So you've given two week notices to all people you've fired? If not, you're simply being a huge hypocrite for holding your employees to a standard you don't hold yourself to.
I agree BUT, burning your bridges is never a smart idea if it is not necessary,
It's not burning a bridge. It's treating the company as they would treat you. Besides, many companies will simply walk you out the door after giving notice. So all that courtesy that you were trying to extend to them is thrown back in your face.
That's all good in theory until they list you as terminated for job abandoning.
They weren't saying to no longer show up to work without saying anything. They are talking about telling telling the boss that you quit and then leaving right then and there. That is not "job abandoning". It's quitting.
Well, Apple might as well just shut up shop now. Random Internet guy is gonna stop buying their products. Apple better be quick to make a press release to try contain the near-irreparable damage that your post to Slashdot is going to do to their bottom-line and stock price.
Tons of people. Over 200 million units were sold in 2015. And just Apple alone they've sold 26 million in the first two quarters of 2016. Your anecdotes don't match reality by any measure.
So according to your logic if your family reports you to the FBI then they should just simply arrest you whether or not actionable cause exists? You want them to just violate somone's civil liberties until they find something to arrest him for? It's amazing to hear that someone is actually mad at the FBI for actual staying within their constitutional authority
While I mostly agree, your claim that no one paid attention is not true. The FBI checked him out multiple times but found nothing of cause to be able to investigate him further. They very much did pay attention, they just didn't have any evidence to do anything. So, as I said, unless you wanted them to more flagrantly ignore people's civil liberties, the FBI had their hands tied. For once, they weren't massively overreaching their authority.
Slashdot Mirror
So you've given two week notices to all people you've fired? If not, you're simply being a huge hypocrite for holding your employees to a standard you don't hold yourself to.
I agree BUT, burning your bridges is never a smart idea if it is not necessary,
It's not burning a bridge. It's treating the company as they would treat you. Besides, many companies will simply walk you out the door after giving notice. So all that courtesy that you were trying to extend to them is thrown back in your face.
That's all good in theory until they list you as terminated for job abandoning.
They weren't saying to no longer show up to work without saying anything. They are talking about telling telling the boss that you quit and then leaving right then and there. That is not "job abandoning". It's quitting.
Courts are brought in all the time for contract disputes. It's been true for hundreds of years.
https://github.com/ShiftSpace
Well, Apple might as well just shut up shop now. Random Internet guy is gonna stop buying their products. Apple better be quick to make a press release to try contain the near-irreparable damage that your post to Slashdot is going to do to their bottom-line and stock price.
Yes, because asking for actual evidence to back up wild speculation is clearly astro-turfing. How dare them!
Nuh uh! The summary says it's apparent that he has been threatened by Apple. How dare you second guess the infallibility of the summary!
Tons of people. Over 200 million units were sold in 2015. And just Apple alone they've sold 26 million in the first two quarters of 2016. Your anecdotes don't match reality by any measure.
Huh? Apple didn't set Spotify's prices. Spotify did. They could have done what Amazon did if they didn't like the rules.
So the cameras can be remotely monitored.
Yes, you can. You can flash ROM. It's done all the time.
Because there are no R&D costs or anything. No, technology just pops into existence from the aether.
No shit, Sherlock? It sounds like they are doing something which is directly mentioned in the summary? How insightful of you!
Is it truly illegal, or just against terms of service.
It's illegal without a license to do so.
However, illegality needs to be determined by law, and not contract.
It is determined by law. Are you just completely ignorant of copyright statues?
(Editor's note: Wired blocks adblockers)
Only in a really poor way apparently. I have an ad-blocker and can get to the link just fine.
So according to your logic if your family reports you to the FBI then they should just simply arrest you whether or not actionable cause exists? You want them to just violate somone's civil liberties until they find something to arrest him for? It's amazing to hear that someone is actually mad at the FBI for actual staying within their constitutional authority
That is delightful fantasy. The Republican party has zero history as a party of "small government". It's simply empty rhetoric.
It never existed outside of rhetoric used to trick rubes into voting for their party?
While I mostly agree, your claim that no one paid attention is not true. The FBI checked him out multiple times but found nothing of cause to be able to investigate him further. They very much did pay attention, they just didn't have any evidence to do anything. So, as I said, unless you wanted them to more flagrantly ignore people's civil liberties, the FBI had their hands tied. For once, they weren't massively overreaching their authority.
Wouldn't matter. If you're hell-bent on killing a bunch of people, no laws are going to stop you.
Which isn't an excuse TO DO NOTHING.
But...but...but... Terrists!!!!
Huh? How did they do nothing? The FBI checked him out multiple times but had no actionable cause.
Unless you want the FBI more flagrantly violating civil liverties there was nothing they can do. And these expanded powers will do fuck all either.
It's an editorial.
The people running the venue. You do realize that concerts were held long before cellphones existed, right?