I can do it too, two words that sums up the argument against what you typed. It isn't legal to post video of people naked without their permission, which is why porn companies get releases from the "actresses".
That does make for an interesting point about this election I hadn't considered. Just imagine that Trump and Clinton both announce the other as their running mates. After all, they were real good friends before the election, why not?
Would you rather see no justice for a person who had their sex video published without permission? There are laws against this, Gawker should have known better.
"Congress shall make no law"..."abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"...
Please, can you show me where the AC was wrong? AC was trying to point out that it is a restriction on the government, it doesn't give you the right to say whatever you like, and there are some things which are expressly forbidden by law, despite it being against the first (just like the second amendment...).
Gawker posted about someone's private life, where is that allowed? Gawker posted a sex video of someone's without their permission, this actually has laws against it, but I guess Gawker thinks it is allowed?
Not quite. Voltage isn't about the directions the electrons are going. However, the electrons do go to your device and back in a large loop (through the ground).
Don't get me wrong though, I'd prefer government regulations pushing ever upwards towards 100% renewable.
God, I hope not, that would be a terrible future. "Renewable Power" isn't reliable, so 100% renewables would lead to rolling blackouts, or wouldn't be 100% renewables.
Now if only the US and the Middle East would stop fighting over who's prophet of a sky god has a bigger nut sack, there might be hope for humanity.
In case you somehow missed it, the Jews, Christians and Muslims all worship the same god. The Jews call him Yahweh, the Christians call him God, and the Muslims call him Allah, but they are all speaking of the same God.
Just imagine if control went by population. China restricting free speech, India thinking it is ok to harass women at every turn. It would be a very interesting internet.
Slashdot Mirror
Revenge Porn.
I can do it too, two words that sums up the argument against what you typed. It isn't legal to post video of people naked without their permission, which is why porn companies get releases from the "actresses".
Unless it is a kid's wallet, very likely there is a handy identifying picture inside.
Yeah, HumanWiki is totally racist against his D key, that is why he missed typing it.
You might want to click the link, it was a joke.
Manganese nodules was the excuse the US government used to cover up the Glomar Explorer's real mission of recovering a soviet sub in the deep ocean.
Honestly, is the case really that much different from this one:
http://www.bbc.com/news/techno...
just because Hulk Hogan is a celebrity doesn't make it suddenly ok to post a sex video of him without his permission.
Couldn't be worse than Clinton/Trump...
That does make for an interesting point about this election I hadn't considered. Just imagine that Trump and Clinton both announce the other as their running mates. After all, they were real good friends before the election, why not?
Would you rather see no justice for a person who had their sex video published without permission? There are laws against this, Gawker should have known better.
Not fishy at all that Gawker published a video without the participant's approval, and there are specific laws against this? Not fishy at all...
"Congress shall make no law"..."abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press"...
Please, can you show me where the AC was wrong? AC was trying to point out that it is a restriction on the government, it doesn't give you the right to say whatever you like, and there are some things which are expressly forbidden by law, despite it being against the first (just like the second amendment...).
Gawker posted about someone's private life, where is that allowed?
Gawker posted a sex video of someone's without their permission, this actually has laws against it, but I guess Gawker thinks it is allowed?
It is also the intellectual capacity of those who complain about the title SJW as if it has anything at all to do with the content of the message.
You have to admit though, a guillotine would be useful for cutting the watermelon...
Not quite. Voltage isn't about the directions the electrons are going. However, the electrons do go to your device and back in a large loop (through the ground).
Don't get me wrong though, I'd prefer government regulations pushing ever upwards towards 100% renewable.
God, I hope not, that would be a terrible future. "Renewable Power" isn't reliable, so 100% renewables would lead to rolling blackouts, or wouldn't be 100% renewables.
Recall sure, but these parts aren't recalled.
They are collecting Manganese Nodules.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Now if only the US and the Middle East would stop fighting over who's prophet of a sky god has a bigger nut sack, there might be hope for humanity.
In case you somehow missed it, the Jews, Christians and Muslims all worship the same god. The Jews call him Yahweh, the Christians call him God, and the Muslims call him Allah, but they are all speaking of the same God.
If you are concerned about your prepaid card testing positive for cocaine, you shouldn't be cutting your cocaine with the card...
Entirely possible, though it would be annoying to listen to that music while dropping the kids off to school on the way to work.
I also cannot imagine a wife lasting very well taking the husband's whole wallet...what she doesn't have her own bank account and cash flow?
Who are these people with multiple penises? What do they do with the second penis? Is it beside or above below?
It appears you might have missed the joke. Here is a video demonstration.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
You are so delusional it is cute. Keep it up, maybe one day you will score a point, but for now, you are a failure.
I'll leave you with some reading, others recommending against using hosts files:
http://superuser.com/questions...
http://serverfault.com/questio...
Keep up the good fight APQuixote, one day that windmill will bow to your "superiority".
So we should call them all "gonein60seconds"?
Only if one is found to be a room temperature superconductor; even for a few ms.
So websites that break internationally accepted laws aren't allowed? Funny how that works.
Just imagine if control went by population. China restricting free speech, India thinking it is ok to harass women at every turn. It would be a very interesting internet.