You just answered your own question. There's only "little data" to support it. And that data is only based on small rat studies. That's hardly qualifying of solid science.
Security is only as good as the underlying Operating System and Memory Management Unit , which is to say in the case of Microsoft Windows running on Intel hardware is non-existent
The hell are you talking about? Intel chips have had MMUs for 30 years now.
Who cares about security on OS X? 10% of all desktop users I would imagine. And where did you get the idea they were only testing OS X applications. You seem to have invented that out of whole cloth.
10% compounded interest in the market would pay off much faster. If it requires more than 7.5 years to even break even on this it's worse than 10% compounded interest in the market which would double your principal in 87 months.
That isn't what the headline is saying and you know it. Stop being intentionally obtuse. There are plenty of better criticisms of the "editors" than this one.
Slashdot Mirror
Tell us also about how you wear onions on your belt and shake your fists at clouds.
Non-junk monitors get upgrades.
Violating the Constitution is not treason. Maybe you should actually read the document?
So true. We all know Judicial Watch is a bastion of Clinton and Obama lovers. /s
Go choke on a dick and die.
SBC was AT&T. That's like claiming you're left hand isn't a part of your body.
Their national party platform says otherwise.
You just answered your own question. There's only "little data" to support it. And that data is only based on small rat studies. That's hardly qualifying of solid science.
Weak troll is weak. Hillary falls center right in her political leanings. Hardly the part of the spectrum of a "communist."
Security is only as good as the underlying Operating System and Memory Management Unit , which is to say in the case of Microsoft Windows running on Intel hardware is non-existent
The hell are you talking about? Intel chips have had MMUs for 30 years now.
But that's hard and stuff.
Who cares about security on OS X? 10% of all desktop users I would imagine. And where did you get the idea they were only testing OS X applications. You seem to have invented that out of whole cloth.
So cops never solved crimes before telephones existed?
Authorized dealers do not fall under the first-sale doctrine.
Sales contracts.
No actually it is. The story specifically says that the new subscriber numbers are weak due to churn of older customers.
The Chinese are a disinterested party? That's a great joke.
Flat out wrong. ETFs are traded on the stock market and are not themselves stocks.
10% compounded interest in the market would pay off much faster. If it requires more than 7.5 years to even break even on this it's worse than 10% compounded interest in the market which would double your principal in 87 months.
That isn't what the headline is saying and you know it. Stop being intentionally obtuse. There are plenty of better criticisms of the "editors" than this one.
Patching an exploit vector is now a bad thing?
Because the same people would be howling about how Microsoft was keeping users unprotected by not patching a known security exploit.
But it'll be ok for me to watch ISIS beheading videos near those same kids?
Who said only fictional? You'll still be able to watch real beheading videos in front of all of the kids.
"Oh, that's just that Game of Thrones show, honey." You, know, that violent show with nudity that won't be blocked by this policy.
But someone watching a violent movie, which won't be blocked, is okay for the kid to see, though, right?