The Finder is the application that shows you the files on the desktop and the file browser windows. You have to do it with a few Finder windows opened, as it's a minimize function.
There is consistency: Some time, try option-clicking on the close box of a Finder window. The option and the cmd keys usually do the same thing everywhere.
I think you miss the point. I did a search for 'geolocation' and got 15,100 results. I, for one, use a search engine like Google with the expectation that it will put the most helpful results first. I can access all 15,100, but I don't want to have to scroll down to 14,999 to get the one for which I'm looking just because it starts with 'y' and the engine sorted alphabetically. Ranking makes me happy.
If you ask me, something worth reading is likely considered a "troll" by somebody. That's the nature of opinion and oversensitivity to disagreement. Interpret as you may.
Right. Lots of places have my credit card number. I'm secure in the knowledge that if it's used fraudulently, it would be irritating, but I'm protected against fraud. It really takes more than that to make me worried.
Right -- those are also awful things (and I'd forgotten about them. Note that I'm not defending Wal*Mart -- I dont' shop there and I really hate the idea.) But they have nothing to do with my privacy. Wal*Mart knowing how much I spent on socks and correlating that to my ZIP code for more effective marketing just doesn't show up on my radar. Perhaps if we spent some of the energy that is currently expended on hand waving about people getting our e-mail addresses instead on remonstrations about locking employees in stores and fudging their hours downward (didn't they do that, too?), then the world might actually improve instead of just getting more worked up with no results.
Why did I submit it? Because people like this irritate me and I like to see them thwacked by a lot of people. I'm happy to leave most people and their dumb ideas alone, but once in a while, it's fun to disabuse them of their peculiar notions. And heck, I could be wrong, and Google could in fact be evil.
Why didn't I mention it in the submission? I dunno. I was tired and forgot.
Whta's evil about Wal*Mart beside their nasty habit of destroying local businesses?
I don't shop there, but I don't fear them outside the context of the local hardware store's fear for them. I couldn't care less what they do with my personal information, to tell you the truth.
Well, I wanted to mention in the submission that it seems like the authors are pretty darned dumb. "They are able to easily access all the user information they collect and save"? Duh! They're a search engine. If they didn't easily access all the information that they collect and save, they'd be a pretty bad search engine.
All of their practices that are decried in the webpage are either perfectly normal behavior (the cookies) or just not an issue (NSA, etc.)
So my roommate and I had had a lot of beer last night (along with other things) and were watching the TV. An ad for that dumb Richard Gere movie about marital infidelity came on and I said "wasn't that movie released a year ago?" The commercial ended, then repeated as they often do. At the same time, I said "wasn't that movie released a year ago?" and my roommate freaked out. It was pretty cool.
Slashdot Mirror
It certainly won't come with PC-DOS anymore.
The Finder is the application that shows you the files on the desktop and the file browser windows. You have to do it with a few Finder windows opened, as it's a minimize function.
There is consistency: Some time, try option-clicking on the close box of a Finder window. The option and the cmd keys usually do the same thing everywhere.
Do it in the Finder.
Nowadays, that could probably get you arrested.
No, you aren't. I'm just surprised that I'm not the only one who thought that. Now I have to go cry alone.
I think you miss the point. I did a search for 'geolocation' and got 15,100 results. I, for one, use a search engine like Google with the expectation that it will put the most helpful results first. I can access all 15,100, but I don't want to have to scroll down to 14,999 to get the one for which I'm looking just because it starts with 'y' and the engine sorted alphabetically. Ranking makes me happy.
If you ask me, something worth reading is likely considered a "troll" by somebody. That's the nature of opinion and oversensitivity to disagreement. Interpret as you may.
Right. Lots of places have my credit card number. I'm secure in the knowledge that if it's used fraudulently, it would be irritating, but I'm protected against fraud. It really takes more than that to make me worried.
I think it all stems from the fact that lots of geeks found Scully hot. The rest sort of fell into place.
Right -- those are also awful things (and I'd forgotten about them. Note that I'm not defending Wal*Mart -- I dont' shop there and I really hate the idea.) But they have nothing to do with my privacy. Wal*Mart knowing how much I spent on socks and correlating that to my ZIP code for more effective marketing just doesn't show up on my radar. Perhaps if we spent some of the energy that is currently expended on hand waving about people getting our e-mail addresses instead on remonstrations about locking employees in stores and fudging their hours downward (didn't they do that, too?), then the world might actually improve instead of just getting more worked up with no results.
Why did I submit it? Because people like this irritate me and I like to see them thwacked by a lot of people. I'm happy to leave most people and their dumb ideas alone, but once in a while, it's fun to disabuse them of their peculiar notions. And heck, I could be wrong, and Google could in fact be evil.
Why didn't I mention it in the submission? I dunno. I was tired and forgot.
I'm not France. I'm Belgium! Ha! Take that, NATO!
Whta's evil about Wal*Mart beside their nasty habit of destroying local businesses?
I don't shop there, but I don't fear them outside the context of the local hardware store's fear for them. I couldn't care less what they do with my personal information, to tell you the truth.
Well, I wanted to mention in the submission that it seems like the authors are pretty darned dumb. "They are able to easily access all the user information they collect and save"? Duh! They're a search engine. If they didn't easily access all the information that they collect and save, they'd be a pretty bad search engine.
All of their practices that are decried in the webpage are either perfectly normal behavior (the cookies) or just not an issue (NSA, etc.)
Yes. I changed the text, but the URL points to Tom's hardware. Ha!
Try cmd-option clicking the desktop. Blow your mind! And then if you're so inclined, cmd-option-m. Bam!
So my roommate and I had had a lot of beer last night (along with other things) and were watching the TV. An ad for that dumb Richard Gere movie about marital infidelity came on and I said "wasn't that movie released a year ago?" The commercial ended, then repeated as they often do. At the same time, I said "wasn't that movie released a year ago?" and my roommate freaked out. It was pretty cool.
Perhaps you should review your credit card policies.
From the article, it appears that Visa is saying that none of the flagged numbers have actually been used after the specified date and time.
ObjC has a runtime environment that permits for the cool dynamic binding capabilities. It's not emulation, per se.
You're. Stones, houses, glass, etc.
I've cleaned and re-arranged since then, but this is why my desk typically looks like.
Just about works in Safari.
For an "advancing technology" university, they sure have a shit website.
He's already pretty cute, I have to say.
Oh no!