Slashdot Mirror


District 9 Rises From the Ashes of Halo

JohnSmedley sent in a story about what might be the last SciFi film worth caring about this summer. He writes "Wired has an interesting piece up on the upcoming District 9 release. District 9 rose from the ashes of a failed Halo movie and expands on 'Alive in Jo'Burg' which is a South African short film by Blomkamp. Both the short and full feature films expand and explore a premise in which aliens in space are treated as badly as illegal immigrants and the underclass. The story begins as a damaged alien craft lands in Africa. The foreign race is quarantined in a remote area called District 9, and from there are subjected to xenophobia, and the desire of a multi-national conglomerate to steal their technology. The film is an exploration of what would happen in terms of segregation between an alien race and humans, subjecting the stranded visitors to the very human condition of greed, fear, and exploitation. District 9 will be in theatres on August 14'th, and you can view the trailers from the viewpoint of Multi-National United."

207 comments

  1. Interesting parallels by woutersimons_com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The referenced site in the article on Wired for the trailer and the D-9 site in the article here do not work for me it seems. I found a good trailer on the site Sony made for it.

    This is sure to be a movie that I am going to watch, very interesting story. It also interests me that the director is from South Africa, the way the aliens are moved to camps does seem to have some parallels with the Apartheid

    1. Re:Interesting parallels by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm still hoping that this movie will actually be a good, cerebral Science Fiction story; rather than just another disposable alien-action movie built on what would otherwise be a great plot to explore.

      Still crossing my fingers.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    2. Re:Interesting parallels by davidsinn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't have an opinion one way or another but the burden of proof is always upon those making a claim. In other words, put up or shut up.

    3. Re:Interesting parallels by krou · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even though there are obviously parallels with Apartheid, I think there are much closer parallels to the recent and growing xenophobia against immigrants (illegal or not) in South Africa. Incidentally, there's a good interview with Blomkamp here where he notes that both of these played crucial roles in the film. He also mentions that in the first week of filming, the recent xenophobic riots took place where people were murdered and burnt alive etc. Alive in Jo'Burg was also clearly influenced by xenophobia.

      --
      'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    4. Re:Interesting parallels by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Unless this yet-unnamed research group has some actual clout, you're just regurgitating garbage. Did they take this survey in prison? Even if 25% had commited rape (an absolutely ludecrous number), there's no way they would admit to in in a survey.

      Go Away AC. We don't want your kind here. (Being a racist troll is a choice, not a skin color)

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    5. Re:Interesting parallels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still hoping that this movie will actually be a good, cerebral Science Fiction story; rather than just another disposable alien-action movie built on what would otherwise be a great plot to explore.

      Still crossing my fingers.

      Crossing your fingers won't help a bit. Did you even bother to read the summary?

      It is going to be "humanity bad, aliens good" bullshit. It might be an interesting watch just to see the aliens and spaceships, but there's not going to be anything even remotely "cerebral" about it.

    6. Re:Interesting parallels by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      The premise already requires humanity as a whole to be acting like idiots.

      Q) An alien spacecraft, full of highly advanced technology and skilled laborers who are willing to integrate into your society, has recently crashed. Do you:
      A) Cordon them off in their own district, refuse to let them communicate with anyone else on the planet, and enslave them for use as manual laborers.
      B) Hire them as members of a government think tank, and provide them with a loan to set up housing, et cetera
      C) Give them access to an ebay account, and let them sell things to pay their own way.
      D) Just ignore them

    7. Re:Interesting parallels by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Oh, and recall that South Africa has to do virtually all of its military development internally.

  2. Moon by u38cg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Another fantastic sci-fi piece recently released is Moon, directed by one Duncan Jones. Strongly recommend it, if you can find it - it's been reasonably widely released in Britain, not sure about the US and the rest of the world.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
    1. Re:Moon by rrwood · · Score: 1

      Fantastic? Meh. It was a rehash of a lot of ideas we've seen done in films and books over the past 20-30 years, with nothing particularly new added. Go re-watch 2001, Bladerunner and re-read some early John Varley instead.

      If, on the other hand, this is the first time you've seen these ideas explored in film or fiction, I could see this being a very interesting movie.

    2. Re:Moon by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It's was pretty widely released here in the U.S. a few weeks ago. It even played in one of my local multi-plexes (though there was only me and three other people in the theater when I went to see it, sadly). I really wish more people would show up for this excellent and thoughtful piece of science fiction, instead of just turning out in droves for Michael Bay blow-em-up movies that just use sci-fi as an excuse for a lot of gee-whiz FX shots.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Moon by Aqualung812 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Same could be said about "V for Vendetta" and "Equilibrium". Bah, just go read or watch "1984".
      However, watching or reading 1984 just flat drains the soul. The other two movies are more entertaining, have a happier ending, yet still deliver the core of the same message as 1984. Does it soften the message? Somewhat. However, they reach far more people, and those that watch it don't usually kill themselves during the closing credits.
      Respect the originals, yet keep refreshing it to new audiences. Often, those that like the new versions end up hungry to read about the original source material.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    4. Re:Moon by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Moon was fantastic. It draws a lot from 2001, but that's not a bad thing. It was refreshing to see such a well made sci-fi movie that was not dressed up for mass audiences. In other words, they didn't add explosions, comic relief characters, etc. for the sake of selling tickets.

      The movie website has a release schedule - go see it if you can!

    5. Re:Moon by yincrash · · Score: 2, Informative

      In case anyone doesn't know, the one Duncan Jones is the son of the one David Bowie.

      I saw the movie at the Tribeca Film Festival followed by a question and answer with him. It's a fantastic scifi feature for a directorial debut. I hope he continues making more films in the future.

    6. Re:Moon by agrif · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the biggest thing about Moon is that it is the first hard science fiction film in a long time that has gained even the meager attention it has. Hard Sci-Fi is a dying breed, as far as I can tell from the last decade or so.

      Maybe Moon didn't introduce any new ideas. But it did present those ideas in a medium where it is easier to evoke an emotional response, if it's done correctly. Moon did it very well, at least in my opinion, and it reached a wider audience than most sci-fi.

      If Moon is playing near you, I highly recommend you see it.

    7. Re:Moon by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      My wife and I went to see it after seeing the trailer. We both felt that while the revelations that occurred about what was going on somewhat obvious pretty quickly, it was well worth watching. We agreed that the lack of slasher/blow-em-up type movie was refreshing. Sam Rockwell did a pretty good job playing basically the only part (parts??) in the movie other than GERTY. The plot even had an opportunity for a 'final show-down' sequence involving lots of blood and mayhem, but it was very well directed to a different place. One thing that bugged me was the full gravity while at the moon base. But I guess watching everyone moon-bouncing around indoors for 90 minutes would have been a little much also.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    8. Re:Moon by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      The fact that you get to reference Varley (and not in conjunction with "Millenium") is why I so loved it. Yup, it's got pieces in there from Phantoms of Kansas, but it's an actual Science Fiction flick. Not scifi, not SciFi/Action. And for that reason alone it should be commended. And it doesn't hurt that it's a really well-done movie. Saw it and The Hurt Locker last week - and while it was a bit draining, emotionally, that was the best movie experience I've had in a while. If you like Science Fiction, go find it - it's worth it.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    9. Re:Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Besides, how are we all supposed to read 1984 when Amazon.com deleted it from all our Kindles?

    10. Re:Moon by TheLink · · Score: 1, Troll

      I don't care if it's a rehash, if it's a good rehash it could still be entertaining, interesting and even mind provoking.

      After all, lots of movies/stories are a rehash of ideas more than 2000 years old.

      --
    11. Re:Moon by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fantastic? Meh. It was a rehash of a lot of ideas we've seen done in films and books over the past 20-30 years, with nothing particularly new added. Go re-watch 2001, Bladerunner and re-read some early John Varley instead.

      I'm getting so tired of this nonsense. Bladerunner was a film noir set in the future with robots. It wasn't new. Asimov did androids struggling with their (lack of) humanity in the 50s, and all Dick added was his drug addicted sense of a decaying reality to which Scott added a very provincially 1980s aesthetic. Go watch Metropolis and the Maltese Falcon. There, see how easy it is to throw stones at a good and viewing-worthy film?

      Fact of the matter is that premise doesn't matter. Every premise has been done. Every idea has been pushed through the salad-tosser that is the writer's pen. What remains is the actual writing, and in the case of film acting and directing. Moon is, as I've heard (and I really do want to go see it), well written, acted and directed. If the idea is also compelling, that's great, but do we go to see a murder-mystery because we've never seen a detective confront the suspects before? Do we go to see space opera because we've never seen ships shooting at each other before? No, we go because we, as humans, enjoy the act of story-telling. It's an art, and good art is good art, even when the subject has been painted/drawn/written about/sculpted or filmed before.

    12. Re:Moon by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could consider investing in more reliable cellulose-based storage media. You'll find that a lot of popular ebooks have been translated into this "paper" format over the last, oh, 500 years and there's a good chance that your city even has one or more brick-and-mortar retailers who specialize in them.

      Get 'em before the fad passes.

    13. Re:Moon by ajs · · Score: 2, Funny

      salad-tosser that is the writer's pen

      Yeah, I think I meant Salad Shooter(tm) there. We'll just ignore what salad-tossing pens might be a metaphor for....

    14. Re:Moon by Bakkster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does it soften the message? Somewhat. However, they reach far more people, and those that watch it don't usually kill themselves during the closing credits. Respect the originals, yet keep refreshing it to new audiences. Often, those that like the new versions end up hungry to read about the original source material.

      That's, of course, assuming that the first exploration of a theme is the best. I would venture that while 1984, V for Vendetta, and Equilibrium explore the same space, they do it in unique ways. None are, what I would consider, a definitive work; neither are the newer movies a simple rehash of 1984.

      In 1984, the 'resistance' comes from within the government and is a trap, while Equilibrium has the government using its own agent who defects, yet V for Vendetta is a resistance of an outsider. These are unique explorations, and it would be disappointing if anyone thought that any single piece was a sufficient exploration of the theme. Taken as a whole, however, the reader/viewer can make their own, deeper connections.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    15. Re:Moon by Kurusuki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know. I tried watching 1984 once, and only made it about 30 minutes in before I had to stop watching. The movie is just so bland. It's a movie about the message, one of those artsy political movies that doesn't need any semblance of flow. The people who watch it will already be well versed in the mantra it preaches. However, V for Vendetta and Equilibrium both set out to entertain with an undertone of the 1984 mantra. This lets people take in the meaning without having to put forth any thought. Watch, enjoy, and receive political propaganda (from the good side of the fence albeit) without even knowing it. It's like separating a movie like An Inconvenient Truth to a movie whose plot revolves around those downtrodden by global change, the animals in the arctic regions for example. Someone seeing An Inconvenient Truth already someone leans in that direction and is already expecting a message, disregarding the fact the movie is a documentary. Someone seeing the later genre of movie will probably be seeing it for entertainment, and take away the important message at a subconscious level. They are more likely to start acting eco-friendly without attributing the shift in habits to the movie or its message.

    16. Re:Moon by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, watching 1984 is a painful experience. I think the book is less so, since you're not forced to consume it all at once like a movie.
      And your point about "An Inconvenient Truth" is a good one, "The Day After Tomorrow" is the entertaining version of it. I think there are some people that would have never watched "Truth" without first seeing "Tomorrow" and getting a spark of intrest that allows them to sit through the bland power point.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    17. Re:Moon by ianare · · Score: 1

      I found that watching 1984 before reading the book was extremely boring and bland. However after reading the book, I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. The adaptation could be considered too literal, but once put into proper context is truly a masterpiece. A little like 2001 in a way (yes, yes, I know the book was written after the movie).

    18. Re:Moon by ianare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The whole point of 1984 is to make you feel like shit. If you were uplifted by a hollywood type happy ending, it would lose much of its power. Why is it that many people think a movie that makes you feel bad is a bad movie ?

      The two movies you mentioned are the typical hollywood stuff ... entertainment and almost nothing else. Not bad for blowing a couple hours, but nothing that will change the way you look at the world like 1984 has done for many people.

    19. Re:Moon by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Day After Tomorrow was not entertaining. I'd rather watch a 2 hour presentation by Al Gore.

    20. Re:Moon by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Mrs u38cg enjoyed it, and in all honesty, she only went to see it because of the director's pappy. Now she might even read an Iain Banks novel...

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    21. Re:Moon by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with your first paragraph. However, many people, including one of the posters in this thread, have turned off 1984 after a short time because they don't want to feel like shit. I have a feeling that some of them, not all, may go and try 1984 again someday if they watch a "lite" version of it in one of the remakes then hear how the underlying theme is based on 1984.
      You can't change the way someone looks at the world if they won't listen to you. You need to get their attention first.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    22. Re:Moon by Infernal+Device · · Score: 1

      The problem with 1984, though, is that it crushes any hope that any resistance is useful.

      In order to get people fight for change, you have to give them the hope that their fight will result in change, or perhaps a small change, or a piece of the change. Without that hope, they're just dying.

      Equilibrium and V for Vendetta show that the hero doesn't sacrifice himself needlessly.

      As Admiral Adama said (roughly, I don't remember the exact quote): It's not enough just to live.

      So, if you go to movies to walk out feeling hopelessly abused and that whatever struggle you commit yourself to is a pointless walk thru a hellish morass of equally bad choices and that no matter what you do, you will never effect change of any sort in an uncaring world that hates you and despises your very existence, then by all means, 1984 is the movie for you.

      --
      "My God...it's full of trolls!"
    23. Re:Moon by skeeto · · Score: 1

      I've been really wanted to see this but it won't be showing in any theaters reasonably close to me. And so far no torrents to be found.

    24. Re:Moon by ianare · · Score: 1

      To me the point is that we need to make sure things never get to that point in the first place. Because once a ruthless and totalitarian system in place, it is impossible to resist from within. See : present North Korea, Nazi occupied France, Saddam's Iraq, etc ...

    25. Re:Moon by tgd · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen Moon, but I thought Sunshine falls into that category of unusually hard Sci-Fi that got wide attention.

    26. Re:Moon by Knara · · Score: 1

      Impossible, or just very difficult to sustain, much less succeed? Because all those regimes had(have) resistance movements (N. Korea's is harder to see, since there's not a ton of info that gets out, but they don't have prisons with political prisoners due to everyone toe-ing the party line).

    27. Re:Moon by DaveGod · · Score: 1

      I can also recommend Moon.

      I will say though that I went into the film having simply been told "a guy is alone on a moon base and things start to go wrong". This is the best way to go. If you really must watch the trailer, stop at 1 min.

    28. Re:Moon by sorak · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I would say the message is the same. At the very least, the viewer could take different interpretations from "V For Vendetta" and 1984. In 1984, the reason the ending is bad is because the author may be suggesting that human beings can be subjugated and brainwashed, and because those in power can create an stable balance of power that keeps the lower class subservient to those in power.

      V for Vendetta is more hopeful. One of the differences can be summed up as:
      .
      1984: Fight for your rights now, before it's too late.
      V for Vendetta: It's never too late. All you need is a terrorist in a funny mask, and the problem-fixing uprising will be coming along shortly.
      .
      (BTW, I loved V for Vendetta, and loved the questions it raised about whether V was justified in his actions, but my point is that each one is different, and you cannot just apply the "I've seen x, so I don't need to see y" attitude.)

    29. Re:Moon by sorak · · Score: 1

      Asimov did androids struggling with their (lack of) humanity in the 50s

      And don't forget Pinocchio before that!

    30. Re:Moon by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      The Day After Tomorrow was not entertaining. I'd rather watch a 2 hour presentation by Al Gore.

      Are you kidding? That scene where the do the utterly cliche "run down the hall from the fireball" but mixed it up by reversing the temperature gradient so it's "ZOMG run from the FREEZE!" was pure hilarity.

      Also, watching gawking LAers get smoked by tornadoes was highly enjoyable no matter how retarded the premise. My mother especially loved it, living near LA at the time.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    31. Re:Moon by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      You could consider investing in more reliable cellulose-based storage media. You'll find that a lot of popular ebooks have been translated into this "paper" format over the last, oh, 500 years and there's a good chance that your city even has one or more brick-and-mortar retailers who specialize in them.

      "It's a non-volatile storage medium. It's very rare. You should have one." - Blank Reg

      (Sorry, couldn't resist.)

    32. Re:Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bladerunner was a film noir [wikipedia.org] set in the future with robots. "

      There were no ROBOTS in Blade Runner. The antagonists were highly genetically modified humans who payed the price for great speed and endurance with a very short life span. But they were humans none the less who were not considered to be people and were property of the corporations who bought them.
      One aspect of the film is that we never did determine if Decker was really a replicant but I will leave that to you, so watch the uncut version.
      The cut version, the one tested on audience that who must have been advertising MBA's has this bizarre happy ending showing scenes of driving through the unblemished country side!!! Apparently the test audience was too confused by the end of the film to know what was going on so they added the drive in the woods to make you feel better.

    33. Re:Moon by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I agree with your first paragraph. However, many people, including one of the posters in this thread, have turned off 1984 after a short time because they don't want to feel like shit. I have a feeling that some of them, not all, may go and try 1984 again someday if they watch a "lite" version of it in one of the remakes then hear how the underlying theme is based on 1984.

      That's just crazy. That's like saying people might get bummed watching World War II movies because Hitler keeps killing all these Jews and it's really sad, so we should make a "lite" version where Hitler doesn't kill anyone. 1984 has a message and a purpose. You can't neuter those aspects of it and pretend to have anything of the original left. And ironically, this is one of things Orwell talked about in 1984...

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    34. Re:Moon by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      OT, it's not so much a "new audience", as Nietzsche was observing and speculating on the same social tendency toward comedy (in the sense of happy endings or just deserts) in The Birth of Tragedy, well before 1984 was penned or filmed.

    35. Re:Moon by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      So, how do you reach people that don't want to hear an uncomfortable message? Strap them in a chair and pry their eyelids open? You may not like the fact that there is a large group of people that refuse to watch 1984. The message of 1984 IS important. How do we reach them?

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    36. Re:Moon by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Brazil was before either of those and is closer to "1984".

    37. Re:Moon by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think I meant Salad Shooter(tm) there. We'll just ignore what salad-tossing pens might be a metaphor for...

      I believe you're looking for Chris Rock.

    38. Re:Moon by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      The movie is just so bland. It's a movie about the message, one of those artsy political movies that doesn't need any semblance of flow. The people who watch it will already be well versed in the mantra it preaches. However, V for Vendetta and Equilibrium both set out to entertain with an undertone of the 1984 mantra. This lets people take in the meaning without having to put forth any thought.

      By flow, do you mean explosions and special effects, or did you have something else in mind? Given the two appalling films you compared it to, it's not surprising you switched off after half an hour, but I don't suppose you've even read the book? It's not necessary for understanding the film, but it might help (as would watching the entire film instead of the first 30 minutes). I hope you realise that the cinematography and sets were intentionally bland to reflect the world it is set in? That it is not in fact 'preaching a mantra' whatever that means, but is remarkably ambivalent about drawing a firm conclusion (like the novel), other than that totalitarianism in all its forms is inhuman?

      I'm not sure what you mean by 'movie about the message', but there's far more going on in 1984 than in either of the films you compared it to, and it functions on a lot of different levels, not just a didactic one. The script is pretty good too - in comparison to something like Equilibrium which I suspect has more gun-shots than words. I suppose 1984 is not as slick as the newer films in terms of costume, camera-work, explosions, and implausible acrobatics while firing small-arms, but it has far more interest and long term appeal than those films, and far more depth than much of the flummery which passes for entertainment nowadays.

      PS You don't put forth thought or preach a mantra, it's impossible to receive propaganda (unless it's in the mail), albeit cannot be used at the end of a sentence, and latter has two motherfucking t's.

      PPS Get off my lawn.

    39. Re:Moon by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      You may not like the fact that there is a large group of people that refuse to watch 1984. The message of 1984 IS important. How do we reach them?

      Some ideas cannot be dumbed down or made comfortable.

      Neither Equilibrium nor V for Vendetta deal with the same ideas as 1984 in any comparable depth. They're a crude caricature which loses most of the insight of the original.

    40. Re:Moon by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... dude? It's called being an adult. Life is full of stuff that sucks, no matter what you might "want to hear." You can stick your head in the sand and cry for your mommy or you can grow up and learn about the world around you. But I'm pretty sure the solution is not to take the uncomfortable message out of things so that people will feel OK when they see them. I'm not going to twist anybody's arm to watch 1984 (and God forbid they should actually read it). But I'm sure as shit not going to have any respect for them if they think V for Vendetta is an adequate substitute, either.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    41. Re:Moon by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      To me the point is that we need to make sure things never get to that point in the first place. Because once a ruthless and totalitarian system in place, it is impossible to resist from within. See : present North Korea, Nazi occupied France, Saddam's Iraq, etc ...

      Precisely. Orwell is telling us that the time to fight the totalitarian state is before it assumes power, not after, because we are reaching a point technologically where it will no longer be possible to fight it after it takes power. So instead of depressing us, 1984 should galvanize us to stop anything similar from ever arising.

      Meanwhile we happily let our elected 'representatives' permit total surveillance, secret police, torture, free speech zones, unexplained foreign wars, state-sponsored corporations...

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    42. Re:Moon by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      Fact of the matter is that premise doesn't matter. Every premise has been done. Every idea has been pushed through the salad-tosser that is the writer's pen.

      I think it's sad if you believe this. Just because a great deal of our culture is rehashed doesn't mean that there are no genuinely new ideas.

      I'm getting so tired of this nonsense. Bladerunner was a film noir set in the future with robots. It wasn't new. Asimov did androids struggling with their (lack of) humanity in the 50s, and all Dick added was his drug addicted sense of a decaying reality to which Scott added a very provincially 1980s aesthetic. Go watch Metropolis and the Maltese Falcon. There, see how easy it is to throw stones at a good and viewing-worthy film?

      So hang on... Asimov was the last guy with a new idea, then? So we ran out of new ones in the 1950s, roughly?

      This is, with respect, nonsense. You can take any two stories and show that one is "just" the other with certain basic elements added or subtracted, but this does not define the work in question or its originality. Blade Runner was a visionary film based on an innovative novel, and its combination of plot, themes and imagery were indeed new.

      No doubt you also like to harp on about how Star Wars is "just" a western set in space.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    43. Re:Moon by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Does Ziggy Stardust have a cameo?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    44. Re:Moon by Bl4ckJ3sus · · Score: 1

      I agree about Sunshine. However, If Danny Boyle hadn't turned it into a "slasher-flick in space" near the end it would have been much much better. The frequent camera flashes and other nonsense kind of messed it up for me. But overall it was a very good sci-fi film.

      Moon was spectacular, (Sam Rockwell....well, rocks :-) and I really look forward to Duncans' next film.

    45. Re:Moon by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      1984 was never on your Kindles.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    46. Re:Moon by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      (N. Korea's is harder to see, since there's not a ton of info that gets out, but they don't have prisons with political prisoners due to everyone toe-ing the party line).

      The presence of political prisoners does not imply a resistance movement. Mao's China and Stalin's Russia had tens of millions of prisoners but no organised resistance movement.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    47. Re:Moon by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      You could consider investing in more reliable cellulose-based storage media.

      More reliable? People rip the magnetic, semiconductor and optical media as being unreadable in a few centuries, but this "reliable" cellulose-based storage media is not much better! Moisture, mold, exposure to sunlight and heat tends to kill this thing. I've seen these celluloid things go into a not-so-mint-anymore condition after mere 10 years on non-optimal attic conditions, while CDs were just fine! Talk about flimsy!

      I guess we need to build a Temple of Dystopias and carve our important anti-dystopian message on the stone walls. (Granite, not some flimsy crap like marble.) I'm sure that can be read in a few thousand years, provided nothing really major happens!

    48. Re:Moon by EricTheO · · Score: 1

      Go see the movie "Fahrenheit 451". I think they burned all of the books going by that title.

      --
      -Eric
    49. Re:Moon by Rosy+At+Random · · Score: 1

      If I had any mod points to give, they would be yours.

      --
      Would you like a slice of toast?
    50. Re:Moon by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for Mo2n

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    51. Re:Moon by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Neither Equilibrium nor V for Vendetta deal with the same ideas as 1984 in any comparable depth.

      The graphic novel V for Vendetta is significantly deeper than the movie of the same name, and is intended to present a different set ideas than Orwell's novel 1984, though it does have overlap.

      Neither V for Vendetta nor Equilibrium is a "crude caricature" of 1984, they are independent works with their own points. If you want someone to get the ideas of 1984, have them read or view some version of that work -- ideally, read the damn book, or if not that watch one of the film adaptations.

      (The movie V for Vendetta, though, may rightfully be called a crude caricature of Moore's graphic novel.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    52. Re:Moon by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've seen these celluloid things go into a not-so-mint-anymore condition after mere 10 years on non-optimal attic conditions, while CDs were just fine!

      This book is almost a thousand years old. Where's the thousand year old CD copy? Huh?

      If you look through the world's museums and archives you won't find a single CD produced before 1979. Clearly these things cannot last more than thirty years. If anyone tries to tell you something different, insist that they show you a hundred year old CD. Sure, they'll probably come up with some lame story which explains why they can't produce one, but we all know the real truth.

      That's why I have taken all of my most important data and carved it into the Nazca Plateau. You just can't beat that kind of reliability.

    53. Re:Moon by ajs · · Score: 1

      I think it's sad if you believe this. Just because a great deal of our culture is rehashed doesn't mean that there are no genuinely new ideas.

      That's somewhat unfair. I was responding to someone who was pulling the usual "bah, nothing new here... Simpsons did it," routine with respect to what is largely being described as a very good film. I pointed out that his examples of originality could receive the same treatment, and that, in fact, just about anything could. I think it's sad that you only consider premise when evaluating the originality of a film, but then you're in a boat with most Americans, so don't feel too bad. Originality of writing, acting, photography and direction generally only glance off our subconscious, and only the high concept "things blow up in space and a guy gets the girl," type synopsis sticks.

      So hang on... Asimov was the last guy with a new idea, then? So we ran out of new ones in the 1950s, roughly?

      No, I'd say... probably around 4,000 BC, but then I'm basing that on some rather presumtive guesses about the origins of modern story-telling.

      Fact of the matter is that novelists and screenplay authors (storytellers in general, actually) don't do original for the most part. That's not their thing. They combine the known in ways that inform our social and cultural conversation. We judge those works on their impact on that conversation.

      Even someone like Clarke or Vinge who are taking the science they know and writing about it are only presenting ideas that are new to the lay person. Within their fields, these are the culmination of small contributions from a string of people dating back to the middle ages and beyond.

      Does that mean that writing isn't a creative act? No, of course not. It just means that you can't define creativity in terms of the presence or lack of a completely unique concept, since that doesn't actually happen.

      You can take any two stories and show that one is "just" the other with certain basic elements added or subtracted, but this does not define the work in question or its originality. Blade Runner was a visionary film based on an innovative novel, and its combination of plot, themes and imagery were indeed new.

      And therein you make my point. Bladerunner, Moon, and many other works of fiction are both derivative and creative. Simply pointing at what's derivative and decrying the overall work as redundant is as absurd as pointing at the creative portion and claiming that the overall work is a paragon of creativity.

    54. Re:Moon by ajs · · Score: 1

      You're arbitrarily assigning the label "robot" to something that has no genetic code and "human" to something that does. Why can't both labels be applied?

  3. It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least these aliens are slightly more alien, but they're still bipedal oxygen breathers with bilateral symmetry. I look forward to the District 9 TV series, but not to the romantic relationship between Detective Matt Sikes and (what is now) a giant bug living in the apartment next door.

    1. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

      At least these aliens are slightly more alien, but they're still bipedal oxygen breathers with bilateral symmetry.

      FWIW, it took evolution billions of years to come up with that this is a very efficient way of moving intelligent beings with use of free appendages (arms + hands) around a solid earth crust with an oxygen atmosphere. I'm not so sure this is a "one in hundreds" of potentially useful evolutionary ideas, but rather one in very few. That it's symmetric comes from cellular division, and there is so far little supporting evidence that alternative mechanisms can support a two meter tall intelligent organism well.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Um 6 appendages with 4 legs and 2 arms would work just as well if not better.
      Stop giving Evolution so much credit. Evolution is dumb, it does not care what is best, just what causes the longest survival to allow more evolution changes. It will allow stupidity to win if dumb is allowed to breed unchecked.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by EdZ · · Score: 1

      You're assuming an oxygenated environment, a solid crust, a certain range of gravitational pull, composition from cells that divide, etc.

    4. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they didn't originate from somewhere vaguely earthlike they'd find it difficult to survive here.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um 6 appendages with 4 legs and 2 arms would work just as well if not better.

      Add another pair of legs to a human, and see how well they do climbing trees.

      You know it would work just as well how? Because you created your own virtual earth and ran genetic simulations on it for a million years?

      Evolution is dumb, it does not care what is best, just what causes the longest survival to allow more evolution changes. It will allow stupidity to win if dumb is allowed to breed unchecked.

      Stupidity doesn't win, but you might need a bigger head to hold a bigger, more complicated brain in order to get more intelligent, and that might get you killed. Which is almost the same thing, but no, stupidity doesn't win. Intelligence just doesn't necessarily win either. Our brain's need for high blood flow is a liability...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by wjousts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um 6 appendages with 4 legs and 2 arms would work just as well if not better.

      Nonsense, you are looking only at the (presumed) benefits of an extra pair of legs without considering the costs. An extra pair of legs requires more energy, it requires more neurons devoted to controlling the extra legs, etc. The benefits? You're slightly less likely to get knocked over?

    7. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What are the non primate candidates on our own planet? Whales, Dolphins and Octopuses. Whales and Dolphins lost theirs legs and Octopuses went down a different route. There's some argument tool users need this configuration but we are one planet out of billions of potential planets so odds are we aren't the dominant form. Really this is more about film/TV show budgets traditionally as well as the audience needing references they can understand. It's hard to relate emotionally to an Octopus like thing or do an action scene with a blob of jelly in a jar.

    8. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Volda · · Score: 1

      I guess if you drink enough spoiled milk it wont matter either way.

    9. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by TheLink · · Score: 1

      An extra pair of arms would help when soldering stuff :). Plenty of other uses - being able to firmly hold stuff while doing things to it.

      As for an extra pair of legs - I don't think something like a centaur would really be that disadvantaged. A centaur would be able to be a very effective predator, and thus consume high energy density food (e.g. other animals) if necessary. Imagine being able to use a spear, and sprint almost as fast as a horse. Perhaps centaurs wouldn't have as much endurance - depends on whether they still have to have human sized air intakes and horse style lungs.

      Now getting to "centaur" from some other precursor creature might take a huge evolutionary leap :). But stuff like butterflies are pretty amazing too.

      --
    10. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because yes, if you have a choice of crash landing on a planet that is hospitable and contains life like your own, or on the toxic silicoid life sustaining one you should defiantly choose the one most unlike yourself, you know, just for the sheer challenge.

      Of course I don't know how desperate they were to crash, or what the range of the partially disabled craft was, or if they were low on fuel, because I am not an alien... and you know more importantly, I havn't seen the movie... and even more importantly, it is a freaking' movie.... you know, entertainment?

      On a conceptual level I generally feel the same way about most Science Fiction particularly in movies and tv where 99% of all life encountered is pretty much identical to us with the exception of some forehead ridges, colour, or perhaps some weird facial hair or antennae or something. There has been some exceptions like the Lava monster in old star trek, or stuff like crystalline entity or tar monster later on... Bottom line the reason this is likely the case isn't due to lack of imagination, but rather the reason is for entertainment purposes. James T Kirk can't exactly sleep with the lava monster can he? (well he could try anyway). So they make a green woman alien and call it a day. People need to be able to interact in some meaningful way for it to be entertaining. Why do you think everyone can also communicate so easily? Because it would really suck if you had to sit through an hour of confusion. I can barely comprehend the Japanese language, how the fsck can we comprehend a language developed on another world with no context? Magic technology of course... but again... movie magic.

    11. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by SoVeryTired · · Score: 1

      The benefits? You're slightly less likely to get knocked over?

      You can run like a horse, or climb trees like a leopard.

      --
      Slashdot: news for Apple. Stuff that Apple.
    12. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by ianare · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know it would work just as well how? Because you created your own virtual earth and ran genetic simulations on it for a million years?

      Yes, I played Spore, and came up with a wide variety of different body plans that worked just as well. So there.

    13. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, it took evolution billions of years to come up with that this is a very efficient way of moving intelligent beings with use of free appendages (arms + hands) around a solid earth crust with an oxygen atmosphere.

      Why not just two fingers and an opposable thumb, wouldn't that be more efficient and just as effective? Why two testicles, or two nostrils, instead of just one? Why not 2 stomachs instead of just one?

      That it's symmetric comes from cellular division,

      What about life forms that are non-symetric, where does that come from?

      ...there is so far little supporting evidence that alternative mechanisms can support a two meter tall intelligent organism well.

      I know an 800lb gorrilla who would disagree with you...

      There are plenty of primarily earth mobile creatures that walk on more than two legs, and there are more such creatures 2+ meters tall than humans.

    14. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not thinking alien enough. Aliens, if there are any, will be genuinely alien. StanisÅaw Lem (**) grokked this.

      A 500m shimmering armoured blob that is unaware of anything taking place over less than a week or smaller in volume than a car. A billion coin sized independently mobile units co-operating as part of a single conscious organism that lives for only a few minutes at a time in a lake of frozen carbon dioxide that's periodically heated by a distant star.

      The aliens won't need a translator, there will be nothing for us to talk about. What does a microbe have in common with you? Practically nothing. The aliens will have even less in common with us.

      (**) Slashdot sucks and can't handle Unicode so there may be the wrong character in Lem's name. But we knew this (that it sucks) already, right?

    15. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      with bilateral symmetry.

      If Final Fantasy has thought me anything, it's that asymmetric aliens will have aliens with the same exact anatomy reflected along vertical axis sharing the same planet. And this will result in a cataclysmic civil war that will destroy said planet!

    16. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by serano · · Score: 1

      An important thing to keep in mind with evolution is it is not some person sitting in a shop coming up with a design for a new species. There is no intelligent thought involved (ignoring sexual selection and animal husbandry for the moment), and a huge amount of luck is required. A given mutation needs to happen in a given environment and not get wiped out immediately by some random event. The result is not the best design an intelligent actor would create. It's the best design that happened to mutate and survive in a given environment.

    17. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by wjousts · · Score: 1

      The benefits? You're slightly less likely to get knocked over?

      You can run like a horse, or climb trees like a leopard.

      Last time I checked, leopards did not have four legs and two arms. Besides, we could climb trees just as well as leopards if we had feet that can grip like many other primates. In fact, if I had four legs, but still had non-gripping human feet, I seriously doubt I'd be any better at climbing trees that I am now.

    18. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 1

      At least these aliens are slightly more alien, but they're still bipedal oxygen breathers with bilateral symmetry.

      Bilateral symmetry is objectively rational for multicellular organisms on the surface of a planet. Gravity provides a reason to differentiate between up and down, and direction of travel provides a reason to differentiate between forward/backward and side-to-side. No external force makes left different from right. Organisms that don't have bilateral symmetry tend to not care about gravity, or are not self-propelled, or both.

    19. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      At least these aliens are slightly more alien, but they're still bipedal oxygen breathers with bilateral symmetry. I look forward to the District 9 TV series, but not to the romantic relationship between Detective Matt Sikes and (what is now) a giant bug living in the apartment next door.

      You know, the whole idea of Sikes getting snuggly with a newcomer always seemed kind of screwed up. I mean, salt water is very dangerous to the newcomers, right? Human sweat is pretty salty...

      But that didn't even come close to the silliness of a pregnant George Francisco...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    20. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      You're not thinking alien enough. Aliens, if there are any, will be genuinely alien. StanisÅaw Lem (**) grokked this.

      A 500m shimmering armoured blob that is unaware of anything taking place over less than a week or smaller in volume than a car. A billion coin sized independently mobile units co-operating as part of a single conscious organism that lives for only a few minutes at a time in a lake of frozen carbon dioxide that's periodically heated by a distant star.

      The aliens won't need a translator, there will be nothing for us to talk about. What does a microbe have in common with you? Practically nothing. The aliens will have even less in common with us.

      Well, those are all interesting ideas - but in the absence of any real data about what aliens are like I wouldn't assume that those ideas are more likely to represent the alien life we'll meet than anything else science fiction has come up with...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    21. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. This lack of any creative thought always struck me. How in the world can you be so dumb to come up with *another* epic failure of bipedal human-like "aliens"??

      Like those scientists, who can't imagine that life can form in a way that is not carbon- and water-based?

      How freaking stuck-inside-the-box can you be??

      I bet the first ten alien lifeforms that come in contact with us, will net even be detected as such by those idiots. (Yeah, I'm angry about it. And rightfully so.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    22. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      When I first saw a preview a couple days ago, my first thought was that this was an Alien Nation remake and was wondering if that movie/series is old enough for a remake yet.

    23. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by nilbog · · Score: 1

      Laven! Had you seen episode 20 season 6 of Star Trek: The Next Generation (which appear to be what you're referring to), you would know that life through the galaxy was seeded from the same genetic material millions of years ago, explaining why all the alien races look similar.

      The seed for all those life forms was taken from earth by the preservers and seeded on other M class planets.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Trek_races#Preservers

      --
      or else!
    24. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      was wondering if that movie/series is old enough for a remake yet.

      Sci-fi channel thinks so. (syfy, ptooi!)

    25. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by sorak · · Score: 1

      2 extra legs require more food to keep up, and more coordination to, well, coordinate. Evolution may be dumb, but it's also cheap. It will take its time getting rid of those extra appendages, but growing them in the first place is unlikely to ever happen.

    26. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I remember hearing that Gene Roddenberry had a rule about Star Trek, where all aliens had to look more-or-less human. It was just something he believed in.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    27. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Some of the reason for aliens that look like us is cost. It's cheaper to put some ridges on a forehead, or put someone in a suit, than to generate something that looks alien. Especially in a weekly TV series.

    28. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming there are trees.

      Imagine a gravitational pull twice what we have. Extra limbs start making sense.

      A world with sheer cliffs might support tentacles with gecko-like pads.

    29. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Imagine a gravitational pull twice what we have. Extra limbs start making sense.

      Yep. But then you'd expect a whole lot of things to be different; our body shape is determined by a host of factors including genetic background and the shape of the mother. Every organ's shape is informed by all its neighbors, but also by atmospheric pressure and gravity.

      You'd expect certain things to be the same; it's advantageous to have multiple eyes, but too many can be a liability; you want the eyes above the eating orifice, and you'd prefer if your nose wasn't below your mouth, too. At the same time, you'd expect a lot of other things to be possibly different.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vrusk of the old rpg Star Frontiers. That being said....convergent evolution.

    31. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It always reminds me of a write up of Lois and Clarke in the Guardian where the reviewer said "In this episode Lois and Clarke visit a doctor to see if Clarke can get Lois pregnant or whether his super sperm will rip through her like dum dum bullets at the speed of light"

      But yeah, humans breeding with aliens - who are not just a different species but the product of a completely separate version of evolution - seems to me to be a really implausible idea.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    32. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Yes and the reason why Klingons used to look a lot like humans with goatees was that plague that happened... but then they found a cure and got better, and turned back into the ridgeheads we love...

      Also everything that ever happened in a comic book, ya well that was in an alternate universe X19...

      Its called trying to makes stuff up so all the freaking inconsistencies make some kind of rational sense to the consumer.

    33. Re:It's just the opening scenes of Alien Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the bare minimum, we'll have a cordial exchange of mathematics.

  4. Alien Nation by RenHoek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So.. it sounds like the premise of the Sci-Fi series 'Alient Nation'.. which was a very good series.

    1. Re:Alien Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which was based on a fantastic movie.

    2. Re:Alien Nation by Anonymusing · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was my first thought. Actually, I thought of the Alien Nation movie, which I thought was even better than the series. "Your mother mates out of season!"

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    3. Re:Alien Nation by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      Thanks for saying it first.

    4. Re:Alien Nation by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The moment after that, when James Caan realizes they don't have testicles, is hilarious too.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Alien Nation by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      "What is it?"
      "Casull .454 Magnum. You're talking twice the impact energy of .44 Magnum hot loads."
      "Only holds five."
      "Yeah, the shells are too big for six in an cylinder. Hell, Matt, you don't need but one."

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    6. Re:Alien Nation by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      As I recall, they did have testicles - but they were located in the armpit.

    7. Re:Alien Nation by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      So.. it sounds like the premise of the Sci-Fi series 'Alien Nation'.. which was a very good series.

      It was on Fox before Sci-Fi Channel existed... (And, as others mentioned, it was a movie before that...)

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    8. Re:Alien Nation by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      How was it good?? It had no aliens at all in it. Just some bald average people with spots on their heads
      And the whole thematic world revolved around the age-old conflict between strangers and natives that's told countless times already.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  5. Documentary style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who was disappointed that Blomkamp didn't stick to the documentary-style story-telling for the movie itself?

    I was rather disappointed when I saw the second trailer that looked like a regular action flick, rather than the first trailer and "Alive in JoBurg".

    1. Re:Documentary style by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      He'd never get the funding needed to pull it off. I'd imagine the studio told him they'd help him fund it only if he made it an action movie also. It'll draw in more people that way.

  6. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by mdda · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a legal immigrant in the States, I can state that (although I'm paying just as much tax as anyone else) : I have no vote, no free healthcare and no constitutional rights (let alone a TV show).

    But then you're obviously a troll, aren't you?

  7. grotesque propaganda by dickbot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I remember a time when aliens in fiction were used as a mean to explore the intricacies of our own evolution as a species, or to reflect on our own tendencies toward self-destruction, the H-Bomb, the cold war, that sort of stuff.

    When Stanislas Lem wrote Fiasco, aliens were a way to reflect on the nature of communication and its philosophical conundrums. Good stuff.

    Saddening to see political correctness take over that too, and turn a potentially mind-boddling discovery into a mere pretext for bigoted post-cultural and post-racial propaganda.

    They surely won't get my money for that one.

    1. Re:grotesque propaganda by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      LOL. Yeah. So when the aliens are metaphors for the Soviets or the Japanese and used to explore our self-destructive tendencies, war-like natures, need to overcome differences to fight a common enemy, all that's all good thoughtful sci-fi.

      But when the aliens are metaphors for immigrants, and used to explore our tendency for xenophobia, that's just PC progpaganda trash!

      Clue: It's the same thing, but in one case you don't like the (assumed) message. That's your problem.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  8. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by LordLimecat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're either not a citizen, or a troll, or uninformed. Your taxes do not pay for constitutional rights, either--they pay for the benefits that you DO reap (law enforcement, road upkeep, sewage, fire protection, emergency care even if you cannot pay, etc). Also, I'm a citizen and do not have this free healthcare I keep hearing mentioned-- it is one of my employment benefits. Are you sure that you are referring to the right country?

  9. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by glwtta · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we just fucking love aliens here in the US. Also, everyone who looks different from us.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  10. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Green card holders pay taxes yet can't vote - something that you citizens held a tea party over a few centuries ago.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  11. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let anyone tell you that you don't have constitutional rights. The Constitution does NOT only apply to citizens. Even illegal immigrants have constitutional rights.

  12. Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by theolein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm South African so yay for South Africans of all colours, shapes and broken accents, and yay for an SA director making a really interesting SF movie set in SA. It is really nice to see something that isn't shallow Hollywood crap. It might be shallow South African crap, but at least it's different and interesting shallow South African crap.

    1. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by dickbot · · Score: 0, Troll

      "I'm South African so yay for South Africans of all colours, shapes and broken accents"

      How long since your last trip to J-Burg ? Remember the city as it was 15, say, 20 years ago maybe ? Clean and ordered ?

      guess not.

    2. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got any statistics to back that up? crime rates? anything?

    3. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by dickbot · · Score: 1, Troll

      a good picture being better than a thousand words...

      http://deathofjohannesburg.blogspot.com/

    4. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by FlyingSquidStudios · · Score: 1

      I thought Charlie Jade was pretty good South African sci-fi. Not a movie, a TV series, but still pretty good.

    5. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Agreed - its a pity Charlie Jade was never renewed :(

    6. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a good picture being better than a thousand words...

      http://deathofjohannesburg.blogspot.com/

      Wow. There's some pretty twisted racial overtones in those comments. I wonder how far South Africans have really come?

      "Interestingly, there was a hijacking in Innaloo some months ago, it turns out the perpetrators were.... yep, Black Africans from Jo'burg! :-O"

      "Funny that I sat at the pleasant tables of the Mark/Sands Hotels dining rooms arguing against a black takeover. I wonder what my opponents would say to these pictures now."

      It's definitely much easier to blame the poorer occupants who moved in only to find city services and investment capital denied than to... you know, blame themselves for overbuilding or denying blacks civil services and opportunities. Perhaps this movie will say more about SA than locals will want to hear?

    7. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by zakkie · · Score: 1

      Did you have to link to that one-eyed, racist blog? Yes, there's urban decay in Joburg. It was inevitable given the inequality and injustice of the previous system, and has happened in other places too. Using race to apportion blame is being narrow minded in extremis.

    8. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by dickbot · · Score: 1

      If you intend on blaming everything on racism I know I surely can't stop you : I know from experience that a lot of people will just NOT look at cultural, religious, racial, climatic or biological factors IF they can just shout "racist !" instead and get away with it.

      For your information, and after having spent 8 years in SA, claiming that blacks commit 95% of all violent crimes in SA isn't "racism" but merely stating obvious facts. So the first comment you just quoted is hardly indicative of racism, although it is indicative of decent familiarity with the statistics.

      I don't deny the fact that social and economic factors are essential in order to grasp the new SA criminal reality, but to outright dismiss biological and cultural factors as "racist" is frankly delusional.

    9. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by dickbot · · Score: 1

      yeah, let's all get together, fix the "injustice", and in the process let's just trash our cities, murder our citizens and rape 5 million women a year.

      great plan.

    10. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by amilo100 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Switch to Al Jazeera at this moment and you will see a pretty telling picture. Joburg municipal workers are on strike and they really make a mess when they strike (vandalism, etcâ¦). There are also âoeservice deliveryâ strikes (although none in Joburg as far as I know). There is no doubt that the inner cities decayed a lot in the last 5 to 10 years (of both Joburg and Pretoria â" the decay in Pretoria at least bottomed out).

      You can get the statistics for the past few years at the SAPSâ(TM) site: http://www.saps.gov.za/statistics/reports/crimestats/2008/crime_stats.htm You should however bear in mind that statistics tampering has become widespread in the past few years.

      This country has a lot of problems â" unfortunately a lot of foreign people are not willing to accept that (and still cling to the âoerainbow nationâ fallacy). Problems locally also do not get handled because any criticism against the government or the ANC is seen as racism. This coupled with a criminal for president really removes the confidence in the future of South Africa from any rational person.

    11. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      It was inevitable given the inequality and injustice of the previous system,

      When does the buck stop? The Apartheid government arose exactly because they felt that the previous English government (+war) oppressed them (âoeeeu van onregâ). 15 years have passed. Why arenâ(TM)t South African leaders hold to the same standards as other world leaders?

      The Apartheid government had a smaller police force that reduced crime (among everyone) in South Africa. They did this while fighting an ANC insurgency and protecting South Africaâ(TM)s borders.

      The Apartheid police force may have been bad â" but at least they were efficient. The police force grew drastically (and more than tripled in size the past 15 years). Why has crime tripled since the early 80ies? More people die each day today due to violence than any day at the height of Apartheid.

      PS: Maybe it is whole scale corruption and graft by the ANC government that is responsible for South Africaâ(TM)s current situation? (and not some system which ended in 1994) Maybe if they used money on education instead of buying arms in the corrupt arms deal things would have been better?

    13. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so it is OK in SA to assume blacks are biologically predisposed to crime?

      If you don't think those comments section have racial undertones, it says much about you. POVERTY breeds criminality, not BIOLOGY. That is an academic consensus.

    14. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by theolein · · Score: 1

      Was there 2 years ago. Yes, it truly is looking better slowly. Used to live in Hillbrow, Yeoville and Braamfontein when I was at Wits in the 80s. Place went downhill totally, but it is looking much better these days.

    15. Re:Just kind happy that it's not Hollywood SighFi by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I am an aussie, and there are two accents I can't stand. New Zealand, because it is just like aussie accent with a few words changed (ie sound ridiculous), and South Africa, because it is such a harsh combination of English and Dutch.

      Still, looking forward to this movie.

  13. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can state, but that doesn't make you entirely correct. You do so have constitutional rights. The only constitutional rights you lack are the ones specifically granted citizens such as voting rights, or people born here, such as eligibility to be president, or a few age requirements. Everything else in there which applies to "the people" applies to you. Quoting the ACLU for examples because it's much easier than compiling myself:

    "every person in the United States has the right to due process and equal protection; to criminal proceedings that afford a right to counsel, a jury trial and freedom from double jeopardy; to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment; to freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; and to freedom of speech, religion and association."

  14. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    Apparently you didn't have hyperbole in your country.

  15. Halo? by mkiefte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To suggest that District 9 rose from the ashes of a failed attempt at Halo is disingenuous at best. First off, yet another movie based on a video game is a bad idea anyway. District 9 is more directly an expansion of the short film which can be seen on YouTube. However, an attempt to link it to Halo is most likely a cheap advertising gimmick to get fanboys out to the cinema.

    1. Re:Halo? by f33dback · · Score: 0

      Semi right, but he did direct the Halo: Landfall shorts. http://halo.wikia.com/wiki/Halo:_Landfall So people who enjoyed that may have a vested interest in this.

    2. Re:Halo? by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's a hundred percent accurate that this rose from the ashes of Halo. Peter Jackson said in an interview that after the Halo movie fell through he and Neil decided to do D-9 instead. If it wasn't for Halo, Peter Jackson may never have partnered up with Neil. And if it wasn't for Halo getting killed, this film may not have been made.

      And here's my reference

  16. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some rights under the constitution apply to non-citizens who are there legally. FAIL.

  17. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Of course. This place is so welcoming that Africans used to come over here by the boatload.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  18. Coming in 2009: "District 9" by mblase · · Score: 1

    ...not to be confused with "9", "Nine", and "9.99", all of which will also be released in '09.

    I swear, it's worse than all the "Blankety Blank 2000" films we had at the start of the decade.

    1. Re:Coming in 2009: "District 9" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear, it's worse than all the "Blankety Blank 2000" films we had at the start of the decade.

      Didn't you see all of the "2000" crap at the turn of the millenium?

    2. Re:Coming in 2009: "District 9" by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see all of the "2000" crap at the turn of the millenium?

      Nope. Though that might've been because they were all a year old by then.

    3. Re:Coming in 2009: "District 9" by FrostDust · · Score: 1

      Maybe I don't go to the movies enough, but what films are you talking about? The only movie coming out I can think of that has a reference to the year in its name is "2012".
      I'd chalk up "District 9"/ 2009 to coincidence, as there doesn't seem to be anything numerically significant about this year.

  19. Very Human by minijedimaster · · Score: 0

    "subjecting the stranded visitors to the very human condition of greed, fear, and exploitation."

    Considering no one has ever met an alien from another world before, I don't see how these "conditions" can be attributed to humans alone. As far as any of us know greed, fear and exploitation could be the three most common things in the universe.

  20. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by nevillethedevil · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about? I'm a legal immigrant in the US and aside from the vote issue (which should not stop you from being politically active) I have all the same constitutional rights as a person born here. I am interested in knowing which specific rights you don't have?

    --
    Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
  21. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes, just what we need. More "I'm a more (illegal) immigrant/minority whining.

    Why is Michael Jackson the "King of Pop"? Because he kept saying he was. Why are minorities/aliens(as in immigrants not from space) always victims? Because they always say they are too. Look at Mr. Gates claims of profiling which turned out not to be true. Isn't it possible that the people crying foul about 'isms are themselves the problem?

    Either way, this is just another gay attempt at social engineering through popular media.

    1. Re:Why? by gishzida · · Score: 1

      Either way, this is just another gay attempt at social engineering through popular media.

      No. It is a straight attempt a social engineering by little grey men from space. You know them guys and gals from Roswell that do kinky stuff to Humans in the name of weird science. If INS and DHS could get a hold of them I betcha they'd make it in to a reality TV series: Cops Vs. Aliens.

    2. Re:Why? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Yes, just what we need. More "I'm a more (illegal) immigrant/minority whining.

      Why is Michael Jackson the "King of Pop"? Because he kept saying he was.

      The fact that he sold 750 million records might also have had something to do with it.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  22. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an example. "Minorities aren't victims! It is so gay to say that! Those gay niggers are so retarded!"

    Way to shoot yourself in the foot there.

  23. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Also, everyone who looks different from us."

    Who is "US"? Again, here's some ignorant wiener head rebel without a clue spouting off just because it's cool to rail against the system. Please define "different"? I can find people from just about any nation/culture wherever I go in the United States so who/what are these people that are so different that all Americans give them a hard time? Who are you to speak on behalf of everyone in the United States? Did you do a survey in your room of all people with an IQ of less than 2 and 100% of responders think like this?

    It's funny, the whole point of your post is to say that Americans are prejudice, but the fact of the matter is that it's obvious you are the one who is prejudice since you've prejudged that attitudes of the entire country. Way to go!

  24. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Tangent128 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The fuss back then was that British citizens were not given representation.

    A Green Card holder is still a citizen of another country, and is thus denied a vote on the basis of national sovereignty.

  25. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by navygeek · · Score: 1

    Out of curiosity. You seem to suggest that green card holders should be afforded the right to vote (though I could be mistaken) - why? They aren't citizens, they shouldn't have full rights of a citizen. They have several paths towards becoming citizens, and rightfully so. On another note - the tea party held in the, then, colonies wasn't because those people weren't citizens and not allowed rights, it was because they WERE citizens of Britain and STILL getting crapped upon.

  26. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We citizens held a tea party a few centuries ago because we were establishing a legislation and levying taxes on ourselves for upkeep of the colonies, and then Mother Britain imposed additional tariffs on our consumables without our consent. Green card holders are not (normally) beholden to additional tariffs from their home country while here in the States, and they know coming into the situation that they need to pay taxes. They also know that when they get their citizen status then they will be given all the rights and responsibilities of the People as laid out in the US Constitution.

    Except they cannot run for President at the moment, but we anticipate that that might change when Ah-nold wants to throw his hat into the ring and fulfill one of the prophesies laid out in Demolition Man.

  27. comment on website on 4th planet of canopus: by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    FWIW, it took evolution millions of years to come up with a wheel. this is a very efficient way of moving intelligent beings with use of biomagnetics (repulse + attract) around a solid water crust with a nitrogen atmosphere. I'm not so sure this is a "one in hundreds" of potentially useful evolutionary ideas, but rather one in very few. That it's trilaterally symmetric comes from cellular agglomeration, and there is so far little supporting evidence that alternative mechanisms can support a three meter tall intelligent organism well

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  28. How funny that "anti-racist" films are FICTIONAL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a million films out there about innocent people on death row.

    The vast majority of them are fictional. Why is this?

    There's a few films about immigrants being mistreated.

    The majority of them are fictional. Why is this?

    The answer to the first question is: Because, although it would inevitably happen that people are given the death penalty, these have all raped and murdered before. People do not get the death penalty under uncertain circumstances without a prior record. The intention of the filmmakers is often to create sympathy for death row inmates, and because knowing that the person has butchered a couple of families before might diminish the viewer's sympathy, they conveniently let this out.

    Please, prove me wrong by classifying the top-20 IMDB films about death row inmates as either fictional or close to factual as reasonably possible.

    The counter to this is: Is it okay for people to get the death penalty for things they didn't do, if they have done other bad things before? The counter-counter is: No, it's unfortunate, but it does not justify misrepresenting reality even if you feel it's for a good cause.

    In this case, the illegal immigrants are very badly treated. In most countries, they are treated FAR better than this. How is hence this film relevant to anything at all?

    Of course, you MUST include the factors that the illegal immigrants in the FILM are extremely well bbehaved (unlike e.g. Norway, where 55 out of 55 assaults with rape in the capital over the last X years were committed by immigrants according to official confirmed numbers). You must also naturally include that the illegal immigrants has a VALUABLE RESOURCE which the people who treat them badly are trying to sap and extract at their expense, rather than vica versa.

    Last question: Would anyone be ABLE to create a film where things were different: the illegal immigrants were very well treated, and they exploited the people they moved to? If the answer is "no", why is this?

  29. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm afraid you didn't quite get the point of that tea party then. The residents of the colonies were British citizens. At that time most of them had even still been born in Britain. If they were still living in merry old England they would have been eligible to vote and hence had representation in the tax forming body. They were born in Britain, were still considered citizens of the British Empire but had apparently lost their right to vote when they moved to the colonies, part of said British Empire.

    Green card holders are not US citizens. They are citizens of another country working in the US. I am not aware of any foreign country that allows non-citizens to vote in its elections. And, as already pointed out, paying taxes does not buy you constitutional rights nor citizenship. Paying taxes provides funding for the common defense and general welfare. Something Green Card holders benefit from as well as citizens.

  30. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Congratulations on winning "Historical Distortion of the Day."

  31. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Minwee · · Score: 1

    But if space aliens were to suddenly land in the U.S., they'd be voting, given free healthcare, and have their own Emmy-winning reality TV show before anyone could even examine them for xeno-viruses or concealed particle-beam sidearms.

    Why is everybody always talking about Paris Hilton?

  32. "1984" vs "WE" by jbssm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually I'm a big fan of Orwell, but after reading We from Zamiatine. I must say that Orwell, was at least "heavily inspired" (not to say an harsher word), by the much less know work of Zamiatine.

    1. Re:"1984" vs "WE" by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that, I'll have to look Zamiatine up.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    2. Re:"1984" vs "WE" by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1

      dropping the last 'E' will help you find it easier. Eugene Zamiatin.

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    3. Re:"1984" vs "WE" by ianare · · Score: 1

      I agree, much of the setup is nearly identical (the journal aspect for example). You do have to give it to Orwell for 'newspeak' though. Absolutely brilliant, and completely missing from We.

    4. Re:"1984" vs "WE" by jbssm · · Score: 1
      Actual is Yevgeny Zamyatin in English.

      Since he was Russian and the original name is in Cyrilic, different Languages "translate" the name differently. In Portuguese and French (for instance), it's Zamiatine (we don't have Y in the Portuguese alphabet).

    5. Re:"1984" vs "WE" by caitsith01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am a big fan of "We" but I must say I find it to be much more in the vein of Brave New World or Brazil than 1984. It presents a society which attempts, perhaps even genuinely attempts, to run itself on principled and idealistic grounds, but which in reality imposes a bureaucratic dystopia on its people because (a) those ideals are fundamentally misplaced and (b) the very notion of forcing people to live according to particular principles is doomed to have that result. But, for example, D's friend R is a government-endorsed poet and a 'true believer' in the state and its principles. The characters are able to engage in discussion and reflection on these issues, even though those who become too prominently troublesome are subject to 'correction'.

      By contrast the core of 1984 in my mind is that there is literally no room for debate or reflection - the state doesn't ask you to accept anything, it demands it with absolutely no tolerance whatsoever for anything other than complete subservience. The state is also more overtly cynical, for instance waging perpetual war as a means of keeping the domestic population under control, and deliberately entrapping its citizens to ensure total compliance. The character of O'Brien in 1984 serves to emphasise that the state is not interested in your consent - he engages Winston Smith in political/philosophical discussion, but this is just a ruse of the state to trap Winston, who still instinctively believes that there must be room for such things. This differs from the government in We which genuinely (in my opinion) believes in its stated principles and indeed wishes to export them to the rest of the universe to 'enlighten' other species.

      Anyway, I suppose I take issue with your implication that Orwell stole his ideas from Zamyatin (as I think his name is spelt in English). Orwell freely acknowledged that We was very influential on him, but I think it is equally clear that 1984 takes certain ideas about the totalitarian state to much more brutal and harsh extremes. Orwell's idea is really that the state can assume total control to a point where the consent of the individual is utterly irrelevant; in We, the consent of the individual is still significant, and it is the belief in the system which allows it to continue.

      Just my two cents, they are both great novels. I hope Zamyatin had a better grasp on humanity than Orwell, but I doubt it.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
  33. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by hercubus · · Score: 1

    Everything else in there which applies to "the people" applies to you.

    I'm sure you mean well, and I'm sure that technically non-citizens are supposed to have certain rights. But the folks at the Department of Homeland Security haven't heard of these "rights" you speak of.

    No one I've ever talked to can believe how awful it is to have to deal with DHS. If you get a paranoid case worker you're just fucked. Sure you can hire a lawyer but DHS closes ranks around their own and they sit in judgement of themselves. It's a pretty deep hole to climb out of if you're a non-citizen.

    I could go on but until you've had some paranoid delusional psycho bitch with a gun screaming about "putting you people on the next flight out of here" you just wouldn't believe it. Not in America, we're not like that. Land of the free, home of the brave and shit...

    --
    -- How I want a drink, alcoholic of course, after the heavy lectures involving quantum mechanics.
  34. As badly as illegal immigrants?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...in which aliens in space are treated as badly as illegal immigrants..."

    Maybe they are treated badly because they are criminals for dodging legal procedure to enter the United States and become a citizen like our family had to do.

    Illegals should not receive any sort of social benefits including social security and public education. They should be deported and forced to enter the country legally.

    1. Re:As badly as illegal immigrants?!?! by Jonny_eh · · Score: 4, Funny

      And how are space aliens supposed to enter the country legally?

    2. Re:As badly as illegal immigrants?!?! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And how are space aliens supposed to enter the country legally?

      Well they're kinda screwed until we add the INS module to the ISS.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:As badly as illegal immigrants?!?! by cheetah_spottycat · · Score: 1

      Well, they are not. If they were, it would be legal, wouldn't it?

    4. Re:As badly as illegal immigrants?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an app for that!

    5. Re:As badly as illegal immigrants?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, camp out on the moon first and then claim that you were born there under the US flag and are thus a citizen.

  35. Re:How funny that "anti-racist" films are FICTIONA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the rapes in Norway, I'll bet it was the goddamned Pakis for all 55.

  36. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may be the one illegal immigrant that makes so much money that you actually pay taxes. But that would be the exception (income/payroll). Most illegals would either be working under the table, and pay ZERO! taxes. Or using a fake social security number, their income will be low enough that all payroll taxes would be refunded as tax credits.

    Healthcare, if you live in California, they have county hospitals & all private emergency rooms are required to take anyone, for anything. Illegals give fake addresses, and yes, get free healthcare.

    (Free as in taxpayers pay either for the county hospital or paying customers get charged more to try to keep the game afloat, or some private hospitals have had to close their emergency rooms). Yeah that's free.

  37. an0nymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you guys sure are behind the times. the trailers have been out for over a month now.

  38. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by glwtta · · Score: 1

    Who is "US"?

    My bad, I meant those who have traditionally (and until very recently, overwhelmingly) dominated American politics and the public sphere: Caucasian males.

    Please define "different"?

    Sure: "of darker complexion". Though I'm sure tentacles and exoskeletons would fit into that category, too.

    so who/what are these people that are so different that all Americans give them a hard time?

    Did I say all? You don't need all people to give someone a hard time.

    Did you do a survey in your room of all people with an IQ of less than 2 and 100% of responders think like this?

    Now, that's just an unrealistically low IQ score; probably wouldn't even be measurable.

    but the fact of the matter is that it's obvious you are the one who is prejudice since you've prejudged that attitudes of the entire country.

    I can't be prejudiced against an entire country - I could be prejudiced against individuals from a country (though I do try to avoid doing that), with a country I can only have an opinion of the currently prevailing attitudes.

    And yes, based on my experience, I don't believe extraterrestrial asylum seekers would do well here.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  39. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    What?

    In some parts of the U.S., 'lighter compelxion' would be different.

    You need to get out more. The U.S. is not nearly so homogeonous as it was when I was young. And this is not a bad thing, just inevitable. We allow legal immigration on a scale much greater than most nations on Earth. Illegal immigration just tilts the statistics. And causes other problems that legal immigration does not.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  40. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The point of the tea party was: "No taxation without representation." If you don't want to give non-citizens the right to vote, that's fine. But according to the US's own core beliefs, you shouldn't be taxing them in that case.

  41. August "14'th"? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    It starts with someone prominently deciding "14th" needs an apostrophe (even though there's nothing omitted) and next thing you know people are eating candy bars with a knife and fork.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  42. The whole point is this; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading the various posts regarding this film and what it means in the context of the SciFi genre one finally gets to the meat of the meaning at the end. Meaning that last few posts have devolved to the crux of what this film is about. Who cares how it arrived there... it did and these last few posts in the forum prove that point. People are scuffling in the dirt about Racial and Genetic differences in our own race! It is ironic that a "scifi film about aliens" omg real ones could spark all this. Its fairly obvious this is the whole point. So viral marketing works as well as good ole movies about topics that are, have been and will continue to be controversial.

    I for one cannot wait to see this. For entertainment, storytelling (a ancient practice) and just because I enjoy a good scifi movie.

  43. as badly as illegal immigrants and the underclass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you said it, who are the underclass? Are they a separate group from illegal aliens?

    As for illegal immigrants, their children can attend public schools, they get free emergency health care and if they have children born here the children are full citizens. That's in the movie?

    PS. Don't assume anything about my beliefs based on the questions asked, I often play Devil's advocate.

  44. Re:as badly as illegal immigrants and the undercla by cml4524 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This movie is about South Africa. I know it's difficult sometimes, but try to remember that there are countries on this planet other than the United States of America.

  45. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are wrong about that. You do have constitutional rights. It is law of the land, and it is not up to the police to determine if you are a citizen or not before deciding to violate your rights. As far as health care is concerned, it was stated that most likely legal residence, like card holders, will be included in the health reform.

    People who are US citizens but cannot vote, like Peurto Ricans or convicts, are the one who should be upset. Not you!

  46. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    You serious? Illegals pay taxes for sure. America has so many "creative" taxes it's impossible not to pay any tax. Sales tax for example. Granted they may not pay Income tax, and yes even if they did it would probably be refunded.

    But if that outrageous you, you should get a job as a day laborer! You too can have the awesome advantage of not paying income tax and getting free emergency care, all you have to do is sacrifice you job which pays multiples of what a day laborer makes, possibly even have a company funded health program. Then you move to less luxurious accommodations like a one room shared in a house full of other day laborers with 1 bathroom, in a neighborhood that can only be described as "interesting." Hope your dental health is good, because there is no emergency dental care. And why not go all the way? Tear up your Driver's license! You can walk everywhere after all!

  47. Millipedes by Zancarius · · Score: 1

    An extra pair of legs requires more energy, it requires more neurons devoted to controlling the extra legs, etc

    With this reasoning, millipedes either shouldn't exist or should have massive brains, right?

    I, for one, welcome our many legged, slithering overlords!

    --
    He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    1. Re:Millipedes by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Millipedes use a very simplified walking strategy (their legs move in a wave from one end to the other) and have very little "brain" power for anything else, nor do they really need much brain power. Millipedes are not very fast either, their main defense consists of rolling up and tasting bad (some species have poisonous or highly irritating secretions).

  48. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by vertinox · · Score: 1

    As a legal immigrant in the States, I can state that (although I'm paying just as much tax as anyone else) : I have no vote, no free healthcare and no constitutional rights (let alone a TV show).

    A a native born American citizen I have to say that:

    1. My vote doesn't count in a first past the post two party system.
    2. I don't get free health care either.
    3. And my constitutional rights are trampled on anyways unless I can afford a good lawyer.

    But I do have plenty of TV shows!

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  49. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by navygeek · · Score: 1

    First of all, the Boston Tea Party was not *just* because of 'taxation without representation', but we'll skip over that. In that case it was CITIZENS being taxed unfairly and, they felt, unconstitutionally. That situation is not comparable to the issue brought up here, as we're discussing non-citizens paying taxes. It's apples to oranges - overused but apt in this case.

  50. Re:as badly as illegal immigrants and the undercla by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    This movie is about South Africa. I know it's difficult sometimes, but try to remember that there are countries on this planet other than the United States of America.

    I don't know what you're talking about. I'm quite aware of The South. That's where Forrest Gump lived, and it's where televangelists are from...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  51. Alien Nation 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a re-make of Alien Nation.. Crashed ship.. segregation.. etc.

  52. Um 6 appendages with 4 legs and 2 arms would work just as well if not better.

    No. Haven't you ever wondered about those old Ripley's cartoons that showed a man outrunning a horse? Haven't you ever thought through the old tales of Native Americans running down pronghorns? A creature with four legs can accelerate more quickly and run faster for a while but if you've ever seen a four-legged animal collapsed and near death in a foamy sweat from running for too long and too hard, then you'd know that four legs burns fuel faster. At a given (fairly high) percentage of max speed, four-legged animals hit the wall sooner and harder. If a horse and a good marathon runner both start a marathon, the horse will quickly sprint far ahead but the human will catch up and pass long before the race is over, especially if the horse is pushed a bit too hard in the beginning.

    A biped may be slower in the short term (and also less able to bear weight, incidentally) but has huge endurance advantages.

    But is four legs merely different or actually better? More specifically, which is the better mode for an *intelligent* creature?

    If you're only capable of running on instinct and responding to danger by running away at max speed, then four legs is just peachy keen. But if you're intelligent, capable of planning ahead and avoiding life-or-death fight or flight problems, capable of using tools to move loads or defend against attack, and capable of harnessing four-legged creatures to do the grunt work, then being a biped is distinctly advantageous.

    The tendency of SF writers to envision aliens as bipeds has never bothered me. It seems reasonably logical, certainly reasonable enough to use in works of fiction.

  53. The district 9 ads make the movie concept by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    about as appealing as the failed to appear Halo game movie. Both strike me a perfect examples of idiots in hollywood failing to even begin to grasp their audience, and yet willing to believe they know it, and throwing good money after bad...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:The district 9 ads make the movie concept by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I plan on going to see it. What do you feel they failed to grasp?

  54. Mods by TheLink · · Score: 1

    I don't think I was trolling, but how about a Score: 5, Troll while you all are at it?

    Pretty please? :)

    --
  55. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

    "As a legal immigrant in the States, I can state that (although I'm paying just as much tax as anyone else) : I have no vote, no free healthcare and no constitutional rights (let alone a TV show)."

    Funny , as a legal citizen of the United States, I've felt much the same way the past 8 years.

    --
    ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
  56. Re:Moon Whole point of 1984... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I like watching imports, mainly tragic Korean, Japanese, or Chinese films. I'm sick to death of namby-pamby-assed hero-wins/bad-guy-dies/gets caught tripe coming out of mainstream hollywood. Yeh, we can find major studios backing the occasional hero/innocent-loses//bad-guy-walks/finds redemption films, but i think or feel many are the occasional "loss risk" the big studios put money into to be "cosmo" or "hip" or "sensitive". Watch enough Korean films (never mind occasional plot holes, just step into the shoes of each character), you just might turn your back on hollywood, too.

    I look forward to watching "D-9", finding "Moon", and maybe even revisiting "Alien Nation" and "V"....

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  57. Now this... is bullshit by theolein · · Score: 1

    I'm not a racist. I honestly don't care what colour you are. I'll dislike you whether you're black or white. Makes no difference to me. But there is a real problem in South Africa of laying the blame for all current problems on the evils of the Apartheid system. Granted, Apartheid is responsible for much of South Africa's problems, but Apartheid is gone. Whites are now an even smaller minority than they were under Apartheid and have very little political say in what happens in South Africa. They no longer have that much say in who does what in South Africa.

    Until South Africans (and the rest of the developing world, while I'm at it) take responsibility for their problems and stop trying to look for easy cop-outs nothing will change. The fact that SA is slowly improving despite the mess that the country is in, is a testament to the fact that somebody else has realised this fact as well.

    1. Re:Now this... is bullshit by zakkie · · Score: 1

      While you're lording it up in Switzerland, I'm still here in sunny SA. Just so you know. Yes, apartheid is gone, but it is a mere 15 years later, and just because the system was changed quickly (relatively) does not mean that you can (a) ignore the profound impact it had materially and psychologically, and (b) expect the fundamental problems to vanish with the system that created them. We have a massive divide between rich and poor in this country, and like it or not, it's still more or less along colour lines, although there is clearly a small portion of the "previously disadvantaged" community who have accumulated great personal wealth through both straight and crooked dealings. However the basic issues arising from apartheid have largely not been addressed, and bitching that apartheid's over therefore everything must be ok is seriously ill thought out.

  58. bad assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both the short and full feature films expand and explore a premise in which aliens in space are treated as badly as illegal immigrants and the underclass.

    I assume by the "treated as badly as illegal immigrants" that the poster may instead mean "treated as badly as criminals", since they are the same thing. I have less of a problem with illegal immigrants who pay taxes, buy car insurance, and don't steal identities, but the truth of the matter is that most illegal immigrants HAVE stolen identities in order to work, get a driver's license, etc.

    The damages that incurs never really seems to enter into the debate.

    I'd also like the poster to cite reasons why they think the "underclass" is treated so poorly.

  59. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by mldi · · Score: 1

    Of course. This place is so welcoming that Africans used to come over here by the boatload.

    If you rated each country purely by negative aspects of their history, you'd hate every place you come across. Point? Get over it. It's only one of many driving forces of cultural and racial segregation in this country.

    U.S.A. is a larger melting pot than most when it comes to variety of nationalities, cultures, and languages. I can literally walk ten square blocks starting from where I live, and during that time I'll have come across hispanic, indian, leotion, african american, laotian, korean, and "redneck" cultures, with a number of those speaking their own languages amongst themselves... and I live in the "conservative" midwest, much less the more largely diversified cities like New York.

    Caucasians still dominate, but their numbers are shrinking. Just take a look at census data over the last 30 years and you'll get a pretty clear picture of just how amazingly welcoming we are. If we weren't, we wouldn't have such high numbers of immigration (legal or otherwise).

    --
    If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
  60. Re:That May Work as a South Africa Satire by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    It's worse than what the Jews did to the Nazis.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  61. Tetra Vaal by robotbrain · · Score: 1

    I am surprised that no one posted this. It is the first video and IMO the best video that I have seen from this director. Oddly, it looks even more realistic before the Youtube conversion, if you can find it.