"They didn’t confiscate the drone. They gave the drone back to the individuals," he said. "They didn’t take the SIM card out of itbut we’ve gotfive houses here that everyone saw it – they saw what happened, including the neighbors that were sitting in their patio when he flew down low enough to see under the patio."
IANAL
Now how is he supposed to prove his reasoning was justified? If they gave the drone back, what's stopping the owners from altering the data on it? His lawyers should move to dismiss, and it will indeed succeed but nothing good will come out of the result, unless he counter sues after winning the case.
That is pretty cool, so now we can land a missle anywhere on Earth in about 45 minutes instead of 1 hour. I'm sure it'll help with atmosphere re-entry stuff too, but who cares about space stuff.
I really doubt they're going for better service to the consumers here. It should always be impossible to make a large margin of profit from TOR, because TOR "customers" are anonymous, the only reason why they are using TOR in the first place. Sounds to me like they are shooting for scalability here. No thanks, I trust the Navy had anonimity in mind, not performance.
So I remember watching T.V. in Turkey in the early 90s and the interview was about a Turkish lawyer talking about the finer interpretations of a specific law. He said something I'll never forget when he was asked, "The language of the law is nearly Ottoman, how are the average citizens supposed to intelligably read and obey this law?" To which he responded, "It's not the job of every citizen to read and understand our laws, that's the job of lawyers, we need to know." Much like how some important points of law in the US is still in Latin. It makes 0 sense to expect a population to obey laws that aren't readily available and easily consumable.
Now to be fair, the spirit of the law must also be preserved. But I think that's what the Constitution is for.
We all have certain expectancies from products. Like owning what we paid for, and having the reasonable assumption that a random fishing hacker can't hack your gas oven and blow up your house. This all comes down to educated programmers. A programmer who isn't abiding by the ever evolving security standards and practices will leave your product looking like swiss cheese. Real life example being, an educated programmer will avoid SSLv3 in the first place even though it's the latest standard, and uneducated programmer will just go, version 3 is bigger than version 2, so it must be better. I personally prefer the not-so-smart toaster at my house, because one I don't have the time to reverse engineer yet another code base to analyze vulnerabilities, and the other reason being, it makes toast, I'm okay with sacrificing the ability to request a toast via my smart phone.
Then I stand over the code and whip up assembly like the protocol say. No seriously though, I wonder if you need education to write for the Wall Street Journal.
It's just a flag... Take the swastika for example. It means different things to many people. For Hindus it's not a hate symbol, but for most of the Western world it has extremely negative connotations. I think it's idiotic and sensationalist what Google is doing here, let whoever wishes to interpret whatever symbol enjoy their freedom to do so.
There's an old Turkish saying, I'll be that guy and translate it. "A barking dog won't bite." It basically means that anyone who is serious about a crime (terror category or the normal category, not sure how it falls into which one, but I suspect one has more beards) is not going to advertise it online or otherwise. Take a look at 9/11, there weren't a lot of tweets about it before hand. Yes indeed sacrificing your privacy only buys paranoia on a large scale, bloated budgets, broken citizens, and smug authorities.
It's a great tool for typing in long passwords (provided you keep it physically secure), or working with two factor auth mechanisms. I had reviewed YubiKey Standard a while back, you can find further information on here.
Little known fact: Hats off to one of the original geeks who inspired a generation who is an author of MAME32, Chris Kirmse. Also the author of one of the first MMORPGs ever based on the Doom engine, Meridian 59, and a Virginia Tech alumni. The geek is strong in that one.
Okay so, 1.5/6th the world is Asian, and 1.5/6th Indian (which is also in Asia but not what you think when I say Asian). That's half of the human race, get used to it.
This would only prove that the airline "security" system is in desparate need for better IT staff. Simple encryption implementing a proper trapdoor function (elliptical, or prime number based) can prevent most portable hardware from accessing information it's not supposed to (unless there are backdoors implemented for abuse, legal or otherwise). Frankly it's sad how politics corrupt functioning mathematics.
It's a trend. A realization of how cheap surveillance of any kind has become, and the will to be on top of it all. The idea is, "We'll protect you from those evil hackers, if you let us in to all of your personal information". Which kind of defeats the purpose doesn't it? Welcome to the Internet of Things where you should just shut up and not mind your protectors peering into all aspects of your life for your own safety in this dangerous world.
TLDR; You wouldn't want the "bad guys" to hack your computer right?
To commensturbate, you can also prove the existence of negative energy. Hell, if we could fold spacetime, vast nothingness means more than just throwing out in orbit a bunch of binoculars no one else can touch doesn't it?
Or more importantly, how many nations can shoot all those satellites down to oblivion? Oh, just 3? And U.S. is the most effective? I suppose in a reality with a specific constant speed of light and the inability to travel any faster, blowing up lenses of the other kids in the space sandbox matters more huh? Hate God, not America.
Indeed, imagine seeing this man in a documentary after a life time in prison contemplating his decisions, or rather living with himself with nothing but himself. That, is a way stronger message than a knee jerk, "Kill'em back".
I'd say fuck the death penalty, he should be forced to live in Alabama making no more than minimum wage and be kept healthy enough to live over 90. That'll teach him.
So all this surveillence, enough to know what every American waxes their carrot to (or ring their bells, not leaving any ladies out), and we still couldn't stop some Balthazar Whateverthefuckyou from blowing up a bunch of strangers in the middle of Boston. But fear not! We did pester a family for Googling "pressure cooker". Don't cha feel safe already? I know I do.
To commentsturbate, "I don't mean, oh I can get to proc root, I mean that other processor can't send a damn packet to a nearby tower without my strict authorization root."
Slashdot Mirror
"They didn’t confiscate the drone. They gave the drone back to the individuals," he said. "They didn’t take the SIM card out of itbut we’ve gotfive houses here that everyone saw it – they saw what happened, including the neighbors that were sitting in their patio when he flew down low enough to see under the patio."
IANAL
Now how is he supposed to prove his reasoning was justified? If they gave the drone back, what's stopping the owners from altering the data on it? His lawyers should move to dismiss, and it will indeed succeed but nothing good will come out of the result, unless he counter sues after winning the case.
"We live in a dangerous world."
Yes, yes we do. Thanks for the fire and brimstone.
That is pretty cool, so now we can land a missle anywhere on Earth in about 45 minutes instead of 1 hour. I'm sure it'll help with atmosphere re-entry stuff too, but who cares about space stuff.
I really doubt they're going for better service to the consumers here. It should always be impossible to make a large margin of profit from TOR, because TOR "customers" are anonymous, the only reason why they are using TOR in the first place. Sounds to me like they are shooting for scalability here. No thanks, I trust the Navy had anonimity in mind, not performance.
So I remember watching T.V. in Turkey in the early 90s and the interview was about a Turkish lawyer talking about the finer interpretations of a specific law. He said something I'll never forget when he was asked, "The language of the law is nearly Ottoman, how are the average citizens supposed to intelligably read and obey this law?" To which he responded, "It's not the job of every citizen to read and understand our laws, that's the job of lawyers, we need to know." Much like how some important points of law in the US is still in Latin. It makes 0 sense to expect a population to obey laws that aren't readily available and easily consumable.
Now to be fair, the spirit of the law must also be preserved. But I think that's what the Constitution is for.
We all have certain expectancies from products. Like owning what we paid for, and having the reasonable assumption that a random fishing hacker can't hack your gas oven and blow up your house. This all comes down to educated programmers. A programmer who isn't abiding by the ever evolving security standards and practices will leave your product looking like swiss cheese. Real life example being, an educated programmer will avoid SSLv3 in the first place even though it's the latest standard, and uneducated programmer will just go, version 3 is bigger than version 2, so it must be better. I personally prefer the not-so-smart toaster at my house, because one I don't have the time to reverse engineer yet another code base to analyze vulnerabilities, and the other reason being, it makes toast, I'm okay with sacrificing the ability to request a toast via my smart phone.
Then I stand over the code and whip up assembly like the protocol say. No seriously though, I wonder if you need education to write for the Wall Street Journal.
It's just a flag... Take the swastika for example. It means different things to many people. For Hindus it's not a hate symbol, but for most of the Western world it has extremely negative connotations. I think it's idiotic and sensationalist what Google is doing here, let whoever wishes to interpret whatever symbol enjoy their freedom to do so.
There's an old Turkish saying, I'll be that guy and translate it. "A barking dog won't bite." It basically means that anyone who is serious about a crime (terror category or the normal category, not sure how it falls into which one, but I suspect one has more beards) is not going to advertise it online or otherwise. Take a look at 9/11, there weren't a lot of tweets about it before hand. Yes indeed sacrificing your privacy only buys paranoia on a large scale, bloated budgets, broken citizens, and smug authorities.
How much English should you know for an entry-level translator job? Hmmmm... all of it.?
Is to throw a shoe.
This is perfect. I knew there was an emo deep inside every geek :D
But you'd think the fact that it works the same on a Mac, Linux, Android or Windows would have something to do with its popularity as well, no?
It's a great tool for typing in long passwords (provided you keep it physically secure), or working with two factor auth mechanisms. I had reviewed YubiKey Standard a while back, you can find further information on here.
Little known fact: Hats off to one of the original geeks who inspired a generation who is an author of MAME32, Chris Kirmse. Also the author of one of the first MMORPGs ever based on the Doom engine, Meridian 59, and a Virginia Tech alumni. The geek is strong in that one.
Okay so, 1.5/6th the world is Asian, and 1.5/6th Indian (which is also in Asia but not what you think when I say Asian). That's half of the human race, get used to it.
This would only prove that the airline "security" system is in desparate need for better IT staff. Simple encryption implementing a proper trapdoor function (elliptical, or prime number based) can prevent most portable hardware from accessing information it's not supposed to (unless there are backdoors implemented for abuse, legal or otherwise). Frankly it's sad how politics corrupt functioning mathematics.
It's a trend. A realization of how cheap surveillance of any kind has become, and the will to be on top of it all. The idea is, "We'll protect you from those evil hackers, if you let us in to all of your personal information". Which kind of defeats the purpose doesn't it? Welcome to the Internet of Things where you should just shut up and not mind your protectors peering into all aspects of your life for your own safety in this dangerous world.
TLDR; You wouldn't want the "bad guys" to hack your computer right?
To commensturbate, you can also prove the existence of negative energy. Hell, if we could fold spacetime, vast nothingness means more than just throwing out in orbit a bunch of binoculars no one else can touch doesn't it?
Or more importantly, how many nations can shoot all those satellites down to oblivion? Oh, just 3? And U.S. is the most effective? I suppose in a reality with a specific constant speed of light and the inability to travel any faster, blowing up lenses of the other kids in the space sandbox matters more huh? Hate God, not America.
Indeed, imagine seeing this man in a documentary after a life time in prison contemplating his decisions, or rather living with himself with nothing but himself. That, is a way stronger message than a knee jerk, "Kill'em back".
I'd say fuck the death penalty, he should be forced to live in Alabama making no more than minimum wage and be kept healthy enough to live over 90. That'll teach him.
Yea because best way to protest how wrong murder is, is to kill people.
So all this surveillence, enough to know what every American waxes their carrot to (or ring their bells, not leaving any ladies out), and we still couldn't stop some Balthazar Whateverthefuckyou from blowing up a bunch of strangers in the middle of Boston. But fear not! We did pester a family for Googling "pressure cooker". Don't cha feel safe already? I know I do.
To commentsturbate, "I don't mean, oh I can get to proc root, I mean that other processor can't send a damn packet to a nearby tower without my strict authorization root."