Slashdot Mirror


User: mxharlow

mxharlow's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
14
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 14

  1. Re:Why does Apple hate America? on How Apple Sidesteps Billions In Global Taxes · · Score: 1
    The tax laws are complex and inaccuracies arrise when we generalize.

    Companies can deduct any "operating expense".

    This is certainly not the case as any qualified tax profesional will tell you. Business are generally allowed a deduction for "ordinary and necessary" expenses incurred in the pursuit of earning a profit. Not just any "operating expense" will do.

    People cannot (the most obvious ones being food, shelter and transport.

    Again, you have to be careful with these sweeping statements. In Massachusetts you can deduct two of the three!

  2. Re:Why does Apple hate America? on How Apple Sidesteps Billions In Global Taxes · · Score: 1

    Yes! That is precisely correct. I have seen that confusion more than once here. It's more than semantics. The two are very different, legally speaking.

  3. Re:Why does Apple hate America? on How Apple Sidesteps Billions In Global Taxes · · Score: 1

    ... It is *possible* for companies as large as Apple to commit tax avoidance under the law. That does not make it legal.

    Ah, but it doesn't make it illegal. I think you are confusing tax avoidance with tax evasion.

  4. Re:To be fair on How Apple Sidesteps Billions In Global Taxes · · Score: 1
  5. Re:Why does Apple hate America? on How Apple Sidesteps Billions In Global Taxes · · Score: 1

    "...companies simply make sure they pay out all the money they make as wages, and presto: no tax liability because they made no profit."

    No income tax liability! You trade the income tax for the payroll tax.

  6. Re:Why does Apple hate America? on How Apple Sidesteps Billions In Global Taxes · · Score: 1

    To clarify for the /dot community... For the purposes of income tax in the United States, corporations are people. They are more then just comprised of people; they are considered to be "person". Congress wrote it into the Internal Revenue Code that the definition of "person" included corporations. It also includes Partnerships, Trusts, Estates and a host of other entity types. See IRS Sec. 7701(a)(1).

  7. Re:Excellent on Amazon To Pay Texas Sales Tax · · Score: 1

    You're no alone in your opinion! The right thing to do is the right thing to do, if everyone does the right thing to do. If not, the right thing to do is not the right thing to do, and I will not do the wrong thing to do.

  8. Re:A New Money Scheme on Amazon To Pay Texas Sales Tax · · Score: 1

    Exactly why it could never work as designed by using a billing address! A common example in this debate is a person who buys a product online as a gift in a state which does not have nexus with the retailer. He or she then has it shipped to a state which does have nexus. The sales tax applies in this case because of the sales tax and use tax unification.

  9. Re:Argh. on Amazon To Pay Texas Sales Tax · · Score: 1

    The statement "Your company makes money, it's taxed. They pay you, it's taxed again" isn't exactly correct. Generally, for federal income tax purposes companies are only taxes once on this money in the form of a payroll tax. They are allowed a deduction against gross income the amount they pay in payroll and thus escape income taxation on payroll expenses pursuant to 26 USC 62(a)(1). Of course shareholder distributions, dividends and loans to employees do not receive the deduction.

  10. Re:FLAT TAX on Tax Loopholes No Longer Patentable · · Score: 1

    Since most of the patentable tax strategies have to do with federal income tax I'll keep my comment exclusively to that tax. In 2010 a single taxpayer filing a federal Form 1040 who made $12,000 from wages would owe $266 in taxes. He or she would be entitled to a refundable making work pay tax credit of $400. The tax payer would receive a net payment from the federal government of $134. They would have a federal income tax rate of -1.12%

  11. Re:Why do corporations have to be people? on Corporations Now Have a Right To "Personal Privacy" · · Score: 1

    Let us not forget that the Internal Revenue Code section 7701(a)(1) defines âoepersonâ to include an individual, trust, estate, partnership, or corporation.

  12. Re:In case of Slashdot, serve cache. on Herschel Releases First Images of Milky Way · · Score: 1

    hahaha. clever.

  13. Don't post items of this nature in the future. on The Mindset of the Incoming College Freshmen · · Score: 1

    Do you think this incredibly inaccurate opinion belongs on Slashdot?

  14. Re:Tax Exempt? on US Colleges Say Hiring US Students a Bad Deal · · Score: 1

    from page 3, paragraph 1: "In fact, a company may save money by hiring international students because the majority of them are exempt from Social Security (FICA) and Medicare tax requirements."