I'm just wondering what percentage of copyright infringement gets you deported from your home country to the US, where you have never been, and who decides on such things... Does the WTO have a video I can watch or is it completely up to the US as the world's fucking master.
Clearly there's a grey area. However, a site where 99% of its users are provided with legitimate non infringing material, and a site where I'd estimate *at least* 80% of its users were provided with infringing material does indicate a difference in intent. And it's hard to believe the Mr. O'Dwyer was unaware of this infringement.
It also seems pretty clear that TVShack would not have been viable if it only relied on only the subset of material that was legitimate, whereas Google's profitability would hardly be affected.
I search for illegal stuff on goggle every day and It's clear that they must be aware of their -filetype:torrent option sooo once again, for the record, what percentage is ok? I really don't want to be sent to gitmo....
If it is held not to be illegal, you can be damn sure the tories will rush through a law that makes it illegal again pretty quick.
The fact is that this guy encouraged others (the conspiracy part) to submit him links where you could download or watch stuff that you were not paying the copyright holder for. He then ran a web site that amalgamated the links into a nice easily searchable system and took money from advertisers based on the number of page hits he was getting. By the sounds of it he made around £140,000.
I think their might be prior art for such a program.. I tend to remember using it a long time ago and also 30 seconds ago when I attached a file to the email I just sent...
yes... think of the women and children... the burned dead women and children because the ATF moved in with fucking APC's... That's always the best way to end something peacefully...
Maybe liquid methane flows from the poles to the equator and evaporates there. Then gaseous methane flows to the pole through the atmosphere and precipitates out.
So, to these people, inciting a riot or a civil war is perfectly acceptable if their believes come in conflict with the laws of the country they live in?
We have a constitution granting us inalienable rights in the US. If laws are passed taking away those rights then those laws are not legal regardless of what the government might claim. We have a method for updating our constitution to remove/editing things like the second amendment and that is the only JUST way to ban firearms. Some people believe we have already lost a number of our rights and things will only get worse. Will these people rise up? That depends on how far the government pushes them.
If guns are illegal, then anyone who has a gun is a criminal, and you can prevent crime by just arresting everyone who has guns.
You can sure try to arrest us... Best wear your vest and bring bigger guns....
A) *woosh!*
B) Would you honestly die to retain posession of your firearms? Or are you just trying to impress all these internet strangers with how much of a man you are for being willing to stand up to a bunch of guys with assault rifles?
Slashdot Mirror
FUCK YOU yes it will....
Wait, you gave a whine-o, I mean, politician money and you're mad that they told all their friends to hit you up??? ,,,,,,...^*,,
You're Ideas are intriguing and I would like to subscribe to your tumblr.com
I'm just wondering what percentage of copyright infringement gets you deported from your home country to the US, where you have never been, and who decides on such things... Does the WTO have a video I can watch or is it completely up to the US as the world's fucking master.
Clearly there's a grey area. However, a site where 99% of its users are provided with legitimate non infringing material, and a site where I'd estimate *at least* 80% of its users were provided with infringing material does indicate a difference in intent. And it's hard to believe the Mr. O'Dwyer was unaware of this infringement.
It also seems pretty clear that TVShack would not have been viable if it only relied on only the subset of material that was legitimate, whereas Google's profitability would hardly be affected.
I search for illegal stuff on goggle every day and It's clear that they must be aware of their -filetype:torrent option sooo once again, for the record, what percentage is ok? I really don't want to be sent to gitmo....
The meter will develop a bad case of paranoia and a complete disdain for the government.
Yes. It's just a shame that it seemed to be only useful for finding copyright infringing sites.
What percentage of non-copyrighted works would be ok with you???
100 lashes? What is that, like $6.25 US?
If it is held not to be illegal, you can be damn sure the tories will rush through a law that makes it illegal again pretty quick.
The fact is that this guy encouraged others (the conspiracy part) to submit him links where you could download or watch stuff that you were not paying the copyright holder for. He then ran a web site that amalgamated the links into a nice easily searchable system and took money from advertisers based on the number of page hits he was getting. By the sounds of it he made around £140,000.
Sounds like he invented some sort of google....
Your ideas are intriguing to me and I would like to subscribe to your facebook.
nVidia is worried that Linus will replace their binary software with a small well written shell script...
I think their might be prior art for such a program.. I tend to remember using it a long time ago and also 30 seconds ago when I attached a file to the email I just sent...
yes... think of the women and children... the burned dead women and children because the ATF moved in with fucking APC's... That's always the best way to end something peacefully...
Maybe liquid methane flows from the poles to the equator and evaporates there. Then gaseous methane flows to the pole through the atmosphere and precipitates out.
Nooooooooo GLOBAL WARMING has broken Titan!!!!
obvious troll is obvious...
So, to these people, inciting a riot or a civil war is perfectly acceptable if their believes come in conflict with the laws of the country they live in?
We have a constitution granting us inalienable rights in the US. If laws are passed taking away those rights then those laws are not legal regardless of what the government might claim. We have a method for updating our constitution to remove/editing things like the second amendment and that is the only JUST way to ban firearms. Some people believe we have already lost a number of our rights and things will only get worse. Will these people rise up? That depends on how far the government pushes them.
When has legality ever really stopped a corporation like Verizon...
You can sure try to arrest us... Best wear your vest and bring bigger guns....
OK.
Ok. come get some and I'll see you in hell....
If guns are illegal, then anyone who has a gun is a criminal, and you can prevent crime by just arresting everyone who has guns.
You can sure try to arrest us... Best wear your vest and bring bigger guns....
A) *woosh!*
B) Would you honestly die to retain posession of your firearms? Or are you just trying to impress all these internet strangers with how much of a man you are for being willing to stand up to a bunch of guys with assault rifles?
B) yes...
No need, just call the feds and let them smoke you weirdos out - remember Waco, they had guns too!
I don't share any views with the people at Waco but a lot of people DO remember what happened there and some even see it as a rallying cry.
If guns are illegal, then anyone who has a gun is a criminal, and you can prevent crime by just arresting everyone who has guns.
You can sure try to arrest us... Best wear your vest and bring bigger guns....
sooo you'll get a bill one month for 42 million dollars because they auto converted your plain... nice...
Ghost in the Shell just got a bit closer to being real.
As did cyberbrain sclerosis...
Why doesn't someone simply use a GUI interface made in visual basic to track an ip address?
Cyber Police here, we are back tracings his IP now... The consequences will never be the same...
Looks like the prepaid phone market's getting another customer when my Verizon contract ends.
You don't have to wait if they change the terms of your contract.
Yes, but it's time consuming, and far too much effort for what it's worth.
Eh? Isn't that the definition of a government project?