What cameras would the officer be looking at? As I said, most red light cameras are not live feed and most intersections don't have cameras at all. Where would these pictures come from? All a driver would need to do is dodge into a side street and he would be free and clear.
That doesn't seem to hinder the red light cameras.
All red light cameras can is levee a fine that is charged against the vehicle registration. It does not get DUIs or driving while suspended. Which would you choose; a $100 fine for running a red or thousands and a suspended license for a DUI? It can not even be charged against the owner's license because the owner may not be the driver Those two categories make up to 48% of the fleeing drivers. So instead of getting a drunk driver off the road for a while the city makes a little money through fines.
Read the tag, report that, location, and direction.
Who reads the tag? Most stop light cameras are not live feeds and not at every intersection.
If all else fails, go arrest them in the A.M.
Which will fail in court because the driver can not be positively identified. The prosecutor has to prove that the owner was driving and the owner can take the Fifth.
The report states that fleeing drivers will slow down in a few blocks if not chased therefore police should not chase. The example I noted was to show that sometimes tragedy occurs in that few blocks so even the no-chase policy is not completely safe.
a lot of the "dark" networks they say are turned off get turned on when needed.
Which takes time and probably won't be done for a traffic stop.
You must live in a crowded part of the country
A lot of people live in crowded areas; that is why they are crowded. It also assumes that most high speed chases occur on major urban arterials and freeways which is not true at all.
Shooting them is not needed when it's a recent model car - those have tracking in them already.
That generally require a warrant and time to get access to that information and there are many cars without trackers in them or with their trackers disabled.
Also license plate trackers and other ident software on most major urban arterials and most freeways.
Another slow source of data that is near useless in real time tracking.
Someone has been watching too many TV shows. Real life is not that easy.
So back to StarChase, this "revolutionary" GPS launching system: It has some flaws. The cannon costs $5,000 and the non-reusable GPS "bullets" cost $500 each. During a recent media demonstration, four sticky bullets were fired at a car, but only one of them stayed stuck.
That was under good conditions. It is a good idea but not very practical.
National Institute of Justice wherein they interviewed suspects who had fled from the police. Their effort, the first systematic study to quantify the perceptions of suspects involved in pursuits, provided information on a variety of topics, including the demographics of those who fled from the police (their average age was 26, and 94 percent were male), as well as what happened (30 percent of the suspects crashed, 30 percent stopped, and 25 percent outran the police) and why they fled (32 percent were driving a stolen car, 27 percent had a suspended driver’s license, 27 percent wanted to avoid arrest, and 21 percent were driving under the influence).
Notice the "27 percent wanted to avoid arrest". The total is above 100% because suspects could list more than one reason.
Not chasing and getting away are two complete different things.
There is a link; If no chase is initiated the driver gets away. Calling in air surveillance takes time and the fleeing vehicle need to be kept in sight until the support arrives.
The issue is that many people who run from the police when chased for a minor traffic violation are not running to avoid the the ticket. They are usually running because they are wanted on another, much more serious, charge. By not chasing we would let serious criminals get away. For example,serial murderer Ted Bundy who killed over 22 women, and the Atlanta child killer, Wayne Williams, who killed 28, were apprehended because of traffic stops.
As another poster pointed out, a publicized no chase policy will just encourage people to run. It does not take long for an accident to happen. For example, a famous computer programmer was struck killed by a fleeing motorist within 2km of the start of the chase.
The First Amendment bars the government from making certain laws. It has no bearing on clauses put into private contracts.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Is there anything in that about creating a contract that states that certain things can not be said and setting up penalties for breaking the contract? The First Amendment is about Government/citizen interaction not citizen/citizen interaction.
People may be talking about it but I won't be happening any time soon. People have also been talking for decades about a viable flying commuter vehicle. That has not happened yet either.There has yet to be a truly autonomous car. Even the Google car needs a vehicle to pre-map the course in high resolution so it can differentiate between stationary and movable objects and a human backup to take over when it can not deal with the situation.
Notice that every pace was exactly the same. There was no adjustment to place the foot in a better position. Just walk a pre-set pace and hope it can balance on the random spot the foot comes down. People do not walk that way and we fall down a lot less. I would also like to see that robot try to stand if it fell on it' back.
Companies don't use the weapons. Militaries ask companies to build weapons to meet certain specifications and then buy the weapons. The power is with the purchaser in this case.
Drones are similar to nuclear bombs in the same way spring showers are similar to class 5 hurricanes.
One thing they miss it that proliferation has already happened. While most countries have not used drones, many, if not most, advanced militarizes have them or are developing them.
Decrease of 150 tons of meat. Global production of meat 180 million tons. 150/180,000,000 - 0.00005%. Decrease in greenhouse gasses: 0.00005*.18 =0.000009%. Get a million of those together and you would have something.
Sadly, an increasing number of cyclists continue a culture of placing the onus on vehicle drivers to avoid cyclists doing stupid, dangerous, or illegal things with small, fast-moving vehicles who then get struck.
FTFY There are similar number of bad cyclists as there are bad drivers. I was making a right turn on a green. A cyclist on the two way crossing street in the far lane passed several cars on the right barely slowing down, did not stop at the stop light, turned left in front of the stopped vehicles into the crosswalk and passed in front of my vehicle. Had I not noticed him and stopped he would have been a hood ornament and his fault. Legally he broke the following laws; passing on right without enough room, failing to stop at a stop light, turning left from the incorrect lane(there was a left turn lane) and riding a bicycle in a crosswalk. Bicycle vs vehicle accidents are not always the vehicle's fault. I ride a motorcycle sometimes and know that a fight between a 4 wheel vehicle and a 2 wheel vehicle will always be won by the 4 wheels. I call it right of weight.
I have seen many cyclists push their rights to be on the road until it is inconvenient and then want to be treated as a pedestrian. Cyclists are one or the other. Not both. If you want to be treated as a pedestrian get off your bike. Many time cyclists break laws so they don't have to expend energy. I don't think I have ever seen a cyclist stop at an intersection with a stop sign when making a right hand turn.
It it necessary to install a standard bundle on every new Raspberry Pi? No. Therefore it is possible to get e new Raspberry Pi and never have the mentioned packages on it. Therefore the "every" is inaccurate.
maybe your interpretation of the statement is just extreme.
There is only one possible accurate interpretation of "every". That is the problem with using absolutes like "every". If they had said "many" or "most" then interpretation could be an issue.
Slashdot Mirror
What cameras would the officer be looking at? As I said, most red light cameras are not live feed and most intersections don't have cameras at all. Where would these pictures come from? All a driver would need to do is dodge into a side street and he would be free and clear.
That doesn't seem to hinder the red light cameras.
All red light cameras can is levee a fine that is charged against the vehicle registration. It does not get DUIs or driving while suspended. Which would you choose; a $100 fine for running a red or thousands and a suspended license for a DUI? It can not even be charged against the owner's license because the owner may not be the driver Those two categories make up to 48% of the fleeing drivers. So instead of getting a drunk driver off the road for a while the city makes a little money through fines.
Most people who run from the police are apprehended within a few hours.
Care to cite anything to support this statement?
Read the tag, report that, location, and direction.
Who reads the tag? Most stop light cameras are not live feeds and not at every intersection.
If all else fails, go arrest them in the A.M.
Which will fail in court because the driver can not be positively identified. The prosecutor has to prove that the owner was driving and the owner can take the Fifth.
The report states that fleeing drivers will slow down in a few blocks if not chased therefore police should not chase. The example I noted was to show that sometimes tragedy occurs in that few blocks so even the no-chase policy is not completely safe.
a lot of the "dark" networks they say are turned off get turned on when needed.
Which takes time and probably won't be done for a traffic stop.
You must live in a crowded part of the country
A lot of people live in crowded areas; that is why they are crowded. It also assumes that most high speed chases occur on major urban arterials and freeways which is not true at all.
There are ways to capture people who don't stop that don't involve the high speed chase at all.
It you look at all those methods they require a chase for a certain period of time. Show me a reliable method that does not and we can talk.
Shooting them is not needed when it's a recent model car - those have tracking in them already.
That generally require a warrant and time to get access to that information and there are many cars without trackers in them or with their trackers disabled.
Also license plate trackers and other ident software on most major urban arterials and most freeways.
Another slow source of data that is near useless in real time tracking.
Someone has been watching too many TV shows. Real life is not that easy.
Found one.
They are also not without flaws;
So back to StarChase, this "revolutionary" GPS launching system: It has some flaws. The cannon costs $5,000 and the non-reusable GPS "bullets" cost $500 each. During a recent media demonstration, four sticky bullets were fired at a car, but only one of them stayed stuck.
That was under good conditions. It is a good idea but not very practical.
Way to cherry pick your data.
National Institute of Justice wherein they interviewed suspects who had fled from the police. Their effort, the first systematic study to quantify the perceptions of suspects involved in pursuits, provided information on a variety of topics, including the demographics of those who fled from the police (their average age was 26, and 94 percent were male), as well as what happened (30 percent of the suspects crashed, 30 percent stopped, and 25 percent outran the police) and why they fled (32 percent were driving a stolen car, 27 percent had a suspended driver’s license, 27 percent wanted to avoid arrest, and 21 percent were driving under the influence).
Notice the "27 percent wanted to avoid arrest". The total is above 100% because suspects could list more than one reason.
Not chasing and getting away are two complete different things.
There is a link; If no chase is initiated the driver gets away. Calling in air surveillance takes time and the fleeing vehicle need to be kept in sight until the support arrives.
References? I can't seem to find any.
The issue is that many people who run from the police when chased for a minor traffic violation are not running to avoid the the ticket. They are usually running because they are wanted on another, much more serious, charge. By not chasing we would let serious criminals get away. For example ,serial murderer Ted Bundy who killed over 22 women, and the Atlanta child killer, Wayne Williams, who killed 28, were apprehended because of traffic stops.
As another poster pointed out, a publicized no chase policy will just encourage people to run. It does not take long for an accident to happen. For example, a famous computer programmer was struck killed by a fleeing motorist within 2km of the start of the chase.
How do you get that limpet tracker attached to the vehicle?
The First Amendment bars the government from making certain laws. It has no bearing on clauses put into private contracts.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Is there anything in that about creating a contract that states that certain things can not be said and setting up penalties for breaking the contract? The First Amendment is about Government/citizen interaction not citizen/citizen interaction.
People may be talking about it but I won't be happening any time soon. People have also been talking for decades about a viable flying commuter vehicle. That has not happened yet either.There has yet to be a truly autonomous car. Even the Google car needs a vehicle to pre-map the course in high resolution so it can differentiate between stationary and movable objects and a human backup to take over when it can not deal with the situation.
Notice that every pace was exactly the same. There was no adjustment to place the foot in a better position. Just walk a pre-set pace and hope it can balance on the random spot the foot comes down. People do not walk that way and we fall down a lot less. I would also like to see that robot try to stand if it fell on it' back.
Companies don't use the weapons. Militaries ask companies to build weapons to meet certain specifications and then buy the weapons. The power is with the purchaser in this case.
Drones are similar to nuclear bombs in the same way spring showers are similar to class 5 hurricanes.
One thing they miss it that proliferation has already happened. While most countries have not used drones, many, if not most, advanced militarizes have them or are developing them.
Considering the hundreds of times I have seen cyclists ignore stop signs I would call that data.
Decrease of 150 tons of meat. Global production of meat 180 million tons. 150/180,000,000 - 0.00005%. Decrease in greenhouse gasses: 0.00005*.18 =0.000009%. Get a million of those together and you would have something.
Sorry but experience is very different than cliche.
Sadly, an increasing number of cyclists continue a culture of placing the onus on vehicle drivers to avoid cyclists doing stupid, dangerous, or illegal things with small, fast-moving vehicles who then get struck.
FTFY
There are similar number of bad cyclists as there are bad drivers. I was making a right turn on a green. A cyclist on the two way crossing street in the far lane passed several cars on the right barely slowing down, did not stop at the stop light, turned left in front of the stopped vehicles into the crosswalk and passed in front of my vehicle. Had I not noticed him and stopped he would have been a hood ornament and his fault. Legally he broke the following laws; passing on right without enough room, failing to stop at a stop light, turning left from the incorrect lane(there was a left turn lane) and riding a bicycle in a crosswalk. Bicycle vs vehicle accidents are not always the vehicle's fault. I ride a motorcycle sometimes and know that a fight between a 4 wheel vehicle and a 2 wheel vehicle will always be won by the 4 wheels. I call it right of weight.
I have seen many cyclists push their rights to be on the road until it is inconvenient and then want to be treated as a pedestrian. Cyclists are one or the other. Not both. If you want to be treated as a pedestrian get off your bike. Many time cyclists break laws so they don't have to expend energy. I don't think I have ever seen a cyclist stop at an intersection with a stop sign when making a right hand turn.
It it necessary to install a standard bundle on every new Raspberry Pi? No. Therefore it is possible to get e new Raspberry Pi and never have the mentioned packages on it. Therefore the "every" is inaccurate.
Every Raspi can also run a build that does not have Wolfram or Mathematica. There is a difference between "can" and "is".
maybe your interpretation of the statement is just extreme.
There is only one possible accurate interpretation of "every". That is the problem with using absolutes like "every". If they had said "many" or "most" then interpretation could be an issue.
According to this he is being charged in Denmark. The extradition is not just for question. Denmark wants to put him on trial.