Slashdot Mirror


User: troller

troller's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
78
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 78

  1. i got first! on Linux And Hip Hop · · Score: 0

    with IE

  2. Re:Keyboards have too many buttons to start with on AOL Joins The Hardware Marketeers · · Score: 0

    i love joe

  3. FRRST POST on AOL Joins The Hardware Marketeers · · Score: 0

    with IE

  4. Re:one question on Surreptitious Communication via Page Faults · · Score: 0

    At least I ain't no AC. My karma's -39, by the way.

  5. 1st on Exoskeletons for Human Performance Augmentation · · Score: 0

    with IE

  6. 1st post on HPs Dynamo Optimizes Code · · Score: 0

    with IE

  7. Re:Almost first on Surreptitious Communication via Page Faults · · Score: 0

    Not really.

  8. Re:CmdrTaco is a valley girl? Like totally! on Surreptitious Communication via Page Faults · · Score: 0

    Ha Ha. Somebody moderate this up. Of course, since moderators are so stupid, they'll mark it offtopic.

  9. Re:OOG SUCK MY SWEATY BALLS on Byte Offers An Explanation Of Patent Law · · Score: 0

    frickin wussy ACs-why don't you show you have balls and stop hiding? goddangit, this is abuse of the AC system.

  10. Re:Backwards in time?? on Wormhole Generator (Kinda) Patented · · Score: 0

    Nope. As said before, atoms can't push each other faster than the speed of light (or so Einstein says), so it would take at least eight minutes for the pole to move, then another eight for you to actually see it move.

  11. Re:Backwards in time?? on Wormhole Generator (Kinda) Patented · · Score: 0
    Actually, if you put any stock in space-time diagrams, relativity, or pretty much any other current theory of how things work, then yes, a signal travelling faster than light will travel backwards in time. Anyway...

    Nope. Read the posts about special relativity.

  12. Re:Backwards in time?? Huh? on Wormhole Generator (Kinda) Patented · · Score: 0

    You're right. The effect is just not so noticeable in the glass situation.

  13. Re:Not quite, Mr. Newton (crash course in relativi on Wormhole Generator (Kinda) Patented · · Score: 0

    Actually, the time would be a complex number, according to Einstein's equation that I've mentioned above, T'=T(1-V^2/C^2)^(1/2). Einstein actually hypothesized that the speed of light can't be surpassed, and mathematically, his equation, which has been tested and proven to be accurate, supports this hypothesis.

  14. Re:Backwards in time?? on Wormhole Generator (Kinda) Patented · · Score: 0

    But how about having complex values for time? Correct me if I'm wronng, but this doesn't make sense.

  15. Re:Backwards in time?? on Wormhole Generator (Kinda) Patented · · Score: 0

    I think Einstein's theroy of relativity also says something about this. How about T'=T(1-V^2/C^2)^(1/2)? According to this equation, a mathematical impossibility would arise if V > C (velocity > the speed of light) since the expression inside the radical would be negative, and square roots of negatives aren't real numbers. Just a thought.

  16. Re:We need these in the US on Date Pagers · · Score: 0

    Another problem we have is the emphasis on the other person being "cute." Maybe that's why so many relationships fail today. When your s/o no longer looks good enough or you can find someone who looks better, you dump them. Sad.

  17. Re:Arranging Things Not Necessarily Impersonal on Date Pagers · · Score: 1

    Try explaining this to a white guy(no! I'm not racist...it's just the culture gap). I tried explaining why such a marriage would work to a couple of friends, but it was beyond their realm of comprehension. Interestingly, among the couples I know, those who had "arranged" marriages tend to have happier relationships, probably because the superficiality of dating relationships,in which seeming attractive is the top priority, is not present.

  18. Re:It's about time. on XFree86 4.0 Now Available · · Score: 0

    score:-4(qwerty4, God knows what)

  19. Re:Yahoo! on XFree86 4.0 Now Available · · Score: 0

    Netscape!

  20. Re:1st on Boeing Throws Space Station Parts Away · · Score: 0

    Finally. I'm now an initiated troll!

  21. 5th? on Proper Serial Console Support · · Score: 0

    I'm bored. Duh.

  22. Re:FIRST MEGA SCROLL POST! on New Atari Jaguar Game Running $1,225 on eBay · · Score: 0

    Nice.

  23. Re:blah on New Atari Jaguar Game Running $1,225 on eBay · · Score: 0

    Lozerz.

  24. Re:A great vicotry for fart jokes on Update on 'Blame Canada' and the Oscars · · Score: 0

    Why the fsck is this funny? Moderators are idotas.

  25. Re:1st on Is The Fabric of Space-Time Woven With Noise? · · Score: 0

    Dang it, I missed. Oh, well. Try, try again