So true. Corporations and their CEOs have a long history of being 100% honest. Why there's no way that a single case in centuries could be shown where one has ever lied about anything.
People knew that long before gamergate ever existed. Games journalism has always been corrupted by money and publisher influence. Here's such an article from 2003. Gamergate didn't actually expose some hidden truth that no one knew about.
People's opinion can change over time, But a vote is a commitment.
So then this vote is invalid. The people of the UK already decided to join the UK by vote 30 years ago. According to your logic, their 1975 decision is unchangeable.
Considering that there were numerous stories that came out of people having a different opinion on the subject after the lies were exposed, it would seem their lives weren't that bad. Also, you're the one trying to shout everyone out who has a different opinion. If you're trying to have a thoughtful discussion then maybe stop being an asshole?
Which part of "That's a really fucking stupid design decision" do you not understand? Also, the CAP theorem has nothing to do with security. The two are not mutually exclauvie as you try to imply.
You don't give notice because you give a shit about your (soon to be former) employer, you give notice because that's what a professional does. Walk out without notice and you declare "I am not a professional."
And yet it's "professional" to just walk an employee out the door without prior notice? Riiiiiight.
Little bitches throw tantrums and storm out with bitter accusations to justify their immaturity. A decent person does what you did. End things like a pro and walk away standing tall.
No, little bitches throw tantrums that their employee treated them as exactly as they would have treated said employee if only the tablets were turned. Besides, most companies upon getting that notice simply walk you out the door. Essentially spitting in your face for trying to extend them courtesy.
It doesn't matter if the company would have ended things with less class.
No, it actually does. If companies want their employees to extend them courtesies then they need to reciprocate. Otherwise, they're simply being little bitches throwing tantrums.
It doesn't matter if the company would have ended things with less class.
Actually it does. There's this common saying of "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Sorry, but the only one being a "little bitch" is an employer that gets butthurt that the employee did to them what they would have done to the employee if the tables were turned.
Slashdot Mirror
It means they don't want the usual braindead Internet filters that block content that is not porn.
Are you illiterate? It spells out the conditions in the second setence of the summary.
No, this is a case of holding a corporation responsible for its actions. How horrible.
So true. Corporations and their CEOs have a long history of being 100% honest. Why there's no way that a single case in centuries could be shown where one has ever lied about anything.
Nowhere close to that unless you were intentionally paying nearly a magnitude more for your RAM than market price.
They're voted in by other retards.
Nope, I've gotten a $1 cheeseburger and a $1 parfait at a local McDonalds just a couple of weeks ago.
Then why is the dollar menu dead?
It's not?
And why haven't I been able to afford a steak on my birthday for five years?
Because you're shit with money?
Still no sympathy. If you want to use their private property, you play by their rules.
Boohoo. Run your own website if you don't want to play by Facebook's rules. Do you need the waaaahmbulance to stop by?
Have any evidence for all those assertions?
You act like this is a new business tactic. Are you really that naive?
People knew that long before gamergate ever existed. Games journalism has always been corrupted by money and publisher influence. Here's such an article from 2003. Gamergate didn't actually expose some hidden truth that no one knew about.
No one cares what you think.
But you're using silly things like "logic." That has no place in rants.
People's opinion can change over time, But a vote is a commitment.
So then this vote is invalid. The people of the UK already decided to join the UK by vote 30 years ago. According to your logic, their 1975 decision is unchangeable.
That poor strawman. What did he ever do to you?
Considering that there were numerous stories that came out of people having a different opinion on the subject after the lies were exposed, it would seem their lives weren't that bad. Also, you're the one trying to shout everyone out who has a different opinion. If you're trying to have a thoughtful discussion then maybe stop being an asshole?
Which part of "That's a really fucking stupid design decision" do you not understand? Also, the CAP theorem has nothing to do with security. The two are not mutually exclauvie as you try to imply.
Using an adblocker prevents a server from being breached? lolwut?
"Smart surfing" only works in a world in which servers don't ever get breached. We don't live in such a world.
And when that non-sketchy sites gets breached and starts serving drive-by malware how do your steps catch that?
You don't give notice because you give a shit about your (soon to be former) employer, you give notice because that's what a professional does. Walk out without notice and you declare "I am not a professional."
And yet it's "professional" to just walk an employee out the door without prior notice? Riiiiiight.
Little bitches throw tantrums and storm out with bitter accusations to justify their immaturity. A decent person does what you did. End things like a pro and walk away standing tall.
No, little bitches throw tantrums that their employee treated them as exactly as they would have treated said employee if only the tablets were turned. Besides, most companies upon getting that notice simply walk you out the door. Essentially spitting in your face for trying to extend them courtesy.
It doesn't matter if the company would have ended things with less class.
No, it actually does. If companies want their employees to extend them courtesies then they need to reciprocate. Otherwise, they're simply being little bitches throwing tantrums.
It doesn't matter if the company would have ended things with less class.
Actually it does. There's this common saying of "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Sorry, but the only one being a "little bitch" is an employer that gets butthurt that the employee did to them what they would have done to the employee if the tables were turned.