The point is the dude said that he doesn't know what he'd do with a million. Turns out not as much as most people would think. And remember: $50k a year isn't going to be much on 20 years
Django does have a sweet ORM. But Django wouldn't be as it is if Rails hadn't shown the way. The question is, does Ruby have something that makes it better suited to creating the next paradigm shift?
Django was started in 2003. Rails was released in 2004. The ideas behind both , MVC and ORMs preceded both frameworks considerably. They both arose out of internal projects where the creators had figured that all the enterprise nonsense that came with Java (or the unstructured spagetti involved with PHP,ASP and Cold fusion) where poor fits for productive and maintainable code.
Although neither was initially inspired by the other (For simple reasons that neither team could have known about the other), both have exchanged numerous ideas and both draw from similar sources.
Telling it like it is and not indulging unhinged SJWs is Trolling eh?
Back to yer Safe Space, you microagressed and Triggered loser.
See you can wobble your jowels and mash meaning-free slurs like "SJW" (or "cuck" or whatever the in-fad jibberish insult for liberals and academics is these days) into your keyboard all you like. But out here in the adult world, messaging african american women and calling them "black men" , "ugly" and "fat" because you didnt like a movie they where in, is generally considered "asshole" behavior.
Tell you what, go into a bar, find a black woman and call her (SHOUTING) an "ugly fat black man" and then when she responds call her an "SJW" or mock her for being "Triggered' (whatever the fuck that is) and see what happens. If you dont walk away with a broken nose and possibly a beer bottle wrapped around your head,, well hurray your right and I'm wrong.
But of course you wouldnt do that. Because your another boorish anonymous coward who'd rather throw around content free catch phrases like "SJW" or "Cuck" or whatever instead of standing by your own opinions and debating like a goddamn adult.
If a raging asshole like Milo Yiannopoulos is what counts as a "conservative" these days, I'd argue the movements problems are bigger than just Twitter.
Python has gained what could be called a critical mass of popularity and works at a similar level of abstraction to Ruby. If you were creating Rails today, would you still choose Ruby? What are its advantages?
That'd be Django, which is basically python on rails with a less broken ORM. (And also a godlike admin system which I truly wish rails had. Having come from the django world to rails via my new job thats one thing I genuinely miss about django)
I think this is where optimization really kicks in.
AR is great for getting stuff out the door quick, and for most products its fine (After all its cheaper to add hardware than it is to add developers). However there are some problems where "throw hardware at it" wont solve fundamental problems. This is the point where you look at the profiler and realise AR is messing up performance and drop back to SQL.
As far as I can tell, by default ActiveRecord does not enforce referential integrity at the database level. Is there a reason for this omission? Also is there any plan to introduce parameterized queries for raw SQL queries. I still keep seeing people on stack-overflow recomending inerpolation as an alternative, and this seems rather dangerous.
Why not use the DMCA to shut it down? As the law is poorly written they may be able to pull that off.
That would be perjury and you would risk jail time as a result. DMCA claims require that A) The person filing it has personal or corporate juristiction to do so (Ie is the owner of the copyright or an agent), and B) isnt violating fair use, which a review clearly is not.
The courts have a history of being very harsh on people who lie in DMCA filings about their rights to content whilst trying to use them in a SLAPP like manner. Its not a civil offence, its a criminal one.
Yup. As egrarious as it is, once your in parole world, you pretty much dont have civil rights anymore.
Or at least the government seems to think so. Not all the lawyers, and judges for that matter, agree, but some shmoe on parole for a crime thats hard to publically defend (Ie pedos or whatever) aint got the money to fight for his rights, and is pretty much screwed.
Just hand it over to Sharia courts; they'll do it for free. Gonna happen soon enough anyway. You Brits are fucked.
Ah yes, great britain, with its 4% muslim population, sommehow establishing a parallel legal system to spook the hicks. (Protip: There are no sharia courts in the UK, there never have been, and the country is still as white as its ever been despite the loopy howls of mosleys successors)
person to ever be a candiate for the US presidency now prominently hits the Slashdot front page. Slashdot - how low can you go ?
Don't shoot the messenger. Trump might be an incompetent maniac, that much isnt news. Him calling out for a vaguelly hostile foreign power to break into the communications of what was at the time of the mails, the highest level diplomatic and security agent in the country, is malevolent, dangerous and definately news
let's say, instead of bitcoins, the federal agents were trying to buy a 10 ounce bar of gold, which, they told the defendant, they were going to use to make illegal transactions. 10 ounces of gold are not money either. would the transaction be called money laundering or would it be legal?
Probably not, in that its an exchange of assets not money. The point with the ruling is the laundering laws refer to money not *stuff* and the judge is saying that bitcoin qualifies as *stuff*
Your right, in the sense that the general rule of "The constitution is the rules for the government to follow, not the people" (And the language also appears explicit).
However for the government to *recognize* the bitcoins as money, it enters a huge grey area where its not US money (because constitution), but whos money IS it?
Your confusing General AI with weak AI. General AI we are a long way from achieving, however specialized domain specific AI is something we've been doing well for a while. We're talking things that can analyse data and make decisions not programmed into it but by using learning algorithms.
Why did you sell a beach in the first place.. In many countries beaches/forts etc cannot be privately owned.
The joys of new zealands libertarian experiment. A faultering economy, private beaches and half the countries brightest citizens packing bags for australia
See also: Using vaccination programs to collect terrorist DNA.
A doctor friend of mine considers this one of the worst, and most unpunishable, war crimes of the afghanistan war. In entire regions of afghanistan and taliban controlled parts of pakistan even being suspected of being a foreign doctor is enough to get you assasinated now. As a result polio and numerous other things are running rampant in parts of the world again, and may well end up killing more people than the military conflict and world terrorism combined, unless the world health organization can figure out some way to to convince the locals they are not american secret agents.
It was an evil piece of espionage that betrayed everything medicine stands for.
So will it be on par with PC graphic? If not, let me know when consoles catch up.
Well no, obviously not. With the current generation 1080s and the like theres no comparison. But the consoles are not for the PC Master Race. They are for folks who want to hook up an affordable game box to their TV set and blap bad guys with friends over beer and pizza.
And anyway, tuning games to be able to perform well on the consoles buys us a whole lot of free optimizations that make the PC versions scream along at high speeds and res
and the annou ncements are to lure us away from Tor, which authorities have found too difficult to break?
THANKS OBAMA.
Seriously, why the tin foil hat? The research is being done by university researchers and uses a pretty easy to understand improvement on Tors onion routing capable of generating a mathematical proof that the message hasnt been tampered with. This is important as the current vunerabilities in Tor rely on a malicious party being able to manipulate the onion routes to de-anonymise the transmitter or reciever.
You state that Tor is "too difficult to break" and yet we know this isnt true (And of course if you read the article, which you clearly didnt, you'd know that too) and after Operation Onymous, the european cops pretty much said as much. And if the euro spooks know how to do it, then you can bet the american spooks know how to as well. But hey, if we're gonna talk conspiracy theories here, I might as well remind you Tor was actually developed by DARPA (And if you dont believe me wikipedia it).
While I agree in principle. What Oracle has is the *rights* to Java, including the legal interests inhereted when it brought Sun.
Which isnt to say that Oracles behavior is anything less than reprehensible, but they do have a legal right to have their case heard, even if , as we all hope, the judge fines their claims nonsensical.
Remember ST:Enterprise? A new TV series doesn't mean the franchise is still alive.
Enterprise, despite its mistakes, actually had some pretty decent television.
Sure the temporal war stuff was terrible, and the first season was a bit hammy, but the Xindi arc was up there with the Dominion war in terms of good longer-arc trek.
I honestly suggest going and giving it another watch. Enterprise failed because after a 2 decades people where just trekked out.
Slashdot Mirror
The point is the dude said that he doesn't know what he'd do with a million. Turns out not as much as most people would think. And remember: $50k a year isn't going to be much on 20 years
Where I live a million will barely get you a house in the suburbs , let alone a mansion , boat and the rest of your life off on holidays.
Third time dont link neo-nazi websites if you want to be taken seriously
How exactly is hounding someone with messages telling them they are "fat" or making fun of their race and appearance "having an honest conversation"?
Or for that matter photoshopping fake tweets from her (Which he fucked up) "having an honest conversation"?
Did you actually read what he was saying to her, or are you just gonna keep yelping out meaningless slurs like "SJW" hoping someone doesnt notice?
Django was started in 2003. Rails was released in 2004. The ideas behind both , MVC and ORMs preceded both frameworks considerably. They both arose out of internal projects where the creators had figured that all the enterprise nonsense that came with Java (or the unstructured spagetti involved with PHP,ASP and Cold fusion) where poor fits for productive and maintainable code.
Although neither was initially inspired by the other (For simple reasons that neither team could have known about the other), both have exchanged numerous ideas and both draw from similar sources.
See you can wobble your jowels and mash meaning-free slurs like "SJW" (or "cuck" or whatever the in-fad jibberish insult for liberals and academics is these days) into your keyboard all you like. But out here in the adult world, messaging african american women and calling them "black men" , "ugly" and "fat" because you didnt like a movie they where in, is generally considered "asshole" behavior.
Tell you what, go into a bar, find a black woman and call her (SHOUTING) an "ugly fat black man" and then when she responds call her an "SJW" or mock her for being "Triggered' (whatever the fuck that is) and see what happens. If you dont walk away with a broken nose and possibly a beer bottle wrapped around your head,, well hurray your right and I'm wrong.
But of course you wouldnt do that. Because your another boorish anonymous coward who'd rather throw around content free catch phrases like "SJW" or "Cuck" or whatever instead of standing by your own opinions and debating like a goddamn adult.
If a raging asshole like Milo Yiannopoulos is what counts as a "conservative" these days, I'd argue the movements problems are bigger than just Twitter.
Thats triple damage buddy. Will you be paying by cheque or credit card?
That'd be Django, which is basically python on rails with a less broken ORM. (And also a godlike admin system which I truly wish rails had. Having come from the django world to rails via my new job thats one thing I genuinely miss about django)
I think this is where optimization really kicks in.
AR is great for getting stuff out the door quick, and for most products its fine (After all its cheaper to add hardware than it is to add developers). However there are some problems where "throw hardware at it" wont solve fundamental problems. This is the point where you look at the profiler and realise AR is messing up performance and drop back to SQL.
As far as I can tell, by default ActiveRecord does not enforce referential integrity at the database level. Is there a reason for this omission? Also is there any plan to introduce parameterized queries for raw SQL queries. I still keep seeing people on stack-overflow recomending inerpolation as an alternative, and this seems rather dangerous.
That would be perjury and you would risk jail time as a result. DMCA claims require that A) The person filing it has personal or corporate juristiction to do so (Ie is the owner of the copyright or an agent), and B) isnt violating fair use, which a review clearly is not.
The courts have a history of being very harsh on people who lie in DMCA filings about their rights to content whilst trying to use them in a SLAPP like manner. Its not a civil offence, its a criminal one.
Yup. As egrarious as it is, once your in parole world, you pretty much dont have civil rights anymore.
Or at least the government seems to think so. Not all the lawyers, and judges for that matter, agree, but some shmoe on parole for a crime thats hard to publically defend (Ie pedos or whatever) aint got the money to fight for his rights, and is pretty much screwed.
Ah yes, great britain, with its 4% muslim population, sommehow establishing a parallel legal system to spook the hicks.
(Protip: There are no sharia courts in the UK, there never have been, and the country is still as white as its ever been despite the loopy howls of mosleys successors)
person to ever be a candiate for the US presidency now prominently hits the Slashdot front page. Slashdot - how low can you go ?
Don't shoot the messenger. Trump might be an incompetent maniac, that much isnt news. Him calling out for a vaguelly hostile foreign power to break into the communications of what was at the time of the mails, the highest level diplomatic and security agent in the country, is malevolent, dangerous and definately news
Probably not, in that its an exchange of assets not money. The point with the ruling is the laundering laws refer to money not *stuff* and the judge is saying that bitcoin qualifies as *stuff*
Your right, in the sense that the general rule of "The constitution is the rules for the government to follow, not the people" (And the language also appears explicit).
However for the government to *recognize* the bitcoins as money, it enters a huge grey area where its not US money (because constitution), but whos money IS it?
Your confusing General AI with weak AI.
General AI we are a long way from achieving, however specialized domain specific AI is something we've been doing well for a while. We're talking things that can analyse data and make decisions not programmed into it but by using learning algorithms.
The joys of new zealands libertarian experiment. A faultering economy, private beaches and half the countries brightest citizens packing bags for australia
A doctor friend of mine considers this one of the worst, and most unpunishable, war crimes of the afghanistan war. In entire regions of afghanistan and taliban controlled parts of pakistan even being suspected of being a foreign doctor is enough to get you assasinated now. As a result polio and numerous other things are running rampant in parts of the world again, and may well end up killing more people than the military conflict and world terrorism combined, unless the world health organization can figure out some way to to convince the locals they are not american secret agents.
It was an evil piece of espionage that betrayed everything medicine stands for.
Well no, obviously not. With the current generation 1080s and the like theres no comparison. But the consoles are not for the PC Master Race. They are for folks who want to hook up an affordable game box to their TV set and blap bad guys with friends over beer and pizza.
And anyway, tuning games to be able to perform well on the consoles buys us a whole lot of free optimizations that make the PC versions scream along at high speeds and res
Yep. In fact both the US and Russia are signatories to the Outer Space treaty which pretty much forbids sending wmds into space.
Of course its nukes we're talking about. Once you pull *that* trigger, upsetting some lawyers in Geneva is about the last thing your worried about.
THANKS OBAMA.
Seriously, why the tin foil hat? The research is being done by university researchers and uses a pretty easy to understand improvement on Tors onion routing capable of generating a mathematical proof that the message hasnt been tampered with. This is important as the current vunerabilities in Tor rely on a malicious party being able to manipulate the onion routes to de-anonymise the transmitter or reciever.
You state that Tor is "too difficult to break" and yet we know this isnt true (And of course if you read the article, which you clearly didnt, you'd know that too) and after Operation Onymous, the european cops pretty much said as much. And if the euro spooks know how to do it, then you can bet the american spooks know how to as well. But hey, if we're gonna talk conspiracy theories here, I might as well remind you Tor was actually developed by DARPA (And if you dont believe me wikipedia it).
While I agree in principle. What Oracle has is the *rights* to Java, including the legal interests inhereted when it brought Sun.
Which isnt to say that Oracles behavior is anything less than reprehensible, but they do have a legal right to have their case heard, even if , as we all hope, the judge fines their claims nonsensical.
Enterprise, despite its mistakes, actually had some pretty decent television.
Sure the temporal war stuff was terrible, and the first season was a bit hammy, but the Xindi arc was up there with the Dominion war in terms of good longer-arc trek.
I honestly suggest going and giving it another watch. Enterprise failed because after a 2 decades people where just trekked out.