I work with AI, but I fear what weapons government will make with it... thinking computers without fear and without surviving instinct... Just like they made bombs with chemistry, tanks with physics, the nuclear bomb with quantum mechanics and smart missiles with electronics... makes me worried what will be next when we make a intelligent computer... undestructible soldiers, killer robots at size of insects... Government turn good things on bad things... --
What about the millions of PGG Articles? Will they be wasted? Hey I do not like it. It is a commercial site. I really do not like it. PGG seems better. Yeah. It must be a vogon site. --
(display "Scheme is the ultimate logic language, Intercal is the ultimate unlogic language and OISC is the ultimate simple language. Well, I coded some functions to Scheme that emulate Intercal and OISC, so now Scheme is the ultimate logic, unlogic and simple language.") Well, Intercal is still unlogic -- PLEASE COME FROM (69) PLEASE ABSTAIN FROM STASH (42) DO.1 - ".1$'&:51~"#?1$!12~;&75SUB"?'V.1~.2'$,&1SUB:5~#33578"'"'"~'#65535$"?'V#&85'"' PLEASE DO.2 >- !1$"&';?79SUB",&7SUB:173"'~!?9$ #8196'"'~.1"$.2'~'#&5$"'#1279$#4351'~#65535"' P.S: OISC = One Instruction Set Computer (Slashdot <TT> dont show CR) --
There is no such thing as a Open Source government -- No Government at all would be nice! All kind of government is evil and are in it only for the power. You have read Noam Chomsky, you should know. A FAQ on Anarchism
neither under state socialism.... Because there always will be the mass of poor people, there always will be exploitation, there always will be control under capitalism -- under this system, the technology is a WEAPON, it creates unemployement, it creates dependency, it creates dessocialization, and it creates _power_ to who owns the tech. Only in a society without hierarchic power and without money technology can do good. FAQ --
Well, if it is Open Source, than I think we can put whatever we want there hehe. Die stupid politicians! I will put an entire anarchist manifesto on there.
Note: AL Gore will claim that he invented Open Source and Linux now hahahaha. --
I have to say one thing. Internet is nice because it free us from the mass media. In internet you can choose in what site to go and you just dont have to "watch" what everybody else "watch" (like television). And WE make the internet, not them. Revolution, no. But it may be a first step.
You cannot have a Linux OS without a Linux kernel but you can have one Gnu/Hurd OS with Hurd kernel. The compiler is the main part of an OS, not the kernel. Without the compiler you cannot run on your machine. Well, you may say that you get the binaries direct from RedShit Distribution, but anyway, there would be no binaries without the compiler. There would be lines and lines of code doing nothing. Any other C compile that you would use would be one of these things: 1) not free 2) not open-source 3) not as good as gcc
So, remove GNU from Linux and you get an empty box. Maybe Windows is better than Linux w/o GNU.
Bob is an idiot. I am sure he have crack in that smoking pipe.
--
"Devil Linux Sucks, Tom Christiansen is an idiot"
on
Feature:Free Linux
·
· Score: 1
Linux is a kernel, not a OS. What makes the OS is the kernel, the compilers, the utilities and the applications. That's why we should call it Gnu/Linux. Gnu compiler + Linux kernel. Change it to BSD - don't matter - it then should be named BSD/Linux. (Argh) When Gnu releases the Hurd, it will not be called "The GNU Os", it will be called Gnu/Hurd. And also, it is just the name. It doesnt matter. If an apple was called gnapple it would continue to be an apple (a cheaper apple, of course:-) ) Also, Gnu software are fisically 10% of the distro, but are the most used. Disk space is nothing, it does say nothing. I can have 100 programs from lalalasoft in my distro and not use them. But sure that the most useful software on the distro are GNU - who don't use gcc, binutils, textutils, bash, sh-utils, and even ls?
Since the 80's Gnu was supporting and making the free compiler and utilities, and RMS was the first that believed on free software. Was not him, Gnu/Linux would not exist today neither those bunch of free software. Why? Because Linux (the kernel) depends on the compiler. And the OS depends on the compiler and on the utilities (binutils, fileutils, etc.). Linus Torvalds would not be motivated to grow his Minix into Linux if he had not found Gnu and joint with them. Also, Gnu/Linux quality depends a lot on the compiler quality, and we all know that gcc is the best free compiler. (And also better than most of the non-free). So, what's the problem with GNU? They are not charging anyone for the software. They make little money from the donations and investing it all back again on free software. FSF and RMS are good. They mean no harm to free software. No harm at all. They just add to it and makes it greater. They do not control their programmers neither their software. It is all written in the GPL. If it was a evil license, Linux and the other 80% linux software would not be GPL.
You should fight against Red Hat! They are the evil ones. They are trying to monopolize free software hiring all good FS programmers and to make their pack manager the "default" for free software. They are selling the free software and making a lot of profit on work from GNU People and Linux People and other FS programmers that are not being paid. Red$at Capitalists! Die in pain!
-------------- Well, sorry about the grammar - I from Brasil andy dunot spike inglish --
They are evil and dirty. They have a lot of money. They buy programmers. They buy you. They seek power. They seek control. They charge you for what is not theirs. They sell softwares that are free. They lie. They steal. They cheat. They stab in the back. And RedHat is worst. They fool you programmer. They make profit from the free software you make - and they do not pay you. They enslave programmers. So, next time, think better before spending your money on this dirty company. Think well. Remember that you do not want another company to monopolize software - this time FREE software.
Slashdot Mirror
I work with AI, but I fear what weapons government will make with it... thinking computers without fear and without surviving instinct... Just like they made bombs with chemistry, tanks with physics, the nuclear bomb with quantum mechanics and smart missiles with electronics... makes me worried what will be next when we make a intelligent computer... undestructible soldiers, killer robots at size of insects... Government turn good things on bad things...
--
What about the millions of PGG Articles? Will they be wasted? Hey I do not like it. It is a commercial site. I really do not like it. PGG seems better. Yeah. It must be a vogon site.
--
Read George Orwell's 1984...
They actually just have to put a hidden camera on it now...
--
The AntiChrist is putting his mark on Mit. Soon Linus will join.
--
(display "Scheme is the ultimate logic language, Intercal is the ultimate unlogic language and OISC is the ultimate simple language. Well, I coded some functions to Scheme that emulate Intercal and OISC, so now Scheme is the ultimate logic, unlogic and simple language.") Well, Intercal is still unlogic -- PLEASE COME FROM (69) PLEASE ABSTAIN FROM STASH (42) DO .1 - ".1$'&:51~"#?1$!12~;&75SUB"?'V.1~ .2'$,&1SUB:5~#33578"'"'"~'#65535$"?'V#&85'"' PLEASE DO .2 >- !1$"&';?79SUB",&7SUB:173"'~!?9$ #8196'"'~.1"$.2'~'#&5$"'#1279$#4351'~#65535"' P.S: OISC = One Instruction Set Computer (Slashdot <TT> dont show CR)
--
There is no such thing as a Open Source government -- No Government at all would be nice! All kind of government is evil and are in it only for the power. You have read Noam Chomsky, you should know.
A FAQ on Anarchism
--
I agree. We (Brazil) "sell" our orange juice to you and you sell us 3x expensive shitty coca-cola.
Globalization = Imperialism.
A FAQ
--
neither under state socialism.... Because there always will be the mass of poor people, there always will be exploitation, there always will be control under capitalism -- under this system, the technology is a WEAPON, it creates unemployement, it creates dependency, it creates dessocialization, and it creates _power_ to who owns the tech. Only in a society without hierarchic power and without money technology can do good.
FAQ
--
Why does the family dies? Do you care why?
--
Well, if it is Open Source, than I think we can put whatever we want there hehe. Die stupid politicians! I will put an entire anarchist manifesto on there.
Note: AL Gore will claim that he invented Open Source and Linux now hahahaha.
--
I have to say one thing. Internet is nice because it free us from the mass media. In internet you can choose in what site to go and you just dont have to "watch" what everybody else "watch" (like television). And WE make the internet, not them. Revolution, no. But it may be a first step.
-----------------
2nd!
--
You cannot have a Linux OS without a Linux kernel but you can have one Gnu/Hurd OS with Hurd kernel.
The compiler is the main part of an OS, not the kernel. Without the compiler you cannot run on your machine. Well, you may say that you get the binaries direct from RedShit Distribution, but anyway, there would be no binaries without the compiler. There would be lines and lines of code doing nothing.
Any other C compile that you would use would be one of these things:
1) not free
2) not open-source
3) not as good as gcc
So, remove GNU from Linux and you get an empty box. Maybe Windows is better than Linux w/o GNU.
--
Bob is an idiot.
I am sure he have crack in that smoking pipe.
--
Linux is a kernel, not a OS. What makes the OS is the kernel, the compilers, the utilities and the applications. That's why we should call it Gnu/Linux. Gnu compiler + Linux kernel. Change it to BSD - don't matter - it then should be named BSD/Linux. (Argh) :-) )
When Gnu releases the Hurd, it will not be called "The GNU Os", it will be called Gnu/Hurd. And also, it is just the name. It doesnt matter. If an apple was called gnapple it would continue to be an apple (a cheaper apple, of course
Also, Gnu software are fisically 10% of the distro, but are the most used. Disk space is nothing, it does say nothing. I can have 100 programs from lalalasoft in my distro and not use them. But sure that the most useful software on the distro are GNU - who don't use gcc, binutils, textutils, bash, sh-utils, and even ls?
Since the 80's Gnu was supporting and making the free compiler and utilities, and RMS was the first that believed on free software. Was not him, Gnu/Linux would not exist today neither those bunch of free software.
Why? Because Linux (the kernel) depends on the compiler. And the OS depends on the compiler and on the utilities (binutils, fileutils, etc.). Linus Torvalds would not be motivated to grow his Minix into Linux if he had not found Gnu and joint with them.
Also, Gnu/Linux quality depends a lot on the compiler quality, and we all know that gcc is the best free compiler. (And also better than most of the non-free).
So, what's the problem with GNU? They are not charging anyone for the software. They make little money from the donations and investing it all back again on free software. FSF and RMS are good. They mean no harm to free software. No harm at all. They just add to it and makes it greater. They do not control their programmers neither their software. It is all written in the GPL. If it was a evil license, Linux and the other 80% linux software would not be GPL.
You should fight against Red Hat! They are the evil ones. They are trying to monopolize free software hiring all good FS programmers and to make their pack manager the "default" for free software. They are selling the free software and making a lot of profit on work from GNU People and Linux People and other FS programmers that are not being paid. Red$at Capitalists! Die in pain!
--------------
Well, sorry about the grammar - I from Brasil andy dunot spike inglish
--
They are evil and dirty.
They have a lot of money.
They buy programmers. They buy you.
They seek power. They seek control.
They charge you for what is not theirs.
They sell softwares that are free.
They lie. They steal. They cheat.
They stab in the back.
And RedHat is worst. They fool you programmer. They make profit from the free software you make - and they do not pay you.
They enslave programmers.
So, next time, think better before spending your money on this dirty company. Think well. Remember that you do not want another company to monopolize software - this time FREE software.
Support Debian.