The point of arresting people who possess child pornography is that they might have paid for it
Police have lots of tools for tracing financial transactions, but it seem like the business aspect is mostly mythical. Viewers are being punished for unholiness. The government also suppresses legally produced porn that it considers distasteful.
So the only right you recognize is the one to exist like a pig. Because communicating like a human being has some effect on others. If granny and the kids are little piggies they should be locked safely away in pens someplace. "Political correctness" is more degrading to a man than living in a sty.
Beauty isn't an ideal for women, it's practical. When every guy wants them they are well satisfied with their looks. When they bring up a body issue and a guy rapturously compliments them, the look of dissatisfaction on their face is because the guy does not meet their standards.
Correlation is hardly a "direct connection". Girls are coming out of elementary school obese, and it's not because they are trying to look like their favorite haute couture models. It's because of shit food, and a culture that coddles girls and accepts them for "how they are" and their "inner beauty". In times when moms cooked, fashion demanded tiny waists, and neurosis was still a disease, girls had fewer problems maintaining their figure.
When increases in healthcare, gas, food, housing, education are all increasing "in great excess compared to the general rate of inflation", maybe that rate has been a little understated...
What answer? Attaching devices to your car was obviously illegal! How about the real problem: plate readers, which can easily achieve total surveillance of road traffic. But a ruling against those would raise questions about the millions of other government cameras monitoring the public. And at this point questioning those is simply not going to be allowed.
It's kind of the natural order. There's something to be said for the "village" lending a hand, but in large populations the value of a random individual is going to be 0. Certainly people can advance beyond nature and focus on attaining self-fulfillment in their lives, but the first step is: Don't have any children.
It could prevent you from getting a job that pays anything, in which case you are in a kind of debtors' prison. It would more sense for the bank to get part of your paycheck withheld.
Their business depends entirely on the government so they give lots of bribes. Other businesses lobby, but once the government has paid you to build your factory and let you operate it tax free, what else is there to ask for? Copyright on the other hand requires constant vigilance.
They want to make it illegal (more illegal). It undermines a certain social order where men work hard for the chance to support a woman and her children, and where women work in office buildings for low wages. Every worker unit is equal, and its only identity is its assigned level in the corporate hierarchy. Sport and religion obviously are not in conflict with this system! And since no one wants their daughter in porn or their son watching it, and no one will publicly admit to watching it themselves, censorship of obscenity faces weak opposition. And indeed, by pushing those instinctual buttons, most worker units reflexively form up for a mob attack.
The nuclear balance is life-or-death, and any anti-missile systems are destabilizing. The interceptors aren't a deterrent to Iran and North Korea, they neutralize their deterrents to US invasion, which isn't worth reviving an arms race over.
Government wasting money is disgusting, but so is the hoarding of money by corporations. At least the government is stimulating the auto industry, while Microsoft just continues to rip off customers with the "Windows Tax" and invest the proceeds in nothing.
Slashdot Mirror
The government refusing stamp increases because there was "zero inflation" also cost them billions of dollars
LA built a $600 million high school a couple of years ago, so they can't be that underfunded...
The point of arresting people who possess child pornography is that they might have paid for it
Police have lots of tools for tracing financial transactions, but it seem like the business aspect is mostly mythical. Viewers are being punished for unholiness. The government also suppresses legally produced porn that it considers distasteful.
Of course with digital cameras in the hands of kids they are certainly the leading producers of underage nude portraiture...
So the only right you recognize is the one to exist like a pig. Because communicating like a human being has some effect on others. If granny and the kids are little piggies they should be locked safely away in pens someplace. "Political correctness" is more degrading to a man than living in a sty.
The only fact is the product itself. Any representation or description cannot be a fact.
Beauty isn't an ideal for women, it's practical. When every guy wants them they are well satisfied with their looks. When they bring up a body issue and a guy rapturously compliments them, the look of dissatisfaction on their face is because the guy does not meet their standards.
Correlation is hardly a "direct connection". Girls are coming out of elementary school obese, and it's not because they are trying to look like their favorite haute couture models. It's because of shit food, and a culture that coddles girls and accepts them for "how they are" and their "inner beauty". In times when moms cooked, fashion demanded tiny waists, and neurosis was still a disease, girls had fewer problems maintaining their figure.
Nonsense. Cutting the heads off the tallest poppies does not make the grass bloom.
Convert the palace into a brothel and there'd be 100x more tourists
When increases in healthcare, gas, food, housing, education are all increasing "in great excess compared to the general rate of inflation", maybe that rate has been a little understated...
Imagine if your mom's salary was $10,000. She'd be an even bigger hero! It's a win/win.
Usually after repossession the loan is written off. I'm sure plenty of people wouldn't mind handing back the diploma to be free of debt.
What answer? Attaching devices to your car was obviously illegal! How about the real problem: plate readers, which can easily achieve total surveillance of road traffic. But a ruling against those would raise questions about the millions of other government cameras monitoring the public. And at this point questioning those is simply not going to be allowed.
It's kind of the natural order. There's something to be said for the "village" lending a hand, but in large populations the value of a random individual is going to be 0. Certainly people can advance beyond nature and focus on attaining self-fulfillment in their lives, but the first step is: Don't have any children.
It could prevent you from getting a job that pays anything, in which case you are in a kind of debtors' prison. It would more sense for the bank to get part of your paycheck withheld.
Had something to do with established business interests opposed to hemp paper in the early days before pot gained much market saturation.
Their business depends entirely on the government so they give lots of bribes. Other businesses lobby, but once the government has paid you to build your factory and let you operate it tax free, what else is there to ask for? Copyright on the other hand requires constant vigilance.
They want to make it illegal (more illegal). It undermines a certain social order where men work hard for the chance to support a woman and her children, and where women work in office buildings for low wages. Every worker unit is equal, and its only identity is its assigned level in the corporate hierarchy. Sport and religion obviously are not in conflict with this system! And since no one wants their daughter in porn or their son watching it, and no one will publicly admit to watching it themselves, censorship of obscenity faces weak opposition. And indeed, by pushing those instinctual buttons, most worker units reflexively form up for a mob attack.
Women stick out both hands to accept the gifts that conservatives give them. But tell them to stop killing their daughters...
England is not a free country.
The nuclear balance is life-or-death, and any anti-missile systems are destabilizing. The interceptors aren't a deterrent to Iran and North Korea, they neutralize their deterrents to US invasion, which isn't worth reviving an arms race over.
Inevitable that those servers will be shut down one way or another.
Government wasting money is disgusting, but so is the hoarding of money by corporations. At least the government is stimulating the auto industry, while Microsoft just continues to rip off customers with the "Windows Tax" and invest the proceeds in nothing.
Competition between nations means that foreigners lose something which is a sweet victory. Making parts of your own country lose something is not.