Just thought I'd share this in case you run into any anti-neutrality people. Net neutrality is the regulation of corporations, not content. Net neutrality rules seek to bar corporations from tampering with content.
Seriously, why do they keep putting people in charge who only see one side of the issues? Why even have the position at all?
Wouldn't it just be easier to just come out and say "We are the puppets of the copyright industry and we will go with whatever they say". It's honest, to the point, and everyone knows where they stand.
"Dear Customer of Yahoo/Google/Bing,
Recently, it has come to our attention that a group of copyright holders with a lot of sway in your legal system have managed to convince your government to force us to hand-pick every link we index. Unfortunately, this is not a viable solution. As such, we are no longer providing search services to your country. Good luck!
Hope to hear from you again soon if your government changes its mind!
Money speaks louder than words. And that Nvidia logo stamped all over their website, game box, and every time you start the game didn't come cheaply.
I think the "AMD has bad drivers" theory seems a lot less likely.
Since we can trademark our stores based on what we sell, I'm off to trademark hardware store, clothing store, electronics store, video game store, grocery store, and music store.
You freeze it, break it to pieces, and over a small amount of time it melts and re-forms itself to continue the assault.
Where's a vat of molten steel when you need it?
I mean, it's already illegal to listen to a song or watch a movie without paying. Why not make free tethering illegal as well? In fact, make everything that big corporations don't like a felony.
I'll trade our entire government for one run Google-style. They're better at foreign relations. They're better at having a balanced budget. They know how to treat people fairly. They know how not to waste everyone's time on ridiculous litigation that nobody (except their competitors) is calling for, especially when there's a shitton of far more pressing issues at hand. There are also corporations that behave much, much worse than google.
Are you reading this, Google? Get on it.
Hackers can turn your home computer into a bomb!
on
Hacking a Car With Music
·
· Score: 4, Funny
I used to get frustrated with semi-distant relatives or not-so-close friends. Now I just charge them. You'd be surprised at how willing people are to pay the rates you ask. If they don't like my rates, they always have some fourteen year old nephew they can bug.
inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their Form of Government in such manner as they may deem expedient."
What's sad is that if you reveal any plans to reform, alter, or abolish the government, you'll get put on CIA/FBI watch list and won't be able to board a plane in the U.S.
Slashdot Mirror
Just thought I'd share this in case you run into any anti-neutrality people. Net neutrality is the regulation of corporations, not content. Net neutrality rules seek to bar corporations from tampering with content.
Seriously, why do they keep putting people in charge who only see one side of the issues? Why even have the position at all?
Wouldn't it just be easier to just come out and say "We are the puppets of the copyright industry and we will go with whatever they say". It's honest, to the point, and everyone knows where they stand.
Their joint problems and accidents are going to cost medicaid just as much.
"Dear Customer of Yahoo/Google/Bing,
Recently, it has come to our attention that a group of copyright holders with a lot of sway in your legal system have managed to convince your government to force us to hand-pick every link we index. Unfortunately, this is not a viable solution. As such, we are no longer providing search services to your country. Good luck!
Hope to hear from you again soon if your government changes its mind!
I have a feeling they're retaining a lot more unnecessary information than google.
Money speaks louder than words. And that Nvidia logo stamped all over their website, game box, and every time you start the game didn't come cheaply. I think the "AMD has bad drivers" theory seems a lot less likely.
CIA wants them to store it for eternity. FTC wants them to get rid of it ASAP. Make up your mind, The Government!
Take a look at HAWX 2, the only game in the universe where a GTX 460 beats a 6990
Best ending.
Since we can trademark our stores based on what we sell, I'm off to trademark hardware store, clothing store, electronics store, video game store, grocery store, and music store.
You freeze it, break it to pieces, and over a small amount of time it melts and re-forms itself to continue the assault.
Where's a vat of molten steel when you need it?
I think they mean "NO FOREIGN INTERVENTION. Libyan military units can slaughter dissidents alone".
implementation of improved Freedom of Information Act policies has lagged
That's all we needed to know.
I mean, it's already illegal to listen to a song or watch a movie without paying. Why not make free tethering illegal as well? In fact, make everything that big corporations don't like a felony.
Just like it's unfair to kids to lose their dad to prison amirite
Do like you would with real people. Give the company "jail" time. Don't let them buy or sell for three years.
Seems our government uses the above response quite often when questioned by the international community.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20043421-281.html
I can't wait to run up walls and pass through vaginal doors!
I'll trade our entire government for one run Google-style. They're better at foreign relations. They're better at having a balanced budget. They know how to treat people fairly. They know how not to waste everyone's time on ridiculous litigation that nobody (except their competitors) is calling for, especially when there's a shitton of far more pressing issues at hand. There are also corporations that behave much, much worse than google.
Are you reading this, Google? Get on it.
http://www.mopo.ca/2007/08/hackers-can-turn-your-home-computer.html
I used to get frustrated with semi-distant relatives or not-so-close friends. Now I just charge them. You'd be surprised at how willing people are to pay the rates you ask. If they don't like my rates, they always have some fourteen year old nephew they can bug.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Tattam
This is most unfortunate.
inalienable right to alter, reform or abolish their Form of Government in such manner as they may deem expedient."
What's sad is that if you reveal any plans to reform, alter, or abolish the government, you'll get put on CIA/FBI watch list and won't be able to board a plane in the U.S.
I fear people who want to take away life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of those who expose truth.
I cheer people who support truth-bearers any way they can.
So I cheer the vigilantes.