BTW did you convenient forget about MAGAtard Cesar Sayoc Jr.? The guy sending mail bombs to people? I'm pretty sure that's far worse than some guy saying something looney on Twitter.
Neither. They'll simply be out for themselves just like they always have done.
This is like the Slashdork deification of Google. Neither Netflix nor Google gives a shit about you and they never have. It's always been about crafting an image to make as much money as they could.
Yeah, and plenty of people pointed that out years ago but mosr Slashdorks wouldn't listen because Google open sourced some token projects that were never money makers and they used Linux.
But the clouds part is pretty amusing since right now where I live the sky is completely overcast for miles. I guess I'll stick to my fiber internet that is immune to clouds.
I aways ask "What do you think of motorcycle helmet laws?"
How about this response:
You want to ride around without a hement? Then you pay any medical costs incurred in an accident completely out of your own pocket. Your "personal freedom" comes at the cost of complete personal responsibility for the consequences.
But I can pretty much guarantee any rider whining out helmet laws wouldn't accept that responsibility and instead will think their insurance company should shoulder the costs.
It's also a joke that in 2019 that WordPress has no notion of sandboxing plugins so that any security holes they do have could be reasonably contained. Why do they still allow plugins to be huge gaping security holes?
BS. The last major OS version for the S5 that was officially released by Samsung was Android 6.0.1 which was released by Google 3.5 years ago. So you're either falsely conflating security updates with OS upgrades (you know, the topic of the submission) or you're using a third-party ROM when this whole topic is about first-party support.
But it wasn't a public position. It was an informal motto that they used to trick gullible people into thinking they were something they weren't. Google has always put money ahead of ethics. That anyone believed otherwise is silly.
Slashdot Mirror
What amazing MAGAtard logic. Saying something mean on the Internet means you deserve to get a mail bomb sent to you in retaliation.
You will also notice his bombs weren't real.
Yeah you MAGAtards did try to claim that yet the police said otherwise.
Nobody was hurt, but the bombs were real, officials said.
"These are not hoax devices," FBI Director Christopher Wray said.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/u...
Facts are so inconvenient, right?
Yes, tons of people. Step out of your nerd bubble once in a while.
BTW did you convenient forget about MAGAtard Cesar Sayoc Jr.? The guy sending mail bombs to people? I'm pretty sure that's far worse than some guy saying something looney on Twitter.
Neither. They'll simply be out for themselves just like they always have done.
This is like the Slashdork deification of Google. Neither Netflix nor Google gives a shit about you and they never have. It's always been about crafting an image to make as much money as they could.
They do? Then how do you explain all the top MAGAtards being chummy with Roger Ailes and Trump's coziness with Jeffrey Epstein.
I know, I know. Facts are inconvenient.
Right because MAGAtards never send death threats. LOL hypocrisy.
But he was just being politically incorrect. Isn't what you MAGAtards like? Stop being such a snowflake.
A couple of Slashdorks leaving do not repesent a majority of their users.
Hey look, another naive Slashdork that still thinks that motto ever had any teeth to it.
Especially if they are from Google or someone who paid to be whitelisted. People who actually trusted an ad company are pretty lulzy.
Plus they had that slogan about not doing evil or whatever which is obviously true since billion dollar corporations never lie...
Clearly. What's more sad is there are still people to this day that quote that motto as if it was some sort of legally-binding contract.
Of course. You really thought an ad company wouldn't eventually tighten the noose around blocking ads?
Yeah, and plenty of people pointed that out years ago but mosr Slashdorks wouldn't listen because Google open sourced some token projects that were never money makers and they used Linux.
Whatever altruistic motto you want to portray, Google, this doesn't reflect that.
This just in: Google was never altruistic. That motto was purely to scam naive idiots. They've been raping your privacy for profit since day one.
No need to worry. Any place with regularly overcast skies won't be able to use this anyway.
I'll take that fix.
But the clouds part is pretty amusing since right now where I live the sky is completely overcast for miles. I guess I'll stick to my fiber internet that is immune to clouds.
and their signals are largely immune to interference or hacking, although clouds can be problematic.
So they're largely immune to interference except to one form of interference that is prevalent throughout the atmosphere?
That's as stupid as saying you make a body armor vest that is mostly immune to impacts although guns can be problematic.
Yep, Mark Chucklefuck can shove his offer back up his ass.
Slashdot really is going downhill and seems to be in the hands of idiots.
msmash is really no worse than kdawson or samzenpus.
I aways ask "What do you think of motorcycle helmet laws?"
How about this response:
You want to ride around without a hement? Then you pay any medical costs incurred in an accident completely out of your own pocket. Your "personal freedom" comes at the cost of complete personal responsibility for the consequences.
But I can pretty much guarantee any rider whining out helmet laws wouldn't accept that responsibility and instead will think their insurance company should shoulder the costs.
So said the people that came before you, and the people that came before them. Yes, yes, the kids will get off your lawn, gramps.
It's also a joke that in 2019 that WordPress has no notion of sandboxing plugins so that any security holes they do have could be reasonably contained. Why do they still allow plugins to be huge gaping security holes?
Except one was an official policy statement and the other a throwaway motto.
BS. The last major OS version for the S5 that was officially released by Samsung was Android 6.0.1 which was released by Google 3.5 years ago. So you're either falsely conflating security updates with OS upgrades (you know, the topic of the submission) or you're using a third-party ROM when this whole topic is about first-party support.
But it wasn't a public position. It was an informal motto that they used to trick gullible people into thinking they were something they weren't. Google has always put money ahead of ethics. That anyone believed otherwise is silly.