Frozen salmon have brain activity, according to research winning an Ignobel prize in its demonstration of poor controls and poor statistical analysis in fMRI studies.
So, yes, null results are published and are valuable, when they show up flawed methodology.
Bear in mind the government is bitterly divided, wirh a third of MPs in the Tory party in open rebellion. Their majority is dependent on a group seeking to punish May over the backstop.
I see no chance of any such legislation going through, as it would be unpopular and there's likely to be an election soon.
No, it isn't FTL, because distance isn't absolute. If ER=EPR, the distance travelled must always be zero regardless of the distance seen by an external observer.
It isn't necessarily FTL regardless, as an entangled photon is in all states. You're simply collapsing the probability wave to one of those options.
The other particle is also in all possible states, so the state isn't transmitted. Probability waves aren't information and don't radiate, so don't travel.
What I'm pretty sure it means is that a third of Slashdot didn't read the article, a third can't read and a third think this is where you try out for the Morcambe and Wise show.
You can presuppose ER!=EPR, but until you've a paper on arXix, that's a supposition.
ER=EPR doesn't violate light speed, it simply says the particles are at the same point. Space isn't absolute, so two observers can see different distances. That's allowed.
It means that if you were to take the equations modelling the system and look for the values that produce the greatest negative first order differential, the values Cassini was capable of observing are very close to those required.
Or, if you like, increasing or decreasing any of those values would result in the rate of change declining.
This is the only sense in which you can speak of a bound. If you choose to call this worst, and probably only the media do, it's childish but at least based on something real.
First, why the hell is everyone bleating about politics on an astronomy topic? On a level of ignorance that is the only astronomic thing here?
For crying out loud, if you want 4chan, go post on 4chan. Why the hell ruin the internet for everyone else? Too bloody pathetic?
Second, study the bloody rings!
I don't give an f about your whinging about tax cuts and designer genes, hike taxes to 60% or just take the money. Get space missions up there to study how the rings regenerate themselves, how they're depleted and what the relative rate means for the composition of various moons.
If they have to take all your money to do it, why should I care? You want a society where it's every person for themselves, then it's not my problem if you're the person they crush. I only care about people in societies that take care of those in them.
Why should you get a say in space tech? You don't want a say, so why give you one? You're not interested in the results, so why bother to share?
Is there a proper matrix (not the Neo sort) that shows how databases compare for features, plus geaphs showing how they compare under different loads?
A proper... Oh, let's call it a review.
I mean, products like Dezign for Databases support a very large number of engines, and there are many others now obsolete and hard to obtain that may still have value in certain niches.
Yes, PostgreSQL won't match Oracle on everything, but it doesn't have to. It only has to be better for one market. Another system, perhaps commercial, might be better in another.
As long as every use case has a better solution, it doesn't matter if Oracle outperforms the competitor in features that don't apply to that case.
I'd like to see Oracle survive and thrive, in areas it actually is strong in. But it won't, if it has a 'tude, competes by killing rivals rather than focussing on strengths, and has licensing costs and conditions Hell would baulk at.
You use PostgreSQL for the normalized data, stoted procedures, etc. You can then optuonally extrude denormalized tables that still need SQL operations, which you place in MySQL.
You don't then need transactions or stored procedures for MySQL because it's read only pre-generated digested data.
You now have all the power of the backend system, be it PostgreSQL, Ingres (now with a new name), DB/2, Informix, or whatever, with the speed of MySQL. The views, being on a different DB, don't lock up tables or slow down writes.
Slashdot Mirror
The point is that flawed assumptions about "common sense" stuff are a major cause of flawed results.
Indeed, it's the primary cause of irreproducible results.
Frozen salmon have brain activity, according to research winning an Ignobel prize in its demonstration of poor controls and poor statistical analysis in fMRI studies.
So, yes, null results are published and are valuable, when they show up flawed methodology.
If they're faking, damn they're good. Identical results on all markers checked by more than one group.
So far, not a single person has offered a credible link to that claim, and you've offered no link at all.
Urban legands and conspiracy theories don't qualify as proof.
Bear in mind the government is bitterly divided, wirh a third of MPs in the Tory party in open rebellion. Their majority is dependent on a group seeking to punish May over the backstop.
I see no chance of any such legislation going through, as it would be unpopular and there's likely to be an election soon.
Why would Theresa May be flying drones?
Only ones that sound like they're saying ommmm.
The US has banned innocent people on the grounds tgey have similar names to peiple who might possibly be terrirists but nobody is quite sure.
In comparison, no European country has banned or restricted anything like as many.
No, the so-called nanny states are a lot freer than the freedom-as-a-service states.
No, it isn't FTL, because distance isn't absolute. If ER=EPR, the distance travelled must always be zero regardless of the distance seen by an external observer.
It isn't necessarily FTL regardless, as an entangled photon is in all states. You're simply collapsing the probability wave to one of those options.
The other particle is also in all possible states, so the state isn't transmitted. Probability waves aren't information and don't radiate, so don't travel.
What I'm pretty sure it means is that a third of Slashdot didn't read the article, a third can't read and a third think this is where you try out for the Morcambe and Wise show.
At this point, there are many theories, which vary according to which of the 33 different quantum mechanics you use.
Not even quantum physicists can predict behaviours, only aggregates.
Entanglement is one shot, so you have to move particles, but the particles can deliver information. Just one bit's worth.
You can presuppose ER!=EPR, but until you've a paper on arXix, that's a supposition.
ER=EPR doesn't violate light speed, it simply says the particles are at the same point. Space isn't absolute, so two observers can see different distances. That's allowed.
The question is whether it happens.
You're the potato one
Got anything better to do than post irrelevant things about stuff beyond you?
Be like Strax.
It means that if you were to take the equations modelling the system and look for the values that produce the greatest negative first order differential, the values Cassini was capable of observing are very close to those required.
Or, if you like, increasing or decreasing any of those values would result in the rate of change declining.
This is the only sense in which you can speak of a bound. If you choose to call this worst, and probably only the media do, it's childish but at least based on something real.
So?
Science was about discovery, understanding and prediction, last time I looked.
Not about one species or any member therein.
Did anyone ask you to be?
Since when was astronomy or astrophysics about your feelings?
First, why the hell is everyone bleating about politics on an astronomy topic? On a level of ignorance that is the only astronomic thing here?
For crying out loud, if you want 4chan, go post on 4chan. Why the hell ruin the internet for everyone else? Too bloody pathetic?
Second, study the bloody rings!
I don't give an f about your whinging about tax cuts and designer genes, hike taxes to 60% or just take the money. Get space missions up there to study how the rings regenerate themselves, how they're depleted and what the relative rate means for the composition of various moons.
If they have to take all your money to do it, why should I care? You want a society where it's every person for themselves, then it's not my problem if you're the person they crush. I only care about people in societies that take care of those in them.
Why should you get a say in space tech? You don't want a say, so why give you one? You're not interested in the results, so why bother to share?
Evolution is fixed rate.
There are no leftists in Europe. They're the centre, whether you go by global average or by the range of possible political views.
Is there a proper matrix (not the Neo sort) that shows how databases compare for features, plus geaphs showing how they compare under different loads?
A proper... Oh, let's call it a review.
I mean, products like Dezign for Databases support a very large number of engines, and there are many others now obsolete and hard to obtain that may still have value in certain niches.
Yes, PostgreSQL won't match Oracle on everything, but it doesn't have to. It only has to be better for one market. Another system, perhaps commercial, might be better in another.
As long as every use case has a better solution, it doesn't matter if Oracle outperforms the competitor in features that don't apply to that case.
I'd like to see Oracle survive and thrive, in areas it actually is strong in. But it won't, if it has a 'tude, competes by killing rivals rather than focussing on strengths, and has licensing costs and conditions Hell would baulk at.
And?
You use PostgreSQL for the normalized data, stoted procedures, etc. You can then optuonally extrude denormalized tables that still need SQL operations, which you place in MySQL.
You don't then need transactions or stored procedures for MySQL because it's read only pre-generated digested data.
You now have all the power of the backend system, be it PostgreSQL, Ingres (now with a new name), DB/2, Informix, or whatever, with the speed of MySQL. The views, being on a different DB, don't lock up tables or slow down writes.
Any number of variants of this trick.
Share prices depend on what people think they're worth. There's no relationship to the company.
A dead mouse could have rising share values. It's unlikely, but it could.
Either the summary is wrong or Oracle can't English. I don't know which is less likely.
If Oracle wasn't impressed with MySQL, why did it buy it?
PostgreSQL is a do-over of Ingres, which is almost as old as Oracle. Only, PostgreSQL has evolved and Oracle hasn't.
PostgreSQL and MySQL have better licensing terms and superior performance.
Oracle have caused severe damage to MySQL and OpenOffice, and to Java for that matter, raising concerns about the competency of staff.
Why trust a company that can't cope and does so expensively?