..offer your products at very reasonable prices and make them available for easy download.
I do not need a box for a game, nor do I like going to the stores for one. I want a free preview download with one level and if I like it I will buy it when the price is right. EA got it right in my eyes, I got a free trial of C&C and then went and bought it through their online store. My download went at 1.2MB/s filling up my 10Mbps connection. The price was also slightly less than getting the boxed set in a local store.
Perhaps I am, reading the comments I do see the POV where Amazon severely infringes on the rights of their customers if you follow the line of thinking that once you have sold the product to someone they own it. But it is not new that this right is infringed upon and perhaps I have become somewhat dulled to the effects of it. Let me explain.
I have worked as a systems administrator in the past where we used volume licenses for the Microsoft products we used. Windows XP was one of them. Stupidly enough we allowed some of our users to use a copy of windows on their home machines (which Microsoft actually allows or at least allowed at the time). A copy of our volume license must have ended up in a torrent network or something and it got blacklisted. Then with one of the automatic updates the product was noted as no longer "Genuine". For us this was not a very big deal because we contacted Microsoft, got a slap on the wrist and a new key, and fixed our issues quickly. But the users already using our software at home ended up being unable to update their machines properly anymore.
Long story short, with incidents like this and having worked at Joost where we had to find a way to deal with these sorts of DRM issues, I suppose it is easy to get used to things like this happening. Hopefully, this will improve in the future, but I think it is more likely that it is something that we are going to deal with more and more. Like the guy in the article says,
"This is probably going to happen again and we just have to learn to live with it."
Now I am not saying we should live with it, but it is easier. Damn, I guess I really am a pushover!;-)
The referenced site in the article on Wired for the trailer and the D-9 site in the article here do not work for me it seems. I found a good trailer on the site Sony made for it.
This is sure to be a movie that I am going to watch, very interesting story. It also interests me that the director is from South Africa, the way the aliens are moved to camps does seem to have some parallels with the Apartheid
Amazon has refunded their customers according to the article, but if I was halfway through a book and it got deleted from my device I would be very annoyed. To me it seems that the better solution would be for Amazon to arrange the correct rights from the copyright holder and arrange some form of deal to make sure that those who have a copy of the book on their Kindle can continue to use it or receive a new copy with the proper rights and at no cost. In the end, the material was offered through their service and they do have responsibility to their customers, even if it is not illegal for them to use this solution.
The apology posted from Mr. Bezos sounds heartfelt indeed. I wonder how this will be handled in future incidents like this one. Unfortunately, in the Netherlands we do not have access to the Kindle. But even with the risks of allowing Amazon to retain control to remotely delete items you have purchased I would definitely be a customer for the device. I suppose that with products like these you have to decide whether you trust a supplier or not.
This model works for games such as SecondLife as well, doen't it? In fact, once upon a time I played a game where you could buy credits to buy items to give you a small edge in combat. Especially played vs. player. This game has been around since the 90's and the company is still surviving so it must work. And all that with no graphics.
Oh and by the way, a funny fact. Even though Getronics has the ability to get a verified and signed certificate for themselves. When I connect to our outlook webaccess site I am told that there is an unsigned certificate. A message which I am forced to ignore if I want to use the resource. There is a dutch saying: "It leaks in the plumbers house."
The only difference between a self signed certificate and one that is signed by a CA is that someone wrote a check for the CA signed cert. No CA does any verification that the person writing that check is who they say they are, has any rights to that domain, or anything else, they only check to see if they already have a signed certificate....
...Certs never guarantee who you're talking to, they only provide encrypted communication.
I work at Getronics in the Netherlands. Some of the colleagues that I work close to manage a special CA that is used to sign the certs for all government based websites. When a certificate is requested for one of these sites you can be sure that the requester is audited first. Then, to actually sign the key a ceremony is used which involves 7 people.
In this case, I wonder if it is fiction driving science or science driving fiction. It is very normal to fear the unknown and there are few that can know what will happen as robotics and AI advance and integrate more with our lives. But, perhaps instead of fearing the changes we have to embrace them while being careful that no one person or government gains too much control. To me, the question is no longer if there are going to be AI cybernetics taking over human functions, but when it will happen in our day-to-day lives.
The idea has been voiced in holland to start taxing internet connection to pay newspapers for being able to survive. This is along the same lines of thinking. The free content supposedly makes it impossible for newspapers to survive. To keep on the staff of reporters and overhead costs. Nonsense, obviously. A new generation of media companies will just have to find new ways to fund their activities. Advertising is a big one, but other models may work too. If you are going to charge 5$ to access your content I am sure you will lose your readers rather quickly. The idea sounds shortsighted to me.
I started programming by learning python. Still valuable to know the language. But now I suppose I am screwed for life as I also write Java and C#. Why I would need to learn C++ is beyond me, perhaps I just need more convincing, but I have not had a project where I wished I knew more C++.
This promises to be a fun discussion, about what is good and what is best and what sucks. Personally, my opinion is that few are in a position to really say that one tool is better than the other. It is like telling a carpenter that he is better off using a screwdriver than a hammer, where obviously he has a purpose for both.
Best first language? The one you have most fun working with I think. When you have fun with a certain tool you are much more likely to have success and really learn it. But whatever tool you choose, whatever language you prefer, learning about the right way to use your chosen language is smart in any case. For that, python might be a good choice as a first language because it does force you to at least indent properly. If you are more of a mathematician it works well enough for functional programming too, so it does seem to be a safe academic choice.
On the RC, my games worked just fine. The thing that I found very convenient is that the NVidia drivers are bundled with auto updates. It was very easy and fast to get the graphics card in my laptop to work right. Windows 7 was not very exciting to test, but that, to me, was a good thing. I installed it as a secondary OS and it just worked. It appeared to be a tad faster (although of course there was less clutter than in my original Vista installation) and has a clean look and feel. Also, it is good that installing windows live is optional. I had no use for it.
Indeed, they is without meaning unless there is a reference available to explain the term.
If you read the article you see that it is actually the kenyan government working to push the infrastructure further into the country, which is then appended with a question whether this will improve the connection for villages. The government is investing their money to further the infrastructure to improve connections for schools, a good thing, but apparently for a large part of the population that lacks even more basic things, notably electricity, there is no improvement.
So yes "they" (the kenyan government and probably the governments of South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda and Mozambique as well) should focus on some investments there as well.
It must be, especially because of the distance it carries data. The rate of transfer is impacted by that 17,000 km so much that this can hardly be the cable you would find in your common datacentre. Add to that 2 years of labour costs and all the resources needed to lay the cable.
A quote from wikipedia: "Because the effect of dispersion increases with the length of the fiber, a fiber transmission system is often characterized by its bandwidth-distance product, often expressed in units of MHzÃ--km. This value is a product of bandwidth and distance because there is a trade off between the bandwidth of the signal and the distance it can be carried. For example, a common multimode fiber with bandwidth-distance product of 500 MHzÃ--km could carry a 500 MHz signal for 1 km or a 1000 MHz signal for 0.5 km." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiber-optic_communication#Bandwidth-distance_product
Of course you are right. The point I was trying to imply is that the fact that internet coming to the villages might be very good news, it is interesting to me how this emphasizes the differences between cities and the coutryside. In the article, this last paragraph cought my eye:
"But our correspondent says it is not clear whether the internet revolution will reach the villages, many of which still struggle to access reliable electricity."
If there are going to be investments in infrastructure, should they not include working on that too?
In our datacenters we have already started to employ special airconditioning units, raised operating temperatures, redesigned floor layouts, etc. All of this to reduce power used, but not because we do not have enough power, because it is commercially attractive to say and show how "Green" our datacenters are. I suppose this can be seen as another way to prove how green you are, especially if you host services and storage and not dedicated systems.
Slashdot Mirror
..offer your products at very reasonable prices and make them available for easy download.
I do not need a box for a game, nor do I like going to the stores for one. I want a free preview download with one level and if I like it I will buy it when the price is right. EA got it right in my eyes, I got a free trial of C&C and then went and bought it through their online store. My download went at 1.2MB/s filling up my 10Mbps connection. The price was also slightly less than getting the boxed set in a local store.
Your being too nice about it.
Perhaps I am, reading the comments I do see the POV where Amazon severely infringes on the rights of their customers if you follow the line of thinking that once you have sold the product to someone they own it. But it is not new that this right is infringed upon and perhaps I have become somewhat dulled to the effects of it. Let me explain.
I have worked as a systems administrator in the past where we used volume licenses for the Microsoft products we used. Windows XP was one of them. Stupidly enough we allowed some of our users to use a copy of windows on their home machines (which Microsoft actually allows or at least allowed at the time). A copy of our volume license must have ended up in a torrent network or something and it got blacklisted. Then with one of the automatic updates the product was noted as no longer "Genuine". For us this was not a very big deal because we contacted Microsoft, got a slap on the wrist and a new key, and fixed our issues quickly. But the users already using our software at home ended up being unable to update their machines properly anymore.
Long story short, with incidents like this and having worked at Joost where we had to find a way to deal with these sorts of DRM issues, I suppose it is easy to get used to things like this happening. Hopefully, this will improve in the future, but I think it is more likely that it is something that we are going to deal with more and more. Like the guy in the article says,
"This is probably going to happen again and we just have to learn to live with it."
Now I am not saying we should live with it, but it is easier. Damn, I guess I really am a pushover! ;-)
The referenced site in the article on Wired for the trailer and the D-9 site in the article here do not work for me it seems. I found a good trailer on the site Sony made for it.
This is sure to be a movie that I am going to watch, very interesting story. It also interests me that the director is from South Africa, the way the aliens are moved to camps does seem to have some parallels with the Apartheid
Amazon has refunded their customers according to the article, but if I was halfway through a book and it got deleted from my device I would be very annoyed. To me it seems that the better solution would be for Amazon to arrange the correct rights from the copyright holder and arrange some form of deal to make sure that those who have a copy of the book on their Kindle can continue to use it or receive a new copy with the proper rights and at no cost. In the end, the material was offered through their service and they do have responsibility to their customers, even if it is not illegal for them to use this solution.
The apology posted from Mr. Bezos sounds heartfelt indeed. I wonder how this will be handled in future incidents like this one. Unfortunately, in the Netherlands we do not have access to the Kindle. But even with the risks of allowing Amazon to retain control to remotely delete items you have purchased I would definitely be a customer for the device. I suppose that with products like these you have to decide whether you trust a supplier or not.
This model works for games such as SecondLife as well, doen't it? In fact, once upon a time I played a game where you could buy credits to buy items to give you a small edge in combat. Especially played vs. player. This game has been around since the 90's and the company is still surviving so it must work. And all that with no graphics.
Oh and by the way, a funny fact. Even though Getronics has the ability to get a verified and signed certificate for themselves. When I connect to our outlook webaccess site I am told that there is an unsigned certificate. A message which I am forced to ignore if I want to use the resource. There is a dutch saying: "It leaks in the plumbers house."
The only difference between a self signed certificate and one that is signed by a CA is that someone wrote a check for the CA signed cert. No CA does any verification that the person writing that check is who they say they are, has any rights to that domain, or anything else, they only check to see if they already have a signed certificate. ...
...Certs never guarantee who you're talking to, they only provide encrypted communication.
I work at Getronics in the Netherlands. Some of the colleagues that I work close to manage a special CA that is used to sign the certs for all government based websites. When a certificate is requested for one of these sites you can be sure that the requester is audited first. Then, to actually sign the key a ceremony is used which involves 7 people.
In this case, I wonder if it is fiction driving science or science driving fiction. It is very normal to fear the unknown and there are few that can know what will happen as robotics and AI advance and integrate more with our lives. But, perhaps instead of fearing the changes we have to embrace them while being careful that no one person or government gains too much control. To me, the question is no longer if there are going to be AI cybernetics taking over human functions, but when it will happen in our day-to-day lives.
The idea has been voiced in holland to start taxing internet connection to pay newspapers for being able to survive. This is along the same lines of thinking. The free content supposedly makes it impossible for newspapers to survive. To keep on the staff of reporters and overhead costs. Nonsense, obviously. A new generation of media companies will just have to find new ways to fund their activities. Advertising is a big one, but other models may work too. If you are going to charge 5$ to access your content I am sure you will lose your readers rather quickly. The idea sounds shortsighted to me.
I started programming by learning python. Still valuable to know the language. But now I suppose I am screwed for life as I also write Java and C#. Why I would need to learn C++ is beyond me, perhaps I just need more convincing, but I have not had a project where I wished I knew more C++.
This promises to be a fun discussion, about what is good and what is best and what sucks. Personally, my opinion is that few are in a position to really say that one tool is better than the other. It is like telling a carpenter that he is better off using a screwdriver than a hammer, where obviously he has a purpose for both.
Best first language? The one you have most fun working with I think. When you have fun with a certain tool you are much more likely to have success and really learn it. But whatever tool you choose, whatever language you prefer, learning about the right way to use your chosen language is smart in any case. For that, python might be a good choice as a first language because it does force you to at least indent properly. If you are more of a mathematician it works well enough for functional programming too, so it does seem to be a safe academic choice.
Perl anyone?
On the RC, my games worked just fine. The thing that I found very convenient is that the NVidia drivers are bundled with auto updates. It was very easy and fast to get the graphics card in my laptop to work right. Windows 7 was not very exciting to test, but that, to me, was a good thing. I installed it as a secondary OS and it just worked. It appeared to be a tad faster (although of course there was less clutter than in my original Vista installation) and has a clean look and feel. Also, it is good that installing windows live is optional. I had no use for it.
Indeed, they is without meaning unless there is a reference available to explain the term.
If you read the article you see that it is actually the kenyan government working to push the infrastructure further into the country, which is then appended with a question whether this will improve the connection for villages. The government is investing their money to further the infrastructure to improve connections for schools, a good thing, but apparently for a large part of the population that lacks even more basic things, notably electricity, there is no improvement.
So yes "they" (the kenyan government and probably the governments of South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda and Mozambique as well) should focus on some investments there as well.
It must be, especially because of the distance it carries data. The rate of transfer is impacted by that 17,000 km so much that this can hardly be the cable you would find in your common datacentre. Add to that 2 years of labour costs and all the resources needed to lay the cable.
A quote from wikipedia: "Because the effect of dispersion increases with the length of the fiber, a fiber transmission system is often characterized by its bandwidth-distance product, often expressed in units of MHzÃ--km. This value is a product of bandwidth and distance because there is a trade off between the bandwidth of the signal and the distance it can be carried. For example, a common multimode fiber with bandwidth-distance product of 500 MHzÃ--km could carry a 500 MHz signal for 1 km or a 1000 MHz signal for 0.5 km." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiber-optic_communication#Bandwidth-distance_product
Of course you are right. The point I was trying to imply is that the fact that internet coming to the villages might be very good news, it is interesting to me how this emphasizes the differences between cities and the coutryside. In the article, this last paragraph cought my eye: "But our correspondent says it is not clear whether the internet revolution will reach the villages, many of which still struggle to access reliable electricity." If there are going to be investments in infrastructure, should they not include working on that too?
Now all that is left is to get them some electricity in the villages and they can all start joining slashdot.
In our datacenters we have already started to employ special airconditioning units, raised operating temperatures, redesigned floor layouts, etc. All of this to reduce power used, but not because we do not have enough power, because it is commercially attractive to say and show how "Green" our datacenters are. I suppose this can be seen as another way to prove how green you are, especially if you host services and storage and not dedicated systems.