Actually, a scientific study was done that found the reflective aspects of contrails are more than offset by the IR reflective qualities of the water vapor. This means your solution of more jets will cause more warming, not less.
Should we also add labels "may contain dihydrogen monoxyde"? That has about as valid a use as adding GMO labels.
In all honesty, if you want GMO labels, you might as well add them to ever piece of food grown, as there isn't a food plant that hasn't been genetically modified in some way. Or are you trying to say that gene splicing done before the genetics revolution is somehow not the same?
Do you refuse to drink French wine because they used genetic modification techniques to fight the wine blight?
Food packaging is designed to inform about possible issues (may contain nuts), not the latest idiocy (GMO). Demanding that food makers add GMO labeling makes no sense without some kind of scientific study proving harm, or government intervention. So if you want to be anti science, you can petition your representative to make a law requiring GMO labels on all food, but it will be just as silly as it is in Europe.
And the Democrat party contains anti vaxxers. Trying to act like somehow the Democrats are better than the Republicans in science matters is pretty silly. Politicians are politicians, not scientists.
Adding TV service to my already existing Internet service with Verizon cost just the rental fee for the cablebox/cablecard. That surprised me, but their bundling makes it all work. It would cost the same again if I added phone service as well. I am not sure why this is the case, but it appears to just be the way it works for them.
Perhaps that is because all of the GMO labeling is an attempt at scare tactics as there is no scientific evidence of harm. When you can produce any kind of indication of a possible harm from GMO, rather than the equivalent of anti-vax arguments, perhaps there will be a reason to have markings on packaging. Until then, you are just trying to put scare quotes on food packaging for no reason at all.
Which is what this report is. The EPA went out and tested water, tested fracking wells, but apparently, it is not good enough for the OP. It seems that the OP will trust no evidence that there is no issue, and just wants fracking to end at all costs (including $4 a gallon gas).
Upgrades are pretty much brain dead simple now. Throw in a new hard drive and off you go. You can also add USB or eSATA hard drives, which is as simple as it can be.
Don't add FUD.
A Tivo can have up to 16 TB of storage. Sure you can get more into a computer, but this is still huge.
Recordings are not trapped in the Tivo, Tivo Desktop is a free piece of software that pulls them off, and they can then easily be converted to MPeg, or just us kmttg. This process is just as complicated as MCE with MCEBuddy. I would like to go to MP4 like MCEBuddy, instead of MPEG with kmttg.
At this point, Tivo is so cheap comparatively, there is no reason to use the MCE/SiliconDust solution. I just wish there was good support for pulling down Tivo recordings, cutting commercials and reprocessing to MP4 like MCEBuddy.
You do realize that multimode fiber is good past 40Gbit right? This is what is used to run high speed connections, no modifications needed. Why would you rerun the fiber at all when all you need to do is upgrade the transceivers?
I agreed with putting in conduits, I am also suggesting things to put into those conduits which ARE future proof. Multimode fiber is the high bandwidth stuff. Single mode fiber is the long range stuff. Multimode is good for a very long time, and would not be a mistake. The cat 7 might need to be replaced in the future, but unlikely the fiber would ever have to be replaced.
in which gun-rights advocates are not resoundingly winning that debate.
This week's news is that the Texas legislature approved [hotair.com] campus carry
win
both houses of the Maine legislature approved [thetruthaboutguns.com] constitutional carry
win
followed the Federal Courts rollback [hotair.com] of carry restrictions in DC.
win
last year Illinois legalized concealed carry.
win
Did you really mean the first sentence? It sounds like you gave all the argument needed to refute your own statement. Gun rights activists are winning the battles, the war is not far behind.
Did you even read what you responded to before blasting off? He agreed with you.
Assault Weapon = made up phrase for a "scary" rifle Assault Rifle = Military term for a compact select fire rifle that fires intermediate size rounds (less than 50 cal, bigger than 9mm).
Slashdot Mirror
The women shouldn't have raped those poor drunk frat boys than. /s
Then Github gets bought out by Dice, or Cnet, or whatever other malware company.
cars and power plants don't exist to emit CO2 in the first place.
Cars exist to move us around.
Power plants exist to produce power.
Neither exists to emit CO2, that is a result of the reaction.
Ever notice that the NOAA satellites also showed no warming? Maybe they need to be recalibrated too.
Actually, a scientific study was done that found the reflective aspects of contrails are more than offset by the IR reflective qualities of the water vapor. This means your solution of more jets will cause more warming, not less.
Move them to Canada and Siberia.
Should we also add labels "may contain dihydrogen monoxyde"? That has about as valid a use as adding GMO labels.
In all honesty, if you want GMO labels, you might as well add them to ever piece of food grown, as there isn't a food plant that hasn't been genetically modified in some way. Or are you trying to say that gene splicing done before the genetics revolution is somehow not the same?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...
Do you refuse to drink French wine because they used genetic modification techniques to fight the wine blight?
Food packaging is designed to inform about possible issues (may contain nuts), not the latest idiocy (GMO). Demanding that food makers add GMO labeling makes no sense without some kind of scientific study proving harm, or government intervention. So if you want to be anti science, you can petition your representative to make a law requiring GMO labels on all food, but it will be just as silly as it is in Europe.
The republican party loves candidates like you.
And the Democrat party contains anti vaxxers. Trying to act like somehow the Democrats are better than the Republicans in science matters is pretty silly. Politicians are politicians, not scientists.
Adding TV service to my already existing Internet service with Verizon cost just the rental fee for the cablebox/cablecard. That surprised me, but their bundling makes it all work. It would cost the same again if I added phone service as well. I am not sure why this is the case, but it appears to just be the way it works for them.
That's why the food industry resists GMO labeling
Perhaps that is because all of the GMO labeling is an attempt at scare tactics as there is no scientific evidence of harm. When you can produce any kind of indication of a possible harm from GMO, rather than the equivalent of anti-vax arguments, perhaps there will be a reason to have markings on packaging. Until then, you are just trying to put scare quotes on food packaging for no reason at all.
Which is what this report is. The EPA went out and tested water, tested fracking wells, but apparently, it is not good enough for the OP. It seems that the OP will trust no evidence that there is no issue, and just wants fracking to end at all costs (including $4 a gallon gas).
Government salaries are public knowledge.
https://www.opm.gov/policy-dat...
If someone else is making more than you with the same GS level, then you have good reason to complain.
I don't see a single issue there where he agrees with Republicans on. How can he be a Republican?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/in...
That is an incredibly bad MPG number...
Now if it was 800,000 rd/hhd, that would be a different story.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/in...
Compared to? Are any of the issues on the candidate's plates really worth caring about?
How many shekels does the goat cost? That might be worth it, but most likely not.
India isn't really an ally to anyone. They play both sides, buying stuff from Russia and the US off and on.
https://www.tivo.com/shop/roam...
$199 + $499 = $700. How much did you spend on the TV tuner and computer?
http://www.rosswalker.co.uk/ti...
Upgrades are pretty much brain dead simple now. Throw in a new hard drive and off you go. You can also add USB or eSATA hard drives, which is as simple as it can be.
Don't add FUD.
A Tivo can have up to 16 TB of storage. Sure you can get more into a computer, but this is still huge.
Recordings are not trapped in the Tivo, Tivo Desktop is a free piece of software that pulls them off, and they can then easily be converted to MPeg, or just us kmttg. This process is just as complicated as MCE with MCEBuddy. I would like to go to MP4 like MCEBuddy, instead of MPEG with kmttg.
http://www.majorgeeks.com/file...
http://sourceforge.net/project...
Tivo. That is about it anymore.
At this point, Tivo is so cheap comparatively, there is no reason to use the MCE/SiliconDust solution. I just wish there was good support for pulling down Tivo recordings, cutting commercials and reprocessing to MP4 like MCEBuddy.
They are supposedly moving the MCE function over to the X-box line, so it is still available, but on absolutely useless hardware.
You do realize that multimode fiber is good past 40Gbit right? This is what is used to run high speed connections, no modifications needed. Why would you rerun the fiber at all when all you need to do is upgrade the transceivers?
I agreed with putting in conduits, I am also suggesting things to put into those conduits which ARE future proof. Multimode fiber is the high bandwidth stuff. Single mode fiber is the long range stuff. Multimode is good for a very long time, and would not be a mistake. The cat 7 might need to be replaced in the future, but unlikely the fiber would ever have to be replaced.
in which gun-rights advocates are not resoundingly winning that debate.
This week's news is that the Texas legislature approved [hotair.com] campus carry
win
both houses of the Maine legislature approved [thetruthaboutguns.com] constitutional carry
win
followed the Federal Courts rollback [hotair.com] of carry restrictions in DC.
win
last year Illinois legalized concealed carry.
win
Did you really mean the first sentence? It sounds like you gave all the argument needed to refute your own statement. Gun rights activists are winning the battles, the war is not far behind.
You could easily make one, it isn't like the directions are hard to find.
Did you even read what you responded to before blasting off? He agreed with you.
Assault Weapon = made up phrase for a "scary" rifle
Assault Rifle = Military term for a compact select fire rifle that fires intermediate size rounds (less than 50 cal, bigger than 9mm).