or what if a person who had his Identity stolen attempts suicide? Should that be consdered attempted murder?
I truely beleive the sentences against people convicted of Identity Theft are to lite. They should carry harsh sentences, comparable to any physical harm sentences handed out.
I object to this for a different reason: I consider the concept of an organization with world jurisdiction intrinsically dangerous and unacceptable. It's like a monopoly: if you don't like their rules, where else are you going to go?
What do you sugest then? And no, i'm not trying to flame. and no, I am also not talking about piracy?
Cyber crime in my book. - Web sites are taken off line due to denial of service attacks. - identifies are stolen and sold. Costing people their credit and sometimes their homes, their lives
Something has to be done, and at least this(as bad as it is) is a united(least it sounds like it) front. All countries need to be part of the solution for us to win this, which no matter how you look at it. Will be a solution like is described here.
Again, not trying to flame. Just trying to point out the stakes involved require a solution like this.
Why is it that the fresh out of college individual has to be taught real life experiences by the person that is nothing but a VoTech graduate with 10 years experience. Why, because experience counts more.
Most individuals fresh out of college will WASTE more time trying to apply the most complicated answer they learned from school then just get the fucking job done. 9 times out of 10 I can give you a dirt cheap solution that solves ALL the fucking problems and have it done in half a day. Where some over priced fucking College graduate will spend 2 weeks performing analysis which he gives in his perfectly correct documentation. BUT HE STILL NEVER RESOLVED THE INITIAL PROBLEM.
The BEST coders I ever met were the ones that were in a particular business all their lives and then moved over to the tech side. The college boys and girls were fucking idiots that never gave a shit about what was best for the business.
I'll take someone with business experience any time over some school boy/girl who's daddy and mommy sent to school to get the fuck out of the house.
Same thing here... Took a heart attack because of a blocked artery for me to quit smoking. No patches, no gum. Damn gum gave me a head ake. Life savers was my out.
Can't beleive how easy it was to quit. Hell, I found it easier quiting smoking then I did to quit drinking.
Now it's fun again going to the bars though. I watch all the drunks for entertainment.
I had to look this up just out of curiousity. -- In 1970, at the age of 15, Bill Gates went into business with his pal, Paul Allen. They developed "Traf-o-Data," a computer program that monitored traffic patterns in Seattle, and netted $20,000 for their efforts. Gates and Allen wanted to start their own company, but Gates' parents wanted him to finish school and go on to college where they hoped he would work to become a lawyer.
-- His acumen for not only software development but also business operations put him in the position of leading the company and working as its spokesperson. He personally reviewed every line of code the company shipped, often rewriting code when he saw it necessary. As the computer industry began to grow with companies like Apple, Intel, and IBM developing hardware and components, Bill was continuously out on the road touting the merits of Microsoft software applications. He often took his mother with him. Mary was highly respected and well connected with her membership on several corporate boards including IBM. It was through Mary that Bill Gates met the CEO of IBM. --
Sorry for being long winded. I want to add. That there are enough choices out there between other smart phones and pda's that there is no reasons you couldn't find something which fit your business with the software you wanted on it.
Well damn, I wrote up a full reply and realized I wasn't logged in.
Look, it comes down to this. You know what their restrictions are. That is part of reviewing any purchase you make. You don't like it, don't buy it. Hell, I hate iTunes. Hate it with a passion. I don't own an iphone or an iPod touch because of it. Their loss.
You say your iPhone is a part of your business.
ok
H.P. Server., there are restrictions on what you can and can not do with them. Hell, you ever read some of those contracts????
Car lease. You lease a car or a van for your buisness. There are things you can and can not do with regard to modifications to the vehcile.
Software you purchase for your business. Restrictions. Shittttttttt. We won't even talk about MicroSoft. Lets deal with anti virus. A seperate license for each machine? Ok, thats a bad example because you have to download virus definations. How about graphic programs? You have artists you employ. You have to purchase a seperate graphic app for each one.
Its the way it is. Apple is not doing anything other companies arn't doing. Either in brick and morter buisness's or in software buisness's.
Sorry, you bought the phone knowing going into it what you could and couldn't do.
Apple owns it. It is a business web site. That web site is a line item under assets under the apple company. Are you now saying you should be able to dictate to a company what they can and can not sell on their property?
More people would be hired to handle paper payments.
IT people would be let go.
1). Online security? What online security.
Business's would crash.
1). Amazon.
2). E-bay
3). Google
I was sitting here trying to figure if more people would be hired or let go. I actually think more people would lose jobs then would gain.
I disagree, but I will not flame out again like I previously did.
It's strong arm tatics, black mail by a group of people trying to intimidate others that disagree with them. Items will not make it to be voted on because of tatics like this. Cause's will be lost before they even have a chance to be voted on. So be it, nobody will have my support no matter what the cause via petitions.
peace
Speaking of idiots, glad to see you commented.
If I want to be known who/what I support, I will write to the paper and put my fucking name to the article. If I want to support any cause, it's NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS unless I WANT IT TO BE KNOWN.
Let the fucking cause die then. I don't care if the gays get the right to marriage that much.
God damn fucking asshole.
Those names should be private, unless needed for verification in the case of fraud.
And therein lies the problem. Who should get to verify the petition? Shouldn't *everyone* be able to view the list and verify that it is real? If only the government can see the results of a petition, how will we verify that the government is doing their job properly?.
Is it not the goverment that controls recounting of votes if requested? What makes the signiture on a referendum different? If we trust the goverment to count and recount votes which are private, should they not be trusted for verification of signitures when possible fraud is suspected?
EVER.
I side with the gay community on civil mariage, but I do nto agree with them releasing names of people that signed the peition. Next, they will want the names of people that voted AGAINST what they want in the referendum.
Never again will I sign a petition. Thank you gay activits for taking away what I considered a right to privacy for what you consider your right.
And yes, I did read the story. I know that these names were public before. Like I said, never again will I sign a peition.
Those names should be private, unless needed for verification in the case of fraud.
California does everything it can to dictate to the rest of the nation.
Do us all a favor, leave the nation. Then we can put tarrifs on EVERY FREAKEN PEACE OF CRAP your state/nation trys to sell us. And we can tripple the price of energy we sell to your state/nation because your to busy chasing all energy companies away.
Thank you California for nancy pelosi. You should have shot that bitch when you had the chance.
Which founding father are you basing your argument on?
Thomas Jefferson? he was all for State Rights. Alexandar Hamilton, he thought States would be at war with each other in a matter of a few years. Or, in my case.
I HATE CALIFORNIA. Due to their size, they try to dictate to other states.
State rights, please. Most states are run by bigger idiots then what is at the national level.
Sorry, I disagree. It's all in the buisness model.
You write a open source application that replaces a common buisness application. No purchase cost, no license cost, but you charge for support.
Get one major company to switch to your application and also purchase your support services. Your making money from your work.
Again, you have to think about the buisness model here. Open source does not equate no return on your work.
Slashdot Mirror
Is that considered murder?
or what if a person who had his Identity stolen attempts suicide? Should that be consdered attempted murder?
I truely beleive the sentences against people convicted of Identity Theft are to lite. They should carry harsh sentences, comparable to any physical harm sentences handed out.
I object to this for a different reason: I consider the concept of an organization with world jurisdiction intrinsically dangerous and unacceptable. It's like a monopoly: if you don't like their rules, where else are you going to go?
What do you sugest then? And no, i'm not trying to flame. and no, I am also not talking about piracy?
Cyber crime in my book.
- Web sites are taken off line due to denial of service attacks.
- identifies are stolen and sold. Costing people their credit and sometimes their homes, their lives
Something has to be done, and at least this(as bad as it is) is a united(least it sounds like it) front. All countries need to be part of the solution for us to win this, which no matter how you look at it. Will be a solution like is described here.
Again, not trying to flame. Just trying to point out the stakes involved require a solution like this.
I doubt you will find one blind person that wants your pity.
Bet you will find every blind person wanting to tell you to shove your pity up your ass.
bull shit
Why is it that the fresh out of college individual has to be taught real life experiences by the person that is nothing but a VoTech graduate with 10 years experience. Why, because experience counts more.
Most individuals fresh out of college will WASTE more time trying to apply the most complicated answer they learned from school then just get the fucking job done. 9 times out of 10 I can give you a dirt cheap solution that solves ALL the fucking problems and have it done in half a day. Where some over priced fucking College graduate will spend 2 weeks performing analysis which he gives in his perfectly correct documentation. BUT HE STILL NEVER RESOLVED THE INITIAL PROBLEM.
The BEST coders I ever met were the ones that were in a particular business all their lives and then moved over to the tech side. The college boys and girls were fucking idiots that never gave a shit about what was best for the business.
I'll take someone with business experience any time over some school boy/girl who's daddy and mommy sent to school to get the fuck out of the house.
Same thing here... Took a heart attack because of a blocked artery for me to quit smoking. No patches, no gum. Damn gum gave me a head ake. Life savers was my out.
Can't beleive how easy it was to quit. Hell, I found it easier quiting smoking then I did to quit drinking.
Now it's fun again going to the bars though. I watch all the drunks for entertainment.
I had to look this up just out of curiousity.
--
In 1970, at the age of 15, Bill Gates went into business with his pal, Paul Allen. They developed "Traf-o-Data," a computer program that monitored traffic patterns in Seattle, and netted $20,000 for their efforts. Gates and Allen wanted to start their own company, but Gates' parents wanted him to finish school and go on to college where they hoped he would work to become a lawyer.
--
His acumen for not only software development but also business operations put him in the position of leading the company and working as its spokesperson. He personally reviewed every line of code the company shipped, often rewriting code when he saw it necessary. As the computer industry began to grow with companies like Apple, Intel, and IBM developing hardware and components, Bill was continuously out on the road touting the merits of Microsoft software applications. He often took his mother with him. Mary was highly respected and well connected with her membership on several corporate boards including IBM. It was through Mary that Bill Gates met the CEO of IBM.
--
http://www.biography.com/articles/Bill-Gates-9307520?print
The point I want to highligh here is:
He personally reviewed every line of code the company shipped, often rewriting code when he saw it necessary.
So, the man was a developer.
I thought he also wrote the fat file system, but I couldn't find supporting links for that.
Oh well.
Sorry for being long winded. I want to add. That there are enough choices out there between other smart phones and pda's that there is no reasons you couldn't find something which fit your business with the software you wanted on it.
Well damn, I wrote up a full reply and realized I wasn't logged in. Look, it comes down to this. You know what their restrictions are. That is part of reviewing any purchase you make. You don't like it, don't buy it. Hell, I hate iTunes. Hate it with a passion. I don't own an iphone or an iPod touch because of it. Their loss. You say your iPhone is a part of your business. ok H.P. Server., there are restrictions on what you can and can not do with them. Hell, you ever read some of those contracts???? Car lease. You lease a car or a van for your buisness. There are things you can and can not do with regard to modifications to the vehcile. Software you purchase for your business. Restrictions. Shittttttttt. We won't even talk about MicroSoft. Lets deal with anti virus. A seperate license for each machine? Ok, thats a bad example because you have to download virus definations. How about graphic programs? You have artists you employ. You have to purchase a seperate graphic app for each one. Its the way it is. Apple is not doing anything other companies arn't doing. Either in brick and morter buisness's or in software buisness's. Sorry, you bought the phone knowing going into it what you could and couldn't do.
Apple owns it. It is a business web site. That web site is a line item under assets under the apple company. Are you now saying you should be able to dictate to a company what they can and can not sell on their property?
More people would be hired to handle paper payments. IT people would be let go. 1). Online security? What online security. Business's would crash. 1). Amazon. 2). E-bay 3). Google I was sitting here trying to figure if more people would be hired or let go. I actually think more people would lose jobs then would gain.
I disagree, but I will not flame out again like I previously did. It's strong arm tatics, black mail by a group of people trying to intimidate others that disagree with them. Items will not make it to be voted on because of tatics like this. Cause's will be lost before they even have a chance to be voted on. So be it, nobody will have my support no matter what the cause via petitions. peace
Speaking of idiots, glad to see you commented. If I want to be known who/what I support, I will write to the paper and put my fucking name to the article. If I want to support any cause, it's NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS unless I WANT IT TO BE KNOWN. Let the fucking cause die then. I don't care if the gays get the right to marriage that much. God damn fucking asshole.
Those names should be private, unless needed for verification in the case of fraud.
And therein lies the problem. Who should get to verify the petition? Shouldn't *everyone* be able to view the list and verify that it is real? If only the government can see the results of a petition, how will we verify that the government is doing their job properly? .
Is it not the goverment that controls recounting of votes if requested? What makes the signiture on a referendum different? If we trust the goverment to count and recount votes which are private, should they not be trusted for verification of signitures when possible fraud is suspected?
EVER. I side with the gay community on civil mariage, but I do nto agree with them releasing names of people that signed the peition. Next, they will want the names of people that voted AGAINST what they want in the referendum. Never again will I sign a petition. Thank you gay activits for taking away what I considered a right to privacy for what you consider your right. And yes, I did read the story. I know that these names were public before. Like I said, never again will I sign a peition. Those names should be private, unless needed for verification in the case of fraud.
California does everything it can to dictate to the rest of the nation. Do us all a favor, leave the nation. Then we can put tarrifs on EVERY FREAKEN PEACE OF CRAP your state/nation trys to sell us. And we can tripple the price of energy we sell to your state/nation because your to busy chasing all energy companies away. Thank you California for nancy pelosi. You should have shot that bitch when you had the chance.
Which founding father are you basing your argument on? Thomas Jefferson? he was all for State Rights. Alexandar Hamilton, he thought States would be at war with each other in a matter of a few years. Or, in my case. I HATE CALIFORNIA. Due to their size, they try to dictate to other states. State rights, please. Most states are run by bigger idiots then what is at the national level.
Whats wrong? Lose a source of income??
Sorry, I disagree. It's all in the buisness model. You write a open source application that replaces a common buisness application. No purchase cost, no license cost, but you charge for support. Get one major company to switch to your application and also purchase your support services. Your making money from your work. Again, you have to think about the buisness model here. Open source does not equate no return on your work.
Problem solved.