Slashdot Mirror


User: Voulnet

Voulnet's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
151
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 151

  1. Re:One of Our Cancers on DHS Seizes 75+ Domain Names · · Score: 1

    Too big to fail.

  2. Idiots on Kuwait Bans DSLR Cameras Use For Non-Journalists · · Score: 1

    You're all fools who scoop in anything people give you. This ban is a hoax, it was never put into place or even suggested. Please stop spreading FUD about countries you know nothing about.

  3. Re:Micro Four Thirds? on Kuwait Bans DSLR Cameras Use For Non-Journalists · · Score: 1

    Kuwait is not like whatever country you're from or whatever country Fox News wants you to think. In Kuwait if a cop saw you with such camera they'd pose for you, not confiscate it.
    Stop spreading FUD about countries you know nothing about... It just shows why the rest of the world thinks you people are dumb.

  4. Re:A Kuwaiti's Rant on Kuwait Bans DSLR Cameras Use For Non-Journalists · · Score: 1

    The band didn't even take place, to add to your points.

  5. Re:darn on Kuwait Bans DSLR Cameras Use For Non-Journalists · · Score: 1

    Stop spreading FUD about a country you've never been to, you asshole. Kuwait's govt is not a totalitarian regime like yours. Police Officers in Kuwait aren't even allowed to use their weapons unless their life is in danger. Just because it's in the Middle East doesn't mean you can apply Fox News impressions of a ME country to it.

    Also, this ban is a hoax. I am in Kuwait and I can tell you that it didn't happen.

  6. Re:What what? on Kuwait Bans DSLR Cameras Use For Non-Journalists · · Score: 1

    The government of Kuwait doesn't hate people, just because it's in the Middle East doesn't mean you can blindly apply your Fox News ideals to it. Also: This ban news is a hoax. The cameras aren't banned. I am from Kuwait and I can confirm that.

  7. Re:What does Wikileaks get from this? on UK Asks News Outlets Not To Publish WikiLeaks Bombshell, US Prepares For Fallout · · Score: 1

    Your points would fit exactly if we were talking about somebody or something whose privacy must be respected, like your medical records as a citizen.
    However a government is supposed to be held accountable. If a government goes out of its way to cover its tracks when, in fact, it should have been transparent to the people it's supposed to serve, then as I said chances are whatever that government's trying to hide needs to be exposed.
    Especially given the treacherous behind-the-scene government that we're talking about.

  8. Re:What does Wikileaks get from this? on UK Asks News Outlets Not To Publish WikiLeaks Bombshell, US Prepares For Fallout · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Awwww. We still love him because he's exposing whatever they are that you're defending so valiantly. Guess what? People are tired from deceitful governments, and if a government is so scared of having something exposed; chances are it needs to be exposed.

  9. Re:A big deal on UK Police To Get Major New Powers To Seize Domains · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Freedom of speech in the US? Are you kidding? Just today the US Gov't seized torrent domains and is actively trying to stop WikiLeaks.

  10. Re:Ok, seriously on Students Banned From Bringing Pencils To School · · Score: 1

    Actually, you're right. But from what I have read around, there are some really 'special' ideas springing up every now and then in American schools, hence the question.

  11. Re:Interfering on Next Step For US Body Scanners Could Be Trains, Metro Systems · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Why won't they believe that karma is indeed a bitch?

  12. Re:In every train station? LOL on Next Step For US Body Scanners Could Be Trains, Metro Systems · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually the gigantic sum of money there is what can make me believe it might actually happen. Lots of money there to lobby for.

  13. Re:Ok, seriously on Students Banned From Bringing Pencils To School · · Score: 1

    Probably. Excuse my slashdotness for not RTFA. But the fact that somebody even suggested it..

  14. Ok, seriously on Students Banned From Bringing Pencils To School · · Score: 1

    Ok, seriously seriously. I ask this honest question: Is a big percentage of American people really stupid and paranoid like that? Students can't bring pencils to schools? What should they bring, then, their PSPs?

  15. Re:Great...now just one more issue.... on Making Airport Scanners Less Objectionable · · Score: 1

    Don't allow the TSA extreme measures to force you into extreme measures; don't let them force you into accepting racism *again*

  16. Re:Profiling on TSA Pats Down 3-Year-Old · · Score: 1
  17. Re:Profiling on TSA Pats Down 3-Year-Old · · Score: 1
  18. Re:TCP Connection on Cooks Source Magazine Apologizes — Sort Of · · Score: 1

    Yes, we really know that. But there is always room for geek humor.

  19. TCP Connection on Cooks Source Magazine Apologizes — Sort Of · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, at least she was nice enough to close the TCP Connection at the end of her statement with a FIN. So to her I say "FIN ACK"

  20. And what now? on IBM Says New Software Will Help Predict Natural Disasters · · Score: 1

    So they're gonna sue the canaries and birds?

  21. The Wheel on Indian Military Organization To Develop Its Own OS · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Wheel: It's tired of getting reinvented.

  22. Supercomputers on What Tech Should Be In a Fifth-Grade Classroom? · · Score: 1

    Supercomputers.

  23. Re:Restarting again on Google Releases New Image Format Called WebP · · Score: 1

    You're delusional if you think that's a good solution for a widely-deployed piece of software.

  24. Re:Well that's stupid. on Amid Controversy, EA Pulls Taliban From Medal of Honor Multiplayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The soldiers are fighting for your freedoms? That's funny; those who are trying to take your freedom live in the US, not Afghanistan.

  25. Restarting again on Google Releases New Image Format Called WebP · · Score: 1

    What, and get back to waiting until it is supported and/or rewriting image tools to accommodate the new type? I've just had the (dis)pleasure of programmatically converting JPEG2000 images to JPEG and bitmaps, and I sure as hell don't want to waste more time writing yet another converter for a type that will be useless 4 months after I finish coding it.
    And really, who cares about a wee bit increase in compression rate? Computers are getting faster, networks are getting faster and grander in bandwidth, and deadlines are growing smaller.