Well, most of what PragerU posted was prime time bullshit, but I still think he should be allowed to say it, purely for its entertainment value. And because it's great source material for a lot of debunk videos.
Odd. I never had any problem avoiding it. Actually, it was even never suggested to me out of the blue (and I had REALLY weird suggestions in the past). Then again, I never bothered to look for it either.
So what's this supposed to tell us? That you can get propaganda (of all kinds, why single one out?) easily when you're looking for it. Well, DUH? That's newsworthy? Really?
I think it's time for a new news outlet. I call it "obvious news", and it will carry all these things that are apparently outrageous and completely unfathomable... oh wait, Vice beat me to it.
Well, if you put cooks into positions of power in your country that not only question the validity of evolution and development in organisms but also that bacteria can make you sick, you get what you deserve.
Him going for a second term? Could you point to anyone who wants that?
Trump? He didn't even want a first term. He wanted a scandal to promote the media outlet he planned to spawn from the hype around it. Republicans? The GOP wants to get rid of Trump more than the Dems could even want to, the problem is they can't simply say that they want to get rid of the annoying orange.
So who would want to see him a second time? Let alone a third one.
As you have already correctly identified, twitch-based games put us old folks at a disadvantage. But the more tactical and psychological a game gets, the more we manage to complete or out-compete younger players. We tend to excel at games where stealth and planning along with "playing the players" is the road to winning.
Fahrenheit 451 implies a change of historic records simply because they are remembered instead of written down. Memories are not fixed, they change over time. And even if people don't actively and deliberately try to distort and twist them to match their world view, that tends to happen automatically.
So the net outcome is the same. Whether you deliberately fictionalize history or whether it is an outcome of imperfect memory, the main difference is that the latter is harder to control.
This is more news for nerds than the announcement of the awesome features of the latest iPhone or Samsung Galaxy. The (old) movie is actually something a lot of geeks had and have some interest in, so a remake is certainly of interest.
The feature list of the phones was more something for squealing fashion girlies...
Slashdot Mirror
Well, most of what PragerU posted was prime time bullshit, but I still think he should be allowed to say it, purely for its entertainment value. And because it's great source material for a lot of debunk videos.
So ... if I only kill 6000 people it's almost-kinda-sorta ok?
I'm asking for a friend.
Odd. I never had any problem avoiding it. Actually, it was even never suggested to me out of the blue (and I had REALLY weird suggestions in the past). Then again, I never bothered to look for it either.
So what's this supposed to tell us? That you can get propaganda (of all kinds, why single one out?) easily when you're looking for it. Well, DUH? That's newsworthy? Really?
I think it's time for a new news outlet. I call it "obvious news", and it will carry all these things that are apparently outrageous and completely unfathomable ... oh wait, Vice beat me to it.
Well, if you put cooks into positions of power in your country that not only question the validity of evolution and development in organisms but also that bacteria can make you sick, you get what you deserve.
But what do you need Trump for to get that?
I never would've guessed that playing golf can solve all the problems in the world. Silly gramma thought it's chicken soup that can.
Chia?
Do we have to water dear leader now? And dump shit on him to promote growth?
Yes, they're called consultants.
But then again, we're basically a lot like prostitutes anyway.
Do you want to be known as the "Craigslist for the working-poor"?
Him going for a second term? Could you point to anyone who wants that?
Trump? He didn't even want a first term. He wanted a scandal to promote the media outlet he planned to spawn from the hype around it.
Republicans? The GOP wants to get rid of Trump more than the Dems could even want to, the problem is they can't simply say that they want to get rid of the annoying orange.
So who would want to see him a second time? Let alone a third one.
You want to tell me a socialist hellhole has better medical services than the pinnacle of the free world? That's unpossible!
Wow. You actually have to pay to get your ass saved? That's rough.
But... think of the productivity spike if they did!
(Don-Corleone-Voice)
Nice social life you have there, shame if anything bad was to happen to it...
Why should I go through the hassle of hacking something that I can get by simply asking nicely? Or if that doesn't work with an "or else" attached.
Maybe there should be a right to FORGET, too.
Do you deserve having your life ruined for making a mistake as a teenager?
Hell, your abortion laws say yes already, why am I asking?
Yeah, Europe is a veritable hellhole with all those restrictive gun laws.
I had to go through a whole school career without being shot at once.
If you're in "for life", do you really care? Moreover, would it help you in any way?
Hopefully in the correct hand, you never know...
As you have already correctly identified, twitch-based games put us old folks at a disadvantage. But the more tactical and psychological a game gets, the more we manage to complete or out-compete younger players. We tend to excel at games where stealth and planning along with "playing the players" is the road to winning.
No, we tend to have real jobs.
Judging by your writing, I see you're working there. Good for you!
Depends. Using an old IBM-Keyboard (you know, the ones that are bulletproof up to 9mm)...
Fahrenheit 451 implies a change of historic records simply because they are remembered instead of written down. Memories are not fixed, they change over time. And even if people don't actively and deliberately try to distort and twist them to match their world view, that tends to happen automatically.
So the net outcome is the same. Whether you deliberately fictionalize history or whether it is an outcome of imperfect memory, the main difference is that the latter is harder to control.
This is more news for nerds than the announcement of the awesome features of the latest iPhone or Samsung Galaxy. The (old) movie is actually something a lot of geeks had and have some interest in, so a remake is certainly of interest.
The feature list of the phones was more something for squealing fashion girlies...