Different kinds of dna evidence. his point is correct: this will just be another way to hand down verdicts to a bucha people who the jurors happen to think all look same.
After Richard Clarke, fmr. national security advistor to bush jr. amd clinton, publicly brought up the concern that journalist Hastings was murdered, the trolls insisted that such control over a car wasn't possible. Well, here you go. If these guys can rig up a car, you bet your ass the feds can.
So now you're holding a fucking gun to my head, asking me to choose between a mismanaged train spill allowed by lack of regulation, and a pipeline that doesn't benefit anyone for a sustained period of time other than Industry? Hey, get this--oil wasn't even transported by railway ten years ago, so your urgent impetus for an alternative to trains doesn't seem very pressing. On top of that, once abandoned, a nearly cross-continent pipeline has far more reach to intersect and ruin groundwater over time than a train spill.
Hacking stratfor to robin-hood the information on private citizens that they obtained illegally for corporations isn't protest? Ruining HBGary federal, which sought to defame activists on behalf of Bank of America isn't protest? You are so fucking dumb that you think you're convincing anyone. Better have one of yoir sockpuppets downvote me, too, you pussy.
Here's the argument you just made for polluting: "welp, it was already polluted anyway!" Real forward-thinking, there. You were probably one of those mindless chucklefucks downplaying the 2010 BP oil spill (and the use of neurotoxic, carcinogenic dispersants that followed) as it happened.
I hope someone is paying you to write this garbage, because otherwise, you are the lowest variety of useful idiot, worshipping at the altar of the free market while it burns away what's left of our world.
...No, those are YOUR words. Can you even own up to the absurdity of your own ideas without placing some shapeless, meaningless blame on environmentalists?
for poor inner city kids in this country. Several states have enacted laws that more or less allow for arresting teens because they are deemed uncooperative by a teacher. google the school to prison pipeline and see for yourself.
to defend it. BP recently got caught paying trolls to send people death threads on the web. Google it. Or what aboit the time they "lost" a laptop containing personal data about tens of thousands of people? If money had a dick, your lips would be around it.
The FDA can't guarantee it'll get dangerous foods off the shelves within even a few years. It couldn't halt BP from ditching millions of gallons of neurotoxic, carcinogenic dispersants into the gulf after Deepwater Horizon. But it's sure as sin make sure your life isn't ruined by an unclear genetics report--as if there were any way people could imperil theirselves with the information.
If Reagan didn't support aparthead, he wouldn't have vetoed the comprehensive anti-apartheid Act of 1986. Reagan is only idolized by sheep and their shepherds.
You seem to think that people can just up and leave their ISP and choose a new one, but you're ignoring the fact that most people only have two options at the most. it's no surprise other countries have left us in the dust as far as broadband speeds are concerned.
Where have you been? Just go into amy thread about Edward Snowden or assange.. or global warming, even. The phrases to watch out for are "narcissist" and "al gore", respectively
Reich was targeted ferociously by a government controlled in part by pharmaceutical corporations. True fact. If only those who make our food today were given such scrutiny as Reich, who had his machines and lab destroyed and his papers burned.
That doesn't mean their leaders are being entirely honest.
So? Here's what you just said: "So a lot of this European and Latin American angst is... cynical pols." You're representiong the qualms to be only on the part of a corrupt government, when in fact everyone shares them. Not to mention, the qualms themselves are entirely reasonable--we effectively co-opted their internet to spy on them. Your tepid explanation that the US would do "shit that works" (I bet you'd say they'd do it "real good", too!) is a weak nondistinction. Brazil's seeking to circumvent the US by attaining direct network access to China. You wouldn't deem that to be "shit that might work"?
Seriously, those last three sentences just tumbled right out of your butt. Dennis Miller, is that you? Get the fuck out of here.
So other countries who don't like their leaders directly spied on (angela merkel) are just "angsting"? Would you say the same if the US were the victim? Fuck you.
This isn't even controversial. The idea is to collect information and use it retroactively to target people. This thread is full of shills like yourself, trying to emphasize some concept of the NSA's ineptitude rather than the evil of what it is doing.
Slashdot Mirror
Different kinds of dna evidence. his point is correct: this will just be another way to hand down verdicts to a bucha people who the jurors happen to think all look same.
..which was actually a good decision.
After Richard Clarke, fmr. national security advistor to bush jr. amd clinton, publicly brought up the concern that journalist Hastings was murdered, the trolls insisted that such control over a car wasn't possible. Well, here you go. If these guys can rig up a car, you bet your ass the feds can.
So now you're holding a fucking gun to my head, asking me to choose between a mismanaged train spill allowed by lack of regulation, and a pipeline that doesn't benefit anyone for a sustained period of time other than Industry? Hey, get this--oil wasn't even transported by railway ten years ago, so your urgent impetus for an alternative to trains doesn't seem very pressing. On top of that, once abandoned, a nearly cross-continent pipeline has far more reach to intersect and ruin groundwater over time than a train spill.
Hacking stratfor to robin-hood the information on private citizens that they obtained illegally for corporations isn't protest? Ruining HBGary federal, which sought to defame activists on behalf of Bank of America isn't protest? You are so fucking dumb that you think you're convincing anyone. Better have one of yoir sockpuppets downvote me, too, you pussy.
Nice screen-spam. Way to make it all the more obvious what cold fjord and his "friends" are tying to do in threads like these.
Here's the argument you just made for polluting: "welp, it was already polluted anyway!" Real forward-thinking, there. You were probably one of those mindless chucklefucks downplaying the 2010 BP oil spill (and the use of neurotoxic, carcinogenic dispersants that followed) as it happened. I hope someone is paying you to write this garbage, because otherwise, you are the lowest variety of useful idiot, worshipping at the altar of the free market while it burns away what's left of our world.
...No, those are YOUR words. Can you even own up to the absurdity of your own ideas without placing some shapeless, meaningless blame on environmentalists?
right, because there's no environmental impact to a giant pipeline leaking into groundwater through several states, right? keep trolling
Looks like the guy you responded to gets butthurt by clean logic.
for poor inner city kids in this country. Several states have enacted laws that more or less allow for arresting teens because they are deemed uncooperative by a teacher. google the school to prison pipeline and see for yourself.
to defend it. BP recently got caught paying trolls to send people death threads on the web. Google it. Or what aboit the time they "lost" a laptop containing personal data about tens of thousands of people? If money had a dick, your lips would be around it.
sorry drunk post
The FDA can't guarantee it'll get dangerous foods off the shelves within even a few years. It couldn't halt BP from ditching millions of gallons of neurotoxic, carcinogenic dispersants into the gulf after Deepwater Horizon. But it's sure as sin make sure your life isn't ruined by an unclear genetics report--as if there were any way people could imperil theirselves with the information.
Hacked account. Xfd. Why would someone joke about that? So much shitposting in this thread. I wonder who's paying?
That answer wasn't remotely relevant, nor were the replies. Good to see some paid trolls about--this issue must be important to someone.
If Reagan didn't support aparthead, he wouldn't have vetoed the comprehensive anti-apartheid Act of 1986. Reagan is only idolized by sheep and their shepherds.
You seem to think that people can just up and leave their ISP and choose a new one, but you're ignoring the fact that most people only have two options at the most. it's no surprise other countries have left us in the dust as far as broadband speeds are concerned.
Or any other disinfornation troll on here who plays apologist for the Obama administration / NSA. There are many.
Wikileaks doesn't simply tell us that entities are corrupt and expect us to believe it at face value. There are always specific examples.
Where have you been? Just go into amy thread about Edward Snowden or assange.. or global warming, even. The phrases to watch out for are "narcissist" and "al gore", respectively
Reich was targeted ferociously by a government controlled in part by pharmaceutical corporations. True fact. If only those who make our food today were given such scrutiny as Reich, who had his machines and lab destroyed and his papers burned.
That doesn't mean their leaders are being entirely honest. So? Here's what you just said: "So a lot of this European and Latin American angst is... cynical pols." You're representiong the qualms to be only on the part of a corrupt government, when in fact everyone shares them. Not to mention, the qualms themselves are entirely reasonable--we effectively co-opted their internet to spy on them. Your tepid explanation that the US would do "shit that works" (I bet you'd say they'd do it "real good", too!) is a weak nondistinction. Brazil's seeking to circumvent the US by attaining direct network access to China. You wouldn't deem that to be "shit that might work"?
Seriously, those last three sentences just tumbled right out of your butt. Dennis Miller, is that you? Get the fuck out of here.
So other countries who don't like their leaders directly spied on (angela merkel) are just "angsting"? Would you say the same if the US were the victim? Fuck you.
This isn't even controversial. The idea is to collect information and use it retroactively to target people. This thread is full of shills like yourself, trying to emphasize some concept of the NSA's ineptitude rather than the evil of what it is doing.