Slashdot Mirror


China Bans Letter N From Internet as Xi Jinping Extends Grip on Power (theguardian.com)

Speaking of things the Chinese government has been censoring in the country, The Guardian reports: It is the 14th letter in the English alphabet and, in Scrabble, the springboard for more than 600 8-letter words. But for the Communist party of China it is also a subversive and intolerable character that was this week banished from the internet as Chinese censors battled to silence criticism of Xi Jinping's bid to set himself up as ruler for life. The contravening consonant was perhaps the most unusual victim of a crackdown targeting words, phrases and even solitary letters censors feared might be used to attack Beijing's controversial decision to abolish constitutional term limits for China's president. The Communist party has painted the move -- which experts say paves the way for Xi to become a dictator for life -- as an expression of overwhelming popular support for China's strongman leader. However, there has been widespread online push-back in China since it was announced on Sunday on the eve of an annual political congress in Beijing.

196 comments

  1. Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by mnemotronic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well that makes sense.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    1. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by michelcolman · · Score: 5, Funny

      o, it makes sese.

      Log live Xi Jipig!

    2. Re: Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O, it makes sese!

      Repudable historians have proposed China may have actually discovered the new world before Columbus, but burned the records and banned mention of it when the Native Americans weren't able to offer suitable tributes to the emporer.

    3. Re: Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We dom't umderstamd this decisiom.

    4. Re: Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The longer you bottle up peoples angers and surpreaa them and put your thumb on the scale to rig things in you favor just because you can right now, the more pressure builds. How can they not see this is a bad plan with no good long term prospects.

    5. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny. Sorry, no mod points today, but this is utterly hilarious.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckig chik

    7. Re: Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      China has a lot of people and bueracary.

      Also communist China did things smart for many many years the true start of the downhill slide is breaking tradition and changing the term limit.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I would ever call him a chik!

    9. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by syn3rg · · Score: 1

      Sesame ^H^H^H^H^H Subversive Street: YouTube: The Lonely n Song

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    10. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Well that makes sense.

      China is just copying from a Greek military junta, who banned the letter "Z" following assassination of democratic Greek politician Grigoris Lambrakis.

      At least they did in the movie:

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...

      If other totalitarian countries start doing this as well . . . we won't have any alphabet left!

      It's time for a world leader to step up and make our alphabet great again!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    11. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Actually, if one listens to American movies of people speaking with a Chinese accent, dropping the letter 'n' makes reasonable sense.

    12. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why youtube needs an independent mirror. Nice.

    13. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by alex67500 · · Score: 2

      Score: 5, Fuy

    14. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      They didn't ban the use of the letter "n" inside words. Only the use of "n" as a standalone character.

      It is not clear why it was banned, but sometimes characters and phrases will be used symbolically to get around censorship. For instance the number 64 is often censored because it is used to mean "June 4th" the date of the Tiananmen Square "incident". 54 is also sometimes censored because it is used as a symbol for corruption and betrayal, since the terms of the Versailles Treaty were published in Chinese newspapers on May 4th of 1919. The treaty was seen as a betrayal of China, and a sellout to the Japanese by the Western Allies, resulting in riots and unrest.

      One conjecture is that "n" was being used in the sense of "an arbitrary number" to mean the new term limit for the leader of China, replacing the old limit of two terms of five years each.

    15. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by nospam007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Only the use of "n" as a standalone character."

      Gives the N-word a complete new meaning.

    16. Re: Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But reputable historians repudiate that.

    17. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Double Plus Ungood. The party demands nuspeak to be put into practice. We are reassured that we have never been at war with East Asia.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    18. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      54 is also sometimes censored because it is used as a symbol for corruption and betrayal,

      (looks toward the white house) Yeah, OK, that makes sense.

    19. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you feel pressured to defend China? Do you ever think about getting dragged before their kangaroo court and sentenced to death? They would hang a plaque with your crime around your neck like "ShanghuBirrh, who commited the Most Wrong" and then blow your brains out through your face with an AK-47.

      Do you ever think about that, besides right now?

    20. Re: Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How can they not see this is a bad plan with no good long term prospects.

      The Chinese people do see it as bad, but what can they do? XJP has all the power. He directly controls the administration and the army. The legislature is just a rubber stamp and has no power. The judiciary is not independent, and follows the directions of the party. He has spent the last 5 years purging the government of anyone disloyal or likely to dissent, under the guise of an anti-corruption campaign.

      This is an example of why it is important to start opposing authoritarianism at the outset. If you wait until the oppressor's intentions are clear, it will be too late.

    21. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Do you feel pressured to defend China?

      No. As a native-born American citizen living in California, I feel no pressure to defend China.

    22. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in a half hour they'll want to ban another letter!

    23. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      54 is also sometimes censored because it is used as a symbol for corruption and betrayal,

      (looks toward the white house) Yeah, OK, that makes sense.

      If you're dyslexic maybe.
      In the US it should be 45

    24. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Dam, the GAA is goig to be pissed!

    25. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by sheramil · · Score: 1

      "Only the use of "n" as a standalone character."

      Gives the N-word a complete new meaning.

      Makes it that much harder to get anywhere in nethack - sorry, "ethack" - if you can't see the nymphs or Nagas coming.

    26. Re: Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by sheramil · · Score: 1

      China has a lot of people and bueracary.

      You don't have to obfuscate that word - there aren't any "n"s in "bureaucracy".

      Adyway, this sort of thing dever works - people just fide workarouds (like typig as if you have a stuffed dose). Perhaps the government censors are looking for that - they don't want to catch people using "n", they want to catch the sort of people who are sufficiently motivated to be subversive without it.

    27. Re:Chia Bas Letter From Iteret ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Only the use of "n" as a standalone character."

      Gives the N-word a complete new meaning.

      um don't you mean the -word

  2. Let's Organize! by CajunArson · · Score: 0

    All "BUT WHATABOUT TRUMP" posts where you accuse Trump of basically being worse than this without evidence can just be posted as replies here so we can stay organized.

    K-Thanks!

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re:Let's Organize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First Amendment", to you, apparently means running people down with cars and shooting up schools.

    2. Re:Let's Organize! by gnick · · Score: 1

      TFA has zero to do with DJT. Let's keep it that way. Nobody's accusing DJT of being "worse than this" except you.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:Let's Organize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...can just be posted as replies here so we can stay organized.

      Good idea. Your scheme will be useful during the next seven years. :)

    4. Re:Let's Organize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Losing your arm or losing you leg are both different. Both are still bad

    5. Re: Let's Organize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're a good bit into this article's life now and nobody has done anything like that. It appears you owe everyone an apology.

    6. Re:Let's Organize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberals restricted the govt's ability to hold people with mental issues.

      If 10 people call PoPo and say 'this dude is crazy' there is little the gov't can do until they crazy person acts to either harm themselves or others.

      Obligatory guns don't kill people, crazy people with guns kill people. my guns have a 0 body count. I must be doing something wrong.

    7. Re:Let's Organize! by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Liberals didn't give the gun sellers an open market to sell weapons of war
      Guns kill people
      That's what high capacity magazines are FOR!

    8. Re:Let's Organize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one has yet accused Trump of anything. But I don't blame you for being wary. Most accusations against Trump I've seen had sufficient evidence.

    9. Re:Let's Organize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How ableist of you ;_;

    10. Re:Let's Organize! by zieroh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Liberals restricted the govt's ability to hold people with mental issues.

      And by "liberals", you are no doubt referring to Ronald Reagan. As governor of California, he signed the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, which ended the practice of holding mental patients against their will. Then, as president in 1981, Reagan signed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, largely un-doing Carter's work at improving the federal mental health care system, which itself built upon ideas outlined by Kennedy before his assassination.

      Liberals indeed.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  3. 404 Not Found by Zorro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you mean "M" Comrade?

    1. Re:404 Not Found by sinij · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shouldn't this be "404 ot Found" ?

    2. Re:404 Not Found by mnemotronic · · Score: 3, Funny

      In blessed Soviet People's Republic, letter M bans you.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    3. Re:404 Not Found by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't this be "404 ot Found" ?

      "404 ot Foud"

    4. Re:404 Not Found by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Surely you meant "404 ot foud", or "404 (m/2)ot fou(m/2)d".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:404 Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      404 ot Foud

    6. Re:404 Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't this be "404 ot Foud" ?

      FTFY

    7. Re:404 Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. "404 ot Foud"

    8. Re:404 Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thought that was how Asians normally spoke?

      Xi Jinping sounds like an STD anyway.

    9. Re:404 Not Found by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      "A hundred thousand in cash, getaway car and I want the letter M stricken from the English language."

      - Steve _artin, "Hostages"

    10. Re:404 Not Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean "M"

      No, you're thinking of a getaway car.

      (If that's a "whoosh" for you, Google Steve Martin's hostage demands.)

  4. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a little early for April Fool's jokes on Slashdot.

    We have to say this to Xi Jinping: Nnnnnnnnnnnnnooo!

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, you don't need an N to spell "dictator".

    2. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then again he is now called Xi Jipig. I don't think I'd like being renamed to "pig" personally, but maybe it's just the honesty coming through?

  5. LMOP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ch-ch-ch-chia

  6. N N N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N. N. N.

    1. Re:N N N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no... Ni! See?

      Ni! Ni! Ni!

  7. So... by YuppieScum · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chia ow has it's ow iteret?

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
    1. Re:So... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Where have you been? China's had its own internet for years now.

    2. Re:So... by Dr.Saeuerlich · · Score: 3, Interesting

      de facto, pretty much, yes they had their own internet.
      Foreign sites are very slow, if not impossible to access in a reliable manner. It doesn't help that pretty much every foreign website loads stuff from websites blocked by China's firewall - Google APIs, Social Media's like buttons, etc. In addition, regular users on e.g. China Telecom, are on a network that has very low bandwidth to outside China (this could be circumvented in the past by paying extra, e.g. for the China Telecom "VIP Package"). Finally, most Chinese grew up with their own Chinese internet services. Also, they are much, much faster being inside the Great Firewall. If you stick to Chinese websites only, your experience is often very good in terms of speed.

  8. The two requirements for a trustworthy county by KixWooder · · Score: 1

    1. There is no capital punishment.
    2. The highest leader has absolute fixed term limits.

    --
    I hate fat people.
    1. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SwitzerlandðYðY

    2. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      US fails #1, and there's proof Mueller has that Trump intends to remain our ruler until he dies then pass control to his son-in-law. The US has been destroyed.

    3. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Megol · · Score: 2

      Nope. Note I provided as many arguments as you did. :)

    4. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by green1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We know why the first is important, But I don't know what the point is to the second. You must have a way of removing a leader from office, but a limit on their term doesn't make any real sense. If you have the best leader ever, you need to kick them out despite overwhelming public support just because some arbitrary date has passed? Conversely, many countries with term limits fail to have any way to remove a horrible leader before a set amount of time has passed (a term minimum?) which is, in my opinion, an even worse problem.

      No, I think #2 should be replaced with: An effective mechanism to remove leaders.

    5. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I can think of a few more, but these two are an absolute must.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    6. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. The UK has no official term limit. In practise though, any leader staying on more than about 10 years will become unpopular and won't be able to survive. The political system makes it hard for someone to hold on to power indefinitely, even if constitutionally possible.

      That said, I wouldn't object to us having term limits, they are clearly a Good Thing (tm).

    7. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by CajunArson · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "1. There is no capital punishment."

      Well clearly Iceland fails then since they commit systematic capital punishment against Downe Syndrome babies without trial.

      Oh wait, "capital punishment" is only bad when applied to murders who have had trials and appeals. I forgot.

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    8. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      We know why the first is important, But I don't know what the point is to the second. You must have a way of removing a leader from office, but a limit on their term doesn't make any real sense. If you have the best leader ever, you need to kick them out despite overwhelming public support just because some arbitrary date has passed? Conversely, many countries with term limits fail to have any way to remove a horrible leader before a set amount of time has passed (a term minimum?) which is, in my opinion, an even worse problem.

      No, I think #2 should be replaced with: An effective mechanism to remove leaders.

      Interestingly I think, the UK has no limit on Prime Ministers, so every single one of them ends in failure, either by being voted out of power and resigning from leading their party, or being kicked out by their own party, or leaving of their own accord (but usually this is after some pressure). So all past PMs in the UK are tainted. With term limits you get to have 'successful' past leaders, who leave without actually losing face. There is a disadvantage though, the last term is a free-for-all where they don't have to listen...

    9. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump and his cronies will spend some time in prison if they try that!

    10. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You don't like abortions. I get that, and I respect it.
      You however do your argument, and peoples desire to respect your opinion no favors by spinning it to look like something it isn't.

    11. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by green1 · · Score: 1

      And that last term I think is the problem. Politicians should never have an opportunity where they don't have to listen, because they tend to exploit it.

      As for "successful" past leaders. You can still have those in the UK, or any of the MANY other countries without term limits. They just have to know when to call it a day (and many have. They retire and don't seek re-election). That said, why do I care if a past leader was "tainted" or not? I care that I have the best person for the job at any given time. I don't care if the best person has been there for 2 months, or their entire adult life. I *DO* care that once they stop being the best person that we have a means of removing them though, and ideally without having to wait for a set term to pass.

    12. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      That doesn't necessarily follow. A Prime Minister can decide to retire at any point with their legacy intact., the problem is that the position attracts people who are bad at judging when it's time for someone else. The benefit of term limits is that they're forced to step down for a while. The Chinese limit of consecutive terms is probably a good one: if you take a few years off and still look like the best bet then you can come back, but you can also leave gracefully.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Immerman · · Score: 1

      There is a danger #2 mitigates though - the longer a leader is in power, the more high-level connections and back-room deals they can form, and the more tightly they can consolidate their grip on power.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    14. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well clearly Iceland fails then since they commit systematic capital punishment against Downe Syndrome babies without trial.

      Get your news somewhere better.

      It was funny when US right-wingers started freaking out over what is literally nothing more than free prenatal screenings for pregnant women (for a wide range of diseases), as part of extensive prenatal (and postnatal) healthcare coverage. Literally nothing more than that. That many (no, not 100%) choose to terminate their pregnancy if they find out the fetus has Down's shouldn't be surprising, but there's in no way a policy to encourage (let alone mandate) it. Plenty of people with special needs are carried to term, and they're treated a heck of a lot better here than they are in the US. There's even a theatre troupe of actors with Down's Syndrome (Leikhópurinn Perlan), garnering the most attention for their acting in the Sigur Rós music video "Svefn g Englar" (a play on words between "Sleepwalkers" and "Sleeping Angels"). From statistics, we have 334k people and a birth rate of 13,7 per 1000 per year, or 4576 children per year, of which 5-6 have Down's - 1 in every 832. The rate of Down's Syndrome in the US is 1 in 700 children.

      Iceland is actually has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in Europe - more restrictive than the US. We don't have "abortion on request" here. There have to be specific reasons (confirmed by two unrelated parties) among a list of valid reasons; is only legal in the first 16 weeks excepting in the event of deformity or a threat to the mother's life; and requires both pre- and post-abortion counseling, including a course on birth control. The word for abortion in Icelandic literally translates as "fetus destruction"; it's hardly glossed over.

      I'll repeat: get your news from better sources.

      --
      "Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
    15. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is obviously terrible, but your post is idiotic.

    16. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by jareth-0205 · · Score: 2

      That doesn't necessarily follow. A Prime Minister can decide to retire at any point with their legacy intact., the problem is that the position attracts people who are bad at judging when it's time for someone else. The benefit of term limits is that they're forced to step down for a while. The Chinese limit of consecutive terms is probably a good one: if you take a few years off and still look like the best bet then you can come back, but you can also leave gracefully.

      Is the ultimate problem with being in charge - you always have to give way to someone less 'qualified' than you are. Nomatter how virtuous you are, that's got to be hard to choose to do.

    17. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I get #2, but why #1? I see why #1 might be desirable for humanitarian reasons, but what does it have to do with the trustworthiness of a government?

    18. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia has that system. That's why Putin is sometimes the Prime Minister. Weird how the Prime Minister has so much power sometimes and other times not so much...

    19. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by green1 · · Score: 1

      Hence the ability to remove the leader being far more important. Once they're in power, it's too late. Most of those high-level connections and back-room deals happened long before they actually got in to office, otherwise they'd be unlikely to get there in the first place.

      I see no reason to oust a good leader just to try to thwart a bad one. The much better approach is to make sure that the process is in place to remove the bad one.

    20. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey I had a question for you. Russia a a very large country. You wouldn't be Chechens right? Did you guys try to get independence in recent history. Are you guys a muslim majority? As an American your internal politics can be hard to wrap my head around? I don't understand why southern Russians would be trying to help the Kremlin. Don't the hate muslims there?

    21. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It's still a case of "curing" a genetic condition through eugenics. I'm sure sure whether it's evil, but it sure is creepy. We shouldn't pretend it's anything other than aborting babies with undesirable genetics.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Iceland needs moar retard babbies!

      You Amerikuks are hilarious.

    23. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 1

      >Iceland needs moar retard babbies!

      You Amerikuks are hilarious.

      What about Gay babies? What about babies with the wrong racial ancestry? What about babies with merely below average IQ? Autism? What about 2-year-olds?

      Eugenics raises serious philosophical and moral questions, and to be dismissive of it, or pretend it's not eugenics, is the only answer I'm sure is wrong.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by amorsen · · Score: 2

      If you have the best leader ever, you need to kick them out despite overwhelming public support just because some arbitrary date has passed?

      Yes. Because power corrupts. Especially when you have a truly altruistic leader who looks out for the people and manages to bridge divides. Give them 20 years and they will feel that the good they did means everything they do will automatically be good.

      Some democracies do not need term limits as such, because the way their elections are designed make long-term reigns very unlikely. Still, even for those it is good safeguard to have, just in case.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    25. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it's under the ~24 week mark, the mother should be able to abort for any reason she wants. It's less about the fetus, and more about forcing the mother to host and birth a child she may or may not want.

    26. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1. There is no capital punishment."

      Well clearly Iceland fails then since they commit systematic capital punishment against Downe Syndrome babies without trial.

      Oh wait, "capital punishment" is only bad when applied to murders who have had trials and appeals. I forgot.

      Abortion is really a solution. I, myself, should have been aborted (and I loathe my mother that she didn't) so I could be spared the suffering in this miserable life, in this miserable planet. If I had been aborted i wouldn't have the need to kill myself, as I intend to do. Life is overrated. Wake up. Life sucks.

    27. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're an opponent and they drum up false charges against you, the worst you would get is life in prison and have the chance to be released by next administration (point #2)

      But if there is capital punishment they can kill you on the false charges, and not give that opportunity to be released later.

    28. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're going to adopt all the unwanted babies? If not, you're hand-wringing is just shallow concern-trolling.

    29. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      What about it? Why is it your business the reason a woman ends their pregnancy?

    30. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 0

      Why is it my business the reason a woman kills her toddler? Same reason. It's the same moral question regardless of the age of the child.

      Again, the only answer here that's certainly wrong is being dismissive of the question.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    31. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 2

      So you're going to adopt all the unwanted babies? If not, you're hand-wringing is just shallow concern-trolling.

      Perhaps parents have a moral duty to care for their offspring, wanted or not?

      Perhaps the state has a duty?

      Perhaps we just kill anyone overly inconvenient?

      Do you think these are easy questions?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    32. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 1

      As long as it's under the ~24 week mark, the mother should be able to abort for any reason she wants. It's less about the fetus, and more about forcing the mother to host and birth a child she may or may not want.

      Why 24 weeks? Why not 2 years? What different about detecting downs syndrome in the fetus, and discovering severe autism in a toddler? Do you know, with moral and philosophical certitude, when a person becomes a moral entity? I don't see how you could, unless your certainty is a result of religious faith. Or just lack of thinking about the question has left you with an unquestioned belief.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    33. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The types of crimes for which capital punishment is often thought of as deserved is pretty narrow, even in jurisdictions that have it... what kind of crime, specifically, are you imagining they might drum up false charges against somebody for that capital punishment could be appropriate?

    34. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Rei · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, could you explain again what part here is bothering you? The part where we give mothers prenatal care, the part where we have among the most restrictive abortion laws in the west, the part where rates of Down's Syndrome births are pretty much the same as the US, or the part where we treat people with Down's well?

      --
      "Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
    35. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      "1. There is no capital punishment."

      China does not have capital punishment. They treat capital "N" and lowercase "n" the same.

    36. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you can kill them they are mortal. But that doesn't mean they are a person.

    37. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Dorianny · · Score: 1
      Term limits have little to do with the quality of leadership, what they are meant to do is to allow for the training and promotion of new qualified leadership at every level of the organization. If everyone ends up stuck at their posts because there is no opportunities for advancement then the whole organization eventually stagnates.

      .

      The U.S military has a complicated mandatory retirement system for high ranking officers to prevent exactly this sort of stagnation

      One unique aspect of Communist China vs the rest of failed or stagnant Communist states is the large number of peaceful leadership changes.

    38. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Why is it my business the reason a woman kills her toddler? Same reason. It's the same moral question regardless of the age of the child.

      Again, the only answer here that's certainly wrong is being dismissive of the question.

      Here's a question for you. You are in a burning building making your escape and you hear a child crying in a room. You go in to get them and notice on the other side is a room is a box marked, fertilised human fetus x 1000. Which do you save? You can't do both because then you all die. One or the other.

      And don't go around pretending abortion is the same as child murder or that people do it on a whim.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    39. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by stooo · · Score: 1

      Trump is obviously idiotic, but your post is terrible.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    40. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 1

      Trolley problems are a bit contrived. Let's just say I'm not sure what the morally correct answer is. Nor should you be, unless informed by religious faith.

      I don't know whether abortion is murder - it certainly seems to be late in a pregnancy, and I'm pretty skeptical that it would be early in a pregnancy, but what do I know? What do you know? I'm 99% sure that souls aren't a thing, but would you fire a bullet in the air in a city if it had a 1% chance of killing someone? The actual odds are a lot less, but it's illegal everywhere civilized.

      I'm nearly certain, however, that being a vegetarian on moral ground while being a pro-choice absolutist is blatant self-serving idiocy, and there are a lot of those running around.

      Question your deeply-held beliefs from time to time, man, it's important.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    41. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 1

      That part where people claim Iceland has "Cured Down's syndrome" instead of saying "we use eugenics to avoid substandard people". I've read such newspaper articles.

      Don't get me wrong here, I'm not sure whether the practice is moral, amoral, or immoral. I think that's a very hard question, and not one to be taken lightly. But ignoring the question by pretending it's not eugenics? I'm sure that's the wrong answer.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    42. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a better question: do you want kids?

      If so, do you want to raise a kid with Down's Syndrome?

    43. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Rei · · Score: 1

      That part where people claim Iceland has "Cured Down's syndrome" instead of saying "we use eugenics to avoid substandard people". I've read such newspaper articles.

      And as I have very clearly spelled out to you, both of those claims are incorrect. So get your news from better sources.

      --
      "Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
    44. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 1

      Ah, so we're both annoyed by claims that Iceland has "cured Down's Symdrome". So, sure, 1-2 Down's births a year in Iceland, mostly due to the test being imperfect. Pedantry FTW.

      But the moral questions raised by a society choosing to abort (effectively) all fetuses with a particular undesirable quality: those questions remain. And never doubt: this will become a larger effect on the species over time, as the technology becomes commonplace for more and more conditions. Couple that with fallible human judgement about the long term, and it could get pretty ugly.

      Don't you agree we should be addressing, not ignoring, the moral and practical considerations while it's still early days?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    45. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Rei · · Score: 1

      . So, sure, 1-2 Down's births a year in Iceland, mostly due to the test being imperfect

      Wrong. Do you not read?

      From statistics, we have 334k people and a birth rate of 13,7 per 1000 per year, or 4576 children per year, of which 5-6 have Down's - 1 in every 832. The rate of Down's Syndrome in the US is 1 in 700 children.

      You have a fictional version of Iceland in your mind. Our rate of Down's births is nearly the same as the US; what little difference exists has more to do with our younger average age of mothers than anything else.

      There has been in no way, shape, or form any effort to encourage abortion of anyone, and heavy efforts to discourage abortion. Iceland has - has been repeatedly pointed out to you - among the most restrictive abortion laws in the west, stricter than in the US.

      Don't you agree we should be addressing, not ignoring, the moral and practical considerations while it's still early days?

      I don't give a rat's arse about what debate you want to have. What I care about is you grossly misrepresenting my country in your attempt to do so.

      --
      "Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
    46. Re: The two requirements for a trustworthy county by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Trolley problems are a bit contrived. Let's just say I'm not sure what the morally correct answer is. Nor should you be, unless informed by religious faith.

      The child, the living breathing actual child is the correct answer.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    47. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by green1 · · Score: 1

      That still is no justification for term limits. What guarantees that the corruption won't take place on day 1? or that it won't take until year 23? Term limits are arbitrary, and hence useless for fighting that corruption.

      If you want to fight the corruption, don't have an arbitrary term limit, instead have a method in place to remove a bad leader at ANY time, not just at specific multi-year intervals.

    48. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by green1 · · Score: 1

      I think I missed where the leader of any western democracy was promoted from within. I seem to remember this thing called "elections" which completely negate that argument.

    49. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by amorsen · · Score: 1

      While the leader may be corrupt on day, in practice it takes time to implement that corruption.

      Also, term limits are a backstop. They are used when the other methods fail. They are easy to understand and they are an easy trigger to tell the general public that they are dealing with a dictator.

      In Denmark we have a different canary, the Queen. Officially laws only go into force when they have the Queen's signature. Obviously, if she ever refused to sign a law, her reign would end -- but at least the population would be aware that a barrier had been crossed and democracy is at an end. The backstop in this case only works as long as the monarch is sensible and as long as it isn't the monarch themselves trying to take over. Term limits are a safer choice.

      Besides, it is not like there is a huge cost associated with changing leader. Even if we end up losing a really REALLY great leader and having to put up with second choice, the difference is likely to be small. I know that Obama vs. Trump is a counterexample, but that just shows how useless the US election system is.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    50. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well, you haven't shared where you're getting your data. I'm just going from the various mainstream news stories, ignoring the "OMG abortion" fringe sources. Sure, the mainstream news sometimes fabricates stories entirely from nothing, but it seems reasonable to start from the assumption that the stories aren't entirely fiction.

      BTW, most of Europe has stricter abortion laws than the US, so that's hardly surprising. Does the government make sure everyone knows screening tests are available, or is that part made up? And people have time to do the screening and act on the results within the law?

      You sure seem touchy about this.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    51. Re:The two requirements for a trustworthy county by Rei · · Score: 1

      I'm getting it from *I Live In Iceland*. Google all of the numbers I cited above. Google our population. It's 334k. Google our birth rate. It's 13,7 per 1000 women per year. Do the math. That's 4576 children per year. The number of Downs syndrome children per year in Iceland can be found here, although I assume you don't speak Icelandic - that site, by the way, is a society for parents of children with Down's Syndrome. The page starts out with "Congratulations on the birth of your new child!" - Downs is not in any way, shape or form shunned here; as I pointed out, there's even a theatre troupe of people with Down's, and you can see them in a music video of one of our most popular bands. There's a huge amount of government support given to people with disabilities, including Down's, so that they can live good lives. Divide 4576 by 5-6 Down's births per year and tell me what you come up with. Now google the number of Down's birth rates in the US. Compare. Now go google our abortion laws. Is googling too hard for you? Just look at a map.

      In short: ***Stop spreading BS about my country.*** Yes, I know it was "widely reported" in your country. Guess what? People spread a lot of BS about Iceland in general overseas. No, most people here don't believe in elves. No, we did not adopt a new "crowdsourced constitution" and "jail all the bankers" (and the few who went to prison got the most cushy, forgiving sentences you can imagine, and were let out early). No, we're not the biggest banana producer in Europe; we don't even sell them commercially at all. I could go on and on with dozens of "widely reported" stories about Iceland that are pure, unadulterated BS.

      What I fail to understand is why, after having been repeatedly corrected, you keep insisting on a falsehood.

      Does the government make sure everyone knows screening tests are available, or is that part made up?

      Everything mainstream medical is available to all people. It's called universal healthcare, and we're hardly the only country to have it. There is no special effort made concerning Down's versus any other health condition, related to pregnancy or not. Now maybe you live in a country that doesn't like people having access to medical care - but that's your problem, not ours. We have, and will continue to, ensure that people have access to all of the latest technology in every field, to the degree that we can afford to (the healthcare budget being mainly a consequence of whether Sjálfstæðisflokkurinn or Endurreisn are in the government ;) ) Should we ban sonograms too because you're terrified that some people may choose to abort (despite our stricter than the US abortion laws) a child of a particular gender? Are you signing up start a campaign to ban sonograms in the US because they might be misused? The simple facts are that our rates of Down's Syndrome births are very similar to the US's. Period. And there is much more support here for people with Down's.

      You sure seem touchy about this.

      I'm touchy about BS being spread about my country when people refuse to acknowledge the facts despite having been repeatedly corrected on them.

      --
      "Lock and load, Brides of Christ!"
  9. They've also seriously butchered the character set by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    E.g. look what they've done to wan4sui4. Simplified Chinese stripped down version on the left, Traditional Chinese version on the right

    https://translate.google.com/?...

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  10. You can't say "No" to the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't even say "I'm not sure".

    1. Re:You can't say "No" to the government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can say "Yes, yes, exalted dear leader. I will do whatever you say."

  11. They must be inspired by Z by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The military regime banned: long hair, miniskirts, Sophocles, Tolstoy, Euripides, Russian-style toasts, strikes, Aristophanes, Ionesco, Sartre, Albee, Pinter, freedom of the press, sociology, Beckett, Dostoyevsky, modern music, pop music, modern math, and the letter Z, which means HE LIVES in Ancient Greek.

    (end credits for the film "Z" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., by Costa-Gavras)

    1. Re:They must be inspired by Z by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Costa Gavras was a self proclaimed Communist

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      As Jeane Kirkpatrick pointed out anti Communist regimes tended to be authoritarian - if you didn't get involved in politics they'd mostly leave you alone. Communist regimes tended to be totalitarian - they wanted to reformat the culture.

      https://www.commentarymagazine...

      Surely it is now beyond reasonable doubt that the present governments of Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos are much more repressive than those of the despised previous rulers; that the government of the People's Republic of China is more repressive than that of Taiwan, that North Korea is more repressive than South Korea, and so forth. This is the most important lesson of Vietnam and Cambodia. It is not new but it is a gruesome reminder of harsh facts.

      From time to time a truly bestial ruler can come to power in either type of autocracy--Idi Amin, Papa Doc Duvalier, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot are examples--but neither type regularly produces such moral monsters (though democracy regularly prevents their accession to power). There are, however, systemic differences between traditional and revolutionary autocracies that have a predictable effect on their degree of repressiveness. Generally speaking, traditional autocrats tolerate social inequities, brutality, and poverty while revolutionary autocracies create them.

      Traditional autocrats leave in place existing allocations of wealth, power, status, and other re- sources which in most traditional societies favor an affluent few and maintain masses in poverty. But they worship traditional gods and observe traditional taboos. They do not disturb the habitual rhythms of work and leisure, habitual places of residence, habitual patterns of family and personal relations. Because the miseries of traditional life are familiar, they are bearable to ordinary people who, growing up in the society, learn to cope, as children born to untouchables in India acquire the skills and attitudes necessary for survival in the miserable roles they are destined to fill. Such societies create no refugees.

      Precisely the opposite is true of revolutionary Communist regimes. They create refugees by the million because they claim jurisdiction over the whole life of the society and make demands for change that so violate internalized values and habits that inhabitants flee by the tens of thousands in the remarkable expectation that their attitudes, values, and goals will "fit" better in a foreign country than in their native land.

      The former deputy chairman of Vietnam's National Assembly from 1976 to his defection early in August 1979, Hoang Van Hoan, described recently the impact of Vietnam's ongoing revolution on that country's more than one million Chinese inhabitants:

      They have been expelled from places they have lived in for generations. They have been dispossessed of virtually all possessions--their lands, their houses. They have been driven into areas called new economic zones, but they have not been given any aid. How can they eke out a living in such conditions reclaiming new land? They gradually die for a number of reasons--diseases, the hard life. They also die of humiliation.

      It is not only the Chinese who have suffered in Southeast Asia since the "liberation," and it is not only in Vietnam that the Chinese suffer. By the end of 1978 more than six million refugees had fled countries ruled by Marxist governments. In spite of walls, fences, guns, and sharks, the steady stream of people fleeing revolutionary utopias continues..

      There is a damning, contrast between the number of refugees created by Marxist regimes and those created by other autocracies: more than a million Cubans have left their homeland since Castro's rise (one refugee for every nine inhabitants) as compared to about 35,00

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  12. They're just trying to stop the russian bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why u so upset?
    Or did you think our political leadership wasn't trying to censor discussion here in the US?

  13. President for Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All hail president Xi Jinping-ping-pong-wing-wong the 1st.

    look at all those n's I used.

    President Jipig-pig-pog-wig-wog the 1st

    China needs a good 'ol population reduction. I do hope they try to poke the hornest's nest. A few hundred million or so reduction would do the world good.

    1. Re:President for Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still type Presidet with that bad letter. Please report to the gas chamber.

    2. Re:President for Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol - who else read this as "You still type Plesidet with that bad letter" ?

    3. Re:President for Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not me. you must be syslesdic.

    4. Re:President for Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTFY... All hail presidet Xi Jipig-pig-pog-wig-wog the 1st.

  14. Chia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they remove the letter 'N' so China becomes Chia... Maybe time to invest in Chia Pets..

    1. Re:Chia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really disappointed: I just checked out the chia.com website and found that they've stopped selling the Winnie the Pooh chia pets.

  15. Cultural Differences? by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

    Apparently in the Chinese calendar, April 1st falls on our February 28th.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:Cultural Differences? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you aren't aware of these things called timezones or the international date line.

      It is April 1st in China right now.

    2. Re:Cultural Differences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you aren't aware of these things called timezones or the international date line.

      It is April 1st in China right now.

      Actually, it's the 13th day of the first month (chinese new years recently fell on Feb 16 2018)

  16. Alt Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alternate headline, "Future God Emperor of China Xi tells World that he is Afraid of a Mere Letter".

    Seriously, that is what he has just done, he has told everyone that he is a coward who is afraid of 1 singular letter.

  17. Well, that is it for China as a Superpower by gweihir · · Score: 1

    They obviously prefer to go deeply into Fascism instead. What an utterly deranged decision.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Well, that is it for China as a Superpower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The decision seems deranged until they become a Fascist Superpower. It isn't like the world is happy with the current ones.

    2. Re:Well, that is it for China as a Superpower by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I don't think they have that option. They are not militaristic enough. Of course, with all the US Dollars and things in the US they own, they may become an economic Fascist Superpower. That would be pretty interesting from a historical point-of-view as it would be a first.

      Ah well. Interesting times.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Well, that is it for China as a Superpower by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think Fascism and being a superpower are mutually exclusive? Nazi Germany, the canonical Fascist state, was pretty much a superpower and the USSR adopted a lot of Fascist ideas (militarism, strong central personality-based leadership, merging of corporation and state). During its rise, the British Empire also had a lot of these attributes (including concentration camps and a quasi-governmental East India Company).

      There's no rule that says that superpowers have to be nice...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Well, that is it for China as a Superpower by aberglas · · Score: 1

      Read the news. China has been massively upgrading its military. With modern weapons. Air craft carrier.

      Not yet a match for the USA. But fast becoming able to massively overpower their first target. Taiwan.

    5. Re:Well, that is it for China as a Superpower by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      What is with people these days? They have been a Communist dictatorship/kleptocracy since about 1949, with all the degradation, repression, starvation, purges, and death that entails. Only the gullible and like minded willing dupes ever imagined differently.

            And in any case, the USSR was an undeniable super-power for the better part of 50 years despite nearly universal despotism that always comes with leftism. As long at they have a land army of 1.6 million men and a substantial nuclear force, they are still going to be a superpower - whether you think they deserve it or not.

  18. wheel of fortune needs to ax any trips to china by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    wheel of fortune needs to ax any trips to china

    1. Re:wheel of fortune needs to ax any trips to china by quenda · · Score: 1

      wheel of fortune needs to ax

      "Ax"? Have E's been restricted in your country? Run out of money for vowels?

    2. Re:wheel of fortune needs to ax any trips to china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wheel of fortune needs to ax any trips to china

      wheel of fortue eeds to ax ay trips to chia
      fixed!

    3. Re:wheel of fortune needs to ax any trips to china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who annoy you __ggers

  19. Hope to see China crumble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, what a paranoid bunch. We're trying to stop you from crumbling. Purely out of self-interest, mind you: nobody wants to see yet another nuclear-capable government collapse under the weight of those in power who can't let go of their own dicks long enough to govern responsibly. The idea that anyone with an IQ above room temperature would "hope" for a Chinese collapse is frankly laughable.

  20. President Trump's response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Chinese are laughing at us. We need to ban the letter 'O'!

  21. Fuck off Putin cock suckers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many god damn Ivans in this thread!

  22. China = North Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is on it's way to become the next North Korea and Trump is asleep at the wheel as usual.

  23. Long episode of Sesame Street in China by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 3, Funny

    I suspect there will be a long episode of Sesame Street in China when somebody will go looking for the letter "N".

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Long episode of Sesame Street in China by Mal-2 · · Score: 1
      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  24. Cogratulatios Xi Jipig for removig the letter "" by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    Cogratulatios Xi Jipig for removig the letter ""! - I bet your coutry of Chia must be proud!

  25. Do't you mea.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chia bas letter from iteret as xi jipig exteds grip o power?

  26. China bans letter N... by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    China bans letter "N". Crypto currency now huge hit as Chinese hipsters can't stop talking about the "Block Chai".

  27. This makes o sese by forkfail · · Score: 1

    I do't uderstad how this is supposed to work. But will be fu to watch, I suppose...


    for ( ittr = vec.begi(); ittr != vec.ed(); ++ittr ) {
            if ( ittr != ullptr ) {
                    ittr->update();
            }
    }

    --
    Check your premises.
  28. So... China is now... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Chia?

    Do we have to water dear leader now? And dump shit on him to promote growth?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Well, here's an idea by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Do chinese citizens need some of the USA's extra guns to take care of this little problem yet?

  30. This post Has Zero Blocked Characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asia face eats a boiled dog at dog-food festival. Ugly yellow people resemble a flat-face macaque as they eat the dog tissue, like a disgustable wild creature. Asia girl are less attractive because the face looks retarded. The child has the face of a retarded.

  31. Did someone tell Dear Maximum Leader by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 1

    That if we obey this Anglos will now call him Jipig which sounds close to "the pig?"

  32. There is |\|O WAY you can defe|\|d this. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    There is also |\|o way you ca|\| totally stop use of the letter "|\|". Forums have bee|\| trying to stamp out words a|\|d phrases si|\|ce before the I|\|ternet bega|\|, a|\|d have always bee|\| u|\|successful i|\| the e|\|d.

    How ca|\| anyo|\|e defe|\|d the Commu|\|ist Chi|\|ese gover|\|ment whe|\| they act the way they do?

  33. Dictator for life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All hail Emperor Xi Jinping!

  34. China is Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They obviously prefer to go deeply into Fascism instead. What an utterly deranged decision.

    They have a billion people, they're centrally led, and they're making massive investments in AI, and they move more towards being data-driven every year. Democracy has a lot of advantages, but if their central leadership is done reasonably well, that'll be very, very hard to beat economically. It's like trying to out-compete amazon.

    1. Re: China is Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      If we stop buying their garbage they lose all their power.

      You're such a fucking slave Americunt..

    2. Re: China is Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a joke you are. Have you been under a rock for the last 20 years?

  35. Leet circumvention by DrTJ · · Score: 1

    Do you waut iuteruet to stop usiug a character, to preveut them from from sayiug "Zo!" ?

    Good luck with that! I expect that this will be takeu as a challeuge!

    Claude Shauuou once showed that Euglish only coutaius about 1.2 bits of iuformatiou per character. Thus one cau remove a lot more characters and still make seuse out of it!

    Joking aside, I'm a bit sad that what the tools that once was seen as the tools for liberating and informing people, have turned into tools for disinformation and oppression.

  36. Why so worried? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Google is suppressing gun-identifies shopping results, at least in the US, even for legal products. What could be wrong with this?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  37. Fixed summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the 14th letter i the Eglish alphabet ad, i Scrabble, the sprigboard for more tha 600 8-letter words. But for the Commuist party of Chia it is also a subversive ad itolerable character that was this week baished from the iteret as Chiese cesors battled to silece criticism of Xi Jipig's bid to set himself up as ruler for life. The cotraveig cosoat was perhaps the most uusual victim of a crackdow targetig words, phrases ad eve solitary letters cesors feared might be used to attack Beijig's cotroversial decisio to abolish costitutioal term limits for Chia's presidet. The Commuist party has paited the move -- which experts say paves the way for Xi to become a dictator for life -- as a expressio of overwhelmig popular support for Chia's strogma leader. However, there has bee widespread olie push-back i Chia sice it was aouced o Suday o the eve of a aual political cogress i Beijig.

  38. Re:They've also seriously butchered the character by quanminoan · · Score: 1

    While many things are wrong with China, simplified Chinese characters are not one of them. I would much prefer to learn simplified writing than traditional. Anyone upset with simplified characters (Taiwan) is exhibiting the same protectionism given to cursive and (in France) the French language. However easier is always better - lets more of those poor pheasants learn writing and integrate with society. Korea had a similar epiphany centuries ago, much to their benefit.

  39. I'm not sure I see the problem here.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    By my understanding, they only removed the limit on the number of consecutive terms allowed, they did not remove any limit on the duration of any single term. Individual terms are still 5 years long, afaik, and he could still be voted out after any one of them.

    Lots of countries don't have limits on the number of terms that a person can be elected, and there's not any significant problems there. This is mitigated either by upper fixed bounds on the length of any single term (or fixed term lengths) that themselves are not overly long, or else an established legal policy for allowing a sufficient amount of dissent within the government structure to force a re-election if there is no explicit upper bound on a single term.

    1. Re:I'm not sure I see the problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could still be voted out after any one of them

      Hard to be voted out when you rig the elections

    2. Re:I'm not sure I see the problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of countries don't have limits on the number of terms that a person can be elected, and there's not any significant problems there.

      Lots of countries, eh? Which ones? Is there more than one political party in charge of that country? Is that country considered a true democracy? Is it a country you'd consider moving to?

      Cuz I ain't buying it. I'd be very interested in knowing of a situation where term limits -- that were previously in place and then REMOVED -- has led to something better and were not abused sometime later.

      If you don't think this is an issue, you just haven't paid attention to the behavior of "humans in power", like, ever. Also you must be libertarian or something.

    3. Re:I'm not sure I see the problem here.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If proof existed that an election was rigged, then it would not be a valid election in the first place, and a re-election should be possible to force, as I said.

    4. Re:I'm not sure I see the problem here.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe not lots... but certainly more than a few..

      I live in one: Canada.

      The UK and Australia do not impose hard limits on the number of terms for their elected officials either.

      But it's a fair point you raised.... a situation where term limits existed and where then *removed* might be an indicator of a problem. The countries that I know of which do not have a set limit on the number of terms have never had them, to the best of my knowledge.

    5. Re:I'm not sure I see the problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfff, amateur, why would you bother rigging elections in a communist country? The communist party is the only party, there is no alternative to vote for anyway.

    6. Re:I'm not sure I see the problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... Hillary bought out the DNC and pushed Bernie (who would've beaten Trump) to the gutter. Every person with an IQ above a rock voted Trump to keep Hellary out. Where's the justice here?

    7. Re:I'm not sure I see the problem here.... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Where's the evidence of a rigged election that isn't equivalent to hearsay?

  40. Compiled code missing 'N'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name one major brand of software... Oracle, Microsoft, Google, facebook that doesn't include the letter 'N' in their compiled code?

    Watch Oracle release their 'chineese' database user guide where all the n's removed.... you get your varchar2 a_d your varchar2 fields. o_e is actually better tha_ the other, but i'm _ot going to be able to tell you why

  41. Obvious alternatives by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Ten thousand years - 833 1/3 zodiac cycles

    Disagree - DONOTWANT

    Xi Zedong - Mao Xi, or No Moa Xi (sounds like "no more Xi" in English)

    Shameless - goes naked in public

    Lifelong - until worm-food

    Personality cult - cult of fake man-god

    Emigrate - leave home for good

    Immortality - lifetime of fake man-god

    and for n, m+1

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  42. April fools is ext moth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this supposed to be a early April fools joke, or is this real?
    Are they filterig the letter from every website ad text?
    How do they deal with pictures cotaiig the word?

    1. Re:April fools is ext moth by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Is this supposed to be a early April fools joke, or is this real?
      Are they filterig the letter from every website ad text?
      How do they deal with pictures cotaiig the word?

      The same way XKCD extracts passwords from 1024-bit encryption, I presume.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  43. which experts say paves the way for Xi to become a dictator for life

    China has been a communist dictatorship for longer than most of us have been alive.

    For Western sources to cover this little internal squabble as though it has much significance is disturbing, at least in the clueless way it is being covered. China is still a brutal communist dictatorship, whether they periodically rotate people into and out of various positions or not.

    1. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd think a people that have lived under tyrannical governments for so long (Even before the Communist dictatorship), that they would revolt finally? I guess not. I guess it's normal.

    2. Re:Um by sebrk · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed by how we still trade with this country. I mean they are literarily too big to fail. How else are we doing business and travelling to this brutal dictatorship as if it is raining outside. Horrible horrible double standards. Here is to hoping for a new revolution in China very soon.

  44. Ella Minnow Pea by opentunings · · Score: 2

    I'm sure Ella Minnow Pea was consulted. https://www.amazon.com/Ella-Mi...

  45. Chig chog wig wog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me no rikey dis retter

  46. Obscure enough except for 1.3 billion by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Miss Little Bottle yet?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  47. What a silly bunt. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    Monty Python FTW.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  48. overwhelming popular support ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    The Communist party has painted the move - which experts say paves the way for Xi to become a dictator for life - as an expression of overwhelming popular support for China’s strongman leader.

    If he really had ''overwhelming popular support'' then he would have little problem with some on-line criticisms. That he feels it necessary to stamp out any dissent suggests either: that his grip on power is not as it appears, or: that he is a snowflake that cannot stand any criticism.

    What he does not understand is that by shutting down opposition discussion: he will find it harder to know what others think; underground dissent will grow and, because of a lack of safety valve, might blow up in his face. Absolute suppression may work for a few years, not forever. Does he want the history books in 100 years to describe him as a great reformer or as a tyrant ?

  49. Its a GOOD thing we trade with China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nixon was a traitor. Trade with China has only made us a prison state like THE CHINKS. Fuck anyone who backs thise small cock'd faggots.

  50. Re: There is |\|O WAY you can defe|\|d thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite is (\/

    Back in the L33t speak days, there was a guy named (\/eo\/) for NeoN. I always admired that tag for some reason. He made a kick ass password cracker. My 2 cents lul.

  51. So to all those companies that shipped jobs... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... over to China: That looks like it might not have been such a good idea now does it?

    Think you'll have much bargaining power with some petty tyrant that wants to be dictator-for-life and whose first move is to ban letters of the alphabet?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:So to all those companies that shipped jobs... by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      China has over 1 billion people. In order to gain access to that market, they had to establish a presence.

      Plus, capitalism calls for maximizing profits dammed of the consequences. Who cares that the technology and IP was stolen at the same time, cheap labor and almost no environmental laws!

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:So to all those companies that shipped jobs... by rnturn · · Score: 1

      OK... second move.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    3. Re:So to all those companies that shipped jobs... by rnturn · · Score: 1

      If I were a US corporation that just moved all my manufacturing over to China, I might be be a little worried that the new emperor, er, dictator might just say "Ours now". As you said, they have a billion customers. Would they need non-Chinese customers? Really?

      I need to follow up on it but there are some stories going around about how fragile the Chinese economy really is and how close it might be to collapse. We may be close to living in those "interesting" times.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  52. Just say o! by PPH · · Score: 1

    _/t

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  53. Beware of Chimese Kmights who cam't say Mi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh what times we are livimg im whem ramdom ruffiams dare say Mi to old ladies.

  54. Re:They've also seriously butchered the character by quenda · · Score: 1

    The simplified character set is lipstick on a pig.
    Both should be abolished in favour of pinyin, or some other phonetic alphabet.

    Thanks to computers, the archaic Chinese writing system is not quite the handicap it used to be, but it is still a significant drag on Chinese progress.
    How old are kids before they've rote-learned enough characters to read a newspaper?

  55. Nice editorializing by ourlovecanlastforeve · · Score: 1

    Conveniently removing "temporarily" from the headline for dramatic effect.

  56. Harder than, well, hard. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Banning a letter from the Internet is harder than Chinese Algebra. And, since the letter 'n' was just banned along with a few numbers, that is getting quite difficult indeed...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  57. Letter N returns! by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Great news, everybody! Letter N is out of rehab.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  58. Ow we ca't say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    ENC . HEIGH on HEIGH . FALUTIN `OCTILE on HEIGH . .M . M tot M `M tot M `M wes be M tot M `M tot M ` .M . M wes be M wes be M wes be M tot M `M wes be .M . M `FROM `M `FROM `HEIGH on OCTILE on HEIGH . .M . M tot M `M tot M `M wes be M . M wes be . M ` .M . M tot M `M tot M `M wes be M on M . M tot M `
    ENC . HEIGH on HEIGH . FALUTIN `M tot M . HEIGH .