Slashdot Mirror


LeBron James Used A Steve Jobs Speech To Motivate The Cavs To Victory (bgr.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from BGR: Well, LeBron James finally accomplished what he set out to do when he announced his triumphant return to the Cleveland Cavaliers 2014: he brought an NBA championship to Cleveland. Going into the NBA Finals, the Cavaliers were clear underdogs. And once the Cavs went down three games to one, the odds in Vegas that LeBron and co. could take back the series were as high as +900. Looking back at the Cavaliers' historic championship run and odds-defying victory, ESPN has a fascinating piece up detailing how LeBron sought to find every and anything that could help motivate his teammates and help them believe that an unprecedented comeback was indeed within the realm of possibility. And interestingly enough, one of the sources of inspiration James turned to was Steve Jobs. Specifically, James played portions of Steve Jobs' iconic 2005 Stanford University commencement speech to rally the troops ahead of game 3. "You can't connect the dots looking forward," Jobs passionately said, "you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in something -- your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down, and it has made all the difference in my life." You can watch Jobs' aforementioned speech in its entirety here on YouTube.

97 comments

  1. blah blah Steve Jobs blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    How is this news for nerds? Other than a mention of Steve Jobs.

    1. Re: blah blah Steve Jobs blah blah by ememisya · · Score: 2

      Believe in the ball, and throw y'self!

    2. Re:blah blah Steve Jobs blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is a mention of Steve Jobs news for nerds?

      Steve Jobs was a marketing type, cult leader and science denier (fruitarian enema lover).

    3. Re:blah blah Steve Jobs blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is news for nerds because a well known sports figure correctly attributed another person's work. Me impressed.

    4. Re:blah blah Steve Jobs blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is a mention of Steve Jobs news for nerds?

      Steve Jobs was a marketing type, cult leader and science denier (fruitarian enema lover).

      Why didn't you vote down the submission in the firehose? Because you are too dumb.

    5. Re:blah blah Steve Jobs blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I must say this bought out a wide array of cynical or sick fucks. Take a fucking breath and look at yourself for a moment.

    6. Re: blah blah Steve Jobs blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're allowed one white player per team, but only if he's a polack.

    7. Re: blah blah Steve Jobs blah blah by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I have to ask... this is the second or third story I've read this morning with childish racist comments on the threads.

      Slashdot forums are reserved for degrading the writers, the subjects of the stories and other commentors based on incorrect, incomplete or irrelevant information. We are a group of people who believe it's worth the effort to either show people we don't know how nifty smart we are (and generally fail) or to exert our passive aggressive behavior somewhere it's extremely likely we'll simply make fools of ourselves and not care about it.

      You're ruining the comments by filling it with racism. If you want to be a racist, there are many forums available to you out there where you can be so in the good company of others who are like minded. Racists generally prefer segregation when possible and I believe that's a very good thing. I think it's generally best to keep racists away from civilized human beings. I don't think it's possible to cure stupid, so I won't try to fix you and teach you that there are far better reasons to hate other people than their skin color or nationality. I recommend you use me as a target. Instead of hating on people for something meaningless, you are welcome to hate me and I will respect you far more for doing so. I will even be proud of you for hating on me since I genuinely consider you to be meaningless and useless. In fact, I know I don't need racism since there are so many people like you to keep my hate quota filled.

      So... either hate on people with good reason and have the balls to do it without the AC... or go join some white power group somewhere and talk with the other brilliant minds there about how "Yeh... that black guy (who I'm jealous of since I KNOW he must have a bigger dick than me) is such an asshole (because he's making millions bouncing a rubber ball for a living) and I don't like him." ... that's how you guys talk right?

      Please in the future reserve this forum for comments on a high quality of crap. It's absolutely terrible when I feel the need on Slashdot to inform people that we prefer to maintain a REALLY low standard here and if there is such a thing as a bottom, you're crossing it.

      To be fair... when I read the title of the article, I was wondering to myself whether the news was that we're trying to identify whether a professional athlete was actually able to read or simply had a really good memory.

      You see what I did there... it wasn't about race or nationality... it was about how I feel regarding people who prefer to devote their time to bouncing a rubber ball instead of learning to read and write and use their brains for something more than thinking "duh...". You can hate on basketball players for so many things. There's absolutely no reason to bring race into it.

  2. not to mention the refs by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but the NBA got what it wanted, a 7-game series. the Mouse won't have to pay advertisers any make-good money.

    1. Re:not to mention the refs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the NBA got what it wanted, a 7-game series. the Mouse won't have to pay advertisers any make-good money.

      Yes, ultimately the Mouse/Disney(ESPN) got what they want. Kind of the same thing when they reused the plot from "A New Hope" and used in in "The Force Awakens".

    2. Re:not to mention the refs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was a GS player or fan, I'd be pissed at the NBA for deliberately prolonging the series with the game 5 suspension of Draymond Green. Could've been the difference. But it was great series.

    3. Re:not to mention the refs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please use the Stanford non pirated version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF8uR6Z6KLc

    4. Re:not to mention the refs by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      >> NBA for deliberately prolonging the series with the game 5 suspension of Draymond Green

      He was back for games 6 and 7...and they still lost. We haven't seen that kind of choke since the Republicans nominated their 2016 presidential candidate.

    5. Re:not to mention the refs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were a GS player or fan I'd be pissed at Draymond for repeatedly kicking opponents in the groin and earning a well-deserved suspension.

      That shit aint cool.

    6. Re:not to mention the refs by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      And they booted Steph Curry in game 6. And they called other various fouls on the Warriors in games 5 and 6 while letting similar offenses pass for ohio players. Game 7 was a legit ohio win, and just a very good game in all regards. But the officiating in 5 and 6, plus the suspension of Green, was rotten to the core.

      Each one of those seven games represents over a billion dollars profit, spread between the NBA, the television network, and various other interested parties. They have a vested interest in a seven game series. And they very obviously made sure that's what they got.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    7. Re:not to mention the refs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, how dare they stop Green from attacking other players, what could go wrong with allowing that kind of behavior? He literally kicked a guy in the nuts, and picked another guy up and threw him to the ground. Should have been out for a year.

    8. Re:not to mention the refs by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Game 6 was already lost by the time Steph was booted.

      The warriors lost because they weren't shooting as well as they normally do. Curry's shooting percentage dropped from 65% (regular season) to 47% in the finals. In the last few minutes of game 7, when the score was 89-89, Curry missed a 3-pointer, but so did Andre Iguodala, Draymond Green, and Clay Thompson. Of course, LeBron stopped an important layup, but if the warriors had hit one more basket, that wouldn't have mattered. The Warriors had it within their power to win, and they let it go to the Cavs.

      Steph Curry was booted from game 6 after the game was already lost, they were so far behind at that point that remaining in wouldn't have helped, and complaining about the refs makes you look like a whiny fanboy who doesn't understand why his team lost.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re: not to mention the refs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^^^^

      Glad someone around here has some basketball knowledge.

      I watched every game, and every game in the playoffs damn near of every team. Green is a dirty player. He had to get suspended as he had 7 technical fouls in the playoffs. 7 techs = 1 game suspension. He hit 3 different people in the nuts. It was 100% deliberate.

      The moral the story: you play in mud, you get dirty.

    10. Re: not to mention the refs by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Green made momentary contact with LeBron James... not a nut-shot, as evidenced by the fact the James wasn't on the floor clenched over in pain... while getting up off the floor after James knocked him down and then stood over him, trying to prevent him getting up, whilst taunting him and shoving his junk into Green's face. And Green is the dirty player? I think we just found the ohio fanboi here.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  3. Hindsight Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's called Hindsight Bias A logical fallacy.

    Not only is it used by folks to say they knew it all along. But it's also used by folks to judge others with "you should have known better." for actions that no person could possibly have known the outcome.

    Life is quite unpredictable but we have this cultural delusion that it is.

    We have a media that reports only on the successes in our society - the people that took irrational risks and made it and don't report on the majority who do the same and fail miserably. As a result, we have a very distorted view of the likelihood of success in this country and as a result judge people who fail as people with an inherit character deficiency.

    1. Re:Hindsight Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Human beings have an ingrained need to find patterns and attach meaning to events. Call it a fallacy, make fun of it, pretend you're immune, do whatever you want that makes you feel superior but at the end of the day it's human nature and you cannot get away from it. It's served the species well. The truth of the matter is that luck plays as anything else in determining who succeeds and who fails. The old saying "I'd rather be lucky than good" is very true.

    2. Re:Hindsight Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call it a fallacy, make fun of it, pretend you're immune, do whatever you want that makes you feel superior but at the end of the day it's human nature and you cannot get away from it.

      Yes, you can get away from it.

      I make an effort to constantly question my beliefs, update my knowledge of things that are important to me and look out for the tell tale signs of irrational thinking. I may fall into a logical fallacy, but I do my very best to get out of it; which is something I cannot say for the majority of people.

    3. Re:Hindsight Bias by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Human beings have an ingrained need to find patterns and attach meaning to events.

      Read about the Etruscan(passed onto the Romans...) religious practices, who took the reading of events and patterns in nature to the extreme.
      Every ritual had to be performed exactly correct or they would have to start over.
      These rituals could last hours...

      The Gods wouldn't have it any other way.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    4. Re:Hindsight Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is an interesting pattern I have found. Most people who claim to be superior to everyone else, especially when it comes to things like human nature, are instead just insufferable assholes. Bet it holds true in this case too.

    5. Re:Hindsight Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the guy was just saying he is flawed and is doing his best to correct it. What this amounts to is one has to be exceedingly delicate if one is to point out someone else's flaws or imply they exist. Where he went wrong is when he said "YOU can get away from it", and the personal nature of that YOU, rather than sounding inspirational, crowded out the rest of the message.

    6. Re:Hindsight Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said by an anonymous loser. Fucking do something with your life!!!

    7. Re: Hindsight Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Howard Hughes.

      Put the milk in the basket.

  4. All Hail The Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even in death he is more inspirational than any other leaders. The Linux community wishes they had someone with 1/10th of the motivational skills the almighty Jobs had.

    1. Re:All Hail The Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like Jobs, Linus is good at motivating people... right out the door!

    2. Re: All Hail The Jobs by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      So inspirational that he died because he thought he knew better than medical professionals.

    3. Re: All Hail The Jobs by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      The Linux community wishes they had someone with 1/10th of the motivational skills the almighty Jobs had.

      Spoken like someone very much not part of said community.

  5. Sue him! by Calydor · · Score: 1

    Sue him for a gazillion dollars for copyright infringement!

    Isn't that how it works if you take an excerpt of something someone else did and use it for your own profit?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    1. Re:Sue him! by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      I realize you're making a joke, but LeBron had the right to show the video to his teammates, because it was a private viewing, and no admission fee was charged. Now, had they played the video on the Q Arena's Jumbotron to 20,000 people then there would be licensing issues involved (but still not copyright infringement, as you say).

      Incidentally, Stanford holds the copyright to the video, no Jobs' estate.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Sue him! by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I realize you're making a joke, but LeBron had the right to show the video to his teammates, because it was a private viewing, and no admission fee was charged.

      That's not the simple limit that "private viewing" implies. Did he show the video to his team mates as a business function? Did he show the video in a business environment? Did he prevent the viewers from leaving the area if they so chose? It isn't simply whether an admission fee was paid.

      Now, had they played the video on the Q Arena's Jumbotron to 20,000 people then there would be licensing issues involved (but still not copyright infringement, as you say).

      Incidentally, Stanford holds the copyright to the video, no Jobs' estate.

      Interesting detail.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  6. Just once by jvanber · · Score: 1

    This methodology sort of failed Jobs when he decided against a western-medicine treatment for his pancreatic cancer. Although, it may not have made a difference.

    I do recall him saying, near the end, that was his biggest regret.

  7. Have I visited a sports site by accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who is LeBron James? Who are the Cavs?

    1. Re:Have I visited a sports site by accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chavs are lower class Britons. It is generally not a nice word to use in public.

    2. Re:Have I visited a sports site by accident? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      The chavs are lower class Britons. It is generally not a nice word to use in public.

      Thats quite cavalier of you to say that.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    3. Re:Have I visited a sports site by accident? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      The calves are what we put out to pasture.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    4. Re:Have I visited a sports site by accident? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring back the Dice owners!

  8. Failed approach by sinij · · Score: 4, Informative

    >>This approach has never let me down

    Up until needless death from curable cancer.

    1. Re:Failed approach by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      "Touché", whispered Steve Jobs in his grave.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:Failed approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Double death. Jobs bribed a doctor with a "gift" of a luxury condo to allow him to queue jump to gain an organ that was going to someone else. If it wasn't for the IRS catching this Dr's addition instant wealth, Jobs would have successfully bought an organ under the radar. The child that died that didn't receive the order will never be know. All hail Jobs and the almighty dollar!

    3. Re:Failed approach by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. But I would rather live 56 Steve Jobs year than 95 John Sculley years.

    4. Re:Failed approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Touché", whispered Steve Jobs in his grave.

      It's spelled "Douché".

    5. Re:Failed approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh snap

    6. Re:Failed approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

      What Jobs did, in fact, do is work with doctors in multiple states to place himself on the transplant list in each. That, due to the fact that a liver is only viable for a short while after the death of the diner, is only feasible if you have a private jet at your beck and call to fly you to the first available liver before its expiration. But it's perfectly legal.

    7. Re:Failed approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed]

    8. Re:Failed approach by ausekilis · · Score: 3, Funny

      [citation needed]

      ...due to the fact that a liver is only viable for a short while after the death of the diner...

      Especially if said diner was pounding margaritas during happy hour.

  9. Re:and trump doing a lot what hitler did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hitler was a great orator.

  10. If he really wanted to score some points by bravecanadian · · Score: 1

    LeBron should have used an Elon Musk speech.

    Get with the times LeBron!

    1. Re:If he really wanted to score some points by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      LeBron should have used an Elon Musk speech.

      Get with the times LeBron!

      "Elon Musk" sounds like either a lab created pheromone used by Wildlife Biologists in British Columbia or a hipster cologne.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    2. Re:If he really wanted to score some points by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      LeBron should have used an Elon Musk speech.

      Get with the times LeBron!

      Sure: http://www.simplethingcalledlife.com/2015/elon-musk-usc-success-speech/

      • Tip #1: Work Super Hard.
      • Tip #2: Attract Great People.
      • Tip #3: Focus Solely on the Product or Service.
      • Tip #4: Don’t Follow Trends.
      • Tip#5: Take Risks.

      Tip 3 and probably tip 5 would help in basketball finals. Of course having to hear Musk go through the list would make you fall asleep in the 5 minutes it takes...

      And people complain about Tim Cook's oratory skills.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  11. They just won... by PmanAce · · Score: 1

    ...because the Splash Brothers didn't play well enough to win, that's it. The speech is BS.

    --
    Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    1. Re:They just won... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you could say that, but you don't really know, unless the coach of the Warriors had also played the Steve Jobs speech to his team.

    2. Re:They just won... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that and the fact that the series was fixed.

      If you can watch a guy pull up for a 26 foot jumpshot and lean in to the leaping closeout to try to draw a foul and get called for an offensive foul and not see that the fix is in, I have a bridge to sell you.

    3. Re:They just won... by buck-yar · · Score: 1

      Some fans are just poor losers. If you had been watching, this is consistent with how it was called all year long. I agree its somewhat bs, but they have to deal with that with offseason rule changes and change how its called.

    4. Re:They just won... by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Tell you what. Go watch the Conjunction Junction video, so that you can learn how to formulate a sensible argument. Throwing a lot of ideas out, and stapling them together with three "and"s doesn't help your case.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  12. Lebron James vs. Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I developed Kodachrome in my toilet tank.

    "Cuz everything looks worse in black 'n white."

    Captcha -- Fingered

  13. You are NOT my daughter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Repeat after me teammates... You are NOT my Child. You are NOT my daughter. The test results are in and they say there is a one in 13 million chance you are not my child... so you better keep looking.

  14. What are cavs? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    I wasn't born in this country (but English IS my first language)

    cav (singular) is short for cavalry (as in Air-Cav helicopter mobile troops first used in 'Nam

    or is it CAV = Computer Aided Visualization?

    1. Re:What are cavs? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Cavaliers. NBA team for Cleveland, Ohio; a city which hasn't had a professional championship win for any professional sport in over 50 years and is basically known for the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, being the setting for the Drew Carrey Show, and generally being boring. Oh, yes, and the main player (LeBron James)is egotistical, had a whole primetime special a few years ago announcing where was going to be playing at next and essentially shops around teams and tries to run them himself, getting coaches fired and controlling who gets traded. So, basically, it's an irrelevant story for Slashdot with the only tech angle being Steve Jobs. At least now with the NBA over and the US losing in the Copa America semi-finals sports networks will start focusing more on college football.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:What are cavs? by bws111 · · Score: 1

      The first one. It is short for Cavaliers, the name of the team.

    3. Re:What are cavs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or is it that you can't be arsed to read the first sentence of the summary?

    4. Re: What are cavs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to be enough of a cunt to want to type your shitty response than just Google it.

      It's not "cool" to try so hard to distance yourself from pop culture.

    5. Re:What are cavs? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      I wasn't born in this country

      Is that your excuse for not even reading the first sentence of the summary?

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  15. Re:and trump doing a lot what hitler did by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

    Incoming!
    Godwin at 2 O'Clock!

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  16. Steve Jobs book by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 2

    I was never a fan of Apple or of Steve Jobs.
    I've been a Windows/Linux guy since the 90s'.

    Apple fanbois, etc and the cult surrounding Apple has always turned my stomach(and continues to, to this very day).
    However, just for curiosity I read "Steve Jobs" by Walter Isaacson and was blown away.
    I hadn't enjoyed a book that much in a long time, and I mainly read non-fiction.

    The story of his life, what he did and how he did it is hard to describe and really "you couldn't make this stuff up".
    I was really stunned by the different sides of Steve Jobs personality, which shows again that in human nature, some people can be really complex.
    I was stunned by the sheer balls Steve Jobs had to pull off what he did.
    The writing and pace of the story in the book was just great and I highly recommend it.

    I have to say it really is a tragedy that he passed at that point in his life.
    But he managed to accomplish and influence our world like almost no one else has.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    1. Re:Steve Jobs book by quanminoan · · Score: 1

      Right with you on this - never been a fan of apple products and only ever purchased a small iPod once. Isaacson's book was profoundly moving, it reads as if your by Job's side the whole time. Highly recommend anyone to read this.

    2. Re:Steve Jobs book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading a quickie bio of Jobs by a member of the IT press back in the '90s, it was like 300 pages wall to wall of anecdotes about what an asshole he was. But of course, one could say the same (w/ far fewer anecdotes probably) about Gates, Ellison, Bezos, Larry Page.

    3. Re:Steve Jobs book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgive me for invoking godwin's law, but it is even more impressive to read about Hitler's life story, which doesn't make him any better than Jobs though...

    4. Re:Steve Jobs book by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      However, just for curiosity I read "Steve Jobs" by Walter Isaacson and was blown away. I hadn't enjoyed a book that much in a long time, and I mainly read non-fiction.

      So you read "Steve Jobs" by Walter Isaacson, which is quite flawed, and thus fiction. http://daringfireball.net/2012/02/walter_isaacson_steve_jobs

      There is much that is wrong with Walter Isaacson’s biography of Jobs, but its treatment of software is the most profound of the book’s flaws. Isaacson doesn’t merely neglect or underemphasize Jobs’s passion for software and design, but he flat-out paints the opposite picture.

      Isaacson makes it seem as though Jobs was almost solely interested in hardware, and even there, only in what the hardware looked like. Superficial aesthetics.

      [How Isaacson doesn't understand what "Antennagate" was about, and gets the technical details completely wrong because of his "looks above everything else" theory]

      Isaacson, it seems clear, mistrusted Jobs. That’s good. But rather than using that mistrust to push back, to ask insightful questions, he instead simply turned to others. ...

      Again, skepticism is good. But rather than do the research to verify Jobs’s version of events, to learn the facts so as to be able to dispute Jobs himself, he simply turned to sources he did trust, like Hertzfeld and Gates. But Gates is an odd choice to trust, because he clearly has a conflict of interest. His company competed against Jobs’s, and at a personal level, he is Jobs’s only rival in terms of historical stature in the industry.

      ...

      You could learn more about Steve Jobs’s work by reading Rob Walker’s 2003 New York Times Magazine piece than by reading Isaacson’s book, but even then we’re left wanting for the stories behind any of Apple’s products after the iPod. Isaacson’s book may well be the defining resource for Jobs’s personal life — his childhood, youth, eccentricities, cruelty, temper, and emotional outbursts. But as regards Jobs’s work, Isaacson leaves the reader profoundly and tragically misinformed.

      Isaacson gives us the story of an asshole. But the world is full of assholes. What we need is the story of the one man who spearheaded so many remarkable products and who built an amazing and unique company.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    5. Re:Steve Jobs book by swillden · · Score: 1

      I read "Steve Jobs" by Walter Isaacson and was blown away. I hadn't enjoyed a book that much in a long time, and I mainly read non-fiction.

      So, you learned that you enjoy fiction more than you thought you did?

      (j/k; I have no idea how accurate Isaacson's book is. Your comment motivated me to go grab the book on Audible.)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Steve Jobs book by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      But of course, one could say the same (w/ far fewer anecdotes probably) about Gates, Ellison, Bezos, Larry Page.

      Probably about every person who's ever lived, actually. If Mother Theresa and Gandhi get that treatment, what hope is there for the rest of us?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Steve Jobs book by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      However, just for curiosity I read "Steve Jobs" by Walter Isaacson and was blown away.
      I hadn't enjoyed a book that much in a long time, and I mainly read non-fiction.

      Cool! I'll have to buy that for my Kindle with the Apple eBook Settlement money I got through Amazon.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  17. Large sample sizes override luck. Habits matter by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Criminals think that they are unlucky when they get caught. They'll tell you "I got unlucky this time; I've shoplifted a hundred times before and never been caught." The second sentence is of course untrue - they WERE caught, just now. The fact is, if you make a habit of shoplifting, you'll be caught shoplifting sometimes. If you don't shoplift, you won't be caught shoplifting. The "luck" is only WHEN the shoplifter is caught. If you're in the habit of shoplifting, you probably have a court date ahead of you - no luck about it.

    Further, the same people who think that way about shoplifting also think the same way about driving with an expired license, ditching school or work, etc. It's not LUCK when you're once again skipping school to drive over to the store in your unisured car to do some shoplifting and you get caught doing one of these things.

    On the other hand, if you make it a habit to try to be helpful to people around you, eventually you'll be helpful to someone who can offer you a good job, or an important introduction or some other "lucky" thing. If you make it a habit to forego Starbuck's and Netflix in order to save back 10%-15% of your income, you'll luckily be prepared to take advantage of other opportunities that come your way.

    We each make a hundred decisions every day. Get up now or hit snooze and hope to get to work on time? Eat a healthy breakfast or a cinnamon roll? Get the wrinkles out of your shirt or go to work looking like you don't care? Cut the person off on the way to work or slow down and let them go by? Hold the door for someone on the way into the building or not? Smile at the receptionist or not? Pleasant chit chat in the elevator or stare at the wall? I've made seven or eight decisions which could affect my career before I get to my desk each morning.

    My habits, good and bad, mostly determine my outcomes. If I make a habit of flipping all other drivers, the only luck is whether eventually one of those drivers turns out to be my new boss or a random stranger with road rage, or maybe a sheriff. It'll eventually turn out bad somehow.

  18. slight misquote by nimbius · · Score: 1

    you have to trust in something -- your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down, and it has made all the difference in my life.

    "...except for my gut, which combined with Karma and a criminally illiterate understanding of human morphology and disease led me to try eating fruit to cure cancer."

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  19. Binksmanship by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "You can't connect the dots looking forward," Jobs passionately said, "you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in something -- your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever...

    Worked for Jar Jar also

  20. holding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're holding it wrong?

  21. Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, he does mention Karma in that speech. And, as we know, Karma's a bitch...

  22. Breaking news! Sun came up this morning! by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Let's all thank Steve Jobs!

  23. Bertrand Russell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the guy was just saying he is flawed and is doing his best to correct it. What this amounts to is one has to be exceedingly delicate if one is to point out someone else's flaws or imply they exist. Where he went wrong is when he said "YOU can get away from it", and the personal nature of that YOU, rather than sounding inspirational, crowded out the rest of the message.

    I'm glad at least someone got it. I've been delving into Bertrand Russell this Summer, and much of his writing (almost a hundred years ago!) is on this very topic. And that's part of my education on working with my irrationality. And as Daniel Kahneman and his colleagues have pointed out (Thinking Fast and Slow), one can - if they take the time - think quite rationally.

    I didn't think the 'you' was wrong, but I guess in this day and age it is. I suppose using 'one' might have been a better choice of words. But I am nowhere near the writer Russell was - another working point for me.

    1. Re:Bertrand Russell. by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about the AC who responded to you. Some people just can't handle the fact that there are better people than them in this world.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
  24. There was and will only be only one Steve Jobs by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    I knew Steve Jobs

    Everyone who knew Steve Jobs knew that Steve Jobs was definitely ain't a Mr. Nice Guy

    But he was effective and whatever he had set out to do, he would do everything to achieve the goal

    However abrasive Steve Jobs was, however imperfect Steve Jobs was, there was, and will only be one Steve Jobs

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:There was and will only be only one Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Adolf Hitler was also 'effective' and 'he would do everything to achieve the goal'. He conquered Europe and it took the whole world to take him down. Hater gonna hate.

      Also, there was, and will only be one Adolf Hitler.

      Did you even had a point? Or did you just wanted to say that 'you knew Steve Jobs'?

    2. Re:There was and will only be only one Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs was a piker.
      He's not even in the same league as John Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan and that cohort.

    3. Re: There was and will only be only one Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually in the end he was extremely ineffective, if he had kept his drug addicted self out of if, Germany likely would've taken Russia. Thankfully he got too involved and either sacked or limited the power of most of the good generals and tried to handle it himself.

    4. Re: There was and will only be only one Steve Jobs by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that Hitler was brilliant politically, but he was a military rube most of the way through.

      The German military was a top notch organization that basically did not stop planning for the next war even after they lost WWI. Pretty much all of their success was good German military training, staff work, and doctrine. They worked hard starting from 1918 on to get back on top, it wasn't a miracle from 1933 on.

      Of course, without Hitler, it seems unlikely that the democratic parties of the day would have allowed them off their leash, but it was always possible for there to be a coup in Germany as the military was already a state within a state well before Hitler rose to power.

      Hitler basically took credit for good planning by his generals. Yes, he did initially give them the scope to do their jobs, perhaps even encouraged them to make certain achievements, but it was Hitler that ordered the panzers to stop short of Dunkirk. Mind you, they were running well ahead of their supply train and they had left their infantry support in the dust, but it could be argued that this was a strategically bad decision on his part.

      It's easy to look like a genius when you have an elite team under you and the other side doesn't have their heart in the game, even if you're a rather lackluster military leader. His mistakes caught up with him when his elite team was dismembered and he failed to give his good generals the leeway to make decisions that the Allies allowed theirs because he thought he was a genius, instead of just having a really good starting position and a fair amount of luck.

    5. Re: There was and will only be only one Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he clearly doesn't have a point (period).

      How fucking hard to end sentences with a fucking period?

  25. It amazing what you can accomplish . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . when you have enough money to totally fuck people over.

  26. Re: Large sample sizes override luck. Habits matte by otterpop81 · · Score: 1

    Yes, all of this. It could not be more true. I try to live the same way. Thank you for posting.

  27. 26 days early regardinng choke job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it should be a lot of drama.

  28. Summary is incomprehensible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The summaray is incomprehensible. What is it about, who is James LeBron, what do BGR, NBA and ESPN mean and what are cavs?

  29. Everyone is quick to praise LeBron now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the second time LeBron's been bailed out by a teammate (Ray Allen was the first) to win a title. The Cavs didn't really win Game 7, the Warriors gave the game away by uncharacteristically missing decent looks at the basket in the final 4m30s. Cleveland didn't want to win the game either, as they also missed all their shots in the last 4m30s save for Irving's three.