Slashdot Mirror


User: Opportunist

Opportunist's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
44,848
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 44,848

  1. Re:The true problem aren't the bondsmen... on Google Will Ban Bail-Bond Ads (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 1

    No, they should not. But it is your right to damage and destroy your body as you see fit, just don't come crying to me when you're done.

    Same goes for adrenaline junkies that need their fix going hanggliding or freeclimbing. Do what you want, it's your life and your body, but when you break your bones, you're on your own.

  2. Re: this is a mistake on Google Will Ban Bail-Bond Ads (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 0

    You didn't get the memo? When MY side does it, it's fake news. When THEY do it, it's treason.

    And this is true no matter what side of the fence you sit at.

  3. Re: this is a mistake on Google Will Ban Bail-Bond Ads (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 2

    Could it be a bipartisan action? It would be the first sensible one in a long time.

  4. Re:Told you so on Orbits of Jupiter and Venus Affect Earth's Climate, Says Study (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    That's really old knowledge, you know...

  5. And as long as they don't start selling it to someone else I fail to see the problem.

  6. Re:I hope more people will do this on 'Biohacker' Who Injected Himself With DIY Herpes Treatment Found Dead (livescience.com) · · Score: 1

    Given the amount of snake oil peddlers that are currently filling the market, from "Vitamin B17" to MMS, I dare say that at the very least people should experiment with their own bodies and not those of their kids.

  7. Re:good for china on China Plans $47 Billion Fund To Boost Its Semiconductor Industry (wsj.com) · · Score: 1

    We're living in a world that gets more radical by the minute. New parties do emerge in Europe where 5% of the votes is already something you can work with, but all of them are of the radical kind. Moderation is on the way out and we're getting more and more entrenched in our positions, not giving an inch for everyone's afraid to lose a yard in the process. Compromise is seen as weakness, cooperation as betraying your position.

    You want to establish a party of moderation and sensibility in this climate? Good luck, you have my vote, and I guess yours, so we'll probably be about as successful as the parties trying to reestablish the monarchy and that loonies that want to build a christian theocracy.

  8. I think it's time to assemble a list of those pages so we know which consider it too much trouble to not sell your privacy to the highest bidder.

  9. So you have two other parties. What you don't have is two additional parties to choose from.

  10. Re:The same NASA that used the shuttle boosters? on Could SpaceX Rocket Technology Put Lives At Risk? (chicagotribune.com) · · Score: 1

    Of course you're allowed to learn from past mistakes. NASA always did, fortunately. But with the SBRs they added a huge mistake to something that was already far from feasible. The shuttle didn't achieve what it was supposed to, not by a longshot. What we wanted was a cheaper replacement for the throwaway capsules of the past, something we could reuse over and over for multiple trips. What we got was an overhyped, WAY over budget and way too expensive kinda-sorta-at-least-partly-reusable space craft... well, reusable... reusable after it spent enough time and money putting it back together that it would have been faster and cheaper to build a new one.

    The shuttle was a failed concept, to be honest. But it was a prestige object. Maybe the first "too big to fail" thing we had. Frankly, single-use rockets like the Russian used were the right way. Easier (very Russian technology, easy to build, easy to maintain and when in doubt, bang with a hammer), cheaper and, especially as the shuttles aged, WAY more reliable. The last time a cosmonaut died in a Soyuz was in 1971. Given the recent track record, it's safer in the capsule on top of the rocket than in its vicinity before liftoff...

  11. Re: Caller ID Spoofing on Robocalls, and Their Scams, Are Surging (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    It does. But just like email "From" and "reply to" headers, it can be spoofed and just like in email it is by malicious actors.

  12. Re:How to get blacklisted on Robocalls, and Their Scams, Are Surging (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    The difference is I can do this whenever I have time to waste. It sure beats sitting in boring meetings.

  13. How to get blacklisted on Robocalls, and Their Scams, Are Surging (nytimes.com) · · Score: 2

    Easy. Waste their time.

    I got spam calls by the dozen. I picked up, immediately terminated the call when I noticed it's a spam call and they kept coming back. Until I was pissed enough that I felt like playing with the asshole. Be bizarre. Be crazy. Talk about him with some weird conspiracy shit. Eventually you'll get written off as some lunatic batshit crazy idiot and they stop calling.

  14. Re: Caller ID Spoofing on Robocalls, and Their Scams, Are Surging (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    And even then it should be announced to the one you do it to.

  15. Safety is an illusion, why do you wear a seatbelt?

  16. Ok, let me rephrase this: Parties that can be taken serious. Actually serious enough that they make governments virtually impossible if you try to avoid them.

  17. Would somebody please think of the KZ-Guards...

  18. Re:Seems like the right reasons to me on New Service Blocks EU Users So Companies Can Save Thousands on GDPR Compliance (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    None of them are a problem to the average store. Most have already finished implementing it, I recently got a flood of emails from stores I used ages ago, telling me that they'd be really sorry to lose me as a customer but they are going to delete my data now if I don't (click here) to tell them I'm still interested in staying with them.

  19. With blackjack and hookers?

  20. Re:EU showing their true colors on New Service Blocks EU Users So Companies Can Save Thousands on GDPR Compliance (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    Very obviously you haven't even looked at it.

  21. Re:Why would an American site need to block GDPR? on New Service Blocks EU Users So Companies Can Save Thousands on GDPR Compliance (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    It could get tricky, but in theory it's possible. In the end, unless you're storing private sensitive data about EU citizens in your database, why would you care?

  22. Re:Nothing Wrong- It's for all the right reasons on New Service Blocks EU Users So Companies Can Save Thousands on GDPR Compliance (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    When you don't deliver to the EU, there is no sensible reason for anyone but a shyster to register with your webpage and then try to abuse this. And that's easily thwarted by only accepting addresses in the US, because he'll have a hard time explaining how you're required to protect his private information when he himself made sure all the private information you have about him is false.

    Judges in the EU in general aren't dumb enough to let shit like this fly.

  23. You mean you'd be sad if all the spammers went away and the trojan in your computer can't connect to its control server anymore?

    That part of the internet can as far as I'm concerned go to hell as well. Just like the data miners that now wail about their lost hunting grounds. Good riddance!

  24. Re:Seems like the right reasons to me on New Service Blocks EU Users So Companies Can Save Thousands on GDPR Compliance (bleepingcomputer.com) · · Score: 1

    Have you even bothered to take a look at the law? We're not talking about a company asking for your name and mail address so they can deliver a box with shit you buy in it. You take that information, you store it, you don't distribute it, you're golden.

    Once you start selling it, you're in deep shit. As you effin' should be!

  25. Protecting privacy is fascist, war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength...