Wow, you're a moron. First-to-file does not eliminate prior art invalidating a filed patent. The very act you claim got rid of prior art actually expanded the definition of what can be considered prior art for determining patentability. But that would have required you to know what you were talking about rather than repeating nonsense. It even allows foreign, third party use to be used as prior art against a patent.
People accept btc as a form of exchange currency meaning they want to exchange in and out of it. If those access points are insecure the security if the BTC protocol is meaningless.
Intel's R&D budget alone is around 70% of TSMC's total yearly revenue for example. Also, if you look up rankings of R&D spending by technology companies Intel's is basically the second highest just behind Microsoft.
Because the difference is meaningless to the users of it? If all the places that you can use to exchange bitcoin are insecure it really doesn't make a difference whether or not the protocol is secure. If bitcoin is only secure as long as you don't use an exchange then it becomes worthless as a currency for... exchanging money.
And what does it matter if bitcoin itself is secure when the places that allow you to extract any value for your play money have joke level security? That's like saying that credit cards aren't insecure it's just the payment processors. It's a farcical excuse.
Maybe because when you are the victim of credit card fraud that you don't assume the liability and instead that is the card issuer's problem? Or if someone robs you of your cash that they will face criminal charges? On the other hand, the people losing virtual play money assume no liability and will face no prosecution.
I'd also argue that the supremacy of the keyboard/mouse for PC games is a byproduct of the PC's limitations and the impracticality of creating an immersive gaming experience on general-purpose computer.
And what are these limitations and what makes a 'general-purpose computer' impractical to make immersive gaming on?
Slashdot Mirror
Wow, you're a moron. First-to-file does not eliminate prior art invalidating a filed patent. The very act you claim got rid of prior art actually expanded the definition of what can be considered prior art for determining patentability. But that would have required you to know what you were talking about rather than repeating nonsense. It even allows foreign, third party use to be used as prior art against a patent.
"I'm an aspie who can't spot a joke."
Lucid is from April 2010. That's not 2 months ago.
MtGox has been breached before. Using it as an example of a secure exchange is a joke.
People accept btc as a form of exchange currency meaning they want to exchange in and out of it. If those access points are insecure the security if the BTC protocol is meaningless.
Intel's R&D budget alone is around 70% of TSMC's total yearly revenue for example. Also, if you look up rankings of R&D spending by technology companies Intel's is basically the second highest just behind Microsoft.
You don't necessarily have to recode since WP8 is backwards compatible with WP7 apps.
Yes, it will. You misread the summary. WP7 will not run WP8 apps. The other way around will work as Microsoft has repeatedly stated.
Great. So what?
There is also an S3 but that doesn't mean tri-core. All the S1s and S2s were single core. The number has never had anything to do with CPU core count.
Sure, the raving fanbois will pay early, but most people just wait for their uograde period to come.
Writing for Windows 8 does not necessarily imply using Windows RT. You can write Win32 apps to run on the desktop.
It's 250% as the summary states. 50 x 50 is not 225.
Or as most US consumers will do, they'll get it for $199 on contract.
There doesn't need to be when it will run all apps from WP7.
It's even more important when you attempt to mock people for wrong units when the units are actually correct.
They've long since re-denominated their money.
Because the difference is meaningless to the users of it? If all the places that you can use to exchange bitcoin are insecure it really doesn't make a difference whether or not the protocol is secure. If bitcoin is only secure as long as you don't use an exchange then it becomes worthless as a currency for... exchanging money.
And what does it matter if bitcoin itself is secure when the places that allow you to extract any value for your play money have joke level security? That's like saying that credit cards aren't insecure it's just the payment processors. It's a farcical excuse.
Maybe because when you are the victim of credit card fraud that you don't assume the liability and instead that is the card issuer's problem? Or if someone robs you of your cash that they will face criminal charges? On the other hand, the people losing virtual play money assume no liability and will face no prosecution.
Why should he be in a cell? He lost some virtual play money and nothing of actual value.
Yeah it's great as a means of exchange... for the people who are stealing bitcoins. The exchanges all seem to have a joke level of security.
I'd also argue that the supremacy of the keyboard/mouse for PC games is a byproduct of the PC's limitations and the impracticality of creating an immersive gaming experience on general-purpose computer.
And what are these limitations and what makes a 'general-purpose computer' impractical to make immersive gaming on?
The problem is that there is a glut of designers who need to get jobs then justify their position once they score it.
And yet you cannot even seem to name a single one of them.