Slashdot Mirror


The Mindset of the Incoming College Freshmen

Beloit College has come out with its annual Mindset List of what the incoming class (of 2013) has always known and has never known. "For these students, ... the Green Giant has always been Shrek, not the big guy picking vegetables. They have never used a card catalog to find a book. ... Tattoos have always been very chic and highly visible. ... Rap music has always been mainstream. ... Except for the present incumbent, the President has never inhaled. ... Amateur radio operators have never needed to know Morse code."

383 comments

  1. Sorry by dakohli · · Score: 5, Informative

    In my world, Britney Spears has never been featured on a Classic Rock Radio Station.
    Dave

    1. Re:Sorry by SgtKeeling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While most of the items on the list are true, some are off the mark as far as I'm concerned. "#64. CDs have never been sold in cardboard packaging" Personally, I see more and more CDs sold in cardboard rather than plastic these days. "#51. Britney Spears has always been heard on classic rock stations" Classic Rock Stations? I usually listen to the CBC (Talk Radio) or classic rock, and I've never heard Britney Spears on a rock station.

    2. Re:Sorry by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      To everything - turn, turn, turn
      There is a season - turn, turn, turn...

    3. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is more about back when CDs first came out and were considered very valuable so they had larger boxes to both prevent casual theft.

    4. Re:Sorry by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just always assumed every other boy had my mindset when I hit that age.

      Girls! GIRLS! GIRLS!!!

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    5. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Britney Spears thing is totally out of place. Besides the obvious that Britney Spears and rock stations usually don't mix, I haven't heard a classic rock station that plays anything that recent.

      At least in the NYC area, the newest songs on the classic rock stations seem to be pulled from Nirvana's Nevermind, Pearl Jam's Ten, and Stone Temple Pilots' Core albums. All albums from 1991-1992. Britney Spears started out in what, 98 or 99 ?

    6. Re:Sorry by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      That surprised me to see. Britney spears as classic rock? What was he smoking?

    7. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think the point is that to these kids Britney Spears is old music, something that happened before they were teenagers.

    8. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "#64. CDs have never been sold in cardboard packaging"

      Personally, I see more and more CDs sold in cardboard rather than plastic these days.

      i think they're talking about the "long box", a cheap hack from back in the day meant to make CDs tall enough to put in record bins

    9. Re:Sorry by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      but as rock?

    10. Re:Sorry by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

      Planet Rock (www.planetrock.com) in the UK certainly plays recent rock. Take 'Chinese Democracy' as an example. It has been well played on an almost daily basis.

      --
      I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    11. Re:Sorry by SpecBear · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I heard it, the old CD long boxes were designed so that music stores wouldn't have to replace their racks. Two CD cases side by side were the same size as a single vinyl record case.

    12. Re:Sorry by jo42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is a "Britney Spears"?

    13. Re:Sorry by Angstroem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Britney spears are devices to spear Britneys, duh!

    14. Re:Sorry by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Must be an Americanization of Brittany spears, which, of course, are French polearms.

      -Peter

    15. Re:Sorry by scubamage · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a weapon, +4 to music slaying, +2 to virgin slaying, +10 to eardrum slaying. Successful attack requires target to roll saving throw for will.

    16. Re:Sorry by LabRat007 · · Score: 1

      "#64. CDs have never been sold in cardboard packaging" Personally, I see more and more CDs sold in cardboard rather than plastic these days.

      They are talking about the early foot long cardboard boxes that plastic CD jewel cases used to be placed into. I've heard multiple reasons for this, one was compatibility with existing vinyl racks and the other was making it difficult to steal the CD. Later the foot long cardboard box was replaced with a plastic (propylene) case that was removed by the seller after you purchased it. Later still the whole idea of encasing the CD jewel case in something else was abandoned and they just started adding electronic theft deterrents inside the jewel case.

      --
      "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    17. Re:Sorry by Bigby · · Score: 1

      These are the same lists that said people born in 1980 didn't use cassette tapes.

    18. Re:Sorry by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      I just barely remember those things, and I'm 33. I wasn't buying a significant fraction of my music on CD until about 1995, anyway.

    19. Re:Sorry by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      And I for one would like to see the end of the CD jewel case. They're far too fragile with their hinges always snapping off, even in moderately jostled storage. I'm glad DVDs did away with their version of them (though I did get one DVD case where the hinge was completely crushed, held together only by the wrap-around plastic holding the cover insert, which insert also neatly hid the damage).

      I only have two DVD jewel cases in my collection: Evil Dead and The Wraith. (The latter was an obligatory purchase and not a recommendation.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    20. Re:Sorry by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      It's a weapon, +4 to music slaying, +2 to virgin slaying, +10 to eardrum slaying. Successful attack requires target to roll saving throw for will.

      Are you sure it's not a saving throw for Fortitude?

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    21. Re:Sorry by default+luser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And that's why a lot of new albums are sold in printed cardboard cases. The cardboard provides a skeleton that is more durable than a jewel case, and I think theyn add a little plastic to the mix to make it impressively flexible. The industry is starting to like these for other reasons too: for one, printed cardboard is less expensive than clear (i.e. "virgin") plastic.

      There are lots of variations on the design too - you can have pure reinforced cardboard sleeves, or you can combine a cardboard shell glued to a plastic disc holder. These cardboard shells also make it much easier to fit multiple discs in the standard jewel case footprint, which makes the logistics of shipping a double-album (or a bonus DVD) much simpler.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    22. Re:Sorry by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a great way to waste space when shipping things.

  2. I would hope that their mindset involves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thinking about more important things than the Jolly Green Giant.

    1. Re:I would hope that their mindset involves... by Donniedarkness · · Score: 1

      Shrek isn't always jolly.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    2. Re:I would hope that their mindset involves... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Shrek: Ogres are like onions.
      Donkey: They stink?
      Shrek: Yes. No.
      Donkey: Oh, they make you cry.
      Shrek: No.
      Donkey: Oh, you leave em out in the sun, they get all brown, start sproutin' little white hairs.
      Shrek: NO. Layers. Onions have layers. Ogres have layers. Onions have layers. You get it? We both have layers.
      [sighs]
      Donkey: Oh, you both have layers. Oh. You know, not everybody like onions.

  3. !news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get off my slashdot.

    stuff that matters.

    yeah right

    1. Re:!news by PBoyUK · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be new here...or wait, they must be new here. They're not new here yet, but will be new here soon, hence, news about being new here not yet but soon.

      Not news new here? Not new.

    2. Re:!news by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Indeed, they forgot the most important:

      Slashdot always had an idle section.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  4. hammered as the cubs won it all in 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hammered as the cubs won it all in 2012.

  5. 1984 much? by nadando · · Score: 5, Interesting

    'The European Union has always existed'.

    1. Re:1984 much? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The KGB has never officially existed.

      Sounds like something that might have been true all along...

    2. Re:1984 much? by gbarules2999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know I'm not quite indicative of my fellow class of 2013 (I'm on Slashdot, dear lord), but this is nonsense. I know exactly who the Green Giant is and have eaten several of its products. I have indeed used a card catalog to find books, back in elementary and early middle school. Tattoos being chic is an opinion that is not shared by an entire generation.

      The actual link has truth in the list occasionally, but I'm annoyed at the assumptions made.

    3. Re:1984 much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a part of the college class of 2010, I don't believe many of the things listed

    4. Re:1984 much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I represent 100% of my generation when I say:
      "Get off our lawn!"

    5. Re:1984 much? by JimXugle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. The only things I could really relate to were the bits about chocolate chip cookie dough ice cream, GDP, and Blue Jello.

      Honestly, this is basically a list of things to assume about the class of 2013 that you can bring out in conversation to insult their knowledge of history.

      --
      -jX

      Don't you just love politics? It's like a comedy of errors.
    6. Re:1984 much? by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now now, lets not get rid of stereotypes: they make it easier it unnecessary to talk to the person to find out how they think. People of the previous generation actually listened to Rick Astley because they liked the music, they aren't sure if they should be using OS/2 or Win 3.0 for there application, they can't program their VCR, they didn't save for retirement because they were promised a pension and are now biter and broke. Does that about cover it?

    7. Re:1984 much? by bigbird · · Score: 1

      So how did you get a userid less than 1,000,000 anyway?

      I shudder to think that even now there may be slashdot users who were born after I started reading it ...

    8. Re:1984 much? by colk99 · · Score: 1

      Same way other people did he signed up in the womb:P

    9. Re:1984 much? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      We have always been at war with Eastasia

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    10. Re:1984 much? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      The assumptions is the list are not targeted at the "Class of 2013"; the assumptions in the list compilation are biased to scare "old" people.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    11. Re:1984 much? by bfrpsw · · Score: 2, Funny

      'The European Union has always existed'.

      My wife was teaching a first-year economics course last year, and in one lecture she displayed some OECD data from the last 40 years or so. A student put up his hand and asked "Why does it say *WEST* Germany?" :-)

    12. Re:1984 much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the Green Giant as a historical artifact. In the mid 70s he was North American kids cultural icon.

      Same way I knew who 'Howdie Doodie' was but he was not part of my cultural experience. I could tell he meant something to my parents peers, but really nothing to me.

      That said, who cares. Cultural icons come, then drift into history...

    13. Re:1984 much? by silent_artichoke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well son, when a mommy and a USB WiFi stick love each other very much....

    14. Re:1984 much? by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      Bonus points if you know who the "Friendly Giant" is... :)

      Wow... I'm old.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    15. Re:1984 much? by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Since when has less than 1,000,000 been anything special?

    16. Re:1984 much? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      What year? We didn't cover WW2 until 10th grade, IIRC.

    17. Re:1984 much? by bfrpsw · · Score: 1

      First-year university. They were looking at statistics from the 1980s. "West" Germany ceased to exist in 1990, when last year's typical first-year university students were born.

    18. Re:1984 much? by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      This is basically a list of things to assume about the class of 2013

      By the time I was 21, I'd bought a house; by the time I was 23, I was managing 35-year-olds. I remember how much I resented them constantly mentioning my youth. But, now that I'm 38, I can tell you a secret:

      When we marvel at how much has changed since we were kids, it's not that we want to make you feel naive. It's that we didn't know that we were old.

      It's especially true during the "punctuation" part of punctuated equilibrium. In the late '90s, I tried to figure out what my generation's version of "We didn't have automobiles" was. Sure, there was the Internet, but it was slow, search wasn't as integral or widespread as it is now, and life didn't yet revolve around it. What would I say to kids? "When I was your age, we didn't have these fancy CD players in our cars. If we wanted to listen to a CD on a road trip, we had to tape it! And none of these fancy remote controls with their 50 buttons. Our remote controls had six buttons, and if you wanted to watch channel 36, you just held the "up" button a while." ... Not impressive.

      Then, all of a sudden: Cheap RAM. Multicore. Cheap, fast, always-on residential Internet. Cheap DSP. Amazon. Google. eBay. iTunes. Youtube. P2P. Cell phones. Digital cameras. Fast laptops. Death of newspaper, network TV, film, music industry. Digitization of everything. The end of the concept of "out of print". GPS. Cheap, fast, always-on wireless Internet. VoIP. The end of the concept of "lost track of".

      What just happened? Aren't we the post-history generation? ... We're not?

    19. Re:1984 much? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I know exactly who the Green Giant is and have eaten several of its products.

      But do you know who Sprout is?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    20. Re:1984 much? by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      Or, "We have always been at war with Iraq". Well, at least for kids entering first grade (and a bit older before you find one that can actually remember the start of the war).

    21. Re:1984 much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just hit on point, "History". It's all in the past. I can see where it seems condescending and most of these are just tripe pop-cultural differences, but the point is it's history not something you grew up with. Even if some of the things like card catalogs lingered on a bit they probably felt antiquated. I used card catalogs as a kid in the 80s and even then they felt antiquated.

      I'll wont defend the article any further though. It's pretty bad. Who cares weather you grew up watching Saved by the Bell, or what commercials you had to endure? If this is culture then our culture void.

    22. Re:1984 much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why not something more meaningful like

      40% of all wealth has always been owned by 10% of the people (Now its up to 50%).

      The earth has always been doomed by rising temperature.

      Or maybe we could just go with

      The American dream has always been fucked

      These some how seem more interesting than missing Saved by The Bell

    23. Re:1984 much? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I think even kids today read Roald Dahl.

      Of course id software has completely ruined the title of that book for me. "The BFG" means something else to me now.

    24. Re:1984 much? by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this list comes out every year (lately, anyway), and there are always those of us who are exceptions. My mother sent me "the list" my first year of college, and I rebutted every single one of the points on it, as things I'd remembered, with details. As a fun game, though, bring up some of these things with your fellow students, this year, and see what kind of reactions they have. (Note that this can vary widely from school to school.)

    25. Re:1984 much? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      they can't program their VCR

      I can program my VCR. I just don't see the point of doing it anymore as I don't R with it.

      Future generations though will still do things that are impossible, such as voice-dial a phone and rewind the MP3 stored on their SSD, long after the rotary phone and spools of tape needing to be rewound are gone.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    26. Re:1984 much? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Should have learned about WW2 by then, I'd imagine.

  6. Broken rocking chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey you kids, get off my lawn!

    I remember record players, portable tape players, laptops that weighed a ton, actually having to manage hard drive space. And walking to class backwards in six feet of snow for at least ten miles.

    And, no, you don't get your netbook back. You hit it through my window, now its mine.

    1. Re:Broken rocking chair by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      Wow you must be old, even with multiple terrabytes I still have to manage hard drive space.

    2. Re:Broken rocking chair by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      walking to class backwards in six feet of snow for at least ten miles

      You forgot "uphill both ways".

      Also, I actually still *have* a record player (working) and a portable tape player (broken).

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  7. "Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Ah, the young white trash generation.

    1. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's something to that. This is a generation that grew up thinking Jerry Springer was normal and acceptable behavior.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    2. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by samexner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What gives you the right to say that? You're generalising my generation. You are implying that we all listen to rap, and we all conform. You are implying that we are all stupid, and we all are materialistic. I do not listen to rap. I listen to Slayer. I am not stupid. I kick my whole classes ass at the academic bowl every year. I know about these things. I know who the green giant is. We are not all ignorant. It's like me saying your generation is the pot smoking generation. Or maybe you're older. Maybe you're the racist generation. You can't generalise a whole generation of people. You're saying that all the people who will spend the vast majority of their life in the 21st century are ignorant conformists who listen to rap. That's not very fair of you.

    3. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do not listen to rap. I listen to Slayer.

      Lol at this retort to a "white trash generation" claim.

    4. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by PBoyUK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At what I feel may be a very real risk of WHOOSH, I'll respond. This hate on "generalising" is totally irrational. Humans are habit forming, pattern matching biological machines who owe a large part of our success as a species to the ability to generalise. Forming connections based on observed behaviours between multiple sources and using those connections to draw conclusions. Sometimes right, sometimes wrong, but largely useful. Surely you recognise that in even attempting to speak on the character on something as widely varied as the culture of a generation of people, you're dealing with such huge numbers of people that in order to say anything of non-obvious value means identifying the largest occupied unions of the set. What's crazy here is your apparent level of butthurt over someone putting a label on something which by your tone you already knew to be true.

      Or maybe you're hating on generalisations for the sake of them being generalisations. Which is twisted in its own ironic way because it's not based on any proof that abstraction is a bad thing, but rather on the feared result of being subject to some inappropriate application of generalisation to an individual. So really you're damning generalisation as a whole because some idiots misuse it. Generalising generalising not out of its most frequent use, but most feared misuse, a highly faulty premise.

    5. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Nutria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is a generation that grew up thinking Jerry Springer was normal and acceptable behavior.

      Because their parents suck, politically-correct panty-waisted fools who "feel" their children won't love them if a parent say, means, and enforces:

      No, you can not watch South Park! It's rated MA for a reason! Now go outside and practice with that Savage Model 40 we bought you last year, and don't be greedy when it's your sister's turn...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    6. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by scotch · · Score: 1

      You're so smart (go academic bowl champ, go) that you can't even understand the concept of generalizations? Boy are you going to have a painful existence.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    7. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overgeneralize much?

    8. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but I've always thought that you should *never* generalise :-)

    9. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I am getting culturally confused.
      Listening to metal here in the UK is almost exclusively something the white middle class does.
      Is it different in the US? As a metal fan of 10 years (European, though) I am baffled by these "white trash" remarks.

      Here, the lower classes listen to "popular" genres like rap, R&B, drum and bass, etc.

    10. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by GaryOlson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the first time reading Slashdot, a comment has made we want to take a radioactive shower and wash that concept out of my mind.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    11. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are implying that we are all stupid, and we all are materialistic.

      Not much need to imply when it's true. Sorry.

    12. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by hey! · · Score: 1

      What gives you the right to say that?

      Age.

      Now be a good boy and go freshen up Grandpa's whiskey.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by xtracto · · Score: 1

      OMG What gives you the right to say that?
      WTF You're generalising my generation. You are implying that we all listen to rap LOL, and we all conform. w8am You are implying that we are all stupid, and we all are materialistic. ROFL
      I do not listen to rap. I listen to Slayer w00t. I am not stupid FFS. I PWN my whole classes ass at the academic bowl every year. I know about these things. I know who the green giant is. We are not all ignorant LULZ.

      Nice rant, now finish your homework and go to your room.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    14. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      You are implying that we are all stupid, and we all are materialistic.

      Coming from a guy whose teenage years are gone but not forgotten, that's not some generational blip, that's just always described teenagers.

      That's not very fair of you.

      Please forgive this next clause, but I'm imagining you stomping your feet right now

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    15. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      What gives you the right to say that? You're generalising my generation. ... That's not very fair of you.

      Heh, I said the same thing when I was your age.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    16. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because their parents suck, politically-correct panty-waisted fools....

      Wait wait wait. "Politically-correct" parents are responsible for kids growing up thinking that the sort of behavior seen on Jerry Springer was normal? "Politically-correct" parents would let their kids watch South Park?

      Eh, no. Political correctness can be stupid, but it's not the sort of stupidity that neglects filtering what children see and hear -- if anything, it's the opposite sort of stupidity, that thies to make sure that children don't see and hear anything "offensive".

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    17. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Tarsir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course you kick your whole class' ass at the academic bowl - you're in a generation of ignorant conformists! :P

    18. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by 2names · · Score: 1

      Now, now, Scotch, give the boy his "gold star for trying" and let him get back to writing poems about cutting. ~

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    19. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Nah. They can always be guilted by their kids.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    20. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by teh_commodore · · Score: 1

      Was there an entry on how you are all hyper-sensitive and narcissistic and therefore prone take wide-sweeping generalizations personal? 'Cause there should be...

      --
      --"insert clever quote here"
    21. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      This is a generation that grew up thinking Jerry Springer was normal and acceptable behavior.

      Because their parents suck, politically-correct panty-waisted fools who "feel" their children won't love them if a parent say, means, and enforces:

      No, you can not watch South Park! It's rated MA for a reason! Now go outside and practice with that Savage Model 40 we bought you last year, and don't be greedy when it's your sister's turn...

      Bull. Its the rise of schadenfreude, plain and simple. You don't need to look so far as 'TV MA' to find examples of our society deteriorating. Start with the first several weeks of any season of American Idol. Or just about any 'Reality TV'. By 'reality' they mean 'suffering', for which we as a people are developing a huge appetite.

      Even your South Park example falls into this category, with Kenny dieing at the end of all the episodes, etc.

      This is a personal choice, to be sure, but as a culture we really need to start rejecting this evil garbage before it rots our morals out completely.

    22. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I think we are both correct, each expressing part of the problem.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    23. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I was an 'incoming freshman' a quarter of a century ago. I, too, always resented being lumped in with all the other idiots when people made broad generalizations. Try to keep in mind that these generalizations are no reflection on you. All you can do is be yourself.

    24. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally speaking, I think my head hurts.

    25. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP was talking about tattoos, not rap. Do you have a tattoo? I agree that the tattoo fad is a sign that many young people, regardless of social class, have adopted the white trash culture, or at least parts of it.

      "I can't get a tattoo. You see, I'm not white trash."
          - Comedian Jimmy Carr

    26. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

      At what I feel may be a very real risk of WHOOSH, I'll respond. This hate on "generalising" is totally irrational. Humans are habit forming, pattern matching biological machines who owe a large part of our success as a species to the ability to generalise.

      Yes! Yes! A Thousand times yes!

      I can't tell you how much it bothers me when people can't see this! I always think this when people complain about that dreaded evil of bigotry and cynicism: the stereotype. A stereotype represents nothing more than pattern recognition skills in action. Stereotypes literally separate humans from monkeys. They damage only when people force others into certain stereotypes rather than testing and observing them as individuals, but they otherwise make the entire world go around.

      Developing complex stereotypes about everything from Hispanics to public libraries to Chevrolet automobiles makes complete sense; only the ways in which you apply those stereotypes and self-adjust them (or refuse to adjust them) can go wrong.

    27. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by hesiod · · Score: 1

      It only means he beat everyone else involved. If a dumb person beats a group of complete morons, it does not make him smart; only smarter than them.

    28. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      Sigh. The point of the list is not so much about generalizing your generation as it is reminding those of us who are older that your generation has not lived through the same historical changes ours have and will not see the world in the same way we do. It's to help us remember that your worldview is often different from ours and we can't expect you to see things the same way. Various generations have had different experiences and will see things differently - that's just the way it is. The reason this list is put out is because those of us in the older generations want to be able to communicate better with people who have a much different historical perspective and worldview that we can't readily identify with. Is that what you're objecting to?

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    29. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Fareq · · Score: 1

      It was probably true then too.

    30. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's different in the US.

    31. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by etwills · · Score: 1

      What gives you the right to say that? You're generalising my generation. ... That's not very fair of you.

      Heh, I said the same thing when I was your age.

      Mod parent funny
      ...and the article he posted.

    32. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      Only when karma whoring.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    33. Re:"Tattoos have always been very chic" by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      Might I suggest you friend me then? That way, almost every day you can have the dirty disgusting feeling I perpetually walk around with!

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  8. Funny this should come out today... by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...I just told my Electronics 1001 students about the tube testers they used to have at Seven-Eleven. I'll have a 12AU6 and a Slurpee, please. rj

    1. Re:Funny this should come out today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude i would have LOVED to be alive in that day

    2. Re:Funny this should come out today... by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      I bought metal springs and wooden dowels with tubes at the hardware store. Some of those old radio boards the tubes had to be wedged in just right until the board warmed up enough to let the tube seat properly.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    3. Re:Funny this should come out today... by hey! · · Score: 1

      You can date when I learned electronics by the following facts: (1) I was shown how to build circuits on a bakelite terminal strip, although I never did it for real; (2) I was also shown how to wire wrap.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Funny this should come out today... by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      The wire wrap doesn't really help date it that much. In 2003 I had to wire wrap a micro controller together in college before they taught us how to write assembly for the controller.

    5. Re:Funny this should come out today... by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Hell, it's 2009 and we still wire wrap jumper pins rather than place plastic jumpers for rugged applications. Granted, it's not the same as wire wrapping components...

      --
      +1 Disagree
  9. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "They have never used a card catalog to find a book"

    What's a book?

  10. Seinfeld is "classic TV"... by cfa22 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and U2 sucks.

    1. Re:Seinfeld is "classic TV"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... and U2 sucks.

      That has always been true.

    2. Re:Seinfeld is "classic TV"... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      ... and U2 sucks.

      That has always been true.

      How long must they sing that song?!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  11. My conclusion.. by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    America is in trouble. These are the same students who think that all countries along the equator are hotter than any desert in the USA.

    Heck, I saw and almost touched snow on one mountain in Africa. Quite a revelation to me...I almost froze!

    1. Re:My conclusion.. by UltimApe · · Score: 1

      Not me, I read my biology and earth science books in a week for sixth grade.... I practically skipped 2 grades levels with my "knowledge". It is amazing how far a little interest in something can take you, especially when that interest coincides with curriculum.

      Some things are rather benign in the grand scheme of things... the fact act the earth moves round the sun and not vice-versa, is of no real consequence unless you plan to go to outer-space and for most is little more than a passing curiosity.

      However the fact that seasons change due to the tilt of the earth, and not the distance of the sun, has been invaluable.

      I also blame sim-earth and related addictions.

      --
      "Infecting minds with my own memetic virus, one post at a time." Ultimape
    2. Re:My conclusion.. by tonycheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why would that put us in any kind of trouble? Is it particularly important to know that some countries on the equator are cold? How is that relevant to anything? This list looks to me like an entertainment piece, reminding people of rapid culture changes in the US or the world. It doesn't exist to show us that we have a failing education system.

    3. Re:My conclusion.. by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      Because labelling and then making assumptions about an entire generation is a great pastime once you grow older, I assume. they all seem to be doing it these days.

    4. Re:My conclusion.. by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      Why would that put us in any kind of trouble?

      You will not categorize "Not knowing anything about other parts of the world" as particularly advantageous, will you? If all [ignorant] college going folks referenced in the article became future politicians, we surely would have "work" on our hands.

    5. Re:My conclusion.. by Artifakt · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I can think of several reasons why knowing some tropical regions are cold matters. For one, look at geopolitics:

      South America - the left edge is where most of the mountains are, often leaving no more than narrow strips before you get to the seacoast. Peru and Argentina are both colder on average than is generally assumed by North Americans. So, is coca a tropical plant? Or is that just another assumption that follows from the first one? 'No one could grow coca in the Rocky mountains - it has to be imported from tropical countries like Columbia. We can win the war on drugs by fighting it there.'

      Afghanistan - same situation, lots of areas above 10,000 feet mean it's colder than most people here assume. When they hear the stories about the Taliban or Al Quaida hiding in caves in the mountains, they believe them uncriticially, but the real situation involves many regions with incredibly dangerous winters, sometimes altitiudes and temperature combinations where most people cannot adapt, but simply weaken and die from long term exposure, and vast distances that must be crossed to to bring in water. There are serious reasons to doubt that many people can lay up in most of that terrain long term. There are places no one is desperate enough to try and farm, and anybody up that way is on the lam from someone. Either the government as a whole knows this and could narrow its searches for people such as Osama considerably, or they aren't listening to their geography experts at the CIA.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    6. Re:My conclusion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Afghanistan - same situation, lots of areas above 10,000 feet mean it's colder than most people here assume. When they hear the stories about the Taliban or Al Quaida hiding in caves in the mountains, they believe them uncriticially, but the real situation involves many regions with incredibly dangerous winters, sometimes altitiudes and temperature combinations where most people cannot adapt, but simply weaken and die from long term exposure, and vast distances that must be crossed to to bring in water. There are serious reasons to doubt that many people can lay up in most of that terrain long term. There are places no one is desperate enough to try and farm, and anybody up that way is on the lam from someone. Either the government as a whole knows this and could narrow its searches for people such as Osama considerably, or they aren't listening to their geography experts at the CIA.

      For someone who seems to know a lot about the mountains you seem to know fuck all about how hard it is to find someone in the mountains let alone someone hiding in the mountains who doesn't want to be found.

    7. Re:My conclusion.. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I dunno.. I think it demonstrates a failing eductation system. You need to know where you're coming from before you can understand where you're going. Knowing how the universe works should be common knowledge.

      But then, we still have people believing that a zombie doesn't want gay people to get married..

    8. Re:My conclusion.. by JayAitch · · Score: 1

      If finding snow was a revelation to you... Aren't you in the same boat as them?

  12. No, please, stay on my lawn... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...with my eyesight failing from old age like this, it's too hard to aim if you're across the street.

    Somewhere between reactionary neophilia and reactionary neophobia, there is a sparsely populated middle ground where things are evaluated on their own merits, and new things are not automatically good nor old things automatically bad, or vice versa. The modern predilection for the new is just as robotic and mindless as the pre-modern predilection for tradition, the only difference being that we're now indoctrinated into neophilia by advertising instead of being indoctrinated into neophobia by religion.

    Maybe, if we learned from the past instead of ignoring it, we wouldn't feel compelled to reinvent COBOL every thirty years. Then we would have been spared the horror of Visual Basic, and then later, Python. Can't wait to see what the next lumbering reanimated monster from the forgotten past will be.

    Oh wait, I can already guess: another implementation of Scheme.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by PBoyUK · · Score: 3, Funny

      I find the concept of the reinvention of COBOL to be severely troubling. On the one hand, although Zombies are cool, they're still sufficiently dragged down by COBOL that the result would be terrible. On the other, a reinvention of COBOL could lead to the eventual development of time travel, fueled by the desire to go back and kill the nefarious project and/or creator in its infancy.

    2. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      The only thing you learn fro history is thaty no one ever learns from history.

      Great post oh ancient (4 digit ID) wise badger.

    3. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ah yes, the horrors of Python. What are those, again? I mean apart from the standard "wtf significant whitespace" one.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    4. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Nyall · · Score: 1

      What the hell is with this obsession of low digit user ID's ?

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification
    5. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by sneilan · · Score: 1

      Python's not so bad. I use it everyday with the Django Libraries. http://djangoproject.com/

      --
      "I like it when the red water comes out.."
    6. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      need there be a more significant indictment.

    7. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, "the horror of ... python..."? Where did that come from? Wait, let me guess, the language would be great if it had "ends"" or, even better, used braces to delimit blocks.

      --
      Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
    8. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes.

    9. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Then we would have been spared the horror of Visual Basic, and then later, Python.

      Burn, you witch, BURN!

      I have heard many critiques of/complaints about Python, but you are the first to compare it to COBOL. I would be curious as to how you would make that case.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    10. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to admit that a language with simple syntax, rich object libraries and reasonable performance that runs everywhere and is free has to be a bit suspect. Hell, we can't have our managers thinking we should be productive, can we?

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    11. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You, Sir, insulted the Church of COBOL. GO TO HELL.

    12. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhere between reactionary neophilia and reactionary neophobia, there is a sparsely populated middle ground

      Proctive Necrophilia?

    13. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by darpo · · Score: 1

      Your user account is too young to understand. ;-)

    14. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by zztzed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed it is.

    15. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first language was COBOL (I'm just young enough never to have programmed on cards). I write a lot on Python. So I think I am qualified to make this statement: you, sir, are clueless. The similarities between the two are very superficial.

    16. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by nidarus · · Score: 3, Informative

      The ++ operator doesn't exist because it's so convenient - it exists because ++ would translate to a faster opcode than regular addition. Python isn't compiled to machine code, so it's pointless to have it. It also occurs much less often in Python, because it doesn't use C's stupid "for" loop. The main (only?) argument for having it is because C has it.

      P.S.

      (result1, result2)[condition] or, if you prefer a special syntax, result1 if condition else result2.

    17. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by sadness203 · · Score: 1

      LOLZ!!1!!1!1!!!111!
      Oh ... what, something about your lawn ?
      Sure pops ! Suuuure.

    18. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you find errors at "compile time" when there is no user noticeable compile time?

    19. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with python?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    20. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by ricegf · · Score: 1

      It's not installed by default in Windows? Otherwise, it's most always my first choice...

    21. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by goldmaneye · · Score: 1

      You mean another implementation of *everything* for Microsoft's .NET framework:

      http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython (Python!)
      http://www.codeplex.com/IronScheme (Scheme!)
      http://nua.codeplex.com/ (Lua!)
      http://www.ironruby.net/ (Ruby!)
      (Perl conspicuously absent ...)

      Now, let's discuss your allegation than Python and VB are re-inventions of COBOL. Let's look first at what is shared: some syntax. As far as I can tell (and please correct me if I'm wrong), they share little else. For example, boolean expressions are composed with "and," "or," and "not." They also use some of the same operators, such as ">" and "
      (Aside: I had to read up on COBOL to write this post, and frankly, COBOL reads a lot more like SQL to me than it does like either VB or Python).

      I think that Python has far more in common with LISP than with COBOL. Lexical scoping? Functions as first-class data? Built-in "map" and "apply" methods? Smells like functional programming to me. From what I've read about COBOL, it has none of these things. Also, though they both have OO features, COBOL had to *add* those features in 2002. So even COBOL is "re-inventing" the features of other languages.

      I think if you replaced "re-invent" with "learn from" in your statement, you would be closer to the truth. After all, that is in my mind what COBOL did: they saw that object-oriented features could be powerful additions to their language, so they added them. Language designers are taking what they like or what works (or perhaps sometimes, what is most popular) from existing languages, and putting together languages that meet their needs.

      For example, look at the Boo programming language. It takes the features the author loved about the .NET framework and the Python programming language and puts them together into a new language that has developed a strong following (it even has language macros a la LISP ... totally sweet). For its devotees, Boo meets their needs, and it was able to do so by fusing together what the author deemed the best features of existing languages and then building upon them.

    22. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by goldmaneye · · Score: 1

      Whoops, that should read "some of the same operators such as ">" and "" for comparisons and "=" for assignment.

    23. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Old people are wise. Users with low UIDs have been slashdotting in mom's basement for decades. So they are very wise, as smart as the rest of us, but even more so.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    24. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was under the impression that pretty much any compiler on earth would end up reducing x = x + 1 or x += 1 back down the same opcodes as x++. They do a decent amount of optimizations on the code before compiling.

      Not that I CAN'T use the old x = x + 1 method (my first language was BASIC on a Commodore 64, so I used that a lot), nor do I even know Python, but IMHO just using ++ is much faster when coding. I'm a bit of a curmudgeon though. In general anything that strays from C-link syntax I just don't like too much. Like I said I learned on BASIC, and have also dabbled with Fortran quite a bit, but after I learned C and C++ in college it just seemed the "right" way to do things. These days I'm doing more in C# and PHP, but their syntax is still very C-ish.

      Still, sometime in the next year or two I do want to TRY to learn Ruby.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    25. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by spitzak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Although certainly the original reason for ++ was so that a very stupid compiler could still produce the optimal code, it also serves some purposes that are important:

      (complicated_expression)++ is much easier to read than complicate_expression = complicated_expression+1. In the second case it is often difficult to tell that it is the same variable. The only "modern" way to express this is with references, such as reference a = reference(complicated_expression); a = a+1.

      Also postfix ++ returns the previous value, this is often very useful, though confusing. It can be worked around again with a temporary variable.

    26. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The semantics of (result1, result2)[condition] are not the same as those of condition ? result1 : result2.

      Specifically, the trinary ? operator won't evaluate result2 if condition is false, but the tuple-index method will. If evaluating result2 has side effects, this can alter the behavior of the program. Whether this is a good thing or not depends on your programming style.

    27. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, methinks your programming style should depend on whether or not this is a good thing (rather than the other way around).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    28. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ++ operator doesn't exist because it's so convenient - it exists because ++ would translate to a faster opcode than regular addition.

      Yeah, because operators in a high level language translate directly to machine code... NOT!

      If it was just a matter of more efficient opcodes, it would be taken care of on the back end. Like other optimizations are. It's there because it makes code faster to write and easier to read. IE, more convenient. Which is pretty much the point of a high level language.

      Python isn't compiled to machine code, so it's pointless to have it.

      Actually, Python does compile to machine code. It's runs on the Python virtual machine. Do you think that Python has a += operator because that compiles to a more efficient opcode?

    29. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by scotch · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, what are all the .pyc and .pyo files in my build, smart guy?
      Even if those didn't exist, at program startup is compile time. Why
      not detect syntax errors then instead of 1 hour into execution.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    30. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by nidarus · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always the += operator, and Python has it.

      Btw, what do you mean by "complicated expressions" in this context? Can you give me an example?

    31. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      what do you mean by "complicated expressions" in this context? Can you give me an example?

          map.lookup[index(word)].counter

    32. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by nidarus · · Score: 1

      Ah OK I see what you mean.

    33. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add to your argument:

      complicated_expression = complicated_expression + 1;
       
       

      means that complicated_expression is evaluated twice (hence it better contain side-effects that the programmer wants twice) while

      (complicated_expression)++;

      is only evaluated once.

    34. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Yes += is probably acceptable substitute.

      I usually assume that somebody arguing against "++" is also arguing against all such in-place operators such as += as well.

    35. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by nidarus · · Score: 1

      OK... In this case it was more about Python, though.

    36. Re:No, please, stay on my lawn... by nidarus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because operators in a high level language translate directly to machine code... NOT!

      But C was not designed as a high-level language. It even had a register keyword, for fuck's sake.

      Actually, Python does compile to machine code. It's runs on the Python virtual machine.

      I give this troll 7/10.

  13. Re: by PBoyUK · · Score: 4, Funny

    Paper bricks the RIAA will throw at you when they catch you downloading music.

  14. Tatoos and $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If I was a doctor Id get into tattoo removal asap. These gen Y peeps and their fugly tats will be running to the doctors office when they hit middle age.

    1. Re:Tatoos and $$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's obviously no money for you in anything to do with using the English language.

  15. Inhaled? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    "Except for the present incumbent, the President has never inhaled."

    The president in the 90s has never inhaled either;)

    1. Re:Inhaled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Snorted. The word is "Snorted".

    2. Re:Inhaled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. When before would this even been a question? I thinks this means: Every president has smoked weed, but only one has actually 'inhaled.' YMMV

    3. Re:Inhaled? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I am confused by that, as well. Clinton did pot. Bush II was an alcoholic who also did coke. Obama is a smoker who did pot in his youth. What exactly is meant by that "the President never inhaled" statement?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:Inhaled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama is a smoker who did pot in his youth.

      You don't do pot. You smoke it. That would be like 'doing' caffeine, or going to the bar to 'do' some alcohol.

    5. Re:Inhaled? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      They never inhaled sperm.

      I'm pretty sure of that one.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    6. Re:Inhaled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quick google search (NYT article):
      "Obama had written in his first book, "Dreams From My Father" (1995), before entering politics, that he had used marijuana and cocaine ("maybe a little blow")."

    7. Re:Inhaled? by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Clinton did pot but famously and publicly stated that he "never inhaled". So that's his line, give him credit. Then there's the double negative thing, if you straighten it out, Obama is the only president who admitted to inhaling when he smoked.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  16. Whipperspnappers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We had to get our messages by listening to the audio tone over a 300 baud modem and were gratefull . . .

  17. 2013? by XPeter · · Score: 1

    We all die in 2012, so why the study?

    The shitty thing is, 2012 is my freshman class year.

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:2013? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Actually, the implication of 2012 is the end of a period, and the beginning of a new one. It doesn't necessarily mean we're all going to die. I'm sure some people will, due to natural attrition.

          I don't discount the idea that 2012 will be the collapse of civilization as we know it, I'm just not packing up my survival gear and heading to the hills to wait out the end of the zombie attack. :) I'm preparing just as hard as I did for Y2K. I bought a couple boxes of ammo, put them away with my preferred weapon, and went out for a drink. Actually, I still have my Y2K ammo, and probably will still for 2012. :) I plan on a night of drinking and sex. When I wake up the next morning, I expect to turn on the TV, and find it's just another day.

          Since you'll be a freshman, I suggest not doing the drinking part when Dec 21 2012 rolls around. Just make sure you know someone who's well armed, in case the poles flip, the comet hits, zombies attack, and ... well ... whatever else is theorized. None of us are very good at telling the future. If we were, Vegas would be bankrupt, and the stock market would be stagnant since everyone would already know what was going to happen. :) The lottery would be much less interesting, since every time there would be millions of winners.

          Don't panic about the conspiracy theorists. I love a good conspiracy, and since Bush didn't stage a military occupation of the US, I'm pretty much stuck with 2012 and aliens. I'm sure I'll work up a few new ones soon for my own entertainment. It's always a good way to start a conversation to make someone think I'm nuts, or at least feel them out for their insanities. :)

          I did set up a 2012 web site. It has recent news relating to 2012. It'll be running until the ice caps melt and flood all the coastal cities of the world. :)

          Cheers to you in 2012! :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:2013? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I did set up a 2012 web site [comingin2012.com]. It has recent news relating to 2012. It'll be running until the ice caps melt and flood all the coastal cities of the world. :)

      If that sort of web design gets common in 2012, I see why the world would end :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:2013? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You missed the first two versions. Somewhere between pathetic and horrible. Originally, I was going to list out all the events that were planned for 2012, both normal ones like the 2012 Olympics in London, and the conspiracy based. I was finding plenty of stuff, I just never found a good format to post it with. So, it's just news. :) At least the casual reader will have something fresh to look at if they visit each day. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  18. I must be young at heart by chebucto · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I was born in the early 80s, and some of these things hold true for me, which is somehow reassuring
    • They have never used a card catalog to find a book.

    I find it hard to believe that there aren't still a lot of school libraries out there that still use card catalogues. But what do I know.

    • Margaret Thatcher has always been a former prime minister.

    I think there's at least a 10-year delay between birth and awareness of international politics; the first UK PM I remember John Major

    • Salsa has always outsold ketchup.

    I do remember the excitement we all felt when Salsa was officially the fastest-growing condiment in North America. Heady days, those.

    • Text has always been hyper.

    This is interesting. Wiki tells me the first web pages went up in December 1990. Those early days of the web have really moved into the realm of history, albeit recent history.

    • Bungee jumping has always been socially acceptable.

    I don't recall it ever being socially unaccebtable, though I do know it was considered - and is, if you ask me - a stupid thing to do, up there with jumping out of perfectly good airplanes.

    • They have never understood the meaning of R.S.V.P.

    Since when is RSVP out of our lexicon? I never got that memo.

    • The European Union has always existed.

    Well, the European Community has existed since the 50s; this one's more of a technicality.

    • McDonald's has always been serving Happy Meals in China.

    And Tianammen Square happened before they were born! Yikes.

    • Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap.

    I imagine this has been true since the 60s, at least.

    • The nation's key economic indicator has always been the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

    As opposed to what? The GNP?

    • Amateur radio operators have never needed to know Morse code.

    And I bet there's someone on Slashdot who cares! :)

    • There have always been flat screen televisions.

    I don't think there were any flat-screen TVs in 1991 - unless you count those flat-glass CRTs, which don't really count.

    • Britney Spears has always been heard on classic rock stations.

    Hah! I doubt that happens very often.

    • Vice presidents of the United States have always had real power.

    Quayle had power? Biden has power?

    • Migration of once independent media like radio, TV, videos and compact discs to the computer has never amazed them.

    That only became blase in the late 90s, as far as I'm concerned

    --
    The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    1. Re:I must be young at heart by Burdell · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that there aren't still a lot of school libraries out there that still use card catalogues. But what do I know.

      My sister teaches sixth grade, and last year she mentioned something about the card catalog. She got blank looks from her class, and finally one of the smartest, most studious kids raised her hand and asked what my sister was talking about. There was also an intern teacher in the room, and she vaguely remembered it. She did remember what happened to the cards though; some students took out library books and looked at the back of the check-out card (where they stamp the due date), and they were the old cards from the card catalog.

      Some things you expect younger people not to remember; some things are a surprise.

    2. Re:I must be young at heart by jmknsd · · Score: 1

      I don't recall it ever being socially unaccebtable, though I do know it was considered - and is, if you ask me - a stupid thing to do, up there with jumping out of perfectly good airplanes.

      I think your pilot might find it unacceptable if you try and bungee jump out of his plane

    3. Re:I must be young at heart by Ascagnel · · Score: 1

      The European Union has always existed.

      Well, the European Community has existed since the 50s; this one's more of a technicality.

      The formal body of the European Union (not the general European community) was formed in 1993.

      Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap.

      I imagine this has been true since the 60s, at least.

      As someone only a few years younger (mid-'80s birth), CC got a good rap in grammar school, but got progressively worse as I got older.

      There have always been flat screen televisions.

      I don't think there were any flat-screen TVs in 1991 - unless you count those flat-glass CRTs, which don't really count.

      The first HDTVs and plasmas started coming out in the late 1990s (1997 IIRC). They were "flat", but I still remember my family's first TV set.

      Britney Spears has always been heard on classic rock stations.

      Hah! I doubt that happens very often.

      *shudder* I'm with you on that.

      Vice presidents of the United States have always had real power.

      Quayle had power? Biden has power?

      The VP has the tiebreaking vote in the Senate; although, I'm not sure if thats in an amendment or in the Constitution.

      Migration of once independent media like radio, TV, videos and compact discs to the computer has never amazed them.

      That only became blase in the late 90s, as far as I'm concerned

      Media didn't really start to go online until 1997, or at around age 6 for this group. They might have recognized a computer, but not that their news was online (if they were even old enough to comprehend the news).

      Here's a big one to add: For this age group, Bill Clinton always had an unfortunate dry-cleaning incident with a Gap dress.

      --
      "It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine."
    4. Re:I must be young at heart by Christopher+Fritz · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to think about, isn't it? I'm upwards of a few years older than you, so I can completely relate. I'm reminded of the Japanese animated movie from Studio Ghibli, "Whisper of the Heart". The main character is a girl in maybe junior high, and she discovers the books she's been checking out were all checked out by the same person before her--because of the cards. The movie also refers to the school's library moving away from the card system, which interested me to consider, as I was with the card system up through graduation in 1999! Coincidentally, I was waiting in the car earlier today, and to keep it from getting too hot, I "rolled down the window"--by pressing a button. I wonder which "incoming college freshmans" will have been the first to ask, "Why is it called 'rolling' the window up or down?"

    5. Re:I must be young at heart by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      > Biden has power?

      Well, he has power to annoy the Russians by going on about their 'withering economy'.

    6. Re:I must be young at heart by rastilin · · Score: 1

      There's one quote that's going to stick with me, forgive me for not remembering it correctly however; I read this a while back.

      Archeologists uncovered a tablet from thousands of years ago. Roughly about the same time as "The Epic of Gilgamesh", the oldest written story; in it, the writer sates. "I despair of the children of today, they are too interested in the modern stories, full of fire and fury, and do not pay attention to their crop records and studies."

      So that's one thing that's been around forever. Self important idiots who think the world is ending with the next generation. Forgetting they were exactly the same.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    7. Re:I must be young at heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that most card catalogs were replaced by computers (many of them with DOS software) between 1990-1995. Perhaps these kids can remember the days when you had to physically visit the library to search their computer catalog...

    8. Re:I must be young at heart by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      "Why is it called 'rolling' the window up or down?"

      For the same reason you 'dial' a telephone by pushing buttons.

      The more you say "dial" the funnier it sounds.

      --
      Squirrel!
    9. Re:I must be young at heart by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1

      • Salsa has always outsold ketchup.

      I do remember the excitement we all felt when Salsa was officially the fastest-growing condiment in North America. Heady days, those.

      Salsa tastings were trendy events then. It's slowed down. The HotHotHot web shop has been offline for a long time and hopefully will be up and running again.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    10. Re:I must be young at heart by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Around 1993 my school library transitioned to Follett's DOS OPAC software. I think they were actually ahead of the local public library. The school's transition was just the catalog though, check in/out still used the silly cards and stamps. When the public library switched, they switched to a fully bar coded inventory system and electronic check in/out using WYSE dumb terminals. They still have those dumb terminals scattered about, many find them faster to search then using the more modern Windows interface.

    11. Re:I must be young at heart by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I think there's at least a 10-year delay between birth and awareness of international politics

      Speak for yourself, when I was 4 I'd dream of Saddam Hussein. If you watch the news a lot with your parents, then even if you're 4 it just sinks in as part of your environment and knowledge.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    12. Re:I must be young at heart by wangahrah · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not that RSVP is out of the lexicon, it's that its out of the mindset. As one entering freshman year of college a mere 7 years ago...kids THESE days almost never respond to invitations to social events, and on the rare occasions they solidify their plans by texting back "lulz i will c u thar", they skip out anyway when a perceived "better" opportunity with a hotter guy comes along. I'm not bitter.

    13. Re:I must be young at heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      • They have never understood the meaning of R.S.V.P.

      Since when is RSVP out of our lexicon? I never got that memo.

      I got the memo, but I never bothered to reply.

    14. Re:I must be young at heart by Sprouticus · · Score: 1

      I was born in the early 80s, and some of these things hold true for me, which is somehow reassuring

      Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap.

      I imagine this has been true since the 60s, at least.

      Im not a huge fan of this kind of drivel, but I did find this interesting: Im turning 40 in a month, and I can say for sure the Columbus was revered as an almost mythical hero who braved the ignorance of his time to find the east indies. This was in the late 70's. He was not vilified as the person who destroyed entire civilizations until the early 90's. What I was taught was crap, but so is the pseudo modern viewpoint. What I really dont get is why schools refuse to teach younger kids real facts. complexity exists in the world, there is no need to sugar coat it. Teach them the truth from the start and they will learn critical thinking at a far earlier age. then again to do this we would have to spend more time than we do now, and most people seem to dislike that idea.

    15. Re:I must be young at heart by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Born in the 80s?

      No, you are still young in body. But that's OK.

      As we get older, we're supposed to get wiser, but in fact as I get older I don't see most of my peers changing much at all. They were closed minded, ignorant,and obstreperously intolerant youths, and they're aging into closed minded, ignorant and obstreperously intolerant elders. The world moves past them; it changes and they don't change with it. They're too picky about who they learn from to learn much at all. As youths, they see the experiences of their elders as belonging to an irrelevant, bygone age. As elders, they've become certain that every thought worth having must have already passed through their heads.

      Here's a test: if as a young person you can and do have friends older than yourself, chances are you'll have young friends when you are older. That's a nice thing when your old friends start to die, but just as importantly it means you'll probably keep learning things as you get older. Young people who think they can't learn anything from their elders are right, but they don't realize that's because they're already rotting from the head down. Sooner or later they'll become exactly the kind of old fogey they despise, because they've already got the attitude. All they need is a few decades.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:I must be young at heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born in the early 80s, and some of these things hold true for me, which is somehow reassuring


      •        
      • They have never used a card catalog to find a book.

      I find it hard to believe that there aren't still a lot of school libraries out there that still use card catalogues. But what do I know.

      Actually, as a member of the class of 2006, I've almost never had to use a card catalog, except while doing research in Syria - even then they had a (much more efficient) computer catalog, but you could only use it by asking a librarian.

      McDonald's has always been serving Happy Meals in China.

      And Tianammen Square happened before they were born! Yikes.


      •        
      • Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap.

      I imagine this has been true since the 60s, at least.

      I think what people fail to realize is how much this changes the mindset of our generation. You don't really see that many young people at those town hall meetings complaining about socialism - in our generation, socialism has usually meant something like the Scandanavian nations, or France, and had almost no association with the "evils" of Red China or the Soviet Union. In fact, most kids from my generation have almost no concept of Russia as some sort of menacing enemy. I expect as the older generation is replaced by the post-Soviet generation, the knee jerk reaction to communism or socialism is going to disappear, since it will no longer be associated by anyone with the Iron Curtain.

      I also think that the concepts of multiculturalism are also so ingrained in this generation that the idea of Columbus' discovery being celebrated is almost strange to us. I remember teachers saying, "Though some people think Columbus' voyage was great, it was actually..." and thinking "Who thought it was good? I've been told it was terrible my whole life!" Another example, Edward Said's book "Orientalism" arguing against certain portrayals of Arabs in the West often is seen by current generations of college students as "so what," while it was revolutionary at the time it was written, since those portrayals are significantly less prevalent now (replaced by other, possibly worse characterizations of Arabs, but different enough to make it unclear why the book is so important.)

    17. Re:I must be young at heart by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      I even remember talking about Saddam in day-care ('91 I was about 6 I guess). Of course the fact that it was really the first 24-hour news covered war made it stand out more to kids.

      Unfortunately I can't say I was that in tune at age 6. For some reason I had it in my mind that it was part of WWII... strangely enough, even now I still consider WWII the turning point between fairly modern and old...

    18. Re:I must be young at heart by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Ha! My wife and I just watched Whisper of the Heart for the first time a few days ago, and we had a good laugh at the card catalog bit.

      Last time either of us saw one was junior high, which would have been around 1998/99 for us. I believe the library already had a digital catalog, but was keeping the cards around for a year or two (to make sure this computer thing wasn't just a fad, I guess).

    19. Re:I must be young at heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Such works are called jeremiads after one in the bible -- which as you point out was certainly not the first.

    20. Re:I must be young at heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap.

      I imagine this has been true since the 60s, at least.

      Born in the 70's. When I went through school, we still celebrated how Christopher Columbus helped enlighten the Indians and brought them great prosperity and friendship.

      I'm not sure when he changed from a good guy to a bad guy, but he was a good guy in the 80's.

    21. Re:I must be young at heart by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      It's not that bad, back then I thought that the Gulf War was taking place in the Gulf of Morbihan (a small gulf near where I lived). Had me scared of taking the boat there.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    22. Re:I must be young at heart by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      For the same reason you 'dial' a telephone by pushing buttons.

      You don't even do that anymore. Now you "voice-dial" a telephone by saying the name of the person you're calling.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    23. Re:I must be young at heart by mog007 · · Score: 1

      They have never understood the meaning of R.S.V.P.

      That one doesn't make sense to me. Only people who dabble in French actually know what it means, and it's not like people were shunned in the late 80s for not knowing it.

      Vice presidents of the United States have always had real power.

      I suppose this one is a reference to the first couple months of Dubya's term, when the Senate was 50:50 with D and R. This made Cheney the official tie breaker. After Jim Jeffords switch to Independent and started voting with the Democrats, Cheney's job was effectively useless again.

    24. Re:I must be young at heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      • The nation's key economic indicator has always been the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

      As opposed to what? The GNP?

      Yes, as opposed to GNP. To really understand why the government switched from using GNP as the key growth indicator, to using GDP, go read this article.

      From the article:

      The related Gross National Product (GNP) is the broadest U.S. economic measure and includes the GDP plus the balance of international flows of interest and dividend payments. For net debtor nations such as Guinea-Bissau and the United States, GDP usually will show the stronger growth than GNP, since the outflow of interest payments does not get charged against economic activity. For this reason, the United States switched its primary reporting from the GNP to the GDP in 1991. Put in perspective as of the "final" estimate of second-quarter 2004, annualized real GDP growth was 3.3%, down from 4.5% in the first quarter, while GNP growth for the same period was 1.9%, down from 3.9%.

      ...

      Varied academic theories, often with strong political biases, have been used to alter the GDP model over the years, resulting in Pollyanna Creep, where changes made to the series invariably have had the effect of upping near-term economic growth. Whether the change was to deflate GDP using "chain-weighted" instead of "fixed-weighted" inflation measures, to capitalize rather than expense computer software purchases, or to smooth away the economic impact of the September 11th terrorist attacks, upside growth biases have been built into reported GDP with increasing regularity since the mid-1980s.

      Basically, the GDP calculation has been routinely and repeatedly tweaked by the government to cast a more positive light on the country's immediate economic situation, to the point that it is now basically worthless and almost completely disconnected from reality.

  19. Re:We're Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, a few trillion dollars in debt handed to the next generation is not a big deal. ;)

  20. Showing my age by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    20. American students have always lived anxiously with high-stakes educational testing.
    ...
    32. The nation's key economic indicator has always been the Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
    ...
    48. Elite American colleges have never been able to fix the price of tuition.
    ...
    62. Members of Congress have always had to keep their checkbooks balanced since the closing of the House Bank.

    I genuinely can't imagine a world before this stuff happened...

    Yes I'll get off your lawn, but let me absorb some of your wisdom before I go.

  21. Any other Beloit Alums on /.? by ctmurray · · Score: 1

    I attended Beloit, I think before they came up with the mindset list. The computer was fed with punch cards to program in Fortran I think. It was located in the basement of 1890's former science building (now the student union). Any other alum's read slashdot?

    1. Re:Any other Beloit Alums on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Class of '96. I don't know where the student union is these days. It was 810 College Street when I was there. That building doubled as a dorm.

      In my day student records were kept on a system in the basement of Chamberlain Hall which has since been torn down and replaced with a new science building. It's really a bit sad. The Math & CS department was in Chamberlain Hall. I spent a great deal of time there, along with quite a few Physics, Chemistry, and Biology students.

    2. Re:Any other Beloit Alums on /.? by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Not from Beloit (Reed, actually), but I kicked a few decks of FORTRAN punch cards while I was there. In the 70's, punk. ;-)

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    3. Re:Any other Beloit Alums on /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not but my brother is, I'll go get him....

    4. Re:Any other Beloit Alums on /.? by StellarFury · · Score: 1

      Class of '09 (yes, graduated May of this year).

      I'd have to say the loss of Chamberlain isn't really that sad. I mean, I spent three years in that building, and yes, it was home, but when it comes right down to it, the building was way out of date for science and laboratory education. The Center for the Sciences (or as we called it, Chamberlin Mk. II) is a damn fine piece of work, if they'd only get the stupid automatic front entrance doors to stop breaking down in the middle of winter.

      Nonetheless, during Chamberlain's demolition, I liberated a brick of the old science building. Sentimental value and all that.

  22. off the top by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    • Champions, medal winners, and all-stars at the Olympics and major professional sports leagues have always been suspected of using steroids or other performance enhancing drugs.
    • TV cop shows have always featured multiple intertwined plot threads, some of which lap into the next episode, fast camera cuts and off-camera dialog, and always have had an undercurrent of "who are the good guys, anyway?".
    • Toys have always featured software-controlled electronics.
    • PC and console games have always featured interactive 3D graphics with texture mapping.
    • The primary application on a personal computer has always been the Internet browser.
  23. This list is probably drivel by Nimey · · Score: 1

    I'm extrapolating from the 2002 list, which is the oldest one and for the class that was born the year after I was. Many of the things they claimed people of that age never experienced or were too young for, I knew about back then.

    Granted, I'm a little sharper than the average, but it was just /full/ of inaccuracies. I don't expect this list to be all that much better.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:This list is probably drivel by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Yeah these lists are pretty bad and assume that kids grow up in a vacuum and don't have older siblings or talk to their parents, or friends of parents, or uncles and aunts, or grandparents...

      I read the class of 02 list. It took me a bit to figure out they meant start class at 1998. Using 02 and meaning the class 4 years before it is pretty inaccurate, as a lot of kids don't even make it in 4 years through college.

      Anyway, pretty much all the stuff on the list I didn't know about, I did. My wife who is about 3 years older then me, gets odd looks from people because she knows about tv shows and stuff that are about +5 years or so off her age group, but she just had two older sisters.

      I find this list pretty downright insulting. I know plenty of people going into college that these things are not true, let alone the blatant falsehoods like britny spears being played on a classic rock station. Classic rock stations play bands like the who, boston, billy joel. I listen to new yorks classic rock station every day in to work. Trust me, they ain't playing britney spears.

      Its like these guys assume that kids "these days" dont have the capacity to understand things outside their generation, or put blinders on to the things their parents use or talk about. For all this shock about finding a kid who doesn't know what a card catalog was, I could probably find a few 30 year old adults who don't know what one is either.

      Sure, we all have wake up calls as to how old we are. I found myself bobbing my head to music in walmart and stuff like that, thinking, 'oh shit, i'm finally the target audience'. But man, using this list to stay in touch with the generation you are teaching is just plain stupid. Try talking to your students, crazy, but it works.

  24. Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Rix · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's just a different genre of mindless grunting.

    1. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by samexner · · Score: 2, Informative

      But my point is we do not all listen to rap. Some of us might. And some of us might listen to Led Zeppelin and Rush.

    2. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      And then there's white trash like you who listen to Slayer.

    3. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this tripe modded informative?!

      Too bad you know jack shit about music and it shows. Slayer's guitar parts have sheet music. Not exactly mindless. In fact, if you studied music, like some of us, and you took the time to look at the written parts of metal, thrash, etc..music, you'd notice that it's mostly pulled from classical. It's basically to our century what Mozart with the pianoforte was to the 18th century.

      Get a clue.

       

    4. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by fatalwall · · Score: 1, Redundant

      please please mod up +1 funny

    5. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It might be true but the sad part of it is, with all this distortion, you cannot hear the distinct tones anyway.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      In other words..get off of my lawn?

    7. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's just a different genre of mindless grunting.

      Thank you for showing your ignorance. Death and thrash metal (including Slayer) are both incredibly intricate and demanding styles of music. I am not sure what kind of music you listen to, but Slayer's compositions and playing ability are light years ahead of ANY popular music these days. You might not like it, this form of music may not be your cup of tea, but calling it mindless is just plain ignorant. Each member of that band (Araya excepted) has more musical ability than pretty much everything you hear on the radio. I would be very interested to hear... what do you listen to that you base your comparison off of? I listen to literally everything, and I put death metal in the same vaunted category as jazz and classical in terms of musicianship.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    8. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! That is the first time I have heard such a sentiment...
      I gotta go with sam on his one (did you know rap artists are not musically talented, do not know anything about musical theory, or indeed playing an instrument? Did you know they either buy prerecorded beats or have a machine to make their 'music' and then shout obscenities over them?)
      Last time I checked Slayer have been writing and playing their own music for decades, and are damn good at it too. Just because you don't like either of these genres of music, doesn't mean one is technically far superior to another. A friend of mine and I made a rap track just for a laugh once back when we were 14. It involved getting on CuteMX (i think) and downloading a "freestyle beat" and then writing a silly rhyme, and talking it whilst the track played in the background. Total creation time: 10 minutes. In theory, then, we could have a rap album ready recorded in about an hour and a half. Try making a metal album following that formula.

      And about the green giant thing... I just saw an advert for green giant yesterday.. i dont get what that point is about..?

    9. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no idea Slayer was a genre!

    10. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by rotor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't get me wrong - I've been a Slayer fan since the 80's, but to say that they have more musical ability than pretty much everything on the radio is just plain wrong. They have written some fantastic stuff and have the ability to play fast, but both Kerry and Jeff get sloppy when they play fast. Tom plays simple bass lines and doesn't get too complicated with the vocals. Dave is a fantastic drummer though.

      If you want to compare musical ability of metal players with what you hear on the radio, there are thousands of better choices.

      Oh - and to get back to the great grandparent, I don't think the article said that all of this generation listen to rap. Even the quote in the summary says, "Rap music has always been mainstream." You can't deny that for kids going into college this year.

      --
      Addlepated - punk & metal
    11. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      both Kerry and Jeff get sloppy when they play fast
      I've seen Yngwie Malmsteen in concert twice (G3, and his latest tour, with Tim Owens singing). Both times, there were a couple of places where it was clear that, despite playing oodles of notes, he had no idea where in the song he was.

    12. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong - I've been a Slayer fan since the 80's, but to say that they have more musical ability than pretty much everything on the radio is just plain wrong. They have written some fantastic stuff and have the ability to play fast, but both Kerry and Jeff get sloppy when they play fast. Tom plays simple bass lines and doesn't get too complicated with the vocals. Dave is a fantastic drummer though.

      If you want to compare musical ability of metal players with what you hear on the radio, there are thousands of better choices.

      Oh - and to get back to the great grandparent, I don't think the article said that all of this generation listen to rap. Even the quote in the summary says, "Rap music has always been mainstream." You can't deny that for kids going into college this year.

      There are definitely better players than Kerry and Jeff, and I admittedly don't listen to the radio often, but what I do hear is mindless, watered down, simple crap. As for the most musically intense bands out there, I would point to the technical death metal, with bands like Cryptopsy, Anata, Necrophagist, Spawn of Possession and the like. All those bands display stunning musical virtuosity as well as absurd compositional skills. To all those that don't like it, that is fine, but the only excuse for disrespecting it is ignorance.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    13. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Vohar · · Score: 1

      I admittedly don't listen to the radio often, but what I do hear is mindless, watered down, simple crap...

      To all those that don't like it, that is fine, but the only excuse for disrespecting it is ignorance.

      Hypocrisy much? You just generalized an entire outlet of media, then mouthed off about the ignorance of disrespecting something one doesn't like.

    14. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      I never said that there is any problem with generalization -- I was arguing in favor of several SPECIFIC examples, and I feel that generalization can be very useful. For example, not all grizzly bears are going to want to eat you, but it is highly useful to generalize all grizzly bears as wanting to eat you.

      That being said, I have a hard time imagining that any reasonable argument could be made that the popular music that dominates the airwaves does not represent the absolute lowest common denominator in musicianship and composition. Surely there is some good music played on the radio, but I am equally certain that it is far outweighed by the watered down, simplified crap. I choose to listen to my iPod rather than the radio as the Good Music:Crap ratio is very much in favor of the former, whereas on the radio it is very much in favor of the latter.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    15. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you know rap artists are not musically talented, do not know anything about musical theory, or indeed playing an instrument? Did you know they either buy prerecorded beats or have a machine to make their 'music' and then shout obscenities over them?

      First, a good friend of mine makes those "beats." He is the most talented musician I have ever met, whether he is playing classical, rock or anything else. The beats are certainly not made on a machine (in the sense you are talking about); most of the "samples" are him playing various instruments. He does not take 10 minutes to make these and puts just as much into a composition as any metal artists (if not more). As for rappers shouting obscenities, I suggest you actually give the genre a chance, rather then disregarding it based on a few songs you've heard on BET. That would be similar to someone disregarding the entire "rock" genre based on Nickelback. Many rappers are very insightful and talented musicians. You grabbed a beat from somewhere then talked over it. I could also grab a metal beat from somewhere and start yelling about death and religion and shit and make a song in 10 minutes. Doesn't make me, or you, an artist though. Just pretentious assholes.

    16. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by OwMyBrain · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear!

      Metal (in most of its various forms) is very musically complex. It's a genre that will often employ intricate time signatures and very complex rhythms. The speed and complexity alone requires great accomplishment as a musician, not to mention that the lyrics are often charged with interesting political and literary themes.

      Rap is someone spewing ego into a drum machine.

    17. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by hesiod · · Score: 1

      not to mention that the lyrics are often charged with interesting political and literary themes. Rap is someone spewing ego into a drum machine.

      There is a shit tonne of rap that have "political and literary themes" as well. You just haven't listened to any of it.

    18. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by Vohar · · Score: 1

      That's entirely your opinion. Using your flow of logic though, it's a display of ignorance to discount the good stations of varied music types out there(jazz, classical, even some real metal ones) just because all you know about are pop stations.

      Here's a generalization right back at you: Every band I've listened to that had a name like Necroplaguebabykillerdarkblood has sounded like they were trying too hard to be edgy or offensive rather than skilled. Chaotic mashes of notes with a growling, incomprehensible chant for vocals.

    19. Re:Sorry buddy, but Slayer is no better than rap by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but to clarify - The *majority* of *mainstream* rap is someone spewing ego into a drum machine :) All musical genres have their mindless BS (you can generally find it by tuning in to that particular genre on the radio). We just pick on rap because it's the new kid around.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  25. Fucked? Hell no! Not yet at least... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're fucked and we've fucked their future. I don't think that one's on the list, but, I'm guessing, it's something any bright grad will know.

    Are you fucking kidding me? They've got another 4 years and $95,000 worth of debt to rack up before they sue the college for not being handed a six-figure salary WITH their diploma. Yeah, talk about a fucked system.

    IMHO, we haven't begun to see fucked yet, with the ignorance that MTV likes to portray as the Real World. Let's hope there are still some out there who still see the morality of the world today AND are bright enough to see that we have more than ONE political party out there.

  26. A different setting for the same plot by Logibeara · · Score: 1

    Even though every single one of those statements are true, there are still many variations of personality and character. It's just a different setting for the same plot. Much less than a mindset, more like meaningless ramble of facts.

    --
    I'd rather search for the answers than just ask the questions.
  27. Re:Fucked? Hell no! Not yet at least... by Anoraknid+the+Sartor · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... still - on the the bright side - at least we got fucked....

    --
    Find Japanese addresses in English on Google Maps Japan: http://diddlefinger.com/
  28. And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by JoshuaZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Soon they will also be people who only remember when Fermat's Last Theorem was a solved problem, not one of the great mysteries told to young kids interested in mathematics. I've worked for a few years teaching number theory to highschool students and it came as a shock when I realized that I was teaching some students who had actually been born after Andrew Wiles had proved Fermat's Last Theorem. The proof of FLT was one of the defining moments in my mathematical childhold. And in a year or two, those kids will in college. There really isn't any simple problem that has the same wonderful history to rope kids into doing math by looking really easy and yet having such a convoluted and romantic history. Even the oldest two unsolved problems in mathematics (whether there are any odd perfect numbers and whether there are infinitely many even perfect numbers) don't have the same sort of romance to them: No one ever claimed they had a beautiful proof of these. Ok, someone now go ahead and mark this an off-topic ramble by an old-codger...

    1. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by biobogonics · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Soon they will also be people who only remember when Fermat's Last Theorem was a solved problem, not one of the great mysteries told to young kids interested in mathematics.

      The problem might be solved, but there still is a lingering mystery. Did Fermat have a proof by elementary methods? Does such a proof exist? But I suppose that since there is A proof, the impetus to find another one is mostly gone.

    2. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by dasunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem might be solved, but there still is a lingering mystery. Did Fermat have a proof by elementary methods? Does such a proof exist? But I suppose that since there is A proof, the impetus to find another one is mostly gone.

      There's a great passing mention of Fermat's last theorem in the book "The Light of other Days".

      In the book, a device allows one to see the past. Someone looks at old Fermat, and discovers he did possess a simple and elegant proof.

      That proof ends up spawning an entire new field of mathmatics. ;)

    3. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      the impetus to find another one is mostly gone.

      Don't bet on it. I remember when I was studying Geometry in High School and we got to the Pythagorean Theorem. There was a mention in the text book that there are hundreds of different proofs of it, including one by President Garfield.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by Another,+completely · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's because it's easy to prove. The game is to come up with a proof, then compare it to the hundreds of others for originality. I suspect it was popular in the same way that people built magic squares for fun (like sudoku, but you start with an empty piece of paper). A simple and elegant proof of Fermat's Last Theorem will be hard, and there is probably only one (if it exists).

    5. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Fermat have a proof by elementary methods? Does such a proof exist?

      There is a trivial geometric solution, but the filters block it when I try to post it as ASCII art.

    6. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      Soon they will also be people who only remember when Fermat's Last Theorem was a solved problem, not one of the great mysteries told to young kids interested in mathematics.

      The problem might be solved, but there still is a lingering mystery. Did Fermat have a proof by elementary methods? Does such a proof exist? But I suppose that since there is A proof, the impetus to find another one is mostly gone.

      I remember the sensation when they proved the 4 Colour Theorem, and the skepticism at how it was proved.

      I also remember the sensation when they proved Fermat's Last Theorem. It's definitely a 20th Century proof, using tools and concepts that were not available to Fermat. I usually assume that Fermat's "proof" was more an artifact of different standards for mathematical proofs, and was not something we would recognize as a proof today. I'd love to be proven wrong...

      ...laura

    7. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by porges · · Score: 1

      And before that, the four color theorem.

    8. Re:And soon Fermat's Last Theorem... by TheBig1 · · Score: 1

      There is another book also by Clarke, "The Last Theorem", which looks in greater depth at FLT. Another very good book by a great author.

      Cheers

  29. Shrek as Green Giant? by SheeEttin · · Score: 1
    "the Green Giant has always been Shrek, not the big guy picking vegetables"? What are these people on? Shrek came out in 2001. Are they saying that we (yes, I am this precise age) never saw or heard a Green Giant commercial? I sure have.

    I also take umbrage with some of their other points, like "Cable television systems have always offered telephone service and vice versa."
    We used to have NYNEX (the New England Baby Bell) for telephone. (Hell, I think I still have a NYNEX umbrella somewhere...) TV was from an antenna on the roof. (It only came down when we had our hose re-roofed, about three years ago.) Internet access, when we got it, was dial-up (see NYNEX).

    They have been preparing for the arrival of HDTV all their lives.

    Nnnnnnnno. We only just got an HDTV a year or two ago. I'd hardly heard of it before that.

    Nobody has been able to make a deposit in the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI).

    I'll give them this one. I hadn't even heard of it.

    1. Re:Shrek as Green Giant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember this is about mindset not complete fact. Some of the events listed happened so early in these kids lives to not mean anything to them. For example I was born in early 1980 before John Lennon was killed but for all practical purposes he has been dead to me my entire life. Even if he hadn't died till 1984 or so he would still be dead to me because I would have no memories of him being alive.

    2. Re:Shrek as Green Giant? by thatkid_2002 · · Score: 1

      I was born in 1991... I have never heard of a Green Giant - but I am Australian so I have never heard of 75% of American crap.

    3. Re:Shrek as Green Giant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at the Green Giant Homepage (which seems to be a Betty Crocker brand?) They still have pictures of the Green Giant on the packaging. I still see it on packages in the freezer section of the grocery store. So maybe they are just refereeing to the ads?

      And yeah, cable carrying more than TV itself was something that I knew existed, but wasn't in my home town till after I graduated high school (2002 HS grad, So Fall 1998-Spring 2002 was high school). But yeah, cable carrying something other than TV in the mid-90s wasn't there.

      HDTV? Again I don't think I even heard the term till after I was out of high school. I knew of digital TV and that was supposed to happen in 2006. Perhaps the article should have used DTV.

    4. Re:Shrek as Green Giant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born in 1991... I have never heard of a Green Giant - but I am Australian so I have never heard of 75% of American crap.

      There there, it's okay son. It takes the average Australian about two decades to figure out that not only is his nation filled with illiterate felonious louts, but that Australia doesn't matter in the big picture.

      If you're nice and you stay on the knee pads we might sell you an F-35 or two, since you're incapable of engineering anything more complex than a rickshaw.

    5. Re:Shrek as Green Giant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think of the HH-3E's role in Vietnam when someone mentions the Jolly Green Giant.

  30. Thanks everyone... by timothyb89 · · Score: 1
    For feeding the troll.

    Seriously, what sort of article is this? The "generation" this story so fondly speaks of accounts for a pretty significant portion of the /. crowd.

    1. Re:Thanks everyone... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn! :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  31. Re:We're Fucked by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As an academic, part of what I do is try and get them to think. It's never been easy, but after 30 years of postmodernist bullshit, the layer of cynicism, empty irony, and clueless is so thick and self-reinforcing, it's much more difficult than it used to be to get through to these people. Last year was the hardest.

    I quote, "What's wrong withe status quo? It works for me!"

    Argh.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  32. Re:We're Fucked by LordKazan · · Score: 1

    blaming postmodernism for the results of a 30 year assault on the education system in this country is simply intellectually dishonest.

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  33. Re:We're Fucked by LordKazan · · Score: 1

    adding to my last post.. of course someone who was complicit in that 30 year assault on our education system would also be exactly the type of person to use the term "postmodernist" in that fashion..

    assuming that i am correct in that then...

    you're blaming postmodernist for the results of the campaign against public education that you waged - you're complaining about the exact affects you WANTED to have biting you in the ass and displacing that blame on the group you constantly attack.

    Assuming that i'm correct in making an educated guess at your beliefs based on your pulling a term out of thin air to demonize.

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  34. Here I was thinking this would be more than trivia by Quackers_McDuck · · Score: 1

    Based on the headline and the fact that I was not in the idle section I expected this to be some sort of examination of incoming freshmen' opinions on things like education, drugs, and sex. Of course the article is instead just a collection of celebrity trivia and popular culture from the past twenty years.

  35. WHAT THE FUCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the fuck? What is this bullshit? This is not "news". Put this shit back in Idle, or better yet, give it back to Oprah where it belongs.

    1. Re:WHAT THE FUCK by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is more of a "report" and not news.

    2. Re:WHAT THE FUCK by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, its vaguely-but-not-really interesting stuff like this that belongs in Idle.

  36. What exactly is the author trying to convey? by Atriqus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "There have always been flat screen televisions"
    "Margaret Thatcher has always been a former prime minister"

    These statements are not a function of one's age, nor are they true as is. Is the author trying to say that we've got a group passing through that is so self-centered that they refuse to acknowledge any event prior to their birth? I was born in the 80s, but I know it's false to say "Winston Churchill has always been a former prime minister" or "CRT screens have always existed".

    But why point out just the local generation gap? Why didn't the author include "The US has always been a country" or "There has always been written language"? How about "Earth has always had approximately 24 hour rotations" or "The atmosphere has always been about 20% oxygen"?

    Then at the top are lines like "Members of the class of 2013 won't be surprised when they can charge a latte on their cell phone and curl up in the corner to read a textbook on an electronic screen.".... nor should anyone who has recently left the cave. Hell, the first guy I knew that got an eReader was in his 60s. You're not excused from observing your surroundings just because you've made it to (or past) middle-aged.

    I'm writing this article off as a failed attempt at promoting ageism.

    --
    Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    1. Re:What exactly is the author trying to convey? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Is the author trying to say that we've got a group passing through that is so self-centered that they refuse to acknowledge any event prior to their birth?

      Just wait till those freshmen take Philosophy 101.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:What exactly is the author trying to convey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There have always been flat screen televisions"

      "Margaret Thatcher has always been a former prime minister.

      I think what the author means by those is actually something along the lines of "There have always been flat screen televisions (in their lifetime)." and "Margaret Thatcher has always been a former prime minister (in their lifetime)."

      I think it's more just a list that has been true for incoming freshman's their whole lives that seem relatively new to the older population. Or at least, reflect a key moment in history.

      It contains a lot of false generalizations about today's youth, but I don't think it's purposely ageist.

    3. Re:What exactly is the author trying to convey? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then at the top are lines like "Members of the class of 2013 won't be surprised when they can charge a latte on their cell phone and curl up in the corner to read a textbook on an electronic screen.".... nor should anyone who has recently left the cave. Hell, the first guy I knew that got an eReader was in his 60s. You're not excused from observing your surroundings just because you've made it to (or past) middle-aged.

      I think it emphasizes the speed of societal and technological change which has been going on of late (say, the last two decades). I recall hearing in the early '00s how we are now undergoing a greater increase in knowledge as a society in a single day than occurred during the whole of WW2 - or something to that effect. That much change, that quickly, can have a drastic impact on a society, whether intentional or not.

      Consider: kids today have, in all likelihood, always had cell phones and SMS. I'm 28 and I remember having friends whos' parents did not yet have a house phone. I do not SMS regularly; yet kids today are glued to it. My wife is a handful of years younger than I, and she is more inclined to text than I am. But it goes beyond that.

      Is a person more inclined to pick up a book and read it, or search it out, if all they're familiar with (or primarily familiar with) are computers and web pages? There are kids out there who were born after Internet Explorer 3 came out who are fully 'plugged in' and have little to no interaction with 'dead media'.

      Ignoring the possibility that they will potentially remain mostly illiterate throughout their lives, this is a huge, HUGE jump in world perception from what even my generation experienced: I'm 28, for crying out loud! I am NOT old, yet I see what the "youth" are doing and have access to, and what they haven't experienced, and I'm blown away by the changes.

      Case in point: computers in schools. They were just starting to be a big thing when I was a kid, with the Apple IIe, III and similar monochrome display, 5.25" floppy, CLI driven machines. When computerized card catalogs came along, they were CLI based up through college. Most of the current generation equates 'typing commands' with something vaguely "programming" or "hacking" and use (in terms of functionality, from what I've seen) horrible web based catalogs. They interface through a GUI, with their mouse, and mostly don't have a comprehension of "data" (or data/file types) so much as "files" and "folders".

      Anyway, I'm getting way off here. The point I'm trying to make is: things are changing a lot, and whereas it used to be that Grandma couldn't relate to Johny and his evil music with a beat that wasn't about baby Jesus in the 1920s, we're now seeing a "cultural gap" occur every 5 or so years - often with clear punctuation points as new fads come into the forefront (emo, rap, Xbox, etc.). Those things all shape and form culture pretty quickly to be something completely alien to those who were in the same "spot" not long ago.

      Did you know that tight polyester dickies (slacks, whatever you want to call them) in horrible colors have come and gone twice again since the 1970s, both in the last several years? THAT is what I'm talking about.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:What exactly is the author trying to convey? by obijuanvaldez · · Score: 1

      "There have always been flat screen televisions"
      "Margaret Thatcher has always been a former prime minister"

      These statements are not a function of one's age, nor are they true as is. Is the author trying to say that we've got a group passing through that is so self-centered that they refuse to acknowledge any event prior to their birth?

      I think all the author was trying to convey was:
      "Flat screen televisions have been available for their entire lives"
      "Margaret Thatcher has been a former prime minister for their entire lives"

      I don't really think the author is striving to be ageist for those two issues, just pointing out that some of the major technological advancements us older folks were in awe of when they were introduced, have been available for a incoming freshmen's lives. Also to point out that many of really pivotal figures and organizations central to some of the most powerful nations during the Cold War era have not been in charge for a day of their lives. I certainly don't think that observation is ageist. However, for this point:
      "They have never understood the meaning of R.S.V.P."
      I think you could have something there.

    5. Re:What exactly is the author trying to convey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have went to some hick school to be 28 and have been using Apple IIe's and Apple III's. Everything in my high school was either Mac or Windows 3.1 when I left. All the local colleges were Windows 3.1, NT, or a unix workstation or X terminal. I'm 32 years old.

      PS: If your friend's parents didn't have a house phone in 1973 they were very poor, or very cheap. It has been an essential service for a long time.

  37. From my generation to yours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I'm not sure why this isn't in the Idle section, or if this is "News" or a giant troll, if it isn't then you old timers are the real disappointment.
    If it is a troll, then I fell for this bait but I had to let his out...

    Let's go through a few of these...

    "They have never used a card catalog to find a book." Yes, let's NOT use the advancements in databases and instant relational lookups....

    "They have never had to âoeshake downâ an oral thermometer." Yes, please go back to using toxic mercury for nostalgia's sake.

    "Rap music has always been main stream." So? We never stopped you from listening to whatever music you grew up with, quit being condescending on our childhood.

    "Amateur radio operators have never needed to know Morse code." Should we know smoke signals as well?

    "Someone has always been asking: âoeWas Iraq worth a war?â" Yea, I'm sure Vietnam wasn't an issue when you guys were going through college through the Hippy years.

    "Migration of once independent media like radio, TV, videos and compact discs to the computer has never amazed them." You can't blame us for this, it's not our fault advances happened so rapidly in our times, whereas going from Mono to Stereo was the big thing in yours...

    Your nostalgia's great and all, it just gets damned annoying when it starts being condescending....

    I shall part with the following from your generation...

    "UP YOURS!"

    1. Re:From my generation to yours... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Where in the article did he say than any of those are bad?
      (Well, actually Morse code can be useful still today; at least the SOS sign should be known by everyone)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:From my generation to yours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that even us old farts recognize those changes as great, but it took us a while to get used to them - first we doubt, then we wonder, then we slowly get used to them, and finally we enjoy them. It's something we can look back on as a significant and important change. This article is a chance to reflect on the fact that there are now new grown-ups who see the end result as a matter of fact, boring everyday stuff. There's a huge difference in emotional outlook there.

  38. Few things. by Omniscient+Lurker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a upcoming freshmen let me make a few points. 3. The Green Giant has always been Shrek, not the big guy picking vegetables. Shrek came out in 2001. I remember part of the first 11 years of my life. Including the Jolly Green Giant (not much but enough to never call Shrek the green giant). 4. They have never used a card catalog to find a book. My first Elementary School had one, so did the public library back then. 8. Tattoos have always been very chic and highly visible. That's pretty regional, it is only in the last few years they have caught on where I live 19. They have never understood the meaning of R.S.V.P. Send a Reply/Confirmation? 21. Except for the present incumbent, the President has never inhaled. ??? 27. Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap. Not in my school(s). 44. There have always been flat screen televisions. Maybe, but how many people had them earlier in the 90's (my childhood). 51. Britney Spears has always been heard on classic rock stations. She didn't really become popular till the late 90s. How'd she get on classics for my entire life when she didn't start until halfway through it? 53. Someone has always been asking: "Was Iraq worth a war?" They're gonna be asking that a long time. 54. Most communities have always had a mega-church. I let this slide because they used "most".

    1. Re:Few things. by armanox · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is since when is Brtiney Spears rock?

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    2. Re:Few things. by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      As a upcoming freshmen let me make a few points.

      27. Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap. Not in my school(s).

      I think it means "Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap somewhere."

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  39. Re: by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

    A PDF reader than can only display a single PDF file. It is immune to rm but is difficult to back up and doesn't have a search feature.

  40. Completely lost on them...... by idiotnot · · Score: 3, Funny

    "you have died of dysentery"

    As well as MS-DOS and the Apple II.

    1. Re:Completely lost on them...... by armanox · · Score: 1

      Great game. I actually just found my copy of it.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    2. Re:Completely lost on them...... by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, some of them have always known to wish for blessed +2 silver dragon scale mail.

    3. Re:Completely lost on them...... by rascal256 · · Score: 1

      i loved oregon trail

    4. Re:Completely lost on them...... by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      Lost on us? What do you think I played on the crummy public school Franklin computers in 2nd grade? Pshaw, I say!

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    5. Re:Completely lost on them...... by db32 · · Score: 1

      Actually...I think you can get Oregon Trail on the iPhone/iTouch...

      However, there is a disturbing thought in regards to Windows. I mean...really...how many of these kids remember a time before Windows? "Computers have always blue screened while performing trivial tasks" that comes to mind...

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    6. Re:Completely lost on them...... by jlmale0 · · Score: 1

      The Oregon Trail is available at the app store, and I have a copy. :) I recall fun times from many hours at the local college library playing OT on an Apple IIe. While the Iphone edition is fun, it's been reinvented for the phone. It has the hunting, but it also has "telegraph games" (think Simon rather than learning Morse code), and you now have to navigate your way down rivers instead of simply fording them and losing a member to drowning. It's a good game, but it doesn't stack well to memories. Sadly, I've yet to die from dysentary.

  41. #76 by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    They don't truly know what Cc. stands for on an e-mail. Even if they do know it stands for the words "carbon copy" they don't know what a carbon copy is.

    Of course this has been true for quite a few years.

    1. Re:#76 by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I'm 36 years old. The only place I have ever seen "carbon" paper used for typing was from an old box of office supplies my mom had. She also had an old mechanical typewriter, which I used to poke at as a kid. They may have been used in offices, but I've never seen it done. I only used them when I was a kid playing with her typewriter, proving to myself that I could spell. :) Big deal.

          How many people on here learned to type on a mechanical typewriter? Not very many, I'd guess. I only learned on it, because it was there. We had no purpose to buy an electronic typewriter, and when I was still young, we were using a (oh my gosh) computer to type up letters.

          That post was terrible, and really deserved to be in idle, not as a main story. There are plenty of things that have historical value, but are of little purpose 30 years later. It's written as a sad fact that the world changes, but change is a thing that happens frequently with humanity. Get over it. :)

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:#76 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They don't truly know what Cc. stands for on an e-mail. Even if they do know it stands for the words "carbon copy" they don't know what a carbon copy is."

      Is that supposed to be a joke?... I'm 19, I know what a carbon copy is... infact some PC business in my town still uses them.

    3. Re:#76 by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      That's strange. I'm in my late thirties and I learned to type in a mechanical typewriter (in high-school). I took the elective (which was popular among low-achievers) so that I could type faster on my Commodore-64. You see I used to hunt-and-peck, and thought that touch-typing would help (it did). But I distinctly remember having to hand-in term papers, book reports, monographs, and other reports in typed paper; some for high school, but mostly for university. And in the late 80s through early 90s that meant using typewriters with carbon paper copies.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    4. Re:#76 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In high school, we had computers, but most teachers would not accept dot-matrix printouts for submissions. I don't blame them. Typing class was one of the most useful courses I took in high school.

    5. Re:#76 by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I'm in my late thirties and I learned to type in a mechanical typewriter (in high-school). I took the elective (which was popular among low-achievers) so that I could type faster on my Commodore-64. You see I used to hunt-and-peck, and thought that touch-typing would help (it did). But I distinctly remember having to hand-in term papers, book reports, monographs, and other reports in typed paper; some for high school, but mostly for university. And in the late 80s through early 90s that meant using typewriters with carbon paper copies.

      Just turned 30 myself, so looks like I'm a bit under a decade behind you, but a decade ahead of the referenced people. I've never seen carbon paper in the real world, and only used mechanical typewriters as a piece of "interesting history". My first computer was an Apple ][ in 1983 (age 4) and even in primary school, the times we were exposed to keyboards were BBC Micros or Apple ][e systems (by that stage I had a C64 at home though). By high-school, a mix of Win3.x and RISC-OS systems with the occasional early Mac were what was available (and I'd gone up to high end Amigas at home), and typing classes were definitely only conducted on the school PCs running DOS versions of typing-teacher style apps and WordPerfect.

      That's quite a change just between our decades and I hadn't stopped to consider how different it must be for those one or two decades behind me.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    6. Re:#76 by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I took typing class in high school as a Freshman, and learned to type quite well, but didn't wind up using a computer until the following year. In that short time, I forgot everything I knew about typing, and reverted to a hyper-advanced form of hunt-and-peck that I use to this day, ~28 or so years later.

      I never used carbon paper, but I did use the delicious-smelling blue ink mimeograph machine in junior high to run off copies of AD&D character sheets.

      I used to write my papers in college using Emacs. Many times I'd get to class late and frantically be tearing off the tractor feed guides from the paper as the teacher collected the homework...

      Oh yeah, one more thing: Commodore sucks, Atari rules!!!! :-)

    7. Re:#76 by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I have a silly question for you.

          I'm sure you learned just as I did, that to make a mechanical typewriter work, you had to push hard on the keys.

          I built up my real speed in typing after getting very active with BBS's and message networks (such as FidoNet). I was up past 100wpm in the 80's. At those speeds, when i was finally on a PC, I had a tendency of wearing out keyboards very quickly. Beyond the fact that the lettering on the keys would wear away from use, the keys themselves would frequently break from too much pressure. The life expectancy of a keyboard that I used was about 6 months before a (or multiple) keys would simply stop functioning. It took me a long time to unlearn that, but now keyboards usually survive years of use, long after the lettering wears off. :) Sometimes when I get deep in thought, I'll slam keys, not because I'm being aggressive, but because that's how you make the letters show up. :)

          Did you have the same problem?

          Almost everyone I've spoke with has never used a mechanical typewriter. They may have seen one once, but they never had real experience with them. Many people may have learned once with a mechanical, but since electric typewriters entered the office place so many years ago, most learned to type on those. They don't really realize with a CRLF is, where you would hit the arm on the typewriter to do a linefeed, or push the whole thing over for a carriage return.

          Oh, the good ol' days, how I don't miss thee. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    8. Re:#76 by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You weren't too far ahead of me. :)

          My first computer was a TRS 80 model III. It was the first computer that the primary school owned. They didn't exactly know what to do with it. I'd bring it home on weekends to play with it, keying in basic programs from books and/or magazines (I don't remember which).

          My first home computer was a TI 99/4A. Then we later upgraded to an Apple IIe. By high school, PC's were showing up in many classrooms, but they were still more of a novelty than an actual teaching aide. At the time, I had friends with the whole variety of home computers. Anything you could tie a modem to ended up calling local BBS's (also running on a variety of hardware). The Internet was still very primitive, and still mostly the realm of universities. My first exposure to the Internet was a college student who could dial up from his apartment, and could do file transfers and chat via IRC (I'm pretty sure it was IRC). There was no "web" yet.

          We've come a long way, but this is only the beginning. Things will be so different in 30 years, that what we have now will be archaic. :)

          The post made it seem to be a bad thing. Is it really so bad? I wouldn't even know where to get a pen that you fill from an ink well. That was a huge step above using a quill dipped in the ink well. Either is so much more efficient than carving letters into stone tables. :)

          Hey, I'm posting this from an old tablet that the CPU is 1000x faster than the first computer I used (1Ghz), and this thing is ancient. :) At least it has a wireless network card (802.11b), so I can get online without tying it down to much more than a power source on occasion. :) I have to get my real laptop fixed (damaged power jack). This is just a somewhat suitable fallback machine.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:#76 by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      I did learn touch-typing on a mechanical typewriter in high-school. However, I actually practiced and honed my skills on an IBM PC later on. I guess that's why I never had the problem you mentioned of wearing off the keyboard by pounding it hard.

      I'll admit that it did take some time to adjust between the effort needed to slam on the mechanical keys and the softer computer keyboards, but I don't remember it being a very big deal, at least to me.

      I eventually forgot touch-typing for a while and kept using my already proficient skills in hunt-and-pecking I acquired during my C=64 days. I could be faster than most, as long as I didn't have to take my eyes off the keyboards or the screen. Keying in programs from magazines, books, or my own hand-written notes was a bitch, though, which is why a few years later, when I got an IBM PC, I decided to go back to touch-typing and re-trained myself. By the time I was in university, I was more used to the PC keyboard than the mechanical typewriters, though I could (and did) use both.

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  42. I wished it had older years too. by antdude · · Score: 1

    FYI. Clickable links by years: 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, and probably more in the future (just change the year number in the URLs).

    I wished it had older years. Are there any similiar ones online from other sources?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  43. And I care because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. Oh yeah. That's right. I don't.

    Every one starts anew, the same way. What a surprise.

    1. Re:And I care because... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      You mean, every next generation doesn't know everything the previous generation knew? The shock!!

      Meanwhile, in 1873: "Young whipper-snappers and their fancy transatlantic electrical telegraphs can't read optical telegraphs anymore! They don't even remember that Texas was a republic!! Oh, the humanity!"

      At the same time, in 1937: "1873, you anachronistic puzzle-wits!!"

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  44. The President Has Never Inhaled by Myopic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They say that "Except for the present incumbent, the President has never inhaled", but that confuses me. Obviously this is a reference to Clinton, but Bush was a well-known druggie and drunk. Am I to believe that he commonly snorted coke off of coeds' naked bodies and drove drunk, but never puffed a joint? I suppose that is possible, but I find it hard to believe.

    1. Re:The President Has Never Inhaled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Obama was known to enjoy the drug life too:
      Obama had written in his first book, "Dreams From My Father" (1995), before entering politics, that he had used marijuana and cocaine ("maybe a little blow").

    2. Re:The President Has Never Inhaled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      speculation, well known to whom? his adversaries?

  45. GDP by Myopic · · Score: 1

    Serious question: When was the GDP not the key indicator of the national economy? (I'm ten years older than these freshmen.)

    1. Re:GDP by Kebis · · Score: 1

      It was Gross National Product before GDP. I think the difference is/was the GNP also counted money made in other countries by companies and GDP only counts money made in the same country the company is based in.

    2. Re:GDP by Animats · · Score: 1

      When was the GDP not the key indicator of the national economy?

      Actually, GDP may be on the way out. There's increased interest in watching consumer spending. Financial transactions contribute to GDP in a way that creates illusory "production" through double-counting. Because of the turmoil in financial markets over the last year, GDP isn't a strong indicator of real world economic activity.

      Older key indicators were housing starts (1990s; Alan Greenspan was a big fan of housing starts), Gross National Product (1980s), real median income (1970s; it peaked in 1973 and hasn't been mentioned much since Reagan), automobile production (1950s-1960s), railroad freight car carloadings (1930s-1940s), and the price of gold (pre-1930s).

      Personally, I think the number to watch is either real median income or consumer spending.

    3. Re:GDP by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      The number to watch is whatever makes the current administration looks best...

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  46. Re: by Miamicanes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > "They have never used a card catalog to find a book"

    Yawn. I was a UM Freshman in 1992. At that point, I think the card catalog was still there, but there were OLD, tattered signs perched on top warning that it was no longer maintained (and apparently hadn't been maintained in years). My high school library had a card catalog, but that was because it sucked. The public library downtown had greenscreen terminals since middle school.

    What does having been born in 1973 imply?

    * We never understood why our parents got so excited by seeing moonwalkers on TV. Men had *always* been walking on the moon.

    * We didn't notice the videogame crash of 1983, because we'd all moved on and gotten Commodore 64s for Christmas anyway. Six years later, shopping for Amiga toyz, it blew our minds that there were STILL stores selling stuff for the Atari 2600, even though we still thought the Colecovision and Vectrex were kind of cool in their own way.

    * NES? Yawn. Amiga rulez. Well, ok... Sonic on the Genesis is kind of cool...

    * A *Gameboy*?!? (Retch. Retch. Vomit.) They're for teenyboppers and poor kids. (pulls out Lynx)

    * Sprites were invented for programming convenience.

    * You mean assemblers weren't *always* two-pass?

    * We learned binary by drawing 8x8 grids, writing "256 | 128 | 64 | 32 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1" over them, coloring in the squares where we wanted the pixel to be non-transparent, then added up the numbers above each row's darkened squares and added another DATA statement with 8 values separated by commas to define our custom characters.

    * Unix was lame. It was like PCs, but worse, because at least PCs had primitive color and shitty games. Linux didn't become interesting until the internet and web servers made it relevant.

    * When picking a foreign language to study in high school and/or college, German was the obvious choice. Spanish might have been practical, and French was the language of love, but German was the language of zer0daywar3z.

    * We pissed off our parents by running a fake BBS off the family phone line for a week so we could spend more on a US Robotics HST 9600 baud modem than some of our friends paid for their first *cars*... and smile, because we were getting them for less than half price with the sysop discount.

    * Every high school had at least one really, really insanely rich kid who put a car battery and rigged-up car phone in his locker his freshman year so he could act cool and call his answering machine at home between classes to check his messages. By 12th grade, it was officially forbidden by the school, and he got a detention the day his shiny new brick rang in history class.

    * People around campus pointed at you, and called you "the laptop guy" because you had a 12-pound luggable in your backpack that was *almost* powerful enough to run WordPerfect for DOS without too much lag... as long as there was a power outlet nearby.

  47. Too bad history studies were thrown out with NCLB by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    Now all they have time for is reading and math. And not really math, but memorization and defined, structured motions of arithmetic functions. What is the point of "reading" when no one is learning how to write, or think critically, or imagine? An memorized functions will only help so far when the real problem is not defined and you have to generate the formulas.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  48. Re:We're Fucked by mindbrane · · Score: 1

    I believe we should have a hunting season on isms (ists), there's far too many of them and they need to be culled. ;) Have you read Damasio's books? Just as a different way of looking back at the blank stares.

    --
    ideopath @ play
  49. Re:We're Fucked by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    "What's wrong with the status quo? It works for me!"

    You're much more likely to hear Status Quo than Britney Spears on a classic rock channel.

    --
    Squirrel!
  50. Cynical observations for the current generation by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful
    • There have always been homeless people in American cities.
    • About 10% of Americans will see their income drop by half in any given year. This is normal.
    • There have always been tent cities in the US.
    • The Government never paid welfare to people who couldn't get jobs.
    • Employers never offered retirement plans that took care of employees.
    • Employers never paid for medical care.
    • Most manufactured retail goods were always imported.
    • College educations at state schools were never free.
    1. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • There have always been homeless people in American cities.

      As a matter of fact, there have always been homeless people since there have been people. There are homeless people in French cities too. What's your point?

      • About 10% of Americans will see their income drop by half in any given year. This is normal.

      Source?

      • There have always been tent cities in the US.

      There was a time when all frontier towns were tent cities.

      • The Government never paid welfare to people who couldn't get jobs.

      The government paid welfare from 1929 until the present. Somehow, the nation and its people survived from inception to 1929. I wonder how?

      • Employers never offered retirement plans that took care of employees.

      Corporate annuities were seldom a good deal, and few people lived long enough to be retired. 20+ year retirements are now common.

      • Employers never paid for medical care.

      That's right! people just died.

      • Most manufactured retail goods were always imported.

      Source? The United States is still the world's largest manufacturer.

      • College educations at state schools were never free.

      College education at elite private schools is free when there is need. Families that earn $120,000 to $180,000 are only asked to pay 10% of their income for tuition, room, board, and fees.

    2. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There have always been homeless people in American cities.

      Bingo! Back in my day (I'm 47) we called them BUMS and VAGRANTS. The names have changed, the people haven't.

    3. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Some of those that you haven't qualified need to be qualified with "In the U. S." though.

      J. K. Rowling wrote Harry Potter while she was on the dole. I think in the U. S. she would have had to take up pole dancing or something to make ends meet.

      Obviously, India is still giving free college to their students.

      You could cover a lot by saying, "American's have always lived in the inky black shadow of Ronald Reagan."

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    4. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot one: The world ends Dec 21, 2012, so there will be no class of 2013.

    5. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      * There have always been homeless people in American cities.

      There have always been homeless people in any city large enough to be called a city. I'm sure Athens had homeless, as did Babylon. The US certainly always has; in fact, the hobo stereotype is a still a decently influential meme in US culture. Futurama did an episode featuring hobos, for example.

      In short, what's your point?

      * About 10% of Americans will see their income drop by half in any given year. This is normal.

      I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about? Is that a true statistic for the last 20 years? Or are you pulling it out of your ass?

      * There have always been tent cities in the US.

      Yah; again, what's your fucking point?

      * College educations at state schools were never free.

      Have they ever been free, ever? Are you implying that they were free at some point and now are not?

    6. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      College education at elite private schools is free when there is need. Families that earn $120,000 to $180,000 are only asked to pay 10% of their income for tuition, room, board, and fees.

      Have you applied for financial aid lately? Even state colleges expect you to pay +30% of the parents income.

    7. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      College educations at state schools were never free.

      The Hope Scholarship program in Georgia pays full tuition, most mandatory fees, and partially pays for books for any state-school student who maintains decent grades. Similar programs exist in Tennessee, South Carolina, and probably other states. The Georgia program alone has provided a free college education to more than a million students in the past 16 years. (It also provides partial funding to students at private schools.)

      Your statement, then is not cynical. It is wrong.

    8. Re:Cynical observations for the current generation by Fareq · · Score: 1

      • Employers never offered retirement plans that took care of employees.
          many of them still do to this day...

      • Employers never paid for medical care.
          many of them still do to this day...

      • Most manufactured retail goods were always imported.
        ...US-made stuff is still available... it's just neither as cheap as the cheap foreign stuff nor as good as the good foreign stuff

      • College educations at state schools were never free.
        No, though they were pretty darn cheap until the last 5-7 years.
  51. State abbreviations? Card catalogs? by superdude72 · · Score: 1

    Jesus Christ, *how old are you* person who wrote these questions? I'm 37, and state abbreviations for postage haven't had punctuation in them for most of my lifetime either. I can remember because we had to be able to address an envelope as part of a 5th-grade competency test. And card catalogs were about 75 percent computerized at my high school by the time I graduated.

  52. Morse Code. by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

    As far as I'm concerned, ALL people should at least know "SOS" in Morse code. Never know when your only source of communication might be a monotone audio source in an emergency situation. (such as the microphone on your cell phone not working after an accident)

    1. Re:Morse Code. by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      911 Operator 1: Hello? Hello?? is anybody there?
      911 Operator 2: What's going on...?
      911 Operator 1: There's nobody on the line, but there's this intermittent beeping, almost like... like some sort of signal. It's annoying!
      911 Operator 1: Hello!?
      911 Operator 2: Probably someone sat on his phone, or the cat's walking all over it. I'd hang up.
      911 Operator 1: K
      *CLICK*

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    2. Re:Morse Code. by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm concerned, ALL people should at least know "SOS" in Morse code.

      Of course they should!

      It's in the commercials for that bathroom and kitchen cleaner stuff, after all.

  53. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah but ppl of 20 or so probally don't remember the old skool pc's with tapes in stead of floppys, and a lot wil even not remember floppys, especially the big oldskool ones. They will not know all the DOS commands we learned, they don't remember the Wolfenstein 3D or Duke Nukem as revolutionairy games, the first 3D games (kind of actually). They are not used to the dial in interent wich costed a lot per minute for a 32kps connection.

    they probally also don't know the audio cassette, maybe they know vinyl records (something for dj's), for them a mobile phone is a light phone wich you can carry in your pockets (my first mobile was to big and heavy for that), they don't remember the time before internet where you got to tape music from the radio or cd's to have illigal copies of music. ect ect ...

  54. When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by Rick17JJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I was a college freshman in the early 1970s, this was our world:

    Cell phones did not exist, although most doctors had some type of telephone in their cars.

    Home computers and on-line banking and on-line shopping did not exist. Text messaging did not exist. Facebook, MySpace and Twitter did not exist (I still don't know what they are).

    Some of the older telephones still were the rotary phones, where we had to dial the number. We could hear the pulse type dialing being used. The newer phones probably had the buttons and tones, by then. If we dialed 0, by itself, we could talk to the operator. If I am not mistaken, we still had to pay extra, on our monthly bill, for each extra telephone in the house.

    Typewriters were used to type letters. Some were electric and some were purely mechanical.

    Many secretaries knew how to take dictation by shorthand.

    Slide rules were frequently used by engineers and scientists to perform addition, subtraction, roots, logarithms and trigonometry. Pocket calculators did not exist. However, adding machines did exist.

    Nearly all of the appliances that we owned were controlled by mechanical knobs and levers. It was more of an analog world, although large businesses did have computers.

    Many businesses still used punched cards to store data for computer databases.

    We were being encouraged to used trans fats instead of saturated fats because they were supposedly less dangerous than saturated fats. Now we are being told that trans fats are even worse.

    Cars needed a minor tune up every 6,000 miles and a major tuneup every 12,000 miles. Engines usually needed to be overhauled at about 100,000 miles. Most of our gasoline powered cars had carburetors. To start a car when it was cold, we had to pump the gas peddle several times first. On some older cars, we also still had to use a mechanical choke.

    Police cars could do about 140 MPH and policemen carried revolvers instead of pistols.

    I hoped I would not be drafted and sent to Vietnam. Fortunately, the war was winding down by then, an few people were drafted that year.

    AIDs did not exist and I had never even heard of herpes, until several years later.

    If a young person asked the barber to not cut his hair too short, the barber frequently cut it somewhat shorter than he wanted anyway (for some reason). Eventually barbers stopped doing that.

    In many states our social security number was used as our drivers license number. Grocery stores would not accept credit cards, so we usually paid by check. When writing a check at the grocery store or elsewhere, the cashier or clerk usually wrote our driver's license number on the back of our check. Over the decades, many thousands of people have seen my driver's license number and written it on the back of my thousands of checks.

    1. Re:When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by soundguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Additionally, in most places there were only 3 broadcast TV stations, 4 if you were lucky enough to have a PBS affiliate in town. Cable was just getting started. If your TV had a remote, it was probably a "clicker" that struck a steel bar creating a harmonic tone that triggered an audio receiver in the TV. A lot of people you knew still had a black & white set.

      Rock music on FM radio was pretty new. Not many years earlier, FM was all classical and "old people" music.

      There was only one telephone company and one phone book. It was illegal to plug anything into the phone system that they didn't build and provide to you. There were no answering machines or fax machines.

      Only the wealthy "jet set" rode on airplanes.

      Gas was 33 cents a gallon. Your family car weighed at least 2 tons and had a V-8 engine with 300 horsepower or more. Premium gasoline was 102-104 octane as measured by the old method.

      Comic books were 15 cents, having jumped up from the 12 cents of the Silver Age at the end of the 60's. Pretty much everyone read LIFE Magazine, which was mostly pictures and articles about the Viet Nam war

      Solder was 60% lead, and you could roll your own electronics with parts from Radio Shack or a half dozen electronics mail-order catalogs.

      Most of the pennies in circulation were solid copper and you could still occasionally find a quarter, 50 cent piece, or dollar coin in your pocket change that was solid silver. Old Canadian nickels had something like 8 flat sides and didn't work in US vending machines. They were being phased out but you still saw them now and then.

      It cost 8 cents to mail a 1st-class letter.

      Coke and Pepsi were made with cane sugar.

      Young whippersnappers were ALWAYS on your lawn because there were no personal computers, cell phones, video games, MTV, or microwaveable hot pockets to keep them indoors and out of sight.

      --
      Nothing worthwhile ever happens before noon
    2. Re:When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by ricegf · · Score: 1

      I'm of your generation, apparently, as I related to almost everything you wrote (and well-written it was, too).

      But "Slide rules were frequently used by engineers and scientists to perform addition, subtraction,..."?? Since when did slide rules do addition and subtraction? And I say that while looking at my old slide rule... ;-)

    3. Re:When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To start a car when it was cold, we had to pump the gas peddle several times first.

      Must not have been real cold... When it's -20F, it's once - straight to to floor and hold.

    4. Re:When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      I was born in 1970. I frequently have this kind of conversation with my kids. When I was a kid...

      There were no cd players, no dvd players, no vcrs, and therefore no blockbuster. if you wanted to see a movie, you had to either see it in the theater or wait years until ended up on regular tv (no wonder the mpaa is pissed). My parents had an 8-track player and records. My mother had a collection of 50s and 60s 45 rpm records that she bought when they came out while she was growing up.

      There were no microwave ovens. Making your own popcorn either involved jiffypop or a hot-air popper that we couldn't afford.

      We lived in Los Angeles and had four channels on TV: abc, nbc, cbs, and pbs. If the president was speaking that night, you were screwed.

      There were no cell phones and pay phones were everywhere. Long distances calls were so expensive that we only called my grandmother in florida once a month for 5 minutes.

      When I was a baby, I had skin problems that made my mother switch to the "new" disposable diapers even though they were really expensive.

      At school, seeing films meant using an actual film projector, or worse, those film strip projectors that beeped to tell you to switch slides. Teachers used chalk boards and chalk, had never seen dry-erase before.

      And police still managed to catch speeders without radar.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    5. Re:When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      You are half right, I believe we actually pumped the gas peddle several times and then held the peddle to the floor, before starting the engine.

      If you took off the air cleaner and looked down into the carburetor, as the gas peddle is pumped, you could see a small squirt of fuel with each pump of the gas peddle. The accelerator pump in the carburetor gave the small squirt with each pump. So with the engine not running, the air/fuel ratio got richer with each pump. But, if you pumped the peddle too many times, the engine would be flooded and would not start. If the engine were flooded, we would have to wait at least a few minutes before trying again.

      During normal driving, the accelerator pump would added an extra squirt of fuel as the car started to accelerate. That was to compensate for the brief lag in fuel arriving from either the idle circuit or the main jets of the carburetor (or possibly both).

      I forget exactly why we held the peddle to the floor. It may have had something to do with how the automatic choke behaved. With the air cleaner off, I seem to recall seeing something happen with the choke, buy I don't remember exactly what. On older cars that had mechanical chokes, we did not hold the gas peddle to the floor. But on those vehicles, we just pulled out the choke lever, part way or all the way, to choke off some the air going into the carburetor to get a sufficiently rich air/fuel ratio. As the engine warmed up, or we started going faster, we pushed the choke lever back in.

      Most of what I said above, did not apply to European made 4-cylinder cars with SU carburetors such as MGs and pre-1972 Volvos.

      As someone who is not a mechanic, that is the best that I can remember it and explain it.

    6. Re:When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      I should have said multiplication and division instead of addition and subtraction. My only experience with slide rules was the 2 weeks we spent using them, back in my 8th grade math class. I had forgotten some of the details of actually using them.

      As I look at the instructions of one of dads old slide rules, I do not see addition and subtraction mentioned. I doubt that dad would remember either, since he only made very limited use of them, on rare occasions, back in the 1940s and 1950s. One of his two old slide rules is a used ivory on wood model that he purchased used from someone back in the mid-1940s or earlier.

      Wikipedia does mention an obscure, rarely used method for performing addition and subtraction on most slide rules.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slide_Rule

    7. Re:When I was a freshman in the early 1970s by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      Actually, thinking further about what I just said, most my experiences with manual chokes were on 4-cylinder cars with SU carburetors. So, I do not remember if we also held the peddle to the floor on cars with manual chokes and conventional carburetors or not. So I am not sure if it was because of the automatic choke or not.

      If I ever get around to trying to start our old late 1950s era gasoline powered dump truck, I might discover the answer to that question.

  55. Meta-Critique by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

    Compiling lists such as the Beloit College Annual Mindset List is in itself 20th century old-think about large collections of people like the baby boomer generation. Did they ever heard about concepts like the long tail? No one likes generalizations, which are applied to himself (as many posts above) point out.

  56. Used around the world? by BlueTemplar · · Score: 0
    [The list] is used around the world as the school year begins

    This is rather presumptuous - I consider myself having a decent knowledge of American culture (for someone that is not American), and for around 1 in 4 of the statements, I don't even know what they are talking about!

    Also,

    There have always been flat screen televisions.

    Rather try "There have always been color televisions." I was born in 1985 and I have known black-and-white TV.

  57. Re: by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some do indeed have a search feature. It's typically at the end of the file.

            -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  58. Re: by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    You had me until the last two. In my high-school, that guy would have have been beaten up and stuffed in a locker with his battery.

              -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  59. Hearing aid broken? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure people don't listen to Slayer to hear Araya's vocal stylings.

  60. Re:We're Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a student, I say, fuck that, my dear academic, and fuck your easy willingness to give up on us. We clueless, cynical, little automatons have been tasked with developing our own frameworks for filtering and handling information blasted at us from society's great unmetered firehose even as you sit there whining on Slashdot about your abject failure to connect with us. We, the post-post-modern twerps that you are griping about, have grown up DRENCHED in information, to the point that we're numbed to it. We have not experienced the type of developmental cocoons that previous generations wore into adulthood; we didn't grow up in a crappy town where our best sources of information were an out-of-date encyclopedia, Time magazine, and the evening news. We grew up with Internet access and a TV in our bedroom, and we realized at quite a young age that most of the ideas we thought we were alone in having were actually shared by countless thousands or millions. It's discouraging to the thinker, really; quite often, the instant we have a thought, we type it into Google and realize that the discussion is not merely mature, but closed. We realized early on that we were not alone, yet nobody cared what we had to say.

    I can say, without specific knowledge of your field, that your job is fundamentally two pronged: it is the promotion of the best approximation of reality available, and it is also the displacement of the less accurate models which came before. Modernism/postmodernism had an important job to do, and retains some importance as a perspective, a naggling doubt at the back of every good student's mind, but it's beginning to reach saturation in my own, younger generation. The holdouts who haven't either digested the pill to the best of their abilities or passed it through their system are getting rare outside of some fairly recognizable enclaves. It's time to react to that fact. We young people have been told to ask "why?" as a reflex, true, but many of us have unfortunately developed the habit of making snap judgments in the face of informational overload. We have no authorities; we have no role models. The politicians are liars; the businessmen are crooks; the priests are pedophiles. We never learned about righteousness and values; we were taught consumerism and encouraged to swim in knowledge as if we would learn by mere proximity. We are three generations removed from the cultural revolutions of the sixties and seventies. Our grandparents were at Woodstock enjoying sex, drugs, and rock and roll; our parents grew up shaking their heads at the hypocrisy of their suddenly-reactionary baby boomer parents, and now we, their kids, don't know what the hell to think. They say that it takes three generations to breed accent out of spoken language; we've left respect for authority so far behind us that we can't even conceive what the fuss was about.

    Our childhood is getting longer, as is our adolescence, although we were exposed to the facts of life as soon as we could reach a keyboard. It seems that college is no longer a privilege, but a right awarded for simply not screwing up massively in life. Many of us arrive with no specific goal in mind, expecting to have our hands held as they were in high school, and we often wind up with a degree in hand and no plans for its use. Alternately, many of us believe (often correctly) that our future employers care little about what is taught in college and that simply completing the routine is what matters. The reasoners, the deep thinkers, and those interested in pursuing science for its own sake are in there too, but we've always been there, Mr. Academic. Our deep-thinking minds have always been attracted to the college atmosphere, but those of us with that mindset make up a proportionally smaller fragment of the new student body. You, sir, are in a situation where you need to search diligently for the part of that scholastically-minded fragment that's interested in learning, but afraid to step forth; the ones that have been repeatedly abused or isolated

  61. Hey! Cut that out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That girl worked hard (on her knees, every day...) to earn that title and go down in history as the official White House presidential cocksucker.
    Just cause you hate Bush, that does NOT give you the right to take that away from her.

  62. This is absolutely 100% incorrect by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    The real mindset of incoming college freshmen: Our parents are totally gone! Let's party, get drunk, and find someone to sleep with!

    And that has been the mindset of at least a significant percentage of incoming freshmen for decades. Stuff like "OMG, technology changes" doesn't have anywhere near the same effect. Why are these guys concentrating on what divides current college kids from previous generations as opposed to what unites them?

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:This is absolutely 100% incorrect by StellarFury · · Score: 1

      Here is the reason Beloit College keeps producing the Mindset List:

      They did it once, in the 1990s, after one of the professors found a similar type of list in an e-mail forward. He passed it along to the English department, who went "Oh, let's make one of these for incoming college students!"

      They made the list, published it, and it became minutely famous in academic circles, which over the next couple years, grew into small, but nonetheless national, recognition.

      Nowadays, it's the only thing about Beloit College that makes even the tiniest of buzzes on the national scale (aside from their massive budget problems, as reported in Time Magazine last year, and quickly played down by the administration). They won't stop doing it because it gets attention, however small, and if there's anything true about small colleges, it's that they're desperate for press.

  63. MOD PARENT UP by LordKazan · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by unknownroad · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

  64. Re: by ricegf · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was a UM Freshman in 1992... We learned binary by drawing 8x8 grids, writing "256 | 128 | 64 | 32 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1" over them

    I was a Mississippi State freshman in 1979, and we still could only fit "128 | 64 | 32 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1" above an 8x8 grid. I hope to God that your UM was Ole Miss!

  65. Re: by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    ^^^ Argh. That's what rushing to do a final post before going to bed does to you. Yeah, the leftmost column was 128, not 256 (goes to cut eye holes in brown paper bag) ;-)

  66. A couple thoughts on that., from a 44 year old. by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap. When I was in grade school in the 70's, and high school in the early 80's, Columbus was still considered a heroic figure in mainstream middle class society. Still is if you're Italian.

    That only became blase in the late 90s Which was 10 years ago. When these freshmen were 8 years old.

    1. Re:A couple thoughts on that., from a 44 year old. by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Christopher Columbus has always been getting a bad rap. When I was in grade school in the 70's, and high school in the early 80's, Columbus was still considered a heroic figure in mainstream middle class society. Still is if you're Italian.

      That only became blase in the late 90s Which was 10 years ago. When these freshmen were 8 years old.

      That reminded me of a time when I was studying for a History exam (about 12 years ago, during high school, in Mexico). The subject? The Man's landing on the moon.

      My father could not believe I was studying the landing as history, given that he was 20 years old and could see it on TV when that happen.

      I guess the Persian Gulf War or the NAFTA are also historical notes in today's books.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  67. In college, in the early 90's... by wiredog · · Score: 1

    I was 10 years older than most of my fellow students. Talking after class I mentioned going to the local drugstore to use the tube tester. Pretty female classmate from Linear Algebra asks "What's a vacuum tube?"

  68. Most of that was still ture in the early 80's by wiredog · · Score: 1

    When I first went to college. I learned how to use a slide rule in high school in the early 80's.

  69. WRONG right from #1 by hey! · · Score: 1

    For these students, Martha Graham, Pan American Airways, Michael Landon, Dr. Seuss, Miles Davis, The Dallas Times Herald, Gene Roddenberry, and Freddie Mercury have always been dead.

    WRONG. Dr. Seuss will live forever.

    It's like when Jim Henson died, and the media wrung their hands over how to explain to children that Kermit the Frog died. What kind of parent would tell a child such an abominable lie? It's a shame that an artistic genius like Jim Henson died so young, but his creations live on.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:WRONG right from #1 by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that an artistic genius like Jim Henson died so young, but his creations live on.

      I prefer to think of it as "Jim Henson died, but his creatures live on."

      Rygel will never die!

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  70. The previous president didn't inhale! by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    Except for the present incumbent, the President has never inhaled.

    Yes, I was never sure if the previous president liked to snort or inject, but I guess neither of those things is inhaling.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  71. Re:We're Fucked by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    From a classmate at a panel discussion in law school: "We're the most powerful country in the world. Why bother to use diplomacy?" The speaker replied that it wasn't quite as stupid a question as it sounded.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  72. Don't post items of this nature in the future. by mxharlow · · Score: 1

    Do you think this incredibly inaccurate opinion belongs on Slashdot?

  73. Re:We're Fucked by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

    What are you, some kind of Damasioist?

  74. Re:We're Fucked by JerkBoB · · Score: 1

    Wow. If I had mod points today, I'd use them. Sadly, the best I can do is write this post with a recommendation that someone mod the parent up. It's quite a dense little rant, but I have to say that it's one of the most enlightening and insightful posts I've read on /. in a long time.

    Thanks, AC (now git off mah lawn!).

    --
    A host is a host from coast to coast...
    Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
  75. Hardcore and softcore porn is not in their vocab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only do they not know what hardcore and softcore porn means, they also don't know what it means to nuke something (in the microwave)

  76. Re:Fucked? Hell no! Not yet at least... by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    You are right, it is a fucked system. I would think investing $95,000 and four years of effort should result in some sort of return. This person you are yelling about is going to have a house payment following them for 10 or 20 years. It is a house payment they can't avoid, either through bankruptcy or just dodging the payment. It is a house payment that can be garnished out of wages. We call education an investment, but if you had investments like this in the financial world you would end up with a case like Bernie Madoff.

    I assume you are advocating the Republican Party, since the majority of today's youth went Democratic in the last election. Let's look at that. First, the Republican's nominated someone for president old enough to be the great grandfather of some of today's freshmen voters. The much talked about "Young Republicans" elected a 38 year old person accused of blatant racism as their leader. That is the Republican youth organization? If you are complaining about the poltical leanings of today's youth, then you need to look what the Republican Party looks like to a young, racially diverse generation that grew up with technology as part of their daily lives. Twenty years ago Intel released the 80486 processor. I remember owning a 386, 286 and yes an 8088. Their world is not the same as yours. An eighteen year old, for instance, has never known a world before The Simpsons, since it was first shown in 1989. They have always had mobile game systems, since the Gameboy was first produced in 1989.

    The Republican Party is a party of older, reactionary people who seem to be filled with fear. The accusations of racism sticks really easily to the Party, especially when you consider that McCain voted against the creation of the Martin Luther King Jr, and supported its revocation years later. I can't tell you just how many times I have heard jokes about watermelons in the white house since that election, but it is depressingly all too common among the white conservatives in Texas. Why do you think the youth went over to the Democratic Party?

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  77. Re:We're Fucked by roystgnr · · Score: 1

    what I do is try and get them to think.

    That's good. One source of pride in my college is that essentially all of my professors in the "soft" subjects tried to get us to think, not just to agree with them. And I never ran into any who confused those two goals.

    I quote, "What's wrong withe status quo? It works for me!"

    For instance, if I had asked a question and made a statement like this, the professors who were trying to get me to think would have answered the question and then asked me for more details on the statement. Occasionally their answers would change my mind or their questions would help me change theirs, but in any instance we'd both learn something from the exchange. Even among my most liberal professors, I never got to meet the stereotypical ivory tower dweller who thinks it's self-evident that a "status quo" is an inherently bad thing and that there is no wisdom in being conservative when proposing to change a working system.

    For that, I guess I have to go to Slashdot. Nice to meet you.

  78. Obligatory XKCD by unknownroad · · Score: 1
  79. "Amateur radio operators" Whatszat??? by gpronger · · Score: 1

    Amateur radio operators, sorry too close to a useful hobby.

    Greg

  80. Amateur radio operators have NEVER needed to know by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    Morse code. We needed to know the International Code. Morse was used on landlines. It's similar, but has a number of differences. You still have to pass a minimal, 5 words per minute, code test to operate on HF (Shortwave).

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  81. Re:Fucked? Hell no! Not yet at least... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

    IMHO, we haven't begun to see fucked yet, with the ignorance that MTV likes to portray as the Real World. Let's hope there are still some out there who still see the morality of the world today AND are bright enough to see that we have more than ONE political party out there.

    And then they won't bother with elections because unlike American Idol, you only get one vote, and you can't cast it from a cell phone :-)

  82. Yay, stereotypes! by Codex_of_Wisdom · · Score: 1

    And I thought the big movement right now was to stamp out profiling... how naive I was...

  83. Re: by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, well maybe they don't know how to spell either. Nor would they bother starting a paragraph with a capital letter, let alone a simple sentance. They likely think that things like "ppl", "probally", and "costed" are words too.

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  84. Jesus Christ on a dildo pogo stick! by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

    Ye gods! We've actually been visited by a THREE DIGIT ID! How many feet of cobwebs are YOU trailing, old timer? And what hoary tomb did you crawl out of to inflict your will upon this dark earth? Does this mean that we could possibly be visited by a *GASP!* TWO DIGIT ID Methuselah!

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
  85. Re:We're Fucked by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    Since we don't have a "+1, awesome rant!" mod, somebody give this AC an "insightful".

    /or as all you kids with your iphones that play hippity-hop music and your tattoos of 4chan memes would say: "OMG EPIC WIN!"
    //Now, off the lawn please.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  86. MOD PARENT UP by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    Alas, I have no mod points.

    This was a well put together response to the typical whining academic. As a student now back in college at the tender age if 38, I can recognize the dismissive tone with which college professors have approached students and to my lack of surprise it hasn't changed since I first touched a college campus when I was 17.

    The fact is, most people in college are going because without that piece of paper, they are screwed. It doesn't matter whether they learn, it only matters that when their resume hits the inbox of the human resources department, it states that there is a college degree. It doesn't really even matter if the degree matches the job you are applying for.

    That sad truth, that the degree you study for doesn't make a difference in the REAL world, is why you have students looking at you with blank stares. You want them to look at education as some sort of mystical mind opening experience. It isn't. They know, as you should no doubt be aware, Mr. Academic, that only the piece of paper really matters. That piece of paper is why they are mortgaging their future, betting an insane amount of money on the fact that the piece of paper your college gives them will enable them to live a life of prosperity. The few out there going to college for the love of learning are to be both praised and condemned. They should be praised for approaching the chance to learn with reverence, and they should be condemned for not approaching college realistically.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  87. One Word by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Entitlement.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  88. They forgot about Duke Nukem Forever by Dalzhim · · Score: 1

    Duke Nukem Forever has always been an upcoming title they have looked forward to.

  89. Re:We're Fucked by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

    Hmmm.... sounded like "Mr. Academic" was distinctly saying he had not "given up" on the current generation, but that he was finding it even harder to "get through" to his students than in previous years.

    It sounds as if "Mr. Academic" was reflecting his frustrating experience, possibly due in part to how he has changed, and partly due to the changes in the attitudes and interests from those he faced when he started his job. This is why it's good that there are new generations of teachers to complement older ones in universities.

    Meanwhile, you can improve on this eloquently worded, long-winded, over-generalized, citation-free, and condescending rant. There are some good thoughts here. I expect you'll develop a more focused, compelling style that with a bit of experience.

  90. Re: by Massacrifice · · Score: 1

    I'm still locked up in my locker, you insensitive clod!

    --
    -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
  91. Re:We're Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod up please

  92. Re:We're Fucked by Massacrifice · · Score: 1

    I'm in mid thirties, and just learned more in one post about the generation following mine than in a full year of TV watching, net reading and discussing with other people. Thank you for making this thread relevant. I'd mod you up if I wasn't such a karma whore by having posted before in the thread.

    --
    -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
  93. Re:We're Fucked by mindbrane · · Score: 1

    To the cutting point of the bleeding edge, your intellect is a weapon, the most potent weapon you now have. Learn to use it as a concealed weapon. Your post suggests someone in their 30s or even older, but if you really are a young student and as bright as your post suggests you to be then 'welcome to the arena'. I've had my face busted open, head broken open, bones broken, been groped and worse, and, I'm a middle class brat with a genius level IQ. Take the soother out of your mouth, get off the E and learn to take multiple punches. It can only get worse.

    --
    ideopath @ play
  94. Underground metal is more like classical by hessian · · Score: 1

    Death and thrash metal (including Slayer) are both incredibly intricate and demanding styles of music.

    I agree. Trying to write good underground metal (death metal, thrash, speed metal, black metal -- Slayer is in my lexicon a speed/death hybrid) is not as simple as people want it to be.

    Here's a good definition of how underground metal is similar to classical music in composition and values.

    1. Re:Underground metal is more like classical by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I find it difficult to take seriously a musical critique from "anus.com", thank you.

  95. Re:We're Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What's wrong withe status quo? It works for me!"

    Change for the sake of change isn't a good thing. I think you have to actually answer the question. Most things in most people's lives do work for them just fine, especially in the short term. I think the question deserves an answer.

    I don't even know what "empty irony" is supposed to mean, but cluelessness is not a new thing. I don't really believe in the whole "kids these days" bullshit. People have always been dumb and lazy. I think it's just easier now, which is nice since I'm dumb and lazy.

  96. I don't get it by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    Nobody has ever responded to âoeHelp, Iâ(TM)ve fallen and I canâ(TM)t get up.â

    Huh? Anyone?

    Someone has always been asking: âoeWas Iraq worth a war?â

    So the war started in 1991?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:I don't get it by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Nobody has ever responded to "Help, I've fallen and I can't get up."

      Huh? Anyone?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27ve_fallen_and_I_can%27t_get_up!

      Someone has always been asking: "Was Iraq worth a war?"

      So the war started in 1991?

      That'd be the first Iraq war: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  97. Re:Fucked? Hell no! Not yet at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... still - on the the bright side - at least we got fucked....

    Yeah, except it was in the ass. With a wooden pole.

    I mean, I suppose you could be in to that sort of thing, but I am not.

  98. Re:We're Fucked by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the response - well spoken, well done.

    I have not and will not give up. I'm actually one of "the good guys" in this, in that I have absolute faith that the people I am teaching can think and think well, if given the proper time, tools, place, and encouragement.

    I'm sure that if you were one of my students, I would be happy and proud to have you around. You are correct in that there are always some students who are willing and happy to push things intellectually. They are always a steady 15% or so. The problem is the middle and the bottom. The middle is shrinking. Over the past 10 years, the number of willfully ignorant students has increased dramatically, all at the expense of the middle ground - the students who are bright enough, but poorly served and unwillfully ignorant, i.e., they don't "know" because they simply don't know, as opposed to the bottom feeders who don't know and don't want to know and are in school to punch a ticket. They piss me off.

    Even still, I do reach out to them all as best I can, but there is always a certain number of them who are categorically useless. So, I do my best to cultivate the ones at the top who care, and enlist the ones in the middle who might care.

    Again, thanks for your well thought response. It was an inspiration to read. Cheers,

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  99. two kinds of tattoos by pigwiggle · · Score: 1

    It seems now-a-days I see a lot of nicely done full/half sleeves on hipster kids. I guess that's what they are talking about - the chic tattoos. That's one sort of tattoo. I also see some not so well done, a bit faded, and far less contrived tattoos on people about my age (I'm 36). I think is says something about these people. When I think of my old tats, I think about the kid who got them. Impulsive, adventurous, rebellious, self destructive, optimistic. The kid who would try *anything*. Today I'm a research scientists - theoretical physical chemistry. Life is very tame. No more drugs, slumming, hitchhiking, crazy girls, chaotic times. I'm marked up from those days, and I don't regret any of it. When I see other folks with their faded tats I think they are probably like me. Definitely not chic, though.

    --
    46 & 2
    1. Re:two kinds of tattoos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today I'm a research scientists

      Right. Sure you are, Einstein.

  100. Re:Fucked? Hell no! Not yet at least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, here's hoping those youngins don't have closed minds that over generalize their ignorant opinions to entire groups of people. We already have you to do that.

  101. In my day... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    It was pussy, booze, video games and in fairly distant fourth was school. Everything else fell into the irrelevant or no time for that crap pile.

  102. mod parent up! by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

    because that was quite funny.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
  103. Hyphen abuse by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Because their parents suck, politically-correct panty-waisted fools....

    Wait wait wait. "Politically-correct" parents are responsible for kids growing up thinking that the sort of behavior seen on Jerry Springer was normal? "Politically-correct" parents would let their kids watch South Park?

    I mention this only because you repeated the error of your parent post (and there has been a rash of this mistake on Slashdot stories in the past few weeks): there is no hyphen in "politically correct". Indeed, there should be no such thing as an adverb with an "-ly" ending being immediately followed by a hyphen ever. The "-ly" adverb has taken the job of the hyphen, so the hyphen is redundant. It is one of the few hard and fast rules of English.

    I now return you to your regularly scheduled arguments over trivial matters.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  104. Re: by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    What's a book?

    It's a non-volatile storage medium. It's very rare. You should 'ave one.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  105. Re: by mog007 · · Score: 1

    But it does have a built in screen and instant access time.

  106. Re:We're Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Was that your college essay? That was good enough to get you into an elite school. That was amazingly perceptive. Submit that to the New Yorker or the USA Today College edition...

  107. Left handed complements? by Rix · · Score: 1

    Of course popular music (including Slayer) is crap.

    Growling into a microphone and thrashing a guitar is neither intricate nor demanding. Any monkey can do it.

    1. Re:Left handed complements? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      Of course popular music (including Slayer) is crap.

      Growling into a microphone and thrashing a guitar is neither intricate nor demanding. Any monkey can do it.

      Ok, fine. You do it. Please make a recording of yourself playing all the guitar and drum parts from Slayer's Reign in Blood, and then we talk. Until then you are a loudmouthed idiot.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  108. Half-Size by conureman · · Score: 1

    Fuel was half the price, as well.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  109. The kids are alright... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a bit odd of me since I'm close to 50 now but I actually finished college recently. I have found my classmates (as of 2005) neither shallow, self absorbed or otherwise thoughtless any more than that of the generation that went to school in the '70s or '80s. If you want to connect with them be clear, honest and sincere and the connection, if there is to be one, will come. The technology changes all the time but the motivations and needs of people really don't. The youth of today is really not that much different than we were then. The only real differences are the circumstances in which they have grown up in.

  110. Multicultural ? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    According to TFA, it is simultaneously true that this year's stock of freshers is both "multicultural" and "They have never understood the meaning of R.S.V.P."
    While I wouldn't require strong French as an indication of being "multicultural", this does seem to be a bit of a non-sequiteur. Ooops, there I go again. But some phrases get so absorbed into one native language that they acquire a certain je ne sais quoi, and their understanding simply becomes part of the host language. It's particularly so between French and English because of the actions of a Scandanavian bastard almost a thousand years ago.
    So, essentially what the article is saying is that students going to college this year can be expected to be ignorant, if not necessarily stupid. Well, DOH!, but isn't that why they're going to college?
    Hmmm, do I brush up on my Spanish first, or my French, or my Russian? The wife wants to move once #1 daughter gets her digit out and moves out, but we haven't decided which country to move to. Oh well, no great hurry.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  111. Re:We're Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS.