Basic logic. You said that people should deploy your host file through Group Policy. As that is terrible advice, and will cause a domain network to run slow as shit, and putting the entries into DNS is far better and faster, and WAY better on resources, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that you think people aren't running DNS with AD. Just because you REPEATEDLY fail to understand this, doesn't mean the point hasn't been made at least 5 times already.
Coren22 "doesn't trust 1 security researcher" (though I had over 60++ going MY WAY vs. his desperation DO NOTHING OF HIS OWN bullshit)? Bullshit
You have had 1 person look at your code. This is not a code review, and doesn't guarantee the safety of the code. Also, he has retracted his statement about the safety of your software. 60++ whatever is BS, you have virus scanners that say your software isn't a virus, that means nothing when it comes to the safety of your software, and prevention of you performing a man in the middle attack.
Used your OWN bullshit against you on that one, imbecile... lol!
Yeah, I'm the imbecile, is that why after so long explaining the same damn things to you, you are still not getting how idiotically insecure your shit is? Is that why you are still BS posting on everything I post as if that will solve everything, despite promising to stop? http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
As far as security you fucking bullshitting blowhard, what is it you ALLEGEDLY do & for whom?
I've already told you repeatedly and at length, I can't talk about my own work, it is all proprietary and not for public consumption, but what does that have to do with the glaring holes in your software? Do I have to prove myself before I can point out over and over that your software has these glaring holes? And what would software experience (which you are asking for) have anything to do with security expertise I have shown over and over? Software people are notoriously insecure in their designs, as I have shown in your design. When you fix your shit, then it might be secure, but it doesn't take someone with a PHD to see that you don't know the first thing about security.
YOU WON'T ANSWER THAT ANYMORE THAN YOU WILL MY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU RAN FROM HERE https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]
Really? I have answered your questions so many times, it is tiring. Just because you post the same thing 400 times, doesn't mean I ran away when I don't respond to every single one. You are the one who can't seem to get it through your skull what I am saying.
P.S.=> You menial fucking liar (I spent 1/2 my career securing code of all types as well as database + webservers & desktops + servers too besides coding solutions people use that work)... apk
More idiotic insults like that has anything to do with it. I've seen your work you published, I did better in middle school. You don't know the first thing about security, just those things you could find and collect together on the internet. You like to act like you are all that, but you really aren't. I have proven it over and over, now I will link to this post every time you reply, have a nice day.
Well, at least you earn all that shilling money. Who else would be posting so many glowing reviews about how awesome Apple is on a story about Apple being shits about allowing third party repairs and overcharging for the repairs they offer.
Except that I didn't lie, you just seem to have the logic skills of an infant.
I get paid every day for what I do in security. I have pointed out the flaws in your thinking so many times, I get tired of responding to your garbage, yet you keep coming at me as if you have proven me wrong....yet the only person who agrees with you is you posting as if you are a third party. I have shown where you are wrong, it is your choice to continue attacking rather than accepting the honest criticism.
As of 07/2015, Apple had 203 billion cash on hand. Do you think a $5 billion building is so much more than a company acquisition such as recently announced Linkdin ($26 billion)?
They need a new campus, they can afford to buy a nice one, how is it bad spending to build a nice building in SV?
The 330 ton is given as a collective weight, but I am not sure what the 92 feet is unless that is the height if all the doors are stacked. It however makes no sense at all. Why give the collective weight and height of the doors like that is some kind of measurement of anything useful?
The article also contained no pictures of these restaurant doors. I am curious why they have such a heavy door on the cafeteria. Are they afraid that tater tot Tuesday will cause a stampede and they need to protect the food serving people with extremely heavy doors? 92 foot tall doors? WHY!?
The funny thing is every new version of Windows since XP has been getting better and more stable.
I will agree that Windows 8's GUI was awful, but the OS was stable and ran things well. People complain about Windows 10, but I have had no issues with it. I rarely ever reboot, and have only had a couple crashes, one routinely caused by the removal of a USB-C/TB 3.0 laptop dock, and likely had to do with the video card having to recompose the screens from dual 24" 1920x1200 screens down to 1 4k 15" screen in the laptop.
I used to support Mac OS, but the last one I touched was Lion. Back then I remember all the programmers I supported on OSX having to routinely be rejoined to the domain because the Mac would just stop functioning on the domain for no reason at all. There were other issues, but that one was the most annoying. iPhones hooking to Exchange were pretty flakey as well as I remember it.
Aww, poor pathetic APK, the wannabe security professional that thinks programming a piece of shit sort/unique is security chops.
So, when are you getting your CISSP or you Security+ to prove that you have security know how? When are you getting recognized as a security researcher and publishing your virus examinations?
Keep up the insulting the source rather than responding to the criticism, we all know that means you are admitting defeat.
So, you can pay a monthly fee that comes out to $20 more expensive, or just get prime and use their streaming music service. This standalone thing sounds awesome!
This can easily be demonstrated as well, if you click on the image (twice) it will bring you to the page the image originated in. The next thing to do it to search for the individual words (not phrase, Google doesn't actually search for phrases often). You will find that the article accompanying the picture refers to three black teenagers being arrested for some crime.
It is quite easy to see what happened, and to see that Google has no place correcting their search, as it is working exactly as it should.
The bias is actually in the media companies and how often the report on black people committing crimes. This bias comes from reality though, so it is difficult to fix.
No, we should all marry unwed black mothers so that their children can grow up with a father figure. We are all being selfish by marrying for love while others are selfish for not marrying their "baby's momma".
Much of the problem in the black community has been put upon unmarried mothers raising kids on their own. The lack of father figures in the kid's lives leads to a lack of discipline and respect for authority. But I am sure it is all the fault of the terrible white man that is keeping them down.
I am with you on this. China is most definately trying to assert its dominance in the region. This has little to do with deep sea scientific research, therefore it is another Glomar Explorer, another attempt to cover up something clearly military/political in nature by stating it is for scientific research.
You know, if I lived in a country that conducted a lot of trade with a potentially hostile country with whom I shared an ocean borderline, I'd take their actions quite seriously. Which is exactly what I do - living on the Atlantic coast of Europe.
No, I was pointing out that the way you flew off the handle, and insulted me for something that you aren't even involved in, was exactly like his behavior. You posted a response to me stating that I won the argument (as APK does 10 times a minute), based upon an actual measurable thing, the number of ACs agreeing with him (himself acting as a third party), vs the number of logged in user agreeing with him (none in this case, he didn't even bother to create accounts to agree with his posts). How is that dumb? I am trying to prove to APK that he is the only one who thinks he is winning anything.
I guess it is kind of dumb to me to argue with someone who is obviously mentally ill (APK, not you, I know nothing about your posting history).
So, not a single response to the actual legally backed supreme court case, but instead accusing me of being an ammosexual? I own no firearms, but apparently because I choose to defend all rights guaranteed by the constitution, I am some kind of gun lover?
Look, I get it, you are a pansy and are terrified of people owning guns, but you are the one in the minority. There are more firearms in the US than people. You have already lost the argument if you are trying to remove firearms from people's hands.
And you and all of your ammosexual friends can get together to start your own move to amend the Constitution, to take out the words "a well regulated militia". So you cultists can finally stop ignoring the first words in your Bible.
Perhaps you should go back to remedial English, since you seem to fail at grammar. "A well regulated militia" is not the only reason for the right to bear arms, it was just given as a reason, and any 5th grader could tell you by reading the sentence that it does not restrict the right to bear arms to a militia. Also, the militia was everyone, not some small subset of people who work for the government. You can keep flipping off the handle all you like, it doesn't change the actual meaning of the sentence.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
militia mliSH/Submit noun a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency. a military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities, typically in opposition to a regular army. all able-bodied civilians eligible by law for military service.
The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.
So please, link to legal definitions that change any piece of the amendment, I will wait for your response.
Slashdot Mirror
You have the reading comprehension of a toddler. It is quite sad really. Are you sure you haven't been replaced by an AI?
Wow, outed and proven telling the truth...yup.
And ran away by responding to all your points, you really win there.
Good luck with that mental disorder, it must be pretty profound for you to believe you won on those two links.
https://fi.google.com/
$20/mo + $10/GB, with refunds of up to the megabyte not used in a month.
If you are paying $90/month for a phone, you are doing something very wrong. Even Verizon, the most expensive cell company doesn't charge that much.
Oh yes, because almost instantly replying is paying for your lies, and instantly replying is exactly the same as running away.
You are so full of yourself it is hilarious. Go get some Valium, you could use it.
Keep linking to that thread, it is hilarious how badly I humiliate you by responding for the 100th time to your garbage!
Are you socially retarded, or do you just play that on the internet?
A secretary, Coren22 you bullshit artist liar
http://www.dictionary.com/brow...
You say I told others NOT to use AD & DNS?
Basic logic. You said that people should deploy your host file through Group Policy. As that is terrible advice, and will cause a domain network to run slow as shit, and putting the entries into DNS is far better and faster, and WAY better on resources, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that you think people aren't running DNS with AD. Just because you REPEATEDLY fail to understand this, doesn't mean the point hasn't been made at least 5 times already.
Coren22 "doesn't trust 1 security researcher" (though I had over 60++ going MY WAY vs. his desperation DO NOTHING OF HIS OWN bullshit)? Bullshit
You have had 1 person look at your code. This is not a code review, and doesn't guarantee the safety of the code. Also, he has retracted his statement about the safety of your software. 60++ whatever is BS, you have virus scanners that say your software isn't a virus, that means nothing when it comes to the safety of your software, and prevention of you performing a man in the middle attack.
Used your OWN bullshit against you on that one, imbecile... lol!
Yeah, I'm the imbecile, is that why after so long explaining the same damn things to you, you are still not getting how idiotically insecure your shit is? Is that why you are still BS posting on everything I post as if that will solve everything, despite promising to stop? http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
As far as security you fucking bullshitting blowhard, what is it you ALLEGEDLY do & for whom?
I've already told you repeatedly and at length, I can't talk about my own work, it is all proprietary and not for public consumption, but what does that have to do with the glaring holes in your software? Do I have to prove myself before I can point out over and over that your software has these glaring holes? And what would software experience (which you are asking for) have anything to do with security expertise I have shown over and over? Software people are notoriously insecure in their designs, as I have shown in your design. When you fix your shit, then it might be secure, but it doesn't take someone with a PHD to see that you don't know the first thing about security.
YOU WON'T ANSWER THAT ANYMORE THAN YOU WILL MY OTHER QUESTIONS YOU RAN FROM HERE https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]
Really? I have answered your questions so many times, it is tiring. Just because you post the same thing 400 times, doesn't mean I ran away when I don't respond to every single one. You are the one who can't seem to get it through your skull what I am saying.
P.S.=> You menial fucking liar (I spent 1/2 my career securing code of all types as well as database + webservers & desktops + servers too besides coding solutions people use that work)... apk
More idiotic insults like that has anything to do with it. I've seen your work you published, I did better in middle school. You don't know the first thing about security, just those things you could find and collect together on the internet. You like to act like you are all that, but you really aren't. I have proven it over and over, now I will link to this post every time you reply, have a nice day.
Well, at least you earn all that shilling money. Who else would be posting so many glowing reviews about how awesome Apple is on a story about Apple being shits about allowing third party repairs and overcharging for the repairs they offer.
Wow, the amount of fud you spew is amazing.
No, it doesn't last longer.
Frankly, Apple products are already outdated the day you buy them.
Except that I didn't lie, you just seem to have the logic skills of an infant.
I get paid every day for what I do in security. I have pointed out the flaws in your thinking so many times, I get tired of responding to your garbage, yet you keep coming at me as if you have proven me wrong....yet the only person who agrees with you is you posting as if you are a third party. I have shown where you are wrong, it is your choice to continue attacking rather than accepting the honest criticism.
Anyone who riots should be thrown in jail for some time. It is wrong, and destructive, with no positive outcome.
The Pentagon has people movers inside it.
http://www.history.com/news/9-...
They are scooters that can move someone at 3 mph if they aren't physically fit enough to walk the distances needed.
But less than 1/5 Linkedin. http://www.wsj.com/articles/mi...
http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/2...
As of 07/2015, Apple had 203 billion cash on hand. Do you think a $5 billion building is so much more than a company acquisition such as recently announced Linkdin ($26 billion)?
They need a new campus, they can afford to buy a nice one, how is it bad spending to build a nice building in SV?
The 330 ton is given as a collective weight, but I am not sure what the 92 feet is unless that is the height if all the doors are stacked. It however makes no sense at all. Why give the collective weight and height of the doors like that is some kind of measurement of anything useful?
The article also contained no pictures of these restaurant doors. I am curious why they have such a heavy door on the cafeteria. Are they afraid that tater tot Tuesday will cause a stampede and they need to protect the food serving people with extremely heavy doors? 92 foot tall doors? WHY!?
The funny thing is every new version of Windows since XP has been getting better and more stable.
I will agree that Windows 8's GUI was awful, but the OS was stable and ran things well. People complain about Windows 10, but I have had no issues with it. I rarely ever reboot, and have only had a couple crashes, one routinely caused by the removal of a USB-C/TB 3.0 laptop dock, and likely had to do with the video card having to recompose the screens from dual 24" 1920x1200 screens down to 1 4k 15" screen in the laptop.
I used to support Mac OS, but the last one I touched was Lion. Back then I remember all the programmers I supported on OSX having to routinely be rejoined to the domain because the Mac would just stop functioning on the domain for no reason at all. There were other issues, but that one was the most annoying. iPhones hooking to Exchange were pretty flakey as well as I remember it.
Aww, poor pathetic APK, the wannabe security professional that thinks programming a piece of shit sort/unique is security chops.
So, when are you getting your CISSP or you Security+ to prove that you have security know how? When are you getting recognized as a security researcher and publishing your virus examinations?
Keep up the insulting the source rather than responding to the criticism, we all know that means you are admitting defeat.
When talking about a company doing something in the USA, wouldn't it be normal to refer to the seasons in the USA not Australia or South America?
Amazon music streaming: /mo
$9.99
9.99X12 = 119.88
Amazon Prime (including music streaming) /yr
$99
So, you can pay a monthly fee that comes out to $20 more expensive, or just get prime and use their streaming music service. This standalone thing sounds awesome!
This can easily be demonstrated as well, if you click on the image (twice) it will bring you to the page the image originated in. The next thing to do it to search for the individual words (not phrase, Google doesn't actually search for phrases often). You will find that the article accompanying the picture refers to three black teenagers being arrested for some crime.
It is quite easy to see what happened, and to see that Google has no place correcting their search, as it is working exactly as it should.
The bias is actually in the media companies and how often the report on black people committing crimes. This bias comes from reality though, so it is difficult to fix.
I wish I had mod points, this was one funny comment.
No, we should all marry unwed black mothers so that their children can grow up with a father figure. We are all being selfish by marrying for love while others are selfish for not marrying their "baby's momma".
Much of the problem in the black community has been put upon unmarried mothers raising kids on their own. The lack of father figures in the kid's lives leads to a lack of discipline and respect for authority. But I am sure it is all the fault of the terrible white man that is keeping them down.
I challenge you to thank these people when they smash in the windows of your car, or loot the local CVS in their neighborhood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I am with you on this. China is most definately trying to assert its dominance in the region. This has little to do with deep sea scientific research, therefore it is another Glomar Explorer, another attempt to cover up something clearly military/political in nature by stating it is for scientific research.
You know, if I lived in a country that conducted a lot of trade with a potentially hostile country with whom I shared an ocean borderline, I'd take their actions quite seriously. Which is exactly what I do - living on the Atlantic coast of Europe.
I fart in your general direction from Maryland. :P
No, I was pointing out that the way you flew off the handle, and insulted me for something that you aren't even involved in, was exactly like his behavior. You posted a response to me stating that I won the argument (as APK does 10 times a minute), based upon an actual measurable thing, the number of ACs agreeing with him (himself acting as a third party), vs the number of logged in user agreeing with him (none in this case, he didn't even bother to create accounts to agree with his posts). How is that dumb? I am trying to prove to APK that he is the only one who thinks he is winning anything.
I guess it is kind of dumb to me to argue with someone who is obviously mentally ill (APK, not you, I know nothing about your posting history).
So, not a single response to the actual legally backed supreme court case, but instead accusing me of being an ammosexual? I own no firearms, but apparently because I choose to defend all rights guaranteed by the constitution, I am some kind of gun lover?
Look, I get it, you are a pansy and are terrified of people owning guns, but you are the one in the minority. There are more firearms in the US than people. You have already lost the argument if you are trying to remove firearms from people's hands.
And you and all of your ammosexual friends can get together to start your own move to amend the Constitution, to take out the words "a well regulated militia". So you cultists can finally stop ignoring the first words in your Bible.
Perhaps you should go back to remedial English, since you seem to fail at grammar. "A well regulated militia" is not the only reason for the right to bear arms, it was just given as a reason, and any 5th grader could tell you by reading the sentence that it does not restrict the right to bear arms to a militia. Also, the militia was everyone, not some small subset of people who work for the government. You can keep flipping off the handle all you like, it doesn't change the actual meaning of the sentence.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
militia
mliSH/Submit
noun
a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.
a military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities, typically in opposition to a regular army.
all able-bodied civilians eligible by law for military service.
http://www.constitution.org/co...
The phrase "well-regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order. Something that was well-regulated was calibrated correctly, functioning as expected. Establishing government oversight of the people's arms was not only not the intent in using the phrase in the 2nd amendment, it was precisely to render the government powerless to do so that the founders wrote it.
So please, link to legal definitions that change any piece of the amendment, I will wait for your response.