requiring a locker room/shower would be forcibly moved to another institution or disbanded.

    1. Re:The only solution... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why so complicated? Hold schools responsible for bullying, including any and all costs for medical bills, psychological and otherwise, that can be linked to it, payable by the school's budget. Unless they can show that they did their best to get rid of the bullies instead of the usual tactics of turning a blind eye to it so the bully doesn't find other targets (like school property or faculty) they are responsible, fully. In public schools you can also fire anyone who could have responded and didn't. Private schools should be sufficiently motivated by the fact that the fines can make up a multiple of the tuition fee they lose by throwing the bully out.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  112. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

    Oh, and you can bet my kid stopped that crap that day.

    How'd you get him to do that? Did you bully him?

    Trolling with baseless and inflammatory questions? Or intentionally displaying your abject stupidity by interpreting "bully" so broadly that the term becomes useless?

    Given your posting history, my bet is on both.

    For others who might care (since you won't):
    Punishment and bullying are distinguishable in many ways, one of which is that punishment tends to be used after violation of a generally agreed norm by someone we recognize has the authority to punish (a judge, an teacher, a parent). Bullying tends to involve some random jackass acting on a whim or in reponse to a violation of his own personal rules. I'll assume for the sake of argument that you're aware of the various state laws and school policies that make bullying a punishable offense, rather than a figment of the GP's imagination.

  113. Backup by billy3 · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the kid has an "automatically backed up" copy which "someone" could anonymously post on YouTube. If officials ask if he knew about it he could just say he knew less than the school officials did about him being bullied.

  114. Clockwork Orange by billy3 · · Score: 1

    Yup, that's the kind of society this is!

  115. Re:Jeesh, make a federal case of it why don't you. by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

    Exactly. The only chance to get a fair shake is to practice asymmetric warfare. Bury them with stuff it doesnt cost you much to file but costs them lots to defend, which is exactly what they do to you.

  116. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    You're a good dad. Thank you.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  117. The world will be a better place by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    if that cop is killed in the line of duty.

    Or anytime really.

    1. Re:The world will be a better place by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Na, I would rather he have to live the rest of his life with being fired from his job and denied his pension for being a corrupt asshole.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  118. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I and all the people know
    What school children learn
    Those to whom evil is done
    Do evil in return
    -
    W.H. Auden

  119. Hang them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So ... the moral of the story is two fold. The officials, lieutenant, and magistrate need to be lynched with barbed wire ... ---- THAT is justice. The bully need to be beaten with in an inch of his life. ---- This is also justice. If bully does it again, make him disappear, permanently.

  120. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
    um, first, stop assuming because you're wrong and the fact you can't think of anything besides those two things shows your limitations.

    Second, you do know punishment doesn't work do you? Or you're one of those weird church nutters that believes jesus did away with all religious requirements except for the punishment of children? See, how I copied you? I even left out the most obvious fanboi option.

    and 3rd. Monkey see, monkey do. If you read the postings on the topic here there are a significant number of people who were bullied that would relish the opportunity to bully someone weaker or in a weakened position.

    Forth and most significant, don't you want to know how he 'solved' bullying? Doesn't that seem the least bit important to you?

    No, of course not. You've already solved it with 'punishment' which in your head seems to be abuse that's sanctified because of its 'educative' goals.*

    Of course, that's how perpetrators of any human vice justify their personal use. They alone, out of the whole human race, actually have a reason for their actions.

    * If bullies are frequently heard talking about how they're going to teach-someone-a-lesson, in your world does that mean we should let the abuse slide and just judge them on their poor teaching skills?

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  121. "but clubs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in school, We had a "but club". It was a -- wait a minute ... Uh oh, missing an extra 't' there. Whoops!

    PS: The CAPTCHA is "miseries". Poetic.

  122. Careful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't want a mob. Remember the reddit fiasco after the Boston bombing?

  123. as devil's advocate and one who remembers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how rotten kids can be.

    Passive aggressiveness is a real thing. It is real easy to start sh*t then turn the camera/tape recorder on after initiating conflict. I saw similar done when kids wanted the yard monitor to see the retaliatory swing in a fight, and lots of girls saying all sorts of vile viscious sh*t until someone snaps and throws something.

    I witnessed friends' teenage son do this a lot. He got sympathy from adults because he claimed he was being beat up for being gay. His folks didn't want to hear that most of the fights he got into, were with other kids also out of the closet. I watched him pull some passive aggressive stunts to "friends" who were over visiting (I rented half the house from his family so got lots of exposure) Got himself into a special school where his "orientation wouldn't lead to victimization" and got beat up there too. So his folks moved him out of state to somewhere that there's not enough openly gay kids in his district to support.

    I could see him doing something like recording a fishing expedition. As it was, a number of kids came real close to getting some serious "hate" brandings in their school records. The open kids avoided that, but the others, I don't know. I'd moved out by that time - kid tried to steal my mini recorder among other things.

    Yes, kids think like this. Anyone who refuses to acknowledge the possibility otherwise, I'd suspect of either refusing to remember, or having a vested interest in maintaining the victim status, or some sort of "revenge by munchausen" syndrome.

  124. Perhaps he meant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Penn State?

  125. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

    * If bullies are frequently heard talking about how they're going to teach-someone-a-lesson, in your world does that mean we should let the abuse slide and just judge them on their poor teaching skills?

    No, it means that we really need to work on your reading comprehension skills.

    1. Just because you say "you're wrong" doesn't mean that I am.
    2. Thanks for proving my second point for me.
    3. Thanks for proving my first point for me. The guy you attacked didn't claim to have been bullied, much less to relish bullying others.
    4. Nope. And even if I did, asking would be sufficient, not asking and then immediately following up with a charge that the parent bullied the child.

    You've already solved it with 'punishment' which in your head seems to be abuse that's sanctified because of its 'educative' goals.*

    Yep..

    Of course, that's how perpetrators of any human vice justify their personal use. They alone, out of the whole human race, actually have a reason for their actions.

    Name even one society which does not punish. Alternately, explain how a universal lack of punishment is a virtue. Because that is precisely where you've taking this given your rejection of punishment by judges, administrators and parents.

    And again... troll.

  126. You are missing the point. by thedarb · · Score: 1

    Anti-wiretapping laws are there TO PROTECT YOU.

    Yes, it is unfortunate that it hampers this kid's attempt at exposing the bullying... But the law is there to protect everyone from being recorded without their express consent. The fact that the recording was used for good does not make it legal, and I know that sucks in this case... but overall, the law is better left intact for the greater good. It's protecting you, all of you, from someone recording you and using it against you. Do you *really* want to lose that protection because of this one case? I hope not. Because once you lose a protection like that, it's gone forever. I say that again, it would be gone FOREVER. And in days... not weeks, not years, you would see people falling prey to the loss of that protection. Then you will look back and think, "What have we done?"

    Don't get me wrong, I was bulllied horribly growing up. It was terrible! But losing this one legal protection we have to deal with bullies is not the answer.

    Don't know what the real answer is... anything I dream up is just as illegal, as I was bullied myself and can only think of mean ways to deal with them. But losing our rights and legal protections is the *worst* way to go.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  127. Fair is Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the NSA can record the phone conversations of millions of people, including German prime minister Angela Merkel, but this poor kid can't record a bully in the act of bullying him? OK, kid. If you're going to be charged with a felony, it may as well be for shooting the prick rather than recording him.

  128. I am of 2 minds here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the one hand, having been bullied as a child, no one should have to put up with bullying, nor should they have to put up with the Bullying by proxy, from authorities whose responsibility it is to correct the situation, but don't, out of laziness, conflict of interest or whatever. I agree that the situation here is nothing short of unacceptable. That does not however fix the problem either, neither does the kind going "columbine" improve the order of the universe at all. Part of the lesson here is the hard truth that "LIFE IS NOT FAIR" It isn't and I believe that the earlier one learns this, the better off they are. Yes it can suck until one steps out of the bounds of thinking in the box and (within the bounds of the law, morality and moving forward with their future in mind...) and considers that the corollary of Life sucking for those that are bullied by bullies and the bullying by proxy of the authorities that refuse to do their jobs like everyone else.. Life isn't fair, which means that Within the bounds of the law, morality and moving forward with one's future well being in mind there is still a large latitude where that kind can be creative and make life as unfairly miserable for the bully and the proxy bullies.

    I think copying the video and putting it on youtube and letting it go viral is one idea, once it is beyond a certain point, the weak ass argument of "take it down now!" kinda becomes moot when it is already airing on "Good Morning America" and has Al Roker and Savanah Guhtrie and Carson Daily commenting on it. Once it gets to Hoda and Kathy Lee Gifford, there really is not an amount of bullying that can stop the public from passing judgement on the wrong do-ere and life goes on.. and this is just one creative tangent.. there are surely many many more..

    I think the take away.. and if it were my kid, I would use it as a teachable moment, Don't let others make your life miserable, Don't get angry, don't be miserable because other people , in a word, suck. In the many words of a mentor of mine, "Calling the bully stupid, is an insult to stupid people" and as for the authorities who are misusing the law and their authority here, "You sir, are about as useful as Anne Frank's Drum kit."

  129. Same thing with fights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a kid, I was walking down the baseball field hill of my school to go back into the building. Next thing I know, some kid is randomly pinching my neck pretty hard like WTF? So i play his game and we go back and forth. Next thing I know I'm running around the PRINCIPAL OF THE SCHOOL while getting punched by this kid and two "volunteers" of the afterschool program "talked" to just me. That was it.

    I didn't get any bruises or swelling from this bigger kid but i could've broken his face and then where would the school be? I didn't fight back because my mom would've beat my ass lol

  130. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by strikethree · · Score: 1

    Something similar here: My son has always been MUCH larger than everyone in his same age group. In kindergarten, I caught him beating up a boy in the third grade. I grabbed him and took him over to the other boys house after the other boy arrived home and had him apologize in front of the other boy's parents. He stopped being a bully forever after that.

    Fast forward to high school and my son comes home complaining loudly one day. He is tired of hearing all of this anti-bullying "crap". They have to watch movies and go to the auditorium and blah blah endlessly and there is no bullying problem!

    "Dad, why do I have to keep hearing this crap? I never see ANY bullying anywhere."

    So I finally broke it to him, "Son, YOU are the bully. I know, you do not bully anyone but look at yourself. Is there anyone in the 10th grade who is as big as you?"

    "No.", he says.

    "Is there anyone in the 11th grade that is as big as you?", I ask.

    "No, but there is one kid as tall as me.", he says.

    So I told him that he was supposed to be the bully but because he was not doing his job, there was no room for anyone else to do it. Why? Because he could beat the shit out of anyone who tried.

    I then went on to explain how bullying actually *IS* is a huge problem elsewhere and he agreed that it was possible. He stopped complaining after that and his school remained peaceful. I am proud of his choices.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  131. ...differences... by Mr_Nitro · · Score: 1

    where I grew up school discipline was plain and simple, u get a discipline note once , twice, third time you have to repeat the whole year even if your exams scores are fine. You keep doing stupid things nonetheless, you get expelled from that school, no if no but. Athletes? No differences at all. And during teaching not a fly moves...always. Actually once we complained to the school principal because we perceived that one teacher had slightly too soft/slacking attitude. That's how it should be imho. School is a place to learn and open your mind, professional multi-millions earning athletes don't bring anyone any benefit except as tv-party hooligans people entertainment.

  132. Re:Assistant Principal doesn't believe it was bull by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
    Gosh, lot's of idiots lately.

    Just to clarify, since you can't seem to comprehend. I didn't attack anybody. I asked a question. Then you went off the rails, taking everything to illogical extremes, changing contexts willy-nilly, setting up strawmen and red herrings left and right, and going off on unrelated tangents.

    Science fact:Punishment does not work, whether everybody keeps doing it has nothing to do with if it actually works.

    You couldn't even understand the paper you posted could you? Do you know why they keep saying 'deterrence'? It's because the fact that punishment does not work has been shown so many times that the only hope left for the penal system, and what's left to study, is that punishment 'works' as a deterrent. If you understood the paper, you would see even then, not so much. In fact, in the paper you linked to, increasing duration and severity of punishment actually increases recividism!!! That's as far as I'll try explaining because you don't seem like somebody who understands science or logic, or you wouldn't have posted a document that totally undermines your position. It's not enough to wave knowledge around like a burning brand to fend off arguments, you have to actually understand it. You trolled me good.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
  133. removals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this story is a true representation of what happened then some of the school officials, the police lieutenant, the original prosecutor who filed the charges and the magistrate all have too little judgment for their positions and need to be fired! If you live in that district PLEASE make a stink with your elected officials and the head judge for that court and demand they be fired or retired. There is no point in reassigning any of them. I wouldn't even trust any of them to serve me fries. Their total lack of judgment makes them unfit for almost any occupation.

  134. Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SO kid gets bullied. He decides to do something about it. He records bullying to show them whats happening. OK GOOD SO FAR. Next he takes the recording to his mother who agrees that this is unacceptable and so she goes to the school shows it to the principle who calls the police on the victim for FUCKING WIRETAPPING. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THIS PRINCIPLE. AND THE POLICE EAT THIS SHIT UP. SO DOES THE JUDGE APPARENTLY. That whole community is full of dumb ass people who clearly don't follow the same exact guidelines they tell students to follow. I get assemblies at my school about bullying I'm sure they do to and if they don't then they need to start.

  135. Magistrates are a blight on the justice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No magistrate, glorified court clerks with an ego problem for the most part, should be allowed to decide a parking violation, let alone a serious issue such as this. These political hand out positions are too often used to provide respectable jobs for relatives and friends of politicians and contributors.

    I am a bit surprised that the system even continues to operate.

  136. Cause I don't wish to be named. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    School can be held liable for not protecting students
    When I was bullied, my parents contacted a hungry lawyer.

  137. Curious about the characterization... by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    Why do you call this a "post authoritarian decade"?

    Was 2000 - 2010 an "authoritarian decade"? If so, why?

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  138. Bullying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A classic example of how fucked up the world (country) is becoming. Remember this is a "school", one place where one is (supposedly) taught socialization, right from wrong, etc. in addition to academics. There's a higher purpose there rather than relying entirely upon "Constitutional" protections against wire tapping, recording conversations or even video of certain events (perhaps without someone's knowledge?). The government does it when they perceive such threats. But some kid bullied in school doesn't have the same "right"? How cynical can school officials get? The morally right thing to do would've been to be more concerned about the intimidation that was going on by the bullies! Is it any wonder people who are bullied turn to their own devices for any degree of justice. Those school officials should be embarrassed and parents, if they had any sense, should demand the removal of any responsible school official. Local law enforcement should also be embarrassed for responding they way they did.

  139. The idiots are running the Asylum.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our government", from Eric Holder to Barney Fife, can run around after people all day long recording everything they do, reading their mail, their email, tracing their calls, their internet, their cars...and it's all perfectly legal. Even "the press" and the paparazzi can follow (aka stalk), photograph and record whatever people do "in public"...no violations of privacy there.

    But when a minor attempts to defend himself in a manner proscribed by law by documenting proof of assault, the law turns on him and protects the instigators. As if the boy had taken a gun to school, which many of you here would say was his right to do, and threatened bodily harm against his attackers.

    I'd be very interested in knowing more about the parents of the alleged attackers and more about South Fayette township generally, but especially the average per capita income. I see by the school district's website The South Fayette Foundation for Excellence is sponsoring a charity golfing event, supposedly during the offseason (July). How many school districts do you know that offer space on their front webpage sponsoring a golf tournament? Any in the inner cities in that list at all?

    In other words, what kind of prestige does it take to stand the law on its ear? And what kind of ignorance does it take to not be aware of it?

           

  140. Re:How shortsighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the revenge fantasies are over the top, they do something good: document what bullying causes and that it is not something that is easy to get over. You are playing it down if you tell people to " get the fuck over it already" and likely haven't had to deal with true bullying. It is not picking on somebody as you probably picked on somebody, too.

    Having lost all sense of security around you is not something you can take lightly, and that's what true bullying leads to! Also, when you are different bullying does not stop. Adults do it, too, but more subtly, even if you have more chances to take your distances.

    Also, you make the mistake that therapy fixes anything of this. It does not, true therapy is fixing the offending behavior, not tricking yourself into believing it was not all that bad afterall... This is exactly the same kind of mind set that does not fight bullying.

    There is a difference between teasing, playing, having fun, and bullying. The difference is big, and quite distinct. Drama queens abuse these subjects to get attention; real bullying is not something you just get over, because it is not just fun, it is something that affects your security, and it's not something imaginary.

    Think over it a little more, think about how society works, how the job market works, age discrimination, etc. and you will see that this is something that starts early. This kind of thinking creeps in everywhere and it is not harmless.

  141. Privacy advocates should shut the front door by FreedomFirstThenPeac · · Score: 1

    He was NOT an arm of government, so 5th amendment does not apply. Maybe he should have packed heat into the school and gone all Columbine on them. Fek that.

    --
    "There is no god but allah" - well, they got it half right.
  142. Anthony David by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was taking video in a public place, and nobody has a right to privacy in a public place.