Every story, you see liberals bring up Trump. They sleep thinking about him. They think about him in the shower, at breakfast, while reading their email. They can't get him out of their heads for one second
So wrong. You've rewritten the Constitution in your head to mean the opposite of its intended meaning by the founders.
Madison: "With respect to the two words "general welfare," I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators."
"If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions."
Jefferson: "Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."
Having considered the bill this day presented to me entitled "An act to set apart and pledge certain funds for internal improvements," and which sets apart and pledges funds "for constructing roads and canals, and improving the navigation of water courses, in order to facilitate, promote, and give security to internal commerce among the several States, and to render more easy and less expensive the means and provisions for the common defense," I am constrained by the insuperable difficulty I feel in reconciling the bill with the Constitution of the United States to return it with that objection to the House of Representatives, in which it originated.
The legislative powers vested in Congress are specified and enumerated in the eighth section of the first article of the Constitution, and it does not appear that the power proposed to be exercised by the bill is among the enumerated powers, or that it falls by any just interpretation with the power to make laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution those or other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States.
"The power to regulate commerce among the several States" can not include a power to construct roads and canals, and to improve the navigation of water courses in order to facilitate, promote, and secure such commerce without a latitude of construction departing from the ordinary import of the terms strengthened by the known inconveniences which doubtless led to the grant of this remedial power to Congress.
To refer the power in question to the clause "to provide for common defense and general welfare" would be contrary to the established and consistent rules of interpretation, as rendering the special and careful enumeration of powers which follow the clause nugatory and improper. Such a view of the Constitution would have the effect of giving to Congress a general power of legislation instead of the defined and limited one hitherto understood to belong to them, the terms "common defense and general welfare" embracing every object and act within the purview of a legislative trust. It would have the effect of subjecting both the Constitution and laws of the several States in all cases not specifically exempted to be superseded by laws of Congress, it being expressly declared "that the Constitution of the United States and laws made in pursuance thereof shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges of every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Such a view of the Constitution, finally, would have the effect of excluding the judicial authority of the United States from its participation in guarding the boundary between the legislative powers of the General and the State Governments, inasmuch as questions relating to the general welfare, being questions of policy and expediency, are unsusceptible of judicial cognizance and decision."
Also, if they are grouping all the different model Iphones together, doesn't Toyota, Michael Jackson, etc get to group all of their similar products under one count as Apple got to?
Seems like one of the most fraudulent claims heard this ____ (insert arbitrary date range here)
Not true. Exercise causes muscle cells that are stressed to phosphorylate AKT, which upon feeding activates mTOR and will make you hungrier as insulin starts binding to the muscle cells and activates the PI3K / Akt and Erk MAP kinase pathways.
Exercise will cause the food you eat to go to repair, versus being stored as fat. Doesn't curb hunger at all, other than while you are exercising (due to AMP Kinase phosphorylation). You will certainly be hungrier after a workout than if you hadn't worked out at all.
Shouldn't be, women burn fat more effectively than men.
"there is abundant evidence that the proportion of energy derived from fat during exercise is higher in women than in men." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
... Or one jump into traffic, or off into a subway track. If you can't control your kid in a mall, perhaps they shouldn't have been parents. Then to blame the robot for their inattentiveness.
Why can just anyone have kids? No regulation whatsoever, no background checks, no permits or license, just on a whim anyone can have the immense power and awesome responsibility to raise children.
Can be looked at from the other standpoint, for some time consumers have been gouged by Amazon's barriers to entry. Is it fair to these Chinese mfgs that a product is more likely to sell if it has a lot of reviews and large number of sales? Those are called barriers to entry and favor the establishment.
So this OP article is favoring one person, the supplier, over the large number of customers. We're supposed to feel sorry for this supplier, but they are rich from overcharging customers. If Amazon wasn't favoring established sellers with barriers to entry, the market price would be lower, and the customers would have more of their money.
In the end, people got what they wanted at a lower price. The only who is worse off is the original supplier. Who shouldn't have been reaping such profits, but was due to Amazon's setup.
I await the autopilots 100 question written exam results.
Private property is not an immunity shield, check out drunk driving laws. You're not allowed to drive drunk in most states even on your private property. Hurting yourself is costing society, hence you're not allowed to do it. I don't see why autopilots should be held to a different standard.
None of those things you mentioned take the driving from you and do it for you. Silly to argue wipers and other things you mentioned have the same distracting effect as no longer having to pay attention to the road.
Not sure how Tesla can shield liability. Gun manufacturers are being sued for their product's misuse. One could even make an argument, Telsa is encouraging users to break the law by making driving "hands free."
Company I work for makes power equipment. There's literally a label for every possible safety scenario, and any potential situation where a problem could arise, the company must design the product in such a way to be safe. This seems the exact opposite, creating a device to aid in breaking the law (since it is illegal to not be paying attention to the road, at least in my state).
Some fans are just poor losers. If you had been watching, this is consistent with how it was called all year long. I agree its somewhat bs, but they have to deal with that with offseason rule changes and change how its called.
Having large sums of cash is, for all intensive purposes, illegal. Unless you can prove, without the slightest doubt that the money is legit and not used in crime.
United States v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency The district court's opinion includes no finding as to the credibility of Gonzolez and the other two claimants. The court did observe that the explanations of the claimants were “plausible and consistent,” but this is different from a finding that the court actually believed the testimony. “Plausible” means “apparently acceptable or trustworthy (sometimes with the implication of mere appearance),” see Shorter OxfordEnglish Dictionary 2238 (5th ed.2002), and we thus read the district court's opinion to hold that given a “plausible and consistent” explanation from the claimants on one side of the balance, the government's countervailing proof was not strong enough to meet its burden of showing a substantial connection by a preponderance of the evidence.
On de novo review, we respectfully disagree and reach a different conclusion. We believe that the evidence as a whole demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that there was a substantial connection between the currency and a drug trafficking offense. Possession of a large sum of cash is “strong evidence” of a connection to drug activity, $84,615 in U.S. Currency, 379 F.3d at 501-02, and Gonzolez was carrying the very large sum of $124,700. The currency was concealed in aluminum foil inside a cooler, and while an innocent traveler might theoretically carry more than $100,000 in cash across country and seek to conceal funds from would-be thieves on the highway, we have adopted the common-sense view that bundling and concealment of large amounts of currency, combined with other suspicious circumstances, supports a connection between money and drug trafficking. $117,920.00 in U.S. Currency, 413 F.3d at 829. The canine alert also supports the connection.
"Blood on Microsoft's hands," is a figure of speech. Personification is used since Microsoft is not a person and does not have hands. I also can't see how the blood of dead Africans be on Microsoft's hypothetical hands if it were a person, as the dead person would be on the other side of the earth.
There's a program called Missionplanner for autonomous drone waypoint planning. It uses google maps, and can precache the maps (aka download google maps). Just select your area, select prefetch, and you'll have the maps at whatever zoom level you choose to go to.
Slashdot Mirror
The obsession with Trump
Every story, you see liberals bring up Trump. They sleep thinking about him. They think about him in the shower, at breakfast, while reading their email. They can't get him out of their heads for one second
hahhahaha
So wrong. You've rewritten the Constitution in your head to mean the opposite of its intended meaning by the founders.
Madison:
"With respect to the two words "general welfare," I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators."
"If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the general welfare, the government is no longer a limited one possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one subject to particular exceptions."
Jefferson:
"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."
Madison again. Full text: http://www.constitution.org/jm...
"To the House of Representatives of the United States:
Having considered the bill this day presented to me entitled "An act to set apart and pledge certain funds for internal improvements," and which sets apart and pledges funds "for constructing roads and canals, and improving the navigation of water courses, in order to facilitate, promote, and give security to internal commerce among the several States, and to render more easy and less expensive the means and provisions for the common defense," I am constrained by the insuperable difficulty I feel in reconciling the bill with the Constitution of the United States to return it with that objection to the House of Representatives, in which it originated.
The legislative powers vested in Congress are specified and enumerated in the eighth section of the first article of the Constitution, and it does not appear that the power proposed to be exercised by the bill is among the enumerated powers, or that it falls by any just interpretation with the power to make laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution those or other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States.
"The power to regulate commerce among the several States" can not include a power to construct roads and canals, and to improve the navigation of water courses in order to facilitate, promote, and secure such commerce without a latitude of construction departing from the ordinary import of the terms strengthened by the known inconveniences which doubtless led to the grant of this remedial power to Congress.
To refer the power in question to the clause "to provide for common defense and general welfare" would be contrary to the established and consistent rules of interpretation, as rendering the special and careful enumeration of powers which follow the clause nugatory and improper. Such a view of the Constitution would have the effect of giving to Congress a general power of legislation instead of the defined and limited one hitherto understood to belong to them, the terms "common defense and general welfare" embracing every object and act within the purview of a legislative trust. It would have the effect of subjecting both the Constitution and laws of the several States in all cases not specifically exempted to be superseded by laws of Congress, it being expressly declared "that the Constitution of the United States and laws made in pursuance thereof shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges of every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Such a view of the Constitution, finally, would have the effect of excluding the judicial authority of the United States from its participation in guarding the boundary between the legislative powers of the General and the State Governments, inasmuch as questions relating to the general welfare, being questions of policy and expediency, are unsusceptible of judicial cognizance and decision."
This source says nearly 400 billion estimated Big Macs https://www.reference.com/busi...
One guy has eaten more than 25,000 (lets see iPhone beat that)
Errata- Looks like its more like 400 billion Big Macs (estimated), but they stopped counting.
This. Something like 14 billion Big Mac's sold.
Also, if they are grouping all the different model Iphones together, doesn't Toyota, Michael Jackson, etc get to group all of their similar products under one count as Apple got to?
Seems like one of the most fraudulent claims heard this ____ (insert arbitrary date range here)
Not true. Exercise causes muscle cells that are stressed to phosphorylate AKT, which upon feeding activates mTOR and will make you hungrier as insulin starts binding to the muscle cells and activates the PI3K / Akt and Erk MAP kinase pathways.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
Exercise will cause the food you eat to go to repair, versus being stored as fat. Doesn't curb hunger at all, other than while you are exercising (due to AMP Kinase phosphorylation). You will certainly be hungrier after a workout than if you hadn't worked out at all.
Shouldn't be, women burn fat more effectively than men.
"there is abundant evidence that the proportion of energy derived from fat during exercise is higher in women than in men."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...
No broscience, cite studies please.
At some point, parents have to be watching over their kids.
Seems rather irresponsible to let their kid run around unwatched, then blame anyone but yourself.
... Or one jump into traffic, or off into a subway track. If you can't control your kid in a mall, perhaps they shouldn't have been parents. Then to blame the robot for their inattentiveness.
Why can just anyone have kids? No regulation whatsoever, no background checks, no permits or license, just on a whim anyone can have the immense power and awesome responsibility to raise children.
If they can't compete, that's what should happen.
Can be looked at from the other standpoint, for some time consumers have been gouged by Amazon's barriers to entry. Is it fair to these Chinese mfgs that a product is more likely to sell if it has a lot of reviews and large number of sales? Those are called barriers to entry and favor the establishment.
So this OP article is favoring one person, the supplier, over the large number of customers. We're supposed to feel sorry for this supplier, but they are rich from overcharging customers. If Amazon wasn't favoring established sellers with barriers to entry, the market price would be lower, and the customers would have more of their money.
In the end, people got what they wanted at a lower price. The only who is worse off is the original supplier. Who shouldn't have been reaping such profits, but was due to Amazon's setup.
I await the autopilots 100 question written exam results.
Private property is not an immunity shield, check out drunk driving laws. You're not allowed to drive drunk in most states even on your private property. Hurting yourself is costing society, hence you're not allowed to do it. I don't see why autopilots should be held to a different standard.
None of those things you mentioned take the driving from you and do it for you. Silly to argue wipers and other things you mentioned have the same distracting effect as no longer having to pay attention to the road.
Not sure how Tesla can shield liability. Gun manufacturers are being sued for their product's misuse. One could even make an argument, Telsa is encouraging users to break the law by making driving "hands free."
Company I work for makes power equipment. There's literally a label for every possible safety scenario, and any potential situation where a problem could arise, the company must design the product in such a way to be safe. This seems the exact opposite, creating a device to aid in breaking the law (since it is illegal to not be paying attention to the road, at least in my state).
How is this autopilot legal? It sounds like one of the most dangerous devices created, inviting distracted driving.
Cell phones are banned in many states for causing distracted driving, how is this not treated the same?
Some fans are just poor losers. If you had been watching, this is consistent with how it was called all year long. I agree its somewhat bs, but they have to deal with that with offseason rule changes and change how its called.
So that guy selling wallet protectors on Shark Tank wasn't crazy after all?
Its probably easier to gain someone's password by listening to their keyboard presses.
Having large sums of cash is, for all intensive purposes, illegal. Unless you can prove, without the slightest doubt that the money is legit and not used in crime.
United States v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency
The district court's opinion includes no finding as to the credibility of Gonzolez and the other two claimants. The court did observe that the explanations of the claimants were “plausible and consistent,” but this is different from a finding that the court actually believed the testimony. “Plausible” means “apparently acceptable or trustworthy (sometimes with the implication of mere appearance),” see Shorter OxfordEnglish Dictionary 2238 (5th ed.2002), and we thus read the district court's opinion to hold that given a “plausible and consistent” explanation from the claimants on one side of the balance, the government's countervailing proof was not strong enough to meet its burden of showing a substantial connection by a preponderance of the evidence.
On de novo review, we respectfully disagree and reach a different conclusion. We believe that the evidence as a whole demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that there was a substantial connection between the currency and a drug trafficking offense. Possession of a large sum of cash is “strong evidence” of a connection to drug activity, $84,615 in U.S. Currency, 379 F.3d at 501-02, and Gonzolez was carrying the very large sum of $124,700. The currency was concealed in aluminum foil inside a cooler, and while an innocent traveler might theoretically carry more than $100,000 in cash across country and seek to conceal funds from would-be thieves on the highway, we have adopted the common-sense view that bundling and concealment of large amounts of currency, combined with other suspicious circumstances, supports a connection between money and drug trafficking. $117,920.00 in U.S. Currency, 413 F.3d at 829. The canine alert also supports the connection.
What you wrote is inaccurate.
Not socialism, the word you're looking for is totalitarianism.
lol @ the left wing. This is what desperation looks like.
"Blood on Microsoft's hands," is a figure of speech. Personification is used since Microsoft is not a person and does not have hands. I also can't see how the blood of dead Africans be on Microsoft's hypothetical hands if it were a person, as the dead person would be on the other side of the earth.
There's a program called Missionplanner for autonomous drone waypoint planning. It uses google maps, and can precache the maps (aka download google maps). Just select your area, select prefetch, and you'll have the maps at whatever zoom level you choose to go to.
Fox news stands out because the ENTIRE rest of the media is far left and just a mouthpiece for the Democratic party.