Slashdot Mirror


What Happens After Surprising DNA Test Results? (bloombergquint.com)

schwit1 shared an interesting article from Bloomberg: Though genetic tests are frequently marketed as family-friendly entertainment, they sometimes wind up surfacing life-altering surprises. And when those surprises show up in someone's test results, the first move is often a call to customer service.... At 23andMe, those types of calls are so frequent that preparing for them is integrated into the company's months-long training program.... "We always try to steer the conversation toward the data, tell them that this is science," said Kent Hillyer, head of customer care for the genetic-testing firm 23andMe...

Lindsay Grove, a customer-care representative at 23andMe, still remembers one call in particular years later, a dad who took the test only to find out that his child was not, in fact, his child. At first, like most, he was just trying to figure out whether the results were accurate. So Grove explained the science behind the data. The customer then became somber and quiet. He questioned whether he should talk to his wife, and, if he did, how.... "That process of figuring out what to do next is very difficult for customers...."

Such emotional calls can take a toll on employees, too. That's perhaps inevitable when technology interfaces with such sensitive, personal information.... At 23andMe, Hillyer often encourages representatives to go for a walk after an intense call, or cracks open a bottle of wine to help them decompress. "We kind of do these internal therapy sessions,'' he said. "Here, maybe more so than most places, you have to be really supportive of each other."

238 comments

  1. Do they deal with law enforcement? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Do they deal with law enforcement?

    1. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

      I doubt law enforcement ever calls and complains that someones results are wrong.

    2. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by PPH · · Score: 2

      What do you mean by 'deal with'? Do they inform law enforcement when an upset customer gets some results that he might react badly to? Or do they track down anonymous DNA samples from crime scenes to expose the identity of criminals?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do they deal with law enforcement?

      You bet they do. That's why it's dangerous to give them your DNA. In fact you may inadvertently be compromising the genetic privacy of your children, their children, your nieces and nephews and their children, etc. All of them can be tracked down from the data point that you unwittingly provided. This is how the government tracked down the Golden State Killer and now that this new capability has been demonstrated it's only a matter of time before it becomes cheaper, faster and more widely available until every small police department has access to it and every incentive to use your DNA against you and your loved ones. The government is cunning, deceitful and untrustworthy. You cannot trust them or their intentions. Please consider carefully the consequences beyond your own privacy before you buy one of these genetic testing kits. The value of the information that you get from these services is minimal and the consequences may end up being worse than you ever imagined. If you thought Facebook was bad then just imagine what the government might do with your genetic information. Just say no to genetic testing this holiday season. It's not worth it.

    4. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or you could, you know, raise your children to not murder people, so they don't need privacy from homicide detectives. Just sayin.

    5. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by novakyu · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have nothing to hide, and I'm sure you have nothing to hide either. Who needs the Fourth Amendment?

    6. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by Shikaku · · Score: 2

      That isn't the point. If your genetics match the DNA left by a killer, you'll get a broken door and police search and seizure of evidence soon after. Even if they admit they got the wrong guy, your restitution could be minimal, and your life could still be in shambles, because they took everything valuable and your family ostracized you because they thought and still think you did it.

    7. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Did you not hear about the Golden State Killer earlier this year?

    8. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, all "they" need is "probable cause" and "good faith."

      These things should operate in a silo. I mean, if it's a service I'm paying to has performed,
      it's my property and isn't meant to be shared with anyone. If they want to aggregate the
      results anonymously, I wouldn't care. These things are nothing more than a modern-day
      scam of a fortune telling business that started in the early (19)70's where you ancestry was
      determined by your last name (remember that scam, anyone - I do).

      The problem was that Ellis Island "randomly" assigned names to people and did not keep a
      record of the original name. Not all, but many U.S. citizens came to the U.S. in one of the two
      immigration waves from the last century (and maybe a few from the post-WWI era). So
      unless a person emigrated from an English speaking country and had an English-ish (sic)
      last name, they got what ever the reviewer decided was best. Remember, the reviewer's
      primary job was to ensure that people emigrating were not infected with some disease
      that could place U.S. citizens in danger (I wish that practice was still followed), not to be a
      warm welcome to those people (not cruel; please don't mistake prudence for cruelty).

      It doesn't seem statistically possible to determine (today) someone's ancestry from such small
      sample sizes (like they advertise on TV). Especially since many cultures outside of the U.S.
      do not practice Christian New Testament monogamy as is mandated by law in the U.S.
      (but not entirely adhered to -- see Trump, Kennedy, Clinton, et. al.). With that, a family could
      have children sired by many fathers.

      These services that say they can provide DNA analysis that state a person's DNA contains
      something like 10% Madagascar, 5% Andaman Island, 13% Tibetan and so on is all complete BS.
      Quite frankly, that technology doesn't exist. Period. We are duped by these "companies" into
      our own naiveté that since we have some advanced medical procedures in the U.S., that
      everybody (else) in the world has the same level of advanced science and that DNA sample
      are not contaminated or otherwise fudged for whatever reason. Especially, in places like India /
      China / the southern continents where birth certificates didn't exist until very recently (last
      30-40 years or so, maybe less in some areas). Medical records are even worse.

      Anyway, I agree, a person willing paying a company to blast your private medical records to
      anyone with a dollar or any dopey judge is just too stupid for words. Remember, in the U.S.,
      judges are immune to any damage they cause (wonder how that happened in the U.S.)
      so they really don't care if an innocent person is harmed by their actions.

      CAP === 'listens'

    9. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 The service in question enables LE to look for familial matches on active/cold rape and murder cases to identify suspects or victims. Any reasonable member of modern society is going to tell you committing either act is not acceptable. If you believe your kids need privacy because they commit such crimes, you have a much bigger problem than DNA testing results would create.

    10. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they do. Here's the biggest example that I can think of...
      https://www.ajc.com/news/national/can-police-legally-obtain-your-dna-from-23andme-ancestry/8eZ24WN7VisoQiHAFbcmjP/

    11. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by BravoZuluM · · Score: 1

      How about when the government grabs your genetic results to plan and prioritize health care? They can say that certain DNA is a better bet than substandard DNA. It's always about, "Think of the children!" until it isn't.

    12. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My daughter is half Asian and half white. Do you think she will be college-aged soon enough to avoid having to take a genetic test as part of her college entrance evaluation so she can be ranked on the Intersectional Olympics Ranking System? I do not. And its for this reason that I won't be participating in *any* activity which involves sharing my DNA information.

    13. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by RottenJ · · Score: 1

      That is nothing, wait until insurance companies get a hold of your DNA info and use it to profile you based on the likelihood of you getting certain diseases. Then the fun will begin.

      --
      "It's fun to obey the machine" - Ralph Wiggum
    14. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by Donwulff · · Score: 3, Informative

      23andMe, which this article deals with, does not (voluntarily) co-operate with law-enforcement. Of course, if they get a court order, they will have to, but to do date they've never been asked for DNA data and haven't had to give out any personal data requested: https://www.23andme.com/transparency-report/
      23andMe also does not allow comparison of samples tested outside 23andMe against their own database, the same goes for AncestryDNA. The only reason the GSK case was solved was because those people had purposefully transferred their DNA data into GEDMatch, whose technology and terms of service specifically allowed for matching against this sort of data.
      It's alleged that many users of GEDMatch had not read or understood the Term of Service (likely) but others had uploaded their DNA data into GEDMatch specifically for these kinds of purposes. It remains a controversial topic in DNA testing circles not the least because it can implicate distant relatives, but to date merely testing at 23andMe or AncestryDNA hasn't caused anybody to become "police informant", they've had to take complicated actions where they're warned of this sort of possibility every step along the way (Or allowed somebody else to do it for them) to participate in law enforcement DNA searches.
      On the other hand, in most of the world USA included law enforcement can legally collect DNA samples from pretty much everybody and construct their own, private DNA database. The law enforcement DNA databases even currently dwarf 23andMe's database in size. The only reason consumer DNA tests were useful in GSK case were because the culprit was beyond suspicion due to being an ex cop and had never had his DNA taken by law enforcement.

      But anyway, the short answer is that no, 23andMe does not "deal" with law enforcement unless forced to, which they've never yet been.

    15. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems like a dumb reason.

      Odds are she will not be accepted to any brand-name university regardless of her genetic background and whether it's known or unknown. In-state public universities, the only other rational, informed choice, typically do very well at avoiding any kind of ethnic class modeling.

    16. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But anyway, the short answer is that no, 23andMe does not "deal" with law enforcement unless forced to, which they've never yet been.

      Law enforcement is a powerful political constituency in the United States. Even Apple was hard pressed to resist the demands of the FBI in the case of the San Bernardino Shooter. Apple probably would have lost and been forced to comply had the FBI not found an alternative method to hack into the phone in the meantime. The recent law passed in Australia making unbreakable encryption unlawful is further evidence of the collision course between tech and government over these kinds of issues. Companies like 23andMe can be forced to cooperate by the government, regardless of what they say their policies are. Nobody is going to languish in prison for life in contempt of court to protect an encryption key or a DNA profile and the government knows that. If you chose to give your DNA to 23andMe then you have to understand that that information can end up in the hands of the government. This risk is heightened in the United States because of the many bad court precedents over the past several decades which have substantially eroded 4th Amendment protections for information that citizens willingly put into the hands of third parties, like 23andMe.

    17. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by surd1618 · · Score: 1

      Take the test anonymously?

    18. Re:Do they deal with law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take the test anonymously?

      That's what I plan to do.

    19. Re: Do they deal with law enforcement? by alexo · · Score: 1

      Or you could, you know, raise your children to not murder people, so they don't need privacy from homicide detectives. Just sayin.

      Homicide detective's #1 priority is to close cases. It does not matter if they get the actual murderer as long as they can build a strong case against a person -- any person. So if your DNA is found on the scene of the crime (and you leave traces of you DNA whenever you go) and you don't happen to have an ironclad alibi, well then my friend, it sucks to be you.

  2. What happens? by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some white supremacists discover they are not quite _that_ white.

    1. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Elizabeth Warren finds out she's not _that_ Indian.

    2. Re:What happens? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ask them, both 23andme and Ancestry have admitted to skewing results such that people almost always get results indicating mixed ancestry.

    3. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      She's exactly as much Indian as she said she was, and nazi faggots are exactly as dumb as we know you are.

    4. Re: What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, depends on what you call mixed. Mine from Ancestry was mainly Gaelic ( Irish, Scots ) with a small about of Eastern European that might be Russian from the family tree.

      DNA matches were spot on - I found two first cousins on my dad's side, and several 2nd cousins (first cousins of both parents ) . Considering it was a denial at first of my existence from my dad's side, science won out.

    5. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happy Hanukkah!

    6. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Donald Trump should take the test and find out if he has a higher percentage. If he does, he should then claim to have discovered himself to be genderfluid (the left says you can't question it!), and is now the first minority woman to become president.

    7. Re:What happens? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got the opposite results of what many white supremacists nutcases are getting, according to 23andMe I'm 100.0% white European (my family were peasant stock from central European going back forever). I actually wanted to have some interesting mixed blood, but it's just completely boring central European monoculture. Maybe I should sell my DNA to the mixed-race white supremacists...

    8. Re: What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you thought it would be cool if the test showed your mother had been raped by Snoop Dogg?

    9. Re:What happens? by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      I got the opposite results of what many white supremacists nutcases are getting, according to 23andMe I'm 100.0% white European (my family were peasant stock from central European going back forever). I actually wanted to have some interesting mixed blood, but it's just completely boring central European monoculture. Maybe I should sell my DNA to the mixed-race white supremacists...

      Wow dude. I hope you are trying to crack wise or something. Otherwise... Yikes.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    10. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      N1gg3r loving f@ggot

    11. Re:What happens? by Corbets · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. He was clearly not serious about selling his dna to white supremacists. If you think otherwise... Yikes.

    12. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're probably a non-American just trying to incite hate and anger by calling people faggots and Nazis, but Elizabeth Warren was at most 3% Native American which corresponds to a great-great-great grandparent. This doesn't match her story.

    13. Re: What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't be such a dumbass- it's right there in the summary. 'Guy X was surprised to find out he's not the bio dad.' All it takes is one link in the chain of her ancestors.

      But I'm very glad to know that you know the truth of her family history better than she does. Perhaps you should call her office and make an appointment. I'm sure she'd be grateful.

    14. Re: What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not confuse the issue.

      An entirely white white oh so completely white woman advanced her career on entirely false claims of being Native American and got busted.

      End of story and her bid for president. She is over. Move on.

    15. Re:What happens? by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      No kidding. We discovered 1/64 Ashkenasi DNA, we are proud of that, have traced their immigration and then 3 generations of integration. Britain was an acceptably diverse place, until the recent culturally-incompatible invasions

    16. Re: What happens? by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Donald Trump is very likely more "Indian" than she is."

      No, his granddad was a whorehouse owner in Klondike, not an Indian.

    17. Re:What happens? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Elizabeth Warren was at most 3% Native American which corresponds to a great-great-great grandparent. This doesn't match her story."

      So her granny missed a 'great' when telling her the story?
      The bitch!

    18. Re:What happens? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "Donald Trump should take the test and find out if he has a higher percentage. If he does, he should then claim to have discovered himself to be genderfluid (the left says you can't question it!), and is now the first minority woman to become president."

      He has bigger tits than Elisabeth Warren anyway.

    19. Re: What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do not confuse the issue.

      An entirely white white oh so completely white woman advanced her career on entirely false claims of being Native American and got busted.

      End of story and her bid for president. She is over. Move on.

      Several attempts have been made to determine if she used her ancestry to advance her career.
      All have failed. Move on yourself

    20. Re:What happens? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "He has bigger tits than Elisabeth Warren anyway."

      And a much wider ass

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    21. Re:What happens? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      "it's just completely boring central European monoculture. Maybe I should sell my DNA to the mixed-race white supremacists"
      Better idea would be to challenge for leadership of Stormfront or some such based on ancestral purity.
      Or go after Steve King's Congressional seat

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    22. Re:What happens? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Elizabeth Warren was at most 3% Native American which corresponds to a great-great-great grandparent.
      From what I read, that was the "at most" value, and that the probable range was 1/64th to 1/1024th, with 1/512th being most likely.

    23. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It corresponds to that to people that don't understand genetics.

      You get half your genes from each parent. At the grandparent level, it's a crapshoot. The chromosomes exchange data during meiosis. You end up with a bell shaped curve with some eggs/sperm having DNA mostly from one grandparent on one side of the family, others with DNA mostly from the other grandparent, and most having a big mix.

      Her grandfather on one side could be 100% native american, and she could still end up with only 3% native american genes.

      People are getting worked up over bullshit.

    24. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't very many white supremacists compared to the number of communists Mr Stalin.

    25. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no white supremacists except in your feverish imagination antifa boy.

    26. Re:What happens? by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I'm defined by who I am, not whether my great-great-great grandfather was a different race to my great-great-great grandmother.

      For any white supremacists wanting to cover up the fact that their great-grandmother's name was actually Leshaniqua and not Mary as claimed, please remit $1,000 to pure_aryan_dnatest_results@paypal.com.

      I'm actually surprised no-one's done this yet. You can buy clean urine test results to cover up doping, I'm sure there'd be a good market for "pure" DNA test results to cover up ancestry. If you can get people to pay money for pee, I'm sure they'd pay money for spit.

    27. Re:What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't be a surprise considering reports that some at these companies have been caught inserting fake lineage into people's results for purely ideological reasons.

    28. Re: What happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And jewish people discover they are only 70% chosen.

  3. ask Elizabeth Warren by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Basically nothing happens, you still get to be a highly paid politician.

  4. The ones I like by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    are all the white supremacists finding out they're made up of 30-40% some kind of dark skinned folks they've decided to hate. It's been a bit of a problem in their community since a sizable chunk of their leadership's been forced out by it. Gotta love the way science chips away at all the old crap our species has put up with.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The ones I like by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's been a bit of a problem in their community since a sizable chunk of their leadership's been forced out by it.

      Who has been forced out? Do you have a citation?

      According to PBS, alt-right groups do not cast out people with "non-white" DNA. They instead question the validity of the results, and there are conspiracy theories that the DNA labs are telling many people that their DNA is "mixed" to push their liberal agenda that "we are all the same".

      Also, they may not be as bigoted as you think. The founder of the Aryan Brotherhood is a Jew.

      Disclaimer: I am white, but my wife and kids are not.

    2. Re:The ones I like by Kjella · · Score: 2

      are all the white supremacists finding out they're made up of 30-40% some kind of dark skinned folks they've decided to hate.

      We're 99% chimp, more like 0.3-0.4% the "dark skinned folks".

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:The ones I like by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Given the questionable accuracy and the ability of technicians to "tune" the test results, it could just be 23andMe trolling those people. Which may be a moral requirement to do to them.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:The ones I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer Translation : I am white, but suffer from yellow fever.

    5. Re:The ones I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The founder of the Aryan Brotherhood [wikipedia.org] is a Jew.

      His last name comes from a step-father his mother named when he was a kid, and he seems to make a pretty big deal about insisting who his biological father is. Considering he tells stories of getting beaten up in school by kids who thought he was Jewish when he was not, it shouldn't be surprising how that influenced his development and why not being Jewish is an important part of his identity...

    6. Re:The ones I like by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It should be. Those idiots deserve it not only for being dumbfuck racists, but for treating the Fisher-Price Babby's First Ethnicity Test results with such confidence. Either factor alone would be enough to warrant a sound trolling.

      Interestingly the white supremacist...community (centipede hive?) has responded to the fact that they're not "Aryan" Ubermensch by shifting to a "well as long as you're white-ish and support white nationalism" standard for membership.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:The ones I like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: I am white, but my wife and kids are not.

      This added nothing to your post except virtue signalling in your mind.

  5. Ethically bankrupt business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no objections against exposing cheating wives, but if your business relies on encouraging your own employees to become alcoholics, that sounds like a rather questionable practice.

  6. That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In case you have forgotten, last year there was a big scandal about 23andme employees adding african ancestry to test results to "screw with the racists": http://www.cracked.com/persona...

    1. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which leads to question that I never saw asked in the reporting of this story: How did the 23&me staff know about the racist attitudes of their customers?

    2. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      cracked.com is a source?

      LOL. Maybe you should dredge up a stormfront or breitbart link too.

    3. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which leads to question that I never saw asked in the reporting of this story: How did the 23&me staff know about the racist attitudes of their customers?

      Uh, is this seriously a question? It should be clear by now that they called the thought police and had them first investigate, sheesh... haven't you seen minority report?

    4. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where have you been for the last decade? If you're white, you're automatically racist. Check your privilege.

    5. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the article. The customer said their reason for the test was to prove that they had no African ancestry. They didn't lie on the results but they did add a " 1%" to several African categories.

    6. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried to use my white privilege at Costco but they wouldn't give me any discount.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re: That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh why wouldnâ(TM)t they take that there? Is white privilege not their currency of choice lolz?

    8. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't argue facts? Attack the source. Typical Alinskyite stooge.

    9. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Fox News host.. but even they are forced to reckon with you Trumptard liars and traitors.

    10. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh.

      Is it really possible that you don't actually know by now that when you go far enough back, everyone is 99% or more African.

      Neanderthals arose in Europe; and most people of European descent have a small mount of Neanderthal.

    11. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were you arrested? If not, then they did give you the credit for being white

    12. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fake News! https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dna-testing-companies-admit-altering-tests-screw-racists/
      It would be suicidal for them to fake results if they want to maintain a viable business and BTW, Cracked.com is a humor site

    13. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong store. Try Whole Foods. Or find any of the newer on-the-go type grocery stores. You won't find anyone under the high-middle class in them despite their ads showing a high disproportional amount of non-caucasians. However their lack of poor people in their ads is accurate. The 'discount' you get is the increase joy of your shopping experience which will be far more gleeful than your real life.

    14. Re: That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that a whoosh? Do you know what whoosh means?

    15. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      That is of course the most hilarious thing about racism. All Americans are all African-Americans if you go back far enough!

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    16. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      In fact, I think we should start reporting DNA test results as "time that your ancestors moved out of Africa". Just to mess with the racists of all persuasions!

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    17. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      You had a discount, but you used it on the "don't have security follow me around" add-on service.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    18. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so white privilege is most useful for shoplifting.

    19. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that credit was already earned via being from a culture which does not emphasize criminality.

    20. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      And which culture is that, and where's your evidence?

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    21. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're charging their victims for the extra security coverage now? Wow. Not having that IS a discount.

    22. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you have no sense of humor.

      Lighten up a bit, you'll live longer.

    23. Re:That was due to 23andme faking results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never stolen anything, so having some rent-a-cop shadow me (poorly) would just be comical.
      Besides, I see non-white people in stores all the time with no security around. Maybe you're just perpetuating a stereotype?

  7. Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1/3 of us are Bastards.

    This sample shows 30%, near 1/3 of children&men are victimized by Parental Fraud.
    https://medium.com/@jimpreston...

    Motherhood is sampling of all women's morals. 1/3 women will actively live life-destroying (to 'loved' husbands/lovers & their children) lies,the rest lie to cover for them.

    Enjoy considering the #BelieveWomen !

    1. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Had no idea the number was that high.

    2. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      You do have to keep in mind that 104% of statistics are made up.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Only the optimistic ones.
      Source: life.

    4. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 5, Informative

      30% of paternity tests, not 30% of paternity tests done for a random selection of children ...

    5. Re: Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the incel!

    6. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      30% of paternity tests, not 30% of paternity tests done for a random selection of children ...

      Yes. They have done studies on "incidentally" taken genetic tests like looking for compatible donors and in the population as a whole it's probably somewhere between 0.5-3%. This is largely consistent with anonymous surveys indicating about 2% of women got pregnant at a time they had multiple sexual partners, some of which would have the "right" dad. It's not one in a million odds but that 30% figure is a myth that never dies.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      A fair amount of infidelity is to be expected. Where reproduction is concerned, we're merely acting in the best interest of our genes. Because it's very limited how many children a woman can raise, their genetic goal is to (a) obtain help raising children to the best possible level, and to (b) pair the genes with the best possible male genes. This encourages women to infidelity with more successful males than their partners, as long as it isn't found out.

      That this is fairly common shouldn't surprise anyone. Being cuckolded is a part of human life. Deal.

    8. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, say that when I’m screwing your wife.

    9. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      I'm sure then that you've never had the feeling that someone was "like a son" to you. Biology isn't all there is to being a parent.

      --
      -
    10. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      What sample? You linked to a blog post, with no link to the actual sample. Just "a recent study": those words, not a link.

      And then he concludes that it somehow is the biggest reason birth rates are falling across the Western world?

      You're as gullible as shit.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    11. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And males will look to get as many sexual partners by any means necessary to spread genes. Part of Nature. But then we reach modern society and morals and suddenly that part applies to one party one. How come?

    12. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess that once the infidelity is revealed, said cuckolded male should not not have to pay alimony after kicking the said bitch out.

      But the courts think otherwise unfortunetely. Ah yes the the great patriarcal system.

    13. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Then I guess that once the infidelity is revealed, said cuckolded male should not not have to pay alimony after kicking the said bitch out.

      But the courts think otherwise unfortunetely. Ah yes the the great patriarcal system.

      A countermeasure from our genes' point of view is keeping the women confined so they won't see other males, especially not high status males. That's basis for the patriarchal system.
      And when that fails, infanticide.

    14. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure then that you've never had the feeling that someone was "like a son" to you. Biology isn't all there is to being a parent.

      That is biology. The drive to be a father figure to children that may not be yours is a response to the female tricks of hidden ovulation and infidelity. When the males can't know for sure whether the children are theirs (or children of male relatives that share a large percentage of one's genes), the best survival tactic from the genes' point of view is to err on the side of caution and raise as many nearby children as one has resources for.
      Even if you know the children aren't yours, your genes don't, so the drive will be there.

    15. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit

    16. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otherwise Maury wouldnt be as fun to watch

    17. Re:Ops, you're a bastard or you child isn't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That this is fairly common shouldn't surprise anyone. Being cuckolded is a part of human life. Deal.

      Murdering the lying whore is a perfectly valid way of dealing, IMO.

  8. Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Even after admitting to putting some small random percentage of a random minority in nearly everyone's results to help steer politics the way they want?
    It's Silicon Valley, Silicon Valley is never about science, it's about the cult of science used to control people.

    1. Re: Science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What politics were steered when someone finds out they are 2% African?

    2. Re: Science? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Probably the same kind of weird events that happened with Clayton Bigsby.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Science? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link for this? Google turns up nothing about 23andMe distorting their results in this manner.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Science? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Ah, never mind. I found it. It's an alt-right conspiracy theory, to explain why some people who thought they were Arian turned out not to be.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re: Science? by jd · · Score: 1

      So far, not a single person has offered a credible link to that claim, and you've offered no link at all.

      Urban legands and conspiracy theories don't qualify as proof.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

      No it's not, they openly admitted it years ago then removed the statements.

    7. Re: Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should try following the statements they put out if you're going to speak on the subject. The only one here spreading fake information is you.

    8. Re: Science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is in no way, shape, or form, involved with any n1gg3erdom.

    9. Re: Science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how in the fuck do you know about it?

      Did you actually read the statement before they deleted it and can you prove it?

    10. Re:Science? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Right, and no-one thought to screenshot or archive the page, no news articles were written about it, all evidence was effectively and completely scrubbed from the internet.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Science? by Megol · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

    12. Re: Science? by Megol · · Score: 1

      So where are the statements? If you know where they are why not post a link to them, or are we to go to stormfront.org to see an "archived" statement?

    13. Re: Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Then how in the fuck do you know about it?

      I have a thing that I believe most people call "memory" and I read a lot of shit on biotech.

    14. Re:Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone expect a company to make a statement, news articles to be written about that statement, then all of the articles and statements to be pulled?

    15. Re: Science? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      The fact you would assume my sources come from a website like that shows a lot more about your credibility than mine.

  9. They couldn't fool me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just looking at the size of my dick - how small it is - I KNEW they were bullshitting me!

    I bought another AR-15 and I felt better afterwards.

    Trump 2020!!!!

  10. #Prison for Drumpftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ironically the test confirmed exactly what she had said all along, whoops? It was the fact that she fed the troll (Donald Drumpfth) rather than just ignored him. Personally, she should have traded it for his taxes.

    Then we'd see who gets to continue being a politician or not, lol. #Prison

    1. Re:#Prison for Drumpftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's sad that your hatred for Trump means you need to defend corrupt Warren.

      They all are corrupt, dems and gop alike.

    2. Re:#Prison for Drumpftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's where I'm at. I GET why many democrats hate the republican politicians so much. I GET why many republicans hate democrat politicians so much. What I don't get is how any of them LIKE their sides politicians. The ones that really have influence in the parties? They're almost all garbage. Not all. Almost all. The kicker is I can't vote the fuckers out. They're not even from my state (not usually).

    3. Re:#Prison for Drumpftards by mukinrestak · · Score: 1

      I think it's a pretty big assumption to assume we actually like our side's politicians. We just hate/fear theirs even more. (feel free to assume/assign whichever side you prefer to there, it works either way)

      Think of it like one of those torture porn Saw type movies. You're being forced to make a choice between having your genitals ripped off with a rusty wire wheel, or your teeth ground out on a stone mill wheel. Or you can vote third party and drill your kneecaps, then get one of the first two options chosen for you anyway.

    4. Re:#Prison for Drumpftards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then she wouldn't be an idiot, and we would be living in a different reality.

    5. Re:#Prison for Drumpftards by haruchai · · Score: 1

      But then she wouldn't be an idiot, and we would be living in a different reality.

      It's all Warren's fault we're living in a reality where Trump has shown us for decades exactly the kind of person he is and still became President

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  11. Surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If a dad took the test only to find out whether his child was his or not, then it means that he was suspicious to begin with, so why is the DNA test result surprising?

    1. Re:Surprising? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I guess it's easier to be shocked by test results than to acknowledge your own suspicions.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Surprising? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      If a dad took the test only to find out whether his child was his or not

      Where do you get this if from? How do you know he didn't take the test for other reasons, and found out something he wasn't expecting?

      At any rate, I won't take any genome test until there is a test facility that (a) will anonymize submissions and (b) will destroy all genetic materials and results after providing the results. Paying extra for the two is fine.

  12. This happened to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turns out I am 95% English.

    Quite a surprise to my parents.

    Still trying to figure it out and why I have a first cousin in Texas.

  13. Re: Isn't this the same company by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    And where did you here that?

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  14. They do make errors by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My sister had my dad tested since although we're stereotypically Asian, our family's eyes are slightly rounder. She thought we might have a European ancestor somewhere in our genealogy. The test results came back 50% Hungarian, 40% Scandinavian. The biggest Asian component was 0.6% Japanese. Our best guess is the sample was contaminated, or they accidentally swapped with someone else's sample. But the company insisted they were accurate and that they never made mistakes.

    I feel really sorry for people whose lives might be turned upside down by an erroneous test result, because they believe a company which is trying to preserve the marketability of their product by insisting they can't make mistakes. Given that 23andMe claims 5 million users, even a 99.99% accuracy rate means 500 customers were given erroneous results.

    1. Re:They do make errors by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      But the company insisted they were accurate and that they never made mistakes.

      Bullcrap. All of these companies have huge disclaimers about the accuracy of their results all over their websites and on the results you receive. None of them say they "never make mistakes."

    2. Re:They do make errors by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I think people put too much faith in these low-budget companies like 23 & Me. Whether it's contaminated samples, or claiming to analyze all sorts of DNA while actually only looking at mitochondrial results... their results shouldn't be considered definitive.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re: They do make errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that would cast additional doubt on any claim

    4. Re:They do make errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We always try to steer the conversation toward the data, tell them that this is science," said Kent Hillyer, head of customer care for the genetic-testing firm 23andMe... ...At first, like most, he was just trying to figure out whether the results were accurate. So Grove explained the science behind the data. The customer then became somber and quiet.

      Question our results? Bud, do you even SCIENCE?!

    5. Re:They do make errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All they are doing is correlations based on genetic tests from people who have family ties to certain areas. If those areas have been cosmopolitan or a melting pot for a long time, the results get quite muddled. If you heritage is from a community they have not tested before or not flagged as separate, expect them to be extrapolating.

      It is like asking a computer to estimate a color name based on surveyed names, but missing one of the three rgb channels. Except there are a lot more than three human tribes.

    6. Re: They do make errors by misnohmer · · Score: 1

      All tests have a margin of error, and none have 100% accuracy. That's just the nature of testing. That is why, if someone gets a surprising result, the best course of action is to perform another, independent test, to further minimize the error. So, if a dna test tells you a child is not yours, before you take drastic action, order a paternity test from an independent company.

      That said, DNA testing companies will of course have to deal with this problem because there will always be a percentage of children whose fathers have been mislead. I saw a long term study a while back tracking paternity over 40 years at a hospital on the east coast of US. Surprisingly, the percentage of children born with the fathers not knowing they were not theirs was almost constant for 40 years - it was around 10%. So, it seems that this is a problem which is not new at all, and it's probably not going to go away since it seems it's just human nature. I'm sure the percentage varies between communities, but it is likely that it also not changing, unless something drastic happens like mandatory paternity tests at hospitals, but that is very unlikely as governments such as the US government prefer to not do that as it would create a large number of fatherless children, therefore nobody to go after for child support. This is why the law in the US only gives fathers 6 months to contest paternity, after that, even 100 independent DNA test results make no difference as far as child support goes.

    7. Re:They do make errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, bro I don't SCIENCE. I spend all my time at the gym lifting.

    8. Re: They do make errors by quenda · · Score: 1

      That "10% rate" is a widely circulated urban legend, or zombie statistic.
      Real studies in western countries show around 1-2% .

      Though 10% has been seen in studies from Mexico, and blacks in Detroit.

      https://isogg.org/wiki/Non-pat...
      http://insidestory.org.au/the-...

    9. Re:They do make errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sister had my dad tested since although we're stereotypically Asian, our family's eyes are slightly rounder. She thought we might have a European ancestor somewhere in our genealogy. The test results came back 50% Hungarian, 40% Scandinavian. The biggest Asian component was 0.6% Japanese.

      I am a 100% ethnic Chinese, with 100% of my ancestors traced back to China.

      The test result, however, insists that I'm a Hungarian / Persian mongrel.

    10. Re:They do make errors by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      What do you mean bullcrap? You're talking about disclaimers. He's talking about what the company said, presumably after contacting them about obviously wrong results. ie, some customer service person.

      Just because they put disclaimers doesn't mean that person-to-person customer service can't then make questionable claims.

      You must be really gullible if you think companies only say what's on their disclaimers.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    11. Re:They do make errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My results has changed over the years. There is more Russian, less German, and more Scandinavian. My Genes goes as far east as Lake Baikal in Siberia.I also know there was a Muslim "Tatar" with my surname in Siberia in the 15 hundreds.

  15. Re: Isn't this the same company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol good convo for a quiet evening. What grounds exactly?

  16. No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a college class, the professor mentioned at one time, professors would do DNA tests on the students (with their consent). That ended when a professor had to testify at a divorce hearing though. This was over 20 years ago when I heard the story.

  17. Re: Isn't this the same company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cracked.com LUL

  18. Some people don't need a DNA test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can tell with 100% accuracy where they came from by just looking at them.

    1. Re:Some people don't need a DNA test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS. White ancestry is a bitch when you have convicted yourself that you are what you see in the mirror.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5u_jTzwbL0

    2. Re:Some people don't need a DNA test by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1

      So your theory proves it. Chelsea Clinton's father really is Webster Hubbell.

    3. Re:Some people don't need a DNA test by Sique · · Score: 2
      Yes, like my classmate: Redhaired, blue eyed, spreckled face. And born in Santiago de Cuba.

      You fail.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    4. Re:Some people don't need a DNA test by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      It'a obvious from the face Chelsea is Bill's daughter. The real question is does Hillary know Chelsea is not her daughter?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  19. Re:SO what? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

    Seriously... why would you analyze your kid's DNA in this manner? Even if you're not the father, it's not the kid's fault - but the child is the one most likely to suffer for it.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  20. When did I say "alt-right"? by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    I said, "white supremacist". OTOH it says something about the alt-right that when you mention white supremacists folks think of the two together...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:When did I say "alt-right"? by quenda · · Score: 1

      I said, "white supremacist". OTOH it says something about the alt-right that when you mention white supremacists folks think of the two together...

      What does it says? Except that oft-repeat slurs stick.

  21. Re:SO what? by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

    What if your kid comes to you as a teenager and just really wants to know the their ancestry. Dad says sure. Results come back and gee, looks like mom cheated and got pregnant. If dad doesn't already know about this, that's a HUGE big deal. I mean, if the wife lied about that, who knows WHAT she is capable of.

    Has nothing to do with the daughter really and dad doesn't love daughter any less. Obviously the child is innocent. BBC literally just did a long write up on this topic. Was a decent read but don't be surprised if skeletons come out of the closet. People like to mess around.

  22. Wine? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    At 23andMe, Hillyer often encourages representatives to go for a walk after an intense call, or cracks open a bottle of wine to help them decompress.

    If experience has taught me anything it's that to decompress something you usually need pkunzip.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most doctors would hesitate to treat emotional issues with alcohol. But I guess it's cheaper than health insurance.

    2. Re:Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kidz today can't run anything from the command line, they need at least Winzip.

      BTW, pkzip has been dead for years. We're getting old.

    3. Re:Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite right! Pkunzip needs to be run in DosBOX, not Wine!

    4. Re:Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wine? At my company, after a bad phone call, no one even got to Whine.
      "You whine on your own time, you over-emotional lazy bastards. Pick up
      that phone. Now!".

    5. Re:Wine? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      We're old, not obsolete.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  23. Dangerously oversimplified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have significant work experience in this area. Consumer-focused services like 23andMe gloss over the ambiguities involved in this type of testing. It's completely wrong to dump a bunch of results in a layperson's lap and say "this is science, herp-derp!"

    Yes, it's true that certain genetic variations have well-established clinical significance and would influence a course of treatment, or reliably signal a high risk of developing some condition. But that list is much shorter than you might think. On the other hand there's a very long list of variants with conflicting evidence of association with disease, or that wouldn't be actionable or significant even if they were real. There are many published findings based solely on randomly discovered correlations and little else.

    Putting aside the extreme outlier cases, these tests probably do more harm than good, causing people to freak out over scary-sounding results that they have no possible basis for interpreting correctly.

    On the other hand, if you simply want to learn that 30% of your genome might be from five different countries in Europe, go for it!

  24. Même chose pour moi by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    Mon test d'ADN confirme que je suis 97% Français et 3% Amérindien. Et pourtant, je ne parle pas un seul mot de la langue française.

    Quelles foutaises, ces tests d'ADN!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Même chose pour moi by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Well, that is the proof that nurture trumps nature.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  25. Re: Isn't this the same company by Cederic · · Score: 2

    Fraud. Exactly the grounds on which he should also be suing her for damages to cover for any legally mandated monetary award against him to pay for the child, plus whatever damages he feels are appropriate.

  26. libtard wet dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're programmed to enjoy feeling that those we hate, like white supremacists, are miserable. In truth, I seriously doubt they care about this. And to the degree that they do, it just drives their hatred.

    If you revel in their misery, you're ultimately no better than they are.

  27. Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexican by raymorris · · Score: 3, Informative

    She claimed to be native American, and specifically Cherokee.

    The test results show that over 99% of her DNA is European. In other words, she's about as white as they come. Very close to the average UK citizen.

    The results further indicate that most likely, she had a single great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparent from South America, Central America, or North America.
    So 6-10 generations back, one Mexican or whatever. That hardly supports her long-held claim "I'm Cherokee". Notably, after the results, the tribe made it a point to come out and say that as far as they are concerned, she's definitely not Cherokee.

  28. Re: SO what? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Apparently, more relevantly, she is NOT capable of using a condom.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  29. Re:SO what? by vakuona · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe people don't like being lied to. It's not necessarily about the child. Having a child is a big step, and a responsibility that most men take seriously. Is it too much to ask that one doesn't lie to a man about the paternity of their child?

  30. Retest, it'll pay for itself. by doug141 · · Score: 2

    If you really think an error, submit another sample, under a false name if you have to. I saw a journalist submit 2 doggy DAN samples to the same company, along with the (required) photo of the animal. The results for second sample he submitted (with the false photo) came back totally different, and matching the photo, not the original DNA "results." $180 bucks for the two samples gave him a notable news story.

  31. Even your own link doesn't claim that by raymorris · · Score: 2

    The article you linked to says that in two instances, when those people stated they wanted to make sure they didn't have any "n*gger* blood", 23andme truthfully told them that their level of African ancestory was âless than 1%".

    They said they did it to those two racists, and their statement was true.

    1. Re:Even your own link doesn't claim that by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder if the same is not true of "less than 1% native american" reported to Senator Warren.

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    2. Re:Even your own link doesn't claim that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Even your own link doesn't claim that by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      23andme truthfully told them that their level of African ancestory was "less than 1%"

      ... when in fact their ancestry was 100% African. Everyone's ancestry is 100% African. The human species originated in Africa (along with the ancestors of Homo sapiens Neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens Denisovensis, to dispose of those few percent of possible argument). If those white supremacists don't like that, then they're probably going to be upset by the news that they are fish - as seen from the perspective of a shark.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  32. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That hardly supports her long-held claim "I'm Cherokee". Notably, after the results, the tribe made it a point to come out and say that as far as they are concerned, she's definitely not Cherokee.

    They have been mostly quiet after the results came out and when forced to make a statement it falls in line with what they said before the results came out: that they reject the concept of using a DNA test to test for heritage whole cloth. They didn't reject her statement based on the small amount the test showed, or because of the test results at all really.

    The results further indicate that most likely, she had a single great-great-great-great-great-great-grandparent from South America, Central America, or North America

    The results quite explicitly refer to an unadmixed native american group, so not Mexican.

    I don't like her handling of the situation and think she pushed things way too far, even if she had a full blooded first nations person 6-10 generations back in her family tree. Disagreeing with her about that doesn't require obscuring or stretching the truth about the test results.

  33. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marriage vows are null and void after someone commits adultery. Why would you willingly pay for someone elses child under false pretense?

  34. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "She claimed to be native American, and specifically Cherokee." - You're a liar and Nazi propagandist. She said she was told by family that she had some Cherokee blood. That was a fact that was proven.

  35. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you find out you have a hereditary disease, either full fledged or as a carrier, and want to know if your kids now have it...

  36. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women aren't capable of much more than cheating if in fact all they did was cheat and lie to cover it up. Face it, women thrive in circumstances where they have the opportunity to reproduce themselves from a wider range of the gene pool. It doesn't do them much good if they have to lock themselves in to one mating partner in order to achieve socioeconomic stability. A woman that can successfully birth children by two or three different men has better overall genetic diversity among her offspring as compared to a woman who reproduces herself exclusively by one man. The only real problem is possible unintentional incest if one of her "bastard" children chooses to mate with a close genetic relative in the future that has no family ties. Overall, it provides females a significant advantage to mate freely, so it should surprise exactly no one when they choose to be socially aggressive. It doesn't mean they're going to rob you blind or murder you.

  37. It should be illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to test another person's DNA without their consent. Even if that other person is your **underage** child. A spoouse (father/mother) shouldn't have the unilateral right to make such a test.

    1. Re:It should be illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wat

      you cheating women!

  38. References were Mexico, Peru and Colombia by raymorris · · Score: 1

    The reference DNA they used for American native is people from Mexico, Peru and Colombia. That's native to the Americas (Western hemisphere), not Native American.

    The test shows that most likely, one of her 256 great^8 grandparents were from the Western Hemisphere.

    1. Re:References were Mexico, Peru and Colombia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reference DNA they used for American native is people from Mexico, Peru and Colombia.

      These days, the models for which Native American sub-populations went where and when during the migration of humans into the Americas are fairly sophisticated and are based on genetic data from individuals living in a wide variety of different places in the Americas. And it's also worth pointing out that Native peoples in Mexico, Peru, and Columbia have ancestors who lived in North America before migrating further south.

      As far as I know, the genetic testing that Elizabeth Warren has done so far doesn't have enough resolution to establish which Native American sub-population her ancestors are from. Parsimony would make it likely that the sub-population is from North America. And, eventually, she might decide to do enough genetic testing to see who else in the world who is currently alive has the same fragments of Native American DNA that she has. If so, I suspect that it would turn out that a number of people in the Oklahoma region, who are as Native American as it's possible to be these days, share DNA fragments with Elizabeth Warren.

  39. Yeah, this is not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would be amazed how much cheating goes on out there - I see it all the time. Women in this country are not to be trusted. Also, don't ever get married.

  40. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She then said she was Cherokee when applying to things. Do you not see how that is a problem?

  41. Surprising Origins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After I was on 23andMe for several months, a half sister popped up and messaged me. She mentioned that she was conceived from donor sperm and was looking for information about the donor or any relatives from that part of her family. It turned out that my parents had used a sperm donor to have me due to fertility issues but hadn't told me that (and seemed to not have any plans to tell me anytime soon despite me being in my mid 20s at the time). They would never have considered that I would have found out on my own given how relatively limited technology was at the end of the 80s. I was fine with it all, and another half sister has popped up since, but some people don't handle it well. I actually feel lucky since the first half sister and I get along phenomenally well.

  42. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In France paternity tests are illegal, so apparently not.

  43. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the same also applies to men, yet they're largely scorned for cheating while women are apparently just doing what's natural and expected?

    I really shouldn't be surprised by this kind of double-standard.

  44. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's capable of anything. She murder the family in their sleep. Or she might be a drug mule for a mexican drug lord and smuggles drug filled condoms inside her front hole. She might even turn up at a local protest even with explosives strapped to her body. Anything I tell you, after an affair like that, she's definitely capable of anything.

    On a more interesting note, if she was actually knocked up by a BBC as long as you suggest, then she probably came so hard that she didn't know what hit her, and was likely sore for days afterwards. But, then you'd expect the kid to come out at least half black.

  45. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a natural drive to continue ones genetic lineage. If the child isn't theirs, then that drive is unfulfilled. The parent probably still holds love for the child, but that doesn't change the genetic reality.

    Then there are circumstances where a male is financially support another man's child, in case of divorce. Sometimes divorce is bitter and the man may find himself isolated from a child yet expected to financially supports its development. This would infuriate a lot of men, particularly if the divorce occurs very early in the child's life, such that they are mostly estranged.

    Your argument isn't nearly as noble as you imagine it to be.

  46. Re:SO what? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Maybe people don't like being lied to. It's not necessarily about the child. Having a child is a big step, and a responsibility that most men take seriously.

    And in some cases, very begrudgingly. Like if you felt this was a colossal fuck-up, but it's your kid so suck it up and be a dad, completely rewrite your plan for life... only to learn you're not actually the dad. Yeah, I can see how that would send someone in a 11/10 rage. I mean it's different if you were totally okay with starting a family and it's the child you wanted but turned out not to be yours. I'd really like to know if there are some statistics on that, like in what percentage of pregnancies was the man expecting a child. Of course sometimes the woman is surprised too and if she doesn't want an abortion it can happen out of the blue, but usually it's just the man "stuck" with an unexpected child. Just because it's something of a surprise pregnancy is not reason to assume your girlfriend is cheating on you.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  47. Determining your own blood type by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

    Determining your own blood type used to be a standard lab exercise in high school biology classes, 30+ years ago. The biggest reason it isn't any longer is, of course, fear of blood borne infections. A secondary consideration was that a lot of students found out via this exercise that it was impossible for them to have been their parents' biological child. This sometimes caused family drama when the child found out this information and brought it home to his or her parents. The kid was adopted and had never been told, their mother had had an affair, the mother had been pregnant when she got married or gave birth before marriage but the groom wasn't the father, there had been divorce and remarriage before the kid was old enough to remember, etc., etc. All sorts of situations. Years ago I remember casually reading somewhere that the biological father of 1/5 of USAn children was someone other than the person the child called "Dad".

  48. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by atheos · · Score: 1

    Source, and prisonplanet doesn't count.

  49. Been tested by three independent companies by jd · · Score: 1

    If they're faking, damn they're good. Identical results on all markers checked by more than one group.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  50. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To paraphrase President Trump - 'That makes her smart'

  51. Genetics are weird - that may be true about you by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    My sister had my dad tested since although we're stereotypically Asian, our family's eyes are slightly rounder. She thought we might have a European ancestor somewhere in our genealogy. The test results came back 50% Hungarian, 40% Scandinavian. The biggest Asian component was 0.6% Japanese. Our best guess is the sample was contaminated, or they accidentally swapped with someone else's sample. But the company insisted they were accurate and that they never made mistakes.

    You ever heard of Chang and Eng Bunker? They died in 1874. They are where the term "Siamese twins" comes from. Look them up on Wikipedia if you don't know about them. They lived in North Carolina and married a couple of white ladies. Some of their descendants still look Asian almost 150 years later. Most don't. But some do look very Asian. And that's despite years of breeding with white people. I suppose it could really be true what the genetic test said based on that.

  52. 23and42 by billybob2001 · · Score: 1

    Nice ad for 23andme - not sure what else it is.

    The only DNA I want to be reading about is Douglas Adams.

    Which would give us 42andme - much better.

  53. The identical twin cases are always amusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    23andme and friends always seems to think they have some percentage of difference that varies with the company and time. You'd think they would at least notice this case.

  54. They do make shit up.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 0

    Make errors? They flat out make shit up. Inside Edition compared 23andMe vs. Ancestry.com and found a 10% difference between the tests. Testing the same sample multiple times revealed 50% differences. The "analysts" make shit up, to confirm what people are proud of (based on names, or how a client may want to prove if they are 100% X, or their self reported history, etc.)

    It's just trying to get people to pay money to get their data added to a giant DNA database. Seems horrible.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  55. Re:SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't mean they're going to rob you blind or murder you.

    They save that for the divorce settlement.

  56. When your sister... isn't. by CODiNE · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know someone who found out their "sister" was actually their mother. It took some time to work out what was going on, but it turned out her biological father raped his daughter long ago, got her pregnant and made her agree to hide it. The victim admitted to this when confronted by her sister/daughter with the genetic test results.

    The family is quite freaked out. The old guy is dead but everyone is kind of wrecked right now. There's worse things than finding out your spouse cheated on you. Much worse things.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:When your sister... isn't. by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Instead of moping about it, they could just decide to move on with their lives. Nothing material had changed and nothing needs to change.

      Even if it turns out my mother is actually my granddaughter, I would still treat her the exact same way (aside from questioning her about the time machine perhaps).

    2. Re:When your sister... isn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always suspected the same about my mother's mother's mom. Supposedly grandma's "auntie" had raised her instead of the real mom because the real mom had mental issues. But Auntie was only 16 at the time...the mid 1910's.

      Better theory: 16 year old gets in trouble. "Ok, your older, married sister will lie it's hers, but you're still raising her."

  57. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    Maybe those places should've hired on merit. They can't lie about their race if you don't ask!

  58. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She claimed to be native American, and specifically Cherokee.

    Incorrect. Elizabeth Warren said that according to family lore, she has a Cherokee ancestor.

    The test results show that over 99% of her DNA is European. In other words, she's about as white as they come.

    Actually, no it proved that the family lore was legit and she is part Cherokee. Not a lot but some which was the claim all along.

    Notably, after the results, the tribe made it a point to come out and say that as far as they are concerned, she's definitely not Cherokee.

    She didn't claim to be part of the tribe. Also, they only seemed to be upset after the results were in, not when Individual-1 was making a big deal about it.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  59. Re: Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, dumbass, perhaps you could read the summary above and note sometimes "social" paternity doesn't match bio.

    How very broad-minded of you, calling out some unknown ancestor for, I dunno, maybe being raped, and blaming Senator Warren for it. Nice.

  60. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very close to the average UK citizen.

    Isn't the average UK citizen nowadays 7% Asian or something like that?

  61. Re: Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You were doing ok up until you said her statements were proven. The dna used was South American. Meaning Hispanic based. She has zero Cherokee or any other Native American in her but had no problem lying about it to advance her career.

  62. Re: Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no no no a thousand times no. The test showed she may have some trivial amount of South American. Zero North American. And she put Cherokee down on all her school and job applications which is a flat out lie. She is busted and her presidential hopes are completely dead.

    Trump did not make a fool of her. She did it herself. Too stupid to be president and that is saying something!

  63. Reliable by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    I've tested with all the major systems (genetic Nerd here) and the results are absolutely compatible ('export' to GEDmatch to compare detail). 23&Me seems to be choosing the 'health' speciality, Ancestry guards its proprietary earnings, FTDNA seems fully professional (and willingly re-tested/confirmed, when I had a query). My surname back to 1700s never matches, and we must accept that 10% of births are 'non-paternity events'. In the old days, that included informal adoption by maternal uncles when genetic parents had both died of the ususal smallpox or TB. Are we so generous now?

  64. Re: SO what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, more relevantly, she is NOT capable of using a condom.

    She doesn't have a dick, so yeah.

  65. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give it up already, this is indefensible even the Democratic party is distancing itself from her. And not because there is a large amount of pressure to do so. Because it is OBVIOUS even to her party that she used her "heritage" to her benefit in several points across her career. As far as her being correct I suspect she was lucky that her fake family legend had any truth at all. Were talking 1/1024th Native American in the best case, that individual lived 300 but more likely 500 years ago. I'm bastardizing the concept a little but that is WAY below the level of accepted scientific significance. That's a infinitesimally small amount to have the gall to self identifying as Native American to Harvard (She checked the box next to Native American) . Which they then used that as proof of staff diversity.

    If you are still defending her you need to find out why you are having so much trouble accepting something as simple as this. At least climate deniers can dig up "evidence" (yes that's sarcastic) complicated enough to muddy up the water.

  66. what to do with result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do people here seriously suggest to continue raising other men's child and that dumping cheater wife and avoiding financial support for her bastard at any cost is not ok?

  67. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by haruchai · · Score: 1

    Very close to the average UK citizen.

    Isn't the average UK citizen nowadays 7% Asian or something like that?

    Isn't more like 30% Pakistani? That's what I've heard from some *white* friends

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  68. Re:SO what? by Megol · · Score: 1

    In many places a cheating woman is killed or at least a pariah while a cheating man is celebrated. In many other places a man can have as many wives as he want, including temporary wives for some sex, while a woman walking outside by herself (even if not exposing any skin which of course is a great crime) can be killed.
    Yes women have it easy and the poor men takes all the blame. :(

  69. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very close to the average UK citizen.

    Genetic inheritance is discrete - more like sampling different colors of marbles than like mixing different colors of paint. So it's not clear what it means to take a genetic "average" of a population. But there are a lot of people in the UK who don't have any Native American ancestry at all - where the last common ancestor between the person in the UK and Native Americans was way back before humans even crossed from Asia into the Americas. Most people in the world don't have any Native American ancestry at all.

    So it's actually kind of cool that Elizabeth Warren does have a little bit of Native American ancestry. And, as a nerd, I think it's very cool that it's now possible to use modern genetic testing to prove that she does have that Native American ancestry. The Bustamante lab that did the analysis is one of the best labs in the world for this kind of analysis. Their report is actually a very good read. And Elizabeth's Warren's family background is also kind of interesting.

    ANd, in the big picture, I'm just not understanding the hate. As far as I can tell, she's one of the few politicians who genuinely wants to reduce economic inequality - to make things better to ordinary working class Americans. That's not to say she's perfect but she seems, to me at least, to be better than most politicians.

  70. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went through my life believing I was Armenian, but my DNA shows no genes from the Caucuses. My dad told me, so I had no reason to doubt him. Was Warren also the victim of lies our parents tell us?

  71. You have Black ancestors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They told a white skinhead supremacist in England.

  72. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Wikipedia:

    white 87.2%, black/African/Caribbean/black British 3%, Asian/Asian British: Indian 2.3%, Asian/Asian British: Pakistani 1.9%, mixed 2%, other 3.7% (2011 est.)

    So I wasn't too far off, it's around 8%, unless I'm reading it wrong (10% with mixed population included).

  73. This is what genetic counseling is for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know expertise isn't particularly held in high regard, but there is a whole profession dedicated to addressing and mitigating these horror stories: Genetic Counseling. These entertainment-genetics firms can't be bothered to offer meaningful pre- or post-test counseling and thus, we have this non-sense. On the plus side, at least the testing is so cheap anyone can afford to get meaningless results which may turn their family's life upside down!

  74. I can vouch for this life destroying bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've talked to women both IRL and online who live dramatically different lives from what their husbands thing they do.

    Contrary to popular belief, you are as well off having your spouse working full time as you are keeping them at home without 'exposure' to other people. If they are too busy and tired after work, they are less likely to be fucking someone else. Just make sure your schedules align. If you are on different schedules your sex lives might be as well.

    As a final example I know someone from a strict religious background who lived a double life as a BDSM sex slave to a co worker, including siring children with them before it was discovered many years later (the spouse having worked out of town for months to years at a time to support them.) They finally got a divorce after this was discovered by the spouse either accidentally or intentionally on the Dom's part.

    People are into fucked up shit.

  75. Depends on their religious outlook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the people who are easily damaged by these revelations tend to be religious. I have a relative for instance who gets freaked out by discussing the possibility of a long term relationship with multiple partners which doesn't involve marriage.

    If this whole family was of a conservative religious background, then going batshit over this is not surprising, since it is one of the most heinous sins possible.

    Having said that, it seems like being supportive of the parent and child and helping them adjust to the dynamics of their new relationship should be at least as straightforward as any other birth parents discovery, even if this one is a little closer to home.

  76. Who needs the second amendment either? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean the government is here to protect and serve CIVILIAN, now face down on the ground with your hands behind you so we can decide if you're a good enough fit to gain a conviction. If you have your FOP donation card we might try and pin it on someone else instead. FOP: the card that gets you out... of jail.

    And while we're on the subject, maybe we should discuss about this whole free speech issue. Some speech is just repugnant and goes against the common decency, morals, and values of our fair and patriotic nation. I mean just ask that Judge lady on fox news :)

  77. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't the controversy that she marked herself as being a minority on college entrance applications? That's a far fling from "according to family lore", that's self identifying as such.

    And sorry, but when you're less than 1% something, claiming that you are is more than a bit disingenuous. I'm a quarter jewish but wasn't raised in a jewish household, as such, I don't know a damn thing about the culture and would never identify as such, except to annoy people (white supremacists and jewish people who take themselves way too seriously). Her identifying as such is just....yeah. She's using it to her advantage, which is just wrong because she can't actually relate to it in any way.

  78. anonymous by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    How about a totally anonymous test?

  79. Re:Not really. 99% European. 8 generations, a Mexi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it wasn't. These tests are not completely accurate, so "1/1024th Native American" could mean any number of things. It could just be an error, but it could also mean she really did have a Mexican, Colombian or Peruvian (the comparison pool for the category) ancestor. It absolutely cannot prove she had a Cherokee ancestor though, because the test does not have that level of resolution.