Slashdot Mirror


Saturn's Rings Are Disappearing At a 'Worst-Case Scenario' Rate, NASA Says (usatoday.com)

A new study published in the journal Icarus found that Saturn is losing its signature rings at a "worst-case scenario" rate, and the bands could disappear completely within 100 million years. USA Today reports: The rings are being pulled into the planet "by gravity as a dusty rain of ice particles under the influence of Saturn's magnetic field," NASA said. The phenomenon is called "ring rain," and it drains enough water from rings to fill an Olympic-sized swimming pool every 30 minutes, said James O'Donoghue of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. "From this alone, the entire ring system will be gone in 300 million years," O'Donoghue said in a statement. "But add to this the Cassini-spacecraft measured ring-material detected falling into Saturn's equator, and the rings have less than 100 million years to live. We are lucky to be around to see Saturn's ring system, which appears to be in the middle of its lifetime."

228 comments

  1. And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by raymorris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's a fun game. Go out on the street and ask 30 random people what could be causing Saturn's rings to slowly dissapear. But first take a guess what the number one answer will be.

    1. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Ambvai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Global warming?

    2. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dark matter hurricanes?

    3. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has 100 people?

    4. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      non Americans.

    5. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aliens.

    6. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by meglon · · Score: 1

      Here's a fun game. Go out on the street and ask 30 random people what planet has rings. My guess will be less than 5 say Saturn. However, for your fun game, the majority of 30 random people will still put out stupider than shit answers to most questions that people should learn the answer too in 9th grade.

      https://variety.com/2013/tv/ne...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    7. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait.... only 30% of people voted for Trump?! I didn't realise he lost the vote by quite that much.

    8. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 0

      Russians (if you are from the US/UK)

    9. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      raymorris

    10. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Given that half of the planets (determined by how many we're calling planets this week) have rings the odds of someone giving a right answer are 2-1. It might be a complete guess, but so what?

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    11. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      19% of the US population voted for Trump. That's all, most of them didn't vote and it's causing the rings of Saturn to disappear.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duck seasonal migration?

    13. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Humans sent "robots" with their space probe work.
      Space was fine until humans sent missions on fly pasts.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    14. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Trump?
      Global Warming?
      The Communists?
      Satan?
      Jews?
      Blacks?
      Whites?
      Cuba?
      Fluorine?
      Democrats?
      Republicans?

      I guarantee you all of these answers will appear somewhere

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    15. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Sorry, forgot Aliens, The Government, The Cops and Mexicans. Ans since this is /. we should add Microsoft, Apple, Facebook and Google too.

      Did I get all the 21st century bogeymen? Radiation perhaps?

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    16. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Shit, I forgot the Russians and the FBI or the CIA! Of course! I knew I forgot something. Throw the Chinese and maybe the Japs in for good measure too. Or it might be a military experiment by Uncle Sam.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    17. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mexicans

    18. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by tigersha · · Score: 0

      So here is the final list.

      Trump?
      Global Warming?
      The Communists?
      Satan?
      Jews?
      Blacks?
      Whites?
      Cuba?
      Fluorine?
      Democrats?
      Republicans?
      Aliens?
      The Government?
      Cops?
      FBI?
      CIA?
      KGB?
      The NSA?
      The Russians?
      Chinese?
      Japs?
      Mexicans?
      Microsoft?
      Apple?
      Facebook?
      Google?
      IBM?
      Hillary Clinton?
      Obama?
      Radiation?
      The Military?

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    19. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Oh lordy, forgot about Muslims, Iran, Al Queda, Osama Bin Laden, ISIS and Saddam. The most important bogeymen of them all!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    20. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      =)

    21. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      In my neighborhood, 23 said Uranus. And the other 7 said Pluto.

      And most of them would be accidentally correct.

    22. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      global waffle

    23. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 will say "gods will, nothing we can do"
      5 will say global warming
      5 will say "what's a saturn?"
      5 will say "I dunno man, I'm not a planetary scientist"
      9 will say "I knew it, Global Warming is a scam! The liberal elite scientist socialists are trying to trick us!"
      1 will shoot you and take your clipboard, because 'murica.

      How close did I get?

    24. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still down a few: the Curse of the Bambino, Black Cats, Violent Video Games, D&D, Harry Potter, Witchcraft, Satan, the Billy Goat, Saruman, Homosexuals, Lex Luthor, Thanos, and of course, Aglets.

    25. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of them will realistically appear unironically.
      People who like to blame Trump/Republicans for things aren't conditioned to use it outside of political issues yet.
      I don't think anyone would use the Cuba one either. As far as I know there is no conspiracy theory involving Cuba in space.
      The Jew one probably works. If there are Nazis on the moon then Jews are probably strip mining Saturn's rings.
      The Satan one is also pretty useful since everyone knows that all the others are just doing Satan's bidding.

    26. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You thought they said Uranus..

    27. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

      > Trump?

      Actually president Trump just announced: "Let's make Saturn great again!".

    28. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did! And they blamed illegal immigrants, negroes, liberals and godless atheists.

      But they repeated themselves.

    29. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hipsters.

    30. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >cult of climatology

      Oh, a conspiracy theory!

      >dinosaurs and their horrible DGW (Dinosauric Global Warming) that destroyed the Jurassic

      You should go back on your medications. Your diatribe doesn't actually address the issues, and creates false strawmen that have nothing to do with modern climate trends.

    31. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      This is probably the perspective you're looking for: https://xkcd.com/1732/

    32. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But muh rates!!!

    33. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You forgot GMOs.

    34. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by drnb · · Score: 1

      In my neighborhood, 23 said Uranus.

      And they are correct. That is one of the four with rings.

    35. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      So did you just *invent* something so that you could say you hate the American people in public? Seriously? Don't you have enough gripes with them without making shit up?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    36. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you guys all missed the obvious:

      creimer thought they were onion rings and he figured out a way to attract them in order to eat them.

      He probably uses his mountainous mass to attract them with gravitation.

    37. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      The big one today is...MEN.

    38. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odds are 165:15 in my estimation

    39. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by mpercy · · Score: 0

      Yep.

    40. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by mpercy · · Score: 0

      Yes, 19.19% voted for Pres. Trump (~62.9M / 327.8M). And 20.07% voted for Sec. Clinton (~65.8M / 327.8M).

      But, of course, according to the rules of the game the all knew they were playing by, Trump garnered more of the Electoral College votes. In sports terms, Clinton moved the ball well between the 20s and built up a few more yards of total offense, but failed to score in the red zone. Plus, she turned the ball over 5 times (she lost 5 states that Obama had won twice). Sure 500 yards of offense looks nice in the box score and gives one a sense of moral victory, but the 5 turnovers led to the scoreboard difference.

      She--the most qualified person ever to run for the office (so said Obama)--lost 5 states that Obama carried twice, to perhaps the worst candidate ever to run for the office. Clinton, the wily political veteran and consummate politician, who had spent pretty much her entire life preparing for her Presidential run, lost to a blowhard billionaire, a rookie she outspent by about 4:1. Many people voted for him simply because he wasn't her.

      OTOH, even in a race between a turd sandwich and a giant douche, one of them's gonna win.

    41. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by mpercy · · Score: 1

      Spiders?
      Bees?
      Quicksand?

    42. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer went to a Shake Shack and only had a strawberry milkshake.

    43. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vladimir Putin

    44. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure a lot more will just say that these damn scientists just want more grant money so they scaremonger disappearing rings so they can steal our way of life and dictate that we can't drive SUVs anymore.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    45. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And NGOs.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    46. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Make Saturn ring again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    47. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Global warming?

      And 100% of politicians could find a way to turn this into new taxes and regulations.

    48. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah the Jurassic was a great time for modern human civilization! This is as bad as the guy saying "Venus is still a planet" when talking about runaway CO2.

    49. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by bill.pev · · Score: 1

      >> that people should learn the answer too in 9th grade.

      Grammar? Spelling? but, I agree with your (or is it youre, (sic) I can never remember) basic premise. It's your presentation I have a problem with. Yes, that is a preposition at the end of my sentance. (sic) Deal with it motherf*ckers.

    50. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot rock and/or roll, teenagers, single mothers, and hipsters

    51. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Well, in "sports terms" you neglected to mention that the rules of the game were biased (gerrymandering, voter suppression), refs were bought (electoral fraud) and there was a significant home field advantage (gross imbalance in free media coverage). Then there's the huge difference in respect for the rules, one team had none. While there's nothing wrong with your analogies, they are carefully chosen to paint an inaccurate picture of what happened.

      It's all fine to say that the better team failed to win because it didn't execute, but that doesn't excuse the cheating by their opponent. Had the election been honest, had there not been an unprecedented shitstorm of propaganda from every direction, had there not been possibly treasonous conspiracies with foreign actors, the outcome would have been different. Sure Hillary fumbled, but her opponent runs a corrupt criminal organization and was assisted by foreign powers.

    52. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 0

      Global warming

      on Saturn?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    53. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a game that's even more fun; go out on the street and record 300 random people answering a question, throw out all the correct response and any incorrect responses which aren't funny or incredibly stupid, then compile what's left and show it on late night TV.

      The fun is in seeing how many idiots mistake that for an actual survey that represents the intelligence of the average person, then pat themselves on the back for being smarter than average.

    54. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jews

    55. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      the many probes sent around Saturn and Jupiter?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    56. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Talderas · · Score: 1

      You forgot the rich.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    57. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Funny

      At what point in your thought process did you think "slashdot will surely understand this better if I use a sports-based metaphor"?

    58. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half of the people in my neighborhood would probably say "Vulcan" or "Tatooine"

    59. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Global warming

      on Saturn?

      Of course...don't you know that earth's global warming is the leading cause of the failure of the sun, and eventually our whole solar system if we don't do something NOW??

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    60. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Technically, there *should* be one, in line with the Sun moving along the main sequence. It's fairly slow, though.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    61. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamn! When you put it like that, those Russians are the most effective campaign managers in the universe. Cuz it was the Russians that got him elected, right? That's what the media says. Everyday... Since November 2016...

    62. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not 30% of Americans but virtually peer reviewed scientific consensus that global warming is to blame.

    63. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.

      Now class this brings me to my next point. Don't. Smoke. Crack.

    64. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was going to be a funny thread until you mentioned some complete nobody that no one cares about. You are boring. Just stop.

    65. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by mpercy · · Score: 1

      Good point, especially the American football one. Should have used a soccer or Fortnite analogy.

    66. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's funny. Was actually trying to be funny... And you guys really think someone did not hear enough of the global warming on earth, he really think that's on Saturn?? And got -1 for that!! My gosh, the level gets pathetic around here...

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    67. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... Global warming?

      Probably you'd find a number like that. It is also very likely that very few, if any scientists, would blame the disappearance on global warming.

      Which probably should indicate we should listen more to scientists instead of random Americans when it comes to figuring out cause and effect and making predictions.

    68. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawd.

      Just Kill Yourself.

      Seriously, your thinking is so flawed, Life has no use for you.

      You would of more use as Pig Food.

    69. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does no one point out that if Hillary wasn't a dirtbag releasing her emails would not have hurt her.

    70. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 to 1 is 50% chance. 2 to 1 would be a 66% chance. Or that you'll potentially win twice what you risk on a bet.

    71. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Everyone should know all references here should be in Library of Congresses (LoCs) or car metaphors. Double points if both can be used at once.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    72. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They call it "climate change" now.

    73. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by sosume · · Score: 1

      Let's turn this into a positive: companies can exchange "Saturn ring credits" which can be bought from the government. Win-win!

    74. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lame joke.

    75. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Because, in 100 (million) years, all the land on Saturn will be covered in water!

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    76. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dasunt is what happens when you drink too much and destroy the humor and sarcasm portions of your brain.

    77. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Shotgun · · Score: 1, Informative

      Because it has been done 10,000 times and is always ignored? The same way it is ignored when you say that Hillary was "colluding" when paying the Russians for the "dossier" (but, I guess that was ok because she laundered the payments through her law firm Perkins Cole), or that the Clinton Foundation was a pay-to-play scheme (and that is coming to light now that Louis Lerner and other Obama appointees aren't in office to cover for them).

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    78. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the graphs of computer performance that they used to print in Byte Magazine. It would show a huge increase, because the graph was cut off to show the numbers from 90% to 100%.

      Really, that graph you show is just as meaningless.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    79. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Hillary you fuck

    80. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Autistic nerds are horrible at letting anything go.

    81. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have learned which form of "to" to use in 2nd grade.

    82. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Never tell me the odds.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    83. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      #uranusnow

      (with the understanding that many still pronounce # as pound instead of hashtag)

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    84. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of VERIFYING what you read. Here is the MOST IMPORTANT PART. It was 26 percent of ELIGIBLE voters. Know what that means? Not the percentage of votes cast, but anyone that could vote. Now follow this up with, YOU REALLY THINK HITLARY got that much of a higher percentage of ELIGIBLE voters?

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    85. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Soros?

    86. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's funny. Was actually trying to be funny... And you guys really think someone did not hear enough of the global warming on earth, he really think that's on Saturn?? And got -1 for that!! My gosh, the level gets pathetic around here...

      Slashdot's sense of humor has drained away over the last decade. There are a lot of folks with mod points and anger issues. I think they're mostly newer (registered post-2010) and come from other sites where it's common to down-mod if you disagree, and every joke is played totally straight. That's the wrong way to do it. :-(

    87. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice obvious try, creimer.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Cryptofeces Lepidoptera Creimerus infestation is a serious problem. Not only are they capable of reproducing asexually like amoebas, they can also lay eggs hermaphroditically in unexpected places. They can disguise eggs as something useful to fool the unaware, sometimes pretending to be a haiku author, blogger, vlogger, or IT closet cleaner.

      Very dangerous. They can seemingly reproduce out of the cosmic background radiation, even if you step on twelve of them, there's always one you miss.

      Don't be fooled by the C. Lepidoptera Creimerus's innocuous, rolly-polly, and almost friendly appearance; despite its great size, stupid demeanor, and bedraggled toothless appearance, they have the hardiness of a tardigrade.

      Only a concerted, targeted downmodding campaign has been shown effective in controlling this dangerous pest.

      Experience shows that stopping such a campaign leads to C. Lepidoptera Creimerus returning within days.

      Don't let it happen again!
      --
      the biggest looser on Slashdot

    88. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      State borders were gerrymandered? Say what?
      Electoral fraud? Say what?
      Disadvantage in free media coverage? This one is true. During the Primaries, the Clinton campaign worked with media companies to promote Trump, leading to him getting significant free coverage - 60%-70% positive coverage. However, during the general election, the same media companies turned around and produce 95% negative coverage.
      If 70% positive coverage is worth $5 billion during the primaries, what is 95% media attack ads worth to the opposition during the far more expensive general election? $10 billion? $20 billion?

      Respect for the rules? We just discovered that Clinton secretly channel campaign funds through a cutout to hire a foreigner in order to manufacture evidence to overturn the election if she lost. Is that the treasonous conspiracy with a foreign actor you are talking about?

    89. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Uranus would have been my second choice, after Saturn. It's a good guess that there would be dark rings around Uranus.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    90. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you people really bought into the Russian narrative that Hillary is the evil one. It's turning out that Donald is ten times the criminal you pretend she is. Everything with the Trump name attached to it is under investigation, and they're finding criminal activity all over the place.

      I'm curious - that you drank so much of the Kool-Aid, did the Russians spike it with VODKA?

    91. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Watching miss universe a couple of nights ago, they had three commentators, including a very effeminate man who was probably some fashion guy. He got excited near the start and said âoethis is like the World Series of fashion; of course I shouldnâ(TM)t use a football analogy.â

      Yeah, probably not. Especially when nerds are laughing at you.

    92. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      The Trump-Russia Dossier was first paid for indirectly by the Republicans to Fusion GPS, dirt to use against him during the primaries, as part of opposition research on other Republicans. When Trump became the presidential nominee, the Free Beacon dropped funding and the DNC picked it up. It IS worth noting that the Dossier was not in the form that we know it until Democrats hired Fusion GPS. Nobody paid "the Russians" for this.

      I'm not sure why you'd say money was "laundered" through Perkins Coie, they were the attorney firm of record for the Clinton campaign, and paying a firm for opposition research is as legal for Democrats as it was for the Republicans. It's hard to launder money when you're reporting it on your public campaign finance reports.

    93. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the graphs of computer performance that they used to print in Byte Magazine. It would show a huge increase, because the graph was cut off to show the numbers from 90% to 100%.

      Really, that graph you show is just as meaningless.

      Climate scientists, assuming you believe them, will tell you that a swing of 10C (the graph's scale) is an enormous amount, having a huge effect on global temperature variations and weather patterns. They'll tell you 2C is a pretty big number too.

    94. Re: And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Nobody paid "the Russians" for this.

      Christopher Steele is on the record saying that he paid Russians for their lies. Hillary's team is the one that expanded it to include the Russians. If Trump was "colluding" by his son and a staffer meeting with a Russian, because the Russian claimed to have something useful, then how was paying for that information not colluding?

      I'm not sure why you'd say money was "laundered" through Perkins Cole,

      Because, it was not reported as "opposition research". It was reported as legal fees. The point of my snarky comment was that people have actually argued with me that it was ok that Hillary colluded, because she passed it through a law firm. How would you define "laundering"?

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    95. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your faux outrage does not impress

    96. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Meaningless? It shows 20,000 years of context. It includes noticeable warm and cold periods in that period, and makes it quite obvious how the current warming is different from all of those fluctuations. I admit it doesn't show 100 million years, but do you think that over those 100 million years, you'd find more than one event with a faster temperature change than today?

      I think you'd find at most one, about 65 million years ago.

    97. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Well it seems it's a more general matter ; don't know if you're a stackoverflow contributor, but over there also the same amount of angriness has taken over the site within the last (two?) year(s).

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    98. Re:And 30% of Americans blame this on ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hash tag" is not a real thing. It was made up by Twitter as a convenient way to identify key words. Whenever anyone says "hash tag" simply replace the term with "key word" and the rest of the conversation will make sense.

      The correct English terminology for that symbol is either "pound" or "hash".

      Otherwise, great joke, I'm still chuckling :)

  2. Extension by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I propose a sequel to Wall-E, where humanity realizes Saturns rings are almost gone - but saves the day by replacing missing ring-ice with plastic floating in the oceans of Earth!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Extension by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Funny... but since you mentioned it, all of the plastic in earth's oceans wouldn't replace even one *millionth* of Saturn's rings, and it's also going away at least an entire order of magnitude faster than the rate at which humans have ever added plastic to our oceans.

  3. Re:so, contrary to theory... by meglon · · Score: 0

    Congratulations...you've jumped to an conclusion not supported by the article. Sorry to burst your bubble, but you simply are not as smart as you think you are, Chris. On the brighter side, at least your not as stupid as the the dipshit above making straw man arguments about climate change (well, maybe it's more of a toss-up still), when in fact he's only confirming that a lot of people in the US are stupid.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  4. Here's what we'll do by Kohath · · Score: 4, Funny

    We'll build bid, fat, beautiful new rings. They'll go up so fast your head will spin!

    And Enceladus will pay for it!

    1. Re:Here's what we'll do by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      We'll build bid, fat, beautiful new rings.

      Eh, like other large-scale pork projects, I expect it will be a no-bid contract.

    2. Re:Here's what we'll do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Uranus will pay for it

    3. Re: Here's what we'll do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should send the migrant caravan to saturn. Apparently maintaining the rings is a job saturners won't do.

  5. Tax the sh*t out of people by scsirob · · Score: 2

    .. I'm sure some new tax will be invented to Save the Rings of the Evil of Mankind

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Tax the sh*t out of people by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 1

      Not sure how but the EU leftists will find a way

    2. Re:Tax the sh*t out of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So glad people are waking up this bullshit

    3. Re: Tax the sh*t out of people by jd · · Score: 1

      There are no leftists in Europe. They're the centre, whether you go by global average or by the range of possible political views.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Tax the sh*t out of people by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There are leftists now in the EU? Care to point them out? I thought by now they're all gone.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re: Tax the sh*t out of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are leftists, but in terms of being in government, only in Portugal. All other nations in Europe have center or center right to more right governments.

    6. Re: Tax the sh*t out of people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Center by global average? LOL, I don't think you've actually thought about that one. The planet is rather large and there are a lot of people in it.

  6. Space Force by inking · · Score: 1

    That’s all right. Now that we have a Space Force, we could probably go and make sure someone holds the rings in place so that our children 100 million years down the line can look at circular crap floating through space.

    1. Re:Space Force by drnb · · Score: 1

      No need. Just dump the waste materials from orbital industries into orbit around Saturn to replace the lost matter.

    2. Re:Space Force by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly not sure if you're joking or not. Do you know how much material there is in Saturn's rings?

    3. Re:Space Force by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Not enough?

    4. Re:Space Force by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Only if by not enough, you mean that we don't have enough waste material to even *begin* to replace what is being lost

    5. Re:Space Force by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I mean that there is not enough material in Staturn's ring because they're disappearing. :)

    6. Re:Space Force by drnb · · Score: 1

      Its not how much is in the rings, its how much is being lost in a given amount of time. The summary indicated about two swimming pools worth of material per hour. That seem manageable.

    7. Re:Space Force by inking · · Score: 2

      Are there really people here genuinely concerned about the rings being “lost”?

  7. But that's good news, isn't it? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

    It means the Ace Rimmers across the multitudinous universes are living longer, on average - so the orbital decay of their coffins is happening more frequently than new coffins are arriving.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:But that's good news, isn't it? by The-Ixian · · Score: 2

      Smoke a kipper for me, skipper. I'll be back for breakfast....

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
  8. Heat from the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The heat from the sun, which is causing warming of the Earth, is evaporating the rings of Saturn. This is very incredible. Hopefully the sun will cool down soon and everything will be back to normal.

    1. Re:Heat from the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because a cold sun would be good for humankind.

      I actually think increased levels of radiation, from multiple sources, would be good as it encourages forced evolution and the decline of defectives.

    2. Re: Heat from the sun by jd · · Score: 1

      Evolution is fixed rate.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re: Heat from the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. What?

      I desperately hope you missed a '/s' or similar. Otherwise you may just be an idiot.

      If you say that seriously, I recommend googling 'speed of evolution'.

  9. Sorry, could you repeat that please?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reverb coming out of your backside from you having your head so far up it when you speak is making it difficult to hear anything you say. Or take you seriously.

    Please remove your head from your butt before commenting further.

    1. Re:Sorry, could you repeat that please?! by meglon · · Score: 1

      More likely it's just the shit in your ears.

      Don't let the mere fact that some of Saturn's rings have already coalesced into moons/moonlets, and never mind that a SINGLE SOLITARY end to ALL MATTER in ALL RINGS is the stupidest idea yet... planetary accretion discs and what is essentially a rubble disc around a planet are two very different things, being acted on different events, and in different environments. This isn't a one-or-the-other scenario. If you weren't trying so hard to disprove ALL physics for your own, childish, bullshit, brain dead reasons, you might sit back and take a science thread off once in a while from your anti-reality, anti-physics crusade.

      The biggest problem here is... you assume you're intelligent; you're not.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  10. Look away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He thinks Saturn needs to have rings on account of the fact that it is actually a giant alien record player and the beat must go on.

  11. Thanks, Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you have destroyed Saturn, too.

    If we can blame Trump for everything that is going wrong, even if he had nothing to do with it, we can blame Obama as well.

    Because

    1. Re:Thanks, Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you already been doing that even for events what happened way before Obama.

      You and your president complex. A president is not an emperor.

    2. Re:Thanks, Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I blame Bush.

  12. Re:so, contrary to theory... by ByteSlicer · · Score: 5, Informative

    accretion disks DO NOT condense into discrete well-defined orbital bodies like planets (or in this case, moons)

    Planetary rings are not accretion disks. So your statement is already wrong from the first two words. Even so, there is evidence that some of Saturn's moons were formed partially out of condensed ring material.

    the Big Bang theory as a simple explanation of everything we see.

    The Big Bang theory has little to do with ring mechanics. Maxwell already had a comprehensive model of how the rings worked (based on Newtonian physics) 70 years before Lemaitre posed the idea of a Big Bang.

  13. i guess the libbies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will try to blame this on "climate change" as well LOLOL

    1. Re:i guess the libbies by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm more expecting the conspiracy nuts to say that this is all fake and that the scientists only fabricate it so they can somehow destroy our murrican way of life.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Day ruined! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here I am having a great day, and I learn that in 100 million years, some planet I'll never have any business with, will cease having rings around it.

    Oh noes!! Whatever will I do?! Life sucks now!

    Nah but seriously "worst case scenario" as a headline for something profoundly unimportant is clickbait one would expect on buzzfeed, not Slashdot.

  15. This is why we can't have nice things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seriously. You want to know what is truly to blame for people willfully ignoring climate change? Science journalism. When I see articles like this, that talk about an interesting observation of an astronomical phenomenon in the same way that the National Emergency Broadcasting System talks about impending thermonuclear annihilation, it makes me jaded to articles about things that actually affect me or more importantly, things that I affect. It isn't the fault nor really the responsibility of scientists to prevent their discoveries from falling in the hands of hacks, but it is BeauHD's fucking job to keep clickbait bullshit off the front page of Slashdot.

    1. Re:This is why we can't have nice things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. How can one tell the difference between this hyperbole and the climate change narrative?

      Answer: you can't.

      So - perhaps not so much willful ignorance, but rather, discarding of what is obviously a bogus and manipulative narrative.

    2. Re:This is why we can't have nice things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it is BeauHD's fucking job to keep clickbait bullshit off the front page of Slashdot.

      You misspelled "on".

  16. Climate change? by eminencja · · Score: 1

    It appears that the global warming is truly global, affecting Saturn's rings.

    1. Re:Climate change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! You beat me to it.

  17. Not much time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should grab your kids and take a trip to go and see them before theyre gone !

  18. Worst case scenario?? by Potor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What does this even mean, in this context?

    I mean, apart from external realities causing science to lose it characteristic dispassion?

    1. Re: Worst case scenario?? by jd · · Score: 1

      It means that if you were to take the equations modelling the system and look for the values that produce the greatest negative first order differential, the values Cassini was capable of observing are very close to those required.

      Or, if you like, increasing or decreasing any of those values would result in the rate of change declining.

      This is the only sense in which you can speak of a bound. If you choose to call this worst, and probably only the media do, it's childish but at least based on something real.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  19. Humans too by eggstasy · · Score: 1

    So basically you shouldnt worry too much about what happens 100 million years ago, civilization will not last 100 thousand XD

    1. Re:Humans too by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 0

      100 thousand? It may not last past our great grand children...

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    2. Re: Humans too by jd · · Score: 1

      So?

      Science was about discovery, understanding and prediction, last time I looked.

      Not about one species or any member therein.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re: Humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once civilization crumbles, science will be lost.

    4. Re:Humans too by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You really think that we won't see the end of it?

      Well, depends, if you're young enough, you just might.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Humans too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically you shouldnt worry too much about what happens 100 million years ago, civilization will not last 100 thousand XD

      Civilization won't make it to 2020. Sad.

  20. Will be dead in less than 50 by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

    Wow, I'm so concerned.

    1. Re: Will be dead in less than 50 by jd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did anyone ask you to be?

      Since when was astronomy or astrophysics about your feelings?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Will be dead in less than 50 by quenda · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm so concerned.

      How about Jupiter? There is a good chance the Great Red Spot will be gone in a few decades.
      Maybe we could drop in a few thermonuclear weapons in the right spot to give it a kick?

      That kind of puts the 100 million years for the rings in perspective.

      https://news.nationalgeographi...

    3. Re: Will be dead in less than 50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it anything like Math?

  21. Two things by jd · · Score: 0

    First, why the hell is everyone bleating about politics on an astronomy topic? On a level of ignorance that is the only astronomic thing here?

    For crying out loud, if you want 4chan, go post on 4chan. Why the hell ruin the internet for everyone else? Too bloody pathetic?

    Second, study the bloody rings!

    I don't give an f about your whinging about tax cuts and designer genes, hike taxes to 60% or just take the money. Get space missions up there to study how the rings regenerate themselves, how they're depleted and what the relative rate means for the composition of various moons.

    If they have to take all your money to do it, why should I care? You want a society where it's every person for themselves, then it's not my problem if you're the person they crush. I only care about people in societies that take care of those in them.

    Why should you get a say in space tech? You don't want a say, so why give you one? You're not interested in the results, so why bother to share?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  22. Yawn by jd · · Score: 1

    Got anything better to do than post irrelevant things about stuff beyond you?

    Be like Strax.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep on sleeping

  23. We're the clever ones by jd · · Score: 1

    You're the potato one

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  24. Re:so, contrary to theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    accretion disks DO NOT condense into discrete well-defined orbital bodies like planets (or in this case, moons)?/quote.

    Uh, this disk of material is doing a pretty good job of condensing into a planet: Saturn. Some moons gained material too, but otherwise it is doing a pretty good job of accumulating into a single large body. Given that most of the rings are within the fluid Roche limit, it is pretty well in line with current theories that moons would struggle to form but also not lose what they've already accumulated.

  25. OMG: GLOBAL WARMING AGAIN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH NO! How will the universe survive such a change? No Rings around the collar????

  26. Telescope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG!!

    Just bought a telescope - hope it gets here in time for me to still see the rings!!!

  27. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES FOR YOUR LIES NAZI FAGGOT KEN DOLL

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  28. Cool ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is pretty cool.

    This is a planetary feature which happens to exist within the time we are capable of seeing an knowing about them.

    They'll come and go, have their own life cycle, and eventually go away.

    That a bunch of monkeys on a boring rock in a corner of the galaxy floating in a vast universe can be aware of other planets in our solar system (or outside of it), know they have features like rings, send probes to look at them, and calculate that in 100 million years they'll be gone ... I find that pretty awesome, in the literal sense of the world.

    We think of planets and the solar system and galaxies as these fixed, static systems which never change.

    In reality, they're massively complex systems, which ebb and flow, wear out, fall apart, get made all over again. Over long scales, everything is in constant process of change.

    There's no real human impact here, and the timeline is so crazy it's doubtful humans will still be around ... but that we can know this is happening around us is the kind of thing that just makes me happy to be alive to know about.

    Science is cool, knowing what the universe around us doing, what it's made of, and in part how it got that way ... that's really amazing to me.

  29. "Worst case scenario"? by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    Why is it a "worst" case scenario? Why not a best case scenario? Saturn will lose those freakish rings and will soon morph into a normal round planet like everyone else. It can be proud of its body for once.

    1. Re:"Worst case scenario"? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Stop ringshaming, please.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:"Worst case scenario"? by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Right, this absurd value judgement has utterly no meaning. It is also a quote attributed to "NASA scientists" but does not appear in the quoted study.

      "We are lucky to be around to see Saturn’s ring system, which appears to be in the middle of its lifetime," said O'Donoghue.

      This is also not at all clear and is completely meaningless. What is special about the rings that makes us lucky to have seen them and how are we not unlucky to have not lived at another time to have seen even greater things? How do we not know that the time to live is when the rings disappear and we're unlucky to have lived too soon?

    3. Re:"Worst case scenario"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're being quite silly, but I'm not sure if it's intentionally playing along. Anyway, the rings are a really interesting phenomena. If the mammals and us had evolved when they were already gone, would anyone have even imagined the possibility?

    4. Re:"Worst case scenario"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is special about the rings that makes us lucky to have seen them and how are we not unlucky to have not lived at another time to have seen even greater things? How do we not know that the time to live is when the rings disappear and we're unlucky to have lived too soon?

      Besides, another 3 planets got rings.

      *Comparing all of them could give us important conclusions/information.

  30. Re:so, contrary to theory... by mpercy · · Score: 1

    I thought the Big Bang Theory was about the blonde chick and the nerds?

  31. Needs one ring to rule them all by mpercy · · Score: 1

    That's the ticket.

  32. Probably humanity's fault? by mpercy · · Score: 1

    The Cassini probe May have disrupted the delicate balance of the rings when it flew by. That butterfly's effect of gravity cascaded into all the rings collapsing into the planet. We should just stay home?

  33. Antiscience idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your straw man back to the gun club, people are interested in science here.

    1. Re: Antiscience idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people on slashdot were interested in science then they would question AGW orthodoxy, not try to suppress views that conflict with their socialist SJW religion.

    2. Re:Antiscience idiocy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Take your straw man back to the gun club, people are interested in science here.

      Why would 'science' look at the changes in Saturn's rings as a 'worst case scenario"? Scientifically, there is nothing inherently bad (or good) about the normal course of planetary evolution. It is what it is. We can study it, explain it, but the headline is anything but scientific in nature.

  34. Let's ask the real question everyone's thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, clearly someone needs to say it. But...

    We need to determine how human activity is causing this catastrophe, and how we can apply tax strategies to mitigate it.

    There, I said it. I propose a Ring Tax on telescopes and other magnification devices to provide funds to study the dissipation of the rings and how human activity is causing it (and we ARE the cause, that science is settled). We can funnel the money to politically well-connected "scientists" via a political nonprofit or maybe even the Clinton Foundation.

    Sounds like a great plan to me. Let's get started. Forward!

  35. Straw Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you schilling political crap on a science articla?

  36. Not bad... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny
    Given that the company closed in 2008 and it is legally bound to provide spare parts only till 2018, it is really surprising its piston rings are going to last for 100 million years....

    Wait... it's not that Saturn right...?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  37. TERRIBLE NEWS EVERYONE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this ALARMING rate only 100 million years!

    Right, so since we actually have no idea what is happening or why, that seems like a stretch to even think this is radical behavior.

  38. Not to worry... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    the rings have less than 100 million years to live

    With the incredible rate of advancement of technology, we'll probably blow them up long before then!

  39. Maybe so... by bill.pev · · Score: 1

    ... but, frankly, when they are gone, I doubt anyone will miss them. In fact, I doubt anyone will even realize they were there in the first place. Like glaciers, or the gulf stream, or fish, ...

    1. Re:Maybe so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but, frankly, when they are gone, I doubt anyone will miss them. In fact, I doubt anyone will even realize they were there in the first place. Like glaciers, or the gulf stream, or fish, ...

      Or Bill Perv

  40. Now when did they form? by Headw1nd · · Score: 2

    I feel like this significantly informs the theories of how the rings formed. If they are being lost this quickly, it would seem to disprove theories that have them being formed in the early solar system, and suggest a more recent cause.

    1. Re:Now when did they form? by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that's what I'm wondering. Once we figure out more, can we work backward? What caused them? How big/bright did they used to be? Did Jupiter used to look like Saturn, but clear out its rings faster, or are they of a different origin and type?

  41. Alright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who flew creimer to Saturn and told him the rings are ice cream?

  42. Sun's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the video, UV from the sun is causing the problem. So, we just need to turn off the sun. That would fix the global warming problem too.

  43. I'm busy today. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "It's fairly slow, though."

    From the Slashdot story: "... could disappear completely within 100 million years..."

    Does anyone mind if I worry about that tomorrow?

    1. Re:I'm busy today. by sycodon · · Score: 1

      100 million years!

      Fuck!

      We need new taxes and a hashtag, pronto!

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re: I'm busy today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just in from Michelle Obama. #savesaturnsrings

  44. Thanks, Obama... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the rings are missing, somebody should check Hillary's emails...

  45. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about what happens in 100 M years! You freaks... but we all have to eat, right? ;)

  46. TDS lives on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gerrymandering

    Except, President is a national election. Gerrymandering is immaterial in the Presidential count in all but Maine and Nebraska: a grand total of 5 electoral votes at stake and none of which in those all important "swing state" votes. But I wouldn't expect a TDS victim to understand simple logic or try to understand the process before spouting off some CNN talking point.

    voter suppression

    I know, because getting an ID is sooo fucking hard. And everyone knows, only Democrats are poor. Unfortunately, Democrats are apparently too retarded to figure out how to navigate the confusing, scary world of the DMV. Republicans apparently understand it from birth. And voting by mail might as well be calculating moon shot trajectories. Who could figure that shit out? And my God! Having to re-register to vote if I fail to show up to the polls for four years straight? Might as well ask me to explain quantum mechanics.

    electoral fraud

    God only knows what you mean by this idiotic statement. Perhaps you are talking about Michael Moore offering to cover legal expenses if electors violated their legally bound duties and vote for Hillary? He was suborning electoral fraud, but nobody took up his offer.

    gross imbalance in free media coverage

    You need to focus your anger on the media then. They are still imbalanced (or should I say unbalanced) in their Trump coverage. You should thank them though. Every time Hillary hit the news she was saying things to alienate half the country. Her "deplorables" comment cost her the election more than Russian interference. You TDS victims are too angry and pig headed to admit that she cost herself the election from her own contemptuous, hateful, and arrogant attitudes.

    that doesn't excuse the cheating by their opponent.

    Kind of like how Hillary used the DNC to cheat her way to the nomination? The leftards like to speculate how Trump "cheated" by playing to the existing rules whereas we have proof - thanks to Wikileaks - that Hillary cheated her way to the general election.

    Had the election been honest, had there not been an unprecedented shitstorm of propaganda from every direction

    LOL. A shitstorm brought out because Hillary misused classified email on an unsecured server and wiped 30,000 emails while under a subpoena. Somehow leftards dismiss this as no big deal and focus on Trump paying hush money to shut up 2 gold digging whores looking to cash in. Let's see... National security violations from a high level Cabinet Secretary with willful destruction of evidence vs. blackmail payoffs for an affair of a civilian running for office.

    Maybe your side ought to pull your heads out of your collective asses or you'll have to live with another four years of MAGA.

  47. Only ONE explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Global Warming.
    Or rather intergalactic warning.
    We must eliminate all the farting vegan activists to cool down the earth and later Saturn.

  48. Anyone blaming climate change yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, something has changed in a grand scale. Blaming the climate change is kinda mandatory these days. Just curious.

  49. Slashdot, news for jocks by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That's funny.

    It *is* an apt analogy, however.

    1. Re:Slashdot, news for jocks by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

      I prefer zypper analogies you insensitive clod!

      --
      It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  50. Future though! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    all of the plastic in earth's oceans wouldn't replace even one *millionth* of Saturn's rings

    Aha, you are talking about all the plastic now - remember this is Wall-E FanFic, set in a distant time after much plastic has had time to accumulate, and the citizens showed a propensity for leaving crap outside!

    An interesting technical exercise - would all of the hydrocarbons on Earth manage to produce enough plastic to make a dent in replacing Saturn's rings?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  51. Also we're lucky with our Moon by shoor · · Score: 2

    We're lucky to live in the 400 or 500 million year window when Saturn's rings are spectacular huh? I think we're also lucky to live in a time when we get those nice solar eclipses. Our moon used to be closer, probably blotted out too much of the sun, and someday it'll be further away, only annular eclipses.

    Truly, these are the best of times. Unless of course, Wolf-Rayet 104 blasts off or Yellowstone erupts or ...

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  52. Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me the water could be harvested and used to make fuel.

  53. There shall be signs in the stars, sun, and moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.
    Mystery Red of the Great American Eclipse 2017

  54. Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks Obama

  55. Here are the real answers, the actual results by raymorris · · Score: 3, Funny
    Here are the actual answers from 48 people:
    • The sun is burning hotter and as the sun orbits closer it could be causing the rings to fade.
    • The sun is causing the ice within the rings to melt and fall back down to the planet.
    • energy burning out
    • dust disipates
    • Saturn's gravity is not enough to hold them
    • gas vapor
    • Probably global warming.
    • The chaging atmosphere
    • As the planet gets older and losses mass the gravitational pull is decreasing which is causing it to lose debris on the outer portion of it's rings and it's not able to be replaced with the decreased gravitational pull.
    • I do not know
    • I think that the dust and particles that the rings are made up of are slowly either drifting away into space, or disintegrating into nothing as the years go by.
    • I think it could have to do with having more space debris coming into the galaxy. This could be slowly taking out parts of the rings as time goes on.
    • New rings are forming making the current ones dissapear, eventualy the rings will be bigger.
    • gravity is making them spin away
    • The asteroids are slowly getting pulled away by the gravity of the sun
    • The planet is several billions of years old. That has to be some wear and tear on it. Planets do not have an indefinite lifespan.
    • Donald Trump's hair spray
    • The gravatational pull of Saturn is slowly drawing the material of the rings to the planets surface.
    • moisture or lack thereof
    • Changes in atmosphere on Saturn
    • It could be a natural process that is meant to happen and we just don't understand.
    • Maybe it is getting closer to the sun which is causing the rings to disintegrate. The rings are misty and not made of anything of substance so at any sign or resistance, they will falter.
    • The lost could be due to constant rotation of the ring itself.
    • My guess is that the rings are gas and the gas is burning off or dissipating, just as a natural process.
    • The sun is too powerful
    • The water in the rings are dissipating.
    • They aren't disappearing it just appears they are due to Saturn's rings angle compared to the earth making most telescopes unable to see the rings.
    • Globalization is only reason
    • What I think could be causing the rings to slowly be lost is due to gravity pulling the rings closer to Saturn and in turn, the rings are disappearing.
    • just a guess: i would say that the cause is explained by natural science; that they are disappearing as a natural act which has nothing to do with human activity. in other words, i don't think there is any "visible evidence" that could answer why the rings are disappearing. it's just part of nature.
    • It could be from the objects forming the rings breaking down into smaller pieces due to collisions with other objects thus causing the rings to become less significant over time. It could also be from those same objects exiting their orbit around Saturn caused by Saturn's gravitational pull, either pulling the objects inwards towards the planet or causing a bit of a boomerang effect if the orbit of the object is irregular.
    • Because of our thoughts
    • meteorites
    • dissipation of gases
    • The rings are being pulled into Saturn by gravity as a dusty rain of ice particles under the influence of Saturn's magnetic field
    • natural decay
    • the gravitational pull of Jupiter and Saturn
    • They are melting and leaving the gravitational pull of Saturn.
    • There is an increase in carbon dioxide
    • the air in the ozone could be one of the reasons
    • The vacuum of space is pulling it apart.
    • the innermost rings would disappear first as they rain onto the planet. ... When this happens, the particles can feel the pull of Saturn's magnetic field, which curves inward toward the planet at Saturn's rings
    • The planet is drifting away from the sun and the gravity on the planet is going down.
    • Because of
    1. Re:Here are the real answers, the actual results by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      The forces of the university as...

      Wow, someone thinks their school has a much bigger impact on reality than it actually does.

    2. Re:Here are the real answers, the actual results by raymorris · · Score: 1

      Several Slashdot commenters mentioned "global warming".
      I see eight responses (16%) which clearly suggest the respondent was thinking in terms of global warming:

      The changing atmosphere

      Changes in atmosphere on Saturn

      There is an increase in carbon dioxide

      the air in the ozone could be one of the reasons

      The sun is burning hotter and as the sun orbits closer it could be causing the rings to fade.

      The sun is causing the ice within the rings to melt and fall back down to the planet.

      Probably global warming.

      The planet may be heating up

    3. Re:Here are the real answers, the actual results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not know

      The hero we need.

      Donald Trump's hair spray

      The hero we have.

  56. They actually won't be visible in a few years by raymorris · · Score: 1

    By the way, this person's answer is also correct:

    > They aren't disappearing it just appears they are due to Saturn's rings angle compared to the earth making most telescopes unable to see the rings.

    In a few years, we won't be able to see the rings of Saturn because we'd be looking at them from the edge. if you want to see them, or want your kids to see them, now is the time to do so.

  57. ocasio cortez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just waiting for Ocasio Cortez to get out there and let us know this is because the Rich aren't paying their "fair share".

    The rings would be 200% larger today if the richest gave just a tenth or their 2018 earnings !!

  58. This is outrageous!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I demand the UN be sent in to overthrow the peaceful nation states of Saturn and put in place a ring protection tax so everyone can hand over their money to a one world/one solar system monopoly right now.

  59. And?... So? by dragon-file · · Score: 1

    In 100 millions years we will most likely have destroyed earth, either killing ourselves off, or spreading like a plague throughout the galaxy. Either way, Saturn's rings wont matter.

    --
    Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
  60. What created the rings then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're melting or whatever at a geological blink of an eye, makes me curious then, how were they created? (please don't answer "God"). Can't the clock be run backwards? And, why saturn?

    Inquiring minds wanna know.

  61. They'll be gone in 100 years? by Lucas123 · · Score: 1

    Oh, no. I read that wrong. It's 100 million years. I guess I don't have to hurry up to get my space passport renewed after all.

  62. Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blame white males - especially the Christian ones - and global warming. It works for everything else. Perhaps you could even land a government grant.

  63. "Worst-case Scenario" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh no a "Worst-case Scenario" is happening! How will I be able to go about my daily business now?!

  64. Fuck you and your meaningless numbers by sootman · · Score: 1

    I love when people use numbers that appear big, except when compared to *really* big numbers.

    ...it drains enough water from rings to fill an Olympic-sized swimming pool every 30 minutes...

    OH NO! Except...

    ... the entire ring system will be gone in 300 million years...

    300,000,000 years * 365 days * 48 half-hours in a day = 5,256,000,000,000. So there are 5.256 TRILLION swimming pools worth of water up there. I'm not going to lay awake tonight worrying about this.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  65. KYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least your not as stupid

    You were saying? Did you prefer to die in a fire, kill yourself, or choke on a bag of baby dicks?

  66. Source unknown = duration unknown by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The cause/source of the rings is still unknown. Thus, how do they know they'll disappear if the source is not known? The cause/source may replenish the rings.

    While a one-time collision is one possible cause, periodic ice-burping by a moon or two may also be the source.

    One interesting theory is that periodically a pair of moons get too close to each other, heat each other up, melt their cores, burp water/ice, swap orbits, and then drift into normal orbits for a while again. (Sounds like my marriage.)

  67. but wait, there was more ... by epine · · Score: 1

    We are lucky to be around to see Saturn's ring system, which appears to be in the middle of its lifetime.

    And we're unlucky to have missed Jupiter's rings, which were far more impressive.

  68. Rings and Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saturn's rings are the result of catastrophic events such as impacts and the collision of captured bodies. There will be more collisions with Saturn in the future. And thus more orbital debris (rings) will be generated.