So many people have been claiming that China is eating us alive because they focused only on Treasury bond purchases and see China's economy as this monolithic block when the situation there is very complex. China would not have bought those bonds if it didn't think they would pay back. They may end up being part of what cushions China as that $1.2 trillion returns over time, but I think the next few years are going to be at best very shaky, and at worst could see China plunge into recession or even depression. That will not bode well for the rest of Asia, and if the EU doesn't improve soon, could see the world economy dragged down again.
The funny thing is, the US could just print money to pay off those bonds, and it would hurt the US far less than China.
You can try to claim that Breitbart is just some shitty blog or whatever, but they have all the evidence they were able to gather linked in there. So if you disagree with them, provide your own proof.
Refute what they said, not the source. They have citations, where are yours? I know nothing of Breitbart, but I do know that citations are the basis of things like this. Are you saying that Roberto Rosario isn't in the ggautoblocker, or that he is somehow a harasser? Show your work. Are you trying to claim that Chris von Csefalvay did not get harassed for doing a scientific article about gamergate, or that he did but he is wrong because it disagreed with Randi? Did Claire Schumann not get harassed right off the internet for daring to try to settle the differences between gamergate and anti-gamergate? Did Vivek Wadhwa get harassed into no longer advocating for women in tech, or is that a lie too?
As I have no way to verify any of the claims in these articles, you are better off reading them yourself and coming to a conclusion. However, sending comments like in the first article is harassment, and that is out in the open.
Comments like this are harassment, no doubt about it:
“Set yourself on fire.”
“You’ve made your bed, now get fucked in it.”
“Fuck your feelings.”
and they came from Randi towards people she did not agree with.
As you read their spiels try to remember that the alternative they offer — whether they know it or not — is dreary, inoffensive, publicly funded dreck, with the occasional critically acclaimed outlier involving some grievance or debauchery. The sort of world they would inflict has never produced anything half as great as Star Wars. It can't, by nature.
We can deal with the waste from reactors, it is just environmental idiots and people afraid of proliferation that are holding back reprocessing. France reprocesses and sells power to all of Europe, but the US has laws against reprocessing that were put in place under Carter.
Are you always such an asshole, or are you just having a bad day? People are trying to have a civil conversation with you, and you bust out the insults. You may know more than the majority of us about aquaculture, but you don't have to be such a jerk whenever anyone has an opinion different than yours. It isn't always true that they are even talking about exactly the same type of farm as you run, they could just be talking about the normal ground based farms that many of us have to deal with.
In short, chill out and be civil or you won't last long here, no one wants to have a discussion with a jerk.
It would be kind of hard for me to downmod him as he is always replying to me. I don't run multiple accounts, and a registered user cannot mod on a story that they have also commented on. Therefore, it is other's downmodding an annoying troll (such as the original APK comment on this thread).
APK is modded off topic most of his posts. He is after all completely offtopic, just like you. What does all of this have to do with a factory worker being crushed by machinery?
Slashdot Mirror
I can't wait for someone to come out with a serial hybrid diesel electric pickup truck. It would be a great vehicle.
If the subsidies for oil and gas go away, will they also decrease the increased taxes on these fuels?
We pay for Gas taxes, therefore gas companies pay less taxes, it isn't a subsidy but a balancing.
http://www.catholic.com/magazi...
Now, why do you have to analyze a joke so much? Would it have been better if I had said that Jesus stoned her instead?
Well, the traffic in the DC area was pretty awful this morning...
That is funny. You won't even register an account, but I must have a ton of sockpuppet accounts that I downmod all your posts with.
This is my only account, I don't post with any other account, nor do I post AC.
So we agree? I was making a joke, I'm sorry if it was made towards the wrong person, but it was never meant to be an attack.
So many people have been claiming that China is eating us alive because they focused only on Treasury bond purchases and see China's economy as this monolithic block when the situation there is very complex. China would not have bought those bonds if it didn't think they would pay back. They may end up being part of what cushions China as that $1.2 trillion returns over time, but I think the next few years are going to be at best very shaky, and at worst could see China plunge into recession or even depression. That will not bode well for the rest of Asia, and if the EU doesn't improve soon, could see the world economy dragged down again.
The funny thing is, the US could just print money to pay off those bonds, and it would hurt the US far less than China.
This is totally fine though, we must all bow down to capitalism, there are no better systems, in fact no other system could possibly work.
What is your proposed system that will work so much better?
His solution is to raise the minimum wage, didn't you read that?
Of course, if we raise the minimum wage to $60k a year, everyone would be much better off, wouldn't they?
Sounds like a pretty clear case of defamation. You should get a nice payday out of that.
Here is my response to Dave420 asking the same thing above.
http://yro.slashdot.org/commen...
You can try to claim that Breitbart is just some shitty blog or whatever, but they have all the evidence they were able to gather linked in there. So if you disagree with them, provide your own proof.
Refute what they said, not the source. They have citations, where are yours? I know nothing of Breitbart, but I do know that citations are the basis of things like this. Are you saying that Roberto Rosario isn't in the ggautoblocker, or that he is somehow a harasser? Show your work. Are you trying to claim that Chris von Csefalvay did not get harassed for doing a scientific article about gamergate, or that he did but he is wrong because it disagreed with Randi? Did Claire Schumann not get harassed right off the internet for daring to try to settle the differences between gamergate and anti-gamergate? Did Vivek Wadhwa get harassed into no longer advocating for women in tech, or is that a lie too?
http://www.stopthegrbullies.co...
Maybe Randi will tell me she wants me to burn next? That tweet right there is harassment, no matter which side of the debate you are on.
No, ctid is intentionally lying to try and make this Randi person out to be not a harasser.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-j...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-h...
As I have no way to verify any of the claims in these articles, you are better off reading them yourself and coming to a conclusion. However, sending comments like in the first article is harassment, and that is out in the open.
Comments like this are harassment, no doubt about it:
“Set yourself on fire.”
“You’ve made your bed, now get fucked in it.”
“Fuck your feelings.”
and they came from Randi towards people she did not agree with.
“Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.”
At which point Mary stoned her to death.
As you read their spiels try to remember that the alternative they offer — whether they know it or not — is dreary, inoffensive, publicly funded dreck, with the occasional critically acclaimed outlier involving some grievance or debauchery. The sort of world they would inflict has never produced anything half as great as Star Wars. It can't, by nature.
I offer you BBC as a counter example.
Except for maybe an easter egg of JarJar's bones bleaching in the sun.
Or Jar Jar's corpse being served up to Jabba the Hut like a roast pig.
We can deal with the waste from reactors, it is just environmental idiots and people afraid of proliferation that are holding back reprocessing. France reprocesses and sells power to all of Europe, but the US has laws against reprocessing that were put in place under Carter.
My house uses it for cooking and heat as well. What a waste.
It is nice and warm in the winter though.
When the aquifer in Nebraska dries up, all those farms will turn into dust.
Are you always such an asshole, or are you just having a bad day? People are trying to have a civil conversation with you, and you bust out the insults. You may know more than the majority of us about aquaculture, but you don't have to be such a jerk whenever anyone has an opinion different than yours. It isn't always true that they are even talking about exactly the same type of farm as you run, they could just be talking about the normal ground based farms that many of us have to deal with.
In short, chill out and be civil or you won't last long here, no one wants to have a discussion with a jerk.
Moo!
It would be kind of hard for me to downmod him as he is always replying to me. I don't run multiple accounts, and a registered user cannot mod on a story that they have also commented on. Therefore, it is other's downmodding an annoying troll (such as the original APK comment on this thread).
Moo?
Apk gets more upmods (245) than downmods
Hahahahaha
APK is modded off topic most of his posts. He is after all completely offtopic, just like you. What does all of this have to do with a factory worker being crushed by machinery?
So, hosts files will lead to Greece paying their Denbts?