I'd call Anne Frank a slut if there were proof and eyewitnesses that had her turning tricks ten at a time. If you can show me that, I'll call her a slut until you ask me to stop. What's that? No proof? I could have guessed, because that's bullshit and completely unrelated. As far as I know, the only thing credible sources accuse her of is being a Jew. I'm inclined to believe that, just as I'm inclined to believe the FB posts of the boy, the reenactment of the crime scene based on fancy math like angles, his girlfriends testimony (who had absolutely nothing to gain by lying) who said that he got to his house, then went back to pick a fight, etc.
Holy fuck a court of law enforcing the law based on the laws! Where are we people? This is the United States of America, we stand for mob justice and only caring about rights when we feel like it. We need to go to war with Florida to show them that in this country, we take acting like a stupid fuck and talking about shit that we know nothing about seriously.
Anyway, SYG was never mentioned, it was pure self defense. The worthless thug attacked first and wouldn't have let the fat one withdraw even if he had wanted too. Jump to the end: scum ended up dead. The only tragedy here was the fact that the black community cares nothing for justice and only wants to throw a fit and stage stupid walks.
Except it's nothing even close to that. The voyeurs with badges are absolutely shitting themselves over the face that someone had the nerve to expose their secrets. They sit in their tower, safe from any public scrutiny at all. They have so much privacy that you can't even tell others that you got a `warrant' served to force you to put in a backdoor apparently.
And I suppose you think we should do something about it? Why are you such a bloodthirsty warmonger? Why do you support the huge military-industrial complex's war machine to violate the sovereignty of other nations and assert imperialism around the globe?
False Dichotomy, I love this game and I'd love to play another round with you!
I agree completely. Were you expecting dissent, or did you just need a place to post that? Anyway, let them have Europe, since Europeans seems to like them so much. If anyone has a problem with that, let them voice that themselves; we need not give billions to Israel to help them, nor spend trillions on a failed attempt to establish secular governance in Afghanistan. Let's focus on keeping them out of the US, and that should be good enough.
Yes, and I'm saying that we shouldn't be over there. Strengthen domestic security all you please, but if the Taliban wants Afghanistan, let them have it. I don't see why we are obligated to fix the place after making it marginally more wrecked than it was when we found it. Let's focus on keeping suspicious foreigners out rather than letting them flood in and then fighting them in foreign countries. All of our so-called ``allies'' who do nothing for us can fend for themselves for once. Same with Syria, I give a fuck what Assad does, this is not our fight. If it's so damn important, let someone else do it. As it is, we are playing right into Putin's hand.
So no, I would not say that they are our worst enemies, we are being our own worst enemies by even bothering to fight this worthless scum. If I can be allowed to simplify a bit: they are like rats -- you can chase them out of your house, but you will never eradicate all the rats on Earth, so just keep a supply of poison on hand and let them infest your neighbor's house (if he's not careful). But are rats your enemy in this case? If they are in your house, dying in your walls and stinking the place up and eating your children's sleeping faces certainly are, but the rats eating the derelict building on the other side of town are not. They simply are, and it doesn't matter until they infest your house.
How do you think they should be referred to? As the, "Asian gentlemen with a minor beheading problem?" "The life of the party with a suicide vest?" "The local representatives of Crucifier's Anonymous - the 12 step program to kill all your enemies?"
And how is this our problem? It's not nice, for sure, but why is it our job to fix it? To stabilize the region? Why should we care? For Israel and Saudi Arabia? The Saudis can go fuck themselves and Israel is only our friend when they want something (usually guns and money). Are we trying to impress Europe? All they ever do is complain anyway. Don't tell me it's for `stopping human suffering', because you know damn well that that shithole was a shithole for the previous century and it will be for the next few centuries too.
What's the problem here? That's a typical girlintraining comment: clueless on the topic but ready to spew unsolicited and off topic opinions and often blatantly wrong "facts".
You know, you could just do it yourself rather than depend on a middle finger-giving society. If a state of the art particle accelerator is too much for your personal finances, maybe you could find a bunch of people to chip in. A lot of the disease here is depending on society to fund your personal desires rather than doing them yourself.
You can fuck right on off with that though. If society can agree to stop leaching off the discoveries of scientists and using it to build more useless shit like MRIs and iWatches, then maybe we'll do that. Big science keeps those satellites you love so much in the sky, gives us those big bombs to blowup worthless desert trash, keeps those stupid asses alive when those decide to get cancer, powers plants that keep the lights on. The mere fact that we run intellectual institutions is all that keeps us from feudalism.
All in all, if you want to pretend that you live in a vacuum and that publicly funded research is just a tax drain than you are a worthless cunt. If you're a brainless libertarian who can't see the benefits, then just kill yourself you worthless leach, because your never going to be anything that matters anyway and will certainly never do anything worthwhile. This is a fact and I do not need to provide evidence for this statement.
I accidentally spilled some gasoline in my lighter and I died a painful death. Can I sue Exxon? Surely they should have known that this might happen. They shouldn't have put so much octane in their gasoline. These companies have to be held responsible for the damage they cause by selling dangerous products.
I accidentally spilled some bleach in my ammonia and I died a painful death. Can I sue Clorox? Surely they should have known that this might happen. They shouldn't have put so much chlorine in their bleach. These companies have to be held responsible for the damage they cause by selling dangerous products.
Your flimsy `think of the children!' arguments and appeals to tradition have been rejected several times already. There is no longer any need to give you the privilege of a rebuttal. If you want statements that refute what you said (I didn't bother reading it, because coming from you, it's no doubt just more fascist garbage), then go to your post history and view the responses to your earlier threads.
Scrunch that tin foil even tighter: what if the intercepted information was used to manipulate Congress, and thus public policy, directly, or to influence elections? Senator Smith called in a few favors from old army buddies to win his district (the incumbent was found to be addicted to scat porn after a ``hacker'' broke into his email), so he has to pay back his friends in the intelligence community by attaching a rider to a certain bill to buy some more $500 ``toilet seats''.
Did they actually target pedos with PRISM? Surely they would have told us if they did; after all, `if only ONE child is saved....'. Many are disillusioned by the War on Terror, and many like to light up every once in a while, but everyone hates sexual deviants. It would be the perfect PR move. 90% of those against the spying programs would be pushing for an even larger program.
You want a bloated police state but you don't want to pay for it. Typical. Keep licking those boots, cold fjord, maybe they will kick you a bit softer when you've outlived your usefulness to them.
Yes, it is all on him. Bush is gone forever. He'll be languishing in obscurity painting mediocre pictures for the rest of his life. Absolutely no power at this point, not even soft power like Carter has. Obama, on the other hand, is the head of the federal bureaucracy and has the power to stop this. But he doesn't. You make it sound like something Kafkaesque, where the system is so convoluted that not even the engineers can control it. It's not. This isn't some abuse that stopped when he was inaugurated; it's an ongoing abuse of power. Obama is responsible. It's why we elected him: to take fucking responsibility for the executive branch of the government. Yes, both parties are involved, but fuck them, they can wait their turn. It would be great the throw them out with the trash too, but we've got to start somewhere, and that somewhere might as well be the most high profile abuser of power. It makes no sense to keep hand-wringing about ``B-but Bush started it, so we can't blame Obama! Let's start with Congress!'' Impeachment is the strongest signal we can peacefully send, and that vote is a clear dividing line on who in Congress is for us and who is against us.
Let me try to predict your reply:
Wah Wah Bush is a war criminal don't bully Obama you stupid republican piece of shit!
Don't give me that fucking garbage, shove your partisan bullshit right up your ass.
He probably isn't afraid of some spooks caring about him, but some section manager googling his name or email address and finding shit, then putting him on the industry shitlist and hurting his career.
NSLs do not work that way, nor do any other laws. That `corporate veil' is only about liability for finances. If you are a Fedex driver and decide to drive drunk and kill three people, you are still at fault.
Freedom of speech is a relatively new thing as well (and possibly an anomaly in human history; only time will tell). Also, thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule of feeling scared to make it clear what a impotent coward you are.
Uh, they also stopped over five hundred attacks on the White House. The White House for fucks sakes! Don't you realize that your blind opposition to these benign programs is putting the President's daughters at risk? Do you even care? Of course, they can't tell us about it because if they did, the TERRORISTS might realize that their attacks failed and suspect that we stopped them. Got to be careful about that. But really, they happened. It's all in this classified document. We'll show the Intelligence Committees, and they can explain your representatives, who can assure you. Yes, you. We go through all this trouble to help you, and you want to call us a liar?
Slashdot Mirror
I'd call Anne Frank a slut if there were proof and eyewitnesses that had her turning tricks ten at a time. If you can show me that, I'll call her a slut until you ask me to stop. What's that? No proof? I could have guessed, because that's bullshit and completely unrelated. As far as I know, the only thing credible sources accuse her of is being a Jew. I'm inclined to believe that, just as I'm inclined to believe the FB posts of the boy, the reenactment of the crime scene based on fancy math like angles, his girlfriends testimony (who had absolutely nothing to gain by lying) who said that he got to his house, then went back to pick a fight, etc.
Holy fuck a court of law enforcing the law based on the laws! Where are we people? This is the United States of America, we stand for mob justice and only caring about rights when we feel like it. We need to go to war with Florida to show them that in this country, we take acting like a stupid fuck and talking about shit that we know nothing about seriously.
Anyway, SYG was never mentioned, it was pure self defense. The worthless thug attacked first and wouldn't have let the fat one withdraw even if he had wanted too. Jump to the end: scum ended up dead. The only tragedy here was the fact that the black community cares nothing for justice and only wants to throw a fit and stage stupid walks.
Except it's nothing even close to that. The voyeurs with badges are absolutely shitting themselves over the face that someone had the nerve to expose their secrets. They sit in their tower, safe from any public scrutiny at all. They have so much privacy that you can't even tell others that you got a `warrant' served to force you to put in a backdoor apparently.
And I suppose you think we should do something about it? Why are you such a bloodthirsty warmonger? Why do you support the huge military-industrial complex's war machine to violate the sovereignty of other nations and assert imperialism around the globe?
False Dichotomy, I love this game and I'd love to play another round with you!
I agree completely. Were you expecting dissent, or did you just need a place to post that? Anyway, let them have Europe, since Europeans seems to like them so much. If anyone has a problem with that, let them voice that themselves; we need not give billions to Israel to help them, nor spend trillions on a failed attempt to establish secular governance in Afghanistan. Let's focus on keeping them out of the US, and that should be good enough.
Yes, and I'm saying that we shouldn't be over there. Strengthen domestic security all you please, but if the Taliban wants Afghanistan, let them have it. I don't see why we are obligated to fix the place after making it marginally more wrecked than it was when we found it. Let's focus on keeping suspicious foreigners out rather than letting them flood in and then fighting them in foreign countries. All of our so-called ``allies'' who do nothing for us can fend for themselves for once. Same with Syria, I give a fuck what Assad does, this is not our fight. If it's so damn important, let someone else do it. As it is, we are playing right into Putin's hand.
So no, I would not say that they are our worst enemies, we are being our own worst enemies by even bothering to fight this worthless scum. If I can be allowed to simplify a bit: they are like rats -- you can chase them out of your house, but you will never eradicate all the rats on Earth, so just keep a supply of poison on hand and let them infest your neighbor's house (if he's not careful). But are rats your enemy in this case? If they are in your house, dying in your walls and stinking the place up and eating your children's sleeping faces certainly are, but the rats eating the derelict building on the other side of town are not. They simply are, and it doesn't matter until they infest your house.
You take issue with referring to the ever fun-loving Taliban and al Qaida as enemies?
17 Beheaded in Taliban-Controlled Afghanistan for Attending Wedding Party with Dancing Taliban Hangs Afghan Boy, 7, for Spying I was one of the Taliban's torturers: I crucified people
How do you think they should be referred to? As the, "Asian gentlemen with a minor beheading problem?" "The life of the party with a suicide vest?" "The local representatives of Crucifier's Anonymous - the 12 step program to kill all your enemies?"
And how is this our problem? It's not nice, for sure, but why is it our job to fix it? To stabilize the region? Why should we care? For Israel and Saudi Arabia? The Saudis can go fuck themselves and Israel is only our friend when they want something (usually guns and money). Are we trying to impress Europe? All they ever do is complain anyway. Don't tell me it's for `stopping human suffering', because you know damn well that that shithole was a shithole for the previous century and it will be for the next few centuries too.
True, pure anarchy is much better.
You know, you could just do it yourself rather than depend on a middle finger-giving society. If a state of the art particle accelerator is too much for your personal finances, maybe you could find a bunch of people to chip in. A lot of the disease here is depending on society to fund your personal desires rather than doing them yourself.
You can fuck right on off with that though. If society can agree to stop leaching off the discoveries of scientists and using it to build more useless shit like MRIs and iWatches, then maybe we'll do that. Big science keeps those satellites you love so much in the sky, gives us those big bombs to blowup worthless desert trash, keeps those stupid asses alive when those decide to get cancer, powers plants that keep the lights on. The mere fact that we run intellectual institutions is all that keeps us from feudalism.
All in all, if you want to pretend that you live in a vacuum and that publicly funded research is just a tax drain than you are a worthless cunt. If you're a brainless libertarian who can't see the benefits, then just kill yourself you worthless leach, because your never going to be anything that matters anyway and will certainly never do anything worthwhile. This is a fact and I do not need to provide evidence for this statement.
I accidentally spilled some gasoline in my lighter and I died a painful death. Can I sue Exxon? Surely they should have known that this might happen. They shouldn't have put so much octane in their gasoline. These companies have to be held responsible for the damage they cause by selling dangerous products.
I accidentally spilled some bleach in my ammonia and I died a painful death. Can I sue Clorox? Surely they should have known that this might happen. They shouldn't have put so much chlorine in their bleach. These companies have to be held responsible for the damage they cause by selling dangerous products.
If it's so damned important, then maybe Europe can do it.
Your flimsy `think of the children!' arguments and appeals to tradition have been rejected several times already. There is no longer any need to give you the privilege of a rebuttal. If you want statements that refute what you said (I didn't bother reading it, because coming from you, it's no doubt just more fascist garbage), then go to your post history and view the responses to your earlier threads.
No.
Scrunch that tin foil even tighter: what if the intercepted information was used to manipulate Congress, and thus public policy, directly, or to influence elections? Senator Smith called in a few favors from old army buddies to win his district (the incumbent was found to be addicted to scat porn after a ``hacker'' broke into his email), so he has to pay back his friends in the intelligence community by attaching a rider to a certain bill to buy some more $500 ``toilet seats''.
Did they actually target pedos with PRISM? Surely they would have told us if they did; after all, `if only ONE child is saved....'. Many are disillusioned by the War on Terror, and many like to light up every once in a while, but everyone hates sexual deviants. It would be the perfect PR move. 90% of those against the spying programs would be pushing for an even larger program.
Of course! Copyright infringement funds terrorists!
Wait a minute... that's supposed to be YOUR line!
You want a bloated police state but you don't want to pay for it. Typical. Keep licking those boots, cold fjord, maybe they will kick you a bit softer when you've outlived your usefulness to them.
Let me try to predict your reply:
Wah Wah Bush is a war criminal don't bully Obama you stupid republican piece of shit!
Don't give me that fucking garbage, shove your partisan bullshit right up your ass.
He probably isn't afraid of some spooks caring about him, but some section manager googling his name or email address and finding shit, then putting him on the industry shitlist and hurting his career.
NSLs do not work that way, nor do any other laws. That `corporate veil' is only about liability for finances. If you are a Fedex driver and decide to drive drunk and kill three people, you are still at fault.
Freedom of speech is a relatively new thing as well (and possibly an anomaly in human history; only time will tell). Also, thank you for taking time out of your busy schedule of feeling scared to make it clear what a impotent coward you are.
Go get high off anti-Americanism somewhere else.
Whoa there, wait a minute. The fascist cold fjord may be a lot of things, but anti -American is definitely not one of them.
Uh, they also stopped over five hundred attacks on the White House. The White House for fucks sakes! Don't you realize that your blind opposition to these benign programs is putting the President's daughters at risk? Do you even care? Of course, they can't tell us about it because if they did, the TERRORISTS might realize that their attacks failed and suspect that we stopped them. Got to be careful about that. But really, they happened. It's all in this classified document. We'll show the Intelligence Committees, and they can explain your representatives, who can assure you. Yes, you. We go through all this trouble to help you, and you want to call us a liar?
Have you?